Tuesday, January 15, 2019

JUSTICE BE DAMNED , ENFORCE THE LAW ! .. NOT ANY MORE, IN FREE INDIA !! part 2 – Capt Ajit Vadakayil


THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 1, BELOW--



Capt. Ajit Vadakayil
March 1, 2019 at 11:48 PM


SUBJECTIVE JUDGEMENT --WITH EYES WIDE OPEN-- WITHIN PERIMETER OF CONTEXT..

OUR STUPID COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND ALL THIS

Capt ajit vadakayil

..




  1. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/judging-under-stress-in-digital-era-sc-judge/articleshow/67934852.cms

    HULLO MELORD JUSTICE SIKRI-

    DONT GET DESPONDENT , WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER !!...

    LET ME EXPLAIN BASICS..

    ALL THE JUDICIARY IS ALLOWED TO DO AS PER THE CONSTITUTION IS TO INTERPRET THE LAWS WITHIN THE CONSTITUTION .. PERIOD !..

    STARE DECISIS IS NOT ALLOWED --WHERE PAST RULINGS OF STUPID JUDGES UNDER THE MINDLESS SYSTEM OF "JUSTICE IS BLIND SANS CONTEXT " IS ATTACHED AS AN ADDENDUM-- NAY-- LANGOT TO THE CONSTITUTION..

    NOW--

    TRY TO THINK IN AN INTELLIGENT MANNER..

    ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION LIES --

    1) WE THE PEOPLE
    2) THE WATAN
    3) DHARMA OR NATURAL JUSTICE..

    OUR JUDICIARY IS IN CONTEMPT OF--

    1) WE THE PEOPLE
    EXAMPLE: AAA-IF YOU HOLD A REFERENDUM ON ADULTERY 99.9% WILL REJECT IT.. IF PUT TO VOTE IN THE PARLIAMENT 90% ( LEAVE OUT FOREIGN PARYROLL MPs ) WILL REJECT IT..

    BBB- AT SABARIMALA , JUDGES TRAMPLED ON 5900 YEAR OLD CULTURE..

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/11/5900-year-old-sabarimala-this-planets.html

    2) THE WATAN..
    THE RED CORRIDOR WAS CREATED BY THE JUDICIARY IS 3 DECADES FLAT.. JUDGES DO NOT REALISE THAT THE CONSTITUTION IS ONLY TO PROTECT LAWFUL ABIDING DESH BHAKT CITIZENS -- NOT TO PROTECT DESH DROHIS ( INDIAN / FOREIGN ) HOLDING FOREIGN GUNS OR THE FOREIGN FUNDED THINKERS WHO CONTROL THEM..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/09/bauxite-mining-naxalite-menace-joshua.html

    3) DHARMA OR NATURAL JUSTICE--
    JUDGES MUST NOT ENFORCE THE LAW AT THE EXPENSE OF JUSTICE ( FAIRNESS )..JUSTICE CAN NEVER BE BLIND SANS CONTEXT .. JUSTICE MUST BE SUBJECTIVE NOT OBJECTIVE.. JEW ROTHSCHILD WHO RULED INDIA WANTED ONLY OBJECTIVE JUSTICE AS HE WAS RULING OVER SLAVES..

    IT WAS JEW ROTHSCHILD WHO CREATED THE LEGEND THAT LADY JUSTICE IS BLIND..

    THIS WAS TO SHOW THAT THE CROWN PRINCE AND A OLD DYING LEPER ON THE STREET WILL GET SAME IMPARTIAL JUSTICE..

    IN DUE COURSE THIS FINE CONCEPT WAS HIJACKED IN A CUNNING MANNER TO A FOUL “ CRIME IS CRIME.. WE THE MASTERS OF SLAVE INDIANS DON’T CARE WHY THEY DID A CRIME ”— MIND YOU, IT COULD BE FOR SHEER SURVIVAL OR TO BREAK CHAINS OF ABJECT SLAVERY ..


    FINALLY--

    4) JUDGES ARE IN CONTEMPT OF THE CONSTITUTION ITSELF ...

    COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY IS NOT ALLOWED BY THE CONSTITUTION.. JUDGES CANNOT MAKE AND BREAK LAWS FOR THE WHOLE NATION VIA PIL ROUTE , FILED BY FOREIGN PAYROLL DESH DROHIS..

    PEOPLE HAVE WOKEN UP.. EVEN A 12 YEAR OLD CLASS TOPPER SCHOOL BOY CAN DOWNLOAD THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION AND INTERPRET IT ( APPLYING BODMAS ) BETTER THAN ANY JUDGE IN INDIA.. WE WANT THE CONSTITUTION TO BE PART OF THE SCHOOL SYLLABUS..

    WE THE PEOPLE WANT THE DEEP STATE CONTROLLED OPAQUE JUDICIAL SYSTEM TO BE BROKEN DOWN AND BUILT FROM SCRATCH..

    READ ALL 8 PARTS OF THE UNFINISHED BLOG SERIES BELOW ( ONLY 32% COMPLETE )..

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any.html

    REMEMBER IT IS PENNED BY A RESPONSIBLE SHIP CAPTAIN WHO COMMANDED SHIPS FOR 30 YEARS ..

    THIS DESH BHAKT AND INTELLIGENT CAPTAIN ( YOURS TRULY ) HAS NO INTENTIONS OF WRITING SOMETHING IN THE BALANCE UNWRITTEN 68% WHICH WILL PERMANENTLY ERODE THE TRUST OF THE PEOPLE IN OUR JUDICIARY AND OUR CONSTITUTION..

    WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER...

    WE ASK THE JUDICIARY NOT TO DESTROY INDIA.. BE LOYAL TO THE WATAN.. THE RED CORRIDOR HAS DONE ENOUGH DAMAGE TO BHARATMATA..

    BHARATMATA ( WHO WAS IN CHAIN FOR 800 YEARS ) IS NOW FREE AND IS RACING TO BE THIS PLANETs NO 1 SUPERPOWER IN 15 YEARS FLAT...THE WHITE JEW OF THE DEEP STATE WILL NEVER ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN .. AND HE IS USING THE JUDICIARY AS A TOOL..

    HOMOSEXUALITY / ADULTERY LOVING FAYE DSOUZA KEEPS REPEATING " YOU FIRST " ( NAXALS/ TRAITORS ) --WHEN IT SHOULD BE " OUR WATAN FIRST "..

    WHY DOES A BLOGGER HAVE TO TELL ALL THIS ? ..

    WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ALLOW "CONSTITUTIONAL PATRIOTISM " ( MAOs RED BOOK TYPE ) WHICH CAUSED INDIAN COMMIE TO SUPPORT CHINA IN THE 1962 WAR .. WE WILL ALLOW ONLY "PATRIOTISM TO THE WATAN"..

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..
    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF—
      JUSTICE SIKRI
      CJI GOGOI
      ATTORNEY GENERAL
      ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
      ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
      LAW MINISTER
      LAW MINISTRY
      ROHINGTON NARIMAN
      CHANDRACHUD
      ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
      ALL HIGH COURT JUDGES
      LAW MINISTER PRASAD
      LAW MINISTRY
      SWAMY
      ANURAG THAKUR
      GURUMURTHY
      RAJIV MALHOTRA
      AJIT DOVAL
      NIA
      CBI
      IB
      RAW
      ED
      RAJNATH SINGH
      HOME MINISTRY
      AMIT SHAH
      ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
      ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
      RSS
      VHP
      AVBP
      RAM MADHAV
      NCM
      NHRC
      NCW
      SPEAKER LOK SABHA
      SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
      CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
      DGPs OF ALL STATES
      GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
      PRESIDENT OF INDIA
      VP OF INDIA
      SPEAKER LOK SABHA
      SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
      EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA
      EVERY CENTRAL MINISTER / MINISTRY
      RAJEEV CHANDRASHEKHAR
      MOHANDAS PAI
      SOLI BABY
      SALVE BABY
      FALI BABY
      KATJU
      CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWMI
      RAJDEEP SARDESAI
      NAVIKA KUMAR
      ZAKKA JACOB
      ANAND NARASIMHAN
      VIKRAM CHANDRA
      NIDHI RAZDAN
      PRANNOY JAMES ROY
      AROON PURIE
      VINEET JAIN
      RAGHAV BAHL
      SHASHI THAROOR
      CHETAN BHAGAT
      DAVID FRAWLEY
      STEPHEN KNAPP
      KONRAED ELST
      WALLIAM DARYLMPLE
      WENDY DONIGER
      SHELDON POLLOCK
      KAANIYA MURTHY
      SUDHA MURTHY
      KIRON KHER
      MEENAKSHI LEKHI
      SMRITI IRANI
      ARUN SHOURIE
      SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
      SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV
      BABA RAMDEV
      MATA AMRITANANDA MAYI
      I&B DEPT
      COL RATHORE
      NCERT
      EDUCATION MINISTER
      EDUCATION MINISTRY
      RAHUL GANDHI
      SONIA GANDHI
      PRIYANKA GANDHI
      JOHN BRITTAS
      SHOBHAA DE
      ARUNDHATI ROY
      SURESH GOPI
      MOHANLAL
      RAM MADHAV
      DILIP CHERIAN
      SWAMYs VIRAAT SENA
      RAJ THACKREY
      UDDHAV THACKREY
      PC GEORGE
      JANAM TV
      ALL COLLECTORS OF KERALA
      ALL MPs AND MLAs OF KERALA
      VC OF JNU
      VC OF DU/ JU/ TISS
      DEAN OF FTII
      BARKHA DUTT
      SHEKHAR GUPTA
      SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
      N RAM
      MANI SHANKAR AIYERAN
      ROMILA THAPAR
      IRFAN HABIB
      NIVEDITA MENON
      AYESHA KIDWAI
      PAVAN VARMA
      RAMACHANDRA GUHA
      RAM MADHAV
      DANIEL RAJA
      BRINDA KARAT
      PRAKASH KARAT
      SITARAM YECHURY
      SUMEET CHOPRA
      DINESH VARSHNEY
      ANNA VETTIKAD
      SUDHEENDRA KULKARNI
      KANCHA ILAIH
      JOHN DAYAL
      KAVITA KRISHNAN
      TEESTA SETALVAD
      SWARA TRRR BHASKAR ( OR IS IT PRRRR ? )
      RANA AYYUB
      SNEHLA RASHID
      PAGALIKA GHOSE
      NITI AYOG
      AMITABH KANT
      GEN GD BAKSHI
      SAMBIT PATRA
      RSN SINGH
      IRA BHASKAR
      ADMIRAL LN RAMDAS
      KAVITA RAMDAS
      LALITA RAMDAS
      NAYANTARA SEHGAL
      DILEEP PADGOANKAR
      VIR SANGHVI
      PRASOON JOSHI
      LEELA SAMSON
      PRITISH NANDI
      ASHISH NANDI

      WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKT LEADERS
      SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA EVERY WHICH WAY



JUST CHECK OUT THIS RIDICULOUS NONSENSE ..

ONLY PHOTOS OF PRESIDENT , PRIME MINISTER AND CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA CAN BE PUT ON GOVT ADVERTISEMENTS

JUST WHO THE HELL IS CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA ?   

IS HE PART OF THE ELECTED GOVT ?


AT THE BEST CJI CAN ONLY RULE THE ILLEGAL PATLI GALLI CALLED "PIL LANE " 

KAUN SA KHET KA BEET ROOT HAI YEH CJI !

WHAT ABOUT VP AND GOVERNORS OF STATE WHO HAVE ENORMOUS SUBJECTIVE POWERS    ?

WHAT THE  FUCK ?

WHO HAS AUTHORIZED THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA TO CLAIM  “APUN BHI AWWAL ?”

IS  THIS UNACCOUNTABLE COLLEGIUM JUDGE  SOME RULER OF INDIA APPOINTED BY GOD ?    

A MELORD  WHO ONLY HAS THE POWERS ONLY TO INTERPRET LAWS WANT TO BE RULER OF INDIA?


THIS IS THE HEIGHT OF JUDICIAL OVER FUCKIN’ REACH ..

WHY WAS THE CJI NOT PUNISHED FOR THIS SELF PROMOSSANN  (  WITH THE BLESSINGS OF THE DEEP STATE  AND BENAMI MEDIA ?)


THIS COURT BENCH WAS HEADED BYGOGOI, AS HE KNEW THAT HE IS LINE TO BE CJI..



BURN ALL LAWS CREATED BY ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM SUPREME COURT VIA PIL ROUTE

BURN ALL PAST JUDGEMENTS OF ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY WHICH  IS BEING MINDLESSLY USED AS A LANGOT TO THE CONSTITUTION VIA STARE DECISIS.

  1. https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any.html

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any_15.html

    TOO MUCH DECEIT HAS BEEN INTRODUCED INTO OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM..

    WE MUST SET IT RIGHT ! WE THE PEOPLE PLEDGE TO DO IT !!

    WE HAVE A STUPID LAW MINISTER PRASAD , WHO HAS SAT OUT HIS ENTIRE TENURE.. HE IS GOOD ONLY FOR GIVING HIS BOSS MODI AN EGO MASSAGE..

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
    LAW MINISTER PRASAD
    LAW MINISTRY
    LAW NINISTERS OF ALL STATES
    LAW MINISTRIES OF ALL STATES
    CBI
    IB
    NIA
    RAW
    ED
    MANEKA GANDHI
    ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
    ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
    NCW MAIN
    NCW STATES
    NHRC
    NCM
    CJI GOGOI
    ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
    ALL SUPRME COURT LAWYERS
    ATTORNEY GENERAL
    INDU MALHOTRA
    KHANWILKAR
    CHANDRACHUD
    ROHINGTON NARIMAN
    HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES OF ALL STATES
    RAM JETHMALANI
    KATJU
    AMITABH KANT
    NITI AYOG
    RSS
    VHP
    AVBP
    AMIT SHAH
    PMO
    PM MODI
    AJIT DOVAL
    RAJNATH SINGH
    HOME MINISTRY
    PRESIDENT OF INDIA
    VP OF INDIA
    SPEAKER LOK SABHA
    SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
    EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA
    EVERY CENTRAL MINISTER / MINISTRY
    MLAs OF ALL STATES
    CMs OF ALL STATES
    GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
    DGPs OF ALL STATES
    SWAMY
    GURUMURTHY
    SOLI BABY
    SALVE BABY
    FALI BABY
    RAJ KAMAL JHA
    PRANNOY JAMES ROY
    AROON PURIE
    VINEET JAIN
    RAGHAV BAHL
    SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
    N RAM
    SHASHI THAROOR
    CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWMI
    RAJDEEP SARDESAI
    BARKHA DUTT
    NAVIKA KUMAR
    ZAKKA JACOB
    ANAND NARASIMHAN
    FAYE DSOUZA
    NIDHI RAZDAN
    SHEKHAR GUPTA
    RAMCHANDRA GUHA
    MEENAKSHI LEKHI
    KIRON KHER
    SMRITI IRANI
    SONIA GANDHI
    RAHUL GANDHI
    BRINDA KARAT
    PRAKASH KARAT
    SITARAM YECHURY
    SUMEET CHOPRA
    DINESH VARSHNEY
    SWARA BHASKAR
    KAVITA KRISHNAN
    TEESTA SETALVAD
    SWARA BHASKAR
    ROMILA THAPAR
    IRFAN HABIB
    SHOBHAA DE
    ARUNDHATI ROY
    MANI SHANGARAN AIYERAN
    ANNA MM VETTIKAD
    KANCHA ILAIH
    JOHN DAYAL
    CHETAN BHAGAT
    SANJAY HEGDE

    WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKTS
    SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA

History teaches that the independence of the judiciary is jeopardised when courts become embroiled in the passions of the day instigated by PILs and the need to PLAY TO THE GALLERY.

Ex- CJI Markandey Katju has said “  Indian judiciary is perhaps the most empowered and activist judiciary in the world. It can strike down legislation. It can strike down governmental policies and indeed it is not unknown for it to mandate new policies or prescribe policies through judge made law.”

PIL HAS BEEN CREATED BY THE “COLLEGIUM “ JUDGES FOR THEMSELVES WITH ULTERIOR MOTIVE.

In exercise of PIL the COLLEGIUM judiciary will  entertain petitions from any desh drohi activist,  TROJAN HORSE FOIREIGN FUNDED NGO or vested individual like Prashant Bhushan ( a laywer who wants to give Kashmir to Pakistan ) --

----- espousing any public cause and in such cases courts do not insist on locus standi or procedural compliances and do not consider it to be an adversarial litigation (which is otherwise the norm in India).

Hence PIL has become a catch all jurisdiction where the COLLEGIUM judiciary blatantly transgressed into NO GO areas , where they are NOT equipped to get into.

BY DOING THIS COURT CASES HAVE BEEN DELAYED— TAKES MORE THAN 30 YEARS TO GIVE JUSTICE TO A COMMON MAN—

--WHAT WITH  ALL JUDGES BEING HAJAAAAR  BUSY WITH PIL —  SOME AT THE EXPENSE OF THE WATAN / BHARATMATA

PIL have made the Judiciary operate at the PERSONAL WHIMS AND FANCIES of a Judge , bases on his ego or taste.

There has been no consistency – all this is fraught with extreme danger is the judge is SOLD OUT to foreign desh drohi forces.

There are no clear guidelines as to when the court would or would not interfere and the extent of intervention.

Many times the executive ( childless Modi ) threw any distasteful task ( sensitive matters of CULTURE/ FAITH like Sabarimala )  into the lap of the Judiciary. .  Rothschild darling Modi sat in the shadows while Melords kicked Bharatmata into the kosher adultery/ homosexuality mandi..

DESH DROHI ZIONIST JEWS HAVE USED THEIR OWN TROJAN HORSE NGOs TO FILE PIL - --AND USE THEIR PET JUDGES IN GETTING FAVOURABLE JUDGEMENTS..

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM WAS STARTED BY US JUDGES IN ROTHSCHILDs PAYROLL. US JUDGES WHO ARE AGENTS OF THE KOSHER DEEP STATE HAS NO SUCH EXTREME POWERS , THAT THEY CAN DEFY THE ELECTED PRESIDENT OVER THINGS LIKE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION...

Judicial activism refers to a "philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy, among other factors, to guide their decisions”..

… and the trouble with defining Judicial Activism?
• Inconsistency
• Imprecision
• Lack of specificity
• There are thousands of law journal articles on judicial activism –  thousands of articles per year
• Courts,  Sociologists, Historians, Political scientists debate it on an ongoing basis--- 

--throwing all in FOG --

--  so that BIG BROTHER can milk the system...

 The Public interest litigation means any litigation conducted for the benefit of public or for removal of some public grievance...

ALL THIS IS OK, IF DESH DROHI FOREIGNERS DO NOT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR SYSTEM TO BLEED THE WATAN...

It all started with fundamental rights—now it has been reduced to even whoring for Mumbai gangsters via CHAMIYA BARS..

DO PEOPLE WHO SLEEP ON STREETS CARE FOR CHAMIYA BEER BARS ?


WE CALL THIS JUDICIAL ADVENTURISM..

The Indian constitution is the supreme law of the land. No organ should go beyond the role as assigned to it by the constitution.   The judges shall enforce a law but should not create a law and seek to enforce it--

--  by threats of--

 CONTEMPT OF COURT INCARCERATION

Distribution of food grains to persons below poverty line was monitored, which even made the PM remind the court that it was interfering with the complex food distribution policies of the government.

so MELORDS are the only KIND guys, right ?

The errors of the lower courts can be corrected by the higher courts, but there is none above the Supreme Court to correct its errors and vested judgements with ULTERIOR MOTIVES.

LET ME REMIND ALL AGAIN—

BEFORE 1947 ALMOST ALL THE JUDGES WERE IN THE PAYROLL OF JEW ROTHSCHILD..

HEY MELORDS- WHY DID YOU SIT ON YOUR HANDS, WHEN THE ITALIAN WAITRESS BECAME EMPRESS VIA NAC ?  

BATAAO NAH ?

The fundamental rights of MALE GENDER ( NCW ), the fundamental rights of Hindus ( NCM ) the fundamental rights of high caste Hindus ( NAC ) were trampled on by the Italian waitress.


DOES NOT OUR CONSTITUTION ALLOW EQUAL RIGHTS TO ALL INDIAS, WHETHER THEY ARE MALES,  HINDUS OR HIGH CASTES ?

With the COLLEGIUM system , WE THE PEOPLE have lost trust in the Judiciary

Remember, the greatest asset and the strongest weapon in the armoury of the judiciary is the confidence it commands and the faith it inspires in the minds of the people in its capacity to do even handed justice and keep ;the scales in balance in any dispute.

NO JUDGE CAN EVER SCUTTLE NATURAL JUSTICE TO THE WATAN !   

"WE THE PEOPLE" WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION WILL NOT ALLOW IT !

BE VERY VERY CAREFUL WITH THE SEDITION GOING ON IN JNU-  MELORDS !!.

WHY DO MIDDLE AGED JNU STUDENTS DO TRIPLE PHD , ON SUBJECTS WHERE THERE IS NO REMUNERATIVE JOB SCOPE ?... WHAT IS 33 YEAR OLD KANHAIYA KUMARs "AFRICAN STUDIES" ALL ABOUT ?.

THEY USE JNU FOR SCHOLARSHIP MONEY, LODGING, FOOD AND SEX.. THEY DONT ATTEND CLASS AS ATTENDANCE IS NOT COMPULSORY.. THEY WORK AS WAITERS AND AUTO DRIVERS ..

MODI MUST CLAMP DOWN ON DESH DROHI BENAMI MEDIA WHO ARE IN CAHOOTS WITH THE TRAITOR JUDGES ...

COLLEGIUM judges have been using EXTRAVAGENT RHETORIC while pronouncing  judgments—playing to the gallery or for posterity .

MIND YOU, PAS JUDGEMENT ARE BEING USED AS A LANGOT TO THE CONSTITUTION VIA STARE DECISIS..

All this comes at an expense to the watan.  

Decisions that exhibit an extralegal rhetoric are activist.  Decisions that pronounce views on issues beyond the  specific question of the case are highly activist.

We do NOT expect the COLLEGIUM judges to quote US laws in India, as we have our own laws.  Do not tell Muslims to eat pork or menstruating women to enter Sabarimala sanctum..

We had judges stating that LIVING TOGETHER and ANAL SEX is a normal thing .

Below is EXTREME JUDICIAL ADVENTURISM , as it is NOT Indian culture for couples to stay together without marriage


WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ALLOW COLLEGIUM JUDGES TO INJECT WESTERN DEBAUCHERY AND DECADENCE INTO INDIAN CULTURE.

American Constitutional doctrine has NO place within Indian Law.   We are NOT Americans

While announcing that LIVE IN RELATIONSHIP IS ACCEPTABLE  or  MENTRUATING WOMEN MUST ENTER HINDUS TEMPLES,  the COLLEGIUM JUDGES have ingnored the will of WE the people oreven vox populi...

Why does COLLEGIUM JUDGES feel the need to accept a PIL from a Muslim lawyer about Hindu temples? Is he some aggrieved soul ?..

THINKING is the hardest thing on this planet, right ? 

People get impressed with rustic Kanhaiya Kumar type faalthu AAJJJADDI type crass rhetoric with NIL substance or class.

I ASK THE LAW MINISTER AND ATTORNEY GENERAL TO CREATE A SET OF CORE VALUES FOR THE STUPID COLLEGIUM JUDGES .

FIRST OF ALL OUR CONSTITUTION DOES NOT ALLOW A COLLEGIUM JUDICIAL SYSTEM , WITH PIL FACILITY – BECAUSE OUR WATAN WILL AGAIN GO BACK TO SLAVERY..

Every now and then Benami TV ( like NTV ) shows us a footer that they are following NBA guidelines and if you have any fuckin’ problem complain to NBA.

Who the hell cares for a private body created by Benami media with ulterior motive?

JOURNALISM FIRST and WATAN INDIA LAST ?

Patriotism is the FIRST refuge of a scoundrel ? ( tweeted by Rajdeep Sardesia –his gift to our brave Jawans )

Immoral thieves form a private body NATIONAL THIEVES ASSOCIATION and then they do propaganda that they follow NTA guidelines ?

If you have any fuckin’ complains against thieves go and complain to NTA ?

APPIDIYAAA ?

The idea of converting Commie Professors controlled Universities into SAFE dens is a conspiracy from abroad.

This is why there is NO attendance  requirement.

ISLAMIC MILITANTS WITH GUNS HAVE STAYED IN JNU HOSTELS FOR MONTHS TOGETHER.  ONE WAS A BATLA HOUSE TERRORIST WITH NIL ATTENDANCE.

When Vice-Chancellor, Abhijit Chakrabarti called the police into Jadavpur University to weed of SEXUAL criminal assault to women student, the DESH DROHI Commie professors ( controlled from abroad ) took this as a golden opportunity to do rabble rousing.

False rumours were spread in Commie newspapers that female students were molested by male police officers.

This is quintessential female cader Naxal modus operandi— cry sexual assault –after shoving stones into the anus and vagina.

RAPE propaganda of Indians being rapists has always been carried out by foreign forces .

Estimates of participants in the JU rally fluctuate between 30000 and over 100000 people AS PER Wikipedia .

Shows this rally was arranged by Commie forces outside campus.   Even commie film stars were roped in.

The gullible public and police were convinced that all Commie strongholds like FTII Pune , JNU Delhi are like foreign embassies with COMMIE IMMUNITY.

Foreign forces like Rotshchild media, Noam Chomsky, Nobel peace/ literature prize winners put pressure on the PM to release Prof Binayak Sen / GN Saibaba of JNU who were creating a Naxal blueprint .

Remember a Naxal foot soldier holding a gun is just a pawn , the THINKERS can tear India apart.

Today the RED CORRDOR is infested with Naxals holding guns. Lakhs of Naxals ( not thousands as per Benami media propaganda ) hold superior guns like ISIS and are lying low as sleeper cells.

The Indian govt is on reactive mode , when they should be in proactive mode.

A soon as a Naxal women is caught by our Jawans , the NCW will come screaming like outraged virgins.

If our jawans nab a THINKER like Binayak Sen, immediately Kerala Syrian Jewess nay Christian Arundhati Roy comes rushing in.

And her propaganda is done on NDTV run by her uncle Prannoy Roy with an Irish mother.

Judicial activism when overtly exercised results in undermining -nay- usurping the powers of the ELECTED  executive or the legislature, which are the two MOST important organs of governance.

It has been consistently laid down by the Supreme Court of India that there cannot be a  writ of mandamus from any court directing the Legislature to legislate on a given  subject.

The power to legislate is squarely conferred on the ELECTED legislature by the Constitution..

No such legislative power is given to the UNELECTED COLLEGIUM courts by the Indian Constitution.

PREVIOUSLY THE BENAMI MEDIA SAND THE PRAISES OF ALL JUDICIAL ADVENTURISM , ON BEHALF OF KOSHER BIG BROTHER AND BILDERBERG CLUB.

TIMES HAVE CHANGED— AND HOW !

TODAY THIS BLOGSITE ALONE CAN PHAADO THE  BHUNNDD  ( READ AS ROTTEN ASS ) OF THE ENTIRE BENAMI INDIAN MAINSTREAM MEDIA COMBINE.


857 million is the PROFILE VIEW..    

Modi, Amitabh Bachchan , the mighty Khans are all less than ten million..

Judicial Activism cannot be used for filling up the lacunae in Legislation or for providing rights or creating liabilities not provided by the Legislation.

ALMOST ALL “CANDLE LIGHT MARCHES “ IN INDIA ARE TRIGGERED AND FUNDED BY FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs SOME OWNED BY BENAMI MEDIA BARONS..

Activism, like beauty, is often in the eye of the beholder. 9 from my perspective can be 6 from yours.
From 1979, the judiciary led by the Supreme Court in India became relevant to the nation in a manner not contemplated by the makers of the Constitution and became an active participant in the dispenser of social justice.

We would NOT have a problem with this , but for the fact that FALSE WITNESSES ARE PRODUCED OUT OF THIN AIR by foreign funds –

-- like how Teesta Setalvad has done again and again using FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs to bring down Modi. 

The COLLEGIUM JUDGES call this OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE..

WHITHER JUSTICE WHEN FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs CAN PRODUCE DOZENS OF FALSE LYING WITNESS OUT OF THIN AIR ?  

WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE ?

What started off with ENSURING FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE POOR AND OPPRESSED has now metamorphosed to “public cause litigation” in courts.

 In this type of litigation, the court’s intervention is not sought for correcting the actions or omissions of the ELECTED executive or public officials or departments of government or public bodies.

Why should the COLLEGIUM JUDGES be interested in INTERLINKING INDIAN RIVERS or OPENING CHAMIYA BAR WHOREHOUSES in Mumbai, against the wishes of WE THE PEOPLE ?

The JUDICIAL ADVENTURISM has reached ridiculous proportions against VOX POPULI –but hey- it may impress JEW Noam Chomsky !

n its most ADVENTURIST  and RIDICULOUS interpretation of the Constitution, the Supreme Court took away the constitutionally conferred power of the  President of India to appoint judges after consultation with the Chief Justice, and appropriated this power in the Chief Justice of India and a collegium of four judges.  

In no Constitution in the world is the power to select and appoint judges conferred on the judges themselves.

WHAT A CRYING SHAME !!

OUR BENAMI MEDIA IN CAHOOTS WITH THE JUDICIARY KEEPS TOM TOMMING THAT PRESIDENT OF INDIA, IS JUST A RUBBER STAMP..

SORRY THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA HAS BEEN VESTED WITH ENORMOUS SUBJECTIVE DISCRETIONARY POWERS..WHICH INCLUDES THE POWER OF VETO WITHOUT ASSIGNING REASONS..

Obviously under pressure from external forces , The Supreme Court has made an order even in a military operation which involved the SECURITY OF THE WATAN.

The Court issued orders on the conduct of military operations in Hazratbal, Kashmir where the military had as a matter of strategy restricted the food supplies to DESH DROHI hostages.

The Court ordered that the provision of food of 1,200 calorific value should be supplied to hostages.

Commenting on this, an Army General wrote: “For the first time in history, a Court of Law was asked to pronounce judgment on the conduct of an ongoing military operation. Its verdict materially affected the course of operation.”

The Indian constitution does NOT allow the above !

MELORDS -- SHOULD OUR ARMY SPIN THE CHARKHA , TOO AND SING "RAGHUPATI RAAGHAVA RAJARAM"  TOO FOR GOOD MEASURE ?

Here is an example of how COLLEGIUM judiciary micro-managed the proceedings of Legislatures. In the Jharkhand Legislative Assembly case, the Supreme Court ordered the Assembly to conduct a Motion of Confidence and ordered the Speaker to conduct proceedings according to a prescribed agenda and not to entertain any other business.

Its proceedings were ordered to be recorded for reporting to the Court.

These orders were made in spite of Article 212 of the Constitution which states that Courts are not to inquire into any proceedings of the legislature.

The COLLEGIUM judiciary set aside the expert opinion of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to sell 2G spectrum without auction to create greater teledensity in India.

WHY DO WE HAVE SO MANY FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs?

WELL THEY HIJACK THE JUDICIARY AND PIL , WITH OR WITHOUT THE “COLLEGIUM JUDGES “ KNOWING OF THEIR ULTERIOR MOTIVES

These NGOs make full vested use of the Supreme Court and the 21 High Courts to BLEED Bharatmata with KOSHER PIL..

In as much as today ordinary citizens have been kicked off the true democratic road  -- the primary responsibility of citizens themselves in a representative self government of making ELECTED legislators and the executive responsible for their actions.

THE VALUE OF A CITIZENS VOTE IS NOW NULL AND VOID !

The LAME and RIDICULOUS  answer often given by the judiciary to this type of ADVENTURISM  is that it is compelled to take upon this task as the other branches of government have failed in their obligations.

WELL MELORDS , YOUR CASES ARE PENDING FOR 30 - 40 YEARS IN COURT—

JUDGES DIE OF OLD AGE , 

LAWYERS DIE ,

-THE GRANDSON SON OF THE CITIZEN HAS TO PAY A LAWYER 5000- 10000 BUCKS EVERY 4 MONTHS TO BE EXEMPT FROM  A COURT APPEARANCE  - FAR AWAY HOME

THE HARASSED  CITIZEN HAS TO SELL HIS LAND, HIS WIFEs MANGALSUTRA AND MORTGAGE HIS HOME !

THE MELORD JUDGES ARE RIDING HARD ON THE HONORABLE  PIL HIGHWAY -TILTING AT FRESH WINDMILLS !

SAB MIL  BHAANTKE KHAATE HEIN !

Courts have also no method to reverse their orders if they are found technically unworkable or requiring modification due to paucity of funds .

While meddling with Delhi airpollution – how many COLLEGIUM  judges heard of  TEMPERATURE INVERSION which causes smog ?

India has 33.4  lakh NGOs, more than double the number of schools..

Among the states, Uttar Pradesh tops the list with more than 5.48 lakh NGOs, followed by Maharashtra which has 5.18 lakh NGOs. Kerala comes third with 3.7 lakh NGOs, followed by West Bengal with 2.34 lakh NGOs. 

Of the 82,250 NGOs in the Union Territories, Delhi alone has more than 76,000 NGOs. In Kerala, none of the 3.7 lakh NGOs ( mostly desh drohi Christian/ Islamic )  have filed details since the state law does not mandate it.



On 8th April 2007, the PM of India Manmohan Singh, sick and tired of the ACTIVIST JUDICIARY himself told in no uncertain terms

“ PILs cannot become vehicles for settling political or other scores. We need standards and benchmarks for screening PILs so that only genuine PILs with a justifiable cause of action based on judicially manageable are taken up”

http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/pm-tells-judiciary-not-to-overreach-itself-107040901090_1.html

GUJJU NO2 MODI HAS BEEN USING THE JUDICIARY FROM THE SHADOWS—SO THAT HE CAN WRANGLE A NOEL PRIZE FROM HIS JEWISH MASTERS.

When the LAKSHMAN REKHA is breached--

-- a situation may arise where a COLLEGIUM JUDGE orders the police to arrest someone - 

--and will be met with a retort GO TO HELL MELORD  ! 

We are reaching that TIPPING POINT now -- 

The Constitution, has  clearly drawn the Lakshman Rekha .

 Articles 122 and 212 preclude the courts from sitting in judgment over the internal proceedings of the legislature. Article 105 (2) and 194(2) protect the legislators from interference of the Courts with regards to his/her freedom of speech and freedom to vote.

It is clear to the President and PM that Judicial ADVENTURISM is too vicious to be ignored .
COLLEGIUM judges are cocking a snook at the constitution just because they can ( supported by desh drohi main stream media) , not because they are right, legal or just.

The whole of India knows UNELECTED  judges availing so many powers and refusing to heed the intentions of the elected representatives is undemocratic   - especially when JUDGES ELECT THEMSELVES ( chosen by white Jews )!

We all agree and support the clause in the constitution which allows appropriate judicial intervention –but definitely not judicial ADVENTURISM.

WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA DO NOT WANT ANY INDIAN SERVING JUDGE TO BE A MEMBER OF FREEMASON  LODGE !

BEFORE 1947 ALMOST ALL TOP INDIAN JUDGES WERE MEMBERS OF THE FREEMASON LODGE .

YOU MUST KNOW THAT THE FRENCH REVOLUTION WAS TRIGGERED BY JEWS OF ROTHSCHILD CONTROLLED FREEMASON LODGES IN FRANCE




ALL INDIAN DRUG RUNNERS OF ROTHSCHILD WERE FREEMASONS


ALL OPIUM DRUG RUNNERS OF USA WERE FREEMASONS  – TODAY THEIR DESCENDANTS RULE USA, AS PART OF THE SWAMP.


KANHAIYA KUMAR IS SHOUTING AAJJAADDI ( AZADI )

WHAT IS MORE IMPORTANT IS AZADI FOR BHARATMATA FROM THE DESH DROHI BENAMI MEDIA.

CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA KG BALAKRISHNAN IS A CHRISTIAN-   ALL IN KERALA KNOW IT.

HOWEVER HE CAME IN VIA THE HINDU SC/ST QUOTA

Let us listen to him—HE IS GOD !

QUOTE :  Holding that there was no limit to judicial review, Supreme Court Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan has ruled out the question of having any compulsory annual declaration of wealth and assets by judges of the apex court and high courts . No self-respecting judge would accept the idea of such compulsory declaration or have any committee of lay persons to probe the conduct of the judiciary, Justice Balakrishnan maintained in an interview to a private TV channel UNQUOTE

To another question whether there should be compulsory annual declaration of their wealth and assets by judges, the CJI remarked, "No self-respecting persons will accept it."


If the court starts doing a job not supposed to be his,  then other than the problem of lack of technical expertise, it leaves the aggrieved party with no forum to ventilate his grievances.  

This aspect has always been ignored by the COLLEGIUM judiciary.

This is plain commonsense even to a child.

PAKISTAN IS IN SUCH A TERRIBLE STATE , BECAUSE THEIR CRYPTO JEW JUDGES ARE CONTROLLED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD AND BILDERBERG CLUB.. THE PAKISTANI JUDICIARY SACKED THE PM FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT.

IF JUDCIARY DOES NOT FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION AS PER THEIR SWEARING IN OATH, THE CONSTITUTION PROVIDES THAT “COLLEGIUM “ JUDGES CAN BE INCARCERATED BY THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE.


WE DO NOT WANT ANY MORE PRIME MINSTERS VIA THE RAJYA SABHA BACK DOOR LIKE JEW ROTHSHILDs STOOGE MANMOHAN SINGH.

WHY DO LAWYERS REFUSE TO BECOME JUDGES..( UNLESS YOU ARE A BLUE EYED STAR KID LIKE CHANDRACHUD )

BECAUSE THERE IS LOT OF MONEY IN THE LAWYERs JOB BY TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ PAH TAREEQ


WHEN THE CRYING BOLLYWOOD SUPERSTAR PUT A DEFAMATION CASE ON CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL ( SATYAMEVA JAYATE TV SERIAL GOT SUNK--LOW TRP ) -- .....THE SYSTEM FORCES ME TO TRAVEL ALL THE WAY TO MUMBAI TO GET THE NEXT DATE , OR PAY UP TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ FEES TO THE LAWYER ....

JUDGES WHO WERE LOSER LAWYERS BEFORE- ALLOW CURRENT LOSER LAWYERS TO MAKE MONEY BY TAREEQ PAH TAREEQ PAH TAREEEQ....

EVERY 3 MONTHS THESE LAWYERS CHARGE FULL DAY APPREARANCE MONEY OF AVERAGE 10,000 RUPEES JUST TO GET THE NEXT TAREEQ.

THIS CONTINUES FOR 40 YEARS .. ..

TO GET THE NEXT TAREEQ THE LAWYER BRIBES A COURT CLERK AND HE GETS THE NEXT TAREEQ BY SMS....

SAB MIL BHAANTKE KHAATE HAIN . ...

 MORE THAN 40% OF LAWYERS HAVE FAKE DEGREES ....

JUDGES DIE, LAWYERS DIE, THE GRANDSON IS LEFT HOLDING THE BABY... WHY CANT WE HAVE A TRANSPARENT WEBSITE?

CRORES OF CASES ARE PENDING..


SC GIVE PRIORITY FOR DESH DROHIS AND PILs..

PRASHANT BHUSHAN GETS TO FILE MAXIMUM PILs..

PRASHANT BHUSHAN WANTS AZADI FOR KASMHIR AND INDIA TO TAKE IN ALL ROHINGYA IMMIGRANTS.



PRASHANT BHUSHAN HAS NEVER CARED FOR KASHMIRI PANDIT REFUGEES WHO WERE ETHNICALLY CLEANSED AND THEIR TEMPLES DESTROYED.


SUPREME COURT WORKS ONLY FOR 192 DAYS IN A YEAR.. EVEN SMALL SCHOOL CHILDREN HAVE LESSR VACATIONS.


THE BRITISH  JUDGES WERE CALLED BACK TO ENGLAND BY SHIP DURING VACATIONS ( BEFORE 1947 ) TO GET TRAINING ON HOW TO SCREW THE SLAVE INDIANS ..


Today PIL (Public Interest Litigation ) have ( Personal Interest Litigation ) by some foreign funded NGOs who are TROJAN horses. There are PILs against road widening –where vehicles are driven in first gear..

What we see today is most unfortunate.

Our President is a rubber stamp and CJI is playing god.

This blogsite may condone Judicial activism by NJAC judges. But definitely not COLLEGIUM judges.

When the ELECTED EXECUTIVE complained about judicial overreach , here is the reply from Justice T S Thakur “You call this judicial overreach, we can only say, sorry, it may continue for a long time.”

BEFORE 1947, JEW ROTHSCHILD CONVERTED ALL "TRUTH SPEECH" TO "HATE SPEECH"

USING HIS "COLLEGIUM " JUDAS JUDGES HE SUED THE BROKEN BLEEDING NOSE FOR HURTING THE SPIKED FIST.

The Judicial System at lower levels has become extremely corrupt. Ask any old retired BABU for information about a judge when he was a lawyer , and you will be shocked.  These retired  babus have a ear to the ground.

The COLLEGIUM Judges  rejected Kerala's proposal for construction of a new dam on Periyar, which has been turned down by Tamil Nadu. "The offer made by Kerala cannot be thrust upon Tamil Nadu," the bench said.


ULTA CHOR KOTWAAL KOH DHANTE –

“You are overreaching the judiciary,”  COLLEGIUM  Supreme Court told counsel for Kerala during the hearing of Mullaperiar. 

AIYYOOOOOO !

Justice Lodha remarked “You are overreaching the judiciary.”


Judges must know their limits and must not try to run the Government. They must have modesty and humility, and not behave like Emperors. There is broad separation of powers under the Constitution and each organ of the State i.e. the legislature, the executive and the judiciary must have respect for the others and not encroach into each other’s domain..

Judicial activism is not backed by the Constitution

Melords, COLLEGIUM judiciary striking down NJAC act, is it activism or over each?

When Judicial Activism is extrapolated and is found to be constricting executive action and initiative, it is known as Judicial overreach. When the judiciary steps over the line of the powers given to it, in the name of judicial activism, it becomes judicial overreach

Judicial Activism, refers to use of judicial powers to analyze  and enforce what judiciary thinks is right unilaterally .

Judicial activism has led to fake PILs filed to gain FAALTHU publicity.  Mostly young lawyers to get some recognition and jumpstart their sinking career..  

Judicial activism is appropriate ONLY when it is in the domain of legitimate judicial review. It should neither be judicial adhocism or judicial tyranny

MELORDS get HAJAAAAR miffed if someone were to file a PIL demanding to know what his case is still ending after 30 years. 

Judges must decide which PIL outlaw they will ride after and at what time , right?

EXAMPLE : JUDICIAL ADVENTURISM,   CHANGE ALL CARES TO CNG.


There is a very thin line between judicial activism and judicial overreach, as when the activism crosses its limit and starts becoming judicial adventurism it takes the form of Judicial overreach.
Judicial overreach destroys the spirit of the constitution as the democracy stands on the separation of powers between the organs.

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IS THE PLACE YOU CAN SEE A STATUE OF BR AMBEDKAR – MENTORED BY JEW ROTHSCHILDs AGENT COMMIE JEW JOHN DEWEY..

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SUPPORTS AND NURTURES EVERY INDIAN JUDAS


Judiciary does not understand that Article 13 of the Constitution does not give any protection to traitors to the WATAN or Naxals who hold a foreign gun on Bharatmata’s head..   They don’t seem to understand subsection 4.

LAWMAKERS HAVE MASSIVE POWERS UNDER ARTICLE 368 OF THE CONSTITUTION.
Article 13 in The Constitution Of India 1949
13. Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights
(1) All laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void
(2) The State shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void
(3) In this article, unless the context otherwise requires law includes any Ordinance, order, bye law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usages having in the territory of India the force of law; laws in force includes laws passed or made by Legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas
(4) Nothing in this article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368 Right of Equality

Treason is the gravest crime known to society and by the law of every country traitors are liable to the severest punishment. It is a crime directed against the very existence of the State itself and is therefore peculiarly odious and can never be forgiven. Treason is the crime of betraying the WATAN  ..
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IS THE PLACE YOU CAN SEE A STATUE OF BR AMBEDKAR – MENTORED BY JEW ROTHSCHILDs AGENT COMMIE JEW JOHN DEWEY..

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SUPPORTS AND NURTURES EVERY INDIAN JUDAS


I have seen lawyers walking backwards in lower courts , so that the MELORD judge does not see his posterior ( like old emperors –JAHANPAHAHs )

Why have the COLLEGIUM  judges NOT yet enforced equality before law as per our constitution ?   

Today FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs have wedged Indians apart even by gender—leave alone caste and religion

Our constitution is above all institutions in our priceless democracy (except vox populi)- hence   its spirit should not be tampered .

Judicial Activism, refers to use of judicial powers to analyze  and enforce what judiciary thinks is right unilaterally .

We do NOT understand why judges deem these PILs TOP URGENT of the RUSH RUSH RUSH category.

THE SKY WOULD FALL IMMINENTLY ON OUR COLLECTIVE HEADS , RIGHT ?

We ask—

Why could our Melords NOT prevent Mayawati from installing her UGLY self statues?

While she was a teenager Mayawati did NOT have proper chappals to wear.  Do you know her worth today?
..
In future, we the people of India want every PIL to be totally TRANSPARENT with a website running for every court. 

There must be a comment column where ordinary citizens can give TECHNICAL INPUTS –as the COLLEGIUM  Judges are NOT technically wired inside their brains.

The PIL is a DARK  box as of today.

Unless you are a court insider, you cannot keep track of what PILs are pending ( for which a bribe must be forth coming )  and unless you are a party to a case, you cannot even obtain a copy of the filings in the matter.

Even if a  interested desh bhakt man wants to listen in person to arguments in a PIL, they could not necessarily sit in the courtroom because they are not officially a party to the case.

Besides, given frequent adjournments and scheduling changes, all but the most committed members of the public are effectively barred from listening to arguments in open court. 

DESH DROHI FOREIGN FUNDED TROJAN HORSE NGOs do not want any transparency—as most of the PILs are controlled from abroad by BIG BROTHERs agents.

PIL is in PUBLIC interest right?

Or does P stand for PRIVATE desh drohis ?

If the WATAN is irreversibly damaged  because the elected executive followed MELORDS orders to interlink all  Indian rivers , who shall be ACCOUNTABLE?

Can we put that MELORD in jail? ---or maybe the CJI?

BATAAO NAH ?

MELORDS DO NOT SEEM TO KNOW THAT WATER CANNOT FLOW UPHILL.

As a ship captain I remain accountable for every order or duty I  delegate—as I cannot abdicate my responsibilities.  The buck stopped on the Captain's table always.

So are MELORDS are like the ITALIAN WAITRESS  who was/ is unaccountable –when she became super prime minister  - nay-  empress via NAC?

WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA are NOT willing to tolerate unelected COLLEGIUM JUDGES who have ZERO accountability . 

COLLEGIUM Courts already undermanned by judges have to set aside regular cases in favour of PILs.   

Most COLLEGIUM judges prefer to rule cases where they are in the daily limelight and get MAXIMUM publicity for posterity

We had COLLEGIUM judges looking outwards—but never inwards. 

They have never made an attempt to address the humongous backlog of cases.   

Justice Katju knows which all ex-CJI have amassed enormous wealth beyond their month end salaries. . 

Judiciary must stick to old dictum with greater power çomes greater responsibility and accountability –or they are like the Italian waitress , who has NIL accountability.

Check out her food security program  for votes –but it will KILL Bharatmata. Giving FREE FOOD to healthy people kills mindsets ..


PUNISH TROJAN HORSE NGOs WHO DO CULTURAL TERRORISM AND FILE PILs WITH VESTED INTERESTS. PUNISH JUDGES WHO PLAY DEEP STATE KOSHER BALL.

We ask supreme court NOT to entertain PILs from known FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs using Indian fronts ,  whose sole aim is to do CULTURAL TERRORISM in India .

Today every nations brands itself to get a higher financial growth rating.

Singapore has an amazing amount of crime which is never reported in the media. All this blackout is state sponsored.

Singapore punished PRESSTITUTES who do extreme rabble rousing ( like in India )

JEALOUS ZIONIST JEW NATIONS ARE TRYING TO PORTRAT INDIA AS A SAVAGE NATION , UNFIT TO BE IN THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL OR A SAFE PLACE FOR TOURISTS 

DESH BHAKTI TO THE WATAN IS PARAMAOUNT.

Why has Supreme Court encouraged PIL from Prashant Bhushan who has no love for the watan.   Is he NOT the man who wants Kashmir to be given away to Pakistan ?

Failure of judiciary in STOPPING INDISCRIMINATE PIL INTAKE  would collapse the entire system.

Ever since the CRYING BOLLYWOOD SUPERSTAR declared on SATYAMEVA JAYATE,  that police cannot block or filter a obviously FAKE or FRIVOLOUS FIR – they have been indundated .  

Today any woman can fix anybody by saying that he WINKED at me—never mind it was in the DARK.

The lakshman rekha of Judicial activism should be defined without sacrificing the potency of PIL. 

" WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA"  - WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION ,  ASKS THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE TO “DISOBEY “ ANY IMMORAL FIATS BY WAY OF PIL ,  IF THEY FIND THAT IT IS A FORM OF “CULTURAL TERRORISM “ SPONSORED BY DESH DROHI FOREIGN FORCES.

WHICH MOTHER, WIFE, SISTER , DAUGHTER IN MAHARASHTRA WANTS A MAN TO VISIT CHAMIYA BARS AND WASTE HIS HARD EARNED MONEY ?

WHY IS THE “COLLEGIUM JUDGE “ SO EAGER TO ENCOURAGE  DEBAUCHERY IN INDIA?

CHAKKAR KYA HAI “COLLEGIUM” MELORDS ?

WHY DON’T YOU WANT CCTVs ? 

SO THAT FINGER IN TWAT OR PRICK IN HAND IS SAFE FROM SCRUTINY ? ANDHERI RAAT MEIN DIYA TERI HAATH MAIN ? ( APOLOGIES TO DADA KONDKE ) 





TRAITORS HAVE COME ON TV AS PERCEPTION MOLDERS TO OPENLY SUPPORT THE TRAITORS OF JNU WHO HAVE ENGAGED IN SEDITION..

ANYBODY WHO SUPPORTS TRAITORS TO THE WATAN IS ALSO A TRAITOR.. THE ONLY EXCEPTION TO THE RULE IS A LAWYER APPOINTED LEGALLY TO ARGUE THE CASE FOR A TRAITOR IN COURT ALONE ( NOT ON TV )..

WE ASK AJIT DOVAL TO PROFILE ALL THESE FOREIGN PAYROLL DEEP STATE AGENTS AND THIS INCLUDED MEDIA ANCHORS WHO PUT ON SPIN ON THE DEFINITION OF THE TERM SEDITION..

WHEN SOMEONE ABUSES THE WATAN AND CALLS FOR DISMEMBERMENT OF BHARATMATA , IT IS SEDITION. ....

THE PUNISHMENT IS DEATH .....

ABUSING A RULER ON A THRONE OR ANY MORTAL IS NOT SEDITION.....

WHAT HAPPENED IN JNU IS SEDITION . ....

BHARAT TERE TUKDE HONGE ,, BHARAT TERE BARBAADI TAK JUNG RAHENGE ,,, SLOGANS RAISED BY COMMIE STUDENTS ( INSTIGATED BY COMMIE JNU PROFESSORS ) IS SEDITION....

EVERY TIME OUR UNIFORMED MEN RISK THEIR LIVES AND ARREST TERRORISTS , NAXALS AND SEPARATISTS - -OUR COLLEGIUM MELORDS WHO ARE AFRAID OF JEW NOAM CHOMSKY SAVE THEM . ..

THE SPIN GIVEN BY THE SPIN DOCTORS LIKE SOLI SORABJEE / SANJAY HEGDE IS THAT SEDITION LAWS CAN BE APPLIED ONLY IF SLOGANS THIS RESULTS IN VIOLENCE....    SO SO SO- YOU CAN PLANT A BOMB IN PARLIAMENT , AND YOU ARE INNOCENT LONG AS YOU DONT HAVE THE REMOTE CONTROL WITH YOU TO IGNITE THE BOMB  ? 

SORRY -- WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ACCEPT THIS.........IN INDIA MOST OF THE VIOLENCE IS TRIGGERED BY TROJAN HORSE FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs CONTROLLED BY THE BENAMI MEDIA...

IN INDIA THERE IS A CLEAR NEXUS BETWEEN NCW/ NCM/ NHRC / SOME COLLEGIUM JUDGES / FOREIGN PAYROLL RAJYA SABHA MPs / BENAMI MEDIA/ TROJAN HORSE NGOs / NAXALS/ SEPARATISTS/ PERCEPTION MOLDERS / INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTsARGS WHO COME ON TV AND SUPPORTED NAXALS AND JNU TRAITORS...

DEEP STATE CONTROLLED NGO FILE PILs SO THAT ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDGES CAN MAKE LAWS…

WE KNOW THE TRAITORS WHO ARE IN FOREIGN PAYROLL... THEY MUST AWAIT SEVERE RETRIBUTION..

capt ajit vadakayil
..


  1. COUPLE OF DAYS AGO PRIYANKA CHOPRA AGAIN CAME ON TV TO DECLARE THAT SHE DOES NOT CARE FOR TROLLS..

    SHE SHOULD WORRY MORE ABOUT HER SEX TAPES ( PRIYANKA CHOPRA NICK JONAS SEX TAPES-- ON GOOGLE SEARCH ) WHICH ARE ALL OVER THE INTERNET..

    PRIYANKA CHOPRA CAN SAY THAT THE FEMALE IN THE SEX TAPE IS SOMEONE ELSE.. BUT THERE ARE VERY FEW WOMEN ON THE PLANET WHOSE UPPER LIP TOUCHES THE BOTTOM OF THE NOSE DURING A SMILE..

    SHE CAN SAY THAT THE VIDEO IS MORPHED --LIKE THE JNU TRAITORS..

    MONA SINGH CLAIMED THAT THE FEMALE IN THE NUDE VIDEO TAPE IS NOT HER.. BUT THERE ARE VERY FEW WOMEN WITH SHOULDERS WIDER THAN HIP BONES WITH A OVERHANGING ASS -- AND NAZI TEETH TO BOOT.

    A VIDEO CAN BE MORPHED.. BUT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO MORPH THE LIGHT SOURCING AND ITS SHADOWS..

    A GOOD PAINTER CAN RECOGNIZE A WORTHLESS PAINTING IN A FEW SECONDS , ALL HE LOOKS FOR IS LIGHT/ SHADOWS AND THE PERSPECTIVE..

    KOSHER BIG BROTHER HAS HIJACKED ART..

    TODAY SHIT IS TOUTED AS CHOCOLATE AND VICE VERSA.. USELESS JEW PAINTERS MAKE MILLIONS.. A GOOD ARTIST CANT BUY A LOAF OF BREAD TO FEED HIS FAMILY..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2015/09/francis-newton-souza-birth-painting.html

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/02/modern-abstract-art-and-picasso-capt.html


    SOMEBODY CALLED ME AND SAID-- HATS OFF TO YOU CAPTAIN-- YOU ARE THE ONLY PERSON ON THIS PLANET WHO HAS THE INTELLIGENCE TO EXPOSE THE HUMONGOUS NAY MIND BOGGLING DECEIT KNOWN AS "STARE DECISIS " OF THE KOSHER DEEP STATE SPONSORED JUDICIARY..

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any.html


    INDEED -- THAT IS BECAUSE I AM THIS PLANETs NO 1 TROLL, WHO DOES NOT SACRIFICE TRUTH ON THE KOSHER ALTAR OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

    https://www.blogger.com/profile/14410812789424637654

    858 MILLION IS MY PROFILE VIEW.. 

    HOW MUCH IS MODI OR AMITABH BACHCHAN OR BBC OR CNN ? 

    DYNAMO , THIS PLANETs GREATEST MAGICIAN IS A PAKISTANI JEW WITH CHRONS ASSHOLE.. HE CAN MAKE AN ASS OF THE WHOLE WORLD OR EVERY JUDGE ON THIS PLANET --NOT CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL ..
    A MAGICIAN WANTS YOU TO LOOK AT THE CON-TRICK OBJECTIVELY..   I , AS A TROLL EXHUMING TRUTHS , WILL ONLY LOOK AT HIS CON-TRICK SUBJECTIVELY.. 

    I DONT HAVE TUNNEL VISION, I VIEW LIKE A FLYING CONDOR..

    AT SEA, WHEN AN ACCIDENT TOOK PLACE IN THE FLEET ( OF MORE THAN 120 SHIPS ) THE SHORE BOSSES WOULD SEND ME THE PROBLEM -- MOSTLY ENGINEERING-- AND I WOULD GIVE THEM THE REASON WHY THE ACCIDENT TOOK PLACE.. 

    I GO PAST ONION LAYERS SIT AT THE CORE AND LOOK OUTWARDS , UNDERSTAND IN 3D VISUALS INSTANTLY..

    THIS IS THE ULTIMATE SRI YANTRA BINDU THINKING. . THE SHALLOW WESTERN MIND CANT DO THIS..

    I WAS THE ULTIMATE CHANGE MANAGER ONLY BECAUSE OF MY ABILITY TO ARRIVE AT THE ROOT CAUSE IN A JIFFY – TO BE DE-WEEDED BY THE ROOTS NEVER TO APPEAR AGAIN...

    When there is an accident at sea TRUTH IS ALWAYS THE FIRST CASUALITY..

    You find the truth is buried instantly by people who want to protect their backsides and people who want to collect insurance and laugh all the way to the bank...

    THIS IS WHY IN INDIA WE MUST REVERT BACK TO THE JURY SYSTEM -

    JURY CONSISTS OF ORDINARY PEOPLE WHO UNDERSTAND THE MEANING OF NATURAL JUSTICE AND PERIMETER OF CONTEXT..

    A FATHER WHO KILLED HIS 12 YEAR OLD DAUGHTERs RAPIST , WHO ALSO POURED ACID ON HER FACE AFTER THE ACT --WILL BE HUNG BY THE JUDGE SYSTEM , NOT BY THE JURY SYSTEM ..JURY HAS THE POWERS OF "JURY NULLIFICATION"..


    JURY IS NOT SHACKLED BY PAST PRACTICE AND RIDICULOUS --NAY MAD ROTHSCHILD CREATED JUDICIAL PROCEDURES CONVERTED TO GOSPEL OVER TIME ( STARE DECISIS ) ..
    WE MUST NOT ALLOW PAST JUDGMENTS TO CONTROL ANY CASE .. EVERY CASE IS UNIQUE BY CONTEXT --IT MUST BE SEEN BY A FRESH PAIR OF EYES --

    EVERY CASE HAS A UNIQUE ROOT CAUSE ..

    CONTINUED TO 2-
    1. WE HAD HARISH SALVE WHO EARNS IN CRORES GOING TO THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AT HAGUE ( KULBHUSHAN JADHAV CASE ) AND QUOTING RIDICULOUS PAST JUDGEMENT OF ICJ , WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING THE CONTEXT --PATHETIC !

      BURN ALL PAST JUDGMENTS MADE BY LAWYER TURNED JUDGES, IN A JUSTICE IS BLIND SYSTEM SANS CONTEXT WHERE WITNESSES CAN BE PRODUCED OUT OF THIN AIR ..

      LAWYER RK ANAND HAD HIS OWN "DIRECT WITNESS MILKED OUT OF THIN AIR" WHOM HE KEPT IN HIS OWN HOME .. THIS FAKE WITNESS SUNIL KULKARNI GOT A DRIVING LICENCE WITH PERMANENT ADDRESS AS RK ANANDs HOUSE..

      THIS IS HOW HE GOT CAUGHT..

      KULKARNI BABYs NEW FAKE NAME WAS NISHIKANT ANAND , SON OF LAWYER RK ANAND WITH HIS TRUE PHOTO ON THE LICENCE..

      https://www.hindustantimes.com/delhi-news/rk-anand-threatens-to-sue-ndtv/story-QrfExdnYeBOSQ1IhryFmvM.html

      FINALLY RK ANAND GOT CAUGHT WITH HIS PANTS DOWN.. HE WAS LET OFF WITH A WEE RAP ON HIS KNUCKLES..IT JUST SHOWS THE JUDGE LAWYER NEXUS..

      https://www.legallyindia.com/the-bench-and-the-bar/rk-anand-avoids-jail-accepts-supreme-court-offer-to-work-for-free-a-bci-donation-20120926-3136

      THE WORLDs BEST COMPUTER CANNOT TELL THE ROOT CAUSE OF AN INCIDENT OR THE MORAL OF A STORY.

      FOR THIS YOU NEED A CONSCIOUS HUMAN BRAIN WHO THINKS SUBJECTIVELY--NOT OBJECTIVELY.

      PEOPLE WHO CREATE EXAM QUESTIONS FOR MENSA – NOTE...

      ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS CANNOT BE DONE BY YOUR BEST MENSA BRAINS ...

      WE HAVE CONMAN GURU WHO TWEETED THAT AYYAPPA IS A PRODUCT OF GAY SEX BETWEEN SHIVA AND VISHNU.. HE DOES NOT KNOW THAT AYYAPPA IS A MORTAL ( VISHNUs NINTH AVATAR ) WHILE SHIVA AND VISHNU ARE COSMIC ALLEGORIES ..

      STILL THIS FAKE GURU WITH GIRLY VOICE AND FINGERS HAS MILLIONS OF FOLLOWERS AND HUNDREDS OF BRANCHES WORLDWIDE ..THANKS TO KOSHER DEEP STATE..

      THE WORLD LIVES A KOSHER LIE ..

      THIS PLANETs NO 1 TROLL CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL , WILL EXPOSE THESE LIES..    NEITHER KOSHER BIG BROTHER NOR JEW MAGICIAN DYNAMO CAN FOOL ME..

      I EXHUME TRUTHS , BECAUSE IF I DONT DO IT--   NOBODY ON THIS PLANET CAN , TILL THE SUN GOES SUPERNOVA..

      AL MY DETRACTORS WHO CRIED, CAPTAIN HAS A ROTHSCHILD FIXATION HAVE ALL FALLEN BY THE WAYSIDE.. THEY READ MY BLOG AHEAD OF THE MORNING NEWSPAPER .. TODAY THEY ALL ACCEPT THAT ROTHSCHILD RULED INDIA --NOT THE QUEEN ..

      HISTORIANS WHO CANNOT DO “VADAKAYIL BINDU THINKING” WRITE SHIT. .

      NOBODY HAS A TIME MACHINE !!

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..



IN MAHARASHTRA MANY CHAMIYA BEER BARS BARS ( WHOREHOUSE PICK UP JOINTS ) WERE OWNED BY TOP COPS— AND THIS ENCOURAGED A COP-CRIMINAL NEXUS..

VERY SOON WE WILL HAVE GAY BEER BARS , WITH SUBSIDISED FOREIGN BRAND BEER.

Today kosher big brother wants “Government by Algorithm”..  Policy will be driven by OBJECTIVE data. Of course kosher big brother will tweak the data to his advantage any time he wants.
This type of DEEP STATE tool is used to spy on anybody big brother wants.

Big Brother is watching you.” That’s a line from George Orwells dystopian classic 1984, but it’s also far closer to reality than most . No, there’s not some totalitarian government spy in a trench coat following you, but you are being watched — not by a dictator, but by a handful of companies that make big bucks aggregating tiny scraps of information about you and putting the puzzle pieces together to build your digital profile.

GEORGE ORWELL WROTE HIS BOOK ABOY ANIMAL FARM AND 1984 ( ABOUT BIG BROTHER)  , FROM DATA HIS FATHER GAVE HIM FROM HIS EXPERIENCES AS ROTHSCHILD OPIUM AGENT IN INDIA.   

KATHIAWARI JEW NAY JAIN GANDHI WAS ROTHSCHILDs AGENT WHO SUBSTITUTED THE MONIKER INDIGO FOR OPIUM.

Cambridge Analytica  harvested the personal data of millions of people's Facebook profiles without their consent and used it for political purposes. The scandal erupted in March 2018 with the emergence of a whistleblower, an ex-Cambridge Analytica employee Christopher Wylie.

During his testimony before Congress on April 10, 2018, Mark Zuckerberg said it was his personal mistake that he did not do enough to prevent Facebook from being used for harm. If this THIEF ( stole Facebook idea from Divya Narendra ) and Deep State agent  was not a JEW he would have been fried !

Cambridge Analytica Ltd (CA) was a British political consulting firm which combined data mining, data brokerage, and data analysis with strategic communication during the Indian electoral processes..
On 1 May 2018, Cambridge Analytica and its parent company filed for insolvency proceedings and closed operations.  Alexander Taylor, a former director for Cambridge Analytica, was appointed director of Emerdata ( new avatar ) on 28 March 2018

Algorith based Policy decisions are pushed in the name of IMPARTIALITY.. The real reason is big brother wants everything to be in the OBJECTIVE bowl, so that he can keep SUBJECTIVE human conscience out of the picture for profits and power.  

This is how Jew Rothschild created communism and killed millions of people and siphoned off world wealth without anybody raising a stink ..

There is a steady increase in the automation of traditionally human-based SUBJECTIVE decision processes throughout organizations all over the world…

Algorithms are ALWAYS opaque, biased, and unaccountable tools being wielded agents of the DEEP STATE in the interests of institutional power.

JEWS WILL GRAB ALL PLUM POSITIONS ON THIS PLANET. Big brother has already created the system of algorithms choosing board members –of course the catch is that it will favour only Jews.

Algorithms will now slowly undermine the JURY SYSTEM and do away with JURY NULLIFICATION.

THE CLAIM IS ALGORITHMS REDUCE BIAS—WHILE IN REALITY IT IS JUST THE OPPOSITE –ONY JEWS WILL GAIN.

KOSHER PARETO EFFICIENCY IS ALREADY MAKING AN ASS OF THE WHOLE WORLD.

AN ECONOMY IN WHICH JEWS HOLD ALL THE WORLD WEALTH IS KOSHER PARETO EFFICIENT !

AS IT IS ROTHSCHILD HAS CREATED “MODERN ECONOMICS WHICH MAKES AN ASS OF THE WHOLE WORLD.. 

UNDER THIS SYSTEM, INDIA WILL ALWAYS BE A POOR NATION ON PAPER WITH ROTHSCHILDs AGENCIES RATING INDIA ( THE ONLY ROARING ECONOMY ) ONE NOTCH ABOVE JUNK ..


“Pareto Efficiency” a HUMONGOUS HOAX ecause it encapsulates a normative principle that property rights of the wealthy ( Jews ) take precedence over the right to basic needs of the poor.

It is disguised to have an appearance of scientific OBJECTIVITY while the opposite normative preference, which most people have, is said to depend o SUBJECTIVE and thus unreliable ( SIC ) value judgments.

It appeals to everyone when we say that increasing social welfare requires giving more goods to all. But the hidden consequence of accepting this principle is that you cannot take wealth away from the super-rich to give to the hungry, because that would decrease the wealth of the KOSHER super-rich.
It also provides moral cover for increasing inequality.. 

This is deceit of the highest order.

Pareto principle protects rich JEWS  not by what it says, but by what it REFUSED to say. This has always been Rothschild’s slimy signature.

Pareto argues that we cannot compare the utility/pleasure derived by KOSHER aristocrats with refined tastes, and the utility derived by the coarse and crude GOYIM peasants.

Of course, this apparently fair, OBJECTIVE and neutral refusal to compare, conceals a preference for the kosher wealthy..

Pareto principle was always used to prevent taxation of the rich to support the poor..

When the status quo is one where the aristocrats have five course meals, while peasants eat coarse bread, refusal to compare amounts to supporting the status quo, and arguing that social welfare would decline if we took from rich to give to the poor.

The Pareto Principle is used by economists today in the same way – to prevent moves to re-distribute wealth in an equitable way. It does not allow us to take away luxuries from the kosher rich to distribute food to the starving. Thus, it serves as an ideology which favors the wealthy.  This is the general characteristic of ET1%, that these theories appear to be fair and equitable, but conceal strong support for the wealthy JEWS.

THE COLLEGUM JUDICIARY WILL SOON INTRODUCE ALGORITHMS IN INDIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM TO MAKE IT 100% OBJECTIVE  AND PUSH STARE DECISIS  – MARK MY WORDS..

VERY SOON THE INDIAN ARMY WILL BE SHACKLED BY ALGORITHM BASED POLICY MAKING..

An algorithm or AI software programme ALWAYS have a bias ( obscured by comlex software ) built in—and there is no way the comman man can figure this out. JEWS wants to make money out of thin air by CARBON TAXES –all controlled by kosher software.

This is how the JEWS made an ass of the word by claiming that the Hebrew Bible and TORAH is the world of GOD.




COMPUTER JEE NEY BOLA HAI BHAIYYA.. DEKH LOCK KARKE RAKHELA HAI !

PIL IS NOT AN INDIAN CONCEPT AS EVERYBODY THINKS

IT IS A BILDERBERG INNER CLUB CONCEPT TO INCREASE THE POWER OF THE “COLLEGIUM “ JUDICIARY. 

WE ALL KNOW THAT BEFORE 1947 ALMOST THE ENTIRE JUDICIARY WAS SOLD OUT TO JEW ROTHSCHILD.

PEOPLE IN INDIA LACK PERCEPTION,  WHEN IT COMES TO KOSHER BIG BROTHER,  TRYING TO STUNT BHARATMATA AND CONVERT HER PROM A GIANT GROWING PEEPAL TREE TO A BONZAI POTTED PLANT.

JNU AUTONOMY IS ONLY FOR RUNNING THE ACADEMY- PERIOD !

THIS IDEA IS BEING SUBVERTED BY FOREIGN FORCES TO MEAN THAT THE 1000 ACRE CAMPUS IS AN ISLAND-- AN INDEPENDENT DIPLOMATIC EMBASSY LIKE THE US EMBASSY—WHERE COMMIES CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT.

JUST WHO THE HELL IS JEW NOAM CHOMSKY..  IS JNU HIS POPs PROPERTY ?


https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/chomsky-to-jnu-vc-why-did-you-allow-police-on-campus/article8264400.ece

The PIL system is being misused to diminish the image of lawmakers and  the elected executive by DESH DROHIS  and FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs  with benami media is cahoots. 

Most BENAMI media owners who are mere Indian fronts for kosher BIG BROTHER have their own NGOs to “create” news..

THIS BLOGSITE ASKS PM MODI, TO CUT SERVING COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TO SIZE ( TO KILL THE FOREIGN FACTOR ) BY ADDRESSING PIL USING THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE.   WHY SHOULD PIL GO TO THE JUDICIARY.. JUST WHO THE  HELL IS THIS ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY..

THIS BLOGSITE ASKS MODI TO CREATE A POOL OF RETIRED JUDGES WHO HAVE GOOD REPUTATION AND MOST  IMPORTANT DESH BHAKTI.

PAY THESE RETIRED JUDGES WELL , TWICE AS MUCH AS THE SUPREME COURT JUDGES .

HAVE REPRESENTATION FROM DALITS ( ASK  KHARGE ) , MUSLIMS  ( ASK OWAISI ) , SIKHS , CHRISTIANS SO THAT THIS EXTRA JUDICIAL BODY GETS LEGITIMACY . 

THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE MUST HOLD VETO POWER WHEN IT COMES TO THE WATANs INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL SECURITY  .

FOREIGN FUNDED TROJAN HORSE NGOs have been involved in flooding PILs to allow gay marriages .  Everybody knows that 99.9 % homosexuals are pedophiles. 

DESH DROHIS have , learned to “dress up” private disputes as PIL—fixing a desh bhakt business opponent.

We are know that COLLEGIUM judges should NOT be involved in environmental, social, and economic matters .

Why are judges involved in breaking long established Hindu culture  in the name of superstition ?


ONLY LAWYER TURNED JUDGES ARE SMART— REST ARE ALL IDIOTS ?

When a COLLEGIUM JUDGE cannot enforce his FIAT, where is he gonna hide his melord face?

ATHEIST COMMIE PINARAYI VIJAYAN HAS TOLD SUPRME CURT TO “CATCH AND SWING” WHEN IT CAME TO THE KERALA MALANKARA CHURCH RULING OF SUPRME COURT.


JACOBITE FACTION HAS TOLD SUPREME COURT TO SHOVE THEIR RULING ..  THEY HAVE COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYANs BACKING ( IN EXCHANGE FOR VOTES ).

HINDU HATING PINARAYI VIJAYAN HOWEVER IS TRIPPING ON HIS HEELS IN HIS HASTE TO ENFORCE THE SUPREME COURT SABARIMALA RULING.

MELORDS WANT US TO SIT WITH NAPIERS LOG TABLES AND MS DOS IN 2019 - HAATH MEIN PAKADKE  ?

OH YEAH ?

In the past -- the right to make SLIMY  insulting observations, the right to be EXTREMELY rude, and the right to CAST UNFOUNDED OBSERVATIONS on desh bhakt  individuals and institutions, statutory authorities, and constitutional bodies in open court, with sweeping generalisations and unfounded assumptions of moral turpitude, was the sole prerogative of COLLEGIUM judges.

NOT ANY MORE !


WE THE PEOPLE WILL STOP THIS NONSENSE—IN LIGHT OF WHAT HAPPENED WITH HOMOSEXUALITY / ADULTERY AND SABARIMALA RULINGS .
THIS IS THE LAST STRAW  !!

What about false witnesses produced by Teesta Setalvad ( using crypto jew Wahabbi foreign funds ) , being taken as OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE by our melords ?

Anybody can abuse PM Modi – yet we all have to cower in front of a lower court judge ?
In Dec 2011, theGujarat High Court directed the CBI to take over the investigation into the Ishrat Jahan ‘fake’ encounter case.  

They could have avoided extravagant rhetoric and insults  -- like the Gujarat police could not be “relied upon” to conduct an impartial probe. 

Only police can be bribed-- not judges ?

Were these judges not LYING THROUGH THE TEETH lawyers before?

 — are they so full of spontaneously received character from divine sources  ?

WHY ARE THE JUDGES POKING THEIR MELORD NOSES IN EXTERNAL / INTERNAL SECURITY,  WHEN THEY HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DO SO ?

Why is it that NOT one single tainted judge has ever been brought behind bars?   Ask Katju how many judges deserve to be behind bars— he will give you a full list.

Ulta the have put high court justice Karnan in jail for stating that many TOP judges are corrupt.


MIND YOU, CJI JS KHEHAR WANTED WHITE JEW LAWYERS TO PRACTISE IN INDIA..  THIS IS THE FELLOW WHO PUT KARNAN IN JAIL.



There was a PIL to call back the Indian cricket team from Australia ( Sydney ) over some minor issue of a black umpire named Steve Bucknor who was partial to his white masters the Aussies. The MELORDS were hajaaar busy over this issue, as if the sky was falling down ..

The misuse of PIL in India, which started in the 1990s, has reached to such a stage where it has started undermining the various purpose for which PIL was introduced, and is now a FRANKESTEIN controlled by foreign desh drohis via their NGOs.

WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA WILL NOT ACCEPT UNELECTED “COLLEGIUM JUDGES “ TO PLAY PETER THE HERMIT OF CRUSADERS FAME.

PILs have  duped disadvantaged sections of society in believing that justice has been done to them, but without making a real difference to their situation.  Many a time DOUBLE AGENT NGOs who work for the INDIAN BENAMI mining barons have duped the poor gullible tribals.

The melords have shied away from introducing a uniform civil code. They are quick to discipline Hindus, but when it comes to Muslims the melords get cold feet—we know why !


MELORD WANT DIWALI CRACKERS TO BE BANNED .. BUT LET MORNING SHRIEKING AZAN CALLS FROM MOSQUE LOUDSPEAKERS CONTINUE.

THE JUDGES WANTMENTRAUTING WOMEN INTO SABARIMALA, BUT THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING WHEN COMMIE PINARAYI VIJAYAN ARRESTED SOME WOMEN WHO WANTED TO PRAY IN VAVAR MOSQUE

CAN ANY NUN BECOME A BISHOP? 

WHAT ABOUT THE PARSI FIRE TEMPLE TWO IN ONE JUDGE CUM PRIEST ROHNIGTON NARIMAN?

THE MELORDS HAVE ALWAYS CURED USING BANDAID STRIPS,BUT NEVER SOUGHT TO “PREVENT” –ONLY BECAUSE THEY DO NOT HAVE THE BRAINS OR PERCEPTION.

MELORDS HAVE KEPT GRANTING PERMISSION TO INCREASE WATER LEVEL IN DAM RESERVOIRS . 

BUT THEY HAVE NEVER ADDRESSED THE ROOT PROBLEM OF THE RESERVOIR GETTING SILTED .


The Public Interest Litigation (Regulation) Bill had proposed that petitioners filing frivolous and vested PIL cases should be put behind bars and pay the damages.

However, the Bill—which raised concerns of interfering with judicial independence—could not receive the support of all political parties , some in the payroll of kosher deep state.

As the Bill lapsed, this attempt to control the misuse of PIL failed.

Though more than 96% of the PILs are frivolous or vested ( ulterior motives ) ,  NO penalties have been imposed on obvious culprits.   In India whoever files a FIR first is considered righteous .

What the Supreme court does NOT realize, is that most of the PILs filed are by DOUBLE AGENTS.   

We now see Naxal Satinath Sarangi and his wife still milking foreign money for Bhopal Gas disaster after 35 long years .

A PIL is now reduced to be an instrument to fulfill private interests, settle political scores , malign someone or simply gain easy publicity – sometimes  by young lawyers who want their faces on TV to get a kick star in their sinking career

On November 16, 1992, the Supreme Court responded to a PIL filed by lawyer Indira Sawhney and introduced 27% reservation for backward classes in posts and services under the Government of India.Citing the age old Varna system, the court justified its reason for reservation.

THE MELORDS MUST KNOW THAT CASTE SYSTEM WAS INTRODUCED BY THE WHITE INVADER TO DIVIDE AND RULE.

THE MELORDS MUST STOP READING LIES WRITTEN BY COMMIES ROMILA THAPAR , IRFAN HABIB AND THEIR ILK.


CASTE SYSTEM EXISTED ONLY IN KERALA BEFORE THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA AND THAT TOO SET UP BY LORD PARASHURAMA 6000 YEARS AGO.

THIS WAS TO PREVENT SUBDIVISION AND FRAGMENTATION OF MEAGRE FERTILE LAND ( WHICH IS INDIAs NO1 PROBLEM TODAY )--

-- AND TO PRESERVE AYURVEDIC HERBS VIA TEMPLE LANDS AND SNAKE GROVES..

- AND NAMBODIRIS WHO WERE VEDAS ORAL ROUTE EXPERTS TO REMAIN MARRIED ( ALLOWED 4 WIVES )..  ONLY A MARRIED MAN CAN DO YAGNA IN SANATANA DHARMA..


TODAY AYURVEDA IS DEAD , AS 95% OF ANCIENT PRICELESS HERBS ARE NO MORE.


WHY DO “LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES”  MAKE FAALTHU  ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON ZILCH OR SCANTY INFORMATION ?


In USA the objective of the PIL was to increase civic engagement in decision-making -because  USA has Jury system instead of  MeLord judges deciding.   

Read the above line a TRILLION TIMES --   you stupid "bottom of the school cerebral barrel" judges !


The SC's verdict striking down the 99th constitutional amendment to turn the appointment of judges into an exclusive prerogative of judiciary was tantamount to rewriting the Constitution.  The judges dared to do so only because of KOSHER DEEP STATE support.. Prashant Bhushan was the key man.


REASON? :    HOLD YOUR FUCKIN’ BREATH --  DELAY !



MeLORDS must refrain from giving FIATS that cannot be enforced, whatever the fundamental right may be and however good the cause. It serves no purpose to issue some high profile mandamus or declaration that can remain  only on paper.

It is counter productive to have people say ‘The Supreme Court  has not been able to do anything’ .
The DIKTAT of ordering bureaucrats to send their children to govt schools is just an example.

AS A SHIP CAPTAIN I ALWAYS MADE SURE THAT MY ORDERS WERE OBEYED.   OR MY POWER OF COMMAND GETS ERODED, TO THE DETRIMENT OF SAFETY OF LIFE.

It is of cardinal importance to the confidence that people have in the Court that its orders are implicitly and promptly obeyed and is, therefore, paramount that orders that are incapable of obedience and enforcement are just not made. 

When a PIL is filed ,  the COLLEGIUM MeLORDS  must satisfy itselfthat the party which has brought the litigation is litigating bona fide for public good as it has some IMMINENT value.

The PIL should not be merely a cloak for attaining ULTERIOR MOTIVES of foreign funded NGOs.
If foreign funded NGOs do not achieve the demands of their paymasters their funds dry up.

The MeLORDS  must be careful to weigh conflicting public interest before intervening. The melords ignored the voice of the people about Sabarimala.   JUDICIARY IS CLEARLY IN CONTEMPT OF WE THE PEOPLE.

IN RALLY ATHEIST COMMIE DECLARED --  "I AM ON THE SIDE OF SABARIMALA DEVOTEES "..



THIS EVIL WOMAN REANA FATIMA WAS DRESSED US AS POLICE BY ATHEIST COMMIE PINARAYI VIJAYAN TO FOOL PILGRIMS 



OBVIOUSLY HE MEANS MUSLIM WOMAN REHANA FATIMA WHO WANTED TO HURL MENSES BLOOD SOAKED SANITARY NAPKINS ON AYYAPPA IDOLs FACE.. 



SHE HERSELF SAID SHE HAD THE USED NAPKINS INSIDE HER IRUMUDI KETTU..





ONE DROP OF BLOOD CANNOT FALL IN THE TEMPLE INNER SANCTUM..

IF THE CHIEF TANTRI HAS A CUT ON HIS BODY AND ONE DROP OF HIS BLOOD SHOWS - IT DOES NOT HAVE TO FALL ON THE GROUND.. THE SAME PURIFICATION RITUAL IS UNDERTAKEN..

IT DOES NOT MATTER IF THE BLOOD BELONGS TO MAN OR WOMAN..

IT WAS THE WHITE INVADER WHO COOKED UP THE FOUL LIE THAT BLOOD IS SACRIFICE COMPULSORY IN TANTRIC TEMPLES USING HIS FAKE MUTTS ..


WHEN THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA THERE WERE ONLY 4 ORIGINAL MUTTS IN THE 4 CORNERS OF INDIA, EACH UNDER A KERALA NAMBOODIRI..

BY THE TIME THE WHITE INVADER LEFT INDIA IN 1947, HE CREATED MORE THAN 1000 FAKE MUTTS ( WITH CRYPTO JEW PONTIFFS )  , TO HARASS THE POOR HINDUS AND MAKE THE HINDU SELF LOATHING ( FOR CONVERSIONS )..

EVERY SACRIFICE IN A HINDU TEMPLE IS A BLOODLESS SACRIFICE.. THE SACRIFICE IS GHEE AND ELECTROLYTIC PLASMA OF COCONUT WATER..

THIS IS WHY IN THE IDUMUKETTU THERE IS ONE COCONUT FILLED WITH DESI GHEE AND ANOTHER COCONUT UNBROKEN WHICH HAS THE LIQUID INSIDE..

'AS EXPECTED ALL NATIONAL BENAMI TV CHANNELS ( ENGLISH/ HINDI ) IGNORED THIS PLANETs LARGEST PILGRIMAGE..

THIS YEAR BECAUSE OF AN ATHEIST COMMIE THUG NAMED PINARAI VIJAYAN THE CROWD WAS JUST 19% OF LAST YEAR..

THE MAGIC OF SABARIMALA IS THE 3 FLASHES..

THE LAST FLASH IS THE EXACT MOMENT BHISHMAs SOUL LEFT HIS MORTAL COIL LYING ON A BED OF ARROWS 6000 YEARS AGO…

THE BRIEF SPACE OF ABOUT TEN SECONDS BETWEEN THE SECOND AND THIRD FLASH, OF PURE AWARENESS DOES SURGERY OF THE MIND .. VICES , TRAUMAS AND PHOBIAS ARE AMPUTATED FROM THE MIND..

THIS BRIEF PERIOD OF TIME IS THE DEEPEST REST THE HUMAN MIND CAN HAVE…

THIS PERIOD OF TEN SECOND DELIVERS QUANTUM ENTRAINMENT, A SMALL GAP IN YOUR THINKING SANS EGO ( SHUNIATA ) WHERE THE RICH AND MIGHTY RUB SHOULDERS WITH BEGGARS . .

LAKHS OF PILGRIMS CONCENTRATE ON SINGLE SPOT OF LIGHT IN A MASSIVE FIELD OF CONSCIOUSNESS ..

THIS NOTHING DOES NOT GIVE ANSWERS --IT IS THE ANSWER, A BRIEF PERIOD OF OPENING THE THIRD EYE .. THIS IS THE MAGIC OF SABARIMALA…

PILGRIMS GO BACK HOME KNOWING THAT THERE IS SOMETHING BEYOND THE MIND..THEY HAVE FELT IT.. .

HIS 41 DAY VRAT AND HIS PILGRIMAGE HAS DONE EVERYTHING FOR HIM.. HE ASKS NOT FOR MORE..

SABARIMALA IS THE ONLY EXPERIENCE ON THIS PLANET WHICH DELIVERS THIS MAGIC..

THIS IS NOT SUPERSTITION-- THIS IS QUANTUM PHYSICS…

The Bhagavad Gita pings it 6000 year ago “Just a little pure awareness relieves a soul of great fear.”



WE ALL KNOW HOW PINARAYI VIJAYAN TOOK OUT AN ORDINANCE TO KICK ASIDE THE COURT ORDER ON KARUNA MEDICAL COLLEGE KANNUR ADMISSION CASE..

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/supreme-court-scraps-keralas-ordinance-regularising-medical-admissions/article24932992.ece

WE ALL KNOW HOW PINARAYI VIJAYAN SUBVERTED THE ALCOHOL RETAIL SHOPS ON NATIONAL HIGHWAYS -- BY RENAMING THEM TO BYROADS..

https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/kerala-govt-denotify-4342-km-state-highways-facilitate-reopening-bars-liquor-outlets-67083

ATHEIST PINARAYI VIJAYAN SPONSORS A FAKE SWAMI SANDEEPANANDA GIRI-- A CON-MAN..

HE DOES NOT KNOW THE BASICS OF SANATANA DHARMA..

WEARING SAFFRON ROBES AND GIVING BHAGAWAD GITA PARAYAN, DOES NOT MAKE YOU A SEER OR A GURU.. WE CAN SEE ANOTHER SWAMI AGNIVESH-- ANOTHER CON-MAN..

WE ASK THE KERALA HIGH COURT-- FOR EVERY DAY SPENT IN JAIL ON FALSE CHARGES , THE COMMIE GOVT OF CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN MUST PAY COMPENSATION OF RUPEES 5 LAKHS TO EVERY SABARIMALA PILGRIM..

THE SABARIMALA EPISODE WAS RIGGED WELL IN ADVANCE..

MODI KNOWS THE ONLY WAY TO GET A TOE HOLD IN KERALA AND FOUR SOUTHERN STATES ( KARNATAKA/ TAMIL NADU/ TELENGANA / ANDHRA ) IS BY DRIVING A WEDGE BETWEEN AYYAPPA DEVOTEE HINDUS AND THE RULING GOVTS WHO ENJOYED THEIR VOTES..

PINARAYI VIJAYAN THINKS THAT BY CULTIVATING FAKE SWAMIs LIKE SANDEEPANANDA GIRI ( A CLOSET COMMIE ) AND SPENT FORCE SNDP LEADER VELLAPALLY NATESAN , HE COULD HOLD ON TO HINDU NON-ATHEIST VOTES IN KERALA..

MUDDLED THINKING..

COMMIE KERALA MINISTERS POPPED UP REGULARLY AT FAKE SWAMI SANDEEPANANDA GIRIs MEETINGS-- AND HINDUS SMELT A RAT..

SNDP LEADER VELLAPPALLI NATESAN IS 81 AND HE DOES NOT HAVE GRASSROOT SUPPORT OF THIYYAS OR EZHAVAS.. WE ASK ALL SNDP OFFICE BEARERS TO IGNORE THIS FELLOW .. WITHOUT SNDP VOTES COMMUNIST PARTY MLAs  WILL LOSE THEIR ELECTION DEPOSITS.

WE HAVE PROFILED THE MALAYALI BENAMI BUSINESSMEN IN GULF WHO HAVE HANDLED THE KICK BACK MONEY TAKEN BY CORRUPT COMMIE MINISTERS..

THESE UBER RICH MALAYALI BUSINESSMEN WHO WERE BORN IN POVERTY HAVE BEEN CARELESS..

THEY ALL ATTENDED THE " GIVE ME FUNDS FOR FLOOD RELIEF " MEETINGS OF PINARAYI VIJAYAN IN DUBAI .. WE HAVE THEIR PHOTOS..

THE "TIHAR JAIL LALU PRASAD YADAV " MOMENT LOOMS LARGE OVER CORRUPT KERALA COMMIE MINISTERS..

ALL TOP COPS OF KERALA , WHO HAVE BEEN VICIOUS ATTACK DOGS FOR THE ATHEIST COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN -- MUST MENTALLY PREPARE TO BE TRANSFERRED TO KASHMIR...THEY CAN PROVE THEIR EFFICIENCY THERE ..

THE MOOT QUESTION NOW IS-- CAN MARXIST COMMUNISM BE INCLUDED IN INDIAN DEMOCRACY ANYMORE ? .. SORRY IT IS NOT POSSIBLE..

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL SAYS , DEMOCRACY AND COMMUNISM IS LIKE OIL AND WATER..

THIS SUBJECT IS FOR THINKERS.. AND THERE ARE NO REAL THINKERS IN THE COMMUNIST PARTY..

The Communists in Kerala swear by their working class ideology and dialectics, but in practice they deftly spin it to survive and gain from a neoliberal world order. .

The Communist party of India is supported by the DEEP STATE as Jew Rothschild created Communism…

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR JEW JOHN DEWEY WROTE MAOs LITTLE RED BOOK-- HE ALSO BRAINWASHED BR AMBEDKAR..

Most readers of Das Kapital only pretended to understand the contents--so that they can cry APUN BHI INTELLECTUAL..

Karl Marx saw history as the story of class struggles, in which the oppressed fight against their oppressors. .

MARX KNEW DAMN WELL THAT ROTHSCHILD CONTROLLED BOTH CAPITALISTS AND LABOUR UNIONS..

KARL MAX STOLE ALMOST ALL HIS IDEAS .. THEY WERE GIVEN TO HIM BY JEW ROTHSCHILD TO MAKE A KITCHIDI...

Example?...

The “theory of surplus value” was already espoused by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon..

The theory of the “immiseration of the proletariat” was espoused by Louis Blanc…
The theory of the “withering away of the State” and the ‘governing of men giving way to the administration of things’ was espoused by Henri de Saint-Simon…

The theory that a relatively small vanguard should conspire to take over the State and usher in the dictatorship of the proletariat is lifted from works of Louis Auguste Blanqui…

Karl Marx injected mindless Hegelian religious nonsense into his socialism. Marx clung so dearly to Hegel that he ended up espousing a sort of “Calvinism without God,” turning Marxism into a quasi-religious ideology..

His Hegelian ideology led him to espouse a most unscientific socialism. Marx called his theory “scientific socialism,” not because he followed the scientific method, but merely because it was dialectical and materialist. ..

Dialectics is not scientific as much as practical. Materialism is a metaphysical creed, not science…

Marx baby lifted from the works of Carl Menger and Murray Rothbard…

Marx does not condemn the capitalist. Instead, he dissects the structural constraints inherent in the dominance of capital…

JEW Karl Marx , a fellow of INFERIOR INTELLECT gets overly caught up in economistic drivel and pedantic UNREADABLE nonsense, so as to sound like the intelligensia. ..

To an intelligent man Marx sounds like a IDIOT..

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL DARES ROMILA THAPAR, SUNEET VARMA, DANIEL RAJA , SITARAM YECHURY, BRINDA KARAT , PRAKASH KARAT ETC TO DEBATE ON DAS CAPITAL LIVE ON TV...

I KNOW WHAT THESE INDIAN COMMIES ARE WORTH..

MAYBE KANHAIYA KUMAR --WHEN HE SITS AT HIS "BHINDOW SEAT " CAN EXPLAIN BETTER.

BREADWINNERS OF THOUSANDS OF FAMILIES HAVE BEEN AWAITING JUSTICE AS UNDERTRIALS FOR DECADES . .


MANY DPGs AND IGs OF INDIA CLAWED PROMOTIONS FOR THEMSELVES( AIDED BY CRIMINAL POLITICIANS ) BY SLAPPING FALSE CHARGES .. AND THEN KEEPING THEM IN JAIL AS UNDERTRIALS TILL THESE TOP COPS RETIRE...

UNIFORMED MEN GOT FAALTHU MEDALS AND PROMOTIONS…

POOR PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE THE WHEREWITHAL TO PROVIDE BAIL MONEY OR PERSONAL SURETY . . .WITH ANOTHER MAN COMING AND SHOWING ALL THOSE DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR THE GUARANTEE . ...

WHY IS THE INDIAN GOVT INSISTING ON BAIL MONEY FROM VERY POOR PEOPLE ? . ..
THE COMMIES HAD TAKEN OUT A LOW PROFILE , ALMOST INVISIBLE, GAZETTE NOTICE ( I HAVE PUT THE SCAN IN THIS POST ) THAT NON-HINDUS ( MUSLIMS/ CHRISTIANS/ ATHEIST COMMIES ) CAN BE IN THE DEVASWOM BOARD..

THIS HAS JUST BEEN STRUCK DOWN BY THE KERALA HIGH COURT.. THE COURT RULED THAT ONLY HINDUS CAN BE IN THE DEVASWOM BOARD ..

A HONOURABLE MAN WOULD FEEL BAD-- NOT ATTIMARI GANG TYPE GOON COMMIE POLITICIANS

WHEN THE PREVIOUS DEVASWOM BOARD CHIEF HANDED OVER CHARGE TO THE CURRENT COMMIE ATHEIST CHIEF -- MORE THAN 1200 CRORES OF MONEY WAS IN THE KITTY..

CHRISTIANS WITH HINDU NAMES, HINDU HATING ATHEIST COMMIES HAVE BEEN ENJOYING GOOD SALARIES, PERKS , BONUSES AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS-- ALL MONEY DONATED BY ADIVASIS AND POOR PILGRIMS ..

IF COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN THINKS HE CAN SHUT DOWN SABARIMALA PILGRIMAGE , USING HIS ATTACK DOG POLICE, CHELA MAGISTRATES / JUDGES AND HIJACKED DEVASWOM BOARD -- HE MUST THINK AGAIN..

COMMUNISM IS DEAD -- DROWNING COMMIES ARE CLUTCHING AT STRAWS..

WHEN THE COMMIE GOVT IS KICKED OUT IN THE NEXT ELECTIONS--  GOD SAVE PINARAYI VIJAYAN AND HIS GOONS .. AND WHO WILL ENJOY THE MOST ? BONG AND TELUGU COMMIES ...   THEY HAD ENOUGH OF THE ARROGANT  "KANNUR LOBBY " ..

UBER RICH MALAYALI BUSINESSMEN IN GULF WHO ARE MERE BENAMI FRONTS FOR THE ILL GOTTEN KICKBACK WEALTH OF CORRUPT COMMIE POLITICIANS WILL HAVE TO RUN FROM INDIA LIKE NIRAV MODI..

WE KNOW WHO THEY ARE..

ALL POLICE , MAGISTRATES, COLLECTORS , JUDGES WHO HAS HAVE FORGOTTEN THEIR OATHS AND HAVE BEEN PERSONALLY LOYAL TO CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN MUST BE WARNED, THEIR SERVICE REPORTS MARKED WITH ABUSE OF DEMOCRACY AND TRANSFERRED TO NORTH EAST STATES OR KASHMIR..

WE ASK I&B MINISTER COL RATHORE TO FIND OUT WHY ALL TV CHANNELS EXCEPT JANAM TV ARE TELLING FOUL LIES ABOUT SABARIMALA.

WHY ARE HINDUS CALLED FRINGE ELEMENTS IN OUR OWN ANCIENT LAND ?..

There are two sides to every coin.

NOTHING MUST BE DONE BY JUDGES WHICH HURT THE WATAN. 

READ THIS LINE A MILLION TIMES.

MOST MELORDS ARE THE QUINTESSENTIAL FROGS IN THE WELL , PRETENDING TO KNOW EVERYTHING, RIGHT?

KANHAIYA KUMARs FINGER QUIVERING MELODRAMA DURING CRASS SPEECHES WILL NOT WORK

FINGER QUIVERING WORKS ONLY WHEN GIVING A SPEECH TO A CROWD OF ILLITERATE GHUTKA CHEWING STREET SWEEPERS IN MUMBAI .. .

IT DOES NOT WORK WITH LITERATE PEOPLE— JUST SHOWS THE CLASS AND PATHETIC MINDSET OF JNU STUDENTS . ..

WE WILL NOT ALLOW JNU TO BE A NEST OF POISONOUS COMMIE VIPERS IN THE HEART OF DELHI. THIS IS MOST DANGEROUS FOR BHARATMATA.

KANHAIYA KUMAR, THE RUSTIC, CRASS , MIDDLE AGED STUDENT LEADER OF JNU FROM A DIRTY HOVEL (HOME ) —

WHAT JOB DOES KANHAIYA KUMAR, EXPECT TO SECURE AFTER HIS ”AFRICAN STUDIES” PHD ?

CAN HE EVEN UTTER A DECENT SENTENCE IN ENGLISH ?

HE WANTS PHELLOSSIPP ( fellowship ) , PROMOSSANN ( promotion ) , SORE LEAVE ( shore leave ) , AJJJADI ( azadi ), BHYABBASSTA ( vyavasta) AND WHAT NOT !

THE JNU COMMIE STUDENTS DESERVE HIM—ALL UNKEMPT, UNWASHED, UNCOUTH , CRASS .

REWARDS WHISTLE BLOWERS AMONG JNU STUDENTS AND TEACHERS . .

While these desh bhakt JNU students marched the commie students /teachers warned them  of dire consequences- Jis tarah se waha police ko mara gaya hai, usi tarah tum logo ko yahan marenge (You will be killed as the policemen were massacred in Dantewada).    There were threatened with acid on face by hardcore Naxals hiding inside the JNU hostels, if they blew the whistle .  Hostels have country guns in secure hidden areas.





Below: This is the STINKING hovel Kanhaiya Kumar is from (father/ mother/ brother ) 

 -- poor OK it is NOT a crime ,  but atleast you can keep it clean !  

How many of you want your darling daughter to sit next to a 33 year old man sans class or culture, from this home ?  

Culture rubs off !

What job does Kanhaiya Kymar at the age of 33 expect to secure , after finishing his AFRICAN STUDIES in JNU ?

Is there NO limit to the number of years a student can study (sic) in JNU ?

Why is OPEN treason by COMMIES being tolerated ?  

Is Modi afraid of Rothschild’s DOUBLE agent JEW Noam Chomsky?



MANU SMRITI IS A POISON INJECTED DOCUMENT OF JEW ROTHSCHILD.

MANU WAS A NOBLE MAHARISHI



The temptation to rush to the COLLEGIUM judge with a PIL for imaginary grievance against a public authority has deflected the primary responsibility of citizens themselves in a representative self government of making ELECTED legislators and the executive responsible for their actions.


The MELORD JUDGES react knee jerk as if the sky will IMMINENTLY fall on Bharatmata’s head- 

-- they love to play MOSES , don’t they !




Almost all MELORDS were handpicked by JEW Rothschild to bleed Bharatmata.

But for the social media people of India would have asked – “ROTHSCHILD WHO?”

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee tried her own hand in hijacking the Judiciary.  She demanded that the centre must clearly mention in the NJAC Bill that the Governor would have to follow the advice of the state government in the appointment of high court judges

This is when the Governor is bound to take decisions on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers.


Madame Mamata, this is NOT as easy as selling your puerile UGLY painting for crores . 


Below: Is mein maa ki momota bhi hoi-- baap ki peepta bhi hoi - nay - hai !



WE  THE PEOPLE OF INDIA do not have a problem with  judicial activism, if the JUDGES DO NOT ELECT THEMSELVES via a vested COLLEGIUM system- we do NOT want foreign DESH DROHIS involved in our system.





WE THE PEOPLE of India will NOT allow the unelected COLLGEIUM JUDGES to play Moses – leave alone GOD

Let the MELORDS know , India is NOT Pakistan.

Judiciary can never enslave armed forces and police,  like in Pakistan with BILDERBERG CLUB help.

The judiciary is the weakest body of the state. 

It  has NO power over purse and sword.  

MeLORDS derive power only when  WE THE PEOPLE  repose faith in them.


LET NOT A SITUATION ARISE--

-- WHEN A MELORD CONVICTS A CRIMINAL AND ASKS THE POLICE TO ARREST HIM—

--  AND THE POLICE REPLIES --

 FUCK YOU MELORDS – YOU ARE NOT WORTH IT !”


BE WARNED!


WHICH PART OF THE CONSTITUTION SAYS ONLY MELORDS CAN JUMP ON THE BACKS OF ELECTED POLITICIANS AND BITE OFF THEIR EARS?

BECAUSE POLITICIANS TELL LIES AND ARE CORRUPT ?

WHAT ABOUT MELORDS  BEFORE THEY BECAME JUDGES?   

YOU WERE FOOT SLOGGING UNSUCCESSFUL DISHONEST LAWYERS , RIGHT?  




( UNLESS YOU WERE STAR SONS LIKE MAHESH JETHMALANI OR PRASHANT BHUSHAN )

YOU LAWYERS NEVER LIED ?  

YOU WERE NEVER WAS CORRUPT? 

WELL RETIRED COURT BABUS SAY SOMETHING ELSE.



BOTH PRAKASH KARAT AND SITARAM YECHURY ARE EX-STUDENT LEADERS OF JNU.  
D RAJA IS GROOMING HIS VICIOUS JNU COMMIE STUDENT LEADER DAUGHTER --WATCH HER IN ACTION . HER MOTHER ANNIE RAJA IS A COMMIE FROM KANNUR..




Read all 11 parts of the post below-





BR Ambedkar did NOT spend one minute of his life fighting for India’s freedom.  He was HOOO HAAA about Brahmins refusing to drink from the same cup as a dalit.  But he also knew that the white invader would NOT drink from the same Brahmins cup.

BR Ambedkar asked the dalits to hate Brahmins , but for himself , he married a Chitpavan Brahmin woman—such was his hypocrisy.   


A lot of Mahar dalits who converted into Buddhism on the behest of Bharatratna BR Ambedkar felt cheated by his slimy hypocrisy and they re-converted back from Buddhism to Hinduism.

To milk dalit votes APCO Modi spares NO opportunity to pray to BR Ambedkar statues ( only if a camera is around to record it ).





The constitution declares that the final interpreter of the law is the Supreme Court. 

 By the way MELORDS we the people also know how to interpret the constitution in this internet age, without any pre-conceived notions. A small school boy can interpret the constition better than our Judges.

The only the judges are good at it to use past judgememnts as a langot to the constition—This is illegal.

WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ALLOW STARE DECISIS WHERE OLD JUDGMENTS MADE UNDER A JUSTICE IS BLIND SYSTEM, SANS CONTEXT WITH FAKE WITNESSES PRODUCED OUT OF THIN AIR IS USED AS GOSPEL , AND USED AS A FOUL ILLEGAL SNOW BALL PICKING UP WEIGHT EVERY DAY..

BURN ALL PAST RECORDS WHERE JUDGES WROTE THEIR OWN DICTATOR LAWS -LIKE THE 3 JUDGE COLLEGIUM .

THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs WHOSE SOLE AIM IS TO KEEP THE QUOTA SYSTEM ALIVE ---

--BY BRIBING THE DALIT LEADERS AND FUNDING EXTREME RABBLE ROUSING BY STUDENTS OF EVR PERIYAR- BR AMBEDKAR UNIONS IN COLLEGE CAMPUSES.

BRAINY STUDENTS FIND IT ABHORRENT TO COMPETE WITH SUCH MEDIOCRE COLLEAGUES Or EVEN WORK ALONGSIDE,  THEM IN A TEAM.

BRIGHT INDIANS MIGRATE ABROAD—THIS IS WHAT THE DEEP STATE WANTS
WE INDIANS WILL NOT ALLOW THE UNELECTED NGT ( NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL ) TO PLAY GOD.

WHO THE HELL ARE THESE MELORDs OF NGT,   TO ASK FOR VEHICLE SCRAPPING EVERY 10 YEARS ?

WE KNOW WHAT TATA MOTORS IS DOING IN AMERICAN DEAD CITY OF DETRIOT !

WE WILL NOT ALLOW NGT TO BE A PARALLEL JUDICIARY.

WE KNOW THEIR DEALINGS WITH GREENPEACE,   AFTER NGT WAS USHERED IN BY THE ITALIAN WAITRESS.

WE THE PEOPLE WARN NGT—

DO NOT OVERSTEP YOUR BRIEF.    DO NOT EVER GET INFLUENCED BY THE BILDERBERG CLUB AND KOSHER BIG BROTHER.

THESE RETIRED JUDGES ( MOST UNDER MEDICATION ) PUT OUT TO PASTURE MUST NOT THINK THEY ARE THE JUDICIARY.
THE SOLUTION TO INDIAs PROBLEMS IS ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM – NOT JUDICIAL ADVENTURISM..

THIS MUST START OFF WITH NIL DISRUPTIONS IN PARLIAMENT BY SHOUTING , WAVING PLACARDS AND RUSHING INTO THE WELL OF THE HOUSE.

ERRANT MPs MUST BE FINED AND THE FINE DEDUCTED FROM HIS SALARY AT SOURSE—WITH A FORMULA WHICH ENCOMPASSES HIS WEALTH .

OBVIOUSLY A RAJYA SABHA MEMBER LIKE VIJAYA MALLYA WOULD NOT MIND BEING FINED DAILY.

AFTER  THREE FINES- IT MUST BE SUSPENSION FOR A FEW DAYS , AS PER THE SPEAKERS PREROGATIVE ( IN CONSULATION WITH BOTH THE RULING/ OPPOSITION HOUSE LEADERS )
HEY MELORDS—

YOU ACCEPT PIL EVEN VIA POST CARD , RIGHT?

####################################
HERE IS A PIL FROM THIS BLOGSITE.

“SUBDIVISION AND FRAGMENTATION “ OF AGRICULTURAL FERTILE LAND IS INDIAs NO 1 PROBLEM—

THE ROOT CAUSE OF FARMERS SUICIDE.  

 PLEASE FIND A SOLUTION AND SET A MINIMUM AREA LIMIT AFTER WHICH LAND CANNOT BE FRAGMENTED ( AMONG CHILDREN ) ANYMORE.

PIL FILED WITH SC VIA BLOG POST  : 
DATE 16TH JAN 2019
TIME : 1820 IST

###################################


COMMIES GRABBED LAND AND DISTRIBUTED AMONG LANDLESS. YOU CANNOT DO AGRICULTURE ON SMALL PIECES OF LAND..

THE ENTIRE NAXAL MOVEMENT IN INDIA IS SUPPORTED BY FOREIGN FORCES . ..

NAXALISM IN BENGAL, KERALA AND TELENGANA HAS ALWAYS BEEN ABOUT LAND GRABBING, BURNING LAND RECORDS IN GOVT REGISTRY OFFICES , KILLING CURRENT AND RETIRED REGISTRARS,  AND BURNING FIR RECORDS IN LOCAL POLICE STATIONS . .

Read all parts of the post below--

today the Indian govt writ does NOT run in this red corridor. Voters are afraid to cast votes. Schools are afraid to hoist the national flag on Independence day.

Foreign white skinned desh drohis in the garb of human rights groups, good samaritans and evangelists have been allowed a free run in the red corridor.

Today this red corridor is almost fully non-vegetarian atheists , Commies and Christians.

The census figures are fudged as these naxals are their families ( also NE states ) are told to declare themselves as Hindus and not Christians.

Today desh drohi foreign forces are involved in making sure there are BR AMBEDKAR/ EVR PERIYAR students unions in every Indian college.   We all know how the Commie professors of JNU bred commie traitors in the heart of Delhi.

By way of PIL the Melords ruled – Only  photographs of only President, PM and the Chief Justice of India can be used in in advertisements.



We can understand PM and President.

JUST WHO THE HELL IS CJI ?   

KAUN SA KHET KA BEETROOT HAI YEH?

PRAY ?

PRITHEE?

WHAT A FUCKIN’ JOKE..

THERE IS NO WAY WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA WILL ACCEPT A CJI AS OUR NATIONs LEADER .


THE WHOLE IDEA OF THE ABOVE ORDER (  TO PUBLISH THE PHOTO OF CJI  ) WAS TO CONVINCE THE INDIAN MASSES THAT MELORD CJI ( COLLEGIUM ) IS INDEED A NATIONAL LEADER TO BE SANCTIFIED IN OUR HEARTS AND MINDS.


BUT WE INDIANS ARE NOT STUPID ANY MORE  !

The BILDERBERG CLUB created the PIL system to elevate MELORDS as NATIONAL LEADERS .


PIL was created as a TOOL  for the UNELECTED judiciary to expand its own powers and autonomy under the mantle of a popular social justice agenda !




HULLO MELORDS--

YOU ALL GOT HAJAAAAR SPONTANEOUS KNOWLEGDE,  WHILE SITTING IN YOUR AC CHAMBERS , RIGHT ?


IF NCW DOES NOT HAVE 50% MALE MEMBERSHIP--WE ASK MODI TO DISMANTLE NCW.

THIS ORGANISATION IS NOW DARING ENOUGH TO SUMMON MINISTERS.   ALL NCW CAN DO IS TO MAKE AN OBSERVATION—PERIOD !

THE NCW SUMMONED THE LAW MINISTER OF DELHI ( SOMNATH BHARATI ) OVER SOME AFRICAN WHORES WHO PUSH DRUGS

NCW IN INDIA WAS STARTED BY BILDERBERG CLUB ( USING NARASIMHA RAO ) TO WEDGE INDIA APART BY GENDER.

ALMOST ALL DOWRY COMPLAINT CASES ARE FALSE.

WHEN NCW CALLED KERALA MLA PC GEORGE (  THE ONLY KERALA MLA WITH BALLS ) HE CRIED OUT LIVE ON TV IN MALAYALAM  “ OHH DARR GAYA APUN . EN CEEEE DOUBLEW – TELL THEM TO FUCK THEMELVES “ ( AIYYO PEDICHU POI, NCW , POYITTU PANI KOKKAN PARIYU )

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kochi/kerala-nun-rape-case-hc-says-no-to-cbi-probe/articleshow/65794739.cms

JUDICIARY DOES NOT HAVE THE POWERS TO STOP A CBI PROBE..

In 1987, the CBI was divided into two divisions: the Anti-Corruption Division and the Special Crimes Division.-- to widen its SCOPE..

The High Courts and the Supreme Court have the jurisdiction to order a CBI investigation into an offence alleged to have been committed in a state without the state's consent..

The COLLEGIUM JUDGES started paying GOD with a ruling no complaint can be made against a judge of the supreme court without the written permission of the chief justice of India.. Why ?

CBI had arersted a hawala operator who led them eventually to a retired judge of the Orissa high court, IM Quddusi, who, it was claimed, had taken money from a medical college with a promise to help them get a favourable judgement from the supreme court..

On matters of integrity and accountability, the judiciary has always asked the public to trust them.

ON WHAT BASIS ?

Judges appoint judges. Judges decide whether judges face any consequences for misconduct. Judges decide whether judges have committed an impeachable offence. Judges decide whether judges will be named in a criminal offence. At all times, the claim has been raised that the institution of the judiciary is too precious, too fragile, and too important to allow anyone but judges to safeguard it. 

The judges have abused the term SUBJUDICE which is not applicable to India ( without a JURY system )

KYA HO RAHA HAI ?

ALMOST ALL LAND GRABBED BY NAXALS IN KERALA BELONGED TO TEMPLES  - -AND TODAY WE HAVE LOST 95% OF PRICELESS AYURVEDIC HERBS . . .


TELGI STAMP PAPER SCAM WAS NOT ABOUT SELLING FAKE STAMP PAPER... IT WAS ABOUT REGULARISING LAND GRABBED BY COMMIES AND POLITICIANS ...

Below: Indians have lost faith in the Judiciary--it is SLOW /  EXPENSIVE / UNFAIR -- while the khaps are FAST / FREE  / FAIR ( with a finger on local history / pulse and culture).  



All MUCK thrown on Khaps by BENAMI media are almost 99% false.






NGT is trying to acquire the powers of superior courts. “NGT cannot strike down a statute. It can only examine the decisions that are taken and consider if they are in compliance with the three principles laid down in Section 20 of the Act”

NGT has been accused of overstepping its jurisdiction and taking actions for which it has not been empowered under the NGT Act.

Three issues have frequently cropped up.

First, does NGT have powers to take cognisance of a matter on its own and take action upon it-the power of suomotu. 
Second, can NGT review and direct change in rules and regulations-the power of judicial review.
Third, can NGT take up any case which can be termed as “substantial question of environment”.

Once the NGT started operating, lower courts were barred from taking up environmental cases. Not that they were doing a great job, but the debarring of lower courts has meant that poor and disadvantaged communities living in remote parts of the country now have to go to NGT Benches in their respective zones to get justice. 

For a tribal trying to stop pollution from an iron ore mine in Bastar, this means filing and fighting a case in Bhopal. For a villager affected by oil pollution in Nagaland, this means coming to Kolkata and hoping to be heard quickly. This is neither easy nor affordable.




A THINK TANK MUST GET TOGETHER AND EVOLVE A BODMAS SYSTEM IN OUR CONSTITUTION—AS MOST WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO INTERPRET IT CANT THINK FROM ASSHOLE TO ELBOW !


TIME TO BREAK A BOMBSHELL ON THE COLLECTIVE HEADS OF OUR COLLEGIUM MELORDS.

THE COLLEGIUM MELORDS HAVE MADE IT OUT TO BE , THAT ONLY JUDICIARY HAS THE POWERS TO MONITOR AND CHECK THE OTHER ORGANS

SORRY, IF THE COLLEGIUM MELORD JUDGE IS FOUND TO BE A TRAITOR TO THE WATAN  ( AS SEEN IN PAKISTAN ) THE OTHER ORGANS OF OUR DEMOCRACY HAS THE POWER TO CHECK THE JUDGES.

A TRAITOR TO THE WATAN MELORD COLLEGIUM JUDGE CAN BE INCARCERATED OR SHOT -  

-- AS THE POWERS OF THE CONSTITUTION ARE VESTED BY   ”WE THE PEOPLE “


The Judiciary has saved themselves every time.

Today even an FIR against a judge can only be registered after the permission of the CJI.

This had tragic consequences in the provident fund scam where then- CJI  KG Balakrishnan did not give permission to file an FIR against accused judges for almost two years, by which time the prime accused, Ashutosh Asthana, died in mysterious circumstances.

In his confessional statement, Asthana had named 36 sitting and retired judges, including those of the Allahabad High Court and district courts in Uttar Pradesh, besides an apex court judge as beneficiaries in the Ghaziabad Provident Fund (PF) scam.

The fraudulent withdrawals were to the tune of 48 crores of rupees from provident fund accounts of class III and class IX employees.  In his statement to the trial court, Asthana named several judges and said he used to illegally withdraw cash from the PF accounts on their verbal instructions.

On April 28, 2008 Asthana recorded his statement before the trial court in Ghaziabad and named 36 judges as alleged beneficiaries, but testimony was yet to be concluded.   There were eleven High Court judges who are alleged to have taken cash or other benefits from him. They were named by Asthana in his statement before the court.

This immoral scam involved 11 High Court judges, 23 district court judges besides a Supreme Court judge, accused as beneficiaries of the money withdrawn fraudulently from the provident fund accounts of Class IV employees working in Ghaiziabad district courts

Ashutosh Asthana’s wife Sushma had declared that her  husband had told her he would be killed in Dasna jail

And by the way ex-CJI  KG Balakrishnan got in via the backdoor on SC quota—while in reality he was a Christian , NOT entitled to this quota.

Justice KG Balakrishnan did not meet the minimum qualifications prescribed for being selected a judge of the High Court.



As per our constitution any  judge can be impeached.  

This impeachment is carried out by a vote by ELECTED Members of Parliament.  

COLLEGIUM JUDGES –  HERE IS ANOTHER BOMBSHELL ON YOUR COLLECTIVE MELORD HEADS-

In your case, the appointing authority is not the dismissing authority—so you cant save yourself—though right now you are appointing yourselves.

ACHCHE DIN for COLLEGIUM MELORDS  have now come to an end-
DATE : 16TH JAN 2019
TIME: 2210 IST
.


The High Court/Supreme Court judges SHALL not escape punishment for being a TRAITOR TO THE WATAN--

- or even  misusing their office or "misbehaviour" or for corruption.


Article 124(4) of the Constitution proscribes against misappropriation, bribery, committing of crimes of the nature of "moral turpitude," acts of treason and other grave offences.  

 The Constitution Review Commission has proposed that the prohibited acts listed under Article 124(4) ought to be included in the definition of "misbehaviour."

 WE THE PEOPLE SHALL DECIDE ON THIS MATTER WHEN IT COMES TO SEDITION AND  TREASON BY MELORD COLLEGIUM JUDGES.  

TAKE IT EASY WHEN YOU PUSH FOR END OF AFSPA AND TO POKING YOUR NOSE TOO MUCH IN IB/ RAW/ NIA AFFAIRS.  

Article 124(4) SHALL remain applicable to the case of the High Court and Supreme Court judges—if they are clearly guilty of TREASON by accepting money from foreign forces to KILL Bharatmata.
INTERLINKING OF INDIAN RIVERS WOULD HAVE KILLED BHARATMATA

The Supreme Court, while interpreting Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, has been banking upon the American Constitution and its interpretation in case law. For example Indian Constitution's "procedure as established by law'' is approaching towards the American "process by law." 

By the same token it would be good for Indian justice to borrow the "process of law" to which American judges found guilty of offences are subjected to, while facing consequences of their unacceptable actions.

WE INDIANS ARE NOT SLAVES OF ROTHSCHILDs USA !



The term “procedure established by law” is used directly in the Indian constitution. “Due Process of Law” has much wider significance, but it is not mentioned in Indian Constitution but we have desh drohi perception molders on benami media trying to fool us into giving Judiciary excessive powers as what the kosher DEEP STATE has given to US judges.. 

The “due process doctrine” is followed in the United States of America, and Indian constitutional framers very deliberately purposefully left that out—as our constitution considers the elected Parliament as supreme like the British system..

Procedure Established by Law means that a law that is duly enacted by the legislature or the concerned body is valid if it has followed the correct procedure.

PROCEDURE ESTABLISHED BY LAW “ ( Indian system as per our constitution)  means a law duly enacted is valid even if it’s contrary to principles of justice and equity.    

Our Indian constitution offers NO protection to DESH DROHIS in the payroll of foreign forces or Naxals who point a foreign gun at Bharatmata or TUKDE TUKDE seditious NU traitors. 

“ Due process of law” of the American system  doctrine  not only checks if there is a law to deprive the life and personal liberty of a person but also see if the law made is fair, just and not arbitrary.  This is why USA has such a deep swamp full of DEEP STATE payroll traitors..

If the US SC finds that any law as not fair, it will declare it as null and void. This doctrine provides for more fair treatment of individual rights.    Sorry, in India we don’t follow this KOSHER DEEP STATE injected doctrine.. Have you seen an ordinary lower court judge in Honolulu vetoed President Trump’s effort to curtail illegal immigration.

MORE THAN 12 MILLION ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ENTERED USA VIA MEXICO DURING JEW OBAMAs RULE..

THIS FIGURE IS HIDDEN BY THE KOSHER DEEP STATE..

ALL THESE VOTES ARE 100% FOR DEMOCRATS .. 

THAT WAS WHY HILLARY CLINTON WAS SO CONFIDENT OF BECOMING PRESIDENT OF USA ..SHE SWEPT THE POPULAR VOTES IN CAILIFORNIA STATE WHICH HAS MAXIMUM ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS

Under American style ” DUE PROCESS OF LAW ” the judiciary plays GOD  to access fundamental fairness, justice, and liberty of any legislation. This clause known as the due process clause, has been the most significant single source of judicial review in the U.S.A.

IN INDIA JUDICIARY HAVE NO POWERS TO MAKE JUDICIAL REVIEWS ..

In India, a liberal interpretation is made by judiciary after 1978 and it has tried to make the term ‘Procedure established by law’ as synonymous with ‘Due process’.. 

This happened when JUDICIARY was riding high after the emergency and Indian Judiciary was in the grip of MOSSAD and CIA .   JP was a CIA spook.

KERALA COMMIE AK GOPALAN ( FROM KANNUR ) WAS A ROTHSCHILD AGENT.

In A.K. Gopalan v State of Madras, the petitioner A.K. Gopalan, a communist leader, was detained under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950. The petitioner challenged the validity of the Act and his detention there under on the following grounds:

That it violated his right to move freely throughout the territory of India which is the very essence of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution. The detention under this Act was not a reasonable detention under clause (5) of Article 19 and hence the Act was void

That the Act was in conflict with Article 21 of the Constitution in as much as it provided for deprivation of the personal liberty of a man not in accordance with ‘procedure established by law’.   It was argues that the word law in Article 21 should be understood not in the sense of an enactment but as signifying the universal principles of natural justice and a law which did not incorporate these principles could not be valid

That the expression “procedure established by law” meant the same thing as “due process of law” in the American Constitution. MY LEFT BALL

The petitioner argued that the expression “procedure established by law” was synonymous with the expression “due process of law” of the American Constitution. It was contended that the Indian Constitution gives the same protection with the only difference that while the due process clause has been interpreted in America to cover both substantive and procedural law, only the protection of procedural law is guaranteed in India.

The contention was that the omission of the word “ DUE “ made no difference to the interpretation of Article 21; the word established was not equivalent to prescribed, but had a wider meaning; the word law did not mean enacted law but it meant principles of natural justice. MY LEFT BALL !

The Report of the Drafting Committee shows that Constituent Assembly had formerly used the AMERICAN expression “ DUE PROCESS OF LAW” ,  but they deliberately dropped it in favour of the INDIAN expression “PROCEDURE ESTABLISHED BY LAW”, which is more specific and does NOT give an excuse for the Judiciary to play GOD.  This truth is on record...


IF SO, THEN WHO THESE HELL ARE THESE DEEP STATE SPONSORED JUDGES TO PUNCH A FOUL “ DUE “ HOLE IN THE CONSTITUTION TO SAVE AK GOPALANs GHOST  FROM THE GALLOWS VIA MANEKA GANDHIs PASSPORT ??


The Report of the Drafting Committee shows that Constituent Assembly had formerly used the AMERICAN expression “ DUE PROCESS OF LAW” ,  but they deliberately dropped it in favour of the INDIAN expression “PROCEDURE ESTABLISHED BY LAW”, which is more specific and does NOT give an excuse for the Judiciary to play GOD.  This truth is on record...


IF SO, THEN WHO THESE HELL ARE THESE DEEP STATE SPONSORED JUDGES TO PUNCH A FOUL “ DUE “ HOLE IN THE CONSTITUTION TO SAVE AK GOPALANs GHOST FROM THE GALLOWS VIA MANEKA GANDHIs PASSPORT ??

The Report of the Drafting Committee shows that Constituent Assembly had formerly used the AMERICAN expression “ DUE PROCESS OF LAW” ,  but they deliberately dropped it in favour of the INDIAN expression “PROCEDURE ESTABLISHED BY LAW”, which is more specific and does NOT give an excuse for the Judiciary to play GOD.  This truth is on record...


IF SO, THEN WHO THESE HELL ARE THESE DEEP STATE SPONSORED JUDGES TO PUNCH A FOUL “ DUE “ HOLE IN THE CONSTITUTION TO SAVE AK GOPALANs GHOST  FROM THE GALLOWS VIA MANEKA GANDHIs PASSPORT ??

But in Maneka Gandhi v Union of India, the Supreme Court controlled by the DEEP STATE has illegally overruled the above case and has held that the mere prescription of some kind of procedure is not enough to comply with the mandate of Article 21.. This ruling is NULL AND VOID..

THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY ILLEGALLY AND UNCONSTITUTIONALLY GRABBED POWER BY CHICANERY OF THE WORD “DUE”. 

PROCEDURE ESTABLISHED BY LAW “  KEEPS THE ELECTED PARLIAMENT RIGHTFUL SUPREME ( USING SUBJECTIVE DISCRETION ) AS LAID OUT UNDER THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION.

Following this doctrine means that, a DESH DROHI n can be deprived of his privacy or personal liberty according to the procedure established by law.

DUE PROCESS OF LAW” KEEPS THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY SUPREME—BUT THIS IS NOT ALLOWED BY THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION…

By this doctrine DESH DROHIS under foreign payroll can inflict a thousand cuts on Bharatmata—this is how  the BASTARDS made the RED CORRIDOR ..


Indian 'Procedure established by law' has now the same significance as the American 'Due process of law'  after SC verdict in Maneka Gandhi v/s Union of India Case.

Article 21: Protection of life and personal liberty No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law

Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India' Case 1978 : She was issued a passport during Emergency period and later at the time of new government she was asked to surrender her passport in public interest as per procedure established by law in section 10(3)(c) of the passport act. She filed a petition in SC challenging Govt order and whether a procedure can deprive a person from the right guaranteed under Article 21. The Court ruled that the mere existence of an enabling law was not enough to restrain personal liberty. Such a law must also be “just, fair and reasonable”.

SO SO SO

BY “STARE DECISIS “  THIS ILLEGAL RULING IS NOW ATTACHED AS A LANGOT TO THE CONSTITUTION..

A FOREIGN BLACK MAMBA SNAKE WHO HAS COME TO BITE YOUR BABY NOW HAS THE SAME RIGHTS AS YOUR BABY..

I ASK , HAS INDIA PRODUCED A SINGLE INTELLIGENT MAN—WHY DOES A BLOGGER HAVE TO WRITE ALL THIS.. ARE WE CUNTS  

The post-emergency period (1977-98) is known as the period of ILLEGAL Judicial Adventurism.   During this period Judiciary controlled by the KOSHER DEEP STATE grabbed enormous powers illegally and unconstitutionally.

DIGNITY AND PRIVACY IS AFFORDED BY THE CONSTITUTION TO YOUR BABY , THE GOOD CHILD OF BHARTMATA  , NOT THE EVIL FOREIGN BLACK MAMBA ( TRAITORS WITH FOREIGN GUNS ) WHO HAS COME TO KILL YOUR BABY..

THESE ILLEGAL COLLGIUM MELORDS WILL MAKE INDIAN SLAVES TO FOREIGN FORCES , ALL OVER AGAIN -- IN THE NAME OF GIVING INDIANS MORE FREEDOM.

WE KNOW HOW MESSIAHs LIKE KATHIAWARI JAIN NAY JEW GANDHI SOLD US "SELECTIVE " AHIMSA AND ALLOWED HIS MASTER JEW ROTHSCHILD TO ENSLAVE INDIA

.
Before the landmark judgment of Maneka Gandhi v. UOI, t he concept of due process of law was not known to any Indian.    It is the kosher DEEP STATE who introduced this alien concept via the illegal Judiciary..

PROCEDURE ESTABLISHED BY LAW established SUBJECTIVE DHARMA.
Protecting good citizens of the watan is DHARMA of the rulers.

DUE PROCESS OF LAW established OBJECTIVE JUDICIAL TYRANNY of the unelected, controlled by DESH DROHIS from abroad.   

This is the reason why we have so many foreign funded NGOs.. This is the reason why we have been unable to anything to the JNU commie professors who bleed Bharatmata..

In America, judiciary can declare any law passed by the legislature void on the basis of several factors like the enacted law is in contravention of the provisions of the Constitution or infringing upon the basic principles of the Constitution.   

This is how JEW Rothschild created the SWAMP in USA which Trump is trying hard to drain.


SOMEONE WANTED ME TO EXPOUND MORE--

AK GOPALAN CASE  -  AK Gopalan's preventive detention was upheld though in violation to Article 14 ( because arbitrary detention) and Article 19 (violated freedom of mvmt) because Article 21 meant only procedural due process ie., Only arbitrary actions of Executive are protected against, not those of legislature and hence the SC concluded that A21 was not violated as preventive detention law was valid. 

This judgement concluded that FRs are not interconnected - a law based on 1 FR need not satisfy other FRs

AK GOPALAN DIED ON 22ND MARCH 1977.

AK Gopalan case held two major points:--

19, 21 and 22 are mutually exclusive. Art 19 was to not apply to a law affecting personal liberty to which art 21 applies. In the above case, the restrictions under article 19 applied only on free people. Unless the state arrested a person for making a speech, holding an assembly, forming an association or for entering a territory, the arrest had to be EXAMINED under article 21.

 A “LAW” affecting life and liberty could not be declared unconstitutional merely because it lacked natural justice or due procedure. Hence article 21 provided no immunity to DESH DROHIS against competent legislative action.

Maneka Gandhi was issued a passport on 1/06/1976.

On the 4th of July, 1977, Smt. Maneka Gandhi received a letter from the Regional Passport Office, Delhi, asking her to submit her passport (No. K-869668) within seven days from the day on which she had received such letter, i.e. before 11th July 1977.  AK Gopalan died on 22nd March 1977..

The letter stated that it had been the decision of the Government of India to impound her passport under Section 10(3)(c)of the Passport Act 1967. The grounds for such an impounding, as told to her, was “public interest.”

Maneka Gandhi’s s case was decided by a “CHOSEN “  7-judge bench of the Supreme Court in 1978.

The judges involved in the case were-

M.H. Beg, C.J.
P.N. Bhagwati.
Y.V. Chandrachud.
V.R. Krishna Iyer.
N.L. Untwalia.
P.S. Kai asam.
S. Murtaza Fazal Ali.

In Maneka Gandhi’s case, the Supreme Court laid down that Articles 14, 19 and 21 are not mutually exclusive. A FOUL nexus has been established between these three Articles.

This means that a law prescribing a procedure for depriving a person a ‘personal liberty’ has to meet the requirements of Article 19. Also, the procedure established by law in Article 21 must answer the requirements of Article 14 as well.

Hence this judgement established "due procedure of law" rather than “process established by law" - protection not only against arbitrary actions of Executive but those of Legislature also leading to establishment of Judicial Activism eg. eg. striking down NJAC

Also Right to travel abroad was interpreted as the part of the Art 21.  DESH DROHIS could thus run away from India legally. This was a major judgement reversing Goalan's case judgement - narrow and FOUL interpretation of Article 21..

The Supreme Court in the present case had adopted the widest possible interpretation of the right to life and personal liberty, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.  Bhagwati, J. observed:

“The expression ‘personal liberty’ in Article 21 is of widest amplitude and it covers a variety of rights which go to constitute the personal liberty of man and some of them have raised to the status of distinct fundamental rights and given additional protection under Article 19.”

Also, with respect to the relationship between Article 19 and Article 21, the Court held that Article 21 is controlled by Article 19, i.e., it must satisfy the requirement of Article 19.

THIS WAS A PLOY TO SAVE DESH DROHIS AND ALSO IN FUTURE TO STRIKE DOWN NJAC..

The Court observed:  “The law must therefore now be settled that Article 21 does not exclude Article 19 and that even if there is a law prescribing a procedure for depriving a person of personal liberty, and there is consequently no infringement of the fundamental right conferred by Article 21 such a law in so far as it abridges or takes away any fundamental right under Article 19 would have to meet the challenges of that Article.”Thus a law “depriving a person of ‘personal liberty’ has not only to stand the test” of Article 21, but it must stand the test of Article 19 and Article 14 of the Constitution as well.

This  gave a new and ULTERIOR MOTIVED INTERPRETATION  to the meaning of ‘life and personal liberty’ under Article 21 of the Constitution..

The word “DUE” in the expression “due process of law” in the American Constitution is interpreted to mean “JUST” according to the opinion of the Supreme Court of U.S.A. controlled by the DEEP STATE.

That word imparts jurisdiction to the Courts to pronounce what is “due” from otherwise, according to law. The deliberate omission of the word “due” from article 21 of Indian constituion lends strength to the contention that the justifiable aspect of “law”, i.e., to consider whether it is reasonable or not by the Court, does not form part of the Indian Constitution.

The omission of the word “due”, the limitation imposed by the word “procedure” and the insertion of the word “established” thus brings out more clearly the idea of legislative prescription in the expression used in article 21. By adopting the phrase “procedure established by law” the Constitution gave the legislature the final word to determine the law.

JUDICIAL ADVENTURISM WAS NOW “STARE DECISIS”..

This FIVE judge bench was bound by the NINE judge bench in 2nd and 3rd Judges. The doctrine of STARE DECISIS ’ commands that for complete adjudication, the matter should have been heard by a larger bench.

SO SO SO

APPLICATION OF THE ULTERIOR MOTIVED STARE DECISIS ( NOT ALLOWED BY THE CONSTITUTION ) IS ON THE WHIMS AND FANCIES OF THE MELORDs ?

NJAC WAS STRUCK DOWN BY THE SUPREME COURT

The Lok Sabha on 13 August 2014 and the Rajya Sabha on 14 August 2014 passed the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Bill, 2014 to scrap the collegium system of appointment of Judges. The President of India has given his assent to the National Judicial Appointments Commission Bill, 2014 on 31 December 2014, after which the bill has been renamed as the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014.

99th Amendment and NJAC Act quashed by Supreme court…By a majority opinion of 4:1, on 16 October 2015, Supreme Court struck down the constitutional amendment and the NJAC Act restoring the two-decade old collegium system of judges appointing judges in higher judiciary. Supreme Court declared that NJAC is interfering with the autonomy of the judiciary by the executive which amounts to tampering of the basic structure of the constitution where parliament is not empowered to change the basic structure.

Justices J. S. Khehar, Madan Lokur, Kurian Joseph and Adarsh Kumar Goel had declared the 99th Amendment and NJAC Act unconstitutional while Justice Chelameswar upheld it. The judgement was hailed by lawyer Prashant Bhushan who had appeared for the petitioners challenging NJAC

Declaring that the judiciary cannot risk being caught in a “web of indebtedness” towards the government, the Supreme Court rejected the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act and the 99th Constitutional Amendment which  give elected parliament a final say in the appointment of judges to the highest courts.

The SC is giving a message that the power is with them: Senior advocate Harish Salve

“Vesting the power of appointing judges on the executive is inappropriate and arbitrary,” said Fali Nariman.

SORRY THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT GIVE AN SUCH POWERS TO THE SUPRME COURT

The Third Judge’s case of 1998 which became the basis on which the collegium system assumed primacy in appointment of judges for the higher judiciary.

The Supreme Court of India's collegium system, which appoints judges to the nation's constitutional courts, has its genesis in, and continued basis resting on, three of its own judgments which are collectively known as the Three Judges Cases..

The Supreme Court struck down the 99th Constitutional Amendment for being ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution.

Ultra vires means “beyond one's legal power or authority”.. TEE HEEEEEEEEEEEE !

VETO POWER LIES WITH THE SUBJECTIVE PARLIAMENT, NOT THE OBJECTIVE JUDICIARY.. THESE ARE BASICS.

In 2017, the Committee on Judicial Accountability published the suicide note written by former Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister, Kalikho Pul. In the note, Pul claimed that Khehar had demanded 49 crore (Para 15.22, Page 39) and 31 crore (Para 15.27, Page 41) in bribes from Pul for delivering a favourable verdict..

In yet another controversy involving CJI Khehar, High Court Judge C.S. Karnan ordered a psychological evaluation of Khehar. On 8 May 2017 C S Karnan ordered a punishment of 5 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine worth Rs. 1 lakh on Jagdish Khehar.

JS Khehar with pale eyes wanted white JEW lawyers to practice in India.

BELOW-- ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY USED “TIME AXIS “ TO SAVE THEIR SHIP FROM SINKING..


In its 1,024-page verdict, the apex court said: “It is to be assumed that the independence and integrity of the judiciary is of the ‘highest importance’ not only to the judges but to the citizens seeking resort from a court of law against the high-handed and illegal exercise of power by the executive.”

SORRY ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDGES, WE THE PEOPLE TRUST THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE NOT THE CORRUPT JUDICIARY.

The National Judicial Appointments Commission Bill, introduced in Parliament on August 11, 2014 in conjunction with the Constitutional (Amendment) Bill, was the result of rare bipartisanship—of the likes never seen in India for a very long time.

Parliament agreed that judges couldn’t appoint themselves because the Collegium System had become disreputable and CONTROLLED FROM ABROAD, adversely affecting the principle of independence of the judiciary.

  1. https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any_15.html

    HULLO LAW MINISTER RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD ...

    DO YOU KNOW YOUR JOB?..

    HULLO ATTORNEY GENERAL KK VENUGOPAL..

    DO YOU KNOW YOUR JOB?....

    HULLO PM NARENDRA DAMODARDAS MODI ...

    YOU ARE GUILTY OF ALLOWING ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TO SHIT ON BHARATMATAs FACE...

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any.html

    READ BOTH PARTS OF THE POST TITLED " JUSTICE BE DAMNED , ENFORCE THE LAW ! .. NOT ANY MORE, IN FREE INDIA !! – Capt Ajit Vadakayil "

    WE THE PEOPLE WATCH ..

    HULLO MANEKA GANDHI...

    DO YOU KNOW THAT YOUR PASSPORT WAS USED BY THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TO PUNCH A FOUL "DUE" HOLE IN THE CONSTITUTION SO THAT JUDGES CAN PLAY MOSES-- NAY--GOD ?...

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
    LAW MINISTER PRASAD
    LAW MINISTRY
    LAW NINISTERS OF ALL STATES
    LAW MINISTRIES OF ALL STATES
    CBI
    IB
    NIA
    RAW
    ED
    MANEKA GANDHI
    KAPIL SIBAL
    SUSHMA SWARAJ
    SALMAN KHURSHID
    ARUN JAITLEY
    K PARASARAN
    CHIDAMBARAM
    CHELAMESHWAR
    ARUN JAITLEY
    ABHISHEK MANU SINGHVI
    ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
    ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
    NCW MAIN
    NCW STATES
    NHRC
    NCM
    CJI GOGOI
    ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
    ALL SUPRME COURT LAWYERS
    ATTORNEY GENERAL
    INDU MALHOTRA
    KHANWILKAR
    CHANDRACHUD
    ROHINGTON NARIMAN
    HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES OF ALL STATES
    RAM JETHMALANI
    KATJU
    AMITABH KANT
    NITI AYOG
    RSS
    VHP
    AVBP
    AMIT SHAH
    PMO
    PM MODI
    AJIT DOVAL
    RAJNATH SINGH
    HOME MINISTRY
    PRESIDENT OF INDIA
    VP OF INDIA
    SPEAKER LOK SABHA
    SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
    EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA
    EVERY CENTRAL MINISTER / MINISTRY
    MLAs OF ALL STATES
    CMs OF ALL STATES
    GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
    DGPs OF ALL STATES
    SWAMY
    GURUMURTHY
    SOLI BABY
    SALVE BABY
    FALI BABY
    RAJ KAMAL JHA
    PRANNOY JAMES ROY
    AROON PURIE
    VINEET JAIN
    RAGHAV BAHL
    SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
    N RAM
    SHASHI THAROOR
    CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWMI
    RAJDEEP SARDESAI
    BARKHA DUTT
    NAVIKA KUMAR
    ZAKKA JACOB
    ANAND NARASIMHAN
    FAYE DSOUZA
    NIDHI RAZDAN
    SHEKHAR GUPTA
    RAMCHANDRA GUHA
    MEENAKSHI LEKHI
    KIRON KHER
    SMRITI IRANI
    SONIA GANDHI
    RAHUL GANDHI
    BRINDA KARAT
    PRAKASH KARAT
    SITARAM YECHURY
    SUMEET CHOPRA
    DINESH VARSHNEY
    SWARA BHASKAR
    KAVITA KRISHNAN
    TEESTA SETALVAD
    SWARA BHASKAR
    ROMILA THAPAR
    IRFAN HABIB
    SHOBHAA DE
    ARUNDHATI ROY
    MANI SHANGARAN AIYERAN
    ANNA MM VETTIKAD
    KANCHA ILAIH
    JOHN DAYAL
    CHETAN BHAGAT
    SANJAY HEGDE

    WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKTS
    SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/4-kerala-nuns-who-stood-up-for-rape-survivor-punished/articleshow/67564981.cms

COLLEGIUM NCW APPOINTED BY BILDERBERG CLUB IS VERY QUIET..

RAPIST BISHOP IS ON BAIL.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/04/asaram-bapu-conviction-we-people-are.html

ASARAM BAPU IS IN JAIL BASED ON THE COMPLAINT BY ONE DEMENTED GIRL..
ASARAMs ROOTLESS, VULNERABLE , POVERTY RIDDEN HINDU FOLLOWERS HAVE CONVERTED INTO CHRISTIANITY..

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/01/dubious-role-of-bilderberg-club-created.html

capt ajit vadakayil
..


https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/from-2020-pre-filled-i-t-returns-refunds-in-a-day/articleshow/67565007.cms

INDIA MUST GO FOR BTT..

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/11/abolish-income-tax-in-india-have.html


capt ajit vadakayil
..

90% of the time JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS are quotes by vested Jugdes with ULTERIOR motives under the term STARE DECISIS .  WE THE PEOPLE do not care for judicial precedents-- every case is unique and fresh.   



Can "surgical precedent" be accepted in a operation theatre  ? 

AKKAL BHAAD MEIN GAYA KYA ?




Today’s judicial activism is articulated and enforced by judicial rulings which smacks of being based on personal or political considerations rather than on existing law.   

Which mother/ wife/ daughter wants a man to visit CHAMIYA BARS  ( front for whorehouses ) and ogle at cheap dancing girls – where hard earned money is drained ?   The dancing girls receive just a small percentage of this money .


Judicial activism implies going beyond the normal constraints applied to jurists and the Constitution, which gives jurists the right to strike down any legislation or rule against the precedent if it goes against the Constitution.   

Judicial activism is premised upon the fact that judges assume a role as independent policy makers or independent “trustees” on behalf of society that goes beyond their traditional role as interpreters of the Constitution and laws.  

COLLEGIUM judges are in the game of building up their own ETHOS.



BELOW IS THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA



Our Indian constitution is a sheer copy of the British model, just amended to suit India-- a draft given to Ambedkar on the quiet by Rothschild..

There was NIL brainwork involved. 

Why don't you compare the two constitutions.

Where is the intelligence, in copying and plagiarism?

Dr B. R. Ambedkar was just the Chairman of an eminent team consisting of K M Munshi,  Alladi Krishnaswamy Iyer,  N Gopalaswami Ayengar ,  Madhava Rao ,  Md. Saadullah ,  TT Krishnamachari and a  constitutional advisor Sir Benegal Narsing Rau .

The separation of powers among the major branches of government, the establishment of a supreme court was copied from the US model,  provided by Rothschild.


Sir Benegal Narsing Rau was chosen by Rothschild to play a liaison role in drafting the Constitution of India.  

From 1949 to 1952 Sir Benegal Narsing Rau was India's Permanent Representative to the UN, till he was appointed as a Judge of the International Court in The Hague. He also served as the President of the United Nations Security Council.

His brother SIR Benegal Rama Rau were Governor of the Reserve Bank of India
JEW Rothschild favoured the CHITRAPUR MUTT darlings of a particular DNA.   

Chitrapur Mutt is a FAKE and backdated Mutt created by JEW Rothschild.

Girish Karnad,  Shyam Benegal,  Deepike Padukone ( whom COMMIE FTII students love )  are a few of them.

The other brother Benegal Shiva Rao  was married to a German Jew d Kitty Verstaendig.   Rothschild made him the chief of INTUC  .  

After all JEW Lenin had said -  IF YOU WANT TO CONTROL THE OPPOSOTION LEAD THEM YOURSELF.

Below: Chitrapur Mutt men Girish Karnad  and  Shyam Benegal,  UR Anathamurthy ( who pissed on a Hindu temple idol ) ,   Saeed Akhtar Mirza ( anti-Hindu award wapsi pioneer with a Christian wife Jennifer  ) of ANHAD NGO   whose trustees are Shabnam Hashmi, K N Panikkar, Harsh Mander, Shubha Mudgal, Kamla Bhasin, Saeed Akhtar Mirza.




Supreme Court of India  slowly started acquiring more power through constitutional interpretation with help from foreign KOSHER forces.   Its transformation into an activist court has been gradual and imperceptible to an average Indian caught up in the daily grind of life

Fali Nariman spAke:--- "Judges have wrapped themselves in a cloak of inviolability-- How are they appointed? Why are they appointed? What are their shortcomings? How are these dealt with? "

Ask and they will say, 'It is none of your business to ask us questions. We know what is best for the system'."

Are judges above the law? 

Not really. 

But they live in a politico-legal no-man's-land. 

No one can file a case against them without the permission of the CJI.

What do we do when we have a CJI like KG Balakrishnan who was never meant to be even a high court judge ?

An untoward word can invite contempt of court in India—while all the civilized nations have go rid of this.

To impeach a judge, two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament will have to vote.

Illegal Collegium Judges can declare a law passed by Parliament null and void, exercise executive and legislative powers via public interest jurisdiction and control their own appointments.

At the root of the problem is the collegium system, THIS PLANETs ONLY-  thrust down Indian throats by KOSHER BIG BROTHER .


Former SC judge N. Santosh Hegde  spAke  "No judge has been found guilty and punished ever, and this speaks very poorly of the Indian judiciary."

KARNAN WHO BLEW THE WHISTLE ABOUT CORRUPTION IN SUPREME COURT WAS JAILED BY CJI JS KHEHAR..

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh very rarely opened his mouth. 

Once he got so exasperated that he demanded that the COLLEGIUM SC not cross "the thin dividing line between judicial activism and judicial overreach".


PM Manmohan Singh WARNED the MELORDS  to stay away from the "realm of policy formulation". 


WE THE PEOPLE will NOT allow COLLEGIUM JUDGES to poke their MELORD noses into Indi’s external and internal security wrt terrorists and Naxals with guns .

We all know how the COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY hijacked the SALWA JUDUM – by ruling that the use of tribal youths as Special Police Officers to fight Maoists is unconstitutional.  Here the court clearly engaged in the domain of security functions of the state.    

THE RED CORRIDOR OF INDIA WAS CREATED BY THE NEXUS BETWEEN COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND THE BENAMI MEDIA..



ALL SORTS OF LIES WERE INVENTED BY FOREIGN FUNDED TROJAN HORSE NGOs WHO FUND THE NAXALS.

The false and fierce propaganda offensive that was unleashed to paint the Salwa Judum movement in the darkest of colours took birth in Rothschild’s Opium drug founded Western universities.

In December 2005, a group of “human rights” activists controlled by foreign money , released a FALSE report denouncing the Salwa Judum movement as an assault on the dignity of the tribal population. 

Any idiot could see what this report was worth as it was TOTALLY SILENT on the extreme atrocities committed by Maoists and Naxals .  

This foreign funded report  accused “forces from other states” of “behaving like an occupation army.”


LYING HISTORIAN Ramchandra Guha, member of the “independent” study, described the  Mahendra Karma, the man credited with kick-starting Salwa Judum, as a “dangerous populist” and compared him to a more dangerous man Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

If Salwa Judum had NOT been disbanded , by now India could have broken the spine of the Naxal movement controlled by THINKER COMMIE professors in JNU.




Today, the Maoists and Naxals control 31% of India’s forests.

The genesis of Salwa Judum lies in the refusal of a large section of tribal society to endure this nonsense any longer. 

What began in May 2005 in Kutru village in Dantewada and quickly spread to neighbouring areas was essentially a non-cooperation movement against an occupying Red Army. 

The Maoists and their sympathisers were chased out of villages and their supply chain was crippled. When large 8,000-strong gatherings of local people voted in unison to fight the Maoist menace, if necessary with bows and arrows, Chhattisgarh saw the beginnings of a popular upsurge. 

The local administration had neither the force nor resource to provide adequate protection to the Salwa Judum.

The Maoists responded to the challenge with characteristic savagery. 

The idea was to intimidate villagers into submission. 

The Maoist reign of terror has yielded results. 

IN THIS INTERNET AGE,  "WE THE PEOPLE "   KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING , MELORDS !  

WE DO NOT TRUST THE JUDAS MAIN STREAM MEDIA ANY MORE  !!

ONLY "JANAM TV " SPOKE THE TRUTH ON SABARIMALA.. REST ALL MEDIA SUPPORTED ATHEIST COMMIE PINARAYI VIJAYAN

In the multi-crore Ghaziabad court provident fund scam, CJI Balakrishnan did not give permission to investigate for over one-and-a-half years, not even for the police to file an FIR. 

By the time the CBI finished the probe in 2010, evidence had disappeared, most judges did not bother to attend the hearings, and the prime accused, Ashutosh Asthana, who had named 36 judges, was found dead under mysterious circumstances. 

SC judge Tarun Chatterjee, who was named as one of the beneficiaries, had already retired.


Asthana (43), an administrative officer in the Ghaziabad District Court Treasury, died on October 17, 2009, in Dasna Jail, where he was lodged since February 2008 in connection with the scam.

His family members had alleged that he was “murdered” on the instructions of powerful people involved in the scam.

The fraudulent withdrawals were to the tune of crores of rupees from provident fund accounts of class III and class IX employees.

A bench of Justices Tarun Chatterjee ( LAST DAY AS JUDGE ) and Aftab Alam in its verdict accepted a demand for the CBI probe on the plea of the brother of Sohrabuddin Sheikh

WHO WAS SOHRABUDDIN , THE DARLING OF SUPREME COURT ? 

HE WAS A MURDERER, PAKISTANI BACKED TRAITOR AND A DREADED GANGSTER..


DESH BHAKT COPS WERE PUT IN JAIL FOR A DESH DROHI , AND FORGOTTEN FOR MANY YEARS ..

BUT WHEN IT CAME TO PUTTING SREESHANT IN JAIL, IT HAPPENED OVERNIGHT !


TEESTA SETALVAD FLUSH WITH ISLAMIC WAHABBI FUNDS COULD GET ANY NUMBER OF FALSE WITNESSES OUT OF THIN AIR.


IN THIS INTERNET AGE "WE THE PEOPLE" ARE ABLE TO JUDGE OUR JUDGES --

WE SHALL DO IT AS "WE THE PEOPLE" ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION.


WE THE PEOPLE shall ask WHISTLE BLOWERS from within the system to blow the lid off the Pandora’s box.

This process has already begin.

We know who the corrupt judges are. We know the EXTREME nepotism and vested interests which rule.

Today we know how Judge appointments are done on give-and-take basis, not purely on merit.
A whole host of other considerations- religion, caste, community- has come into play—we know -- the national security agencies know !. 

"The appointment of the judges is an absolutely opaque process where nepotism plays a big role," said Supreme Court counsel D.P. Singh.

In November 2010, SC justice Markandey Katju said, "There is something rotten in the Allahabad High Court---“ Some judges have their kith and kin practising in the same courts who within a few years will become multi-millionaires."

In the 2008 case of justice Nirmal Yadav, former judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, when a packet containing Rs 15 lakh for her was wrongly delivered at another judge's door, the in-house mechanism under justice KG Balakrishnan absolved her, even after a three-judge panel recommended her removal from office. The CJI instead transferred her to the Uttarakhand High Court.

Every member of the Bar would agree that a corrupt judge can't survive long without the help of a corrupt lawyer. A classic example is that of former telecom minister A. Raja.

In 2009 he had reportedly threatened justice S. Reghupati of the Madras High Court through a lawyer in court.

His demand?

Bail for his "family friends" involved in mark-sheet forgery.

It backfired, with Reghupati narrating the incident in open court.

But after a flurry of parliamentary delegations, press conferences, angry letters and finger-pointing, the issue died a quiet death.

Judges say they are ultimately judged by their own conscience.


I AM TOUCHED LIKE MADONNA !




V. Ramaswami was the Justice of the Supreme Court of India and the first judge against whom impeachment proceedings were initiated in independent India.

The only other judge to face impeachment proceedings is Justice "Soumitra Sen" of Calcutta High Court, proceedings against whom were initiated in Rajya Sabha on 17 August 2011.

Another such motion has been initiated against Chief Justice Dinakaran of Sikkim High Court. An Inquiry Committee is looking investigating the issue.

 A scandal surfaced in the middle of year 1990 when several media outlets reported about his ostentatious expenditure on his official residence during his tenure as a Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana.

In a serious turn of events, on 1 February 1991, Supreme Court Bar Association passed a resolution calling for his impeachment and requesting Chief justice not assign him any further legal work.

Bharatiya Janata Party and Left parties submitted a notice of motion to the Indian Parliament seeking his removal from office.

Accepting the motion on 12 March 1991, Speaker Rabi Ray constituted a committee composed of Justice P B Sawant of the Supreme Court, Chief Justice P D Desai of the Bombay High Court and Justice O Chinnappa Reddy, retired judge of the Supreme Court to investigate the affair.

The committee found Ramaswami guilty of 11 out of 14 charges.

The impeachment motion was placed in the assembly for debate and voting on 10 May 1993. Well known lawyer and a Congress politician Kapil Sibal was his defence lawyer.

 Of 401 members present in the assembly that day, there were 196 votes for impeachment and no votes against and 205 abstentions by ruling Congress and its allies.

The motion which required not less than two third majority of the total number of members present in both houses of the Parliament and an absolute majority of its total membership thus failed to pass. 

The said decision was challenged before the Supreme Court and they upheld the decision of the Parliament. 

Soumitra Sen was a former judge of the Calcutta High Court. He was the first judge in independent India to be impeached in India's Rajya Sabha for misappropriation of funds

Justice Sen has been bearing the allegation for appropriating Rs 32 lakh as a court-appointed receiver in 1993 in a lawsuit between Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) and Shipping Corporation of India over supply of fire bricks.

The Chief Justice recommendation was made shortly after a three-judge inquiry committee had established Sen's misconduct in depositing the money in his personal account.

Sen retained the money even after being appointed as the High Court judge in 2003. It was in 2006 after HC order, he returned money.

Justice Sen was held guilty of misappropriation of public funds he received in his capacity as receiver appointed by the High Court of Calcutta and misrepresenting facts with regard to it.

On 18 August 2011, Rajya Sabha passed the impeachment motion by overwhelming majority of 189 votes in favour and 17 against.

This is the second case in the history of the country in which Parliament has initiated proceedings for removal of a judge. The first involved Justice V. Ramaswami.

Paul Daniel Dinakaran Premkumar  was the Chief Justice of the Sikkim High Court. He resigned from the post following allegations of corruption and subsequent impeachment proceedings.

In September 2009, allegations were made against Dinakaran by several members of the Bar Council of India including Former Union Law Minister Ram Jethmalani stating that he had huge assets and land acquisitions in his Hometown Arakkonam more than what was fixed by the Tamil Nadu Land reforms.

The lawyers requested Chief Justice of India Union Law Minister not to appoint Dinakaran as Supreme Court Judge and initiate an enquiry process regarding the allegation.

The Supreme Court collegium headed by Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan had decided to replace Justice Dinakaran with Uttarakhand High Court Chief Justice JS Khehar, and recommended transfer of Dinakaran to the Sikkim High Court.

The Sikkim Bar Association president D R Thapa had asked "How come the person be fit to be discharge judicial duties in one state if he has not been found worthy of doing the same in another state?"

Facing impeachment on charges of corruption and judicial misconduct, he resigned from the post of Sikkim high court Chief Justice on 29 July 2011 expressing "lack of faith and confidence" in the three-member inquiry Committee probing charges against him.

Justice Dinakaran, a Dalit, also said he had a "sneaking suspicion" that his "misfortune" was because of the circumstances of his birth in the socially oppressed and underprivileged section of the society ( so what else is new ?) 

The proverbial 'bad fish' dirties the whole fuckin' tank.  

Former Chief Justice of India, S.P.Bharucha spoke of '20% tainted judges', and observed that corrupt judges 'should be identified and dismissed from service'

The notorious case of Ahmedabad Metropolitan Magistrate signing/issuing blindfolded bailable warrants of arrest on 15.1.2004 against A.P.J. Abdul Kalam (President of India), V.N.Khare (CJI), B.P.Singh (Judge Supreme Court) and R.K.Jain (leading lawyer), allegedly for a bribe of Rs 40,000/- collected for him by 3 lawyers will ever remain fresh in public memory.

It resounded in the Supreme Court in a PIL filed by Advocate Vijay Shankar where CJI V.N.Khare is reported to have observed : " By giving Rs 40,000/- you can get a judicial order, and if this is the state of affairs, only God knows what will happen to the Country ..... time has come to take strict action, otherwise nothing will remain.

At a later hearing, the SC Bench is reported to have remarked that there was a complete nexus  between the Metropolitan Magistrate  and the lawyers and that such incidents were happening all over the country.

CJI also emphasised the need of finding out ways to weed out corruption in lower judiciary and evolve a system to keep vigil on Judicial Officers

Justice V.N.Khare, who retired as CJI in May 2004, said that every citizen, including Judges are accountable and are not above Law

I suggest we must have a “National Ombudsman” who  deals with complaints against improper conduct of Judges and living beyond their month end salaries  .

 Lawyers and Judicial clerks are asked to be whistleblowers.           

The supervision MUST be by an outsider, so that there can be no accusation of Judges 'protecting their own'.  

This NATIONAL  JUDICIAL OMBUDSMAN  must be competent.  He must pass an exam set up by senior judges supervised by CJI.  Judiciary cannot accuse him  not being an expert on proper judicial procedure.

An ombudsman is a person who acts as a trusted intermediary between either the state, elements of state or an organization, and some internal or external constituency, while representing not only but mostly the broad scope of constituent interests.

Ombudsman is etymologically rooted in the Old Norse word umboðsmaðr, essentially meaning “representative”.

The Ombudsman cannot interfere with the independence of Judiciary in making decisions because they do not have power to overturn or alter court decisions.     They review only procedural matters, and have no power to review the content of judicial decisions.

Regarding the behaviour of Judges, the Ombudsman mainly issues only reprimands or criticisms. They can also prosecute for serious misbehaviour. . 

He CAN inspect the Courts, and if he finds that the Judge has committed an unquestionable error or negligence in performance of his functions, he may issue a critical warning or even initiate process in Court against the Judge for abuse of power.

Even so, he does not interfere in judicial processes pending in a Court, nor does it intervene in cases in which regular appeal channels remain open. 

The Ombudsman may act on its own initiative.

Nothing prevents him from investigating why no Court order has yet been issued when the stipulated time there for has expired, or looking into the causes of delay like lack of material means, or overload of cases, or functional responsibility of its head, or other officials, and making recommendations for correcting the situation.

The  Ombudsman MUST investigate into lawyers' misconduct, and even the misconduct of State Bar Council, and recommend to State Bar Council, or to the Bar Council of India, as the case may be, for appropriate action in disciplinary jurisdiction.

The Ombudsman MUST be given constitutional status in the name of DEFENDER OF THE WATAN.

NATIONAL  JUDICIAL OMBUDSMAN  MUST HAVE THE POWERS TO VETO MATTERS WHERE THE WATANs SECURITY IS INVOLVED.

 IT IS BETTER TO HAVE THREE NJO s INSTEAD OF ONE - THEY MUST BE PRO-ACTIVE AND NOT REACTIVE .

AND PLEASE SPARE US OF DALIT QUOTA , WOMENs QUOTA AND ASSHOLES QUOTA !


IN THE HOLLYWOOD MOVIE “ A FEW GOOD MEN” THE SMART ASS LAWYER ( TOM CRUISE ) ASKS THE COLONEL ( JACK NICHOLSON ) –

WHERE IS IT WRITTEN IN THIS BOOK OF RULES ABOUT “BREAKFAST”

HE SWINGS THE CASE IN HIS FAVOUR BY THIS RIDICULOUS QUESTION .

THIS BLOGSITE ASKS THE JUDICIARY--  THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE USED FOR “POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT”  NEVER NEGATIVE

LIKE TRIPLE SRI  TELLING BARKHA DUTT ON NDTV   ” NOWHERE IT IS MENTIONED IN THE VEDAS THAT HOMOSEXUALITY IS NOT ALLOWED”

Homosexuality-not a crime in any Smriti. Everyone has male & female elements. According to their dominance,tendencies show up & may change.
IF SO WHERE IT IS WRITTEN IN THE VEDAS THAT “ WOMEN CANNOT EAT SHIT “- OR  “STAND UP AND PEE IN A MEN’S TOILET “?

Below: Which GURU will dye his hair / beard and patent FAKE hyperventilation yoga ?





THE CONSTITUTION CANNOT CONTAIN EVERYTHING UNDER THE SUN. 

NATURAL JUSTICE MUST BE APPLIED TO TRAITORS WHO THREATEN THE WATAN OF ARMED DISMEMBERMENT.  

 WE HAVE MADE A MISTAKE OF PUNISHING ONLY PAWNS ( NAXAL CADRE ).  

WE MUST PUNISH THE KING ( THINKER BINAYAK SEN ) WHO GIVES THE BLUE PRINT .


FROM NOW ON “WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA” WILL NOT ACCEPT ANYBODY TO BE AN INTELLECTUAL UNLESS HE IS LOYAL TO THE WATAN. 

We had enough of “made to order “ Indian intellectuals ( by Zionist Jews )

WE DO NOT CARE FOR KINGPINS WHO HAVE WRANGLED :-

THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE,  
MAGSAYSAY AWARD,  
ENGLISH KNIGHTHOOD,  
FOREIGN LITERARY AWARDS,  
PLACE IN TIME TOP 100,  
TOP RATNA OF SOME ZIONIST JEW NATION LIKE FRANCE, 
THINKER WHO LECTURES IN ROTHSCHILDs OPIUM DRUG FOUNDED WESTERN UNIVERSITIES,  
PEOPLE WHOSE NEXT OF KIN HAVE MARRIED PAKISTANIS ( LIKE ARMIRAL LN RAMDAS ), 
PEOPLE WHO HAVE MARRIED FORIEGNERS ( LIKE AMARTYA SEN WITH A ROTHSCHILD WIFE ), 
BOOKER PRIZE WINNERS, 
ETC


There is a Supreme Court judgment that says a judge who hasn't committed a mistake is yet to be born.

The Ombudsman must keep an eye on ROGUE lawyers who fleece their clients.

Excessive court applications, exorbitant arbitrator fees, and respondent recalcitrance are the norm and in many ways, arbitrations do not provide a better and more efficient alternative to the courts for the resolution of commercial disputes. Only if this important objective is achieved can arbitration promote trade, commerce, and investment.

TODAY ANYBODY CAN KILL A GOOD THING BY SLAPPING A “STAY ORDER”

We want the Ombudsman to have powers over these newly sprouted COMMISSIONS who are controlled from abroad. The NCW has punished the male gender with no proof or evidence.

If a woman's complaint accusing her husband and in-laws of cruelty under the dreaded Section 498A of Indian Penal Code turns out to be false, then the man is entitled to divorce, the Supreme Court has ruled.



Allowing dissolution of marriage between K Srinivas and K Sunita, the court said, "We unequivocally find that the respondent-wife had filed a false criminal complaint, and even one such complaint is sufficient to constitute matrimonial cruelty. We accordingly dissolve the marriage of the parties."

And this thing about only a male must provide alimony even if the wife earns more than him.

Filing FALSE cases under the Domestic Violence Act by female members has become common.   A neutral and unprejudiced law is needed to protect the genuine victims of domestic violence, irrespective of gender.

Women prodded on by IMMORAL lawyers  ( who want to WIN cases ) find it hard to resist the temptation to 'teach a lesson' to their male relatives and they  file frivolous and false cases

Property disputes are filed by women against in-laws, under the garb of Domestic Violence Act (DV Act) etc.  A jobless husband cannot deny maintenance to wife, but a jobless wife can claim maintenance from her husband?

http://www.daijiworld.com/news/news_disp.asp?n_id=265173


The NCW today has degenerated into a direction-less political appointee-led feminist watering hole, which chooses to intervene in trivial but high profile cases involving celebrities or high media attention with the sole intention to hog some media limelight and to probably justify its existence.  

The NCW women love to come on TV, dont they ?


Men and their families in any case would never stand a chance to get any justice from a NCW court, whose mandate is to protect women at all costs.  Indian men are now being stereotyped as RAPISTS   .
All this when India has the LEAST amount ( BY PERCENTAGE ) of rapes/ divorce/ homosexuals/ crimes on this planet.

The NCW must grasp the fact that its own biased gender exclusive mandate prevents it from being conferred the rights if a gender neutral court.

The NCW and its political appointees should instead work to steer the organization from the current clueless feminist watering hole status toward a gender inclusive organisation working for the real upliftment of Indian women and families. 

Disgruntled women are misusing all the women cells, police stations and NGO’s to harass in-laws, husband and their relatives and lately even boyfriends, colleagues and bosses in office who have given less bonus or denied promotions


Most of the woman’s organizations have increasingly become platforms for feminists to devise laws against men with ulterior motives , organize protest rallies, quote false statistics, and manufacture media stories, misuse government funds and power of the chair. 

In India men have been traditional providers and this led to happy homes with GOOD PARENTING.


The NCW today has degenerated into a hardcore feminist led agenda driven group promoting VULGAR western laws, which chooses to intervene in trivial but high profile cases involving celebrities or high media attention with the sole intention to hog some media limelight and to probably justify its existence.

Principles of natural justice would be shattered if an ideologically exclusive body like NCW with a specific mandate to protect women be made to judge a case involving men and women. Our constitution does NOT allow this. 

WE THE PEOPLE  do NOT want COLLEGIUM judges to refer to previous judgements from other branches to settle a case.  

This is akin to the navigating officer  on a ship’s wheelhouse contending that the order the previous Captain gave to the cook last year in the galley,  could be applied on the navigating bridge in heavy traffic and poor visibility- this hour .

This happened with SEC 377 to be partial to homosexuals and anal sex.

“In its anxiety to protect the so-called rights of LGBT persons and to declare that Section 377 IPC violates the right to privacy, autonomy and dignity, the High Court has extensively relied upon the judgments of other jurisdictions.” (Paragraph 52) -- OBSERVATION OF SUPREME COURT AGAINST HIGH COURT




WE WILL NOT ALLOW DECADENT WESTERN STANDARDS TO BE APPLIED IN INDIA.     

COLLEGIUM  JUDGES DO NOT HAVE THE POWERS TO DESTROY INDIAN CULTURE OR CREATE LAWS .     


WILL THE MELORD JUDGES  ALSO RULE THAT INDIAN MUSLIMS MUST EAT PORK,  BECAUSE AMERICAN BLACK MUSLIMS EAT PORK ?




The drafting committee of the Constituent Assembly failed to imagine, much less foresee, the depravity that would come to define the standard of judicial conduct in India. 

In a bid to ensure that the members of the higher judicature remained independent to fearlessly guard the rights and liberties of the poor, the framers enacted such a procedure for the removal of judges of higher judiciary that—characteristic of the Nehru era where the noblest intentions often led to horrendous results—the procedure itself epitomised the circumvention of those rights and liberties it was supposed to protect. 

A literal lifelong immunity to the judges of higher judiciary was guaranteed by way of the aforesaid Constitutional provisions.

This is a HUGE error of foresight.   

At sea we captains never had the privilege of errors of foresight and sink the ship.

WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA DO NOT MIND IF THE MELORD JUDGE STEALS A FEW CRORES , BECAUSE HIS SALARY IS LESS . 

BUT WE WILL NOT ALLOW A COLLEGIUM JUDGE TO BE MORALLY HIJACKED BY THE BILDERBERG CLUB OR KOSHER BIG BROTHER TO BLEED OR KILL BHARATMATA


The judiciary’s independence was compromised the day the Supreme Court passed orders in 1993 establishing the Collegium System.   

As soon as Narasimha Rao came into power  ZIONIST JEWS used Chandraswamy to sink their tentacles into Bharatmata.   

Chandraswamy got the news within minutes of Rajiv Gandhi getting assassinated –while holed up in Sindoori Hotel owned by Apollo Hospitals ( Dr Pratap Reddy ). There are witnesses to this.    Chandraswami was the spiritual guru of Narasimha Rao.   Chandraswamy telephoned Narasimha Rao and several high ranked congressmen from Hotel Sindoori – not for minutes—but for hours after the bomb blast. When Chandrasekhar and Narasimha Rao were PM, Chandraswamy could walk into PMO any time, without entering his name in any register ( I AM JUST TELLING 0.05% ).

Below: Today every picture of Narasimha Rao with Chandraswamy on the internet is deleted.



In 1998, the Supreme Court under pressure did attempt to broad-base the Collegium System by adding two more judges to the original body of three, but its insular SINISTER character endured.


Over the years, Parliament had shirked its responsibility to hold the judiciary accountable thanks to the MPs in Rothschild’s payroll. 

For years, the secretive foreign controlled Collegium System had resorted to the QUID PRO QUO  method,  scooping up SURMA EYED people from the bar rather than the state judicial services.  

The people of India do NOT trust our Judiciary any more. I cant imagine being a captain of a ship where my crew and officers do NOT trust me.


Instead of introspecting and looking at its own PATHETIC  performance, the Supreme Court took to un-called for activism nay adventurism – to establish they are LEADERS TO BE RATIFIED – nay - ENSHRINED IN THE HEARTS AND MINDS of the people..


The COLLEGIUM judiciary must be reminded that judicial independence is not an end in itself but merely a means to an end.  

UNACCOUNTABLE Judicial independence cannot be cited to maintain untrammelled power when the other two ELECTED arms of the government.

IN A DEMOCRACY THE PEOPLEs VOTE IS SUPREME.


WE ASK THE MODI GOVT TO START A FILE ON EVERY JUDGE IN THE SUPREME COURT AND ASK THE IB / RAW/ NIA TO GET INPUTS . 

PAY HUGE MONEY TO WHISTLEBLOWERS  WHO GIVE OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE. 

ONLY THE STIGMA OF TOTAL DISGRACE , EVEN TO THEIR FUTURE GENERATIONS , CAN CAUSE COLLEGIUM MELORDS TO SERVE BHARATMATA TO THEIR FULLEST POTENTIAL.

EX-CJI KG BALAKRISHNAN IS COCKY--  DOES NOT EVEN CARE, AS HE WILL PULL OUT HIS DALIT CARD AND SLAP IT ON THE COLLECTIVE INDIAN FACES


We ask Modi to focus on the Judges Standard and Accountability Bill till we can bring NJAC and strike down the COLLEGIUM system. 

When NJAC was struck down the foreign Zionist Jew media went GA GA.  They could NOT stop singing the praises of the BOLD Indian judges. 


PICTURE BAAKI HAI –   till then have some kosher vinegar 

WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA SHALL SNATCH AWAY THE IMMORAL SHIELD OF COLLEGIUM JUDICIAL IMMUNITY.



The NATIONAL JUDICIAL OMBUDSMAN must chalk out a fool proof  way to a complaints mechanism. 

Serious and credible complaints like SEDITION AND TREASON must be examined by an intra-ministerial body before they are forwarded to the NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCIES for INCARCERATION or EVEN HANGING TO DEATH

Punishment must not only be exemplary, it must send a clear message to all judges, errant or otherwise, that any deviation from the right course in upholding the rule of law, fairness and honest delivery of justice will be met with the harshest of penal actions.

And there must be ZERO TOLERANCE to any foreign funded COLLEGIUM judge who tries to KILL Bharatmata ( watan )  



We are aware that the COLLEGIUM  judiciary has taken an intransigent stand on its own ACCOUNTABILITY.

WE THE PEOPLE ask the MELORDS to earn respect in keeping with democratic precepts- not by vulgar CONTEMPT OF COURT might !


AFTER THESE MELORDS RETIRE THEY HAVE TO LIVE IN INDIA , THEY CANT RUN TO ARGENTINA LIKE JEW HITLER  RIGHT ?.



Did the COLLEGIUM Melords approve of black bagging Sreeshant, which even Islamic terrorists like Ajmal Kasab were spared of ?

How come not even one judge spoke about it — considering Sreeshant was part of the Gold medal winning Indian teams of Test/ ODI and T20 cricket?

Is it because he was not a Dalit or a Christian or a Muslim or a woman or a chakka ?

What is IPL - some immoral and vulgar circus ?



WHY DO WE ELECT 545 MPs IN THE LOK SABHA WITH OUR VOTE.

IN THE LOB SABHA THESE ELECTED BY VOTE PEOPLE REPRESENT THE ASPIRATIONS OF WE THE PEOPLE.

THESE PEOPLE FROM FAR FLUNG AREAS OF INDIA , COLLECT TOGETHER IN A SINGLE HALL.  THEY ARE LIKE  ALIVING ORGANISM—THEY  REPRESENT THE WATAN.

THE UNCLECTED “COLLEGIUM “ MELORDS WANT MORE POWERS THAN THIS ELECTED GROUP?

BEFORE 1947 ALMOST THIS ENTIRE “COLLEGIUM” GROUP WAS CHOSEN BY JEW ROTHSCHILD WHO RULED INDIA.


IN 1951 JEW STALIN HAD WARNED THE 4 COMMIES LED BY SA DANGE , WHO WANTED TO TAKE OVER INDIA BY A BLOODBATH,  IN MOSCOW   ” INDIA IS STILL BEING RULED BY PROXY BY THE WHITE INVADER WHO LEFT INDIA IN 1947”

The traditional concept of Locus Standii is no longer a bar for the community oriented PIL misused by FOREIGN FUNDED TROJAN HORSE NGOs.

Locus standi is a Latin phrase meaning “place to stand”. It refers to whether or not someone has the right to be heard in court. People may use the term “standing” or “legal standing” to describe this concept.

Though not an aggrieved party, vested foreign funded DESH DROHIS  now have access to the Supreme Court/High Courts through PIL.   

Who has given MElord judges the green signal to give priority to PILs ( with NO “imminent” nature  qualification ) over  regular business?


As an organic document, a written Constitution chiefly performs two  main tasks-  firstly, it sets up the organs of governance, and secondly, having set up these institutions, it provides a recourse against the abuse of power by these organs.

Public Interest Litigation is a good thing when it is used to enforce the rights of the disadvantaged. 

 But what we see is that PIL system has been hijacked by FOREIGN FUNDED TROJAN HORSE NGO to dilute, to interfere and bush whack the ELECTED government, and  to take decisions on a range of policy matters. 

I still do not understand how JEW NOAM CHOMSKY gets himself accommodated to screw the watan

Judicial activism in loose terms can be defined as “Judiciary taking on the responsibilities of Legislature”.

The role of the judiciary is interpreting the laws made by the parliament or say interpreting the constitution and not making laws itself--which is in exclusive domain and prerogative of legislature.

Indian constitution makers were not in favour of judiciary being a law making institutes and strictly confined its role to an interpreter as it is apparent from Article 21 which says procedure established by the law is an essence of Indian judiciary and not the due process of law which is there in the American constitution.

The use of PIL with an ulterior motive has put a dampener of the VIBRANCY of Indian democracy.   

We may shout and argue like mad in the parliament, but at the end of it all , if you see the BOTTOM LINE ,  our democracy works—  with adequate CHECK AND BALANCES. 

The whole world is jealous of it.


YOU WILL NEVER SEE INDIAN DEMOCRACY LIKE THE VIDEO BELOW- 

CLAPPING LIKE CHOOTS .




When there were RACIAL attacks on Indian students in Australia, the COLLEGIUM MELORDS asked the foreign ministry to enquire/intervene in the situation.   This type of a FIAT breaks down the system.

Sometimes on my ship, my crew comes to me direct.

Unless it is of an IMMINENT nature or a matter of secrecy, I tell them to come via proper channels.

We saw how Kapil Sibal went running to Supreme court over the JNU Kanhaiya Kumar incident.  

By the way we know the connections certain HIGH PROFILE LAWYERS of the Supreme court have with certain judges.  

Whistle blowers ( retired judges/ lawyers/ babus ) are still coming out with juicy details.

Foreign Affairs is exclusive prerogative of the ELECTED executive and the COLLEGIUM  Judiciary has no role and so cannot direct elected representatives to take or not to take actions.


The day is NOT far before the MELORD collegium judges with use a self inflicted PIL and peruse the financial budget even before it is read out in the assembly.  Things are moving towards this PATHETIC STATE .

Article 21 in The Constitution Of India 1949
21. Protection of life and personal liberty No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law

Innovation in interpretation of article 21 which has been made very organic and with far reaching consequences , has reduced the ELECTED legislature as a moot spectator.

Today SHAMELESS people who want to KISS SAME GENDER ,  MOUTH TO MOUTH on the streets are supported by the judges.

THE COLLEGIUM MELORDS MUST KNOW A WEAPON FOR DEFENCE AND TO SAVE--  MUST NOT BE CONVERTED INTO A FOUL WEAPON OF ULTERIOR MOTIVE FOR OFFENCE.


MELORDS -- DO NOT TIE THE LANGOT ON THE HEAD AND BE PROUD OF IT.


KOSHER BIG BROTHER ASKS HIS RAJYA SABHA POLITICIANS IN HIS PAYROLL ,TO DISRUPT THE ASSEMBLY AND WASH OUT THE FULL SESSION.

WE KNOW THESE RAJYA SABHA DESH DROHIS WHO DO IT DAILY -- HOUR AFTER HOUR.

THUS WHEN COLLEGIUM JUDGES START PLAYING DICTATOR , THE GULLIBLE PEOPLE DO NOT MIND.

MELORDS , THERE ARE STILL PERCEPTIVE PEOPLE IN INDIA

Article 14  embodies a universal treatment to all denying any special privilege in favour of anyone.   

This does NOT mean Mayawati can claim to be as beautiful as Aishwarya Rai and snatch away her prize.   

Or a cripple—nay-- specially enabled man can cry,  “ Let MS Dhoni keep the wickets in the first innings and I shall keep wicket in the second innings “.

If such a thing ever happens MS Dhoni will say “ My specially enabled wicketkeeper SIR, with one leg and one hand—kindly keep wicket during both innings “

This is what is happening with real brainy students.   

These champion race horses  do NOT want to be part of the desi QUOTA donkey team— and most migrate abroad.    The EVR Periyar BR Ambedkar student unions are now controlled and funded from abroad.




HEY DEEPA MALIK-- CAN YOU GIVE US A LIST OF WHAT ALL YOU ARE SHOCKED ABOUT.. GIVE US YOU WISH LIST TOO—WHAT ALL AWARDS YOU LIKE TO HAVE.

THIS STUPID WOMAN DEEPA MALIK IS SO VAIN..    PITY HER HUSBAND ..

SHE WON A MEDAL AT RIO IN A FIELD DEVOID OF ANY COMPETITION..


The New Doctrine of Equality  gives the judges the untrammelled power to strike down legislative and executive action at will with a bald observation that they are not reasonable.

The standard of ‘reasonability’ or ‘unreasonability’ not being subjected to any SUBJECTIVE examination lies in the discretion of the illegal COLLEGIUM Court.  

The New Doctrine purports to treat arbitrariness as inequality at the same time. In fact, not all arbitrary actions can be termed unequal simply because some arbitrary actions are both arbitrary and unequal.


The New Doctrine fails to distinguish between the violation of equality by legislative action and the violation of equality by executive action.



Justice Bhagwati spAke:
“... Equality is a dynamic concept with many aspects and dimensions and it cannot be imprisoned within traditional and doctrinaire limits. Article 14 strikes at arbitrariness in State action and ensures fairness and equality of treatment. The principle of reasonableness, which legally as well as philosophically, is an essential element of equality or non–arbitrariness pervades Article 14 like a brooding omnipresence.”

 “... the doctrine of classification which is involved by the court is not paraphrase of Article 14 nor is it the objective and end of that Article. It is merely a judicial formula for determining whether the legislative or executive action in question is arbitrary and therefore constituting denial of equality. If the classification is not reasonable and does not satisfy the two conditions referred to above, the impugned legislation or executive action would be plainly arbitrary and the guarantee of equality under Article 14 would be breached.” 

AIYYOO -- THODA PAANI PEEKE AATHA HOON !

SOMETIMES I PONDER - NAY- WONDER--

HOW MANY  SUPREME COURT JUDGES / LAWYERS COULD HAVE SCORED ONE SINGLE MARK OUT OF 100 ,  IF THEY HAD APPEARED IN THE IIT JEE ENTRANCE EXAMS.




CHECK OUT HOW THE MELORDS MIND WORKS !
In Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib

Ajay Hasia challenged the allocation of 33 1/3 percentage of marks for oral test conducted during the Engineering Entrance Test as arbitrary and violative of his right to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court was able to establish the nexus between who (candidates) and why (merit assessment) factors. But the Court was not able to justify the nexus between why (merit assessment) and what (allocation of 33 1/3 percentage of marks) factors. Consequently, the Court struck down the rule prescribing high percentage of marks (33 1/3 percentage of marks) for oral test as plainly arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Article 14. But the Court declined to quash the admissions in view of a lapse of a reasonable amount of time. The Court held that a mere suspicion that some candidates had obtained high marks in oral interview but very low marks in written test did not establish a malafide intention on the part of the selectors.

AIYYOOOOO !     THODA RASAM PEEKE AATHA HOON !!


Similarly, in Arti Sapru v. State of J & K, the Supreme Court held that the allocation of 33 1/3 percentage of marks for the viva–voice test conducted during the Medical College Entrance Test was excessive. The Court held that there was no nexus between the ‘why’ and ‘what’ factor. “The nebulous test of arbitrariness has again enabled the Court to reach some undesirable result”.

DOUBLE AIYYOOO !  THODA PULIYODHARAI KHAAKHE AATHA HOON !!

WHY HAVE OUR MELORDS NEVER CONSIDERED THAT RESERVATIONS AND QUOTA ARE VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE 14 OF OUR CONSTITUTION ?    


BODMAS LAGAANA BHOOL GAYA ? 

DONT MELORDS KNOW THAT QUOTA HAS DRIVE AWAY THE BEST BRAINS AWAY FROM THE WATAN ,  FOR HORSES WONT RUN WITH DONKEYS ?     

THIS IS WHAT THE JEALOUS WHITE NATIONS WANT , RIGHT ?

MELORDS,  WHY DO YOU THINK FOREIGN MONEY COMES TO SUPPORT EVR PERIYAR- BR AMBEDKAR STUDENTS UNIONS ?   PROFESSORS ARE THREATENED TO PASS PLAIGAIRISED THESIS AND DISSERTATIONS ..


CHANGE IS THE ONLY CONSTANT.

THE RULE OF LAW CAN NEVER BE STATIC AND MUST FLOW WITH THE TIMES.

QUOTA MUST CONSIDER THE ECONOMIC STATUS / POWER OF THE DALIT.   

HEY MELORDS, EVER HEARD OF INDIAN DY CONSUL GENERAL DEVYANI KHOBRAGADE  WHOSE CHILDREN / HUSBAND HELD AMERICAN PASSPORTS AND WHO HAD AN ADARSH FLAT ?

Devyani Khobragade’s husband AS Rathore , is a visiting Professor of Philosophy at JNU  - so what else is new ?

Melords, why have you allowed the Italian waitress ( empress under NAC ) to put her own Presidents in place to use the sword of article Article 356 among many others?


Here is the list of people who wanted to save TERRORIST  Yakub Memon

Aamir Khan
Arundhati Roy
Azam Khan
Teesta Setalvad
Justice Panachand Jain (Retd)
Justice H.S. Bedi (Retd)
Justice P. B. Sawant (Retd)
Justice H. Suresh (Retd)
Justice K. P. Siva Subramaniam (Retd)
Justice S. N. Bhargava (Retd)
Justice K Chandru (Retd)
Justice Nagmohan Das (Retd)
Shatrughan Sinha MP
Mani Shankar Aiyer, MP
Ram Jethmalani,
MP Majeed Memon, MP
Sitaram Yechury, MP, G.S, CPI(M)
D. Raja, MP, Secretary, CPI
K.T.S Tulsi, MP H.K. Dua, MP
T. Siva, MP
Mamta Banerjee
Prakash Karat, CPI(M), Member, Polit Bureau
Dipankar Bhattacharya, General Secretary, CPI(ML)-Liberation
Brinda Karat, CPI(M), Member, Polit Bureau
N. Ram, Senior Journalist
Prashant Bhushan, Senior Lawyer
Jagmati Sangwan, General Secretary, AIDWA
Kavita Krishnan, Secretary, AIPWA
Annie Raja, General Secretary, NFIW
Tushar Gandhi, Mahatma Gandhi Foundation
M. K. Raina, Film & theatre artist
Anand Patwardhan, Filmmaker
Naseeruddin Shah, Actor
Mahesh Bhatt, Filmmaker
Lalit Vachani, Filmmaker
Ram Rahman
Vivan Sundaram, Artist
Prof. Prabhat Patnaik
Prof. C. P. Chandrasekhar
Prof. Utsa Patnaik
Ritu Diwan, Former Director & Head Dept of Economics, Mumbai University
Jean Dreze
Pamela Philipose, Journalist
Achin Vanaik
Adv. Flavia Agnes, Director, Majlis Legal Centre, Mumbai.
Parthiv Shah
Prof. Irfan Habib
Prof. Arjun Dev
Prof. D. N. Jha
Prof. Kalpana Kannibaran, Hyderabad
Indira Jaisingh, Former, Addl. Sol. General
Kirti Singh, Former Member, Law Commission
Vrinda Grover, Lawyer
Prof. Abhijit Sen
Dr. Imrana Qadir
Dilip D’souza, Author
Ravi Chelam, Biologist and Conservationist Scientist, Bengaluru
Prof. Sohini Ghosh
Associate Prof. Sabina Gadihoke
Smita Gupta, economist
Prof. Jayati Ghosh
Prof. Jagmohan Singh, Coalition Against the Death Penalty, Ludhiana
Shabnam Hashmi, Anhad
Manisha Sethi, Academic
Prof. Ved Kumari
Biraj Patnaik
Virginia Saldanha
Prof.Madhu Prashad
Anees Azmi
Rahul Saxena
Anjali Mody
Dr. Nikita Sood, Oxford University
Rahul Roy, Filmmaker
Dr. Ayesha Kidwai
Prof. Harbans Mukhia
Adv. Kamayani Bali Mahabal
Binoo John (senior journalist, author)
Nachiket Udupa
N. Jayaram
Prof. Pulin Nayak
Prof. Kamal Mitra Chenoy
Angana Chatterjee
Deep Joshi
Mr. Tarun Bhartiya, Shillong
Ms. Angela Rangad, Shillong
Sanjay Karkala
Gitanjali Prasad
Vivek Sundara
Arundhati Dhuru NAPM
Sandeep Pandey, Socialist Party
Dr John Dayal, Member, National Integration Council
Chetan Mali
Vidula Ramabai
Nandini Sundar, Professor, Delhi School of Economics, Delhi University
Suroor Mander
Rammanohar Reddy
Kiran Bhatty, Senior Fellow, Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi
Laxmi Murthy
Aruna Roy, MKSS
Rev. Kyrsoibor Pyrtuh, Shillong
Ms. Kalpana Kumar, Delhi
Asad Zaidi, Writer
Dunu Roy, Hazards Centre, New Delhi
Sohail Akbar
Mr. Napolean S. Mawphniang, Shillong
Ms. Gertrude Lamare, , Shillong
Ms. Janice Pariat, Shillong
Ms. Angela Rangad, Shillong
Mr. Tarun Bhartiya, Shillong
Ms. Mona Mishra, Delhi
Mr. Aflatoon, Varanasi, Secretary (Organisation), Samajwadi Janparishad
Mr. Manas Das, Bangalore
Ms. Amba Kak, Delhi
Kshetrimayum Onil, Imphal
Subrat Kumar Sahu, Delhi
Dr. Kranti Bhavana, Patna
Mr. Taru Dalmia, Delhi
Mr. Apal, Jaunpur
Mr. Mujibur Khan, Delhi
Ms Kanika Kamra, Chandigarh
Ms Neelima Goyal
Ms Brinda Bose, Delhi
Mr. Hossein Fazeli,
Mr. Jatinder Mauhar Singh, Chandigarh
Himanshi Rawat, Delhi
Dhruba J. Dutta
Abhinandita Mathur
Rahul Saxena, Bangalore, India
Muralidharan, Secretary, National Platform for the Rights of the Disabled
Ghazala Jamil
Sohail Hashmi
Prabir Purkayastha
Nikhil De, MKSS
Michael Noronha, (Mysore)
Ovais Sultan Khan
Abha Baiya
Ashok Chowdhury, AIUFWP
Bondita Acharya, Jorhat, Assam
Dr.Rosemary Dzuvichu, Nagaland University, Kohima
Kalyani Menon-Sen
Gita Sen
Vani Subramaniam
Saheli Women's Resource Centre
Gabriele Dietrich
Niraj Malik
Javed Malick
Kiran Shaheen
Dyuti Ailawadi
Ramlath Kavil
Supriya Madangarli
Amrita Shodhan
Geetanjali Gangoli
Helen Saldana
Albertina Almeida
Pushpa Achanta
Kalpana Mehta
WSS Women Against Sexual Violence and State Repression
Vineeta Bal
Malini Subramaniam
Sumi Krishna
Ratna Appnender
Sujata Patel
Chayanika Shah
Sadhna Arya
Asmita Basu
Johanna Lokhande
Pyoli Swatija
Mamta Singh
Ardhendu Sen
Parijata
Sakina Bahora
Juhi Jain
Meena Seshu
Vahida Nainar
Indira Chakravarthy
Anubha Rastogi
Soma KP
Abha Bhaiya
Runu Chakraborty
Shraddha Chickerur
Mihira Sood
Nisha Biswas
Ilina Sen
Preetha Nair
Rakhi Sehgal
Shoma Sen
Greeshma Aruna Rai
Uma Chandru
Shals Mahajan
LABIA Queer Feminist Collective
Sujata Gothoskar
Sandhya Gokhale
Forum Against Oppression of Women
Nikita Sonavane
Lalita Ramdas
Veena Shatrughna
Abhi Nandita Mathur
Freda Guttman
Vinod Mubayi, Co-editor, Insaf Bulletin
T K Raghunathan
Abby Lippman, PhD, Professor Emerita, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Martin Duckworth, cineaste
Shrikumar Poddar NRISAHI
George Abraham NRISAHI
Mohammad Imran NRISAHI
Kasim Sait Progressive Interactions, Chennai
Kareem Sait
Jai Sen
Prof.Praveen Jha
A K Ramakrishnan
Gitanjali Prasad
Rohan Dominic Mathews
Amod Shah
Shreya Agarwal
Anamika Lahiri
Rhea John
Kiran Bhatty
Vanita Leah Falcao
Ankita Aggarwal
Aashish Gupta
Avantika Dhingra
Radhika Jha
Seema Jha
Sridhar A
Farah Naqvi, Writer and Activist, Delhi
Radha Holla Brar
Vinay Kulkarni
Veena Shatrugna
R Srivatsan KS Jacob
Ravi Duggal
Indira Charkavarti
Sulakshna Nandi
Amar Jesani
Dhruv Mankad
Manisha Gupte
Renu Khanna
Sarojini
Saraswathy Ganapathy
Anant Phadke
Chinu Srinivasan
Ygesh Jain
Dr. Mohan Rao
C Sathyamala
Pallavi Gupta
Sukla Sen
Veena Johari
Ajaya Kumar Singh, Social Activist, Odisha Forum for Social Action, Bhubaneswar
Amalendu Upadhyaya, Editor, hastakshep.com
Anjali Monteiro, Mumjbai
Anubha Rastogi, advocate, Mumbai
Anuradha Bhasin Jamwal, Jamwal
Apoorvanand, Teacher, DU
Capt. Tauseef H. Mukadam, Airline Pilot - Air Asia India, Bangalore
Darryl D'Monte, Chairperson, Forum of Environmental Journalists of India (FEJI), Mumbai
Devangshu Datta, New Delhi
Farah Naqvi, Writer and Activist, Delhi
Fr. Cedric Prakash sj, Director, PRASHANT, Gujarat
Francis Parmar.Gujarat
G. M. Sheikh, artist, Vadodara
Gagan Sethi, development professional, Gujarat
Geeta Seshu, Journalist, Mumbai, Maharashtra
Ghanshyam Shah, academician, Gujarat
Githa Hariharan, writer, New Delhi
Harsh Kapoor, New Delhi
Harsh Mander, social activist, writer, Aman Biradari, New Delhi
Hussain Indorewala, Asst. Professor, Madhta Pradesh
Indira Chandrasekhar, publisher, New Delhi
K.P. Jayasankar, Mumbai
Manan Trivedi, Social Activist, Gujarat
Manoranjan Mohanty, New Delhi
Mitul Baruah, Syracuse University, NY
Mukul Mangalik, Ramjas College, DU
N.D.Jayaprakash, Social Activist, New Delhi
Nasreen Fazalbhoy, Mumbai
Navaid Hamid, MOEMIN, New Delhi
Nilanjana S Roy, New Delhi
Nilima Sheikh, artist, Vadodara
Priya Pillai , Environmental Activist , Greenpeace India.
Radha Khan, Freelance development consultant.
Ram Puniyani, writer, Mumbai
Rohit Chopra, Associate Professor Santa Clara University
Rupa Gulab
S.Q.Masood, activist, Hyderabad
Sadanand Menon, Chennai
Sanjiv Bhatt, IPS Gujarat
Shankar Singh, MKSS, Rajasthan
Sheba George, Director , SAHR WARU , Gujarat
Vineet Tiwari, Progressive Writers Association, Indore
Swarna Rajagopalan, Researcher, Chennai
Isha Khandelwal, Lawyer, Jagdalpur Legal Aid Group
Shalini Gera, Lawyer, Jagdalpur Legal Aid Group
Nandini Rao, women's rights activist, New Delhi
Y J Rajendra, GEneral Secretary, PUCL - Karnataka
Irfan Engineer, Mumbai
Prof Archana Prasad
Dr. Dinesh Abrol
Siddaramaiah
Sania Mirza
Shahrukh Khan
Saif ali khan
Kareena Kapoor
Sharmila Tagore
Abu Azmi
Aravind Kejriwal
Asaduddin Owaisi
Akbaruddin OWaisi
Nitish Kumar
Laloo Prasad Yadav
Shashi Taroor
Digvijay Singh
Akhilesh Yadav
Mulayam Singh Yadav
Javed Akthar


Ex-Chief Justice of India HL Dattu  took charge as the Chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).   He took over from  Justice Cyriac Joseph who held charge as the acting Chairperson. 

Joseph Paaji holds a world record- albeit a dubious one.

HOLD YOUR BREATH.

Cyriac Joseph authored only seven judgments during his tenure as a Supreme Court judge from July 7, 2008 to January 27, 2012.

Arun Jaitley wrote about Justice Cyriac Joseph: “As a judge, he was known for not writing judgments. As against a few hundred judgments authored by every judge of the Supreme Court, Justice Cyriac Joseph is believed to have written only six judgments. He has been, even during his tenure as a judge, perceived to be close to certain political and religious organisations…”

Joseph paaji delayed the pronouncement of a judgement against Samajwadi Party leader Mulayam Singh Yadav in a disproportionate assets (DA) case. 

When it came to giving the verdict on 10 February 2009, just ahead of the 2009 Lok Sabha elections, Joseph Paaji said he was "reserving it".

Joseph also allegedly tried to interfere with a pending investigation in a criminal prosecution in the murder of a nun, Sister Abhaya ( who witnesses a sexual orgy between two priests and a nun  )  in Kerala by visiting the forensic laboratory where the analysis of the narco test of the accused was being conducted. Joseph was a sitting judge in the Supreme Court at the time. 

The incident caused huge resentment in the lawyers' fraternity. Subsequently, the Kozhikode Bar Association passed a resolution against Joseph demanding an investigation into his role and sought his suspension from work for that period.


CHECK OUT HOW THE HIGH COURT JUDGE HEMA  SLAPPED CONTEMPT OF COURT CHARGE ON A MAJOR NEWSPAPER..  THIS WOMAN WANTED TO BE FACEBOOK FRIEND OF MY WIFE --  MY WIFE JUST IGNORED HER 






27 YEARS HAVE PASSED .  

NO JUSTICE IS DONE !




A former crime branch SP, KT Michael, in the list of accused for allegedly destroying key evidence in the case. KT Michael was in charge of the preliminary investigation in the death of Sister Abhaya, and had closed the case saying sister Abhaya had committed suicide in 1992.

THE POPE TAKES GOOD CARE OF PEOPLE WHO HUSH CHURCH CRIMES.

MOTHER TERESAs NILLIONS WAS USED BY THE POPE AS HUSH MONEY TO PAY OFF THE PARENTS OF  PEDOPHILE VICTIMS.      

MANY WHITE  STEP PARENTS PUSHED THEIR SMALL STEP SONS INTO HOMOSEXUALITY WITH THE CATHOLIC CLERGY AND THEN MADE MONEY OUT OF IT ( SECRET VIDEO TAPES )..




Transparency International, in its Global Corruption Report, 2007 released on May 25, 2007 came out with a shocking revelation that the estimated amount paid in bribe to the lower judiciary in India during 2006 was around Rs. 2,630 crore.

How can they be so sure?


Because they know who funds the NGOs!



https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sc-paves-way-for-opening-of-dance-bars-in-mumbai/articleshow/67568502.cms

THE ENTIRE DESH DROHI BENAMI MEDIA IS CELEBRATING . .FOOTERS FLASH ON TV “ SANSKAR AND BRAHMANICAL PATRIARCHY TAKES A BEATING “.

SUPRME COURT HAS “ORDERED” THAT CHAMIYA DANCE BEER BARS ARE RE-OPENED IN MUMBAI, AFTER 14 YEARS .
NO CCTV ARE ALLOWED, BY THE MELORDS QUOTING PRIVACY RULES....  DRUNKEN MEN TAKE HAND JOBS UNDER THE TABLES WITH DIM LIGHTING .. THE WHOLE PLACE REEKS OF SWEAT, SEMEN AND STALE CHEAP BEER.

THE SUPREME COURT SAYS “ WE HAVE UPHELD THE DIGNITY OF WOMEN AND RIGHT TO LIFE “

DANCE BARS ARE PICKS UP JOINTS FOR WHORES. CRASS OBSENITY RULES HERE IN THESE DENS ..

THESE GIRLS LOCK SEDUCTIVE GLANCES WITH MALE CUSTOMERS TILL THEY THROW MONEY AT THEM..

ONE OF MY CHIEF OFFICERS TOLD ME THAT HE THREW 30,000 RUPEES ON A GIRL HE WANTED TO SCREW LONG AGO IN MUMBAI .. AFTER THAT HE WAS MOST REMORSEFUL AS HE DID NOT HAVE MONEY TO BUT SOMETHING FOR HIS SMALL SON.. HE SAID "MY DRINK WAS SPIKED "..

AS IF A FEW DOZEN GOOD LOOKING GIRLS WITH GOOD FIGURES CANNOT EARN A DECENT LIVING..

THIS IS WHAT INDIA HAS COME TO .. HOMOSEXUALITY/ ADULTERY/ MENTRUATING WOMEN IN SABARIMALA AND NOW THIS.

JUDGES PLAY GOD.. THE MAHARASHTRA STATE LEGISLATURE DOES NOT WANT DANCE BARS AS THEY ARE DENS OF CRIME AND CORRUPTION..

NAPUNSAKS MODI AND LAW MINISTER ALLOWS THE JUDGES TO PLAY GOD.

ONE OF MY SECOND OFFICERS USED TO WORK AS A BOUNCER IN THE BEST CHAMIYA BAR OF MUMBAI … HE USED TO TAKE A FREE SCREW DAILY .. HE CHOSE THE GIRL HE WANTED TO SCREW.. HE WAS A VERY HANDSOME AND POLISHED , CLASSY LAD ….

AFTER THE DANCE BAR SHITS HE USED TO DRIVE THE GIRLS BACK TO “CONGRESS HOUSE “ WHERE THEY STAYED.

I KNOW THE SLIMY INSIDES OF THESE DANCE BARS.

Capt ajit vadakayil
..

If the court cases due to FIRs in Police stations are computerized , you can see a SUDDEN SPURT OF WORK LOAD FOR THE JUDGES from a particular week onwards..

It is because a CRYING BOLLYWOOD SUPERSTAR said on his Axis Bank sponsored show that POLICE CANNOT REFUSE FIR  – it is mandatory .  

No judge will agree to this sort of thing . .


AND PRETTY SOON WE HAD THE PUBLIC RUNNING TO THE POLICE STATIONS FOR MINOR EGO PROBLEMS .


EVERY FIR, HAS ITS SHARE OF PAPERWORK , INVOLVEMENT OF LAWYERS AND JUDGES.

Lawyers have become millionaires just be getting his client “exempted from personal appearance” .

Every 4 months the lawyer will collect 5000,  20000,  40000 or more depending on how well to do his client is. 

The case will drag on for years –may be 20 or 30.    The lawyer milks the man on whom a frivolous FIR is slapped—by doing nothing.      

The lawyer will get the next court appearance date by using a mobile phone and convey it by phone or letter to his client who lives far away..


Below:   Obviously all the advise of the CRYING BOLLYWOOD SUPERSTAR was only for others-- 

Check out 1.10 --where  "police force must not be used by HIGH AND MIGHTY for own selfish ends  "  .-  

I was slapped with a defamation case by this CRYING SUPERSTAR by using his PET top cop.



SOMEBODY ASKED ME

WHY DID YOU GET SATYAMEVA JAYATE SHOW WHICH WAS RIDING HIGH , AND WAS NO 1 SHOW ON TV, SHUT DOWN..


WELL THE AXIS BANK  ( OWNED BY JEW ROTHSCHIL D )  SPONSORED SHOW WAS SPONSORING MAOIST COMMUNIST PARTY.. ROTHSCHILD CREATED COMMUNISM.


I want my readers to see the video in the link below where THE CRYING SUPERSTAR is shedding copius tears .
This program SATYAMEVA JAYATE is making a good example of a COMMIE CANDIDATE Ajit Sarkar and his COMMIE son Amit Sarkar .

People are told by the CRYING SUPERSTAR not to vote for Pappu Yadav.

But what happened ?

Despite CRYING SUPER STAR running him down , Pappu Yadav still won.  Despite hajaaar BENAMI media's blitzkrieg against him

Pappu Yadav on a RJD ticket still defeated STRONG MAN and SEVEN TIME LOK SABHA MP Sharad Yadav of JDU in the 2014 general elections!

Sharad Yadav was the SITTING MP again and again and again since the year  1991  from Madhepura Parliamentary Constituency till 2014 when Pappu Yadav trounced Sharad Yadav him off his seat which he won with 3,70,585 votes in 2009. 

 There was NO vote rigging OR booth capturing  in May 2014 Lok Sabha elections !  



Pappu and his sardarnee wife Ranjita ( a national level tennis player ) are the only political couple to win 2014 polls-  despite being relentlessly hounded by the election commission and BENAMI media--with black propaganda that they are Anand Margis .

.People gave Pappu Yadav 3,68,937. All these 3.7 lakh voters are not fools.

This shows that CORPORATE ZIONIST JEW TV SPONSORED  commie candidates do NOT win. 

WE THE PEOPLE decide , not some crying TV hero , BENAMI media , or the Commies students and professors in JU / JNU / FTII / DU !    

On 17 May 2013. Pappu Yadav was acquitted by the Patna high court in CPM leader Ajit Sarkar murder case for want of evidence

 On 14 June 1998, he was gunned down at Subhash Nagar in Purnia, along with his driver and a party worker. In 1999, Yadav was arrested for the murder and was in jail till 17th May 2013. 

The Benami media HATED Pappu Yadav -but the people loved him as a Robin Hood. He was after the asses of all corrupt officers and rich people who fleeced the poor. Foreign Funded NGOs could not operate with him around. 

His mere presence ensured that there were no power cuts in his constituency. Doctors had to treat the desperately poor for small amounts . 

He and his wife set up  schools and vocational training centres where the deprived and the  poor were  offered education at highly subsidised cost. 

THE COMMIES HATED HIM.

Yadav earned degrees in human rights and disaster management while he was lodged in Tihar Jail during 2008-2009. Despite this he was accused by the Commies  of having a luxurious life in jail.

The three times he was granted bail, the COLLEGIUM  Supreme Court cancelled it promptly and sent him back to prison. 

Ajit Sarkar the commie leader was no babe in the wood. 

He was a violent man and entered politics through the Students' Federation of India, the CPM’s youth wing, Ajit Sarkar he was gunned down with a party worker Ashfaqur Rehman ( alleged to be a Bangladesi illegal immigrant ) in broad daylight at Subhash Nagar in Purnea.


In his young age a magistrate ordered that Pappu Yadav be paraded around town with a placard hung on his neck I AM PAPPU YADAV , A THIEF .  After being traumatized , he was a changed man . .

He is soft spoken and does NOT smoke or drink.  Several attempts have been made on his life.   

Ajit Sarkar with long hair , sporting sunglasses was a LAND GRABBER- the usual Naxal thingy.   

People who come on TV to praise Ajit Sarkar are the Commies who received free lands , mostly grabbed from Hindu temples.   

Commie Ajit Sarkar assisted illegal Bangladesi  immigrants  .  

Ajit Sarkar was killed ( 58 days after ) by his own commie bosses, because he told his followers to vote for BJP in 1998.    

Everybody in Purnea knows this.   I have information from my officers in Purnea.  


Pappu Yadav is HATED by the Commies and the Muslims.


We want the elected legislature to amend the constitution , find an easy way to punish 100% sure TRAITOR TO WATAN JUDGES in this electronic age of video and hidden cams.

CORRUPT JUDGES HAVE BECOME VERY JITTERY TODAY— THEY HAVE LOST REM SLEEP.

THE MODI GOVT IS SNOOPING ON THESE CORRUPT JUDGES BASED ON WHISTLE BLOWERS EVIDENCE..


WE ASK THAT WHISTLE BLOWERS BE OFFERED PROTECTION..  THESE CORRUPT JUDGES ARE IN FOREIGN PAYROLL .. THEY HAVE MONEY AND EVIL POWER .. 

WE KNOW WHO PICKS UP THE BILL FOR THESE JUDGES WHEN THEY TRAVEL IN INDIA AND ABROAD STAYING IN 5 STAR HOTELS..



HEY COLLEGIUM MELORDS

IF YOU CAN INSTALL JUDGES

WHY CANT YOU REMOVE JUDGES ?

STRANGE INCONSISTENCY THIS !!

BATAO NAH ?

PLEAJJJJE !




The Indian judicial system has no connection with the society ( despite being in the digital age ) , something which it had inherited from the British judicial set-up.

Today 65% of Indians believe the judiciary is corrupt, a view shared by external assessments. If judges do not agree let us have a nationwide referendum..

Indian judiciary, like its counterparts elsewhere, relies on its reputation for fairness, impartiality, and incorruptibility. The courts can scarcely afford any loss of public faith.

In 2010, a former Law Minister declared that eight of sixteen former Chief Justices of India (CJI) were corrupt, and in 2014 a former Supreme Court judge alleged that three former CJIs made “improper compromises”to let a corrupt High Court judge continue in office.

The Indian judiciary has shown a predilection to treat every call from the executive or the legislature for greater judicial accountability as an attack on the judiciary’s independence.

In the post below--  peruse the COMMENT SECTION —  99.5% of people are abusing the unaccountable judiciary. People are done with the useless judiciary...




India’s judicial corruption is a cancer that begins at the lower levels and inches its way up. Spanning more than 600 district courts and hundreds of subordinate courts, the heterogeneous lower judiciary acts as the primary interface between Indian judiciary and its common citizens.  More than 45% of citizens reported paying a bribe to the judiciary ( judges/ lawyers/ babus ) , a sad reality validated by many senior judges themselves.. 

The pendency of cases, collusion between lawyers of the defense and prosecution, manipulation of an opaque justice system by court officials, and the political influence in appointments of lower court judges have created a toxic justice system at the lower levels..

In a judicial system like India’s, where higher court judges are selected from the ranks of lower court judges and lawyers, there is always a possibility of corrupt judges making it to higher courts. This is especially likely when, as in India, seniority becomes the primary ‘de facto’ criterion for promotion. 

Once judges have been appointed to higher courts, they can use their expansive ”contempt of court” powers to suppress allegations of corruption. Indeed, the Indian judiciary’s use of contempt of court proceedings against its detractors is often blamed for reducing to a sullen whisper what should be a democratic debate on judicial corruption. 

For instance, those who accused the former CJIs of corruption are now battling contempt of court proceedings.

CONTEMPT OF COURT TO KEEP PROCEEDING IN COURT FROM BREAKING DOWN IS NOW CONSTRUED AS CONTEMPT OF JUDGE..    JUST WHO THE HELL IS A JUDGE ?  IS HE GOD ?


OTHER DEVELOPED NATIONS DON’T HAVE”CONTEMPT OF COURT “ SYSTEM  ANYMORE……
TRUTH CAN BE BRANDED AS VILIFICATION OR DEFAMATION ......
INDIA IS A DEMOCRACY.. CITIZENS HAVE RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH AGAINST JUDICIARY ....

DOES OF OUR CONSTITUTION SAY OTHERWISE ? ....  

PM CAN BE ABUSED AS “MAUTH KA SAUDAGAR “ BUT A LOWER CORRUPT JUDGE CANNOT BE QUESTIONED ?

BY THE TIME A LAWYER BECOMES A JUDGE HE IS CORRUPT, AND HE IS READY TO SELL HIS OWN MOTHER IN THE WH0REHOUSE PROVIDED THE PRICE IS RIGHT . . . 

COURT CLERKS KNOW THE MORAL FIBRE OF THE JUDGES AS THEY WERE LAWYERS BEFORE WHO GAVE THEM A CUT .... 

THERE IS A NEXUS BETWEEN LAWYERS AND JUDGES. . . TODAY OUR COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY IS PACKED WITH ANTI-HINDU AND ANTI-WATAN JUDGES.

 PEOPLE LIKE JEW NOAM CHOMSKY GIVE FIATS TO COLLEGIUM MELORDS .. . MOST OF OUR COLLEGIUM JUDGES ARE PEA BRAINED . . THEY WERE FOOT SLOGGING UNSUCCESSFUL LOSER LAWYERS . .

THEY BECAME JUDGES SO THAT THEY CAN C0CK A SNOOK AT THEIR SUCCESSFUL MERCEDES DRIVING LAWYER COLLEAGUES.

EX-CJI KATJU GOT BUSHWHACKED AND AMBUSHED BY JUSTICE GOGOI ( FAR JUNIOR TO HIM ) FOR WRITING SOME TRUTHS IN HIS BLOGS.

IF IT IS A PERSONAL ATTACK ON A JUDGE VIA A BLOG, IT DOES NOT AMOUNT TO CONTEMPT OF COURT... ....

LET THE JUDGE WHO WAS PERSONALLY ATTACKED ALLOW THE LAW TO TAKE COURSE (  TELLING TRUTH IS NOT DEFAMATION )  -- BUT DEFINITELY NOT VIA CONTEMPT CLAUSE..........

WE INDIANS ARE NOT FOOLS …

KATJU WAS HUMILIATED BY GOGOI..

QUOTE:  Katju was particularly upset with Gogoi not according him the respect he thought he was due, by virtue of being more senior than Gogoi (albeit retired).

Katju wrote:Is this how a former judge of the Supreme Court is to be treated ? Is this how sitting Supreme Court judges should behave?  Am I to be thrown out of Court like a common vagabond ?”

I kept tolerating such insults from Gogoi, who was much junior to me as a judge, and evidently does not know how to behave to his elders and seniors...

I had been a Supreme Court Judge when all these 3 had been High Court Judges. Pant had in fact been a Joint Registrar in Allahabad high court when I had been a Judge there, but today he addressed me as Mr. Katju, although there is a Govt. of India notification which says that a retired Supreme Court and High Court Judges are to be addressed as ‘ Justice ‘. UNQUOTE



Even when there is overwhelming evidence against corrupt judges, a cumbersome impeachment process impedes their removal. Under Indian law, either 100 members of the Lower House or 50 members of the Upper House have to submit a signed complaint that is then investigated by a three-member committee comprising two judges and a jurist; if approved, the matter is debated in both Houses, and must be completed within a single session ( always saved by deep state payroll Rajya Sabha members , or else the whole process must begin again in a subsequent session. 

It is therefore not difficult to see why the country has so far not seen a single successful judicial impeachment. Since independence, only three judges have ever faced impeachment, all three for misappropriating public funds or accumulating disproportionate wealth. 

Of those three, in one case the impeachment motion failed, and in the other two (see here and here), the judges resigned before the motion could go through. In the two latest impeachment efforts in 2014 and 2015, one failed to gather momentum and the fate of the other remains uncertain.

India has the world’s largest backlog of cases, at nearly 31.5 million. The time between filing and final disposition in extreme cases can be up to 20 years in civil cases and 30 years in criminal cases. 

A weak infrastructure, chronic judicial vacancies, manual processes, a weak law and order enforcement system, prolonged trials and delayed judgments have been major contributors to corruption at all levels of judiciary. 

Conscious of the chronic delays, citizens feel compelled to bribe at all stages to hasten the trial process. Worse, the opportunities for illicit gain created by the delays create perverse incentives to keep the judicial system inefficient.

As with many other issues facing India, the problem of judicial corruption festers not for want of solutions but for lack of will. Several reform commissions, senior judges, and eminent jurists have laid out detailed proposals for reforming the system from the ground up. 

Some of the key suggestions include improvements to contempt of court and impeachment proceedings, improvement of judicial infrastructure, enforcing integrity codes for judges and lawyers, extending the Right to Information Act to cover the judiciary, opening judicial vacancies to qualified legal scholars, using alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and introduction of modern technology

Article 124 gives the legislature the power to act as a watchdog, and a restraining agency, on the judicary.

Article 124 in The Constitution Of India 1949
124. Establishment and constitution of Supreme Court
(1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India constituting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other Judges
(2) Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty five years: Provided that in the case of appointment of a Judge other than the chief Justice, the chief Justice of India shall always be consulted:
(a) a Judge may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office;
(b) a Judge may be removed rom his office in the manner provided in clause ( 4 )

NOT ONE SINGLE JUDGE HAS BEEN IMPEACHED IN INDIA SO FAR.. THE DEEP STATE ENSURES THIS..

Soumitra Sen, Justice of the Calcutta High Court, came closest to impeachment in 2011 as the Rajya Sabha passed the motion making him the first judge to be so charged in the Upper House for misappropriating Rs 33 plus lakhs under his custody as a court appointed receiver in his capacity as a lawyer, and misrepresenting facts before the Calcutta High Court in a 1983 case. He resigned before the Lok Sabha could complete the procedure

P.D Dinakaran, the Chief Justice of the Sikkim High Court, faced a judicial panel to look into allegations of corruption. He resigned in July 2011 before impeachment proceedings could be initiated against him by Parliament.

V. Ramaswami, Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana, was the first judge against whom impeachment proceedings were initiated in 1993 by a motion through the Lok Sabha. He came under scrutiny for extravagant spending on his official residence with the Supreme Court Bar Association also passing a resolution for his impeachment in 1991.

The two thirds majority for passing the motion was lost as the Congress abstained. Significantly, he went on to contest the elections in 1999 as an ADMK candidate against Vaiko from Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam. Ramaswami lost the election in the peoples court as well.

J.B. Pardiwala, Justice in the Gujart High Court, faced an impeachment notice by 58 Rajya Sabha MPs in 2015 for “objectionable remarks on the issue of reservation.”

He had said, “If I am asked by anyone to name two things which have destroyed this country or rather have not allowed the country to progress in the right direction, then the same is, (i) Reservation and (ii) Corruption. It is very shameful for any citizen of this country to ask for reservation after 65 years of Independence. When our Constitution was framed, it was understood that reservation would remain for a period of 10 years, but unfortunately, it has continued even after 65 years of Independence.”


He removed the wordings from his judgement within hours after the impeachment notice was sent by the Rajya Sabha to then chairperson and Vice President Hamid Ansari

Sometime, in 2009 or so, Prashant Bhushan had alleged that at least half of the last 16 to 17 Chief Justices of India were corrupt.

Recently, on 12 January 2018, four senior judges of the Supreme Court came out in the open to make allegations before full glare of media about important cases being allocated by the Chief Justice of India to certain favoured benches only.


Before we decide what is wrong with the Indian judiciary, let me ask you a question first, based on a scenario.

Person A shoots Person B.
Person B dies of the bullet injury.
There are dozens of  eye witnesses to the crime.
How long would you take to determine that Person A is guilty of manslaughter?

A minute???

Guess how long an Indian court took?

7 years!

Yes and what was the verdict?

Person A acquitted of murder!

Tough time believing it?

I think you all are aware of the Jessica Lal Murder Case.


WANNA READ ANOTHER PATHETIC CASE –WHICH REFLECTS THAT OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM IS THE WORST ON THIS PLANET ?


I KNOW JUICY INSIDE STORIES..

MY CHIEF OFFICER WAS HER NEIGHBOUR —  THE PRESS USED TO LEAN ON HIS HONDA CAR AND KEEP THEIR STUFF ON THE CAR BONNET , AND THAT GOT HIM PISSED OFF.


READ ABOUT DMKs POODLE JUDGE ASHOK KUMAR WHO CRIED : IS YOUR HEART MADE OF MUSCLE OR MUD ? 

BOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOO !!





THE CORRUPT JUDGE KATJU ALLUDES TO BELOW IS ASHOK KUMAR

How a corrupt Judge continued in the Madras High Court

There was an Additional Judge of the Madras High Court against whom there were several allegations of corruption. He had been directly appointed as a District Judge in Tamilnadu, and during his career as District Judge there were as many as 8 adverse entries against him recorded by various portfolio Judges of the Madras High Court. But one Acting Chief Justice of Madras High Court by a single stroke of his pen deleted all those 8 adverse entries, and consequently he became an Additional Judge of the High Court, and he was on that post when I came as Chief Justice of Madras High Court in November 2004.

That Judge had the solid support of a very important political leader of Tamilnadu. I was told that this was because while a District Judge he granted bail to that political leader.


Since I was getting many reports about his corruption, I requested the Chief Justice of India, Justice Lahoti, to get a secret IB enquiry made about him. A few weeks thereafter, while I was in Chennai, I received a call from the Secretary of the CJI saying that the CJI wanted to talk to me. Justice Lahoti then came on the line and said that what I had complained about had been found true. Evidently the IB had found enough material about the Judge's corruption.


Since the 2 year term as Additional Judge of that person was coming to an end I assumed he would be discontinued as a Judge of the High Court in view of the IB report. However what actually happened was that he got another 1 year appointment as an Additional Judge, though 6 other Additional Judges who had been appointed with him were confirmed and made permanent Judges of the High Court.


I later learnt how this happened. The Supreme Court Collegium consists of 5 seniormost Judges for recommending names for appointment as a Supreme Court Judge, and 3 seniormost Judges for dealing with High Courts.


The 3 senior most Judges in the Supreme Court at that time were the Chief Justice of India, Justice Lahoti, Justice Sabarwal, and Justice Ruma Pal. This Supreme Court Collegium recommended that in view of the adverse IB report the Judge should be discontinued as a High Court Judge after his 2 year term was over, and this recommendation was sent to the Central Government.

The Central Government at that time was the UPA Government. The Congress was no doubt the largest party in this alliance, but it did not have a majority in the Lok Sabha, and was dependent on support by it allies. One of such ally was the party in Tamilnadu which was backing this corrupt Judge. On coming to know of the recommendation of the 3 Judge Supreme Court Collegium they strongly objected to it.
The information I got was that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was at that time leaving for New York to attend the U.N. General Assembly Session. At the Delhi airport he was told by the Ministers of that party of Tamilnadu ( who were Congress allies ) that by the time he returns from New York his government would have fallen as that Tamilnadu party would withdraw support to the UPA ( for not continuing that Additional judge ).


On hearing this Manmohan Singh panicked, but he was told by a senior Congress minister not to worry, and he would manage everything. That Minister then went to Justice Lahoti and told him there would be a crisis if that Additional Judge of Tamilnadu was discontinued. On hearing this Justice Lahoti sent a letter to the Government of India to give another term of 1 year as additional Judge to that corrupt Judge, ( I wonder whether he consulted his two Supreme Court Collegium members ),and it was in these circumstances this corrupt Judge was given another 1 year term as Additional Judge ( while his 6 batch mates as Additional Judges were confirmed as permanent Judges ). 


The Additional Judge was later given another term as Additional Judge by the new CJI Justice Sabarwal, and then confirmed as a permanent judge by the next CJI Justice K.G. Balkrishnan, but transferred to another High Court.
I have related all this to show how the system actually works, whatever it is in theory. In fact in view of the adverse IB report the Judge should not even have been continued as an Additional Judge



Markandey Katju accuses 3 former chief justices of backing 'corrupt' Madras High Court judge due to UPA govt pressure

Press Council of India chief alleges that Justices R.C. Lahoti, Y.K. Sabharwal and K.G. Balakrishnan allowed a Madras High Court judge, against whom there were several corruption allegations, to continue in office.

Former Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju
Former Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju
File photo of Madras High Court. (Wikipedia Commons))
Press Council of India chief Justice (retd) Markandey Katju is in news again, this time for questioning the conduct of three former Chief Justices of India.
Justice Katju, a former Supreme Court judge, in an explosive blog post, has accused three CJIs in giving extension to an additional judge of Madras High court, facing corruption charges, at the instance of the previous UPA government due to pressure from an ally, apparently the DMK.
Katju served as chief justice of Madras High Court from 2004 to 2005.
In his blog, Katju also named the three CJIs but refrained from naming the "corrupt" judge.  
Katju made the charge while alleging how Justices R.C. Lahoti, Y.K. Sabharwal and K.G. Balakrishnan made "improper compromises" in allowing the judge, against whom there were several allegations of corruption, to continue in office, said a PTI report.
"These three former CJIs made improper compromises. Justice Lahoti who started it, then Justice Sabharwal and then Justice Balakrishnan. These are CJIs who can surrender. Is a CJI going to surrender to political pressure or not going to surrender to political pressure?" Katju told a news channel.

Katju said since he got many reports that the additional judge concerned was allegedly indulging in corruption he had requested the then CJI Lahoti to get a secret IB inquiry made about him.
He claimed that the IB report found the allegations to be true and he should have been sacked.
Katju said since the two-year term as additional judge of that person was coming to an end he presumed he would be discontinued as judge.
"But to my utter shock I came to know he was been given another extension when an adverse IB report was there," he said.
Katju said he came to know that the reason for all this was that at that time the UPA-I government was dependent on allies and one of them was a Tamil Nadu party, an apparent reference to DMK, whose leader was given bail by the additional judge concerned. 

THE KOSHER DEEP STATE HAS A SAY IN APPOINTMENT OF JUDGES IN OUR COLLEGIUM SYSTM..

THE JNU  COMMIE PROFESSOR SYSTEM OF SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPTS AND ISLAMIC LANGUAGE DEPARTMENTS , IS COLLEGIUM


Kapadia couldn't stop KGB's nod to Dinakaran: Katju continues anti-collegium campaign

Justice Markandey Katju has continued his indictment of the collegium system on his blog, now alleging that then-Chief Justice of India (CJI) KG Balakrishnan pushed hard for the elevation of Justice PD Dinakaran to the Supreme Court, despite strong evidence of corruption against the latter.
While not mentioning Dinakaran by name but dropping enough hints about his identity, Katju recounted from his own time as a Supreme Court judge, when he had told his senior brother judge Justice SH Kapadia (who was on the collegium and whom Katju said he holds “in great respect for his high integrity”) of the “very bad reputation” of Dinakaran in terms of integrity. Katju claimed he gave Kapadia “many details” that Katju was privy to because he was chief justice of the Madras high court where “this judge” was on a bench.
Katju blogged in his post with the title “How the Collegium actually works": [Editor's note: The blog post has been deleted. It is still accessible over Google's cache for now here]
Justice Kapadia thanked me for this information, and requested me to keep informing him about such matters. Despite my informing Justice Kapadia, the Collegium of the Supreme Court recommended this Judge for elevation to the Supreme Court, and he would certainly have been elevated but for the protests of lawyers of Tamilnadu who furnished documentary proof of that Judge’s corruption, e.g. large scale land grab done by him. Then he was transferred to Sikkim.
Katju claimed that Kapadia told him a year later that he remembered Katju’s warning but CJI Balakrishnan, also a former chief justice in Madras, had insisted on Dinakaran’s elevation because he claimed that the allegations against him were untrue.
Last week Katju had begun his collegium whistleblowing campaign by blogging allegations about successful government pressure on the collegium to extend the tenure of a judge, despite questions about his propriety, and earlier today he tweeted, implying that more than 20 per cent of judges were corrupt.





'They just talk about cricket, or the weather': Markandeya Katju says that most of India's Supreme Court judges are 'intellectually low' as BCCI reform controversy rumbles on

  • Katju used a Facebook blog post to launch the attack
  • The blog comes after The Board Of Control For Cricket In India (BCCI) was directed to implement reforms in the structure of India's cricketing body 
  • Chief Justice T S Thakur is one of those named by Markandeya Katju as being 'intellectually low'
  • See more news from India at www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome
With confidence in the higher judiciary already at rock bottom, former Supreme Court judge Markandeya Katju has controversially claimed that the majority of India's apex court's judges are, 'of a low intellectual level'. 
Katju has been frequently attacking the judiciary, slamming the collegium system of appointing judges, accusing the system of promoting corrupt and incompetent judges, and even sought a probe against ex-CJI H L Dattu leveling corruption charges against him.
But this is by far his strongest attack to date on the judges of the apex court.
Katju used a Facebook blog post to launch the attack on the Supreme Court judges
Katju used a Facebook blog post to launch the attack on the Supreme Court judges
“I think the time has come to tell Indians about the intellectual level and background of most Indian Supreme Court judges.
Katju used a blog on Facebook to claim: "While some of them have high intellectual level and character, like Justice Chalameshwar and Justice Nariman ( CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL DOES NOT AGREE ), the vast majority of the present SC Judges are people of very low intellectual level”, Katju said, naming a number of judges including Chief Justice T S Thakur.
Queried by a Facebook follower if he did not fear being sued for contempt for such dangerous remarks, Katju responded, “truth is a defence in contempt proceedings". 
Under Contempt of Courts Act, publication of any matter or the doing of any act whatsoever which scandalises or tends to scandalise or lowers or tends to lower the authority of, any court” amounts to contempt.

When another follower said, “Now I think many citizens will genuinely think low of SC judges, will it not result in people losing faith in judiciary?”, Katju responded “they have already lost faith”.
The hard-hitting blog comes after The Board Of Control For Cricket In India (BCCI) was directed by a bench headed by chief justice T S Thakur to implement reforms in the structure, functioning and membership of India's cricketing body.
Katju, a legal advisor of the BCCI, questioned the order and accused the CJI of showing utter lack of judicial discipline and the self-restraint expected of a judge of a superior court".
Katju went on to write: “…evidently Justice Thakur believes that since he is the CJI he is above the law, and need not follow it, being the monarch of all he surveys.
"He forgets the saying ‘Be you howsoever high, the law is above you’…Does Justice Thakur imagine that being the CJI he need not follow the Constitution of India and the law?

“I can say this [that vast majority of the present SC judges are people of very low intellectual level]”because I myself was a Supreme Court Judge for about five and a half years, and I was constantly interacting with my colleagues [the present Supreme Court judges were only High Court judges when I was a Supreme Court judge].
The level of their conversation was usually about cricket or the weather, never on any intellectual subject”.
When another of his Facebook follower asked Katju if he thought “we should have a Katju system of appointing judges instead of the present collegium system, he replied: “No system will work. Our judiciary is beyond redemption".

Ex-CJI Katju has written that that corruption is rampant and even well-known but, "most Chief Justices of India are reluctant to expose corruption in the judiciary thinking that this will defame the judiciary, and so they prefer to bury corruption under the carpet..".


Our Constitution or any other law have proved to be insufficient in punishing higher judiciary. It happened in the case of K. Veeraswami, a former judge of the Madras High Court who was prosecuted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1946 for financial gains. 

He fought his case 134 in 1991 in the Supreme Court which held that a sanction from the Chief Justice was needed before a criminal case could be registered against a judge. 

A charge framed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1946 without the prior approval of the Chief Justice of India lacked the force to  prosecute a judge charged with corruption. 

The Constitution of India provides for removal of a judge by way of impeachment on the grounds of proved misbehavior or incapacity.

The instance of Justice V. Ramaswamy shows that the constitutional mechanism of impeaching a corrupt judge may fail in the absence of the support of a two-third majority in the Parliament.    

V. Ramaswamy, the son-inlaw of V. Veeraswami was the first judge to face impeachment for financial irregularities committed during his term as a Punjab and Haryana High Court judge.


But he got away with impeachment as the Congress MPs sitting in opposition completely abstained from voting in the Tenth Lok Sabha. 

The constitutional provisions of impeaching an errant judge can thus fail by BILDERBERG CLUB controlled political manipulations.


The faith of WE THE PEOPLE in the judiciary has been eroded because MeLord judges are NOT afraid of stigma or punishment.

During the recent times, corruption in the judiciary is at an all time high as stories of judicial misconduct continue to tumble out of judicial cupboards.

In 2002, at least thirty-four sitting judges from all the three tiers of the Uttar Pradesh judiciary came under scanner for their alleged involvement in the Ghaziabad Court employees provident fund scam. The investigation against the erring judges is on.

Of late, the two developments that have embarrassed the country’s higher judiciary are the cash-for-judge scam and the misappropriation of money by a High Court judge.

In the cash-at-judge door scam, Justice Nirmal Yadav, a sitting judge of Punjab and Haryana High Court was relieved from judicial work after her name was involved for a receiving a bag of Rs. 15 lakhs. 

The bag containing Rs. 15 lakhs was mistakenly delivered at the residence of Justice Nirmaljit Kaur, another sitting judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Now, Justice Nirmal Yadav had asked the  Chief Justice of India to take her back to work “as nothing has been proved”. 

The second incident involves Justice Soumitra Sen of the Calcutta High Court who was held guilty of criminal misappropriation when he was an advocate and appointed receiver in a lawsuit.  hereafter he became a judge of the Calcutta High Court. 

On receipt of a report from the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court, the Chief Justice of India had recommended the Prime Minister for removing Justice Sen from office. The proposal to impeach Justice Sen is yet to materialize. The errant judge had rejected the advice to resign or seek voluntary retirement after he was found guilty of misconduct. Recently Justice Sen resigned before he faced the Lok Sabha proceedings for impeachment. 

Corruption, land-grabbing charges and abuse of judicial office are among the sixteen charges framed against Justice P.D. Dinakaran currently facing removal proceedings in the Parliament.  Justice Dinakaran as Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court was recommended for being appointed a Supreme Court judge in August. 2009. 

But after the land grabbing allegations were levelled, he went on leave and his elevation was stopped. Thereafter he was shifted to the Sikkim High Court as Chief Justice.

Read about Tamil dalit Christian convert Paul Daniel Dinakaran Premkumar below-

Read about V Ramaswami below-

Read about Saumitra Sen below-

Read about KG Balakrishnan below-

Read about the PF scam below-







A former Chief Justice of India was accused of getting special treatment for his daughter, a practicing lawyer in the Supreme Court during his tenure as the Chief Justice of India. 

Another Chief Justice of India was accused of using his position as the CJI to get the subordinate judiciary to rule in favour of his mother-in-law in a suit that had been barred by limitation for decades. 

Similarly another Chief justice of India faced allegations of delivering orders against the principles of natural justice and also for furthering business interests of his family.

No charges were, however, proved in any of the above instances.


“When the robed brethren break the code of correct conduct or rob the rule of law of its efficacy, sanctity and majesty, they too must be subject to severe discipline and punitive action in case of delinquency and aberration”.





BELOW ASSET DECLARATION ON VOLUNTARY BASIS -





When an attempt was made to bring the judiciary within the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2002, the judiciary voiced strong oppositions against it. 

Former Chief Justice of India, K. G. Balakrishnan went to the extent of saying that since the CJI is not a constitutional authority it does not come within the purview of the RTI 

The contentions of the CJI was, however, rejected by a parliamentary committee headed by E. M. Sudarsana Natchiappanan on 29 April, 2008. The Committee held that the judiciary comes under the purview of the Right to Information law with regard to all activities of administration except “judicial decision making”. 

Interpreting section 2(h) of the RTI Act, the Committee said that from the definition of ‘public authority’, it is clear that all the constitutional authorities come under the definition of ‘public authority’. 

That all the wings of the State – executive, legislature and judiciary are fully covered under this Act since all organs of the State are accountable to the citizens of India in a democratic state. The judiciary cannot immunize itself from judicial accountability under the RTI Act.


Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill was brought by UPA govt but had lapsed following dissolution of the 15th Lok Sabha in 2014.

If India has to be tis planet’s superpower in 15 years, we must bring as fresh a bill that seeks to change the present system of probing complaints of “misbehavior, incapacity and DISLOYALTY TO WATAN ” against Supreme Court and high court judges.

Though impeachment is the only provision available for removing high court and supreme court judges, the difficulty of garnering two-thirds majority of those present and voting, has led to the provision being sparingly used. And that too in one single session of parliament where desh drohi  UNELECTED Rajya Sabha members in kosher deep state payroll , disrupt proceedings.

This is despite many judges in high courts facing allegations of corruption, sexual harassment, and misbehaviour.   It is high time we enact the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill which proposes alternate and easier processes for removal of judges.

The judiciary must not depend upon any legislation to enforce discipline among its robed brethren.


An independent judiciary is an indispensable requisite of a free society under the  rule of law. Such independence implies freedom from interference by the executive or the legislature in the exercise of the judicial function but it does not mean that the judge is entitled to act in an arbitrary manner.

We must NEVER forget that the COLLEGIUM Supreme Court of India  has grabbed power by JUDICIAL ADVENTURISM.

And to remove a COLLEGIUM judge they have made it almost impossible, because our UNELECTED Rajya Sabha is still controlled by BIG BROTHER whom we kicked out in 1947.



  1. SOMEBODY ASKED ME—

    WHAT IS THE REASON WHY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL IS A LIVING LEGEND AT SEA..

    WELL I HAVE DONE MORE FOR THE SAILORS AND SEA THAN ANYBODY ELSE PAST, PRESENT AND 100% IN FUTURE..

    THE QUALITY IS “COURAGE OF CONVICTIONS”. ..

    THE COURAGE TO STAND AND FIGHT WHEN ALL TOP GUNS THREATENDENDEN TO BITE YOUR HEAD OFF.

    THE INTEGRITY TO CRY OUT LOUD “ THE NAKED EMPERORs ONE LARGE BALL IS HANGING LOWER THAN THE OTHER SMALL ONE “

    THE PERCEPTION TO HOLLER “ WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS ELEPHANT DOING IN THE ROOM.. HOW DID THE LARGE PACHYDERM GET IN VIA THAT SMALL DOOR “..

    CJI DIPAK MISHRA DID US ALL A HUGE FAVOUR WHEN DE DECIDED TO GIVE A LONG FAIRWELL SPEECH ON TV..

    WE INDIANS WERE ALL APPALLED ..

    WHO IS THIS CORNY LITTLE FELLOW WHO CANNOT ARTICULATE A SINGLE INTELIGENT SENTENCE ?

    DIPAK MISRA CONTENTEDNED ENED – “SUPREME COURT IS SUPREME “..

    THIS IS LIKE THE SHIPs CHIEF COOK ( HE HAS TWO COOKS UNDER HIM ) SAYING “ IN AM THE CHIEF OF THIS SIPPP NAY SHIP “

    THE CHIEF COOK IS THE CHIEF ONLY IN THE GALLEY AND THAT TOO IF THE CAPTAIN IS NOT INSIDE FOR AN INSPECTION .. IF HE TRIES TO COME ON THE BRIDGE AND TAKE OVER NAVIGATION , I WILL KICK HIS MANGY ASS , AND KICK IT GOOD.

    SAME WAY SUPREME COUT IS SUPREME AMONG COURTS.. THE CJI IS NOT AN IMPORTANT MAN AT ALL .. HE CANNOT DECLARE “ I AM AWWAL – I AM MORE POWERFUL THAN PM OR PRESIDENT “ ..

    THIS FLAWED FEEING IS WHY CJI DECLARED THAT ALL ADVERTISEMENTS CAN HAVE ONLY PHOTS OF PM, PRESIDENT AND CJI.

    JUST WHO THE HELL IS CJI ? IS THIS LAWYER TURNED JUDGE SOME ELECTED ENTITY ?

    https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/government-advertisements-photos-prime-minister-president-cji-chief-justice-supreme-court-252648-2015-05-13

    THIS IS A PRIME EXAMPLE OF “MUNGERILAL KE RANGEEN SAPNE “.. TEE HEEEEEEEE..

    DIPAK MISRA WILL TAKE A FLIGHT TO CAPITAL OF IDNIA DELHI BECAUSE IT IS WRITTEN IN THE ADMISSION FORM “FILL UP IN CAPITAL”..

    MIND YOU—

    THIS IS NO LAUGHING MATTER

    THE WHOLE WORLD RUNS THIS WAY—HIJACKED BY KOSHER BIG BROTHER..

    AN EXAMPLE AMONG HUNDREDS – WHICH I ENFORCED AGAINST ALL ODDS—FIGHTING ALONE ?

    SAILORS AT SEA WERE ARM TWISTED TO SPRAY METHANOL/ TOLUENE INSIDE STAINLESS STELL CHEMICAL TANKS.. DO IT OR GET SACKED.. HUNDREDS OF THIRD WORLD SAILORS DIED INSIDE TANKS .. IT WAS ALL HUSHED UP..

    THE BASTARDS IN POWER HIJACKED THE TERM IN THE RULE BOOK ” LUNG DEMAND TIME” AND CONVERTED IT TO WORKING TIME”..

    RESCUE breathing apparatus sets are not for WORKING in the literal sense.

    " Working time " relates to "lung demand" of free air, which is 10 litres / min for rest, 30 litres/ min for light work and 100 litres / min for strain of fireman's lift.

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/01/airline-breathing-apparatus-on-chemical.html


    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/11/methanol-spray-on-chemical-tankers-capt.html

    I STOPPED THE DANGEROUS PRACTICE OF TOLUENE SPRAY.. WHICH HAS CAUSED DOZENS OF TANK EXPLOSIONS DUE TO STATIC ELECTRICITY KILLING HUNDRED OF SAILORS… ALL THIS WAS HUSHED UP ..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/05/toluene-floating-on-chemical-tankers.html

    MIND YOU, THIS IS JUST ONE EXAMPLE OF HUNDREDS OF ITEMS IT SET RIGHT—BY PUTTING MY OWN HEAD ON THE CHOPPING BLOCK..

    I TAUNTED “ TAKE ME ON , IF YOU HAVE BALLS , YOU BASTARDS “

    ONE MORE EXAMPLE ?

    I WAS THE FIRST TO BRING ATTENTION TO HYPOCHRORITE FIRES ON CONTAINER SHIPS.. KICKED ALL MY BOSSES ON THEIR VENERABLE BALLS ..

    IT TAKES GUTS POWERED BY EXTREME COMPETENCE..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/11/auto-ignition-dangers-on-chemical.html

    capt ajit vadakayil




JUSTICE R BANUMATHI OF SUPRME COURT WAS MY CLASSMATE IN 1967/ 68 AT THE KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SCHOOL CALICUT.

At the last OLD ALUMNI MEET -- i gave an anecdote..

We had 4 girls in front of our bench MALLIKA -- BANUMATHI - BHOOMA -- SHAKILA

So one day as a process of one upmanship we on the bench behind threw a piece of paper MBBS on their desk..

We were a bit afraid as BHOOMAs ( Tamil girl ) father was the collector of Calicut ( Kaaleshwaran ) and she was HAJAAAR squeamish ..

After sometime the girls threw a piece of paper on our desk..

ANUS ( Ajit/ Nandakumar / Ullas / Sathish )

SO I SAID TO THE AUDIENCE -- AFTER 4 DECADES I HAVE MET NANDAKUMAR AND ULLAS -- BUT SATISH IS MISSING..

A LOT OF EX-STUDENTS HOLLERED -- HE WAS HERE THREE MINUTES AGO -- HE HAS JUST GONE OUT ..

AND SURE ENOUGH AFTER 5 MINUTES SATISH CAME AND GAVE ME A HUG..

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/08/old-alumni-meet-kendriya-vidyalaya-no-1.html

NOW NOW NOW..

After we received the exam mark sheet of every subject , Banumathi would turn back and ask me “ Ajit, how much marks did you get ?”..

And then she would be busy doing the Math .. 
Banu baby could never beat me in studies.. 



Ajit was always FIRST in class, as sure as sun rose in the east..
This narrative is just to reveal that Banumathi is not the quintessential BOTTOM DREGS OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL, from where LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES emanate...

Banumathi will retire in 1.5 years..

I ask her to come on TV and take questions on what ails the Indian judiciary..

Why WHISTLE BLOWER High Court Judge Karnan had to be jailed for 6 months ( this stigma can never ever be erased ) .. Why Karnan wanted two crores personal compensation from Banumathi..

Banumathi must read the following 3 blogposts first..

https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any.html

https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any_15.html

https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any_17.html


I am sure Banumathi has the CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL to l understand what I have written.. I am not too sure about the Solis, Falis and Salves..

WE THE PEOPLE WANT THE TRUTH.. JUSTICE KATJU HAS BEEN BOLD ENOUGH TO REVEAL A FEW HARD TRUTHS AND WE THANK HIM FOR THAT..

Capt ajit vadakayil
..

  1. PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF—
    JUSTICE R BANUMATHI
    JUSTICE KARNAN
    JUSTICE KATJU
    LAW MINISTER PRASAD
    LAW MINISTRY
    LAW NINISTERS OF ALL STATES
    LAW MINISTRIES OF ALL STATES
    CBI
    IB
    NIA
    RAW
    ED
    MANEKA GANDHI
    KAPIL SIBAL
    SUSHMA SWARAJ
    SALMAN KHURSHID
    ARUN JAITLEY
    K PARASARAN
    CHIDAMBARAM
    CHELAMESHWAR
    ARUN JAITLEY
    ABHISHEK MANU SINGHVI
    ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
    ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
    NCW MAIN
    NCW STATES
    NHRC
    NCM
    CJI GOGOI
    ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
    ALL SUPRME COURT LAWYERS
    ATTORNEY GENERAL
    INDU MALHOTRA
    KHANWILKAR
    CHANDRACHUD
    ROHINGTON NARIMAN
    HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES OF ALL STATES
    RAM JETHMALANI
    AMITABH KANT
    NITI AYOG
    RSS
    VHP
    AVBP
    AMIT SHAH
    PMO
    PM MODI
    AJIT DOVAL
    RAJNATH SINGH
    HOME MINISTRY
    PRESIDENT OF INDIA
    VP OF INDIA
    SPEAKER LOK SABHA
    SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
    EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA
    EVERY CENTRAL MINISTER / MINISTRY
    MLAs OF ALL STATES
    CMs OF ALL STATES
    GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
    DGPs OF ALL STATES
    SWAMY
    GURUMURTHY
    SOLI BABY
    SALVE BABY
    FALI BABY
    RAJ KAMAL JHA
    PRANNOY JAMES ROY
    AROON PURIE
    VINEET JAIN
    RAGHAV BAHL
    SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
    N RAM
    SHASHI THAROOR
    JOHN BRITTAS
    CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWMI
    RAJDEEP SARDESAI
    BARKHA DUTT
    NAVIKA KUMAR
    ZAKKA JACOB
    ANAND NARASIMHAN
    FAYE DSOUZA
    NIDHI RAZDAN
    SHEKHAR GUPTA
    RAMCHANDRA GUHA
    MEENAKSHI LEKHI
    KIRON KHER
    SMRITI IRANI
    SONIA GANDHI
    RAHUL GANDHI
    BRINDA KARAT
    PRAKASH KARAT
    SITARAM YECHURY
    SUMEET CHOPRA
    DINESH VARSHNEY
    SWARA BHASKAR
    KAVITA KRISHNAN
    TEESTA SETALVAD
    SWARA BHASKAR
    ROMILA THAPAR
    IRFAN HABIB
    SHOBHAA DE
    ARUNDHATI ROY
    MANI SHANGARAN AIYERAN
    ANNA MM VETTIKAD
    KANCHA ILAIH
    JOHN DAYAL
    CHETAN BHAGAT
    SANJAY HEGDE

    WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKTS
    SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA




https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any.html

https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any_15.html


MY POST IS NOW 15% COMPLETE.. I DO HOPE I DON’T HAVE TO EAT MY OWN HEAD..

SEND THE 2 LINKS ABOVE TO LAWYERS YOU KNOW..

CONDITION:    THE LAWYER MUST BE A DESH BHAKT -- 100%.. HIS HEART MUST BEAT FOR BHARATMATA.. DOES NOT MATTER IF HE IS A LITTLE CORRUPT ( MAKES IT EASIER )..
REMEMBER YOU ARE PART OF THE ONLY SILENT REVOLUTION ON THIS PLANET.. 

DO YOU DUTY-- MAKE INDIA THIS PLANETs NO 1 SUPERPOWER IN 15 YEARS ..

LET YOUR GRAND CHILDREN BOAST-- MY GRAND DAD WAS PART OF THE SILENT REVOLUTION WHICH CONVERTED WOUNDED INDIA TO THIS PLANETs NO 1 SUPERPOWER..

Capt ajit vadakayil
..






THIS POST IS NOW CONTINUED TO PART 3 , BELOW--









CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..

53 comments:

  1. TRAITORS HAVE COME ON TV AS PERCEPTION MOLDERS TO OPENLY SUPPORT THE TRAITORS OF JNU WHO HAVE ENGAGED IN SEDITION..

    ANYBODY WHO SUPPORTS TRAITORS TO THE WATAN IS ALSO A TRAITOR.. THE ONLY EXCEPTION TO THE RULE IS A LAWYER APPOINTED LEGALLY TO ARGUE THE CASE FOR A TRAITOR IN COURT ALONE ( NOT ON TV )..

    WE ASK AJIT DOVAL TO PROFILE ALL THESE FOREIGN PAYROLL DEEP STATE AGENTS AND THIS INCLUDED MEDIA ANCHORS WHO PUT ON SPIN ON THE DEFINITION OF THE TERM SEDITION..

    WHEN SOMEONE ABUSES THE WATAN AND CALLS FOR DISMEMBERMENT OF BHARATMATA , IT IS SEDITION. ....

    THE PUNISHMENT IS DEATH .....

    ABUSING A RULER ON A THRONE OR ANY MORTAL IS NOT SEDITION.....

    WHAT HAPPENED IN JNU IS SEDITION . ....

    BHARAT TERE TUKDE HONGE ,, BHARAT TERE BARBAADI TAK JUNG RAHENGE ,,, SLOGANS RAISED BY COMMIE STUDENTS ( INSTIGATED BY COMMIE JNU PROFESSORS ) IS SEDITION....

    EVERY TIME OUR UNIFORMED MEN RISK THEIR LIVES AND ARREST TERRORISTS , NAXALS AND SEPARATISTS - -OUR COLLEGIUM MELORDS WHO ARE AFRAID OF JEW NOAM CHOMSKY SAVE THEM . ..

    THE SPIN GIVEN BY THE SPIN DOCTORS LIKE SOLI SORABJEE / SANJAY HEGDE IS THAT SEDITION LAWS CAN BE APPLIED ONLY IF SLOGANS THIS RESULTS IN VIOLENCE....

    SORRY -- WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ACCEPT THIS.........IN INDIA MOST OF THE VIOLENCE IS TRIGGERED BY TROJAN HORSE FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs CONTROLLED BY THE BENAMI MEDIA...

    IN INDIA THERE IS A CLEAR NEXUS BETWEEN NCW/ NCM/ NHRC / SOME COLLEGIUM JUDGES / FOREIGN PAYROLL RAJYA SABHA MPs / BENAMI MEDIA/ TROJAN HORSE NGOs / NAXALS/ SEPARATISTS/ PERCEPTION MOLDERS / INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTsARGS WHO COME ON TV AND SUPPORTED NAXALS AND JNU TRAITORS...

    DEEP STATE CONTROLLED NGO FILE PILs SO THAT ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDGES CAN MAKE LAWS…

    WE KNOW THE TRAITORS WHO ARE IN FOREIGN PAYROLL... THEY MUST AWAIT SEVERE RETRIBUTION..

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    ReplyDelete
  2. COUPLE OF DAYS AGO PRIYANKA CHOPRA AGAIN CAME ON TV TO DECLARE THAT SHE DOES NOT CARE FOR TROLLS..

    SHE SHOULD WORRY MORE ABOUT HER SEX TAPES ( PRIYANKA CHOPRA NICK JONAS SEX TAPES-- ON GOOGLE SEARCH ) WHICH ARE ALL OVER THE INTERNET..

    PRIYANKA CHOPRA CAN SAY THAT THE FEMALE IN THE SEX TAPE IS SOMEONE ELSE.. BUT THERE ARE VERY FEW WOMEN ON THE PLANET WHOSE UPPER LIP TOUCHES THE BOTTOM OF THE NOSE DURING A SMILE..

    SHE CAN SAY THAT THE VIDEO IS MORPHED --LIKE THE JNU TRAITORS..

    MONA SINGH CLAIMED THAT THE FEMALE IN THE NUDE VIDEO TAPE IS NOT HER.. BUT THERE ARE VERY FEW WOMEN WITH SHOULDERS WIDER THAN HIP BONES WITH A OVERHANGING ASS -- AND NAZI TEETH TO BOOT.

    A VIDEO CAN BE MORPHED.. BUT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO MORPH THE LIGHT SOURCING AND ITS SHADOWS..

    A GOOD PAINTER CAN RECOGNIZE A WORTHLESS PAINTING IN A FEW SECONDS , ALL HE LOOKS FOR IS LIGHT/ SHADOWS AND THE PERSPECTIVE..

    KOSHER BIG BROTHER HAS HIJACKED ART..

    TODAY SHIT IS TOUTED AS CHOCOLATE AND VICE VERSA.. USELESS JEW PAINTERS MAKE MILLIONS.. A GOOD ARTIST CANT BUT A LOAF OF BREAD TO FEED HIS FAMILY..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2015/09/francis-newton-souza-birth-painting.html

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/02/modern-abstract-art-and-picasso-capt.html

    SOMEBODY CALLED ME AND SAID-- HATS OFF TO YOU CAPTAIN-- YOU ARE THE ONLY PERSON ON THIS PLANET WHO HAS THE INTELLIGENCE TO EXPOSE THE HUMONGOUS NAY MIND BOGGLING DECEIT KNOWN AS "STARE DECISIS " OF THE KOSHER DEEP STATE SPONSORED JUDICIARY..

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any.html

    INDEED -- THAT IS BECAUSE I AM THIS PLANETs NO 1 TROLL, WHO DOES NOT SACRIFICE TRUTH ON THE KOSHER ALTAR OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

    https://www.blogger.com/profile/14410812789424637654

    858 MILLION IS MY PROFILE VIEW..

    HOW MUCH IS MODI OR AMITABH BACHCHAN OR BBC OR CNN ?

    DYNAMO , THIS PLANETs GREATEST MAGICIAN IS A PAKISTANI JEW WITH CHRONS ASSHOLE.. HE CAN MAKE AN ASS OF THE WHOLE WORLD OR EVERY JUDGE ON THIS PLANET --NOT CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL ..

    A MAGICIAN WANTS YOU TO LOOK AT THE CON-TRICK OBJECTIVELY.. I , AS A TROLL EXHUMING TRUTHS , WILL ONLY LOOK AT HIS CON-TRICK SUBJECTIVELY..

    I DONT HAVE TUNNEL VISION, I VIEW LIKE A FLYING CONDOR..

    AT SEA, WHEN AN ACCIDENT TOOK PLACE IN THE FLEET ( OF MORE THAN 120 SHIPS ) THE SHORE BOSSES WOULD SEND ME THE PROBLEM -- MOSTLY ENGINEERING-- AND I WOULD GIVE THEM THE REASON WHY THE ACCIDENT TOOK PLACE..

    I GO PAST ONION LAYERS SIT AT THE CORE AND LOOK OUTWARDS , UNDERSTAND IN 3D VISUALS INSTANTLY..

    THIS IS THE ULTIMATE SRI YANTRA BINDU THINKING. . THE SHALLOW WESTERN MIND CANT DO THIS..

    I WAS THE ULTIMATE CHANGE MANAGER ONLY BECAUSE OF MY ABILITY TO ARRIVE AT THE ROOT CAUSE IN A JIFFY – TO BE DE-WEEDED BY THE ROOTS NEVER TO APPEAR AGAIN...

    When there is an accident at sea TRUTH IS ALWAYS THE FIRST CASUALITY..

    You find the truth is buried instantly by people who want to protect their backsides and people who want to collect insurance and laugh all the way to the bank...

    THIS IS WHY IN INDIA WE MUST REVERT BACK TO THE JURY SYSTEM -

    JURY CONSISTS OF ORDINARY PEOPLE WHO UNDERSTAND THE MEANING OF NATURAL JUSTICE AND PERIMETER OF CONTEXT..

    A FATHER WHO KILLED HIS 12 YEAR OLD DAUGHTERs RAPIST , WHO ALSO POURED ACID ON HER FACE AFTER THE ACT --WILL BE HUNG BY THE JUDGE SYSTEM , NOT BY THE JURY SYSTEM ..JURY HAS THE POWERS OF "JURY NULLIFICATION"..

    JURY IS NOT SHACKLED BY PAST PRACTICE AND RIDICULOUS --NAY MAD ROTHSCHILD CREATED JUDICIAL PROCEDURES CONVERTED TO GOSPEL OVER TIME ( STARE DECISIS ) ..

    WE MUST NOT ALLOW PAST JUDGMENTS TO CONTROL ANY CASE .. EVERY CASE IS UNIQUE BY CONTEXT --IT MUST BE SEEN BY A FRESH PAIR OF EYES --

    EVERY CASE HAS A UNIQUE ROOT CAUSE ..

    CONTINUED TO 2-

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WE HAD HARISH SALVE WHO EARNS IN CRORES GOING TO THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AT HAGUE ( KULBHUSHAN JADHAV CASE ) AND QUOTING RIDICULOUS PAST JUDGEMENT OF ICJ , WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING THE CONTEXT --PATHETIC !

      BURN ALL PAST JUDGMENTS MADE BY LAWYER TURNED JUDGES, IN A JUSTICE IS BLIND SYSTEM WHERE WITNESSES CAN BE PRODUCED OUT OF THIN AIR ..

      LAWYER RK ANAND HAD HIS OWN "DIRECT WITNESS MILKED OUT OF THIN AIR" WHOM HE KEPT IN HIS OWN HOME .. THIS FAKE WITNESS SUNIL KULKARNI GOT A DRIVING LICENCE WITH PERMANENT ADDRESS AS RK ANANDs HOUSE..

      THIS IS HOW HE GOT CAUGHT..

      KULKARNI BABYs NEW FAKE NAME WAS NISHIKANT ANAND , SON OF LAWYER RK ANAND WITH HIS TRUE PHOTO ON THE LICENCE..

      https://www.hindustantimes.com/delhi-news/rk-anand-threatens-to-sue-ndtv/story-QrfExdnYeBOSQ1IhryFmvM.html

      FINALLY RK ANAND GOT CAUGHT WITH HIS PANTS DOWN.. HE WAS LET OFF WITH A WEE KNAP ON HIS KNUCKLES..IT JUST SHOWS THE JUDGE LAWYER NEXUS..

      https://www.legallyindia.com/the-bench-and-the-bar/rk-anand-avoids-jail-accepts-supreme-court-offer-to-work-for-free-a-bci-donation-20120926-3136

      THE WORLDs BEST COMPUTER CANNOT TELL THE ROOT CAUSE OF AN INCIDENT OR THE MORAL OF A STORY.

      FOR THIS YOU NEED A CONSCIOUS HUMAN BRAIN WHO THINKS SUBJECTIVELY--NOT OBJECTIVELY.

      PEOPLE WHO CREATE EXAM QUESTIONS FOR MENSA – NOTE...

      ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS CANNOT BE DONE BY YOUR BEST MENSA BRAINS ...

      WE HAVE CONMAN GURU WHO TWEETED THAT AYYAPPA IS A PRODUCT OF GAY SEX BETWEEN SHIVA AND VISHNU.. HE DOES NOT KNOW THAT AYYAPPA IS A MORTAL ( VISHNUs NINTH AVATAR ) WHILE SHIVA AND VISHNU ARE COSMIC ALLEGORIES ..

      STILL THIS FAKE GURU WITH GIRLY VOICE AND FINGERS HAS MILLIONS OF FOLLOWERS AND HUNDREDS OF BRANCHES WORLDWIDE ..THANKS TO KOSHER DEEP STATE..

      THE WORLD LIVES A KOSHER LIE ..

      THIS PLANETs NO 1 TROLL CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL , WILL EXPOSE THESE LIES.. NEITHER KOSHER BIG BROTHER NOR JEW MAGICIAN DYNAMO CAN FOOL ME..

      I EXHUME TRUTHS , BECAUSE IF I DONT DO IT--NOBODY ON THIS PLANET CAN , TILL THE SUN GOES SUPERNOVA..

      AL MY DETRACTORS WHO CRIED, CAPTAIN HAS A ROTHSCHILD FIXATION HAVE ALL FALLEN BY THE WAYSIDE.. THEY READ MY BLOG AHEAD OF THE MORNING NEWSPAPER .. TODAY THEY ALL ACCEPT THAT ROTHSCHILD RULED INDIA --NOT THE QUEEN ..

      HISTORIANS WHO CANNOT DO “VADAKAYIL BINDU THINKING” WRITE SHIT. .

      NOBODY HAS A TIME MACHINE !!

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..

      Delete
    2. pc has done some other stuff to get her 2nd season of quantico which got leaked [clearly she's done cosmetic surgery on not just the face but the other popular region women in the west often enhance]

      Delete
  3. Modi blames Pinarayi Vijayan govt for Sabarimala issue

    Modi has no guts to take on illegal collegium judges who spawned this illicit illegal judgement which Pinarayi is gleefully upholding!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Modi and BJP workers blame Kerala people for electing the commie govt. But Ram Mandir is still pending despite BJP being in power in both the state (UP) and the centre. Then, they make excuses like "let the judgement come, then we'll bring ordinance for Ram Mandir".

      But the same excuses could be and would be made by BJP in case of Sabarimala, had they been in power in Kerala.

      Modi could ask president for an ordinance that would put STAY on the SC verdict and no one could do anything about it.

      But they didn't.

      Yesterday, Modi's rally was a flop show. The people were left disappointed when Modi kept blaming other parties.

      Over four years have passed and Modi has done NOTHING for Hindus. This cannot be a coincidence.

      Delete
  4. The deshdrohi elements on foreign payroll are busy perception moulding to water down the arrest of Kanhaiya etc by going down misguided youth etc route and questioning the application of sedition charges comparing with Annadurai types

    Apples and oranges..


    A long overdue overhaul and refit to our judiciary is needed.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. JNU students are pawns in the hands of the multi headed Hydra deep state that exerts control over it's agents and their managers and think tanks.
    But misguided or otherwise they must be punished. Let them navel gaze while in jail!

    What are your views on universal basic income scheme ?

    ReplyDelete
  7. https://postcard.news/corrupt-communists-lakhs-of-indians-had-donated-to-kerala-relief-fund-but-it-was-pocketed-by-cm-pinarayi-and-gang-lokayukta-begins-investigation/

    “There’s nothing wrong in this. This is a usual practice”.

    ReplyDelete
  8. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supreme-court-rejects-states-application-on-appointment-of-dgp/articleshow/67552359.cms

    THE KERALA DGP ORIYA PARTY LOKNATH BEHERA IS A SLAVE F THE ATHEIST COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN..

    BEHERA DOES NOT HAVE THE LOYALTY OF THE KERALA POLICE FORCE --HE RUNS THE SYSTEM WITH HIS HANDPICKED BLUE EYED BOYS..

    OUR POLICE SYSTEM NEEDS IMMEDIATE REFORMS..

    THE CM AND THE DGP MUST NOT BE ABLE TO PROMOTE THEIR OWN PET ATTACK DOGS WHO SHOW ONLY PERSONAL LOYALTY..

    ReplyDelete
  9. Captain, Modi's Kerala visit was a flop show.Clearly the public is now aware that BJP and RSS clearly lack spine. I would like to thank you from the bottom of my heart for such an enlightening post on time management.
    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/11/time-management-capt-ajit-vadakayil.html
    All the readers of captain must read the above post. The time management you taught is so practical,doable and game changing. Especially the vertical thinking and lateral thinking explanation is out of the world. Thank you captain and bless me.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I ASK MT READERS-- SUPPORT THE PROFESSION.. BOTH MY WIFE AND DAUGHTER IN LAW WERE UNOPENED BOTTLES..

    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/jadavpur-university-professor-divested-of-teaching-duties-over-his-remarks-on-women/articleshow/67557424.cms

    WE SUPPORT THE PROFESSOR.. .. NAKED TRUTH CAN NEVER BE POLITICALLY CORRECT...
    NCW IS CONTROLLED BY BILDERBERG CLUB....
    WE WANT 50% MEN IN NCW . . . OUR CONSTITUTION DOES NOT ALLOW TILTED PLAYING FIELDS. . OUR BENAMI MEDIA ARE ACTING LIKE AN OUTRAGED BHARGEENS NAY VIRG1NS .. . . THESE ARE THE SAME DESH DROHI BAST#RDS WHO PROMOTE HOMOSEXUALITY, DEBAUCHERY AND DEGRADATION OF INDIAN WOMEN BY SAVITA BHABHI AND LUNNY SEONE . .. IS THERE A SINGLE EDITION OF T0ILET PAP#R OF INDIA WITHOUT DIRTY AND DEMEANING PICTURES OF INDIAN WOMEN-- INCLUDING UP SK1RT PICTURES ? ..BIGG BOSS HAS BEEN INTRODUCED IN INDIA TO MAKE INDIAN SOCIETY ACCEPT WEIRDOS / PUNKS / HOMOSEXUALS / CROSS DRESSERS / MISFITS -- AS IF THEY ARE NORMAL PEOPLE . . . . . . . BHARATMATA IS RACING TO BE THIS PLANETS NO 1 SUPERPOWER IN 15 YEARS --BEFORE THAT THE NEW WORLD ORDER WANTS INDIA TO IMPLODE. .. . . OUR COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY BURNT MIDNIGHT OIL TO OPEN CHAMIYA BARS ( WH0RE HOUSES IN MUMBAI ) BREAD WINNERS OF ENTIRE FAMILIES HAVE BEEN ROTTING IN JAIL WITHOUT A TRIAL FOR THREE DECADES .. WHY DO THESE B1MBETTES WEAR MICRO MINI SKIRTS ? ….. TO ATTRACT MEN OR WOMEN ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ajit Sir, I am seeing your comments there.

      Delete
    2. "Though he had deleted the post, screenshots of it went viral"

      Captain, he could show some spine and not delete it.

      Delete
    3. Dear Captain ji,

      ToI is deleting the comments as offensive.
      ---------------------------------------------------------
      Dear Reader,


      Thanks for posting a comment on our article!.

      We appreciate your engagement on our website. But we are sorry, we cannot publish your comment as the content is not compliant with our editorial policies. While we do encourage you to participate in conversations on the website, we request you to refrain from posting any obscene, defamatory, or inflammatory comments. We also request you not to indulge in any personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community through your comments. Also, please do not copy message from the article itself.
      Comment Removed:
      -------------------------------------------------------------------

      Delete
    4. Sir, I don't see comment box to make a comment. This is strange.

      Delete
  11. https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/sabarimala-entry-reshma-nishant-shanila-satheesh-begin-hunger-strike-95119?amp

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hindus in South India have united thanks to Sabarimala. The revolution has begun - the countdown has started for the arrival of LORD KALKI - A REAL KING - not a beggar dressed as one like Rothschild.

      Delete
  12. Synergy = minds working together (?SAME WAVELENGTH)

    (Prof. Madhav Nalapat @MD_Nalapat)


    https://twitter.com/MD_Nalapat/status/728974866875961344

    ReplyDelete
  13. http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2019/jan/15/kochi-is-new-hotspot-for-illegal-migration-1925134.html

    Kochi is new hotspot for illegal Rohingyas, Bangladeshi migrants

    ReplyDelete
  14. https://swarajyamag.com/insta/script-unfolding-as-predicted-former-rbi-governor-raghuram-rajan-reportedly-involved-in-drafting-congress-manifesto

    Former RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan Reportedly Involved in Drafting Congress Manifesto

    ReplyDelete
  15. https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any.html

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any_15.html

    TOO MUCH DECEIT HAS BEEN INTRODUCED INTO OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM..

    WE MUST SET IT RIGHT ! WE THE PEOPLE PLEDGE TO DO IT !!

    WE HAVE A STUPID LAW MINISTER PRASAD , WHO HAS SAT OUT HIS ENTIRE TENURE.. HE IS GOOD ONLY FOR GIVING HIS BOSS MODI AN EGO MASSAGE..

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
    LAW MINISTER PRASAD
    LAW MINISTRY
    LAW NINISTERS OF ALL STATES
    LAW MINISTRIES OF ALL STATES
    CBI
    IB
    NIA
    RAW
    ED
    MANEKA GANDHI
    ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
    ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
    NCW MAIN
    NCW STATES
    NHRC
    NCM
    CJI GOGOI
    ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
    ALL SUPRME COURT LAWYERS
    ATTORNEY GENERAL
    INDU MALHOTRA
    KHANWILKAR
    CHANDRACHUD
    ROHINGTON NARIMAN
    HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES OF ALL STATES
    RAM JETHMALANI
    KATJU
    AMITABH KANT
    NITI AYOG
    RSS
    VHP
    AVBP
    AMIT SHAH
    PMO
    PM MODI
    AJIT DOVAL
    RAJNATH SINGH
    HOME MINISTRY
    PRESIDENT OF INDIA
    VP OF INDIA
    SPEAKER LOK SABHA
    SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
    EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA
    EVERY CENTRAL MINISTER / MINISTRY
    MLAs OF ALL STATES
    CMs OF ALL STATES
    GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
    DGPs OF ALL STATES
    SWAMY
    GURUMURTHY
    SOLI BABY
    SALVE BABY
    FALI BABY
    RAJ KAMAL JHA
    PRANNOY JAMES ROY
    AROON PURIE
    VINEET JAIN
    RAGHAV BAHL
    SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
    N RAM
    SHASHI THAROOR
    CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWMI
    RAJDEEP SARDESAI
    BARKHA DUTT
    NAVIKA KUMAR
    ZAKKA JACOB
    ANAND NARASIMHAN
    FAYE DSOUZA
    NIDHI RAZDAN
    SHEKHAR GUPTA
    RAMCHANDRA GUHA
    MEENAKSHI LEKHI
    KIRON KHER
    SMRITI IRANI
    SONIA GANDHI
    RAHUL GANDHI
    BRINDA KARAT
    PRAKASH KARAT
    SITARAM YECHURY
    SUMEET CHOPRA
    DINESH VARSHNEY
    SWARA BHASKAR
    KAVITA KRISHNAN
    TEESTA SETALVAD
    SWARA BHASKAR
    ROMILA THAPAR
    IRFAN HABIB
    SHOBHAA DE
    ARUNDHATI ROY
    MANI SHANGARAN AIYERAN
    ANNA MM VETTIKAD
    KANCHA ILAIH
    JOHN DAYAL
    CHETAN BHAGAT
    SANJAY HEGDE

    WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKTS
    SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sent through email to many law ministers, PMO and many others.

      Your Registration Number is : PMOPG/E/2019/0030593

      Delete