JUSTICE BE DAMNED , ENFORCE THE LAW ! .. NOT ANY MORE, IN FREE INDIA !! part 6 – Capt Ajit Vadakayil

THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 5 , BELOW---

https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any_21.html

Capt. Ajit Vadakayil

March 1, 2019 at 11:48 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K60JpNtOS2U

SUBJECTIVE JUDGEMENT --WITH EYES WIDE OPEN-- WITHIN PERIMETER OF CONTEXT..

OUR STUPID COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND ALL THIS

Capt ajit vadakayil

..

 

Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 24, 2019 at 6:02 AM

DONALD TRUMP

LISTEN UP

AND LISTEN GOOD

IF SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI IS STONEWALLING YOUR SOTU ADDRESS

DELIVER THE SPEECH SOMEWHERE ELSE , ON YOUR OWN TURF AND TIME TABLE..

POINT OUT THAT JEW OBAMA NEVER SPOKE ABOUT THE HUMONGOUS DEBT OF USA IN HIS SOTU SPEECHES..

POINT THE NUMBER OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS JEW OBAMA TOOK IN --PURELY TO INCREASE THE DEMOCRAT VOTE COUNT..

THE BIGGEST STATE CALIFORNIA , IS FULLY DEMOCRAT -- WHY ? TAKE AWAY THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS , CALIFORNIA WILL BE A REPUBLICAN STATE..

DELIVER THE SOTU ADDRESS -- CHURN THE KOSHER DEEP STATE SWAMP UP INTO A WHIRLPOOL --GET THEM INTO A TIZZY..

WARN THE JUDGES NOT TO PLAY GODS..

IN INDIA OUR ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY PLAYS GOD.. THIS WILL STOP !

capt ajit vadakayil
..

Cross-Claim - A claim by codefendants or coplaintiffs in a civil case against each other and not against persons on the opposite side of the lawsuit.

Cross-Examination - The questioning of a witness produced by the other side.

Cumulative Sentences - Sentences for two or more crimes to run consecutively, rather than concurrently.

Custody - Detaining of a person by lawful process or authority to assure his/her appearance at any hearing; the jailing or imprisonment of a person convicted of a crime.

Return to top

D

Damages - Money awarded by a court to a person injured by the unlawful act or negligence of another person.

Decision - The judgment reached or given by a court of law.

Declaratory Judgment - A judgment of the court that explains what the existing law is or expresses the opinion of the court as to the rights and status of the parties, but which does not award relief or provide enforcement.

Decree - An order of the court. A final decree is one that fully and finally disposes of the litigation. An interlocutory decree is a preliminary order that often disposes of only part of a lawsuit.

Defamation - That which tends to injure a person’s reputation. Libel is published defamation, whereas slander is spoken.

Default - A failure to respond to a lawsuit within the specified time.

Default Judgment - A judgment entered against a party who fails to appear in court or respond to the civil complaint or petition.

Defendant - In a civil case, the person being sued. In a criminal case, the person charged with a crime.

Deferred Sentence – A sentence that is postponed to a future time. After conviction, the judge does not announce or impose a sentence, but defers sentencing to a future date so that the defendant will complete certain conditions, such as attending driving school or completing a probationary period. If the person completes the requirements, the case will be dismissed and will not be part of the defendant’s criminal record.

Deficiency Judgment – Judgment for a creditor for an amount equal to the difference between the amount owed by the debtor and the amount collected from sale of the collateral.

Demand for Discovery - Demand by the defense attorney to the prosecutor to furnish material information on a case.

Demanding State - The state seeking return of a fugitive.

De Novo - “Anew.” A trial de novo is a new trial of a case, such as a district court trial de novo of a magistrate court case.

Deposition - An oral statement made before an officer authorized by law to administer oaths. Such statements are taken to examine potential witnesses, to obtain discovery to be used later in trial. Testimony of a witness other than in open court.

Descent and Distribution Statutes - State laws that provide for the distribution of estate property of a person who dies without a will. Same as intestacy laws.

Designee - A person appointed by a judge to act for the court to set conditions of release for any person arrested at a time when the judge is not available.

Direct Evidence - Proof of facts by witnesses who saw acts done or heard words spoken.

Direct Examination - The first questioning of witnesses by the party on whose behalf they are called.

Directed Verdict - Now called judgment as a matter of law. An instruction by the judge to the jury to return a specific verdict.

Disbarment - Form of discipline of a lawyer resulting in the loss (often permanently) of that lawyer’s right to practice law. It is more severe than censure (an official reprimand or condemnation) and suspension (a temporary loss of the right to practice law.)

Discharge of bond - A court order to release a bond.

Disclaim - To refuse a gift made in a will.

Discovery – Investigation and gathering of information by opposing parties prior to going to trial. The tools of discovery include: interrogatories, depositions, production of documents or things, permission to enter land or other property, physical and mental examinations, and requests for admission.

Discretion - A power or right conferred on a judge to act according to the dictates of his own judgment and conscience, uncontrolled by the judgment or conscience of others.

Dismissal – An order or judgment disposing of a case without a trial.

With prejudice – In criminal cases, the defendant may not be charged with the specific crime again. A case is usually dismissed with prejudice when the court has not pursued action within the six-month time limit. In civil cases, the complainant is barred from bringing the same claim or cause of action against the same defendant.

Without prejudice - the person may be charged with the specific crime again. A case is usually dismissed without prejudice when more evidence is needed in a case or the case needs to be filed in another court because of jurisdictional issues. In civil cases, the plaintiff is entitled to bring the same claim or cause of action again.

Disposition - The sentencing or other final settlement of a case.

Dissent – (Verb) To disagree. (Noun) An appellate court opinion setting forth the minority view and outlining the disagreement of one or more judges with the decision of the majority.

Diversion - The process of removing some minor offenses from the full judicial process, on the condition that the accused undergo some sort of rehabilitation or make restitution for damages.

DOC - The Department of Corrections - state prison facility.

Docket - A list of cases to be heard by a court or a log containing brief entries of court proceedings.

Docket Call - The proceeding in which a judge assigns trial dates or takes pleas.

Docket Number – The numerical designation assigned to each case by the court.

Domicile - The place where a person has his/her permanent legal home. A person may have several residences, but only one domicile.

Double Jeopardy - Putting a person on trial more than once for the same crime. It is forbidden by the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and by Article II, E of the NM Constitution.

Due Process of Law - The right of all persons to receive the guarantees and safeguards of the law and the judicial process. It includes such constitutional requirements as adequate notice of legal proceedings, opportunity to be heard by the judge, assistance of counsel, and the defendants’ rights to remain silent, to a speedy and public trial, to an impartial jury and to confront and secure witnesses.

Return to top

E

Elements of a Crime - Specific factors that define a crime and which the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt in order to obtain a conviction.

Eminent Domain - The power of the government to take private property for public use through condemnation.

En Banc - All the judges of a court sitting together. Appellate courts can consist of a dozen or more judges, but often they hear cases in panels of three judges. If a case is heard or reheard by the full court, it is heard en banc.

Endorsed - Stamped with the seal of the court indicating the date and time of filing with the court.

Enjoining - An order by the court telling a person to stop performing a specific act.

Entrapment - A defense to criminal charges alleging that agents of the government induced a person to commit a crime he/she otherwise would not have committed.

Entry of Judgment or Order - The filing of a written, dated and signed judgment or order.

Equal Protection of the Law - The guarantee in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution Article III, and Article II, Section 18, of the NM Constitution, that the law treat all persons equally. Court decisions have established that this guarantee requires that courts be open to all persons on the same conditions, with like rules of evidence and modes of procedure; that persons be subject to no restrictions in the acquisition of property, the enjoyment of personal liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, which do not generally affect others; that persons are liable to no other or greater burdens than those are laid upon others; and that no different or greater punishment is enforced against them for a violation of the laws.

Equity - Generally, justice or fairness. Historically, equity refers to a separate body of law developed in England in reaction to the inability of the common-law courts, in their strict adherence to rigid writs and forms of action, to consider or provide a remedy for every injury. The king therefore established the court of chancery to do justice between parties in cases where the common law would give inadequate redress. The principle of this system of law is that equity will find a way to achieve a lawful result when legal procedure is inadequate. Remedies such as restraining orders and injunctions are equitable remedies. Equity and law courts are now merged in NM.

Escheat - The process by which a deceased person’s property goes to the state if no heir can be found.

Escrow - Money or a written instrument such as a deed that, by agreement between two parties, is held by a neutral third party (held in escrow) until all conditions of the agreement are met.

Estate - An estate consists of personal property (car, household items, and other tangible items), real property and intangible property, such as stock certificates and bank accounts, owned in the individual name of a person at the time of the person’s death. It does not include life insurance proceeds (unless the estate was made the beneficiary) or other assets that pass outside the estate (like a joint tenancy asset.)

Estate Tax - Generally, a tax on the privilege of transferring property to others after a person’s death. In addition to federal estate taxes, many states, including New Mexico, have their own estate taxes.

Estoppel - A person’s own act, or acceptance of facts, which preclude his or her later making claims to the contrary.

Et al. – “And others.”

Et Seq. - "And the following."

Evidence - Testimony or exhibits received by the court at any stage of court proceedings.

Examination – The questioning of a witness under oath.

Exceptions - Declarations by either side in a civil or criminal case reserving the right to appeal a judge’s ruling upon a motion or objection. These are no longer required to preserve error in New Mexico courts. Also, in regulatory cases, objections by either side to points made by the other side or to rulings by the agency or one of its hearing officers.

Exclusionary Rule - The rule preventing illegally obtained evidence, such as property found during an illegal search, from being used in any trial.

Execute - To complete the legal requirements (such as signing before witnesses) that make a will valid. Also, to execute a judgment or decree means to put the final judgment of the court into effect.

Executor - A personal representative, named in a will, who administers an estate.

Exempt Property – In collection, execution, and bankruptcy proceedings, this refers to certain property protected by law from the reach of creditors.

Exhibits – A document or item which is formally introduced in court and which, when accepted, is made part of the case file.

Exigent Circumstances - An emergency, demand, or need calling for immediate action or remedy that, for instance, would justify a warrantless search.

Exonerate - Removal of a charge, responsibility or duty.

Ex Parte - On behalf of only one party, without notice to any other party. For example, a request for a search warrant is an ex parte proceeding, since the person subject to the search is not notified of the proceeding and is not present at the hearing.

Ex Parte Communication – Communication about a lawsuit between a judge and one party, witness, attorney, or other person interested in the litigation when all of the parties are not present and the absent party did not have notice.

Ex Parte Proceeding - The legal procedure in which only one side is present or represented. It differs from the adversary system or adversary proceeding, and is only lawful in limited circumstances. For example, a hearing for a temporary restraining order.

Ex Post Facto - After the fact. The Constitution prohibits the enactment of ex post facto laws. These are laws that permit conviction and punishment for an act that was lawful at the time it was performed.

Express Warranty - An affirmation of fact or promise made by the seller to the buyer that is relied upon by the buyer in agreeing to the contract.

Expungement - Official and formal erasure of a record or partial contents of a record.

Extenuating Circumstances - Circumstances that render a crime less aggravated, heinous, or reprehensible than it would otherwise be.

Extradition - Surrender by one state to another of a person accused or convicted of an offense outside its own territory and within territorial jurisdiction of the other, with the other state which is competent to try him/her, demanding his/her surrender.

Extrinsic - Foreign, from outside sources.

Return to top

F

Family Allowance - A small amount of money set aside from the estate of the deceased. Its purpose is to provide for the surviving family members during the administration of the estate.

Felony – A crime that allows a defendant to be imprisoned for more than one year upon being found guilty.

Fiduciary - A person having a legal relationship of trust and confidence to another and having a duty to act primarily for the other’s benefit: i.e., a guardian, trustee or executor.

File - To place a paper in the official custody of the clerk of court/court administrator to enter into the files or records of a case.

Filed in Open Court - Court documents entered into the file in court during legal proceedings.

Final Order – An order that ends the lawsuit between the parties, resolves the merits of the case, and leaves nothing to be done but enforcement.

Finding - Formal conclusion by a judge or regulatory agency on issues of fact. Also, a conclusion by a jury regarding a fact.

First Appearance - The initial appearance of an arrested person before a judge to determine whether or not there is probable cause for his/her arrest. Generally, the person comes before a judge within hours of the arrest. Also called initial appearance.

Foundation - Preliminary questions to a witness to establish admissibility of evidence; i.e., "laying a foundation" for admissibility.

Fraud - Intentional deception to deprive another person of property or to injure that person in some way.

Fruit of the Crime - Property acquired by means and in consequence of the commission of a crime, and sometimes constituting the subject matter of the crime.

Fruit of the Poisonous Tree - Property seized or statements made subsequent to and because of an illegal search or interrogation. Fruit of the poisonous tree is generally not admissible in evidence because it is tainted by the illegal search or interrogation.

Fugitive - A person who flees from one state to another to avoid prosecution.

Return to top

G

Garnishment - A legal proceeding in which a debtor’s money, which is in the possession of another (called the garnishee), is applied to the debts of the debtor, such as when an employer garnishes a debtor’s wages.

General Damages - Compensation for the loss directly and necessarily incurred by a breach of contract.

General Jurisdiction - Refers to courts that have no limit on the types of criminal and civil cases they may hear.

Good Faith – Honest intent to act without taking an unfair advantage over another person. This term is applied to many kinds of transactions.

Good Time - A reduction in sentenced time in prison as a reward for good behavior. It usually is one-third to one-half off the maximum sentence.

Grand Jury - A jury of inquiry convened to determine whether evidence against a defendant justifies issuing an indictment; comprised of not more than 18 and not less than 15 persons, with at least 12 concurring before an indictment may be returned.

Grantor or Settlor - The person who sets up a trust. Also known as “trustor.”

Guardian - A person appointed by will or by law to assume responsibility for incompetent adults or minor children. If one parent dies, the children’s guardian will usually be the other parent. If both die, it usually will be a close relative.

Guardianship - Legal right given to a person to be responsible for the food, housing, health care, and other necessities of a person deemed incapable of providing these necessities for himself/herself. A guardian also may be given responsibility for the person’s financial affairs, and thus perform additionally as a conservator. See also Conservatorship.

Return to top

H

Habeas Corpus - A writ used as a means to bring a person before the court to determine whether he/she is being detained unlawfully.

Harmless Error - An error committed during a trial that was corrected or was not serious enough to affect the outcome of the trial and therefore was not sufficiently harmful (prejudicial) to require that the judgment be reversed on appeal.

Hearing -A proceeding, generally public, at which an issue of fact or law is discussed and either party has the right to be heard.

Hearsay – Testimony by a witness concerning events about which the witness has no personal knowledge. Hearsay testimony conveys not what the witness observed personally, but what others told the witness or what the witness heard others say. Hearsay is usually not admissible as evidence in court because of its unreliability.

Hung jury - Jury unable to reach a verdict. A trial ending in a hung jury results in a retrial with a new jury.

Return to top

I

Immunity - A grant by the court assuring someone that they will not face prosecution in return for their providing criminal evidence.

Impeachment of a Witness - An attack on the credibility (believability) of a witness, through evidence introduced for that purpose.

Implied Consent – Knowing indirectly (through conduct or inaction) that a person would agree or give permission. For example, in New Mexico a person who gets a driver’s license has given implied consent to allow a police officer to conduct an alcohol breath or blood test, when the police suspects the person is driving while intoxicated.

Implied Warranty of Merchantability – An assumption in law that the goods are fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used. This implied warranty applies to every sale by a merchant who deals in goods of the kind sold. However, if there is a warning that the goods are sold “as is,” the implied warranty does not apply.

Inadmissible - That which, under the rules of evidence, cannot be admitted or received as evidence.

In Camera - In chambers or in private. A hearing in camera takes place in the judge’s office outside of the presence of the jury and the public.

Incarcerate - To confine in jail.

In-Custody Arraignments (jail cases) – Arraignment while the defendant remains in jail because defendant has not been released on bond or by other means.

Indeterminate Sentence - A sentence of imprisonment to a specified minimum and maximum period of time, specifically authorized by statute, subject to termination by a parole board or other authorized agency after the prisoner has served the minimum term.

Indicia - Signs, indications.

Indictment – The written accusation by a grand jury that charges a person named in the indictment with the violation of a law. Indictments are used for felony charges, not misdemeanors.

Indigency - Financial inability to hire a lawyer or pay court costs.

Indigent - Needy or impoverished. A defendant who can demonstrate his/her indigence to the court may be assigned a court-appointed attorney at public expense in criminal and child abuse/neglect cases, but not in other civil cases.

In Forma Pauperis – “In the manner of a pauper.” Permission given to a person to sue without payment of court costs because of indigence or poverty.

Information - An accusation against a person for a criminal offense, without an indictment; presented by the prosecution instead of a grand jury. Informations are used for felony charges, not misdemeanors.

Infra - Below.

Infraction - A violation of law not punishable by imprisonment. Minor traffic offenses generally are considered infractions.

Inheritance Tax - A state tax on property that an heir or beneficiary under a will receives from a deceased person’s estate. The heir or beneficiary pays this tax.

Initial Appearance - In criminal law, the hearing at which a judge determines whether there is sufficient evidence against a person charged with a crime to hold him/her for trial. The Constitution bans secret accusations, so initial appearances are public unless the defendant asks otherwise; the accused must be present, though he/she usually does not offer evidence. Also called first appearance.

Injunction - Writ or order by a court prohibiting a specific action from being carried out by a person or group. A preliminary injunction is granted provisionally, until a full hearing can be held to determine if it should be made permanent.

Inspectorial Search - An entry into and examination of premises or vehicles by an inspector for the identification and correction of conditions dangerous to health or safety.

Instructions - Judge’s explanation to the jury before it begins deliberations of the questions it must answer and the applicable law governing the case. Also called charge to the jury.

Intangible assets - Nonphysical items that have value, such as stock certificates, bonds, bank accounts, and pension benefits. Intangible assets must be taken into account in estate planning and divorce.

Interlocutory - Provisional; not final. An interlocutory order or an interlocutory appeal concerns only a part of the issues raised in a lawsuit.

Interpleader – An action in which a third person asks the Court to determine the rights of others to property held—but not owned—by the third person.

Interrogatories - Written questions asked by one party in a lawsuit for which the opposing party must provide written answers.

Intervention - An action by which a third person that may be affected by a lawsuit is permitted to become a party to the suit.

Inter Vivos Gift - A gift made during the giver’s life.

Inter Vivos Trust - Another name for living trust.

Intestacy Laws - See Descent and Distribution Statutes.

Intestate - Dying without having a will.

Intestate Succession - The process by which the property of a person who has died without a will passes on to others according to the state’s descent and distribution statutes. If someone dies without a will and the court uses the state’s intestate succession laws, an heir who receives some of the deceased’s property is an intestate heir.

Invoke the Rule - Separation and exclusion of witnesses (other than parties) from the courtroom.

Irrevocable Trust - A trust that, once set up, the grantor may not revoke.

Issue - 1. The disputed point in a disagreement between parties in a lawsuit. 2. To send out officially, as in to issue an order.

Return to top

J

Joinder – Combining charges or defendants on the same complaint. Where a crime is committed by two people, both may be charged on one complaint. Joinder also applies in civil cases, where parties and claims may be joined in one complaint.

Joint and Several Liability - A legal doctrine that makes each of the parties who are responsible for an injury liable for all the damages awarded in a lawsuit if the other responsible parties cannot pay.

Joint Tenancy - A form of legal co-ownership of property (also known as survivorship). At the death of one co-owner, the surviving co-owner becomes sole owner of the property. Tenancy by the entirety is a special form of joint tenancy between a husband and wife.

Judge - An elected or appointed public official with authority to hear and decide cases in a court of law. A judge Pro Tem is a temporary judge.

Judgment - The first disposition of a lawsuit.

Consent Judgment - Occurs when the provisions and terms of the judgment are agreed on by the parties and submitted to the court for its sanction and approval.

Default Judgment - A judgment rendered because of the defendant’s failure to answer or appear.

Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict – Judgment entered by order of the court for one party notwithstanding the jury’s verdict in favor of the other party. A judgment notwithstanding the verdict may only arise after a motion for a directed verdict.

Judgment on the Pleadings – Judgment based on the pleadings alone. It is used when there is no dispute as to the facts of the case and one party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

Summary Judgment - Judgment given on the basis of pleadings, affidavits, and exhibits presented for the record without any need for a trial. As with Judgment on the Pleadings, it is used when there is no dispute as to the facts of the case and one party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

Judgment and Sentence - The official document of a judge’s disposition of a case sentencing a defendant to the Department of Corrections or jail custody.

Judicial Review - The authority of a court to review the official actions of other branches of government. Also, the authority to declare unconstitutional the actions of other branches.

Jurat - Certificate of officer or person whom writing was sworn before. Typically, “jurat” is used to mean the certificate of the competent administering officer that writing was sworn to by person who signed it.

Jurisdiction - The court’s legal authority to hear and resolve specific disputes. Jurisdiction is usually composed of personal jurisdiction (authority over persons) and subject matter jurisdiction (authority over types of cases.)

Jurisprudence - The study of law and the structure of the legal system.

Juror Disqualified - Juror excused from a trial.

Jury - Persons selected according to law and sworn to inquire into and declare a verdict on matters of fact. A petit jury is a trial jury, composed of 6 to 12 persons, which hears either civil or criminal cases.

Jury Array - The whole body of prospective jurors summoned to court from which the jury will be selected. Also called “Jury Panel.”

Jury List - A list containing the names of jurors empanelled to try a cause or containing the names of all the jurors summoned to attend court.

Jury Polling - The procedure by which each individual juror is asked to affirm his or her verdict in open court at the conclusion of a trial.

Jury Trial - A trial in which the jury judges the facts and the judge rules on the law.

Justiciable - Issues and claims capable of being properly examined in court.

Juvenile - A person under 18 years of age.

Return to top

K

Kangaroo Court - Term descriptive of a sham legal proceeding in which a person’s rights are totally disregarded and in which the result is a foregone conclusion because of the bias of the court or other tribunal.

Knowingly and Willfully - This phrase, in reference to violation of a statute, means consciously and intentionally.

Return to top

L

Lapsed Gift - A gift made in a will to a person who has died prior to the will-maker’s death.

Larceny - Obtaining property by fraud or deceit.

Law - The enforceable rules that govern individual and group conduct in a society. The law establishes standards of conduct, the procedures governing standards of conduct, and the remedies available when the standards are not adhered to.

Law Clerks - Persons trained in the law who assist judges in researching legal opinions.

Leading Question - A question that suggests the answer desired of the witness. A party generally may not ask one’s own witness leading questions. Leading questions may be asked only of adverse witnesses and on cross-examination.

Legal Aid - Professional legal services available usually to persons or organizations unable to afford such services.

Leniency - Recommendation for a sentence less than the maximum allowed.

Lesser Included Offense - Any lesser offense included within the statute defining the original charge, such as a lower grade of an offense. An offense composed of some, but not all of the elements of a greater offense and which does not have any additional elements not included in the greater offense, so that it is impossible to commit the greater offense without also committing the lesser.

Letters of Administration - Legal document issued by a court that shows an administrator’s legal right to take control of assets in the deceased person’s name. Used when the deceased died without a will.

Letters Testamentary - Legal document issued by a court that shows an executor’s legal right to take control of assets in the deceased person’s name. Used when the deceased left a will.

Liable - Legally responsible.

Libel - Published words or pictures that falsely and maliciously defame a person. Libel is published defamation; slander is spoken.

Lien - A legal claim against another person’s property as security for a debt. A lien does not convey ownership of the property, but gives the lien-holder a right to have his or her debt satisfied out of the proceeds of the property if the debt is not otherwise paid.

Limited Jurisdiction – Courts with limited jurisdiction may hear only certain kinds of cases and are precluded from hearing anything else. For example, small claims court may only decide cases in which the amount in controversy is below a set figure.

Lis Pendens - A pending suit. Jurisdiction, power, or control that courts acquire over property in a suit pending action and until final judgment.

Litigant - A party to a lawsuit. Litigation refers to a case, controversy, or lawsuit.

Living Trust - A trust set up and in effect during the lifetime of the grantor. Also called inter vivos trust.

Return to top

M

Magistrate – A judge whose civil and criminal jurisdiction is limited by law. In federal court, a judicial officer who is assigned numerous trial and pretrial responsibilities.

Malfeasance - Evil doing, ill conduct; the commission of some act which is positively prohibited by law.

Malicious Abuse of Process – Tort involving a litigant’s malicious misuse of the power of the judiciary. The elements of this tort are: (1) initiation of judicial proceedings against the plaintiff by the defendant; (2) an act by the defendant in the use of process that would not be proper in the regular prosecution of the claim; (3) a primary motive by the defendant in misusing the process to achieve an illegitimate end; and (4) damages.

Malicious Prosecution – In New Mexico, the tort of “Malicious Prosecution” no longer exists. It has been combined with “Abuse of Process” to form a new tort, “Malicious Abuse of Process.”

See Malicious Abuse of Process.

Mandamus - A writ issued by a court ordering a public official to perform an act that s/he is required to do by law under the existing state of facts.

Mandate - The official decree by a court of appeal.

Manslaughter - The unlawful killing of another without intent to kill; either voluntary (upon a sudden impulse); or involuntary (during the commission of an unlawful act not ordinarily expected to result in great bodily harm.)

Mediation - A form of alternative dispute resolution in which the parties bring their dispute to a neutral third party, who helps them reach a resolution.

Memorialized - In writing.

Mens Rea - The “guilty mind” necessary to establish criminal responsibility.

Merchant – A person who regularly deals in goods of the kind being sold or who otherwise holds himself out as having a special knowledge of the goods sold. For example, Bob owns a clock shop and sells clocks, so he would be considered a merchant of clocks. However, if Bob sold his car to someone, he would not be considered a merchant of cars.

Merger Clause – Merger clauses state that the written document contains the entire understanding of the parties. The purpose of merger clauses is to ensure that evidence outside the written document will not be admissible in court to contradict or supplement the express terms of the written agreement.

Merits - The substantive claims and defenses raised by the parties to an action.

Minor – A person under 18 years of age.

Miranda Warning – Prior to any custodial interrogation (that is, questioning by police after a person has been deprived of his or her freedom in a significant way), a person must be advised that: (1) he has a right to remain silent; (2) any statement he does make may be used in evidence against him; (3) he has the right to the presence of an attorney; and (4) if cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning, if he so desires.

Misdemeanor - An offense punishable by not more than one year in county jail and/or $1,000 fine.

Mistrial - An invalid trial, caused by fundamental error or inability of a jury to reach a verdict. When a mistrial is declared, the trial must start again from the selection of the jury.

Mitigating Circumstances - Those facts which do not constitute a justification or excuse for an offense but which may be considered as reasons for reducing the degree of blame.

Mitigation – Reduction of penalty or punishment.

Moot - A moot case or a moot point is one not subject to a judicial determination because it involves an abstract question, because there is no actual controversy, or because the issues no longer exist. Mootness usually refers to a court’s refusal to consider a case because the issue involved has been resolved prior to the court’s decision, leaving nothing that would be affected by the court’s decision.

Motion - Oral or written request made by a party to an action before, during, or after a trial, upon which a court issues a ruling or order.

Motion in Limine - A motion made outside the presence of a jury requesting that the court not allow certain evidence that might prejudice the jury. Usually heard before trial begins.

Motion to Expunge – A motion to delete material from official court records, such as a record of juvenile conviction.

Motion to Mitigate Sentence - A motion to reduce the sentence.

Motion to Seal - A motion to close records to public inspection.

Motion to Suppress - A motion to prevent admission of evidence in a case.

Murder - The unlawful killing of a human being with deliberate intent to kill. Murder in the first degree is characterized by premeditation; murder in the second degree is characterized by a sudden and instantaneous intent to kill or to cause injury without caring whether the injury kills or not.

Mutuality – A meeting of the minds of contracting parties regarding the material terms of the agreement.

Return to top

N

Necessarily Included Offense - Where an offense cannot be committed without necessarily committing another offense, the latter is a necessarily included offense; sometimes referred to as lesser included offense.

Negligence - Failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances.

Next Friend - One acting without formal appointment as guardian for the benefit of an infant, a person of unsound mind not judicially declared incompetent, or other person under some disability.

No-Contest Clause - Language in a will providing that a person who makes a legal challenge to the will’s validity will be disinherited.

No Contest Plea – See Nolo Contendere.

No-Fault Proceedings - A civil case in which parties may resolve their dispute without a formal finding of error or fault.

Nolle Prosequi – The prosecutor declines to prosecute, but may still initiate prosecution within the time allowed by law.

Nolo Contendere - No contest. A plea through which the defendant does not admit guilt, but which has the same legal effect as a plea of guilty in a criminal case. However, the no contest plea may not be used in a civil action related to the criminal charge to prove the defendant’s civil liability. For example, a plea of nolo contendere for a traffic citation that resulted from an accident cannot be used to convince a judge in a civil case that the defendant is guilty of causing an accident.

Non-jury trial - A case tried by a judge on the facts as well as the law.

No Probable Cause - Insufficient grounds to hold the person who was arrested.

Notice - Formal notification to the party that has been sued that a civil lawsuit has been filed. Also, any form of notification of a legal proceeding or filing of a document.

Notice of Lis Pendens - A notice filed on public records to warn all persons that the title to certain property is in litigation, and that if they purchase or lease that property they are in danger of being bound by an adverse judgment. The notice is for the purpose of preserving rights pending litigation.

Nuisance – An unreasonable, unwarranted, or unlawful use of one’s property that annoys, disturbs, or inconveniences another in the use of his or her property. Violation of an ordinance that forbids annoyance of the public in general.

Nunc Pro Tunc - An entry made now for an act done previously and to have the effect as if it were done on a prior date.

Nuncupative Will - An oral (unwritten) will.

Return to top

O

Oaths - Sworn attestations required in court, usually administered by the in-court clerk.

Objection - The process by which one party tries to prevent the introduction of evidence or the use of a procedure at a hearing. An objection is either sustained (allowed) or overruled by the judge.

Offense - A violation of a municipal ordinance or state statute.

Offer – An expression of willingness to enter into a bargain that is definite and certain in its terms and that is communicated to the offeree. Once accepted, the offer is transformed into a contractual obligation.

Offeree – The person to whom an offer is made.

Offeror – The person who makes an offer.

Opening Statement - The initial statement made by attorneys for each side, outlining the facts each intends to establish during the trial.

Opinion - A judge’s written explanation of a decision of the court or of a majority of judges. A dissenting opinion disagrees with the majority opinion because of the reasoning and/or the principles of law on which the decision is based. A concurring opinion agrees with the decision of the court but offers further comment or different reasoning. A per curiam opinion is an unsigned opinion “of the court.’’

Oral Argument - An opportunity for lawyers to summarize their positions before the court and also to answer the judges’ questions.

Order - A written or oral command from a court directing or forbidding an action.

Ordinance – A law adopted by the governing body of a municipality or county.

Overrule - A judge’s decision not to allow an objection. Also, a decision by a higher court finding that a lower court decision was in error.

Return to top

P

Parens Patriae - The doctrine under which the court protects the interests of a juvenile.

Parol Evidence – Oral evidence.

Parol Evidence Rule – When a written agreement is intended to be a complete and final document, then the terms of the agreement cannot be altered by evidence of oral (parol) agreements that purport to change, explain, or contradict the written agreement.

Parole - The supervised conditional release of a prisoner before the expiration of his/her sentence. If the parolee observes the conditions, he/she need not serve the rest of his/her term.

Party - A person, business, organization or government agency involved in the prosecution or defense of a legal proceeding.

Patent - A government grant giving an inventor the exclusive right to make or sell his/her invention for a term of years.

Penalty Assessment - Procedure in which traffic offender is allowed to mail in a fine (plead guilty by mail). Points may be assessed against the person's driving record for penalty assessment offenses.

Peremptory Challenge - The right to challenge a judge or prospective juror without assigning a reason for the challenge.

Perjury - The criminal offense of making a false statement under oath.

Permanent Injunction - A court order requiring that some action be taken or that some party refrain from taking action for an indefinite period.

Personal Jurisdiction - Power which a court has over the defendant's person and which a court must have before it can enter a judgment affecting the defendant's rights.

Per Se Law - In the Motor Vehicle Code, the per se crime is driving with a blood alcohol level of .08 or greater, as established through a valid testing procedure. No proof is required to show that the defendant was under the influence since the law concludes that driving with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of .08 or greater is driving while intoxicated. (DWI can be proved by other evidence even if a defendant’s BAC is less than .08.)

Personal Property - Tangible physical property (such as cars, clothing, furniture and jewelry) and intangible personal property (such as bank accounts). This does not include real property such as land or rights in land.

Personal Recognizance - In criminal proceedings, the pretrial release of a defendant without bail upon his/her promise to return to court. See also Release on Own Recognizance.

Personal Representative - The person that administers an estate. If named in a will, that person’s title is an executor. If there is no valid will, that person’s title is an administrator.

Petitioner - The person filing an action in a court of original jurisdiction. Also, the person who appeals the judgment of a lower court. The opposing party is called the respondent.

Petty Misdemeanor – A crime that allows less than six months of jail time upon conviction.

Plaintiff - The person/business/organization/agency that files the complaint in a civil lawsuit. Also called the complainant.

Plain View Doctrine - The doctrine that permits a law enforcement officer to lawfully seize incriminating evidence not specifically sought but readily visible in the course of a valid search.

Plea - (1) Defendant’s answer to the charge - guilty, not guilty, nolo contendere or Alford plea.

(2) In a criminal proceeding, the defendant’s declaration in open court that he or she is guilty or not guilty. The defendant’s answer to the charges made in the indictment or information.

Plea Agreement - An agreement between the prosecutor and the defendant, presented for the court's approval, regarding the sentence the defendant should serve upon a plea of guilty, an Alford plea, or a no contest plea. Typically, the defendant pleads guilty in exchange for some form of leniency. For example, the defendant may plead to lesser charges so that the penalties are diminished. Or, the defendant may plead to some, but not all of the charges so that others are dropped. The agreement may include sentencing recommendations. Such bargains are not binding on the court.

Plea Bargaining or Plea Negotiating - The process through which an accused person and a prosecutor negotiate a mutually satisfactory disposition of a case. The Court is not privy to the actual negotiations, but is presented with a plea agreement for its approval or rejection.

Pleadings - The written statements of fact and law filed by the parties to a lawsuit.

Points or Point Information - Penalty points imposed by the Motor Vehicles Division after conviction of a traffic offense.

Polling the Jury - The act, after a jury verdict has been announced, of asking jurors individually whether they agree with the verdict.

Pour-Over Will - A will that leaves some or all estate assets to a trust established before the will-maker’s death.

Prejudice - Unfair harm to one party.

Power of Attorney – Formal authorization of a person to act in the interests of another who is incapable of managing his or her own affairs or property.

Preliminary Hearing – See “Initial Appearance.”

Preliminary Injunction - Court order requiring action or forbidding action until a decision can be made whether to issue a permanent injunction. It differs from a temporary restraining order.

Pre-Sentence Investigation - A background investigation of the defendant by the Department of Corrections, returnable to the sentencing judge on or before a certain date.

Pre-Sentence Report - A report designed to assist the judge in passing sentence on a convicted defendant. Such reports should contain at least the following: (1) complete description of the situation surrounding the criminal activity; (2) offender's educational background; (3) offender's employment background; (4) offender's social history; (5) residence history of the offender; (6) offender's medical history; (7) information about environment to which the offender will return; (8) information about any resources available to assist the offender; (9) probation officer's view of the offender's motivations and ambitions; (10) full description of the offender's criminal record; and (11) recommendation as to disposition.

Pretermitted Child - A child born after a will is executed, who is not provided for by the will. New Mexico law provides for a share of estate property to go to such children.

Pretrial Conference - A meeting between the judge and the lawyers involved in a lawsuit to narrow the issues in the suit, agree on what will be presented at the trial, and explore the possibility of settling the case without a trial.

Pretrial Intervention - Programs to aid certain qualifying criminal defendants by diverting them from prosecution and enrolling them in rehabilitative programs. Upon successful completion of the required program(s), the criminal case is dismissed. Pretrial intervention is most often used in substance abuse and domestic violence where the crime charged is the defendant’s first offense.

Pretrial Release - Release by sheriff’s personnel after arrest and before any court appearance, but with a court appearance date.

Precedent - A previously decided case that guides the decision of future cases; source of common law.

Preponderance of the evidence - Evidence that is of greater weight or more convincing than the evidence that is offered in opposition to it. The amount of evidence that must be presented to prevail in most civil actions.

Presentment - Declaration or document issued by a grand jury that either makes a neutral report or notes misdeeds by officials charged with specified public duties. It ordinarily does not include formal criminal charges.

Prima Facie – Presumably. A fact presumed to be true unless disproved by some evidence to the contrary. Evidence that will prevail until contradicted and overcome by other evidence. A prima facie case is one in which the plaintiff has presented sufficient evidence to require the defendant to go forward with his or her case. In other words, the plaintiff will prevail if the defendant does not rebut the plaintiff’s case.

Principal - The person primarily liable; the person for whom performance of an obligation a surety has become bound.

Privilege - A right, power, or immunity held by a person or class beyond the course of law, such as the privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment.

Probable Cause – The evidence required before a person or property may be searched or seized by law enforcement and before a search or arrest warrant may be issued.

Probable Cause to Arrest exists when the facts and circumstances within the officers’ knowledge and of which the officers had reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that the suspect has committed or is committing a crime.

Probable Cause to search exists when the facts and circumstances within the officers’ knowledge and of which the officers had reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that evidence of a crime will be found in the location identified.

Probate - The court-supervised process by which a will is determined to be the will-maker’s final statement regarding how the will maker wants his/her property distributed. It also confirms the appointment of the personal representative of the estate. Probate also means the process by which assets are gathered; applied to pay debts, taxes, and the expenses of administration; and distributed to those designated as beneficiaries in the will.

In Chapter 12 of our Probate Judges Manual is the Probate Glossary that includes legal terms specific to probate court in New Mexico.

Probate Court - The court with jurisdiction to supervise estate administration.

Probate Estate - Estate property that may be disposed of by a will.

Probation - A procedure under which a defendant convicted of a crime is released by the court without imprisonment under a suspended or deferred sentence and subject to conditions.

Probative Value - Evidence has "probative value" if it tends to prove an issue. It is evidence that furnishes, establishes, or contributes toward proof.

Pro Bono Publico - For the public good. Lawyers representing clients without a fee are said to be working pro bono publico.

Promissory Estoppel – Equitable doctrine allowing the court to enforce a promise even though a valid contract was not formed when a person reasonably acted in reliance on that promise. Promissory Estoppel allows the court to compensate the person for their expenditures and/or to avoid the unjust enrichment of the other party.

Property Bond - A signature bond secured by mortgage or real property.

Pro Se - In one’s own behalf, commonly used to refer to a party representing himself or herself in a court action, instead of being represented by an attorney.

Prosecutor - A trial lawyer representing the government in a criminal case and the interests of the state in civil matters. In criminal cases, the prosecutor has the responsibility of deciding who and when to prosecute.

Proximate Cause - The act that caused an event to occur. A person generally is liable only if an injury was proximately caused by his/her action or by his/her failure to act when he/she had a duty to act.

Public Defender - A court-appointed attorney for those defendants who are declared indigent.

Punitive Damages – Damages awarded over and above compensatory damages in order to punish the defendant for malicious, wanton, willful, reckless, oppressive, or fraudulent conduct. Punitive damages are imposed to compensate the Plaintiff for mental anguish, shame, degradation, or other aggravations beyond actual damages.

Return to top

Q

Quash - To vacate or void a summons, subpoena, etc.

Return to top

R

Real Property - Land, buildings, and other improvements affixed to the land.

Reasonable Belief - Probable cause. The facts and circumstances within an arresting officer's knowledge, and of which s/he had reasonably trustworthy information, sufficient in themselves to justify a person of average caution in believing that a crime has been or is being committed. Facts sufficient to justify a warrantless arrest.

Reasonable Doubt - Such a doubt as would cause a careful person to hesitate before acting in matters of importance to himself/herself.

Reasonable Person - A phrase used to denote a hypothetical person who exercises the qualities of attention, knowledge, intelligence, and judgment that society requires of its members for the protection of their own interest and the interests of others. This term is commonly used in torts, where the test of negligence is based on either a failure to do something that a reasonable person, guided by considerations that ordinarily regulate conduct, would do, or on the doing of something that a reasonable and prudent (wise) person would not do.

Reasonable Suspicion - Level of suspicion required to justify law enforcement investigation, but not arrest or search. A lower level of suspicion or evidence than probable cause. An officer has reasonable suspicion when the officer is aware of specific, articulable facts, together with rational inferences from those facts, which, when judged objectively, would lead a reasonable person to believe that criminal activity occurred or was occurring.

Rebut - To introduce evidence disproving other evidence previously given or reestablishing the credibility of challenged evidence.

Rebuttal - Evidence that is offered by a party after he has rested his case and after the opponent has rested in order to contradict and explain the opponent's evidence.

Rebuttal Witnesses - Witnesses introduced to explain, repel, counteract, or disprove facts given in evidence by the adverse party.

Recall Order - Court order recalling a warrant or capias (writ requiring an officer to take a named defendant into custody).

Record - All the documents and evidence plus transcripts of oral proceedings in a case.

Recusal - The voluntary action by a judge to remove himself or herself from presiding in a given case because of self-interest, bias, conflict, or prejudice. Also, the process by which a judge is disqualified from a case because a party objects.

Redirect Examination - Opportunity to present rebuttal evidence after one’s evidence has been subjected to cross-examination.

Redress - To set right; to remedy; to compensate; to remove the causes of a grievance.

Referee - A person to whom the court refers a pending case to take testimony, hear the parties,

and report back to the court. A referee is an officer with judicial powers who serves as an arm of the court, but whose final decision is subject to court approval. Also called “special master,” “special commissioner,” or “hearing officer.”

Rehearing - Another hearing of a civil or criminal case or motion by the same court in which the matter was originally decided in order to bring to the court’s attention an error, omission, or oversight in the first consideration.

Release - Discharge from confinement or custody.

Release On Own Recognizance - Release of a person from custody without the payment of any bail or posting of bond, upon the promise to return to court.

Remand - To send a dispute back to the court where it was originally heard. Usually it is an appellate court that remands a case for proceedings in the trial court consistent with the appellate court’s ruling.

Remedy - Legal or judicial means by which a right or privilege is enforced or the violation of a right or privilege is prevented, redressed, or compensated.

Remittitur - The reduction by a judge of the damages awarded by a jury.

Removal - The transfer of a state case to federal court for trial.

Rendition - Transfer of a fugitive from the asylum state to the demanding state.

Replevin – A legal action for the recovery of a possession that has been wrongfully taken.

Reply - The response by a party to charges raised in a pleading by the other party.

Request for Production - A formal court process by which one party requests that another produce certain documents or other tangible items.

Rescission – Cancellation of a contract.

Res Judicata – A thing or matter already decided by a court. A final judgment on the merits is conclusive as to the rights of the parties and is an absolute bar to a later action involving the same claim, demand, or cause of action. Res judicata bars relitigation of the same cause of action between the same parties where there is a prior judgment. By comparison, collateral estoppel bars relitigation of a particular issue or determinative fact. Compare Collateral Estoppel.

Respondent - The person against whom an appeal is taken. See Petitioner.

Rest - A party is said to rest or rest its case when it has presented all the evidence it intends to offer.

Restitution – Either financial reimbursement to the victim or community service imposed by the court for a crime committed.

Retainer - Act of the client in employing the attorney or counsel; also denotes the fee which the client pays when he/she retains the attorney.

Return of service - A certificate of affidavit by the person who has served process upon a party to an action, reflecting the date and place of service.

Reversal - An action of a higher court in setting aside or revoking a lower court decision.

Reversible Error - An error during a trial or hearing sufficiently harmful to justify reversing the judgment of a lower court.

Revocable Trust - A trust that the grantor may change or revoke.

Revocation (of Driver’s License) – Judicial termination of a driver's license and privilege to drive after conviction of DWI. The license shall not be renewed or restored for the duration of the revocation, except that an application for a new license may be presented and acted upon by the division after the expiration of at least one year after date of revocation. This kind of revocation is distinguished from an administrative revocation, in which the Motor Vehicle Division may terminate a driver’s license for up to one year.

Revoke - To cancel or nullify a legal document.

Robbery - Felonious taking of another’s property, from his or her person or immediate presence and against his or her will, by means of force or fear.

Rules of Evidence - Standards governing whether evidence in civil or criminal case is admissible.

Return to top

S

Satisfaction of Judgment – Payment of all monies determined to be owed pursuant to a court judgment.

Seal - The Clerk of Court symbol of authenticity.

Search - Examination of a person's house or other building or premises, or of his person, or vehicle, with a view to discovery of contraband, illicit or stolen property, or some evidence of guilt to be used in the prosecution of a criminal action.

Search Warrant - A written order issued by a judge that directs a law enforcement officer to search a specific area for a specific piece of evidence.

Secured Debt - In collection or bankruptcy proceedings, a debt is secured if the debtor gave the creditor a right to repossess the property or goods used as collateral.

Self Defense - Claim that an act otherwise criminal was legally justifiable because it was necessary to protect a person or property from the threat or action of another.

Self-Incrimination (privilege against) - The constitutional right of people to refuse to give testimony against themselves that could subject them to criminal prosecution. The right is guaranteed in the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Asserting the right is often referred to as “Taking the Fifth.”

Self-Proving Will - A will whose validity does not have to be testified to in court by the witnesses to it, since the witnesses executed an affidavit reflecting proper execution of the will prior to the maker’s death.

Sentence - The punishment ordered by a court for a defendant convicted of a crime. A concurrent sentence means that two or more sentences would run at the same time. A consecutive sentence means that two or more sentences would run one after another.

Sentence Report - A document containing background material on a convicted person. It is prepared to guide the judge in the imposition of a sentence. Sometimes called a pre-sentence investigation.

Sequester - To separate. Sometimes juries are separated from outside influences during their deliberations. For example, this may occur during a highly publicized trial.

Sequestration of Witnesses - Keeping all witnesses (except plaintiff and defendant) out of the courtroom except for their time on the stand, and cautioning them not to discuss their testimony with other witnesses. Also called exclusion of witnesses. This prevents a witness from being influenced by the testimony of a prior witness.

Service - The delivery of a legal document, or of a requirement to appear in court, by an officially authorized person in accordance with the formal requirements of the applicable laws. Service is required, unless waived, for complaints, summonses, or subpoenas, to notify a person of a lawsuit or other legal action taken against him/her.

Settlement - An agreement between the parties disposing of a lawsuit.

Settlor - The person who sets up a trust. Also called the grantor or trustor.

Severance - The separation of offenses or defendants into different trials.

Show Cause Order - Court order requiring a person to appear and show why some action should not be taken.

Sidebar - A conference between the judge and lawyers, usually in the courtroom, out of earshot of the jury and spectators.

Slander - False and defamatory spoken words tending to harm another’s reputation, business or means of livelihood. Slander is spoken defamation; libel is published.

Sovereign Immunity - The doctrine that the government, state or federal, is immune to lawsuit unless it gives its consent, generally through legislation.

Special Damages - Damages that are the actual, but not necessary, consequence of a breach of contract or injury. In contract law, special damages must have been reasonably foreseeable and must flow directly and immediately from the breach, or they are not enforceable.

Specific Performance - A remedy by which a court orders a person who has breached an agreement to perform specifically what he or she has agreed to do. Specific performance is ordered when damages alone would be inadequate compensation.

Speedy Trial - A rule of law wherein the defendant must be brought to trial within 180 days.

Spendthrift Trust - A trust set up for the benefit of someone whom the grantor believes would be incapable of managing his/her own financial affairs.

Standing - The legal right to bring a lawsuit. Only a person with some legally recognized interest at stake has standing to bring a lawsuit.

Stare Decisis - The doctrine that courts will follow principles of law laid down in previous cases. Similar to precedent.

Statement - A writing made by a person and signed or otherwise adopted or approved by such person; any mechanical, electrical or other recording or a transcription thereof, which is a recital of an oral utterance; and stenographic or written statements or notes which are in substance recitals of an oral statement.

Statute – Law passed by a legislative body declaring rights and duties, or commanding or prohibiting certain conduct.

Statute of Frauds – Law which requires that certain documents be in writing, such as leases for more than one year. Under the UCC, contracts for the sale of goods for more than $500 must be in writing to be enforced.

Statute of Limitations - The time within which a plaintiff must begin a lawsuit (in civil cases) or a prosecutor must bring charges (in criminal cases). There are different statutes of limitations at both the federal and state levels for different kinds of lawsuits or crimes.

Statutory Construction - Process by which a court seeks to interpret the meaning and scope of legislation.

Statutory Law – The body of law enacted by the legislative branch of government, as distinguished from case law or common law.

Stay - A court order halting a judicial proceeding.

Stipulation - An agreement by attorneys on both sides of a civil or criminal case about some aspect of the case; e.g. to extend the time to answer, to adjourn the trial date, or to admit certain facts at the trial.

Strict Liability Statutes – Statutes criminalizing specific conduct without regard to the actor’s intent. The only question for a judge or jury in a strict-liability case is whether the defendant did the prohibited act.

Strike - Highlighting evidence, in the record of case, that has been improperly offered and will not be relied upon.

Sua Sponte - A Latin phrase which means on one’s own behalf, voluntary, without prompting or suggestion.

Subject Matter Jurisdiction - Power of a court to hear the type of case that is before it. Example: a municipal court has subject matter jurisdiction for cases involving violation of that municipality's ordinances, but does not have subject matter jurisdiction over felonies.

Subpoena – A process directing a witness to appear and give testimony at a certain time and in a certain place.

Subpoena Duces Tecum - A court order commanding a witness to bring certain documents or records to court.

Summary Judgment - A decision made on the basis of statements and evidence presented for the record without a trial. It is used when there is no dispute as to the material facts of the case, and one party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summons - A document signed by a deputy clerk ordering a person to appear before the court to respond to a complaint.

Support Trust - A trust that instructs the trustee to spend only as much income and principal (the assets held in the trust) as needed for the beneficiary’s support.

Suppress - To forbid the use of evidence at a trial because it is improper or was improperly obtained. See also exclusionary rule.

Supra - Latin for above.

Surety - One who signs a bond and guarantees to pay money if the defendant fails to appear in court as ordered.

Surety Bond - A bond purchased at the expense of the estate to insure the executor’s proper performance.

Survivorship - Another name for joint tenancy, in which one owner becomes entitled to property because he or she has survived all other owners.

Suspended Sentence - Postponed execution of sentence; sentence is imposed, and execution of sentence is suspended, postponed, or stayed for a period and on conditions set by the judge.

Suspension (of driver’s license) - The driver's license and privilege to drive are temporarily withdrawn, but only during the period of such suspension. No reapplication is necessary to obtain license.

Sustain - A court ruling upholding an objection or a motion.

Sworn Complaint Affidavit - A sworn, witnessed complaint filed with the Clerk of the Court.

Return to top

T

Temporary Relief - Any form of action by a court granting one of the parties an order designed to protect its interest pending further action by the court.

Temporary Restraining Order - A judge’s order forbidding certain actions until a full hearing can be held. Usually of short duration. Often referred to as a TRO.

Testamentary Capacity - The legal ability to make a will.

Testamentary Trust - A trust set up by a will. This trust becomes effective only upon the death of the testator.

Testator - Person who makes a will (female: testatrix)

Testimony - The evidence given by a witness under oath. It does not include evidence from documents and other physical evidence.

Third Party - A person, business, organization or government agency not actively involved in a legal proceeding, agreement, or transaction, but affected by it.

Third-Party Claim - An action by the defendant that brings a third party into a lawsuit.

Time served - Actual number of days already served in jail on a charge or offense before conviction.

Title - Legal ownership of property, usually real property or automobiles.

Tort - An injury or wrong committed on the person or property of another. A tort is an infringement on the rights of an individual, but not founded in a contract. The most common tort action is a suit for personal and/or property damages sustained in an automobile accident.

Transcript - A written, word-for-word record of what was said, either in a proceeding such as a trial or during some other conversation, as in a transcript of a hearing or oral deposition.

Transfer cases - Cases going from one court or one jurisdiction to another.

Trial - Examination of any issue of fact or law before a competent court to determine the rights of the parties.

Trial by Jury – Trial by a body of persons selected from the citizens of a particular district and brought before the court where they are sworn to try one or more questions of fact and determine them by their verdict.

Trial de Novo - A retrial in district court that is conducted as if no trial had occurred in the lower court.

True Bill - A finding by a grand jury that there is sufficient evidence to warrant a criminal charge; allows trial to proceed. An indictment.

True Copy - An exact copy of a written instrument.

Trust - A legal device used to manage real or personal property, established by one person (the grantor or settlor) for the benefit of another (the beneficiary). A third person (the trustee) or the grantor manages the trust.

Trust Agreement or Declaration - The legal document that sets up a living trust. Testamentary trusts are set up in a will.

Trustee - The person or institution that manages the property put in trust.

Trustor – Grantor, settlor; one who establishes a trust.

Return to top

U

UCC - Uniform Commercial Code. The UCC applies to the sale of movable goods to or by a merchant. New Mexico’s UCC statutes are encoded at NMSA 1978, §§ 55-1-101 to -12-109.

Unenforceable Contract – A valid contract is unenforceable when some defense exists that is extraneous to the formation of the contract, such as when the contract violates the Statute of Frauds or the Statute of Limitations has passed.

Unjust Enrichment - Occurs when a person has unfairly gained at the expense of another (such as by mistake), and principles of justice and equity require the person to return or pay for the property or benefits received.

Unlawful Detainer – An unjustifiable retention of real estate without the consent of the owner or other person entitled to its possession; may occur when a tenant refuses to leave premises after the right of occupancy has ended.

Unlawful Search - Examination or inspection of premises or persons without authority of the law and in violation of the immunity from unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article II, Section 10 of the New Mexico Constitution.

Unsecured - In collection or bankruptcy proceedings, a debt or a claim is unsecured if there is no collateral, or to the extent the value of collateral is less than the amount of the debt.

Usury - Charging a higher interest rate or higher fees than the law allows.

Return to top

V

Vacate - To set aside, as a judgment.

Venire - A writ summoning persons to court to act as jurors, also refers to the people summoned for jury duty, as in the “jury venire” or “jury panel.”

Venue – The place in which prosecution is brought; venue may be in the county of the defendant’s residence or in the county in which the offense is alleged to have been committed.

Vested - Fixed; accrued; settled; absolute.

Verdict - The findings of a judge or jury at the end of the trial.

Void Contract – A contract that does not have any legal effect and cannot be enforced under any circumstances. For example, a contract to commit an illegal act is void.

Voidable Contract – A valid contract that a party may cancel upon request. For example, a contract made by a minor is voidable by the minor or his or her legal guardian.

Return to top

W

Waive - To give up a known right voluntarily. Example: To give up the right to an attorney.

Waiver – In extradition proceedings, a form signed before a judge whereby a defendant voluntarily submits to pick-up by a foreign jurisdiction, waiving his/her rights as guaranteed under the Constitution.

Waiver of Immunity - A means authorized by statute by which a witness, before testifying or producing evidence, may relinquish the right to refuse to testify against himself or herself, thereby making it possible for his or her testimony to be used against him or her in future proceedings.

Warrant - Most commonly, a court order authorizing law enforcement officers to make an arrest or conduct a search. An affidavit seeking a warrant must establish probable cause by detailing the facts upon which the request is based.

Warrantless Search - Examination of a person or premises without first obtaining a warrant, which may be lawful under such limited circumstances as a domestic violence situation, emergency, hot pursuit, consent, or threat of immediate removal of contraband.

Warranty – A legal promise that certain facts are true.

Will - A legal declaration that disposes of a person’s property when that person dies.

Without Prejudice - A claim or cause dismissed without prejudice may be the subject of a new lawsuit.

With Prejudice - Applied to orders of judgment dismissing a case, meaning that the plaintiff is forever barred from bringing a lawsuit on the same claim or cause.

Witness - A person who testifies to what he/she has seen, heard, or otherwise experienced. Also, a person who observes the signing of a will and is competent to testify that it is the will-maker’s intended last will and testament.

Writ - A judicial order directing a person to do something.

Writ of Attachment - A writ of the court ordering the sheriff to seize or hold a debtor’s property and bring the property before the court.

Writ of Certiorari - An order by the appellate court used when the court has the discretion on whether or not to hear an appeal.

Writ of Mandamus - A writ to compel performance of one’s responsibilities as set forth by law.

Writ of Prohibition – A writ used by a superior court to prevent an inferior court from exceeding its jurisdiction.

Writ of Superintending Control – A writ issued to prevent a gross miscarriage of justice by correcting the erroneous ruling of a lower court that is acting within its jurisdiction but is making mistakes of law or is acting in willful disregard of the law. The writ is issued when there is no appeal or when an appeal cannot provide adequate relief.

The American jury trial is a constitutional right. The founding fathers believed that the right to be tried by a jury of peers was so important that it merited inclusion in the highest law of the land. Amendments 6 and 7 of the Bill of Rights contain this right:--

 Amendment VI

 In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses n his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

 Amendment VII

 In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and  no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

1. 
   Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 24, 2019 at 2:40 PM

   SOMEBODY TOLD ME--
   
   YOU SAID YOU ARE TELLING ONLU 0.01% AND IF YOU TELL MORE JUDGES WILL GET STONED IN THEIR CHAMBERS..
   
   CAN YOU ELABORATE A BIT--
   
   WELL YOU CAN GET WORLD INTRIGUE AND NAKED TRUTH ONLY FROM THIS BLOGSITE..
   
   ILLEGAL COLLGEIUM JUDICIARY IS HELL BENT TO PROVE THAT THEY ARE THE CUSTODIANS OF BHARATMATAs SECURITY AND WELL BEING..
   
   DONT FORCE ME TO OPEN MY MOUTH MELORDS.. THERE WILL BE NO PLACE TO YOU TO HIDE AFTER THAT.
   
   A WEE EXAMPLE?
   
   JUDGES IN THE PAYROLL OF KOSHER DEEP STATE KICKED OUT INDIRA GANDHI FROM THE PM CHAIR ( IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO DO THIS WITHOUT JEW ROTHSCHILDs SPONSORSHIP ) AND INSTALLED CIA AGENT MORARJI DESAI.
   
   WHEN INDIRA GANDHI NATIONALISED BANKS IN 1969, FINANCE MINISTER MORARJI DESAI HAS OPPOSED IT TOOTH AN NAIL, BACKED BY BENAMI MEDIA BARONS.
   
   AS SOON AS INDIRA GANDHI NATIONALISED ROTHSCHILDs BANKS IN 1969, MORARJI DESAI QUIT THE CABINET IN PROTEST AND HE SPLIT THE CONGRESS INTO SYNDICATE AND INDICATE .
   
   THIS SPLIT WAS CONTROLLED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD..
   
   MORARJI DESAI WAS NOTICED BY ALL WHEN HE WAS SUDDENLY GIVEN MAGSAYSAY AWARD IN 1965.. HIS GROOMING WAS ON.
   
   KACHRAWAAL GOT A MAGSAYSAY AWARD TOO .. THAT IS HOW HE BECAME THE CM OF DELHI.
   
   ROTHSHILD USED HIS AGENTS GANDHI AND MORARJEE DESAI WELL TILL INDEPENDENCE..
   
   INDIRA GANDHI WAS FALSELY CONVICTED BY ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT FOR ELECTORAL FRAUD –AS IF WITHOUT CHEATING SHE CANT WIN AN ELECTIONS..
   
   IN THE 1971 ELECTIONS SHE HAD DECIMATED MORARJI DESAIs SYNDICATE FACTION— ALL OF THEM LOST THEIR DEPOSITS..
   
   THE ONLY WAY TO REMOVE HER WAS “ UNHE HATAYIYE HAMEIN LEH AAYEYA “ REQUEST TO THE DEEP STATE .
   
   JP WAS A CIA SPOOK.. I HAVE SEEN PROOF FROM A CIA AGENT IN USA.. JP MOVEMENT AGAINST INDIRA GANDHI WAS 100% CONTROLLED AND FUNDED BY THE KOSHER DEEP STATE.
   
   MORARJI DESAI DESTROYED RAW WHICH WAS PROTECTING BHARATMATA FROM FOREIGN POWERS..    HE LEAKED ALL RAW AGENTS IDs AND INDIA LOST OUR DEEP STATE ASSETS .. 
   
   EVEN TODAY WE DON’T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO HUNDREDS OF OUR AGENTS ABROAD— MOST OF THEM IN PAKISTAN.
   
   I HAVE JUST SHIFTED FROM 0.01% TO 0.02 % ..
   
   capt ajit vadakayil
   ..

1. 
   Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 24, 2019 at 5:01 PM

   https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/deadline-to-finalise-nrc-should-not-be-extended-beyond-july-31-2019-sc/articleshow/67671787.cms
   
   JUDICIAL OVER REACH HAS REACHED SUCH RIDICULOUS EXTENTS THAT THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY NOW DEALS IN EXTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS .. THEY DO WITH IN CAHOOTS WITH BENAMI MEDIA CONTROLLED BY THE DEEP STATE..
   
   VERY SOON THESE KOSHER DEEP STATE PAYROLL JUDGES WILL DICTATE FOREIGN POLICY..
   
   In 2015, Markandey Katju, former SC judge, addressing lawyers at the Punjab and Haryana high Court had stated that 50% of the higher judiciary consisting of SC and high court judges was corrupt
   
   THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICARY AND MAIN STREAM MEDIA ARE THE REASON WHY COMMIE JNU PROFESSORS WAGE A VICIOUS HYBRID WAR TO MAKE INDIA IPLODE FROM WITHIN..
   
   INDIA WILL BE THIS PLANETs NO 1 SUPERPOWER IN 15 YEARS . THE WHITE MAN WILL NEVER AGREE TO BE RULED OVER BY A BROWN MAN..
   
   EVERY TIME ISLAMIC SEPARATISTS DO OPEN SEDITION, THE COLLEGIUM JUDGES SAVE THEM BY QUTING THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION.. SORRY THE CONSTITUTION SAVES ONLY LAW ABIDING CITIZENS..
   
   SUPRME COURT HAS ENDLESSLY INTERFERED WITH THE AFPSA , ENDANGERING THE LIVES OF DESH BHAKT JAWANS.
   
   SC ruling that FIR be lodged and police investigate actions by the Army in counter-insurgency / counter-terrorism amounts to dilution of AFSPA and runs contrary to its provisions enacted by the Parliament, which should actually be outside the jurisdiction of the SC unless first discussed and agreed to by Parliament. These judges have no powers to ask police to investigate the army or countermand what has been enacted by the elected Parliament.
   
   IT IS TIME WE CREATE A LAW FOR SPECIAL MILITARY COURTS TO TRY FOREIGN PAYROLL DESH DROHI JUDGES.
   
   Hundreds of Pakistani funded and backed Kashmiri militants throw stones on a dozen CAPF personnel on a daily basis . Yet the Melords banned the jawans from fighting back with pellet guns?... Why do we need a JNU woman Nirmala Sitaraman as our defence minister ? Why has she allowed illegal collegium judges to tie the arms of the Jawans ?
   
   JUDGES HAVE POWERS ONLY TO INTERPRET LAWS WHEN ASKED TO BY AN AGGRIEVED DESH BHAKT CITIZEN—NOT BY DESH DROHI FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs BY WAY OF PIL..
   
   Drafters of our Constitution have introduced the provisions like Arts.352, Art 356 and also Art. 355 in the Indian Constitution. Art. 352 and Art.356 deals with extraordinary situations where total constitutional machinery failed or there is a threat to the unity and integrity of India..
   
   Art. 355 was incorporated in the Constitution with a view to assign role to the Union in case of internal disturbance. Art. 356 confers extra ordinary powers on the Union to deal with the Constitutional breakdown in a state whereupon all functions of the State government may be assumed by the Union Government.
   
   Art. 355 of the Indian Constitution :--
   “It shall be the duty of Union to protect every state against external aggression and internal disturbance and to ensure that the government of every state is carried on in accordance with the provisions of this constitution”
   
   CONTINUED TO 2--

   
   
   1. Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 24, 2019 at 5:01 PM

      CONTINUED FROM 1-
      
      THE NAXAL RED CORRIDOR WAS CREATED BY THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY, WITH BENAMI MEDIA AND FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs IN CAHOOTS.
      
      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/09/bauxite-mining-naxalite-menace-joshua.html
      
      
      The PIL system was injected into our system as an upgrade to allow a “DESH BHAKT public-spirited person” to protect the interest of the watan and fundamental rights of law abiding citizens through the intervention of the court..
      
      But what is the gruesome reality?
      
      DESH DROHI foreign funded NGOs ( some owned by judges themselves using benami fronts ) use PIL for illegal collegium judges to CREATE and STRIKE DOWN laws ( adultery/ homosecuality/ sabarimala issue ).
      A lot of unknown worm quality lawyers shot into the limelight by way of PIL and now they have changed from bicycles to Mercedes cars.
      
      Judges who don’t have the brains to apply BODMAS have trampled on article 50 of the constitution.
      The legislature is the policy making body of India. Generally, new laws or policies are introduced in the Parliament/ State Legislature in the form of Bills. These Bills once passed by the Legislature are sent to the President for assent. Once the passed bill gets the assent of the President, it becomes the law or the policy comes into effect. Parliament or the State Legislature are the forms of “Legislature”.
      
      Prime Minister and his council of ministers are called the Executives. The policies framed by the legislature are implemented by the Executive. This body is in charge of enforcement also frames policy and rules to effectively implement the law. The Executive is accountable to the Legislative Assembly.
      
      Article 50 of the Indian Constitution use the words “judiciary” and “executive”, but not “legislative”..
      
      Article 50 in The Constitution Of India 1949:---
      50. Separation of judiciary from executive The State shall take steps to separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services of the State
      
      DOES MODI KNOW THAT HE HEADS THE EXECUTIVE?
      
      Capt ajit vadakayil
      ..

1. Dark angelJanuary 24, 2019 at 4:12 PM

   Respected ajit sir,
   
   An Italian lawmaker tweeted Monday a link to a website claiming that one of the most famous Jewish dynasties, the Rothschilds, has global dominance over the international banking system.
   
   https://sputniknews.com/world/201901241071772504-italy-apology-rothschilds-banking/
   
   Regards
   
   Gunjan Arya
   1. 
      Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 24, 2019 at 5:31 PM

      IF YOU UTTER THE WORD "ROTHSCHILD " THERE ARE 18 COUNTRIES WHO WILL PUT YOU IN JAIL FOR BEING "ANTI- SEMETIC"..
      
      WHY WAS CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL THE FIRST MAN TO DECLARE THAT "ROTHSCHILD RULED INDIA , NOT THE QUEEN OR BRITISH PARLIAMENT ?"..
      
      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/02/britannia-did-not-rule-waves-and-this.html

      BEFORE 1947, ALMOST THE ENTIRE SUPREME COURT JUDGES WERE PERSONALLY VETTED AND CHOSEN BY JEW ROTHSCHILD..

      
      

      A BIG PERCENTAGE OF THE 65 PARSIS KNIGHTED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD BEFORE 1947 WERE SUPREME COURT JUDGES AND LAWYERS..

      
      BY PERCENTAGE TRAITOR PARIS HAVE THE MAXIMUM KNIGHTS , AS A RELIGION/ CLAN ON THIS PLANET .. LIKE HOW JEWS HAVE THE MAXIMUM NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS ..
      
      ALMOST ALL UBER RICH INDIANS BEFORE 1947 WERE OPIUM DRUG RUNNING AGENTS OF JEW ROTHSCHILD..
      
      NOBODY DARED UTTER THE WORDS "ROTHSCHILD" OR "OPIUM" IN THE INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS..
      
      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/04/fake-champaran-satyagraha-of-gandhi.html
      
      THE BALFOUR DECLARATION IS A BACKDATED LETTER - WRITTEN BY ROTHSCHILD TO HIMSELF.. WHEN I WROTE ABOUT IT 9 YEARS AGO--ALL RIDICULED ME..
      
      Lord Rothschild Discusses How His Family Created Israel - Full Interview
      
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIA4EkvpLtc

THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION DEMANDS THAT ALL CHILDREN OF BHARATMATA ( REGARDLESS OF GENDER AND CREED ) MUST ENJOY SAME RIGHTS ..

Article 14 in The Constitution Of India 1949:--

14. Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth

THIS CLAUSE HAS BEEN TWISTED NAY HIJACKED TO GIVE RESERVATION ON BASIS OF CASTE  ( AND NOW GENDER ) – MOSTLY FOR VOTES.. 

HOW?

SEE THEY ARE TIDING UP FROM LOW TO HIGH!

BRAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY !

ROTHSCHILD OPERATED WORLD BANK, IMF AND ADB GAVE FUNDS TO ACHIEVE THIS.

DONKEYS RULED OVER HORSES.

THE BEST BRAINS OF INDIA WANTED OUT AND IMMIGRATED ABROAD.

At the Round Table Conference of June 1932, Rothschild  proposed the Communal Award, according to which separate representation was to be provided for Muslims, Sikhs, Indian Christians ( rape products ) , Anglo-Indians, and Europeans.  The STs and SCs, were assigned a number of seats to be filled by election from constituencies in which only they could vote , as required by Rothschild’s agent BR Ambedkar..

IN SHORT , ALL MUST BE TIDED UP—AND HINDUS MUST BE PULLED DOWN..

BR AMBEDKAR WAS A STAR KID !

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2015/10/the-only-dalit-freemason-of-india-capt.html

After negotiations, Rothschild’s agent Gandhi reached an agreement with Rothschild’s agent BR Ambedkar to have a single Hindu electorate, with Dalits having seats reserved within it.

NEGOCIASSANN MAANGTHA HAI NAH ?

Electorates for other religions, such as Islam and Sikhism, remained separate. This became known as the Poona Pact

BEFORE THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA THERE WAS NO CASTE SYSTEM

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/07/untouchables-capt-ajit-vadakayil.html

THE CLAN OF MAHAR SHIVAJI WERE CONVERTED FROM RULING CLAN TO UNTOUCHABLE SHIT HOUSE CLEANERS AND CHITPAVAN JEWS NAY BRAHMINS BECAME PESHWA RULERS.   

MIND YOU  THE INDIAN VARNA SYSTEM SINCE 400 CENTURIES  NEVER ALLOWED BRAHMINS TO RULE..

UNTOUCHABILITY DID NOT EXIST IN INDIA-    EXCEPT IN KERALA , STARTED BY VISHNU AVATAR PARASHURAMA TO PROTECT VEDA ORAL ROUTE EXPERT NAMBOODIRIS..

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/10/worst-racists-on-planet-earth-capt-ajit.html

In 1954, the Ministry of Education suggested that 20 percent of places should be reserved for the SCs and STs in educational institutions with a provision to relax minimum qualifying marks for admission by 5 percent wherever required. In 1982, it was specified that 15 percent and 7.5 percent of vacancies in public sector and government-aided educational institutes should be reserved for the SC and ST candidates, respectively

In 1980 the commission's report recommended that a reserved quota for OBCs of 27 per cent should apply in respect of services and public sector bodies operated by the Union Government. It called for a similar change to admissions to institutes of higher education, except where states already had more generous requirements. It was not until the 1990s that the recommendations were implemented in Union Government jobs..

Article 15(4) in The Constitution Of India 1949

(4) Nothing in this article or in clause ( 2 ) of Article 29 shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes

Article 46 in The Constitution Of India 1949

46. Promotion of educational and economic interests of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other weaker sections The State shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people, and, in particular, of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, and shall protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation

The Supreme Court of India ruled in 1992 that reservations could not exceed 50 percent, anything above which it JUDGED would violate equal access as guaranteed by the Constitution. It thus put a cap on reservations..

BRAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYY

SEE OUR JUDGES ARE SO FUCKIN’ GOOD IN MATH..

THEY MUST REPRESENT INDIA IN THE MATH OLYMPIAD.

THIS IS WHAT OUR LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES ARE WORTH  GENTLEMEN—THIS SAYS IT ALL !

YOU EXPECT THESE MELORDS TO UNDERSTAND BODMAS ?

In the State of Tamil Nadu, the caste-based reservation stands at 69 percent..CM Jayalalithaa used SCHEDULE NINE. 

THE JUDGES THEN USED SCHEDULE NINE LIKE MANEKA GANDHIs PASSPORT ( PUNCHED A “DUE” HOLE IN THE CONSTITUTION )

In an unanimous verdict, a nine-member Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Y K Sabharwal decided that --

JUDGES HAVE THE RIGHT FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW – NOT ONLY ON NINTH FUCKIN’ SCHEDULE , BUT EVERYWHERE

MANEKA GANDHI KE PASSPORT KEE JAI !

NINTH SCHEDULE KE BHUNDD PHAAD KEE JAI ! 

( 69% in Tamil Nadu covered 88% of the population who were screwed by Rothschild FAKE Kanchi mutt .)

JUDICIAL REVIEW BY GODS FALLEN FROM HEAVEN KEE JAI !

HOW MANY OF YOU THINK THESE STUPID JUDGES CAN EVEN UNDERSTAND WHY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL IS SHOUTING JAI ?

I will write on this in great detail soon.

1. 
   Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 25, 2019 at 9:58 AM

   SOMEBODY CALLED ME AND SAID
   
   “CAPTAIN , ( WITH THIS 50% MEANS EQUALITY MINDLESS MELORD MATH ) YOU HAVE RIPPED APART THE BOTTOM OF THE JUDICIARY .. AUR PHAADNE KELIYE KUCH BACHCHA HI NAHIN “”.
   
   SORRY
   
   I HAVE NOT UNDERMINED THE PEOPLEs FAITH IN THE SYSTEM— I WAS A CAPTAIN FOR 30 YEARS , I KNOW THE MEANING OF RESPONSIBILITY.
   
   I HAVE JUST REVEALED 0.5%.
   
   AND THIS IS JUST TO SHOW THAT IF I DON’T REVEAL, NOBODY ELSE ON THE PLANET CAN DO IT TILL THE SUN GOES SUPERNOVA ..
   
   BUT HEY,
   
   EVEN A CLEAR THINKING 14 YEAR OLD TOPPER SCHOOL BOY CAN FIGURE OUT THESE THINGS .. THIS IS WHY THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION MUST BE PART OF THE NCERT SOCIAL STUDIES TEXT BOOK.
   
   IF I REVEAL 100%, PEOPLE WILL STOP GOING TO INDIAN COURTS..
   
   IT IS UPTO THE PM, LAW MINISTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, CJI AND OUR THINK TANKS TO RESURRECT OUR MOTH EATEN JUDICIARY..
   
   AND NOW THEY WANT TO INJECT SC/ ST AS JUDGES ..
   
   HEY, WHY NOT IN ISRO ?
   
   Capt ajit vadakayil
   ..

The 1992 Supreme Court ruling in the Indra Sawhney case said that reservations in job promotions are "unconstitutional"  ( AAH HA OUR JUDGES GOT SPONTANEOUS KNOWLEDGE ) but allowed its continuation for five years..

In 1995, the 77th amendment to the Constitution was made to amend Article 16 before the five-year period expired to continue with reservations for SC/STs in promotions.It was further modified through the 85th amendment to give the benefit of consequential seniority to SC/ST candidates promoted by reservation.

The 81st amendment was made to the Constitution to permit the government to treat the backlog of reserved vacancies as a separate and distinct group, to which the ceiling of 50 per cent did not apply. The 82nd amendment inserted a provision in Article 335 to enable states to give concessions to SC/ST candidates in promotion

The validity of all the above four amendments was challenged in the Supreme Court through various petitions clubbed together in M. Nagaraj & Others Vs. Union of India & Others, mainly on the ground that these altered the Basic Structure of the Constitution. 

In 2006, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments but stipulated that the concerned state will have to show, in each case, the existence of "compelling reasons" - which include "backwardness", "inadequacy of representation" and overall "administrative efficiency - before making provisions for reservation. The court further held that these provisions are merely enabling provisions. If a state government wishes to make provisions for reservation to SC/STs in the promotion, the state has to collect quantifiable data showing backwardness of the class and inadequacy of representation of that class.

A fixed percentage of India's government and public sector jobs are made exclusive for categories of people largely based on their caste or tribe. Then quietly this transgressed into promotions.. Horses left India and let the donkeys rule .

In 1995, the 77th amendment to the Constitution was made to amend Article 16 before the five-year period expired to continue with reservations for SC/STs in promotions.  It was further modified through the 85th amendment to give the benefit of consequential seniority to SC/ST candidates promoted by reservation..

The 81st amendment was made to the Constitution to permit the government to treat the backlog of reserved vacancies as a separate and distinct group, to which the ceiling of 50 per cent did not apply. The 82nd amendment inserted a provision in Article 335 to enable states to give concessions to SC/ST candidates in promotion.

In 2006, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments but stipulated that the concerned state will have to show, in each case, the existence of "compelling reasons" - which include "backwardness", "inadequacy of representation" and overall "administrative efficiency - before making provisions for reservation. The court further held that these provisions are merely enabling provisions. If a state government wishes to make provisions for reservation to SC/STs in the promotion, the state has to collect quantifiable data showing backwardness of the class and inadequacy of representation of that class..

In 2007, the Government of Uttar Pradesh introduced reservation in job promotions. However, citing the Supreme Court decision, the policy was ruled to be unconstitutional by the Allahabad High Court in 2011.The decision was challenged in the Supreme Court, which upheld it in 2012 by rejecting the government's argument because it failed to furnish sufficient valid data to justify the move to promote employees on a caste basis..

In India scholarships or student aid is available for—SCs, STs, BCs, OBCs, women, Muslims, and other minorities. Only about 0.57 % of scholarships or student aid in India is based on merit.

1. 
   Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 25, 2019 at 11:16 AM

   https://www.huffingtonpost.in/2018/09/25/pm-narendra-modi-nominated-for-nobel-peace-prize_a_23542005/
   
   MODIs JEWISH MASTER WILL SOON GIVE HIM A NOBEL PRIZE...
   
   ALREADY MODI IS "CHAMPION OF EARTH" FOR BUYING SOLAR PANELS, WIND TURBINES, LITHIUM CELL ELECTRIC CARS FROM HIS JEWISH MASTERS ( MOTHBALLING COAL )..
   MODI HAS BRAINWASHED INDIANS THAT SUN AND WIND IS FREEEEEEEEEEEEE..
   NOW JEWISH MEDICAL INSURANCE WILL INVADE INDIA , WITH MODIs HELP..
   
   NEVER MIND GANDHI SINGING "RAGHU PATI RAGHAVA RAJA RAM" --GANDHI WAS A KATHAWARI JAIN JEW.. GANDHI NEVER UTTERED "HEY RAM" BEFORE FALLING DEAD..
   
   NOW MODI WILL BE MADE CHAMPION OF THE COSMOS --FOR PUSHING BHARATMATA INTO THE KOSHER HEALTH INSURANCE MANDI..
   
   IN USA IS IT IMPOSSIBLE TO SEE A GOOD DOCTOR WITHOUT MEDICAL INSURANCE..
   
   A YOUNG INDIAN COUPLE ( WITH NO CHILDREN ) PAYS MORE THAN 145 USD MEDICAL INSURANCE PER MONTH..THIS IS MORE THAN TEN THOUSAND INDIAN RUPEES..
   
   PEOPLE WHO TAKE GOOD CARE OF THEIR HEALTH ARE FORCED TO PAY FOR DRUG ADDICTS, SEXUAL DEVIANTS AND PROCESSED FOOD CONSUMERS WHO ABUSE THEIR HEALTH.
   
   JEWS DONT WANT TO PAY FAALTHU INSURANCE LONG TERM .. IF YOU WILL BE SICK FOR TOO LONG JEWS WANT THEIR CHOSEN DOCTORS TO KILL YOU BY A HEAVENLY TERM NAMED EUTHANASIA TO MAKE PROFITS ..
   
   WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ALLOW HEALTH INSURANCE TO DECIDE WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO LIVE.... RIGHT TO HEAL ALSO INCLUDES RIGHT TO KILL ??..
   
   WHEN A MAN IS SICK , AND IS IN PAIN -- HIS MIND IS VULNERABLE.. GREEDY CHILDREN WILL KILL HIM OFF TO GRAB PROPERTY...
   
   IN INDIA DUE TO THE DEEP STATE INFLUENCE ( WITH COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY / BENAMI MEDIA IN CAHOOTS ) , FAMILY VALUES ARE EBBING..
   
   LAST TIME WHEN I AND MY WIFE TOOK A FLIGHT ( BOOKED ON INTERNET ) WITHOUT MY PERMISSION THEY DEDUCTED FLIGHT INSURANCE.. I WOULD NOT HAVE MINDED IF THE INSURANCE COMPANY WAS INDIAN.. BUT HEY, A GERMAN JEW INSURANCE COMPANY MADE THE MOOLAH..
   
   WE WATCH.. MODI WILL RUN AWAY TO ISRAEL WHEN HE LOSES THE 2019 ELECTIONS ?? WE SHALL SEE !..
   
   capt ajit vadakayil

A BIG PERCENTAGE OF OUR JUDGES ARE KAYASTHA !

1. 
   Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 25, 2019 at 11:43 AM

   https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/metoo-tanushree-dutta-curses-ganesh-acharya-nana-patekar-rakhi-sawant/articleshow/67680649.cms
   
   TANUSHREE DUTTA WAS UNLEASHED ON INDIA BY THE POPE..
   
   SHE IS A CHRISTIAN CONVERT AND LOSES NO TIME TO RIDICULE SANATANA DHARMA..
   
   AND MIND YOU , HER ANCESTORS WERE ROTHSCHILDs KAYASTA CLAN -- WHO CAN EAT BEEF AND REMAIN BRAHMINS..
   
   ROTHSCHILDs AGENT AND FREEMASON SWAMI VIVEKANANDA ( PIR ALI MUSLIM DATTA ) WHO PROPAGATED HEAVEN AND HELL WAS A KAYASTHA..
   
   BEFORE THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA , THERE WAS NO " MISSING LINK " KAYASTHA CLAN ...
   
   The FAKE Smriti of the fake and back dated creation of Jew Rothschild Yajnavalkya describes the Kayasthas as writers and scribes.. Most of them are traitor converted Muslims ( during Islamic rule ) who re-converted back to Hinduism ..
   
   IN KERALA THERE ARE NO KAYASTHAS OR CHITRAGUPTA TEMPLES.
   
   MANY KAYASTHA LEADERS WERE TRAITORS DURING ROTHSCHILDs RULE OF INDIA
   
   ROTHSCHILD GAVE THE BULLSHIT THAT CHITRAGUPTA ( PATRON DEITY OF KAYASTHAS ) DECIDES IF YOU MUST GO TO HEAVEN OF HELL..
   
   THERE IS NO HEAVEN OR HELL IN SANATANA DHARMA..
   
   THERE IS NO PEARLY GATES --NO PURGATORY-- NO DAY OF JUDGEMENT-- NO CHITRAGUPTA ( OF KAYASTHA SHIT ) .
   
   CHITRAGUPTA IS A CREATION OF JEW ROTHSCHILD.. ALL CHITRAGUPTA TEMPLES IN INDIA WERE BUILT BY JEW ROTHSCHILD..
   
   WE HAVE A CONCEPT OF REINCARNATION. IN SANATANA DHARMA IT IS NOT YOUR CURRENT BIRTH WHICH DECIDES YOUR FATE-- ALL THE EXTRA BAGGAGE OF YOUR PAST LIVES ADD UP..
   
   DURING MOGHUL RULE OPPORTUNISTS CONVERTED TO ISLAM.. MOST WERE LOW CASTE HINDU ACCOUNTANTS AND GIVEN HIGH POSTS WITH LAND AND PERKS...IN BENGAL THEY WERE CALLED PIR ALI MUSLIMS.
   
   AFTER MUGHAL EMPIRE WAS TAKEN OVER BY JEW ROTHSCHILD , THESE KAYASHTAS CONVERTED BACK TO HINDUISM..
   
   AND ROTHSCHILD MADE KAYASTHAS THE MISSING LINK-- BETWEEN BRAHMINS AND KSHATRIYAS. SINCE THESE OPPORTUNISTS WERE OF LOW MORAL FIBRE THEY WERE USED AS TRAITORS.
   
   100 YEARS AGO BENGALI KAYASTHAS ( ORIGINALLY PIR ALI MUSLIMS ) HELD 53% OF LAND IN BENGAL. 
   THEY WERE CALLED BHADRALOK ( ELITE GENTRY-- BOSE/ BASU/ GUHA/ GHOSH / MITRA/ DATTA etc)
   
   BENGAL HAS PRODUCED MORE TRAITORS THAN FREEDOM FIGHTERS.
   
   ROTHSCHILD USED HIS OPIUM FUNDED UNIVERSITIES LIKE UC BERKELEY, COLUMBIA , CAMBRIDGE ETC TO PROP UP THESE FAKE KAYASTHAS.. THEY WERE ALMOST LIKE THE KNIGHTED SIRs ..
   
   EXAMPLE OF TWO TRAITOR PIR ALIS ?
   
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/07/opium-raja-british-stooge-ram-mohan-roy.html
   
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/08/opium-drug-running-tagore-family-capt.html
   
   Some Kayastha surnames are : Srivastava, Gaur, Saxena, Mathur, Nigam , Bhatnagar, Asthana, Kulshreshtha etc
   
   In the FAKE Garud Purana, Chitragupta is hailed as the first man to give the script.“Chitragupta namastubhyam vedaksaradatre”(Obeisance to Chitragupta, the giver of letters)
   
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2015/09/garuda-vimana-of-vishnu-and-garuda.html
   
   HERE IS POISON INJECTED INTO RIG VEDA… this invocation to FAKE Chitragupta never existed .“Om tat purushaya vidmahe Chitragupta dhimahi tena lekha prachodayata.”
   
   WHO KNOWS VERY SOON WE WILL HAVE INVOCATION TO SHIRDI SAI BABA ( WHO DIED 100 YEARS AGO ) TOO IN THE RIG VEDA..THE WAY THINGS ARE GOING IN INDIA..
   
   CHECK OUT THE BULLSHIT OF DEVDUTT PATTANAIK--90% OF WHAT HE HS WRITTEN OR SPOKEN ARE FOUL LIES..
   
   https://www.mid-day.com/articles/devdutt-pattanaik-descendants-of-chitragupta/19083152
   
   Rothschild sent children of TRAITOR Kayasthas to England, they later became civil servants, tax officers, junior administrators, teachers, legal helpers and barristers. They rose to the highest positions accessible to natives in British India.
   
   NETAJI SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE WITH A HONEY POT GERMAN JEWESS WIFE WAS A KAYASTHA..
   
   ROTHSCHILDs AGENT AND FREEMASON SWAMI VIVEKANANDA ( PIR ALI MUSLIM DATTA ) WHO PROPAGATED HEAVEN AND HELL WAS A KAYASTHA..
   
   VIVEKANANDA NEVER UNDERSTOOD SANATANA DHARMA.. HINDUISM IS THE ONLY RELIGION WITHOUT HEAVEN/ HELL CONCEPT. THESE ARE BASICS..
   
   I HAVE READ THE WORKS OF VIVEKANDANDA—
   
   
   
   CONTINUED TO 2--
   1. Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 25, 2019 at 11:44 AM

      CONTINUED FROM 1--
      
      VIVEKANANDA SUPPORTED THE HEAVEN- HELL THEORY, PROPPED UP ALL FAKE DASAS/ RADHA / RAM KICKING PREGNANT SITA TO THE FOREST / 16000 GOPIKA LOVERS/ BHAKTI MOVEMENT/ ANIMAL SACRIFICE IN TEMPLES/ DEVADASI TEMPLE WHORES/ SATI/ AGHORIS / BIGOT MANU LIES/ KAMASUTRA SEX/ BRAHMACHARYA SEMEN/ ASHWAMEDHA HORSE SACRIFICE/ FAKE EMPEROR ASHOKA/ FAKE ROTHSCHILDs MUTTS/ ISLAMIC CONVERSION OF HINDU MONUMENTS LIKE QUTAB MINAR-TAJ MAHAL- BABRI MASJID ETC.
      
      VIVEKANANDA DID NOT KNOW THAT HINDU GODS ( EXCEPT VISHNU MORTAL AVATARS PARASHURAMA/ RAMA/ KRISHNA/ AYYAPPA ) ARE COSMIC ALLEGORIES .
      
      I want my readers to know that Vivekananda was part of the Brahmo Samaj which-
      
      Rejected the Vedas
      Rejected Vishnu avatars Krishna and Rama
      Rejected temple worship of Shiva, Vishnu and Devi
      Rejected Karma , re-birth and Moksha theory.
      
      The Brahmo Samaj was founded by two Opium drug running agents of Jew Rothschild— Dwaraknath Tagore and Raja Ram Mohan Roy—both Pir Ali Muslims . The theology of the Brahmo Samaj was called "neo-Vedanta" by Christian commentators.
      
      Rothschild’s agent Keshub Chandra Sen, a Christian convert controlled his nephew Vivekananda and had him enrolled in his Nava Vidhan ( Nobobidhan ).
      
      Keshab Chandra Sen and Vivekananda incorporated Christian theology within the framework of Hindu thought.
      
      Keshab Chandra Sen was Secretary to the Goodwill Fraternity, Masonic lodge associated with the Unitarian Rev.Charles Dall and a Christian missionary Rev. James Long .
      
      With them Sen establish a TRAITOR "British Indian Association" filled with Bhadaraloks , Pir Ali “brahmins” , white people and Anglo Indians ( RAPE PRODUCTS OF WHITE MAN AND THEIR MAID SERVANTS ) ..
      
      In 1866 Sen delivered an address on Jesus Christ, Europe and Asia, in which he proclaimed that "India would be for Christ alone who already stalks the land"
      
      Vivekananda was a member of a Freemasonry lodge in 1883.
      
      Rothschild published ( 1896 ) and propagated Vivekananda’s book Raja Yoga.
      
      Rothschild send Swami Vivekananda on his ship to represent Hinduism at the Parliament of Religions at Chicago on September 11th, 1893.
      
      For the next three years Vivekananda would be shown to several western doctors in USA , England and Europe to treat his terrible diseases—and all the while he lectured too.
      Rothschild gave Narendra his new name Swami Vivekananda just before he boarded his ship in May 1893.
      
      COMMIE AGNIVESH IS ALSO SWAMI.
      
      VIVEKANANDA IS GUILTY OF ALLOWING HINDUISM TO BE BRANDED AS FULL OF SUPERSTITION — WHEN THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO SUPERSTITION , OTHER THAN WHAT HIS MASTER ROTHSCHILD INJECTED- USING HIS FAKE CREATIONS AND FAKE MUTTS
      
      ROTHSCHILDs MEDIA PROPPED HIM UP
      
      VIVEKANANDA HAD VERY LITTLE PRANA WITHIN AND SUFFERED FROM 33 MAJOR ILLNESSES. SO BALLS TO HIS BULLSHIT BRAHMACHARYA / OJAS THEORY..
      
      ROTHSCHILD SEND HIS FREEMASON AGENT VIVEKANANDA TO CHICAGO.
      
      AS SOON AS HE SPOKE FIRST 3 WORDS ( BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF AMERICA ) A PAID AUDIENCE WAS KEPT TO CLAP LIKE THERE IS NO TOMORROW , AND ROTHSCHILDs MEDIA COVERED IT - -AND MADE ALL CURIOUS.
      
      ROTHSCHILD MAKE NIKOLA TESLA MEET VIVEKANANDA AT JEWESS SARAH BENDHARTS PARTY.
      
      VIVEKANANDA DID EXTENSIVE MEDICAL TESTS IN USA.
      
      VIVEKANANDA USED TO GIVE BULL TO ALL AND SUNDRY THAT HE PRESERVED HIS SEMEN FOR 12 YEARS --AND THAT IS WHY HE IS SO BRAINY AND HEALTHY
      
      HE WENT TO VIVEKANDA ROCK ( KANYA KUMARI ) NOT TO MEDITATE FOR WORLD PEACE--
      
      HE WAS SENT THERE BY KOTTAKKAL ARYA VAIDYA SALA IN KERALA TO INCREASE HIS PRANA BY TAKING IN NEGATIVE IONS ( SALT SEA SPRAY ) AT THE VIVEKANADA ROCK MIDSEA OFF RAMESHAWARAM.
      
      AN AYURVEDA DOCTOR FROM KOTTAKKAL ACCOMPANIED HIM-- TO SHOW HIM THE CORRECT WAY TO DO SURYA NAMASKAR FOR INCREASING PRANA
      
      Capt ajit vadakayil
      ..

1. DiyaJanuary 25, 2019 at 6:51 PM

   Hello Sir.
   Government has increased number of law colleges and seats in law colleges. But at ground level lawyers are main cause of fights, murders, family matters. In north india most of them earn money by instigating fights. Go to any village, people fight for a mere peace of land which makes no sense especially in up haryana and bihar where literacy level is low. People fight with their relatives. This is on the ground. Lawyers are causing tensions in society. They strike against judges who clear the cases fast. It is common. This is the main reason of increase in crime. Criminals have money to hire lawyers and poor public is left with nothing. Criminal lawyers are cause of increase in crime. The Civil lawyers along with land mafia are cause of land disputes. First they create dispute and then try to solve it.
   I am fed up seeing these lawyers involved in all illegal activities except doing land registaries, solving genuine cases and making certificates.
   
   Instead of promoting law as a subject, government should promote science and technology, sports, cultural music and dance, film making in every region.
   
   What are your views on this sir?
   1. 
      Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 25, 2019 at 6:56 PM

      DOWRY HARASSMENT CASES AND MARITAL ( LIVE IN ) RAPE CASES ARE 99.9 % COOKED UP BY LAWYERS ..

1. 
   Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 25, 2019 at 7:34 PM

   https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pathalgarhis-long-shadow-indias-tribal-heartland-wants-freedom-from-govt-control/articleshow/67673490.cms
   
   ALL THIS IS THE WORK OF FOREIGN PAYROLL CHRISTIAN MISSIONARIES , WITH THE ACTIVE SUPPORT OF ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDCIARY AND BENAMI MEDIA...
   
   OUR MAIN STREAM MEDIA IS COMPLETELY BENAMI..
   
   IN THE SABARIMALA EPISODE ALL MAIN STREAM MEDIA SUPPORTED ATHEIST COMMIE ANTI-HINDU THUG PINARAYI VIJAYAN ( EXCEPT JANAM TV )..
   
   WHY?
   
   ROTHSCHILD CREATED COMMUNISM..
   
   WE WILL NOT GIVE AWAY FORESTS TO TRIBALS , THE WAY KOSHER DEEP STATE AND THEIR PAYROLL COLLEGIUM JUDICARY WANTS..
   
   A BIG PERCENTAGE OF LAND WITH COMMIES ARE ALL GRABBED . ..MODI MUST PROFILE THESE ROGUES AND TAKE THEIR ILLGOTTEN LAND BACK….
   
   COMMUNISM IN INDIA WAS ALL ABOUT GRABBING LAND, AND BURNING GOVT LAND REGISTRY OFFICES… THEY KILLED THE REGISTRARS AND EVEN RETIRED REGISTRARS …
   
   ALMOST ALL LAND GRABBED BY NAXALS IN KERALA BELONGED TO TEMPLES - -AND TODAY WE HAVE LOST 95% OF PRICELESS AYURVEDIC HERBS .
   
   SOME OF THE COMMIE PROFESSORS OF JNU/ DU/ JU/ FTII/ TISS ARE IN FOREIGN PAYROLL… THESE PROFESSORS LIVE FAR BEYOND THEIR SALARIES...
   
   SOME WOMEN COMMIE PROFESSORS ( UGLY ONES ) GET SERVICED BY NAXAL STUDENTS AND SEPARATIST STUDENTS … MORALITY IS DEAD !
   
   TELENGANA NAXAL HISTORY WRITTEN BY JNU COMMIE PROFESSORS MUST BE REWRITTEN . . .
   
   TWO JNU STUDENTS BECAME PM OF NEPAL AND LIBYA --AFTER COUP AND MURDER OF NEPAL ROYAL FAMILY ( BABURAM BHATTARAI ) / GADDAFI ( ALI ZEIDAN ) .. .
   
   THE RED CORRIDOR IN INDIA IS CREATED BY COMMIE PROFESSOR DESH DROHI BRAINS FROM JNU WITH ACTIVE CONNIVANCE OF ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND BENAMI MEDIA . 
   TELGI STAMP PAPER SCAM WAS NOT ABOUT MAKING MONEY WITH STAMP PAPER--IT WAS ABOUT GRABBING LAND , MAKING FORGED LAND DEEDS AND INSERTING IT IN GOVT REGISTRY OFFICES….
   
   TOP COMMIE LEADERS MADE THEIR MONEY BY GRABBING LAND , DISTRIBUTING IT AMONG LANDLESS HIGH PROFILE , AND THEN TAKING BACK THE LAND LOW PROFILE..
   
   TELUGU POLITICIANS WANTED TO REGULARIZE GRABBED LAND ( LIKE ISRAEL ) USING BLOCKCHAIN-ULU ( OR IS IT UDU ?)..
   
   BHADRALOK FREEMASONS BENEFITED FROM THE COMMIE LAND GRAB -- THESE BEEF EATEERS BECAME RICH BENGALI LANDOWNING CLASSES ..
   
   MEAT EATING MAITHIL BRAHMINS AND CHITPAVAN BRAHMINS WERE MADE KINGS BY JEW ROTHSCHILD— SORRY, BRAHMINS CANNOT BECOME KINGS ..
   
   Example--- Maithil Brahmin Sir Lakshmeshwar Singh Bahadur, Maharaja of Darbhanga WAS AN Opium drug running partner of Rothschild… one of the founders of INC… Rothchild made Lakshmeshwar Singh Bahadur deputy chief of the Royal Commission on Opium of 1895… 
   
   Land was grabbed and granted FREE to Chitpavan Jews--and the best part was that they were exempted from ALL taxes by Rothschild…
   
   INDIA WILL MAP EVERY SQUARE METRE OF LAND USING SATELLITE MAPS.
   
   TODAY NAXALS IN RED CORRIDOR ARE ARMED AND LYING LOW AS SLEEPER CELLS . .

   SUBDIVISION AND FRAGMENTATION OF LAND IS INDIAs NO 1 PROBLEM AND CAUSE OF FARMERS SUICIDES .. YOU CANT CULTIVATE ON A SMALL PIECE OF LAND AND MAKE A PROFIT..

   
   ROTHSCHILD ENSLAVED INDIA BY THE RYOTWARI SYSTEM OF SIR THOMAS MUNRO , TO WHOM THE GHOST OF A FAKE ROTHSCHILD CREATED GOD GAVE FIRM INSTRUCTIONS , WITH NAIVE VILLAGERS GAPING IN AWE..
   
   CONTINUED TO 2-
   1. Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 25, 2019 at 7:35 PM

      CONTINUED FROM 1-
      
      WHEN I TELL ABOUT SUBDIVISION AND FRAGMENTATION OF LAND TO PMO ( MORE THAN 50 TIMES ), THE DESH DROHI BASTARDS REPLY THAT THE COMMENT IS "ILLEGIBLE"..
      
      Read all 11 parts of the post below..
      
      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/02/jnu-den-of-anti-nationals-and-communist.html
      
      read all eight parts of the post below.......
      
      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/08/communist-maoist-naxalite-movements-in.html
      
      NOTE: DO NOT KILL ANY NAXAL WHO HAS BEEN DEPRIVED OF CLEAN WATER TO DRINK ……
      
      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/09/bauxite-mining-naxalite-menace-joshua.html
      
      KERALA COMMUNISTS GRABBED MOST OF THE TEMPLE LANDS AND DISTRIBUTED IT AMONG LANDLESS COMMIE CADRE AND CHRISTIAN CONVERTS.. N DUE COURSE ALL THESE PIECEMEAL PLOTS OF LAND WERE BOUGHT BACK BY LAND SHARKS CONTROLLED BY THE POLITICIANS AND CHURCH.
      
      MODI ( GUJJU NO 2 ) ACCEPTED ONE CRORE DONATION FROM THE BIGGEST LANDGRABBER KP YOHANNAN..
      
      LAND WAS GRABBED BY THE BLESSINGS OF GUJJU NO 1 ( KATHIAWARI JAIN JEW GANDHI ) , BY WAY OF BHOODAN MOVEMENT..
      
      The CRIMINAL Bhoodan Movement of CHITPAVAN JEW Vinobha Bhave was to regularize these shady land grab – SUBDIVIDE FRAGMENT AND DISTRIBUTE — RECAPTURE AND MERGE ..
      
      The Bhoodan land created many landowning commie politicians who were all paupers before.
      
      We see GENDER DIVIDE in India today... Women are tempted to divorce so that they can grab the ancestral property of man....
      
      AGAIN--
      
      THE RED CORRIDOR WAS CREATED BY ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY..    I ASK -- IS IT BY CHANCE THAT THE RED CORRIDOR IS CONNECTED WITH NEPAL WHICH HAS CHANGED FROM A DEVOUT HINDU LAND TO A MAOIST ATHEIST LAND ?
      
      ARE THERE NO INTELLIGENT PEOPLE IN OUR AGENCIES ?
      
      HULLO AJIT DOVAL -- ANYBODY HOME ?
      
      capt ajit vadakayil ..

Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 25, 2019 at 7:51 PM

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-case-cji-reconstitutes-bench-includes-names-of-justice-bhushan-and-nazeer/articleshow/67690747.cms

THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY WILL VIEW THE AYODHYA CASE AS A LAND DISPUTE CASE -- OBJECTIVELY..

THE JUDGES ARE SUPPOSED TO VIEW THE CASE SUBJECTIVELY-- AS AYODHYA IS THE MECCA OF HINDUS..

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/11/babri-masjid-demolition-mughal-emperor.html

KOREA WANTS TO ADOPT AYODHYA..

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/07/korean-brahmins-kim-hae-clan-capt-ajit.html

THE DEEP STATE CONTROLS THE INDIAN COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY ..

capt ajit vadakayil
..

1. DiyaJanuary 25, 2019 at 7:05 PM

   Sir, there are 2.78 crore pending cases because of these lawyers and their setting with judges. Even if government forms IJS. Trend will continue because if cases are solved, what will lawyers do? It can increase even more what I think because more judges, more lawyers(no retirement age) and more cases. I have seen lawyers union striking against a lower court judge who was solving cases fast. Public was happy. Then judge was transferred and now lawyers are happy.
   1. 
      Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 25, 2019 at 8:00 PM

      TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ PAH TAREEQ SYSTEM IS SUSTAINED BY JUDGES TO PROVIDE MONEY TO THE JOBLESS LAWYERS ..

      
      

      ONCE UPON A TIME THESE JUDGES WERE LOSER UNEMPLOYED LAWYERS --WHO SURVIVED ON TAREEQ DATE FEES..

      
      WHEN CRYING BOLLYWOOD SUPERSTAR AAMIR KHAN PUT A DEFAMATION CASE ON CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL ( SATYAMEVA JAYATE TV SERIAL GOT SUNK--LOW TRP ) -- .....
      
      THE SYSTEM FORCES ME TO TRAVEL ALL THE WAY TO MUMBAI ( FLIGHT/ HOTEL STAY CHARGES FOR 2 DAYS ) OR PAY UP TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ FEES TO THE LAWYER ..
      
      .... EVERY 3 MONTHS THESE LAWYERS CHARGE FULL DAY APPEARANCE MONEY OF AVERAGE 10,000 RUPEES JUST TO GET THE NEXT TAREEQ. THIS CONTINUES FOR 30 YEARS ..
      
      TO GET THE NEXT TAREEQ THE LAWYER BRIBES A COURT CLERK AND HE GETS THE NEXT TAREEQ BY SMS.... SAB MIL BHAANTKE KHAATE HAIN . ...
      
      MORE THAN 45 % OF LAWYERS HAVE FAKE DEGREES ...
      
      https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/45-of-lawyers-fake-checking-is-on/articleshow/56724326.cms
      
      JUDGES DIE, LAWYERS DIE, THE GRANDSON IS LEFT HOLDING THE BABY... WHY CANT WE HAVE A TRANSPARENT WEBSITE?...
      
      PEOPLE WHO SUE ( EGO BASED ) FOR 100 CRORES FOR DEFAMATION -- MUST FIRST DEPOSIT 10% ( 10 CRORES ) OF THE MONEY ..... .
      
      IF THE EGO MANIAC LOSES THIS 10% MUST GO TO THE POOR HARASSED MAN WHO WAS SUED.... 90% OF THE MONEY MUST GO TO GOVT COFFERS......
      
      THE UPPITY EGO MASSAGE SEEKER FELLOW WHO LOST THE CASE MUST BE ARRESTED IN COURT AND TAKEN TO JAIL WITHOUT BAIL--TILL HE PAYS UP 90 CRORES ( 90% ) TO THE GOVT COFFERS..
      
      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..

BELOW:  AS GOSPEL- NO VIDEO RECORDINGS ARE ALLOWED IN COURT ..  BUT LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA MUST HAVE LIVE RECORDINGS –WHY ?

PUBLIC HAS A RIGHT TO KNOW HOW THE SABARIMALA CASE PLAYED OUT..

WE ASK MODI TO CREATE A LAW VIA PARLIAMENT ROUTE.. WE ARE IN THE DIGITAL AGE.

BALLS TO "THE MAJESTY OF COURT" —    PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN SHORT CHANGED KNOW THE COURT CAN BE WORSE THAN A SHIT HOUSE 

WE KNOW WHAT OUR COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY IS WORTH!     WE KNOW HOW MANY FOREIGN SPONSORED FOUL CUTS HAVE BEEN INFLICTED ON BHARATMATA IN COURT...

JUDGES HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO GLEAN CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE WHICH A BEGGAR CHILD OF 14 CAN EASILY DEDUCE..  MIND YOU THESE BELOW AVERAGE INTELLECT JUDGES HAVE THE POWER OVER LIFE AND DEATH..

JUDGES HAVE USED CONTEMPT OF COURT THREAT TO SILENCE TRUTH -- PUT FOG ON THEIR ABJECT INABILITY TO SPEED UP JUSTICE -- AND TO HIDE "JUDGE LAWYER NEXUS".. 

IN KERALA ATHEIST COMMIE PINARAYI VIJAYAN HAD MAGISTRATES/ JUDGES IN HIS POCKET , TO SLAP CHARGES ON INNOCENT PILGRIMS.. COMMIE CADRE IN PILGRIM GARB THREW STONES ON POLICE..

IF CCTV FAILS THEN THE TRIAL MUST BE RE-DONE..  THERE MUST BE TWO CCTVs.. WE ALL KNOW HOW THE LEELA HOTEL SANK THE CCTV VIDEOS OF SUNANDA PUSHKAR... WITHIN A HOUR I GOT NEWS ..  OWNER CAPT KRISHNAN NAIR IS A MALAYALI AND SO IS SHASHI THAROOR.

NOW WE HAVE A HARDCORE MUSLIM JUDGE NAZEER BEING PLANTED IN THE 5 MEMBER AYODHYA JUDGE BENCH.. 

WE WANT JUDGES LIKE CHANDRACHUD AND ROHINGTON NARIMAN TO BE PROFILED ON  CCTV CAMERAS.. BY THE PEOPLE.. 

CAN YOU IMAGINE USA HAVING A RESERVATION FOR BLACKS FOR JUDGE AND JURY?

IN INDIA LET US COMBINE THE BENCH SYSTEM WITH JURY SYSTEM—WHERE JURY CAN POINT OUT IF NATURAL JUSTICE ( DHARMA ) IS TRAMPLED OVER.. IN WHICH CASE THE JUDGE BENCH MUST BE CHANGED , TO SEE THE CASE AGAIN  WITH A FRESH PAIR OF EYES..

IF THE JUDGES AND JURY STILL CLASH, THE JURY MUST PREVAIL..

WE CANT HAVE A SITUATION WHEN AYODHYA BECOMES A MERE LAND DISPUTE OR 5900 YEARS  OF SABARIMALA CULTURE IS KICKED DOWN THE DRAIN BY ALIEN JUDGES LIKE PARSI ROHINGTON NARIMAN WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND HINDUISM  - FROM A IMMIGRANT CLAN WHICH HAS NEVER INTEGRATED WITH INDIAN SOCIETY AFTER SEVERAL CENTURIES..

LAWYERS MUST BE WARNED, THE DESIRE TO WIN AT ALL COSTS ( BY TELLING LIES OR QUOTING LOGICAL FALLACIES ) CANNOT BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH OR DELIVERING FAIR JUSTICE.  THIS IS WHY WE MUST HAVE VIDEO RECORDING OF ALL CASES.

BEFORE TRUTH CAN SET YOU FREE YOU MUST IDENTIFY LIES WHICH HOLD YOU HOSTAGE

A STUPID MIND CANNOT BE TRAINED TO GUARD AGAINST LOGICAL FALLACIES.. IT WILL BE EASIER TO TEACH A DONKEY TO SING

ANY LAWYER (CAUGHT BY VIDEO RECORDING ) USING LOGICAL FALLACIES TO OBFUSCATE AND FOOL THE JUDGE MUST BE DEBARRED AND DEFROCKED.. 

WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF THIS BULLSHIT, WHERE STUPID JUDGES BELIEVE THAT THE SLIMY ARGUMENT OF A LAWYER IS EVIDENCE , AS WHAT HAPPENED IN THE COMMANDED NANAVATI CASE.  ( AM I SUPPOSED TO MARRY EVERY WOMAN I FUCK?)

HAVE WE EVER HEARD A LAWYER STATING “ OBJECTION TO LOGICAL FALLACY MELORD “..? 

BHARATMATA IS BEING BLED CONTINUOUSLY JUST BECAUSE WE HAVE REAL TIME IDIOTS SITTING IN JUDGEMENT AND RUNNING THE JUDICIAL SHOW. .

GANDHI AND KING FOOLED THE PLANET WITH LOGICAL FALLACIES

Below: I write this post for our COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY--they are this stupid.

Spin has been and continues to be used to pull the wool over the eyes of the general public.

Below: Both Joseph Goebbels and his wife Magda were Jews 

The deceptive misinformation and misleading actions of spin-doctors (and their employers) are a major threat to democracy, justice and the economy the world over.

WARNING:

BELOW: SPOT THE CUNT CONTEST !

A SINGLE MAN LIKE PRANNOY JAMES ROY ( WITH AN IRISH MOTHER ) OR COMMIE SIDDHARTH VARADARAJAN IS MORE DANGEROUS FOR BHARATMATA,   THAN 10,000 TERRORISTS WITH GUNS.

NDTV KEEPS  RUNNING FOOTERS – IF U HAVE A PROBEM WITH OUR NEWS, GO AND COMPLAIN TO NBA.

SHUT DOWN THE DESH DROHI "NEWS BROADCASTERs ASSOCIATION " FOUNDED BY PRANNOY JAMES ROY ( WITH AN IRISH MOTHER )..

LET ME QUOTES SOME LOGICAL FALLACIES USED BY SLIMY LAWYERS ON STUPID BRAIN DEAD JUDGES..

######### PEDDLING HALF TRUTHS

A half-truth is a deceptive statement that includes some element of truth. People who want to deceive do not want their deception to be detected.

Beware of those who use the truth to deceive. When someone tells you something that is true, but leaves out important information that should be included, he can create a false impression.

It involves the use of various techniques to hide the deception and create an impression of truthfulness

The statement may have double meaning, with the intent  to deceive, evade, blame or misrepresent the truth.

ANDHERI RAAT MEIN DIYA USKI HAATH MEIN ! ( Dada Kondke stuff )

"I'm a really good driver. In the past thirty years, I have gotten only four speeding tickets"---- This statement is true, but irrelevant if the speaker started driving a week ago.

############ DUMBING IT DOWN

This technique involves denial  to side step answering pertinent questions..   It involves characterizing the issues as just "rumors" or dismissing the charges as old news and using these as excuses not to comment.. It is so goddamn easy to dumb down a stupid judge.

#########  CREATING A DIVERSION

Changing the subject may be as simple as ignoring the relevant question and changing the subject.. Sometimes shills are used to create this diversion .

DID ANYBODY HEAR AHUJA SAYING “ AM I SUPPOSED TO MARRY EVERY WOMAN I FUCK ?

############ HERE IS THE FUCKIN’ PROOF.

Below: In the movie MY COUSIN VINNY the female uses the same type of "confident manufactured proof" to make a CHOOT of the car expert , the judge and the jury --  and win the case..  She cerebrally raped everybody !

SUCH A BRILLIANT MOVIE CAN NEVER EVER BE MADE AGAIN !

Proofiness is lying with numbers or using incorrect logic deliberately to mislead.

Proofiness can involve: outright lying about numbers; quoting statistics out of context so that they mislead; distorting statistics; or using incorrect logic in order to mislead the audience.

############### FALSE LOGIC.

Logical thinking may be correct or incorrect.  When talking about incorrect logic in terms of spin, the intent and the consequences matter.  Incorrect inductive reasoning can also be used by a spin-doctor to create a misleading illusion of cause and effect.

Example of incorrect inductive (backward) reasoning:--

All of the swans we have seen in New Zealand are black

Therefore all swans in New Zealand are black.

#############  STRAW MAN  ARGUMENT

The Straw Man Argument technique involves ignoring the opponent's actual position. Instead, the spinner creates a "Straw Man" argument - and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of the opposition's position and attempts to make the opponent's stance appear ridiculous. Then the spinner attacks the distorted "Straw Man" argument the spinner has created, rather than the opponent's actual position. The objective of this technique is to distort the opponent's argument and hope the STUPID judge will not see that this has happened.

Straw man arguments often arise in public debates such as a (hypothetical) prohibition debate:--

A: We should relax the laws on beer.

B: No, any society with unrestricted access to intoxicants loses its work ethic and goes only for immediate gratification.

The original proposal was to relax laws on beer. Person B has misconstrued/misrepresented this proposal by responding to it as if it had been something like "(we should have...) unrestricted access to intoxicants". It is a logical fallacy because Person A never advocated allowing said unrestricted access to intoxicants.

############ HOW DARE YOU

This is a variation on the "Straw Man" gambit.  It involves avoiding key issues of an opponent's position and trying to link some side issue in the opponent's position so that it appears insulting to judge and jury.

This is often accompanied by wrongfully attacking the motives of the opponent, all the while waxing indignant. We see this happening every hour on pea brained debates conducted by pothole journalist Faye Sorpotel Dsouza or the cocaine snorting Demented Orangutan.

########## HIT AND RUN

In the case of Kachrawaal it is SPIT AND RUN.

The purpose of the tactic is not to acquire territory but to “hit” an opponent, causing damage and then “run” before they can retaliate— ( or drown out his reply )..

############# BELITTLING AND NAME CALLING

This is an evasive spin and propagandist technique whereby the spin-doctor side-steps their expected response in an argument or discussion by making a personal attack on their opponent instead of responding to the argument:

eg: "Well, he would say that, wouldn't he."

An expert in mud slinging is Hillary Clinton.

This includes belittling opponents by making sarcastic comments about them while avoiding the issues. We know of an Italian waitress who branded someone MAUTH KA SAUDAGAR , right?

############ APPEAL TO MISLEADING AUTHORITY

Argumentum ad verecundiam---  Using an authority as evidence in your argument when the authority is not really an authority on the facts relevant to the argument.  This is what happened in the movie My Cousin Vinny.

################### FEAR MONGERING

This is a propaganda technique that capitalizes on fear. Multiple forms of lies and deceptive techniques are used to spin fear-mongering stories.

ear is known to be the most powerful emotion as it’s the unknown that we fear.. With the Appeal to Fear - the spin-doctor usually also presents a solution  to cope with the fear he has induced. Lock him up !

########### JUMP INTO THE BANDWAGON

This is what the illegal collegium judiciary did to kick Bharatmata into the kosher adultery/ homosexuality mandi..  Join the crowd.

The bandwagon effect is a psychological phenomenon in which people do something primarily because other people are doing it, regardless of their own beliefs, which they may ignore or override.

Statistics are presented which are entirely made up.  

This type of spin also serves to reassure those already, or partially on the bandwagon - that staying aboard is the best course of action. As more people come to believe in something, others also "hop on the bandwagon" regardless of the underlying evidence.

HEY MELORDS-- HOW ABOUT INCEST, BESTIALITY AND NECROPHILIA ?

BATAO NAH ?

PLEAJJE !

SHALL WE PACK OUR ARMY WITH ANAL SEX RECEIVING GAYS ?   PAKISTAN WILL LOVE THEM !

Article 124 in The Constitution Of India 1949:---

124. Establishment and constitution of Supreme Court

(1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India constituting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other Judges

(2) Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty five years: Provided that in the case of appointment of a Judge other than the chief Justice, the chief Justice of India shall always be consulted:

(a) a Judge may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office;

(b) a Judge may be removed rom his office in the manner provided in clause ( 4 )

Article 217 in The Constitution Of India 1949:---

217. Appointment and conditions of the office of a Judge of a High Court

(1) Every Judge of a High Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, the Governor of the State, and, in the case of appointment of a Judge other than the chief Justice, the chief Justice of the High court, and shall hold office, in the case of an additional or acting Judge, as provided in Article 224, and in any other case, until he attains the age of sixty two years Provided that

(a) a Judge may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office;

(b) a Judge may be removed from his office by the President in the manner provided in clause ( 4 ) of Article 124 for the removal of a Judge of the Supreme Court;

(c) the office of a Judge shall be vacated by his being appointed by the President to be a Judge of the Supreme Court or by his being transferred by the President to any other High Court within the territory of India

(2) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judge of a High Court unless he is a citizen of India and

(a) has for at least ten years held a judicial office in the territory of India; or

(b) has for at least ten years been an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; Explanation For the purposes of this clause

(a) in computing the period during which a person has held judicial office in the territory of India, there shall be included any period, after he has held any judicial office, during which the person has been an Advocate of a High Court or has held the office of a member of a tribunal or any post, under the Union or a State, requiring special knowledge of law;

(aa) in computing the period during which a person has been an advocate of a High Court, there shall be included any period during which the person has held judicial office or the office of a member of a tribunal or any post, under the Union or a State, requiring special knowledge of law after he became an advocate;

(b) in computing the period during which a person has held judicial office in the territory of India or been an advocate of High Court, there shall be included any period before the commencement of this Constitution during which he has held judicial office in any area which was comprised before the fifteenth day of August, 1947 , within India as defined by the Government of India Act, 1935 , or has been an advocate of any High Court in any such area, as the case may be

(3) If any question arises as to the age of a Judge of a High Court, the question shall be decided by the President after consultation with the Chief Justice of India and the decision of the President shall be final

Nowhere in these two articles has the collegium system been mentioned. The Apex Court has devised its own method of appointment of judges over a period of time, decades after India’s independence

The Supreme Court of India's collegium system, which appoints judges to the nation's constitutional courts, has its genesis in, and continued basis resting on, three of its own ILLEGAL judgments which are collectively known as the Three Judges Cases..

Following are the three cases:

--S. P. Gupta v. Union of India - 1981 (also known as the Judges' Transfer case)

--Supreme Court Advocates-on Record Association vs Union of India - 1993

--In re Special Reference 1 of 1998

By a 7:2 majority, the court ILLEGALLY overruled the First Judges Case, holding that in the event of conflict between the President and the Chief Justice of India with regard to appointments of Judges, it was the Chief Justice of India whose opinion would not only have primacy, but would be determinative in the matter.

The Second Judges Case instead of restoring the balance of power between the judiciary and the executive, resulted in the Supreme Court ILLEGALLY  assuming for itself the upper hand in judicial appointments and ushered in the Collegium System

A nine-Judge bench of the Supreme Court ILLEGALLY delivered a unanimous opinion and evolved the Collegium System of appointment of Judges to include the Chief Justice and four of the most senior Judges, as against two, mentioned in the Second Judges Case (Collegium). This came to be popularly known as the Third Judges Case. 

The Supreme Court ILLEGALLY and categorically held that the expression “consultation with the Chief Justice of India” in Articles 217(1) and 222(1) of the Constitution requires consultation with a plurality of Judges in the formation of the opinion of the Chief Justice of India.

With the Third Judges Case perpetuating the last word on judicial appointments in the hands of the judiciary itself, JUDICIAL ADVENTURISM VIA FOREIGN FUNDED NGO PIL ROUTE began.

Over the course of the three cases, the court ILLEGALLY evolved the principle of judicial independence to mean that no other branch of the state - including the legislature and the executive - would have any say in the appointment of judges. The court then ILLEGALLY created the collegium system, which has been in use since the judgment in the Second Judges Case  was issued in 1993.  

There is no mention of the collegium either in the original Constitution of India or in successive amendments. 

Although the creation of the collegium system was viewed as ILLEGAL by legal scholars and jurists outside India her citizens, and notably, Parliament and the executive, have done little to replace it. 

The Third Judges Case of 1998  is not a case but an ILLEGAL opinion delivered by the Supreme Court of India responding to a question of law regarding the collegium system, raised by then President of India K. R. Narayanan, in July 1998 under his constitutional powers.

Further, in January 2013, the court ILLEGALLY dismissed as without locus standi, a public interest litigation filed by NGO Suraz India Trust that sought to challenge the collegium system of appointment.

In July 2013, Chief Justice of India P. Sathasivam ILLEGALLY spoke against any attempts to change the collegium system

On 5 September 2013, the Rajya Sabha passed The Constitution(120th Amendment) bill, 2013, that amends articles 124(2) and 217(1) of the Constitution of India, 1950 and establishes the Judicial Appointment Commission, on whose recommendation the President would appoint judges to the higher judiciary. The critical aspect about the new setup that the Government through the amendment seeks to achieve is the composition of the judicial appointment commission, the responsibility of which the amendment bill lays on the hands of the Parliament to regulate by way of Acts, rules, regulations etc. passed through the regular legislative process

National Judicial Appointments Commission established---

The Lok Sabha on 13 August 2014 and the Rajya Sabha on 14 August 2014 passed the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Bill, 2014 to scrap the collegium system of appointment of Judges. The President of India has given his assent to the National Judicial Appointments Commission Bill, 2014 on 31 December 2014, after which the bill has been renamed as the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014.

99th Amendment and NJAC Act quashed by Supreme court----

By a majority opinion of 4:1, on 16 October 2015, Supreme Court ILLEGALLY  struck down the constitutional amendment and the NJAC Act restoring the two-decade old collegium system of judges appointing judges in higher judiciary.Supreme Court declared that NJAC is interfering with the autonomy of the judiciary by the executive which amounts to tampering of the basic structure of the constitution where parliament is not empowered to change the basic structure

The Collegium system, which finds no mention in the Constitution and is a mechanism put in place by the SC itself, personifies the democratic deficit and kosher deep state interference that plagues the Indian judiciary.

The members of the Collegium, whilst signifying the  ILLEGAL independence of the judiciary, also exemplify the FOREIGN FUNDED cabal-like behind-the-door dealings of the judicial branch that lacks accountability and public scrutiny.

The lack of transparency has proven cases of nepotism and elevation of judges based on personal relationships and past favours instead of merit or seniority. 

Most of these favoured judges create laws to suit their foreign masters who pay them to play god --  with Law Minister and PM ( Jew darlings ) in cahoots .

Corruption is rampant in India's courts ever since the collegium sytem began .  The whole world knows this ..

According to Transparency International, judicial corruption in India is attributable to factors such as "delays in the disposal of cases, shortage of judges and complex procedures, all of which are exacerbated by a preponderance of new laws".

 Most disturbing is the fact that corruption has reached the highest judicial forum i.e. Supreme Court of India. Some notable cases include:--

In April 2017, A judicial Magistrate Debanjan Ghosh gave bail to an murder accused, and it is alleged that it is unusual unless huge money is involved.

In December 2009, legal activist and Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan stated in court, "out of the last 16 to 17 Chief Justices, half have been corrupt" In November 2010, former Law Minister, Shanti Bhushan echoed Prashant Bhushan's claim.

There have been allegations that judges with doubtful integrity were elevated within the higher judiciary and campaigns held for their impeachment.

In November 2011, a former Supreme Court Justice Ruma Pal slammed the higher judiciary for what she called the seven sins. She listed the sins as:

Turning a blind eye to the injudicious conduct of a colleague

Hypocrisy – the complete distortion of the norm of judicial independence

Secrecy – the fact that no aspect of judicial conduct including the appointment of judges to the High and Supreme Court is transparent

Plagiarism and prolixity – meaning that very often SC judges lift whole passages from earlier decisions by their predecessors and do not acknowledge this – and use long-winded, verbose language

Self Arrogance – wherein the higher judiciary has claimed crass superiority and independence to mask their own indiscipline and transgression of norms and procedures

Professional arrogance – whereby judges do not do their homework and arrive at decisions of grave importance ignoring precedent or judicial principle

Nepotism – wherein favours are sought and dispensed by some judges for gratification of varying manner.

In 2011, Soumitra Sen, former judge at the Calcutta High Court became the first judge in the India to be impeached by the Rajya Sabha for misappropriation of funds.

Former Chief Justice of Odisha Justice Quddusi was also involved in huge corruption.

1. 
   Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 26, 2019 at 7:13 PM

   DEEP STATE DARLING AND DROHI BHARAT RATNA IS AGAIN ON NDTV
   
   SINGING THE PRAISES OF "CONSTITUTIONAL PATRIOTISM ""... PRANAB MUKHERJEE INSISTS CONSTITUTION IS A HOLY DOCUMENT WHICH HOLDS INDIA TOGETHER LIKE GLUE.. TEE HEEEEEEEE ..
   
   TRULY SPOKEN LIKE A DESH DROHI
   
   HEY MIDGET PRANAB MUKHERJEE --HOW ABOUT PATRIOTISM TO THE WATAN, OUR MOTHER LAND..
   
   PATRIOTISM TO A BOOK ( MAOs RED BOOK )IS THE REASON BY INDIAN COMMIES SUPPORTED CHINA DURING THE 1962 WAR..
   
   PATRIOTISM TO A BOOK ( KORAN ) IS THE REASON WHY AN ISLAMIC TERRORIST TRIES TO DISMEMBER INDIA AND GIVE AWAY KASHMIR TO PAKISTAN..
   
   ALMOST EVERY DAY NDTV ( OWNED BY PRANNOY JAMES ROY WITH AN IRISH MOTHER ) RUNS FOOTERS THAT NAXALS ARE PATRIOTIC TO THE CONSTITUTION.. THIS IS SEDITIOUS PROPAGANDA AT ITS BEST..
   
   WE KNOW WHY JEW DARLING MODI GAVE BHARAT RATNA TO PRANAB MUKHERJEE ..THE WORST PRESIDENT OF INDIA..
   
   capt ajit vadakayil
   ..

1. 
   Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 26, 2019 at 6:35 PM

   https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/priyanka-gandhi-may-begin-political-innings-with-kumbh-holy-dip/articleshow/67701994.cms

   RAHUL BE WARNED --WE THE PEOPLE WONT ALLOW YOU TO DO BLASPHEMY TO MILK VOTES..

   
   PRIYANKA VADRA IS NOW A BUDDHIST.. BUDDHISTS DONT BELIEVE IN HOLY DIPS AT KUMBH MLELA..
   
   RAHUL GANDHI WITH FAKE DATTATREYA GOTRA MUST KNOW THIS TRUTH---- WE NEVER HEARD OF THE WORD DATTATREYA TILL THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA..
   
   JEW ROTHSCHILD COOKED UP DATTATREYA AS AN AVATAR OF SHIVA AND INJECTED IT INTO OUR ANCIENT SCRIPTURES...
   
   ONLY VISHNU HAS AVATARS ..NO OTHER GOD HAS AVATARS ..
   
   BOTH SHIVA AND VISHNU ARE COSMIC ALLEGORIES PERSONALIZED IN OUR PURANAS...
   
   Jew Rothschild ( who ruled India ) did foul propaganda that Guru Gobind Singh wrote Dasam Granth in which he says that Dattatreya is an incarnation of Rudra ( Shiva ).
   
   Jew Rothschild's agent WHITE SKINNED JEW Max Arthur Macauliffe wearing turban wrote the Guru Granth Sahib holy book and he packed it with DASA verses.
   
   WE NEVER HEARD OF ANY DASA OR THE BHAKTI MOVEMENT TILL THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA.. ALL INITIAL KHALISTANIS WERE CRYPTO JEWS WITH PALE EYES..
   
   Go0gle for DATTATREYA WIKIPEDIA ..
   
   Every single sentence is a foul LIE.
   
   All Dattatreya tempes were built by the FAKE mutts of Jew Rothschild..
   
   WHEN THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA THERE WERE ONLY 4 ORIGINAL MUTTS , EACH LEAD BY A KERALA NAMBOODIRI ( SINCE 2000 BC ) PROFICIENT IN VEDAS ON ORAL ROUTE..
   
   BY THE TIME THE WHITE INVADER LEFT INDIA, THERE WERE MORE THAN 1000 FAKE MUTTS ( LIKE UDIPI MUTT/ KANCHI MUTT/ GORAKHPUR MUTT ) LED BY AGENT PONTIFFS OF JEW ROTHSCHILD. THESE FALSE MUTTS HARASSED THE POOR HINDU AND MADE HIM SELF LOATHING..
   
   EVEN THE FOUR ORIGINAL MUTTS WERE LED CRYPTO JEWS WITH PALE EYES.. KERALA NAMBOODIRIS WERE THROWN OUT..
   
   Aghor tradition believes that Jagadguru Dattatreya propounded the tradition of Aghor.
   
   COSMIC ALLEGORY SHIVA IS CONVERTED TO BE A TRIBAL WHO ATE DEAD CORPSES , DUG OUT DEAD WOMEN TO HAVE SEX AND SEXUALLY SEDUCED THE WIVES OF THE SAPT RISHIS WHO WERE MEDITATING , BY EXPOSING HIS ERECT PR!CK ..
   
   THESE SEXUALLY EXPLICIT FRESCOS , WHERE HORNY SAPT RISHIS WIVES ARE STRIPPING IN EXTREME LUST WERE MADE ON HINDU TEMPLES IN TAMIL NADU BY THE FAKE KANCHI MUTT..
   
   I HAVE PUT PHOTOS IN THE POST BELOW--
   
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/09/aghoris-corpse-eaters-of-india-capt.html
   
   Shirdi Saibaba who died 100 years ago was a Muslim from Nizam’s Hyderabad state .. Jew Rothschild converted him to be an incarnation of Lord Dattatreya using his opium drug running Parsi agents and Chitpavan Jews nay Brahmins..
   
   There are several FAKE Muslim Sufis who are revered by their Hindu followers as incarnations of FAKE Dattatreya. Sufi saint Baba Budan (also called Guru Dattatreya), who is revered by both Muslims and Hindus..
   
   Guru Nanak went to Mecca, he was NOT killed, as he was CIRCUMCISED . When he died both Hindus and Muslims fought over his dead body. This story was created by Jew Rothschild..
   
   Sufi legend has it, that the slogan or elating cry for the Supreme Being Alakh means A-Lakhshana was first coined by Rishi Dattatreya..
   
   DATTATREYA ( OF AVADHUTA GITA ) IS A FAKE AND BACKDATED CREATION OF JEW ROTHSCHILD..
   
   THE "NATH " TRADITION WAS CREATED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD...
   
   WE NEVER HEARD OF NATH TRADITION OR MUTT TILL THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA..
   
   YOGI ADITYANATH IS THE CURRENT KING PIN OF "NATH " GORAKHPUR...
   
   IN SANATANA DHARMA RELIGION AND POLITICS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO MIX..
   
   NATH SCHOOL WAS CREATED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD SPECIFICALLY TO INDULGE IN POLITICS AND DIVIDE AND RULE..
   
   GITA PRESS PUBLISHED ALL FAKE POISON INJECTED SCRIPTURES OF HINDUISM . ..THEY PUBLISHED THE "HANUMAN CHALISA " FOR DEVADASI WHORES WHO GAVE FREE SEX TO WHITE BRITISH TROOPS..
   
   CONTINUED TO 2--
   1. Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 26, 2019 at 6:36 PM

      CONTINUED FROM 1--
      
      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/02/devadasi-system-immoral-lie-of-temple.html
      HANUMAN WAS JUST A MONKEY IN RAMAYANA.. THE FLAG ON KRISHNAs CHARIOT IN MAHABHARATA WAS DISPLAYED GARUDA THE VAHANA OF VISHNU --NOT MONKEY HANUMAN..
      
      WHEN THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA, THERE WAS NOT ONE SINGLE HANUMAN TEMPLE IN INDIA.. BY THE TIME HE LEFT THERE WERE 20 TIMES MORE HANUMAN TEMPLES THAN RAM TEMPLES..
      
      PRIYANKA MUST KNOW THIS-- WHEN THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA THERE WAS NOT ONE SINGLE BUDDHIST IN INDIA.. 
      
      ROTHSCHILD REVIVED BUDDHISM BY COOKING UP A FAKE ASHOKA WHO CONVERTED FROM BAAAAAD HINDUSIM TO GOOOOOD BUDDHISMM..
      
      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/08/chanakya-taxila-university-professor.html
      BUDDHA ATE PIG AND DID NOT BELIEVE IN SOUL AND HE WAS REJECTED BY INDIA..
      
      DATTATREYA IS ALSO TOUTED AS SON OF MAHARISHI ATRI ( ONE OF THE GOTRA SAPT RISHIS )BY JEW ROTHSCHILD.. A LOT OF CHITPAVAN JEWS NAY BRAHMINS ( LIKE TILAK/ GOKHALE / SAVARKAR ) WERE ASSIGNED WITH THE FAKE DATTATREYA GOTRA ..
      
      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/11/gotra-system-khap-rules-y-chromosome.html
      
      SAPT RISHI ATRI (MEGREZ OF GREAT BEAR CONSTELLATION ) AND HIS WIFE ANUSUYA ( ELECTRA OF SEVEN SISTERS CONSTELLATION ) ARE STARS ..THERE WERE IN QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT WITH INSTANT COMMUNICATIONS ..LEAVE ALONE FASTER THAN LIGHT..
      
      You will also get NONSENSE in Wikipedia like-
      
      “Goddesses Saraswati, Lakshmi and Parvati wanted to test the chastity of ANASUYA , who was reputed to be the epitome of chastity. So, they sent their husbands Brahma, Vishnu and Siva, who asked Anasuya to serve them food in her nude form” ( I wonder of she was allowed to wear her sanitary napkin ) .
      
      THE WIVES OF TRINITY ARE ALSO COSMIC ALLEGORIES ..
      
      WIFE OF SHIVA IN THE TERRIFYING KALI FORM IS THE MIGHTY BLACK HOLE WHICH CAN DEVOUR ENTIRE GALAXIES IN SECONDS..
      
      WIFE OF BRAHMA SARASWATI IS THE PRIMORDIAL LIGHT, THE QUASAR, HAVING THE BRILLIANCE OF A TRILLION SUNS..
      
      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2017/07/gayatri-mantra-savitr-savitur-saraswati.html
      Just go0gle BRAHMA INCEST and see how many LYING posts crop up..
      
      Both Brahma and Saraswati are cosmic allegories ..
      
      Like CONMAN Sri Sri Ravishankar ( CHILDLESS MODIs DARLING WITH A GIRLE VOICE ) tweeted " Shiva humped Vishnu anally and produced Ayyappa"
      
      https://twitter.com/srisri/status/410810667176697856?lang=en
      
      WE HAVE ANOTHER CONMAN SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV WHO CONVERTED SHIVA TO 15000 YEAR OLD ADI YOGI..
      
      AMISH TRIPATHI RAKED IN MILLIONS BY CONVERTING SHIVA TO A SEX STARTED TRIBAL ..
      
      Ayyappa is a mortal--ninth avatar of Vishnu . Both Shiva and Vishnu are cosmic allegories .. The KURMA avatar of Vishnu ( Samudra Manthan , Mohini and amrit ) took place several millenniums before AYYAPPA avatar of Vishnu ..
      
      https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/11/5900-year-old-sabarimala-this-planets.html
      
      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..
      
      

      
      
   2. Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 26, 2019 at 6:58 PM

      ENSURE THE COMMENT ABOVE REACHES SONIA/ RAHUL/ PRIYANKA AND VADRA..
      ALSO PUT IN WEBSITES OF ( COWARDS MUST KEEP AWAY FROM THIS WEBSITE -- I DONT NEED THEM HERE)
      
      PMO
      PM MODI
      AJIT DOVAL
      CBI
      IB
      RAW
      ED
      NCERT
      RAJNATH SINGH
      HOME MINISTRY
      CJI GOGOI
      ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
      ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
      ATTORNEY GENERAL
      PRESIDENT OF INDIA
      VP OF INDIA
      SPEAKER LOK SABHA
      SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
      EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA
      EVERY CENTRAL MINISTER / MINISTRY
      MLAs OF ALL STATES
      CMs OF ALL STATES
      GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
      DGPs OF ALL STATES
      SWAMY
      GURUMURTHY
      RAJIV MALHOTRA
      ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
      ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
      SOLI BABY
      FALI BABY
      SALVE BABY
      AMITABH KANT
      NITI AYOG
      RSS
      VHP
      AVBP
      VC OF JNU
      VC OF DU/ JU/ TISS
      DEAN OF FTII
      DEAN OF NALANDA UNIVERISTY
      SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
      SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV
      MATA AMRITANANDA MAYI
      AMISH TRIPATHI
      CHETAN BHAGAT
      DEVDUTT PATTANAIK
      SAGARIKA GHOSE
      RANA AYYUB
      
      EVERY KERALA MEDIA
      JANAM TV
      JOHN BRITTAS
      PC GEORGE
      ALL COLLECTORS OF KERALA
      ALL MPs AND MLAs OF KERALA
      DGP BEHERA
      RAMAN SRIVASTAVA
      SNDP
      VELLAPALLI NATESAN
      TUSHAR VELLAPALLY
      SRIDHARAN PILLAI
      SWAMI CHIDANANDA PURI
      SURESH GOPI
      PADMA PILLAI
      RAHUL EASHWAR
      NSS
      GOVERNOR OF KERALA P SATHASIVAM
      KERALA HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICE
      NHRC
      NCM
      NCW
      INDU MALHOTRA
      ROHINGTON NARIMAN
      KHANWILKAR
      CHANDRACHUD
      PRANNOY JAMES ROY
      AROON PURIE
      VINEET JAIN
      RAGHAV BAHL
      SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
      N RAM
      BARKHA DUTT
      SHEKHAR GUPTA
      MANI SHANKAR AIYERAN
      ROMILA THAPAR
      IRFAN HABIB
      SHASHI THAROOR
      PAVAN VARMA
      RAMACHANDRA GUHA
      RAM MADHAV
      STEPHEN KNAPP
      DAVID FRAWLEY
      KONREAED ELST
      WENDY DONIGER
      SHELDON POLLOCK
      KAANIYA MURTHY
      AUDREY TRUSCHKE
      CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWMI
      RAJDEEP SARDESAI
      NAVIKA KUMAR
      ZAKKA JACOB
      ANAND NARASIMHAN
      VIKRAM CHANDRA
      NIDHI RAZDAN
      BRINDA KARAT
      PRAKASH KARAT
      SITARAM YECHURY
      SUMEET CHOPRA
      DINESH VARSHNEY
      SWARA BHASKAR
      NIVEDITA MENON
      AYESHA KIDWAI
      DANIEL RAJA
      KARAN THAPAR
      SHOBHAA DE
      ARUNDHATI ROY
      ADMIRAL RAMDAS
      ARUN SHOURIE
      SUDHEENDRA KULKARNI
      ANAND PATHWARDHAN
      JOHN DAYAL
      KAVITA KRISHNAN
      KANCHA ILAIH
      LK ADVANI
      ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
      
      EVERY HINDU STALWART
      WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKT LEADERS
      SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA EVERY WHICH WAY

ALL YOU FOREIGN PAYROLL TRAITOR BASTARDS


WHO HAVE INFLICTED CUTS ON BHARATMATA


YOUR WATERLOO IS NEAR 


YOU HAVE BEEN PROFILED



A LAMP POST AND SHORT ROPE AWAITS !


ROTHSCHILDs AGENT KATHIAWARI JAIN JEW GANDHI IS THE CENTRAL THEME OF TODAYs REPUBLIC DAY PARADE..

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/04/fake-champaran-satyagraha-of-gandhi.html

IN SOUTH AFRICA THEY HAVE PULLED DOWN / VANDALISED ALL GANDHI STATUES 

https://qz.com/africa/1422937/malawi-protestors-dont-want-gandhi-statue-from-india/

GUJJU NO 2 IS VERY KEEN ON INSTALLING  GUJJU NO 1 s STATUES ALL OVER THE PLANET..   

MODIs JEWISH MASTERS WANT GANDHI AND KING TO BE TREATED AS GODS .. 

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/07/martin-luther-king-jr-had-125-white.html

THIS POST IS NOW CONTINUED TO PART 7 , BELOW

https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any_26.html

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..