FOREIGN FUNDED TROJAN HORSE NGOs , PIL, JUDICIAL OVERREACH, UNHOLY NEXUS ,PART 5 - CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL

THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 4 , BELOW-

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/03/foreign-funded-trojan-horse-ngos-pil_8.html

Below: Indians have lost faith in the Judiciary--it is SLOW /  EXPENSIVE / UNFAIR -- while the khaps are FAST / FREE  / FAIR ( with a finger on local history / pulse and culture).  

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2012/11/gotra-system-khap-rules-y-chromosome.html

All MUCK thrown on Khaps by BENAMI media are almost 99% false.

HEY MELORDS—

YOU ACCEPT PIL EVEN VIA POST CARD , RIGHT?

HERE IS A PIL FROM THIS BLOGSITE.

“SUBDIVISION AND FRAGMENTATION “ OF AGRICULTURAL FERTILE LAND IS INDIAs NO 1 PROBLEM—

THE ROOT CAUSE OF FARMERS SUICIDE.   

 PLEASE FIND A SOLUTION AND SET A MINIMUM AREA LIMIT AFTER WHICH LAND CANNOT BE FRAGMENTED ( AMONG CHILDREN ) ANYMORE.

PIL FILED WITH SC VIA BLOG POST  :  

DATE 10^TH MARCH 2016

TIME : 0230 IST

################################### 

By way of PIL the Melords ruled – Only  photographs of only President, PM and the Chief Justice of India can be used in in advertisements.

We can understand PM and President.

JUST WHO THE HELL IS CJI ?

PRAY ?

PRITHEE?

THERE IS NO WAY WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA WILL ACCEPT A MELORD CJI AS OUR NATIONs LEADER .

SC: Except PM, President, CJI, no neta faces in govt ads

The bench said the 'legitimate' objective of advertisements can always be achieved without publishing pictures of individuals.  

Supreme Court said several advertisements by different departments on the same occasion were not justified.

Calling it an “antithesis to democracy” to let political functionaries develop “personality cult” at the cost of public money, the Supreme Court Wednesday ruled that photographs of only the President, Prime Minister and Chief Justice of India can be published in newspapers and other media, including the Internet.

Prohibiting publication of photographs of even Governors and Chief Ministers using the public exchequer, a bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and P C Ghose said “institutions need not be glorified but they must earn glory by contribution and work”.

The bench noted that publication of photographs of a state or a political party functionary had a tendency to associate individuals with social benefit schemes or achievements.

“Photographs, therefore, have the potential of developing the personality cult and the image of one or a few individuals which is a direct antithesis of democratic functioning,” it said.

The bench said the “legitimate” objective of advertisements can always be achieved without publishing pictures of individuals.

Citing the relevance of the Directive Principles of State Policy, the bench said “ensuring avoidance of unproductive expenditure of public funds” will go a long way in securing “social and economic justice to the teeming millions of the country, who even today live behind an artificially drawn poverty line.”

The bench said it was the government’s “responsibility” to disseminate information necessary for the public to know about policies and programmes while making certain that the advertisement campaigns are objective and fair, cost-effective and definitely “not directed  at promoting political interests of a party”.

Dismissing the Centre’s objection to restrict publication of photographs or to issue other guidelines, the court said it was a fit case to exercise the top court’s powers under Article 142 of the Constitution and impose curbs on “politically motivated” advertisements.

It said while the government could issue advertisements in the memory of national leaders and great personalities,  several advertisements by different departments on the same occasion were not justified.

A single advertisement issued by a central agency such as the Directorate of Advertising and Visual Publicity (DAVP) and information departments of states would be enough, the bench said.

It said patronisation of media houses by central and state governments must be avoided and award of advertisements should be on a fair and objective basis while taking note of circulation etc.

To iron out issues regarding implementation of its directions and compliance, the court said the Centre will constitute a three-member body of ombudsmen, comprising persons with unimpeachable impartiality who have excelled in their fields.

The bench, however, said there was no necessity of imposing a special curb on government advertisements on the eve of the elections or to order a special audit in view of the guidelines issued.

Hearing PILs by NGOs Common Cause and CPIL, the court, in April last year, had ordered constitution of a panel to frame comprehensive guidelines to help end the abuse of public advertisements for political mileage.

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/only-photos-of-pm-president-chief-justice-to-be-allowed-in-government-advertisements-rules-supreme-court/

Time for my revelations to jump to 16.05%

THE WHOLE IDEA OF THE ABOVE ORDER (  TO PUBLISH THE PHOTO OF CJI  ) WAS TO CONVINCE THE INDIAN MASSES THAT MELORD CJI ( COLLEGIUM ) IS INDEED A NATIONAL LEADER TO BE SANCTIFIED IN OUR HEARTS AND MINDS.

BUT WE INDIANS ARE NOT STUPID ANY MORE  !

Ethos is a difficult thing to acquire; sometimes it may take decades to build a strong, credible reputation –but there is a backdoor via endless visual propaganda

Jew Rothschild cloaked CRYPTO Kathiwari Jain lawyer Gandhi in ETHOS before he imported him from South Africa --

-- and unleashed him on unsuspecting Indians, to sit on the drivers seat of our freedom struggle—always to make the right noises but always to steer away.

The BILDERBERG CLUB created the PIL system to elevate MELORDS as NATIONAL LEADERS .

PIL was created as a TOOL  for the UNELECTED judiciary to expand its own powers and autonomy under the mantle of a popular social justice agenda !

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/09/shrewd-club-within-naive-bilderberg.html

Below: Poor Pakistanis do NOT know that their collegium JUDGES are chosen by JEW BIG BROTHER .

JUST WHAT DID THE COLLEGIUM MELORDS HAVE IN MIND WHEN THEY ORDERED THAT INDIAs RIVERS MUST BE INTERLINKED , AND THAT TOO WITH A DEADLINE  ?

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-02-27/news/31104318_1_interlinking-social-activists-rivers

IT WAS AS EASY AS ORDERING A PIZZA FROM PIZZA HUT , RIGHT ?

WRONG !

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/05/interlinking-rivers-of-india-capt-ajit.html

HULLO MELORDS--

YOU ALL GOT HAJAAAAR SPONTANEOUS KNOWLEGDE,  WHILE SITTING IN YOUR AC CHAMBERS , RIGHT ?

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/06/ganga-manthan-cleaning-of-river-ganges.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/03/vanishing-lakes-rain-water-harvesting.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/11/foam-froth-on-bangalore-lakes-capt-ajit.html

Below: US courts are controlled by BILDERBERG club !

National green tribunal (NGT ) has  power to initiate proceedings for contempt of court, at par with a High Court which is reflected from Section 26 of the act .

“ Even otherwise the NGT Act itself confers enormous power on the Tribunal to deal with any person       who fails to comply with the order or award either by punishing with imprisonment up to 3 years or to         impose a fine up-to 10 Crores under Section 26 “

 S 26. Penalty for failure to comply with orders of Tribunal (1) Whosoever, fails to comply with any order or award or decision of the Tribunal under this act, he shall be punishable with imprisonment  for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine which may extend to ten crore rupees, or with both and in case the failure or contravention continues, with additional fine which may extend to twenty-five thousand rupees for every day during which such failure or contravention continues after conviction for the first such failure or contravention: Provided that in case a company fails to comply with any order or award or a decision of the Tribunal under this Act, such company shall be punishable with fine which may extend to twenty-five crore rupees, and in case the failure or contravention continues, with additional fine which may extend to one lakh rupees for every day during which such failure or contravention continues after conviction for the first such failure or contravention. (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), every offence under this Act shall be deemed to be non-cognizable within the meaning of the said Code.”

Recently ,NGT initiated  contempt of court proceedings as below :

NGT charged the district magistrate of Baghpat with contempt of court for failing to shut down 600 brick kilns running illegally, without the mandatory environment   clearances.

On September 8, 2013 environmentalist Lokender Kumar had filed a petition in NGT seeking that steps be taken to stem the growth of a number of illegal   brick kilns in the rural belt of Baghpat. The district magistrate was among the  respondents in the case.

In another instance , the NGT has issued bailable warrant against the Delhi Chief Secretary for failure of officials to appear before it for apprising about the   implementation of closure orders of stainless steel pickling firms .

MELORDS OF NGT HAS BANNED ALL 10 YEAR OLD DIESEL VEHICLES FROM PLYING ON DELHI ROADS.

WHY DO WE NURTURE THIS UNELECTED FRANKENSTEIN IN A DEMOCRACY ?

WHO GAINS ?

This blogsite asks  the POMPOUS IGNORAMUS  NGT MELORDS , who has powers to slap CONTEMPT, powers to slap FINES , powers  SHUT DOWN , powers to SUMMON etc  --to read all posts below-

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/12/thermal-coal-power-plants-clean-exhaust.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/12/thermal-coal-power-plants-clean-exhaust_6.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/12/thermal-coal-power-plants-clean-exhaust_9.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/12/thermal-coal-power-plants-clean-exhaust_12.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/12/thermal-coal-power-plants-clean-exhaust_16.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/12/thermal-coal-power-plants-clean-exhaust_18.html

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH,    POWER HUNGRY MELORDS OF NGT !

IF I SET A EXAM FOR YOU MELORDS ,  ON YOUR OWN SPECIAL SUBJECT ALL OF YOU WILL SCORE ZERO PERCENT !

WHY HAVE AN ENVIRONMENTAL MINISTRY ?

The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), has repeatedly contended that NGT has been overstepping its jurisdiction.

In an affidavit filed before Supreme Court, MoEF&CC’S deputy secretary during the previous regime labelled NGT’S conduct an “embarrassment” to the government in Parliament.

The affidavit drew heavy criticism from COLLEGIUM  Supreme Court, which termed it as “nonsense”.

The then Solicitor General, Mohan Parasaran, later disowned the affidavit.

Let it be known however –

This blogsite SALUTES the NGT for quashing the clearances given to the vested Aranmula Airport Project in Kerala-  where foreign DROHIS are involved

CLAP

CLAP

CLAP

CLAP

CLAP

CLAP

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/11/aranmula-airport-kerala-mindless-rape.html

NGT is trying to acquire the powers of superior courts. “NGT cannot strike down a statute. It can only examine the decisions that are taken and consider if they are in compliance with the three principles laid down in Section 20 of the Act”

NGT has been accused of overstepping its jurisdiction and taking actions for which it has not been empowered under the NGT Act.

Three issues have frequently cropped up.

First, does NGT have powers to take cognisance of a matter on its own and take action upon it-the power of suomotu. 

Second, can NGT review and direct change in rules and regulations-the power of judicial review.

Third, can NGT take up any case which can be termed as “substantial question of environment”.

Once the NGT started operating, lower courts were barred from taking up environmental cases. Not that they were doing a great job, but the debarring of lower courts has meant that poor and disadvantaged communities living in remote parts of the country now have to go to NGT Benches in their respective zones to get justice. 

For a tribal trying to stop pollution from an iron ore mine in Bastar, this means filing and fighting a case in Bhopal. For a villager affected by oil pollution in Nagaland, this means coming to Kolkata and hoping to be heard quickly. This is neither easy nor affordable.

NGT gave permission for TRIPLE SRIs  three-day cultural extravaganza of Art of Living on the flood plains of Yamuna river from Friday but imposed a fine of Rs five crores on it as environmental compensation.

MELORDS of NGT also slapped fine of Rs five lakh on DDA and Rs one lakh on Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) for not discharging statutory functions.

WE WILL NOT ALLOW NGT TO BE HIJACKED BY FOREIGN FUNDED TROJAN HORSE NGOs--

-- WHO DECIDE WHAT MUST BE SHUT DOWN AND WHAT MUST BE FINED IN AN ARBITRARY MANNER.

BOTTOMLINE:  

THIS BLOGSITE SUPPORTS THE NGT AND ITS SINCERE PURPOSE OF SAVING THE WATAN FROM DESH DROHIS AND  POWERFUL ROGUES  .

Some of the roadblocks to CNG implementation could have been avoided, or at least minimized, had  the conversion been originally mandated through the normal legislative process.

The hidden dangers to human health and future of India ( babies ) could have been examined.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/10/interstitial-lung-disease-nano-carbon.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/12/asd-atrial-septal-defect-hole-in-heart.html

Below:   THE ENTIRE ENGLISH MAIN STREAM MEDIA SLICE OF THE PIE ,  IS JUST 0.36% OF THE TOTAL .

TV CHANNELS LIKE NDTV /  CNN-IBN /  INDIA TODAY  / NEWS X  etc  HAVE HARDLY ANY VIEWERSHIP.    

HOW DO THEY BREAK EVEN ?  

WHO FUNDS THESE LOSS MAKING TV STATIONS?

vikas bhartiMarch 10, 2016 at 7:05 PM

Namastey captain
Can government amend the law which was written in British time?
What is role of president over double agent judges? If president is aware of your blog, can he control the double agent judges? 

1. Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 10, 2016 at 8:32 PM

   hi vb,
   
   if TN Seshan was the president he would have had all rogues in MURGA POSITION on his presidential lawns-
   
   he would have had their collective BALLS and TWATS strung together
   
   and he would pull the string to his heart's content.
   
   I WAS A POWERFUL CAPTAIN AT SEA, ONLY BECAUSE I KNEW MY POWERS .
   
   i used to even quote SOLAS ( safety of life at sea ) rules to FUCK my shore bosses.
   
   later it became so easy after ISM code came.
   
   http://www.theartofdredging.com/overridingauthority.htm
   
   EVEN BEFORE THIS CODE CAME TO LIFE, I WAS USING MY OWN CODE FOR NEARLY A DECADE.
   
   i knew BODMAS !!
   
   capt ajit vadakayil
   ..

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 10, 2016 at 10:14 PM

http://thewire.in/2016/03/10/swadeshi-indology-and-the-destruction-of-sanskrit-24450/

CANCEL THE VISA OF DESH DROHI SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN ( US CITIZEN ) WHO RUNS THE WIRE.

SHELDON POLLOCK SAYS VEDAS WERE A MEANS OF ANCIENT HINDUS EXPRESSING THEMSELVES -LIKE A RETARDED CHILD DOING BLABBER --

--OR A CROW DOING CAW CAW --

OH YEAH ?

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/07/nasadiya-sukta-rig-veda-5000-bc.html

LET NR NARAYANA MURTHY GO TO ENGLAND AND SETTLE DOWN WHERE HIS SON-IN-LAW RISHI SUNAK IS MP.

LET HIM TAKE HIS MONEY WITH HIM-- THIS BLOGSITE KNOWS HOW HE STARTED HIS BUSINESS .

I WILL PUT A FULL POST ON IT ,SOON.

PUT THIS COMMENT IN PMO,MODIs, RAJNATH SINGHs, PARRIKKARs, RSS , SMRITI IRANI WEBSITES TWITTER , FACEBOOK

capt ajit vadakayil
..

VIJAY MALLYA RAN AWAY-

APCO MODI IS NOW THE BABE IN THE WOODS.

OUR "LITTLE BO PEEP" PM IS HELPLESS

GIVE HIM SOME GUJJU AMUL MILK TO DRINK !

LANGOT YAAR , JEW DAVID CAMERON , IS ONLY FOR HUGGING, RIGHT ?

THE PIL I PUT IN THIS POST ABOUT “SUBDIVISION AND FRAGMENTATION OF FERTILE LANDS” HAS BEEN PUT IN MODIs WEBSITE AT LEAST 6 TIMES OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS.

APCO MODI HAS DONE NOTHING—AS HE CANT MILK VOTES HERE.

WATAN GAYE TEL LENE !

BUT HE RAN FASTER THAN USAIN BOLT ,  TO PRAISE SOME VAGUE UNKNOWN KERALA CHRISTIAN SAINTS — CHRISTIAN VOTES MAANGTHA HAI NA ?

APCO Modi spAke –CHARKHA GHUMAAKE  -

 ” I am delighted to participate in this function to celebrate the elevation to sainthood of two great saints of Kerala - Saint Kuriakose Elias Chavara and Saint Euphresia.    The whole country is proud of their recognition.   The life and deeds of Saint Chavara and Saint Euphresia are an inspiration not only to the Christian community, but to humanity as a whole”

BAAP RE !

CHRISTIAN VOTE PAKKA ?

THENGA MILEGA !  

INTEZAAR KARO !!

NORTH EAST STATES , TAMIL FISHER FOLK  , KERALA-  (CHRISTIAN CONVERTS) VOTES WILL GO TO THE  CHRISTIAN ITALIAN WAITRESS ! 

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 11, 2016 at 3:17 AM

Who is Sandeep Pandey?

He was awarded MAGSAYSAY award by JEW Rothschild for pushing his COMMIE agenda in India.
Recently this COMMIE Sandeep Pandey was sacked by IIT ( BHU) on charges of being a “Naxalite”, engaging in “anti-national” activities and screening a banned documentary ( Nirbhaya ) on the campus.

In 2002, Sandeep Pandey was one of the key speakers at the seventh Party Congress of the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist).

The theme of the event was ‘Red Resistance to Saffron Subversion’. During the event, he stressed the need of unity of revolutionary COMMIES to take on HINDU fascist danger.

Several prominent social activists such as Mahashweta Devi, Arundhati Roy, Sandeep Pandey, Rajinder Sachar, Praful Bidwai, and Anand Patwardhan attended the opening session of this event.

Our Intelligence agencies know how Sandeep Pandey's FOREIGN FUNDED TROJAN HORSE NGO named ASHA funds the Naxals.

TRAITOR Sandeep Pandey who openly advocates India should give up Kashmir. Sandeep Pandey is a hindu hating, anti-watan BIGOT.
http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/Sandeep-Pandey-Supports-JNU-Students/2016/03/11/article3320950.ece

WE DO NOT CARE FOR ROTHSCHILDs DOUBLE AGENT JEW NOAM CHOMSKY

http://www.europe-solidaire.org/spip.php?article15515

capt ajit vadakayil
..

Below: Ram Jethmalani says he wont employ AKKAL KA DUSHMAN even as a clerk !  

Below:  See the video from 3.40 onwards-- 

AKKAL KA DUSHMAN cannot write a sentence without copying-- 

-- this is the FUTURE PM which his illiterate Italian waitress mother , wants to dump on our collective Indian heads.

Below: Check out the MUG of the Italian waitress  -- so proud of her BONDHU mulatto son - she is delirious with joy !

DRAKMarch 11, 2016 at 3:54 AM

Captain,

Interesting news from Sri Sri- he had an exclusive obterview with Burkha-- Dutt; and was grilled.  Now his supporters crying foul.

Also, he disgraced himself by claiming that - Kanhaiya of JNU wanted Azadi from 'garibi' or something and "India needs such youth ( Kanhaiya)".

HE HAS LET ALL PATRIOTIC INDIANS DOWN.

https://twitter.com/sgurumurthy/status/707966779016908800

Regards.

1. Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 11, 2016 at 11:04 AM

   THIS IS WHAT OUR PM MODI IS WORTH
   
   HE WILL ATTEND THE YAMUNA BANKS FUNCTION TODAY --
   
   SEE HIS GUJARATI No 2 FACE !
   
   SHAMELESS AND SPINELESS MAN , APCO BRANDED MODI  -- DARLING OF JEWS !
   
   TRIPLE SRI IS THE DROHI WHO SAID THAT VEDAS CONDONE HOMOSEXUALITY AND SHIVA/ VISHNU HAD HOMOSEXUAL SEX AND PRODUCED LORD AYYAPPA   - THE 9TH AVATAR OF VISHNU
   
   capt ajit vadakayil
   ..

Sri Sri Ravi Shankar 

 ✔‎@SriSri

Homosexuality has never been considered a crime in Hindu culture. In fact, Lord Ayyappa was born of Hari-Hara (Vishnu & Shiva). #Sec377

10:07 PM - 11 Dec 2013

   
•   2,5532,553 Retweets
   
•   793793 likes

Sri Sri Ravi Shankar 

 ✔‎@SriSri

Homosexuality-not a crime in any Smriti. Everyone has male & female elements. According to their dominance,tendencies show up & may change.

10:14 PM - 11 Dec 2013

   
•   840840 Retweets
   
•   259259 likes

THIS  ROTHSCHILD  SUPPORTED MAN  TRIPLE SRI , DOES NOT KNOW  THAT SHIVA AND VISHNU ARE COSMIC FORCES –NOT MORTALS.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/09/sanatana-dharma-hinduism-exhumed-and.html

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Sri-Sri-Ravi-Shankar-Will-go-to-jail-but-wont-pay-Rs-5-crore-fine-NGT-fixes-deadline/articleshow/51353276.cms

SEND TRIPLE SRI TO JAIL

ALMOST ALL THE HINDUS OF INDIA WILL NOT MIND

THE ONLY ONES TO SUPPORT HIM WILL BE THOSE WHO HAVE A VESTED AGENDA .

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL SAYS-- TRIPLE SRI IS NOT A HINDU LEADER, NOR DOES HE UNDERSTAND SANATANA DHARMA.

capt ajit vadakayil
..

APCO MODI IS GUILTY OF CULTURAL TERRORISM --


- DESPITE BEING THE PM OF THE NATION.  


MODI CAME TO POWER  BY LYING TO HINDUS .


THEN AS SOON AS HE SAT OF THE PM CHAIR--


-- HE KICKED HINDUS ON THEIR COLLECTIVE TEETH.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/12/cultural-terrorism-by-benami-media-and.html

Below: This blogsite gives 100% support to AAP Law Minister Somnath Bharti .  

At least he supports the watan-- 

-  unlike APCO Modi who does things only to milk votes or please the ZIONIST JEWS --

( like attending TRIPLE SRIs Jumuna river banks event ).  

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 11, 2016 at 11:40 AM

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Delhi-University-could-be-getting-high-on-Wolf-of-Wall-Street-drug-Cops/articleshow/51353027.cms

AFRICAN WHORES SELLING SEX AND DRUGS IS WHAT AAP LAW MINISTER SOMNATH BHARTI TRIED TO STOP.

THIS DRUG MAFIA BRIBES THE POLICE AND JUDGES-- AND THEY CAN NEVER BE CAUGHT THE REGULAR INDIAN SYSTEM WAY..

THEY ARE TIPPED OFF BEFORE THE RAID.

THE NCW ( NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN ) SAVED THESE SEX AND DRUGS MOLLS.

MOST OF THE AFRICAN WOMEN ARE ENROLLED AS STUDENTS. BUT THEY HAVE ZERO ATTENDANCE.

THE BATLA HOUSE ISLAMIC TERRORIST WAS A JNU STUDENT WITH NIL ATTENDANCE.

DRUGS OVERFLOW IN JNU.

SEX IS FREE FOR MALE STUDENTS WHO CAN GIVE FEMALE STUDENTS DRUG ADDICTS A FIX.

WE WANT 50% MEN IN NCW.

NCW DOES NOT PROTECT THE INTERESTS OF THE WATAN.  IT WAS CREATED BY BILDERBERG CLUB TO DRIVE A GENDER DIVIDE.
In December 2006 the NCW ruled that that under Section 497[6] of the Indian Penal Code adulterous wives are NOT equally prosecutable by their husbands.

is this what our constitution wants ?

all these national organisations created by KOSHER BIG BROTHER -- NHRC, NCW, NCM , NGT , NBA ( news broadcaster's association ) -- all bleed the watan- bharatmata.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2012/07/jewish-russian-mafia-capt-ajit-vadakayil.html

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/video/somnath-bharti-delhi-african-community-national-human-rights-commission/1/338388.html

capt ajit vadakayil

..

Above:  INDIAN ECONOMY WILL GROW AT 10% -- 

WE DONT NEED WHITE SKINNED ECONOMISTS TO TELL US THIS .

CHINA IS NO 2  AT  5.8% 

S No/  Country   /  Real GDP growth rate in percent

1/ India/     8.4 % ( WITHOUT adjusting GDP to factor in cottage industries )

2/China/     5.8 %

3/Indonesia /       4.5

4/Malaysia /    4.4

5/Egypt /     4.0

6/Pakistan/   3.8

7/ Nigeria    /   3.7

8/ Poland    /   3.3

9/ Romania/    3.2

10/ Saudi Arabia /    3.1

11/ Spain /  2.8

12/ Turkey  /     2.8

13/ Sweden    /  2.6

14/ South Korea  /   2.5

15/ United States  /     2.4

16/ Thailand  /   2.3

17/ United Kingdom  /    2.3

18/ Australia  /       2.2

19/ New Zealand  /           2.0

20/ European Union  /  1.5 ( AVERAGE )

21/Netherlands  /   1.5

22/ Denmark  /      1.4

23/ Portugal  /   1.3

24/ Germany/      1.3

25/ South Africa   / 1.2

26/ Belgium  /      1.2

27/ France /  1.0

28/ Canada  /     0.9 ( KNEEDAAA )

29/ Norway     /    0.8

30/ Italy/    0.7

31/ Japan/  0.4

31/ Argentina/       0.3

33/ Finland     /  0.2

34/ Greece  /    - 3.0

35/ Brazil  / - 4.0

36/ Russia  /   - 4.0

37/ Venezuela /  -10.00  %

38/ Ukraine    /   -13.0 %

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2012/09/modern-economics-empirical-vulgar_2219.html

Article 13(2) of the Constitution of India prescribes that the Union or the States shall not make any law that takes away or abridges any of the fundamental rights, and any law made in contravention of the aforementioned mandate shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void.

While judicial review over administrative action has evolved on the lines of common law doctrines such as ‘proportionality’, ‘legitimate expectation’, ‘reasonableness’ and principles of natural justice, the Supreme Court of India and the various High Courts were given the power to rule on the constitutionality of legislative as well as administrative actions. 

In most cases, the power of judicial review is exercised to protect and enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed in Part III of the Constitution.

Hence the scope of judicial review before Indian courts has evolved in three dimensions –

1) Firstly, to ensure fairness in administrative action

2) Secondly, to protect the constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights of citizens and thirdly to rule on questions of legislative competence between the centre and the states. The power of the Supreme Court of India to enforce these fundamental rights is derived from Article 32 of the Constitution. It gives citizens the right to directly approach the Supreme Court for seeking remedies against the violation of these fundamental rights.

This entitlement to constitutional remedies is itself a fundamental right and can be enforced in the form of writs evolved in common law:-

1) habeas corpus (to direct the release of a person detained unlawfully),

Below:  MeLords- whether your foreign Bilderberger masters allow it or not--  WE THE PEOPLE shall crush the heads of Black Mamba snakes sent in by foreign desh drohis to kill Bharatmata !   We shall give NO quarter!  MeLords , do NOT interfere with IB / RAW/ NIA

2) mandamus (to direct a public authority to do its duty),

Below: JEW Churchill, pigs are useful only when dead--unless you like the sound of OINK OINK !
We shall NOT care for NCW unless they have 50% membership for male gender. 

3) quo warranto (to direct a person to vacate an office assumed wrongfully),

Below: This lion knows who sits in the COLLEGIUM !

4) prohibition (to prohibit a lower court from proceeding on a case) and

5) certiorari (power of the higher court to remove a proceeding from a lower court and bring it before itself).

Below: JEW Noam Chomsky caused our COLLEGIUM judges to free Naxal Binayak Sen ( imprisoned for life ) and send him to USA to receive a KOSHER award .

Besides the Supreme Court, the High Courts located in the various States are also designated as constitutional courts and Article 226 permits citizens to file similar writs before the High Courts.

Rothschild historians love to say that it was Aristotle who for the first time classified the functions of  the Government

Greeko Aristotle just lifted from contemporary Chanakya .  Aristotle was the disciple of Plato who studied in India.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/08/chanakya-taxila-university-professor.html

Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu explained the doctrine :-

"There is no liberty if the judicial power is not separated from the legislative and executive powers. Where it joined with the legislative power, the life and liberty of the subject would be exposed to arbitrary control; for the Judge would then be the legislator. Where it joined with the executive power, the Judge might behave with violence and oppression. There would be an end of everything were the same man or the same body to exercise these three powers…”

This blogsite declares for the first time on this planet.  JEW Rothschild used Montesquieu to foment his French Revolution.

Honoré Gabriel Riqueti, comte de Mirabeau  , the leading orator among the revolutionists of this early phase, was the disciple of Montesquieu in his demand for a constitutional monarchy

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/11/the-french-revolution-conceived-and.html

The doctrine of separation of powers has no place in strict sense in Indian Constitution, but the functions of different organs of the Government have been sufficiently differentiated, so that one organ of the Government could not usurp the function of another.

In Indian Constitution there is express provision that “Executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President and the executive power of the State shall be vested in Governor..” (Article 154(1) of Indian Constitution). But there is no express provision that legislative and judicial powers shall be vested in any person or organ.

#################################################

[Article 154] [Constitution]

Central Government Act

Article 154(1) in The Constitution Of India 1949

(1)   The executive power of the State shall be vested in the Governor and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with this Constitution

###########################################

WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA WANT THE GOVERNORs POST TO BE ABOLISHED.

THE GOVERNOR OF MAHARASHTRA ALLOWED  A MURDERER ( PARSI  COMMANDER NANAVATI ) TO ESCAPE .

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/01/abolish-rajya-sabha-capt-ajit-vadakayil.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/11/altamas-kabir-worst-chief-justice-of.html

President being the executive head is also empowered to exercise legislative powers. 

In his legislative capacity he may promulgate Ordinances in order to meet the situation as Article 123(1) says “If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in Session, President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinance as the circumstances appear to him to require”.

When Proclamation of emergency has been declared by the President due to failure of Constitutional machinery the President has been given legislative power under Article 357 of our Constitution to make any Law in order to meet the situations. 

A power has also been conferred on the President of India under Article 372 and 372-A to adapt any Law in country by making such adaptations and modifications, whether by way of repeal or amendment as may be necessary or expedient for the purpose or bringing the provisions of such Law into accord with the provisions of the Constitution.

The President of India also exercises judicial function. Article 103(1) of the Constitution is notable in this connection. According to this Article “If any question arises as to whether a member or either of House of Parliament has become subject to disqualification mentioned in clause (1) of Article 102, the questions hall be referred for the decision of the President and his decision shall be final”.

Article 50 lays emphasis to separate judiciary from executive. But in practice we find that the executive also exercises the powers of judiciary as in appointment of judges. (Articles 124, 126 & Article 127). 

The legislative (either House of Parliament) also exercises Judicial function in removal of President (Article 56) in the prescribed manner. Judiciary also exercises legislative power, High Court and Supreme Court are empowered to make certain rules legislative in character.

Whenever High Court or the Supreme Court finds a certain provision of law against the Constitution or public policy it declares the same null and void, and then amendments may be incorporated in the Legal System.

 Some time High Court and Supreme Court formulate the principles on the point where law is silent. This power is also legislative in character.

A THINK TANK MUST GET TOGETHER AND EVOLVE A BODMAS SYSTEM IN OUR CONSTITUTION—AS MOST WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO INTERPRET IT CANT THINK FROM ASSHOLE TO ELBOW !

TIME TO BREAK A BOMBSHELL ON THE COLLECTIVE HEADS OF OUR COLLEGIUM MELORDS.

THE COLLEGIUM MELORDS HAVE MADE IT OUT TO BE , THAT ONLY JUDICIARY HAS THE POWERS TO MONITOR AND CHECK THE OTHER ORGANS

SORRY, IF THE COLLEGIUM MELORD JUDGE IS FOUND TO BE A TRAITOR TO THE WATAN  ( AS SEEN IN PAKISTAN ) THE OTHER ORGANS OF OUR DEMOCRACY HAS THE POWER TO CHECK THE JUDGES.

A TRAITOR TO THE WATAN MELORD COLLEGIUM JUDGE CAN BE INCARCERATED OR SHOT -  

-- AS THE POWERS OF THE CONSTITUTION ARE VESTED BY   ”WE THE PEOPLE “

The Judiciary has saved themselves every time.

Today even an FIR against a judge can only be registered after the permission of the CJI.

This had tragic consequences in the provident fund scam where then- CJI  KG Balakrishnan did not give permission to file an FIR against accused judges for almost two years, by which time the prime accused, Ashutosh Asthana, died in mysterious circumstances.

In his confessional statement, Asthana had named 36 sitting and retired judges, including those of the Allahabad High Court and district courts in Uttar Pradesh, besides an apex court judge as beneficiaries in the Ghaziabad Provident Fund (PF) scam.

The fraudulent withdrawals were to the tune of 48 crores of rupees from provident fund accounts of class III and class IX employees.  In his statement to the trial court, Asthana named several judges and said he used to illegally withdraw cash from the PF accounts on their verbal instructions.

On April 28, 2008 Asthana recorded his statement before the trial court in Ghaziabad and named 36 judges as alleged beneficiaries, but testimony was yet to be concluded.   There were eleven High Court judges who are alleged to have taken cash or other benefits from him. They were named by Asthana in his statement before the court.

This immoral scam involved 11 High Court judges, 23 district court judges besides a Supreme Court judge, accused as beneficiaries of the money withdrawn fraudulently from the provident fund accounts of Class IV employees working in Ghaiziabad district courts

Ashutosh Asthana’s wife Sushma had declared that her  husband had told her he would be killed in Dasna jail

And by the way ex-CJI  KG Balakrishnan got in via the backdoor on SC quota—while in reality he was a Christian , NOT entitled to this quota.

Justice KG Balakrishnan did not meet the minimum qualifications prescribed for being selected a judge of the High Court.

http://www.firstpost.com/politics/kgbs-cv-says-he-wasnt-even-qualified-to-be-hc-judge-25920.html

As per our constitution any  judge can be impeached.  

This impeachment is carried out by a vote by ELECTED Members of Parliament.  

COLLEGIUM JUDGES –  HERE IS ANOTHER BOMBSHELL ON YOUR COLLECTIVE MELORD HEADS-

In your case, the appointing authority is not the dismissing authority—so you cant save yourself—though right now you are appointing yourselves.

ACHCHE DIN for COLLEGIUM MELORDS  have now come to an end-

DATE : 11TH MARCH 2016

TIME: 1528 IST

.

The High Court/Supreme Court judges SHALL not escape punishment for being a TRAITOR TO THE WATAN--

- or even  misusing their office or "misbehaviour" or for corruption.

Article 124(4) of the Constitution proscribes against misappropriation, bribery, committing of crimes of the nature of "moral turpitude," acts of treason and other grave offences.  

 The Constitution Review Commission has proposed that the prohibited acts listed under Article 124(4) ought to be included in the definition of "misbehaviour."

 WE THE PEOPLE SHALL DECIDE ON THIS MATTER WHEN IT COMES TO SEDITION AND  TREASON BY MELORD COLLEGIUM JUDGES. 

TAKE IT EASY WHEN YOU PUSH FOR END OF AFSPA AND TO POKING YOUR NOSE TOO MUCH IN IB/ RAW/ NIA AFFAIRS. 

Article 124(4) SHALL remain applicable to the case of the High Court and Supreme Court judges—if they are clearly guilty of TREASON by accepting money from foreign forces to KILL Bharatmata.

INTERLINKING OF INDIAN RIVERS WOULD HAVE KILLED BHARATMATA

The Supreme Court, while interpreting Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, has been banking upon the American Constitution and its interpretation in case law. For example Indian Constitution's "procedure as established by law'' is approaching towards the American "process by law."

By the same token it would be good for Indian justice to borrow the "process of law" to which American judges found guilty of offences are subjected to, while facing consequences of their unacceptable actions.

WE INDIANS ARE NOT SLAVES OF ROTHSCHILDs USA !

We ask Modi NOT to allow MELORD COLLEGIUM JUDGES to be a member of FREE MASON LODGES.

The FRENCH REVOLUTION was conceived, planned, funded and executed by FREEMASONS.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/10/the-only-dalit-freemason-of-india-capt.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/08/freemason-lodge-of-calicut-capt-ajit.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/12/dirty-secrets-of-boston-tea-party-capt.html

DEVIANT BEHAVIOR not amounting to MISBEHAVIOR includes--, indifference to natural justice,  lack of punctuality and irregularity in observing working hours; keeping away from work without applying for leave; reserving judgments, at times for years; jumping the cause list or manipulating them for deliberately placing heavier matters at the fag-end with a view to delaying disposal; adjournments for no valid reason; some judges even manipulate allotment of cases; seek cheap popularity or media attention; mix with politicians, thus compromising the "image of neutrality" expected of a judge.

In our constitution any act, inaction or abuse of such powers by one organ calls for interference of the other organ.  

There is no way a MELORD COLLEGIUM JUDGE can commit TREASON in cahoots with JEW BIG BROTHER and get away –like in Pakistan.

WE THE PEOPLE require the ELECTED  Executive should refrain from executing the laws which are against natural justice or which is in violation of the rights, liberties and freedoms of common man or is against the state or constitution in particular.

The Constitution must in all circumstances be considered supreme, and the laws made by the legislature should pass the test of reasonableness and the objectives of the Constitution.  

WE THE PEOPLE expect the PM  and President and CJI to pledge loyalty to the WATAN .

Below: 90% of the time JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS are quotes by vested Jugdes with ULTERIOR motives.  WE THE PEOPLE do not care for judicial precedents-- every case is unique and fresh.   

Can "surgical precedent" be accepted in a operation theatre  ? 

AKKAL BHAAD MEIN GAYA KYA ?

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 11, 2016 at 4:08 PM

http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/the-interviews-blog/tagore-warned-of-nationalisms-oppressive-side-india-should-have-self-confidence-id-like-my-own-cartoon/?utm_source=TOInewHP_TILwidget&utm_campaign=TOInewHP&utm_medium=Widget_Stry

THIS MORON SUGATA BOSE DOES NOT KNOW THAT TAGORES ARE PIR ALI MUSLIMS.

HE DOES NOT KNOW THAT DWARAKNATH TAGORE WAS AN OPIUM DRUG RUNNING PARTNER OF JEW ROTHSCHILD, WHO RULED INDIA

HE DOES NOT KNOW THAT RABINDRANATH TAGOREs NOBEL PRIZE WINNING VERSE OF GITANJALI WAS WRITTEN BY YB YEATS AND TRANSLATED BACK TO BENGALI

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/08/opium-drug-running-tagore-family-capt.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/12/nobel-prize-and-knighthood-for-tagore.html

capt ajit vadakayil
..

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 11, 2016 at 4:29 PM

STOP PRESS:

YESTERDAY I HEARD TRIPLE SRI TELL BARKHA DUTT ( NDTV ) ABOUT ENZYMES TO PURIFY YAMUNA RIVER WATER.

SORRY THIS CAUSES DEPOPULATION AND AUTISTIC BABIES.

This enzyme technology is nothing new.

PRINCIPLE: The enzyme decomposes organic macromolecules into smaller components, making them water-soluble and hence easier to be assimilated by the bacteria.

Enzymes (protease, lipase, amylase, and cellulase) and a bacteria concentration formulated specifically for metabolisation of organic matter and in particular fatty matter.

As chemical tanker captains were are proficient in all this. We do tankcleaning to convert from one cargo to another.

The enzymes is alsoused correctively by suppressing the inhibitor effect of some detergents on biological purification processes.

In Ganges there are macrophages. The population spurts during Kumbh Mela due to the human body effect. Bacteriophage, is a virus, any of a group of viruses that infect bacteria—it literally means “bacteria eater”

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/06/ganga-manthan-cleaning-of-river-ganges.html

TRIPLE SRI HAS BEEN CRIMINALLY HARDSELLING HIS “EXTREMELY HARMFUL TO HUMAN BRAIN “ HYPERVENTILATION ( SUDARSHAN KRIYA SOO HUMM )

Capt ajit vadakayil
..

Today’s judicial activism is articulated and enforced by judicial rulings which smacks of being based on personal or political considerations rather than on existing law.   

Which mother/ wife/ daughter wants a man to visit CHAMIYA BARS  ( front for whorehouses ) and ogle at cheap dancing girls – where hard earned money is drained ?   The dancing girls receive just a small percentage of this money .

Judicial activism implies going beyond the normal constraints applied to jurists and the Constitution, which gives jurists the right to strike down any legislation or rule against the precedent if it goes against the Constitution.   

Judicial activism is premised upon the fact that judges assume a role as independent policy makers or independent “trustees” on behalf of society that goes beyond their traditional role as interpreters of the Constitution and laws.  

COLLEGIUM judges are in the game of building up their own ETHOS.

BELOW IS THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

http://lawmin.nic.in/coi/coiason29july08.pdf

Our Indian constitution is a sheer copy of the British model, just amended to suit India-- a draft given to Ambedkar on the quiet by Rothschild..

There was NIL brainwork involved. 

Why don't you compare the two constitutions.

Where is the intelligence, in copying and plagiarism?

Dr B. R. Ambedkar was just the Chairman of an eminent team consisting of K M Munshi,  Alladi Krishnaswamy Iyer,  N Gopalaswami Ayengar ,  Madhava Rao ,  Md. Saadullah ,  TT Krishnamachari and a  constitutional advisor Sir Benegal Narsing Rau .

The separation of powers among the major branches of government, the establishment of a supreme court was copied from the US model,  provided by Rothschild.

Sir Benegal Narsing Rau was chosen by Rothschild to play a liaison role in drafting the Constitution of India.  

From 1949 to 1952 Sir Benegal Narsing Rau was India's Permanent Representative to the UN, till he was appointed as a Judge of the International Court in The Hague. He also served as the President of the United Nations Security Council.

His brother SIR Benegal Rama Rau were Governor of the Reserve Bank of India

JEW Rothschild favoured the CHITRAPUR MUTT darlings of a particular DNA.   

Chitrapur Mutt is a FAKE and backdated Mutt created by JEW Rothschild.

Girish Karnad,  Shyam Benegal,  Deepike Padukone ( whom COMMIE FTII students love )  are a few of them.

The other brother Benegal Shiva Rao  was married to a German Jew d Kitty Verstaendig.   Rothschild made him the chief of INTUC  .  

After all JEW Lenin had said -  IF YOU WANT TO CONTROL THE OPPOSOTION LEAD THEM YOURSELF.

Below: Chitrapur Mutt men Girish Karnad  and  Shyam Benegal,  UR Anathamurthy ( who pissed on a Hindu temple idol ) ,   Saeed Akhtar Mirza ( anti-Hindu award wapsi pioneer with a Christian wife Jennifer  ) of ANHAD NGO   whose trustees are Shabnam Hashmi, K N Panikkar, Harsh Mander, Shubha Mudgal, Kamla Bhasin, Saeed Akhtar Mirza.

KrishMarch 11, 2016 at 8:46 PM

Dear Capt.

Namaste!

Your views on below:

http://in.mobile.reuters.com/article/idINKCN0WD0J1?irpc=932

Supreme Court dismisses suits against drug regulators, whistleblower says

1. Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 11, 2016 at 9:34 PM

   hi k,
   
   THE WHITE MAN HAS BRAIN PROBLEMS DUE TO "MAD COW" ORIGINATED VARIANT CREUTZFELDT JACOB DISEASE.
   
   DRUGS MUST BE TRIED OUT ON "CONSCIOUS " HUMAN BEINGS.
   
   ANIMALS AND MAMMALS DO NOT SEE THEMSELVES IN MIRROR -- THEY CANNOT SEE COLOURS TOO ( EXCEPT A HANDFUL LIKE ELEPHANTS/ DOLHONS/ BONOBOS ETC )
   
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/12/shocking-legacy-of-mad-cow-disease-capt.html
   
   DRUGS ARE TRIED ON TRIBALS ( USING EVANGELISTS ) WHO HAVE PURE UNPOLLUTED BODIES AND BRAINS.
   
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2012/05/guinea-pigs-for-untested-medicines.html
   
   http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/11/sterilisation-deaths-of-13-tribalwomen.html
   
   capt ajit vadakayil
   ..

WHEN I COMMANDED SCI SHIPS I ENFORCED THE MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT BELOW—IT GAVE ME SWEEPING POWERS.

I TRASHED THE COMPANY RULE BOOKS.

I WAS GOOD IN APPLYING BODMAS.

https://www.google.co.in/webhp?source=search_app&gfe_rd=cr&ei=xD85U8vKLqrW8gf3koDYCA#q=merchant+shipping+act+

Judicial activism in India means the power of the Supreme Court and the high courts (but not the sub-ordinate courts ) to declare the laws as unconstitutional and void if it infringes or if the law is inconsistent with one or more provisions of the constitution.   

To the extent of such inconsistency while declaring a law as constitutional and void the courts do not suggest any viable alternative measures. 

Supreme Court of India  slowly started acquiring more power through constitutional interpretation with help from foreign KOSHER forces.   Its transformation into an activist court has been gradual and imperceptible to an average Indian caught up in the daily grind of life

Fali Nariman spAke:--- "Judges have wrapped themselves in a cloak of inviolability-- How are they appointed? Why are they appointed? What are their shortcomings? How are these dealt with? "

Ask and they will say, 'It is none of your business to ask us questions. We know what is best for the system'."

Are judges above the law? 

Not really. 

But they live in a politico-legal no-man's-land. 

No one can file a case against them without the permission of the CJI.

What do we do when we have a CJI like KG Balakrishnan who was never meant to be even a high court judge ?

An untoward word can invite contempt of court in India—while all the civilized nations have go rid of this.

To impeach a judge, two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament will have to vote.

Judges can declare a law passed by Parliament null and void, exercise executive and legislative powers via public interest jurisdiction and control their own appointments.

At the root of the problem is the collegium system, THIS PLANETs ONLY-  thrust down Indian throats by KOSHER BIG BROTHER .

Former SC judge N. Santosh Hegde  spAke  "No judge has been found guilty and punished ever, and this speaks very poorly of the Indian judiciary."

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 12, 2016 at 12:48 AM

STOP PRESS:

ONE OF MY READERS ASKED ME

HOW IS IT THAT YOU CAN CLAIM , THAT YOU MADE MORE THAN TEN THOUSAND REVELATIONS FOR THE FIRST TIME ON THE PLANET.

I ASKED HIM—WHAT IS YOUR PROFESSION.

HE REPLIED—A LAWYER

I SAID— FIND OUT HOW MANY PEOPLE ON THE PLANET , TILL TODAY, HAVE TALKED ABOUT APPLYING BODMAS TO THE CONSTITUTION OR FOR THE MATTER – ANY SET OF RULES RUNNING INTO HUNDREDS OF PAGES ?

HE WAS SILENT FOR A WHILE—

THEN HE SPAKE—I KNOW WHAT YOU MEAN !
HE THEN LIMPED AWAY !

Capt ajit vadakayil
..

TO BE FRANK--

IF YOU CUT OUT THE PROFANITIES THIS BLOG POST CAN BE PART OF ANY WORLD SYLLABUS ON THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM.  

THIS POST IS MUCH MORE THAN A THESIS .

IT INCISES THE SYSTEM --

-- AND LOOKS FROM INWARDS TO OUTWARDS.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh very rarely opened his mouth. 

Once he got so exasperated that he demanded that the COLLEGIUM SC not cross "the thin dividing line between judicial activism and judicial overreach".

PM Manmohan Singh WARNED the MELORDS  to stay away from the "realm of policy formulation". 

WE THE PEOPLE will NOT allow COLLEGIUM JUDGES to poke their MELORD noses into Indi’s external and internal security wrt terrorists and Naxals with guns .

We all know how the COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY hijacked the SALWA JUDUM – by ruling that the use of tribal youths as Special Police Officers to fight Maoists is unconstitutional.  He the court clearly engaged in the domain of security functions of the state.    

On 5 July 2011, the Supreme Court of India declared the militia to be illegal and unconstitutional, and ordered its disbanding. 

The use of Salwa Judum by the government for anti-Naxal operations was criticised for its violations of human rights and poorly trained youth for counter-insurgency roles. It also ordered the government to investigate all instances of alleged criminal activities of Salwa Judum.

ALL SORTS OF LIES WERE INVENTED BY FOREIGN FUNDED TROJAN HORSE NGOs WHO FUND THE NAXALS.

The false and fierce propaganda offensive that was unleashed to paint the Salwa Judum movement in the darkest of colours took birth in Rothschild’s Opium drug founded Western universities.

In December 2005, a group of “human rights” activists controlled by foreign money , released a FALSE report denouncing the Salwa Judum movement as an assault on the dignity of the tribal population. 

Any idiot could see what this report was worth as it was TOTALLY SILENT on the extreme atrocities committed by Maoists and Naxals .  

This foreign funded report  accused “forces from other states” of “behaving like an occupation army.”

LYING HISTORIAN Ramchandra Guha, member of the “independent” study, described the  Mahendra Karma, the man credited with kick-starting Salwa Judum, as a “dangerous populist” and compared him to a more dangerous man Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

If Salwa Judum had NOT been disbanded , by now India could have broken the spine of the Naxal movement controlled by THINKER COMMIE professors in JNU.

Today, the Maoists and Naxals control 31% of India’s forests.

The genesis of Salwa Judum lies in the refusal of a large section of tribal society to endure this nonsense any longer. 

What began in May 2005 in Kutru village in Dantewada and quickly spread to neighbouring areas was essentially a non-cooperation movement against an occupying Red Army. 

The Maoists and their sympathisers were chased out of villages and their supply chain was crippled. When large 8,000-strong gatherings of local people voted in unison to fight the Maoist menace, if necessary with bows and arrows, Chhattisgarh saw the beginnings of a popular upsurge. 

The local administration had neither the force nor resource to provide adequate protection to the Salwa Judum.

The Maoists responded to the challenge with characteristic savagery. 

On February 28 this year, 26 people died in a landmine explosion at the venue of a Salwa Judum rally. On April 28, 13 people were abducted from Mankota village and killed in an articular manner.

The idea was to intimidate villagers into submission. 

The Maoist reign of terror has yielded results. 

The 50,000 people living in the relief camps have not been forcibly relocated as Maoist pamphleteers suggest. 

They were refugees who have fled their villages with nothing but the clothes they were wearing. . They did NOT have  cattle and livestock—ony an IDIOT would not notice this .. 

The Maoists cannot be tamed by pouring money into inefficient welfare schemes. The guerrillas want to usurp political power by force and they are controlled and armed by foreign forces.

JEW Noan Chomsky was MAHAAAA khush !

Salwa Judum can be a fitting complement to a mammoth counter-insurgency drive. 

It needs to be replicated throughout the Maoist belt.

WE NEED TO DO THIS AGAIN. 


FIRE MUST FIGHT FIRE. 


ONLY TRIBALS CAN MERGE WITHIN NAXAL TRIBALS.

THIS TIME AROUND--

“WE THE PEOPLE” DEMAND THAT COLLEGIUM JUDGES LAY OFF !     CARE FOR THE WATAN , DO NOT CARE FOR JEW NOAM CHOMSKY

Above: WE THE PEOPLE ask the COLLEGIUM judges NOT to beleive the FAKE reports of FOREIGN FUNDED TROJAN HORSE NGOs who fund and arm the Naxals

IN THIS INTERNET AGE,  "WE THE PEOPLE "   KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING , MELORDS !  

WE DO NOT TRUST THE JUDAS MAIN STREAM MEDIA ANY MORE  !!

In the multi-crore Ghaziabad court provident fund scam, CJI Balakrishnan did not give permission to investigate for over one-and-a-half years, not even for the police to file an FIR. 

By the time the CBI finished the probe in 2010, evidence had disappeared, most judges did not bother to attend the hearings, and the prime accused, Ashutosh Asthana, who had named 36 judges, was found dead under mysterious circumstances. 

SC judge Tarun Chatterjee, who was named as one of the beneficiaries, had already retired.

IN THIS INTERNET AGE "WE THE PEOPLE" ARE ABLE TO JUDGE OUR JUDGES --

WE SHALL DO IT AS "WE THE PEOPLE" ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION.

WE THE PEOPLE shall ask WHISTLE BLOWERS from within the system to blow the lid off the Pandora’s box. 

This process has already begin.

 We know who the corrupt judges are. We know the EXTREME nepotism and vested interests which rule.

Today we know how appointments are done on give-and-take basis, not purely on merit.

A whole host of other considerations- religion, caste, community- has come into play—we know -- the national security agencies know !.  

"The appointment of the judges is an absolutely opaque process where nepotism plays a big role," said Supreme Court counsel D.P. Singh.

In November 2010, SC justice Markandey Katju said, "There is something rotten in the Allahabad High Court---“ Some judges have their kith and kin practising in the same courts who within a few years will become multi-millionaires."

In the 2008 case of justice Nirmal Yadav, former judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, when a packet containing Rs 15 lakh for her was wrongly delivered at another judge's door, the in-house mechanism under justice KG Balakrishnan absolved her, even after a three-judge panel recommended her removal from office. The CJI instead transferred her to the Uttarakhand High Court.

Every member of the Bar would agree that a corrupt judge can't survive long without the help of a corrupt lawyer. A classic example is that of former telecom minister A. Raja.

In 2009 he had reportedly threatened justice S. Reghupati of the Madras High Court through a lawyer in court.

His demand?

Bail for his "family friends" involved in mark-sheet forgery.

It backfired, with Reghupati narrating the incident in open court.

But after a flurry of parliamentary delegations, press conferences, angry letters and finger-pointing, the issue died a quiet death.

Judges say they are ultimately judged by their own conscience.

I AM TOUCHED LIKE MADONNA !

SNIFF !

BOO HOOOOOOO !

V. Ramaswami was the Justice of the Supreme Court of India and the first judge against whom impeachment proceedings were initiated in independent India.

The only other judge to face impeachment proceedings is Justice "Soumitra Sen" of Calcutta High Court, proceedings against whom were initiated in Rajya Sabha on 17 August 2011.

Another such motion has been initiated against Chief Justice Dinakaran of Sikkim High Court. An Inquiry Committee is looking investigating the issue.

 A scandal surfaced in the middle of year 1990 when several media outlets reported about his ostentatious expenditure on his official residence during his tenure as a Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana.

In a serious turn of events, on 1 February 1991, Supreme Court Bar Association passed a resolution calling for his impeachment and requesting Chief justice not assign him any further legal work.

Bharatiya Janata Party and Left parties submitted a notice of motion to the Indian Parliament seeking his removal from office.

Accepting the motion on 12 March 1991, Speaker Rabi Ray constituted a committee composed of Justice P B Sawant of the Supreme Court, Chief Justice P D Desai of the Bombay High Court and Justice O Chinnappa Reddy, retired judge of the Supreme Court to investigate the affair.

The committee found Ramaswami guilty of 11 out of 14 charges.

The impeachment motion was placed in the assembly for debate and voting on 10 May 1993. Well known lawyer and a Congress politician Kapil Sibal was his defence lawyer.

 Of 401 members present in the assembly that day, there were 196 votes for impeachment and no votes against and 205 abstentions by ruling Congress and its allies.

The motion which required not less than two third majority of the total number of members present in both houses of the Parliament and an absolute majority of its total membership thus failed to pass.

The said decision was challenged before the Supreme Court and they upheld the decision of the Parliament.

Soumitra Sen was a former judge of the Calcutta High Court. He was the first judge in independent India to be impeached in India's Rajya Sabha for misappropriation of funds

Justice Sen has been bearing the allegation for appropriating Rs 32 lakh as a court-appointed receiver in 1993 in a lawsuit between Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) and Shipping Corporation of India over supply of fire bricks.

The Chief Justice recommendation was made shortly after a three-judge inquiry committee had established Sen's misconduct in depositing the money in his personal account.

Sen retained the money even after being appointed as the High Court judge in 2003. It was in 2006 after HC order, he returned money. 

Justice Sen was held guilty of misappropriation of public funds he received in his capacity as receiver appointed by the High Court of Calcutta and misrepresenting facts with regard to it.

On 18 August 2011, Rajya Sabha passed the impeachment motion by overwhelming majority of 189 votes in favour and 17 against.

This is the second case in the history of the country in which Parliament has initiated proceedings for removal of a judge. The first involved Justice V. Ramaswami.

Paul Daniel Dinakaran Premkumar  was the Chief Justice of the Sikkim High Court. He resigned from the post following allegations of corruption and subsequent impeachment proceedings.

In September 2009, allegations were made against Dinakaran by several members of the Bar Council of India including Former Union Law Minister Ram Jethmalani stating that he had huge assets and land acquisitions in his Hometown Arakkonam more than what was fixed by the Tamil Nadu Land reforms. 

The lawyers requested Chief Justice of India Union Law Minister not to appoint Dinakaran as Supreme Court Judge and initiate an enquiry process regarding the allegation.

The Supreme Court collegium headed by Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan had decided to replace Justice Dinakaran with Uttarakhand High Court Chief Justice JS Khehar, and recommended transfer of Dinakaran to the Sikkim High Court.

The Sikkim Bar Association president D R Thapa had asked "How come the person be fit to be discharge judicial duties in one state if he has not been found worthy of doing the same in another state?" 

Facing impeachment on charges of corruption and judicial misconduct, he resigned from the post of Sikkim high court Chief Justice on 29 July 2011 expressing "lack of faith and confidence" in the three-member inquiry Committee probing charges against him.

Justice Dinakaran, a Dalit, also said he had a "sneaking suspicion" that his "misfortune" was because of the circumstances of his birth in the socially oppressed and underprivileged section of the society ( so what else is new ?)

The proverbial 'bad fish' dirties the whole fuckin' tank.   

Former Chief Justice of India, S.P.Bharucha spoke of '20% tainted judges', and observed that corrupt judges 'should be identified and dismissed from service'

The notorious case of Ahmedabad Metropolitan Magistrate signing/issuing blindfolded bailable warrants of arrest on 15.1.2004 against A.P.J. Abdul Kalam (President of India), V.N.Khare (CJI), B.P.Singh (Judge Supreme Court) and R.K.Jain (leading lawyer), allegedly for a bribe of Rs 40,000/- collected for him by 3 lawyers will ever remain fresh in public memory. 

It resounded in the Supreme Court in a PIL filed by Advocate Vijay Shankar where CJI V.N.Khare is reported to have observed : " By giving Rs 40,000/- you can get a judicial order, and if this is the state of affairs, only God knows what will happen to the Country ..... time has come to take strict action, otherwise nothing will remain.

At a later hearing, the SC Bench is reported to have remarked that there was a complete nexus  between the Metropolitan Magistrate  and the lawyers and that such incidents were happening all over the country. 

CJI also emphasised the need of finding out ways to weed out corruption in lower judiciary and evolve a system to keep vigil on Judicial Officers

Justice V.N.Khare, who retired as CJI in May 2004, said that every citizen, including Judges are accountable and are not above Law

The Lokayukta is an anti-corruption ombudsman organization in the Indian states

I suggest we must have a “National Ombudsman” who  deals with complaints against improper conduct of Judges and living beyond their month end salaries  . 

 Lawyers and Judicial clerks are asked to be whistleblowers.            

The supervision MUST be by an outsider, so that there can be no accusation of Judges 'protecting their own'.   

This NATIONAL  JUDICIAL OMBUDSMAN  must be competent.  He must pass an exam set up by senior judges supervised by CJI.  Judiciary cannot accuse him  not being an expert on proper judicial procedure.

An ombudsman is a person who acts as a trusted intermediary between either the state, elements of state or an organization, and some internal or external constituency, while representing not only but mostly the broad scope of constituent interests. 

Ombudsman is etymologically rooted in the Old Norse word umboðsmaðr, essentially meaning “representative”.

The Ombudsman cannot interfere with the independence of Judiciary in making decisions because they do not have power to overturn or alter court decisions.     They review only procedural matters, and have no power to review the content of judicial decisions. 

Regarding the behaviour of Judges, the Ombudsman mainly issues only reprimands or criticisms. They can also prosecute for serious misbehaviour. .  

He CAN inspect the Courts, and if he finds that the Judge has committed an unquestionable error or negligence in performance of his functions, he may issue a critical warning or even initiate process in Court against the Judge for abuse of power. 

Even so, he does not interfere in judicial processes pending in a Court, nor does it intervene in cases in which regular appeal channels remain open.  

The Ombudsman may act on its own initiative. 

Nothing prevents him from investigating why no Court order has yet been issued when the stipulated time there for has expired, or looking into the causes of delay like lack of material means, or overload of cases, or functional responsibility of its head, or other officials, and making recommendations for correcting the situation.

The  Ombudsman MUST investigate into lawyers' misconduct, and even the misconduct of State Bar Council, and recommend to State Bar Council, or to the Bar Council of India, as the case may be, for appropriate action in disciplinary jurisdiction.

The Ombudsman MUST be given constitutional status in the name of DEFENDER OF THE WATAN.

NATIONAL  JUDICIAL OMBUDSMAN  MUST HAVE THE POWERS TO VETO MATTERS WHERE THE WATANs SECURITY IS INVOLVED.

 IT IS BETTER TO HAVE THREE NJO s INSTEAD OF ONE - THEY MUST BE PRO-ACTIVE AND NOT REACTIVE . 

AND PLEASE SPARE US OF DALIT QUOTA , WOMENs QUOTA AND ASSHOLES QUOTA !

THIS POST IS NOW CONTINUED TO PART 6 BELOW-

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/03/foreign-funded-trojan-horse-ngos-pil_12.html

Capt. Ajit VadakayilMarch 10, 2016 at 9:52 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxZW2YiV48E

JNU PROFESSOR COMMIE ROMILA THAPAR , THE DESH DROHI --

-- WHO HAS FALSIFIED ANCIENT INDIAN HISTORY AND INJECTED POISON INTO OUR NCERT SCHOOL BOOKS, WITH COMMIE IRFAN HABIB AND OTHERS 
capt ajit vadakayil
..

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..