THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 112, BELOW--
Panini's ( 5500 BC ) Ashtadhyayi, its commentaries, and the Vakyapadiya of Bhartrihari ( 7000 BC) constitute the fundamental texts for the school of Panini’s grammar.
Patanjali ( 5000 BC ) wrote the Mahabhashya, an interpretation of some of Pânini’s rules written in dialogue form, and it is this work that is the basis for later commentaries on grammar and philosophy.
The Dharmashâstras or Treatises on Law, including the well-known Laws of Manu ( 8300 BC ) , were composed much before .
With the Vakyapadiya,
Bhartrihari moves grammatical analysis squarely into the realm of philosophy,
arguing that grammar can be consider a darshana, a "view," or an
official philosophical school, providing perspective and insight into ultimate
reality.
The first verse
articulates the fundamental view of his newly envisaged school:---
The Brahman is without
beginning and end, whose essence is the Word, who is the cause of the
manifested phonemes, who appears as the objects, from whom the creation of the
world proceeds.
It is the project of
the Vakyapadaiya to explain this verse, with all of its philosophical,
linguistic, and metaphysical implications.
At base, we
contextualize Bhartrihari's philosophical inquiry into language as being
conditioned by the Indian culture and scriptural tradition, in which this type
of intellectual pursuit had a soteriological purpose -the realization of
absolute knowledge and the spiritual liberation which ensues; thus, it is a
distinctively ontological reflection on language which Bhartrihari added to the
thought of earlier grammarians.
The Brahminic view of
the cosmos put forth in the Vedas is one of constant and cyclical creation and
dissolution. At the dissolution of each creative cycle a seed or trace
(samskara) is left behind out of which the next cycle arises.
What is significant
here is that the nature of the seed from which each cycle of creation bursts
forth is expressed as "Divine Word" (Daivi Vak). If language is of
divine origin, it can be conceived as Being Brahman expressing and embodying
itself in the plurality of phenomena that is creation.
Bhartrihari considers
Brahman, the basis of reality, to be "without beginning and end"
(anadi nidhanam), as a concept that is not subject to the attributes of
temporal sequences of events, either externally or in the succession of mental
events that form cognitions.
The word principle,
shabda Brahman, is not defined in terms of the temporal nature of our cognitive
states, because it functions as the inherent, primordial ground of all
cognitions. meaning of the term "eternal" or “akshara” as Bhartrihari
applies it to the word-principle.
Bhartrihari's specialized
way of referring to phonemes, the minimal units of meaningful sound. It seems
that phonemes understood in this way explain how it is the case that Word
appears as objects.
Eternity is “that which
appears as objects, and from whom the creation of the world proceeds.”
Phonemes
are thus the eternally possible elements that can be combined in inexhaustible
ways to manifest the plurality of nature.
This principle accounts
for creation on a number of levels: it is the origin of consciousness, of
cognition, sensation, language use, cognitive and experiential aspects of the
world. In other words, objects of thought and the relations between them are
word-determined, regardless of whether they are objects of perception,
inference or any other kind of knowledge.
When we perceptually
apprehend external reality, we always do so in terms of names, for without
names objects are neither identifiable nor knowable.
In the Vakyapadîya, kanda
I, Bhartrihari defines the scope of his inquiry as the subjects of grammar. Our
speech takes the form of the basic structures of language, and grammar deals
with this communicatively spoken language.
The correct
understanding of speech can take us to the limits of our conventional and
spiritual capacities, and so language analysis must operate at all the
following levels: 1. sentences and words, 2. meanings corresponding to
sentences and words, 3. the fitness or compatibility between sound and sense,
and 4. the spiritual merit obtained by using the correct language.
In his linguistic
theory, Bhartrihari distinguishes between two forms of language, the spoken, or
“language-in-use” and the analytic. The analytic or formal language emerges
from a formal, abstract analysis of communicative language.
If we were to
gather and compare various sentences and words from different contexts of use,
we would logically infer the basic segments (roots, stems, suffixes) that
account for a common logical or formal basis of denotation.
This hierarchical
conception of language use and language meaning can be understood in the
following way, with the term on
the far right of each column understood as the originator of the term in the
middle, and the term in the middle being the originator of the term on the left.
In other words, Bhartrihari's conception of utterance and understanding can be
grasped with the following schema under the rubric of:--
Product
|
Producer
|
Derivative Element
|
Linguistic Components
|
Language-in-Use
|
Analytic Language
|
sound
|
||
sentences and words
|
word stems, suffixes, etc..
|
|
sense
|
sentence meaning and word meaning
|
stem meaning and suffix meaning
|
sound and sense relations
|
fitness compatibility
|
causality relations
|
purpose
|
spiritual merit
|
correct knowledge
|
In the first chapter of
the Vakyapadiya, Bhartrihari explains the naturalist view. Following the
padavadins (those who regard the word as the primary indivisible unit) who
consider word-constituents, such as roots and suffixes, to be mere fictitious
abstractions from words, so also the vakyavadins (those who regard the sentence
as the indivisible unit) consider words to be imaginary abstractions from the
sentence.
The naturalists, such
as Panini, believe that language has an invariant form expressed in grammar.
They therefore give epistemic primacy to spoken language; formal language is
only an “appearance” and secondary aid to understanding.
The conventionalists,
on the other hand, hold that the analytic language is primary in that it
contains within it all the structural features that may be used to create
meaningful speech.
Bhartrihari puts forth
a theory of language which, rather than starting by taking fundamental
ontological, epistemological or social sides in these well-established debates,
starts from the question of how meaning happens, how it emerges from the acts
of both speaker and audience, and, constructing this theory first, what he
believes to be appropriate metaphysical, epistemological and soteriological
implications are drawn from it.
For Bhartrihari,
linguistic meaning cannot be conveyed or accounted for by the physical
utterance and perception of sounds, so he puts forth the sphota theory: the
theory which posits the meaning-unit, which for him is the sentence, as a
single entity.
The meaning of the
sentence, the speech-unit, is one entire cognitive content (samvit). The
sentence is indivisible (akhanda) and owes its cognitive value to the
meaning-whole. Thus, its meaning is not reducible to its parts, the individual
words which are distinguished only for the purposes of convention or
expression.
The differentiated
word-meanings, which are also ontological categories, are the abstracted
"pieces" we produce using imaginative construction, or vikalpa.
Sphota entails a kind of mental perception which is described as a moment of
recognition, an instantaneous flash (pratibha), whereby the hearer is made
conscious, through hearing sounds, of the latent meaning unit already present
in his consciousness (unconscious).
The sentence employs
analyzable units to express its meaning, but that meaning emerges out of the
particular concatenation of those units, not because those units are meaningful
in themselves. We analyze language by splitting it up into words, prefixes,
suffixes, etc….but this is indicative of the fact that we “misunderstand” the
fundamental oneness of the speech-unit.
Words are only
abstracted meaning possibilities in this sense, whereas the uttered sentence is
the realization of a meaning-whole irreducible to those parts in themselves.
This fundamental unity seems to apply, also, to any language taken as a whole.
It is only those who do
not know the language and grammar thoroughly who analyze it into words, in
order to get a connected meaning. This
is why pretenders like Wendy Doniger and Sheldon Pollock ( with a Monier
Williams dictionary between their legs ) always get it wrong.. Sanskrit is not
a stupid language like English.
Bhartrihari's
recognition of the theoretical indivisibility of the sentence resonates with
the contemporary linguistic view of learning sentences as wholes—in Sanskrit
you don’t build new sentences from
learned first sentences through analogical reasoning..
We might think of this
unit of linguistic potency, the sphota, as the cognitive/propositional whole
content of meaning that can be transposed into different languages, while the
actual word-sounds comprise the contents of the "speech-act". But
what holds the act to its ability to convey intended meanings?
The words sounded by a
plurality of speakers comprise the physical manifestation of vâk or
vaikharî-vâk and it is upon this form of vâk that physical objects as objective
forms are modeled.
The unity that underlies these objective referents and
meanings, however, is known as the intuited vâk-pashyati-vâk, which makes
possible the unmediated understanding of a complete linguistic expression.
This intuitive level of
understanding, constitutive of the sphota, is teleological in its nature and
structure in that it contains all potential possibilities of meaning-bearing
dhvanis and their order of manifestation.
But, what guarantees
that the hearer of speech properly comprehends what is uttered?
In the second book of
the Vâkyapadîya, Bhartrihari states:--
Sentence meaning is
produced by word meanings but is not constituted by them. Its form is that
Intuition, that innate "know how" awareness (pratibha) possessed by
all beings. It is a cognitive state evident to the hearer…not describable or
definable, but all practical activities depend on it directly or through
recollection of it.
Pratibha intuition can
be characterized as shabda, the very same speech principle externalized in the
utterances of speakers, as it operates within the hearer, causing her to
instantaneously comprehend the meaning of the utterance.
However, linguistic convention, shared by
speaker and hearer, cannot account for the flash of comprehension. If that were
the case, we would not have instances where communication breaks down in spite
of the shared language between speaker and hearer.
The comprehension of
meaning lies in the sphota that is already present in the hearer's awareness.
As he hears the succession of audible phonemes, the latent and undifferentiated
language potency within him is brought to "fruition" in the form of
grasping the speaker’s meaning.
Thus, while the audible words are necessary
for such verbal comprehension to occur in the hearer, they are not sufficient.
It is his own ability to understand meaning referred to by these words, by
virtue of sharing the same sphota with the speaker, which completes the act of
cognition.
Just as various
sentences might sound different in the mouths of different speakers and yet
convey the same meanings, various Vedas may seem different in form and style,
but there is a unity carried by the underlying sphota, which ensures that it is
the same truth, or dharma that is expressed throughout the texts.
Bearing in mind that
Brahman is the ultimate referent of all speech forms, this higher reality is
manifested in the sacred texts-whose efficacy (ritual, soteriological,
epistemological) depends upon our ability to correctly apprehend its meaning.
The sphota concept makes such interpretation possible.
Again, the sphota
expresses a meaning-whole behind individual letters and words. The implication
for the truth of Vedic discourse is clear, for that truth is already present in
the speaker (the Veda) and is potentially present in the consciousness of the
hearers (the practitioners).
There are three kinds
of evidences accepted by the learned scholars in Vedic culture. One evidence is
pratyakṣa. Pratyakṣa means direct perception.
Just like I am seeing you, you are seeing me. I am present, you are present.
This is direct perception.
And there is another
evidence which is called anumana. Suppose in that room, and I am coming just
now, I do not know whether any person there is or not. But there is some sound,
I can imagine, "Oh, there is somebody."
This is called anumana. In
logic it is called hypothesis. That is also evidence. If by my bona fide
suggestions I can give evidence, that is also accepted. So direct evidence,
and, what is called, hypothesis or suggestion evidence.
But the strong evidence is Shabda-pramana. Shabda-pramaṇa
means as soon as there is evidence in the Vedic literature, "This is
this," you have to accept. That's all. Then your knowledge is perfect
because you are accepting things from the perfect source.
According to
Bhartrihari's theory, we can justify this particular philosophical method as
revelatory by using the concept of shabda pramana. Vedic evidence should be taken in such a way
that no argument. There is meaning; there is no contradiction.
Shabda-pramāṇa means to take the truth from
the highest authority. Veda srutis have no mortal author. They have been
downloaded from Akasha by Maharishi seers.
Shraddha is faith in Vedanta as a
Pramana, a means of knowledge. Pramaṇa refers to epistemology in Vedanta--
Yukti which means active application of epistemology or what one already knows..
Shraddhaavaan labhathe jnanam--- That person alone who has shraddha can secure
wisdom.
Shraddha means unwavering faith in the Vedas. No spiritual progress is
possible without shraddha. From shraddha
comes nistha or one-pointed devotion and from nistha comes
self-realization. If the faith is
flickering, it will die soon and the aspirant will be drifted aimlessly hither
and thither.
Shraddha is a Sanskrit /Malayalam
word -- an unshakable conviction in our journey. Experience can never
remove ignorance, as experience does not negate ignorance. Neither action nor experience can remove
ignorance.
The scriptures give a
technical definition to pramana
There are five
conditions for a thing to be a pramana;
1) It has to produce knowledge. 2) It has to
produce a new knowledge. 3) It has to produce uncontradicted knowledge. 4) It
has to produce a doubtless knowledge. 5) It has to produce a useful knowledge.
anadhigata, abAdhita
asandigdha phalavat jn~Ana janakam pramANam.
--. The pramANa should produce knowledge (jn~Ana
janakatvam). Mystic experiences or actions cannot produce knowledge, hence they
are not pramANas. Upanishadik statements do reveal the self and hence produce
knowledge.
---. What a pramANa
talks about should not be talked about by any other pramANa. (anadhigatatvam).
It should be a new knowledge not gained in any other way.
---. What a pramana
reveals should not be contradicted by any other pramana (abadhitatvam); for e.g.,
the eye gives form knowledge, so it is giving us a knowledge which is new. Also, the form knowledge given by the eye
can never be negated by the ear.
The ear can never come
up with a knowledge that says, the form reported by the eye is wrong.
Pramāṇa forms one part
of a tripuţi (trio) of concepts, which describe the ancient Indian view on how
knowledge is gained. The other two concepts are knower and knowable, each
discussed in how they influence the knowledge, by their own characteristic and
the process of knowing.
The two are called
Pramatŗ ( the subject, the knower) and Prameya ( the object, the knowable).
Pramana, a valid means
of knowledge for revealing the corresponding objects.
We should have a
similar trust in Vedanta because Vedanta is a Pramana for the truth about the
Self. The Self is not available for
perception. It cannot be grasped by the
organs of perception, the mind, or words.
The Self cannot be
comprehended by any means of knowledge other than Vedanta.
Shraddha, is surrender
to the Pramana so that the Pramana can operate.
Pramana literally means "proof" and
"means of knowledge". It refers to epistemology in Indian
philosophies, and is one of the key, much debated fields of study in Hinduism
It is a theory of
knowledge, and encompasses one or more reliable and valid means by which human
beings gain accurate, true knowledge.
Ancient and medieval Indian texts
identify six pramanas as correct means of accurate knowledge and to truths:
perception (Sanskrit pratyakṣa), inference (anumana), comparison and
analogy(upamana), postulation, derivation from circumstances (arthapatti),
non-perception, negative/cognitive proof (anupalabdhi) and word, testimony of
past or present reliable experts (Śabda).
Each of these are
further categorized in terms of conditionality, completeness, confidence and
possibility of error, Pramaṇa literally means "proof". The word also
refers to a concept and field of Indian philosophy.
The concept is derived
from the Sanskrit root, prama which means "correct notion, true knowledge,
basis, foundation, accurate notion".
The concept Pramana implies that which is a "means of acquiring
prama or certain, correct, true knowledge"
Accepting Veda (sruti
) as a pramana is first step of vedantik
enquiry.
Vedanta being a
pramana, no experience can ever contradict it; since the definition says that a
pramana can never be contradicted. It is absurd to call vedanta (sruti ) a non pramana. It would be equally
absurd to call shraddhda in veda as ‘rigid belief’. ShraddhA cannot be translated into belief at
all.
The Shraddha or trust
that we have in Vedanta enables us to maintain a certain frame of mind wherein
we don’t question what Vedanta says, but try to understand what it says.
Shraddha or trust does
not mean that we have to blindly accept whatever the teacher tells us. It only
means that we give it the benefit of the doubt and look upon it with a certain
reverence.
Shraddha, trust /
faith, must arise in its own way. It must be discovered. It cannot be commanded.
This reverence for scripture cannot be thrust upon anybody.
We discover it as we
get exposed to Vedanta, appreciate its profundity and clarity, and see how it
releases us from different notions and complexes.
Just as we cannot make
ourselves love someone, we cannot make ourselves have Shraddha. Love has to manifest itself. Similarly, Shraddha is not something that we
can command; it has to happen. Shraddha, trust and reverence, is essential to
learn and enjoy an open mind. An open
mind is willing to shed its conclusions and prejudices and is ready to learn
and change
In having Shraddha,
there is trust, faith, reverence, devotion, openness, and freedom. In fact,
this is the trust where there is freedom.
The word “faith” scares
a Hindu.
A Hindu free of dogma ( like in other single
holy book religions ) is skeptical when this question of trust / faith arises
because faith is always understood to be blind faith.
But here we are talking
not about blind faith, but enlightened faith, a faith that we discover as a
result of self verification. As we listen and understand Vedanta and try to
assimilate and implement it in our lives, we discover its validity and take the
next step. We do not simply believe it,
but proceed as we discover the validity of the truth.
Vedanta says that
happiness is not to be found outside, but is to be discovered within ourselves
as it is our own nature.
Shraddha or reverential
faith enables that learning frame of mind and, therefore, is freedom. Such a mind remains free from doubts and
questions and open to the teacher and the teaching.
Lord Krishna also gives
importance to Shraddha and says in the Bhagavad Gita:--
One who has Shraddha (
not BHAKTI ) gains knowledge. Shraddha is defined as trust or faith in the
words of Vedanta pending verification.
Shraddha is faith in
Vedanta as a Pramana, a means of knowledge for knowing the Self, just as eyes
are a means of knowledge with respect to colour and form.
Vedanta is not to be
looked upon as speculation or philosophy.
Again , shraddha is not blind faith, but enlightened faith based on
verification. We discover faith when we
implement Vedanta in our lives and verify whether what the teachings say is
true.
Faith is the ability to
believe what we do not see. The reward of faith is to see what we did not
believe.
Shraddha is more than
mere faith. It also implies
self–reliance, an independent sense of right and wrong, reliance on conscience and the courage of
one’s own conviction
Faith in Sanatana
Dharma begins as an experiment and ends as an experience.
Faith expressed in
action is a sure means of realization.
Faith is not blind. It is the
willingness to try free of threats of dogma.
Faith is the belief in
the unknown. Faith heals, faith creates,
faith works wonders, faith moves mountains. Faith is the searchlight for
finding brahman.
He who has no faith in
himself can never have faith in God.
Shraddha hrudayya
yakutyaa shradhayaa vindate vasu. --(Rig Veda 10/151/4) 5000 BC.
Meaning: Shraddha (faith) is the symbol of the high
sentiment of the heart.
Shraddha cannot be
aptly translated into English. Loosely
put, it may be be called faith / trust.
In the context of
Vedanta it is the trust that one has in Veda ( sruti ) , where the Veda is
taken to be a valid means of knowledge(pramana). It is the deep trust that the Veda is a
means to knowledge, hence a means for liberation.
Vedas are timeless and
apaurusheya (not a fabrication of human mind).
They are eternal and are revealed to mankind by seers (
maharishis). This vedic wisdom has
provided many with knowledge.
The spiritual stalwarts
are living examples for us as a proof for the validity of the vedas.
Single messiah , single
holy book religions cry “God is there to save you”, “You have sinned and need a
saviour” etc; under such contexts a blind faith props up.
You believe in the
saviour thinking that you have sinned.
You are doomed if you do not believe the saviour. That will be YET YENOTHER sin !
Vedanta says you need
not be saved at all. You alone are the truth, the non dual truth. There is no
rescue work needed! Where is the
question of blind faith, when all that is needed is knowledge.
Liberation for us is
through knowledge, and here, there is no role for blind faith to play.
A Hindu is allowed to
question and discuss; but the attitude matters. If one questions with the idea of throwing
shit on Veda, then it is lack of shraddha (ashraddha). Instead if one says, veda cannot be wrong,
but there is some confusion in my understanding and the concept of me being the
whole, the truth, is not sinking; then it is shraddha. The person has doubts, conviction is not
there, but he has trust in the veda as being a valid means of knowledge.
Many of our Upanishads
are in the form of dialogue between guru and disciple. The student asks questions till he gains conviction.
Neither the guru nor
the upanishad expects you to listen once, blindly accept and pack up.
There is a gradual
unfolding of Vedanta by an adept guru. The whole learning environment is open,
graceful, friendly, encouraging, logical
and of course filled with shraddha.
SHRADDA WAS REPLACED BY
BHAKTI (BLIND DEVOTION ) AND SANATANA
DHARMA WAS HIJACKED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD ..
AT EVERY DESH DROHI
LITERARY FEST, A HUGE CHUNK OF TIME IS
LEFT ASIDE FOR THE FAKE AND BACKDATED CREATIONS OF ROTHSCHILDs BHAKTI MOVEMENT
FROM NOW ON I ASK MY
READERS TO WATCH THESE FOREIGN FUNDED DROHIS
Shraddha is the first step in one's search
for God. In the fourth chapter of the
Bhagavad Gita, Sri Krishna says, "shraddhavan labhate jnanam, one with
shraddha gains knowledge.
Thus shraddha is like a
stepping stone; with the help of a teacher, believe in God eventually leads to
direct knowledge. Shraddha is
indispensable, because without it, knowledge of the Lord will forever be beyond
ones grasp.
Check out the FAKE
Bhakti movement heroes-- 12 Alvars , 63 Nayanars, Andal, Basava, Bhagat Pipa,
Allama Prabhu, Akka Mahadevi, Kabir, Tulsidas, Kabirdas, Kalidas, Ramdas,
Chandidas , Surdas , Ravidas, Gusainji, Ghananand, Ramananda Sripadaraja, Vyasatirtha, Purandara Dasa,
Kanakadasa, Vijaya Dasa, Six goswamis of Vrindavan , Raskhan, Jayadeva Goswami,
Namdev, Eknath, Tukaram, Mirabai, Ramprasad Sen, Sankardev, Vallabha Acharya,
Narsinh Mehta, Gangasati,Chaitanya Mahaprabhu etc etc
EVEN ADI SHANKARACHARYA
WAS CONVERTED TO A BHAKTI CHARACTER
THIS FOUL AND CUNNING
SUBSTITUTION OF SHRADDHA WITH BHAKTI, IN THE WARP AND WEFT OF HINDUISM BY JEW
ROTHSCHILD REDUCED THE GREAT
SPIRITUALITY OF SANATANA DHARMA TO THE ABSURD LEVEL OF SINGLE HOLY BOOK/ SINGLE
MESSIAH RELIGIONS ..
Sabda-pramana as a
concept which means reliable expert testimony. The schools of Hinduism which
consider it epistemically valid suggest that a human being needs to know
numerous facts, and with the limited time and energy available, he can learn
only a fraction of those facts and truths directly.
In order for one to
give their assent to a worldview that renders to language the cosmic and
salvific roles Bhartrihari does, a theory that posits that language is the
medium of ultimate knowledge, one must be convinced that language in general
has the capacity to yield ordinary knowledge.
Given the way Bhartrihari
conceptualizes language, as not primarily referent directed, but instead as referent-constructing,
we need to look at how the grammarian thematizes the knowledge-conferring power
of language within his own peculiarly unique framework.
Sphota may be
characterized as the intersubjective, universal "store-house" of
meaning, the ground of all linguistic activity and communication. Sphota is the
unifying principle that connects the word, the grammatical form of the word,
and the meaning.
Furthermore, just as
words and sentences represent “pieces” of the meaning extracted from the whole,
the objects and states of affairs these pieces represent actually refer to a
“whole of objects meant” or an entire reality.
In classical Indian
thought, objects are thought to be constituted of substance (dravya), but in
Bhartrihari , substance can be distinguished into two kinds, the substance of
all things, which is Brahman, and the other individual, empirical substances.
The empirical notion of substance here may be derived from the grammatical
operation of ekashesha, explained by Panini as using individual word-tokens to
refer to individual objects-substances.
Thus, names or singular terms are said
by the earliest grammarians to refer to one substance at a time, therefore
substance is defined through the relation of reference, and the nature of each
substance is so specific that we cannot posit any general properties possessed
by all of them.
Bhartrihari defines
"actual" or empirical substance as that which we refer to by using
indexicals and quantifiers, which refer to anything in our ontological reality:
'this' ‘that’ ‘something’ or ‘anything.’
The term ‘this’ points out an
existence given to perception, while ‘that’ refers to something whose existence
can be validated by some other means of knowledge but which is not available to
perception.
Bhartrihari acknowledges the pragmatic and common sense
view of “substance” as “a relative concept being dependent on our concept of
quality (guna). A substance is that which is said to be distinguished and a
quality is that which distinguishes the substance.
Bhartrihari's
contribution to this debate changes the very notion of substance into a much
more inclusive and general concept, since anything we refer to using a name or
substantive term, even generic properties and verbs, become substances in that
they are distinguished by words
In the third book of
the Vakyapadiya, Bhartrhari defines the concept of ‘quality’/guna as dependent
upon, as arising from substance. . For him, qualities, existing in relation to
substances serve to further differentiate those substances by “delimiting their
scope.”
Bhartrihari's
contribution of his particular theory of the "imaginative
construction" of perceptions and language once again emerges within the
context of debates with competing theories of knowledge.
Bhartrihari’s theory
posits knowledge as a matter of specifically linguistic construction. The
concept of vikalpa for him implies the following: the structure of language
shapes how we categorize the objects of our experience and our descriptions of
reality as a whole.
Even at the most immediate levels of awareness), we must
conceptualize and therefore interpret the contents of sense perception. Thus,
at the level of pure sensation, the sensory core is already saturated, as it
were, with the “deep structure” of language.
Bhartrihari, as an ontological
monist, does not distinguish between a pure perception and a constructed perception
such that the former is concept-free and ineffable and the latter
concept-loaded and autonomously constructed, because he thinks that perception
is inherently verbal.
Not only are sense data and linguistic units
non-different, but they are expressive of the unitary principle of
Brahman-which is differentiated into the plurality of linguistic objects that
make up the world.
Bhartrihari says that the act of perception, rather than
acquiring linguistic clothing after the bare particular has already been
presented to consciousness, can only be aware of the object before it as a
'this’ or ‘that’, that is, as an awareness of something only as a particular
and as such, identifiable
For Bhartrihari, the
word makes the thing an individual, and as one moves further and further along
the refined categories of what is conventionally known as denotation, the word
makes the thing what it is.
For Bhartrihari, the difference the Logicians posit
between the ontological and the linguistic would make meanings of all kinds,
mundane ones and religious ones, contingent on the circumstances and speaker.
But if perception is innately verbal, no perilous bridge need be suspended over
some supposed abyss between vision and truth, both in our mundane lives and for
the Maharishis who pronounced the Vedas.
The word then makes the thing, and
Brahman makes the world, and so it is entirely proper to speak of words as the
creator of all things (shabda-Brahman).
The shallow Western
mind cannot fathom the depth of Bharthari’s intellect.
His explorations into
the relations between language, thought and reality reflect contemporary
philosophical concerns with meaning, language use, and communication,
particularly in the work of thieves Chomsky, Wittgenstein, Grice, and Austin.
Noam Chomsky has lifted
his entire works from ancient Indian Grammar.
His works are useless as he lifted without understanding from a perfect divine
language Sanskrit for application to a ridiculous language of syntax called
English.
The grammar of the Sanskrit language has a complex but perfect verbal
system, rich nominal declension, and extensive use of compound nouns. Sanskrit
has ten classes of verbs divided into two broad groups: athematic and thematic.
The thematic verbs are so called because an a, called the theme vowel, is
inserted between the stem and the ending.
This serves to make the thematic
verbs generally more regular. Exponents used in verb conjugation include
prefixes, suffixes, infixes, and reduplication. Every root has (not necessarily
all distinct) zero, guṇa, and vṛddhi grades.
Because of Sanskrit's
complex declension system, the word order is free. In usage, there is a strong
tendency toward subject – object – verb (SOV), which was the original system in
place in Vedic prose.
S is the subject, V is
the verb and O is the object; the three exhaustive elements of a simple
sentence.
Malayalam is
subject–object–verb (SOV) language is one in which the subject, object, and
verb of a sentence appear or usually appear in that order.
If English were SOV,
" Dick apple ate" would be an ordinary sentence, as opposed to the
actual Standard English " Dick ate apple". Hindi is SOV.
Hebrew is
subject–verb–object (SVO) is a sentence structure where the subject comes
first, the verb second, and the object third. English is SVO.
BILBLICAL HEBREW WAS
VSO LIKE CLASSICAL ARABIC .
SANSKRIT IS THE MOTHER
OF ALL LANGUAGES
Simple sentences in
Sanskrit do not need to follow any specified structure. They are attached
either to the subject or the object in form of ‘vibhakti’. Thus, in principle,
every simple sentence in Sanskrit can be condensed into three distinct words:
the subject, the verb and the object. We can write these three words in any
order we want (all 3! = 6 ways) and the sentence will bear the same meaning. A
unique meaning.
Sanskrit like Malayalam
is usually used in SOV format though.
Sanskrit's grammatical
structure, words carry extra information with them. Because of this extra
information, word order is more flexible in Sanskrit than in English.
IN STUPID ENGLISH
BANANA CAN EAT ELEPHANT, WHICH CANNOT HAPPEN IN SANSKRIT.
Sanskrit, uses
inflection to a great extent. In Sanskrit, a complex idea can exist as one word
and still carry a single and precise meaning.
Malayalam and Hindi employs
postpositions, whereas English employs prepositions
Term/Definition
Grammar/The set of
rules that describes or defines a language
Grammatical/used to
describe an expression that follows the rules of grammar.
Subject/ In a sentence,
the thing that performs an action
Verb/ In a sentence,
the word that describes the action
Object/ In a sentence,
the thing that is affected by the action
Emphasis/ a quality
that tells us to pay attention to certain words
Inflection/ the act of
changing a word to further clarify its meaning
Thief Noam Chomsky showed
that syntax is independent from phonology and semantics. This led to major
advances in linguistics but the analysis continued to be phrased in terms of
rules..
Then Chomsky made
another radical change- he showed that the formal properties of syntax may be
derived from more abstract principles.
Jew Noam Chomsky, is
called the the greatest linguist since Panini—BALLS !
He lifted everything halfbaked from Sanskrit
Grammar. Panini's work is purely grammatical and lexicographic, cultural and
geographical inferences can be drawn from the vocabulary he uses in examples.
Predecessors of Noam Chomsky
were all Sanskrit scholars—Today they admit “None of us drink from wells that
we have dug and Chomsky is no exception”.
There is a baggage of
sources that each scholar carries that
originates years, decades, centuries, even millennia before. It is a composite
of prooftext sources that receives
occasionally a side reference in a footnote or short comment, but which
indicates the philosophical stream that
the writer or scholar is tapping for inspiration. .
Thief Noam Chomsky has admitted that great
ancient Indian Sanskrit grammarians contributed to his inspiration( sic ). His Jew
got inspired after stealing?
All the “great” spirits
that he cites as his pioneers all had one thing in common: they studied
Sanskrit and admired Panini the Hindu grammarian. And this is where this article
originated.
“Anyone who has but
just a glimpse of understanding of Hindu philosophy and religion will know that this pantheistic religion views all
the sounds of language as gods. The gods are eternal and thus language in a person has an eternal ring to
it in us
Panini left his gurukula and
went far away into the Himalayas to do
severe Tapas to please Lord Siva.
Satisfied with his austere penance, Lord
Shiva emerged before him and granted him the bonus of extreme intellect.
Shiva then danced his Tandav in his
ecstasy and gave birth to fourteen holy Sutras Aphorism by beating his drum ( Damaru
) fourteen times.
Blessed with astuteness, Panini accepted them and returned
home.
Then he composed a grammar of Sanskrit language which became the first
and the most perfect grammar that could ever be composed. There has been NO
changes in Panini’s Grammar for the past 7500 years.
Dimirti Mendeleyev modeled
his Periodic Tables after Panini’s 54 Sanskrit alphabets .It just shows that Sanskrit is a divine
language.
Noam Chomsky's concept
of "deep structure" and "surface structure" was lifted from
Bhartrhari. Deep structure and surface structure (also D-structure and
S-structure, although these abbreviated forms are sometimes used with distinct
meanings) are concepts used in linguistics, specifically in the study of syntax
in the Chomskyan tradition of transformational generative grammar.
The deep
structure gives the semantic component of a sentence, while the surface
structure gives the proper phonological information to express that thought.
Chomsky coined and
popularized the terms "deep structure" and "surface
structure" in the early 1960s. Chomsky
DID NOT BORROW from Hockett as
written by the white man --- thief Chomsky lifted it from Bhartrhari..
Chomsky
first referred to these concepts in his 1962 paper The Logical Basis of
Linguistic Theory (later published as Current Issues in Linguistic Theory in
1964).
There is no such thing
as a language without grammar.
The Vedic srutis had
divine Math embedded ..and precision Sanskrit Grammar was developed on those
lines.
MERU, PASCALSs TRIANGLE
, SIERPINSKI TRIANGLE, GOLDEN MEAN, FIBONACCI SERIES , LUCAS NUMBER, ULAM
SPIRAL , ISOTOPE MAGIC ARE ALL EMBEDDED IN VEDIC SRUTIS
Bharthari’s theory of
language recognizes that meaning is conveyed in formalist terms where meaning
is organized along syntactical rules.
But it makes the leap, not made by modern
Western philosophers, that such a view of language does not merely serve our
mundane communicative purposes and see to the achievement of practical goals,
but leads to paramount metaphysical knowledge, a knowledge carrying with it a
palpable salvific value.
CHECK OUT HOW THE
IMMORAL WHITE MAN HAS BEEN RUNNING DOWN SANSKRIT, THE OLDEST LANGUAGE ON THIS
PLANET..
THERE ARE NO SYNONYMS
IN SANSKRIT. THE MONEIR WILLIAMS DICTIONARY HAS ONLY 40% OF SANSKRIT
VOCABULARY..
The LIAR Daniel H. H.
Ingalls Sr.Professor of Sanskrit at Harvard University gives the below BULLSHIT— nay
WHITE KOSHER LIE ..
This BASTARD studied Sanskrit in India to inject poison in
our ancient scriptures..
Lying JEWESS Wendy Doniger is his student..
QUOTE: Peculiar
characteristics -In the introduction to his celebrated translation of
Vidyakara's 'Subhashitaratnakosha', Daniel H.H. Ingalls describes some peculiar
characteristics of the Sanskrit language. He refers to the enormous vocabulary
of Sanskrit, and also of the presence of a larger choice of SYNONYMS IN
SANSKRIT than any other language he knew of. Further, he writes, just as there
exist a VAST NUMBER OF SYNONYMS for almost any word in Sanskrit, there also
exist synonymous constructions. Ingalls writes that in elementary Sanskrit
examinations he would ask his students to write in Sanskrit the sentence 'You
must fetch the horse' in ten different ways. Actually, Ingalls explains, it is
possible to write the sentence in Sanskrit in around fifteen different ways 'by
using active or passive constructions, imperative or optative, an auxiliary
verb, or any of the three gerundive forms, each of which, by the way, gives a
different metrical pattern'. Ingalls emphasizes that while these constructions
differ formally, emotionally they are identical and completely interchangeable.
He comments that in any natural language this would be impossible. Ingalls uses
this and other arguments TO SHOW THAT SANSKRIT IS NOT A NATURAL LANGUAGE BUT AN
ARTIFICIAL LANGUAGE . By 'artificial', he explains he means it was learned
after some other Indian language had been learned by simple conditioning. ( HEY
WAS THAT TAMIL—YOU CUNT ? ). Ingalls writes: 'Every Indian, one may suppose,
grew up learning naturally the language of his mother and his playmates. Only
after this and if he belonged to the priesthood or the nobility or to such a
professional caste as that of the clerks, the physicians, or the astrologers
would he learn Sanskrit. As a general rule, Sanskrit was not the language of
the family. It furnished no subconscious symbols for the impressions which we
receive in childhood nor for the emotions which form our character in early
adolescence.'[22]
SANSKRIT IS A VERY
PRECISE LANGUAGE –ONE WORD ,ONE MEANING
THERE ARE NO SYNONYMS
IN SANSKRIT—LIKE THE STUPID LANGUAGE ENGLISH.
BY INTRODUCING FAKE
SYNONYMS IN SANSKRIT, THE BASTARD WHITE
INVADER
---- MADE OUR VEDAS LOOK LIKE MINDLESS MONKEY
CHATTER
---- PLACED MONKEY HANUMAN ON KRISHNAs CHARIOT
FLAG INSTEAD OF GARUDA
---- CONVERTED KING
VALI INTO A MONKEY
etc etc
Check out the different
meanings of the English word SET. You can hardly call English a precise
language.
1. to put (something or
someone) in a particular place: to set a vase on a table.
2. to place in a
particular position or posture: Set the baby on his feet.
3. to place in some
relation to something or someone: We set a supervisor over the new workers.
4. to put into some
condition: to set a house on fire.
5. to put or apply: to
set fire to a house.
6. to put in the proper
position: to set a chair back on its feet.
7. to put in the proper
or desired order or condition for use: to set a trap.
8. to distribute or
arrange china, silver, etc., for use on (a table): to set the table for dinner.
9. to place (the hair,
esp. when wet) on rollers, in clips, or the like, so that the hair will assume
a particular style.
10. to put (a price or
value) upon something: He set $7500 as the right amount for the car. The
teacher sets a high value on neatness.
11. to fix the value of
at a certain amount or rate; value: He set the car at $500. She sets neatness
at a high value.
12. to post, station,
or appoint for the purpose of performing some duty: to set spies on a person.
13. to determine or fix
definitely: to set a time limit.
14. to resolve or
decide upon: to set a wedding date.
15. to cause to pass
into a given state or condition: to set one's mind at rest; to set a prisoner
free.
16. to direct or settle
resolutely or wishfully: to set one's mind to a task.
17. to present as a
model; place before others as a standard: to set a good example.
18. to establish for
others to follow: to set a fast pace.
19. to prescribe or
assign, as a task.
20. to adjust (a
mechanism) so as to control its performance.
21. to adjust the hands
of (a clock or watch) according to a certain standard: I always set my watch by
the clock in the library.
22. to adjust (a timer,
alarm of a clock, etc.) so as to sound when desired: He set the alarm for seven
o'clock.
23. to fix or mount (a
gem or the like) in a frame or setting.
24. to ornament or stud
with gems or the like: a bracelet set with pearls.
25. to cause to sit;
seat: to set a child in a highchair.
26. to put (a hen) on
eggs to hatch them.
27. to place (eggs)
under a hen or in an incubator for hatching.
28. to place or plant
firmly: to set a flagpole in concrete.
29. to put into a
fixed, rigid, or settled state, as the face, muscles, etc.
30. to fix at a given
point or calibration: to set the dial on an oven; to set a micrometer.
31. to tighten (often
fol. by up): to set nuts well up.
32. to cause to take a
particular direction: to set one's course to the south.
33. Surgery. to put (a
broken or dislocated bone) back in position.
34. (of a hunting dog)
to indicate the position of (game) by standing stiffly and pointing with the
muzzle.
35. Music.
a. to fit, as words to
music.
b. to arrange for
musical performance.
c. to arrange (music)
for certain voices or instruments.
36. Theater.
a. to arrange the
scenery, properties, lights, etc., on (a stage) for an act or scene.
b. to prepare (a scene)
for dramatic performance.
37. Nautical. to spread
and secure (a sail) so as to catch the wind.
38. Printing.
a. to arrange (type) in
the order required for printing.
b. to put together
types corresponding to (copy); compose in type: to set an article.
39. Baking. to put
aside (a substance to which yeast has been added) in order that it may rise.
40. to change into
curd: to set milk with rennet.
41. to cause (glue, mortar,
or the like) to become fixed or hard.
42. to urge, goad, or
encourage to attack: to set the hounds on a trespasser.
43. Bridge. to cause
(the opposing partnership or their contract) to fall short: We set them two
tricks at four spades. Only perfect defense could set four spades.
44. to affix or apply,
as by stamping: The king set his seal to the decree.
45. to fix or engage (a
fishhook) firmly into the jaws of a fish by pulling hard on the line once the
fish has taken the bait.
46. to sharpen or put a
keen edge on (a blade, knife, razor, etc.) by honing or grinding.
47. to fix the length,
width, and shape of (yarn, fabric, etc.).
48. Carpentry. to sink
(a nail head) with a nail set.
49. to bend or form to
the proper shape, as a saw tooth or a spring.
50. to bend the teeth
of (a saw) outward from the blade alternately on both sides in order to make a
cut wider than the blade itself.
Now let us go to the
ancient Indian language SANSKRIT-- which is the oldest language in the world ,
with the most immense vocabulary, clear speech, perfect pronunciation, accurate
expression and politeness.
Since Panini wrote the
adaptable Sankrit grammar 7500 years ago, there has been NO changes, it is that
perfect-- the work of a genius!!
Sanskrit has a
construct like geometry in cymatics and can be digitalised.
There is no
communication every year , like for English " the following new words have
been added to the Oxford English dictonary in the year 2009". Sanskrit has
no meanings by connotations and hence cannot age. It has perfect morphology
that leaves no room for error.
NASA had declared that
sanskrit is the only unambiguous spoken language on the planet. Its alphabets
are impeccably arranged. There are no proper nouns in Sanskrit. Every single
Sanskrit word has a meaning built into the word itself.
The principles of sound
harmonics working precisely and consistently through the entire language, from
the basic four sounds through thousands of words and their variations. The way
words unfold from their seed forms is amazing. The mathematical precision
throughout the language and give it its extraordinary power in MANTRAS
There is a direct link
between the sound and signs,it is phonetic. The writing of Sanskrit language is
based on the sound of the spoken form. Sanskrit has no spelling, nor there are
any silent letters . There is logic in its sound system, and a natural
continuity in its word-making as well as sentence-making. Sanskrit sentence
structure is flexible--to hell with syntax. The order of words in a sentence
does not matter.
Sanskrit has three
genders (masculine, feminine, and neuter), three numbers (singular, dual, and
plural), and eight cases (nominative, accusative, instrumental, dative,
ablative, genitive, locative, and vocative), although only in the singular of
the most common declension does a noun show different forms for each case.
Adjectives are inflected to agree with nouns. Verbs are inflected for tense,
mode, voice, number, and person.
There is a vibration or
resonance in the sounds of Sanskrit and hence is the choice language for
mantras.( CYMATICS )
Sanskrit grammar has
extensive grammatical tenses. There are ten tenses: one form for the
present tense, three forms for the past tense and two forms for the future
tense.
There is also
imperative mood, potential mood, benedictive mood (called asheerling, which is
used for indicating a blessing), and conditional. Each tense has three separate words for each
of the three grammatical persons (first person, second person and third
person), and it further distinguishes if it’s referring to one, two, or more
than two people (called eakvachan, dvivachan and bahuvachan).
There are three
categories of the verbs called atmanepadi, parasmaipadi and ubhaipadi. These
forms indicate whether the outcome of the action is related to the doer or the
other person or both. In this way there are ninety forms of one single verb.
Sanskrit words are
formed of a root word called dhatu. For
instance: kri root word means ‘to do,’ gam root word means ‘to go.’ So, there
are ninety forms of each of these verbs like, karoti, kurutah, kurvanti, and
gachchati, gachchatah, gachchanti etc.
There are ready-made single words for all kinds of uses and situations.
There are words for all
the three genders and each word has twenty-one forms of its own which covers
every situation. Then there is a very elaborate and precise system of
composing, phrasing, making a sentence, joining two words and coining any
number of words according to the need.
Sanskrit grammar has
the capacity for creating any number of new words for a new situation or
concept or thing.
The morphology of word
formation is unique and of its own kind where a word is formed from a tiny seed
root (called dhatu) in a precise grammatical order which has been the same
since the very beginning.
Any number of desired
words could be created through its root words and the prefix and suffix system
as detailed in the Ashtadhyayi of Panini.
Furthermore, 90 forms of each verb and 21 forms of each noun or pronoun could
be formed that could be used in any situation.
Its vowels are the
actual ‘voice pattern’ of the sound and consonants are only the ‘form’ of the
‘voice pattern’ of the sound. So a consonant
alone cannot be pronounced as it is only a ‘form’ of the ‘voice pattern’
until it is attached to a vowel. hus, a vowel, which itself is a ‘voice
pattern,’ can be pronounced alone (like,) or it can be modulated by adding a
consonant to it (like,).
Mantras have to be in a
divine language compulsorily. Only Sanskrit
qualifies.
A language for mantras
must be/have—
1) More than 7000 years old
2) Accurate expression
3) Clear speech and perfect pronunciation
4) No changes since it was first made
5) Must have a meaning built into every word
and hence must have immense vocabulary.
6) Must have precise golden ratio sound
harmonics ( Fibonacci/ Sri Yantra )
7) Mathematical and geometrical precision
8) Phonetic—direct link between sound and
signs
9) Script must be based on the spoken form
10) Cannot have spellings like English
11) Cannot have silent alphabets
12) Words must unfold from seed forms
13) Natural continuity is word making
14) Natural continuity in sentence making
15) Sound must have vibration
16) Sounds must have resonance— (this is just the
tip of the iceberg )
17) Alphabets must form in cymatics when uttered
18) Must not have proper nouns
19) Must be polite with no bad words in the un- abridged dictionary
20) Mantras in this language must be approved by
a gifted seer and the effect felt on his chakras
---Mantras are Scalar
energy based sounds which resonate in the Zero Point Field Aakashik hyperspace.
---Mantras resonate
your pineal gland . Pineal glands of Vedic seers were the size of a lemon. Ours
in this 21st century is the size of dried raisin .
---Mantras reprogramme
your DNA. The human DNA can produce longitudinal scalar waves
---Mantra is a carrier
wave with potent information within it.
---Mantras vibrations
on DNA , chakras and pineal gland purifies and raises human consciousness
---Mantras have
immediate soothing effect makes the brain produce and release magic healing
chemicals. Errant and disturbing thought are killed! ( what happened on Big Boss
4 )
---Mantras must begin
and end with OM or AUM – the bible uses a lifted version Amen. OM resonates
with the earths heartbeat of 7.83 hertz.
NASA kept 7.83 hertz generators on their Apollo space crafts.
---Mantras cleanse the
environment and can reduce crime in a city—if chanted by sufficient numbers ,
the right way, and right number of times.
Some call this transcendental. It
is about quantum consciousness.
---Mantras increase
Prana or life force, sharpens intellect and boosts metabolism.
---Mantras can reduce
the surface tension of water. Sages kept Saraswati and Ganges water in copper
lotas with them
---Mantras centres your
mind ( effect on subconscious ) and slows down your breathing .
---Mantras increase
your Auras as seen by Kirlean photography—due to the effect on symphathetic and
para sympathetic nervous systems.
---Mantra chanting must
be done with intent, to make it more powerful. This is about consciousness
again.
Today no painful and
damaging surgery is done for kidney stones—sond is used to pulverize the
stones.
People under estimate sound of music so
much. Longitudinal sound wave is
everything!!
Noam Chomsky's concepts
of "deep structure" and "surface structure" is lifted from
Bhartrhari.
In modern times,
scholars of Bhartṛari have included Ferdinand de Saussure, who did his doctoral
work on the genitive in Sanskrit, and lectured on Sanskrit and Indo-European
languages at the Paris and at the University of Geneva for nearly three
decades.
Saussure lifted from Bhartṛari,
particularly the sphota theory. His
description of the sign, as composed of the signifier and the signified, where
these entities are not separable - the whole mapping from sound to denotation
constitutes the sign, is lifted from Bhartrhai’s sphota theory.
Many other prominent
European scholars around 1900, including linguists such as Leonard Bloomfield
and Roman Jakobson may have been influenced by Bhartṛari ..
NOAM CHOMSKY , A JEW OF INFERIOR INTELLECT , WOULD NOT
BE FAMOUS TODAY IF HE HAS NOT LIFTED FROM PANINI AND BRARTRHARI ALBEIT WITH HALF
BAKED UNDERSTANDING AND MIND BOGGLING OBFUSCATION.
THE LINGUISTICS PART OF
NLP - FOUNDED BY CONMAN BANDLER AND CONMAN GRINDER ARE DERIVED
FROM NOAM CHOMSKYs LINGUISTIC SHIT - TRANSFORMATIONAL GRAMMAR, SYNTAX AND DELETION PHENOMENA
Transformational
grammar is a theory of grammar that accounts for the constructions of a
language by linguistic transformations and phrase structures..
Noam Chomsky's BULLSHIT
book Syntactic Structures on transformational grammar dominates the field of
linguistics today
Noam Chomsky’s
BULLSHIT book Aspects of the Theory of
Syntax developed the idea that each sentence in a language has two levels of
representation — a deep structure and a surface structure.
The deep structure
represents the core semantic relations of a sentence, and is mapped onto the
surface structure..
THIS BLOGSITE CAN SEE
THE NAKED EMPEROR –ALWAYS !
NLP LINQUISTICS LIFTED
FROM AN ORIGINAL TIME TESTED INDIAN VEDIC METHOD-- THAT SANKRIT MANTRAS CAN AFFECT A HUMANs
PSYCHE
BUT THESE NLP LINGUISTIC
CUNTS LIKE NOAM CHOMSKY DO NOT KNOW THAT SANSKRIT MANTRAS AFFECT THE HUMAN BY
“SOUND” -- NOT “MEANING”
THE MAGIC IS IN SHABDA
BRAHMAN
ENGLISH IS A STUPID
LANGUAGE . ENGLISH IS NOT SANSKRIT
ANYBODY WHO TRIES
STUNTS WITH NLP LINGUISTICS IS A CUNT OF THE FIRST ORDER— USING PATHETIC “TAG
QUESTIONS “
A NLP tag question is
added to the end of a statement to invite agreement. Tag
questions are a deliberate device that distracts the conscious mind of
recipients with something they can agree with.
The effect is that the statement in front of
the tag question goes directly to the unconscious mind and is acted upon (
BALLS ) :--
## This is easy, isn’t
it?
## Your health is
important, you know?
## You can, can’t you?
## It’s time to relax,
don’t you know?
The cognitive
revolution is the name for a PSEUDO intellectual movement six decades ago. It
began in the modern context of greater interdisciplinary communication and
research. The relevant areas of interchange were the combination of psychology,
anthropology, and linguistics ( mindless bullshit of Noam Chomsky ) with
approaches developed within the then-nascent fields of artificial intelligence,
computer science, and neuroscience.
THIS WAS MINDLESS
REVERSE ENGINEERING OF THE HUMAN THOUGHT PROCESS.
THE CONMEN DAZZLED
EVERYBODY WITH THEIR BRILLAINCE , MADE SURE NOBODY UNDERSTOOD IT –AND BY THE
MID EIGHTIES THE COGNITIVE SHIT HAD BECOME ZE DOMINANT RESEARCH LINE OF INQUIRY
IN MOST PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH FIELDS
The five key ideas that
made up the cognitive revolution:--
"The mental world
can be grounded in the physical world by the concepts of information,
computation, and feedback."
"The mind cannot
be a blank slate because blank slates don't do anything."
"An infinite range
of behavior can be generated by finite combinatorial programs in the
mind."
"Universal mental
mechanisms can underlie superficial variation across cultures."
"The mind is a
complex system composed of many interacting parts."
ALL ABOVE WAS WORSE
THAT MAD MAN CHARLES DARWINS SHIT –WHICH WE STILL TEACH IN OUR NCERT TEXT BOOKS
( IN THIS DNA AGE )
WHEN INTELLIGENT PEOPLE
OUTSIDE THIS CLOSED GROUP— ASKED WHAT THE FUCK IS ALL THIS COGNITIVE SHIT—THEY
GOT CAUGHT WITH THEIR PANTS DOWN AND SEAMLESSLY CROSSED OVER TO POSTCOGNITIVISM
PEOPLE LIKE NOAM
CHOMSKY MUST BE SHOT WITH THEIR OWN SHIT
Transformational
grammar (TG) is, the study of linguistics, part of the theory of generative
grammar, especially of naturally evolved languages, that considers grammar to
be a system of rules that generate exactly those combinations of words which
form grammatical sentences in a given language.
Noam Chomsky developed
the BULLSHIT idea that each sentence in
a language has two levels of representation — a deep structure and a surface
structure. The deep structure represents the core semantic relations of a
sentence, and is mapped onto the surface structure (which follows the
phonological form of the sentence very closely) via transformations.
All this in a BULLSHIT
language called English.
Noam Chomsky invented
something called 'universal grammar' which is somehow programmed into us at
birth. In India almost everybody knows
atleast 3 languages . It is pretty
obvious to us that there is no such thing as 'universal grammar'.
It is bullshit that we
formulate 'deep structures' in our heads using 'universal grammar'—and that too
in a stupid language called English
The combination of junk science and junk
politics has made Jew Noam Chomsky an attractive - and unstoppable - juggernaut
in the kosher controlled Western
academic world.
Linguists who reject
the bullshit Chomskyan paradigm are marginalized , blackballed and shut out of
the profession entirely
Jew Chomsky is a
Rothschild backed prophet who demands that people believe him. Since his claims
cannot be proved, they have to be taken on faith.
Universal grammar (UG)
in linguistics, is the theory of the genetic component of the language faculty,
credited to Noam Chomsky.
The basic postulate of
UG is that a certain set of structural rules are innate to humans, independent
of sensory experience. With more linguistic stimuli received in the course of
psychological development, children then adopt specific syntactic rules that
conform to UG
Chomsky argued that the
human brain contains a limited set of constraints for organizing language. This
implies in turn that all languages have a common structural basis: the set of
rules known as "universal grammar" ( sic )
Sanskrit is the mother
of all language .
I know Sanskrit— Chomsky does not.
My mother tongue
Malayalam is the closet language on this planet to Sanskrit-- and I studied
Sanskrit in school
Sanskrit is the oldest
language on this planet , while Malayalam ( the language of Danavas ) is second
oldest.
Every vestige of
ancient Indian knowledge is Danava . I
am a Danava.
In Sanskrit every word
(except adverbs and particles) is inflected, and the grammatical inflexion
itself shows the. relation in which one word stands to another. Thus
grammatically speaking, there is no order as such that need be much attended to
....
But if there is no
grammatical order, there is a sort of logical sequence of ideas, which must
follow one another in a particular order. ... Words must be so arranged that
the ideas will follow one another in their natural order, and the words in
their natural connection
Sanskrit grammarians
were interested in grammar but not in syntax. Only stupid languages like
English have syntax and spelling.
Syntax is the arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed
sentences in a language
In Sanskrit the
grammatical inflexion itself shows the relation of one word to another, and no
harm or inaccuracy occurs, if the student does not observe the usual order of
words in a sentence. Take, for example, the English sentence, "Rama saw
Govinda."
If the order of the
words 'Rāma' and 'Govinda' be changed, there will be a very great difference in
the meaning; it will, in fact, be a different sentence altogether. If the order of the words be changed, in
Sanskrit no difference occurs in the meaning thing.
Sanskrit and
Malayalam is a word-order free language
. You can take a Sanskrit sentence,
jumble its words the way you wish and the resulting sentence would still mean
the same as the original one
All the sentences given
below mean exactly the same.
“A man abandons worn-out clothes to wear other
new ones.“
वासांसि
जीर्णानि
विहाय
नवानि
गृह्णाति
नरः
अपराणि
॥
विहाय
जीर्णानि
वासांसि
नवानि
गृह्णाति
नरः
अपराणि
॥
नरः
विहाय
वासांसि
जीर्णानि
गृह्णाति
अपराणि
नवानि
॥
विहाय
वासांसि
जीर्णानि
नरः
नवानि
अपराणि
गृह्णाति
॥
गृह्णाति
नवानि
अपराणि
नरः
विहाय
वासांसि
जीर्णानि
॥
जीर्णानि
विहाय
वासांसि
गृह्णाति
अपराणि
नरः
नवानि
॥
and so on…till
thousands of permutations are exhausted!
Try to change the
position of even a single word in the stupid language English and you will see the sentence become
meaningless.
English is a weakly
inflected language. An inflection of a word is a different form of that word
and is used for enhancing the meaning of the original word. English rarely uses
different forms of a word, to convey enhanced meanings of that word. Instead,
it uses totally new unrelated words to convey the enhanced meanings.
For example, to convey
“the meat was eaten by a dog“, we are using a totally new unrelated word ‘by’,
instead of using a different form of the word ‘Dog’
Highly inflected
languages are those which depend heavily on inflections to convey the enhanced
meanings of a word. For example, the sentence “the meat was eaten by a dog”
written in Sanskrit, would be-
मांसं खादितं कुक्कुरेण
॥
The meat was eaten by a
dog .
In English, to convey
the information that dog is the agent by whom the action(of eating) is being
performed, we are using a totally new unrelated word by. But in Sanskrit, we
are using a different form(inflection) of the word कुक्कुर
.
Here, कुक्कुरेण
is an inflection of the original word कुक्कुर,
which conveys the extra information that कुक्कुर
is the agent by whom the action is being performed. Similarly, while English
used the word was to convey that the meat is already eaten, Sanskrit uses खादितं – a different form of the word खादन
– to convey that the action(खादन) is already performed.
The word खादितं
is an inflection of the original word खादन
.
Sanskrit grammarians
were interested in sambandha and not in abhisambandha, and accordingly in
grammatical relations but not necessarily in word order
Sambandha is the relation of one word to another within
a sentence (as shown, e.g., by grammatical inflexion)'.
The grammar of the
Sanskrit language has a complex verbal system, rich nominal declension, and
extensive use of compound nouns.
CHOMSKY HAS NO RIGHT TO
CALL HIMSELF A LINGUISTICS EXPERT WITHOUT BASIC UNDERSTANDING OF SANSKRIT—THE
MOTHER OF ALL LANGUAGES .
SRUTI OF VEDAS IN
SANSKRIT IS 400 CENTURIES OLD.
Con-man Chomsky spAke—“A
grammar contains a syntactic component, a semantic component and a phonological
component...The syntactic component consists of a base and a transformational
component. The base, in turn, consists of a categorial subcomponent and a
lexicon. The base generates deep structures. A deep structure enters the
semantic component and receives a semantic interpretation; it is mapped by
transformational rules into a surface structure, which is then given a phonetic
interpretation by the rules of the phonological component”
In above grammar model
of CHOOT CHOMSKY , syntax is given a prominent, generative role, whereas
phonology and semantics are assigned secondary, interpretive roles
The theoretical
constructs and principles of the generative grammar introduced by Chomsky such as deep structures, transformations,
autonomy and primacy of syntax, etc. deserve to be shat on and thrown on
Chomsky’s face.
I am sorry, I have been
reduced to this – hurling abuse .
Mindless Chomskyanism
has been the dominant paradigm in linguistics for nearly forty years.
So, so , so-- If you
toe CHOOT Chomsky’s line, you are a
genius ?
Not any more !
A blogger named Capt
Ajit Vadkayil is in town—who can fit the entire intellect of a 100 Jew
Chomsky’s intellect under the forsskin of his uncircumcised prick and have
space for 99% more.
Linguistics is the
scientific study of language, and involves an analysis of language form,
language meaning, and language in context.
Structural linguistics
is an approach to linguistics originating from the work of Swiss linguist
Ferdinand de Saussure and is part of the overall approach of structuralism.
Structural linguistics involves collecting a corpus of utterances and then
attempting to classify all of the elements of the corpus at their different
linguistic levels: the phonemes, morphemes, lexical categories, noun phrases,
verb phrases, and sentence types
Ferdinand de Saussure
is considered one of the founders of
20th-century linguistics
Noam Chomsky placed
himself explicitly in the tradition of saussurean linguistics.
Epistemology in Indian
philosophy ( 5000 BC ) is divided into six pramanas. The six pramanas as correct means of accurate
knowledge and to truths are:--
Pratyakṣa (perception),
Anumāṇa (inference),
Upamāṇa (comparison and
analogy),
Arthāpatti
(postulation, derivation from circumstances),
Anupalabdi
(non-perception, negative/cognitive proof) and
Śabda (word, testimony
of past or present reliable experts).
Each of these are
further categorized in terms of conditionality, completeness, confidence and
possibility of error, by each school of Indian philosophies.
The white historian
must know that ancient Greek philosophy was stolen from Indian philosophy.
Every Greek stalwart studied in Kodungallur University owned by the Calicut
King ( except Aristotle who used his mentor Plato’s notes )
Pramaṇa refers to
epistemology in Vedanta-- Yukti which means active application of
epistemology or what one already knows, innovation, clever expedients or
connections, methodological or reasoning trick, joining together, application
of contrivance, means, method, novelty or device to more efficiently achieve a
purpose.
The focus of Pramana is
how correct knowledge can be acquired, how one knows, how one doesn't, and to
what extent knowledge pertinent about someone or something can be acquired
In pramāṇa, “knowledge
sources.”--the principal candidates are perception, inference, and testimony.
The central notion throughout classical Indian epistemology is the “knowledge
source,” pramāṇa, which is a process of veridical-cognition generation.
Pramaṇa concept is
derived from the Sanskrit root, prama which means "correct notion, true
knowledge, basis, foundation, accurate notion".
Yukti and Pramana are
discussed together in some Indian texts, with Yukti described as active process
of gaining knowledge in contrast to passive process of gaining knowledge
through observation/ perception.
The texts on Pramana,
particularly by Samkhya, Yoga and Advaita Vedanta schools of Hinduism, include
in their meaning and scope "Theories of Errors", that is why human
beings make error and reach incorrect knowledge, how can one know if one is wrong,
and if so, how can one discover whether one's epistemic method was flawed, or
one's conclusion (truth) was flawed, in order to revise oneself and reach
correct knowledge.
In some texts such as
by Vedavyasa, ten pramanas are discussed.
Vedanta gave importance to circumstantial implication (arthāpatti),
which appeals to common sense (e.g., one does not see the sun move from minute
to minute, but, as it is in a different place at different times of day, one
must conclude that either earth or sun has moved.
The word ‘pramāṇa’
(“knowledge source”) along with the words used for individual knowledge
sources, for perception and so on, are commonly used such that the truth of the
resultant cognition is implied.
This runs counter to
Western usage.
The knowledge, perceived
by the mind and sense organs is known as Pratyaksha. The means of perceiving
the knowledge is known as Pratyaksha Pramana. In this case, knowledge is the
result and the contact of the object and the sense organs is nothing but means
of knowledge.
The instrumental cause
of a true cognition is called ‘ pramana ’. A pramana theory is one which
theorizes about the (causal) modes by which true cognitions are acquired and
their truth claims validated.
According to Noam
Chomsky, the mind comprises an extensive cluster of innate “modules,” one of
which is language. Each module operates automatically, independently of
individual control, on the basis of a distinct, domain-specific set of rules
that take determinate inputs from some modules and yield determinate outputs
for others.
In earlier work these
operations were called “derivations”; more recently they have been called
“computations.” The various modules interact in complex ways to yield
perception, thought, and a large number of other cognitive products.
For example, a bee’s
genome does not have to direct it to build hives in a hexagonal lattice. The
lattice is a requirement imposed by physics, since this structure is the most
stable and efficient of the relevant sort. Analogous points can be made about
the growth, structure, and operation of the human brain.
SORRY CHOOT CHOMSKY
PAAJI ,
THIS IS SHABDA BRAHMAN AT WORK
Panini's work ( 5500 BC
) were the first systematic investigations of language. The motivation was the
precise and accurate preservation of Vedic texts on oral route . 500 years latter Vedas would be penned down..
Sanskrit language was
studied against the background of literary studies as well as philosophical
enquiry.
Phonological and
phonetic study of words as isolates and words as part of sentences (also
morphemes as part of words); the technical term sandhi i.e. ``joining
together'' is now accepted in Western linguistics.
Bhartrihari
distinguishes language into two aspects:-
--Communicative
language : that which is found in use in the speech community for communicating ideas
-- Analytic language:
developed by absraction in order to show the correctness of communicative
language.
The abstraction is made
on the basis of anvaya-vyatireka, copresence and coabsence. Different sentences are compared and
contrasted.
On the basis of
similarities and differences, one extracts:--
- words and word meanings from sentences
- bases and formative elements with segmented
meanings from words
Just as samhita-patha
is shown as derived from pada-patha of the vedic hymns by the pratishakhya
texts, the grammarians show the sentences as being formed by concatenating
words with different case-relations (karakas), just as pearls in a necklace...
This idea appears to
have influenced the Sanskrit scholar de Saussure, who in his Course in General
Linguistics, calls a version of this distinction that of parole (individual
acts of speech and the "putting into practice of language") and
langue (the abstract system of language that is internalized by a given speech
community).
In linguistics Chomksy’s main contribution is
the influential transformative-generative grammar “which is an attempt to describe
the syntactical processes common to all human language mathematically”
Later on, Noam Chomsky
would call a related distinction as that between e-language and i-language,
which was related to the competence (the knowledge that allows people to construct
and understand grammatical sentences), and performance (the actual sentences).
Language has been
thought to be the object of linguistics. But Noam Chomsky insists that language
as a useless notion for linguistic science. He argues that linguistics should
be concerned with grammar.
He renames
language and grammar, externalized language (E-language) and internalized language (I-language) respectively. According
to Chomsky, E-language (language) is something abstract externalized from the actual apparatus of our
mind and I-language (grammar) is the physical
mechanism of our brain.
If we are endowed with Universal Grammar (UG) at
birth and get I-language after
parameters built in UG are set one way or another and I-language generates
E-language, then I-language will be the
object of linguistic science.
But if there is nothing but language (E-language) spoken or written around us and grammar
(I-language) is regularity derived from language (E-language), then we will have a quite
different story
Noam Chomsky (1965) , a
THIEF of inferior intellect, claimed the Paninian grammar to his ‘generative
enterprise’ because of the recursive properties manifested by the latter,--but
he did not have the cerebral wherewithal to understand the metaphysical and
epistemological ideas that underlie Indian grammatical system..
Karak are the words
which are commonly used before a noun, noun phrase, pronoun or verb. The
karakas are basic semantic notions that pivot sentence constructions. They are
similar to the case roles/relations proposed in the case grammars.
But karakas
are much more than these, and their crucial role as a common substratum of
ontology, cognition, and grammar can be understood only if we regard them as a
manner of classifying ‘actions’ in the real world.
Panini
himself was probably merely projecting the karakas (literally, ‘a factor of
action’) from morphological occurrences in the form of cases to a set of
possible actions in the world.
Panini identifies six
karakas corresponding to six cases, viz., the nominative, accusative, dative,
instrumental, locative, and ablative. Possessive and vocative are conspicuous
by their absence in Panini’s grammar.
This is how Panini
defines the six karakas (Ashtadhyayi, I.4.24-54):--
Apadana (lit. ‘take
off’): "(that which is) firm whendeparture (takes place). This is the
equivalent of the ablative notion which signifies a stationary object from
whicha movement proceeds.
Sampradana
(‘bestowal’): "he whom one aims at with the object". This is
equivalent to the dative notion which signifies a recipient in an act of giving
or similar acts.
Karana
("instrument") "that which effects most". This is
equivalent to the instrumental notion.
Adhikarana
(‘location’): or "substratum". This is equivalent to the locative
notion.
Karman
(‘deed’/’object’): "what the agent seeks most to attain". This is
equivalent to the accusative notion.
Karta (‘agent’):
"he/that which is independent in action". this is equivalent to the
case of the subject or the nominative notion.
Patanjali’s Mahabhashya
defines karakas in relation to the notion of kriya, or the ‘distinctive mode of
action of the accessories’ (karakanam pravrttivisesaha kriya). The following
points of Mahabhashya are relevant:--
the root can be defined
as something which expresses kriya, it is necessary to understand kriya or
action in terms of karakanam pravrttivisesaha kriya = ‘a particular mode of
behaviour of accessories’
Kriya is different from
all the accessories which play a part, direct or indirect, in its complishment-
it is not pratyaksha, it can only be inferred.
The Mahabhashya
approves that existence, the meaning of the root ‘as’ (exist) is one of the
transformations of bhava or satta and therefore, action.
Even though the
dictionaries give word meanings, no word can signify any meaning in isolation
unless its referent is connected with an action expressed by a verb... In the
same way, a word is formed by the combination of segments called root,
suffixes, etc.
Grammatical Analysis: may
be sentence based - terminating when the sentence is reached (vakyavadhikanvakya);
or terminating with the word (padavadhikanvakyana).
The karakas (strictly,
that which effectuates a verbal action) bear names of strongly individualized
aspects, among which the most important is a group derived from the root kr- :
karman, karana, kartr, adhikarana. Karman, "action" (equally, direct
object, the object of the transitive verb) belongs to the rituals where the
word, since the Rig Veda, denotes the act par excellence, that is, rite
Bhartrhari says-- whenever
something, finished or unfinished is presented as something to be accomplished
(i.e., sadhya), then it is called ‘action’ because of its having acquired the
form of sequence.
The Brahmakanda
(Chapter I) of Vakyapadiyam is a treatise on the metaphysics and
ontology/physics of the form and meaning aspects of language.
It dwells
primarily on the following relations: --
1. between word in the intellect and the
word spoken;
2. between sequenceless and the sequential in language;
3. between
the universal and the particular;
4. between the word and the world..
In the philosophy of
grammar that is presented in Bhartrhari’s Vakyapadiyam, there are important
references to the nature of word and meaning. The form of the word is the
result of eternal transformations of the Sabdabrahma or the primordial
word/sound.
Meaning is the
particular instanciation of the activation, through an explosion or ‘bursting
forth’ (sphota) in the intellect (pratibha) of the hearer. What is important in
these views is the dynamic perspective attached to both meaning and form.
The main feature of
Bhartrhari’s ideas is the constancy of and the omnipresence of transformations
in the universe. Both word and the world are the result of manifest transformations
and/or apparent differentiations of a cosmic unity, which takes the name of shabdabrahman.
(Brahman, or the Ultimate reality is of the nature of the word, i,e,
sabdatattva)
From a eternal point of view these
transformations/differentiations are unreal and illusory. Time, as one of the
properties of the unchanging cosmic unity, is the material force which produce
these transformations, which are in turn perceived and cognized as activities
of particular things.
The shabdabrahman is initially differentiated into its
mental and material media, and the time-force (kalashakti) effects both these
aspects.
In the domain of the
world, there are essentially two kinds of transformations, effected by the
power of time, namely birth or manifestation and death or hiding. More
specifically, there are essentially six kinds of transformations in the world:
birth, existence, change, increase, decrease, and death.
The transformations
between the intellect and its verbal manifestation at least three stages. These
are para, pashyanti and madhyama. The fourth stage or vaikhari is that of
differentiated speech..
Important to
Bhartrhari’s philosophy of the word, is his assumption of a ‘word in the
intellect’ which is the ’cause’ of the spoken word. Probably, he believes that
the word in the intellect is undifferentiated, therefore sequenceless, in
contrast to the spoken word. The meaning of the spoken word could be an object
‘which is connected to some action.
Bhartrhari asserts that the action referred to by the
word — which is itself an activity — will have the ‘fitness’ when it
corresponds to the word in the intellect which could be an (isomorphic) schema
of the action in the world. Bhartrhari’s notion of sphota coincided with the
word in the intellect, or with the spontaneous ‘bursting forth’ of recognition
of meaning. Both have a role in meaning grasping..
The
word-in-the-intellect aspect of sphota is a kind of mental (transcendental)
schema.
Bhartrhari insists that
a new-born child possesses innate knowledge, he does not see this knowledge in
terms of some semantic or other universals that can be inventoried. The innate
knowledge is thought of as some sort of ‘action-schemas’. the idea seems to be
that just as the infant has the ability to breathe, or to make the simplest of
movements (which no one has taught it), similarly it is the possessor of a
thread of (the eternal) knowledge.
The relation between
the word in the intellect and the spoken word is not construed as the relation
between the internal and the external, but as the one between fixed and static
on the one side side and the mobile and the dynamic on the other.
"Just as the form
of the self (i.e., the senses) is involved in the perception/cognition of
objects, so the meaning form is involved in the recognition of the word."
(partially improvised translation) (Vakyapadiya,
I.50 –7000 BC)
In Bhartrhari’s view,
only the sentence can completely express ‘reality’, and not the word which may
denote objects. Moreover, "reality is expressible only in the form ‘it
exists’ which means that a word in order to express a reality has to be
compounded with a verb, namely ‘exists’."
Therefore, "a verb
has to be part of a sentence… If the verb is mentioned as expressing an action
to be conveyed, nouns are required to effect the action.. The
verb constitutes the essential and minimal content of a sentence.
Sentence-meanings
which are primarily in the nature of an action are also relative to the
speaking subject. The ancient grammarian … makes a
distinction between word-meanings which mention an object, and the meaning of
the sentence which is primarily an action, effected by men through objects..
For the grammarian,
reality is understood only through speech (language) and it is understood only
in the form it is presented by speech (word/language). But language cannot
describe the intrinsic nature of things, although we know things only in the
form in which words describe them.
Bhartrhari rejects the
existence of meanings of individual words. Individual word-meaning is an
illusion, according to him. Only the undifferentiated sentence-meaning is real.
A cognition which
embraces many objects at the same time is a complex cognition. As a cognition,
it is one but because of the many objects which figure in it, one sees
plurality in it, though it is indivisible..
Following his top-down
approach, Bhartrhari considers the sentence-meaning to be primary, and the
word-meaning the result of rather artificial analysis. The relationship between
sentence-meaning and word-meaning is compared to the relationship between a
holistic picture and its component-parts..
Just as an unified
perception of composite (picture) can be analyzed (into the preoccupation of
component parts) depending upon which part is required to be perceived so
likewise is the understanding of the meaning of the sentence.
Just as a single
homogeneous picture is described through various features as being blue (green,
etc.) as a result of its being perceived in different ways, similarly the
sentence which is single and does not possess expectancy is described in terms
of words which possess mutual expectancy.
Bhartrhari discusses a
possible set of cases under the name of Sesa (the rest or the extras). Sesa
does not represent a karaka relation but may involve or be preceded by one of
the karaka relations.
Panini and Patanjali,
and etymologists like Yaska were clearly concerned with human speech in the
everyday empirical world; but they also made room for metaphysical study.
Similarly, the great Indian philosopher of language, Bhartrhari, begins his
Vakyapadiya with a metaphysical enquiry into the nature and origin of language
in relation to Brahman, but then goes on in Chapters Two and Three to explore
technical grammatical points involved in the everyday use of language
The great creative intellectual
giants of ancient India, take care to explain their thought not as creation but as a retracing of forgotten
eternal truth. They compare their
activity to the clearing an overgrown ancient path in the jungle, not to the making of a new
path .
Language ( vak) has a
prominent place in the Vedas. In the
Vedas language is directly identified with the divine ( Brahman). The Rigveda
states that there are as many words as there
are manifestations of Brahman. In the
Upanishads , there is a continued equating of speech and Brahman.
Vag
vai brahmeti, “Speech, truly, is Brahman."-- Brhadaranyaka Upanisad 4.1.2 - 5000 BC
The Rig-Veda, in its
several hymns, contains glorious references to the power of speech. An entire Sukta (RV. 10.7l) is devoted to the
subject of speech; its various kinds ranging from the articulated to the
in-articulate sounds in nature and to the gestures (ingita).
For the Vedic
seers who herd and spoke about their experiences, speech was the most wonderful
gift from the divine. The splendour and beauty of Vac, the personification of
wisdom and eloquence, is sung in several hymns. Maharishis secured the power of divine speech through
Yajna; studied it; and, revealed it for the benefit of the common people.
Yajnena vaeah padavlyan
ayan tam anv avladan rslsa praviatam i tam abhnya vy adadhnh pnrutra tarn sapta
rebha abhi sain navante (Rig Veda .10.71 – 5000 BC)
Vac is the inexplicable
creative power of speech which gives form to the formless; gives birth to
existence and lends identity to objects by naming them. It is the faculty which
gives expression to ideas; calms the agitated minds; and, enables one to hear,
see, grasp, and then describe in words or by other means the true nature of
things.
Vac is intimately associated with the Rishis and the riks (verses) that
articulate or capture the truths of their visions. Vac, the navel of energy,
the mysterious presence in nature, was, therefore, held in great reverence.
Many of the later philosophical theories on this unique human faculty, the
language, have their roots in Vedas.
While the Rishis of the
early Vedas were overwhelmed by the power of speech, the philosophers of the
Upanishads asked such questions as: who is the speaker? Who inspires one to
speak? Can the speech truly know the source of its inspiration?
They doubted; though the speech is the
nearest embodiment of the in-dweller (Antaryamin) it might not truly know its
source (just as the body cannot know its life-principle). Because, they
observed, at the very beginning, the Word was un-uttered and hidden
(avyahriam); it was silence.
Ultimately, all those speculations led to the Self. But, again they said that Self is beyond mind and words (Avachyam; yato vacho nivartante, aprapya manasaa saha)
Ultimately, all those speculations led to the Self. But, again they said that Self is beyond mind and words (Avachyam; yato vacho nivartante, aprapya manasaa saha)
In the Indian
traditions, it is believed that it is only
in its oral form that the language becomes fully alive and reveals its true nature , provided it is spoken
properly. For Indian thinkers, language
was primarily the spoken word or
speaking itself (vac); while the written word, as a secondary aid, was only a
coded-representation of the spoken word; but, without its nuances.
Perhaps the
most salient feature of ancient Indian linguistic culture was its concern for
preserving the purity of the spoken word.
Speech was regarded as the verbal expression of a
thought that arises in a person’s consciousness. If there is no consciousness,
there would be no speech. Speech (Vac) is indeed an outward form of
consciousness (chetana). Vac is the word principle that gives expression to the
latent or unmanifest thoughts and feelings.
That was meant to say;
thinking is, in fact, a sort of internal speaking. Such inaudible speech was
regarded the seed or the potent form of explicit speech that is heard by
others. It was also said; all knowledge is interpreted in terms of words; and,
it is quite not possible to have any sort of cognition that is free from words
(tasmād arthavidhāḥ sarvāḥ śabdam-ātrāsu niśritāḥ– Vakyapadiya: 1.123)
The process of
transformation of a thought or an impulse arising in ones consciousness into a
cognizable, explicit speech is said to resemble the evolution of the Universe
from the un-manifest (A-vyakta) to the manifest (Vyakta) material world.
It was the speech, the
spoken word not the written letter that is at the base of the Sanskrit grammar.
All speculations and practices are concerned with the oral. Panini’s Astadhyayi
is also based on the sounds of spoken Sanskrit. The spoken language in Sanskrit
was/is the real language.
Therefore, right from
the earliest period, the study of speech has been one of the major concerns of
various Schools of Indian traditions. The power of the spoken word or still
more of the potent un-spoken sound was well recognized.
Chatvaari vaak
parimitaa padaani / taani vidur braahmaanaa ye manishinaah. Guhaa trini nihita
nengayanti / turiyam vaacho manushyaa vadanti. (Rigveda Samhita – 1.164.45- 5000 BC)
There are four levels
of speech. Only the wise who are well trained, endowed with intelligence and
understanding know them all. As for the rest; the three levels remain concealed
and motionless. Mortals know only the fourth. ( the
classification of speech into four strata: Para; Pashyanti; Madhyama; and,
Vaikhari)
Sound has four
divisions: Para manifested in Prana
(vital energy); Pashyanti manifested in the mind (Manas); Madhyama manifested
in the senses (Indriyani); and, Vaikhari manifested in articulate expressions
(Vac). While
Para Vac is pure consciousness; the three other forms are its transformations.
The three lower forms of speech viz. Pashyanti, Madhyama and Vaikhari which
correspond to intention, formulation and expression are said to represent ts
powers , such as : iccha-shakthi (power
of intent or will) , jnana-shakthi (power of knowledge) and the power of becoming
(bhuti sakti) or the power of action (Kriya shakthi ). Thus, out of the transcendent Para, the
three phases of its power (Shakthi) emanate.
The urge to communicate
or the spontaneous evolution of Para into Pashyanti, Madhyama and Vaikhari epitomizes the Cosmic act of One becoming
many; and, the subtle energy transforming into a less- subtle matter.
The speech, each time
it emanates, is an enactment, in miniature, of the unfolding (Vimarsa) of the
One into many. And each time, when that
speech is grasped by the listener and each time it merges into her/his
intellect, it re-enacts the process of absorption (Samhara) of the many into
One.
The process of
manifestation of speech is, compared to the evolution of the Universe. And,
that process is said to take place in four stages.
First, in the
undifferentiated substratum of thought, an intention appears. This first
impulse, the self-radiant consciousness is Para-vac (the voice beyond). This latent, un-spoken, un-manifest, silent
thought (Para) unfolds itself in the next three stages as Pashyanti (thought
visualized), Madhyama (intermediate)
and as Vaikhari (explicit)
speech).
Para represents
transcendental consciousness; Pashyanti the intellectual consciousness;
Madhyama the cerebral consciousness; and, Vaikhari the physical consciousness.
Further,
these levels of consciousness are said to correspond with varying levels of
awareness: Turia (the fourth, the
transcendental or the one-beyond); Shushupti (deep sleep); Svapna (dream state)
; and Jagrat ( wakeful state) , in that order.
And again, these states
of consciousness are said to relate to different states of being (bodies). Para
which is referred to as the Supreme form; the first form; the pure and
resplendent Highest-light etc, is indeed beyond all forms (Turiya); and it is
formless.
The sphere of consciousness at Pashyanti is said to be the causal
body (Karana-sarira); at Madhyama, the subtle or psychic body (Sukshma-sarira);
and at Vaikhari, the physical body (Sthula-sarira).
In the Vritti
accompanying the main text of the Vakyapadiya (1.14), Bhartrhari describes and
offers explanations on the process of evolution or transformation (Vivarta) of
the thought arising in one’s mind into audible speech.
Madhyama tu
antahs-amnivesini parigrihita-krameva buddhi-matropadana sukshma
prana-vrtti-anugata
As that cognition crops
up and takes a shape within, he grasps it.
Here, one looks for and identifies appropriate words, phrases, and their
sequence, which are capable of conveying ones’ intention, clearly. “he recognizes the verbal parts, which he is
about to verbalize either to himself or to another as distant and separable
from the Artha or thought.”
[That sequence of
thoughts results in definite and clear array of words. This is the intermediate
stage – The Madhyamā vak, a sequenced but a pre-vocal thought –described as the
voice of silence; perhaps best understood as internal speaking.
Here, there is
no perceptible sound (Nada). The Madhyamā vak is in an inaudible wave or
vibratory (spandana) form.
Thus, Madhyamā is the
stage at which the initial idea or intention is transformed into series of
words, as conceived by the mind, before they are actually put out. It may even be regarded as introspection or
as a sort of internal dialogue.
All the parts of speech that are linguistically
relevant are present here in a latent form. At this stage, which corresponds to
Prakrta-dhvani, the word and the meaning are still distinct; and the word order
is present. Therefore, temporal sequence may also be present.
While Para is pure
consciousness, the other three are said to be its powers through which it
differentiates as its power of will (iccha shakthi) at the subtle level of
Pashyanti; as the power of discrimination or knowledge (Jnana shakthi) at the
mental level of Madhyama; and, as its power of action (Kriya Shakthi) at the
physical level of Vaikhari.
Mantra is said to
connect, in a very special way, the objective and subjective aspects of
reality. The Mantra, in its sublime form, is rooted in pure consciousness.
The theory underlying
the evolution of speech is an extension of that faith; and it asserts, though
there are several levels in the hierarchy of language, they all emanate from
one indivisible reality Sabdabrahman.
And again, the
Sabdabrahman is identified with Para Brahman, the Absolute. The
various levels of language from the most subtle to the gross are, therefore,
treated as hierarchy or the levels of a unitary language-system.
Most of the
philosophical speculations on the process of manifestation of language; and,
the discussions upon its various stages – from the subtlest (Para) to the most
explicit (Vaikhari) – are based in that principle.
According to Nirukta
(Etymology), the language of the three Vedas (Rik, Yajus and Saman ) and the speech commonly used for dealings in the world , together make the
four quarters of speech – (Rg-yajuh-samani-caturdhi vyavharikiti nairuktah –
13,8 )
In the Rig-Veda, Vac,
generally, denotes speech which gives an intelligent expression to ideas, by
use of words; and it is the medium of exchange of knowledge. Vac is the vision,
as also, the ability to turn that perceived vision into words. In the later periods, the terms such as
Vani, Gira and such others were treated as its synonyms.
In the Sanskrit, the
vowels and consonants sounds are classified and arranged dependent on their
origin (pronunciation) in different parts of mouth, such as throat, palate,
teeth or lips.
The vowels and
consonants are so arranged that those emanating from the throat come first.
These are followed by those pronounced through tongue; the palate; teeth and
the lips. All sounds are arranged as those from the inside of the mouth
proceeding outwards, in that order. No other ancient system of writing seems to
have been so systematically thought out.
The vowels (Svara-s) ,
alternating long and short, come first : अ (a) आ (aa) इ(i) ई(ee) उ(u) ऊ (oo) ऋ (r) ॠ (r) लृ (lr) ए (e) ऐ (ai) ओ (o) and औ (au)
The commencing vowels अ
(a) and आ
(aa) are pronounced in the throat –
Kantya (कण्ठ्य).
They are followed by vowels इ(i) and ई(ee) produced by
the tongue touching the base of the teeth , Taalavya (तालव्य).
The vowels उ (u)
and ऊ (oo)
are produced using the lips making a rounded opening – Oshtya (ओष्ठ्य). The vowels ऋ(r)
and ॠ(r)
are produced by the tip of the tongue curling back against the roof of the
mouth- Murdhanya (मूर्धन्य). The vowel लृ(lr)
is produced by the tongue touching the upper teeth – Dantya (दंत्य). The vowels ए
(e) and ऐ
(ai) are produced near the throat by
the tongue touching the bottom of the teeth and sucking in the air –
Kanta-taalavya (कंटतालव्य). The vowels ओ
(o) and औ
(au) produced near the throat by the rounding of the lips are called Kantoshtya
(कंटोष्ठ्य).
The two ornamental
nasal (Anusvara) letters अं (am) and
अः (aha ) ,which are used to decorate the
vowels, are called the Visarga , meaning
sending forth . These sounds, which are neither consonants nor vowels,
add a softening short burst effect at the end.
These are usually listed as a part of the vowel -group; but are shown at
the end.
Similar is the
emanation of the consonants – from throat outwards to the lips .
The set of consonants –
क
(ka) , ख
(kha) , ग
(ga) , घ
(gha) , and ङ( nga) – are guttural (throaty)
consonants – Kantya (कण्ठ्य).
Then the consonants – च (cha) , छ
(chha) , ज (ja) , झ
(jha) , and ञ (nja)- are pronounced on the palate-
Taalavya (तालव्य). The next set of consonants – ट (ta) ,ठ (tha) , ड
(da) , ढ
(dha) and ण(
na) – is produced by the tip of the
tongue curling back against the roof of the mouth– Murdhanya (मूर्धन्य).
Next are those on the teeth (दन्त्य),
like – त
(ta) , थ(tha)
, द
(da) , ध
(dha) and न
(na) . And last come those on the lips प (pa) फ (pha) ब(ba) भ (bha) and म ( ma) – (ओष्ठ्य).
Oshtya (ओष्ठ्य).
The list is rounded off
with semi-consonants like – य (ya) , र
(ra) , ल
(la) and व(va)
; and the aspirated and sibilant sounds like श
(sha) ष (sha) ,
स
(sh) and ह
(ha ).
Such unique
organization of the alphabet underlines the attention paid to the patterns of
articulated sound; points of its
location; and , to degree of resonance,
in a way that has not been attempted in any other language—though every
language on this planet has lifted from Sanskrit
-
YASKA ( 5800 BC ) GETS THE VADAKAYIL PRIZE ( BELATED )..
AAA ) HERE IS THE LIST OF MAHA MERUS WHO FOOLED THE WORLD , WHOM I HAVE TRASHED INTO THE GARBAGE BIN OF THE PLANET.
GARBAGE BUCKET LIST:
1) BERTRAND RUSSEL
2) ROMILA THAPAR
3) IRFAN HABIB
4) NOAM CHOMSKY
5) RAMCHANDRA GUHA
6) SHELDON POLLOCK
7) SIGMUND FREUD
8) GEORG WILHELM HEGEL
9) AMARTYA SEN
10) WENDY DONIGER
11) FREIDRICH WILHELM NIETZSCHE
12) IMMANUEL KANT
13 ) BARUCH SPINOZA
14) ALBERT EINSTEIN
15) ISAAC NEWTON
16) GUGLEILMO MARCONI
17) CHARLES DARWIN
18) KARL MARX
19) MAX WEBER
20) THOMAS ALVA EDISON
21) FIBONACCI
22) BARKHA DUTT
23) ADMIRAL LN RAMDAS , WIFE LALITA AND DAUGHTER KAVITA.
24) EDWARD BERNAYS
25) JOHN DEWEY
26) GEORGE IVANOVICH GURDJEIFF
27) PETER D OUPENSKY
28) OPRAH WINFREY
29) RICHARD BANDLER AND JOHN GRINDER
30) CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR
31) STEPHEN HAWKING
32) SIDNEY HOOK
33) ALFRED KINSEY
34) BARACK OBAMA
35) AYN RAND
36) WILHELM WUNDT
NOTE: MENTAL MIDGETS LIKE ROMILA THAPAR , IRFAN HABIB , RAMACHANDRA GUHA, SHELDON POLLOCK, WENDY DONIGER , BARKHA DUTT , RAMDAS FAMILY MUST BE THANKFUL THAT THEY ARE INCLUDED AMONG A LIST OF CEREBRAL GIANTS
#########################
BBB ) HERE ARE PEOPLE WHO MADE A DENT IN THE UNIVERSE— THEY GET THE "VADAKAYIL PRIZE". THIS IS NOT A VESTED “NOBEL PRIZE “
1) NIKOLA TESLA
2) DIMITRI MENDELEYEEV
3) IE IRODOV
4) ARYABHATTA ( 2700 BC)
5) SRINIVASAN RAMANUJAN
6) CHANAKYA ( 372 BC )
7) ADI SHANKARACHARYA ( 2000 BC )
8) APOLLONIUS ( AN INDIAN SAGE –WHO LEGACY WAS SHIFTED ON TO A COOKED UP JESUS IN 325 AD )
9) "JOHN DOE"
10) JULIAN ASSANGE
11) SWAMI CHINMAYANANDA
12) GARY STEPHEN WEBB
13) GEORGE ORWELL.
13) CESAR MILLAN
14) HENRY FORD.
15) PANINI ( 5500 BC )
16) BHARTRHARI ( 7000 BC )
17) PATANJALI ( 5000 BC )
18) MANU (8300 BC)
19) YASKA ( 5800 BC )
CCC) DOWN THE SHIT HOLE----
1) SUHEL SETH
2) PRITISH NANDI
3) DILIP CHERIAN
4) PRANNOY JAMES ROY
5) AROON PURIE
6) VINEET JAIN
7) SHEKHAR GUPTA
8) SAGARIKA GHOSE AND HUSBAND RAJDEEP SARDESAI
9) SHOBHAA DE
10) SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN AND WIFE NANDINI SUNDAR
11) KAMALHAASAN
12) AUDREY TRUSCHKE
13) NOSTRODAMUS
14) MANI SHANKAR AIYAR
15) VERGHESE KURIEN
16) MS SWAMINATHAN
17 DEVDUTT PATTANAIK
capt ajit vadakayil
..
Maharishi Yaska ( 5800
BC ) wrote the Nirukta-- the discipline of "etymology" (explanation
of words) within Sanskrit grammatical tradition.
Nirukta is a technical treatise on etymology,
lexical category and the semantics of Sanskrit words. Nirukta is the study
concerned with correct interpretation of Sanskrit words in the Vedas
Nirukta
(Sanskrit), means "uttered,
pronounced, explained, expressed, defined, loud". It also refers to the etymological
interpretation of a word, also the name of such works
The related Sanskrit
noun niruktiḥ means "poetical derivation" or "explanation of a
word”
Yaska developed a
semantic analysis of words, by breaking them down into their components, and
then combined them in the context they were used to propose what the archaic
words mean.. He pointed out that meaning
and the etymology of words are always context dependent.
The Nirukta attempts to
explain how certain words get to have their meanings, especially in the context
of interpreting the Vedic texts. It includes a system of rules for forming
words from roots and affixes, and a glossary of irregular words, and formed the
basis for later lexicons and dictionaries.
It consists of three
parts, viz.:(i) Naighantuka, a collection of synonyms; (ii) Naigama, a collection
of words peculiar to the Vedas, and (iii) Daivata, words relating to deities
and sacrifices.
The Nirukta was one of
the six vedangas or compulsory ritual subjects in syllabus of Sanskrit
scholarship in ancient India.
Words are created
around object-agent, according to Yaska, to express external or internal
reality perceived by man, and are one of six modifications of Kriya (action)
and Bhava (dynamic being), namely being born, existing, changing, increasing,
decreasing and perishing
Nirukta covers
etymology, and is the study concerned with correct interpretation of Sanskrit
words in the Vedas. Vyakarana deals with
linguistic analysis to establish the exact form of words to properly express
ideas, while Nirukta focuses on linguistic analysis to help establish the
proper meaning of the words, given the context they are used in.
Sanskrit noun niruktiḥ
means "poetical derivation" or "explanation of a word”
Words are created
around object-agent, according to Yaska, to express external or internal
reality perceived by man, and are one of six modifications of Kriya (action)
and Bhava (dynamic being), namely being born, existing, changing, increasing,
decreasing and perishing.
Yaska views words as
the main carriers of meaning -- that words have a primary or preferred
ontological status in defining meaning,
Nirukta, means
"uttered, pronounced, explained, expressed, defined, loud". It also
refers to the etymological interpretation of a word, also the name of such
works.
Yaska defines four main
categories of words:--
nama – nouns or
substantives
akhyata – verbs
upasarga – pre-verbs or
prefixes
nipata – particles,
invariant words ( prepositions)
The meaning of Vedic
passages has to be understood through context, purpose stated, subject matter
being discussed, what is stated, how, where and when.
Yaska, in his famous
text titled Nirukta, asserts that Rigveda in the ancient tradition, can be
interpreted in three ways - from the perspective of religious rites
(adhiyajna), from the perspective of the deities (adhidevata), and from the
perspective of the soul (adhyatman)
The fourth way to interpret
the Rigveda also emerged in the ancient times, wherein the gods mentioned were
viewed as symbolism for legendary individuals or narratives.
The original idea of
Sphota goes back to the Vedic age when Vak or speech was considered to be a
manifestation of the all – pervading Brahman , and Pranava (Aum) was regarded
as the primordial speech sound from which all forms of Vak were supposed to
have evolved.
This provided the model
upon which the Vyakarana philosophers based their concept of Sphota. Indeed Sphota
is often identified with Pranava.
For Bhartrhari, Vac or
speech is the means to all knowledge and is the essence of consciousness. He
regards speech as the verbal expression of a thought that arises in a person’s
consciousness. If there is no consciousness, he argues, there would be no speech.
Speech (Vac) is indeed an outward form (Vargupta) of consciousness (chetana ).
Yaska describes speech
(Vac) as the divine gift to humans to clearly express their thoughts (devim
vacam ajanayanta- Nir. 11.29); and, calls the purified articulate speech as
Paviravi – sharp as the resonance (tanyatu) of the thunderbolt which originates
from an invisible power (Tad devata vak paviravi. paviravi cha divya Vac
tanyatus tanitri vaco’nyasyah – Nir. 12.30).
Vac, the
speech-principle (Vac-tattva), has numerous attributes and varied connotations
in the Rig-Veda. Vac is not mere speech.
It is something more sacred than ordinary speech; and , carries with it a far
wider significance. Vac is the truth
(ninya vachasmi); and, is the index of
the integrity of one’s inner being.
A true-speech (Satya-vac) honestly reflects
the vision of the Rishi, the seer. It is through such sublime Vac that the true
nature of objects, as revealed to the Rishis (kavyani kavaye nivacana), is
expressed in pristine poetry. Their superb ability to grasp multiple dimensions
of human life, ideals and aspirations is truly remarkable.
Vac is thus a medium of expression of the
spiritual experience of the Rig Vedic intellectuals who were highly dexterous
users of the words. Being free from falsehood, Vac is described in the Rig-Veda
as illuminating or inspiring noble thoughts (cetanti sumatlnam).
dharmam cadharmam ca
satyam canrtam ca sadhu casadhu ca hrdayajnam cahrdayajnam ca; yad-vai van
nabhavisyat na dharmo nadharmo vyajnapayisyat, na satyam nanrtam na sadhu
na’sadhu na hrdayajno na’hrdayajna vag-eva etat sarvam vijnapayati, vacam
upassveti.
Chandogya Upanishad
(7.2.1) asserts that Vac ( speech)
is deeper than name (worldly
knowledge) – Vag-vava namno bhuyasi
– because speech is what
communicates (Vac vai vijnapayati) all outer worldly knowledge as well as what
is right and what is wrong (dharmam cadharmam) ; what is true and what is false
(satyam canrtam ca); what is good and what is bad (sadhu casadhu ca); and, what
is pleasant and what is unpleasant ( hrdayajnam cahrdayajnam ca). Speech alone makes it possible to understand
all this (vag-eva etat sarvam vijnapayati). Worship Vac (vacam upassveti).
Vac when translated
into English is generally rendered as Word. That, however, is not a very
satisfactory translation. Vac might, among many other things, also mean speech,
voice, utterance, language, sound or word; but, it is essentially the creative
force that brings forth all forms expressions as also the existence.
It is an
emanation from out of silence which is the Absolute. Vac is also the river and
the embodied or god-personified as word, as well. It may not, therefore, be
appropriate to translate Vac as Word in all events. One, therefore, always
needs to take into account the context of its usage.
As speech, the term Vāk
or Vāc (वाक्),
grammatically, is a feminine noun. Vac is variously referred to – Syllable
(akshara or Varna), word (Sabda), sentence (vakya), speech (Vachya), voice
(Nada or Dhvani), language (bhasha) and literature (Sahitya).
While in the Rig-Veda,
the Yajnas are a means for the propitiation of the gods, in the Brahmanas
Yagnas become very purpose of human
existence ; they are the ends in themselves. Many of the Brahmana texts are
devoted to the exposition of the mystic significance of the various elements of
the ritual (Yajna-kriya).
The priests who were the adepts in explaining the
objectives, the significance, the symbolisms and the procedural details of the
Yajnas came into prominence. The all-knowing priest who presides over , and directs the course and conduct of the Soma sacrifice is designated as Brahma;
while the three other sets of priests who chant the mantras are named as hotar,
adhvaryu, and udgatru
Here, Brahman is the
definitive voice (final-word); while the chanting of the mantras by the other three priests is taken to be
Vac. Brahma (word) and Vac (speech) are said to be partners working closely
towards the good (shreya) and for the
fulfilment of the performer or the patron’s (Yajamana) aspirations
(kamya). And, Brahma the one who
presides and controls the course of the
Yajna is accorded a higher position over the chanters of the mantras.
It was said; Vac
(chanting) extends so far as the Brahma allows (yaávad bráhma vistham taávatii
vaák– RV.10.114.8).
It was said; if word is flower, speech is the garland.
And, if Vac is the weapons, it is Brahma that sharpens them – codáyaami ta
aáyudhaa vácobhih sám te shíshaami bráhmanaa váyaamsi. (RV 10.120.5 and
9.97.34)
Bhartṛhari also
asserted that, all knowledge is
illumined through words, and it is quite not possible to have cognition that is
free from words (tasmād arthavidhāḥ sarvāḥ śabdamātrāsu niśritāḥ – Vakyapadiya:
1.123); ‘no thought is possible without language’; and ’there is no cognition
without the process of words’.
‘Bhartrhari’ glorifies
in his ‘Vakyapadiya’, the greatness of the Goddess of speech. And he also
asserts that it is ‘Vak’ alone created the entire Cosmos.
And, Bhartrhari
declares- ‘It is Vac which has created all the worlds’- vageva viswa bhuvanani
jajne (Vakyapadiya. 1.112)
The concept of Vac was extended
to cover oral and aural forms such as : expression , saying , phrase ,
utterance sentence, and also the languages of all sorts including
gesture (ingita).
Vac is the word
principle that gives expression to the latent or un-manifest thoughts, feelings
and impulses. And at the same time, for Bhartrhari, all forms of awareness
imply the presence of words. That is to say; language is an integral part of
our consciousness.
Unfolding of speech
(Vac) takes place, at least, in two stages. The first one is the thought that
flashes and takes a form within. And, the other is that which comes out as
audible speech riding the vehicle of words and sentences; attempting to
transport the idea that arose within.
The former is intuition (Prathibha) the flash of insight that springs
up; and, the latter is the effort that is exerted, both internally and
externally, to put it out.
Yaska says that all
kinds of creatures and objects created by God speak a language of their own,
either articulate or in-articulate (devastam sarvarupah pasavo vadanti, vyakta
vac-ascha- avyakta- vacacha – Nir. 11.29).
He says that the Vac of humans is intelligible, articulate (vyakta vaco
manushyadayah) and distinct (Niruktam); while the speech of the cows (animals)
is indistinct (avyakta vaco gavayah).
It was said; the extant
of Vac is as wide as the earth and fire. Vac is even extolled as having
penetrated earth and heaven, holding together all existence. As Yaska remarks:
Vac is omnipresent and eterna1 (vyaptimattvat tu Sabdasya – Nir.I.2)
Vac (word) belongs to
both the worlds – the created and un-created.
It is both the subject of speech and the object of speech.
The Tantra ideology
identified Vac with the vibrations of the primordial throb (adya-spanda) that
set the Universe in motion; and , said
that all objects of the Universe are created by that sound –artha-srsteh puram
sabda-srstih.
Vac is, verily, the
very principle underlying every kind of sound, speech and language in nature.
And, Vac goes beyond
speech. Vac is indeed both speech and
consciousness (chetana), as all actions and powers are grounded in Vac.
It is the primordial energy out of which all existence originates and subsists.
Vac is also the expression of truth.
Chatvaari vaak
parimitaa padaani / taani vidur braahmaanaa ye manishinaah. Guhaa trini nihitaa
neaengayanti / turiyam vaacho manushyaa vadanti. (Rigveda Samhita – 1.164.45-
5000 BC)
“Vac has four quarters;
only the wise that are well trained, endowed with intelligence and
understanding know them all. For the rest; the three levels remain concealed
and motionless. Mortals speak only with the fourth (RV. 1.164.45).”
Vac is sometimes
identified with waters, the primeval principle for the creation of the
Universe.
In the Vak Suktha or
Devi Suktha of Rig Veda (RV.10. 10.125),
Apah, the waters, is conceived as the birth place of Vac. And, Vac who springs
forth from waters touches all the worlds with her flowering body and gives
birth to all existence. She indeed is Prakrti.
Vac is the creator, sustainer and destroyer. In an intense and highly
charged superb piece of inspired poetry Vac declares “I sprang from waters
there from I permeate the infinite expanse with a flowering body. I move with
Rudras and Vasus. I walk with the Sun and other Gods. It is I who blows like
the wind creating all the worlds”.
Ultimately, Vac is
identified with Brahman, the Absolute.
It is the Vac that
brings the cosmos into existence.
Bhartrhari, places the word-principle – Vac – at the very
core (Bija) of existence That Vac, – according to Bhartrhari is not merely the
creator and sustainer of the universe but is also the sum and substance of it.
Bhartrhari’s concept of
the speech-principle Sabda-tattva or Sabda-Brahman the fundamental basis of the
all existence and of speech, virtually equates to the concept of Para Vac, the
Supreme Consciousness
And, Vac as
Sabda-Brahman is the creative force that brings forth all existence. Vac is
also the consciousness (chit, samvid), vital energy (prana shakthi) that
vibrates (spanda). It is an emanation from out of silence, which is the
Absolute.
That Sabda-tattva
(Sabdasya tattvam or Sabda eva tattvam) of Bhartrhari is of the nature of the
Absolute; and, there is no distinction between Sabda Brahman and Para Brahman
the Supreme Principle (Para tattva).
Vac was considered
manifestation of all-pervading Brahman; and, Pranava (Aum) was regarded the
primordial speech-sound from which all forms of speech emanated
The Maharishis believed
in a cyclic view of creation with no absolute beginning. The whole of the cosmos, has constantly been going on through cycles of
creation-dissolution, creation-dissolution. . .beginning- lessly. At the
dissolution of each cycle a seed or trace ( samskara) is left behind out of
which the next cycle arises. It is an agricultural image of seed-flower-seed. .
. .
The significant thing
to note in relation to the Vedas is that the nature of the seed, from which
each cycle of creation bursts forth, is described as “Divine Word.”
The language of the
Veda is “rhythm not composed by the intellect but heard, a divine Word that
came vibrating out of the Infinite to
the inner audience of the man who had previously made himself fit for the impersonal
knowledge.”
While the Vedas
contained in seed form the essence of later
Indian thought on language, it fell to the PratiSakhyas to prescribe
rules for prosody, phonetics, accentuation and sandhi and thereby ensure that the oral form of the
Veda would be preserved and passed on with little loss or distortion. In
the Indian tradition, language is
thought to be truly and most fully experienced only in its oral form
Sandhi is a technical term in Sanskrit grammar
which refers to the rules of euphonic combination
experienced only in its oral form. The written word is a secondary thing
developed only for heuristic teaching purposes
and as an aid for those too dull to remember the important texts by heart. For the Indian the criterion form
of language is not written but oral, and the .
Pratishakhyas play the important
role of keeping the oral form disciplined and pure in its presentation. Pratishakhyas
collectively constituting four treatises, are the earliest of the
Shikshas: works dealing with the phonetic aspects of the Sanskrit language used
in Vedas.
These works mainly pertain to euphonic permutation and combination of
letters and special characteristics of their pronunciation as they prevailed in
various schools of Vedic studies. One of the Pratisakhyas deal with the
phonetic aspects of the Rig Veda.
The
Pratisakhya works are neither concerned with the sense of words, nor with their
division into bases and affixes, nor with their etymology. They contain, more
or less,Vedic passages arranged from the point of view of Sandhi.
Sandhi
(joining) is a cover term for a wide variety of sound changes that occur
at morpheme or word boundaries. Examples include fusion of sounds across word
boundaries and the alteration of one sound depending on nearby sounds or the
grammatical function of the adjacent words.
Sandhi belongs to
morphophonology. It is the process
whereby the form of a word changes as a result of its position in an utterance
(e.g. the change from a to an before a vowel). In Sanskrit, small words
(morphemes) are combined to form compound words through a process known as
Sandhi.
Sandhi splitting is the process of splitting a given compound word into
its constituent morphemes. Although rules governing word splitting exists in
the language, it is highly challenging to identify the location of the splits
in a compound word.. Sandhi is
modification of the form or sound of a word under the influence of an adjacent
word
Knowledge of the Vedas,
therefore, is not simply “book-learning” of the contents or main ideas, as is promoted
by modern western scholarship. In the Indian tradition, language is considered to
be fully alive only when spoken.
Thus knowledge of the Vedas includes and
requires the ability to speak the text with correct accent, metre and so on.
The fact that the vast majority of the Vedic hymns are poems made attention to
the details of form specified in the Pratishakhyas even more important.
Pratishakhyas is concerned mainly with the
changes, euphonic and others, in the Pada text of the Samhita as compared with
the running text, the Samhita itself. The Pratisakhya works are neither
concerned with the sense of words, nor with their division into bases and
affixes, nor with their etymology. They contain, more or less,Vedic passages
arranged from the point of view of Sandhi.
Bhartrhari, begins his
Vakyapadiya with a metaphysical enquiry into the nature and origin of language
in relation to Brahman, but then goes on in Chapters Two and Three to explore
technical grammatical points involved in the everyday use of language.
Stress on the oral or
spoken form is an important aspect of the Indian view of language. Thinking is
seen as internal speaking to which not enough prana or breath energy has been
added to make it overt.
Writing is merely a coded recording which can never
perfectly represent all the nuances of the spoken word, and is therefore always
secondary. With regard to the relationship between written and spoken language,
the Indian approach is opposite to that taken in modern western
scholarship. .
In the earliest
PratiSakhyas, or rules for speaking the Vedas, the first formulations of
Sanskrit Grammar may be found. Vak or
speech was taken as a manifestation of the all-pervading Brahman.
The
mantra AUM was regarded as the
primordial speech-sound from which all forms of vak are thought to have
evolved.
Bhartrhari develops his theory of language by
maintaining that the sphota, the meaning-whole, is something over and above the
uttered or written letters. . At first the word exists in the mind of the
speaker as a unity or sphota.
When he
utters it, he produces a sequence of different sounds so that it appears to have differentiation.
The listener, although first hearing a
series of sounds, ultimately perceives the utterance as a unity—“the light bulb coming on” image of
the cartoon.
This “ah ha !”
experience of the listener is his mental perception of the same sphota with
which the speaker began, and it is then
that the meaning of the word first seen by the speaker is also known by the
hearer.
Contrary to most theories of communication, Bhartrhari’s view is that
meaning is not conveyed from the speaker to the hearer, rather, the spoken
words serve only as the stimulus to
reveal or uncover the meaning which was
already present in the mind of the hearer.
.
In this way Bhartrhari accounts for the complete continuum of cognition. Whether one is dealing with factual scientific language or a poem which can be understood on various levels, Bhartrhari’s Sphota Theory would seem to provide an adequate explanation.
In this way Bhartrhari accounts for the complete continuum of cognition. Whether one is dealing with factual scientific language or a poem which can be understood on various levels, Bhartrhari’s Sphota Theory would seem to provide an adequate explanation.
The logic of
Bhartrhari’s philosophy of language is that the whole is prior to the parts. This
results in an ascending hierarchy of speech levels. The word is subsumed by the
sentence, the sentence by the paragraph, the paragraph by the chapter, the
chapter by the book, and so on, until all speech is identified with Brahman.
Bhartrihari’s
Vakyapadiya ( words in a sentence ) is written in verse form so that it will be
easier to memorize. For this reason it contains highly compressed treatments.
The first chapter of his renowned work the Vakyapadiya, asserts the identity of the Sabda tattva (the
Word principle) with the Absolute Reality, the Brahman (vāg vai brahmeti) which
is without a beginning (Anadi), without an end (Nidana) and is imperishable
(Aksharam).
That Brahman, he avers,
is One (ekam eva) and is the essence of
Sabda from which the whole of existence is derived. And, it transforms
(Vivartate) itself into speech; as words, their meanings (Artha) and also the
universe (jagato yataha).
(Anadi-nidhanam Brahma sabda-tattvam
yad-aksharam / vivartate artha-bhavena prakriya jagato yatah – VP. 1.1)
Thus, according to
Bhartrhari, Sabda Brahman is the ultimate ground of all existence; and, the
Sabda tattva is the first principle of the universe.
At a metaphysical
level, Bhartrhari conceives the ultimate Reality as One-without–a second (Ekam
Eva). It is of the nature of the Word (Sabda eva tattvam) and from it are
manifested all objects (including speech) and the whole of existence.
Bhartrhari was a
Advaita philosopher; and, he explained everything in terms of his metaphysical
view point. Thus, at the top of the language hierarchy there is only one
indivisible reality present; and that transforms into many.
At a metaphysical
level, Bhartrhari conceives the ultimate Reality as One-without–a second (Ekam
Eva). It is of the nature of the Word (Sabda eva tattvam) and from it are
manifested all objects (including speech) and the whole of existence.
Bhartrhari said
that the language we speak is the medium
of expression of the Ultimate Reality communicated through meaning-bearing
words. It leads us across the external appearances and diversities to the core
of the Reality which is the source and the underlying unity beneath everything.
Here, the Real is the
luminous Truth which needs to be rediscovered by every speaker. The Real breaks
forth (sphut) through the medium of speech (Sabda). And, Sabda is not mere
means to the Reality, but it is the very Truth and Reality (Shabda-Brahman).
The Vakyapadiya is
based on Bhartrhari questioning of why something that exists comes into being
and how something that does not exist comes into being . For him, language is
the manifestation of Brahman, and it constitutes the world .
Vakyapadiya is split
into three kandas, respectively called Brahma-kanda (Agama-kanda), Vakya-kanda,
and Prakirna-kanda, all of which are composed in karikas .
The first two
chapters discuss metaphysical ideas concerning the concept of sabdabrahman and
the structure and meaning of sentences, while the third deals with issues
relating to words.
According to
Bhartrhari, the sentence is indivisible and is the unit of expression, which is
why the focus of first two kandas is on the vakya sentence . The real structure
of language is formed from the words and sentences in our speech and written
records , and from this,
Bhartrhari notes that knowledge and the proper use of
words reveals spiritual dharma, which leads to an understanding of pratyaya.
According to the Vakyapadiya, there are eight subjects within grammar that must
be dealt with.
These subjects are: sentences and words, word and sentence
meanings, fitness or compatibility, spiritual merit, stems/suffixes (etc.),
meanings of stems/suffixes (etc.), causality, and knowledge of the meaning of
the correct words. These are each discussed in their respective chapters of the
Vakyapadiya.
Bhartrhari explains; at
first, the intention (iccha) exists in the mind of the speaker as a unity or
Sphota. In the process of giving an outward form to that impulse or thought, he
produces a series of different sounds in a sequence where one sound follows its
previous one.
It might appear as though those word-sounds are separated in time
and space. But, they are indeed part and parcel of one and the same single
entity – the sentence which puts out, in full, the intention of the speaker.
The communication of a sentence and its meaning is not complete until its last
word is uttered. Thus, though the word-sounds reach the listener in a sequence,
eventually they all merge into one; and, are grasped by the listener as a
single unit.
The same Sphota which originated in speaker’s mind re-manifests in
listener’s mind, conveying the intended meaning.
In the Vakyapadiya, the
concept of Sabda occupies a central role; Bhartrhari equates it with Sphota to
show the metaphysical nature of the language.
According to
Bhartrhari, the perfect perception is that in which there is identity between
the object (namely, the Sphota) and the form of its cognition (namely, words or
the letters of sounds). This special kind of perception is held to be function
of mind, rather than of the external senses.
The sphota is the
perfect gist of language and is the cornerstone of all linguistic process. The
etymological meaning of sphota is that which bursts. In this context, the gist
of language which bursts itself is the sphota. It is the internal realness of the sentences which establish
language.
Bhartrhari formulates his sphota theory in order to show that without the internal realness of language
there can be no arrant realizing of the meaning and operation of language.
According to
Bhartrhari, sphota is the original sound produced by various vocal organs with
the contact of various places of articulation
Bhartrhari says that
word and meaning are inseparable units. If we go to the theoretical sense of
sphota, we can realize that the ‘word’
means sabdatattva (sound principle), arthatattva (meaning principle) and
pratibha (intuition).
According to
Bhartrhari, the term sabda is only an equivalent word for sphota. The real word
or the real sphota is the ‘Brahman’ itself and it is the Ultimate Reality,
hence it bears for the akhandavakyasphota.
Bhartrhari believes
that sphota is a two sided coin that is indivisible and changeless. One of its
proportions is the sound form and the
other is the meaning assuming unit. It
is believed that sphota along with expressing the meaning also expresses itself..
Bhartrhari
supposes that a word has a double power, i.e. a word can express both the
meaning and the expressed thing. To him,
the eternal word Sphota is without parts. The cause of the word is Brahman..
He
begins the discussion on the theory of Sphota with the observation that words
or sentences can be considered under two aspects, as sound patterns and
meaning-bearing symbols.
Sphota is classified
into a number of varieties. They are Varnasphota,
Padasphota and Vakyasphota.
It is of three types:
1) 'varnasphota' which conveys the meaning of letters, 2) 'padasphota' which
communicates the meaning of a word, and 3) 'vakyasphota which communicates the
meaning of the sentence
Meaningfulness is the
fundamental aspect in all these cases.
The Sphota shabda which
si nothing but the consciousness of the speaker appears in the form of prakrita
dvani and vaikraita dvani which are destructible. The invisible sphota appears
as divisible in the stages of prakrita dvani and vaikraita dvani by taking on
it , the qualities of sound.
While
prakrita dvani and vaikraita dvani are only appearance ( vivarta ) of sphota ,
one word in a sentence or one phenome in a word should be enoughto communicate
the shhota shabda in the mind of the listener.
The abstract sound;
pattern with the time sequence is - called Prakrta dhvani. It is the external
aspect of the language. The internal aspect of the language is phota and is
directly attached to the meaning.
Bhartrhari emphasizes
the fact that a word has double power.
It can convey an idea of the form of an expression as well as its content. He
explains it by means of various illustrations. Language is similar to light and
consciousness as that it can reveal itself and also other things.
The process of
revelation of word by the sound is from the indeterminate stage ,to the determinate
stage, it begins from complete ignorance, passes through practical knowledge
and ends in complete knowledge.
He gives
an analogy to illustrate the process of
omprehension of Sphota. It is that of a student trying to learn a verse byheart by reading
it repeatedly. It is the last reading
aided by the impressions left behind by
the previous readings helps the student
to know the verse fully.
To Bhartrhari the eternal word Sphota is without parts. He
said that everything is a manifestation of the. ultimate Reality, Brahman. The
speaker, the words which he utters, the object which the words denote and the
listener are all emanations from this ultimate
principle.
He declared it in the
first part of his Vakyapadiya. He begins
the discussion on the theory of Sphota
with the observation that words or
sentences can be considered under two aspects - sound-patterns and
meaning-bearing symbols.
According to
Bhartrhari, the speechprinciple has
three stages in the course of its manifestation, namely, para, madhyama and
vaikhari. Pasyanti is the supreme
reality, sabdabrahman. It has been has been identified with pratibha, the
principle of consciousness. There is no real distinction between speech and
thought at this stage.
Madhyama is the
intermediate stage which lies between PasyantI and Vaikhari. It can be
comprehended by the intellect. All the elements linguistically relevant to the
sentence are present in a latent form at this stage. This corresponds to
prakrtadhvani.
Sphota is the inner mystical
sound.. It is Sphota that makes the meaning comprehensible. The divine nature
of speech, rather its being the great
God himself, the creative and illuminative power of the word, and the different
levels of speech—these doctrines which formed the main plank of the philosophy
of language in Indian thought,—all stem
from the Vedas which is 400 centuries old..
The word Sanskrit, in
Sanskrit, is spelled Saṁskṛta, and means "refined" or "well
made."
The ancillary
disciplines of the Veda, phonetics (Sikfa), grammar (Vyakarana language
analysis) and Nirukla (definitions of terms) were directly connected with the
Veda.
The sciences of yoga,
medicine (Ayurveda), astronomy/astrology (Jyotisha), sound (Mantra),
mathematics, and many others, developed over thousands of years, and the
accumulated knowledge was recorded in Sanskrit, both aurally (via chanting) and
in writing.
Sound is the highest
priority in Sanskrit. In the beginning, the sacred texts called Veda-s were not
written down, only chanted. Having a language that is 100% phonetic makes it
much easier to preserve these sacred sounds.
Because most people automatically
blend words together when speaking fast, sound blending rules were created,
ensuring the spoken and the written always match. Pronunciation has always been
extremely important, since all sound has an energetic effect.
The science of
Mantra developed from this idea, and Sanskrit sounds are made in specific mouth
positions long the human palate, each causing vibration to travel in a different
direction.
Sanskrit is 100%
phonetic: each written character is always pronounced the same way. This makes
Sanskrit very easy to learn and pronounce. A spelling bee in Sanskrit would be
impossible. Rhythm is built into the language, each syllable being either short
(one beat) or long (2 or more beats).
Sanskrit is a natural
language, meaning its sounds are said to truly represent what they mean.
Reading Sanskrit words
rendered in English letters with no diacritical marks, and pronouncing them as
an English word, almost always results in poor pronunciation, and often the
expression of a completely different energy.
Here are some blatant examples:
mAla means "impurity" and in Ayurveda translates to "SHIT"
mAAla means " 108 bead rosary" .
Chanting a mantra,
especially a single-seed "bija" mantra (click here for examples),
releases specific energy into the world.
The more the sound (̥śabda),
intention, meaning (artha) and visualization (yantra) align, the more powerful
the desired effect will be. Even if the mantra is recited mentally, it is still
based on the audible sound.
Chanting divine names
of gods and goddesses invokes the energies they represent. If these are
mispronounced, then the resulting vibration may shift into something that is
not intended.
The word Vak comes from
the root of Vac, which means “ to speak”.
In the book "Aitareya
Brahmana" Speech has been compared to the ocean on account of its
inexhaustible nature.
The vowels were compared
to the day and the consonants to the
night. The consonants were considered pearls in the String of vowels, perhaps due to the superior
perceptibility of the vowels in normal speech.
Indian grammarians had
given so much importance to speech that they even considered speech the only
ornament of human beings and they said that there is nothing beyond
speech. They tried to define speech and
to understand the phenomena of speech
production and perception.
Phonetics included, the
study of speech sounds, their pitch, duration, intensity, modulation and
conjunction. It is concerned with the physical properties of speech sounds or
signs (phones): their physiological production, acoustic properties, auditory
perception, and neurophysiological status.
Phonology, on the other hand, is
concerned with the abstract, grammatical characterization of systems of sounds
or signs.
Vedas were transmitted orally
for 330 centuries before they were penned down 70 centuries ago ..
When Vedas
were penned down we had Kerala Namboodiri oral route Veda sruti experts (
including Panini) settling down on the
banks of the river Saraswati.
The
Saraswati river dried up a thousand years later by which time most of the
ancient knowledge has been penned down, except for some Atharva Veda vahikaran mantras
which could be misused. ..
pade na varṇā vidyante
varṇeṣv avayavā na ca / vākyāt padānām atyantaṃ pravibhāgo na kaś cana //
VP:1.74 //
“ There is no phonemes
(Varna) in the word; and, nor are there
any parts of the phonemes. It is
entirely not possible to separate words from the sentence ”.
All phonetics has three basic areas of study:--
Articulatory phonetics:
the study of the organs of speech and their use in producing speech sounds by
the speaker.
Acoustic phonetics: the
study of the physical transmission of speech sounds from the speaker to the
listener.
Auditory phonetics: the
study of the reception and perception of speech sounds by the listener.
Panini’s grammar formed
the basis of modern linguistics and described a number of important phonetic
principles. Pāṇini provided an account of the phonetics of voicing, describing
resonance as being produced either by tone, when vocal folds are closed, or
noise, when vocal folds are open..
Speech sounds are
generally produced by the modification of an airstream exhaled from the lungs.
The respiratory organs used to create and modify airflow are divided into three
regions: the vocal tract (supralaryngeal), the larynx, and the subglottal
system.
The airstream can be either egressive (out of the vocal tract) or
ingressive (into the vocal tract). In pulmonic sounds, the airstream is
produced by the lungs in the subglottal system and passes through the larynx
and vocal tract.
Glottalic sounds use an airstream created by movements of the
larynx without airflow from the lungs. Clicks or lingual ingressive sounds
create an airstream using the tongue.
A midsagittal view of
the mouth with numbers marking places of articulation.
Passive and active
places of articulation: (1) Exo-labial; (2) Endo-labial; (3) Dental; (4)
Alveolar; (5) Post-alveolar; (6) Pre-palatal; (7) Palatal; (8) Velar; (9)
Uvular; (10) Pharyngeal; (11) Glottal; (12) Epiglottal; (13) Radical; (14)
Postero-dorsal; (15) Antero-dorsal; (16) Laminal; (17) Apical; (18) Sub-apical
or sub-laminal.
The overall aim of
Sanskrit Grammar was not to list out the rules and to standardize the language;
but, to aptly bring out the intended meaning of the structure of words..
Sanskrit Grammar was an attempt to purify (samskruta), to discipline and to
explain the behavior of the spoken language, so that the inner meaning could
shine forth unhindered.
Bharthari’s major work,
Vakyapadiya, discusses the ways in which the outer word-form could unite with
its inner meaning.
WE ASK AJIT DOVAL AND RAJNATH SINGH TO PROFILE JOHN BRITTAS , THE ATHEIST COMMIE JOURNALIST WHO IS THE BLUE EYED BOY OF COMMIE PINARAYI VIJAYAN..
I HAVE BEEN CLOSELY MONITORING THIS DESH DROHI FOR A LONG TIME.
HE HAS THE ABILITY TO DELIVER BACK HANDED SLAPS.. TO HINDUS, INDIAN CULTURE AND THE WATAN.. TERRIFIC INNUENDO..
EXAMPLE?
TODAY , 4TH OCT 2018, AT 0745 , HE WAS LEADING A DISCUSSION ABOUT AYYAPPA..
THEN HE SAYS AYYAPPA ( VISHNUs NINTH AVATAR ) IS NASTIKA BRAHMACHARI-- BUT CAN WE EVER CONSIDER KRISHNA ( VISHNUs EIGHT AVATAR ) TO BE A SIMILAR NASTIKA BRAHMACHARI-- WITH A SARCASTIC SMILE , ELUCIDATING A SIMILAR SARCASTIC RESPONESE FROM THE PARTICIPANTS ON STAGE AND THE LEANINGS BASED SELECTED AUDIENCE ..
I MUST TELL THIS TO CULTURAL TERRORIST JOHN BRITTAS..
KRISHNAs MISTRESS RADHA NEVER EXISTED.. WE IN INDIA NEVER HEARD OF RADHA TILL THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA..
KALIDAS WHO WROTE ABOUT RADHA NEVER EXISTED.. NOT A SINGE DASA OF THE BHAKTI MOVEMENT EXISTED ..BHAKTI MVOVEMENT NEVER EXISTED.. HINDUS DO SHRADDHA , NOT BHAKTI..
THE CHRISTIANS AND ATHEISTS AND ZAKIR NAIK MADE A GREAT DEAL OF KRISHNA BEING A WOMANISER.. THAT HE WAS FROLICKING WITH 16000 VIRGIN GOPIKA DAMSELS, WHOM HE DEFLOWERED....
DEVDUTT PATTANAIK HAS BEEN REGULARLY DENIGRATING KRISHNA-- THE LAST I HEARD HIM TELLING ON EPIC TV THAT KRISHNA WAS A CROSS DRESSER AND HE USED TO EXCHANGE CLOTHES WITH RADHA ..
HULLO EX-JNU STUDENT COMMIE JOHN BRITTAS... YOUR MIND IS SO SHALLOW AND FULL OF POISON-- YET, TRY ND UNDERSTAND THIS..WE KNOW YOU DONT HAVE THE BALLS TO INSULT ISLAM..
16000 GOPIKAS ALLUDE TO THE 16000 DHATUS OF SAHASRARA CHAKRA WHICH IS A 1000 PETALLED LOTUS IN FULL BLOOM ..EACH PETAL WITH 16 KALAS ( ASPECTS ) ...
NARAKASURA KIDNAPPED 16000 GOPIKAS WHOM KRISHNA SAVED --THIS IS JUST AN ALLEGORY..
IN SANATANA DHARMA ALL GODS ARE COSMIC ALLEGORIES ,, EXCEPT VISHNU AVATARS RAMA, KRISHNA AND AYYAPPA.
EVERY DESH DROHI LITERARY FEST --HAD ATHEIST COMMIES AND WHITE CHRISTIANS SINGING PRAISES OF KRISHNAs MISTRESS RADHA AND HER BOLD SEXUALITY ..
JAYADEVA WHO INVENTED RADHA NEVER EXISTED. HE WAS A FAKE AND BACKDATED CREATION OF JEW ROTHSCHILD.
Odissi dance was created by the white invader to propagate the FAKE Radha. Jayadeva's ashtapadis are sung in dance performances of Odissi. Oriya bhajans are all ragas and talas specified by COOKED UP Jayadeva's hymns.
THE FAKE MUTTS OF JEW ROTHSCHILD SPREAD THE FAKE WORK OF JAYADEVA "GITA GOVINDA " PACKED WITH KRISHNA RADHA EROTICA AND SEX ..
AMITABH BACHCHAN PROPAGATES LIES ON TV SHOW KBC-- THAT BUDDHA IS THE NINTH AVATAR OF VISHNU, THAT JAYADEVA IS THE COURT POET OF KING LAKSHMANASENA OF BENGAL GETTING ORIYAS HOPPING MAD..
THE HINDU HATING ITALIAN WAITRESS RELEASED STAMPS OF JAYADEVA IN 2009.. SHE DOES NOT KNOW THAT THE GLORY OR ANCIENT ROME IS HINDU.. THAT JESUS WAS COOKED UP BY THE ROMAN EMPEROR CONSTANTINE THE GREAT IN 325 AD AT THE FIRST COUNCIL OF NICEA .
JESUS WAS MODELED AFTER A KERALA SAGE NAMED APOLLONIUS OF TYANA.. ALL CAESARS AND ROMANS SENATORS WERE HINDU..
EPIC MAHABHARATA HAS NEVER MENTIONED RADHA..
SABARIMALA PILGRIMAGE , THIS PLANETs LARGEST , HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR 5900 YEARS ..
HEY COMMIE JOHN BRITTAS -- IF YOU WANT TO KNOW HINDUISM READ THE 114 PART BLOG SERIES BELOW..
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/11/sanatana-dharma-hinduism-exhumed-and.html
capt ajit vadakayil
..
I HAVE BEEN CLOSELY MONITORING THIS DESH DROHI FOR A LONG TIME.
HE HAS THE ABILITY TO DELIVER BACK HANDED SLAPS.. TO HINDUS, INDIAN CULTURE AND THE WATAN.. TERRIFIC INNUENDO..
EXAMPLE?
TODAY , 4TH OCT 2018, AT 0745 , HE WAS LEADING A DISCUSSION ABOUT AYYAPPA..
THEN HE SAYS AYYAPPA ( VISHNUs NINTH AVATAR ) IS NASTIKA BRAHMACHARI-- BUT CAN WE EVER CONSIDER KRISHNA ( VISHNUs EIGHT AVATAR ) TO BE A SIMILAR NASTIKA BRAHMACHARI-- WITH A SARCASTIC SMILE , ELUCIDATING A SIMILAR SARCASTIC RESPONESE FROM THE PARTICIPANTS ON STAGE AND THE LEANINGS BASED SELECTED AUDIENCE ..
I MUST TELL THIS TO CULTURAL TERRORIST JOHN BRITTAS..
KRISHNAs MISTRESS RADHA NEVER EXISTED.. WE IN INDIA NEVER HEARD OF RADHA TILL THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA..
KALIDAS WHO WROTE ABOUT RADHA NEVER EXISTED.. NOT A SINGE DASA OF THE BHAKTI MOVEMENT EXISTED ..BHAKTI MVOVEMENT NEVER EXISTED.. HINDUS DO SHRADDHA , NOT BHAKTI..
THE CHRISTIANS AND ATHEISTS AND ZAKIR NAIK MADE A GREAT DEAL OF KRISHNA BEING A WOMANISER.. THAT HE WAS FROLICKING WITH 16000 VIRGIN GOPIKA DAMSELS, WHOM HE DEFLOWERED....
DEVDUTT PATTANAIK HAS BEEN REGULARLY DENIGRATING KRISHNA-- THE LAST I HEARD HIM TELLING ON EPIC TV THAT KRISHNA WAS A CROSS DRESSER AND HE USED TO EXCHANGE CLOTHES WITH RADHA ..
HULLO EX-JNU STUDENT COMMIE JOHN BRITTAS... YOUR MIND IS SO SHALLOW AND FULL OF POISON-- YET, TRY ND UNDERSTAND THIS..WE KNOW YOU DONT HAVE THE BALLS TO INSULT ISLAM..
16000 GOPIKAS ALLUDE TO THE 16000 DHATUS OF SAHASRARA CHAKRA WHICH IS A 1000 PETALLED LOTUS IN FULL BLOOM ..EACH PETAL WITH 16 KALAS ( ASPECTS ) ...
NARAKASURA KIDNAPPED 16000 GOPIKAS WHOM KRISHNA SAVED --THIS IS JUST AN ALLEGORY..
IN SANATANA DHARMA ALL GODS ARE COSMIC ALLEGORIES ,, EXCEPT VISHNU AVATARS RAMA, KRISHNA AND AYYAPPA.
EVERY DESH DROHI LITERARY FEST --HAD ATHEIST COMMIES AND WHITE CHRISTIANS SINGING PRAISES OF KRISHNAs MISTRESS RADHA AND HER BOLD SEXUALITY ..
JAYADEVA WHO INVENTED RADHA NEVER EXISTED. HE WAS A FAKE AND BACKDATED CREATION OF JEW ROTHSCHILD.
Odissi dance was created by the white invader to propagate the FAKE Radha. Jayadeva's ashtapadis are sung in dance performances of Odissi. Oriya bhajans are all ragas and talas specified by COOKED UP Jayadeva's hymns.
THE FAKE MUTTS OF JEW ROTHSCHILD SPREAD THE FAKE WORK OF JAYADEVA "GITA GOVINDA " PACKED WITH KRISHNA RADHA EROTICA AND SEX ..
AMITABH BACHCHAN PROPAGATES LIES ON TV SHOW KBC-- THAT BUDDHA IS THE NINTH AVATAR OF VISHNU, THAT JAYADEVA IS THE COURT POET OF KING LAKSHMANASENA OF BENGAL GETTING ORIYAS HOPPING MAD..
THE HINDU HATING ITALIAN WAITRESS RELEASED STAMPS OF JAYADEVA IN 2009.. SHE DOES NOT KNOW THAT THE GLORY OR ANCIENT ROME IS HINDU.. THAT JESUS WAS COOKED UP BY THE ROMAN EMPEROR CONSTANTINE THE GREAT IN 325 AD AT THE FIRST COUNCIL OF NICEA .
JESUS WAS MODELED AFTER A KERALA SAGE NAMED APOLLONIUS OF TYANA.. ALL CAESARS AND ROMANS SENATORS WERE HINDU..
EPIC MAHABHARATA HAS NEVER MENTIONED RADHA..
SABARIMALA PILGRIMAGE , THIS PLANETs LARGEST , HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR 5900 YEARS ..
HEY COMMIE JOHN BRITTAS -- IF YOU WANT TO KNOW HINDUISM READ THE 114 PART BLOG SERIES BELOW..
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/11/sanatana-dharma-hinduism-exhumed-and.html
capt ajit vadakayil
..
-
I JUST HEARD A ONE HOUR SPEECH OF ATHEIST COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN AT PALGHAT..
HIS SPEECH WAS FULL OF LIES AND DISINFORMATION..
EXAMPLE OF LIES
AAA-- THAT HE ALWAYS FOLLOWS THE ORDERS OF THE SUPREME COURT
HEY -WHAT ABOUT YOU DEFYING THE SUPREME COURT
1) KARUNA MEDICAL COLLEGE KANNUR CASE
2) ALCOHOL RETAIL OUTLETS --WHERE HIGHWAYS WERE RENAMED TO BY LANES?
THAT THE NAMBOODIRI PUJARI DROPS THE PRASADAM FROM A HIGHT OF 3 INCHES TO THE HANDS OF THE DEVOTEE AND SHOWS CONTEMPT ?
WELL-- HE WOULD DO THAT TO HIS OWN FATHER, WIFE OR SON OR KING .. IT IS ABOUT HYGEINE
MANY TIMES PEOPLE HAVE ASKED ME-- WHY DO HINDU MALE DEVOTEES GO BARE CHEST IN KERALA TEMPLE-- SAY GURUVAYUR.
IN HINDU TEMPLES BLOOD OUTSIDE THE SKIN IS CONSIDERED IMPURE --IN THIS AIDS ERA WE KNOW WHY.. THIS APPLIES TO HUMANS AND ANIMALS..
IF A COW OR AN ELEPHANT BLEEDS IT IS TAKEN OUT OF THE TEMPLE. IF A PUJARI BLEEDS HE HAS TO STOP IMMEDIATELY --ND THEN THERE IS A RITUAL TO PURIFY.. THIS CAN HAPPEN EVEN IF A SMALL BABY PISSES ON THE TEMPLE FLOOR..
A DROP OF BLOOD OUTSIDE THE BODYs LEATHER BAG ( SKIN COVER ) IS CONSIDERED IMPURE..
YET--AFTER THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA, HE CREATED MORE THAN A THOUSAND FAKE MUTTS..AND THEY INTRODUCED BLOOD SACRIFICE INSIDE TEMPLES.. THIS IS BLASPHEMY.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/11/all-animal-sacrifices-in-hindu-temples.html
THE WHITE HISTORIAN HAS INJECTED POISON INTO OUR SCRIPTURES AND SAID WE SACRIFICED INTO THE HOMAM FIRE..
THIS SACRIFICE IS DESI GHEE..
BLOODLESS SACRIFICE IS DONE WITH COCONUTS..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/04/vedic-quantum-intention-experiment.html
WENDY DONIGER HAS ASHWAMEDHA YAGNA ( HORSE SACRIFICE ) ON HER BOOK COVER..
I WAS THE FIRST PERSON ON THE PLANET TO SAY-- THIS IS A VOTE OF CONFIDENCE WHICH CONVERTS A KING TO AN EMPEROR.. TODAY ALL HAVE STARTED AMENDING THEIR LIES THEY WROTE..
HOW DO I KNOW ?- FROM MY GENOME ! I FEEL I HAVE DONE THIS BEFORE!!!
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/09/ashwamedha-yagam-bloodless-sacrifice.html
DANAVA KING KING MAHABALI DID ASHWAMEDHA YAGNA ON ADVISE FROM SHUKRACHARYA-- AND CONVERTED HIMSELF TO EMPEROR.. AS IT IS HE WAS RULING THE WHOLE WORLD --EXCEPT SOME POCKETS HELD BY DEVAS..
AND ALL HELL BROKE LOOSE. VISHNU AVATAR VAMANA CAME TO BANISH HIM TO A REMOTE CORNER OF HIS KINGDOWM PATALA ( PERU ).
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/09/why-kerala-does-not-celebrate-diwali-or.html
capt ajit vadakayil
..
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL DECLARES THIS.
SWAMI SANDEEPANANDA GIRI IS A CON-MAN
HE DOES NOT KNOW THE BASICS OF SANATANA DHARMA..
WEARING SAFFRON ROBES AND GIVING BHAGAWAD GITA PARAYAN, DOES NOT MAKE YOU A SEER OR A GURU.. WE CAN SEE ANOTHER SWAMI AGNIVESH-- ANOTHER CON-MAN..
THE VERY FACT THAT ATHEIST COMMIE KERALA POLITICIANS SPONSOR YOU-- SAYS IT ALL..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
WHO IS JOHN BRITTAS ?
HE IS A DISGRACE TO JOURNALISM -- A BLUE EYED BOY OF ATHEIST COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN.
HE IS A EX-JNU STUDENT .. WE KNOW HIS DEEP STATE CONNECTIONS..
THE COMMUNIST PARTY IS NOW DEAD.. THE LAST BASTION IN KERALA HAS CRUMBLED..
ONCE A STRONGMAN PINARAYI VIJAYAN IS A PATHETIC SHADOW OF HIMSELF AFTER HAVING SELF DESTRUCTED OVER THE SABARIMALA ISSUE..
PINARAYI VIJAYAN THINKS HE CAN REMAIN AFLOAT USING THE POLICE STALIN STYLE.. HE CANNOT.
POLITICS IN KERALA WAS LIKE A PENDULAM-- SWINGING FROM LDF TO UDF.. ANTI- INCUMBENCY FACTOR RULES KERALA.. QUID PRO QUO WENT ON.. YOU DONT EXPOSE US, WE DONT EXPOSE YOU..
NOW THAT COMMUNISM IS DEAD IN KERALA, THE CORRUPT COMMIE KERALA MINISTERS WHO USED BENAMI MALAYALIs TO RUN THEIR BUSINESSES IN GULF WILL SOON BE IN JAIL..
AN AUSSIE WOMAN NAMED GAIL SMEARED MATA AMRITANANDAMAYIs NAME BY CALLING HER A SEXUAL PREDATOR AND A MAD VIOLENT WOMAN..
COMMIE JOHN BRITTAS WENT ALL THE WAY TO AUSTRALIA TO GIVE THIS WHITE WOMAN A PLATFORM TO AIR HER FOUL LIES..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gail_Tredwell
Managing Director of COMMIE 'Kairali TV' John Brittas was appointed Media Advisor to Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan in June 2016..
HE IS A DISGRACE TO JOURNALISM -- A BLUE EYED BOY OF ATHEIST COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN.
HE IS A EX-JNU STUDENT .. WE KNOW HIS DEEP STATE CONNECTIONS..
THE COMMUNIST PARTY IS NOW DEAD.. THE LAST BASTION IN KERALA HAS CRUMBLED..
ONCE A STRONGMAN PINARAYI VIJAYAN IS A PATHETIC SHADOW OF HIMSELF AFTER HAVING SELF DESTRUCTED OVER THE SABARIMALA ISSUE..
PINARAYI VIJAYAN THINKS HE CAN REMAIN AFLOAT USING THE POLICE STALIN STYLE.. HE CANNOT.
POLITICS IN KERALA WAS LIKE A PENDULAM-- SWINGING FROM LDF TO UDF.. ANTI- INCUMBENCY FACTOR RULES KERALA.. QUID PRO QUO WENT ON.. YOU DONT EXPOSE US, WE DONT EXPOSE YOU..
NOW THAT COMMUNISM IS DEAD IN KERALA, THE CORRUPT COMMIE KERALA MINISTERS WHO USED BENAMI MALAYALIs TO RUN THEIR BUSINESSES IN GULF WILL SOON BE IN JAIL..
AN AUSSIE WOMAN NAMED GAIL SMEARED MATA AMRITANANDAMAYIs NAME BY CALLING HER A SEXUAL PREDATOR AND A MAD VIOLENT WOMAN..
COMMIE JOHN BRITTAS WENT ALL THE WAY TO AUSTRALIA TO GIVE THIS WHITE WOMAN A PLATFORM TO AIR HER FOUL LIES..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gail_Tredwell
Managing Director of COMMIE 'Kairali TV' John Brittas was appointed Media Advisor to Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan in June 2016..
COMMIES ALI ZEIDAN ( LIBYA ) BABURAM BHATTARAI ( NEPAL ) ARE EX-JNU STUDENTS WHO CONDUCTED THE MURDER OF GADDAFI/ NEPAL ROYAL FAMILY..
AFTER THE NEPAL ROYALTY MASSACRE JOHN BRITTAS WENT TO COVER THE ELECTIONS-- WHEN COMMIES CAME INTO POWER..
DEEP STATE WAS BEHIND THE NEPAL ROYAL FAMILY MASSACRE..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nepalese_royal_massacre
Prince Paras, son of ousted King Gyanendra and cousin brother of Dipendra, came to the palace dinner party that night accompanied by a person wearing a Dipendra look-alike mask, who shot Dipendra dead first before other royal family members were killed.
Dipendra was mortally wounded by a gunshot to the left side of the head, while Dipendra was right-handed. It aint suicide..
These are things that killers do NOT plan in advance.
THE COMMIE NEPALESE CIVIL WAR ( 20,600 PEOPLE MASSACRED ) AND OVERTHROW OF THE 241 YEARS OLD HINDU SHAH GORKHA MONARCHY WAS HATCHED IN JNU , BY THE KOSHER DEEP STATE ..
A 100% HINDU STRONGHOLD OF NEPAL IS NOW ATHEIST COMMIE.
HOW DID THEY MANAGE TO DESTROY THE FAITH OF THE POPULATION OF AN ENTIRE NATION? BY MAKING THE HINDU SELF LOATHING !!..
THE ANNUAL ANIMAL MASSACRE OF NEPAL WAS PLANNED IN JNU.. THIS BLOGSITE STOPPED IT..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/11/all-animal-sacrifices-in-hindu-temples.html
IN HINDU TEMPLES ONE DROP OF BLOOD ( EVEN FROM A CUT ON THE PUJARIs BODY ) WAS ENOUGH, TO STOP ALL RITUALS FOR A PURIFICATION CEREMONY. AND HERE HINDUS WERE FOOLED INTO MERRILY SACRIFICING ANIMALS AND DRINKING BLOOD AND THROWING BLOOD ON THE IDOL INSIDE TEMPLES.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/03/kodungallur-bharani-festival-capt-ajit.html
capt ajit vadakayil
..
THIS POST IS NOW CONTINUED TO PART 114 , BELOW--
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..
COMMENTS MADE IN THIS POST WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED
ReplyDeleteMAKE COMMENT IN PREVIOUS POST "COMMENTS OVERFLOW 44 "
hello captain pleae aproove my comment......
Deletei am your big fan......
ATHEIST COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN HAS ARRESTED MORE THAN 3400 HINDUS OVER THE SABARIMALA PROTESTS ..
ReplyDeleteYESTERDAY AMIT SHAH DID TERRIFIC ACTING AT KANNUR --HOW HIS JAIN HEART PAINS AND BLEEDS..
BALLS !
MODI AND AMIT SHAH STOOD IN THE SHADOWS WHILE THEIR DEEP STATE AGENTS IN COLLEGIUM JUDICARY KICKED BHARATMATA INTO THE HOMOSEXUAL/ ADULTERY MANDI..
THE SABARIMALA EPISODE WAS RIGGED WELL IN ADVANCE..
MODI KNOWS THE ONLY WAY TO GET A TOE HOLD IN KERALA AND FOUR SOUTHERN STATES ( KARNATAKA/ TAMIL NADU/ TELENGANA / ANDHRA ) IS BY DRIVING A WEDGE BETWEEN AYYAPPA DEVOTEE HINDUS AND THE RULING GOVTS WHO ENJOYED THEIR VOTES..
PINARAYI VIJAYAN THINKS THAT BY CULTIVATING FAKE SWAMIs LIKE SANDEEPANANDA GIRI ( A CLOSET COMMIE ) AND SPENT FORCE SNDP LEADER VELLAPALLY NATESAN , HE COULD HOLD ON TO HINDU NON-ATHEIST VOTES IN KERALA..
MUDDLED THINKING..
COMMIE KERALA MINISTERS POPPED UP REGULARLY AT FAKE SWAMI SANDEEPANANDA GIRIs MEETINGS-- AND HINDUS SMELT A RAT..
SNDP LEADER VELLAPPALLI NATESAN IS 81 AND HE DOES NOT HAVE GRASSROOT SUPPORT OF THIYYAS OR EZHAVAS..
EVERY ARREST BY CM PINARAYI VIYAYAN HAS MODI AND AMIT SHAH CHUCKING LIKE MUTLEY THE DOG FROM THE SHADOWS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uSTOHa4Im4
CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN HAS KILLED THE COMMUNIST PARTY. HE HAS PERSONALLY SELF DESTRUCTED ..
ONCE A STTRONGMAN PINARAYI VIJAYAN LOOKS PATHETICALLY WEAK NOW --DESPITE HIS SHOW OF STRENGTH USING PERSONALLY LOYAL CHRISTIAN DGP BEHERA AND IG OF POLICE MANOJ ABRAHAM ..
PINARAYI VIJAYANs COMMIE CADRE IS NOW DESERTING HIM ENMASSE EVERY HOUR.. HIS OPPORTUNIST COMMIE MINISTER LOYALISTS ARE AWAITING AN OPPORTUNITY TO KICK HIM INTO THE PITS..
IN THE POLITICAL BATTLE-- THE GUJJU LOBBY HAS DECIMATED THE KANNUR LOBBY.
THE DAY IS NOT FAR -- CORRUPT COMMIE KERALA MINISTERS AND THEIR BENAMI MALAYALI BUSINESS MEN FRONTS WHO HANDLE THEIR KICKBACK MONEY -- WILL BE IN JAIL TILL THEY DIE..
NO TEARS WILL BE SHED...
ARROGANCE IS THE CAMOUFLAGE FOR INSECURITY..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
In 1957 the communists won the election in Kerala, first time in world history, by using the Sabarimala arson as an issue for campaign. It was the Communist extremes with the support from Evangelists on Steroids who had set fire on Sabarimala temple in 1950.
DeleteCurrently the known traitors have adopted a scorched-earth military strategy to suppress the struggle of Sabarimala devotees by arresting over 3345 people without any basis. This cruel strategy was used by the British in South Africa against the Boers in 1902. The innocent women and children were kept in concentration camps and many of them died. When the brave Boer fighters heard about the plight of their family, they voluntarily gave up. MK Gandhi fought for the British and against the Boer farmers. In 1979, the retreating Chinese army followed this strategy against the Vietnamese people by destroying plants, trees, cattles, innocent villagers etc. Churchil adopted this policy in Bengal in 1943 and killed millions through his man made famine. The moplahs following the Padayottam of Tipu Sultan (Juggernaught) also followed this strategy for the purpose of arson, loot, rape and plunder.
Reading history we can see that it was the Evangelists on Steroids who had carried out the worst crimes on Humanity. They had a role in the extermination of native Americans by supplying them with smallpox blankets. Hitler and Nazis had a strong connection with the Jesuits (Society of Jesus). The monsters like David Barry, The Jail Superintendent of the cellular jail and Colonel Dyer who killed thousands at Jallianwala Bagh were extreme sadists.
The Kerala police had a reign of terror when Antony and Oommen Chandy were the CM and at that time the victims were commie boys (useful idiots of RED CAPITALISTS). Now Pinarayi has promoted the same monster police officers in performing their sadistic rituals on October 17
The fake swamy Sandeepananda (PK Shibu) is a benami for both UDF and LDF leaders. Another swami by name Santhosh Madhavan was assisting these politicians earlier. It can be found that in many cases the Hindu Swamis and so called intellectuals are used as a front for all underground activities.
DeleteThe UDF, LDF leaders have noticed that their workers and even leaders are ditching their party after the Sabarimala episode. So they stage managed a fake drama at Sandeepananda Ashram as a ploy to divert the attention of people. Moreover the parliament election is near. For many decades the LDF,UDF used to win all seats in Assembly and Parliament elections through mutual adjustments. People does not have any choice other than to vote for either LDF or UDF
I JUST HEARD A ONE HOUR SPEECH OF ATHEIST COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN AT PALGHAT..
ReplyDeleteHIS SPEECH WAS FULL OF LIES AND DISINFORMATION..
EXAMPLE OF LIES
AAA-- THAT HE ALWAYS FOLLOWS THE ORDERS OF THE SUPREME COURT
HEY -WHAT ABOUT YOU DEFYING THE SUPREME COURT
1) KARUNA MEDICAL COLLEGE KANNUR CASE
2) ALCOHOL RETAIL OUTLETS --WHERE HIGHWAYS WERE RENAMED TO BY LANES?
THAT THE NAMBOODIRI PUJARI DROPS THE PRASADAM FROM A HIGHT OF 3 INCHES TO THE HANDS OF THE DEVOTEE AND SHOWS CONTEMPT ?
WELL-- HE WOULD DO THAT TO HIS OWN FATHER, WIFE OR SON OR KING .. IT IS ABOUT HYGEINE
MANY TIMES PEOPLE HAVE ASKED ME-- WHY DO HINDU MALE DEVOTEES GO BARE CHEST IN KERALA TEMPLE-- SAY GURUVAYUR.
IN HINDU TEMPLES BLOOD OUTSIDE THE SKIN IS CONSIDERED IMPURE --IN THIS AIDS ERA WE KNOW WHY.. THIS APPLIES TO HUMANS AND ANIMALS..
IF A COW OR AN ELEPHANT BLEEDS IT IS TAKEN OUT OF THE TEMPLE. IF A PUJARI BLEEDS HE HAS TO STOP IMMEDIATELY --ND THEN THERE IS A RITUAL TO PURIFY.. THIS CAN HAPPEN EVEN IF A SMALL BABY PISSES ON THE TEMPLE FLOOR..
A DROP OF BLOOD OUTSIDE THE BODYs LEATHER BAG ( SKIN COVER ) IS CONSIDERED IMPURE..
YET--AFTER THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA, HE CREATED MORE THAN A THOUSAND FAKE MUTTS..AND THEY INTRODUCED BLOOD SACRIFICE INSIDE TEMPLES.. THIS IS BLASPHEMY.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/11/all-animal-sacrifices-in-hindu-temples.html
THE WHITE HISTORIAN HAS INJECTED POISON INTO OUR SCRIPTURES AND SAID WE SACRIFICED INTO THE HOMAM FIRE..
THIS SACRIFICE IS DESI GHEE..
BLOODLESS SACRIFICE IS DONE WITH COCONUTS..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/04/vedic-quantum-intention-experiment.html
WENDY DONIGER HAS ASHWAMEDHA YAGNA ( HORSE SACRIFICE ) ON HER BOOK COVER..
I WAS THE FIRST PERSON ON THE PLANET TO SAY-- THIS IS A VOTE OF CONFIDENCE WHICH CONVERTS A KING TO AN EMPEROR.. TODAY ALL HAVE STARTED AMENDING THEIR LIES THEY WROTE..
HOW DO I KNOW- FROM MY GENOME !! I FEEL I HAVE DONE THIS BEFORE!!!
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/09/ashwamedha-yagam-bloodless-sacrifice.html
DANAVA KING KING MAHABALI DID ASHWAMEDHA YAGNA ON ADVISE FROM SHUKRACHARYA-- AND CONVERTED HIMSELF TO EMPEROR.. AS IT IS HE WAS RULING THE WHOLE WORLD --EXCEPT SOME POCKETS HELD BY DEVAS..
AND ALL HELL BROKE LOOSE. VISHNU AVATAR VAMANA CAME TO BANISH HIM TO A REMOTE CORNER OF HIS KINGDOWM PATALA ( PERU ).
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/09/why-kerala-does-not-celebrate-diwali-or.html
capt ajit vadakayil
..
Dear Captain,
DeleteGreetings.
The purification process, they strictly follow in Guruvayur.
Earlier this year, when I was there during the 10 days fest, it happened (on the final day - morning)
One person met with a minor injury,slipped probably resulting in small qty of blood spill.
The entry for darshan at the sanctum was stopped and the purification process ( Shuddikaran) started. Well it was the final day and there were plenty of devotees standing in the queue.
However, they strictly followed it.
Grace & Peace,
JTA
Captain,
DeleteRahul Eashwar did a foolish thing by holding a press conference and disclosing that he had a plan b and plan c. There was absolutely no need to disclose this in a press conference. He should have kept it a secret and used it when the situation demanded.
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/mkatju?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
NO WONDER JUSTICE GOGOI WANTED TO KICK KATJU INTO JAIL..
JUST READ KATJUs BLOG POSTS AND TWITTER RANTS-- EVEN A HALF WIT CAN FIGURE OUT THE SHALLOW DEPTH OF KATJUs CEREBRAL WELL..
POOR KATJU DOES NOT KNOW THAT THE BHAKTI MOVEMENT WITH ALL THOSE DASAS NEVER EXISTED..
TULSIDAS WAS A FAKE AND BACKDATED CREATION OF JEW ROTHSCHILD WHO RULED INDIA..
POOR KATJU DOES NOT KNOW ABOUT JAYA ( RAVANA ) AND VIJAYA ( KUMBHKARNA )..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/09/king-ravana-of-ramayana-hero-or-villian.html
RAM WAS MARYADA PURUSH.. BUT HE DID ONE UN-RIGHTEOUS ACT OF KILLING KING VALI FROM BEHIND..
THIS WAS TO SET UP THE DEATH OF HIS NEXT AVATAR KRISHNA.. VALI WOULD COME AS JARA THE HUNTER AND KILL KRISHNA..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/10/king-vali-and-queen-tara-of-ramayana.html
THE MORE KATJU WRITES , THE MORE HE CONVINCES INDIANS THAT HE IS A DUFFER OF THE FIRST ORDER.. THANK GOD HE HAS RETIRED.. BACHCH GAYA SAALA..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
EX-CI KATU
CJI GOGOI
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL
PMO
PM MODI
AMIT SHAH
ALL CMs OF STATES
ALL GOVERNORs OF STATES
ALL MPs OF LOK SABHA
ALL MPs OF RAJYA SABHA
ALL CENTRAL / STATE MINISTERS AND MINISTRIES
RSS
VHP
AVBP
FALI BABY
SOLI BABY
SALVE BABY
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
NCERT
ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
SITARAM YECHURY
PRAKASH KARAT
BRINDA KARAT
DANIEL RAJA
SUMEET CHOPRA
NITI AYOG
AMITABH KANT
EX-CJI DIPAK MISRA
SHIV SENA CHIEF UDDHAY THACKREY
MNS CHIEF RAJ THACKEREY
DEFENCE MINISTRY
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
WEBSITES OF HINDU STALWARTS
SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
SADGURU JAGGI VASUEDEV
MOHANDAS PAI
RAJIV CHANDRASHEKHAR
RAJIV MALHOTRA
SWAMY
GURUMURTHY
ALL MEDIA OF INDIA
CLOSET COMMMIE ARNAB GOSWAMI
NAVIKA JUMAR
FAYE SORPOTEL DSOUZA
NIDHI RAZDAN
BARKHA DUTT
ZAKKA JACOB
ANAND NARASIHAN
RAJDEEP SARDESAI
MADHU TREHAN
PRANNOY JAMES ROY
AROON PURIE
VINEET JAIN
SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
ARUNDHATI ROY
ROMILA THAPAR
AYESHA KIDWAI
NIVEDITA MENON
SHOBHA DE
SUHEL SETH
PAVAN VARMA
RAMCHANDRA GUHA
SHASHI THAROOR
N RAM
NHRC
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
SO SO SO—
ReplyDeleteDONALD THE TRUMP HAS REFUSED TO BE THE CHIEF GUEST FOR OUR REPUBLIC DAY PARADE ?...
INDIA WILL NOT LOSE SLEEP OVER IT..
INDIA WILL NEVER EVER BE PART OF THE YANK COWBOY RIDING POSSE LED BY SHERIFF TRUMP CHASING OUTLAW PUTIN..
INSTEAD OF TRUMP CALL BOTH THE NORTH AND SOUTH KOREAN RULERS... THEY CAN BE "JOINT " CHIEF GUESTS ...
THE RULING KIM CLAN OF KOREAS HAVE THEIR PROGENITORS IN AYODHYA INDIA..… KOREANS ACCEPT AYODHYA AND RAM MANDIR, BUT INDIAN COMMIES / ATHEISTS RIDICULE HINDU HISTORY…
WHAT IS NORTH KOREAs FAULT ?.... ALL THEY DO IS TO PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM THE ZIONIST JEWS WHO ARE TRYING TO STEAL NORTH KOREAN RARE EARTHS BY INSTALLING A PUPPET RULER BY ENFORCING REGIME CHANGE ....
THE ATOM BOMBS IN NAGASAKI AND HIROSHIMA KILLED MORE KOREANS THAN JAPANESE ... THE WAS THE MOTHER OF ALL DECEITS...
WHO DIVIDED KOREA?... WHO ILL TREATED KOREANS?... WE ALL KNOW...
USA AND UN IS GUILTY OF GENOCIDE BY HUNGER IN NORTH KOREA. ..
NORTH KOREA IS THE RICHEST NATION ON THE PLANET AS THEY HAVE A MONOPOLY OVER RARE EARTHS....
THE KOREAS MUST UNITE... JAPAN , CHINA AND THE WHITE JEWS DONT WANT KOREAS TO UNITE .....
NORTH KOREA HAS SAME PEOPLE .. SAME DNA.. SAME LANGUAGE.. THEY WANT TO UNITE , LIKE GERMANY... ..
IF REQUIRED INDIA/ RUSSIA/ CHINA WILL GUARANTEE KOREAN UNIFICATION....
THE KOSHER DEEP STATE HAS ALREADY CHOSEN A CRYPTO JEW GIRL YEONMI PARK ( LIKE JEWESS MALALA YOUSAFZAI ) TO BE THE NEW RULER OR NORTH KOREA ………..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/07/korean-brahmins-kim-hae-clan-capt-ajit.html
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2017/03/japanese-in-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.html
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2017/03/regime-change-in-north-korea-rare.html
capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
PMO
PM MODI
MEA
SUSHMA SWARAJ
NIRMALA SITARAMAN
DEFENCE MINISTRY
AMIT SHAH
CJI GOGOI
RAJNATH SINGH
HOME MINISTRY
AJIT DOVAL
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
emailed the above comment Captain
Deleteas kaliyuga ends the chief terrorist states of this planet are going to see their fortunes reverse and become 3rd world backyards after they get repaid for their services with severe depopulation and political,economic and social decline.
Deletehttps://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/woman-dials-100-after-tiff-with-guard-strips-in-lift-when-cops-ask-her-to-come-to-police-station/articleshow/66407584.cms
ReplyDelete'NCW MUST SUMMON ALL INDIAN MEN AND MAKE THEM APOLOGISE..... NCW WAS CREATED BY BILDERBERG CLUB TO PUSH THE NEW WORLD ORDER AGENDA ...WE WANT 50% MEN IN NCW . . ...Women alone cannot do justice as most of them are hormone driven and have ego issues . .
Do you have any idea how many indian woman have extra-marital affairs ? . . WHAT DOES NCW DO?... DO THEY REALLY PROTECT INDIAN WOMEN?... WHY IS NCW ENCOURAGING INDIAN WOMEN TO SHOW PRIVATE PARTS IN PUBLIC ?....
The mathematical ratio is 50:50 , and math does NOT lie.. A man needs a woman to accept his thing in with great glee ( or else it becomes rape ). .
NCW insist that women are never offenders. They are always the victims, going against the PURE laws of mathematics and perception. . .
…… Go0gle for the blogpost below----
DUBIOUS ROLE OF BILDERBERG CLUB CREATED NCW IN INDIA VADAKAYIL ……………………
Capt ajit vadakayil ..'
ReplyDeletehttps://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kozhikode/school-teacher-who-attempted-to-visit-sabarimala-faces-threats/articleshow/66330643.cms
YESTERDAY THIS 43 YEAR OLD WOMAN BINDU FROM KOTTAYAM WHO IS A TEACHER AT A SCHOOL IN CHEVAYUR CALICUT ( 5 KM FROM MY HOME- INSIDE THE MEDICAL COLLEGE CAMPUS ) FOR PAST THREE YEARS , CAME ON TV AND THREATENDENDDENED ALL AND SUNDRY..
SHE WARNED THAT SHE WILL APPROACH SUPREME COURT AND SUE JANAM TV ( WHO CALLED HER BINDU ZKARIA , A CHRISTIAN WOMAN ) AND THOSE THOSE WHO DEFAMED HER AS A MAOIST ..
WELL THIS VICIOUS WOMAN WAS CAUGHT ON HER WAY TO SABARIMALA WITHOUT IRUMUDI KETTU..
WHEN ASKED IF SHE IS A DEVOTEE BY PILGRIMS-- SHE SAID YES
WHEN ASKED TO CHANT "SWAMIYE SHARANAMAYYAPPA " ONCE , SHE TAUNTED THAT SHE WOULD RATHER GO BACK HOME THAT UTTER IT..
WELL HER STUDENTS ARE OF THE OPINION THAT SHE IS ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT AND UNFIT TO BE A A TEACHER..
WHY DO WE EMPLOY SUCH ACTIVIST TEACHERS ? A TEACHER IS SUPPOSED TO MOULD YOUNG MINDS TO BE GOOD CITIZENS..
IS HER BEHAVIOR ANY LESS THAN A MAOIST ? WHOM IS SHE TRYING TO FOOL.. HER SHABBY ACTIVIST BEHAVIOR IS ON RECORD ON VIDEOS..
WILL YOUR SISTER , MOTHER OR MY WIFE BEHAVE THIS WAY ?
99.8% OF PILGRIMS ARRESTED BY ATHEIST COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN HAVE BEEN SLAPPED WITH FALSE IPC SECTIONS AND JAILED.. AN EXAMPLE IS THE IPC SECTIONS SLAMMED ON RAHUL EASHWAR..
WE ASK THE KERALA HIGH COURT-- FOR EVERY DAY SPENT IN JAIL ON FALSE CHARGES , THE COMMIE GOVT OF CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN MUST PAY COMPENSATION OF RUPEES 5 LAKHS TO EVERY PILGRIM..
https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/woman-who-tried-enter-sabarimala-move-sc-against-those-calling-her-maoist-90697
MOST OF THE KERALA DALIT WOMEN CHRISTIAN CONVERTS RETAIN THEIR HINDU NAMES BECAUSE THE CHURCH INSISTS -- THIS IS NO BIG DEAL..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
JANAM TV
RAHUL EASHWAR
PADMA PILLAI
PARASARAN
CJI GOGOI
KERALA HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICE
NCW MAIN
NCW STATES
DeleteWE HAD THREE MAIDS -- ALL WITH HINDU NAMES
WHEN I AND MY WIFE GO OUT , WHEN WE COME BACK WE CHECK , THE LAST TV CHANNEL LOGGED ON BY THE MAID ( THEY ARE ALLOWED TO SWITCH ON TV WHEN WE ARE NOT AT HOME)..
ALL THREE SAW CHRISTIAN EVANGELIST CHANNELS..
WHEN WE ASKED AGAIN-- ARE YOU HINDU OR CHRISTIAN-- THEY LOOK SHEEPISH AND ADMIT THAT THEY ARE CHRISTIAN CONVERTS..
WE DONT CARE IF THE MAID IS CHRISTIAN OR HINDU-- TRUST IS PARAMOUNT WITH SMALL CHILDREN IN THE HOUSE ..
LONG AGO WE HAD A NAXAL CHRISTIAN CONVERT MAID IN OUR HOME.. MY MOTHER TOOK HER TO THE MARKET IN THE CAR AND SHE SUDDENLY RAN , IN PANIC..
SHE CAME BACK HOME SLINKING BY AUTO RICKSHAW AT NIGHT ..
A MONTH LATER WOMENs POLICE SUDDENLY LANDED UP AT HOME AT NOON..
A BURLY FEMALE COP RAN INTO THE KITCHEN AND SLAPPED HER SO HARD SHE FELL DOWN - EDDI NEE EVIDE ENTA CHEYYUNATHE ( WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING HER )..
THE POLICE TOLD MY MOTHER--GET RID OF HER THIS VERY MINUTE-- SHE IS A DANGEROUS WOMAN WITH MURDER CHARGES ..
ONE MAID WAS SO GOOD LOOKING , THAT MY WIFEs FRIENDS WOULD TELL HER-- YOU HAVE TERRIFIC GUTS KEEPING SUCH A ATTRACTIVE YOUNG WOMAN AS YOUR MAID. SHE VISITED BEAUTY PARLOUR EVERY WEEK-- A VERY DOCILE FEMALE . AND SHE WOULD PUT HER PHOTO IN MARRIAGE BUREAUS WITH HINDU NAME, THOUGH SHE WAS A CHRISTIAN CONVERT , HOLDING BIBLE IN HER HAND DURING OFF HOURS..
ONE DAY SHE SLIT HER WRIST WITH A BROKEN GLASS --I WAS ON THE SHIP-- MY WIFE DROVE HER TO CALICUT MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL HER KNEES KNOCKING.
THE SURGEON TOLD MY WIFE, IT IS A MIRACLE THAT SHE SURVIVED CONSIDERING THE TIME ELAPSED BETWEEN SLITTING HER WRIST AND GETTING MEDICAL ATTENTION..
MY WIFE MADE HER SIT IN THE FRONT SEAT, WITH HER HAND HELD HIGH ( BANDAGED ) OUTSIDE THE WINDOW..
MY WIFE KNEW THIS WAS COMING-- AS THE PAST WEEK SHE WOULD BE BANGING HER HEAD ON THE WALL HOLDING THE BIBLE..MAKING LOUD DHAD DHAD SOUNDS ..
LATER WE CAME TO KNOW THAT SHE WAS A MOVIE EXTRA IN THE TAMIL FILM INDUSTRY-- WHERE ALL FROM HERO, TO DIRECTOR TO PRODUCER TOOK HER SEXUALLY FROM ALL THREE ORIFICES --PROMISING HER A MEATY MAIN HEROINE ROLE.
MY WIFEs FRIENDS TOLD -- YOU ARE LUCKY THAT YOUR HUSBAND IS AT SEA-- OR NCW WOULD HAVE SUMMONED YOUR HUSBAND.
capt ajit vadakayil
..
This comment has been removed by the author.
Deletesir how can we access information from our genome ? is it the part of your 99-100% revelation part ? kindly reveal please
ReplyDeleteSupreme Court has deferred the hearing on Ram Janambhoomi case till Jan, 1st, 2019. Wonder why ?
ReplyDeleteSharia Court of India is anti Hindu its confirmed with every single judgement. BJP wants votes not interested in Ram Temple.
DeleteGood afternoon Sir,
ReplyDeletehttps://scroll.in/latest/899877/sabarimala-row-centre-will-dissolve-kerala-government-if-it-arrests-more-devotees-says-amit-shah
Amit Shah never said that. Later scroll even apologised for posting this
DeleteSabarimala has turned from being the one of the holiest Hindu temple to a polliest temple. Political Parties trying gain mileage, irrespective their ideologies.
DeleteNo doubt with Sanskrit as language a message can be sent by the computer in the least number of words, which is why NASA is after Sanskrit for it's AI applications. Found interesting post from Quora -
ReplyDeletehttps://www.quora.com/profile/Kalyan-Gupta/Posts/Nasa-Uses-Sanskrit-To-Program-Artificial-Intelligence
Suresh Gopi says he will push for an all women ayyapa temple on the model of sabarimala. Gopi oh Gopi.... Many many years ago, there was a time almost all depended on DTC. Only a few VIPs and lucky lots could afford a car. Due to harassment of women by some naughty thugs DTC introduced a divider inside the bus. One side for men and the other for the opposite sex. A week went by. All the women agitated. Reason I throw wide open for any imagination. Within a couple of days the system was back to old messy way.
ReplyDeleteNo women will go to such a temple, do not waste your valuable MPs time.
ReplyDeleteCAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL DECLARES THIS.
SWAMI SANDEEPANANDA GIRI IS A CON-MAN
HE DOES NOT KNOW THE BASICS OF SANATANA DHARMA..
WEARING SAFFRON ROBES AND GIVING BHAGAWAD GITA PARAYAN, DOES NOT MAKE YOU A SEER OR A GURU.. WE CAN SEE ANOTHER SWAMI AGNIVESH-- ANOTHER CON-MAN..
THE VERY FACT THAT ATHEIST COMMIE KERALA POLITICIANS SPONSOR YOU-- SAYS IT ALL..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
Pranams CAptain:
ReplyDeleteYesterday there was a major discussion around Sati on Twitter and I posted your blog post about Sati to all those threads. Surprisingly I saw Amish Tripathi (yes that Joker) saying similar words about Sati that you have said in your blog posts. So he is turning around after reading you I guess. Almost all the threads except for one were saying what you have been saying years ago. I was very gratified to see this change in India that you me writings have accomplished though almost no one gives You credit. That’s the reason I am writing this.
Second, today Actor Madhavan announced he is making a movie on Nambi Narayanan on Twitter. I immediately swung to action and posted your blog posts about Nambi in 2012 to Actor Madhavan’s Twitter feeds and also wherever there was a retweet by his followers. I have got a few people already requesting my link to your article.
I am writing all this to let people know that ALL READERS WITHOUT EXCEPTION must do the same unless they are mentally unfit or physically disabled to do this. Only then can they change India. Simply reading blogs here for Time Pass will not do.
Thanks
Slasher
Twitter: USlasher
Slashser I follow you and Sangeetha on Twitter. You both are doing wonderful job in fighting anti Hindus on Twitter. I regularly retweets you people tweets.Today I saw Sangeetha waging a battle against Rajdeep Sardesai.
DeleteHi Slasher and Aditya,
DeleteI watch tamil celebrities speech in youtube once in a week.
In Tamil nadu, commie minded celebrities, actors and directors are lifting this blog contents(selective) and projecting themselves as great leaders in the college or public or audio launch or movie release function speech.
All Tamilians were like "WOW" in the comments section until i posted the comments that these jokers copied form "Captain Ajit vadakayil blogs".
I made sure that these viruses do not thrive by keeping the public in dark. I ask readers to do the same whenever they happen to see such viruses.
Of course, my comments were not published when i use the name Ajit Vadakayil in youtube. So, i use Aj!t Vadakay!1.
After my comments in those pages, i hardly see any appreciation to those tamil celebrities/actors/directors by public. hehehe
Readers can do the same whenever they witness any celebrity using Captain blog contents but not giving credit to Captain.
Recently, i watched popular tamil, telugu, kannada, malayalam movies using Captain statements in movie scripts but no credit to Captain. Bastards.
Supreme Court has now become Supreme (literally).
ReplyDeleteThe constitution is supposed to be supreme in INDIA. For adopting the collegium system SC should be charged for the contempt of constitution. But that is not possible because of the judicial immunity it enjoys.
Captain, I suggest there should be an independent executive body whose sole job is to validate / invalidate courts' rulings that affect an undefined set of people, like PIL VERDICTS. Basically to put a stamp on the rulings after examining the case thoroughly.
Such an executive body should also be immune from being questioned in courts. Limited but independent and powerful features of such a body would also make it appealing to youth.
This is the only way to cut the wings of our courts which have achieved an all powerful status all by themselves.
The NJAC would have done exactly that. That's why the old fart Me-lauds ganged up together and declared it unconstitutional. Modi chickened out without a whimper, his 56-inch artificially-inflated chest got deflated, and allowed these despicable scumbags to lord over him!
DeleteThanks for publishing my comment even though commenting is forbidden here.
DeleteCaptain one small suggestion - the comments overflow should be put on top of the blog where you don't want comments, that is afterwards your Sanatana Dharma series blog. This way we will be compelled to read the blog in addition to one dedicated to comments (on desktop the one with the comments will open by default whereas on mobile it will show on top of main blog).
My suggestion regarding our judicial system is to make a switch for it. The courts are switchless machines that start running whenever they please - sometimes even at midnight and for no clear reasons. We need a switch to operate this machine.
Another important thing to understand here is that such an executive body will never say yes yes yes to rulings of courts since being in agreement will make its existence unnecessary.
You need to bring back the natural justice series since recent SC verdicts have people curious like never before.
if independent body gets infected then?
Deletethere are many autonomous and independent body in india ..although they are fully packed with deshdrohi ..
only whistle-blower work!!!
each body should be collectively and individually responsible of each and every executive order..
Dear Capt Ajit sir,
ReplyDeleteThis is heights and Collegium Judiciary has to be banned...apart from postponing the Ayodhya Ram temple hearings to Jan 2019...they also do this from the back...what a sham or shame ???
Copied from Fb post : Mr.MyLord, Isn't it true that your son, Raktim Gogoi & another MyLord's son, Saket Sikri was appointed as the state's empanelled lawyers by Punjab Govt to defend it before the SC and other courts outside Chandigarh last year even when they hadn't applied for same and later after issue became public abt their appointment they withdrew their names ??????
Punjab Govt had also increased per appearance fee for them from Rs2.5 lakh to Rs3.30 lakh .
Namaste Guruji,
ReplyDeletePlease guide on how to self-study Ashtadhyayi. I have tried Pushpa Dixit, S. D. Joshi and George Cardona. All of these are very dense and seem to talk down to you even though they are very detailed.
ReplyDeleteCapt. Ajit VadakayilOctober 30, 2018 at 3:11 AM
https://news.sky.com/story/this-is-an-invasion-trump-sending-5200-troops-to-us-mexico-border-for-migrant-caravan-11539539
THE IMMIGRANT INVASION INTO USA IS ARRANGED BY THE KOSHER DEEP STATE..
SAME WAY, THE INFLUX OF ROHINGYAS INTO INDIA IS ARRANGED BY THE DEEP STATE ( A LOT OF THEM ARE IN KERALA ).. AND WE HAVE DEEP STATE AGENTS LIKE PRIYANKA CHOPRA CLUCKING LIKE MOTHER HEN FOR THEM..
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/india-tops-in-under-5-deaths-due-to-toxic-air-60000-killed-in-2016-who/articleshow/66422048.cms
ReplyDeleteNEVER MIND THE FALSE PROPAGANDA... INDIA WILL NEVER MOTHBALL OUR ENORMOUS RESERVES OF COAL..
DEEP STATE AGENT AND MOSSAD DARLING KNEW THAT ELECTED LEGISLATURE WILL NEVER VOTE TO ALLOW HOMOSEXUALITY / ADULTERY IN INDIA....
THIS IMMORAL CHILDLESS GUJARATI FELLOW STOOD IN THE SHADOWS AND KICKED BHARATMATA INTO THE KOSHER MANDI-- USING THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY..
ROTHSCHILDs APCO BRANDED MODI NOW PLANS TO DO THE SAME WITH COAL ... HE WILL GET DEEP STATE PAYROLL JUDGES TO BAN COAL ..
ALREADY COLLEGIUM JUDGES ARE PLAYING GOD AND FORCING INDIANS TO SCRAP THEIR CARS OLDER THAN TEN YEARS.. ..
THE US DEAD CITY OF DETROIT IS BEING REVIVED USING POOR INDIANs HARD EARNED MONEY..
capt ajit vadakayil
..'
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/india-tops-in-under-5-deaths-due-to-toxic-air-60000-killed-in-2016-who/articleshow/66422048.cms
ReplyDeleteNANO CARBON KILLS ... NOT VISIBLE CARBON... THE HUMAN BODY CAN HANDLE VISIBLE SMOKE , NOT LPG/ CNG EXHAUST EMISSIONS..NANO CARBONS FROM EXHAUSTS OF CNG AND LPG BREACHES THE BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER ………………. EVER SINCE CNG/ LPG USE INCREASED IN INDIA CHILDREN ARE BEING BORN WITH HOLE IN THE HEART …. HULLO APCO MODI … LISTEN UP … AND LISTEN GOOD…….A WOOD FIRE FOR MAKING A CHAPPATI IN A VILLAGE, WILL NOT CAUSE A HOLE IN THE HEART OF A BABY- .. BECAUSE THIS VISIBLE SMOKE WILL NOT INVADE THE BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER …. CHILDEN ARE BEING BORN AUTISTIC AND WITH BIRTH DEFETCS FALSELY TOUTED AS GENETIC ……… BREACHING OF BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER BY NANO CARBON CAN CAUSE MYELOMENINGOCELE. …. BEFORE ADVENT OF CNG/ LPG THIS DISEASE WAS UNKNOWN IN INDIA……… IN INDIA NEURAL TUBE DEFECTS ARE RARE DUE TO OUR GOTRA SYSTEM……….. OUR COLLEGIUM JUDGES ARE PUSHING EVEN VILLAGE WOMEN TO USE LPG CYLINDERS AND PM MODI WANTS TO IMPORT US SHALE GAS FROM HALF WAY AROUND THE PLANET….. NANO CARBON CAUSES INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE AND SCARRING OF LUNGS ……… NANO CARBON BY CNG VEHICLE EXHAUST CAUSE MYELIN SHEATH DAMAGE….
go0gle for the blogpost below--
..................................... INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE, NANO CARBON EMISSIONS , CNG VEHICLE EMISSIONS , LPG COOKING EXHAUST VADAKAYIL ...................
and ..................... ASD, ATRIAL SEPTAL DEFECT , HOLE IN THE HEART VADAKAYIL .......................
and ................................. MYELOMENINGOCELE , SPINA BIFIDA , NEURAL TUBE DEFECTS , BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER VADAKAYIL
capt ajit vadakayil
..'
Supreme unelected leaders of this country the collegium melords have ruled that any car in Delhi more than 15 years old if petrol and 10 years old if Diesel is to seized immediately if found on roads.
DeleteThis benevolence was granted due to a killing smog in Delhi.
Er whT is root cause analysis melords?
Welcome to the banana republic of India.
ReplyDeletehttps://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/hc-frowns-upon-police-excesses-at-sabarimala/articleshow/66422933.cms
IT IS THE WHITE INVADER WHO CREATED THE LIE OF MUSLIM VAVAR AND ENGLISHMAN PRIEST ARTHUNGAL VELUTHACHAN...
AYYAPPA EXISTED IN 5900 YEARS AGO.. .. ISLAM WAS BORN JUST 1388 YEARS AGO...
SORRY, AYYAPPA COULD NOT HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH ANY MUSLIM...
AYYAPPA IS THE NINTH AVATAR OF VISHNU..
WE DONT WANT COMMIE LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES TO DEAL WITH SANATANA DHARMA ..
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/judiciary-in-contempt-of-we-people-capt.html
Capt ajit vadakayil
..
Dear Captain,
ReplyDeleteHow will India be saved from the insider forces of the deep state.
Do you think the Qanon group & Trump will be over to kill the Rothschild control world wide?
Can the strings of Modi & other traitors be cut & locked up those that dont play ball? Very hard to imagine Modi getting out of power with the support of the bad actors.
Will Bharatmata be saved? Is there a group of patriots in India who can engage the public like Qanon in America & bloggers like you in India. Can't our military help us?
Thank you for doing all you do for us.
Namaste.
ReplyDeleteATHEIST COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN NEEDS AN IMMEDIATE PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION..
HE HAS FORGOTTEN THE BASICS OF COMMUNISM..
ON 5TH NOV 2018, THERE WILL BE A BLOOD BATH-- AS PINARAYI VIJAYAN HAS GOT THOUSANDS OF POLICE GASSED UP AND READY UNDER HIS POLICE ATTACK DOG BLUE EYED BOY CHRISTIAN IG MANOJ ABRAHAM..
WHAT IS ALL THIS?
IN HIS LAST TWO RALLIES PINARAYI VIJAYAN LIED WHEN HE SAID THAT HE ALWAYS FOLLOWS THE SUPREME COURT ORDERS ..
HEY--
HE CANT PULL THE WOOL OVER THE EYES OF EVEN HIS LOYAL COMMIE CADRE.. THEY HAVE ALL HEARD OF ORDINANCE HE BROUGHT TO DEFY COURT ORDERS ON "KARUNA MEDICAL COLLEGE KANNUR"
https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2018/09/12/sc-quashes-kerala-ordinance-onkaruna-kannur-medical-college-admissions.html
AND WE ALL REMEMBER HOW NATIONAL HIGHWAYS WERE RENAMED TO BYPASS ROADS IN KERALA TO CIRCUMVENT THE ALCOHOL RETAIL SHOPS ORDERS OF SUPREME COURT..
SUPREME COURT HAD ONCE ASKED THE PM TO INTERLINK ALL INDIAN RIVERS WITHIN A DEAD LINE.. IT WAS IGNORED , AS IT WOULD KILL BHARATMATA..
WHITHER THE COMMUNIST PARTY DISCIPLINE ? ARE THE BENGALI AND TELUGU COMMUNIST LEADERS AFRAID OF KERALA COMMUNIST LEADERS ?..
PINARAYI VIJAYAN IS NO LONGER A STRONGMAN- HE LOOKS DEFLATED AND WEAK.. HE KNOWS HE HAS SELF DESTRUCTED AND THE LAST BASTION OF INDIAN COMMUNISM IS DEAD..
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE CM LOSES TRACK OF THE PULSE OF THE PEOPLE..
PEOPLE HOLD THE POWER --NOT PINARAYI VIJAYAN WHO THINKS HE CAN DO A STALIN IN INDIA..
WHITHER COMMUNIST PARTY DISCIPLINE ?..
CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN IS HELL BENT ON DESTROYING A 5900 YEAR OLD PILGRIMAGE --THE LARGEST ON THIS PLANET.. TWICE THE SIZE OF MAHA KUMBH MELA AND FIVE TIMES THE SIZE OF HAJ.
THIS PILGRIMAGE HAS NEVER KNOWN VIOLENCE..
AYYAPPA IS THE NINTH AVATAR OF VISHNU..
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/judiciary-in-contempt-of-we-people-capt.html
WE ASK THE CJI GOGOI TO IMMEDIATELY WARN CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN.. TO BE FAIR TO HIM HE SEEMS TO BE MENTALLY AFFECTED MY SIDE EFFECTS OF MEDICINES -- AFTER ALL HE WENT TO USA LAST MONTH FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT..
WE ASK RAJNATH SINGH TO WARN CHRISTIANS DGP OF POLICE BEHERA AND IG MANOJ ABRAHAM WHO HAVE FORGOTTEN THEIR OATHS ..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
CJI GOGOI
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
PMO
PM MODI
RAJNATH SINGH
HOME MINISTRY
JIT DOVAL
LAW MINISTER
LAW MINISTRY
KERALA HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICE
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
GOVERNOR OF KERALA
RAMAN SRIVASAVA
PRAKASH KARAT
SITARAM YECHURY
JANAM TV
RAHUL EASHWAR
PADMA PILLAI
PARASARAN
ROHINGTON NARIMAN
KHANWILKAR
CHANDRACHUD.
INDU MALHOTRA
DEFENCE MINISTRY
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
NIA
CBI
IB
NHRC
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
NCW STATES
NCW MAIN
NCM
ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
capt ajit vadakayil
..
All private vehicles will be disallowed if pollution continues to increase in Delhi, says Bhure Lal. The whole Delhi will be on the roads from the danteras eve and nobody on earth can stop it. Why these people are so eager to make such comments To remind people of their importance.
ReplyDeleteA new movie out to be soon *kedarnath* showcasing the flood - but the highlight is the main hero is Muslim (played by Sushant singh rajput - who saves a hindu girl (played by Sara ali khan) from the floods highlighting pyaar.(love jihaad at its best) ..like seriously bollyshit is gone nuts.. Tomorrow we will have movies on
ReplyDeleteNow the Supreme Court will decide if suprabhtam will be recited in padmanabh swami temple or not??i smell a conspiracy to degrade Hindus
ReplyDeletehttps://scroll.in/article/761408/should-lord-vishnu-be-woken-up-with-suprabhatham-a-welcome-debate-in-supreme-court?utm_content=bufferf107f&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
hi sir
ReplyDeletesent your comment to foloowing emails
dutyoffr.ops@nsg.gov.in,
nsghq@nic.in,
38ashokroad@gmail.com,
ajaitley@sansad.nic.in,
dgp.pol@kerala.gov.in,
dgp@keralapolice.gov.in,
igpekmrange.pol@kerala.gov.in,
info@janamtv.com,
chiefminister@kerala.gov.in,
ksamresh.nbt@nic.in,
vpindia@nic.in,
connect@mygov.nic.in,
rajyavardhan.rathore@sansad.nic.in,
ravis@sansad.nic.in,
jscpg-mha@nic.in,
bjphqo@gmail.com,
contactus@rss.org,
contact@amitshah.co.in,
dr.bsshastri@gmail.com,
rahulkeaswar@gmail.com,
rajnath.singh@nic.in,
supremecourt@nic.in,
s_mahajan@nic.in,
Yogi.Adityanath@sansad.nic.in,
general@malaysiahindusangam.org,
info@vhp.org
Namaste Capt.,
ReplyDeleteHere is the list of all authors, activists, naxalites, foreign media, etc. who have published negative articles about Statue of Unity :
1. Anand Mazgaokar - tribal leader of Narmada Region
2. Roxy Gagdekar - BBC Gujarat : https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-45978120
3. Damayantee Dhar - Newsclick / wire / scroll : https://www.newsclick.in/tall-price-gujarats-tribals-are-paying-tallest-statue
4. Dhruv Rathee (Youtuber) : https://theprint.in/opinion/even-if-statue-of-unity-becomes-as-famous-as-taj-mahal-we-need-120-years-to-break-even/142596/
5. Aishwarya Mohanty (Indianexpress) : https://indianexpress.com/article/india/waiting-for-dues-farmers-threaten-to-drown-in-narmada-during-unveiling-of-statue-of-unity-5422741/
6. Mohan Gurumurthy (Centre for Policy Alternatives) - quoted in several foreign news articles like : https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/10417093/India-criticised-for-200m-tallest-statue-to-honour-founding-fathers.html
7. Laura Mowat : https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1038016/india-news-statue-of-unity-gujarat-farmers-Narendra-Modi
8. Medha Patkar : https://thewire.in/politics/statue-of-unity-an-open-letter-to-sardar-patel-by-medha-patkar
9. Jyotika Sood (NGO / Mint / DNA): https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/sardar-patel-statue-project-has-no-green-clearance-activists--42645
Hi sir
ReplyDeleteI send emails to ids mentioned by Reader Biju. Thanks Biju and hegde
You reveal truth on this blogsite. Thats the main reason you are our hero.
I am from Haryana.
I have also heard once in a day(24 hours) ,Saraswati goddess sits on our tongue. It means we should only speak auspicious things all day. If we speak any thing inauspicious , and if that moment goddess Saraswati sits ,that inauspicious thing will become reality....
This is prevalent in North India.
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/we-people-declare-that-all-laws-created.html
ReplyDeletePARAMOUNT CLAUSE : WE THE PEOPLE ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION.. THE CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE USED TO STRAIT-JACKET "WE THE PEOPLE"….
RECENTLY THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY PASSED THREE LAWS BELOW--
AAA- ADULTERY IS LEGAL..
BBB- HOMOSEXUALITY IS LEGAL..
CCC- MENSTRUATING WOMEN CAN ENTER SABARIMALA SANNIDHANAM…
THE UNELECTED / UNACCOUNTABLE JUDICIARY CANNOT MAKE OR BREAK LAWS.. ALL THEY ARE ALLOWED TO DO IS TO INTERPRET EXISTING LAWS ….
IN OUR CASE THE JUDICIARY IS A COLLEGIUM SYSTEM—WHICH MEANS JUDGES ELECT JUDGES.. THIS IS NOT ALLOWED BY OUR CONSTITUTION. …
INDIA IS THE ONLY NATION ON THE PLANET WHERE JUDGES ELECT JUDGES .. THIS BREEDS NEPOTISM AND TRAITORS IN DEEP STATE PAYROLL….
JUDGES CAN ONLY JUDGE FOR A SPECIFIC CASE FOR AN AGGRIEVED INDIVIDUAL OR SMALL GROUP OF LIMITED NUMBERS … FOR AN AGGRIEVED NATION OF 1300 MILLION PEOPLE WE HAVE AN ELECTED DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM..
LAWYER TURNED JUDGES WHO CANNOT THINK BEYOND THE OBJECTIVE, ARE THE BANE OF INDIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM…
DHARMA ( NATURAL JUSTICE ) CAN NEVER BE OBJECTIVE AND GIVEN TO A NON-CONSCIOUS CALCULATOR / COMPUTER , WHICH CAN NEVER TELL THE MORAL OF A STORY , LAUGH AT A SUBTLE JOKE OR UNDERSTAND WHAT IS CULTURE..
WE NEED A SYSTEM WHERE INTELLIGENT JUDGES ( WHO HAVE THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL TO GLEAN CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE) ARE SELECTED BY A NATION WIDE ENTRANCE EXAM LIKE IIT...
PUT ABOVE CRITICAL COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
CJI GOGOI
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL
LAW MINISTER PRASAD
LAW MINISTRY
PMO
PM MODI
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA
EVERY MLA OF INDIA
ALL CENTRAL STATE MINISTERS AND MINISTRIES
ALL MAJOR COLLECTORS OF INDIA
RAJNATH SINGH
HOME MINISTRY
DGPs OF ALL STATES
IGs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
ALL MAJOR MEDIA
RSS
VHP
AVBP
ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
FALI BABY
SOLI BABY
SALVE BABY
AJIT DOVAL
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
NITI AYOG
AMITABH KANT
SWAMY
GURUMURTHY
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
NCW STATES
NCW MAIN
NCM
NHRC
PRAKASH KARAT
BRINDA KARAT
SITARAM YECHURY
DANIEL RAJA
SUNEET CHOPRA
CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWAMI
VINEET JAIN
AROON PURIE
PRANNOY JAMES ROY
N RAM
RAGHAV BAHL
BARKHA DUTT
SHEKHAR GUPTA
SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
RAJDEEP SARDESAI
NAVIKA KUMAR
RAHUL KANWAL
JAKKA JACOB
FAYE DSOUZA
NIDHI RAZDAN
VIKRAM CHANDRA
DINESH VARSHNEY
SIDDHARTH VARADARAJAN
RAMACHANDRA GUHA
PAVAN VERMA
EVERY HINDU ORG
SONIA GANDHI
RAHUL GANDHI
RAHUL EASHWAR
PADMA PILLAI
JANAM TV
VIDYASAGAR GURUMURTHY
PARASARAN
WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKT LEADERS
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA EVERY WHICH WAY
sorry for posting comment in latest post.
DeleteGrievance registered via PMO portal : PMOPG/E/2018/0508688
Captain
ReplyDeleteNo matter how many times we expose hidden agendas of Zionist jews, our corrupt rulers ,BJP or CONGRESS will never care for us ,they care only for votes ,money and power.
Let's see atleast this will get attention among our selfish rulers.
Captain, Pls expose this corrupt money system(Banking) going on without being noticed for decades which is looting our economy .Why can't our GOVT print DEBT AND INTEREST FREE MONEY for all of us why it is enslaving itself and its own people to Bankers??
Our top bankers knows this and never care for common people who are suffering, dying due to debt.
INDIA and almost all counties are still following ROTHSCHILDs Debt-Based monetary system (CBS),trapping country into deep debt, making our system ,everyone as debt -slave to bankers .
Pls expose this fraud Debt-Based Monetary System- Central Banking System (CBS)which is pushed upon our collective throats, which is controlling big corporates, govt,people through debt.
Real power lies with these people, who controls our monetary system, rest of our system which depends on it, is a merseyless corrupt system,they never care for us .
BANKING SYSTEM is biggest Fraud in the history of mankind ,trapping country into debt -slave, Bankers are Robber barons
NATIONAL DEBT OF INDIA = 76,046,552,935,317 (76 Lakh Crore Rupees )
Interest Payments Per Year
₹48,62,887,801,956
National Debt Per Citizen
₹57,394, taken from below
INDIA DEBT CLOCK
https://www.nationaldebtclocks.org/debtclock/india
This Debt-Based Monetary System ,Central Banking System ,debt -based economy thingy was introduced to world ,implemented in every country by ILLUMINATI ROTHSCHILD family to rule whole world ,to LOOT RULE ENSLAVE whole world population ,keeping majority of them in debt-servitude( forced to work for someone to pay-off a debt, effectively a slave)
__________________________________________________
BANKERS -
WE JUST CREATE WORTHLESS
ELECTRONIC MONEY OUT OF NOTHING
THEN WE LEND IT OUT AND CHARGE INTEREST ON IT.
THEN WE MAKE THEM GIVE US THEIR HOUSES AND
REAL WEALTH WHEN THEY CAN NOT PAY
The modern banking system manufactures money
out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most
astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever
invented. Banking was conceived in iniquity and
born in sin. Bankers own the earth. Take it away
from them, but leave them the power to create
money and control credit, and with the flick of a pen,
they will create enough money to buy it back again.
Take this great power away from the bankers and all
the great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they
ought to disappear, for this would be a better and
happier world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the
slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own
slavery, let them continue to create money and to
control credit.
Sir Josiah Stamp, Director and President of the
Bank of England during the 1920's
#ThePursuitofHappiness
_________________________________________________
The Real Economic Scandal: Understanding the Debt-Based Economy
http://www.permanentculturenow.com/the-real-economic-scandal-understanding-the-debt-based-economy/
Banks create money as a debt
https://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/social-credit/item/banks-create-money-as-a-debt
The solution: debt-free money issued by society
https://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/social-credit/item/the-solution-debt-free-money-issued-by-society
_______________________________________
The Fraudulent Monetary System & the Occult Meanings of Mortgage: Why a Mortgage Is a Pledge to the Dead
http://www.yogaesoteric.net/content.aspx?lang=EN&item=13161
((The Illuminati invented and implemented the perpetually growing debt spiral,
For at least one hundred years the financial system has been manipulated to the hilt, bringing the world to its knees through the financial engineering of the elite, which should have been alarming enough for every well-educated expert.
But the majority has been masterfully kept in
Continued
Deletemajority has been masterfully kept in the dark about the hidden agenda, not taking heed of the bells ringing loud and clear. In-depth analyses reveal that the whole monetary system is – unintentionally – in its final stage of self-destruction.
The excessive currency printing of debt-money has arrived in its final reflation stage of self-destruction. Because the debt in the world has grown so excessively, the credit-system has gone into reverse mode, as result of the invention of the perpetual debt spiral.
Fight the New World Order with Global Non Compliance
Understand your enemy, and understand the weapons they use. Then use those same weapons against them. The MONEY SYSTEM IS THE HEAD of the snake. Cut the head off the snake and the rest of it will wither and die.
There need be no violence, no guns, no banners, no slogans, no group think, just a united act of global noncompliance.))
sir i sent your (RBI) comment to all CM,amitabh kant ,arun jaitley
Deletevia email.
Captain,
ReplyDeleteFacebook didn't allowed my post regarding sabarimala(including your blog link) which exposes traitor media, sc judges,Kerala govt , claiming that it goes against their standards
ReplyDeleteURGENT …
IMPORTANT ..
WE THE PEOPLE ASK THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE..
STRIKE DOWN THE LAWS CREATED BY ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY ON ..
1) ADULTERY..
2) HOMOSEXUALITY..
3) SABARIMALA ..
READ THE POST BELOW TO UNDERSTAND WHY JUDICIARY CANNOT PLAY GOD….
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/we-people-declare-that-all-laws-created.html
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH !
Capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE CRITICAL COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
CJI GOGOI
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL
LAW MINISTER PRASAD
LAW MINISTRY
PMO
PM MODI
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
CMs OF ALL STATES
EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA
EVERY MLA OF INDIA
ALL CENTRAL / STATE MINISTERS AND MINISTRIES
ALL MAJOR COLLECTORS OF INDIA
RAJNATH SINGH
HOME MINISTRY
DGPs OF ALL STATES
IGs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
ALL MAJOR MEDIA
RSS
VHP
AVBP
ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
FALI BABY
SOLI BABY
SALVE BABY
AJIT DOVAL
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
NITI AYOG
AMITABH KANT
SWAMY
GURUMURTHY
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
NCW STATES
NCW MAIN
NCM
NHRC
PRAKASH KARAT
BRINDA KARAT
SITARAM YECHURY
DANIEL RAJA
SUNEET CHOPRA
CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWAMI
VINEET JAIN
AROON PURIE
PRANNOY JAMES ROY
N RAM
RAGHAV BAHL
BARKHA DUTT
SHEKHAR GUPTA
SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
RAJDEEP SARDESAI
NAVIKA KUMAR
RAHUL KANWAL
JAKKA JACOB
FAYE DSOUZA
NIDHI RAZDAN
VIKRAM CHANDRA
DINESH VARSHNEY
SIDDHARTH VARADARAJAN
RAMACHANDRA GUHA
PAVAN VERMA
EVERY HINDU ORG
SONIA GANDHI
RAHUL GANDHI
RAHUL EASHWAR
PADMA PILLAI
JANAM TV
VIDYASAGAR GURUMURTHY
PARASARAN
WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKT LEADERS
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA EVERY WHICH WAY
ReplyDeleteCapt. Ajit VadakayilNovember 1, 2018 at 10:32 AM
HEY CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWAMI,,,
WE HAVE ONE SIMPLE QUESTION...
IS IT TRUE THAT PADMA PILLAI RAPED YOU CEREBRALLY...AND SHE DID NOT HAVE TO JUMP UP AND DOWN LIKE A DEMENTED COCAINE SNORTING ORANGUTAN TO DO THAT ..
TOBA TOABAAAAHHH ....
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/we-people-declare-that-all-laws-created.html
THROW A CHAPPATI IN THE GENERAL DIRECTION OF OUR CLOSET COMMIE.
capt ait vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF—
PADMA PILLAI
CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWAMI
RAJEEV CHANDRASHEKHAR
RAHUL EASHWAR
JANAM TV
VIDYASAGAR GURUMURTHY
PARASARAN
ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
BARKHA DUTT
SHEKHAR GUPTA
SIDDHARTH VARADARAJAN
RAMACHANDRA GUHA
PAVAN VERMA
SHASHI THAROOR
MANI SHANGARAN AIYERAN
SUDHEENDRA KULKARNI
KAVITA KRISHNAN
TEESTA SETALVAD
ROMILA THAPAR
KARAN THAPAR
AYESH KIDWAI
NIVEDITA MENON
RANA AYYUB
PAGALIKA GHOSE
SHOBHAA DE
ARUNDHATI ROY
KARAN THAPAR
JOHN DAYAL
KANCHA ILAIAH
CEDRIC PRAKASH
SNEHLA RASHID
ReplyDeleteCapt. Ajit VadakayilNovember 1, 2018 at 12:58 PM
https://twitter.com/sardesairajdeep/status/1056423190656962561
TRULY SPOKEN LIKE A DHAKKAN OF THE FIRST ORDER..
SATI NEVER EXISTED BEFORE THE ISLAMIC INVADER CAME TO INDIA.. NOT A SINGLE PURANA MENTIONS SATI..
JAUHAR WAS CONVERTED TO SATI.
DURING ISLAMIC INVADER RULE HINDU WOMEN JUMPED INTO THE FIRE TO FUSE THEIR GENITALS AND MUSLIM SOLDIERS RAPED COLD DEAD FEMALE BODIES ....
JAUHAR , THE HEROIC PRACTICE OF RAJPUT WOMEN JUMPING INTO THE FIRE IN FRONT OF THE LIVE HUSBANDS AND FATHERS , ON THE LAST NIGHT OF A LOSING BATTLE , IS NOT SATI....
IT WAS BETTER TO DIE THAN LAND UP IN A ISLAMIC MANDI ( WH0REHOUSE ) TO BE REPEATEDLY USED AS A SEX SLAVE ....
WE ALL KNOW HOW YAZIDI WOMEN WERE USED BY ISIS ...
RAJA RAM MOHAN ROY WAS A PIR ALI MUSLIM-- AN OPIUM DRUG RUNNING AGENT OF JEW ROTHSCHILD..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/07/opium-raja-british-stooge-ram-mohan-roy.html
capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF—
RAJDEEP SARDESIA
PAGALIKA GHOSE
CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWAMI
ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
BARKHA DUTT
SHEKHAR GUPTA
SIDDHARTH VARADARAJAN
SHASHI THAROOR
MANI SHANGARAN AIYERAN
SUDHEENDRA KULKARNI
KAVITA KRISHNAN
TEESTA SETALVAD
ROMILA THAPAR
KARAN THAPAR
AYESH KIDWAI
NIVEDITA MENON
RANA AYYUB
SHOBHAA DE
ARUNDHATI ROY
KARAN THAPAR
JOHN DAYAL
KANCHA ILAIAH
CEDRIC PRAKASH
SNEHLA RASHID
NCW STATES
NCW MAIN
NCM
NHRC
PRAKASH KARAT
BRINDA KARAT
SITARAM YECHURY
DANIEL RAJA
SUNEET CHOPRA
VINEET JAIN
AROON PURIE
PRANNOY JAMES ROY
N RAM
RAGHAV BAHL
BARKHA DUTT
NAVIKA KUMAR
RAHUL KANWAL
JAKKA JACOB
FAYE DSOUZA
NIDHI RAZDAN
VIKRAM CHANDRA
DINESH VARSHNEY
RAMACHANDRA GUHA
PAVAN VERMA
EVERY HINDU ORG
SONIA GANDHI
RAHUL GANDHI
RAHUL EASHWAR
PADMA PILLAI
JANAM TV
VIDYASAGAR GURUMURTHY
PARASARAN
WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKT LEADERS
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA EVERY WHICH WAY
ReplyDeletehttps://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/we-people-declare-that-all-laws-created.html
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/judiciary-in-contempt-of-we-people-capt.html
PUT ABOVE TWO LINKS IN WEBSITES OF--
EVERY DISTRICT COLLECTOR IN INDIA
ALL SOCIAL ORGS IN INDIA
ALL IAS OFFICERS OF INDIA
EVERY MLA OF INDIA
EVERY MP OF INDIA
I CAN SEE THAT VERY FEW OF MY READERS ARE PARTICIPATING.. I WATCH ..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
i sent the email sir with subject -"capt vadakayil tells secrets of RBI"
ReplyDelete11:47 PM (0 minutes ago)
to presidentofindia, speakerloksabha, Subramanian, ajaitley, vpindia
Hi Sir
ReplyDeleteI sent to all Collectors of Kerala and tamilnadu state.
____________________________________________________________________________
Subject-Our Hero Capt Vadakayil (even PM Modi reads his blog)...
Message -
Please Read below links. Captain Vadakayil is creating silent revolution
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/we-people-declare-that-all-laws-created.html
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/judiciary-in-contempt-of-we-people-capt.html
__________________________________________________________________________________
Tamil Nadu DC emails
collrari@nic.in
collrkar@tn.nic.in
collrkgi@nic.in
collrmdu@tn.nic.in
collrngp@tn.nic.in
collrnmk@tn.nic.in
collrpmb@tn.nic.in
collrpdk@tn.nic.in
collrrmd@nic.in
collrslm@nic.in
collrsvg@nic.in
collrchn@tn.nic.in
collrtnj@tn.nic.in
collrnlg@tn.nic.in
collrthn@tn.nic.in
collrtlr@tn.nic.in
collrtvm@tn.nic.in
collrtvr@tn.nic.in
collrtnv@nic.in
collrtry@nic.in
collrtup@nic.in
collrtut@tn.nic.in
collrcbe@nic.in
collrvel@tn.nic.in
collrvpm@tn.nic.in
collrvnr(at)tn.nic.in
collrcud@tn.nic.in
collrdpi@tn.nic.in
collrdgl@tn.nic.in
collrerd@tn.nic.in
collrkpm@tn.nic.in
collrkkm@tn.nic.in
KERALA DC emails
dctvm@kerala.nic.in
dcalp@kerala.nic.in
dcktm@kerala.nic.in
dcidk@kerala.nic.in
dcpkzk@kerala.nic.in
dcwayanad@kerala.nic.in
dckknr@kerala.nic.in
dckas@kerala.nic.in
tsrcoll.ker@nic.in
mlp-collectorate@messaging.kerala.gov.in
hi sir
ReplyDeleteThree corrected email ids of above mentioned list of all emails are :
dcwayanad@gmail.com
dcknr@kerala.nic.in
dckzk@ker.nic.in
And
mlp-collectorate@messaging.kerala.gov.in is not working
hi sir
ReplyDeletesent to all Rajasthan DC
dm-ajm-rj@nic.in
dm-alw-rj@nic.in
dm-ban-rj@nic.in
dm-bar-rj@nic.in
dm-bha-rj@nic.in
dm-bhi-rj@nic.in
dm-bik-rj@nic.in
dm-brn-rj@nic.in
rajbun@nic.in
dm-chi-rj@nic.in
dm-chu-rj@nic.in
dm-dau-rj@nic.in
dm-dho-rj@nic.in
dm-dun-rj@nic.in
dm-gan-rj@nic.in
dm-han-rj@nic.in
dm-jai-rj@nic.in
dm-jaip-rj@nic.in
dm-jal-rj@nic.in
dm-jha-rj@nic.in
dm-jhu-rj@nic.in
dm-jod-rj@nic.in
dm-kar-rj@nic.in
dm-kot-rj@nic.in
ReplyDeleteCapt. Ajit VadakayilNovember 5, 2018 at 5:02 AM
MANY WORLD RECORDS WILL TUMBLE IN KERALA DURING THIS SABARIMALA SEASON…
ALREADY TWO WORLD RECORDS HAVE BEEN SET BY IG OF POLICE MANOJ ABRAHAM, THE BLUE EYED COP OF ATHEIST COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN..
AAA- IG MANOJ ABRAHAM IS THE FIRST TOP COP ON THE PLANET TO SUE PEOPLE FOR DEFAMATION- ENMASSE ( 14 PEOPLE ). TELLING THE TRUTH IS DEFAMATION !..
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/thiruvananthapuram/two-held-for-online-slandering-against-ig/articleshow/66369546.cms
BBB- IG MANOJ ABRAHAM IS THE FIRST TOP COP AGAINST WHOM HIS NEIGHBOURS HAVE COMPLAINED FOR CALLOUS NOISE POLLUTION AT UNEARTHLY HOURS AT NIGHT.. LOUD PENTACOSTAL SONG SESSIONS WITH OVERKILL RELIGIOUS FERVOUR..
https://haindavakeralam.com/protests-against-ig-manoj-hk24005
JUST A TASTE OF SUCH FRENZIED SONGS ? WATCH THE VIDEO BELOW..
WHEN I WAS FOUR YEARS OLD, I WAS TRAUMATIZED BY SUCH LOUD ABNORMAL MELANCHOLY SONGS IN MALAYALAM AT MIDNIGHT , WITH THE DEVOUT CLAPPING , SCREAMING AND JUMPING UP AND DOWN , FROM THE HOUSE OF MY PENTACOSTAL NEIGHBOR THEODORE.--
THE ONLY TIME IN MY LIFE SUCH A UNEASY FEELING EVER CAME ON ME..
I KEPT THIS FEARFUL FEELING TO MYSELF..
THERE WAS A SICK CHRISTIAN CHILD -- THE CHILD DIED WITHOUT MEDICINES ..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eso1oDjwclE
IF YOU SAY ANYTHING AGAINST IG OF POLICE MANOJ ABRAHAM YOU WILL GO TO JAIL.. TRUTH DOES NOT MATTER .. HE IS PROTECTED.. HEY, WHY IS PM OF INDIA, MODI NOT PROTECTED THIS WAY ..
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/vacb-probe-against-manoj-abraham/article17528456.ece
IG MANOJ ABRAHAM HAS FORGOTTED HIS OATH AS AN IPS OFFICER..
THE IG OF POLICE IS EXPECTED TO CARE FOR THE PEOPLE, SERVE AND PROTECT THEM.. NOT BE AN ATTACK DOG SHOWING PERSONAL LOYALTY TO AN ATHEIST COMMIE CM WHILE HANDLING A PILGRIMAGE WHICH HAS GONE WITHOUT AN INCIDENT FOR 5900 YEARS..
WE WONDER IF PM MODI WILL GET A NOBEL PRIZE FROM JEW ROTHSCHILD , FOR ALLOWING COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TO PLAY GOD ..
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/judiciary-in-contempt-of-we-people-capt.html
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/we-people-declare-that-all-laws-created.html
DHARMA DOES NOT EXIST IN THE ANCIENT LAND OF BHARAT ANYMORE.. THIS WATAN IS NO LONGER NOBLE..
Capt ajit vadakayil
..
PMO
PM MODI
AJIT DOVAL
RAJNATH SINGH
HOME MINISTRY
CJI GOGOI
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL
LAW MINISTER PRASAD
LAW MINISTRY
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA
EVERY MLA OF INDIA
ALL CENTRAL STATE MINISTERS AND MINISTRIES
ALL MAJOR COLLECTORS OF INDIA
DGPs OF ALL STATES
IGs OF ALL STATES
CMs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
ALL MAJOR MEDIA
RSS
VHP
AVBP
ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
FALI BABY
SOLI BABY
SALVE BABY
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
NITI AYOG
AMITABH KANT
SWAMY
GURUMURTHY
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
NCW STATES
NCW MAIN
NCM
NHRC
RAHUL GANDHI
SONIA GANDHI
AMIT SHAH
LK ADVANI
SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV
EVERY HINDU ORG
RAHUL EASHWAR
PADMA PILLAI
JANAM TV
VIDYASAGAR GURUMURTHY
PARASARAN
WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKT LEADERS
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA EVERY WHICH WAY
Wishing you, your family and all the readers a very happy Deepavali. May the light of Dharma shine bright in Sabarimala.
ReplyDeletePranaams,
Prapulla
Dear Captain and Readers, Wish you all happy Deepavali. may Goddess Laxmi brings wealth and health in all of your families.
ReplyDeleteFire up crackers in the outskirts and stay safe.
Best Wishes.
ReplyDeletehttps://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/11/the-indian-constitution-does-not-allow.html
WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA DEMAND THAT THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY BE ABOLISHED IMMEDIATELY..
COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY WHERE JUDGES ELECT JUDGES IS NOT ALLOWED BY THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION..
INDIA IS THE ONLY NATION ON THE PLANET WHERE JUDGES ELECT JUDGES…
“TRYRANNY OF THE UNELECTED “ WILL NOT BE ALLOWED ANYMORE BY WE THE PEOPLE..
IF SOMEBODY DOES NOT AGREE, LET US HAVE A NATIONWIDE REFERNDUM ON “ADULTERY”..
IF EVEN 0.1% PEOPLE VOTE FOR ADULTERY, I WILL EAT MY OWN HEAD..
IMAGINE FIVE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDGES ( WITH DEEP STATE CHEERING THEM FROM THE SIDELINES ) HAVE SHOVED ADULTERY DOWN THE THROATS OF 1300 UNWILLING INDIANS.. TRAMPLING ON THE WILL OF "WE THE PEOPLE" IN A DEMOCRACY …
The Supreme Court is itself bound by the Constitution of India and the Parliament can amend the Constitution any time they want.. The Melords don’t realize this…
The time has come for the Supreme Court to introspect on whether the use of Article 142 as an independent source of power should be regulated by strict guidelines—if the Melords DRUNK WITH POWER do not then the govt must strike it down with an ordinance..
ARTICLE 141 GIVES THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY UNBRIDLED DISCRETIONARY POWER WITHOUT ANY ACCOUNTABILITY WHATSOEVER…
In a landmark ruling on 11 January 2007, the Supreme Court of India ruled that all laws (including those in the Ninth Schedule) would be open to Judicial Review if they violated the basic structure of the constitution. ..
Sorry, this ruling is NULL AND VOID.. Supreme court has NO such powers…
WE THE PEOPLE ASK THE MODI GOVT TO BRING AN ORDINANCE TO OVERTUN THE SUPREME COURT VERDICT..
Article 32: Allows any AGGRIEVED person to knock on the doors of the Supreme Court in case of (what according to him is) a violation of Fundamental Rights…
Empowers the SC to issue Writs to enforce such person's Fundamental Rights, if such a violation has indeed taken place…
IN THE CASE OF SABARIMALA THE PIL WAS FILED BY A CRYPTO JEW MUSLIM NAMED NAUSHAD KHAN.. HE WAS NOT AN AGGRIEVED PERSON.. KHAN BABY SHOULD HAVE WORRIED ABOUT MUSLIM WOMEN NOT BEING ALLOWED IN SUNNI MOSQUES…
WE ASK THE MODI GOVT TO PASS A LAW CREATING STRICT GUIDELINES FOR JUDICIARY TO ENTERTAIN PILs.. ..
NO JUDGE CAN GO BEYOND THE CONSTITUTION.. ALL JUDGES CAN DO IS TO INTERPRET LAWS.. JUDGES CANNOT STRIKE DOWN OR CREATE ANY LAWS ..
THE CONSTITUTION IS A DYNAMIC DOCUMENT.. CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE USED AS A FRANKENSTEIN TO STRAITJACKET WE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION...
TO MOVE WITH THE TIMES—WHEN THE BABY BECOME BIGGER , LENGTHEN THE CRADLE ( CONSTITUTION ) , DON’T CUT THE LEGS OF THE BABY. WE ARE IN THE MODERN DIGITAL AGE…
WE NEED JUDGES TO BE RECRUITED BY AN INTELLIGENT SYSTEM LIKE IIT OR IAS..
WE ARE DONE WITH THE BOTTOM DREGS OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL BECOMING LAWYERS AND THEN BOTTOM DREGS OF THE LOSER LAWYER POOL BECOMING MELORD JUDGES, WHO ARE SO SQUEAMISH ( OUT OF INFERIORITY COMPLEX ) THAT THEY WILL SEND YOU TO JAIL FOR "CONTEMPT OF COURT " AT THE DROP OF A HAT.
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/we-people-declare-that-all-laws-created.html
Capt ajit vadakayil
..
अानन्दिनी दीपावली
ReplyDeleteHappy Diwali captainji!
ReplyDeleteI wish Captain, Readers and everyone's Families a very Happy Deepavali !!! :)
ReplyDeleteHappy diwali dear captain
ReplyDeleteHappy Diwali Wishes to Captain sir and all readers ..
ReplyDeleteRespected Captain , A very happy Diwali to you and your family and also to all the readers.
ReplyDeleteCharansparsh.
Happy Diwali/Deepawali Captain and everyone!
ReplyDeleteCaptain, India is the only major country that does NOT have an official g0vt sanctioned fireworks-celebration. Every major country, including Japan & Saudi have extravagant fireworks displays for some or the other occasion......but India, land of Diwali and Hindu-New-Year, does not even have a small firecracker being burst by g0vt authorities. Very unfortunate to see the rot of pseudo-secularism, liberalism, cultural-marxism taking control of this Nation.
ReplyDeleteWish you Happy Diwali Capt. Sir and your family and all readers.
ReplyDeleteCaptain, in forum posts, I found White-Women complaining that they face much much more street harassment in the MENA countries, especially Oman, Jordan and Egypt. They say that the local-men even drive up in their cars and ask them to get in......one man even faked that he was a police-officer and told the woman to get in (but she knew he was a fake & ran away). I have found more favourable views on India, Pakistan & Bangladesh than on MENA region, especially by the most affected group (White-Women). Shows the hypocrisy/lies/agenda of the media.
ReplyDeleteWish you and Your Family and fellow readers a very Happy Diwali
ReplyDeleteHappy Diwali sir.it's transition phase for Hinduism where enemies from outside and within are hurting the fabric of our great religion and country but we along with ur guidance will fight tooth and nail for it.
ReplyDeleteCaptain, after watching all sorts of propaganda/pop-culture/etc. stuff of most countries, I can say that India's is the worst by far. We have no propaganda, no cool-stuff to show. Even the GCC nations make excellent propaganda videos with catchy music and clips which glorify their g0vt, military and culture. Learning from the Arabs and Turks, the Pakistanis too have learned quickly and are releasing good quality stuff.
ReplyDeleteOnly India is sitting back, letting the whole world dictate what is supposed to be "Indian-culture" and allowing anybody to do whatever, say whatever. Our only propaganda is this nonsense
(a) We are a peaceful nation.
(b) We are followers of Gandhi
(c) We come in peace (like Aliens say in hollywood movies)
(d) We don't want to offend anybody (also proven by abstaining everytime in UN especially during UPA regimes)
This weak spineless propaganda impresses nobody. Heck, even Saudis have made awesome videos glorifying their military forces sent to Bahrain to crush the local-rebellion. Even Palestine has fantastic patriotic songs. India doesn't even come anywhere close. It's high time we change this approach or else even after 50-100 years we will be spinning charkha-propaganda while the whole world laughs/ridicules us.
Wishing you and your family and all the reader a Very Happy Prosperous Deepawali !!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteDear Captain,
ReplyDeleteWish you a very Happy Deepavali!
Regards
Sukanya
&
Srinivas
Hello Capt
ReplyDeleteWish you and your family Shubh Deepawali.
Pranaam Elderly Ajit Sir,
ReplyDeleteShubh Deepavali to you. I am very grateful to you.
Right now I am feeling proud of our culture.
Elderly Ajit Sir, Charan Sparsh with lot of respect.
I also wish all true dedicated Bharatvarshiya readers Happy Diwali. Be happy. I am also grateful to all of you.
Wishing you and your family a happy Diwali sir !! may the festival of lights light up your home with happiness and prosperity!
ReplyDeleteHappy Deepavali to Captain and all readers...
ReplyDeleteHappy deepavali guruji to you and your family. Getting ready to make some nice sweets @home. Bless our family with good health and prosperity guruji. We love you a lot. Thanks for everything. :-)
ReplyDeleteGOD SPEED
Delete346325845
Thanks guruji love you:-)
DeleteDear Captain,
ReplyDeleteWish You Happy Deepawali to you and your family. May this festival of lights brings peace to Kerala.Thanks
Dear Capt Ajit sir,
ReplyDeleteWishing you and your family good health, happiness and harmony in this festival season...loving you and your blogging awareness, guidance most and more...:-)
Swamiye Saranam Ayyappa.
Happy Deepawali Captain,
ReplyDeleteMay Goddess Lakshmi shower more and more prosperity to you and your family.
Happy Deepawali Readers, have a great one.
God Bless India/Bharata/Hindustan, Jai Ho :-)
Happy Diwali captain to you and family and all reader's .
DeleteHari Om Tat sat
Captain,
ReplyDeletewish you and family very happy Deepawali.. Happy Diwali to all readers..
- with Heartfelt gratitude
Biju
Readers just as refresher
ReplyDeleteTo know another poison "Naraka Chaturdashi" see the Captain's comment below
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/09/why-kerala-does-not-celebrate-diwali-or.html?showComment=1413989894294#c2446895766239065824
Happy Diwali Captain Ajit Vadakayil
ReplyDeleteHappy Deepawali to you and your family captain sir. All my friends now know the reason behind the celebration of deepawali. Thanks for everything and your guidance sir
ReplyDeleteJaihind
Dear Captain, Wish you and family a very happy Deepavali!
ReplyDeleteI am very shocked that even Hindu schools are brainwashing children not to burst crackers and making them take pledge! I am making sure my kids do learn about how Deepavali is celebrated and burst atleat the light crackers. People are worried about the environment, dogs and everything else only on this day. I truly hope this Deepavali and the ones in the future removes the darkness from our minds.
Happy Deepavali
ReplyDeleteHi Captain,
ReplyDeleteHappy deepavali to you and all the fellow readers of this blog.
Regards,
Balamurali Shivaram
Shubh Diwali to Captain Ajit Vadakayil sir ,Your family & all readers.
ReplyDeleteShraddheya Shri Gurudev
ReplyDeleteSubha Deepavali and Subha Kali Puja to U and Ur family and all ur readers and well wishers .
May Maa Kali wipe out all the evils of the universe .
Strength and Honour always .
Pranam
Happy Diwali Wishes to Captain sir and all readers ..
ReplyDeleteWish you Happy diwali captain vadakayil.
ReplyDeleteHappy Deepavali, Captain.
ReplyDeleteLord Ayyappa's blessings are always with you and to your family.
Swami Saranam.
Dear Captain and all readers , wish you all a very happy Deepavali. May your homes be filled with light, love, happiness and prosperity always.
ReplyDeleteNamaste
ReplyDeleteWish you and your family a very happy Diwali Captain!
I have been having a tough time changing my job (very toxic and soul-draining) since long, please bless me so that this Diwali I manage to change to a better place successfully! I feel so helpless and depressed in this foreign land of Europe, maybe some blessings from you bring some light in life this Diwali.
Gratitude
_/\_
WHEN YOU ARE GOOD IN YOUR JOB , IT WONT BE TOXIC..
DeleteGODSPEED
346325845
Thank you very much Captain!
DeleteIt doesn't even reach the "being good in your job" stage. I face racism and I can't work in a place where they keep making fun of my country and culture and treat me second class because I am not native/local. Bullying me and unprofessional behavior towards me is ignored by even the highest of managers and team leaders simply because I'm Indian and its too uncomfortable for them to confront their own people. This breaks my spirit. There is no respect. And I refuse to be insulted in my own silent strong way which enrages them even more.
Despite this I have always tried to singularly focus on my work and be good at it. I am competent. That's the only reason why I haven't been fired yet.
I LEFT THE SEA 7 YEARS AGO.
DeleteEVEN TODAY SAILORS ( EVEN THOSE WHO DONT KNOW ME ) SING MY PRAISES AS THE LAST LIVING LEGEND --
AS THE SLAVE YOU WAS MORE POWERFUL THAN THE CAESAR..
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER !
I agree, knowledge is power and that's the power that has protected me this far. Because I was the slave more powerful than Caesar, the Caesar/Boss hated my guts. Still does. He has been asked to leave after 6 months. But this very power has made the higher-ups feel threatened as the whole world knows German companies in Germany want Indians only as far as they work and stay "in their place". And do not get too uncomfortable for them. There is deep rooted hypocrisy. It's not like I had any itch for controversy either.
DeleteThere is way too much more to the story I won't bother you with. But please know that I am not some reader of yours who is weak, whines and complains because of incompetence etc.
Quite the opposite and God knows I'm speaking the truth.
But I am thankful to this universe that you exist. Your posts are very empowering and hope-giving. Thank you again.
Dear Captain,
ReplyDeleteDeepavali shubhakanshalu to you and your lovely family.
Captain,
ReplyDeleteThose mind blowing drum beats was like hitting F5(refresh) to my brain. Just WoW !!!
Happy Deepawali to you & your beautiful family and to all your readers.
ReplyDeletePranaam sir,
ReplyDeleteHappy and the most prosperous deepawali to you and your wonderful family sir!! I really wish to meet you in person at least once sir 😊😊😊
Respected Captain,
ReplyDeleteWishing you and your family A happy and prosperous Deepawali.
Regards
Dear Captain
ReplyDeleteHappy Deepavali to all. My email was blocked by most official recipients in the morning but managed to get through at night.
To complicate matters in recent weeks there has been some kind of break between my Google account and blogger.
Thanks for everything.
Cheers
Ravi
KL
Dear Sir,
ReplyDeleteHappy Deepawali to you and your family and all your readers.
With Gratitude
Raghavendra Desai
HAPPY DEEPAWALI to ESTEEMED CAPTAIN SAAHEB, to Mrs. Vadakayil Ji & family.
ReplyDeleteHAPPY DEEPAWALI to all the READERS here.
☆¤☆¤☆¤vasudhaiva kutumbakam¤☆¤☆¤☆
Happy Diwali to you, your family and all readers here. Gratitude for all the work done by you.
ReplyDeleteHello Captain and all deshbhakts!
ReplyDeleteHappy Diwali to everyone around the world!
Regards,
Happy Deepawali Captain and all the readers!
ReplyDeletePranaam Guruji,
ReplyDeleteCharan sparsh.
We family wishing warmly you and your family a very happy dipawali.
And, big glory to KING MAHABALI also.
Yours faithfully
Nishant
Hi Sir,
ReplyDeleteHope u are doing good. I know Keralites don't celeb Diwali, just generally wana wish all Indians happy Diwali.
Off topic Sir,
I'm proud to see the Indian national football team ranked 97th (Top 100) in FIFA World Rankings as of this month. My home country (Malaysia) is ranked 169.
Recently India drew with China. Was proud to see the score line. I hope Indian national football team continues to get stronger. Cheers sir