THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM THE POST BELOW-
The Climatic Research Unit (CRU) is a component of the University of East Anglia and is one of the leading institutions concerned with the study of natural and anthropogenic climate change.
CRU have been using to produce false data and make sure the real data never gets to see the light of day.
The CRU had staked its claim as the world’s leading institution involved in the study of climate change. It has direct links to the EU and a number of well-known international organisations. The headquarters are based in the UK at the University of East Anglia in Norwich, and its staff consists of around 30 research scientists and students.
The Climatic Research Unit email controversy (also known as "Climategate" began in November 2009 with the hacking of a server at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) by an external attacker, copying thousands of emails and computer files (the Climatic Research Unit documents) to various internet locations several weeks before the Copenhagen Summit on climate change.
The incident began when a server used by the Climatic Research Unit was breached in "a sophisticated and carefully orchestrated attack", and 160 MB of data were obtained including more than 1,000 emails and 3,000 other documents
As the climate change research results presented by the CRU seemed to be fraudulent, there were requests made to view their hard data under the Freedom of Information Act. Once a request is made to view the data, it is illegal to destroy that data; but this is precisely what the CRU did. They had argued that there were problems storing the vast amounts of data, with deleting the data being the only solution.
In addition to the wealth evidence detailing fraud, there is also proof of further crimes including tax evasion, such as the following email quote “Also, it is important for us if you can transfer the ADVANCE money on the personal accounts which we gave you earlier and the sum for one occasion transfer (for example, during one day) will not be more than 10,000 USD. Only in this case we can avoid big taxes and use money for our work as much as possible.”
An interesting document to make its way into the public arena is called ‘The rules of the game’. Essentially, it is the strategy document for UK climate change promoters, and details the tactics and mindset they should employ to promote their agenda. The document starts off with the question “Why were the principles created?” and is answered with “The game is communicating climate change; the rules will help us win it”. The document features a number of interesting points, such as:---
Those who deny climate change science are irritating, but unimportant.
Climate change must be ‘front of mind’ before persuasion works. Currently, telling the public to take notice of climate change is as successful as selling tampons to men. People don’t realise (or remember) that climate change relates to them.
Use both peripheral and central processing. Attracting direct attention to an issue can change attitudes, but peripheral messages can be just as effective: a tabloid snapshot of Gwyneth Paltrow at a bus stop can help change attitudes to public transport.
Link climate change mitigation to positive desires/aspirations. Traditional marketing associates products with the aspirations of their target audience. Linking climate change mitigation to home improvement, self-improvement, green spaces or national pride are all worth investigating.
Use transmitters and social learning. People learn through social interaction, and some people are better teachers and trendsetters than others. Targeting these people will ensure that messages seem more trustworthy and are transmitted more effectively.
Government policy and communications on climate change must be consistent. Don’t ‘build in’ inconsistency and failure from the start.
Create ‘agency’ for combating climate change. Agency is created when people know what to do, decide for themselves to do it, have access to the infrastructure in which to act, and understand that their contribution is important.
Create a trusted, credible, recognised voice on climate change. We need trusted organisations and individuals that the media can call upon to explain the implications of climate change to the UK public.
Use emotions and visuals. Another classic marketing rule: changing behaviour by disseminating information doesn’t always work, but emotions and visuals usually do.
They have successfully created a mindset for people to ‘go green’ and develop a sense of pride in doing so, as well as hopping in bed with the governments and drawing up their environmental policies; and targeted credible people and agencies to promote their messages.
But the credible people and agencies have turned out not to be so credible at all. They have won their opinions by offering large sums of money; effectively buying voices and faces for their campaigns. The CRU was the trusted, credible and recognised voice on climate change, but has now been exposed as being a pawn in the global climate change agenda.
Philip Douglas Jones is a former director of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) and a Professor in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia (UEA)
Here’s the full email, note what Bob Ward concludes at the end :----
From: Phil Jones
Sent: 20 December 2007 13:58
To: Bob Ward
Subject: Re: More nonsense on climate change
Quickly re-reading this it sounds as though I’m getting at you. I’m not – just at the idiots who continue to spout this nonsense. It isn’t an issue with climatologists. All understand. If I tried to publish this I would be told by my peers it was obvious and banal. I will try and hide it in a paper at some point. I could put it on the CRU web site. I’ll see how I feel after the Christmas Pud.
I would have thought that this writer would have know better! I keep on seeing people saying this same stupid thing. I’m not adept enough (totally inept) with excel to do this now as no-one who knows how to is here.
What you have to do is to take the numbers in column C (the years) and then those in D (the anomalies for each year), plot them and then work out the linear trend. The slope is upwards. I had someone do this in early 2006, and the trend was upwards then. It will be now. Trend won’t be statistically significant, but the trend is up.
This is a linear trend – least squares. This is how statisticians work out trends. They don’t just look at the series. The simpler way is to just look at the data. The warmest year is 1998 with 0.526. All years since 2001 have been above 0.4. The only year before 2001 that was above this level was 1998. So 2cnd to 8th warmest years are 2001-2007
The reason 1998 was the warmest year was that it resulted from the largest El Nino event of the 20th century in 1997/8. We’ve not had anything resembling a major El Nino event since – they have all been minor.
Using regression, it is possible to take the El Nino event into account (with a regression based on the Southern Oscillation Index). This accounts for about 0.15 deg C of 1998’s warmth. Without that 1998 would have been at about 0.38.
There is a lot of variability from year-to-year in global temperatures – even more in ones like CET. No-one should expect each year to be warmer than the previous. The 2000s will be warmer than the 1990s though. This is another way of pointing out what’s wrong with their poor argument. The last comment about CET is wrong. 2007 will be among the top 10 warmest CET years – it will likely be 2cnd or 3rd.
Ward Baby responds:
Thanks for responding so comprehensively. I have plotted the data before, and as you observe, the trend is up but the result isn’t statistically significant, which I think makes it open to attack. I think the problem is that NOAA made the following statement in its report on the 2006 data:
“However, uncertainties in the global calculations due largely to gaps in data coverage make 2006 statistically indistinguishable from 2005 and several other recent warm years as shown by the error bars on the global time series.”
I’m not sure how to argue against this point – it appears to imply that there is no statistically significant trend in the global temperature record over the past few years.
Why would Phil Jones and the rest of the CRU staff become involved in the world’s greatest ever scientific fraud? Simple – the answer is money.
It is an all too common problem within the scientific community at present, with practically every scientist being forced to prostitute themselves to maintain their livelihood.
The sad fact is that there are basically no real jobs anywhere in the world for scientists, and they are instead heavily reliant on research grants from the Jeiwsh Deep state for their funding. Scientific studies are expensive and the scientists demand top dollar for their superior academic minds.
Jewish Companies and governments run by crypto Jews whose eelections have been rigged ,don’t request scientific studies to be nice; they request them so they can use the results to their advantage. This means that the scientists are told what results they should come up with upfront, and they have to manipulate the data to come to the required conclusions.. Every who can think clearly knows this..
If a scientist dare present the real results of their studies, it effectively prevents them from gaining any research grants from rich Jews in the future. If the Marlboro tobacco company wants a study done on smoking, do you think they will hire an honest scientist or one who give them the results they want?
If the Motorola mobile phone company wants a study done on mobile phone use causing brain cancer, do you think they will hire an honest scientist or one who give them the results they want? Going against the funding company’s wishes spells the end to a scientist’s career.
Scientists who have gone against the grain have ended up being shunned by universities and unable to win research grants for the rest of their careers. Most of these scientists are first honer trapped with minors.. Their hands are tied.
One of the leaked documents details the funding sources and projects of the CRU over the time period from 1991 to early 2006. Almost fourteen million pounds (AUD $25 Million) were listed on the document as research funding
The Department of Environment in the UK kicked off the funding with a near 200,000 pound project back in 1991. Some of the other early requests came from NATO, the EU, UK National Rivers Authority, US Department of Energy, and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC).
DO YOU KNOW WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO ANY US CONGRESSMAN OR SENATOR WHO DOES NOT JUMP UP TO CLAP?? THEY STAND TO DIE BY ACCIDENT.. THERE ARE VIDEO CAMERAS FOCUSSED
The EU and the US Dept of Energy were the most frequent donors, mainly requesting models and graphs to detail the environmental effects that future climate change would be responsible for. The biggest single donor was jointly from HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England) and JIF (Joint Infrastructure Fund) and totalled almost 7 million pounds.
Some of the project names provides proof that there were deliberate requests for ‘modified’ data to promote the climate change agenda, such as the EU request for ‘Statistical and regional dynamical downscaling of extremes for European regions’. They didn’t like the real data, so they needed the extremes downscaled to suit their needs.
Other examples of producing new data to counter the old are ‘Update and re-examination of temperature indices for Scotland and Northern Ireland’, or ‘eliminating climate sensitivity and thermohalene circulation influences’ on Holocene proxy data sets, and also ‘Development of an improved global historic surface temperature dataset’.
The last donor request is an interesting one. It is a near three million pound study called ‘Tyndall Phase 2’ requested by NERC. Tyndall was a 19th century scientist who was famous for his studies on a variety of subjects, including both heat in the earth’s atmosphere and glaciers.
It is quite ironic that his name is used by the CRU, considering that Tyndall’s studies on the absorption of heat by gases in the atmosphere proved water vapour is the main absorber of radiant heat in the atmosphere and the principal gas which controls air temperature, while all others gases including carbon dioxide have basically no effect on air temperature.
Considering that the leaked data proves climate change is a scam, many people wonder why the governments of the world and their respective agencies are handing over millions of dollars to companies like the CRU to produce false climate change temperature models.
IT IS ALL PART OF AN AGENDA TO BRING ALL COUNTRIES UNDER ONE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT, AND THE PROOF CAN BE FOUND THROUGHOUT SEVERAL SOURCE DOCUMENTS. THE JEWS TRIED TO USE WHO WITH A PANDEMIC TREATY—BUT FELL PHUTT O THEIR KOSHER FACES..
The evidence can be found in UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) papers such as “The UNEP That We Want” and “Proposed Medium Term Strategy 2010-2013”, which both outline the program to implement a global governance system based around environmental laws and regulations.
A particular strategy mentioned in the papers is “recruiting a far wider community of support, in civil society, the academic world and the private sector.” and then ensure they are “harnessed to the UNEP mission without appearing to make an end-run around the member governments”. The UNEP just happens to be the regulatory body which established the IPCC, which then appointed itself as the supreme international climate authority.
A leaked email from the CRU back in 2000 also provides confirmation of the IPCC involvement in pushing the globalisation agenda. “It was good to see you again yesterday – if briefly. One particular thing you said – and we agreed – was about the IPCC reports and the broader climate negotiations were working to the globalisation agenda driven by organisations like the WTO.” This shows that the IPCC has nothing to do with saving the planet from global warming, but rather its main purpose is to advance the pre-determined agenda of the global Jewish elite.
The leaked emails and documents and the respective fallout has become known as the ‘Climategate’ scandal. Establishments such as the CRU, IPCC and UNEP have all been instigated in Climategate, and have played their part in conspiring to hide evidence of global cooling while pushing the world population into an unwanted and unelected global government. An act such as this would normally have fallen short of its goal many years ago, but the global elite behind the agenda have successfully engaged the public support through the use of clever fear tactics.
The ‘Club of Rome’ is a premier environmental think-tank and consultants to the United Nations. They have previously been quoted on record presenting a seemingly outrageous plan to use global warming to turn mankind into its own greatest enemy, with “The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
Unfortunately for the global population, the Club of Rome was successful in making the public believe in a fake climate change problem. The use of lies and deceptions has also been inadvertently admitted by one of the IPCC lead men, Stanford Professor of Climatology Jew Stephen Schneider, who was quoted as saying “So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts…Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.” The use of fabricated fear tactics was also suggested by Emeritus professor Daniel Botkin when he said “The only way to get our society to truly change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe.”
Government figures have also been caught out playing middle-men for the one-world government agenda, including British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who was quoted as saying “Climate change makes us all global citizens, we are truly all in this together.” Over in Canada, Jewess Christine Stewart, the former Canadian Minister of the Environment echoed the same sentiment with “No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”
Ultimately, the global Jewish elite want to usher in their own hand picked world government, which bypasses any kind of democratic election system. At the same time, they will hit the middle class where it hurts most – in their pockets – by introducing a raft of new regulations and laws. Businesses will be affected by having to adhere to impossible CO2 mandates and face restrictions on industries available and technologies they can deploy, while environmentalism will become the religion of choice for most of the world.
A pay as you pollute scheme is on the cards for every human being worldwide, such as the one already put forward in the UK by Britains Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Jew David Miliband. The man who also maintains regular contact with Australia’s Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, plans to issue every world citizen with a ‘carbon credit card’; starting in the UK. E
very time someone buys petrol, pays an electricity bill or books an airline ticket, they will be forced to swipe their ‘carbon credit card’. The globalist plan is to issue every single person on earth a card and a balance of 1,000 points to spend each year. When you use up your points, you must purchase additional ‘carbon credits’ from a carbon credit trading firm. This crazy idea is nothing more than a socialist international wealth redistribution scheme. Only Jews will sing all the way to the bank
THE UN HAS ADMITTED THAT THE PRIMARY SOURCE OF INCOME FOR THE WORLD GOVERNMENT WILL BE THE CARBON TAX.
So while the general public and business community are forking out money left, right and centre on their ‘carbon credit cards’, a select few Jews will be collecting the money and living a life of luxury. Private Banks have been financing the carbon cap and trade scheme, which will create a new form of derivatives based on carbon credits. The UN will be in full control of the industry, and have the power to decide who is able to buy and sell carbon credits. This allows a select few banks and brokerage firms to have control over the carbon market and ensure they generate substantial profits.
Climate change has been exposed as a massive fraud designed to transfer more wealth from the poor to the Jewish rich. The global elite seem to be following the advice of Jew Adolf Hitler with their climate change scam, which was “The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it.”
HITLER WAS A ROTHSCHILD AGENT AND A JEW.
Science has officially gone to bed with world governments controlled by Jews . The only solution to receive unbiased climate change advice is to keep climate science well away from lobbyists, NGO’s, advocates, professional environmentalists, and crooks like Al fuckin’ Gore
TO BE CONTINUED --
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
Capt. Ajit Vadakayil March 28, 2016 at 3:40 PM
SING TO THE TUNE OF HOTEL CALIFORNIA BY EAGLES BAND . . . .
On the dusty road to JNU - -
Humid air thru mE hair - --
Warm smell of beef n paratha - - -
Wafting up through the air - - -
Up ahead in the distance -- -
I saw the bright JNU gates - --
My tummy rumbled , I felt weak and thin
I had to stop for a bite - - -
There he stood in the doorway - --
Flicking his ganja beedi in style - - -
And I was thinking to myself - - -
I don't like his sinister commie smile - - -
Then he lit up a candle - --
Muttering . power cut today - - - - - .
More commies down the road - - -
I thought I heard them cry - - -
Welcome to the big prison called India - - - -
Such a lousy place - -
Such a lousy place (background) - -
Such a sad disgrace, - -
Plenty of JNU commies cry - -
All through out the year - -
Any time of year (background) - - -
We commies are infested here - - -
Kanhaiya Kumar leads the charge - -
He's got an unwashed stubby face - - -
He makes an ugly, rasping noise - - -
But that's just his laugh - -
Rustic behenjis turned mod in funny jeans - - -
Eating mustard oil reeking paratha - -
Some scratch their crotch - -
Some their hairy armpits -- -
I said to the dhaba waiter - -
My beer lacks some ice - -
He said, - - -
Don't worry saar, Ill send desi tarra sans ice - -
Them commie slogans wafting from far away - -
Wake you up in the middle of the night - -
Just to hear them pray - -
Save us from this big prison called India - -
Such a ch0otiya place, - -
Such an anti-commie place (background) - -
Such a sad disgrace
Trying to stay at the JNU campus delhi
It aint no surprise - -
It aint no surprise (background) - -
That it swarms with commies - -
The stinking waiter was pouring - -
Stale slimy dhal on rice - -
And he said -- - -
We are all Comrades here - - -
In thinker JNU-disguise - -
And in the dhabha foyer - -
We gathered for the feast - - -
Though we stab it with our steely knives - -
We just can't cut JNU beef - - -
Last thing I remember --
I was rolling on the floor - -
That stale warm JNU beer was the culprit, I am sure - -
Relax, said the commie professor - --
This rustic naxal beauty can make you well - - - -
And her commie comrades laughed as they pinned me down - - -
Taking my pictures – oh blimey Hell! - - -