JEW ROTHSCHILD ENDED THE CODE OF HONOUR OF THE JAPANESE .
THIS WAS DONE IN A VERY CUNNING WAY.
HOW MANY OF YOU HAVE SEEN THE MOVIE “THE LAST SAMURAI “?
Seppuku, was a symbol of Japanese honour a highly ritualized form of suicide that involved disemboweling yourself with your own samurai sword – a part of the bushido samurai code
Today you don’t see this practice any more
Japanese honor died with WW2. There exists a deep rooted feeling ( almost a DNA program ) that Japanese honor is NO more.
Japanese society is now DECADENT.
THE ONLY WAY OUT IS TO MAKE PEACE WITH THE PAST.
Can any intelligent Jap tell me why the act of seppuku DIED after WW2.
BECAUSE –JAPANESE HONOUR IS DEAD .
Judoka Isao Inokuma's 2001 death by seppuku was a mere anomaly.
For two centuries, Japan existed in relative isolation. It was forbidden for Japanese citizens to leave the country, and trade with the outside world.
But in the mid-19th century, all that changed when Rothschild’s ships invaded Japan, taking trading rights by force. What resulted was a period of major social upheaval for Japan.
Many members of the samurai class resented the government reforms that came with reopening the ports and the appearance of foreigners on their shores.
Samurai killed many white skinned foreigners and those Jap authorities who made anti-national treaties with foreigners
Most of the samurai would commit voluntary seppuku ( HARAKIRI ) following these killings. Others were arrested and, if they were fortunate, permitted to commit obligatory seppuku as a judiciary punishment.
Matters were not helped by the Emperor Komei, who in 1863 issued an order to "expel all foreign barbarians."
While the Jap government( in the payroll of Jew Rothschild ) were passing reforms to modernize Japan, many samurai took this as moral permission to kill foreigners.
Westerners violated time tested Japanese laws, might find themselves on the wrong end of a samurai's blade.
In 1868 Incident at Sakai, a coastal town thirteen sailors from a French Rothschild ship rowed to shore.
They raped some young Japanese girls in a drunken state.
The samurai of the Tosa clan took this small foreign invasion quite seriously, killing eleven of the guilty sailors.
Japan's French consul, Léon Roches ( a Rothschild appointed agent ) , insisted that the culprits be executed. Twenty samurai, were chosen by lots, were sentenced to death by obligatory seppuku.
Roches sent one of his captains, Bergasse du Petit-Thouars, to witness the execution.
The first samurai selected by lots, who was not even involved in the French sailor killings , Minoura Inokichi, leaped forward with his sword and cried -- “French men you will never eat meat after this” -- and disemboweled himself in a most gruesome manner –and this was NOT the usual calm ritual—but a most gory display .
After this the kaishaku, did NOT allow any such hara-kiri which would outrage Jap sentiment –and they hacked the remaining Samurai’s necks the European away –which causes excessive pain -hacing through the samurais' necks rather than slicing them off with a single neat painless cut.
After eleven samurai had cut their stomachs, Du Petit-Thouars grandly declared that the ceremony was over.
Eleven samurai had died for the murders of eleven soldiers, and the captain decided that was sufficient—he was now the merciful foreigner. The Jap hosts vehemently objected—it must be 20 as decided by mutual agreement
Du Petit-Thouars would not change his stance—he was being merciful.
This provoked the Japanese who screamed that the Frenchman a coward.
Other Western diplomats living in Japan learned something very important from this incident: judiciary seppuku was not a deterrent to killing Westerners. A glorious and honorable martyrdom was hardly a punishment to the more xenophobic samurai.
The Rothschild’s agent –the British consul general petitioned the government to outlaw judiciary seppuku, and an imperial decree was wrangled . “Any samurai who killed a foreigner would be stripped of their rank, and will meet with a suitable punishment."
That did, in fact, prove a deterrent to killing foreigners—judicial seppuku was now dead in the Jap courts.
While judiciary seppuku may have ended with the imperial decree, martial seppuku continued as a dying cry of the samurai class.
In 1868, a return to imperial rule under Emperor Meiji was announced. This was the proceeded by the resignation of Tokugawa Yoshinobu as shogun and the end of the Tokugawa Shogunate — which, in turn, initiated the decline of the samurai.
Many samurai who remained loyal to the shogunate were displeased with the new direction that the country was taking, and anti-imperial samurai rebellions raged in the following decade.
This was what the Hollywood movie THE LAST SAMURAI was all about.
The Satsuma Rebellion, led by Saigo Takamori, taking the final stand against the Meiji government provided the historical basis for The Last Samurai.
Below: Great acting by Ken Watanabe --his face was live --promising a world of pain
Below: Great acting by Ken Watanabe --his face was live --promising a world of pain
HERO Takamori was not allowed the opportunity to commit seppuku himself; he was mercilessly shot during the Battle of Shiroyama in 1877. This was a great moral let down for the fanatic samurai.
In 1876, the Meiji government put a major nail in the coffins of the samurai class and seppuku by banning the carrying of swords.
Jew Rothschild did this with the Kalari warriors of my hometown Kerala too.
Only commissioned army officers and certain security officials, it decreed, could carry swords. Supporters of the samurai were incensed—for the sword was a symbol inherently tied to the honour of a samurai.
Thus ended the amazing MINDSET of Japanese honour
Here was this final catharsis.
A Samurai force 173 warriors decided to attack Kumamoto, where an Imperial Japanese Army was stationed.
It was 173 samurai against some 2100 heavily armed troops with long range guns The Shinpuren fought only with swords, a symbol of their LAST commitment to the samurai way of life.
Less than a dozen wounded ( with bullet holes bleeding ) made it back to their shrine, where they decided to disband and say their farewells to the living world with a ritual hara-kiri .
The Shinpuren Rebellion would now be the death knell of samurai culture.
The message was made clear by Jew Rothschild controlled Jap historians - seppuku was not an act that belonged in modern Japan.
Martial suicide would see a resurgence during World War II, including acts of seppuku. And when World War II found the Allies victorious, many Jap officers decided to kill themselves rather than surrender. But in the wake of World War II, Japan underwent another great upheaval.
The Allied forces occupied Japan and forced the country to abolish the Meiji Constitution in favor of the Constitution of Japan. The Emperor became a figurehead once again as Japan adopted a parliamentary-based government.
And when, in 1970, Yukio Mishima barricaded himself in an office of the Eastern Command of Japan's Self-Defense Forces, delivered a speech demanding that power be returned to the emperor, and then disemboweled himself, the reaction from embarrassed Japanese commentators was-- seppuku was simply not an act that belonged to modern Japan.
The unwritten Samurai code of conduct, known as Bushido, held that the true warrior must hold that loyalty, courage, veracity, compassion, and honor as important, above all else
WHERE WAS THE HONOR IN FORCING 21000 INDIAN INA SOLDIERS TO DIG 640 KILOMETERS OF TUNNELS THROUGH HARD ROCK AT RABAUL ISLAND AND THEN EATING ALL OF THEM FOR DINNER ?
You could never have a mercenary samurai warrior. This code of honor is known as Bushido, and comes from the word bushi, which means "warrior."
Although Bushido is referred to as a code, it was not a formal set of rules that all samurai followed.
Samurai also had a duty of vengeance. Should the honor of his master be tarnished, or his master killed, a samurai was required to seek out and kill those responsible.
WHAT HAS BEEN DELETED FROM HISTORY IS THAT THE SAMURAIs MARTIAL GURU WAS BODHI DHARMA --- A GRANDMASTER IN KALARI SWORD FIGHTING
MY REVELATIONS NOW JUMP TO 32.%
SAMURAIs WENT FOR WAR ONLY AFTER AN ELABORATE TEA CEREMONY
THEY CALLED TEA CHAI -- LIKE IN MALAYALAM/ HINDI
The Samurai had a dedicated tea room called the chachitsu. They samurai had to leave the swords outside the room near the nijiriguchi ( entrance)
'Winter' tea bowls are deeper, to help contain heat, while 'summer' bowls are shallower and broader to release the heat
Tea must be drunk in an atmosphere of tranquility
The samurai would ritually wash their hands .
They enter the teahouse by crawling- an act that is purposefully humbling.
What happens inside is quiet, subtle, unpretentious. It offered a moment of peace and contemplation amid the chaos of battle.
The samurai used tea leaves and they read into the tea leaf ( sencha ) patterns in the empty bowl to work out their fortunes at the end of the impeding fight.
The samurai lost track of time during the tea ceremony and their brains would be in the ALPHA mode.
For the Samurai, the tea ceremony was an important companion to his martial arts training, which placed a value on clarity, honor, and transcendence.
While some meditated on Buddha or Bodhi Dharma others meditated on the ancient Ganesha
A BIG CHUNK OF THE SAMURAI WERE HOMOSEXUALS AND THEY PREFERRED THE AGE OF 10 TO 16 FOR THEIR “RECEIVING ANAL SEX “ BOYS—THE TERM “SHUDO” WAS USED
EVEN TODAY ALMOST ALL JAPANESE MEN HAS PEDOPHILIA INSTINCTS , WITH A FETISH FOR JERKING OFF OR HAVING REAL SEX WITH SCHOOL GIRLS
YOU WILL BE AMAZED TO SEE THE TOON SEX LITERATURE INVOLVING OLD JAPANESE MEN AND YOUNG SCHOOL GIRLS IN UNIFORM
WHEN I DELIVER A BRAND NEW SHIP FROM JAPANESE YEARS –I SEND MY CREW TO COLLECT ALL JAPANESE MAGAZINES HIDDEN ALL OVER THE SHIP AND BRING IT TO MY CABIN
99% OF THESE MAGAZINES WOULD BE ABOUT PEDOPHILIA
THEN I WOULD PUT IT INTO LARGE PAPER BAGS AND DUMP IT OVERBOARD UNDER MY SUPERVISION
Shudo is a samurai tradition where older and more experienced warriors would have younger apprentices ( CHIGO/ WAKASHU for covert anal sex and blow jobs )
The love of women was often devalued as it had a “feminizing” effect.
The wife of the samurai accepted this anal sex between her husband and his pupil. ( doseiaisha )
This homosexual thing started only after Buddhism invaded Japan –all now of the homosexual Buddhist monk named Kobo Daishi
This homosexual thing started only after Buddhism invaded Japan –all now of the homosexual Buddhist monk named Kobo Daishi
All samurai that practiced shudo were married to women who accepted this anal sex relationship between her husband and his shudo boy. The practice of shudo was a RIGHT OF PASSAGE.
Buddhist monks and priests are supposed to take vows of celibacy--included both heterosexual and homosexual activity. That being said, there were definite ideas about which was worse.
Heterosexual activity was actually the greater offense, as Buddhism considered women to be "evil and defiling" by nature.
Homosexual activity amongst practicing Buddhists, on the other hand, was treated more like a "lapse in self control."— requiring VINAYA ( compassionate acceptance )
JUST VISIT ANY BUDDHIST MONK HOSTELS IN INDIA — EVERY TIME THE SEPTIC TANK HAS TO BE CLEANED CHECK OUT THE THOUSANDS OF CONDOMS INSIDE.
MASTURBATION REQUIRES NO CONDOMS
The Japanese samurai has a TANTRA SEX for anal sex between me—which is a FOUL lie. No kundalini raise can be achieved.
Both remain at the animal muladhara chakra level
THE SAMURAI WARRIR AND HIS UNDERAGE SEXUAL PARTNER FOR ANAL SEX—USED TACHIKAWA-RYU AS A FOUL LYING EXCUSE—
Let me quote Wikipedia—
QUOTE: Tachikawa-ryu (立川流?) is a Japanese school of Mikkyō (esotericism) of Shingon Buddhism founded in 1114 by the monk Ninkan (仁寛) (1057-1123) in an attempt to create a Japanese tradition corresponding to Indian tantra (Sanskrit Vāmācāra).UNQUOTE
WHAT DO THESE JAPANESE PERVERTS KNOW ABOUT KUNDALINI RAISING?
WHAT DO THESE JAPANESE CHOOTS KNOW OF HUMAN CHAKRAS ?
THE WHOLE WORLD STEALS FROM INDIA, WITH HALF BAKED UNDERSTANDING
There were more than one lakh Buddhist establishments in Japan during the medieval period of 1180-1575.
Most contained thousands of monks and monks-in-training, all of them male.
Anal sex was rampant.
DIGRESSION: TIME TO BUST FOUL LIES REPEATED AGAIN AND AGAIN BY AGENTS OF KOSHER BIG BROTHER IN LITERARY FESTS, BENAMI MEDIA AND BY JNU COMMIE PROFESSORS!
WE HINDUS DON’T NEED TO LEARN ABOUT MORALITY FROM BR AMBEDKARs MAHAR BUDDHISTS
BRAHMACHARYA WAS SUBVERTED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD AND HIS AGENT GANDHI –AND MADE OUT TO BE PRESERVING SEMEN.
SORRY, IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SEMEN
AND GANDHI WAS HAVING HIS DEBAUCHERY WITH KHAT DRUG LACED ENEMA AND UNDERAGE GIRLS
In Sanatana Dharma a man must compulsorily go through GRIHASTA stage –where he has a wife and children. It refers to the second phase of an man’s life in a four age-based stages of the Hindu ashram system.
IN SANATANA DHARMA NO MAN CAN DO A HOMAM ( YAJNA ) WHEN HE IS IN THE BRAHMACHARYA STAGE .
ONLY A MAN WHO IS MARRIED AND HAS CHILDREN CAN DO A YAJNA.
THIS HAS BEEN SUBVERTED BY THE WHITE INVADER AND TODAY WE FIND FAKE GURUS ( MOSTLY HOMOSEXUALS ) GIVING BULL THAT SAGES MUST BE UNMARRIED, LIKE SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
ALL OUR ANCIENT MAHARISHIS WERE MARRIED WITH CHILDREN. IF YOU FIND ANY LITERATURE THAT A MAHARISHI WAS UNMARRIED , IT IS POISON INJECTED.
THERE IS NO PLACE FOR HOMOSEXUALS IN THE SPIRITUAL LIFE OF SANATANA DHARMA .
IN ANCIENT INDIAN LITERATURE YOU DO NOT FIND ANY MENTION OF HOMOSEXUALS , DUE TO OUR Y CHROMOSOME PRESERVING GOTRA SYSTEM
BARREN WOMEN AND UNMARRIED CHILDLESS MEN DO NOT MAKE GOOD RULERS OR SPIRITUAL LEADERS —AS PER SANATANA DHARMA.
Sanatana Dharma gives utmost importance to GRIHASTA stage .
Sanatana Dharma has recognized the psychological problems associated with barren women/ unmarried men ruling a kingdom or being spiritual leaders. It is about a personal stake in the future.
A major portion of DHARMA is carried out in the Grihasta stage -- where you are creative and do your DUTY for good of society and nation ( age 25 to age 50 ). This is the period when a man demonstrates SELF RESTRAINT .
When the scriptural studies appropriate to the student have been completed, and he has received blessings of his Guru, let him enter into the order of the Grihastha (householder). Let him pursue and obtain, by ethical ways, home, wife, children and wealth, discharge to the best of his ability the duties of his life's stage.
— Vishnu Purana, 3.IX.1 - 3.IX.31 5000 BC
IT IS THE LYING WHITE INVADER WHO MADE PRESERVATION OF SEMEN , AND BEING UNMARRIED AS A GREAT QUALIFICATION IN HINDUISM – SANATANA DHARMA BANS IT . .
PRESERVATION OF SEMEN IS ALLOWED ONLY IN THE VANAPRASTA ( 50 TO 75 AGE – OPTIONAL , DEPENDS IF HIS WIFE IS WITH HIM ) AND SANYASA ASHRAM ( 75 TILL DEATH –COMPULSORY ).
IN GRIHASTA STAGE THE MAN IS NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE SEX WITH ANY WOMAN WHO COMES HIS WAY , LIKE HOW THE NAMBOODIRIS DID IN KERALA ( SAMBANDHAM ) .
HE CAN HAVE SEX ONLY WITH HIS WIFE AND CONTINUING HIS LINEAGE IS PART OF HIS DHARMA .
The 7000 year old Vedas lay down that dharma performed by a man alone without his wife is no dharma and will yield no fruit whatsoever. Such is the paramount nature of Grihasta ashrama.
The Vedas hold marriage to be one of the important sacraments sanctifying the body. That is why; marriage is given great importance by the Hindus.
It is said, “That man who does not win a wife is really half, and he is not the full man as long as he does not beget an offspring.” A wife is also hailed as” the very source of the Purusharthas, not Only of Dharma, Artha and Kama but even of Moksha.’
Every Hindu god had his wife almost as a part of him, not as a shadow.
Shiva is powerless without Shakti.
Marriage in Sanatana Dharma is NOT for sexual pleasure.
Every Hindus man is compulsorily expected to undergo the “vivaha samskara” and run a family (kutumba). Never mind what FREEMASON and Jew Rothschild’s UNMARRIED Vivekananda said .
Vedas ordain that dharma must be practiced by man together with his wife.
In Sanatana Dharma, marriage is a religious duty, and not a civil contract. It is regarded as one of the most sacred of the sacraments symbolizing the holy and indissoluble union of a couple who thereafter are mutually dependent and indispensable in the performance of religious duties.
Progeny instrumental to cementing a relationship and for bliss.
Manu Smriti clearly states that “he is a perfect man, who consists of his wife, himself and his offspring.”
Vedas have enjoined that dharma must be observed by man together with his wife. No yagna performed or pilgrimages undertaken will have any effect, if the wife is not a partner in those holy duties during the grihasta and vanaprasta ashramas. During Sanyasa the man can go for pilgrimage on his own.
The early shastras permit unmarried girls to take the whole responsibility upon themselves of choosing their life-mates and enter into wedlock with them. They need to wait for three years only after puberty for some responsible elder to arrange for their marriage, but no more.
In Sanatana Dharma marriages are made in heaven , NOT by LIVING IN TOGETHER ( like in the west ) and examining if the wife can indeed give him a good blow job whenever he wants it—
--or vice versa--
if the husband can use his tongue power on her fungi affected , smelling like putrid fish part whenever she wishes .
My own marriage was arranged.
My elder son’s marriage was arranged
IN OUR FAMILY THERE HAS NEVER EVER BEEN CAESARIAN BIRTHS –THOUGH INDIA WAS THE FIRST TO DO THIS SURGICAL PROCEDURE
IT WAS ROTHSCHILD MEDIA AND HISTORIANS WHO GAVE UNWARRANTED PROPAGANDA FOR UNMARRIED HINDU GURUS ( I AM SURE YOU KNOW WHO THEY ARE ) .
A LOT OF THESE UNMARRIED FAKE GURUS WERE CRYPTO JEW HOMOSEXUALS - -- OR JUST FAKE AND BACKDATED CREATIONS OF THE WHITE INVADER - THEY ARE HEROES IN YOUR NCERT TEXT BOOKS .
It is the white invader who wrote lies that Hindus ill treat women and suppress them. Nothing is further from the truth.
Women were NOT expected to be part of the relay chain which conveyed Vedas and Upanishads by oral route for 30 millenniums before they were penned down in 5000 BC and it was too tedious and a full time job.
Our Hindu culture does not teach us to cast off women as useless stuff and get rid of them as fast as possible. A daughter is very close to the heart of father. But at the time of marriage, father donates his daughter to his son-in-law. Kanyadhanam is the highest form of donation that a householder can ever give.
In Hindu culture mother is like a demi-god. The west has tried hard to inject their useless culture in India by canned laughter TV soaps where the children insult their parents. It did NOT work –it is a genome thing.
Wife is called as DHARMA patni i.e. a life partner who accompanies you on the path of dharma. No yajna (vedic ritual) can be carried out without the presence of wife.
An Indian wife can never be KAMA patni like in the west.—where as soon as lust subsides , both husband and wife are screwing behind each others back.
TODAY , DUE TO THE POISON INJECTED BY THE WHITE INVADER USING HIS FAKE MUTTS – HOMOSEXUALS WEAR SAFFRON ROBES AND CALL THEMSELVES “SEERS “.
SANATANA DHARMA HAS MADE IT VERY CLEAR, THAT UNMARRIED MEN CANNOT DO A YAJNA ( HOMAM ) AND THIS NAILS THE LIE.
GRIHASTA is the greatest of all other āshramas because the other 3 ashramas depend on gr̥ihastas for food. Gr̥ihasta is the pillar on which Hindu society is shored up.
Every man should seek to wed a virtuous and wise wife, because she is the support of the CHATUR ASHRAMA mode of life.
In Sanatana Dharma a wife is expected to keep her husband on the righteous path as part of her DHARMA.
It is the white invader who injected poison that we Hindus suppress our women. Today the BENAMI media has taken over this LYING role.
Indophiles have cooked up fake stories how ancient Hindus trampled on their wives and all this is discusses in every literary fest.
Every literary fest is an occasion to read cooked up anti-Hindu stories and give it a cloak of legitimacy.
JNU commie professors have invented a lot of these fake stories, claiming that their got it from Malaysia, Bali, Vietnam, Thailand etc .
Sorry, there is NO Hindu purana story, that we in Kerala do NOT know about. We never heard of any DASA character , or Radha the mistress of Krishna or how SUSPICIOUS Ram kicked his pregnant wife Sita into the forest
No Hindu widow ever jumped into the fire ( Sati ) or shaved her head before the white invader came to India. I challenge anybody to show me proof.
Hindu women did NOT dare to consume poison or hang themselves before being capture by the Islamic invader because they would rape dead bodies even if the corpse was cold and stiff. The only way was to fuse the vagina by jumping into a fire and getting cremated at the same time.
Did Kunti shave her head in Mahabharata? Do we have any reference from scriptures where Tara (wife of deceased Vali), Mandodari (the wife of deceased Ravana), Uttara (the wife of deceased Abhimanyu) shaving their heads , wearing white sarees and living in seclusion?
TO BE CONTINUED
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL