GENERAL OF VADAKAYIL ARMY, DEBDOOT SARKAR WEDS COLONEL SUMAN
MY WIFE SENT SCALAR WAVES DURING THE SANGHAM
THE VADAKAYIL ARMY IS DELIGHTED -
IN DUE COURSE THE COUPLE PLANS TO START AN ASHRAM AT SIKKIM , WHICH WILL BE THE FOUNTAINHEAD ( GAUMUKH ) OF TRUE SANATANA DHARMA..
SUMAN DID HER MASTERS IN USA, SPECIALIZING IN IOT ( INTERNET OF THINGS )..
SHE IS A VOLLEYBALL PLAYER , AND SHE IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN FROM LEAPING UP AND SMASHING POOR DEBDOOT'S HEAD ( JOKE ).
Capt. Ajit Vadakayil July 1, 2021 at 5:54 AM
BAAP REH !
FOUR YEARS AGO CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WARNED PM / HOME MINISTER/ NSA / ALL DGPs OF POLICE/ LAW MINISTER / CJI / LOK SABHA SPEAKER/ THAT TRISHA SHETTY IS BEING SPONSORED BY PAKISTANI ISI AND THE JEWISH DEEP STATE..
AT THAT TIME SHE WAS A MISS NOBODY..
TODAY THIS EGO LADEN COCKEYED WOMAN, IS AN INTERNATIONAL CELEBRITY, WHO BOASTS ON HER INSTAGRAM ACCOUNT OF HOW THE QUEEN AWARDED HER AND ALLUDED THAT DAVID BECKHAM WAS OGLING HER ( TEE HEEE , MUNGERILAL KE SAPNE ) FROM THE AUDIENCE..
TRISHA SHETTY ACCUSED CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL OF THREATENING TO RAPE HER.. I WOULD NOT EVEN FART ON HER UGLY COCK EYED FACE..
WE ASK AJIT DOVAL/ AMIT SHAH TO FIND OUT TRISHA SHETTY'S SPONSORS IN THE MUMBAI POLICE DEPT-- THE SACHIN VAZE TYPE COPS WHO WHO TAKES DIRECT ORDERS FROM HER..
WHISTLE BLOWERS FROM HER OWN NGO HAS SPOKEN ABOUT HER FOREIGN FINANCES.. RAW/ ED/ NIA/ CBI/ EXTERNAL MINISTRY --DONT SLEEP ON YOUR JOB..
IN THE TWEET BELOW SHE GIVES DIRECT ORDERS TO MUMBAI POLICE TO TAKE AN UNDER AGED GIRL TO COOPER HOSPITAL.. WHY COOPER HOSPITAL ? WHAT IS HER EQUATION THERE ?
WE KNOW WHO SPONSORED TRISHA SHETTY'S EDUCATION AT ANTI-INDIA/ ANTI-HINDU COMMIE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY..
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CHOOSES THE COLLEGIUM COMMIE TRAITOR PROFESSORS OF JNU..
capt ajit vadakayil
Capt. Ajit VadakayilJuly 1, 2021 at 5:56 AM
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-
HER NGO SHE SAYS
ALL MEMBERS OF HER NGO ( ONE IS A WHISTLE BLOWER ).
IG POLICE MUMBAI
MUMBAI POLICE COMMISSIONER
CJI MUMBAI HIGHCOURT
BABA RAMDEV WHOM SHE ABUSED AS GYMNAST AND SNAKE OIL SALESMAN
FINANCE MINISTER MINISTRY / CENTRE AND STATES
ENTIRE BBC GANG
ENTIRE US MEDIA
MAJOR WORLD MEDIA
ALL US SENATORS DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICAN
ALL US CONGRESSMEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICAN
ALL MAJOR EU / NATO NATION RULERS AND AMBASSADORS
ALL BRITISH MPs HOUSE OF LORDS/ COMMONS
QUEEN OF ENGLAND
OBAMA AND WIFE
JUSTIN VAISSE AND PASCAL LAMY OF PARIS PEACE FORUM
VOGUE MAGAZINE EDITOR—FOREIGN AS WELL AS INDIAN
SHAH RUKH KHAN
TED TALKS FOUNDATION
EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER/ MINISTRY
HOME MINISTRY CENTRE/ STATES
LAW MINISTER PRASAD / MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATES
ALL CHIEF JUSTICES HIGH COURTS
I&B MINISTER / MINISTRY
ALL DGPs OF INDIA
ALL IGs OF INDIA
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEF
DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL CMs OF INDIA
ALL MLAs OF INDIA
ALL MPs OF INDIA
ALL COLLECTORS OF MAJOR CITIES
ALL STATE GOVERNORS
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
ALL INDIAN THINK TANKS
FOREIGN INTELLIGECE SERVICE RUSSIA
ASIS – AUSTRALIAN SECRET INTELLIGENCE SERVICE
FEDERAL INTELLIGENCE SERVICE GERMANY
AMBASSADORS TO FROM NATIONS OF ABOVE SECRET AGENCIES
BJP IT CELL
AMBASSADORS FROM TO USA/ RUSSIA/ UK/ FRANCE/ GERMANY/ CHINA/ AUSTRALIA
GVL NARASIMHA RAO
GEN GD BAKSHI
CEO OF WIKIPEDIA
QUORA CEO ANGELO D ADAMS
QUORA MODERATION TEAM
KURT OF QUORA
KATHERINE MAHER WIKIPEDIA
LAXMI NARAYAN MITTAL
REPUBLICAN PARTY HQ
NEWS MAX TV
SKY NEWS AUSTRALIA
IAS / IPS ASSOCIATION
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
PUT A SCREEN SHOT OF THIS LIST ALONG WITH THE COMMENT IN HER TWITTER SITE/ AND ALL OTHER SITES -- INCL HER SHE SAYS NGO SITE
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
Capt. Ajit VadakayilJuly 1, 2021 at 9:59 PM
somebody called me up and cried.. captain your link below is incomplete unless you pulverise the bullshit of “contempt of court”. . #### https://captajitvadakayil.in/2021/06/30/vadakayil-says-abolish-the-collegium-judiciary-the-most-useless-on-the-planet-poll-of-polls/ ####... INDEED .. telling the truth without being politically correct cannot be termed “contempt of court”.. arbitrary suo moto’s actions by indian courts are a reflection of extreme judicial adventurism in contempt of the constitution/ we the people / the watan / dharma.. the 2006 amendment to the contempt of courts act, 1971 clarifies that the court may impose punishment for contempt only when it is satisfied that substantially interferes, or tends to substantially interfere with the due course of justice. apparently judges get temporary amnesia. the delhi hc has convicted four senior journalists of mid day daily of contempt of court by publishing certain scandalous articles about former chief justice of india, yk sabharwal.. mid day dated may 19, 2007 had carried news reports that the sealing orders issued by a bench headed by justice yk sabharwal was intended to benefit his sons who had ties with mall developers. . the court unconstitutionally rejected the contention of the daily newspaper , which had submitted that a judge, after retiring, ceases to be part of the judicial system and writing against him didn’t come within the ambit of contempt of court. . the contempt jurisdiction should not be used by corrupt judges to uphold their own personal dignity. . nemo debet esse judex in proporia causa i.e. ‘no person can be a judge in their own cause’ is one of the most fundamental tenets of justice. . the famous SULLIVAN DOCTRINE that public persons must be open to stringent comments and accusations as long as made with bonafide diligence, even if untrue.. a fair criticism of the conduct of a judge, the institution of the judiciary and its functioning cannot be contempt if made in good faith as a patriot and in public interest.. contempt powers can be only used if there is a clear imminent and present danger to the disposal of a case.. abuse of the authority by the courts as contempt of court has become a mercurial jurisdiction over time giving unconstitutional sweeping discretionary powers to the courts.. this certainly is not a positive development especially in the backdrop of several cases of alleged corruption, partisanship and nepotism in the judiciary.. courts exercise restraint and approach the contempt cases subjectively and not stifle the legitimate criticism of the judiciary. . justice kurian joseph of the supreme court of india has said that the trial by the media on pending cases is tantamount to contempt of court. sorry this SUBJUDICE bullshit applies only when the system is jury ( not judge ) .. a confused litigant ( brow beaten by a cunning lawyer and not familiar with the language ) refusing to answer a question put to him by the court does not constitute criminal contempt of court. a corrupt lawyer without a soul who becomes a judge is eminently fallible – the court clerks will vouch how many times the judge when he was a lawyer bribed them. a tiger cannot change his stripes so fast. judges in the superior courts routinely misuse the power to punish for contempt of court more to cover up their own misdeeds than to uphold the majesty of the law.. the criminal contempt law in india does not recognise the lack of intention i.e. mens rea as a defence to the act of contempt..
CONTINUED TO 2-
Capt. Ajit VadakayilJuly 1, 2021 at 10:01 PM
CONTINUED FROM 1--
india has ratified the international covenant on civil and political rights which provides that the freedom of expression can be curtailed by law only when it is essential for a legitimate purpose. this cannot include a judge’s faalthu personal ego. the united nations human rights committee has stated that any contempt of court proceeding must be justified in the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction to sustain orderly proceedings. in the united kingdom, the offence of scandalizing the courts was abolished in 2013 after a law commission report. this is interesting to note since the indian law of contempt of court is derived from the common law. the contempt law in england has been abolished and the last contempt proceedings occurred in 1930. the united states of america currently has watered down the contempt law by numerous judgments which affirm that the dignity of the courts cannot be established by silencing public opinion or by restricting the free discussions about the court. in the united states of america, justice hugo black had observed in the case of bridges in 1941, that american public opinion could not be silenced in the pretext of contempt of court.. the criminal contempt powers of the courts must be abandoned at least in the form it is currently manifest in. the courts have overlooked that the terms, “scandalizing the courts and obstruction of administration” cannot have the same connotation today as it had in the british india,when we were slaves of german jew rothschild. misuse of contempt jurisdiction could erode the public confidence in the judiciary.. judges, like everyone else, will have to earn respect. they cannot demand respect by demonstration of ‘power’ (of contempt).” this is not like a ship at sea in a storm where captain is king.. the power of judiciary lies, not in deciding cases, nor in imposing sentences, nor in punishing for contempt, but in the trust, confidence and faith of the common man.”.. in 1866, the high court of allahabad was established under the indian high courts act, 1861 and was constituted as a court of record with the power to punish slave indians for contempt. , the court observed that the power to punish for contempt was “arbitrary, unlimited and uncontrolled”, and therefore should be “exercised with the greatest caution.. prior censorship on institutional criticism in a democracy not just curtails the freedom of speech but also causes injury to the very institution. the best way to sustain the dignity of the court and earn respect from the public is by the quality of their judgment, the fairness and objectivity in their approach, and subjective application of dharma ( natural justice ) and by the restraint and decorum which they observe in their judicial conduct. justice ranjan gogoi, in its judgment, permitted the use of photographs of the president, prime minister, chief justice of india, in the advertisements issued by the government and its agencies. Just who the hell is elected unaccountable CJI? Pray? Prithee? . our constitution does not define the expression “contempt of court”, as per the contempt of courts act 1971 . high court justice karnan said that some judges are corrupt and some are TRAITORS .… only law makers can deal with traitors and THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT HAVE THE WORD TRAITOR IN ITS TEXT. instead of treating him as a whistle blower and thanking him -- the higher judges closed ranks and targeted this whistle blower….. whither truth ?……. THE CJI SENTENCED JUDGE KARNAN TO SIX MONTHS JAIL FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT… sorry-- if you know the indian law or even world law --contempt of court does not apply here"…… you can abuse the elected pm ( i abuse modi daily ) --but cant point a truthful finger at a corrupt and stupid lawyer turned judge ?…. SUPREME COURT HAS NO LEGAL RIGHT TO IMPOSE A BAN ON PRESS ( KARNAN CASE ) …. THIS IS MORE DAMAGING TO INDIA’S IMAGE THAN THE "EMERGENCY OF 1975 "…
CONTINUED TO 3--
Capt. Ajit VadakayilJuly 1, 2021 at 10:03 PM
CONTINUED FROM 2--
contempt of court applies when the court is in session and someone in the court related to the case undermines the judge’ s authority repeatedly.. contempt of court cannot be applied along the length and breadth of india ( on land / under ground/ in space ) , as it is meant within the confines of a wee brick and cement building court room … article 19(1)(a) of the constitution gives the right of freedom of speech and expression to all citizens… articles 129 and 215 give the power of contempt of court to the higher judiciary, and this power limits the freedom granted by article 19(1)(a). . the law of contempt has a vague and wandering jurisdiction with uncertain boundaries. such a law, regardless of public good, will unwittingly trample upon civil liberties. . respect for the judiciary cannot be won by shielding traitor judges ( bribes/ honey trapped by the deep state ) from . such enforced silence, in the name of preserving the dignity of the judiciary, causes resentment, suspicion and contempt, more than it would enhance respect. .. both civil and criminal contempt share the same punishment under the contempt of courts act 1971. the act allows for a maximum term of imprisonment for six months, and this can be supplemented with a fine of up to Rs 2000. . in section 7, a person shall not be guilty of contempt of court for publishing a fair and accurate report of a judicial proceeding or any state thereof… in india, the offence of contempt of court is committed when a person either disobeys a court order (civil contempt), or when a person says or does anything that scandalizes, prejudices, or interferes with judicial proceedings and the administration of justice (criminal contempt)… section 2(c) in the contempt of courts act, 1971.. (c) “criminal contempt” means the publication (whether by words, spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise) of any matter or the doing of any other act whatsoever which— (i) scandalizes or tends to scandalize, or lowers or tends to lower the authority of, any court; or.. (ii) prejudices, or interferes or tends to interfere with, the due course of any judicial proceeding; or.. (iii) interferes or tends to interfere with, or obstructs or tends to obstruct, the administration of justice in any other manner;… capt ajit vadakayil declares that the definition of contempt in the contempt of court act should be restricted to civil contempt, i.e., willful disobedience of judgments of the court. so that the system does not break down.. criminal contempt law, has inadvertently trampled upon civil liberties .. the supreme court holds constitutional powers under article 129 read with article 142 (2) of the constitution of india and subsequently, the high courts also have powers vested in them under article 215 of the constitution to punish for contempt. .. article 142(2) in the constitution of india 1949 .. (2) subject to the provisions of any law made in this behalf by parliament, the supreme court shall, as respects the whole of the territory of india, have all and every power to make any order for the purpose of securing the attendance of any person, the discovery or production of any documents, or the investigation or punishment of any contempt of itself .. article 215 in the constitution of india 1949 .. 215. high courts to be courts of record every high court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.. contempt can essentially be of two kinds: .. being disrespectful and rude to the judge or an attorney or subsequently causing any form of a disturbance in the courtroom particularly even after being warned by the judge .. willfully failing or refusing to obey an order given by the court such as failure to pay alimony or child support…
CONTINUED TO 4--
Capt. Ajit VadakayilJuly 1, 2021 at 10:07 PM
CONTINUED FROM 3--
commie traitor iyengar jew n ram stole "classified military secrets " to screw pm modi over the rafale deal.. at court the attorney general told cji gogoi that the evidence presented by commie n ram is a stolen military secret -- and is a crime which entails 14 years of jail.. but hey what does deep state darling cji gogoi tell the attorney general? they wont consider that the document was stolen.. they will check if the document holds water.. what the hell is all this ?..we ask pm modi - are you a babe in the fuckin’ woods ?.. stupid cji gogoi jumped into forbidden subjective territory and argued on behalf of deep state agent commie n ram --quote-- " if an accused stole a document to prove his innocence, it should be admitted in court" -- unquote.. the supreme court is in "contempt of the constitution" and in "contempt of we the people " who are above the constitution.. judiciary has no power to review laws created by the elected law makers.. this is unconstitutional .. section 12 in the contempt of courts act, 1971 .. 12. punishment for contempt of court.— (1) save as otherwise expressly provided in this act or in any other law, a contempt of court may be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees, or with both: .. but hey juhi chawla was fined 20 lakhs for a genuine pil abot 5g which decimates pollinator bees. we have 1380 million people and we cannt feed them if bees get decimated.. the stupid judge will never understand this.. he got provoked because he heard a juhi chawla film song in the back ground while doing the video court session. #### https://captajitvadakayil.in/2021/06/06/vadakayil-on-an-ignoramus-delhi-hc-judge-fining-my-batchmate-veeresh-malik-and-juhi-chawla-20-lakhs-for-their-petition-on-5g-poll/ ####.. judges are allowing unreasonable fines like private org ima ( darling og jewish vaccine lobby ) suing baba ram dev 1000 crores for protecting ayurveda and yoga which THE CHRISTIAN EVANGELIST CUM IMA CHIEF DR JOHN ROSE AUSTIN JAYALAL was abusing ghadi ghadi. people who sue ( ego based ) for 1000 crores for defamation -- must first deposit 50% of the amount sued for ( 500 crores ) of the money with the court , which must be called “aukaat deposit”.. if the ego maniac loses 50% of the aukat deposit ( 250 crores ) must go to the harassed whistle blower who was falsely sued.. the remaining 50% of the aukat deposit money ( 250 crores ) must go to the govt coffers…if the egomaniac wins he will get back his aukat deposit of 500 crores along with the 1000 crores he sued for ..there must be a fixed ceiling based on conditions in india.. the purpose of the power to punish for criminal contempt is to ensure that the faith and confidence of the public in administration of justice is not eroded. such power, vested in the courts, carries with it great responsibility. care should be taken to ensure that there is no room for complaints of ostentatious exercise of power. . there still exists a high number of civil and criminal contempt cases pending in various high courts and the supreme court. . it is a very dangerous jurisdiction in which judges act in their own vested nay ulterior motived clause .. unconstitutional suo motu powers of the court to initiate such proceedings only serve to complicate matters. #### https://captajitvadakayil.in/2021/06/26/vadakayil-on-flights-of-fantasy-by-wanna-be-messiah-moses-low-mental-caliber-judges-misusing-suo-moto-cognisance-clause-poll/ ####.. it was rothschild’s agent( mentored by jew john dewey ) br ambedkar presided over the drafting committee that proposed and successfully defended the inclusion of contempt of court as a restriction on freedom of speech despite vehement opposition from almost all members of the constituent assembly..
CONTINUED TO 5-
Capt. Ajit VadakayilJuly 1, 2021 at 10:08 PM
CONTINUED FROM 4-
the judiciary and judges may be corrected only by public criticism when we have an unconstitutional collegium system where judges are chosen by the jewish deep state.. the best answer to abuse of judges is not frequent or ferocious contempt-sentencing but fine performance. : like a hero cricketer states—let the bat/ ball do the talking for me not cheers or boos of the spectators . right now the supreme court is relying on the wrong weapon, i.e. criminal contempt in a criminal and unconstitutional manner .. in the era of social media ( kalki revolution of consciousness ) , besides the need to revisit the law on criminal contempt, even the test for contempt needs to be evaluated. there is an ocean of difference between well informed and ill informed criticism. what is said in regard to a matter concerning the judiciary by a thinker like capt ajit vadakayil should be viewed differently from a similar statement by an uninformed cunt.”.. an inclusive, diverse, accountable, open and transparent supreme court would be able to administer justice without fear or favour, without needing criminal contempt to preserve its faalthu honour. . if the court “delivers justice which is its professional, fundamental duty, criticism by cunts loses its sting.. in a country as large and diverse as india, the supreme court continues to have its seat only in delhi. this is despite having the constitutional permission to establish benches elsewhere in the country. .. people who have researched extensively on the supreme court of india, know this – “ of the 36 men who had manned the supreme court as justices from 1950 to 1967— they was a GANG OF DEEP STATE DARLING COLLEGIUM FAMILIES, the “SURMA IN AANKH “ kayasthas/ parsis/ chitpavan jews/ peshawari khatri jews.. the adage “change is the only constant” does not apply to india’s supreme court. for it continues to be the bastion of the privileged few, who are controlled by foreign forces. no judge has ever been impeached in india.
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
Capt. Ajit Vadakayil July 2, 2021 at 4:08 AM
SEND THIS POST TO ALL LAW SCHOOL DEANS IN INDIA.. TELL THEM THEY HAVE MY PERMISSION TO INCLUDE IT IN THE SYLLABUS..
I WRITE WHAT OTHERS DONT DARE TO WRITE-- BECAUSE THEY DONT HAVE THE BRAINs OR BALLS.
IT TAKES BALLS TO START WRITING A POST LIKE ABOVE-- AND BRAINS TO COMPLETE IT HOLDING THE READERS INTEREST ALL ALONG. THE SUBJECTIVE HAS TO BALANCE THE OBJECTIVE.
capt ajit vadakayil