SHELL COMPANIES for money laundering, tax evasion, hiding kickbacks, layering PART 16 -- CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL

THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 15, BELOW--

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/03/shell-companies-for-money-laundering_9.html

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 11, 2017 at 6:49 AM

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/25564-epa-head-scott-pruitt-riles-global-warming-alarmists

INDEED

MAN MADE CO2 HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GLOBAL WARMING

DONALD TRUMP--LISTEN UP--

JEWS ARE MAKING MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR WITH CARBON CREDITS AND OFFSETS -- THIS MUST STOP

DONALD TRUMP--

TEAR UP PARIS COP 21 AND THROW IT ON OBAMAs FACE --THIS TRAITOR OBAMA WITH A WHITE JEWESS MOTHER ANN DUNHAM SHIFTED US CO2 EMISSIONS TO CHINA ALONG WITH AMERICAN JOBS ..

NITROUS OXIDE DOES NOT HAVE CARBON IN THE FORMULA

Atmospheric CO2 is not a pollutant, it is in fact the very elixir of life. Adding CO2 to the atmosphere enhances plant water use efficiency. Increased levels of carbon dioxide boosts plant growth and make plants more resistant to droughts

GOD MADE THE OCEANS SALTY FOR A REASON.

Ocean acidification from man made CO2 is fake news

OCEANS ARE A BUFFER AND SINK FOR CO2

The total carbon exchange depended on whether more came up out of the water than went down into it. The deeper parts of the ocean are rich with ancient carbon from limestone, rocks, dead creatures, and so on.

Changes in ocean circulation can have a big impact on how much CO2 the oceans absorb

Almost all of the observed change of CO2 during the Industrial Era comes, not from anthropogenic emissions, but from changes of natural emission.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/04/most-potent-greenhouse-gases-nitrous.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/12/arctic-ice-melt-and-methane-time-bomb.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/06/methane-time-bomb-arctic-ice-meltdown.html

The IPCC contention that natural carbon dioxide absorption and emissions are miraculously in balance and, therefore that man-made emissions are solely responsible for the increase in carbon dioxide concentration is PLAIN STUPID .

The Jews have bribed many world leaders to aint man made CO2 black -- I know the climate change RUDALI pay-roll in India.

The IPCC LIED that CO2 emitted until 2100 will remain in the atmosphere longer than 1000 years, and that the removal of human-emitted CO2 from the atmosphere by natural processes will take a few hundred thousand years -- THESE LYING BASTARDS MUST BE PUNISHED .

CHECK OUT THE LYING BASTARDS IN WIKIPEDIA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions

THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF SHELL COMPANIES ENGAGED IN THE CARBON CREDIT/ OFFSET SCAM

Jew Rothschild EMBEDDED black man Van Jones ( with a white Jewess white ) in the white house to brain wash Obama -- In March 2009 Jones was appointed as the White House Council on Environmental Quality. Van Jones was use to shift US jobs to China.

HEY ROTHSCHILD COMMIE, VAN JONES WANTS TO SAVE THE PLANET.

http://www.eastbayexpress.com/oakland/best-environmentalist/BestOf?oid=1372189

EVER HEARD OF JUGGA BABY ?

YEH LEH !

http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/01/30/climate-change-hack-carbon-credit-black-dragon/

capt ajit vadakayil
..

http://www.redd-monitor.org/2016/07/08/jail-sentences-for-11-in-frances-carbon-scam-of-the-century/

Below:  Donald Tump-listen up- THIS BLACK MAN IS NO 1 TRAITOR IN USA , WHO WAS EMBEDDED IN WHITE HOUSE AS AN ENVIRONMENTALIST  BY JEW ROTHSCHILD

WE ASK PM MODI TO CONDUCT AN EXAM FOR THE NGT MEMBERS 


IF THEY FAIL , FINE THEM HEAVILY AND THEN SACK THEM--


NAME AND SHAME , WITH THE PATHETIC MARKS SCORED

IF CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WERE TO SET A SIMPLE BASIC  EXAM PAPER , ALL WILL SCORE ZERO 

THESE ARE THE ONES WHO POINT FINGERS WITHOUT TAKING RESPONSIBILITY .  

YOU SEE THE BUCK DOES NOT STOP ON THEIR FUCKIN' TABLE 

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 11, 2017 at 10:01 PM

Donald Trump –listen up

The second you tear up PARIS COP 21 and throw it on Obama’s face , it will be Jew Rothschild’s THIRD defeat in as many months ( first being US elections / second being Assad still in place ) 

DIGRESSION : I have a 19 year old Aussie girl and her father who comes to the gym . 
They are from Brisbane and they rue that their GREAT BARRIER REEF is fucked

I explained to them—the reef is hibernating to protect itself—it will soon come back into full bloom

I WAS THE FIRST ON THE PLANET TO EXPLAIN WHY GOD MADE OCEANS SALTY

I have explained in the post below using chemical equations

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/12/thermal-coal-power-plants-clean-exhaust_6.html

capt ajit vadakayil
..

The carbon market is also commonly referred to as a “cap-and-trade” regime. A limit (or “cap) is set for countries or companies on the total amount of greenhouse gas emissions they can emit. 

If they exceed the limit they are required to buy carbon credits from others.  Those with spare carbon credits may sell surplus credits to emitters that require more (the “trade”).

 The Kyoto Protocol has set a “cap” for Countries that have accepted targets for limiting or reducing their emissions.

These targets are expressed as a fixed number of Assigned Amount Units (AAUs)

 Each AAU represents an allowance to emit greenhouse gases equivalent to one tonne of CO2. 

If the country exceeds its allowed emissions it needs to offset its (excess) emissions by purchasing reductions made in another jurisdiction.

There are a number of different types of units that may be purchased as offsets. Each of these units is given a different name depending upon the legal jurisdiction in which it is generated. 

In each case, however, each unit is standardised to one carbon credit, the equivalent of one tonne of CO2 making them easily exchangeable across borders.

The Kyoto Protocol allows countries that have excess AAUs to spare (where that country was able to stay below its assigned target) to sell these excess units to countries that have exceeded their target. 

The types of units (or carbon credits) which may be transferred under the scheme are:--

AAUs: Assigned Amount Units (AAUs) represents an allowance to emit greenhouse gases equivalent to one tonne of CO2.   AAUs are assigned to each country under the Kyoto Protocol, representing their “cap” or target for limiting or reducing their emissions.

RMUs: A special regime has been established for the agricultural and forestry sector (referred to technically under the Kyoto Protocol rules as the “land use, land-use change, and forestry” (LULUCF) sector). Emission units obtained

in this sector, such as from reforestation, are referred to as removal units (RMUs).

ERUs: The Kyoto Protocol also provides for a mechanism, known as “joint implementation projects” that allows a Party to jointly implement “green” projects in another Annex I country that also has binding targets under the Kyoto Protocol (typically this has been a country in central and eastern Europe).

This generates emission reduction units (ERUs), each equal to one tonne of CO2. 

Joint implementation (JI) offers a flexible and cost-efficient means of fulfilling part of a Party’s Kyoto commitments, while the host Party benefits from foreign investment and technology transfer. ERUs can then be traded or used to cover the country’s emissions target.

CERs: The Clean Development Mechanism allows a Party to invest in emission-reduction projects in developing countries to earn certified emission reduction (CER) credits, each equivalent to one tonne of CO2, which may be transferred between countries by emissions trading on the carbon market.

 Eligible projects include renewable energy production and reforestation. The objective of the CDM mechanism is to stimulate sustainable economic development in developing countries using cleaner technology, while giving industrialized countries some flexibility in how they meet their emissions targets.

Carbon trading is THE  world’s fastest growing commodities market.

The EU ETS covers CO2 emissions from installations such as power stations, combustion plants, oil refineries and iron and steel works, as well as factories making cement, glass, lime, bricks, ceramics, pulp, paper and board.  

 On 1 January 2012, emissions from the aviation sector were included. 

Any airline using an EU airport must pay a tax on each tonne of carbon emitted.

Unlike traditional commodities, which at some time during the course of their market exchange must be physically delivered to someone, carbon credits do not represent a physical commodity but instead have been described as a legal fiction that is poorly understood by many sellers, buyers and traders. 

This lack of understanding makes carbon trading particularly vulnerable to fraud and other illegal activity. Carbon markets, like other financial markets, are also at risk of exploitation by criminals due to the large amount of money invested, the immaturity of the regulations and lack of oversight and transparency.

Carbon markets involve more than just direct trading in carbon credits, they also include trading its derivatives and other financial instruments. As carbon markets develop, so too does the complexity of the financial instruments that can be traded. 

The recent global financial crisis has illustrated difficulties in regulating financial markets when financial instruments become too complex to properly disaggregate and assess for compliance. 

Many of the same derivatives traders responsible for developing these complex financial instruments are also actively engaged in investing in the carbon market. 

The financial crisis demonstrated the lack of technical and enforcement capacity among financial regulators to deal with complex financial instruments. The carbon market is at risk, therefore, of following the same path unless its regulators are able to properly manage these complex financial instruments.

Here are ways to identify those areas within emerging carbon markets that are potentially, or have proven to be, vulnerable to criminal activity. In broad terms, the illegal activities identified include:--

(i) Fraudulent manipulation of measurements to claim more carbon credits from a project than were actually obtained;

(ii) Sale of carbon credits that either do not exist or belong to someone else;

(iii) False or misleading claims with respect to the environmental or financial benefits of carbon market investments;

(iv) Exploitation of weak regulations in the carbon market to commit financial crimes, such as money laundering, securities fraud or tax fraud; and

(v) Computer hacking/ phishing to steal carbon credits and theft of personal information.

 Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects generate carbon credits based on the extent to which the project resulted in fewer emissions than would otherwise have occurred. 

This provides fraudsters with two possible approaches to manipulate measurements and fraudulently obtain a greater allocation of carbon credits. 

Firstly, they might overinflate the estimate of the emissions that would otherwise have occurred (through, for example, overstating the business-as-usual scenario). 

Secondly, they might fraudulently claim the project reduces emissions to a greater degree than it actually does.

There are a number of ways to manipulate these measurements. Most obviously, the data can be intentionally misreported. 

More subtly, however, those doing the measurements might distort their analysis through measuring only certain variables, a selective choice of sites for collecting data, or adopting certain assumptions in the calculations. 

In many developing countries, a lack of reliable data and/or poor institutional capacity to monitor the data collection process provides ample opportunity for those with vested interests to manipulate carbon measurements to their own advantage.

To address this risk, the CDM mechanism requires third-party validation and verification before a project receives carbon credits. This function is carried out by Designated Operation Entities (DOEs) certified by the CDM Executive Board.

 Even independent third party auditors, however, may be susceptible to bribes or collusion to manipulate the results. 

Particularly when projects include state elites and powerful business interests, auditing agencies or individual staff may be subject to considerable political pressure, or offered bribes, to verify carbon measurements that show benefits higher than those actually achieved by the project.

Further, concern has been raised about the level of independence of the DOEs. The usual business practice for the commercial arrangements under a CDM project is for the DOE to be paid by the project developer, and only after the project has been approved by the CDM Executive Board. 

This raises an inherent conflict of interest in which DOEs are incentivised to facilitate the project’s approval rather than to ensure accuracy of the validation process.

Since all carbon credits are interchangeable with each other (in market terms this is referred to as being “fungible”) there is little distinction on the carbon market between carbon credits originating as AAUs or those generated as RMUs, ERUs or CERs. 

To ensure market integrity therefore, the priority is only to ensure that the carbon credits are legally recognized under the relevant legal regime, and can be bought and sold as such. This can be achieved through establishing clear, independently regulated trading rules. 

Environmental integrity, however, requires that the project results in a verifiable reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. 

This misalignment of objectives – ensuring that the carbon credits are verified and legally tradable versus ensuring emissions are actually reduced – undermines the incentives of participants in the carbon market to investigate (or self-regulate) the origin of the carbon credits.

Reducing fraud and other forms of corruption in the generation of carbon credits therefore requires specific oversight by regulatory authorities.

The intangible nature of carbon credits makes it possible to separate ownership in the carbon rights from the physical project. A project such as planting trees, or upgrading a factory, for example, may be owned and managed by one person or company, while another acquires the legal rights to trade in any carbon credits generated. 

The risk of corruption, therefore, is increased by the fact that there is no physical indication of the identity of the person who holds the carbon rights, beyond a piece of paper or record in a government register. 

Fraud may also be facilitated by government corruption that allows persons to register forged documents concerning ownership of carbon credits.

This raises a number of risks:--

(i) It is difficult to prevent the owner of the carbon rights from selling the same carbon credits over and over to multiple parties – a practice known as “double-counting”. Double-counting can be easier to get away with when carbon credits are sold through several foreign exchanges with different regulations and lax standards of monitoring or cross-checking between exchanges.

(ii) If someone were to fraudulently claim ownership of the carbon credits generated by a particular CDM or JI project, it is unlikely locally-based law enforcement officers would detect such fraud unless they are regularly monitoring the government carbon registry.

The relative complexity of the carbon markets, and the fact that they are new and emerging markets, means there is little understanding among traders and buyers. This “customer naivety” has been taken advantage of by companies, with many examples of advertising campaigns or investment advice that involves false and misleading claims.

As with the example of Ponzi schemes, many “common” types of financial fraud well-known in other sectors are also finding their way into the carbon market. 

Financial regulators need to be vigilant against “white collar” criminals moving into the carbon market, and be on the lookout for financial crimes such as securities fraud, tax evasion and money laundering.

The recent global financial crisis has shown clearly that current methods of regulating markets are vulnerable to manipulation. The complexity of carbon markets makes them particularly difficult to regulate. 

Poor legal regulation, together with the lack of any tangible asset behind the traded carbon credits makes this market perhaps even easier to manipulate. 

The rapid growth of investment, while regulation and oversight of the carbon markets remain at an immature stage, makes them vulnerable to exploitation. 

This is of particular concern with the development of new financial products which have not been adequately vetted, and with regulators whose technical knowledge and resources are limited.

It is anticipated that in the near future, Carbon credits may be generated in one country, sold to persons in another and traded through several carbon exchanges before reaching the hands of the final owner. 

The more countries involved, the harder it is to trace the carbon credit from its origin to final purchaser, and the easier it is for criminals to take advantage of any legal loopholes or inconsistent regulations between different national legislation. 

Law enforcement and regulators are often limited in their ability to work outside their own domestic legal jurisdiction, making enforcement of international carbon markets complicated and difficult without a proper global enforcement response. 

INTERPOL, with its trans-boundary mandate, can assist law enforcement agencies to police the carbon market across multi-jurisdictions. 

Of particular concern is the number of cases where existing carbon markets are looking to expand into countries without a strong track record in viable markets and where regulatory regimes are extremely weak. 

Further, any inconsistency between the licensing rules for carbon traders or between the regulations across different jurisdictions is likely to see businesses migrate to the jurisdiction with the minimum legal or regulatory requirements.

 Carbon trading in the European Union has already been hit by a particular form of tax fraud involving the theft of Value Added Tax (“VAT”) (also known as carousel fraud or Missing Trader Intra-Community fraud).

This type of fraud exploits how VAT is treated in multi-jurisdictional trading in Europe. It involves importing goods from one jurisdiction that is VAT-free (such as between member states of the European Union) followed by selling those goods charging both the sales price plus VAT. 

The goods and the VAT may then be sold on through a number of companies, passing across a number of borders, with each additional layer of transactions making it more difficult to trace the link between the final VAT that is owed to the relevant government authority and the original importer, who by this time has disappeared without paying the tax.

In its most basic form, Person A in Country 1 sells carbon credits to Person B in Country 2. Because the transaction is over a border, it is VAT free. Now, Person B sells to Person C, who is also in Country 2. 

Person C must pay VAT on the sale to Person B, who is required to pass it along to the government. In VAT fraud, Person B disappears without remitting the money. 

Prior to exploiting the carbon market, this form of tax fraud had been widely used by criminals for items that are of high value but small and easily shipped across borders (such as mobile phones or computer chips). 

With carbon credits, however, such fraud is even more attractive as there is no product to physically ship across jurisdictions, since the credits are transferred electronically.

More than 95 % of all carbon trading in some countries is a result of fraudulent activities.

Billions are dollars are made by criminal Jews out of thin air-they use SHELL COMPANIES to layer their scam.   

Carbon markets are particularly vulnerable to loopholes being exploited by criminals when different tax rules apply when trades are made across different jurisdictions. 

The risk of exploitation and tax fraud will increase the more national and regional carbon markets are linked to each other, unless strong regulations are in place that are consistent across each jurisdiction.

Regulators will need to ensure to close all loopholes when faced with large volumes of carbon credits being exchanged between multiple carbon markets, each subject to different legal regimes

Securities fraud involves deceptive practices in the carbon market in violation of securities laws that induce investors to make decisions to purchase or sell carbon credits on the basis of false information, frequently resulting in losses.

Examples include manipulating the price of carbon credits to outright theft from investors (e.g. embezzlement by traders).

The price of carbon credits can be manipulated, for example, by large traders issuing buy/sell recommendations to their customers on the one hand, while doing the opposite with their own carbon credits. 

Another way to push up carbon credit prices is for those companies that publish commodity indexes to adjust their index weightings to include more carbon credits. The adjustment would result in an increase in demand, and investment into the carbon market, which could also drive up the price.

It is possible that companies that need to purchase carbon credits to offset their emissions may also have investments in derivatives trading and in businesses responsible for generating carbon credits.

This raises the potential for those related companies to engage in transfer mispricing. Transfer mispricing, also known as transfer pricing manipulation, refers to trades between two related parties at artificial prices for the purposes of tax avoidance.

If two unrelated companies trade with each other (known as “arms-length” trading), it is generally accepted that they will deal with each at the market price for the transaction because it is the product of genuine negotiation in a market. 

But when two related companies – that is, a parent company and a subsidiary, or two subsidiaries controlled by a common parent – trade with each other, they may artificially distort the price at which the trade is recorded, to minimise the overall tax bill. 

This might, for example, help the company record as much of its profit as possible in a tax haven with low or zero taxes.

In the case of the carbon market, for example, a company (the “parent company”) may need to purchase carbon credits to offset its own emissions. It may invest in an offset project in Africa to generate those carbon credits. But first it establishes a trading company in a tax haven (with zero taxes). 

The subsidiary company in Africa sells its carbon credits (at a very low price) to the trading company, who then sells those carbon credits (at a very high price) to the parent company. 

In this case the subsidiary company in Africa receives an artificially low price for the carbon credits, resulting in low profits – and consequently an artificially low tax bill in Africa. 

The company in the tax haven sells the credits at a high price – artificially transferring all of the profits there, but being a tax haven, no tax is paid.

Money laundering is any act to conceal or disguise the identity of illegally obtained proceeds to make them appear to have originated from legitimate sources.  Hundreds of  SHELL companies are used .  

Illegally obtained funds are laundered using entities to disguise the true owner of money, and then moved around the globe using intermediaries and money transmitters. In this way, the illegal funds remain hidden and are integrated into legal business and into the legal economy.

Money laundering usually occurs in three steps: first, the proceeds of the crime (usually in the form of cash) is introduced into the financial system by some means ("placement"), the second involves carrying out complex financial transactions in order to camouflage the illegal source ("layering"), and the final step involves using those illicit funds for investments to acquire wealth ("integration" nay commie CUNT  Kanhaiya Kumar waalah  INTEGRASSANN ).

Law enforcement officials should be aware that criminals may purchase carbon credits as a way of introducing illicit proceeds into the financial system, with subsequent trades used to hide the illegal source, making it difficult to trace the funds. 

This might involve, for example, using cash to purchase carbon credits through a broker, which are then re-sold, with subsequent trades used to layer the transactions before the revenue is withdrawn and deposited into a financial institution.

Today, most countries have adopted legal, regulatory and operational measures to combat money laundering.

These require financial institutions to identify unusual or suspicious behavior which may indicate money laundering and report those transactions to the financial intelligence unit in the respective country. 

According to the international standards these requirements apply to all financial institutions including any person who conducts business trading in:--

(a) money market instruments (cheques, bills, certificates of deposit, derivatives etc.);

(b) foreign exchange;

(c) exchange, interest rate and index instruments;

(d) transferable securities; or

(e) commodity futures trading

It is unclear whether these regulations would necessarily apply to carbon traders, since it is unclear whether trading in carbon credits falls into any of the financial instruments listed above. In many countries, the legal character of carbon credits is still being determined as their carbon markets are still in the early stages of development.

 But Jews are making money out of thin air

Law enforcement officials should also be aware that companies developing projects to generate carbon credits might use those projects as a mechanism to filter illegally obtained funds. 

For example, a money launderer could use a combination of legal and illegally obtained funds to purchase wind turbines for an offset project, especially targeting projects in developing countries where oversight and regulations are less advanced.

The criminal would then generate supposedly “legitimate” profits through the sale of carbon credits generated by the project, thus concealing the wealth obtained from the original illegal source.

The electronic nature of carbon credits and their registries make the carbon trading market particularly susceptible to technology crimes such as hacking. 

Although carbon credits can be identified by unique serial numbers, making it possible to track stolen credits, this can be undermined by weak regulatory oversight, particularly when the stolen credits are traded across different jurisdictions. 

Kosher crooks have finessed the art of making money by carbon credits and emissions trading 

In January 2011, computer hackers stole 2 million carbon credits from registries in Austria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece and Poland.

 Users attempting to access the websites of these registries were re-directed to fake websites created by the hackers, where any transactions attempted were redirected to accounts controlled by the hackers.

When this security breach was discovered, the European Commission suspended certain types of transactions (known as spot trading)  from being initiated on all 30 national registries in the EU ETS in order to protect the integrity of the overall registries system.

 Austrian officials traced stolen carbon credits to Lichtenstein and Sweden, where all of the carbon credits from Austria were frozen and prevented from re-entering the market.

 Czech authorities were also able to track over 1.3 million carbon credits to Britain, Germany, and Estonia, at which time the European Commission was requested to freeze those carbon credits too. 

This incident shows that because of the electronic nature of carbon credits, computer hackers are able to quickly move stolen carbon credits out of the jurisdiction and through the national registries of other countries. Tracking those stolen credits, therefore, requires a global law enforcement response and a multi-national investigation.

Criminals have also identified opportunities to use existing carbon markets to steal personal information from customers and investors, such as usernames, passwords, and bank details. This information can then be used to illegally transfer money and/or carbon credits.

One particular way in which this identity theft has occurred is known as phishing. This describes a particular type of internet crime where fake internet websites are established, whose appearance is almost identical to the legitimate one. 

Unsuspecting customers are directed to the website where they are requested to enter personal information, in which case their financial information and passwords may then be stolen.

In February 2010, German authorities uncovered the theft of a considerable number of carbon credits as a result of phishing from companies across Europe, Japan and New Zealand. 

The victims had received fraudulent emails asking them to re-register on the national carbon registry due to “security problems”. This email, however, included a link to a fraudulent website, where the companies were required to input their account data. 

Once the fraudsters obtained the companies' account details, they were able to steal carbon credits by transferring them to other  accounts and immediately selling them. 250,000 credits were stolen, worth €3.2 million

WE ASK TRUMP/ PUTIN/ MODI TO PUT AN END TO THIS NONSENSE OF CARBON TRADING AND OFFSETS. IT INSULTS , MY INTELLIGENCE

PEOPLE WHO KNOW CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WILL SAY — THE SUBJECT ENDS HERE 

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/02/naive-sailor-winch-brake-rendering-capt.html

I HAVE FARTED ONLY TWICE TODAY—WHO BHI EKDUM CHENGA  KOSHER FARTS

CHAAL HAMAARA FART CREDIT, OFFESET KARKE , CHOONA LAGAAKE, CHARKHA GHUMAAKE,  NIKAAAL — TWO MILLION DOLLARS PLEAJJE.

ABOVE IS A COSY JEWISH CLUB.. 

ANYBODY ELSE TRYING TO MAKE MONEY , THE JEWS GANG UP AND

GETS HIM EXPOSED BY THEIR MONOPOLIZED MEDIA AND THEN TAKES HIM TO THE CLEANERS USING JEWSISH INSTRUMENTS.  

THERE IS NO WAY FROM JAIL FOR A LONG TIME

SEE THIS IS AN JEWISH FAIN/ SHYLOCK GAME –NO ENTRY FOR OTHERS. 

THIS IS A FOUL KOSHER GAME FOR JEWS TO MAKE MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR TILL THE SUN GOES SUPERNOVA

CARBON TRADING VIA SHELL COMPANIES HAS BEEN USED TO FUND TERROR.    BUT OF COURSE ROTHSCHILDs MEDIA WILL REPORT ONLY WHAT SUITS THEM

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/briton-used-carbon-trading-to-fund-terror-9754108.html

SHELL COMPANIES ARE ALWAYS USED IN CARBON TRADING..

http://www.france24.com/en/20160503-france-trial-multi-billion-carbon-emissions-trading-fraud-opens-paris

BELOW IS A VAT SCAM USING SHELL COMPANIES

http://www.euractiv.com/section/euro-finance/news/eu-carbon-market-fraudsters-face-heavy-jail-sentences/

VERY RARELY DO ROTHSCHILDs BANKS GET CAUGHT

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-3625388/RBS-sued-145m-alleged-role-huge-carbon-trading-VAT-fraud.html

Since the Panama Papers exposed how opaque shell companies can be used to conceal ill-gotten gains or avoid tax, several countries including Japan, Israel, Bulgaria and France have largely made their company databases freely available, while Britain became the first country globally to provide free access to data showing real company owners, rather than their nominees.

The Panama Papers showed Hong Kong was the most active centre in the world for the creation of shell companies. In response, Hong Kong quietly pushed through proposals on anti-money laundering laws and company disclosure legislation, including a requirement that companies reveal the identity of their true owners.

But in Hong Kong, home to more than 1.3 million private companies, access to the information comes at a cost.

Corporate registry fees make it VERY expensive to conduct investigations into potential crimes amid increasingly complex corporate structures. 

For larger investigations where a company may have hundreds of SHELL subsidiaries or associated companies, the process can be prohibitively expensive—DELIBERATELY so.

The world’s largest KOSHER banks want to do less to stop drug lords, tax cheats, and terrorists from moving money through their institutions –

Since banks, perform banking transactions, they are uniquely positioned to detect when a drug lord or a sketchy hedge fund is trying to wash illicit money through legitimate channels. When transactions are larger than $5,000, or have hallmarks of terrorist financing, tax evasion, or money laundering, they must file a suspicious activity report (SAR) and deliver them to federal regulators.

 This provides raw data for law enforcement to connect the dots on criminal activity.   In a SAR, the subject of the transaction’s personal information, the date of the transaction, the name of the bank where it occurred and its contact information, and a written description of the activity. It is so easy to make it yet banks don’t do it. . 

 There are  fines against Raymond James,  Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank,  Taiwanese firm Mega Bank etc. All of those were within the past nine months.   For allowing the Sinaloa drug cartel and terrorist financiers to launder illegal cash for a decade, HSBC infamously paid $1.9 billion—but their compliance system remains so weak that the British Financial Conduct Authority opened an “wool over the eyes”  investigation  .

Banks are truly terrible at anti–money laundering compliance. 

They’re fined for compliance failures all the time.  Banks don’t care because there are NO jail terms.   

Kosher banks do NOT care for fines

Kosher banks  don’t like following the rules if it means cutting off business with less than reputable clients that can earn them lots and lots of money. This is how the terrorist bank BCCI flourished for so long.

THE WHITE MAN WILL ALWAYS TRY TO RUN DOWN THIRD WORLD BUSINESS MEN –

THEY WILL NEVER SAY A WORD AGAINST WHITE JEWS ESPECIALLY IF THEY ARE PART OF BILDERBERG CLUB

https://www.marineconservation.org.au/data/pdf/The_Adani_Brief_by_Environmental_Justice_Australia.pdf

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/09/shrewd-club-within-naive-bilderberg.html

After the Panama Papers revelations, the European Commission has not shown much interest in taking strong and exemplary action on tax evasion and avoidance. They apparently have a KOSHER avoidance filter..

With up to 1.6 USD trillion USD lost from the real economy each year, they need to be honest to themselves , transparent and  bolder.

The European Commission’s stance on whistleblowing is suspect.

As the verdict in the Luxembourg Leaks trial demonstrates, even award-winning whistleblowers can face criminal prosecution - some reward for publicising political and corporate collusion in tax dodging. 

The Commission proposes nothing beyond monitoring national legislation. This is not good enough—we know why the POOJANIYA Commissions kosher  hands are tied

A public register of beneficial owners for companies and business-type trusts must be created . This should put an end to shell companies used to dodge taxes because citizens will be able to access information on who are the persons behind each company created. 

As the Panama Papers demonstrated, banks and intermediaries have found ways to circumvent money-laundering obligations in the past.   

INDIA WILL CONTINUE BURNING COAL—WHETHER JEW ROTHSCHILD LIKES IT OR NOT !

Read all 6 parts of the post below--

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/12/thermal-coal-power-plants-clean-exhaust.html

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/post-note-ban-rs-35000-crore-cash-stash-flooded-mp-banks/articleshow/57611278.cms

Bogus capital gains of Rs 82,000 crore have been availed by shell companies last year . The  Budget 2017-18 has proposed 10 per cent long-term capital gains tax on those who acquired shares in unlisted companies after October 1, 2004, if they had not paid securities transaction tax (STT) at the time of purchase.

abcindiagogoMarch 14, 2017 at 7:52 PM

Captain and all readers,

Check this out -

TheViralFever (TVF) CEO accused of Sexual Harrasment by multiple women !

http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/tvf-founder-ceo-accused-of-sexual-harassment-by-multiple-women-2149897.html

http://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/mumbai/cover-story/tvf-boss-labels-sex-abuse-charges-fake-challenges-victim-to-file-a-police-case/articleshow/57623657.cms

http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/tvf-boss-arunabh-kumar-defends-himself-after-more-women-accuse-him-of-molestation-1669426

-------------------------

The victim and many other women have shared their experience on this blog -

https://medium.com/@Indian.fowler/the-indian-uber-that-is-tvf-37f9cb73df31#.l00glzg5q
----------------------------------------------

1. 
   Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 14, 2017 at 8:42 PM

   WE ASK THE FINANCE/ IT DEPT TO FIND OUT
   
   WHY DID TVF( THE VIRAL FEVER ) RECEIVE 66 CRORES FROM TIGAL GLOBAL ?Tiger Global also picked up a stake close to 25% in the firm, --270 crore.
   
   WE DO NOT WANT WHITE JEWS CONTROLLING INDIAs SOCIAL MEDIA
   
   Tiger Global, a HUGE hedge funds operator, has used Cayman Islands based shell companies to make large bets against European companies
   
   What is JEW Julian Robertson's interest in India?
   
   WE WANT THE FINANCE DEPT TO FIND OUT WHERE ALL TIGER GLOBAL INVESTMENTS HAVE INVESTED IN INDIA.
   
   We know of companies like Shopclues, Roposo, LimeRoad, Quikr, InShorts, Grofers, LocalOye, Culture Machine , policy Bazaar, Chaayos, Delhivery, Freshdesk, Chargebee, Moonfrog labs, Ather Energy and Vedantu.
   
   WHY ARE WHITE JEWS TWEAKING INDIAN CULTURE ?
   
   Prior to funding TVF, Tiger Global invested in another digital content creator Culture Machine, which runs the Being Indian and several other YouTube channels.
   
   Contagious Online Media Network Pvt Ltd is Viral Fever’s parent company.
   
   WE , THE PEOPLE OF INDIA ARE WATCHING
   
   WE KNOW --WE ARE NOT IDIOTS
   
   PUT THIS COMMENT IN PM MODIs, RAJNATH SINGHs, LAW MINISTERs WEBSITES
   
   capt ajit vadakayil
   ..

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 14, 2017 at 10:28 PM

WE KNOW THE DESH DROHI POLITICIANS WHO HAVE ALLOWED TIGER GLOBAL INVESTMENTS A DRIVERS SEAT IN INDIA

WE KNOW THE KICKBACKS THESE INDIAN TRAITORS GOT

http://www.vccircle.com/news/alternative-investment/2016/09/12/why-tiger-global-crouching-india

WE THE PEOPLE WATCH

Kalyan Krishnamurthy the current CEO of Flipkart served as the Managing Director and Director of Finance and Portfolio Companies at Tiger Global Management LLC

http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/9jYZyiFhhTSMksYebC62WK/Flipkart-Tiger-Globals-unlikely-burden.html

WE WATCH !

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 15, 2017 at 2:05 PM

######### WOMB OF MODERN ECONOMICS #############

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apco3D5B_7A

BIG DADDY !

Short selling is the practice of selling securities or other financial instruments that are not currently owned (usually borrowed), and subsequently repurchasing them .

In the event of an interim price decline, the short seller profits, since the cost of RE purchase is less than the proceeds received upon the initial SHORT sale.

Conversely, the short position closes out at a loss if the price of a shorted instrument rises prior to repurchase.

. Speculators may sell short hoping to realize a profit on an instrument that appears overvalued, just as long investors or speculators hope to profit from a rise in the price of an instrument that appears undervalued. Traders or fund managers may hedge a long position or a portfolio through one or more short positions.

In contrast to a traditional merchant who starts out to "buy low, sell high", a short-seller starts out to "sell high, buy low", or even to "buy high, sell low" when this buy is in fact "on tick".

JEW Isaac Le Maire ( Dutch East India Company spice trade from Kerala ) is the FATHER of short selling


The world’s first stock market, called “Bourse” opened in Antwerp in 1531 monopolised by Jews. The hottest item of trade was spices from Kerala ( Calicut king ships to Salala/ Aden ) and then by Arab camel caravans , ships of the desert to ( Beirut/ Constantinople ) and then further from there on Jewish owned ships to Europe

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/03/protestant-christianity-created-by-jews.html

NAZI is lifted from NASI.

With the high concentration of Jews and their centuries of experience about financial issues, this trading in money itself took off like a rocket.

Nearly every aspect of what we call modern financing, from “forward” contracts, “option” contracts, “stocks”, “securities”, commodities trading and even “sovereign bonds” were created here.

These rules and regulations were all LIFTED from ancient Kerala king’s customs trading post commercial rules at Mecca oasis and Salala/ Aden. These rules were again lifted from the rules of Manu, the planet’s first law giver.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/01/manu-first-law-maker-capt-ajit.html

For example, the Spanish government had something called juros (link in Spanish), a kind of sovereign or treasury bond. The government would essentially sell someone a piece of paper for a sum of money, with the promise to pay the money back at a later date with interest.

These juros themselves were traded at the Antwerp bourse, with people buying and selling them in between themselves independent of the Spanish government.

With relative ease at which large amounts of money could be raised at the bourse, the fundamental aspects of capitalism had great appeal to monarchs and powerful men at the time.

In 1565 Jew Thomas Gresham founded the Royal Exchange in the City of London which is still active

But even with all of the sophisticated terms and contracts and different ways of trading things, from “shorts” to “longs” to “futures” and “options” and all the rest, this still wasn’t quite capitalism.

What was happening in the Antwerp bourse was a kind of sophisticated form of KOSHER gambling.

I bet you X dollars that the price of pepper will go down, you bet the opposite, and one of us ends up winning and making money.

Even the floating of sovereign debt was a kind of gambling, wherein you lend money to royalty today, taking the gamble that through conquests or winning wars (or whatever else), they’ll be able to pay you back more money in the future.

Capitalism was founded by a JEW named Isaac Le Maire.

CONTINUED TO 2-

1. 
   Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 15, 2017 at 2:06 PM

   CONTINUED FROM 1-
   
   Originally a wealthy Calicut spice grocer in Antwerp, in 1585 Spanish troops destroyed much of the town (including the bourse) and so Isaac Le Maire as well as the financial “action” of the bourse along with the Jews moved to Amsterdam.
   
   Dutch East India Company was the first company in history to actually issue bonds and shares of stock to the general public. The VOC was officially the first publicly traded company of the planet, because it was the first company to be ever actually listed on an official stock exchange.
   
   As the first historical model of the quasi-fictional concept of mega-corporations, the VOC possessed quasi-governmental powers, including the ability to wage war, imprison and execute convicts, negotiate treaties, strike its own coins, and establish colonies
   
   A new bourse was created there as well as the first multinational corporation in history, the Vereenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie (VOC), known in English as the “United East India Company”.
   
   The VOC was a trading company, given an exclusive monopoly (by the newly independent Dutch government) to valuable Malabar spices of Calicut King and other imported treasures like diamonds
   Besides all the older “action” on the Antwerp bourse, there was an extremely brisk trade in selling and buying of VOC stocks in the Amsterdam bourse. Extremely complicated strategies on how to trade these stocks soon arose, later detailed in a book (written in Spanish) called Confusión de confusions.
   
   For the first time ever, ordinary people could make a living solely off the profit from trading financial instruments of one kind or another.
   
   JEW Isaac Le Maire was the largest shareholder (owner of stock) of the VOC when it was created in 1602. As a result of his dominant position, he became the “governor” of the VOC, in effect the world’s first CEO.
   
   Whether true or not, other large shareholders became convinced that JEW Le Maire was embezzling funds and so had him expelled from the company by 1605. Pissed off at the loss of so much (potential) profit, he decided to get his revenge on the company using a unique financial strategy.
   
   He and other corrupt Jews founded a company (what would now be called a “dummy corporation”) to secretly trade in VOC shares in an effort both to make money as well as to destroy the VOC’s profitability by driving down the share prices. Le Maire used a unique form of trade called the SHORT SELLING
   
   In essence, he sold something he did not own (shares in the company) to someone based on the premise that he would buy those things in the future when they would (hopefully for Le Maire’s purposes) be cheaper than they are today.
   
   In other words, he sold people the promise to buy something in the future (VOC stock). It is a a kind of gamble or wager because if the future price of stock is higher then Le Maire now owes the other person money. But for the first time in history, people were now selling things that they did not own .
   
   THIS IS MAKING KOSHER MONEY FROM THIN AIR—NOW BEING TRANSLATED EVEN FURTHER TO CARBON CREDITS AND OFFSETS.
   
   Naked means that even their promises were unsecured and making a profit off of them.
   
   Using machinations involving the French government, Le Maire indeed did conspire to lower the (future) price of VOC stock. If he had succeeded, he would have profited enormously without having to own (or buy) anything in the first place.
   
   In Jew Le Maire’s case, his strategy backfired as the price of VOC stock went up and suddenly a lot of people were waiting for payment (in stocks) that Le Maire simply could not afford to buy.
   
   As a result, the Dutch government banned short selling (for a brief time, and then it was reinstated, a cycle that continues in modern economies today).
   
   What distinguishes Rothschild’s capitalism from sophisticated forms of gambling is the premise that something can be created from nothing. Rothschild owned all trade unions ( TO CONTROL THE OPPOSITION, LEAD THEM YOURSELF ) –he could influence the outcome of any business dealing or commercial venture
   
   CONTINUED TO 3-

   
   
2. 
   Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 15, 2017 at 2:07 PM

   CONTINUED FROM 2-
   
   Unlike older forms of trading where either commodities or goods or services (or the promise thereof) were involved, now certain transactions could be done based on nothing but promises alone. Le Maire was the first to do SHORT SELLING in a big way.
   
   Due to geopolitical and religious reasons, a royal from Holland, William of Orange took over the kingship of England, Scotland and Ireland (modern Britain) in the year 1688. Not only was this an act that spurred Britain to become firmly PROTESTANT but it also firmly entrenched the Kosher Dutch ways of capitalism, trade and financing
   
   All economies today are based on two things. One is the elaborately constructed form of unsecured promises, in which monopoly corporations (banks) create money on their word alone.
   
   The second part is extremely elaborate and sophisticated trading in these promises, now reaching ever higher levels of the absurd in which computer programs interact with each other based on extremely complicated mathematic formulas.
   
   ECONOMICS IS CREATED AND TWEAKED DAY AFTER DAY TO SUIT JEW ROTHSHID TODAY.. EVEN THE TOP ECONOMISTS LIKE AMARTYA SEN HAVE NO IDEA OF ASSHOLE FROM ELBOW
   
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/06/gpi-dog-shall-wag-gdp-tail-not-vice.html
   
   It is this BAFFLING WITH BULLSHIT using a combination of mathematics and monopoly control of promises that has led to what we call MODERN ECONOMICS. Another way to say it is that debt (future unsecured promises) and the trading thereof is now the sole source of “wealth”.
   
   The way all of the very richest people and corporations in the world “earn” their wealth is by sophisticated manipulation of these unsecured promises.
   
   THIS IS THE REASON WHY JEWS HAVE AN INNER KOSHER CLUB AT BILDERBERG CLUB. They like to be on the same kosher page.
   
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/09/shrewd-club-within-naive-bilderberg.html
   
   Through hegemonic control of monopoly entities who granted themselves exclusive control of money itself, they are in essence doing nothing more than pushing a few buttons on a computer, transferring empty promises in exchange for real goods, services and commodities.
   
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/02/great-american-depression-capt-ajit.html
   
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/01/murky-truths-of-inflation-and.html
   
   Even if every single possible resource was “liquidated” and turned into cash, it still would not be enough money to pay back all of the debts owed to Jew Rothschild’s banks worldwide. The only reason the system continues to exist is because ever more distant future promises are being sold and traded.
   
   Now Rothschild wants to sell 100 year bonds from his British banks for this very purpose.
   
   http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/04/15/a-century-bond-just-think-what-can-happen-in-100-years/
   
   capt ajit vadakayil
   ..

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/ed-arrests-hong-kong-based-indian-woman-in-rs-1478-crore-laundering-case/story-h6SguPP8XoijtO0vTMI8QJ.html

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 11, 2017 at 5:54 AM

I now flush DILIP CHERIAN down the shithole. He is NOT worth the the Vadakayil garbage bucket .

AAA ) HERE IS THE LIST OF MAHA MERUS WHO FOOLED THE WORLD , WHOM I HAVE TRASHED INTO THE GARBAGE BIN OF THE PLANET.

GARBAGE BUCKET LIST:

1) BERTRAND RUSSEL
2) ROMILA THAPAR
3) IRFAN HABIB
4) NOAM CHOMSKY
5) RAMCHANDRA GUHA
6) SHELDON POLLOCK
7) SIGMUND FREUD
8) GEORG WILHELM HEGEL
9) AMARTYA SEN
10) WENDY DONIGER
11) FREIDRICH WILHELM NIETZSCHE
12) IMMANUEL KANT
13 ) BARUCH SPINOZA
14) ALBERT EINSTEIN
15) ISAAC NEWTON
16) GUGLEILMO MARCONI
17) CHARLES DARWIN
18) KARL MARX
19) MAX WEBER
20) THOMAS ALVA EDISON
21) FIBONACCI
22) BARKHA DUTT
23) ADMIRAL LN RAMDAS , WIFE LALITA AND DAUGHTER KAVITA.
24) EDWARD BERNAYS
25) JOHN DEWEY
26) GEORGE IVANOVICH GURDJEIFF
27) PETER D OUPENSKY
28) OPRAH WINFREY

NOTE: MENTAL MIDGETS LIKE ROMILA THAPAR , IRFAN HABIB , RAMACHANDRA GUHA, SHELDON POLLOCK, WENDY DONIGER , BARKHA DUTT , RAMDAS FAMILY MUST BE THANKFUL THAT THEY ARE INCLUDED AMONG A LIST OF CEREBRAL GIANTS

#########################

BBB ) HERE ARE PEOPLE WHO MADE A DENT IN THE UNIVERSE— THEY GET THE "VADAKAYIL PRIZE". THIS IS NOT A VESTED “NOBEL PRIZE “

1) NIKOLA TESLA
2) DIMITRI MENDELEYEEV
3) IE IRODOV
4) ARYABHATTA
5) SRINIVASAN RAMANUJAN
6) CHANAKYA
7) ADI SHANKARACHARYA
8) APOLLONIUS ( AN INDIAN SAGE –WHO LEGACY WAS SHIFTED ON TO A COOKED UP JESUS IN 325 AD )

CCC) DOWN THE SHIT HOLE----

1) SUHEL SETH
2) PRITISH NANDI
3) DILIP CHERIAN 
capt ajit vadakayil
..

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 10, 2017 at 3:56 AM

I HAVE ALWAYS WONDERED HOW A PEA BRAINED KERALA CHRISTIAN CONVERT DILIP CHERIAN GOT SO MANY FEATHERS IN HIS HAT .

CHECK OUT HIS FEATHERS

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilip_Cherian

this ugly fellow is a BENAMI MEDIA darling --and a PERCEPTION MOLDER on TV

I HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING DILIP CHERIAN FOR A WHILE-- HE OVER EXPOSED HIMSELF

THERE IS A SAYING " IN A MEETING IF YOU KEEP QUIET NOBODY CAN FIGURE OUT IF YOU ARE A SAGE OR A DUFFER "

THEN YESTERDAY IT DAWNED ON ME

DILIP CHERIAN TELLS ON TV "CHANAKYA IS INDIAs GREATEST SPIN MASTER"

CHANAKYA IS BHARATMATAs NO 1 SON --THE GREATEST

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/08/chanakya-taxila-university-professor.html

IT IS AMAZING HOW HINDUS FROM KERALA CONVERTED INTO CHRISTIANITY AND THEN FOR THEM THE WATAN BECOMES SHIT -- EVERY DEAR TO THE WATAN BECOMES SHIT

Dilip Cherian was the editor of Business India – India’s leading business magazine. I know his type of economics.

WELL INDIA'S "IMAGE GURU "-- DILIP BABY--

YOUR HALCYON DAYS ARE OVER

https://www.pgurus.com/pr-agent-dilip-cherian-in-cbi-radar-for-bagging-rs-158cr-from-kejriwal-govt-without-tender/

CHECK OUT THE WHO IS WHO WHO ATTENDS DILIP CHERIANs PARTIES

http://photogallery.indiatimes.com/events/delhi/dilip-and-devi-cherians-pre-christmas-party/articleshow/27462196.cms

HE IS UNDER WATCH -- ALL IN GOOD TIME

capt ajit vadakayil
..

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 11, 2017 at 7:45 PM

THIS MAN RAMANI WHO HOLDS A BABY STEALS FROM MY BLOGS --AND THEN DARES TO PUT A WARNING


https://ramanan50.wordpress.com/

##########
Review the blog at Alexa.com

© S.V.Ramanan, and Ramani's blog, [ August 2009- December 2017).

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited.

Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to S.V.Ramanan and Ramani's blog with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

############

A THIEF WARNING OTHERS NOT TO STEAL STOLEN CONTENT 

capt ajit vadakayil
..

1. Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 11, 2017 at 7:53 PM

   https://ramanan50.wordpress.com/why-and-what-i-write-on-hinduism-sanatana-dharma/#comment-47491
   
   A THIEF WANTING DONATION FOR STOLEN STUFF 
   
   ramanan50@gmail .com

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 11, 2017 at 8:44 PM

NOWADAYS I GIVE A LINK OF MY PAST BLOGS

PREVIOUSLY I WAS FAMOUS FOR "PUNCH INTO GOOGLE SEARCH XXXX VADAKAYIL "

THIS ALLOWS ME TO FIND OUT WHO ALL HAVE STOLEN FROM MY BLOGS

THIS GUY RAMANIs POSTS WERE ALWAYS THERE-- FIRST PAGE  WORD FOR WORD INCLUDING PICTURES

I NEVER SAID ANYTHING FOR SO MANY YEARS

NOW HE WANTS TO PATENT STOLEN STUFF AND MAKE MONEY ?

WATCH OUT BOY RAMANI --  WHY DO YOU USE A BABY IN THE BLOG PICTURE ? WHY GIVE THE CHILD BAD KARMA

WHATEVER RAMANI IS HAS WRITTEN ON HIS OWN ABOUT SANATANA DHARMA IS PURE BULLSHIT -- AND THIS BOTHERS ME 

capt ajit vadakayil
..



THIS POST IS NOW CONTINUED TO PART 17, BELOW--

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/03/shell-companies-for-money-laundering_16.html

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..