HEY JUDICIARY WANTS TO RULE INDIA !!!!!!!
GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHILD WHO RULED INDIA INTRODUCED “ CONTEMPT OF COURT” SYSTEM AS WE INDIANS WERE SLAVES.. NOW WE INDIANS ARE FREE
NOWHERE ON THE PLANET DOES AN OUTGOING CJI NOMINATE AN INCOMING CJI LIKE IN INDIA- WHAT THE FUCK IS ALL THIS?
THE LINK BELOW HOLD A CONSOLIDATED ACCOUNT OF WHAT AILS OUR ROTTEN JUDICIARY ..
69 POSTS --- YES – 69 FUCKIN’ POSTS..
MOST WORDS EVER PENNED BY A MORTAL ABOUT INDIAN JUDICIARY…
THEY HAVE BEEN SENT TO PM MODI, LAW MINISTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, CJI MORE THAN 120 TIMES..
“ WE THE PEOPLE” WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION HAVE GRANTED OURSELVES “FREEDOM OF SPEECH” AND THE “RIGHT TO EXPRESS OUR OPINION” WITHOUT FEAR ..
THE JEWISH DEEP STATE HAS BEEN TRYING FROM BEHIND THE SCENES TO CONVERT TELLING THE NAKED TRUTH INTO HATE SPEECH TO RETARD INDIA’S PROGRESS, TO STRAIT JACKED “ WE THE PEOPLE” AND PULVERISE OUR SOCIAL STRUCTURE ..
WE THE PEOPLE WANT PARLIAMENT TO RE-WRITE SECTION 2 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971, WHICH DEFINES THE OFFENCE OF CONTEMPT.
CONTEMPT OF COURT SHOULD BE LIMITED TO CASES OF CIVIL CONTEMPT, I.E. DISOBEDIENCE OF COURT ORDERS FOR A SPECIFIC CASE , AND SHOULD NOT INCLUDE THE OFFENCE OF 'SCANDALISING THE NON-EXISTANT MAJESTY OF THE COURT', I.E. CRIMINAL CONTEMPT.
NO OTHER NATION ON THIS PLANET SLAPS 'CRIMINAL CONTEMPT' LIKE IN DEMOCRATIC IN INDIA . THE POWER OF COURTS TO PENALISE CONTEMPT IS INHERENT, AND WOULD CONTINUE TO EXIST EVEN IF THE ACT IS DELETED ALTOGETHER.
IN 2022, SENIOR INDEPENDENT JOURNALIST AND WHISTLEBLOWER SAVUKKU SHANKAR WAS CONVICTED IN SUO-MOTO CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR 6 MONTHS OF IMPRISONMENT. HE HAD SAID IN AN INTERVIEW THAT "THE ENTIRE HIGHER JUDICIARY IS RIDDLED WITH CORRUPTION". HE ARGUED "I STAND BY WHAT I SAID" IN THE TRAIL. HE WAS SENT TO JAIL ON 15 SEPTEMBER 2022. THIS WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED IN ANY DEMOCRACY ON THE PLANET..
IN 2015, MADRAS HIGH COURT SENIOR JUDGE, C. S. KARNAN, BLEW THE WHISTLE ABOUT FOREIGN FUNDED CORRUPT JUDGES IN SUPREME COURT.. THE SUPREME COURT , INITIATED CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUSTICE KARNAN, SENTENCING HIM TO SIX MONTHS' IMPRISONMENT. JUSTICE KARNAN INITIALLY REFUSED TO ACCEPT THE WARRANT FOR HIS ARREST BUT WAS LATER ARRESTED AND SERVED THE PERIOD OF IMPRISONMENT. PM MODI ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN IN HIS WATCH ..
Article 129 and 215 of the Constitution of India empowers the Supreme Court and High Court respectively to punish people for their respective contempt. Both 129 and 215 does not allow Supreme court to play god on “ we the people” but hey, our Supreme Court judges are drunk with unbridled power it bestowed on itself ...
Article 129 in The Constitution Of India 1949
129. Supreme Court to be a court of record The Supreme Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself
Article 215 in The Constitution Of India 1949------
215. High Courts to be courts of record Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself
Section 10 of The Contempt of Courts Act of 1971 defines the power of the High Court to punish contempts of its subordinate courts.. It is an internal matter..
Section 10 in the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
10. Power of High Court to punish contempts of subordinate courts.—Every High Court shall have and exercise the same jurisdiction, powers and authority, in accordance with the same procedure and practice, in respect of contempts of courts subordinate to it as it has and exercises in respect of contempts of itself: —Every High Court shall have and exercise the same jurisdiction, powers and authority, in accordance with the same procedure and practice, in respect of contempts of courts subordinate to it as it has and exercises in respect of contempts of itself\:" Provided that no High Court shall take cognizance of a contempt alleged to have been committed in respect of a court subordinate to it where such contempt is an offence punishable under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).
LAWYER TURNED JUDGES , THE BOTTOM DREGS OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL AND THE SCUM OF THE LOSER LAWYER POOL ARE NOT EXPERTS..
WE ASK NSA AJIT DOVAL, WHY HAVE YU NOT ARRESTED THE SUPREME COURT JUDGES ( FOR TREASON ) WHO SUBVERTED THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION.. THESE JUDGES KICKED THE UNANIMOUS WILL OF THE PARLIAMENT AND SUBJECTIVE POWERS OF THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA.. READ THE LINK BELOW.
One stupid judge had slapped both "sedition" and "contempt of court " on Union Minister Arun Jaitley for saying constitution does not support "collegium system" but only NJAC
Collegium system in not allowed by our constitution..
According to stupid judges, police can be stoned, but no judge can be stoned.. You can block the road to the PM’s office but you cannot block the road to a court or a judge’s home..
They are Lord Fucklands, right?
You can abuse Modi, but you cant abuse a lowly magistrate.. Melord judges, are so squeamish ( out of inferiority complex ) that they will send you to jail for "contempt of court " at the drop of a hat..
Contempt of court can be used only inside the wee court room, when the court is in session and proceedings are deliberately disrupted ..And that too only for a specific case the judge is ruling.. within the perimeter of the specific case being argued ...to prevent a breakdown of the system-- where someone defies the judge and undermines the judge’s authority repeatedly . … not to assuage the Melords ego..
It cannot be used outside the court and length and breadth of the country, under land , underwater or in the skies.. Judges are not gods.. People who are above the constitution have right of free speech..
Truth cannot be branded as vilification or defamation ... India is a democracy.. The last time the UK convicted a person for scandalizing the honor of the Judiciary ( not Judge ) , was 1931—i.e., 91 years ago..
Thousands of Hindu temples were razed down in Kashmir. .. these melords jumped and cried when a Babri masjid ( Mecca of Hindus ) was razed down.. Collegium judiciary and benami media and foreign funded NGOs are always on the same page..
We have whistle blower judges like High court Judge Karnan jailed to silence him.. These traitors judges scared desh bhakt whistle blowers with contempt of court and incarceration..
Supreme court has no legal right to impose a ban on Media ( Karnan case ).. This was more damaging to Indias image than the "emergency of 1975”.. Why is media quiet ? …..cowards !!.
Do they know that they have a duty to protect the Watan, the constitution , Indian democracy and a whistle blowing high court judge ?.. How can contempt of court be applicable to patriot whistle blowers and truth?..
“Contempt of court" is only inside the court room, when the legal proceedings are in progress. .. It has nothing to do with majesty of the bumpkin funny looking melord.. This rule exists only if someone disrupts the court in session repeatedly…The term "contempt of JUDGE" does not exist..
CBI director was made to sit in the courtroom corner for a whole day like a dunce school boy.. The constitution has not given such sweeping powers to the judiciary... Constitution has not given the powers of school headmaster to the Judiciary to rap the knuckles of all and sundry as is reported in glee by media ghadi ghadi …
India is a democracy not a dictator ship of Chief Justice of India..
Pakistani ISI backed NGOs jailed home minister Amit Shah to save the legacy of dreaded Islamic terrorist Sohrabuddin.. Foreign funds to produce false witnesses out of thin air. . .
We had lawyer RK Anand having a safe house for fake “direct” witnesses ( witness Kulkarni- Suresh Nanda BMW crash case ) to be produced in court at time and place of his choosing..
The uber rich lawyers have a nexus / setting with judges.. All know that..
These rich lawyers cant argue for nuts -- if so how do they win their cases ?... Warning--- India is going back to slavery !!!..
Melords use the constitution to protect seditious terrorists holding foreign guns .. They get instant bail.. Honest citizens languish in jail for decades..
Judiciary had pulled up Modi over demonetization …just who the hell are these lawyers turned judges when even Rajya Sabha does not have financial powers.?..
Why has judiciary legalized Bitcoin which is used to fund Islamic mercenaries in Kashmir , Khalistani Sikhs in Punjab and desh drohis in India?.. These collegium judges are in contempt of the constitution and "we the people"..
Unlike India which has a judge system, USA has a jury system.. Jury consists of ordinary people who know precious shit about the law or the constitution.. The idea is to deliver subjective natural justice ( dharma ) to the people , not enforce blind objective law..
The judge only conducts and monitors the proceedings in court lisping moth eaten words like "objection sustained", "objection over ruled " etc..
India had a jury system like USA and other major first world nations.. Indian jury system was abolished after the naval Commander Nanavati case.. Nanavati was a tattu Parsi who was married to a nymphomaniac British white woman named Sylvia who needed a hard pound1ng in all her three orifices every day..
Cuckold Nanavati allowed a rich and virile Sindhi named Ahuja to keep his wife sexually satisfied.. All was hunky dory till Nanavati read a latter where his wife begs her lover to marry her .. A furious Nanavati killed Ahuja.. Lawyer Ram Jethmalani kicked his own Sindhi community in the teeth and became famous..
We ask NSA to form military courts and hang the traitor judges in foreign payroll.. Traitor Judges ( serving and retired ) of Mafia Collegium Judiciary must be tried and punished for treason.. THE WORD TREASON IS NOT FOUND IN THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION..
The Judiciary can only interpret the constitution.. Read this sentence a trillion times…. Yet by way of PIL route ( illegally and cleverly filed by NGOs funded by Pakistan ISI/ Jewish Deep state/ China commie party ) the traitor Judges of Indian judiciary has been handling issues involving TREASON again and again and again..
These judges who demand for national secrets as evidence in court , are in contempt of the constitution / We the people / The Watan and hence should have tried by NSA military court , sacked and jailed with loss of all retirement perks..
We ask PM and Law minister to immediately formulate a national policy for the Judiciary. .This must be etched on a large brass plaque in large letters and placed in every court room , behind the Judge’s chair , and the offices of the chief justices of Lower courts/ High courts and Supreme court.. Inscription on large brass plaque
###### “ JUDICIAL POLICY-- THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION DOES NOT DEAL WITH ISSUES INVOLVING TREASON.. IF ANY BODY CAN PROVE THAT A CASE BEING HANDLED INVOLVES TREASON, THEY MUST GIVE A COMPLAINT TO THE JUDGE IN WRITING COPIED TO CHIEF JUSTICE , LAW MINISTER, NSA AND PM.. THE JUDGE SHALL THEN IMMEDIATELY RECUSE HIMSELF , TILL HE GETS A GREEN SIGNAL FROM CJI TO PROCEED”#######…
In the past traitor Indian judges in foreign payroll have again and again tried to wrangle critical national secrets , with foreign payroll media in cahoots, to be passed on to foreign enemies mostly by PIL route..
Traitor judges are the reason why India has the Khalistani terrorist problem/ Kashmiri secession problem and Naxal red corridor terrorism problem..
Judiciary cannot deal with cases like JNU student Umar Khalid controlled by Pakistan ISI screaming and inciting “ Bharat tere tukde honge inshaah Allah… Bharat tere barbadi takk jung rahenge “.. this is high treason..
NSA ( Ajit Doval ) has to form military courts and first hang traitor Indian judges in foreign payroll or honey trapped judges like the US supreme court Chief Justice.. There is no need for any constitutional amendment.
The word SEDITION is found in Section 124 A of the Indian constitution… TREASON ( unlike sedition ) INVOLVES COLLUDING WITH FOREIGN ENEMIES OF THE WATAN.. TREASON is always to the watan ( motherland ) not a mortal ruler elected ( Modi ) or unelected ( like Italian waitress turned Empress via illegal +NAC)..
If Umar Khalid screams “ Modi teri barbadi takk jung rahenge” – it is not TREASON... TREASON affects the entire nation and all its law abiding citizens.. When someone calls for dismemberment of the Watan ( motherland ) , wedging off Khalistan , secession of Kashmir to Pakistan, it is high TREASON..
Abusing a ruler on a throne or any mortal is not high TREASON.. Capt Ajit Vadakayil abuses PM Modi daily.. TREASON affects the entire nation and all its law abiding citizens.
The supreme court is in "contempt of the constitution" and in "contempt of we the people " who are above the constitution.. Judiciary has no power to review laws created by the elected law makers.. This is unconstitutional
the reckless use of the power of contempt by judiciary is unconstitutional and uncalled for. “the naked truth is that the traitor judiciary , has it nose knotted into their own twisted stinking undies , ridiculously struck with its own image of authority and hijacked truth- backed by the JEWISH DEEP STATE AND PAKISTANI ISI..
SUO MOTO’S ACTIONS BY INDIAN COURTS ARE A REFLECTION OF EXTREME JUDICIAL ADVENTURISM IN CONTEMPT OF THE CONSTITUTION/ WE THE PEOPLE / THE WATAN / DHARMA..
in the words of black’s law dictionary, judicial activism is the conviction of judicial pledges whereby judges give their personal views about public policy .. the decision of bribed and honey trapped judges becomes a standard for deciding other cases via STARE DECISIS..
the time has come for "we the people" to declare --whatever laws have been created by stupid judges via stare decisis and attached to the constitution like a tail ( addendum ) are all null and void ..
we cant have the judicial tail wagging the constitutional dog..
"stare decisis" is a deep state sponsored system where you build upon past lies… past judgments sans context made by "we are blind judges" -- is being used as the gospel--to judge future cases.. WAH RAAJAH WAAH !..
any laws can be overridden by the judges that clearly indicate the violation of the constitution..
we the people who are above the constitution will not allow the unaccountable judges to ride rough shod over the constitution and the parliament..
in india pils have a hidden agenda. stupid unqualified judges are taking major decisions about environment ( striking down defense related navy requirements or nuclear requirements ) , finance ( bitcoin ) , scrapping cars, cultural terrorism ( homosexuality/ adultery/ living together ) etc ..
judiciary even tried to distribute all indian mineral rich ( uranium ) forest lands to christian convert / commie naxal tribals..
supreme court and the high court today mostly deals with pil rather than the other cases, thus, leaving pending cases creating a humongous backlog.. judges die, lawers die of old age, yet the mad TAAREEK, PEH TAAREK PEH TAREEK goes on.. what about the lost lawyers fees of a poor harassed citizen ?
telling the truth without being politically correct cannot be termed “contempt of court”.. arbitrary suo moto’s actions by indian courts are a reflection of extreme judicial adventurism in contempt of the constitution/ we the people / the watan / dharma..
the 2006 amendment to the contempt of courts act, 1971 clarifies that the court may impose punishment for contempt only when it is satisfied that substantially interferes, or tends to substantially interfere with the due course of justice.
apparently judges get temporary amnesia. the delhi hc has convicted four senior journalists of mid day daily of contempt of court by publishing certain scandalous articles about former chief justice of india, yk sabharwal..
mid day dated may 19, 2007 had carried news reports that the sealing orders issued by a bench headed by justice yk sabharwal was intended to benefit his sons who had ties with mall developers. . the court unconstitutionally rejected the contention of the daily newspaper , which had submitted that a judge, after retiring, ceases to be part of the judicial system and writing against him didn’t come within the ambit of contempt of court. .
the contempt jurisdiction should not be used by corrupt judges to uphold their own personal dignity. . nemo debet esse judex in proporia causa i.e. ‘no person can be a judge in their own cause’ is one of the most fundamental tenets of justice. .
the famous SULLIVAN DOCTRINE that public persons must be open to stringent comments and accusations as long as made with bonafide diligence, even if untrue.. a fair criticism of the conduct of a judge, the institution of the judiciary and its functioning cannot be contempt if made in good faith as a patriot and in public interest..
contempt powers can be only used if there is a clear imminent and present danger to the disposal of a particular narrow spectrum case.. abuse of the authority by the courts as contempt of court has become a mercurial jurisdiction over time giving unconstitutional sweeping discretionary powers to the courts.. this certainly is not a positive development especially in the backdrop of several cases of alleged corruption, partisanship and nepotism in the judiciary..
courts exercise restraint and approach the contempt cases SUBJECTIVELY and not stifle the legitimate criticism of the judiciary. . Only the President, State Governor’s and PM can use subjective power..
justice kurian joseph of the supreme court of india has said that the trial by the media on pending cases is tantamount to contempt of court. sorry this SUBJUDICE bullshit applies only when the system is jury ( not judge ) .. a confused litigant ( brow beaten by a cunning lawyer and not familiar with the language ) refusing to answer a question put to him by the court does not constitute criminal contempt of court.
a corrupt lawyer without a soul who becomes a judge is eminently fallible – the court clerks will vouch how many times the judge when he was a lawyer bribed them. a tiger cannot change his stripes so fast.
judges in the superior courts routinely misuse the power to punish for contempt of court more to cover up their own misdeeds than to uphold the majesty of the law.. the criminal contempt law in india does not recognise the lack of intention i.e. mens rea as a defence to the act of contempt..
india has ratified the international covenant on civil and political rights which provides that the freedom of expression can be curtailed by law only when it is essential for a legitimate purpose. this cannot include a judge’s faalthu personal ego.
the united nations human rights committee has stated that any contempt of court proceeding must be justified in the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction to sustain orderly proceedings.
in the united kingdom, the offence of scandalizing the courts was abolished in 2013 after a law commission report. this is interesting to note since the indian law of contempt of court is derived from the common law. the contempt law in england has been abolished and the last contempt proceedings occurred in 1930.
the united states of america currently has watered down the contempt law by numerous judgments which affirm that the dignity of the courts cannot be established by silencing public opinion or by restricting the free discussions about the court. in the united states of america, justice hugo black had observed in the case of bridges in 1941, that american public opinion could not be silenced in the pretext of contempt of court..
the criminal contempt powers of the courts must be abandoned at least in the form it is currently manifest in. the courts have overlooked that the terms, “scandalizing the courts and obstruction of administration” cannot have the same connotation today as it had in the british india,when we were slaves of german jew rothschild.
misuse of contempt jurisdiction could erode the public confidence in the judiciary.. judges, like everyone else, will have to earn respect. they cannot demand respect by demonstration of ‘power’ (of contempt).”
this is not like a ship at sea in a storm where captain is king.. the power of judiciary lies, not in deciding cases, nor in imposing sentences, nor in punishing for contempt, but in the trust, confidence and faith of the common man.”..
in 1866, the high court of allahabad was established under the indian high courts act, 1861 and was constituted as a court of record with the power to punish slave indians for contempt. , the court observed that the power to punish for contempt was “arbitrary, unlimited and uncontrolled”, and therefore should be “exercised with the greatest caution.. prior censorship on institutional criticism in a democracy not just curtails the freedom of speech but also causes injury to the very institution.
the best way to sustain the dignity of the court and earn respect from the public is by the quality of their judgment, the fairness and objectivity in their approach, and subjective application of dharma ( natural justice ) and by the restraint and decorum which they observe in their judicial conduct.
justice ranjan gogoi, in its judgment, permitted the use of photographs of the president, prime minister, chief justice of india, in the advertisements issued by the government and its agencies. Just who the hell is elected unaccountable CJI? Pray? Prithee? .
our constitution does not define the expression “contempt of court”, as per the contempt of courts act 1971 . high court justice karnan said that some judges are corrupt and some are TRAITORS .… only law makers can deal with traitors and THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT HAVE THE WORD TRAITOR IN ITS TEXT.
instead of treating him as a whistle blower and thanking him -- the higher judges closed ranks and targeted this whistle blower….. whither truth ?……. THE CJI SENTENCED JUDGE KARNAN TO SIX MONTHS JAIL FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT…
sorry-- if you know the indian law or even world law --contempt of court does not apply here"……
you can abuse the elected pm ( i abuse modi daily ) --but cant point a truthful finger at a corrupt and stupid lawyer turned judge ?….
SUPREME COURT HAS NO LEGAL RIGHT TO IMPOSE A BAN ON PRESS ( KARNAN CASE ) …. THIS IS MORE DAMAGING TO INDIA’S IMAGE THAN THE "EMERGENCY OF 1975 "…
again , contempt of court applies when the court is in session and someone in the court related to the case undermines the judge’ s authority repeatedly.. contempt of court cannot be applied along the length and breadth of india ( on land / under ground/ in space ) , as it is meant within the confines of a wee brick and cement building court room …
article 19(1)(a) of the constitution gives the right of freedom of speech and expression to all citizens… articles 129 and 215 give the power of contempt of court to the higher judiciary, and this power limits the freedom granted by article 19(1)(a). .
the law of contempt has a vague and wandering jurisdiction with uncertain boundaries. such a law, regardless of public good, will unwittingly trample upon civil liberties. . respect for the judiciary cannot be won by shielding traitor judges ( bribes/ honey trapped by the deep state ) from .
such enforced silence, in the name of preserving the dignity of the judiciary, causes resentment, suspicion and contempt, more than it would enhance respect. .. both civil and criminal contempt share the same punishment under the contempt of courts act 1971. the act allows for a maximum term of imprisonment for six months, and this can be supplemented with a fine of up to Rs 2000. .
in section 7, a person shall not be guilty of contempt of court for publishing a fair and accurate report of a judicial proceeding or any state thereof…
in india, the offence of contempt of court is committed when a person either disobeys a court order (civil contempt), or when a person says or does anything that scandalizes, prejudices, or interferes with judicial proceedings and the administration of justice (criminal contempt)…
section 2(c) in the contempt of courts act, 1971.. (c) “criminal contempt” means the publication (whether by words, spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise) of any matter or the doing of any other act whatsoever which— (i) scandalizes or tends to scandalize, or lowers or tends to lower the authority of, any court; or.. (ii) prejudices, or interferes or tends to interfere with, the due course of any judicial proceeding; or.. (iii) interferes or tends to interfere with, or obstructs or tends to obstruct, the administration of justice in any other manner;…
capt ajit vadakayil declares that the definition of contempt in the contempt of court act should be restricted to civil contempt, i.e., willful disobedience of judgments of the court. so that the system does not break down.. criminal contempt law, has inadvertently trampled upon civil liberties ..
the supreme court holds constitutional powers under article 129 read with article 142 (2) of the constitution of india and subsequently, the high courts also have powers vested in them under article 215 of the constitution to punish for contempt. .. article 142(2) in the constitution of india 1949 .. (2) subject to the provisions of any law made in this behalf by parliament, the supreme court shall, as respects the whole of the territory of india, have all and every power to make any order for the purpose of securing the attendance of any person, the discovery or production of any documents, or the investigation or punishment of any contempt of itself ..
article 215 in the constitution of india 1949 .. 215. high courts to be courts of record every high court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.. contempt can essentially be of two kinds: .. being disrespectful and rude to the judge or an attorney or subsequently causing any form of a disturbance in the courtroom particularly even after being warned by the judge .. willfully failing or refusing to obey an order given by the court such as failure to pay alimony or child support…
commie traitor iyengar jew n ram stole "classified military secrets " to screw pm modi over the rafale deal.. at court the attorney general told cji gogoi that the evidence presented by commie n ram is a stolen military secret -- and is a crime which entails 14 years of jail..
but hey what does deep state darling cji gogoi tell the attorney general? they wont consider that the document was stolen.. they will check if the document holds water.. what the hell is all this ?..
we ask pm modi - are you a babe in the fuckin’ woods ?..
stupid cji gogoi jumped into forbidden subjective territory and argued on behalf of deep state agent commie n ram --quote-- " if an accused stole a document to prove his innocence, it should be admitted in court" -- unquote.. the supreme court is in "contempt of the constitution" and in "contempt of we the people " who are above the constitution.. judiciary has no power to review laws created by the elected law makers.. this is unconstitutional ..
section 12 in the contempt of courts act, 1971 .. 12. punishment for contempt of court.— (1) save as otherwise expressly provided in this act or in any other law, a contempt of court may be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees, or with both: ..
but hey juhi chawla was fined 20 lakhs for a genuine pil abot 5g which decimates pollinator bees. we have 1420 million people and we cannot feed them if bees get decimated..
the stupid judge will never understand this..
he got provoked because he heard a juhi chawla film song in the back ground while doing the video court session.
judges are allowing unreasonable fines like private org ima ( darling og jewish vaccine lobby ) suing baba ram dev 1000 crores for protecting ayurveda and yoga which THE CHRISTIAN EVANGELIST CUM IMA CHIEF DR JOHN ROSE AUSTIN JAYALAL was abusing ghadi ghadi.
people who sue ( ego based ) for 1000 crores for defamation -- must first deposit 50% of the amount sued for ( 500 crores ) of the money with the court , which must be called “aukaat deposit”..
if the ego maniac loses 50% of the aukat deposit ( 250 crores ) must go to the harassed whistle blower who was falsely sued.. the remaining 50% of the aukat deposit money ( 250 crores ) must go to the govt coffers…if the egomaniac wins he will get back his aukat deposit of 500 crores along with the 1000 crores he sued for ..there must be a fixed ceiling based on conditions in india..
the purpose of the power to punish for criminal contempt is to ensure that the faith and confidence of the public in administration of justice is not eroded. such power, vested in the courts, carries with it great responsibility.
care should be taken to ensure that there is no room for complaints of ostentatious exercise of power. . there still exists a high number of civil and criminal contempt cases pending in various high courts and the supreme court. . it is a very dangerous jurisdiction in which judges act in their own vested nay ulterior motived clause ..
unconstitutional suo motu powers of the court to initiate such proceedings only serve to complicate matters.
it was rothschild’s agent( mentored by jew john dewey ) br ambedkar presided over the drafting committee that proposed and successfully defended the inclusion of contempt of court as a restriction on freedom of speech despite vehement opposition from almost all members of the constituent assembly..
the judiciary and judges may be corrected only by public criticism when we have an unconstitutional collegium system where judges are chosen by the jewish deep state.. the best answer to abuse of judges is not frequent or ferocious contempt-sentencing but fine performance. : like a hero cricketer states—let the bat/ ball do the talking for me not cheers or boos of the spectators .
right now the supreme court is relying on the wrong weapon, i.e. criminal contempt in a criminal and unconstitutional manner .. in the era of social media ( kalki revolution of consciousness ) , besides the need to revisit the law on criminal contempt, even the test for contempt needs to be evaluated.
there is an ocean of difference between well informed and ill informed criticism. what is said in regard to a matter concerning the judiciary by a thinker like capt ajit vadakayil should be viewed differently from a similar statement by an uninformed cunt.”..
an inclusive, diverse, accountable, open and transparent supreme court would be able to administer justice without fear or favour, without needing criminal contempt to preserve its faalthu honour. .
if the court “delivers justice which is its professional, fundamental duty, criticism by cunts loses its sting.. in a country as large and diverse as india, the supreme court continues to have its seat only in delhi. this is despite having the constitutional permission to establish benches elsewhere in the country. ..
people who have researched extensively on the supreme court of india, know this – “ of the 36 men who had manned the supreme court as justices from 1950 to 1967— they was a GANG OF DEEP STATE DARLING COLLEGIUM FAMILIES, the “SURMA IN AANKH “ kayasthas/ parsis/ chitpavan jews/ peshawari khatri jews/ tamil Iyengar jews/ telugu kamma jews ..
the adage “change is the only constant” does not apply to india’s supreme court. for it continues to be the bastion of the privileged few, who are controlled by foreign forces. no judge has ever been impeached in india.
indian judges are world known for repeating the phrase “majesty of law” and “dignity of court “ must be sustained at all costs .. and in this process they are in contempt of the constitution, we the people, the watan and dharma ( natural justice )...
properly speaking, this “ majesty “ term can be applied only to god, for it signifies that which surpasses all things in grandeur and superiority.
but it is used to kings and emperors, as a title of honor. hey melords , how about majesty of “ we the people “ as enshrined by the constitution? pray? prithee? ..
judiciary is called the guardian of the constitution because it is empowered to interpret the constitution .. the judges have power over life and death.. this is by no means majesty of law.. the majesty of courts is located in the objectivity, consistency, and intellectual integrity of their judgments which must remain open to public scrutiny and fair comment. subjectivity and fairness based on dharma/ natural justice must never be scuttled..
did a man kill to save his under aged daughter from being gang raped?.. justice cannot be blind all the while.. context must never be ignored. dignity of court does not exist in a democracy , what exists is dignity of human life. every human has a soul within… a soul is part of the field of brahman ( god ) albeit at a lower frequency
pakistani isi / jewish deep state bribed / honey trapped judges prohibit india from doing narco test on traitors funded by pakistan ISI / china , ILLEGALLY claiming human rights .
THIS IS CONTEMPT TO THE WATAN/ THE CONSTITUTION/ WE THE PEOPLE AND DHARMA.. DHARMA IS ABOUT ELIMINATING TRAITORS .. SORRY JUDGES ARE PROHIBITED FROM DEALING WITH TRAITORS TO THE WATAN BY THE CONSTITUTION ITSELF.. TREASON IS "THE HIGHEST OF ALL CRIMES"— defined as intentionally betraying one's allegiance by levying war against the government or giving aid or comfort to its enemies. THE JUDICIARY MUST RECUSE THEMSELVES , FOR THEY CANT DEAL WITH TREASON..
ex- cji gogoi was the fellow who threatened retired ex-cji markanday katju ( far senior to him ) and ex- chairman of the press council of india of six months jail for contempt , for writing unpalatable truths in his personal blog..
bharatmata is racing to be this planets no 1 superpower in 10 years --before that the jealous new world order wants india to implode.
we the people of india do not want loser lawyers to become judges--rather there must be a nation wide exam ( like iit/ ias ) to choose judges . … most of these loser lawyers became judges to cock a snook at their successful colleagues who drove mercedes cars while they foot slogged with hawai chappals ….
our failed lawyers turned collegium judges do not have the cerebral wherewithal to understand that sane/ fair judgments must be within the perimeter of context --and natural justice must be inherent.... the melords cant even understand the meaning of circumstantial evidence .... . the system has broken down
in may 2017, justice karnan became the first sitting high court judge to be held guilty of criminal contempt of court.( read as contempt of stupid judge khehar )..
HEY LAW MINISTER RIJIJU—WE DON’T WANT YOU TO MOAN.. DO SOMETHING OF THE GET FUCK OFF YOUR CHAIR
PM MODI HAS USED THE JUDICIARY TO LEGALISE ADULTERY/ LIVING IN/ PROSTITUTION/ HOMOSEXUALITY.. OW HIS PET JUDGE CHANDRACHUD SAYS “ SEXUALITY OF A WOMAN DOES NOT LONG TO HER HUSBAND ?..
CHANDRACHUD’S FATHER WAS A TRAITOR..
THE ITALIAN MAINO JEWESS WAITRESS ONCE TRIED TO DO IT AS SUPER PRIME MINISTER VIA NAC/ CVB AND FELL PHUTTT ON HER FACE
The NAC ( National Advisory Council ) was set up on 4 June 2004 by slave of the Italian Mano Jewess , lame duck Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and was dissolved as soon as Modi became PM of India in 2014..
Using the powers vested in her by NAC, Sonia Gandhi as SUPER PRIME MINISTER created CVB ( Communal Violence Bill ) and attempted to push it into law, where Hindus would become Kaffirs in their own land..
The CVB was worse than rabid Islam theology and Christian Inquisition of the medieval ages combined .. CVB institutionalized rabid anti-Hinduism.. This legally indefensible and perverse bill made Hindus criminals by mere definition..
It borrowed elements from extreme Islamic theology of dividing the people into “US AGAINST THE KAFFIRS” .. The extent and scope of power vested with the NAC did not merely extend to the state law enforcement agencies such as police officers but also shockingly tried to bring the entire armed forces within the ambit of the term “public official” . .
With no judicial intervention, these powers were limitless..
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
oh bewitching apsara queen of my heart
oh love of mee life
when you are with me no one dares to replace you
when the sun of my thoughts tends to set
your flame keeps burn bright at every step
wherever my shadow goes
your image follows me
you're there in the parched deserts
you are there in them rose gardens
i see you in every particle, in the wilderness
i seen you everywhere
you're inherent in the blood
which course through my veins
you're my prayer , you're mee desire
what could i know about anyone else
as long as the honor of my love lies with you
again it is the same night
the night of them dreams
the whole night i will see you in mee dreams
in sleep when dreams weave them beads
do call me to ensconse under the veil of your eyelids
this night is of dreams
of dreams is this night
made of glass are the dreams
they strike to sting cling cling
beckon them on eyelids
so that on them time may stride
whole night in mee dreams i will see you
yes, this is the night of them dreams
one enchanting evening
i lost my heart,
first it used to be mine,
now it belongs to another,
for ages i had the desire
for someone to come into my life,
in my insipid lonesome, life
to sparkle some light
as she arrived, the world brightened up!
my heart's caravan
is led by an enchantress today,
them dew-like eyes of whom
are partly awake, partly sleepy,
as i saw her, the weather became soo pleasant!
one lovely evening
i lost mee heart