Justice cannot be blind , NATURAL JUSTICE shall be inherent , CONTEXT shall be the perimeter, part 11 – Capt Ajit Vadakayil

THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 10, BELOW---

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/01/justice-cannot-be-blind-natural-justice_28.html

IN INDIA JUSTICE IS NOT ONLY BLIND-- IT IS FUCKIN' LAME 

I HAVE WRITTEN  HUNDREDS OF BLOG POSTS WHICH BENEFIT THE WATAN.  

ALL HAVE BEEN IGNORED BY THE MINISTERS WHO READ MY POSTS FIRST THING IN THE MORNING.   

THESE MINISTERS DONT HAVE BRAINS, THEY DONT KNOW THEIR JOBS, THEY HAVE NO DETERMINATION OR POLITICAL WILL.   

AS SOON AS THEY BECOME A MINISTER THEY BED DOWN FOR RETIREMENT AND PENSION, KNOWING FULLY WELL THAT ALL THEY NEED TO DO IS TO SUCK UP TO PM MODI TO SURVIVE THEIR TENURE .

AS LONG AS MODI GETS AN EGO MASSAGE HE DOES NOT NEED A REPORT CARD.  EXAMPLE-- HOW HAS UMA BHARATI SURVIVED SO LONG ? . 

GIFT OF GAB DOES NOT MAKE YOU A GOOD MINISTER OR A GOOD SHIP CAPTAIN. 

YESTERDAY WE HAD COPS BLEEDING TO DEATH IN A MANGLED JEEP AFTER A ROAD ACCIDENT.    PEOPLE TOOK PHOTOS WITH MOBILES   . YET NOBODY HELPED THE COPS WHO WERE PLEADING "PLEASE SAVE US".   THE COPS DIED.    

 http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mysuru/onlookers-snapped-videos-as-police-officer-struggled-for-life-on-highway/articleshow/56882992.cms

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS PATHETIC, STATE OF AFFAIRS ? . 

WE  INDIANS WERE NEVER LIKE THIS.   

THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY IS INDEED RESPONSIBLE .  

WITNESSES ARE TREATED WORSE THAN SHIT BY THE STUPID JUDGE (AND HIS SYSTEM)  WHO THINKS HE IS GOD.  

THESE MELORD LOSER LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES WHO WILL SLAP CONTEMPT OF COURT ON YOU , IF YOU STAND ON ONE LEG IN HIS PRESENCE , CANT EVEN KEEP THE COURT TOILETS CLEAN 

Every court in India must first demand that parties to resort to ADR of some type, usually mediation, before permitting the parties' cases to be tried..   

ADR is faster , costs less than litigation, there is confidentiality, and both parties to have greater control over the selection of the individuals who will decide their dispute..

Objectives of the ADR Processes--

•Reduce the burden on courts by reducing cases 

•resolve or limit the issues in dispute; 

•be accessible; 

•use resources efficiently; 

•resolve disputes as early as possible; 

•produce outcomes that are lawful, effective and acceptable to the parties and the Tribunal; 

•enhance the satisfaction of the parties  

ADR has several advantages over litigation:--

Suitable for multi-party disputes

Lower costs

Likelihood and speed of settlements

Flexibility of process
Informal

Parties' direct control of process

Parties' choice of forum

Practical solutions

Wider range of issues can be considered

Shared future interests may be protected

Confidentiality

Risk management
Free from procedural technicalities , cramping the style of cunning lawyers

People have a chance to tell their story as they see it, without an advocate who twists everything

Relationship between two parties (separated by ego) restored .
Less burden in courts struggling with backlog
There is a commitment to the result WIN-WIN 

Some disputes do not have a legal solution, while others may be made worse by court action. 

The Indian Parliament enacted the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 with a view to making arbitration less technical and more useful and effective

ADR techniques are extra‐judicial in character.  ADR can be used to settle civil, commercial, industrial and family disputes.  

ADR can be used over the full range of business disputes: banking, contract, contract performance and interpretation, construction contracts, intellectual property rights, joint ventures, insurance liability, partnership differences, personal injury, product liability, real estate and securities. 

ADR is not intended to supplant altogether the traditional means of resolving disputes by means of litigation. It offers only alternative options to litigation.

There are still a large number of important areas, including constitutional law and criminal law, in respect of which there is no substitute for court decisions.

ADR may not be appropriate for every dispute even in other areas; even if appropriate, it cannot be invoked unless both parties to a dispute are genuinely interested in a settlement.

Alternative Dispute Resolution” (ADR) encourages the disputants  to arrive at a negotiated understanding with a minimum of outside help.   

Over the years, largely due to the development of trade and  commerce, arbitration came to be recognized as an effective alternative to formal judicial system.    

Due to its own merit of being   adjudicatory in nature resulting in binding decision it held the field of a widely practiced alternative to court system. 

ADR  techniques have been shown to work across the full range of business disputes: 

• banking, 

• contract,

• contract performance and

• interpretation, 

• construction contracts, 

• intellectual property rights,

• joint ventures, 

• insurance liability, 

• partnership differences, 

• personal injury, 

• product liability, 

• Real estate and securities

The various ADR techniques now well recognized are:--

Arbitration: A binding procedure where the dispute is submitted for adjudication by an arbitral tribunal consisting of a sole or an odd number of arbitrators, which gives its decision in the form of an award that finally settles the dispute and is binding on the parties.

Fast‐track Arbitration: A binding procedure where parties agree to accelerated arbitral proceedings resulting in rendering the arbitral award in a short time.

 

Negotiation: A non‐binding procedure involving direct interaction of the disputing parties wherein a party approaches the other with the offer of a negotiated settlement based on an objective assessment of each other’s position. A trade‐off of other interests not involved in the dispute is not uncommon in a negotiated settlement. Objectivity and willingness to arrive at a negotiated settlement on the part of both the parties are essential characteristics of negotiation. 

Mediation: Mediation usually involves people meeting face to face in the presence of a neutral third person. This person listens to each party, helps them identify their real interests and needs and then the parties negotiate a settlement which will meet those needs.  The mediator does not take sides, give legal advice or impose a solution. Mediators assist people by managing the negotiation process, helping people listen to each other and keeping them on track. Mediation is used to successfully resolve many community, family, tenancy, commercial, building, workplace, industrial relations and environmental disputes.   

Conciliation: In mediation, the mediator tries to guide the discussion in a way that optimizes parties’ needs, takes feelings into account and reframes representations. Conciliation differs from arbitration in that the conciliation process, in and of itself, has no legal standing, and the conciliator usually has no authority to seek evidence or call witnesses, usually writes no decision, and makes no award. Conciliation differs from mediation in that the main goal is to conciliate, most of the time by seeking concessions.  

Mediation Arbitration (MED‐ARB) : A procedure where the parties agree to settle their dispute first by attempting a conciliation within a specified time, failing which by arbitration. This is distinct from conciliation in the course of arbitral proceedings where, if a settlement is reached, the arbitration proceedings are terminated by making an award on agreed terms. 

Mini‐trial: A non‐binding procedure where the disputing parties present their respective cases before their senior executives who are competent to take decisions and who are assisted by a neutral third party. Thus, the executives have an objective assessment of the dispute and, if possible; they can mutually arrive at an amicable settlement. 

Expert Determination, the parties appoint an expert to consider their issues and to make a binding decision or appraisal without necessarily having to conduct an enquiry following adjudicatory rules.

Private judging, the Court refers the case to a referee chosen by the parties to decide some or all of the issues, or to establish any specific facts.

Judge hosted settlement conference: In this court‐based ADR process, the settlement judge (or magistrate) presides over a meeting of the parties in an effort to help them reach a settlement. Judges have played a variety of roles in these conferences, articulating opinions about the merits of the case, facilitating the trading of settlement offers, and sometimes acting as the mediator.

Court‐annexed arbitration, requires statutory introduction into the Court system, and which, depending upon the model adopted, may be binding or initially non‐binding, and may or may not provide for a re‐ hearing by a judge under certain circumstances.

The Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1999 provides for Court‐annexed ADR processes. Regulatory Negotiation or Reg‐Neg: Used by governmental agencies as an alternative to the more traditional approach of issuing regulations after a lengthy notice and comment period. Instead, “agency officials and affected private parties meet under the guidance of a neutral facilitator to engage in joint negotiation and the drafting of the rule. The public is then asked to comment on the resulting, proposed rule. By encouraging participation of interested stakeholders, the process makes use of private parties’ perspectives and expertise, and can help avoid subsequent litigation over the resulting rule.”

Ombudsperson: An informal dispute resolution tool used by organizations. A third party ombudsperson is appointed by the organization to investigate complaints within the institution and prevent disputes or facilitate their resolution. The Ombudsperson may use various ADR mechanisms in the process of resolving disputes.

In 1996, The Arbitration and Conciliation Act was passed in India, which was based on the UNCITRAL model.

https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-arb/07-86998_Ebook.pdf

Amendments to this Act were made taking into account the various opinions of the leading corporate and businessmen who utilize this Act the most.   Sufficient provisions have been created and amended in the area of Lok Adalats in order to help the rural and commoner segments to make most use of this unique Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanism in India.

Therefore, today the provisions in India sufficiently provide for Alternative Dispute Resolution. However, its implementation has been restricted to just large corporate or big business firms.

Lok Adalats, though an ancient concept in Indian Society, has not been implemented to its utmost level.  People still opt for internecine litigation in many spheres due to a lot of drawbacks.

These methods of ADR deliver a well-rounded and satisfying experience WIN-WIN for the parties involved.  It provides them the opportunity to "expand the pie" through creative, collaborative bargaining, and fulfil the interests driving their demands .

Thus, ADR can help the parties save time, energy and money that would otherwise have been needlessly expended on endless litigation. The lawyer makes all the money over decades and it is LOSE –LOSE

India cannot become a superpower in 16 years if our Judicial system remains this way…  The PM can be abused and called MAUT KA SAUDAGAR , but if you stand on one leg in front of the judge he will FUCK you. 

Capt. Ajit VadakayilFebruary 10, 2015 at 5:44 AM

SUBJECT: Contempt law threatens freedom .
#####################

http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/satyam-bruyat/contempt-law-threatens-freedom/?utm_source=TOInewHP_TILwidget&utm_campaign=TOInewHP&utm_medium=Widget_Stry

WELL DONE KATJU SAAB !

Kerala MLA MV Jayarajan did NOT call the judge a fool.

He used as very restrained word STUMBHAN - - same meaning in Sanskrit and Malayalam - DENSE INSIDE THE HEAD ( not too bright ).

QUOTE : if they have any self respect they should resign and step down from their office. … Unfortunately, what some DENSE IN THE HEAD people occupying our seat of justice say is nothing else. … :UNQUOTE 

OUR CONSTITUTION ALLOWS EVERY CHILD OF BHARATMATA TO EXPRESS HIS POINT OF VIEW . . .

IT IS DUE TO THIS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA WERE ABLE TO REJECT THE JUSTICE BANNERJEE RULING THAT A HINDU WOMAN SET THE RAILWAY COMPARTMENT S6 OF SABARMATI EXPRESS ON FIRE AT GODHRA -- -with 4000 witnesses. . .

THE LAWS PERTAINING TO CONTEMPT OF COURT MUST BE REPEALED . .

THESE LAWS WERE INTRODUCED BY THE OPIUM DRUG RUNNING OWNER OF BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHILD TO SUBVERT THE SYSTEM USING HIS PET JUDGES , WHOM HE KNIGHTED . .

are the judges god ? 

do they not see how much PM narendra modi ( MAUTH KA SAUDAAGAR ) is taking daily even inside the parliament ?

YET IF YOU DONT CALL A JUDGE,  MeLORD - HE WILL TRY TO PUT YOU IN JAIL FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT .

TELLING THE TRUTH, TO SAVE BHARATMATA IS NOW DEFAMATION AND HATE SPEECH ( BUNTY SIBAL TO PROTECT MADAME ) -- MIND YOU WE HAVE JUST COME OUT OF 800 YEARS OF SLAVERY .

FOREIGN FUNDED DESH DROHIS ARE RUNNING WILD IN INDIA . 

DESH BHAKTS CANNOT DARE TO EXPOSE DANGERS THE WATAN IS FACING .

THE INDIAN JUDICIARY IS GUILT OF SEVERE OVER REACH IN RECENT TIMES .

THEY ORDERED INTERLINKING OF RIVERS WITH A DEADLINE -- WHEN THEY ARE JUST ONE PILLAR AMONG FOUR OF INDIAN DEMOCRACY .

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/05/interlinking-rivers-of-india-capt-ajit.html

THEY SET THE BAIL LIMIT OF TEN THOUSAND CRORES FOR THE SAHARA SUBRATA ROY CASE -- ROY IS INDIAs SECOND BIGGEST EMPLOYER AFTER OVER STAFFED RAILWAYS ( A BIG CHUNK OF BOTTOM CATEGORY COLLECTS WAGES BUT DONT REPORT FOR WORK ) . 

OUR CONSTITUTION AND OUR LAWS DO NOT ALLOW THIS . 

WE NEED TO PULL DOWN THE PILLAR OF JUDICIARY AND ERECT IT AGAIN, USING JURY SYSTEM .

KARUNANIDHI EVEN HAD HIS PET DALIT JUDGE ASHOK KUMAR , WHO CRIED WHEN KARUNANIDHI WAS ARRESTED, ASKING "IS YOUR HEART MADE OF MUSCLE OR MUD!!"

In USA contempt of court , long ago fell foul of the 1st Amendment and is dismissed as English foolishness - it was contempt against a JEW ROTHSCHILD APPOINTED JUDGE actually .

In UK there is NO contempt of court since the 1930s-- and was formally abolished a year ago .

Capt ajit vadakayil
..

ADR settles disputes through arbitration, conciliation, mediation and negotiation.

The technique of ADR is an effort to design a workable and fair alternative to our traditional judicial system.  Any smart lawyer can drown you in the quicksand of procedures of a blind justice system.  ADR is a fast track system of dispensing justice.  Like I said, there are various ADR techniques viz. arbitration, mediation, conciliation, mediation-arbitration, mini-trial, private judging, final offer arbitration, court-annexed ADR and summary jury trial.

ADT provides a  congenial atmosphere and a less formal and less complicated forum for various types of disputes.

THIS THING OF LAWYERS PUTTING ON HOOKS ON POOR PEOPLE BY TAAREEQ PEH TAAREEQ PEH TAAREEQ --AND MAKING THEM PAUPERS OVER ONE OR TWO DECADES MUST STOP ..

FOR ALLEGEDLY SHOOTING A BLACK BUCK , HOW LONG HAS SALMAN KHANs CASE DRAGGED ON?    

HOW MUCH DID HIS LAWYER MAKE  DURING THIS PERIOD ? 

BATAO NAH --PLEAJJE !

A PIG IS USEFUL ONLY WHEN DEAD ( NOT WHEN ALIVE ) … WHAT ABOUT THIS VENERABLE BLACK BUCK ?

HULLO LAW MINISTER—ARE YOU AWAKE ? 

HULLLLOOOOOOO !!

The advantage of ADR is that it avoids seeking recourse to the SLOW/ EXPENSIVE /UNFAIR courts—who do not have any idea of local culture..   In conciliation/mediation, parties are free to withdraw at any stage of time.   

It has been proved that resolution of disputes is quicker through ADR.  

The parties involved in ADR do not develop strained relations; rather they maintain the continued relationship between themselves.. Parties may even submit suggestions for the settlement of the dispute to the conciliator.

When it appears to the conciliator that elements of settlement exist, he may draw up the terms of settlement and send it to the parties for their acceptance. If both the parties sign the settlement document, it shall be final and binding on both.

Note that in USA, this process is similar to Mediation. However, in India, Mediation is different from Conciliation and is a completely informal type of ADR mechanism.

Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 31, 2017 at 8:55 AM

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/immigration-ban-donald-trump-fires-acting-us-attorney-general/articleshow/56883688.cms

IN A DEMOCRACY , THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE CALLS THE SHOTS

DONALD TRUMP HAS DONE THE RIGHT THING

ROTHSCHILDs MEDIA KEPT SAYING THAT TRUMP ENFORCED TRAVEL BAN ON 7 MUSLIM NATIONS --

SORRY TRUMP NEVER MENTIONED ANY NATION. THESE NATIONS WERE PICKED BY OBAMA YEARS AGO.

IN INDIA TOO WE HAVE SUPREME COURT JUDGES PLAYING GOD--WITH ROTHSCHILDs MEDIA SUPPORT .

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/11/contempt-of-court-criminal-misuse-of.html

ON MY SHIP I AM THE JUDGE --NAY-- THE LAW

THIS IS JUST ONE AMONG THE DOZENS OF HATS I WEAR OVER THE DAY

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/12/captain-sleeps-tonight-capt-ajit.html

ANYBODY WHO THINKS I AM INCAPABLE OF WRITING A POST ON JUSTICE , PLEASE RAISE YOUR HANDS

I SEE NO HANDS -- GOOD !

capt ajit vadakayil
..

There must be a system to deal with or change cumbersome procedural laws that result in delaying the administration of justice. 

It has been reported that 45% lawyers in India are fake.

Most make their money by being  SUB-CONTRACTED  genuine lawyers for a pittance for TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ next hearing date collection and for bribing court clerks. .

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/45-of-lawyers-fake-checking-is-on/articleshow/56724326.cms

WHY DOES THE SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION NEED FOREIGN FUNDS ? 

The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) is an Indian bar association, comprising the practising lawyers of the Supreme Court of India.

WHY DID IT GO ON FOR SO LONG ?

http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2015/06/09/ngo-license-cancel-india_n_7545636.html

Section 309 of the Code says that in every inquiry or trial, the proceedings shall be held as expeditiously as possible, and in particular, when the examination of witnesses has once begun, the same shall be continued from day to day until all the witnesses in attendance have been examined. .

Despite the shortage of judges , our melords continued with their lengthy vacations. The commitment to work for the watan was never there .

I WAS ONE OF THE LAST IN MY BATCH TO LEAVE SCI TO JOIN FOREIGN COMPANIES .    

ON MY LAST SHIP IN SCI I DID 21 MONTHS AT A STRETCH .   USUAL TENURE  WAS 6 MONTHS . 

I HAD ONE OLD LOST CHIEF OFFICER (  PULLED OUT OF RETIREMENT  AFTER 25 YEARS ) AND TWO FRESH CADETS . 

SCI BENT ALL LAWS.  

LITERALLY I WAS HOLDING MY SHIP TO MY CHEST 24 HOURS A DAY,  TO BE SAFE   

I RETAINED MY SANITY BECAUSE MY WIFE AND ELDER SON WAS ON BOARD. 

SCI LOST ME BECAUSE I ASKED FOR 5 MONTHS VACATION ( BURNT OUT )  AND THEY SANCTIONED ONLY 2 MONTHS .   

I HAD 22 MONTHS ACCRUED VACATION DUE TO ME –  PLUS LEAVE ON LEAVE – ( 1 MONTH LEAVE FOR EVERY 3 MONTHS OF VACATION ).

VERBALLY SCI COAXED  ME TO TAKE 5 MONTHS VACATION .   

I SAID NOPE — I WANT MY SANCTIONED VACATION IN WRITING.    

YOU DON’T KNOW HOW TO TREAT YOUR LOYAL CAPTAINS .. BYE !

READ ABOUT MY 58 YEAR OLD CHIEF OFFICER –HOW HE GOT HOSPITALISED IN JAPAN.. 

HE HAD LOST HIS SEA LEGS AFTER 25 YEARS ASHORE ..

PSSST— REALLY JAP GIRLS WERE PLAYING SEX GAMES WITH HIM .   

IN PREMIUM  PRIVATE JAP HOSPITALS , THE NURSES ARE VETTED TO BE YOUNG AND PRETTY . 

THE NURSES  ARE EXPECTED  BY THE HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT  TO GIVE MEN PATIENTS  A “RELEASE “ ( IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN ) –

HAND / BLOW JOB  IS PART OF THEIR JOB DESCRIPTION .

JAPAN CAN BE A BIZARRE PLACE WHEN IT COMES TO SEX.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2012/06/asafoetida-and-6000-year-old-ayurveda.html

DR or not-- the number of judges should be substantially increased to reduce the burden of the judges. 

Another reason for delay is non-service of summons to witnesses and even after the service of summons, witnesses do not appear. 

Police, being the investigating agency is responsible for service of summons to the witnesses. Since there is no hard and fast rule to compel the witnesses to attend the court proceeding, even after services of summons, frightened  witnesses do not turn up.  

Many a time even nonappearance of police witness delays the trial. Postponing a trial is often a legal strategy used by cunning lawyers in cahoots with judges .   

Defense lawyers slow down proceedings in the hope that witnesses will disappear or memories will fade, and prosecutors  know that extended confinement  will persuade a defendant to plead guilty.

Mediation, a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR)  aims to assist two (or more) disputants in reaching an agreement. The parties themselves determine the conditions of any settlements reached— rather than accepting something imposed by a third party.

The disputes may involve (as parties) states, organizations, communities, individuals or other representatives with a vested interest in the outcome.

Mediators use appropriate techniques and skills to open and improve dialogue between disputants, aiming to help the parties reach an agreement (with concrete effects) on the disputed matter. Normally, all parties must view the mediator as impartial.

Disputants may use mediation in a variety of disputes, such as commercial, legal, diplomatic, workplace, community and family matters.

A third-party representative may contract and mediate between (say) unions and corporations. When a workers’ union goes on strike, a dispute takes place, and the corporation hires a third party to intervene in attempt to settle a contract or agreement between the union and the corporation.

LAWYERS FEES MUST BE PAID BY DIGITAL MEANS --AND GOVT MUST REGULATE THIS AMOUNT.  

DEVIATIONS MUST BE TREATED AS CRIMINAL WITH A JAIL TERM FOR THE LAWYER

While Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is a fairly standard western approach towards ADR, the Lok Adalat system constituted under National Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 is a uniquely Indian approach

Alternate dispute Resolution(ADR) originated in the USA as an endeavour to find alternatives to the traditional legal system that was regarded as adversarial, costly, unpredictable, rigid, over-professionalized, damaging to relationships, and limited to narrow rights-based remedies as opposed to creative problem solving.

The American origins of the concept are not surprising, given certain features of litigation in that system, such as: trials of civil actions by a jury, lawyers’ contingency fees, lack of application in full of the rule ” the loser pays the costs”.

The objective of ADR is to check litigation explosion, make the justice system less expensive and easily accessible to the illiterate and indigent. The focus is to avoid feuds and develop a harmonious relationship between the disputing parties by settling the dispute through process of arbitration, mediation, negotiation and the likes.

The Courts of law are confronted with four main problems which are as follows :

i) The number of Courts and judges in all grades is alarmingly low.

ii) Increase in the number of cases owing to the various State and Central acts

iii) The costs involved in prosecuting or defending a case. The Court fee, the lawyer’s fee and the incidental charges amounts to quite a large sum.

iv)The process is very cumbersome and time-consuming because of the huge number of already pending cases.

The following are models for ADR as prototypes for use in dispute- redressal exist on national level:

Tribunals, commissions, boards, etc.

Lok Adalats

Nyaya Panchayats

Arbitration

Conciliation

Ombudsman

Fast Track Courts

The Lok Adalat is presided over by a sitting or retired judicial officer as the chairman, with two other members, usually a lawyer and a social worker.

In villages, the administration is carried out by a Panchayat headed by village headman that decides petty civil, criminal and revenue cases.   

The respectable members of the village community form the Panchayat, where for those who prefer it, disputes are resolved by a process of conciliation and mediation. 

Till Jew Rothschild brought his system of justice this what what we did.  The legal system on the planet was created in ancient India.   Manu was NOT a bigot who whole efforts 100% were engaged in troubling dalits.  

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/01/manu-first-law-maker-capt-ajit.html

Those days there were no shudras ( dalits ).

Manu a noble soul , was this planet’s first law giver .

TODAY BR AMBEDKAR / EVR PERIYAR STUDENTS UNION LEADERS ARE ON THE PAYROLL OF ZIONIST JEWS…

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/07/untouchables-capt-ajit-vadakayil.html

There is not a lot of difference between mediation and conciliation. Mediation is one of the methods by which conciliation is achieved. Conciliation is essentially a consensual process.

Compromise settlement shall be guided by the principles of justice, equity, fair play and other legal principles;

Where no compromise has been arrived at through conciliation, the matter shall be returned to the concerned court for disposal in accordance with Law.—

UNLESS THESE ARE MINOR CASES –MOST OF THE TIME DRIVEN BY CRASS HUMAN EGO

Rotor road accident disputes must be brought to Lok Adalats.  The primary condition of the Lok Adalat is that both parties in dispute should consent to the settlement. 

Jusice Palanisamy Sathasivam  is the current Governor of Kerala. He previously served as the 40th Chief Justice of India. He is the first former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to be appointed as the Governor of a state.

P Sathasivam pushed ADR ( Lok Adalat )  in India. 

P Sathasivam achieved a world record by disposing of 35.1 lakh cases within eight hours.

This man showed --

WHERE THERE IS A WILL THERE IS A WAY

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Lok-adalats-dispose-of-35L-cases-in-8-hours/articleshow/26279761.cms

National Legal Services Authority of India (NALSA) was formed on 5 December 1995 under the authority of the Legal Services Authorities Act 1987.   Its purpose is to provide free legal services to eligible candidates (defined in Sec. 12 of the Act), and to organize Lok Adalats for speedy resolution of cases.

The Chief Justice of India is patron-in-chief of NALSA while second seniormost judge of Supreme Court of India is the Executive-Chairman. There is a provision for similar mechanism at state and district level also headed by Chief Justice of High Courts and Chief Judges of District courts respectively.

The prime objective of NALSA is speedy disposal of cases and reducing the burden of judiciary.

The inauguration of Lok Adalat at Supreme Court by the CJI in the presence of NALSA executive chairman Justice G S Singhvi and SC Legal Services Committee chairman Justice A K Patnaik was viewed all over the country through video conferencing and web casting facilities by the SC's e-committee in Nov 2013.   

Lok Adalats settled  compoundable criminal offices, cheque bouncing and loan recovery cases, civil suits, motor accident claims and family disputes.

In order to encourage people to opt for Lok Adalat settlements even before coming to the courts, pre-litigation cases must be taken up in the National Lok Adalat.

The settlement at pre-litigation stage would mean that many possible cases will not reach the courts.

COLOR CODING MUST BE DONE SO THAT THE WHOLE THING MAKES SENSE TO THE COMMON MAN .

namiJanuary 31, 2017 at 4:09 PM

http://www.firstpost.com/india/bombay-hc-reprieve-for-indira-jaisings-ngo-orders-defreezing-of-accounts-3239840.html

1. 
   Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 31, 2017 at 4:30 PM

   JUDICIARY CANNOT OVER RULE THE DECISION OF THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE -- A DECISION TAKEN FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE WATAN
   
   BUT THEN WHAT TYPE OF LAW MINISTER DO WE HAVE ?
   
   
   The Italian waitress made anti-Hindu Indira Jaising the first woman to be appointed Additional Solicitor General of India.   The waitress gave Indira Jaising the Padma Shree .
   
   Jew Rothschild had this woman Indira Jaising lecturing at his Opium founded Columbia University and in UN .
   
   Have you even seen this woman ( perception molder on Benami TV ) fighting for the watan till today ?
   
   Both Indira Jaising and her husband Anand Grover are fighting for gay marriages in India.
   
   Gay anal sex promoting NAZ foundation is being termed a “sexual health group “ in the post below.
   
   http://www.legallyindia.com/content/anand-grover-the-lawyer-who-fought-the-377-law-and-won-20090817-134
   
   Jew Rothschild made lawyer Anand Grover ( husband of Indira Jaising ) the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to health from August 2008 to July 2014. He is a member of the Global Commission on Drug Policy.
   
   capt ajit vadakayil
   ..

WE KNOW THE COLLEGIUM JUDGES WHO HAVE BEEN SUPPORTING ZIONIST JEW PAYROLL TROJAN HORSE NGOs IN INDIA.  

ONE DAY THESE DESH DROHI JUDGES WILL RETIRE.. 

WHERE WILL THEY RUN-- TO ISRAEL ?

Read all 7 parts of the post below--

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/03/foreign-funded-trojan-horse-ngos-pil.html

Below: This is a chart from the media THE HINDU.  

The reality is that the actual amounts and NGOs are 4 times more.  

Why should white foreigners give free money to Indians? 

Because of kindness ?

DONALD TRUMP SACKED THE US ATTORNEY GENERAL   .. 

 PM MODI IS WEAK KNEED AND FAINT  HEARTED .

Capt. Ajit VadakayilJanuary 31, 2017 at 6:43 PM

DONALD TRUMP

LISTEN UP AND LISTEN GOOD

CAN YOU PUT COMMIE VAN JONES AND JEW GEORGE SOROS ( ROTHSCHILDs AGENT ) IN JAIL ?

TRUMP--TAKE PUTINs HELP

MODI--  WE WANT ALL FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs OF JEW ROTHSCHILD AND HIS AGENTS LIKE JEW GEORGE SOROS TO BE SHUT DOWN ... JOIN HANDS WITH TRUMP AND PUTIN

capt ajit vadakayil
..

ABOVE: LIKE HOW HOMOSEXUALS AND COMMIES PULL IN THEIR ILK INTO THEIR ORGANISATIONS BY SUBVERSION -   THERE IS A WAY FOREIGN PAYROLL COLLEGIUM JUDGES PULL IN COLLEGIUM JUDGES 

In the whole world today, India is the only country which has Jew Rothschild’s judiciary that follows the vicious practice of -- Rothschild’s  judges selecting “our type “ judges-- by a system called COLLEGIUM — a cosy judicial club functioning as a desh drohi super judiciary.    

Judiciary cannot appoint itself. No nation on this planet allows this.   Judiciary cannot be a retirement home for lawyers, paid from taxpayer’s money.

This Jew Rothschild controlled Judiciary is the only impediment to our watan becoming the No 1 superpower of this planet in 16 years .   

US president Donald Trump has fired Jew Rothschild payroll Attorney General today.   Trump knows his powers .   In India our elected executive is NAPUNSAK .

The need of the hour is an All-India Judicial Service ( AIJS ) .   At least 70 per cent of the posts should be filled up at the trial and district court levels from such a service

All-India Judicial Service (AIJS) for appointment of district judges MUST  be through a rigorous examination process ( like IAS ) to be conducted by the Union Public Service Commission.  

Our Constitution was amended in 1977 to provide for an AIJS under Article 312.    

By  AIJS we can have intelligent  younger judges in our SC and HCs.   They will run over these “loser lawyer turned Melord judges “ and show them a mirror on their loser faces.

Public debate often gets hijacked by discussions on the number of judges, but it rarely considers the quality of judges themselves—most of whom do NOT have the brains to glean CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE .

There is always a huge  vacancy for judges in the courts?  Vacancies are never filled.  Why do these Judges positions remain empty?  The answer is simple. Because the judiciary is unable to attract talent.  Mostly  loser lawyers become judges.  Later they wear 5 piece suit and act god.

To compound things further, today the subordinate judiciary depends entirely on state recruitment.  But the brighter law students do not join the state judicial services because they are not attractive.  

With no career progression, no one with a respectable Bar practice wants to become an additional district judge, and deal with the hassles of transfers and postings.   Consequently, the quality of the subordinate judiciary is by and large below average  

By extension, at least one-third of high court judges elevated from the subordinate judiciary are also mostly below average. As a result, the litigants are left to suffer.

ENSURE JUDGE SALARIES ARE TRIPLED , PM MODI 

In European models, students pick the judiciary as a stream early in their legal studies itself.   Just as dentistry is a specialisation in medicine, judging is a specialisation in law.  There is a one year diploma on “judging” in law schools, with the eventual idea to have a full-fledged course for judges.

When our Constitution was drafted, the AIJS discussion got sidelined-- by vested forces . 

The end result was Article 235, under which the entire judicial machinery at the subordinate level was under the control of the high courts. 

The Constitution drafting committees also discussed Article 312, conferring power on the Parliament to create All India Services. At that time, it was doubtful whether the judicial services could be organised on a national scale under Article 312. 

After the Swaran Singh Committee’s recommendations in 1976, Article 312 was modified to include the judicial services, but it excluded anyone below the rank of district judge. Therefore, the trial courts are completely eliminated.

Meanwhile, the First Law Commission of India (LCI) came out with its comprehensive, and now legendary, 14th Report on Reforms on the Judicial Administration, which recommended an AIJS in the interests of efficiency of the judiciary.

The idea of an AIJS was approved in the chief ministers’ conference in 1982, and most states were in agreement. It was argued that this would lead to an erosion of the control of the high courts over the subordinate judiciary, which would, in turn, affect the judiciary’s independence.

The process of recruitment of Judges would be through open competition ( like IIT ) , and if designed with the right incentives of VERY HIGH pay, promotion and career progression, it could potentially become an attractive employment avenue for bright and capable young law graduates. 

The judiciary needs such bright determined youngsters to take over the system.

The idea of an AIJS has not merely been academic, and the Law Commission has not been its solitary votary.  The Supreme Court has itself said that an AIJS should be set up, and has directed the Union of India to take appropriate steps in this regard. This has happened at least twice. 

It is clear that the judicial side of the court machinery is entirely in favour of an AIJS. It is the administrative side ( corrupt foreign payroll )  that has been opposing this idea. 

It is extremely disappointing that the opposition is coming from within the judiciary itself, with certain high courts opposing the idea without understanding the issues properly. 

Without a push from the judiciary, the AIJS will never come to fruition.   

Or PM Modi must kick prime judicial ass the way Donald Trump( with balls of steel ) has done.

In a longer-term perspective, uniformity in selection processes and standards, as offered by an AIJS, has many advantages. It will improve the quality of judicial officers in high courts, and one-third of the judges would enter the high courts through the route of promotion from subordinate courts.

By extension, judges of the Supreme Court are drawn from the high courts. In this process, the persons eventually selected into the judiciary would be of proven competence. Simultaneously, the quality of adjudication and the dispensation of justice would undergo transformative changes across the judicial system, from the lowest to the highest levels.

A career judicial service will make the judiciary more accountable, more professional, and arguably, also more equitable. This can have far-reaching impact on the quality of justice, and on people’s access to justice as well. For decades, the judiciary has been asked to do something about judicial recruitments, but always stops short of taking an initiative in the formation of an AIJS.

There has been a palpable wave of tension that is simmering between the government and the judiciary ever since the apex court rejected the NJAC Act and restored the collegium system to appoint judges. The elected executive surrendered meekly under pressure from foreign forces

TODAY DESH DROHI foreign funded NGOs IN CAHOOTS WITH BENAMI MEDIA AND COLLEGIUM JUDGES ARE TRING TO KILL THE FAST/ FREE/ FAIR KHAP JUSTICE SYSTEM IN VILLAGES… 

KHAPS ( VILLAGE PANCHAYATS DELIVERING JUSTICE SINCE MILLENNIUMS )  HAVE THE PULSE  OF THE VILLAGERS.  

THE VILLAGE ELDERS KNOW FROM HINDSIGHT WHO ARE THE ROTTEN EGGS IN THE VILLAGE  BASKET

It is the system of ANCIENT village Panchayats and their schemes of dispute settlement by using means such as mediation, negotiation, and arbitrator process through ‘Nyaya panch’ that forms the underlying idea of Lok Adalats.  

This ancient Indian Judicial concept was  lifted by white men as ADR.  

The philosophy of Lok Adalats rests on involvement, justice, fairness, clarity, independence and absence of malice. 

Today, it is not only the people who directly seek relief but also people who indirectly seek relief that turn to the benefit of Lok Adalats.

Etymologically, Lok Adalat means "people's court".  It was India who provided a torch of justice beacon to the world.     

India has had a long history of resolving disputes through the mediation of village elders when the rest of the planet were running around naked doing GRUNT GRUNT..  

The current system of Lok Adalats is a mere improvement on that.. King Solomon learnt our “circumstantial “ justice system ( based on wisdom ) from his wife Queen of Sheba—an Indian woman from Kerala.   King Solomon’s mother Bath Sheba was a woman from Kerala, India

The focus of the lok adalat is on amicable win-win compromise. When no compromise is reached, the matter goes back to the court.

The Lok Adalat cases heard included criminal cases (minor offences which could be settled out of court), cheque bounces, bank recovery, civil suits, motor accident claims, family matters, traffic violation cases, revenue matters, land acquisition references, consumer matters, service and labour matters where there was a possibility of amicable settlements.

It is the duty of every DESH BHAKT citizens to protect the judiciary from the burden of unnecessary litigation... and approaching the court only as a final resort.

The Lok Adalat has been given statutory status under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

In unequivocal terms, the supreme  Court has held that award of the Lok Adalat is as good as the decree of a Court.

The award of the Lok Adalat is fictionally deemed to be decrees of Court and therefore the courts have all the powers in relation thereto as it has in relation to a decree passed by itself..  

The award passed by the Lok Adalat is the decision of the court itself though arrived at by the simpler method of conciliation instead of the process of arguments in court.

The most important factor to be considered while deciding the cases at the Lok Adalat is the mutual consent of both the parties .   

In several instances, the Supreme Court has held that if there was no consent the award of the Lok Adalat is not executable and also if the parties fail to agree to get the dispute resolved through Lok Adalat, the regular litigation process remains open for the contesting parties.

A compromise is always bilateral and means mutual adjustment.  Settlement is termination of legal proceedings by mutual consent. If no compromise or settlement is or could be arrived at, no order can be passed by the Lok Adalat.

WHEN IT COMES TO EGO MASSAGE ( DEFAMATION  )  AND BEING IN THE LIMELIGHT FOR RICH ,  POWERFUL AND CRYING BOLLYWOOD SUPERSTARS — THIS MUTUAL ADJUSTMENT MUST BE STOPPED.   

 THE PERON WHO SEEKS EGO MASSAGE MUST BE THROWN INTO JAIL..

The benefits that litigants derive through the Lok Adalats are many.   First, there is no court fee and even if the case is already filed in the regular court, the fee paid will be refunded if the dispute is settled at the Lok Adalat.

Secondly, there is no strict application of the procedural laws and the Evidence Act while assessing the merits of the claim by the Lok Adalat.  

The parties to the disputes though represented by their advocate can interact with the Lok Adalat judge directly and explain their stand in the dispute and the reasons therefore, which is not possible in a regular court of law, where the uppity melord is in a mann mandir wallah ivory tower.

Thirdly, disputes can be brought before the Lok Adalat directly instead of going to a regular court first .

Fourthly, the decision of the Lok Adalat is binding on the parties to the dispute and its order is capable of execution through legal process.   

No appeal lies against the order of the Lok Adalat whereas in the regular law courts there is always a scope to appeal to the higher forum on the decision of the trial court, which causes delay in the settlement of the dispute finally.  Read this line twice .

The reason being that in a regular court, decision is that of the court but in Lok Adalat it is mutual settlement and hence no case for appeal will arise. In every respect the scheme of Lok Adalat is a boon to the litigant public, where they can get their disputes settled fast and free of cost.

The major defect of the mechanism of Lok Adalat is that it cannot take a decision, if one of the parties, is not willing for a settlement, though the case involves an element of settlement.  

The adamant attitude shown by one among the parties will render the entire process futile . There must be a sure process of the adamant party A seeks an ego massage or is in the foul game of troubling the other party B who is financially disadvantaged ..

EVERY CASE OF EGO MASSAGE VIA DEFAMATION MUST BE HANDLED BY LOK ADALAT AND FALSE CASES BY RICH AND POWERFUL TO SUPPRESS TRUTH MUST BE DEALT WITH SEVERELY BY HUGE FINES OR JAIL TERM..

Again , every award of the Permanent Lok Adalat, whether it is based on consent of the parties, or on compromise or upon the decision, "shall be deemed to be a decree of a civil court".

In ancient India village panchayaths were "People's court".  This was a non-adversarial system.

Backlog cases that are pending in regular courts can be transferred to a Lok Adalat if both the parties agree.   If it is clear that party A wants to trouble party B because he has more money and time, he must be clearly warned .

THERE IS NO NEED TO AGREE FOR MINOR CASES LIKE ROAD RAGE OR UGLY FAT PMS WOMEN ACCUSING YOUNG HANDSOME BOYS OF EVE TEASING .

Again, the focus in Lok Adalats is on compromise.  When no compromise is reached, the matter goes back to the court.   However, if a compromise is reached, an award is made and is binding on the parties.   It is enforced as a decree of a civil court.   

An important aspect is that the award is final and cannot be appealed, not even under Article 226 because it is a judgement by consent.

All proceedings of a Lok Adalat are deemed to be judicial proceedings and every Lok Adalat is deemed to be a Civil Court.

The Lok Adalat is presided over by a sitting or retired judicial officer as the chairman, with two other members, usually a lawyer and a social worker. There is no court fee.

Lok Adalat is very effective in settlement of money claims.   Disputes like partition suits, damages and matrimonial cases can also be easily settled before Lok Adalat as the scope for compromise through an approach of give and take is high in these cases.

Lok Adalats have the competence to deal with the following cases:--- 

Compoundable civil, revenue and criminal cases.

Motor accident cases

Partition Claims

Matrimonial and family disputes

Bonded Labour disputes

Land acquisition disputes

Bank’s unpaid loan cases

Arrears of retirement benefits cases

Cases which are not under the jurisdiction of any Court.

Compoundable offences are less serious criminal offences and are of two different types mentioned in tables in Section 320 of the CrPC, as follows:

1. Court permission is not required before compounding – Examples of these offences include adultery, causing hurt, defamation criminal trespass.

2. Court permission is required before compounding – Examples of such offences are theft, criminal breach of trust, voluntarily causing grievous hurt, assault on a woman with intention to outrage her modesty, dishonest misappropriation of property amongst others.…

Compoundable offences are those offences where, the complainant (one who has filed the case, i.e. the victim), enter into a compromise, and agrees to have the charges dropped against the accused.

Non-compoundable Offences – All other offences not classified as compoundable in Section 320 of the CrPC are considered non-compoundable offences.  These are offences considered more serious in nature and they impact not only the victim, but society at large is also considered to be affected.

There are some offences, which cannot be compounded. They can only be quashed. The reason for this is, because the nature of offence is so grave and criminal, that the Accused cannot be allowed to go scot-free. Here, in these types of cases generally, it is the "state", i.e. police, who has filed the case, and hence the question of complainant entering into compromise does not arise.

In Non-compoundable offense, no compromise is allowed. Even the court does not have the authority and power to compound such offense. Full trail is held which ends with the acquittal or conviction of the offender, based on the evidence given.

The Powers bestowed on Lok Adalats are as follows:--

i) It has the power of the Civil Court, under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters:-

Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. b) Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document.

c) Power to receive evidence on affidavits,

d) Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court.

e) Such other matters as may be prescribed.

ii) Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it.

iii) All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC.

iv) Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.

During the Lok Adalat, the parties agree to abide by the decision of the judge at the Lok Adalat.. In unequivocal terms, the Court held that the award of the Lok Adalat is as good as the decree of the Court.  

The award passed by the Lok Adalat is the decision of the Court itself though arrived at by the simpler method of conciliation instead of the process of arguments in court.

The Lok Adalat mechanism is no more an experiment in the country, it is in fact, a full-proven success that needs to increase its domain and bring under its realm the several aspects that have been excluded till date.

Lok Adalat has the potential for social reconstruction and legal mobilization for social change. It can influence the style of administration of justice and the role of the lawyer and judge in it. It can take law closer to the life of the people and reduce disparity between law in books and law in action.

Lok Adalat is the way to go till the backlog is finished off and we have more judges in the system. 

In speeding up cases, it better to punish less than punish more—we have to accept this as a necessary “collateral damage “ for common good and the good of the watan.  

There is absolutely NO need to split hairs over this or make this a truth finding exercise. 

To increase the efficiency of the system of Lok Adalats, it is crucial for the public, the lawyers, the executive and the Judiciary to work in harmony and coordination. The people should be made aware of the advantages of the Lok Adalats.

THIS MUST BE PART OF THE NCERT SCHOOL SYLLABUS

Ancient Indian village panchayats have used adjudication such as arbitration, mediation and conciliation when the rest of the planet did NOT have a language .

We need to set up enough lok adalats, fast track courts, family courts, mobile panchayats, nyaya panchayats and gram nyayalayas.  

It is now time to computerize Indian courts are conduct all proceedings under video cam for records. 

THIS BULLSHIT OF TAAREQ PEH TAREEEQ PEH TAREEQ SO THAT THE LAWYER CAN MILK THE CLIENT EVERY 4 MONTHS , FOR DECADES MUST BE STOPPED.    

LAW MINISTER –LISTEN UP.   DO YOUR FUCKIN’ JOB.

SUMMONS CAN BE GIVEN BY SMS MOBILE PHONE OR BY EMAIL OR CHECKING THE WEBSITE – LIKE HOW WE BOOK RAILWAY TICKETS BY USING A CODE NUMBER .

The absence of any court fees makes Lok Adalat  approachable by the weaker societies. Moreover, if a case has previously been filed in any court, the fees charged by this court will be returned as soon as the matter is filed with Lok Adalat.

There is a lot more flexibility with regards to procedural rules and the weight of Evidence Act during the assessment of any claim.  The aggrieved party and the defendants can directly interact and communicate with the judges of Lok Adalat despite being represented by their advocates.

Any matter can be presented directly to the Lok Adalat instead of going through any court. Since time is of the essence in most of these cases, having a fast track and cost effective system such as this can be beneficial to many.

Again, Lok Adalat’s decision is binding on the parties, and the same can be executed with a legal process. The decision of Lok Adalat cannot be appealed to higher courts unlike the other courts of law which usually results in a delay of the proceedings.   

This is because the decision made in a Lok Adalat is mutually settled as opposed to a verdict given in other courts.  Hence, the need for an appeal should not arise if the settlement consents.

The basic features of a “permanent”  Lok Adalat are identical to a Lok Adalat.  There are, however, certain modifications made. The key difference is that a typical Lok Adalat can only be summoned occasionally and not on a daily basis, a permanent Lok Adalat is an established system which is operational throughout just like any other court or tribunal.

The Legal services Authorities Act, 1987, which had established Lok Adalats, did not, at first, establish permanent Lok Adalats.  It was the Amendment Act of 2002 that enabled the establishment of the first “ permanent”  Lok Adalat.

“ Permanent”  Lok Adalat is presided over by a chairperson, who:-- 

Is a district judge or has been one.

Is an additional district judge

Has held judicial office higher in rank than that of a judge of the district court

Along with the chairperson, the government also appoints two other persons who are experienced in the area of public utility service. The state authority or the central authority appoints this person, depending on the case, after a nomination by the respective government has been made.

Again Lok Adakats do not have jurisdiction on matters related to non-compoundable offences.

While in regular suits, the plaintiff is required to pay the prescribed court fee, in Lok Adalat, there is no court fee and no rigid procedural requirement (i.e. no need to follow process given by [Indian] Civil Procedure Code or Indian Evidence Act), which makes the process very fast.

Again, Parties can directly interact with the judge, which is not possible in regular courts.

Cases that are pending in regular courts can be transferred to a Lok Adalat if both the parties agree.  A case can also be transferred to a Lok Adalat if one party applies to the court and the court sees some chance of settlement after giving an opportunity of being heard to the other party.

I ASK--  LOK ADALAT MUST BE LIVE ON TV — PEOPLE CAN JUDGE IF JUSTICE IS BEING DONE.   THIS IS DONE IN USA .

AGAIN, THERE SHOULD BE NO NEED FOR A COMPROMISE ON EGO RELATED ISSUES – OR A RICH AND POWERFUL MAN GETS HIS KICKS TROUBLING A POOR MAN..

The procedural laws, and the Evidence Act are not strictly followed while assessing the merits of the claim by the Lok Adalat.

Lok Adalat is very effective in settlement of money claims.  Disputes like partition suits, damages and matrimonial cases can also be easily settled before Lok Adalat as the scope for compromise through an approach of give and take is high in these cases.

Lok Adalats have the powers of an ordinary Civil Court such as summoning, examining, taking evidence etc.

Capt. Ajit VadakayilFebruary 1, 2017 at 9:04 AM

ALL-

Yesterday one of my followers asked me to crack the CICADA 3301 puzzle.

This is touted by the white man ( with shallow brain ) as the last frontier for human intelligence the ultimate EPIPHAMY moment.

MY LEFT BALL.

This is puerile cerebral shit puzzle walking backwards on a 2D plane from destination to origin—cloaked as an intelligence maze.

I can produce a more intelligent puzzle thinking in 3D from between the destination and the origin.

I have been through western standards of human intelligence . You can get solved MENSA puzzles in science libraries or even on the internet. This is meant for CHOOTS.

No white man can ever come to 1/ one millionth of an ancient Indian Maharishis FRACTAL intellect.

Let me go to UNSUNG Srinivasan Ramanujan’s intellect

Prof Hardy met him as soon as his London airport taxi stopped and he just stepped out. Hardy to break conversation ( like the quintessential weather ) remarked. That number of the taxi’s number plate seems to be a dull number.

Ramanujan walked to the front of the taxi , saw that the number was 1729 and remarked instantaneously—“In fact it is a very interesting number –it is the product of three prime numbers 7, 13 and 19” and then he proceeded to give various other interpretations like—“It’s the smallest number expressible as the sum of two cubes in two different ways.”

This is now a Wikipedia post which is bullshit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1729_(number)

THE WHITE BASTARDS TRIED TO BURY RAMANUJANs INTELLECT AND GAVE EVERYTHING EXCEPT RAMANUJANs FIRST INTERPRETATION OF PRIME NUMBERS .

AND THEN THEY ESTABLISHED THAT RAMANUJAN WAS DYING –HE WAS NOT KILLED.

Only the highest quality human brain like Nikola Tesla or Ramanujan can ever dabble with PRIME NUMBERS.

Such geniuses are used in modern cryptography .

A Prime Number can be divided evenly only by 1, or itself. And it must be a whole number greater than 1. The first few prime numbers are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, and 29.

What Ramanujan told Hardy about 1729 has been stolen and patented by other white Jews.

http://www.zmescience.com/science/math/taxi-number-ramanujan-03213/

I have written a post on Ramanujan below 7 years ago-

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/11/fractal-mind-of-srinivasa-ramanujan.html

Very few people on the planet have ever been to reach the BINDU and look outwards.

Sri Yantra is 2D as seen by the white man is ridiculous.
Sri Yantra in 3D ( 9 interlacing golden spirals ) seen from BINDU outwards gives the THEORY OF EVERYTHING in micro and macro scale from Sanskrit language to elements on the periodic table.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/12/108-numerical-equivalent-of-hindu-king.html

HINDU KING MANTRA OM IN PURE LIVING WATER GIVES THE 3 D SRI YANTRA

Ever since I wrote water can hold memory and can create conscious computers , hundreds of people have hijacked this idea and have written on it.

ALL ARE WRONG

What is a conscious computer? Today NO super computer can laugh at a joke or tell the moral of a story. A conscious computer can.

My Russian Chief Engineer once attended a conference of intellectuals. After the conference they had a Vodka party . All were in pretty high spirits and people started cracking jokes.

Then one man said this and kept quiet-- “ THERE WAS THIS HONEST JEW , WHO WORKED IN A COAL MINE “

All were thinking that he is just recollecting his thoughts before he continued.

Then one genius laughed loudly and then the entire hall were in splits , at the enormity of this joke .

Since nobody could surpass this fantastic CONSCIOUS joke, the joke session got over and they departed in good cheer.

CONTINUED TO 2-

1. 
   Capt. Ajit VadakayilFebruary 1, 2017 at 9:04 AM

   CONTINUED FROM 1-
   
   What is a moral of a story ?
   
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/02/super-panchatantra-capt-ajit-vadakayil.html
   When my elder son applied for a job in the world’s wealthiest IT company after Cornell –he was asked to do a coding test in 45 minutes. He did it in a single line in 23 seconds .
   
   It took my son a few minutes to draw a diagram and explain his code to the befuddled examiner . The director of the company told my son—thousands of candidates from all around the planet took 45 minutes in the past , and that his short and sweet code in JAVA can never be surpassed .
   
   YOU DO NOT JUDGE THE INTELLIGENCE OF A MAN EVEN BY SUCH A FANTASTIC CODE.
   
   YOU JUDGE IT BY ORDINARY EVENTS IN YOUR ORDINARY LIFE
   
   All sailors know about RAT GUARDS .
   
   ONCE MY 8 YEAR OLD ELDER SON ASKED ME—“DADDY WHY ARE SAILORS SO STUPID ?”
   
   The incident is below
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/01/snow-shovelling-and-backache-capt-ajit.html
   
   A western shovel can do the job on soft snow or a sandy beach. What can it achieve in hard snow or a field of clay ?
   
   FUCK ALL !
   
   Only CUNTS push when it is required to PULL
   This is why , in the white man’s imagination his STONEHENGE is humanly impossible—aliens must have built it right? First of all the CHOOT does not even know what it is for—he is still speculating
   
   IF YOU GIVE ME THREE STRONG MEN , I WILL MAKE A BIGGER STONHENGE .
   
   I HAVE DONE FAR GREATER THINGS AT SEA.
   
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/01/mystery-of-stonehenge-solved-capt-ajit.html
   
   SO SO SO—
   A WEE HINT
   HOW CAN WATER HOLD MEMORY?
   WHY IS WATER SPECIAL ?
   THERE CAN BE NO LIFE WITHOUT WATER .. ANAEROBIC CREATURES CAN SURVIVE WITHOUT OXYGEN.
   “ The hydrogen atoms within each water molecule are strongly drawn toward the oxygen atoms in neighboring molecules. In fact, the hydrogen partners are so fickle that a water molecule changes partners ten billion to a hundred billion times a second. Water appears to be H 1.5 O rather than H2O ( hence the fantastic dissolving action )”
   
   REST DURING PILLOW TALK - 98% revelations onwards
   
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/11/water-valley-and-walking-on-water-capt.html
   THROW SOME BREAD CRUMBS IN THE GENERAL DIRECTION OF CICADA 3301 -
   I WILL NOT WASTE ENERGY IN CARRYING IT ON THE TIP OF MY PRICK TO PRICKFORK IT OVERBOARD .
   
   capt ajit vadakayil
   ..

BELOW:   THIS IS WHO WE ARE-- ( WATCH IN FULL SCREEN IN HD )-- THE GRANDEST SPECTACLE ON PLANET EARTH 

IF ANY NATION ATTACKS INDIA , WE WILL GIVE MOONH TODH JAWAAB AS REQUIRED BY KRISHNA IN BHAGAWAD GITA.   

NO MORE OF BEING SLAVES FOR 800 YEARS TO INVADERS 

WE HAVE FLUSHED DOWN ROTHSCHILDs AGENT GANDHI , HIS CHARKHA AND ENEMA KIT DOWN THE SHITPOT..  

TO BE CONTINUED --

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..