ONLY PHOTOS OF PRESIDENT , PRIME MINISTER AND CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA CAN BE PUT ON GOVT ADVERTISEMENTS
JUST WHO THE HELL IS CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA ? IS HE PART OF THE ELECTED GOVT ? AT THE BEST CJI CAN ONLY RULE THE ILLEGAL PATLI GALLI CALLED "PIL LANE "
KAUN SA KHET KA BEET ROOT HAI YEH CJI ! WHAT ABOUT VP AND GOVERNORS OF STATE WHO HAVE ENORMOUS SUBJECTIVE POWERS ?
WHAT THE FUCK ?
WHO HAS AUTHORIZED THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA TO CLAIM “APUN BHI AWWAL ?”
IS THIS UNACCOUNTABLE COLLEGIUM JUDGE SOME RULER OF INDIA APPOINTED BY GOD ?
A MELORD WHO ONLY HAS THE POWERS ONLY TO INTERPRET LAWS WANT TO BE RULER OF INDIA?
THIS IS THE HEIGHT OF JUDICIAL OVER FUCKIN’ REACH ..
WHY WAS THE CJI NOT PUNISHED FOR THIS SELF PROMOSSANN ( WITH THE BLESSINGS OF THE DEEP STATE AND BENAMI MEDIA ?)
THIS COURT BENCH WAS HEADED BY GOGOI, AS HE KNEW THAT HE IS LINE TO BE CJI..
BURN ALL LAWS CREATED BY ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM SUPREME COURT VIA PIL ROUTE
BURN ALL PAST JUDGEMENTS OF ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY WHICH IS BEING MINDLESSLY USED AS A LANGOT TO THE CONSTITUTION VIA STARE DECISIS.
TAKING A EVM MACHINE TO LONDON FOR A HACKATHON IS AGAINST THE LAW .. WHY HAS CEC ALLOWED THIS..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-
AJIT DOVAL
CBI
ED
NIA
RAW
RAJNATH SINGH
HOME MINISTRY
LAW MINISTER
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
PMO
PM MODI
MARKENDAY KATJU
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
NHRC
EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA
EVERY CENTRAL MINISTER / MINISTRY
CMs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
DGPs OF ALL STATES
SWAMY
GURUMURTHY
ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
AMITABH KANT
NITI AYOG
RSS
VHP
AVBP
CEC
EC
WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKT LEADERS
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
CAN INDIA DO SUCH A THING LIKE EVM PARTS EXAMINATION OF ANY OTHER NATION ?.. WHAT IS MODI SUCH A NAPUNSAK ??
capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-
AJIT DOVAL
CBI
ED
NIA
RAW
RAJNATH SINGH
HOME MINISTRY
LAW MINISTER
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
PMO
PM MODI
MARKENDAY KATJU
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
NHRC
EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA
EVERY CENTRAL MINISTER / MINISTRY
CMs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
DGPs OF ALL STATES
SWAMY
GURUMURTHY
ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
AMITABH KANT
NITI AYOG
RSS
VHP
AVBP
CEC
EC
WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKT LEADERS
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
"Jury
nullification" by definition is the jury acquitting a defendant despite
the existence of legally sufficient evidence to support conviction; it can be
done because the jury feel the law requiring conviction is unjust, or because
the jury have CONSCIENCE BASED sympathy
for the defendant.
The jury ignores the
law because it feels an unjust result of some sort is required by the law, or
the jury ignores the OBJECTIVE law because it is partial or overreaching.
Jury, nullification
serves to introduce a de facto measure of flexibility and elasticity in the
law, usually to avoid a result that is manifestly illogical or unjust.
Jury nullification is a
concept where members of a trial jury find a defendant not guilty if they do
not support a government's law, do not believe it is constitutional or humane,
or do not support a possible punishment for breaking the law.
This may happen
in both civil and criminal trials. In a criminal trial, a jury nullifies by
acquitting a defendant, even though the members of the jury may believe that
the defendant did commit the alleged crime. This may occur when members of the
jury disagree with the law the defendant has been charged with breaking, or
believe that the law should not be applied in that particular case.
A jury can
similarly convict a defendant on the ground of disagreement with an existing
law, even if no law is broken (although in jurisdictions with double jeopardy
rules, a conviction can be overturned on appeal, but an acquittal cannot).
Double jeopardy is a
procedural defence that prevents an accused person from being tried again on
the same (or similar) charges and on the same facts, following a valid
acquittal or conviction.
In many modern Western
legal systems, however, judges often instruct juries to act only as
"finders of facts", whose role it is to determine the veracity of the
evidence presented, the weight accorded to the evidence, to apply that evidence
to the law as explained by the judge, and to reach a verdict; but not to
question the law or decide what it says.
Similarly, juries are
routinely cautioned by courts and some attorneys not to allow sympathy for a
party or other affected persons to compromise the fair and dispassionate
evaluation of evidence. This is bullshit, as the whole idea of having a Jury
system to to evaluate subjectively so that natural justice is not crushed.
The most salient and
important kind of jury nullification occurs when a defendant is prosecuted for
an act that was illegal but morally blameless.
Sometimes, the jury
considers the law itself unjust; other times, the jury may accept the law in
general but believe that its application in the particular case at hand would
be unjust. Which man will allow his male servant to screw his wife because the
illegal collegium judiciary made a law stating it is legal?
SPOOF-- A CRY FOR HELP
FROM AN AGGRIEVED CITIZEN..SPOOF
My Private petition to
DGP
Dear DGP,
This request is basis
your paper report regarding police protection for ladies who wish to visit
Sabarimala.
1. I am married &
father of two children. I am from Kottayam.
For the past 2 years I
am in sexual relationship with one lady from ernakulam.
3. Our relationship was
questioned by my wife and her husband and several times we were beaten by them.
4. Hope you are aware
of section 497 and supreme court has ordered this legally valid.
5. Because of
interference from family we were not able to meet each other for last few
months and we are sad & depressed.
6. Now her husband not
going for Job and sitting at home with an objective to block me meeting her if
I go there.
I beg you to intervene
in this matter and take necessary action as per Indian Constitution
I am planning to go to
her residence this Sunday at 9 pm her. I request you to provide adequate police
protection from Ernakulam police station.
Also for smooth
implimentation of court order , please arrest her husband and keep in custody
till Monday morning.
Sincerely
A citizen who believes
in Kerala govt & police
####################
SOMEBODY ASKED ME, WHY
WERE INDIANS SLAVES FOR 800 YEARS..
BECAUSE INDIANS WHO
COULD THINK CLEARLY KEPT QUIET , THOUGH THEY SAW FOREIGN DECEIT EVERYWHERE..
IF WE SPARE KAPIL SIBAL
WHO ORCHESTRATED THE EVM HACKATHON IN LONDON-- WE ARE PART OF THESE TRAITORS
WHO CAUSED BHARATMATA TO BE IN CHAINS...
WHO IS SPREADING
FALSEHOOD ?..
THE INDIAN MEDIA IS 98%
DESH DROHI..YOU DONT GET A JOB IN THE MAIN STREAM MEMDIA IF YOU ARE A DESH
BHAKT..
IF A WOMAN JOURNALIST
SHOWS SOME INDIAN CULTURE-- SHE WEARS A SARI , WITH BINDI, SINDHOOR AND
MAGNALSUTRA THEY WILL KICK HER OUT..
THEY WANT FEMALES WHO
LOOK LIKE WESTERN WHORES WEARING MINI SKIRT AND HIGH HEELS READING NEWS.
NOW SUDDENLY WE HAVE
NEWS PORTALS --THE WIRE--THE PRINT- THE QUINT -- OPERATED BY SIDDHARTH
VARADARAJAN, SHEKHAR GUPTA, BARKHA DUTT, RAGHAV BAHL AND THEIR ILK.. WHY ARE
THEY SO ANTI-MODI?
WHY ARE THEY ANTI-HINDU
AND ANTI-WATAN ? WHY ARE THEY SO PRO-NAXAL?
WHY DO WE HAVE A
I&B MINISTER WHO SPONSORS DESH DROHI MEDIA?
THE RED CORRIDOR OF
NAXALS SPROUTED BECAUSE OF THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY ..
A POOR RAG PICKER WHO
STOLE TO SURVIVE WILL BE IN JAIL AS AN UNDERTRIAL FOR 20 YEARS.
HE WILL NOT GET BAIL ,
BECAUSE HE DOES NOT HAVE THE MONEY-- OR WHEREWITHAL TO GET SOMEBODY WHO CAN
PROVIDE SURETY SHOWING HAJAAR FALTHU DOCUMENTS .. A RICH MAN CAN GET
ANTICIPATORY BAIL OVERNIGHT..
WHY DOES THE LAW
MINISTER ALLOW A JUDICIAL SYSTEM WHICH IS NOT ALLOWED BY THE CONSTITUTION?
.. MIND YOU RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD WAS A
LEADER IN AN ORG NAMED PUCL WHICH NOW HAS NAXALS LIKE GN SAIBABA AS ITS LEADER.
SINCE INDEPENDENCE
EVERT RBI GOVERNOR HAS BEEN CHOSEN BY JEW ROTHSCHILD.. HIS JOB IS TO SHOW THAT
INDIA IS A BEGGAR NATION.. HE WILL NOT SAY ANYTHING IF ROTHSCHILDs RATING
AGENCIES PEG INDIA ONE NOTCH ABOVE JUNK..
WHAT ABOUT NCW?
DID NCW TAKE THE SIDE
OF 996% KERALA WOMEN WHO SAID "WE DONT WANT TO ENTER SABARIMALA"
WHILE IN THE MENSTUATING AGE?
NO, THEY TOOK THE SIDE
OF SOME MUSLIM WHORE WHO WANTED TO THROW BLOODY USED SANITARY NAPKIN ON
AYYAPPAs IDOLS FACE.. MIND YOU, SHE BOASTED ABOUT IT.. THIS IS NOT SOME FALSE
CHARGE..
WHY WAS NCM TREATING
KASHMIRI PANDITS AS MAJORITY COMMUNITY IN KASHMIR?
WHEN WE TRY TO WIDEN
THE ROADS IN BANGALORE--WHO CRIES LOUDEST.. THE DESH DROHI NGT, WHO WEEP FOR
USELESS TREES..
WHY ?,CANT WE PLANT BETTER
TREES AFTER WIDENING THE ROAD ?
A NATION WHOSE CARS
DRIVE IN FIRST AND SECOND GEAR ON THE STREETS CAN NEVER PROGRESS. EVERY TIME
YOU PRESS THE CAR BRAKE, YOU BURN DOLLARS..
WHEN A FOREIGN BLACK
MAMBA TRIES TO BITE YOUR BABY--AND YOU GO RUNNING TO NHRC, HAS NHRC EVER
SUPPORTED YOUR BABY ?
NEVER , NHRC WILL
SUPPORT THE FOREIGN BLACK MAMBA. OBJECTIVE JUDGES WILL SUPPORT THE BLACK MAMBA
FALSELY QUOTING THE CONSTITUTION..
92% OF THE MAHA
GADBANDHAN LEADERS ARE JUST CORRUPT STAR KID / DYNASTY FAMILIES-- ALL HAVING
MADE HUNDREDS OF CRORES AS KICKBACKS..
WHY HAS MODI NOT
MANAGED TO PUT ANYBODY IN JAIL--OTHER THAN LALU PRASAD YADHAV?
BECAUSE FOREIGN FORCES
TELL OUR FOREIGN PAYROLL COLLEGIUM JUDGES TO SAVE THEM, WITH BENAMI MEDIA IN
CAHOOTS..
THE MEDIA HAS CONVINCED
THE STATE GOVERNORS THAT THEY ARE MERE RUBBER STAMPS.. DID GOVERNOR OF KERALA
DO ANYTHING WHEN ATHEIST COMMIE PINARAYI VIJAYAN DID A STALIN TYPE REIN OF
TERROR?
DID PRESIDENT PRANAB
MUKHERJEE DO ANYTHING WHEN AN ENTIRE SESSION OF RAJYA SABHA WAS WASHED OUT..OH
NO-- HE WAS WALKING ON THE PRESIDENTIAL LAWNS EATING MISTI DOHI AND SIPPING
MACHER JHOL..
WHEN FAYE DSOUZA GOES
OVERBOARD WITH HER "YOU FIRST" ( READ AS DESH DROHIS FIRST ) AND
"WATAN LAST" WHY DO WE TOLERATE IT?
THIS IS WHY , INDIA IS
STILL A SLAVE TO JEW ROTHSCHILD..
MODI IS NOW
"CHAMPION OF EARTH"-- HE WANTS TO MOTHBALL COAL , AS HIS JEWISH
MASTERS WANT IT.. MODI HAS WRITTEN A BOOK ON GLOBAL WARMING WITHOUT EVEN
KNOWING WHAT IT MEANS..
FIRST STEP--
BAN ALL FOREIGN AWARDS
LIKE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE AND MAGSAYSAY AWARDS .. CASH ATTACHED TO THE AWARD IS
JUST A BRIBE..
JEWESS MALALA ( A SMALL
GIRL ) WHO WON THE NOBEL PRIZE HAS THE GUTS TO SAY THAT SHE WILL BE FUTURE PM
OF PAKISTAN !
KAILASH SATYARTHI KILLED
THE ULTRA SKILLED FAMILY BASED COTTAGE INDUSTRIES..MODI HAVE HIM PAPPI.
BAN ALL FOREIGN FUNDED
NGOs..
PUNISH DESH DROHI
JUDGES IN KOSHER DEEP STATE PAYROLL-- BHARATMATA WAS PUSHED INTO ADULTERY /
HOMOSEXUALITY-- DID ANYBODY OBJECT, EXCEPT THIS BLOGSITE ?
IMMIGRANT PARSIS GOT 65
KNIGHTHOODS BEFORE 1947 ? THIS CLAN HAS BY PERCENTAGE CORNERED MAXIMUM
"SIRS" ..
WHAT FOR ?
BEING LOYAL TO
BHARATMATA ?..
FROM RADDHIWAALAS THEY
BECAME THE RICHEST IN INDIA DURING ROTHSCHILDs RULE .. WHY ? AND PARSI ADI
GODREJ DARES TO RIDICULE "HINDU RATE OF PROGRESS"..
BELOW: BHARAT IS THE ONLY HOLY LAND ON THIS PLANET.. MOKSHA CAN HAPPEN ONLY FROM INDIA . WE DONT WANT PIR ALI MUSLIM RABINDRANATH TAGOREs SUCKING UP SONG TO KING GEORGE AS OUR NATIONAL ANTHEM.
WHITE HISTORIANS HAVE WRITTEN THAT MAKARA SANKRANTI IS OBSERVED ON 14TH JAN BECAUSE ANCIENT INDIA DID NOT KNOW ABOUT PRECESSION..
OH YEAH , YOU LYING BASTARDS !
AYANA IN OUR 7000 YEAR OLD SANSKRIT TEXTS MEANS PRECESSION..
In Surya Siddhanta the final value of period of precession should be obtained by combining +199669 revolutions of ayana with −30000 revolutions of sampaat ( equinoctial point ) , to get +169669 revolutions per Kalpa, i.e. one revolution in 25461 years, which is near the modern value of 25771 years.
WHAT WAS VISHNUs THIRD VARAHA AVATAR DOING ? WAS HE SOME LITTLE BO PEEP ?..
OUR PURANAS CONTAIN COSMIC EVENTS PERSONALISED , SO THAT THE LAYMAN CAN UNDERSTAND IT..
Vishnu adjusted the axial tilt, and thus PRECESSION of the Earth's orbit to calm down extreme climatic patterns on Earth…
WHAT ARE HINDU YUGAS - MENTIONED IN VEDAS WHICH WENT ON ORAL ROUTE FOR 330 CENTURIES BEFORE BEING PENNED DOWN 70 CENTURIES AGO-- ALL ABOUT ?..
WHY ARE THE TWO CYCLES OF ASCENT AND DESCENT OF THE YUGAS TRIED TO PRECESSION ? OUR ANCIENT MAHARISHIS WERE ALICES IN WONDERLAND?..
Surya Siddhanta states Saurpakshiya period of precession to be of 24000 years exactly. Maya Danava wrote Surya Siddhanta . His daughter the most beautiful Mandodari married Ravana. In Hindu mythology Mandodai is the second most beautiful woman after Tara , wife of Vali ..
Vali was NOT a monkey. He was a Danava Kerala king. I am a Danava.
WHY DID THE MAYAN CALENDAR OF MAYA DANAVA ( OF THE DANAVA CIVILIZATION WHICH FLOURISHED SEVERAL MILLINIUMS BEFORE VEDIC CIVILISATION WAS BORN ) END ON 21ST DEC 2012 ?..THIS DAY IS THE END OF KALI YUGA WITH KALKI AVATAR COMING WITHIN A CUSP OF 30 YEARS..
BEGGARS CAN NO LONGER DRESS UP AS KINGS ( LIKE ATTIMARI GANG TYPE KERALA COMMIE POLITICIANS )
KODUNGALLUR UNIVERSITY OWNED BY THE CALICUT KING ( MY HOMETOWN ) WHERE ALL ANCIENTGREEKS EXCEPT ARISTOTLE STUDIED , CHURNED OUT ASTRONOMY MILLINNIUMS BEFORE TAXILA A UNIVERSITY WAS BORN.. CHANAKYA , A KERALA NAMBOODIRI WAS A VISITING PROFESSOR AT TAXILA FROM KODUNGALLUR ..
IN 1975 I WENT TO PYRAMIDS OF GIZA AND FOUND IT HAD EIGHT SIDES AND FOLLOWED VAASTU.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/10/eight-sided-pyramid-of-giza-egypt.html Earth's precession was WRONGLY called the precession of the equinoxes, because the equinoxes moved westward along the ecliptic relative to the fixed stars, opposite to the yearly motion of the Sun along the ecliptic.
Greek Hipparchus who studied in Kodungallur University lifted precession from Vedanga Jyotisha penned down in 5000 BC in Mlayalam and Sanskrit.. The 27 nakshatras are derived in this text.. It shows that Indian sages built the Stonehenge with 27 portals.. http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/01/mystery-of-stonehenge-solved-capt-ajit.html
The Surya Siddhantha concisely specifies the coordinates of the twenty seven Nakshatras.
BHISHMA WAITED FOR 54 DAYS ON A BED OF ARROWS TO DIE.. HE FELL ON THE TENTH DAY OF THE MAHABHARATA WAR ..WHY?
Vedanga Jyotisha 5 says that a year begins when the Sun is in Shravishtha. The 5th text states this explicitly by stating that this is the beginning of the year because it is the location of “uttarayana” – the point at which the Sun begins moving northward and the days begin getting longer..
Rg Vedanga Jyotish 6 tells us that the shortest day and the beginning of the northward course of the Sun (and Moon) begins at Shravishtha, and that the beginning of the southward course begins in Aslesha (the opposite star from Shravishtha). Vedanga Jyotish 7 tells how much (on average) the day increases each day from the winter solstice, and visa versa from the summer solstice. Rg Vedanga Jyotish 5, mention of different months for lunar and solar calendars was made.
Vaajasaneyi Samhita 13.14 ( 5000 BC ) gives the names of the 12 solar months.. Yajur Vedanga Jyotish 28 (5000 BC ) says that the solar year has 366 days!
Vedic Astrologers did have a concept of dividing the tropical movement of the Sun into 12 segments.. The modern Engish names are just a direct lift from Malayalam and Sanskrit names.
OUR FESTIVALS HAVE DEEP MEANING.. THIS IS NOT LIKE SLITTING THROATS OF ANIMALS OR RUNNING LIKE ASSHOLES AROUND COLLECTING EGGS.
Vernal Equinox is known as ‘Vasanta Vishuvat’ and Autumnal Equinox is known as ‘Sarat Vishuvat’ in ancient Indian Astronomy.
The point of intersection of equinoctial and ecliptic was called ( today the white man calls First Point of Aries, when it is really First point of Pisces ) -- Aswinyadi - Meshadi.
Vyasa who wrote the Mahabharata 6000 years ago, knew how to compute the diameter and other aspects of Earth, and possessed an accurate value of pi !
The Mayan calendar began with the Fifth Great Cycle in 3114 BC and ended on 21 December 2012 AD. In Surya Siddhantam, Maya described how eclipses were caused..
Maya Danava went to Peru on his own Vimana which was a spacecraft. Kerala king Mahabli was banished to Peru ( patala –part of his own kingdom ) by Vishnu avatar Vamana .. Maya had designed several of these spacecrafts for Kubera.
Maya is mentioned 23 times in the Ramayana, and 61 times in the Mahabharata.
WHEN I PENNED THE POST BELOW ABOUT VEDIC VIMANA , MY DETRACTORS COULD NOT STOP BEING SARCASTIC FOR THREE YEARS.. TODAY THEY HAVE ALL FALLEN BY THE WAYSIDE—PHUTTTTT ON THEIR MANGY FACES..
THE LYING WHITE HISTORIANS NEVER EXPECTED A BROWN SKINNED BLOGGER TO RULE THE INTERNET..
Capt ajit vadakayil
..
TO BE CONTINUED-- IMPORTANT
THE ATTACK DOG POLICE LOYAL TO ATHEIST COMMIE PINARAYI VIJAYAN HAS ARRESTED MORE THAN 33,000 SABARIMALA PILGRIMS AND PUT MORE THAN 6200 PILGRIMS IN JAIL ( BJP SOURCES ) .. BELOW ARE THE WATERED DOWN OFFICIALCOMMIE FIGURES
PM MODI AND CJI GOGOI DID NOTHING TO STOP THIS STALIN TYPE TERROR ..
MY WIFE HAS JUST SENT MONEY TO THE BANK ID BELOW-- TO GIVE LEGAL HELP TO THESE UNFORTUNATE VICTIMS OF THE MOST HATED MAN INDIA HAVE PRODUCED SINCE INDEPENDENCE --COMMIE PINARAYI VIJAYAN..
I HAVE JUST UTTERED AN ATHARVA VEDA ISOTOPE MANTRA TO TAKE CARE OF PINARAYI VIJAYANs SOUL..THE GREATEST PUNISHMENT TO AN ATHEIST
I ASK MY GULF READERS --OPEN YOUR HEARTS AND THEN YOUR PURSE..
AFTER THE COMMIE GOVT IS KICKED OUT OF KERALA, EVERY ARRESTED PILGRIM MUST BE GIVEN COMPENSATION BY THE INDIAN STATE , IF WE ARE INDEED A DEMOCRACY
ALL READERS SPREAD THIS MESSAGE CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL ..
ONLY PHOTOS OF PRESIDENT , PRIME MINISTER AND CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA CAN BE PUT ON GOVT ADVERTISEMENTS
JUST WHO THE HELL IS CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA ? IS HE PART OF THE ELECTED GOVT ? AT THE BEST CJI CAN ONLY RULE THE ILLEGAL PATLI GALLI CALLED "PIL LANE "
KAUN SA KHET KA BEET ROOT HAI YEH CJI ! WHAT ABOUT VP AND GOVERNORS OF STATE WHO HAVE ENORMOUS SUBJECTIVE POWERS ?
WHAT THE FUCK ?
WHO HAS AUTHORIZED THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA TO CLAIM “APUN BHI AWWAL ?”
IS THIS UNACCOUNTABLE COLLEGIUM JUDGE SOME RULER OF INDIA APPOINTED BY GOD ?
A MELORD WHO ONLY HAS THE POWERS ONLY TO INTERPRET LAWS WANT TO BE RULER OF INDIA?
THIS IS THE HEIGHT OF JUDICIAL OVER FUCKIN’ REACH ..
WHY WAS THE CJI NOT PUNISHED FOR THIS SELF PROMOSSANN ( WITH THE BLESSINGS OF THE DEEP STATE AND BENAMI MEDIA ?)
THIS COURT BENCH WAS HEADED BY GOGOI, AS HE KNEW THAT HE IS LINE TO BE CJI..
BURN
ALL LAWS CREATED BY ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM SUPREME COURT VIA PIL ROUTE
BURN
ALL PAST JUDGEMENTS OF ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY WHICH IS BEING MINDLESSLY USED AS A LANGOT TO THE
CONSTITUTION VIA STARE DECISIS.
The need of the hour is an All-India Judicial Service ( AIJS ) . At least 70 per cent of the posts should be filled up at the trial and district court levels from such a service
All-India Judicial Service (AIJS) for appointment of district judges MUST be through a rigorous examination process ( like IAS ) to be conducted by the Union Public Service Commission.
Our Constitution was amended in 1977 to provide for an AIJS under Article 312.
By AIJS we can have intelligent younger judges in our SC and HCs. They will run over these “loser lawyer turned Melord judges “ and show them a mirror on their loser faces.
Public debate often gets hijacked by discussions on the number of judges, but it rarely considers the quality of judges themselves—most of whom do NOT have the brains to glean CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE .
There is always a huge vacancy for judges in the courts? Vacancies are never filled. Why do these Judges positions remain empty? The answer is simple. Because the judiciary is unable to attract talent. Mostly loser lawyers become judges. Later they wear 5 piece suit and act god.
To compound things further, today the subordinate judiciary depends entirely on state recruitment. But the brighter law students do not join the state judicial services because they are not attractive.
With no career progression, no one with a respectable Bar practice wants to become an additional district judge, and deal with the hassles of transfers and postings. Consequently, the quality of the subordinate judiciary is by and large below average
By extension, at least one-third of high court judges elevated from the subordinate judiciary are also mostly below average. As a result, the litigants are left to suffer.
ENSURE JUDGE SALARIES ARE TRIPLED , PM MODI
In European models, students pick the judiciary as a stream early in their legal studies itself. Just as dentistry is a specialisation in medicine, judging is a specialisation in law. There is a one year diploma on “judging” in law schools, with the eventual idea to have a full-fledged course for judges.
When our Constitution was drafted, the AIJS discussion got sidelined-- by vested forces .
The end result was Article 235, under which the entire judicial machinery at the subordinate level was under the control of the high courts.
The Constitution drafting committees also discussed Article 312, conferring power on the Parliament to create All India Services. At that time, it was doubtful whether the judicial services could be organised on a national scale under Article 312.
After the Swaran Singh Committee’s recommendations in 1976, Article 312 was modified to include the judicial services, but it excluded anyone below the rank of district judge. Therefore, the trial courts are completely eliminated.
Meanwhile, the First Law Commission of India (LCI) came out with its comprehensive, and now legendary, 14th Report on Reforms on the Judicial Administration, which recommended an AIJS in the interests of efficiency of the judiciary.
The idea of an AIJS was approved in the chief ministers’ conference in 1982, and most states were in agreement. It was argued that this would lead to an erosion of the control of the high courts over the subordinate judiciary, which would, in turn, affect the judiciary’s independence.
The process of recruitment of Judges would be through open competition ( like IIT ) , and if designed with the right incentives of VERY HIGH pay, promotion and career progression, it could potentially become an attractive employment avenue for bright and capable young law graduates.
The judiciary needs such bright determined youngsters to take over the system.
The idea of an AIJS has not merely been academic, and the Law Commission has not been its solitary votary. The Supreme Court has itself said that an AIJS should be set up, and has directed the Union of India to take appropriate steps in this regard. This has happened at least twice.
It is clear that the judicial side of the court machinery is entirely in favour of an AIJS. It is the administrative side ( corrupt foreign payroll ) that has been opposing this idea.
It is extremely disappointing that the opposition is coming from within the judiciary itself, with certain high courts opposing the idea without understanding the issues properly.
Without a push from the judiciary, the AIJS will never come to fruition.
Or PM Modi must kick prime judicial ass the way Donald Trump( with balls of steel ) has done.
In a longer-term perspective, uniformity in selection processes and standards, as offered by an AIJS, has many advantages. It will improve the quality of judicial officers in high courts, and one-third of the judges would enter the high courts through the route of promotion from subordinate courts.
By extension, judges of the Supreme Court are drawn from the high courts. In this process, the persons eventually selected into the judiciary would be of proven competence. Simultaneously, the quality of adjudication and the dispensation of justice would undergo transformative changes across the judicial system, from the lowest to the highest levels.
A career judicial service will make the judiciary more accountable, more professional, and arguably, also more equitable. This can have far-reaching impact on the quality of justice, and on people’s access to justice as well. For decades, the judiciary has been asked to do something about judicial recruitments, but always stops short of taking an initiative in the formation of an AIJS.
There has been a palpable wave of tension that is simmering between the government and the judiciary ever since the apex court rejected the NJAC Act and restored the collegium system to appoint judges. The elected executive surrendered meekly under pressure from foreign forces
TODAY DESH DROHI foreign funded NGOs IN CAHOOTS WITH BENAMI MEDIA AND COLLEGIUM JUDGES ARE TRING TO KILL THE FAST/ FREE/ FAIR KHAP JUSTICE SYSTEM IN VILLAGES…
KHAPS ( VILLAGE PANCHAYATS DELIVERING JUSTICE SINCE MILLENNIUMS ) HAVE THE PULSE OF THE VILLAGERS.
THE VILLAGE ELDERS KNOW FROM HINDSIGHT WHO ARE THE ROTTEN EGGS IN THE VILLAGE BASKET
It is the system of ANCIENT village Panchayats and their schemes of dispute settlement by using means such as mediation, negotiation, and arbitrator process through ‘Nyaya panch’ that forms the underlying idea of Lok Adalats.
This ancient Indian Judicial concept was lifted by white men as ADR.
The philosophy of Lok Adalats rests on involvement, justice, fairness, clarity, independence and absence of malice.
Today, it is not only the people who directly seek relief but also people who indirectly seek relief that turn to the benefit of Lok Adalats.
Etymologically, Lok Adalat means "people's court". It was India who provided a torch of justice beacon to the world.
India has had a long history of resolving disputes through the mediation of village elders when the rest of the planet were running around naked doing GRUNT GRUNT..
The current system of Lok Adalats is a mere improvement on that.. King Solomon learnt our “circumstantial “ justice system ( based on wisdom ) from his wife Queen of Sheba—an Indian woman from Kerala. King Solomon’s mother Bath Sheba was a woman from Kerala, India
The focus of the lok adalat is on amicable win-win compromise. When no compromise is reached, the matter goes back to the court.
The Lok Adalat cases heard included criminal cases (minor offences which could be settled out of court), cheque bounces, bank recovery, civil suits, motor accident claims, family matters, traffic violation cases, revenue matters, land acquisition references, consumer matters, service and labour matters where there was a possibility of amicable settlements.
It is the duty of every DESH BHAKT citizens to protect the judiciary from the burden of unnecessary litigation... and approaching the court only as a final resort.
The Lok Adalat has been given statutory status under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
In unequivocal terms, the supreme Court has held that award of the Lok Adalat is as good as the decree of a Court.
The award of the Lok Adalat is fictionally deemed to be decrees of Court and therefore the courts have all the powers in relation thereto as it has in relation to a decree passed by itself..
The award passed by the Lok Adalat is the decision of the court itself though arrived at by the simpler method of conciliation instead of the process of arguments in court.
The most important factor to be considered while deciding the cases at the Lok Adalat is the mutual consent of both the parties .
In several instances, the Supreme Court has held that if there was no consent the award of the Lok Adalat is not executable and also if the parties fail to agree to get the dispute resolved through Lok Adalat, the regular litigation process remains open for the contesting parties.
A compromise is always bilateral and means mutual adjustment. Settlement is termination of legal proceedings by mutual consent. If no compromise or settlement is or could be arrived at, no order can be passed by the Lok Adalat.
WHEN IT COMES TO EGO MASSAGE ( DEFAMATION ) AND BEING IN THE LIMELIGHT FOR RICH , POWERFUL AND CRYING BOLLYWOOD SUPERSTARS — THIS MUTUAL ADJUSTMENT MUST BE STOPPED.
THE PERON WHO SEEKS EGO MASSAGE MUST BE THROWN INTO JAIL..
The benefits that litigants derive through the Lok Adalats are many. First, there is no court fee and even if the case is already filed in the regular court, the fee paid will be refunded if the dispute is settled at the Lok Adalat.
Secondly, there is no strict application of the procedural laws and the Evidence Act while assessing the merits of the claim by the Lok Adalat.
The parties to the disputes though represented by their advocate can interact with the Lok Adalat judge directly and explain their stand in the dispute and the reasons therefore, which is not possible in a regular court of law, where the uppity melord is in a mann mandir wallah ivory tower.
Thirdly, disputes can be brought before the Lok Adalat directly instead of going to a regular court first .
Fourthly, the decision of the Lok Adalat is binding on the parties to the dispute and its order is capable of execution through legal process.
No appeal lies against the order of the Lok Adalat whereas in the regular law courts there is always a scope to appeal to the higher forum on the decision of the trial court, which causes delay in the settlement of the dispute finally. Read this line twice .
The reason being that in a regular court, decision is that of the court but in Lok Adalat it is mutual settlement and hence no case for appeal will arise. In every respect the scheme of Lok Adalat is a boon to the litigant public, where they can get their disputes settled fast and free of cost.
The major defect of the mechanism of Lok Adalat is that it cannot take a decision, if one of the parties, is not willing for a settlement, though the case involves an element of settlement.
The adamant attitude shown by one among the parties will render the entire process futile . There must be a sure process of the adamant party A seeks an ego massage or is in the foul game of troubling the other party B who is financially disadvantaged ..
EVERY CASE OF EGO MASSAGE VIA DEFAMATION MUST BE HANDLED BY LOK ADALAT AND FALSE CASES BY RICH AND POWERFUL TO SUPPRESS TRUTH MUST BE DEALT WITH SEVERELY BY HUGE FINES OR JAIL TERM..
Again , every award of the Permanent Lok Adalat, whether it is based on consent of the parties, or on compromise or upon the decision, "shall be deemed to be a decree of a civil court".
In ancient India village panchayaths were "People's court". This was a non-adversarial system.
Backlog cases that are pending in regular courts can be transferred to a Lok Adalat if both the parties agree. If it is clear that party A wants to trouble party B because he has more money and time, he must be clearly warned .
THERE IS NO NEED TO AGREE FOR MINOR CASES LIKE ROAD RAGE OR UGLY FAT PMSWOMEN ACCUSING YOUNG HANDSOME BOYS OF EVE TEASING .
Again, the focus in Lok Adalats is on compromise. When no compromise is reached, the matter goes back to the court.However, if a compromise is reached, an award is made and is binding on the parties.It is enforced as a decree of a civil court. An important aspect is that the award is final and cannot be appealed, not even under Article 226 because it is a judgement by consent.
All proceedings of a Lok Adalat are deemed to be judicial proceedings and every Lok Adalat is deemed to be a Civil Court.
The Lok Adalat is presided over by a sitting or retired judicial officer as the chairman, with two other members, usually a lawyer and a social worker. There is no court fee.
Lok Adalat is very effective in settlement of money claims. Disputes like partition suits, damages and matrimonial cases can also be easily settled before Lok Adalat as the scope for compromise through an approach of give and take is high in these cases.
Lok Adalats have the competence to deal with the following cases:---
Compoundable civil, revenue and criminal cases.
Motor accident cases
Partition Claims
Matrimonial and family disputes
Bonded Labour disputes
Land acquisition disputes
Bank’s unpaid loan cases
Arrears of retirement benefits cases
Cases which are not under the jurisdiction of any Court.
Compoundable offences are less serious criminal offences and are of two different types mentioned in tables in Section 320 of the CrPC, as follows:
1. Court permission is not required before compounding – Examples of these offences include adultery, causing hurt, defamation criminal trespass.
2. Court permission is required before compounding – Examples of such offences are theft, criminal breach of trust, voluntarily causing grievous hurt, assault on a woman with intention to outrage her modesty, dishonest misappropriation of property amongst others.…
Compoundable offences are those offences where, the complainant (one who has filed the case, i.e. the victim), enter into a compromise, and agrees to have the charges dropped against the accused.
Non-compoundable Offences – All other offences not classified as compoundable in Section 320 of the CrPC are considered non-compoundable offences. These are offences considered more serious in nature and they impact not only the victim, but society at large is also considered to be affected.
There are some offences, which cannot be compounded. They can only be quashed. The reason for this is, because the nature of offence is so grave and criminal, that the Accused cannot be allowed to go scot-free. Here, in these types of cases generally, it is the "state", i.e. police, who has filed the case, and hence the question of complainant entering into compromise does not arise.
In Non-compoundable offense, no compromise is allowed. Even the court does not have the authority and power to compound such offense. Full trail is held which ends with the acquittal or conviction of the offender, based on the evidence given.
The Powers bestowed on Lok Adalats are as follows:--
i) It has the power of the Civil Court, under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters:-
Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. b) Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document.
c) Power to receive evidence on affidavits,
d) Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court.
e) Such other matters as may be prescribed.
ii) Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it.
iii) All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC.
iv) Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.
During the Lok Adalat, the parties agree to abide by the decision of the judge at the Lok Adalat.. In unequivocal terms, the Court held that the award of the Lok Adalat is as good as the decree of the Court.
The award passed by the Lok Adalat is the decision of the Court itself though arrived at by the simpler method of conciliation instead of the process of arguments in court.
The Lok Adalat mechanism is no more an experiment in the country, it is in fact, a full-proven success that needs to increase its domain and bring under its realm the several aspects that have been excluded till date.
Lok Adalat has the potential for social reconstruction and legal mobilization for social change. It can influence the style of administration of justice and the role of the lawyer and judge in it. It can take law closer to the life of the people and reduce disparity between law in books and law in action.
Lok Adalat is the way to go till the backlog is finished off and we have more judges in the system. In speeding up cases, it better to punish less than punish more—we have to accept this as a necessary “collateral damage “ for common good and the good of the watan. There is absolutely NO need to split hairs over thisor make this a truth finding exercise.
To increase the efficiency of the system of Lok Adalats, it is crucial for the public, the lawyers, the executive and the Judiciary to work in harmony and coordination. The people should be made aware of the advantages of the Lok Adalats.
THIS MUST BE PART OF THE NCERT SCHOOL SYLLABUS
Ancient Indian village panchayats have used adjudication such as arbitration, mediation and conciliation when the rest of the planet did NOT have a language .
We need to set up enough lok adalats, fast track courts, family courts, mobile panchayats, nyaya panchayats and gram nyayalayas.
It is now time to computerize Indian courts are conduct all proceedings under video cam for records.
THIS BULLSHIT OF TAAREQ PEH TAREEEQ PEH TAREEQ SO THAT THE LAWYER CAN MILK THE CLIENT EVERY 4 MONTHS , FOR DECADES MUST BE STOPPED.
LAW MINISTER –LISTEN UP. DO YOUR FUCKIN’ JOB.
SUMMONS CAN BE GIVEN BY SMS MOBILE PHONE OR BY EMAIL OR CHECKING THE WEBSITE – LIKE HOW WE BOOK RAILWAY TICKETS BY USING A CODE NUMBER .
The absence of any court fees makes Lok Adalat approachable by the weaker societies. Moreover, if a case has previously been filed in any court, the fees charged by this court will be returned as soon as the matter is filed with Lok Adalat.
There is a lot more flexibility with regards to procedural rules and the weight of Evidence Act during the assessment of any claim. The aggrieved party and the defendants can directly interact and communicate with the judges of Lok Adalat despite being represented by their advocates.
Any matter can be presented directly to the Lok Adalat instead of going through any court. Since time is of the essence in most of these cases, having a fast track and cost effective system such as this can be beneficial to many.
Again, Lok Adalat’s decision is binding on the parties, and the same can be executed with a legal process. The decision of Lok Adalat cannot be appealed to higher courts unlike the other courts of law which usually results in a delay of the proceedings.
This is because the decision made in a Lok Adalat is mutually settled as opposed to a verdict given in other courts. Hence, the need for an appeal should not arise if the settlement consents.
The basic features of a “permanent” Lok Adalat are identical to a Lok Adalat. There are, however, certain modifications made. The key difference is that a typical Lok Adalat can only be summoned occasionally and not on a daily basis, a permanent Lok Adalat is an established system which is operational throughout just like any other court or tribunal.
The Legal services Authorities Act, 1987, which had established Lok Adalats, did not, at first, establish permanent Lok Adalats. It was the Amendment Act of 2002 that enabled the establishment of the first “ permanent” Lok Adalat.
“ Permanent” Lok Adalat is presided over by a chairperson, who:--
Is a district judge or has been one.
Is an additional district judge
Has held judicial office higher in rank than that of a judge of the district court
Along with the chairperson, the government also appoints two other persons who are experienced in the area of public utility service. The state authority or the central authority appoints this person, depending on the case, after a nomination by the respective government has been made.
Again Lok Adakats do not have jurisdiction on matters related to non-compoundable offences.
While in regular suits, the plaintiff is required to pay the prescribed court fee, in Lok Adalat, there is no court fee and no rigid procedural requirement (i.e. no need to follow process given by [Indian] Civil Procedure Code or Indian Evidence Act), which makes the process very fast.
Again, Parties can directly interact with the judge, which is not possible in regular courts.
Cases that are pending in regular courts can be transferred to a Lok Adalat if both the parties agree. A case can also be transferred to a Lok Adalat if one party applies to the court and the court sees some chance of settlement after giving an opportunity of being heard to the other party.
I ASK-- LOK ADALAT MUST BE LIVE ON TV — PEOPLE CAN JUDGE IF JUSTICE IS BEING DONE. THIS IS DONE IN USA .
AGAIN, THERE SHOULD BE NO NEED FOR A COMPROMISE ON EGO RELATED ISSUES – OR A RICH AND POWERFUL MAN GETS HIS KICKS TROUBLING A POOR MAN..
The procedural laws, and the Evidence Act are not strictly followed while assessing the merits of the claim by the Lok Adalat.
Lok Adalat is very effective in settlement of money claims. Disputes like partition suits, damages and matrimonial cases can also be easily settled before Lok Adalat as the scope for compromise through an approach of give and take is high in these cases.
Lok Adalats have the powers of an ordinary Civil Court such as summoning, examining, taking evidence etc.
A Nyaya Panchayat is a system of dispute resolution at village level in India. This is a system which has been going on for thousands of years still it was stopped by Trojan Horse foreign funded NGOs , benami media and Collegium judiciary nexus.
Unconstitutional Collegium judiciary new plays god by using the PIL route.
Nyaya panchayats are be endowed with functions based on broad principles of natural justice and can tend to remain proceedurally as simple as possible.
There is one Nyaya Panchayat for every three or four villages. Each village Panchayat elects a member to the Nyaya Panchayat.
The Nyaya Panchayat is headed by a village Sarpanch. It hears minor civil and criminal cases.
Nyaya Panchayat is a simple system of dispute resolution at village level in India. India has had a long history of resolving disputes through the mediation of respected village elders.
Nyaya panchayats guided by local traditions, culture and behavioural pattern of the village community instill confidence in the people towards the administration of justice. These village elders know the pulse of the people and have hindsight. They know the rotten eggs.
They would dispose of a large number of cases and thus relieve the burden of regular courts. They would succeed in getting a large number of cases compromised through peaceful conciliation using principles of natural justice. Here the justice is NOT blind , the way Jew Rothschild corrupted our regular judiciary..
The villagers in general would be satisfied with the administration of justice obtaining in village or panchayat courts and that the decisions of these courts on the whole would do substantial justice.
Appeals and revisions from these decisions would be small in number.
There should be speedy and cheap disposal of cases.
The litigants and witnesses who are mostly agriculturists can conveniently attend the courts and thus there would be no interference with agricultural activities in the village. They don’t have to travel far. Witnesses are treated with respect.
The panchayat could bring justice nearer to the villager without involving the expenditure which would otherwise have to be incurred in establishing regular courts, hiring expensive lawyers who are usually JUDASES in cahoots with the lawyer of the opposite camp..
Panchayat would have an educative value.
Local courts acquainted with the customs of the neighbourhood and nuances of the local idiom are better able to understand why certain things are said or done. All conversations are in local dialect or language not some alien language .
The people concerned can talk to the “judges” . There is NO “contempt of court” for faalthu reason like “standing on one leg “. The audience is NOT alien but people in the village who have a stake .
People in a village are so closely known to each other that the parties to a dispute would not be able to conceal or produce false evidence easily and those who tell lies before the nyaya panchayat face the risk of being looked down upon and even boycotted or ex-communicated by others.
Panchas being drawn from among simple village folk strive at decisions which are fair and at the same time consistent with the peculiar conditions of the parties.
Panchayats, the age-old institution has found new vigour with the introduction of the 73rd Amendment to the Constitution, and most accordingly to be considered another pillar in the edifice that symbolizes justice. This is despite the Collegium judiciary, Benami media and Foreign funded NGOs trying their best to discredit this beautiful traditional system.
Strengthening the institution of Panchayats and empowering people at the grass-root level to resolve their disputes amicably would solve many of the problems that is faced by conventional justice dispensation machinery in its attempts to percolate to the lowest levels.
This would provide a, solution to the problems of access to those living in remote regions and illiterate tribals .
The rationale behind setting up the Nyaya Panchayat are:--
Fair justice system
Democratic decentralisation,
Easy access to justice,
Speedy disposal of cases,
Inexpensive justice system,
Revival of traditional village community life,
Combination of judicial system and local self government,
Reduction in pressure on Civil Courts.
Procedure followed in nyaya panchayats is very simple and informal. The procedure codes like Code of Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure Code and Indian Evidence Act apply to the nyaya panchyats,
But, they have power to call witnesses and the parties for recording their evidence or producing any relevant document or fact. Unlike courts, they have the power to investigate the facts to find out the truth and at the same time they have the power to punish for its REAL contempt.
Lawyers cannot appear before a nyaya panchyat in any of its proceedings. Thank god !
IN MINOR CASES WHY DO WE REQUIRE LAWYERS ?
The advantages of nyaya panchayats over the regular courts are priceless…They provide justice at the door steps for the village folks. They provide relief to the ordinary courts as they lift the part of burden of judicial work on their shoulders.
In a way, they are emerged on solution to the problem of mounting arrears of cases before the courts. Local culture and traditions are not kicked on the teeth . Panchayat System has a great educative value for the villagers.
Disadvantages of nyaya panchayats ?
TAKE CARE OF THIS –
HAVE ALL RULINGS UNDER VIDEO CAM , TO FIGURE OUT IF ANY CORRUPTION IS GOING ON
Till our backlog clears do NOT overburden our justice system with traffic challan cases.
All petty cases and ego massage cases should be taken out of this system. Even petty criminal cases caused by extreme poverty should go out.
Courts should be dealing with serious criminal offences, not with petty cases.
There must be more labs for DNA evidence . There must be secrecy – to prevent corruption lab operators must not know names . There must be code numbers.
Justice delayed is justice denied is an axiom that all of us in India understand as we see thousands of cases hanging on without justice for decades.
People who abused the system and kept breadwinner undertrials in jail for too long must be punished
The irony is striking when in many cases, the judgment arrives after the petitioner has died. It is NOT fair to trouble a man because his grandfather who died ( long ago ) shot a deer.
Eighty percent of the backlog is in nine mainline states with very large populations.. Those who deliberately delay cases must be penalized and those filing false affidavits and pompous people seeking EGO MASSAGE should be severely prosecuted and fined heavily.
Media whore Rajdeep Sardesai wants 100 crores .
What is he ?
Some kind of modern maryada purush ?
Below: Puja culture ? How about namaaz culture ? Or kneeling on pew culture ? Only Hindus can be insulted ? Here is this idiot nay CUNT defaming a crowd
We all know how much he lies and how much he defames on TV .
Is telling truth defamation ?
Is this man worth even an small percentage of 100 crores he seeks? If defamation case is frivolous and dismissed, the man who wanted 100 crore charges ( ego massage ) must pay back the same fine -- 80% to the Govt and 20% to the man who had to defend himself
The reason one goes to court is to get justice-- "Justice delayed is justice denied"
At sea I gave rewards and punishments before the sweat dried up—because I am not a CUNT..
The Indian judicial system has been subverted by the white invader – it is bases on mindless “justice is blind “ nonsense – procedures, evidences ( most of the time false direct evidence ) and facts derived in a pea brained manner.
Wanna know how the Aarushi muder case has been botched up royally ?
Are we proud of this type of stupid justice system ?
The whole world laughs at us !!
Is our court room some sort of mad circus ?
FRIVOLOUS EGO MASSAGE CASES MUST BE CLOSED, EVEN IF ONE EGO LADEN ULTERIOR MOTIVED PARTY DOES NOT AGREE.
I HAVE SEEN ONE NCP POLITICIAN ( SUPER RICH AND POWERFUL— HIS FATHER WAS A PAUPER ) ON A TV DEBATE.
ONE DEBATE MEMBER SAID A BITTER TRUTH -- SOMETHING, TO SAVE THE WATAN, WHICH DID NOT SUIT THIS CORRUPT MINISTER PERSONALLY .
IMMEDIATELY THE MINISTER WARNS THIS MAN ” I WILL CONSULT MY TEAM OF LAWYERS AND SUE YOU FOR DEFAMATION “ .
In India, the Model Law has been adopted almost in its entirety in the 1996 Act. This Act repealed all the three previous statutes. Its primary purpose was to encourage arbitration as a cost‐effective and quick mechanism for the settlement of commercial disputes.
It covers both domestic arbitration and international commercial arbitration. It marked an epoch in the struggle to find an alternative to the snail paced traditional way.
The changes brought about by the 1996 Act were so drastic that the entire case law built up over the previous fifty‐six years on arbitration was rendered superfluous.
The Government of India enacted the 1996 Act by an ordinance, and then extended its life by another ordinance, before Parliament eventually passed it without reference to Parliamentary Committee.
The Government of India amended the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by introducing the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2015 in the Parliament.
THE ANCIENT INDIAN SYSTEM WAS NOT TO PUNISH -- BUT TO TIDE HIM UP AND MAKE HIM JOIN THE MAIN STREAM AS A GOOD CITIZEN
The legal Indian profession has long ago ceased to be a noble service oriented system
The vested system ignored their legitimate interests of the people and boggled down to the techniques, rules and unreasonable levels of interpretation.
This led to people being alienated from the system and they avoided litigation like the plague .
Witnesses to road accidents and crimes never helped –thanks to this CHOOTIYA judicial system
While independence of the judiciary and the rule of law are the cornerstones of a democratic society, efficiency in adjudication must be given equal importance. If as a ship captain I don’t do my job , I get sacked.
Same way, lazy and corrupt “loser lawyer turned judges “ judges cannot be treated as gods who are above punishment.
When corrupt judges , foreign payroll benami media and Trojan Horse NGOs are in cahoots, Bharatmata bleeds.
King pins in the Telgi stamp paper scam are still in power.
IT WAS NOT ABOUT SELLING FAKE STAMP PAPER AND MAKING MOOLAH – IT WAS ABOUT GRABBING LAND.
DEMONETIZATION WORKS ONLY IF WE JAIL THE BASTARDS WHO GRABBED LAND AND PUT IT IN BENAMI NAMES
Alternative dispute resolution consists of methods like negotiation, mediation, arbitration and conciliation, any of which may be used to achieve an out-of-court settlement.
While negotiation involves the parties solving their disputes face-to-face without outside intervention, mediation and arbitration involve the assistance of a third-party.
A mediator facilitates an agreement by bouncing non-binding solutions off of parties, while an arbitrator functions more in the nature of a judge and delivers binding but appealable awards.
The National and State Legal Services Authorities must disseminate more information regarding these, FAST TRACK informal courts so they become the first option explored by potential litigants.
While it is the duty of the judiciary to ensure justice for one and all, it is also the duty of citizens to protect it from the burden of unnecessary litigation by resolving minor disputes among themselves and approaching the court only as a final resort. Our Judicial system must be part of the NCERT school books.
REMEMBER , ONCE YOU HIRE A LAWYER THE ONLY THING SURE IS THE LOSS OF MONEY VIA LAWYER FEES .
JUST TO TELL YOU THE NEXT DATE ( TAREEQ ) THE LAWYER CHARGES THE SAME APPEARANCE FEES, THOUGH HE GETS WITH BY GIVING A BRIBE TO THE COURT CLERK ( VIA MOBILE PHONE )
MORE OFTEN THAN NOT THE LAWYER IS IN BED WITH THE OPPOSITE CAMP LAWYER AND THE JUDGE –SURPRISED ?
YES –
THIS IS INDIA !
Below: A scene from Mohan Joshi Haazir ho-- both opposing camp lawyers just had sex and now they are coming to a legal agreement --cooking the case !
WE DEMAND POOR PEOPLE TO BE HELPED BY THE GOVT IN ENGAGING FREE LAWYERS.
THIS TAAREQ PEH TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ NONSENSE MUST BE KILLED.
LAWYERS MUST BE PAID BY DIGITAL MEANS . THIS MUST BE STRICTLY ENFORCED .
MOST SUCCESSFUL LAWYERS IN INDIA ARE FIXERS .
Article 39A of the Constitution of India directs the State to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice, on a basis of equal opportunity, and shall, in particular provide free legal aid, by suitable legislation or schemes or in any other way, to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by economic or other disabilities.
This is the constitutional imperative. HELL --OUR COLLEGIUM SYSTEM ITSELF IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. SUCCESSIVE LAW MINISTERS ( DARLINGS OF THE DEEP STATE ) HAVE IGNORED THIS .. WHY ?
Our Constitution requires us to remove impediments to access to justice in a systematic manner.
All agencies of the Government are now under a fundamental obligation to enhance access to justice.
Article 40 which directs the State to take steps to organise village panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government, has to be appreciated afresh in the light of the mandate of the new article 39A.
Desh drohi foreign Funded Trojan Horse NGOs in cahoots with Benami media run down our village panchayat system as a heathen system .
Why is our justice is controlled from abroad.
WE NEED TO TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TO PROTECT WITNESSES AND WHISTLE BLOWERS
ROTHSCHILD BRANDED APCO MODI DOES NOT CARE
USKO VOTE MAANGTHA HAI, BASSSS — THAT IS HIS TOP PRIORITY
LIKE MANU --CHANAKYA HAS BEEN DENIGRATED AS A MACHIAVELLIAN SON OF A BITCH-- PAKISTANIS WHO COME ON INDIAN TV TO DEBATE ALWAYS REMIND US ..
Saam Daam Dand Bhed : Chanakya Neeti
According to Chanakya, the primary duty of the king is to protect "Dharma"
IT DENOTES FOUR WAYS IN WHICH WORK CAN BE TAKEN FROM OTHERS—BY MOTIVATION
MASLOW LIFTED FROM CHANAKYA NEETI
SAAM -knowledge ( negotiations, ask after explaining why, evince interest for help , convince , create sense of belonging , foster brotherhood , raise awareness from correct perspective )
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed (Repeat 5 times)
Mann mein aghna se bhare bolo kahan jaaye
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed
Yeh trishna se bhare bolo kahan jaaye
Sarkar ke dhwar pe jaake teher jaaye
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed (Repeat 2 times)
Sarkar ek vichaar jo maane ga jaane ga hoo
Govinda govinda govinda govinda
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed (Repeat 2 times)
Anyay ke saath mein kaise jiye jaaye
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed
Sarkar ke dhwar pe jaake tehar jaaye
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed
Anyay ke saath mein kaise jiye jaaye
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed
Sarkar ke dhwar pe jaake tehar jaaye
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed
Sarkar besaar ko bhoole na bhoole na
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed (Repeat 2 times)
Govinda govinda govinda govinda govinda
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed
In the ancient Indian system of Panchayats – the two parties usually embraced and parted after a WIN-WIN judgement.
An institution nearer to the people’s homes , language and culture holds out greater opportunities for settlement, with near and dear watching the proceedings helf by father figures .
A decision taken by a village panchayat does not leave behind that trial of bitterness which generally follows in the wake of prodecural litigation in ordinary courts.
TODAY ANY CRYING BOLLYWOOD STAR KID , WHO NEEDS AN EGO MASSAGE , CAN FILE AN FIR ( USING A TOP POLICE OFFICER ) ---
--- AND PAY HIS LAWYERS TO MAKE A HONEST CHILD OF BHARATMATA RUN FROM PILLAR TO POST OVER THE LENGTH AND BREATH OF THE COUNTRY --
--AND BLEED HIM FINANCIALLY AND MENTALLY.
THIS MUST STOP.
No amount of increase in judges can clear the backlog in courts –as our judicial system is flawed. Collegium judiciary is itself an unconstitutional system.
We had a jury system ( like in USA ) till a Parsi desh drohi media baron who owned the sleazy tabloid BLITZ destroyed our Judicial system by bribing / manipulating the jury to save a fellow Parsi – a naval Commander , whose white wife needed a good hump-- nay--POUNDING from anybody other than her husband .
The new Act of 1996 -- Arbitration and Conciliation Act--brought in several changes to expedite the process of arbitration. This legislation has developed confidence among foreign parties interested to invest in India or to go for joint ventures, foreign investment, transfer of technology and foreign collaborations.
There is no court fee and no rigid procedural requirement (i.e. no need to follow process given by Civil Procedure Code or Evidence Act), which makes the process very fast. Parties can directly interact with the judge, which is not possible in regular courts.
The foreign owned benami media tried their best to decimate our village panchayats calling the village elders a “bunch of heathen idiots “ .
Tribals who are illiterate by and large, indigent in no small measure, feudal in their way of life, economically backward in large numbers, and illiterate-- need an unconventional cadre of jurists and judges, if equal justice under the law is to be a reality.
India has failed squarely on addressing some very basic issues--quick and inexpensive justice and protecting the rights of poor and the vulnerable.
The justice delivery system is right now on the verge of collapse with more than 30 million cases clogging the system and judges opting to give priority to Trojan horse NGOs filed PILs for personal limelight and to push a foreign sponsored agenda
There are cases that take so much of time that even a generation is too short to get any type of redressal—and the worst part is nobody cares .
IT IS NOT RIGHT FOR A FATHER TO PASS ON HIS LEGAL PROBLEMS TO HIS FUTURE GENERATIONS
That it will take more than 300 years to clear the backlog of cases STATUS QUO is maintained . The whole world is laughing at us.
In the Uphaar case it is shocking that it took six years to establish that the 59 people died because of criminal negligence on the part of the cinema management and the Delhi government. It was clear from day one that nobody would have died had the cinema followed mandatory safety rules
In a democracy, the courts belong not to the lawyers and judges but to the `citizen'
The highest is not above the law; the humblest is not beneath the law.
Justice delayed is justice denied.
WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA WANT HEADS TO ROLL
Dubious litigations are allowed to proceed, adding to the load of overworked courts. There is NO system to punish people guilty of filing frivolous cases .
Courts, especially superior courts, need to be VERY VERY firm while dealing with frivolous cases.
There is NO political will.
We had a Collegium judge slamming a central minister Finance Arun Jaitly with SEDITION for saying only NJAC is allowed by our constitution.
BRRAAAVVOOOO —“loser lawyer turned judge “ .
Let any donkey try hard — it can never be a race horse.
Right now Donald Trump is trying to keep USA safe by restricting immigration from certain nations.
JEWISH US JUDGES IN JEW ROTHSCHILDs PAYOLL ARE STONEWALLING –WITH ROTHSCHILDs JEWISH MEDIA AND KOSHER HOLLYWOOD IN SUPPORT
INDIA IS NO DIFFERENT
EVERY TIME OUR UNIFORMED MEN RISK THEIR LIVES AND CAPTURE NAXALS, IMMEDIATELY THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY, NHRC, NCM, NCW , JNU COMMIE PROFESSORS, FTII COMMIES , TROJAN HORSE NGOs etc COMES IN SUPPORT —WITH BENAMI MEDIA SUPPORT.
ROTHSCHILDs DOUBLE AGENT JEW NOAM FUCKIN' CHOMSKY ( WHOSE LINGUISTIC THEORY IS STOLEN FROM BHARTRHARI HALF BAKED ) ASKS QUESTIONS, AS IF INDIA IS HIS POPS PROPERTY.
We have islands of Rothschild Communism in JNU and FTII . JNU commies openly celebrate when our jawans are killed by foreign guns and IED stocked Naxals .
HUGE MONEY MUST BE SPENT IN BONUSES AND SALARIES TO CLEAR THE BACKLOG
THIS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN GIVING CHARITY TO AFRICAN NATIONS WHO ARE NOT GRATEFUL
THE GOVT MUST PASS AND ORDINANCE THAT ALL PAST FRIVOLOUS CASES, EGO MASSAGE DEFAMATION CASES, PETTY CRIMES, MUST BE THROWN OUT FOR THE GREATER GOOD OF THE WATAN. FORGET ABOUT PROTESTS BY FEW DISGRUNTlED FOREIGN AGENTS.
FRIVOLOUS PIL BY TROJAN HORSE NGOs MUST ATTRACT SEVERE FINES AND EVEN JAIL TERM
The loss of their
freedom apart, each of these undertials
had to carry the stigma of being criminals and murderers and in most
cases by the time the grinding wheels of justice oozed their final verdict,
there really wasn't much of a life to return to.
Some of them don't even
come to trial for years though theirs are relatively minor infractions of the
law such as pickpocketing; it's not uncommon for extremely poor undertrials to
several times more time in jail than the
maximum term they would have got if convicted.
In most developed
countries, a wrongful conviction can lead to the aggrieved person seeking huge
compensations. The reason is despite their proven innocence, those convicted
find the odds of relocating themselves in society difficult.
COMPENSATION MUST BE
PAID TO ALL INNOCENT UNDERTRIALS THOSE WHO SPEND MANY YEARS IN JAIL— AND THE
CALLOUS PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS PUNISHED WITH LOSS OF PENSION..
MIND YOU , A RICH MAN
NEVER FACES THIS HORRIBLE FATE
In our country, the
only reward for wrongful conviction is release from prison, never mind if the
life of that person has been destroyed after years and sometimes decades in
prison, for no fault of theirs. Most of
the time some uniformed police gets medals and promotions.
ATHIEST COMMIE PINARAYI
VIJAYAN HAS USED A SUPREME COURT ORDER ON SABARIMALA TO JAIL HINDUS WHO WERE
ENEMIES OF COMMIE CADRE.
COMMIE CADRE DRESSED AS SABARIMALA PILGRIMS THREW
STONES ON THE POLICE..
THIS WAS A FALSE FLAG
ATTACK AND A HEGEIAN DIALECTIC ..
SOME COMMIE CADRE DRESSED UP A POLICE TOO AT SABARIMALA
SANNIDHANAM..
WE THE PEOPLE WANT
ATHEIST COMMIE PINARAYI VIJAYAN KERALA GOVT TO BE DISMISSED.. THERE IS NO
DEMOCRACY IN KERALA TODAY...
WE WANT A JUDICIAL
INQUIRY INTO WHY POLICE/ MAGISTRATES/ JUDGES/ DISTRICT COLLECTORS HAVE
FORGOTTEN THEIR OATHS AND ARE PERSONALLY LOYAL TO A COMMIE GOON NAMED PINARAYI
VIJAYAN..
BANK ACCOUNTS OF
PILGRIMS AND BJP WORKERS ARE BEING FROZEN ON FALSE CHARGES/ MORPHED PICTURES ..
ARRESTED PILGRIMS HAVE LOST THEIR JOBS..
ONL JANAM TV IS TELLING
THE TRUTH. REST ALL BENAMI MEDIA IS ON THE SIDE OF COMMIE PINARAYI VIJAYAN..
WHY IS THE ILLEGAL
COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY SILENT ON THE STALIN TYPE RULE OF PINARAYI VIJAYAN USING
"FEAR IS THE KEY" POLICY ?..
WHY IS NHRC QUIET ?..
WE WANT THE KERALA
DEVASWOM BOARD CONTROLLED BY RABID ANTI-HINDU FORCES ( MOST ARE ATHEIST
COMMIES/ CHRISTIANS WITH HINDU NAMES ) TO BE ABOLISHED ..THEY ARE MORE WORRIED ABOUT
THEIR OWN SALARIES/ PENSIONS AND BONUSES..
AS LONG AS SABARIMALA
PILGRIMAGE EXISTS , FOREIGN FORCES CANNOT CONVERT POOR TRIBALS TO
CHRISTIANITY..
ANTI-HINDU KERALA CM
PINARAYI VIJAYAN WILL ENFORCE SUPREME COURTs ORDER ON MENSTRUATING WOMEN
ENTERING SABARIMALA..
BUT WHEN IT COMES TO
JACOBITE SYRIAN CHRISTIAN VOTES ( POLITICAL SUPPORT FROM JACOBITE BISHOP JOSEPH MOR
GREGORIOUS ) COMMIE PINARAYI VIJAYAN WILL GO AGAINST THE SUPREME COURT VERDICT
FAVOURING MALANKARA ORTHODOX CHRISTAIN CHURCH...
PINARAYI VIJAYAN PASSED
AN ORDINACE DEYING COURTs ORDER ON KARUNA MEDICAL COLLEGE KANNUR , BECAUSE
COMMIE MLAs AND COMMIE CADRE HAD THEIR RELATIVES AT STAKE.
Supreme Court upheld the
State Admission Supervisory Committee decision to annul their admissions after
it found that the colleges ( Kannur Medical college / Karuna medical college ) had conducted the process in an opaque and
illegal manner.
COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY IS NOT ALLOWED BY OUR CONSTITUTION
YET OUR PM / PRESIDENT SWEARS TO UPHOLD THE CONSITUTION
THREE OF OUR PAST PRIME MINISTERS WERE INSTALLED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD
WHEN THIS CAN HAPPEN WHAT WILL BE THE CONDITION OF OUR JUDICIARY, RAJYA SABHA AND MEDIA ?
JNU COMMIE BABUS HAS INFILTRATED INDIAN SERVICES.. THEY HAVE NO LOYALTY TO THE WATAN
YET JNU IS MERRILY FLOURISHING .
WHEN RAJYA SABHA, JUDICIARY, IAS, MEDIA ARE CONTROLLED BY ZIONIST JEWS WHITHER INDIAN DEMOCRACY ?
JEW ROTHSCHILD HAS HIJACKED THE JUDICIARY AND MEDIA IN MOST COUNTRIES.
WHAT IS HAPPENED IN USA IS LIKE 2000 SOMALIANS WANT TO SETTLE DOWN IN INDIA-- MODI/ PEOPLE DO NOT ALLOW-- BUT THE COLLEGIUM MELORDS WANT IT . IS THIS NOT WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN EUROPE ?
JUDICIARY IS JUST A PILLAR --THEY ARE NOT GOD. THEY MUST JUST JUDGE CASES PRESENTED TO THEM.
TODAY THEY USE THE PIL ROUTE-- JUDGES DECIDE WHAT LAWS TO MAKE
JUDGES EVEN WANTED ISRAEL TO LINK INDIAN RIVERS WITH A DEADLINE --BECAUSE DESERT NATION ISRAEL HAS THOUSANDS OF MIGHTY RIVERs ,RIGHT?
PEOPLE ARE GETTING FED UP IN USA .. IF 2ND AMEND,ENT KICKS IN , AND YANKS TAKE OUT THEIR GUNS--JEWS WILL BE HUNG ON THE NEAREST STREET LAMPPOSTS SAME WILL HAPPEN IN INDIA--IF THERE IS A REVOLUTION
ALL THIS AWARD WAAPSI, SIGNATURE CAMPAIGNS , LITERARY FESTS , PERCEPTION MOLDERS ON TV, CANDLE LIGHT VIGILS, AWARDS BY JEWS, AWARDS BY BENAMI MEDIA , SPEAKERS AT BENAMI MEDIA CONCLAVES, --ALL HAVE BEEN BLESSINGS IN DISGUISE --WE KNOW WHO THE DESH DROHIS ARE.
JEW ROTHSCHILD USED HIS OPIUM FOUNDED COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TO INJECT POISON INTO OUR PRICELESS SCRIPTURES.
THEN BR AMBEDKAR WAS GIVEN A LIST OF THESE NICE POISON INJECTIONS . HE THEN WROTE THE BOOK "RIDDLES IN HINDUSIM" RIDICULING ANCIENT INDIAN SCRIPTURES.
BR AMBEDKAR DID NOT KNOW SANSKRIT-- HE HAS NO ACCESS TO OUR VEDAS AND UPANISHADS--HOW DID HE KNOW ?
IT WOULD TAKE HIM 200 YEARS OF READING WITH HELPERS TO WRITE WHAT HE WROTE.
DURING THE JNU INCIDENTS --HINDU STUDENTS UNIONS LIKE VHP WERE BURNING MANU SMRITI..
MANU WAS A NOBLE MAHARISHI--THIS PLANETs FIRST LAW GIVER..
Our collegium Judiciary unwittingly ( deliberately to bleed Bharatmata ? ) functioning towards a more criminalized society than a `humanistic' one.
The old aphorism, “Let justice be done though the heavens fall,“ is turned on its head in our country, where the heavens fall on countless innocents who await the assistance of a system that wrongfully convicted them.
Why do Judges need such lengthy vacations-- who else get this in India ?
Every effort to curtail judge's vacations have been stalled and stonewalled .
We had a Christian Kerala Supreme court Judge who told PM to FUCK OFF because he wanted to celebrate Easter.
The 1966 rules of the SC ( for themselves—how nice ) had allowed it to take a summer break up to 10 weeks. The first reduction in the recess happened under then CJI Y K Sabharwal, who cut it down to eight weeks.
Many succeeding CJIs, including Justices S H Kapadia, P Sathasivam, R M Lodha and H L Dattu, tried to convince judges and the bar association to trim the break. But the judges and advocates stonewalled any proposal for reducing the break.
THIS WAS A EVIL SYSTEM CREATED FOR JUDGES IN THE PAYROLL OF JEW ROTHSCHILD.
IN SUMMERS THEY GOT FREE VACATIONS ABROAD AND IN COOL RESORTS ..
( OUR SLAVE DOCTORS GET FREE SEX VACATIONS IN THAILAND AND EUROPE --ALL PAID BY EVIL PHARMA )
DURING THESE VACATIONS THESE JUDGES HELD MEETINGS ABROAD WITH THEIR ZIONIST JEW MASTERS .
CJI Lodha who wanted courts, including the SC, to function 365 days a year and had presented a blueprint for it.
He had proposed that every judge would intimate in advance the major periods of leave he would take in a year and that would be incorporated to chart out a roster for sitting of judges without the SC closing for a day.
During Lodha's tenure as CJI, the 1966 rules were amended and the summer break was officially reduced from 10 weeks to seven.
LISTEN , A SHIP ONCE DELIVERED WORKS 24 X 7 TILL IT IS SCRAPPED 2 OR 3 DECADES LATER.
THE SHIP DOES NOT STOP AT SEA AT NIGHT FOR ALL TO SLEEP.
WHEN I TAKE COMMAND OF A SHIP , I AM ON 24 HRS CALL DURING MY CONTRACT TENURE.
WE HAVE A WATCH SYSTEM TO KEEP THE SHIP RUNNING .
WE HAVE A SYSTEM OF ROTATION ..
Though bail was a right of every individual, it is only available to the rich. When it comes to rich people, the Indian judiciary has double standards. The rich even get anticipatory bail.
There is something called “ load management “. This can be solved by enabling the courts to shift the more complex cases from over burdened courts to courts dealing with simple cases.
In a situation where this may not be possible due to jurisdictional restraints, judicial resources can be distributed based on the burden of litigation.
ALL JUDGMENTS MUST BE VIEWED BY VIDEO CAM—
THERE MUST BE EXPERTS ( RESPECTED RETIRED JUDGES PAID GOOD SALARY ) TO GLEAN THE CEREBRAL QUALITY AND COMPETENCE OF THE JUDGE
COLOUR CODE CASES – AGE / IMPORTANCE/ SENSITIVITY TO FORTUNES OF BHARATMATA
Very often, legislation is enacted without even thinking about what impact it may have on the functioning of the courts.
For example, the promulgation of the NDPS Act and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, electricity disputes, motor vehicle accidents, traffic laws, etc loaded the courts with HAJAAR FAALTHU cases.
Bringing the accused to the court from prison due to constraints like lack of transport, manpower, etc has become a tough task, the modern methods of video conferencing, etc should be provided. Many prisoners escape during transport by bribing ( blackmailing ) the police. Sec.167 should be amended in order to utilize these modern developments accordingly
Video conferencing by skype must be used when recording of the statement of child witnesses and victims of sexual abuse-- also in cases where the accused cannot be present before the court due to various reasons
Example:--WITNESSES WHO HAVE BEEN THREATENED –PRIVACY OF RAPE VICTIMS .
Video recording of witness statements ( important for fortunes of Bharatmata ) and dying declarations must be made compulsory.
Parole and probation are largely dependent upon the executive discretion. New rules accommodating the rights of the accused should be developed. This reduces need for interim orders through judicial intervention.
There should be a proper sub-jail attached to each criminal court. Stringent punishments should be awarded for false registration of cases and complaints ( EGO MASSAGE FOR SUPERSTARS ).
Sec 182/211 of the Indian Penal Code shall be amended in this respect
TRUTH REVEALED BY DESH BHAKTS TO SAVE THE WATAN CANNOT BE DEFAMATION
The prosecution wing should be separated from the investigation wing. The public prosecutors and assistant public prosecutors should be selected from amongst the persons with experience in criminal law.
The investigation and prosecution wings should be placed under an independent institution in order to avoid the troubling nexus of the prosecution and the investigation causing a mockery of justice.
BAIL AMOUNT ( BEGGARS/ RAG PICKERS etc ) FOR THE EXTREME POOR MUST BE CANCELLED.
The Indian court system is saddled with a gargantuan backlog of pending cases across hundreds of subordinate courts, 21 high courts and the Supreme Court.
This problem of delay and backlog is more critical in a criminal case because the restraint imposed by arrest and consequent incarceration continues at all stages, be it the stage of investigation, inquiry, trial, appeal or revision.
As it is, judicial time is being wasted in unproductive matters such as “mention” in civil cases. If the judicial time could be distributed in a more practicable manner, then, criminal cases could be speedily handled.
When you get your Court Attendance Notice (CAN), it will tell you what court you have to go to and the time and date that you must be there.
This first time that you go to court is called a 'mention'. The purpose of the mention is for the court to find out whether you want to plead guilty or not guilty. If you are not there the court can decide your case without you. The court can also issue a warrant for your arrest to have you brought to the court.
You will have to wait until your name is called. You can take a seat in the courtroom or if the courtroom is full you can wait outside. Make sure you stay close enough to the courtroom to hear the court officer call your name.
If you leave, or are not there when you are called, your case can be decided without you. In India people pay bribe to get their names announced extra loud and several ties.
IF PARLIAMENT CAN BE VIDEOTAPED THERE IS NO REASON WHY A COURTROOM CANNOT BE VIDEOTAPED
EVERY JUDGE MUST HAVE A COMPUTER ON HIS DESK WHERE HE CAN WATCH VIDEO TAPES . JUST A FUCKIN' HAMMER WONT DO ANYMORE.
The "right to life" in Article 21 has been expanded to include right to free legal aid, right to live with dignity, right to education, right to work, freedom from torture, barfetters and hand cuffing in prisons, etc.
HEY WHAT ABOUT SPEEDY JUSTICE ?
HOW ABOUT FREEDOM FROM FUCKIN’ TAAREEQ PEH TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ ?
Consumer Court is the special purpose court, mainly in India, that deals with cases regarding consumer disputes and grievances. These are judiciary set ups by the government to protect the consumer rights. Its main function is to maintain the fair practices by the sellers towards consumers.
Consumers can file a case against a seller if they are harassed or exploited by sellers. The court will only give a verdict in favour of the consumers/customers if they have proof of exploitation, i.e., bills or other documents.
Submitting complaint is very simple and consumer has no need to hire any lawyer. Approaching a consumer court is very simple and extremely cheap as you can represent yourself without having to hire a lawyer and not required to pay any court fee but just a nominal fee.
Cases of medical negligence and disputes with builders constitute the highest number of cases out of 3.5 lakh that are pending before consumer dispute forums across the country - indicating an increasing trend of unethical practices and harassment of consumers due to lack of regulators in the two sectors.
In a recent case, where the apex court had asked a Kolkata hospital to pay an NRI a compensation of Rs 5.96 crore for medical negligence causing the death of his wife
Frivolous cases are frustrating the judges and members of the jury in consumer courts. They not only waste the time of the courts but also create an impression that educated people misuse the Consumer Protection Act for their vested interests
IN INDIA LAWYERS MINTING MONEY BY NOTARIZING AND ATTESTING DOCUMENTS —MOST WERE FAKE LAWYERS . ..
THESE FAKE BASTARDS MINTED MONEY .. POOR STUDENTS KNOW HOW THEY HAVE BEEN FLEECED …
TODAY , THANK GOD WE CAN SELF ATTEST OUR OWN DOCUMENTS
A typical US jury instruction states:
“Intent may be proved by circumstantial evidence. Indeed, it can rarely be established by any other means. We simply cannot look into the head or mind of another person. But you may infer the Defendant’s intent from all of the surrounding circumstances . You may consider any statement made or act done or omitted by the Defendant and all the facts and circumstances in evidence which indicate the Defendant’s state of mind.”
Circumstantial evidence of knowledge and intent in a fraud investigation might include, among many other things, proof that the subject, or someone acting at his or her direction, e.g., deliberately:----
Altered or forged a relevant document, such as a supporting document submitted with a bid or invoice;
Deliberately destroyed a relevant document, or improperly withheld it from investigators;
Lied to investigators or to another party about a material point to hide their guilt, for example, in a bribery case, lied about the source of sudden new wealth (such lies are known in court as a “false exculpatory”);
Obstructed the investigation, by, for example, instructing or threatening a potential witnesses not to meet with or cooperate with investigators;
Committed prior similar acts, which demonstrated that the acts currently under investigation were done knowingly and willfully, and not accidentally or innocently (also known as “pattern evidence”)
The rationale for the above methods of proof, often referred to as “badges of fraud,” is that such acts betray a certain willfulness by the subject and are inconsistent with a defense of accident or mistake.
Documentary evidence usually is considered to be more reliable and persuasive than witness statements, but, as with direct and circumstantial evidence, a combination of the two, with one corroborating the other, is usually the most powerful.
To be convincing (and admissible in court), circumstantial evidence must:---
Be relevant, of course, that is, tend to prove or disprove a fact in issue;
Be cumulative, that is, not limited to one, isolated piece of evidence, but of several inter-connected parts
Be tightly organized and clearly presented: many circumstantial cases fail not because the evidence is weak, but because it is presented in a disorganized and confusing manner which the fact finder cannot understand;
And finally, to be persuasive (and admissible in court) circumstantial evidence must exclude all plausible innocent explanations.
For example, in a case in which a witness admits paying a cash bribe to a government official, for which there is no other direct evidence, the steps of proof might include circumstantial evidence to corroborate the direct evidence. For example, the investigator could:--
1. Record in detail (when, where, how, why, etc.) the statement of the witness that he paid the government official in cash (this is the direct evidence);
2. Prove that the government official spent or deposited a significant amount of cash shortly after he allegedly received the cash bribe;
3. Eliminate all other potential sources of income for the official’s cash expenditures or deposits, to the extent possible;
4. Interview the subject official, and show that the official cannot explain the source of the cash expenses or deposits, or lied about it (the last three points are the circumstantial evidence).
Such evidence, if believed by the jury, would be legally sufficient to convict a defendant in most courts.
PLANTING CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
When one South African delegation visited India a criminal women of the group ran to a local police station with a used condom and claimed she was raped.
The condom had her pussy juice on the outside and the semen of the rapist ( sic ) on the inside
She had foraged the garbage bin , found a used condom and shoved it into her twat using her finger
Alas, the semen was not TAAAAJA – the hours since the rape did not match--there was dust on the outside . Her twat did NOT have similar dust inside -nor did the dust of the garbage bin in the room of occurance match. Below: Kachrawaal won the Delhi elections by false flag attacks on a few Delhi churches and having USEFUL IDIOTS like a retired top cop Christian Julio Ribeiro moaning endlessly on TV
US courts make no distinction between direct and circumstantial evidence.
Direct evidence is the testimony of someone who claims to have personal knowledge of the commission of the crime which has been charged, such as an eyewitness.
Circumstantial evidence is the proof of a series of facts which tend to show whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty.
The US law makes no distinction between the weight to be given to direct or circumstantial evidence.
The jury should decide how much weight to give to any evidence. All the evidence in the case, including the circumstantial evidence, should be considered in reaching the verdict.
A simple example of the difference between direct and circumstantial evidence would be:--
On a snowy winter evening, a witness is awaken from her sleep by what sounds like an intruder at her front door; the witness stumbles to the door and catches only a glimpse of what appears to be a person fleeing down the steps. This is direct evidence. The witness then goes outside and sees fresh footsteps in the snow down the path the intruder fled. This is circumstantial evidence.
IN FUTURE WE WANT ALL POLICE INTERROGATIONS TO BE RECORDED BY VIDEO.
THERE MUST BE A SIMPLE MEANS TO ENSURE NO PART CAN BE DELETED. AUDIO, VIDEO AND TIMELINE MUST BE CONGRUENT
IN THE CASE OF IPL CRICKET FIXING, BIG FISH TRIED TO GET AWAY BY TAINTING SMALL FISH.
SREESHANTS TIME LINE IN THE VIDEO WAS NOT CONGRUENT.
ANYBODY CAN MAKE A FOOL OF A LOSER LAWYER TURNED JUDGE—WHO WAS THE BOTTOM DREG OF HIS SCHOOLs CEREBRAL BARREL.
WHY SHOULD A CONFESSION GIVEN TO POLICE ( IMMEDIATELY AFTER AN INCIDENT ) BE INADMISSIBLE IN COURT ?
WHY DO WE ACCEPT EVIDENCE GIVEN BY A SLIMY LAWYER TWO DECADES LATER ?
NO SUSPECT SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO REFUSE TO BE VIDEO TAPED ..
TODAY EVEN A BEGGAR HAS A MOBILE PHONE WITH CAMERA
TIMES HAVE CHANGED !
We have an obligation to challenge the admissibility of confessions wrought by deceptive interrogation tactics, and to provide data before trial, at trial, and on appeal of the coercive effects of deceptive police interrogation practices.
The Narco truth serum interrogations of the servants in the Aarushi Talwar cases were done by CHOOTS
POLICE REFORMS CANT TAKE OFF UNLESS WE FIX THE JUDICIARY FIRST--
OUR JUDGES CONSTANTLY REFER TO PAST JUDGEMENTs MADE BY PAST JUDGES WHO HAVE RETIRED. SOME OF THESE JUDGES TO SHINE PERSONALLY HAVE WRITTEN ELABORATE FLOWERY NOVELS INSTEAD OF SHORT , CRISP "TO THE POINT" JUDGEMENTS.. THESE JUDGES HOPE THAT POSTERITY WILL CONSIDER THEM AS GREAT INTELLECTUALS SOME MELORDS HAVE QUOTED FROM SHAKESPEARE , SIGMUND FRIED ETC -- SO WE ARE SUPPOSED TO CRY "WOW" -- WHAT A BRAINY ,ERUDITE POOJANEEEYA JUDGE NAY MELORD. THE PATHETIC THING IS-- THIS PAST JUDGEMENT IS BASED ON ROTHSCHILDs "JUSTICE IS BLIND" SYSTEM IF SO-- HOW CAN YOU QUOTE PAST JUDGEMENTS ? WHERE IS THE INTELLIGENCE ? IT WILL BE 100% OUTSIDE THE "PERIMETER OF CONTEXT" AND THERE WILL BE ZERO "NATURAL JUSTICE " ( DHARMA. HEY--WILL OUR JUDGES EVEN UNDERSTAND THE 4 LINES ABOVE?
WE WANT CJI /PRESIDENT/ PM / SPEAKERS OF LOK-RAJYA SABHA CENTRAL CABINET MINISTERS TO SWEAR OATH TO "PROTECT THE WATAN " AND "UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION"
INDIA NEVER HAD THE SYSTEM OF “JUSTICE IS BLIND” –TILL JEW ROTHSCHILD STARTED RULING INDIA.
THIS JEW INTRODUCED “JUSTICE IS BLIND” JUDICIAL SYSTEM , SO THAT HE COULD RULE INDIA
AND THEN THIS JEW IMPORTED GANDHI FROM SOUTH AFRICA TO MAKE SURE INDIAN SLAVES NEVER ATTACKED HIM—NO MATTER HOW MUCH HE ILLTREATS INDIANS AND NO MATTER HOW MUCH HE ROBS THE WATAN.
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL ASKS “ HOW CAN JUSTICE EVER BE BLIND?”
ARE WE FUCKIN’ STUPID ?
LISTEN- ONLY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL HAS THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL ON THIS PLANET TO ASK THIS SIMPLE QUESTION.
THIS WAS MY BLOGSITE MISSION , RIGHT ? TO MAKE MY READERS THINK FOR THEMSELVES ?
QUOTE: This blogsite will transform your mind . You
yourself, are the teacher, the pupil, the messiah, the seeker, the traveller
and the destination . It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to this
profoundly sick society . I am from INDIA, the mother of all civilizations . I
will be re-writing world history , and this will surely not gratify the evil
hijackers of human history . Awaken your inner voice . Experience the joy of
your own being . Your own conscience is the best interpreter . In a time of
universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act . The naked truth
can never be hate speech or defamation. This blogsite does not sacrifice truth
on the altar of political correctness . Capt Ajit Vadakayil leads the only
silent revolution on this planet .. STRENGTH AND HONOR - ALWAYS!.: UNQUOTE
YOU HAVE THREE CHILDREN RAM , SHYAM AND MUNIYANDI
YOU GIVE STEP FATHERLY TREATEMENT TO MUNIYANDI. YOU DON’T GVE HIM WATER TO DRINK
TORMENTED BY THIRST, MUNIYANDI STEALS A GLASS OF WATER WHICH IS AVAILABLE IN THE KITCHEN
YOU THEN SEVERELY PUNISH YOUR OWN SON MUNIYANDI – FOR STEALING
WHERE IS THE “DHARMA “ OR “NATURAL JUSTICE” IN THIS ?
THIS BLOGSITE WILL TAKE INDIA TOWARDS NATURAL JUSTICE SYSTEM—THE SYSTEM INDIA HAD BEFORE JEW ROTHSCHILD CAME TO INDIA .
THIS IS A PROMISE !
FROM HENCEFORTH --JUSTICE IN INDIA WILL HAVE X RAY EYES .
Dharma broadly means righteousness.. Hinduism is a spiritual code based on dharma. Hindusim has core values like integrity, ethics, compassion , fairness, transparency, respect , tolerance for culture, sense of responsibility, spirit of inclusion etc .
We temper all technical judgments by the need to support and maintain human values. Human acts without conscience which creates conflict is called Adharma.
As per the Bhagawat Gita , the fundamentals of dharma are-- truth, grace, restraint, love, non-violence, restraint, lack of jealousy and greed, knowledge of self and austerity.
In the Bhagwat Gita, Lord Krishna declares to Arjuna 6000 years ago:
Dharmenaavirodheshu Kaamosmi Bharatarshabha
“I am those desires that are not against the Dharma”
Dharma is a concept of central importance in Indian philosophy and religion. However dharma is not the same as religion.
Law in the universal or abstract sense, dharma designates those behaviours considered necessary for the maintenance of the natural order of things.
Dharma governed by human conscience is 'the path of righteousness', the way of 'correct', 'appropriate', 'decent', or 'proper' behavior. Dharma is the moral law combined with spiritual discipline that guides one's life.
Hindus consider dharma the very foundation of life. It means "that which holds" the people of this world and the whole creation.
Dharma is the "law of being" without which things cannot exist— even the WATAN
In the Rigveda, there is this belief (and observation) that a natural justice and harmony pervades the natural world.
Sanatana Dharma does not allow you to exploit vulnerability. Jew Rothschild’s JUSTICE IS BLIND system is outside the perimeter of DHARMA
Hinduism does not allow you to breach a trust. When a Hindu says "thank you", he really means it. We dont use FAKE meaningless thank you and “domo arigato gozaimasu” with every breath-- in a ridiculous manner .
Sanatana as “eternal moral order” encourages Hindus to seeks and moral truth wherever it might be found, each individual must realize this truth through his or her own systematic effort. Hindu scripture, based on the insights of noble and graceful Hindu sages and seers, serves primarily as a guidebook.
“Dharma” is that which upholds, nourishes or supports the stability of the society, maintains the social order and secures the general well-being and progress of mankind”
The ultimate goal for Sanatana Dharma is material and spiritual well-being of the mankind.
Consumption of food, sleep, fear, and enjoyment of sex are common to man and animal. But, 'Dharma' is a special attribute of the conscious man . Bereft of 'Dharma', man is equal to anima1.
Whether the rules of Dharma that :
1. Everyone should tell the truth;
2. No one should indulge in violence against other living beings;
3. No one should acquire illegitimate wealth;
4. Every one should establish control over his senses;
5. There should be purity in thought, speech and deed;
6. Everyone should render service to other individuals;
7. Every one should eschew selfishness and greed.
8. The world should be regarded as one family.
Examples of dharma that apply to day-to-day life:--
Vyakti dharma - the dharma of an individual
Parivarika dharma - family dharma (also called kutumba dharma)
“Small and narrow-minded people look at the reality in terms of ‘this is yours and this is mine’; for those of higher consciousness the whole world is a family”.
ANCIENT INDIA DID NOT NEED A CONSTITUTION
When the white Christian man first stepped into India in 1498, India was the world’s richest country. India held 40% of the world's GDP. India and China together held 58% of the world's GDP in 1498-the year Vasco Da Gama landed in Calicut . These are conservative estimates by the white man himself , like how Alexander defeated Porus.
When the British finally left in 1947, India was converted to one of the poorest countries on the planet.
In such a short time they built roads, railway, harbors , airports and bridges to rob India blind. After that these immoral people ridiculed us as being beggars.
THE WHITE INVADER WAS ABLE TO DO THIS ONLY BECAUSE THEY ENFORCED “JUSTICE IS BLIND” SYSTEM
JEW ROTHSCHILD HAS BEEN A MASTER OF DECEIT
HE TOUTED “JUSTICE IS BLIND “ TO DO PROPAGANDA THAT ROTHSCHILD ( RICH AND MIGHTY ) AND MUNIYANDI ( POOR AND VULNERABLE ) WILL BE TREATED SAME SAME BY BLINDFOLDED LADY JUSTICE
AND CHOOTS INDIANS WOULD CRY— “WOW, THE WHITE INVADER IS SO HONORABLE AND FAIR”
ROTHSCHILD HAD HIS MONOPOLISED MEDIA GOING GA GA ABOUT “BRITISH JUSTICE” AND SINGING HIS PRAISES OVERTIME
BUT THE SYSTEM WAS HIJACKED TO KEEP MUNIYANDI IN JAIL FOR 20 YEARS WITHOUT TRIAL – BECAUSE HE “STOLE” WATER.
JUDGES ELECT JUDGES LIKE JNU COMMIE PROFESSORS…
NAPUNSAKS PM MODI AND LAW MINISTER RAVISHANKAR PRASAD ARE SHIVERING IN FRIGHT --THEY CANT MOVE …
BOTH THESE TIMID FELLOWS SWORE TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION…
INDIAN CONSTITUTION DOES NOT ALLOW JUDGES TO ELECT JUDGES..
INDIA IS THE ONLY NATION ON THE PLANET WHERE JUDGES ELECT JUDGES..
CONTEMPT OF COURT APPLIES WHEN THE COURT IS IN SESSION AND SOMEONE IN THE COURT RELATED TO THE CASE UNDERMINES THE JUDGE'S AUTHORITY REPEATEDLY . …
CONTEMPT OF COURT CANNOT BE APPLIED ALONG THE LENGTH AND BREATH OF INDIA ( ON LAND/ UNDER GROUND/ IN SPACE ) , AS IT IS MEANT WITHIN THE CONFINES OF A WEE BRICK AND CEMENT BUILDING COURT ROOM …
I head a ugly Chutney Mary TV anchor telling ---“ If someone makes a sexist remark against me , I will take him to court --"
Hey, ugly Chutney Mary—do you think Indian courts exist to give you an ego massage ?
EVERY EGO MASSAGE CASE ( DEFAMATION ) MUST BE THROWN OUT IMMEDIATELY
TROJAN HORSE NGOs IN CAHOOTS WITH BENAMI MEDIA AND NCW HAVE TILTED THE GENDER PLAYING FIELD.
THE COURTS HAVE BEEN INUNDATED BY SILLY FRIVOLOUS CASES
MOST DEFAMATION CASES ARE FOR EGO MASAGE OF RICH AND POWERFUL .
CELEBRITIES USE PETTY DEFAMATION CASES TO BE IN THE LIMELIGHT AND COME ON TV / MEDIA.
IF JUDICIARY IS MISUSED BY STARS AND CELEBRITIES TO GET AN EGO MASSAGE OR TO BASK IN THE LIMELIGHT , THEY MUST BE SEVERELY PUNISHED BY A JAIL TERM
As longest serving US Chief Justice Warren E Burger has noted: "A sense of confidence in the courts is essential to maintain the fabric of ordered liberty for a free people and three things could destroy that confidence and do incalculable damage to society: that people come to believe that inefficiency and delay will drain even a just judgment of its value; that people who have long been exploited in the smaller transactions of daily life come to believe that courts cannot vindicate their legal rights from fraud and over-reaching; that people come to believe the law - in the larger sense - cannot fulfill its primary function to protect them and their families in their homes, at their work, and on the public streets".
Plea-bargaining is best described as a "pre-trial negotiation between the accused and the prosecution during which the accused agrees to plead guilty in exchange for certain concessions by the prosecution."
We have an adversarial
system of litigation in modern India thanks to Jew Rothschild .
Our ancient KHAP system
of justice sought compromise . .
Most of the time NGOs
who file PILs are in cahoots with pompous Melord Collegium judges who ache to
give executive orders and legislate laws
DO YOU WANT A LIST OF DESH DROHI JUDGES WHO HAVE USED ARTICLE 14 OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION TO SUPPORT DESH DROHI FOREIGNERS ?
Desh Drohi Foreign MNCs ( arms / pharma etc ) who do not have the constitutional right to do business in India, claim the constitutional right to be treated equally with an Indian company that does have that right
Section 14 in The Foreigners Act, 1946
1[14. Penalty for contravention of provisions of the Act, etc.—Whoever—
(a) remains in any area in India for a period exceeding the period for which the visa was issued to him; tc" (a) remains in any area in India for a period exceeding the period for which the visa was issued to him;"
(b) does any act in violation of the conditions of the valid visa issued to him for his entry and stay in India or any part thereunder; tc" (b) does any act in violation of the conditions of the valid visa issued to him for his entry and stay in India or any part thereunder;"
(c) contravenes the provisions of this Act or of any order made thereunder or any direction given in pursuance of this Act or such order for which no specific punishment is provided under this Act, tc" (c) contravenes the provisions of this Act or of any order made thereunder or any direction given in pursuance of this Act or such order for which no specific punishment is provided under this Act," shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine; and if he has entered into a bond in pursuance of clause (f) of sub-section (2) of section 3, his bond shall be forfeited, and any person bound thereby shall pay the penalty thereof or show cause to the satisfaction of the convicting Court why such penalty should not be paid by him. Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, the expression “visa” shall have the same meaning as assigned to it under the Passport (Entry into India) Rules, 1950 made under the Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920 (34 of 1920).]
THE CONSTITUTION IS TO
PROTECT INDIANS NOT DESH DROHI FOREIGNERS.. THIS MUST BE VIEWED SUBJECTIVELY
AND NOT OBJECTIVELY
IMAGINE CJI JS KHEHAR
WANTED WHITE JEW LAWYERS TO PRACTICE IN INDIA.
IF WE ALLOW THEM KOSHER EVIL PHARMA WILL RULE INDIA..
Foreigners cannot hold
any constitutional posts of the country, like The President, Vice-President,
Governor, ministers, etc., as they are not
entitled to enjoy article 16 of the constitution
We do give rights given
to the foreign nationals, such as right to equality before law, right to protection
of life and personal liberty, are those rights which every ’person’ deserve, irrespective
of his nationality and where he/she is residing, as in accordance with the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights.
Citizenship is the most
important aspect, which should be present, in order to make a ‘person’, a
‘citizen’ of a country.
ROHINGYA ILLEGAL
IMMIGRANTS ARE NOT INDIAN CITIZENS… WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ALLOW JUDGES TO GIVE
THEM PROTECTION BY QUOTING FAKE RULES OR STARE DECISIS
Israel is a country
which has expanded its ambit of its citizenship to all the Jews of the world.
Any Jew, from any part of the earth, can go and reside in Israel, and he/she
will be given the Israeli citizenship almost automatically, according to the
rule of Law of Return.
THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO
WITH JUSTICE.. DESCENDANTS WHITE JEWS FROM
KHAZAR WHO DO NOT BELONG TO THE LAND OF PALESTINE WANT TO DO ETHNIC CLEANING OF
ORIGINAL SONS OF THE SOIL PALESTINIANS .
There are two concepts
that are followed in granting citizenship to any individual:-
1- Jus soli
2- Jus sanguinis
India abolished jus
soli on 3 December 2004 in reaction to illegal Muslim immigration from its
neighbor Bangladesh.
Jus soli , meaning
"right of the soil", commonly referred to as birthright citizenship is the right of anyone born in the territory
of a state to nationality or citizenship—like in USA..
Jus sanguinis ( right of blood) is a principle of
nationality law by which citizenship is not determined by place of birth but by
having one or both parents who are citizens of the state.
The conferment of a
person, as a citizen of India, is governed by Articles 5 to 11 (Part II) of the
Constitution of India. The legislation related to this matter is the
Citizenship Act 1955, which has been amended by the Citizenship (Amendment) Act
1986, the Citizenship (Amendment) Act 1992, the Citizenship (Amendment) Act
2003, The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2005 and Citizenship (Amendment) Act,
2015.
Article 9 of Indian
Constitution says that a person who voluntarily acquires citizenship of any
other country is no longer an Indian citizen. Also, according to The Passports
Act, a person has to surrender his/her Indian passport and voter card and other
Indian ID cards must not be used after another country's citizenship is
obtained. It is a punishable offence if the person fails to surrender the
passport.
Indian nationality law
largely follows the jus sanguinis (citizenship by right of blood) as opposed to
the jus soli (citizenship by right of birth within the territory). The
President of India is termed the First Citizen of India.
Citizenship by
registration--
The Central Government
may, on an application, register as a citizen of India under section 5 of the
Citizenship Act 1955 any person (not being an illegal migrant) if s/he belongs
to any of the following categories:--
A person of Indian
origin who is ordinarily resident in India for seven years before making
application under Section 5(1)(a) (throughout the period of twelve months
immediately before making application and for six years in the aggregate in the
eight years preceding the 12 months).
--a person of Indian
origin who is ordinarily resident in any country or place outside undivided
India;
--a person who is
married to a citizen of India and is ordinarily resident in India for seven
years before making an application for registration;
--minor children of
persons who are citizens of India;
--a person of full age
and capacity whose parents are registered as citizens of India.
--a person of full age
and capacity who, or either of his parents, was earlier citizen of independent
India, and has been residing in India for one year immediately before making an
application for registration;
--a person of full age
and capacity who has been registered as an overseas citizen of India for five
years, and who has been residing in India for one year before making an
application for registration.
Citizenship by
naturalization----
Citizenship of India by
naturalization can be acquired by a foreigner who is ordinarily resident in
India for 12 years (throughout the period of 12 months immediately preceding
the date of application and for 11 years in the aggregate of 14 years preceding
the 12 months) and other qualifications as specified in Section 6 (1) of the
Citizen Act,1955.
The Overseas
Citizenship of India (OCI) scheme was introduced by amending The Citizenship
Act, 1955 in August 2005. The scheme was launched during the Pravasi Bharatiya
Divas convention in Hyderabad in 2006. Indian authorities have interpreted the
law to mean a person cannot have a second country's passport simultaneously
with an Indian one — even in the case of a child who is claimed by another
country as a citizen of that country, and who may be required by the laws of
the other country to use one of its passports for foreign travel (such as a
child born in the United States or in Australia to Indian parents), and the
Indian courts have given the executive branch wide discretion over this matter.
Therefore, Overseas Citizenship of India is not an actual citizenship of India
and thus, does not amount to dual citizenship or dual nationality or anyone no
longer to use Indian IDs after OCI. Moreover, the OCI card is not a substitute
for an Indian visa and therefore, the passport which displays the lifetime visa
must be carried by OCI holders while travelling to India. OCI Cards are now
being printed without the lifelong “U” Visa Sticker (which is normally pasted
on the applicant's passport). The proof of lifelong visa will be just the OCI
Card which will have “Life Time Visa” printed on it.
The OCI Card will be valid
with any Valid Passport.
Certain such rights
given to foreign nationals, by the Indian Constitution are:-
Article 14- right to
equality before law and equal protection of laws
Article 20- right to
protection in respect to conviction for offences.
Article 21- right to
protection of life and personal liberty.
Article 21A-right to
elementary education
Article 22- right to protection against arrest
and detention in certain cases.
Article 23- prohibition
of traffic in human beings and forced labour
Article 24- prohibition
of employment of children in factories etc.
Article 25- right to
freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation
of religion.
Article 26- right to
freedom to manage religious affairs
Article 27- right to
freedom form payment of taxes for promotion of any religion.
Article 28- right to
freedom from attending religious instructions or worship in certain
educational
institutions.
These rights are a part
of fundamental rights given to us in part 3 of our constitution.
These rights are not
reserved for any individual group or community, and is applicable to
each and every ‘person’
residing on the territory of India.
THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT
A FOREIGNER LIKE AN ILEGAL ROHINGYA OR A ILLEGAL NIGERIAN GETS THE SAME
PROTECTION AS AN INDIAN CITIZEN .. OUR
JUDGES ARE IGNORANT.
Example ? -- there are certain rights, which are
reserved exclusively for the nationals of the
country itself, and not
to the foreign nationals. These rights are,
Article 15- prohibition
of discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or
place of birth.
Article 16- equality of
opportunity in matters of public employment.
Article 19- protection
of certain rights regarding freedom of speech, etc.
Article 29- protection
of interests of minorities.
Article 30- rights of
minorities to establish and administer educational institutions
In a recent judgment,
in response to the FIR registered by the Maharashtra Government,
against three Ugandan
citizens, including advisor to the President of Uganda, which was
ILLEGALLY quashed by
the Supreme court. It has reaffirmed that Article 21 of the Constitution is
International Journal
of Law and Legal Jurisprudence Studies: ISSN:2348-8212 (Volume 1 issue 6)
available even to the
foreign nationals.
A vacation bench of justice A.K.Patnaik and Ranjan
Gogoi WRONGLY said---
“Article 21 of the
constitution [right to life and liberty] applies to all citizens, whether Indian
or foreign nationals. Their right to liberty cannot be restrained by police due
to a business dispute. Our country gets a bad name ( BRAAAYYYYYYYYYYYY ) because
of the acts of few police officers, and it is unfortunate that the Mumbai
Police, instead of protecting the rights of these foreign nationals, filed an
FIR against them and the charges are baseless.”
THIS IS THE SAD
CONDITION OF INDIA !
IGNORANT JUDGES PLAY
GOD !
A foreigner cannot
claim right ‘reside and settle in any part of the country’. The government has
thus the unrestricted right to expel a foreigner. A foreigner who came to India
in 1937 on a Belgian passport engaged himself in the Christian missionary work.
HE had been staying continuously in India since 1937. By an order dated
8-7-1987, his request for further stay in India was rejected and he was told to
leave the country. He challenged the
order through a writ petition under article 32 which was rejected. The court
ruled that he had not become a citizen of India under Article 5 of the
constitution as he has not acquired his domicile in India.
The Right to form
associations given in the article 19(1) (c), of the constitution, is also not
provided to the foreigners. The main motive behind providing this right to our Citizens,
is to enable them to form political parties, without which it is an impossible
task to run a democratic setup of government, especially that of the
parliamentary type. If this right to form associations is given to foreigners
as well, this would amount to the meaning that they are equally rightful in
forming political parties and participate in our political and democratic
setup. This move will allow the non-citizens to form political parties in
India, and contest elections, thereby, violating the principles for eligibility criteria as given in Part 5 for union, and in
part 6 for states of the constitution , and will also pose a threat to the
sovereignty of the watan.
The right to assemble
given in Article 19(1) (b), of the constitution shares some common grounds with
right to speech of article 19(1) (a). Words like demonstrations, seminars, meetings,
which form an example of 19(1) (a), are also automatically covered by the ambit
of article 19(1) (b). Providing these rights to foreigner’s means, also
providing them the right to speech, this should not be done. Although they are
allowed to join the meetings or assemblies made by the locals or the citizens
of the country, for any particular purpose, like business purpose or any other
purpose, but they do not have the right to make their own assembly.
The Indian Constitution
which deals with the fundamental rights in its part 3, gives every citizen 6
basic fundamental rights, which are only for its citizens.
India was signatory to
the Universal Declaration of human rights.
IN FUTURE IF INDIA
SIGNS ANY SUCH KOSHER DEEP STATE DECLARATION WE MUST SIGN IT UNDER THE “PARAMOUNT
CLAUSE “ –
“ SUBJECT TO THE RULES
OF THE INDIAN CONSTITION AND ANY AMENDMENTS MADE IN FUTURE BY THE PARLIAMENT”
The rights given to us
in the fundamental form, in part 3 of the constitution, similar to a maximum
extent as that to the provisions of UN declaration of Human Right.
DO YOU WANT A LIST OF DESH DROHI JUDGES WHO HAVE USED ARTICLE 14 OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION TO SUPPORT DESH DROHI FOREIGNERS ?
Desh Drohi Foreign MNCs ( arms / pharma etc ) who do not have the constitutional right to do business in India, claim the constitutional right to be treated equally with an Indian company that does have that right
Desh Drohi zionist jew foreign companies have claimed constitutional protection under Article 14 --with COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY in cahoots .
The abuse of PIL is increasing alongwith its extended and multifaceted use.
PIL is as a handy tool of harassment since frivolous cases could be filed without investment of heavy court fees as required in private civil litigation and deals could then be negotiated with the victims of stay orders obtained in the so-called PILs.
Just as a weapon meant for defence can be used equally effectively for offence, the lowering of the locus standi requirement has permitted privately motivated interests to pose as public interests.
The abuse of PIL has become more rampant than its use and genuine causes either receded to the background or began to be viewed with the suspicion generated by spurious causes mooted by privately motivated interests in the disguise of the so-called public interests.
The court must be careful to see that the petitioner who approaches it is acting bona fide and not for personal gain, private profit or political or other oblique considerations. The court should not allow its process to be abused by politicians and others to delay legitimate administrative action or to gain political objectives.
Political pressure groups who could not achieve their aims through the administrative process or political process may try to use the courts (through the means of PILs) to further their closely vested aims and interests.
There may be cases where the PIL may affect the right of persons not before the court, and therefore in shaping the relief the court must invariably take into account its impact on those interests and the court must exercise greatest caution and adopt procedure ensuring sufficient notice to all interests likely to be affected.
At present, the court can treat a letter as a writ petition and take action upon it. But, it is not every letter which may be treated as a writ petition by the court. The court would be justified in treating the letter as a writ petition only in the following cases-
(i) It is only where the letter is addressed by an aggrieved person or
(ii) a public spirited individual or
(iii) a social action group for enforcement of the constitutional or the legal rights of a person in custody or of a class or group of persons who by reason of poverty, disability or socially or economically disadvantaged position find it difficult to approach the court for redress.
The Supreme Court Of India is required to step in by incorporating safe guards provided by the civil procedure code in matters of stay orders /injunctions in the arena of PIL.
When a stay order is obtained at the instance of a private party or even at the instance of a body litigating in public interest, any interim order which stops the project from proceeding further must provide for the reimbursement of costs to the public in case ultimately the litigation started by such an individual or body fails.
In other words the public must be compensated both for the delay in the implementation of the project and the cost escalation resulting from such delay.
A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) can be filed in any High Court or directly in the Supreme Court. It is not necessary that the petitioner has suffered some injury of his own or has had personal grievance to litigate.
PIL is a right given to the socially conscious member or a public spirited NGO ( or a Trojan Horse ) to espouse a public cause by seeking judicial for redressal of public injury. Such injury may arise from breach of public duty or due to a violation of some provision of the Constitution.
BUT DOES OUR CONSTITUTION TREAT EVERY CHILD OF BHARATMATA THE SAME? WE DO WE HAVE QUOTA SYSTEMS ?
PIL IS A SYSTEM DEVISED BY FROEIGN DESH DROHIS TO ALLOW JUDICIARY TO TAKE ON THE ROLE OF EXECUTIVE AND EGISLATURE WITH BENAMI MEDIA AND RAJYA SABHA SUPPORT
For the courts to haul up the executive when it is not performing its duties in ensuring the rights of the poor as per the law of the land.
THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY HAS NO RIGHT TO HAUL UP THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE
In PIL cases where the petitioner is not in a position to provide all the necessary evidence, either because voluminous or because the parties are weak socially or economically, courts have appointed commissions ( some controlled by vested forces ) to collect information on facts and present it before the bench.
In PIL cases where the petitioner is not in a position to provide all the necessary evidence, either because voluminous or because the parties are weak socially or economically, courts have appointed commissions ( some controlled by vested forces ) to collect information on facts and present it before the bench.
Article 14 of the Indian Constitution treat both an foreign desh drohi MNC and a desh bhakt child of Bharatmata. Today foreigm arms dealers and pharma are winning cases in India by PIL
If an citizen's rights are to be fully protected in the wake of increasing Zionist Jew MNC activity and 100% FDI in the national economy, one needs to critique the concept of equality
How can a foreign company that does not have the constitutional right to do business in India, claim the constitutional right to be treated equally with an Indian company that does have that right?"
Article 14 ruling provides foreign vendors a constitutional remedy to challenge MoD contracts, through a writ petition under Article 14
India to allow 100% foreign ownership in defence and civil aviation sectors
Public interest lawyers in the US are called AMBULANCE CHASERS and WARD COMBERS ..
They largely operate on a 'no-win, no-fee' basis, given the huge damages that are awarded by US courts and which are then split between the client and the lawyer.
Prashant Bhushan is an expert in PIL. This Naxal lover wants to giva azaadi to Kashmir . He has his nexus with Collegium Judges—whistle blowers have spoken.
ALL IN GOOD TIME
Undertrial prisoners who spend 40% of the maximum sentence prescribed for the offences they are charged with must be released. Amend Section 436A accordingly.
It may NOT sound fair—but we need to cry WATAN FIRST.
In India people dread being called as witness in courts. They run away from road accidents and public murders . If you are called as a witness in court , you could lose your job ( non attendance )
Frequent adjournments is sometimes a MIL BHAANTKE KHATA HOON ploy between judges and lawyers.
There is this practice of criminal courts granting frequent adjournments, leading to harassment of public witnesses who come to depose. These witnesses have taken leave and travelled across the vast country to depose in court. They are sent back again and again and again.
This foul attitude of courts of sending witnesses back is a major cause of harassment which discourages public from associating in the investigation of any case.
Even the most desh bhakt and spirited person cant handle this sort of harassment. This is the reason why witnesses do NOT come forward even if hundreds have witnessed a murder on the streets in broad daylight.
These people want to help inside their hearts –but they just cant handle the endless harassment
Witnesses dread court summons and the associated police and court proceedings where they are treated worse than shit.
Even before coming to court to depose, a witness would be a part of a tedious investigation. His life will be in danger if the case drag on for years . He is worried about his school going children being kidnapped or killed.
Courts keep adjourning—a smart lawyer will make this happen . There is NO sense of urgency on behalf of courts in recording the testimony of a witness.
In India this is NOT funny anymore and nobody is prepared to suffer any inconvenience for the sake of society.
This I talk about male adult witnesses –not female witnesses. Indian Judiciary refuses to move with the times and use video conferencing of the witness after the first personal swearing in , in front of a judge.
INDIA HAS ONLY A COUPLE OF FUNCTIONAL FORENSIC LABS IN INDIA
Many successful criminal prosecutions in the United States end not with jury trials, but with plea bargains.
Plea bargains are agreements between defendants and prosecutors where defendants agree to plead guilty to some or all of the charges against them in exchange for concessions from the prosecutors.
These agreements allow prosecutors to focus their time and resources on other cases, and reduce the number of trials that judges need to oversee.
In 2013, while 8 percent of all US federal criminal charges were dismissed (either because of a mistake in fact or law or because the defendant had decided to cooperate), more than 97 percent of the remainder were resolved through plea bargains, and fewer than 3 percent went to trial.
The plea bargains largely determined the sentences imposed., the plea bargains usually determine the sentences, sometimes as a matter of law and otherwise as a matter of practice.
The power to determine the terms of the plea bargain is, as a practical matter, lodged largely in the prosecutor, with the defense counsel having little say and the judge even less.
Plea bargains offered a way out: by pleading guilty to lesser charges in return for dismissal of the more serious charges, defendants could reduce their prison time, while the prosecution could resolve the case without burdening the system with more trials.
Plea bargaining is a kind of “devil’s pact” that allowed guilty defendants to avoid the full force of the law. But in the United States it became commonplace. And while the Supreme Court initially expressed reservations about the system of plea bargaining, eventually the Court came to approve of it.
A genuinely innocent defendant could still choose to go to trial without fearing that she might thereby subject herself to an extremely long prison term effectively dictated by the prosecutor.
The vast majority of criminal cases in the United States end not in courtroom trials but in negotiated agreements between prosecutors and defense lawyers. A plea of not guilty would then be entered on the accused person's behalf and the trial will proceed.
People say the plea bargain practice lets criminals get lower sentences, BETTER A LOWER SENTENCE THAN A HIGHER SENTENCE while some defense lawyers and civil libertarians say it coerces defendants to give up their legal rights.
Most prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges, however, say the practice helps produce justice while reducing strains on the court system
In 1968 the American Bar Association adopted standards governing plea bargaining. Today in most criminal cases in the United States are resolved by plea bargaining, whether the defendants are celebrities or unknown criminals, mob figures or disturbed teenagers.
Plea bargaining is a new legal development in India that enables an accused person to plead guilty to a crime and negotiate a sentence.
There is now an amendment to the Indian Criminal Procedure Code. The problem with plea bargaining is that the stigma remains because there is a conviction. For petty cases with petty fined this works well.
he agreement between an accused person and the prosecution will be disclosed only after the court has made sure that everything is in order and after the accused has been allowed to plead to the charges.
The Law Commission of India recommended time and again in its 142nd, 154th and 177th reports that concessional treatment of offences is an absolute must in an over-loaded judicial and prison system like ours. Finally, chapter XXIA was included in the Code of Criminal Procedure in 2005, introducing the procedure for plea-bargaining.
Every coin does have two sides. Critics of plea-bargaining argue that it has altered the classical understanding of justice by encouraging criminality among the rich, undermining the credibility of our criminal justice system and perpetuating monopoly capitalism.
However, proponents urge that plea-bargaining has only been introduced for petty offences which burden the system with unnecessary litigation and can very well be settled outside
Plea bargaining alone cannot solve the problem of backlogs, the judicial officers need to be trained to understand the need to curb delays and indirectly apply bargaining effectively.
Again, Plea bargaining" can be defined as pre-trial negotiations between the accused and the prosecution during which the accused agrees to plead guilty in exchange for certain concessions by the prosecution.
Again, Plea bargaining is the process whereby the accused and the prosecutor in a criminal case work out a mutually satisfactory disposition of the case subject to court approval. It usually involves the defendant's pleading guilty to a lesser offence or to only one or some of the counts of a multi-count indictment in return for a lighter sentence than that possible for the graver charge.
The quick disposition of cases through plea bargaining may conserve judicial resources but the problem is that it allows guilty defendants to obtain unwarranted reductions in sentences by threatening an overworked system with requiring a time-consuming and pointless trial.
Thus, it represents the system as one which sacrifices proper punishment of criminals in the name of efficiency.
I ASK – DO WE HAVE A FUCKIN' CHOICE IN INDIA?
Another observation made by critics of this system is that most guilty pleas are not the fruit of genuine repentance. Instead, defendants feign repentance to earn sentence reductions and therefore, the argument pertaining to acknowledgement of guilt does not hold good .
SO FUCKIN’ WHAT ?
WE CANT BE TRAGEDY QUEENS HERE.
WE NEED TO DISPOSE OFF A HUMONGOUS BACK LOG !
The Indian apex court has always maintained that this practice is unconstitutional, illegal and would tend to encourage corruption and collusion between the parties
BUT HEY, WE ARE DOING IT TO CLEAR A HUMONGOUS BACK LOG –WHICH WE CANNOT HAND OVER TO OUR FUTURE GENERATIONS
In 1971, the Unites States Supreme Court formally accepted that plea bargaining was essential for theSPEEDY administration of justice and when properly managed, was to be encouraged.
Restorative justice is taking root as it promotes reconciliation, reintegration and a culture of offenders owning up responsibility. Plea bargain is the way to go.
A LOT OF CRIMES ARE DUE TO EXTREME POVERTY AND SOME DUE TO A SUDDEN RUSH OF BLOOD
Criminal law is lately moving away from retribution—as in ancient times in India.
The process is also cheaper and it helps the Judiciary plan better for criminal sessions, since cases deserving a full trial are known in advance.
Advantages of plea bargaining:---------
• It is convenient to settle cases through plea bargaining where guilt and proof of charge are obvious, thereby lessening risk to both defendant and prosecution.
• Significant feature of method of plea bargaining is that it helps the courts and state to manage the backlogs and delays that have created great problem in rendering justice. It reduces the work load of the prosecutors and judges enabling them to prepare for gravest case by leaving the petty offences to settle through plea bargaining.
• It helps the offender in accepting the responsibility and liability for their actions voluntarily, without having an expensive and time consuming trial.
• Similarly, witnesses can do away with the troubles of bearing the brunt of delays, traveling, costs of traveling, etc.
• Since most petty offenders (since plea bargaining covers petty offences) are poor, it helps them overcome the costs of litigation and litigational delays.
• For victims, plea bargaining is a better substitute as it avoids lengthy court process to see the accused convicted and need not bear the brunt of litigation delays and litigation and travel costs, etc.
Under Sec 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the statements made before the police officer are inadmissible as evidence during investigation.
• Plea bargaining, in the garb of remedy from delays and backlogs , costs of litigation, etc forces the accused to give up his Constitutional rights. It should always be kept in mind that justice hurried is justice buried.but, the plea bargaining system results in an agreement to plead guilty before any judge has got involved in the case and has checked the evidence before them.
• By plea bargaining, accused could determine their own fate, rather than leaving it to the not so tender mercies of judge and this will lead to the denial of equal protection of law. Thus, different punishments will occur for similar cases between persons who did forego their Constitutional right for plea bargaining and persons who are not ready for plea bargaining. Since poor are forced to accept plea bargaining to avoid the delays.
• The Indian police are well-known for booking poor innocent victims for crimes that they never committed. A majority of under-trial prisoners in India are likely to belong to this category. With the introduction of plea bargaining, torture will be developed as a way to extract confessions. This so-called measure to speed up justice will only speed up miscarriages of justice and then this will be a tragedy for India's already degraded criminal justice system and rule of law.
• Instances of cruel and unusual punishment in the form of torture by police or threat by the prosecutor of much greater punishment to the defendant if plea bargaining is not accepted, may increase in India where large population of the country is illiterate and extremely poor.
• In India, custodial torture is not yet a crime. A police officer accused of custodial torture may only be tried for offences, such as those punishable under sections 323, 324 or 330 of the Indian Penal Code. The. Thus, plea bargaining allows police officers who torture to escape with even lighter penalties, just by plea bargaining, though their offences fall under the gravest crimes.
• It gives rise to prosecutorial discretion and powers and creates such an imbalance that there will be elimination of criminal trials in variety of cases without even being tried.
• Defence lawyers no longer defend their clients, and will become plea negotiators for fee and at a lesser risk, for example, lawyers in case of motor vehicle accidents widely known as ambulance-chasers. This process discourages the lawyer from providing effective representation especially in case of poor defendants who cannot afford the lawyer fee and therefore he is forced to accept plea bargaining or opt for lawyer or legal aid just based on low costs not efficiency.
• The professional rewards will go to prosecutors and judges having the highest conviction rates, whether or not the persons convicted are guilty. There is a danger that the courts could turn into an auction house.
Miscellaneous work such as relating to filing of process fee, service of notice, call work, etc can be allotted to the officers in the court there by saving the time and energy of the judicial officers.
Practically no judge can seriously hear and decide more than three or four cases in a day and thus the number of cases that are listed should be restricted.
Bail provisions should be simplified in order to provide bail to the poor .Statistics show that most persons languishing in jails for petty crimes are poor and underprivileged [since large numbers of accused of petty offences covered by plea bargaining] who cannot provide surety
In 2005, the legislature introduced the provisions of plea bargaining by inserting Chapter XXI-A through the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005 and Sections 265 A - L were added in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
The Indian Supreme Court has observed that this practice intrudes society's interests by opposing pre-determined legislative fixation of minimum sentences. It has been pointed out that allowing plea bargaining in India would amount to subtly subverting the mandate of law and polluting the pure fount of justice
LET IT BE ---WE KNOW WHAT WE ARE DOING –
THIS IS NOT A TRUTH FINDING EXERCISE ANYMORE—IT IS FOR THE GOOD OF THE WATAN AND ITS FUTURE GENERATIONS
In its 154th report, the Law Commission reiterated the need for remedial legislative measures to reduce the delay in the disposal of criminal trials and also to alleviate the suffering of under trial prisoners.
The 177th Report of the Law Commission issued in 2001 also sought to incorporate the concept of plea bargaining in the criminal justice system in India
Keeping in mind the apprehension of misuse, the cautious approach of the legislature is evident from the fact that plea bargaining is introduced in a limited manner in as much as:
• The offence against the accused should carry a maximum sentence of less than seven years.
• The offence should not have been committed by the accused against a woman or a child below the age of 14 years.
• The accused should not have been covered under Section 2(k)32 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.
• The accused should not have earlier been convicted for the same offence.
• The offence should not affect the socio-economic condition of the country.
It is clear that offences committed by habitual offenders and serious offences are excluded from the purview of plea bargaining. Moreover, plea bargaining can take effect only when the consent of all three parties, that is, victim, prosecutor, and judge has been obtained.
It provides greater choices to the victim in satisfactory disposition of the case, and also lays down a scheme for providing compensation to the victim as soon as the process of plea bargaining is complete.
Again –for half wits—a plea bargain is an agreement in a criminal case between the prosecutor and the accused person whereby the latter agrees to plead guilty to a particular charge in return for some concession from the prosecutor.
A voluntary plea of guilt under this mechanism may see the number or severity of the charges against an accused person or their punishment reduced.
In plea bargains, prosecutors usually agree to reduce defendants' punishment. They often accomplish this by reducing the number or severity of the charges against defendants. They might also agree to recommend that defendants receive reduced sentences.
Some plea bargains require defendants to do more than simply plead guilty. For example, prosecutors often offer favorable plea bargains to defendants who agree to testify for the state in cases against other defendants.
THE BRITISH DID DRAMA TO CREATE SNITCHES AND TRAITORS—VEER VINAYAK SAVARKAR AND AUROBINDO GHOSH WERE PLEA BARGAINED.
VEER SAVARKARs ELDER BROTHER GANESH BABARAO ( DELETED FROM HISTORY ) WAS A PATRIOT
The US Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected arguments that plea bargaining is unconstitutional. But it has held that defendants’ guilty pleas must be voluntary, and that defendants may only plead guilty if they know the consequences of doing so.
Courts treat plea bargains as contracts between prosecutors and defendants. If a defendants breaks a plea bargain, the prosecutor is no longer bound by his or her side of the deal.
Although plea bargaining is often criticized, more than 92 percent of criminal convictions come from negotiated pleas. Thus, only 8 percent of criminal cases actually go to trial.
For judges, the key incentive for accepting a plea bargain is to alleviate the need to schedule and hold a trial on an already overcrowded docket. Judges are also aware of prison overcrowding and may be receptive to the "processing out" of offenders who are not likely to do much jail time anyway.
Generally speaking, plea bargains help create more judicial economy and conservation of limited resources.
The downside to this incentive, however, is the tendency for lower income defendants who believe they're innocent to accept a plea deal because they lack the funds for a robust defense.
For a defendant in a criminal case, plea bargaining provides the opportunity for a lighter sentence on a less severe charge, and to have fewer (or less serious) offenses listed on a criminal record. If they are represented by private counsel, defendants also save the monetary costs of a lengthy trial by accepting a plea bargain.
The defendant, even if not actually guilty of the crime, will sometimes take the lighter sentence instead of asserting their constitutional right to a fair trial because they cannot afford an "top-shelf" legal defense.
While pleading guilty to a crime you know you didn't commit can be quite distasteful, sometimes it's best to be pragmatic and listen to your attorney's assessment of your chances at trial. Ultimately, it's a decision you have to make on your own.
PLEA BARGAIN WAS AN INSTRUMENT FOR MANY JEWS TO ESCAPE PUNISHMENT AFTER WW2
The drama inherent in these guarantees is regularly portrayed in movies and television programs as an open battle played out in public before a judge and jury. But this is all a mirage.
In actuality, our criminal justice system is almost exclusively a system of plea bargaining, negotiated behind closed doors and with no judicial oversight. The outcome is very largely determined by the prosecutor alone.
Advantages Of Plea Bargains—in a nutshell—recapitulation
1. No Uncertainty
Plea bargains take away the stress and questions that surround a trial by jury. The anxiety that is involved with not knowing if you will be found guilty or not is completely removed.
2. Court Congestion
Cases are closed much quicker when pleas are involved. This is great for society because it de-clogs the court systems for more serious cases.
3. Leniency
The person who has taken the plea, often pleads guilty to a lesser charge than what they would have normally been tried for. This ultimately translates into a lesser sentence or punishment.
4. Guaranteed Win
From a prosecutor’s point of view, plea bargains are a God send. They allow them to have an open and shut case, that still always results in a prosecution.
5. It Can’t Get Worse
When a person takes a plea bargain, they no longer have to go through trial. This means that other crimes that may have been committed and any damning evidence will not be discovered.
6. No Maximum Sentence
The biggest reason that many people take a plea bargain is the fact that you cannot receive the maximum sentencing for you crime.
7. Aids Other Cases
Prosecutors will often roll other conditions into their plea agreement. Often it is that the defendant will testify against a co defendant, which may aid larger cases in a prosecution.
8. Let’s The Justice System Breathe
If all criminal cases actually made it to a trial by jury, then the justice system would not be able to sustain itself. Courts would be backed up by months, if not years.
Disadvantages Of Plea Bargains – recapitulation :--
1. Innocence Lost
Innocent people will often take a guilty plea bargain. This is done out of fear of being found guilty by a jury in a trial.
2. No Justice
The victims, people affected by the crime, or the general public may be very angered by a plea bargain. Especially if they fee the crime deserves to be punished with the full extent of the law.
3. High Pressure Situation
Defendants are often pressured into taking a plea bargain because it is simply easier for everyone involved. Even if they do not really want to admit guilt.
4. Poor Work All Around
Plea bargains have caused quite a large amount of “shotty” investigations to occur. Investigators and prosecutions begin to slack, thinking a plea will be reached anyway.
5. Forced Guilt
The biggest disadvantage of a plea bargain is that you have to admit that you are guilty, even if you are not. This can cause turmoil for a very long time in someones life.
6. Unconstitutional
The constitution states that every American citizen has the right to a trial by jury. Many people argue that plea bargains are unconstitutional because of this.
7. Leniency
This is listed as both a pro and a con. It completely depends on which side of the case you are on. If you are a victim, or a victim’s family member then a lean punishment may be very painful to take.
Important Facts About Plea Bargains--
92% of all criminal prosecutions are reached through plea bargains in US . Not all cases can be bargained down. The actual sentencing is completely up to the judge, not the lawyers. Everyone who chooses a plea bargain is given multiple opportunities to choose a trial.
There is a need to develop systems such as "Inventory Control Index"(ICI) whereby the total time period for the completion of a case is analyzed based on various court management techniques.
These techniques will not only help in the perfect court management but also will help the litigant in choosing between forcible plea bargaining or formal criminal litigation.
IN ANCIENT INDIA WE HAD THE KHAP PANCHAYATS WHO GAVE INDIANS FAST/ FREE/ FAIR JUSTICE –
OUR VILLAGE ELDERS KNEW THE LOCAL CULTURE , HAD THE PULSE OF THE PEOPLE AND MOST IMPORTANT - BALLS ON ACCURATE HINDSIGHT
DESH DROHI BENAMI MEDIA RAN DOWN OUR PRICELESS SYSTEM AND BRANDED OUR KHAP PANCHAYAT SYSTEM WHERE VILLAGE ELDERS SAT UNDER A BANYAN TREE AS PRIMITIVE HEATHEN SYSTEM
WHAT DID WE GET ?
A VESTED ROTHSCHILDs JUDICIAL SYSTEM WHERE WE HAD TO LUMP SLOW/ COSTLY/ UNFAIR JUSTICE DOWN OUR THROATS .
Below: Jewish Anti-Defamation league ( a group of Jewsih lawyers and Jewish Judges ) protects all Jews -- Hollywood / Media / Banking / Govt/ Pharma/ Politics etc have a Jewish MAFIA monopoly
IN USA JEWISH ADL CAN TAKE ANYBODY TO THE CLEANERS
AT THE CURRENT RATE IF YOU HAVE A DEFAMATION COURT CASE SLAPPED ON YOU BY SOME CRYING BOLLYWOOD EGO LADEN , SUPERSTAR-- YOUR GRANDCHILD WILL HAVE TO SETTLE IT.
Our priceless Gotra system which kept India free of warped DNA criminals/homosexuals were ridiculed as pagan superstition.
In India we ALREADY have the All-India Lok Adalat which is nothing but a Alternative Dispute Redressal (ADR) system.
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is a dispute resolution processes and techniques that act as a means for disagreeing parties to come to an agreement short of litigation.
It is a collective term for the ways that parties can settle disputes, with (or without) the help of a third party.. ADR must gain widespread acceptance among both the general public and the legal profession.
This is the only way out of this mindboggling mess created by a slow Judiciary.
Most criminals are very careful not to generate any direct evidence while they are committing a crime.
Because of this, courts often depend on circumstantial evidence to determine the facts of the case.
Circumstantial evidence is a fact that can be used to infer another fact.
Most successful prosecutions rely greatly on circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence often has an advantage over direct evidence because it is more difficult to suppress or fabricate.
Circumstantial evidence is more persuasive than direct evidence.
IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO FAKE SEVERAL STRANDS OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE UNLESS YOU ARE A GENIUS
Indirect evidence that implies something occurred but doesn't directly prove it; proof of one or more facts from which one can find another fact; proof of a chain of facts and circumstances indicating that the person is either guilty or not guilty.
Circumstantial evidence is based on reasoning and inference-drawing through probability. The judge must apply his brains ( mostly non- existent ) , logic, common sense perception, and experience to the evidence.
They must consider the inherent probabilities and improbabilities, frequently eliminating the possibility of coincidence.
FIBRE / YARN / STRANDS MAKE A STOUT ROPE STRONG ENOUGH TO HANG A CRIMINAL
In a case of a theft, examples of circumstantial evidence include:-----
Evidence of the defendant's fingerprints at the scene of the crime
The fact that the defendant was found with a large amount of money without being able to give any reason.
In the case of a murder, examples of circumstantial evidence include:--
The fact that the accused had an intense dislike of the victim
The fact that the accused behaved in a bizarre and suspicious way after the offence
The fact that he or she lied about his or her alibi
The fact that he or she was in the area at the time that the offence was committed
The fact that the defendant's blood or DNA corresponds to blood or DNA found on the victim's body.
A judge must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the only rational inference that can be drawn from the circumstantial evidence is one of guilt.
Evidence that the accused and victim had a good relationship is not evidence of a lack of motive, but a lack of evidence of a motive
Circumstantial evidence is based largely on inference and uses inductive reasoning. Inductive inference is based on observations-and deductive inference is based on theory.
Circumstantial evidence is used in criminal courts to establish guilt or innocence through reasoning.
Every criminals avoids generating direct evidence. Hence the prosecution usually must resort to circumstantial evidence to prove the existence of mens rea, or intent.
If you can collect enough circumstantial evidence as strands -- this rope made is strong enough to hang a man.
On its own, circumstantial evidence allows for more than one explanation. Different pieces of circumstantial evidence may be required, so that each corroborates the conclusions drawn from the others.
Together, they may more strongly support one particular inference over another. An explanation involving circumstantial evidence becomes more likely once alternative explanations have been ruled out.
Circumstantial evidence allows a trier of fact to infer that a fact exists. In criminal law, the inference is made by the trier of fact in order to support the truth of an assertion (of guilt or absence of guilt).
Circumstantial evidence is especially important in civil and criminal cases where direct evidence is lacking , witnesses turn hostile , or it is very apparent that the witness is unreliable, fake and bribed. .
A popular misconception is that circumstantial evidence is less valid or less important than direct evidence. Many successful criminal prosecutions rely largely or entirely on circumstantial evidence, and civil charges are frequently based on circumstantial or indirect evidence.
Circumstantial evidence can be, and often is much more powerful than direct evidence
In practice, circumstantial evidence can have an advantage over direct evidence in that it can come from multiple sources that check and reinforce each other.
Eyewitness testimony can be inaccurate at times, and many persons have been convicted on the basis of perjured or otherwise mistaken testimony.
If the circumstantial evidence suggests a possibility of innocence, the prosecution has the burden of disproving that possibility.
Circumstantial Evidence is also known as indirect evidence.
It is distinguished from direct evidence, which, if believed, proves the existence of a particular fact without any inference or presumption required. Circumstantial evidence relates to a series of facts other than the particular fact sought to be proved.
The party offering circumstantial evidence argues that this series of facts, by reason and experience, is so closely associated with the fact to be proved that the fact to be proved may be inferred simply from the existence of the circumstantial evidence.
The term "inductive reasoning" requires a CONSCIOUS BRAIN refers to reasoning that takes specific information and makes a broader generalization that is considered probable, allowing for the fact that the conclusion may not be accurate.
Inductive reasoning is bottom-up reasoning; it starts with a probable conclusion and induces premises.
Deductive reasoning is also known as 'top-down reasoning' because it goes from general and works its way down more specific
Inductive reasoning is reasoning where the premises support the conclusion. The conclusion is the hypothesis, or probable. This means that the conclusion is the part of reasoning that inductive reasoning is trying to prove .
Inductive reasoning is also referred to as 'cause and effect reasoning' or 'bottom-up reasoning' because it seeks to prove a conclusion first. This is usually derived from specific instances to develop a general conclusion.
Inductive reasoning is a logical process in which multiple premises, all believed true or found true most of the time, are combined to obtain a specific conclusion . Inductive reasoning is used in applications that involve prediction, forecasting, or behavior.
Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. In inductive inference, we go from the specific to the general. We make many observations, discern a pattern, make a generalization, and infer an explanation or a theory
Inductive reasoning has its place in the scientific method. Scientists use it to form hypotheses and theories. Deductive reasoning allows them to apply the theories to specific situations.
Inductive reasoning is, unlike deductive reasoning, not logically rigorous.
Inductive reasoning is sometimes confused with mathematical induction, an entirely different process. Mathematical induction is a form of deductive reasoning, in which logical certainties are "daisy chained" to derive a general conclusion about an infinite number of objects or situations.
In inductive reasoning, we begin with specific observations and measures, begin to detect patterns and regularities, formulate some tentative hypotheses that we can explore, and finally end up developing some general conclusions or theories.
Inductive reasoning, by its very nature, is more open-ended and exploratory, especially at the beginning. Deductive reasoning is more narrow in nature and is concerned with testing or confirming hypotheses.
Inductive and deductive reasoning are both forms of propositional logic. Propositional logic is the branch of logic that studies ways of joining and/or modifying entire propositions, statements or sentences to form more complicated propositions, statements or sentences.
Deductive reasoning is reasoning where true premises develop a true and valid conclusion. In the case of deductive reasoning, the conclusion must be true if the premises are also true. Deductive reasoning uses general principles to create a specific conclusion
To be convincing (and admissible in court), circumstantial evidence must:----
Be relevant, of course, that is, tend to prove or disprove a fact in issue
Be cumulative, that is, not limited to one, isolated piece of evidence, but of several inter-connected parts
Be tightly organized and clearly presented: many circumstantial cases fail not because the evidence is weak, but because it is presented in a disorganized and confusing manner which the fact finder cannot understand;
And finally, to be persuasive (and admissible in court) circumstantial evidence must exclude all plausible innocent explanations.
Books, movies, and television often perpetuate the belief that circumstantial evidence may not be used to convict a criminal of a crime. But this view is nonsense
In most cases today, circumstantial evidence is the only evidence linking an accused to a crime; direct evidence may simply not exist. As a result, the judge/ jury may have only circumstantial evidence to consider in determining whether to convict or acquit a person charged with a crime.
The U.S. Supreme Court has categorically ruled "circumstantial evidence is intrinsically no different from testimonial [direct] evidence"
AS LONG AS WE HAVE STUPID LAWYER TURNED JUDGES IN INDIA -- DIRECT EVIDENCE WILL RULE
Circumstantial evidence is now employed in criminal trials. Many circumstances can create inferences about an accused's guilt in a criminal matter, including rest; the presence of a motive or opportunity to commit the crime; the accused's presence at the time and place of the crime; any denials, evasions, or contradictions on the part of the accused; and the general conduct of the accused.
The distinction between direct and circumstantial evidence has little practical effect in the presentation or admissibility of evidence in trials. Circumstantial evidence is used in criminal courts to decide the fate of accused by establishing guilt or innocence through reasoning. witnesses are the "eyes and ears of justice".
But testimony of witnesses is not always credible ( 90% of the time ) ; therefore, facts are provable not only by witnesses but also by circumstances.
Circumstantial evidence is used in criminal courts to establish guilt or innocence through reasoning. They play an important role in civil courts to establish or or deny liability.
Evidence" is the raw material which a judge or adjudicator uses to reach "findings of fact". The findings of fact that the evidence generates are - for all their flaws - "what happened" for all intents and purposes of the legal proceeding.
"Circumstantial evidence" however is not so much a type of evidence as it is a logical principle of deduction. Deduction is reasoning from general known principles to a specific proposition
Circumstantial evidence is unrelated facts that, when considered together, can be used to infer a conclusion about something unknown. Like how weak strands make a strong rope.
Today all over the planet successful criminal prosecutions rely largely on circumstantial evidence, and civil charges are frequently based on circumstantial or indirect evidence.
In practice, circumstantial evidence often has an advantage over direct evidence in that it is more difficult to suppress or fabricate
Circumstantial evidence is evidence which strongly suggests something, but does not exactly prove it. Circumstantial evidence simply helps people draw inferences about a fact, or the events that took place. Whether or not the judge or jury makes the intended inference has a major impact on the outcome of the case.
MOST INDIAN JUDGES DON’T HAVE THE FUCKIN’ BRAINS TO GLEAN CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
Facts that do not necessarily prove a defendant’s culpability, such as prior threats made to the victim.
Dick and Prick get into a heated argument, during which Dick declares in front of a room full of people, that he wanted to kill Prick. A week later, Prick is found murdered in his back yard. Dick’s declaration is not direct evidence that he committed the crime, but it gives police a suspect. Many times another person John will murder Prick just to screw Dick.
Digression:
I once held a party at anchorage , with some nearby ship captains ( batchmates and seniors etc ) and a Mallu Loading Master named Capt John were invited.
John was from the ranks—seaman to Captain –up the hawse pipe, the hard way.
We had huge crabs and premium whisky.
One GORA captain asked me “ Captain, can I use your John” . My wife was in the nedroom with other Captains wives and the toilet had to be accessed through the bed room
I replied “ Sure”
Capt John was TUNN and was partly asleep.
He suddenly jumps up and cries out with a distressed look “FOR WHAT ?”
A case based on circumstantial evidence may be just as convincing and reliable as a case based upon direct evidence.. It is important that you approach a circumstantial case by considering and weighing, as a whole, all the facts you find established by the evidence.
It is wrong to consider any particular fact in isolation and ask whether that fact proves the guilt of the accused, or whether there is any explanation for that particular fact or circumstance which is inconsistent with guilt of the accused.
Circumstantial evidence is used in civil courts to establish or refute liability. It is usually the most common form of evidence, for example in product liability cases and road traffic accidents.
One example of circumstantial evidence is the behavior of a person around the time of an alleged offense.If a beggar was charged with theft of money and was then seen in a shopping spree purchasing very expensive items, the shopping spree might be circumstantial evidence of the individual's guilt.
Circumstantial evidence is used during a trial to establish guilt or innocence through reasoning. This indirect evidence is the result of combining different, but seemingly unrelated, facts that the prosecution uses to infer the defendants guilt.
Criminal prosecutors depend on circumstantial evidence to prove their case. Civil cases are often based expressly on circumstantial evidence, when trying to establish or deny liability.
Examples of circumstantial evidence:-
motive (past hostility to victim)
opportunity (including exclusive opportunity)
means, capacity and skills
post-offence conduct (flight, false alibi, destruction of evidence)
knowledge and state of mind
habit
disposition for violence by victim
Circumstantial evidence, whether it is in the form of testimony or physical evidence may have an advantage-- because it comes from several different sources, which can be used as a check on each other.
Its disadvantage is that it is indirect: you must piece it all together and then determine whether or not it leads to a reasonable conclusion about the fact which is to be proved— a halfwit cant do it well.
In a circumstantial case no individual fact can prove the guilt of the accused. The judge/ jury MUST find certain basic facts established by the evidence. Those facts do not have to be proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Taken by themselves they cannot prove the guilt of the accused. The jury is then asked to infer or conclude from a combination of those established facts that a further fact or facts existed.
No conclusions shall be based on mere speculation, conjecture or supposition.
In a case in which a witness admits paying a cash bribe to a government official, for which there is no other direct evidence, the steps of proof might include circumstantial evidence to corroborate the direct evidence. For example, the investigator could:
1. Record in detail (when, where, how, why, etc.) the statement of the witness that he paid the government official in cash (this is the direct evidence);
2. Prove that the government official spent or deposited a significant amount of cash shortly after he allegedly received the cash bribe;
3. Eliminate all other potential sources of income for the official’s cash expenditures or deposits, to the extent possible;
4. Interview the subject official, and show that the official cannot explain the source of the cash expenses or deposits, or lied about it (the last three points are the circumstantial evidence).
Such evidence, if believed by the judge/ jury, would be legally sufficient to convict a defendant in most courts.
Intent may be proved by circumstantial evidence. Indeed, it can rarely be established by any other means. We simply cannot look into the head or mind of another person.
Circumstantial evidence is the proof of a series of facts which tend to show whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. The law makes no distinction between the weight to be given to direct or circumstantial evidence.
The judge should decide how much weight to give to any evidence and as such he cannot be a halfwit. All the evidence in the case, including the circumstantial evidence, should be considered by the judge/ jury in reaching the verdict.
Circumstantial evidence is equally effective as direct evidence--as most criminals take care to eliminate direct evidence . The difference between the two is that direct evidence, on its own settles a fact in dispute (i.e. a confession, eye witness to the crimes, video tape of the crime-- the judge/ jury is not required to draw inferences, the evidence speaks for itself)--
-- whereas circumstantial evidence on its own does not prove anything, but taken in the totality, it is a chain that proves a chain of circumstances the lend itself to guilt.
As a prosecutor, forensic evidence like DNA, is almost always circumstantial.
Circumstantial evidence is a collection of facts that, when considered together, can be used to infer a conclusion about something unknown.
Circumstantial evidence is used to support a theory of a sequence of events. The sum total of multiple pieces of corroborating evidence, each piece being circumstantial alone, build an argument to support how a particular event happened. In civil and criminal investigations, corroboration is often supplied by one or more expert witnesses who provide forensic evidence.
Factors essential to prove guilt by circumstantial evidence:
1. That the circumstances from which guilt is established must be fully proved;
2. That all the facts must be consistent with the hypothesis of guilt and inconsistent with
innocence;
3. That the circumstances must be of conclusive nature and tendency;
4. That the circumstances should, to a moral certainty, actually exclude every hypothesis
except the one proposed to be proved.
The circumstantial evidence should not only be consistent with the guilt of the accused, but should be inconsistent with his innocence.”
Forensic evidence supplied by an expert witness is usually treated as circumstantial evidence. For instance, a forensic scientist may provide results of ballistic tests proving that the defendant’s firearm fired the bullets that killed the victim, but not necessarily that the defendant fired the shots.
Forensic analysis of skid marks can frequently allow a reconstruction of the accident. By measuring the length of such marks and using dynamic analysis of the car and road conditions at the time of the accident, it may be found that a driver underestimated his or her speed. Forensic science and forensic engineering are common as much in civil cases as in criminal.
Other examples of circumstantial evidence are fingerprint, blood analysis or DNA analysis of the evidence found at the scene of a crime.
Similarly, fingerprint evidence, videotapes, sound recordings, un-photoshopped pictures and many other examples of physical evidence that support the drawing of an inference, i.e., circumstantial evidence, are considered very strong possible evidence.
Circumstantial evidence normally requires a witness, such as the police officer who found the evidence, or an expert who examined it, to lay the foundation for its admission. This witness, sometimes known as the sponsor or the authenticating witness, is giving direct (eye-witness) testimony, and could present credibility problems in the same way that any eye witness does
Evidence of motive goes to prove intent as well as the act. Evidence of insolvency or debt can be admitted to establish motive for an offence of theft, fraud or arson.
Circumstantial evidence of knowledge and intent in a fraud investigation might include, among many other things, proof that the subject, or someone acting at his or her direction, e.g., deliberately:
Altered or forged a relevant document, such as a supporting document submitted with a bid or invoice;
Deliberately destroyed a relevant document, or improperly withheld it from investigators;
Lied to investigators or to another party about a material point to hide their guilt, for example, in a bribery case, lied about the source of sudden new wealth (such lies are known in court as a “false exculpatory”);
Obstructed the investigation, by, for example, instructing or threatening a potential witnesses not to meet with or cooperate with investigators;
Committed prior similar acts, which demonstrated that the acts currently under investigation were done knowingly and willfully, and not accidentally or innocently (also known as “pattern evidence”).
The rationale for the above methods of proof, often referred to as “badges of fraud,” is that such acts betray a certain willfulness by the subject and are inconsistent with a defense of accident or mistake.
Factors that affect the credibility of a witness include:--
The plausibility, or the lack thereof, of the witness’s statements when compared to other evidence in the case (i.e., the extent to which the witness’s statement is corroborated);
The consistency or inconsistency of the witness’s current and prior statements;
Whether the witness’s statements promote his or her self-interest, or are neutral or even contrary to it (the latter are termed “statements against interest’ and are considered to be more credible);
Whether the witness has a “reputation for truthfulness” or the contrary, and whether the witness previously has been convicted of a criminal offense (these factors are often admissible in court to attack the credibility of a witness);
To a lesser extent, because of many witnesses’ legitimate concerns for their safety, whether the witness is willing to be identified, sign a statement, or give testimony.
Cases that actually go to trial are almost always based on circumstantial evidence. It's difficult for the defense to get around a video that shows the defendant robbing
Mens rea is a legal phrase used to describe the mental state a person must be in while committing a crime for it to be intentional. It can refer to a general intent to break the law or a specific, premeditated plan to commit a particular offense. Most crimes require "mens rea," which is simply Latin for a "guilty mind."
In other words, what a defendant was thinking and what the defendant intended when the crime was committed. Mens rea allows the criminal justice system to differentiate between someone who did not mean to commit a crime and someone who intentionally set out to commit a crime.
To give an example, imagine two drivers who end up hitting and killing a pedestrian. Driver 1 never saw the person until it was too late, tried his or her best to brake, but could do nothing to stop the accident and in fact ended up killing the pedestrian. Driver 1 is still liable, but likely only in civil court for monetary damages.
Driver 2, on the other hand, had been out looking for the pedestrian and upon seeing him, steered towards him, hit the gas pedal and slammed into him, killing him instantly. Driver 2 is probably criminally liable because he intended to kill the pedestrian, or at least he intended to cause serious bodily harm. Even though the pedestrian is killed in both scenarios (the outcome is the same), the intent of both drivers was very different and their punishments will be substantially different as a result.
The fact that a defendant did something does not explain his state of mind. Absent a statement of intent made by the defendant, a defendant’s state of mind must always be proven by circumstantial evidence.
For circumstantial evidence to be as persuasive as possible, the judges must not only accept it as true, they must also recognize and accept as valid an inferential connection between the evidence and what one contends it proves.
Circumstantial evidence consists of facts pointing in a particular direction-- facts that are in harmony with one side or another, the hypothesis being analyzed, but standing alone this related evidence is not sufficient to draw any definite conclusions. The inference provoked from circumstantial evidence must flow logically, reasonably, and naturally from the facts presented.
Circumstantial evidence should be both exclusive and conclusive i.e. it must exclude the hypothesis of innocence of the accused and must conclusively establish guilt..
Circumstantial evidence is communication of facts, creating a network from which there is no escape for the accused because the fact taken as a whole do not admit any inference except that the guilt of the accused.
Forensic evidence is developed by the examination of physical items to provide inferences of other facts and to recreate events. In traffic accident cases tire skid marks may be examined to determine a car’s direction and speed prior to a crash.
Fingerprints at a scene indicate that a particular person was present. Forensic evidence, presented by expert investigators, is circumstantial evidence since it is presented to establish events that were not observed by the witness.
Remember , proof by circumstantial evidence requires consideration of the evidence as a whole and not in part…
A judge does not need to give special instructions for circumstantial evidence.
Motive is a form of ulterior intent that permits the inferential proof of other essential elements of the offence. Evidence of a motive to commit the offence is circumstantial evidence supporting a conviction.
Conversely, evidence of a lack of motive is circumstantial evidence supporting an acquittal. Evidence of a lack of motive is not the same as lack of evidence of a motive.
Evidence of the accused previously threatening the victim is admissible to establish an animus and motive to harm the victim, an intent to kill, as well as narrative. It is not bad character evidence.
In a murder case, evidence of a prior abuse that establishes an animus or motive to kill is admissible against the accused.
Evidence is any physical item or information observed or gathered by crime scene investigators that may prove to be relevant to an investigation
The major role evidence plays in criminal investigations is to associate a suspect with a victim or with the scene of a crime. In criminal cases, the critical facts that require proof are whether a crime actually occurred and if the accused was responsible for having committed that crime.
Evidence also plays a crucial role in the elimination of suspects and in the exoneration of the wrongfully convicted. Physical evidence (also referred to as real or direct evidence) is that which is tangible and can be observed with any of the five senses. Examples of physical evidence are blood, hair, fiber, fingerprints, shoe/tire track impressions, etc.
Witnesses normally cannot give their opinion as evidence unless a witness is an expert in the field in which she or he is being questioned. To 'qualify' an expert witness you must first lead evidence that the person has relevant qualifications, has made a detailed study in the area of expertise, and probably also has published in that area.
An ordinary person can give expert evidence on everyday matters for which they have an 'expert' opinion – for example, the weather in the particular area in which the person lives.
The Supreme Court has observed “ A witness is not treated with respect in the Court... He waits for the whole day and then finds the matter adjourned... And when he does appear, he is subjected to unchecked examination and cross-examination and finds himself in a hapless situation”
Hostile witness and inordinate delay in trial came in the way of law. The court cannot create its own evidence. Basic principles cannot change and courts have to decide only on the basis of available evidence.
I was a successful captain at sea, as I did NOT allow procedures to affect my judgment. I would tell my officers and crew in the first meeting itself, that I would NOT punish mistakes, if made in good faith. And this boosted performance and sense of belonging.
This is way different from what happens in judicial courts where the stupid judged revels in showing all and sundry that justice is blind. The duffer judge does NOT even know the meaning of CONTEXT.
All over the world cases in judicial courts are won on procedural matters . Truth and natural justice takes a backseat .
The slimy ( but smart ) and successful lawyers drag the judge by his nostrils down the hoary marshlands nay chakravyuh of procedures –all the time reminding the STUPID judge that “Justice is blind” .
When I was 12 years old, I was a volunteer at the school sports function for smaller grades . A strange incident happened which molded my character.
In the 50 metres sprint a ugly girl ran fast and finished the race by coming to me holding one end of the tape. The other end was held by a female teacher whom I respected -- she had taught me and always sponsored me .
This ugly girl completed the race when the rest of the also rans were at 40 metres –but she did NOT “breast the tape”. This 7 year old girl just stopped one foot off the tape by my side. If she has known the “procedures “ and the term of “justice is blind “ she would have touched the tape.
I found that this girl was NOT considered the winner and the medals went to the also rans. I went sort or berserk as a 12 year old boy and got the medal list overturned. All volunteer teachers were surprised at the way I behaved.
But then they knew me as a responsible student ( coming first in class ) and did NOT allow this incident to blow up.
On my ship I did NOT allow ACTIVITY TRAPS turbocharged by procedures. I did NOT allow my Chief Engineer ( like the CUNT judge ) to think that the purpose of the ship is to take the blessed engine from loadport to discharge port.
In India 45% of the lawyers are fake. But it is not only about people with false degrees, but also those with no degrees. These people work without a licence. They go to court and practice without any authority.
That is why wise businessmen prefer to settle their disputes outside the court. It has become a lobby and family business in India, refusing to be regulated by any norm. Most of the cases are lost on won on procedural points.......
A LOT OF FAKE LAWYERS MINT MONEY BY FAKE NOTARY ATTESTATIONS AND TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ --SUB CONTRACT TO A SENIOR LAWYER .
THE FAKE LAWYER IS ALSO USED TO BRIBE COURT CLERKS.
I remember three decades ago, a pilot in Chennai was acting too funny. He wanted the ship’s trim to be reduced or he would NOT berth my tanker. When I said , the trim cant be reduced, he wanted cargo to be transferred and asked for the Trim and Stability book.
I just asked him “ Show me your piloting licence “.
He got deflated right there .
He asked me “ Captain, you have never asked me for my licence , the more that dozen times I berthed your ship in the past , and you also know that I am 6 years your senior on the training ship Dufferin”.
I just replied “ FOLLOW PROCEDURES ! “
He threatened to blackball me and my ship using his pull with the Harbour Master who is his “good friend”.
I replied “ Be my guest – your bum chum Harbour Master will be dealing with behemoth SCI and the Deputy Conservator after that - and he can retire early without pension ”
NAXALS MODUS OPERANDI
NOW USES ACTORS IN POLICE UNIFORM TO DO CRIMES. NAXALS TAKE FAR WAY VIDEO SHOTS
AND USE IT FOR PROPAGANDA.
BENAMI MEDIA DOES
PRPAGANDA THAT JAWANS RAPED NAXAL WOMEN IN BASTAR. NCW,
NHRC, COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND NCM IS IN CAHOOTS.
JAWANS RAPING NAXAL
WOMEN-- IS A "RED BOOK " MODUS OPERANDI
WOMEN WHO SHOVE STICKS
AND STONES UP THE VAGINA TO BLEED AND CHECKED IN HOSPITALS AS RAPED ( WITH
SUCCESS ) -- ARE GIVEN LARGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY BY FOREIGN FORCES WHO SUPPORT
NAXALS.
Our loser lawyers
turned judges ( the bottom of the school cerebral barrel ) do NOT have the
cerebral wherewithal to glean CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence.
As a result FALSE
WITNESSES are produced out of thin air by desh drohis like Teesta Setalvad
using foreign funds, to dish out FAKE direct evidence .
Direct evidence is
something that a witness can testify that they have directly experience
first-hand.
For Example: Puratchi Thirumati Banumati
was outside yesterday and it was raining out. Bhanu muniyamma baby can testify that it was
raining out yesterday. Her testimony is direct evidence of the fact that it was
raining.
Circumstantial evidence is evidence that allows a fact to be inferred.
For example: Puratchi Thirumati Bhanumati went outside yesterday and it was wet outside all over as much as eye can see , and there were many puddles on the ground. While Bhanu muniyamma baby did not see the rain, this is circumstantial evidence that it did in fact rain yesterday.
Circumstantial evidence is evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact—like a fingerprint at the scene of a crime. By contrast, direct evidence supports the truth of an assertion directly—i.e., without need for any additional evidence or inference.
A witness ( could be FAKE ) saying that she saw a defendant stab a victim is providing direct evidence.
By contrast, a witness who says that she saw the defendant enter a house, that she heard screaming, and that she saw the defendant leave with a bloody knife gives circumstantial evidence.
It is the necessity for inference, and not the obviousness of a conclusion, that determines whether evidence is circumstantial.
In the movie MY COUSIN VINNY – a blind as a bat eye witness old lady was trying to send two young boys to the gallows for murder.
Vinny Gambini: Mrs. Riley, when you saw the defendants were you wearing your glasses?
Constance Riley: Yes, I was.
Vinny Gambini: Would you mind putting your glasses on for us, please?
[Stumbles a bit from Mrs. Riley's glasses]
Vinny Gambini: Whoa. How long you been wearing glasses?
Constance Riley: Since I was 6.
Vinny Gambini: Have they always been that thick.
Constance Riley: No. They've gotten thicker over the years.
Vinny Gambini: So, as your eyes become more and more out of whack, as you've gotten older, how many levels of thickness have you gone through?
Constance Riley: I don't know, over 60 years, maybe 10 times.
Vinny Gambini: Maybe you're ready for a thicker set.
Constance Riley: Oh no. I think they're okay.
Vinny Gambini: You sure? Let's check it out.
[Grabs a tape measure from his deak and brings it over to Mrs. Riley]
Vinny Gambini: How far away were the defendants when when you saw them enterin' the Sac-o-Suds?
Constance Riley: About 100 feet.
Vinny Gambini: A hundred feet.
[Hands Mrs. Riley the end of the tape measure]
Vinny Gambini: Would you mind holding this, please?
[Goes to the courtroom door]
Vinny Gambini: All right, this is 50 feet, that's half the distance.
[Holds up 2 fingers on his right hand]
Vinny Gambini: How many fingers am I holding up?
[Mrs. Riley is squinting, trying to see the fingers]
Judge Chamberlain Haller: Let the record know that the counsler is holding up 2 fingers.
Vinny Gambini: [Annoyed] Hey, your honor please, huh?
Judge Chamberlain Haller: Oh, sorry.
Vinny Gambini: Now. Mrs. Riley, and only Mrs. Riley.
[Judge Chamerlain gives Vinny an ugly look, Vinny hols up 2 fingers on his right hand again]
Vinny Gambini: How many fingers am I holding up now?
Constance Riley: [Squinting, trying to see the fingers] 4.
Vinny Gambini: [Coming back to Mrs. Riley] What do you think now dear?
Constance Riley: Thinkin' of gettin' thicker glasses.
Vinny Gambini: [to the jury] Hey, how ya doin'?
[to witness]
Vinny Gambini: Mr. Crane, what are these pictures of?
Ernie Crane: My house and stuff.
Vinny Gambini: House and stuff. And what is this brown stuff on your window?
Ernie Crane: Dirt.
Vinny Gambini: Dirt. And what is this rusty, dusty, dirty-looking thing that's covering your window?
Ernie Crane: That's a screen.
Vinny Gambini: A screen! It's a screen. And what are these really big things that are right in the middle of your view of the Sac-o-Suds and your kitchen window, what do we call these big things?
Ernie Crane: Trees?
Vinny Gambini: Trees, that's right. Don't be afraid, just shout 'em right out when you know 'em. And what are these thousands of little things that are on trees?
Ernie Crane: Leaves.
Vinny Gambini: And these big bushy things between the trees.
Ernie Crane: Bushes.
Ernie Crane: Bushes. So, Mr. Crane, you can positively identify the defendants, for a moment of two seconds, looking through this dirty window, this crud-covered screen, all of these trees, with all of these leaves on them, and I don't know how many bushes.
Ernie Crane: Looks like five.
Vinny Gambini: Uh, uh, uh, don't forget this one and this one.
Ernie Crane: Seven bushes!
Vinny Gambini: Seven bushes. So, what do you think? Isn't it possible you just saw two guys in a green convertible and not necessarily these two particular guys?
Ernie Crane: I suppose.
Vinny Gambini: I'm finished with this guy.
Circumstantial evidence is usually a theory, supported by a significant quantity of corroborating evidence.
The distinction between direct and circumstantial evidence is important because, with the obvious exceptions (the immature, incompetent, or ), nearly all criminals are careful to not generate direct evidence, and try to avoid demonstrating criminal intent
Direct evidence differs from circumstantial evidence because it expressly shows that something is a fact. Some examples of direct evidence are: testimony from a reliable witness, audio/ videotapes ( LAB TESTED ) of a single incident , and physical evidence of the crime.
With direct evidence, the jury does not have to infer whether the defendant is guilty or not and, in some criminal cases, the evidence is sufficient in proving guilt or innocence.
Direct evidence provides proof about some fact in question without requiring jurors to make any assumptions or to draw inferences. It is evidence that clearly speaks for itself and directly leads to a definite conclusion or direction via deductive reasoning. But FAKE witnesses and FAKE direct evidence has sent many innocent people to the gallows
In India DELIBERATELY the justice system delays court cases for two or three decades—in a CRIMINAL MANNER
During this deliberate delay HONEST eye witnesses are killed . Honest eyewitnesses are threatened that their school going children will be kidnapped and killed.
FALSE confessions are easy to manufacture
THERE MUST BE A DEADLINE .
Videotaped interviews are considered to be such corroboration--although these still leave open the possibility that the person has been induced to 'confess'.
Evidence of a confession may be excluded by the judge if it can be shown there has been an inducement for the person to 'confess' (such as bashings, threats of violence/ kidnapping of children , an offer of bail, or an offer to reduce the charges)
Again , direct evidence does not require any reasoning or inference to arrive at the conclusion to be drawn from the evidence. While circumstantial evidence, also called indirect evidence, requires that an inference be made between the evidence and the conclusion to be drawn from it.
Like I said before , an eyewitness to an event is direct evidence, but eyewitnesses are often unreliable for many reasons. More often than not direct evidence of eye witnesses are false.
Many people may lie, or, more often, they may not see things as clearly as they believe, especially if an event occurs quickly or at a time of high stress.
People tend to see things in a way that matches their expectations. Memory can change over time, and people tend to fill in gaps in their memory without realizing it. People are often susceptible to suggestion, whether by police or others.
Most of the time when a case comes up after 2 decades ( like Salman Khan’s black buck case ) witnesses genuinely forget if it was a tiger or a deer.
Hostility is one form of perjury. A hostile witness is one who's provided an eyewitness account of a criminal event or other information to help the prosecution build a case, but has later turned in court, giving a different version of events or contradictory information.
A witness is termed hostile, when he gives a certain statement on his knowledge about commission of a crime before the police but refutes it when called as witness before the court during trial.
No attempt is made by the brainless Judicial system to glean if the hostile witness was telling the lie before or after .
Hostile hai bhaiyya .
One of the main reasons for the large percentage of acquittals in criminal cases is of witnesses turning hostile and giving false testimony in criminal cases. But why do the witnesses turn hostile.
Generally the reason is the long time taken for a case to be judged—sometimes 30 years
During this long delay there is an unholy combination of money/ muscle power, intimidation to family and monetary inducement.
A lot of times the two opposition camp lawyers are in cahoots with the judge . Don’t get surprised—this is the naked reality . Such FIXER lawyers are very rich . These are the foreign payroll lawyers who file PILs ghadi ghadi.
Instances of witnesses turning hostile are so widespread in our system that in 2000 the Supreme Court observed, "It has become a way of life in the law courts".
It is indeed one of the most important factors responsible for so many acquittals in criminal cases.
History repeats itself first as tragedy and then as a total farce.
The witnesses changed their statements in the court due to lack of protection to them and their families --not because they lack moral fibre . They have children going to school. Threats are mad to throw acid on their faces.
In India, you need to prove a case to get justice and witnesses are often the basic foundation of proof, . In such cases, when witnesses turn hostile, there is little chance of getting a conviction.
The conviction rate in criminal cases are lower than 8 % due to perjury by witnesses who do so either of their own volition or under threats, allurements, or inducements from others.
THE GOVT MUST EITHER SET A DEADLINE FOR COURT CASES TO BE RULED OR HAVE A WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAMME.
JUDGES AND LAWYERS BENEFIT IN UTERIOR WAYS BY THIS TAREEQ PEH TAREEEQ PEH TAREEEQ .
THERE IS A METHOD TO THIS MADNESS
MOST OF THE LAYWERS MAKE A LIVING BY TAREEQ MONEY - THEY DONT EVEN GO TO COURT, THEY GET THE NEXT DATE ON THEIR MOBILE PHONE FROM A COURT CLERK FOR BAKSHEESH MONEY. THE JUDGE IS IN CAHOOTS. ASK ANY RETIRED LAWYER , JUDGE OR EVEN A COURT CLERK .
The absence of a witness protection programme in India makes it possible for the accused in a case to threaten or intimidate witnesses—during the three decades in between.
The judges and law minister know this damn well.
Criminal trials should not be reduced to be the mock trials or shadow boxing of fixed trials.
Judicial Criminal Administration System must be kept clean and beyond the reach of whimsical political wills or agendas and properly insulated from discriminatory standards or yardsticks of the type prohibited by the mandate of the Constitution.
Those who are responsible for protecting life and properties and ensuring that investigation is fair and proper seem to have shown no real anxiety or will.
EVERY PRIME MINISTER/ PRESIDENT SINCE THE PAST 40 YEARS HAD TURNED A NELSONs EYE .
THE LEGACY OF THESE USELESS PRIME MINISTERS AND PRESIDENTS LIES WITH THIS BLOGSITE
In India people dread to be witnesses . They run even from an accident scene. This is because of the law minister’s and CJI apathy. Most law ministers dont even know their jobs . They just suck up to the PM for personal fayada.
It has been observed that while offenders have a range of rights, (both Constitutional and legal), the victims and more particularly, witnesses, have a limited range of rights, (expressed and implied) certain privileges and protection accorded to them through the judicial discretions of the judges.
INDIAN JUDICIARY IS ONE OF THE THE MOST CORRUPT AND INEFFICIENT SYSTEM ON THIS PLANET
This TAREEQ PEH TAREEEQ PEH TAREEQ system has been devised with an ulterior motive.
Imagine a person from Kerala is witness to a crime ( say rape by a minister’s son ) in Delhi— do you really expect this witness to be in Delhi for the TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ PEH TAREEQ nonsense for the next 30 years – FOUR TIMES A YEAR ? .
NOBODY FOOTS HIS TRAVEL AND HOTEL BILLS .
Why have the judges not been sacked for dereliction of duty ?
Why has a deadline never been established ?
Why have the retirement benefits of LAZY judges not been withdrawn ?
SEE -- IF CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL DOES NOT ASK THESE QUESTIONS -- WHO WILL ASK ?
Witnesses, who often have little to gain or lose personally from the outcome of a case, see themselves as being penalised for their willingness to speak the truth.
Even when they have a personal stake, witnesses often succumb to bribery or intimidation ( for an extended period of time ) turn hostile.
Perjury and the intimidation of witnesses will remain a problem as long as the courts don’t treat these crimes with the urgency and seriousness they deserve.
Cosmetic changes just won't do much to deliver justice. The system requires a comprehensive revamp. For a situation like the Jessica Lal case, where witnesses refused to support the prosecution's case, the committee has suggested the following measures : -
1. Holding in-camera proceedings,
2. Taking measures to keep identity of witnesses secret,
3. Ensuring anonymity, and
4. Making arrangements to ensure their protection.
5. Witnesses in court should be treated like guests of honour;
6. They should be adequately compensated for spending money on travel and accommodation;
7. Comfort, convenience and dignity of witnesses while deposing in the court of law should be ensured; and
8. A law for protection of witnesses should be enacted as there is no such law in India.
9. Constitution of a National Security Commission at national level and a State security commissions at state level.
THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY SYSTEM IS ROTTEN..
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) is an Indian bar association, comprising the practising lawyers of the Supreme Court of India.
SUCCESSFUL AND RICH CRIMINAL LAWYERS IN INDIA HAVE FIXED FALSE WITNESSES IN THEIR PAYROLL — WHOM THEY TUTOR TO GIVE FALSE EVIDENCE IN CASES, WITH THE FULL KNOWLEDGE OF THE CORRUPT JUDGE AND OPPOSITION LAWYER .
THESE FAKE WITNESSES STAY IN REMOTE SAFE HOUSES OWNED BY THE LAWYER .
THESE WITNESSES ARE LITERALLY UNDER HOUSE ARREST BUT THEY DO NOT MIND AS THEY ARE PAID A GOOD MONTHLY SALARY AND A BONUS FOR EVERY CASE .
THESE WITENSSES ARE VULNERABLE TO ATTACKS ON THEIR OWN WIVES AND SCHOOL GOING CHILDREN BY GOONS IN THE PAYROLL OF THE LAWYER…
On 2 September 2008, Nanda was convicted by a Delhi court for killing six persons including three police officers.
On 3 August 2012 the Supreme Court reduced his prison sentence to the two years he had already spent in prison..
HE WAS OUT FREE—AFTER KILLING SIX PEOPLE
The word “evidence” is used in three senses
1) words uttered, and thing exhibited in Court,
2) facts proved by those words or things , which are regarded as ground word of inference as to other facts not so proved, and
3) relevancy of a particular fact to matter under inquiry
Evidence is generally divided into three categories facts are brought before the Court. Evidence is generally divided into three categories:
1) oral or personal
2) documentary and,
3) material or real.
'That I know the defendant is guilty, my hands are tied. As a judge, I can only go by the evidence provided by the investigative agencies.'
PATHETIC !
These were the words of Additional Sessions Judge G P Thareja, who acquitted Santosh Kumar Singh, Delhi University law student who committed rape and murder of Priyadharshani Matto.
A JURY SYSTEM WILL NEVER EVER HAVE ITS HANDS TIED THIS WAY !
In a direct evidence case, if the evidence is accepted beyond reasonable doubt, it is capable of proving the guilt of the accused.
Direct evidence can be of very dubious quality. For example, direct evidence from a witness identifying an accused person as being the offender can be very unreliable because identification evidence can be honest but mistaken.
There is a general rule against hearsay evidence. That is, evidence is generally inadmissible if someone is saying what they heard someone else say. Witnesses can generally only tell of what they directly saw or heard or otherwise witnessed of an offence.
So, for example, a witness can say that she or he: saw a robbery taking place, heard sounds of the scuffle of a robbery, or saw some people running from the scene of a robbery. However the witness cannot say what he or she heard other witnesses say about the robbery.
A person can say that she or he heard someone admit to a crime. Although this is hearsay, it is considered admissible evidence.
THIS WAS MISUSED IN THE COMMANDER NANAVATI CASE .
Direct Evidence is real, tangible, or clear evidence of a fact, happening, or thing that requires no thinking or consideration to prove its existence, as compared to circumstantial evidence.
Evidence comes in many forms, such as eyewitnesses, participants, prior statements by the defendant, documents, physical evidence, and scientific evidence, like fingerprints or DNA.
Witnesses are treated like SHIT in India . A witness is not treated with respect in the Court. He is pushed out from the crowded courtroom by the peon. He waits for the whole day and then finds the matter adjourned.
He has no place to sit and no place even to have a glass of water. The toilet of the courtroom can be smelt of reeking and eye watering ammonia one mile away.
And when he does appear in the Court, he is subjected to prolonged and unchecked examination and cross-examination and finds himself in a hapless situation. For all these reasons and others a person abhors becoming a witness.
Psychological studies carried on witnesses seem to suggest that grueling cross-examination, frequent adjournments; courtroom-intimidations are some of the major reasons that force a witness to turn hostile.
The successful working of the criminal justice system depends critically on the willingness of individuals to furnish information and tender evidence without being intimidated or bought.
A witness turning hostile seriously compromises the prosecution's case, already under a heavy burden to prove the guilt, "beyond reasonable doubt".
THERE IS NO NEED TO SCUTTLE A CASE WHEN A THE WITNESS TURNS HOSTILE IF THE JUDGE CAN GLEAN CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE WITHOUT BEING SPOON FED BY A LAWYER
Perjury today has also become a way of life in the Courts. In some cases the judge knows that whatever the witness is saying is not true and is going back on his previous statement.
The Judge here ignores this fact and does not even file a complaint against him. The amount of pending cases of the judges makes them indifferent towards the problem. At times they feel that if one or two witnesses turn hostile then it would simply ease their burden, as they have large number of cases to try.
Electronic evidence has entered the courtroom as critical forensic evidence. Audio and video evidence must be authenticated by both parties ( and an approved lab ) in any litigation by a forensic expert who is also an expert witness who assists the court in understanding details about that electronic evidence.
The burden of proof is usually on the person who brings a claim in a dispute. It is often associated with the Latin maxim semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, a translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."
Evidence is the currency by which one fulfills the burden of proof.
Evidence means and includes-
(1) All the statements which the court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses, in relation to matters of fact under enquiry; such statements are called Oral evidence;
(2) All the documents including electronic records produced for the inspection of the court; such documents are called documentary evidence;
The definition of Evidence given in this Act is very narrow because in this evidence comes before the court by two means only-
Thank you for this wonderful post Capt. I know what Indian judiciary is like, we have several cases in the courts and apart from the delays and "tareekh pe tareekh", the language used in the case papers by judges has to be seen to be believed. It's even less legible than Doctor's handwriting, the language I mean.
I was always an avid mystery buff and when I watched "My cousin Vinny", I had like deja vu especially at the torque tap part.
THE TOILET WITHIN THE COURT CAMPUS ( NEXT TO PHOTOSTAT / TEA SHOP )COULD BE SMELT A MILE AWAY
WITHIN 10 METRES YOUR EYES WATER DUE TO STING OF URINE AMMONIA
I STILL WENT TO THE TOILET FOR A PEE - THERE WAS NO BULB
THE TOILET HAS NOT BEEN CLEANED FOR MORE THAN TWO YEARS
WHILE I WAS PEEING A POLICE INSPECTOR ( SENIOR ) CAME TO PEE ALONGSIDE ME-- HE KEPT DOING AAARGGGHH PPTTHHEEOOOYY..
WHEN I WAS SHIP CAPTAIN THE CREW KNEW THAT CAPTAIN VISITS CREW TOILETS EVERY WEEK -UN ANNOUNCED
IF THIS TOILET WAS INSIDE A CREW CABIN I USED THE MASTER KEY -UN ANNOUNCED -- NEVER WOKE UP A SLEEPING WATCHKEEPER ..
THIS IS PART OF THE LIVING LEGEND LORE OF CAPT VADAKAYIL AT SEA
TAREEQ PEH PAAREEQ PEH TAREEQ FEEDS USELESS LAWYERS FOR A LIFETIME. AT CURRENT RATES EVEN A SMALL DELEGATED SUB-JUNIOR LAWYERS CHARGES 5000 RUPEES.
WHAT IS THE ALTERNATIVE ?
FOR YOU TO GO CROSS COUNTRY STAY IN A HOTEL FOR 2 DAYS AND TAKE THE TAREEQ YOURSELF?
WHILE THE LAWYER WILL GET IT ON HIS MOBILE PHONE BY GIVING A BAKSHEESH TO THE COURT CLERK --WHO IS MORE CORRUPT THAN ALL.
WHEN I WENT TO THE ESPLANADE MUMBAI COURT-- THERE WAS A FRIENDLY DOG ( NO FLEAS ) INSIDE THE COURTROOM HAPPILY SITTING THERE WATCHING THE JUDGE
YOU CANT HEAR ANYTHING WHAT THE JUDGE SAYS ..MAYBE IT IS DELIBERATE.
THERE WAS PIGEON SHIT ALL OVER
I HAD TEA AT THE COURT CAMPUS --AND NEXT TWO DAYS I HAD LOOSE MOTION. THE STOMACH RUMBLE GURGLE STARTED WITHIN 5 MINUTES OF HAVING THE TEA ( TEA WAS TASTY )
THEY DONT PUT UP THE NEXT TAREEEQ DATE ON THE NOTICE BOARD-- FOR OBVIOUS REASONS.
TAREEQ DATE MUST BE PUT ON THE INTERNET/ MOBILE PHONE APP --WHERE YOU CAN USE A CODE NUMBER TO ACCESS ( HULLO LAW MINISTER --- DO YOUR FUCKIN' JOB --ENOUGH OF SUCKING UP TO MODI )
THE TAREEQ DATE MILKING CONTINUES FOR 20 TO 30 YEARS .
WHY DOES SUPREME COURT TAKE UP IPL CRICKET DATES EVEN ON SUNDAYS ?
WHY IS NORMAL PROCEDURE SKIPPED FOR IPL ?
I AM SURE THE COLLEGIUM JUDGES KNOWS ROTHSCHILDs INDIAN FRONTS IN BCCI AND IPL.
THE BEST PART IS ALL TRAITOR SIR PARSI JUDGE PICTURES ARE HUNG IN COURT ROOMS--HUGE ONES
AT A SMALL SHRINE MEANT FOR CONVICTS TO PRAY BEFORE BEING SENTENCED TO DEATH OR JAIL-- THE PRIDE OF PLACE IS GIVEN TO SHIRDI SAI BABA -- A MARBLE STATUE. OTHER GODS IDOLS LIKE GANESHA, KRISHNA WERE DWARFED..
I COULD SEE A DEMENTED OLD PARSI LAWYER TAKING THE ROUNDS.. HE WORE LAWYER ROBES -- HE HAD SEEN HALCYON DAYS
HE WAS IN A BAD STATE , MORE THAN 85 YEARS OLD, WEARING WORN OUT HAWAAI CHAPPALS - I GUESS HE WAS ON A REMINISCE TOUR -- HIS HEAD SHAKING TO AND FRO.--DROOLING FROM THE CORNER OF HIS MOUTH
I AM JUST SAYING 2%-- I CAN WRITE A WHOLE BOOK .
THE LAW MINISTER WILL READ THIS , SO WILL CJI AND PM
WHO CARES ?
NOTHING WILL IMPROVE. AT SHIP BOARD PARTIES MY CREW FORCED ME TO SING "REMINISCE " BY NEIL DIAMOND MY CREW SAYS , I SING BETTER THAN THE ORIGINAL.
JETHMALANI BABY HAS A DARK
SECRET—THE NANAVATI CASE WHERE HE KICKED HIS OWN SINDHI COMMUNIY WHO TRUSTED
HIM IN THEIR TEETH.. RAM BABY WAS HIRED
BY DEAD MAN AHUJAs SISTER MAMIE.
THE FIGHT HAS
METAMORPHOSED TO A FIERCE PARSIS VERSUS SINDHIS..
PARSI NANAVATI MURDERED
SINGHI AHUJA IN A COLD PRE-MEDITATED MANNER — THIS WAS NO SUDDEN RUSH OF BLOOD.
TATTU Commander Nanavati,
who had known of the affair of his wife, had also consulted a Parsi lawyer and
wanted to know what he could do about it.
Sylvia had asked Nanavati for a divorce so that she could marry Ahuja
months before the murder..
Nanavati knew that
Ahuja gave his white skinned wife expensive diamond gifts for every FUCK.
It wasn’t as if he got to know of the affair
there and then and was provoked into killing Ahuja in a crime of passion
Commodore Nanda
testified that Nanavati was a very good shot and could not have fired as
haphazardly as the injuries indicated, went in favour of Nanavati. Nanda would be the blue eyed by of the
establishment. He would become Chief of Naval staff. None of his men attended this corrupt man’s
funeral.
With Ahuja gone ( no
more FUCK and diamonds ) white skinned
Sylvia, put ice in her blood and rooted for Nanavati.
Defence lawyer Parsi Karl
Khandalawala took was that Nanavati had gone to confront Ahuja and a scuffle
followed and the gun went off accidentally.
SO SO SO, you fire 3 shots this way ?
The loosely tied towel
stayed on Ahuja’s body and Nanavati’s
clothes were spotless.
Imagine , the Parsi
panchayat held a rally in Mumbai with bribed Anglo-Indian crowds ( after all
Sylvia was GORI right ) cheering and submitted a petition to transfer Nanavati
to the custody of the Navy..
Even though the jury
verdict ( swayed by Parsi RK Karanjia owner of the Blitz ) was in favour of
Nanavati, Sessions Judge Ratilal Bhaichand Mehta considered the acquittal as
perverse and referred the case to the High Court.
Mehta baby has failed
to warn the Jury that the words Ahuja told Nanavati AM I SUPPOSED TO MARRY
EVERY WOMAN I FUCK was a false narrative with zero evidence..
It was argued by the
prosecution that the jury had been misled by the presiding judge on crucial
points. Hence, the jury’s verdict was dismissed and the case heard by the High
Court again.
The HC found Nanavati
guilty of homicide amounting to murder and sentenced him to life in prison. The
Supreme Court upheld the decision on November 11, 1961
With the SC’s
sentencing, Nanavati had to resign. Sylvia has to sell the expensive jewelry
Ahuja gave her for the hundreds of FUCKS she gave him.
Parsi Nanavati knew the
Nehru-Gandhi family ( Indira Gandhi’s
husband Feroz was touted as a Parsi – in
reality he was a KHAN JEW ) and Jawaharlal Nehru’s sister Vijaya lakshmi Pandit
was the Governor of Maharashtra also went in favour of Nanavati.
In the interim, Rajni
Patel who was assisting the defence lawyer, paid Jethmalani a visit along with
Sylvia. Sylvia laid her charm thick ,
she was good looking. She asked if Sindhi Ram Jethmalani could convince Sindhi
Mamie to drop her objection to the
pardon, it would help Nanavati.
EVERY SUCCESSFU AWYER
HAS HIS OWN DARK SECRETS .. I KNOW THE DARK
SLIMY SECRETS OF EVERY UBER RICH LAWYER OF INDIA..
ALL IN GOOD TIME..
Admiral RD Katari ( he
is from my Cadet Training ship Dufferin ) flew down from Delhi in an official
Canberra jet, his naval escort screeching him into the sessions court, so he
could give Nanavati a glowing character certificate.
After Admiral RD Katai
retired another ex-Dufferin cadet Admiral Bhaskar Sadashiv Soman became Navy
Chief.
RIMS Dufferin was a
troop carrier during WW1. The shit pots did not have doors ( leave alone the
showers ) ..
Dufferin had the
privilege of producing several Admirals. Six of them became Naval Chiefs -- them -- J.G. Nadkarni, K. Ramdas, S.
Chatterjee, and Z. Curstjee
Below: President inspecting my batch ( 26th Jan 1974 )
Epilogue: Nanavati migrated to
Canada where he was appointed a trustee of Ontario’s main Zoroastrian prayer
hall. Rothschild gave Sylvia made a plum
job at the Imperial Bank of Commerce.
I ASK -- WHAT IS THE NEED TO HAVE SO COMPLEX LEGAL
PROCEDURES ( DELIBERATE ) THAT EVEN AN INTELLIGENT MAN HAS TO HIRE A LAWYER FOR
SIMPLE CASES LIKE DEFAMATION ?.
WHY
CANT HE DEFEND HIMSELF WITHOUT AN EXPENSIVE MIDDLEMAN LAWYER ?
UNLIKE WHAT THE BENAMI
MEDIA SAYS—THE KHAP SYSTEM WERE MORE OF CONFLICT RESOLVERS OF THE VILLAGE..
WHEN BASTARD MEDIA
CRIES FROM ROOF TOPS – “WOMAN FORCED TO MARRY HER RAPIST” ..
THE TRUTH IS
EXACTLY OPPOSITE ..
A LOVE AFFAIR ( PROMISE OF MARRIAGE , AND GIRL ALLOWED SEX ) FIZZLED OUT AND THE BOY TRIED TO ESCAPE AND WAS DOING THE SAME TO ANOTHER GIRL ..
THE BOY WAS ASKED BY
THE KHAP PANCHAYAT TO MARRY THE GIRL OR GET EX-COMMUNICATED FROM THE VILLAGE..
IF HE AGREES , WHAT IS THE HARM?
WHO ELSE WILL MARRY
THIS GIRL ?
The judge has to give
their reasons while a jury doesn't.
Studies have shown that
judges are FAR inferior to laypeople at fact-finding in general. They also give
instructions called “limiting instructions” that they have no ability to
follow. Jury instructions in which a judge instructs that evidence is
admissible for one purpose but not for another. The judge will often instruct
jurors to consider the evidence only for the legitimate purpose,and ignore it
for any other purpose
The judicial branch of
government ( VIA JURY SYSTEM ) is equal to the other two branches (executive
and legislative) and the JURY courts can overturn laws or acts of government that
violate constitutional rights.
JUDGES CANNOT OVERTURN
LAWS..BUT JURY CAN..
I doubt if our Illegal Indian Collegium Judiciary , so full of themselves
( WITH PRE-CONCEIVED NOTIONS ) will even understand real legal business ..
Checks and balances
requires a strong judicial ranch. A strong
judicial branch requires a healthy jury trial option. In some US states, jurors
can question witnesses.
The right to a “trial
by jury” — a right guaranteed by the constitutions of the United States and of
all 50 states — must mean something, right ?
JURY with open eyes , serves
as the “palladium of justice” and “conscience of the community”—which the LAWYER
TURNED JUDGE with closed eyes , can never ever be..
In USA Juries have refused
to convict those who helped slaves escape..
The jury isn’t supposed
to decide what the law is—or what it should be.
Jury nullification
occurs when a trial jury reaches a verdict that is contrary to the letter of
the law because the jurors either:--
--disagree with the law
under which the defendant is prosecuted, or
--believe that the law
shouldn’t be applied in the case at hand.
Jury nullification
takes place when jurors acquit a defendant who is factually guilty because they
disagree with the law as written to deliver NATURAL JUSTICE.
Jury nullification also
occurs when a jury convicts a defendant because it condemns the defendant or
his actions, even though the evidence at trial showed that he TECHNICALLY
didn’t break any law.
Below: TECHNICAL BILL !
The founding fathers
included jury trials in the constitution because jury trials prevent tyranny. The definition of
tyranny is oppressive power exerted by the government. Tyranny exists when
absolute power is vested in a single ruler. Jury trials are the opposite of tyranny because the
citizens on the jury are given the absolute power to make the final SUBJECTIVE
decision.
A jury’s verdict only
decides the particular case before the court in that trial—it doesn’t change
the law. But a consistent pattern of acquittals for prosecutions of a certain
offense can have the practical effect of invalidating a statute.
A JURY WOULD ACQUIT ALL
THE 6000 SABARIMALA PILGRIMS JAILED BY ATHEIST COMMIE CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN..
AND THE JURY ROOTED IN
SUBJECTIVITY WOULD ANNUL THE ULTERIOR MOTIVED ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDGES CREATED OBJECTIVE
LAW OF ALLOWING MENSTRUATING WOMEN INTO SABARIMALA BREAKING A 5900 YEAR OLD
SACRED CULTURE.
WHEN THE COMMIE KERALA GOVT FALLS, THE PET TOP COPS / MAGISTRATES / JUDGES / COLLECTORS WILL FACE THE MUSIC ..
The law limits the
courts' ability to inquire into jurors' motivations during or after a verdict.
Jurors with OPEN
EYES cannot be punished for their SUBJECTIVE
verdict..
Someone acquitted
because of jury nullification cannot be tried again for the same crime because
of the prohibition against double jeopardy.
COLLEGIUM JUDGES IN THE
PAYROLL OF KOSHER DEEP STATE HAS CREATED THE NAXAL RED CORRIDOR . THEY USE
TECHNICAL LOOPHOLES TO SAVE THE TRAITORS TO THE WATAN.. THE LAW MINISTERS OF
INDIA , ATTORNEY GENERALS AND THE BENAMI MEDIA HAVE BEEN IN CAHOOTS..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
CM KEJRIWAL
LT GOV OF DELHI
LAW MINISTER OF DELHI
DGP OF DELHI POLICE
PMO
PM MODI
RAJNATH SINGH
HOME MINISTRY
LAW MINISTER PRASAD
LAW MINISTRY
ATTORNEY GENERAL
AJIT DOVAL
ED
CBI
NIA
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER OF MAHARASHTRA ASSEMBLY
SS
VHP
AVBP
THE ITALIAN WAITRESS MADE DREZE BABY A MEMBER OF NAC.. WHERE SHE BECAME EMPRESS.
DREZEs WIFE BELA BHATIA IS A NAXAL THINKER.. SHE HAS BEEN PROFILED..
WE THE PEOPLE DONT WANT THIS GRUESOME DUO OF DREZE AND BELA TO SAVE INDIA..
WE KNOW WHY TISS HAS EMPLOYED BELA AS VISITING PROFESSOR .
SOME OF THE COMMIE PROFESSORS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPT OF TISS (URBAN NAXAL SUPPORTERS) ARE WORSE DESH DROHIS THAN JNU COMMIE PROFESSORS .. THEY HAVE BEEN PROFILED..
NAXAL WOMEN ( AS PER THEIR RED BOOK MODUS OPERANDI ) SHOVE STICKS AND STONES --THEY GET PAID GOOD MONEY FOR THIS PAIN-- AND THEN CLAIM THAT JAWANS RAPED THEM..
MIND YOU, SOME OF THESE NAXAL TRIBAL WOMEN ARE REPULSIVELY UGLY !!..
BELOW: EVEN A HALF WIT KNOWS THAT LAW DOES NOT PROVIDE EQUALITY IN INDIA.. A WOMANs WORD IS MORE EQUAL THAN A MANs WORD.. A DALIT OR MUSLIM CAN PUT YOU INTO JAIL BY TELLING LIES TO NCM .. IN KASHMIR, MUSLIMS WHO HAVE ETHNICALLY CLEANSES HINDUS ARE STILL "MINORITY" THE LAW DID NOTHING FOR KASHMIRI PANDITS WHEN MORE THAN A THOUSAND HINDU TEMPLES WERE DEMOLISHED OR CONVERTED TO MOSQUES RICH DALITS LIKE MAYAWATI IS STILL SPONSORED BY LAW AS THE "WEAK " HINDUS ARE "FRINGE ELEMENTS" IN OUR OWN LAND .. OUR JUDICIARY IS PACKED WITH COMMIE ANTI-HINDU JUDGES
Jury trials provide an
opportunity for citizens to participate in the process of governing. Serving on a jury is the
most direct and impactful way for citizens to connect to the constitution. It
is more active and participatory than voting. Citizens can help perpetuate our
system of laws, and stabilize our democracy.
Serving on a jury gives
people insight into the justice system and their own communities..
We do not want judges and lawyers making every
important decision; they are not representative of the people –they can NEVER
EVER deliver DHARMA.
Juries provide the
voice of common sense and conscience and the perspective of the citizen to our developing body of law.
In a civil case, a jury
of citizens will determine community standards and EXPECTATIONS in accordance with the law.
IN THE SABARIMALA CASE
THE JUDGES KNOW THAT THE WOMEN OF KERALA HAVE REJECTED THEIR DECISION ON
MENTRUATING WOMEN.. JUST WHO THE HELL ARE THSE JUDGES ?.. ONE OF THEM IS AN
ALIEN ROHINGTON NARIMAN IS A PARSI PRIEST..
INDIA HAS REJECTED
ADULTERY LAW CREATED BY SLIMY JUDGES..
Delegating the task of
adjudicating a criminal trial to ordinary citizens promotes democracy in both
legal and political institutions. Laypersons bring the voice of the people to
the law. They draw on their own life experiences, allowing trial decisions to more
accurately reflect the society that the legal system serves. This is a form of representative
democracy in legal institutions
Lay-persons act as a
check on authority. They balance the power imbued in state officials such as
prosecutors or professional judges. And by contributing to decisions that directly
affect the people, juries and lay judges engage in an act of selfgovernance,
reestablishing the people’s sovereignty. This act of self-governance in the legal
realm affects political participation.
Employing juries and
lay-judges supports and enhances democratic political institutions.
Lawyers have a
reputation for being money grabbing bastards of the lowest level. It is quite clear when you speak to some
people that they cannot differentiate the criminal defence lawyer from the drug
dealer or violent husband whom they represent
Most of the lawyers are
soul corrupted. They have huge amounts of black money. But govt.of India does
not take any action against them..
MOST OF THEM DON’T PAY
TAXES, AND HAVE HOARDED BLACK MONEY..
MAHARISHI VYASA , A KERALA NAMBOODIRI , WROTE THE MAHABHARATA IN 4000 BC AND ALSO PENNED DOWN THE 18 PURANAS ..
18 PURANAS WENT ON ORAL ROUTE FOR SEVERAL MILLINIUMS BEFORE THE MAHABHARATA WAR AND BEFORE VYASA WAS BORN ..
VEDAS WERE PENNED DOWN IN 5000 BC , AFTER COMING ON ORAL ROUTE FOR 330 CENTURIES..
PURANAS ARE FILLED WITH SHIVA , VISHNU , BRAHMA , PARVATI, LAXMI, SARASWATI STORIES.. http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/09/sanatana-dharma-hinduism-exhumed-and.html http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/09/sanatana-dharma-hinduism-exhumed-and_14.html
THE TRINITY AND THEIR WIVES ARE AMAZING COSMIC ALLEGORIES WHICH HAVE BEEN PERSONALISED FOR THE COMMON LAYMANs CONSUMPTION..
FOR EXAMPLE THE MIGHTY QUASAR ( PRIMORDIAL LIGHT ) WITH THE BRILLIANCE OF A TRILLION SUNS IS SARASWATI.. PARVATI IS THE MIGHTY BLACKHOLE WHICH CAN DEVOUR ENTIRE GALAXIES IN SECONDS .
VEDA SRUTIS ON ORAL ROUTE COULD NOT BE UTTERED BY ANYBODY OTHER THAN KERALA NAMBOODIRIS TO PRESSERVE THE ACCURACY OF RECITAL.
SABARIMALA PILGRIMAGE HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR 5900 YEARS ..
THIS SPOT WAS CONSECRATED BY VISHNU AVATAR PARASHURAMA , EVEN BEFORE NINTH AVATR OF VISHNU AYYAPPA WAS BORN ..
PARAYAN OF THE PURANAS WERE ENCOURAGED FOR THE COMMON MAN, TO IMBIBE VALUES OF DHARMA.
A GURUSWAMI WHO HAS BEEN TO SABARIMALA 18 TIMES , WAS AN EXPERT ON ALL 18 PURANAS PENNED DOWN BY VEDA VYASA..
A GURUSWAMI COULD LEAD UPTO 108 PILGRIMS TO SABARIMALA— IT WAS AN ARDUOUS TREK OF SEVERAL DAYS, THOUGH TIGER AND KING COBRA INFESTED DENSE FORESTS .
DURING THIS PILRIMAGE PASSAGE THE GURUSWAMI GAVE ANSWERS TO PURANA BASES QUESTIONS TO THE TEAM HE LEADS ..
DURING THE 41 DAYS VRAT THE GURUSWAMY GAVE PURANA DISCOURSES IN THE TEMPLES EARLY IN THE MORNING AFTER BATH IN THE TEMPLE POND.. THIS HAPPENS EVEN TODAY .
THE 18 STEPS OF SABARIMALA SANNIDHANAM REPRESENTED THE 18 PURANAS.. NOBODY HAS WRITTEN ABOUT IT TILL TODAY..
THIS IS WHAT THE ANTI-HINDU LYING JEWESS WENDY DONIGER WROTE --
QUOTE: Wendy Doniger, based on her study of indologists, assigns approximate dates to the various Puranas. She dates Markandeya Purana to c. 250 CE (with one portion dated to c. 550 CE), Matsya Purana to c. 250–500 CE, Vayu Purana to c. 350 CE, Harivamsa and Vishnu Purana to c. 450 CE, Brahmanda Purana to c. 350–950 CE, Vamana Purana to c. 450–900 CE, Kurma Purana to c. 550–850 CE, and Linga Purana to c. 600–1000 CE.[8]UNQUOTE
ONCE A PILGRIMS HAS DONE NEY ABHISHEKHAM 18 TIMES AND BROUGHT BACK THE DESI GHEE TO HIS MOTHER/ WIFE/ SISTER/ DAUGHTER WHO FILLED THE GHEE IN THE COCONUT ( THROUGH THE THIRD EYE ) HE BECOMES A GURUSWAMI HIMSELF.. I SAW ON TV ACTIVISTS FILLING GHEE THROUGH THE OTHER TWO EYES OF THE COCONUT..
AFTER 18 TRIPS A PILGRIM BECOMES A GURUSWAMY HIMSELF ( HE IS NOW AN EXPERT ON 18 PURANAS ) HE IS THEN ALLOWED TO PLANT A COCONUT SAPLING IN THE VICINITY OF PAMPA ..
ALL THE 18 PURANAS HAVE BEEN POISON INJECTED BY THE WHITE INVADER—IN AS MUCH AS IN GARUDA PURANA PAINFUL PUNISHMENTS IN HELL WERE INJECTED ..
LIARS LIKE SHELDON PLLOCK MUST KNOW THAT KERALA NAMBOODIRIS ARE THE ARYANS ..
“ARYA VAIDYASALA” IN MALABAR ( PRECEDED CHARAKA SAMHITA 4200 BC ) EXISTED WHEN THE WHITE MAN WAS RUNNING AROUND NAKED DOING GRUNT GRUNT..
THE BENAMI MEDIA CRIED— WOMEN DISCRIMINATION IS HAPPENING IN SABARIMALA.
SORRY IT IS AN AGE RESTRICTION JUDT TO PROTECT WOMEN , SO THAT THEY DON’T PRODUCE STILL BORN / SUBSTANDARD DOWN SYNDROME / MONSTER BABIES ..
IT IS ABOUT NOT INTERRUPTING THE MANDATORY SLOUGHING OFF OF THE INNER LAYER OF THE ENDOMETRIUM ( UTERUS ).
WHY DID PINARAYI VIJAYAN TRY TO TAKE ONLY NAXAL / MUSLIM ACTVISTS INTO SABARIMALA?.. WHY DID HE NOT USE HIS OWN DAUGHTER FOR BREAKING SHACKLES OF DISCRIMINATION ? HE WANTS TO PROTECT HIS OWN DAUGHTER , RIGHT?
RESTRICTION BY AGE IS NOT DISCRIMINATION
THERE IS NO DISCRIMINATION IS A CHILD AT THE AGE OF 8 WANTS TO DRIVE A CAR ON THE BUSY STREETS .. THIS IS A LAWFUL RESTRICTION.. OUR CONSTITUTION DOES NOT UTTER A WORD ON AGE RESTRICTION..
OUR STUPID BOTTOM OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL “LAWYER TURNED JUDGES” WILL NEVER EVER UNDERSTAND ALL THIS.
WHAT DOES THE WHITE MAN AND THE PICKLE JOHN- CHUTNEY MARYs AND COMMIES KNOW ABOUT ORU PRICELESS ANCIENT CULTURE ?
MORE THAN 6000 PILGRIMS WERE JAILED AND THEY LOST THEIR JOBS BECAUSE MY SELFSIH AND GREEDY READERS ( LEAVE ASIDE A COUPLE OF DESH BHAKT EXCEPTIONS ) DID NOT PROPAGATE WHAT I TOLD THEM TO DO..
AN INDIAN JURY WILL BE
MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE THAN AN AMERICAN JURY PACKED WITH STUPID HILLY BILLY YANKS
If you are accused of a
crime, you have the right to ask for a jury of your peers to judge your guilt
or innocence.
In USA most
jurisdictions exempt some groups from jury service (e.g., police officers,
lawyers, doctors, etc.). All jurisdictions excuse jurors if the service imposes
undue hardship.
Voir dire, means,
"to speak the truth”.
An elaborate screening
process known as voir dire, which is conducted by trial counsel at the
inception of a trial. The law permits counsel to challenge prospective jurors
either for cause (if there is specific likelihood of bias) or, for a limited
number, “peremptorily” (i.e., without having to give a reason).
Voir dire is a legal phrase for a variety of procedures
connected with jury trials. It originally referred to an oath taken by jurors
to tell the truth i.e., to say what is
true, what is objectively accurate or subjectively honest, or both. Voir Dire is a form of questioning designed to establish
the qualifications of prospective jurors to serve in a case.
But in USA the deep
state has hijacked this term – in USA voir dire is the process by which
prospective jurors are questioned about their backgrounds and potential biases
before being chosen to sit on a jury. It
is a process by which attorneys select, or perhaps more appropriately reject,
certain jurors to hear a case.
They search the Facebook / Twitter posts with a
toothpick..
The judge and the
attorneys ask jurors questions to determine if the jurors are free of bias
(prejudice) or whether there is any other reason why they cannot be fair and
impartial.. Was Parsi priest ROHINGTON
NARIMAN free of bias in the Sabarimala case?
MAYA DANAVA WAS ARM TWISTED BY KRISHNA TO CREATE THE HALL OF ILLUSIONS IN INDRAPRASTA PALACE..
THIS HALL WAS THE REASON FOR MAHABHARAT WAR 6000 YEARS AGO..
THE HALL HAS MIRRORS , CRYSTALS AND WATER PROVIDING ILLUSIONS..
THE HALL WAS LIT BY ELECTRICITY VIA DC BATTERIES AND AC ALTERNATORS..
THE HALL COULD DIRECT SOUND SO THAT ONLY ONE PERSON IN THE HALL CAN HEAR .. THIS WAS WHAT DRAUPADI DID WHEN SHE INSULTED DURYODHANA ( WHO FELL INTO THE POOL ) "ANDHASYA PUTRA ANDAHAH " SON OF BLIND PARENTS IS BLIND TOO..
BUT BHISHMA HEARD THIS TAUNT MADE TO A GUEST KING..
LATER WHEN DRAUPADI WAS DISROBED BHISHMA SAID " DHARMA IS SUBTLE"..
MAYA DANAVA HAD HIS OWN VIMANA.. THE MAYAN CALENDAR IS NAMED AFTER MAYA DANAVA.. http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/07/maya-inca-aztec-civilizations-decoded.html
URUMI STEEL HAS THE TYPICAL "DAMASCUS" PATTERN.. ( TWISTING STEEL WHILE FORGING )
AS YOU WIELD THE URUMI THE STEEL GETS HEATED AND TOXIC METAL POISON OOZES OUT.. THERE IS NO NEED TO GET DEEP WOUND--A NICK IS ENOUGH--YOU GO HOME A DIE.. http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2017/11/urumi-invincible-kalari-sword-wootz.html
TWISTING STEEL ?
CHECK 11.41 OF THE YOUTUBE VIDEO BELOW-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5R9luYO-NpE
THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN CALLED AGASTYA STEEL -- NOT DAMASCUS STEEL..
SPIRITUALITY CAN NEVER BE DRIVEN OUT OF KERALA..
THE DANAVA CIVILIZATION PRECEDED THE VEDIC CIVILIZATION BY SEVERAL MILLENNIUMS..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-- DEFENCE MINISTER NIRMALA SITARAMAN DEFENCE MINISTRY ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS AJIT DOVAL CBI ED ED RAW PMO PM MODI NITI AYOG AMITABH KANT NCERT EDUCATION MINISTER JAVEDEKAR EDUCATION MINISTRY PC GEORGE MLA RAHUL EASHWAR PADMA PILLAI SRIDHARAN PILLAI PARASARAN SAI DEEPAK VIDYASAGAR GURUMURTHY SURESH GOPI MOHANLAL MOHANDAS PAI RAJEEV CHANDRASHEKHAR K PARASARAN ALL BJP SPOKESMEN ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN CJI GOGOI ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES ALL SUPRME COURT LAWYERS ATTORNEY GENERAL RSS VHP AVBP AMIT SHAH PMO PM MODI RAJNATH SINGH HOME MINISTRY PRESIDENT OF INDIA VP OF INDIA SPEAKER LOK SABHA SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA EVERY CENTRAL MINISTER / MINISTRY MLAs OF ALL STATES CMs OF ALL STATES GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES DGPs OF ALL STATES SWAMY GURUMURTHY RAJ KAMAL JHA PRANNOY JAMES ROY AROON PURIE VINEET JAIN RAGHAV BAHL SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN N RAM SHASHI THAROOR JOHN BRITTAS CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWAMI RAJDEEP SARDESAI BARKHA DUTT NAVIKA KUMAR ZAKKA JACOB ANAND NARASIMHAN FAYE DSOUZA NIDHI RAZDAN SHEKHAR GUPTA RAMCHANDRA GUHA MEENAKSHI LEKHI KIRON KHER SMRITI IRANI SONIA GANDHI RAHUL GANDHI BRINDA KARAT PRAKASH KARAT SITARAM YECHURY SUMEET CHOPRA DINESH VARSHNEY SWARA BHASKAR KAVITA KRISHNAN TEESTA SETALVAD ROMILA THAPAR IRFAN HABIB SHOBHAA DE ARUNDHATI ROY MANI SHANGARAN AIYERAN ANNA MM VETTIKAD KANCHA ILAIH JOHN DAYAL CHETAN BHAGAT SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV JOHN FRAWLEY STEPHEN KNAPP KONREAD ELST WENSY DONIGER SHELDON POLLOCK KAANIYA MURTHY AUDREY TRUSCHKE WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKTS SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
LIKE
HOW THE INDIAN BUREAUCRACY IS PACKED WITH COMMIE TRAITORS , WITH NO LOVE FOR
THE WATAN, -- OUR JUDICIARY/ BENAMI
MEDIA IS PACKED WITH ANTI-HINDU DROHIS ..
ALL
THIS IS NOT COINCIDENCE..
WE
THE PEOPLE WARN THESE DROHIS .. YOU HAVE BEEN PROFILED.
AT EVERY DESH DROHI LITERARY FEST, WE HAVE COMMIE AND WHITE MEN , COMING OUT WITH NEW POISON INJECTED PURANAS--
LIKE SHIVA FUCK!NG VISHNUs, BRAHMAs WIVES BEHIND THEIR BACKS..
SHIVA POUNDING VISHNUs ASSH0LE IN GAY SEX..
ALL THIS HAS SUDDENLY STOPPED.. AS WE HAVE PROFILED THESE LYING BASTARDS , WHO SAY THIS STORY WE GOT FROM MALAYSIA / SINGAPORE ETC..
TODAY THEY ARE AFRAID AS HIDDEN CAMS RECORD EVERYTHING..
VISHNU/ SHIVA / BRAHMA AND THEIR WIVES ARE NOT MORTALS.. THEY ARE COSMIC ALLEGORIES..
EVERY HINDU GOD IS A COSMIC ALLEGORY EXCEPT VISHNU AVATARS MORTALS WITH 13 STRAND DNA RAMA/ KRISHNA/ AYYAPPA.. ONLY VISHNU CAN HAVE AVATARS…
CHECK OUT WHAT THIS DROHI CONMAN SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR TOLD ABOUT SHIVA HAVING GAY SEX WITH VISHNU AND PRODUCING AYYAPPA..
THE SAMUDRA MANTHAN EPISODE OF KURMA AVATAR OF VISHNU , TOOK PLACE MILLENNIUMS BEFORE AYYAPPA THE MORTAL (NINTH AVATAR OF VISHNU ) WAS BORN..
https://twitter.com/srisri/status/410810667176697856?lang=en
THIS FELLOW SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR WITH GIRLIE VOICE AND, SLENDER FINGERS IS TREATED AS A HINDU GOD BY ENEMIES OF HINDUISM.. CHILDLESS MODI GAVE THIS FELLOW A PADMA VIBHUSHAN...
IN SOME LITERARY FEST THEY EVEN TOUTED FOUL STORIES OF HOW SHIVA WOULD DIG UP DEAD WOMEN AND F#CK THEM AND THEN EAT THEM ..
WE KNOW THE FOREIGN PAYROLL ANTI-HINDU DESH DROHIS ..
BRAHMACHARYA HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SEMEN RETENTION.. AS TOUTED BY FREEMASONs GANDHI AND VIVEKANANDA..
JEW ROTHSCHILD USED ABHINAVAGUPTA TO SPREAD THE LIE OF PRESERVING SEMEN AND BRAHMACHARYA – AND INTRODUCED ANAL SEX RECEIVING EFFEMINATE VERMIN AS UNMARRIED GURUS IN HIS FAKE MUTTS...
ABHINAVAGUPTA IS THE FOUNTAINHEAD OF AGAMA SH!T--- WHICH IS NOT PART OF HINDUISM. .. TODAY TAMIL PRIDE PARTY ( OF FAKE KANCHI MUTT ) TOUT THESE FAKE AGAMA TEXTS AS THE REAL VEDAS. ..MOST PASSAGES IN AGAMA TEXTS REPUDIATE THE AUTHORITY OF VEDAS..
JEW ROTHSCHILD USED ABHINAVAGUPTAs WORK GHATAKARPARA KULAKA VIVRITHI TO PRAISE GHATAKARPARA , THE FAKE WORK OF KALIDASA WHO NEVER EXISTED ..
ALL DASAS OF THE FAKE BHAKTI MOVEMENT NEVER EXISTED.. SANATANA DHARMA ALLOWS ONLY SHRADDHA , NEVER BHAKTI OF THE DOGMA SINGLE MESSIAH SINGLE HOLY BOOK RELIGIONS.
ROTHSCHILD INJECTED BHAKTI VERSES OF THESE FAKE DASAS INTO GURU GRANTH SAHIB..
All BHAKTI insertions in Vedas , Bhagawad Gita and Upanishads have been done by the EVIL white invader-- to DIVIDE AND RULE..
BHAGAWAD GITA PROPAGATED ONLY SHRADDHA - NEVER BHAKTI..
Shraddha is more than mere faith. It also implies self–reliance on an inner voice , an independent sense of right and wrong by conscience , and the courage of one’s own conviction… Sanatana Dharma is based on the inner voice of the soul. The soul within you is part of Brahman ( god ) the morphogenetic mother field of consciousness..
SHRADDHA means faith, but in the sense of an INNER SOUL VOICE / CONSCIENCE -based conviction, not just a mere unquestioning belief to BULLSHIT dogma … SHRADDHA is a combination of the desire to seek truth, the perseverance while working on the path, and the firm conviction in truth's existence. It is more than just a belief..
IT IS THE LYING WHITE INVADER WHO MADE PRESERVATION OF SEMEN , AND BEING UNMARRIED AS A GREAT QUALIFICATION IN SANATANA DHARMA..
GANDHI WAS NOT A HINDU, BUT A KATHIAWARI JAIN JEW..ROTHSCHILD USED GANDHI TO SPREAD HIS BRAHMACHARI NONSENSE-- ALL THE WHILE GANDHI WAS SLEEPING NAKED WITH UNDERAGE GIRLS WALLOWING IN ENEMA SHIT.. http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/01/mahatma-gandhi-and-his-endless.html
The technical meaning of Brahmacharya is self-restraint, particularly mastery of perfect control over the senses- not the PRICK alone..
Brahmacharya is a means, not an end. It usually includes cleanliness, ahimsa, simple living, studies, meditation, and voluntary restraints on certain foods, intoxicants, and behaviors-(including sexual behavior).
Brahmacharya has nothing to do with withholding semen...Brahmacharya is about allocation: using your resources effectively to achieve your aspiration. .
Brahmacharya means not misusing sex like EVIL Gandhi. ..
Brahmacharya means ‘to respect the creative power of sex and not abuse it by manipulating others sexually.
Like the other yamas, brahmacharya has to do with balance, and how we choose to use or “invest” our resources. Brahmacharya is about harnessing the energy or power of our senses and directing that instead to greater personal understanding- not withholding semen.
The sex you have with your wife is LOVE. The sex you have with a whore is LUST. No unmarried man or widower can do a yagna ( homan ) in Sanatana Dharma..
KAMA HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SEX.. KAMASUTRA IS A FAKE BOOK...A DHARMIC LIFE MANUAL CALLED KAMASUTRA WAS CONVERTED TO A PERVERTED SEX MANUAL BY JEW ROTHSCHILD.. KAMA PURUSHARTHA IS NOT LUST BUT DESIRABLE ACTION...
Purushartha means those actions which are proper and correct...Kama is a broad subject which encompasses arts, emotions, poetry , relationships and other sciences..
Purushartha means “Purusharthate Purushartha”, which are the efforts made by the individual to achieve the aims, goals and ultimate values of life...
By Purushartha we mean the pursuance of those actions which lead to the fulfillment of socially approved values and goal..
Kama refers to all the desires in man for the enjoyment and satisfaction and sensual gratification of the five human senses.
KAMA could be music or being creative or team spirit in sport or travelling to places of natural beauty or sitting with family at the beach or riding a fast horse or participating in a arrow shooting contest - anything which brings delight to human life and spirit ..
Kama would refer to the totality of the innate desires and drives of man- motivations of man..
Kama refers to the instinctive and emotional life of man, and provides for the satisfaction of his aesthetic urges.
AT EVERY LITERARY FEST WE HAVE TRAITORS PRAISING INVADERS FOR CONVERTING HINDU SAVAGES TO DECENT MEN AND MAKING INDIA INTO A HAPPY PLACE WORTH LIVING ..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PftaGkeZ27M
PATHETIC GAY FELLOW DEVDUTT PATTANAIK IS GUILTY OF DENIGRATING HINDUISM..
I WANT MY READERS TO SPREAD THIS ON THE INTERNET -SOCIAL MEDIA--EVERY WHICH WAY..
ALSO
PUT IN WEBSITES OF --
SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV
DEVDUTT PATTANAIK
SUHEL SETH
ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
ALL HINDU STALWARTS
JOHN FRAWLEY
STEPHEN KNAPP
KONREAD ELST
WENSDY DONIGER
SHELDON POLLOCK
AUDREY TRUSHKE
PRAKASH JAVEDEKAR
EDUCATION MINISTRY
NCERT
CBI
IB
NIA
RAW
ED
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
MANEKA GANDHI
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
CJI GOGOI
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
ALL SUPRME COURT LAWYERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL
HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES OF ALL STATES
AMITABH KANT
NITI AYOG
RSS
VHP
AVBP
AMIT SHAH
PMO
PM MODI
AJIT DOVAL
RAJNATH SINGH
HOME MINISTRY
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA
EVERY CENTRAL MINISTER / MINISTRY
MLAs OF ALL STATES
CMs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
DGPs OF ALL STATES
SWAMY
GURUMURTHY
RAJ KAMAL JHA
PRANNOY JAMES ROY
AROON PURIE
VINEET JAIN
RAGHAV BAHL
SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
N RAM
SHASHI THAROOR
JOHN BRITTAS
CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWAMI
RAJDEEP SARDESAI
BARKHA DUTT
NAVIKA KUMAR
ZAKKA JACOB
ANAND NARASIMHAN
FAYE DSOUZA
NIDHI RAZDAN
SHEKHAR GUPTA
RAMCHANDRA GUHA
MEENAKSHI LEKHI
KIRON KHER
SMRITI IRANI
SONIA GANDHI
RAHUL GANDHI
BRINDA KARAT
PRAKASH KARAT
SITARAM YECHURY
SUMEET CHOPRA
DINESH VARSHNEY
SWARA BHASKAR
KAVITA KRISHNAN
TEESTA SETALVAD
ROMILA THAPAR
IRFAN HABIB
SHOBHAA DE
ARUNDHATI ROY
MANI SHANGARAN AIYERAN
ANNA MM VETTIKAD
KANCHA ILAIH
JOHN DAYAL
FATHER CEDRIC PRAKASH
CHETAN BHAGAT
AMISH TRIPATHI
MOHANDAS PAI
RAJEEV CHANDRASHEKHAR
JANAM TV
CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN
ALL KERALA MINISTERS
ALL KERALA MLAs
ALL KERALA COLLECTORS
DGP BEHERA
RAMAN SRIVASTAVA
HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICE KERALA
PC GEORGE MLA
RAHUL EASHWAR
PADMA PILLAI
SRIDHARAN PILLAI
PARASARAN
SAI DEEPAK
VIDYASAGAR GURUMURTHY
SANJAY HEGDE
RSN SINGH
SHAZIA ILMI
RAJIV MALHOTRA
SURESH GOPI
MOHANLAL
LK ADVANI
MURLI MANOHAR JOSHI
ARUN SHOURIE
RAM MADHAV
WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKTS
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
BEFORE THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA, THERE WERE ONLY FOUR MUTT IN INDIA..
ALL 4 WERE ESTABLISHED BY ADI SHANKARACHAARYA ( A KERALA NAMBOODIRI ) 4000 YEARS AGO.. ALL 4 MUTTS HAS NAMBOORIDI SHANKARACHARYAS ( PONTIFFS ) WITH THE RULE THAT THE PONTIFF MUST ALWAYS BE A KERALA NAMBOODIRI WHO KNEW VEDAS BY ORAL ROUTE..
AFTER THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA , FAKE MUTTS WERE CREATED AND BACKDATED.. BY THE TIME THE WHITE INVADER LEFT INDIA THERE WERE MORE THAN 1000 FAKE MUTTS..
THE WORST PART IS THAT THE FOUR ORIGINAL MUTTS , INSTEAD OF HAVING A NAMBOODIRI PONTIFFS WERE REPLACED BY CRYPO JEWS WITH PALE EYES..
DWARAKA AND GOVARDHAN MUTT HAD A FAKE PRIESTLY CLASS PANDAS CREATED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD, WHO HARASSED POOR NON-BRAHMIN HINDUS AND MADE THEM SELF LOATHING..
WHEN I WENT TO DWARAKA I MYSELF WAS HARRASSED BY A PANDA , WHO KEPT ASKING ME IF I AM A BRAHMIN.. HE SAW MY EXPENSIVE WATCH AND WANTED TO FLEECE ME..
IN KERALA , BRAHMINS ARE NAMBOODIRIS. THEY ARE A MINUSCULE PERCENTAGE OF THE STATE POPULATION, UNLIKE THE REST OF INDIA WERE THERE ARE FAKE BRAHMINS BY INDUCTION.. ONLY KERALA HAS REAL HINDU TEMPLES AN EXCEPTION IS MOOKAMBIKA TEMPLE AT KOLLUR KARNATAKA..
IT IS A ROTHSCHILD CREATED LIE THAT FAKE PADMAPADACHARYA WAS THE SECOND PONTIFF OF GOVARDHAN MUTT AND A DIRECT DISCIPLE OF ADI SHANKARACHARYA..
BEFORE THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA THERE WERE NO TEMPLE PRIEST CLAN BY THE NAME OF PANDAS..
http://hotnhitnews.com/Gang-of-Odisha-priests-literally-fleece-religious-tourists-22309082014.htm IF DEVOTEES ARE HARASSED AND FLEECED BY PANDAS WE ASK YOU TO LODGE A POLICE COMPLAINT .. THESE UGLY EVIL PANDAS ( MOST ARE NON-VEGETARIANS ) HAVE NO RIGHT TO BE IN ANY OF THESE TEMPLES AS PRIESTS.
IN KERALA NO TEMPLE PRIEST WILL HARASS A DEVOTEE.
THE FAKE KANCHI MUTT PROPAGATING THE FAKE AGAMA IS THE REASON WHY TAMIL NADU HAS BECOME A ATHEIST STATE.. BREEDING DROHIS LIKE ROTHSCHILDs AGENT EVR PERIYAR.. http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/06/kanchi-mutt-creation-of-white-invader.html
CHAITANYA MAHAPRABHU WHO SANG BHAJANS AND RAN AROUND BEATING DHOLAK NEVER EXISTED.. HE WAS A COOKED UP AND BACK DATED CREATION OF JEW ROTHSCHILD TO KICK START HIS FAKE BHAKTI MOVEMENT..
IN SANATANA DHARMA BHAKTI IS NOT ALLOWED.. ONLY SHRADDHA IS ALLOWED.
THE "HARE KRISHNA" MANTRA OF SRILA PRABHUPADA IS FAKE..THIS MANTRA IS TOUTED AS CREATED BY CHAITANYA MAHAPRABHU.
HERE IS NONSENSE BY WIKIPEDIA
QUOTE " It is sometimes believed that "Rama" in "Hare Rama" means "Radharamana" or the beloved of Radha (another name for Kṛṣṇa). UNQUOTE
RADHA THE MISTRESS OF KRISHNA NEVER EXISTED.. WE NEVER HEARD OF RADHA TILL THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA..
WIKIPEDIA LIES --
QUOTE - Narada asks to be told this name of Narayana, and Brahma replies:
Hare Rama Hare Rama, Rama Rama Hare Hare, Hare Krishna Hare Krishna, Krishna Krishna Hare Hare UNQUOTE
THIS CHANT DOES NOTHING FOR YOU..
THIS CHANT WAS TOUTED AS CHANTED BY CHAITANYA MAHAPRABHU WHO NEVER EXISTED.. CHAITANYA MAHAPRABHU IS TOUTED AS A GREAT HERITAGE PART OF JAGANATH TEMPLE PURI..
THE ORIGINAL JAGANNATH PURI TEMPLE IS 5900 YEARS OLD AND THE DIETY WAS AYYAPPA , THE NINTH AVATAR OF VISHNU.. IN THOSE DAYS , INSTEAD OF PANDAS , SABARI PEOPLE FROM SABARIMALA MOUNTAIN AREA OF KERALA WERE THE PRIESTS ..
JEW ROTHSCHILD THEN CONVERTED THEM INTO A CRIMINAL TRIBE AND DROVE THEM AWAY FROM PURI..
AT EVERY LITERARY FEST THE DROHIS COOKED UP FOUL STORIES ABOUT PURI TEMPLE.. THESE BASTARD DO NOT KNOW THAT SHIVA AND PARVATI ARE COSMIC ALLEGORIES..
AT LITERARY FESTS THEY DECLARE AGHORI KINA RAM IS A RE-INCARNATION OF BHIRAVA
They do post-mortem ritual cannibalism ( necrophagy – eating raw dead corpses ), urophagia ( drinking urine ) and coprophagy ( eating shit ) --
The Aghoris received incentives to pretend that they ate shit , drank piss and bloating rotting corpses fished out from the ganges.
This is one of the reasons why the whole world sees Hinduism in VERY poor light.
Mind you, even today the Aghoris do this only for the white man's cameras.
MANY SELF LOATHING HINDUS CONVERTED TO CHRISTIANITY..
JEW ROTHSCHILD TRIED TO MAKE AGHORIS ENTER KUMBH MELA , THEY WERE ATTACKED BY REAL SAINTS AND THROWN OUT
The aghoris have a POPE type leader - since 1978 the Aghori pope is Baba Siddharth Gautam Ram. He will tell you that he is an incarnation of the venerable Baba Kinaram himself..
BABA SIDDHARTH GAUTAM RAM IS BEING TOUTED AS A DALIT LEADER.. VERY SOON WE CAN SEE MODI RUNNING TO HIM FOR VOTES.. MODI MIGHT EVEN GIVE THIS FELLOW PADMA VIBHUSHAN
As per Wikipedia -- " By eating shit and dead bodies they have scientific approach in trying to discover how matter converts from one form to another" TEE HEEEEE
WHAT IS THE BHAIRAVA OF SANATANA DHARMA ? IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH EATING DEAD BDIES, EATING SHIT OR FUCKING CORPSES..
Vigyana Bhairava Tantra is a technique of going beyond consciousness.
′Vigyana′ means consciousness, ′Bhairava′ means the state which is beyond consciousness, and ′Tantra′ means the method: the method of going beyond consciousness
Vigyan Bhairav Tantra teaches 108 methods of contemplation..
There is no meditation technique in Sanatana Dharma which has not been covered in Vigyan Bhairav Tantra-- and is cast in our Puranas as a discourse between the god Shiva and his consort Devi or Shakti ( Parvati)
These include several variants of breath awareness, concentration on various centers in the body, non-dual awareness, chanting, imagination and visualization and contemplation through each of the senses..
SWARA YOGA , THE ULTIMATE FORM OF YOGA IS A PART OF THIS.. SWARA YOGA AND TANTRA WERE NOT PENNED DOWN IN 5000 BC- AS IT WAS TO POTENT AND LIABLE TO BE MISUSED..
Changes of electrical potential happen continiously within the mucus membrane of each nostril—the basis of Swara Yoga.. The left nostril is connected to the right sub-conscious brain lobe..
The autonomic nervous system, and its two complementary components- the excitatory sympathetic nervous system (pingala nadi) and the relaxatory parasympathetic nervous system (ida nadi) are centrally activated from the nasal mucus membrane region as well as from the sympathetic and parasympathetic nuclei lying within the brain itself.
The purpose of yoga is to awaken and balance ida and pingala, to enable pranic energy to flow and illumine the dark and sleepy areas of consciousness so that we wake up and realize our full potential as human beings.
BALLS TO THESE BASTARDS WHO DENIGRATE SANATANA DHARMA IN LITERARY FESTS .. WE KNOW THE NAMES OF THE ANTI-HINDU , ANTI-WATAN JUDGES / MEDIA WHO SPONSOR THEM..
GOD FORBID, IF THERE IS A REVOLUTION ( BY ASSASSINATION OF A POPULAR LEADER ) , LAMP POSTS AND SHORT ROPES HAVE BEEN EARMARKED FOR THESE FOREIGN PAYROLL TRAITORS...
I WANT MY READERS TO SPREAD THIS ON THE INTERNET -SOCIAL MEDIA--EVERY WHICH WAY..
ALSO
PUT IN WEBSITES OF --
SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV
DEVDUTT PATTANAIK
SUHEL SETH
ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
ALL HINDU STALWARTS
JOHN FRAWLEY
STEPHEN KNAPP
KONREAD ELST
WENSDY DONIGER
SHELDON POLLOCK
AUDREY TRUSHKE
PRAKASH JAVEDEKAR
EDUCATION MINISTRY
NCERT
CBI
IB
NIA
RAW
ED
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
MANEKA GANDHI
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
CJI GOGOI
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
ALL SUPRME COURT LAWYERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL
HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES OF ALL STATES
AMITABH KANT
NITI AYOG
RSS
VHP
AVBP
AMIT SHAH
PMO
PM MODI
AJIT DOVAL
RAJNATH SINGH
HOME MINISTRY
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA
EVERY CENTRAL MINISTER / MINISTRY
MLAs OF ALL STATES
CMs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
DGPs OF ALL STATES
SWAMY
GURUMURTHY
RAJ KAMAL JHA
PRANNOY JAMES ROY
AROON PURIE
VINEET JAIN
RAGHAV BAHL
SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
N RAM
SHASHI THAROOR
JOHN BRITTAS
CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWAMI
RAJDEEP SARDESAI
BARKHA DUTT
NAVIKA KUMAR
ZAKKA JACOB
ANAND NARASIMHAN
FAYE DSOUZA
NIDHI RAZDAN
SHEKHAR GUPTA
RAMCHANDRA GUHA
MEENAKSHI LEKHI
KIRON KHER
SMRITI IRANI
SONIA GANDHI
RAHUL GANDHI
BRINDA KARAT
PRAKASH KARAT
SITARAM YECHURY
SUMEET CHOPRA
DINESH VARSHNEY
SWARA BHASKAR
KAVITA KRISHNAN
TEESTA SETALVAD
ROMILA THAPAR
IRFAN HABIB
SHOBHAA DE
ARUNDHATI ROY
MANI SHANGARAN AIYERAN
ANNA MM VETTIKAD
KANCHA ILAIH
JOHN DAYAL
FATHER CEDRIC PRAKASH
CHETAN BHAGAT
AMISH TRIPATHI
MOHANDAS PAI
RAJEEV CHANDRASHEKHAR
JANAM TV
CM PINARAYI VIJAYAN
ALL KERALA MINISTERS
ALL KERALA MLAs
ALL KERALA COLLECTORS
DGP BEHERA
RAMAN SRIVASTAVA
HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICE KERALA
PC GEORGE MLA
RAHUL EASHWAR
PADMA PILLAI
SRIDHARAN PILLAI
PARASARAN
SAI DEEPAK
VIDYASAGAR GURUMURTHY
SANJAY HEGDE
RSN SINGH
SHAZIA ILMI
RAJIV MALHOTRA
SURESH GOPI
MOHANLAL
LK ADVANI
MURLI MANOHAR JOSHI
ARUN SHOURIE
RAM MADHAV
WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKTS
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
PUNISH DEEP STATE CONTROLLED JUDGES WHO INTERFERE IN INDIAN SECURITY MATTERS..
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH..
READ ALL 4 PARTS OF THE POST BELOW--
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/01/justice-be-damned-enforce-law-not-any.html
TAKING A EVM MACHINE TO LONDON FOR A HACKATHON IS AGAINST THE LAW .. WHY HAS CEC ALLOWED THIS..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-
AJIT DOVAL
CBI
ED
NIA
RAW
RAJNATH SINGH
HOME MINISTRY
LAW MINISTER
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
PMO
PM MODI
MARKENDAY KATJU
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
NHRC
EVERY MP OF LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA
EVERY CENTRAL MINISTER / MINISTRY
CMs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
DGPs OF ALL STATES
SWAMY
GURUMURTHY
ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
AMITABH KANT
NITI AYOG
RSS
VHP
AVBP
CEC
EC
WEBSITES OF DESH BHAKT LEADERS
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA