Tuesday, January 21, 2020

COMMUNISM failed, because Jew KARL MARX was a mediocre thinker , DAS KAPITAL is a flawed and mindless document, Part 8 -- Capt Ajit Vadakayil



THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 7 BELOW--

https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_17.html




Mann Mein Aghna Se Bhare Bolo Kahan Jaaye...
Saam Daam Dand Bhed... Saam Daam Dand Bhed
Yeh Trishna Se Bhare Bolo Kahan Jaaye
Sarkar Ke Dhwar Pe Jaake Teher Jaaye
Anyay Ke Saath Mein Kaise Jiye Jaaye
Sarkar Ke Dhwar Pe Jaake Tehar Jaaye
Anyay Ke Saath Mein Kaise Jiye Jaaye
Sarkar Ke Dhwar Pe Jaake Tehar Jaaye

Sarkar Besaar Ko Bhoole Na Bhoole Na


A LOT OF CELEBRITIES THINK THAT BY SHOWING THAT THEY ARE LEFT LEANING ,  SHOWCASES THEM AS “FOR THE PEOPLE”.     FILM STARS THINK IT WILL INCREASE THEIR BOX OFFICE COLLECTIONS

NONSENSE !

COMMUNISM WAS CREATED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD TO ENSLAVE PEOPLE AND GRAB THEIR PRIVATE WEALTH AND FAMILY HEIRLOOMS ( GOLD/ JEWELS ) PASSED DOWN FOR CENTURIES..

WHAT IS THE POWER OF ROTHSCHILD MONOPOLISED MEDIA?

EVERYBODY GETS TO HER “SIX MILLION JEWS DEAD” – AND IMAGINE HITLER WAS A JEW..


NOBODY GETS TO HEAR OF 200 MILLION PEOPLE KILLED BY COMMIE JEWS.

  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeMt9r3oTfs

    WE WONT ALLOW COMMIE GITA GOPINATH TO RUN DOWN INDIA.. SHE DOES NOT HAVE A TECHNICAL BRAIN..

    GITA BABY IS IMF CHIEF ONLY BECAUSE SHE IS THE BLOOD RELATIVE OF ROTHSCHILDs AGENT COMMIE AK GOPALAN..

    GITA GOPINATH AND OTHER WESTERN ECONOMISTS DO NOT KNOW THE BASICS OF ECONOMICS.

    WE ASK PM MODI-- REMOVE DAS KAPITAL ( COMMIE ECONOMICS ) OF KARL MARX FROM EVERY UNIVERSITY IN INDIA, AND BURN THEM..

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_21.html

    HEY GITA BABY--

    GOOGLE FOR THE POST BELOW-- READ QUESTIONS TO QUORA 686 TO 820..

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/06/archived-questions-to-quora-from-capt.html

    DAS KAPITAL IS MINDLESS BULLSHIT... JEW KARL MARX ( BLOOD RELATIVE OF GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHILD ) WAS A MAD MAN..HE IS NOT THIS PLANETs NO 1 THINKER , AS TOM TOMMED BY ROTHSCHILD MONOPLOSED MEDIA..

    MY MOTHER/ WIFE/ CHILDREN ARE FROM KANNUR-- GITA GOPINATH IS ALSO FROM KANNUR .. WE KNOW HER FAMILY..

    INDIA GROWS TODAY AT 10.1%.. WE ARE THIS PLANETs NO 3 ECONOMY.. WE ARE THE ONLY NATION WITH POTENTIAL..

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

THE REASON WHY COMMUNISM FELL WAS BECAUSE EVERY COUNTRY THAT HAD COMMUNISM, HAD A DICTATOR LIKE EVIL PIG NAPOLEON IN GEORGE ORWELL’S “ANIMAL FARM”


GEORGE ORWELL WAS BORN IN INDIA, HE MODELED PIG NAPOLEON AFTER GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHILD





Marx saw the living world in terms of a Darwinian ‘survival-of-the-fittest’ struggle, involving the triumph of the strong and the subjugation of the weak. Marx predicted the mass killings which would take place as a result of his proletariat revolution and he sought to justify it.

Charles Darwin wrote  that the ‘survival of the fittest’ existed among all forms of life.  From this idea Marx believed that the major ‘struggle for existence’ among humans occurred primarily between the social classes.  Marx projected that  his own work to be the exact parallel of Darwin’s.   

Darwin wrote what Rothschild wanted him to write..

The communist core idea that violent revolution, in which the strong overthrow the weak, was a natural, inevitable part of the unfolding of history from Darwinistic concepts and conclusions.

Acceptance of atheist Darwinism and rejection of religion were critical for the new movements of communism.

Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859..  In a letter from December 19, 1860 addressed to his friend and colleague Friedrich Engels, Marx states that Darwin’s book contains “the basis in natural history for our view.”   Mad  Marx agreed with Mad Darwin that society, like the living beings on Earth, is the result of historical processes of change.

Darwin did for the understanding of nature what Marx and Engels did for human society—he overturned teleology and essentialism and established a materialist basis for understanding how organisms change over time. And that is precisely what Marx meant when he said that On the Origin of Species “contains the basis in natural history for our view.”

Marx wrote- “History itself is a real part of natural history and of nature’s development into man. Natural science will, in time, incorporate into itself the science of man, just as the science of man will incorporate into itself natural science: there will be one science”

Marx  wrote in the The German Ideology “We know only a single science, the science of history. One can look at history from two sides and divide it into the history of nature and the history of men. The two sides are, however, inseparable; the history of nature and the history of men are dependent on each other so long as men exist”

Engels wrote in Socialism: Utopian and Scientific: “ Nature works dialectically and not metaphysically … she does not move in the eternal oneness of a perpetually recurring circle, but goes through a real historical evolution. In this connection, Darwin must be named before all others. He dealt the metaphysical conception of Nature the heaviest blow by his proof that all organic beings, plants, animals, and man himself, are the products of a process of evolution going on through millions of years”.

In 1845, in The German Ideology, Marx wrote that the ability to produce life’s needs distinguishes humans from other animals:--
  “Men can be distinguished from animals by consciousness, by religion or anything else you like. They themselves begin to distinguish themselves from animals as soon as they begin to produce their means of subsistence, a step which is conditioned by their physical organization. By producing their means of subsistence they are indirectly producing their material life”

Engels wrote  in the late 1870s, in his unfinished book Dialectics of Nature:  --
”Let us accept for a moment the phrase “struggle for existence,” for argument’s sake. The most that the animal can achieve is to collect; man produces, he prepares the means of subsistence, in the widest sense of the words, which without him nature would not have produced. This makes impossible any unqualified transference of the laws of life in animal societies to human society”

Darwin, , opened the door to Marxism by providing what Marx believed was a ‘scientific’ rationale to deny Creation and, by extension, to deny God. His denial of God, and his knowledge of Darwin, inspired Marx to develop his new godless worldview now known as communism. 

And like other Darwinists, Marx stressed that his communistic worldview was ‘scientific’ and, as such, employed a ‘scientific methodology and scientific outlook

In hand-written letter (November 24, 1880) to an American correspondent called F. McDermott , Chales Darwin  states that  “I do not believe in the Bible as a divine revelation, and therefore not in Jesus Christ as the son of God  “.

This document was kept confidential for over 100 years at Darwin’s request and was on September 21, 2015 in New York by Bohams for a record price of almost USD 200,000.

Darwin was right here as Jesus never existed and his life story was lifted from the life of Kerala sage Apollonius of Tyana . His side kick Damisa’s wife was Mary Magdalene.

Read all 4 parts of the post below—

Marx admired Darwin’s book,  not for economic reasons but for the more fundamental one that Darwin’s universe was purely materialistic, and the explication of it no longer involved any reference to unobservable, nonmaterial causes outside or “beyond” it. In that important respect,  Rothschild’s agents Darwin and Marx were truly Commie comrades .

Marx saw the living world in terms of a Darwinian ‘survival-of-the-fittest’ struggle, involving the triumph of the strong and the subjugation of the weak. Darwin taught that the ‘survival of the fittest’ existed among all forms of life. From this idea Marx believed that the major ‘struggle for existence’ among humans occurred primarily between the social classes..

In Marx’s words: ‘Darwin’s book is very important and serves me as a basis in natural selection for the class struggle in history. . . . not only is it (Darwin’s book) a death blow . . . to “Teleology” in the natural sciences but their rational meaning is empirically explained.

Marx detested passionately any ‘belief in supernatural causes’.

The importance of Darwinism in the estimated 200 million deaths caused by communism was partly because,  Clearly, for Marx man has no “nature”. . . . For man is his own maker and will consciously become his own maker in complete freedom from morality or from the laws of nature and of nature’s God. . . . 

Here we see why Marxism justifies the ruthless sacrifice of men living today, men who, at this stage of history, are only partly human.

The theoretical foundation of communism, . . is dialectical materialism which was expounded with great clarity by Frederick Engels in Anti-Dührüng and The Dialectics of Nature.  He recognized the great value of the contributions made by geology in establishing that there was constant movement and change in nature and the significance of Darwin’s demonstration that this applied also to the organic world. . . . 

The crux of the entire theoretical framework, however, is in the nature of qualitative changes. This is also spelt out by Engels in The Dialectics of Nature, “a development in which the qualitative changes occur not gradually but rapidly and abruptly, taking the form of a leap from one state to another”. . . . Here then is the recipe for a bloody Commie revolution.. 

Marx concluded that religion was a tool of the rich to subjugate the poor. He openly denounced religion as ‘the opiate of the people’, and in nearly every nation where the communists assumed power, the churches were neutered.

Opium is a pain-killing drug and Marx characterized religion as having the same function, i.e. it was used to pacify the oppressed because it stressed peace, non-violence, and loving one’s neighbor. The result was it made them feel better but did not solve their problems.

Marx felt that religion is not just an illusion: it had a deleterious social function, namely to distract the oppressed from the truth of their oppression and prevent people from seeing the harsh realities of their existence. So long as the workers and the downtrodden believed their patient, moral behavior and sufferings would earn them freedom and happiness in heaven, they would allow themselves to be oppressed. 

Marx concluded that workers would change their perception of reality only when they realized that there is no God, no afterlife and no good reason not to have what they want now even if they have to take it from others.

The solution, Marx argued, was to abolish religion, which then would allow the poor to openly revolt against their ‘oppressors’ (the land owners, the wealthy, the entrepreneurs, et al.) and take their wealth away so the poor could enjoy wealth and fulfillment in this world. 

Furthermore, since ‘the rich and powerful aren’t just going to hand these over, the masses shall have to seize them’ by force—by gruesome murders .. Marx concluded that the ‘abolition of religion’ is a prerequisite for the attainment of real happiness of the people

Marx’s eschatology, his materialistic philosophy of history is, for all practical purposes, a doctrine of permanent revolution, a doctrine which cannot but issue in periodic violence, terror and tyranny’..

Consequently, an important cornerstone of communism was to take away the opium (religion) from the people and convince them that they should eat, drink and be merry now, for tomorrow they may die (and to have the resources to eat, drink and be merry, they should steal from the rich and the successful).

 Marx stressed that the Darwinist philosophy, aside from personal pleasures in the here and now, life in the long run has no meaning or purpose because we were accidents of nature that, in all likelihood, never again would occur on the Earth.

To ensure that communism maintains its power base, it is necessary to indoctrinate people against religion

Jew Lenin  was influenced significantly by Darwinism, and operated in accordance with the philosophy ‘fewer but better’, a restatement of natural selection

Jew Stalin became an ‘avid Darwinian, abandoned the faith in God, and began to tell his fellow seminarians that people were descended from apes and not from Adam’

The Communist ideal that ‘each takes according to his needs, and each gives according to his abilities’ all too often became ‘each takes whatever he can, and gives back as little as he can’. 

The result has been economic bankruptcy for most Communist countries. The economic poverty of Russia and much of eastern Europe eloquently testifies to the abject failure of communism.

Marx was influenced considerably by Hegel’s dialectic concept.  Jew George Hegel held that religion, science, history, and ‘most everything else’ evolves to a higher state as time progresses.   It does this by a process called the dialectic, in which a thesis (an idea) eventually confronts an antithesis (an opposing idea), producing a synthesis or a blend of the best of the old and new ideas .   

Marx concluded that capitalism is the thesis, and the organized proletariat is the antithesis. Essentially, the central conflict in capitalism was between those who controlled the means of production (the owners, the wealthy class, or the bourgeoisie) and those who did the actual physical work (the workers or the proletariat). 

Marx’s central idea was that the synthesis (i.e. communism) would emerge from the struggle between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. This is illustrated by Marx’s famous phrase, ‘workers of the world unite and overthrow your oppressors’.


Marx concluded that the masses (the workers—those persons who worked in the factories and the farms) would struggle with the business owners, the wealthy and the entrepreneurs. Since there were a lot more workers than owners, Marx believed that the workers eventually would overthrow the entrepreneurs by violent revolution, taking their factories and wealth. 

The result would be a dictatorship by the proletariat. Marx then believed that private property would be abolished, and the workers would collectively own the country, including the farms and the means of production. 

All the workers then would share equally in the fruits of their labor, producing a classless society in which everyone earned an equal amount of money. This philosophy obviously appealed to millions of people, especially the poor, the downtrodden, and many middle class people who had a concern for the poor.

Communist revolutions resulted in forcibly taking the wealth from the land-owning classes, the wealthy, the industrialists and others. Appropriating the land and wealth from the property owners in general resulted in an enormous amount of widespread resistance.

In India Commie were turncoats . They did whatever suited them when it came to killing and grabbing wealth and land


Many of these people had built their wealth from hard work and astute business decisions, and were not willing to give up what in many cases they had worked very hard for years to obtain. A bloodbath resulted that took the lives of hundreds of millions of people. Those murdered often included the most talented entrepreneurs, the most skilled industrialists, and the intellectual backbone of the nation. 

The workers were put in charge of the companies and factories once run by what Marx called the bourgeoisie; many of these workers lacked the skills and personal qualities necessary to run these businesses. Consequently, inferior products, low productivity and an incredible amount of waste was the rule for generations in the Communist world.

Where else can you justify a Second Standard failed , illiterate commie named MM Mani being made “Electricity Minister”?.

Can he answer one single question of the exam below?


Marx’s theory unified Darwinism and revolution intrinsically and inseparably. Marx’s criminal claim to give scientific guidance to those who would transform society has been one of the chief reasons for his doctrine’s enormous influence.

Jew Mao wrote - ‘We had to steel our will to fight in the struggle for existence, he told us. The weak would perish; only the strong would survive.’

Mao was convinced that ‘without the continual pressure of natural selection’ humans would degenerate. This idea inspired Mao to advocate ‘the ceaseless revolution that brought China to the brink of ruin’

In the minds of Jew Hitler, Jew Stalin and Jew Mao, treating people as animals was not wrong because they believed that Darwin had ‘proved’ humans were not God’s creation, but instead descended from some simple, one-cell organism. Romani gypsies and anal sex receiving Jews were marked for extermination by Jew Hitler.


All three men believed it was morally proper to eliminate the less fit or ‘herd them like cattle into boxcars bound for concentration camps and gulags’ if it achieved the goal of their Darwinist philosophy

Meanwhile Jew Rothschild tried his best to do forgery and create the MISSING LINK between man and monkey— “the Peking Man”,  “the Piltdown Man”, “missing link Lucy “ using circular electric saw and super glue.. Lucy still comes as a Google doodle..

BELOW: EVR PERIYAR WAS BRAINWASHED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD WITH THE ATHEIST THEORIES OF JEW NEITZSCHE .. 


BELOW:  ROTHSCHILD GAVE EVR PERIYAR A WORLD TOUR ON HIS SHIP-- TO ALL NATIONS HAVING TAMIL DIASPORA..   ROTHSCHILD KNEW THE TAMIL POPULATION AND LOCATION ABROAD, AFTER ALL HE CREATED IT.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/04/indentured-coolie-slavery-reinvented.html

A LOT OF ATHEIST  TAMILIANS HAVE NAMES OF MASS MURDERERS LENIN AND STALIN




BELOW: ROTHSCHILD ARRANGED FOR BR AMBEDKAR TO CONVERT TO BUDDHISM .. LAKHS WERE CONVERTED FROM HINDUISM TO BUDDHISM..  

BUT THESE CONVERS CAME BACK TO HINDUISM AS SOON AS THEY LEARNT THAT BR AMBEDKAR MARRIED A "CHITPAVAN BRAHMIN"..

BR AMBEDKAR WAS A STAR KID.. HIS GRANDFATHER WAS A FREE MASON AND RECRUITED MAHARS AS SOLDIERS , WHO FOUGHT FOR THE WHITE INVADER IN 1857.

AS PER HINDU VARNA , SHUDRAS CANNOT BE KSHATRIYA WARRIORS .. SHIVAJI WAS A MAHAR, A RULER..  SABKO CHOOTIYA BANAYA..


.
Like Darwin, Marx thought he had discovered the law of development. He saw history in stages, as the Darwinists saw geological strata and successive forms of life. . . .

Both Marx and Darwin made struggle the means of development. Again, the measure of value in Darwin is survival with reproduction—an absolute fact occurring in time and which wholly disregards the moral or esthetic quality of the product.  

In Marx the measure of value is expended labor—an absolute fact occurring in time, which also disregards the utility of the product.

Both Darwin and Marx tended to hedge and modify their mechanical absolution in the face of objections..

Marx attended a series of lectures by Thomas Huxley on Darwin’s ideas, and spoke of nothing else for months but Darwin and the enormous significance of his scientific discoveries ( sic)..

DARWIN SPONSORED BY ROTHSCHILD USED TO BE TERRIBLY SEASICK.. THE CAPTAIN OF THE NAVAL SHIP HMS BEAGLE ROBERT FITZROY  DOCKED HIS SHIP TO PREVENT DARWIN FROM DYING BY PUKING HIS GUTS OUT AT SEA.. 

THIS CONVERTED DARWIN TO A “SCIENTIST”..

The previous Captain Pringle Stokes has committed suicide in the straits of Magellan and Robert FitzRoy  was afraid that he would go the same way.

On 1 August 1828 Stokes shot himself. The bullet remained within his skull, but Stokes remained conscious and coherent.Gangrene set in, and Stokes finally died on 12 August 1828.   

Lieutenant William Skyring, the assistant surveyor, commanded the Beagle on its voyage to Montevideo for repairs. When it arrived there Robert FitzRoy, flag lieutenant of HMS Ganges, was given command. 

FitzRoy commanded the Beagle on its celebrated second voyage from 1831 to 1836, with the young naturalist Charles Darwin on board. Many years later, FitzRoy also suffered from depression, and committed suicide in 1865.. Darwin would become mad on HMS Beagle.  

DARWIN HIMSELF WROTE THAT HIS MENTAL PROBLEMS HAD AN ORIGIN IN HIS FIVE YEAR BOUT WITH SEASICKNESS ON HMS BEAGLE.

EVEN WHEN PUT ASHORE TO  GET OVER HIS SEA SICKNESS, DARWIN WOULD STILL PUKE ..

 WHILE ASHORE DARWIN WOULD EAT IGUANAS AND ARMADILLOS WHICH AFFECTED HIS BRAIN ADVERSELY..

For over forty years Darwin suffered intermittently from various combinations of symptoms such as: malaise, vertigo, dizziness, muscle spasms and tremors, vomiting, cramps and colics, bloating and nocturnal intestinal gas, headaches, alterations of vision, severe tiredness, nervous exhaustion, dyspnea, skin problems such as blisters all over the scalp and eczema, crying, anxiety, sensation of impending death and loss of consciousness, fainting, tachycardia, insomnia, tinnitus, and depression. These symptoms displayed by Darwin might be diagnosed today as a form of dysautonomia known as hyperadrenergic postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome or orthostatic intolerance or relatedly, as mast cell activation syndrome. Despite all this he fucked his wife and produced 10 children

IF DARWIN HAS NOT PUKED EVERY HOUR ON HMS BEAGLE,  WE WOULD NEVER HAD HEARD OF THIS FELLOW..

At age 12, Darwin confessed in a letter that he only washed his feet once a month at school

In 1831,  Darwin was just 22 years old when he boarded the ship.. He was to be more of a companion and a dining table mate to the Captain.. 

On December 27, 1831, Charles Darwin went on board HMS Beagle in Devonport (Plymouth). For five years, the  crypto Jew Anglican parson Darwin– served as an unpaid naturalist on a science expedition on board HMS Beagle.  

HMS Beagle was a WEE ship, just  90-foot long and 24-foot wide with three-masts.  I have commanded ship more than 1000 feet in length



IT IS A SECRET THAT OUT OF THE 5 YEARS DARWIN SENT ON HMS BEAGLE , ONLY 15 MONTHS WERE AT SEA..  THE REST OF THE TIME HE WAS ASHORE , WITH A COUPLE OF SEAMEN.. 

THE SHIP WOULD GO AWAY AND THEN COME BACK TO PICK UP DARWIN WHO WOULD BE PUKING LESS BY THEN. 

On October 2, 1836, the ship reached English shores again. Rothschild ensured his media called Darwin a great scientist and an eminent geologist. This bastard was neither..

On his visit to the Galapagos Islands, Charles Darwin discovered several species of finches that varied from island to island, which helped him to develop his mad theory of natural selection.  

Natural selection leads to evolutionary change when individuals with certain characteristics have a greater survival or reproductive rate than other individuals in a population and pass on these inheritable genetic characteristics to their offspring.  

Darwin's mad theory stated that all species of organisms arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations that increase the individual's ability to compete, survive, and reproduce

Darwin almost missed the ship HM Beagle that took him to the Galapagos Islands and beyond, where he discovered evidence for evolution and started to realize its mechanism — natural selection.   The Captain thought he was dead, still they made a search and located him and the sailors kept to take care of him and feed him..

Captain Robert FitzRoy had rejected Darwin to be his “companion” on the ship after being with him for a trail period of two weeks .. Another man was chosen.. This fellow just disappeared.

Darwin delayed the publication of On the Origin of Species for more than two decades after he was convinced of his theory, because he was nervous about how it would be received. Darwin knew that his theory was all bullshit. 

But Jew Rothschild used his clout and converted his mad theory to science—and the best part is it is still part of our NCERT syllabus in this DNA age.

Life came on earth from a black meterorite stone called Shiva Lingam ( Shiva’s Phallus)


Rotshchild tried to get Darwin’s theory published using another fellow Alfred Russel Wallace (who worked at Amazon river and Malay Archipelago collecting beetles ) , and this made “finch beak collector” Darwin angry and upset.. 

Darwin was thus arm twisted to publish his mad theory which would kill 200 million people.

BELOW: IT IS A SECRET THAT HMS BEAGLE WAS PROSPECTING MINERALS FOR ROTHSCHILD 


DARWINs DATES WHEN HE WAS ON SOLID LAND ( DUE TO PUKING ON BOARD AT SEA ) DO NOT AGREE WITH THE SHIPs LOG MAINTAINED BY THE CAPTAIN.. 

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/944/944-h/944-h.htm


BELOW: MAD FELLOW DARWIN DISCARDED ASHORE BY A FURIOUS CAPTAIN KEPT FILLING HIS SACK WITH GOODIES LIKE DRIED FINCH BEAKS-- AND THEN HEY PRESTO--- .HE BECOMES THIS PLANETs GREATEST NATURALIST AND SCIENTIST

HIS THEORY WOULD BE ASSIMILATED BY MAD MARX TO KILL 200 MILLION PEOPLE..

REAL EVOLUTION IS SOUL EVOLUTION, NOT DARWINs BULLSHIT EVOLUTION..

https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/how-to-release-trapped-and-miserable.html

BELOW:  DARWIN WAS PUT HERE ONLY BECAUSE THE SEAS HERE ARE CALM..

DARWIN WOULD PUKE IF HE SAW ROUGH SEAS FROM LAND



  1. https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_21.html

    HEY DEGREE OVER DOWRY ROMILA THAPAR..

    DO YOU LIKE DARWIN MORE OR MARX MORE..

    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL IS GRINDING BOTH INTO POWDER.. THERE WILL BE NO RESURRECTION..

    ENOUGH OF COMMIE NONSENSE..

    I AM STILL WAITING FOR YOUR RESPONSE ABOUT A DEBATE ON DAS KAPITAL LIVE ON TV ..

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

JEW ROTHSCHILD AND MAD MARX  RECOGNIZED THE IMPORTANCE OF MAD DARWIN TO THEIR MOVEMENT AND THEREFORE VIGOROUSLY DEFENDED HIM

MARXs  STUPID “DAS KAPITAL” AND DARWIN’S  STUPID “ ORIGIN OF SPECIES” WERE THE ‘TWO GREATEST SCIENTIFIC CREATIONS OF THE CENTURY’ ( SIC) THANKS TO THE PROPAGANDA OF GERMAN JEW  ROTHSCHILD MONOPOLIZED MEDIA

Communism teaches that by  ‘defending Darwinism, working people strengthen their defenses against the attacks of . . . reactionary outfits, and prepare the way for the transformation of the social order’, i.e. a communist revolution.

At Marx’s graveside, Jew Engels spAke a eulogy  : ‘Just as Darwin discovered the law of evolution in organic nature, so Marx discovered the law of evolution in human history..

BRRAAAYYYYYYYYYYY

Engels spAke --‘What they both celebrated was the internal rhythm and course of life, the one the life of nature, the other of society, that proceeded by fixed laws, undistracted by the will of God or men. There were no catastrophes in history as there were none in nature. There were no inexplicable acts, no violations of the natural order. God was as powerless as individual men to interfere with the internal, self-adjusting dialectic of change and development.’

Marx felt that religion is not just an illusion: it had a deleterious social function, namely to distract the oppressed from the truth of their oppression and prevent people from seeing the harsh realities of their existence. 

So long as the workers and the downtrodden believed their patient, moral behavior and sufferings would earn them freedom and happiness in heaven, they would allow themselves to be oppressed. 

Marx concluded that workers would change their perception of reality only when they realized that there is no God, no afterlife and no good reason not to have what they want now even if they have to take it from others.


Communism teaches that by  ‘defending Darwinism, working people strengthen their defenses against the attacks of . . . reactionary outfits, and prepare the way for the transformation of the social order’, i.e. a communist revolution.

At Marx’s graveside, Jew Engels spAke a eulogy  : ‘Just as Darwin discovered the law of evolution in organic nature, so Marx discovered the law of evolution in human history..

The solution, Mad Marx argued, was to abolish religion, which then would allow the poor to openly revolt against their ‘oppressors’ (the land owners, the wealthy, the entrepreneurs, et al.) and take their wealth away so the poor could enjoy wealth and fulfillment in this world. 

Furthermore, since ‘the rich and powerful aren’t just going to hand these over, the masses shall have to seize them’ by force. ‘Marx’s eschatology, his materialistic philosophy of history is, for all practical purposes, a doctrine of permanent revolution, a doctrine which cannot but issue in periodic violence, terror and tyranny’

AT THE END OF IT ALL WHAT DO WE SEE— AFTER THE COMMIE FOG CLEARED  ?

JEW ROTHSCHILD STOLE THE WEALTH OF THE CZAR AND SIPHONED OFF THE WEALTH OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION, BY NOT ALLOWING PRIVATE PROPERTY..
IT WAS ALL ABOUT STEALING..


WAH RAAJAAH WAH !


BELOW:  EVEN A RETARDED CHILD KNOWS THAT DARWINs FINCH THEORY IS BULLSHIT AND IT CANNOT BE APPLIED TO HUMANS



JEW DARWIN SHOULD HAVE SHOVED HIS FINCHES UP HIS OWN CHRONS LADEN ASSHOLE, INSTEAD OF CONVERTING HALF THE PLANET TO ATHEISTS


MAD DARWIN FOUND ONLY ONE FUCKIN' FINCH ON THE ENTIRE MAINLAND

BAAAYE GAAD !  SWEAR !!



JAI JAI FINCH... 

PAAGAL DARWIN KA FINCH !



NEXT TIME DARWIN MUST TAKE PAAGALIKA GHOSE AND SEARCH FOR EASTER FINCH EGGS ON GOOD FRIDAY..







BELOW: DARWIN HAD PLAN B GASSED UP AND READY -- WITH BEETLES..





HEY SAGARIKA GHOSE

DARWIN FOUND SOME EASTER EGGS ( FINCH ) ON GOOD FRIDAY..

YOU WANT ONE?

YOU CAN SHARE IT WITH HUSBAND RAJDEEP SARDESAI.. EKKATTA KHAAANA.

https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_21.html

capt ajit vadakayil
..

SEND ABOVE COMMENT TO
SAGARIKA GHOSE
RAJDEEP SARDESIA
AND ALL INDIAN JOURNALISTS AND MEDIA BARONS
I&B MINISTER/ MINSTRY -- CENTRE AND STATES

IAS EXAM QUESTION PAPER:

HOW MANY CYLINDERS ? ...   2 / 6/ 8/ 12


BELOW: MAAJI IS HAJAAAAAR THRILLED.. HER AKKAL KA DUSHMAN SON HAS COME OF AGE!    CHECK OUT THE CUNTS IN THE AUDIENCE..



True Joke :--

I has a senior by the name of Kaushalendar Gupta – a corny fellow


He used to introduce himself as COW CYLINDER GUPTA



Karl Marx is very aware of the propagandistic use of the term "science,"

ROTHSCHILD ASKED MARX TO TERM DARWINs MAD THEORY OF EVOLUTION AS SCIENCE

Economics is not a "science" in any meaningful sense of that term

Engels gave Marx credit for extending Darwin's theory to the study of the inner dynamics and change in human society

Marx drew on Lewis H. Morgan and his social evolution theory. Lewis H. Morgan was a contemporary of the European social theorists Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, who were influenced by reading his work on social structure and material culture, the influence of technology on progress. Morgan is the only American social theorist to be cited by such diverse scholars as Marx, Charles Darwin, and Sigmund Freud.

In 1881, Karl Marx started reading Morgan's Ancient Society, Contemporary European social theorists such as Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels were influenced by Morgan's work on social structure and material culture, as shown by Engels' The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State (1884).


Morgan does not mention Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, but Darwin referred to Morgan's work in his own. He is best known for his work on kinship and social structure, his theories of social evolution,

THINKERS CRY   “THE PROBLEM OF MARXISM IS THAT IT DOES NOT TREAT HUMAN SOCIETY AS A CONTINUOUS GAME, INSTEAD, IT LOOKS ONLY AT CURRENT ROUND”

BUT HEY—

THAT IS EXACLY THE POINT!

COMMUNISM WAS MEANT TO BE SHORT TERM. !

AS SOON AS  ROTHSCHILD HAD STOLEN FROM THE NATIONAL VAULTS AND PEOPLEs HOMES , COMMUNISM  WAS MEANT TO DIE..


KYA IDEA HAI SIRJEEE !



CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL FOUND ONLY ONE TYPE  OF COCKROACH ON INDIAN MAIN LAND

BUT HE FOUND 12 TYPES IN LACCADIVE ISLANDS

THIS SURELY MEANS  “GOD DOES NOT EXIST”..

BOTH VADAKAYIL AND DARWIN ARE ON THE SAME FUCKIN' PAGE !

TOBA  TOAHBAAAHHHH !


COMMUNISM WANTED TO KILL THE LAWS OF KARMA..    KARMA IS QUANTUM PHYSICS .   IT AFFECTS EVERY HUMAN ON THE PLANET AND THIS MEANS NON-HINDUS TOO.



JEW HEGEL LIFTED THE CONCEPT OF DIALECTICS FROM 7000 YEAR OF  VEDANTA WITH ZERO UNDERSTANDING

MAD MARX EXTRACTED THIS BULLSHIT  HEGEL THEORY  AND GIVE IT A MATERIALISTIC FOOTING, WHAT LATER CAME TO BE CALLED "DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM".

MARXIST DIALECTICS EMPHASIZES THE IMPORTANCE OF REAL-WORLD CONDITIONS, IN TERMS OF CLASS, LABOR, AND SOCIOECONOMIC INTERACTIONS.  THIS IS IN CONTRAST TO THE HEGELIAN DIALECTIC, WHICH EMPHASIZED THE IDEALIST OBSERVATION THAT HUMAN EXPERIENCE IS DEPENDENT ON THE MIND'S PERCEPTIONS.

 MARX SUPPOSED THAT THESE MATERIAL CONDITIONS CONTAINED CONTRADICTIONS WHICH SEEK RESOLUTION IN NEW FORMS OF SOCIAL ORGANIZATION.

Communism has as its foundation the concept of the socialist man who will always strive for the societal good instead of what he perceives to be in his own best interest.  like how a man would struggle and sacrifice for his own children ( provided they love him )   . 

This is the reason why reeducation camps are mandated immediately after the communist obtain power and why they focus on education in general. 

If NSA was a smart person by now he would have lined up all JNU/ JU/ TISS/ DU/ IIT commie professors ( naked with a string sown through their family jewels ) of social sciences who are in the payroll of Jew commies.. 


ON SHIPS WE SHIP CAPTAINS HAD TO TAKE A COURSE IN “SOCIAL RESPONSIBILTY”  TO BE EMPLOYED..  

I WAS VERY CLEAR ON THIS .. IN THE FIRST MEETING WITH ME CREW AND OFFICERS, I TELL THEM “ ON MY SHIP, WHAT I SAY IS LAW.. THERE IS NO LOK SABHA AND RAJA SABHA ON MY SHIP..  I HOLD VETO POWER.. WHEN I COMMAND HARD-A-PORT THERE IS NO ROOM FOR OTHER OPINIONS. “



MY CREW LOVED TO HEAR MY GROUND RULES " YOU SHALL DO IT MY WAY"..   THEY ALREADY KNEW IT..  THEY LOVED TO BE COMMANDED BY A TOUGH GUY WHO ENSURED THAT THEY (WITH THEIR  MONEY ) WILL REACH HOME SAFE AFTER THE CONTRACT ... 

THEY KNEW THAT THIS INDIAN CAPTAIN DOES NOT TAKE HIS CHILDREN TO THE POLICE STATION..   

CAPTAIN KNEW THAT HIS CREW HAS COME ON BOARD PRIMARILY-- TO PUT BREAD ON THEIR TABLE BACK HOME..     AND FOR THIS END HE WOULD PUT HIS OWN HEAD ON THE CHOPPING BLOCK.. 

THEY WERE SICK AND TIRED OF PANSY CAPTAINS WHO DANCED TO THE TUNE OF THEIR SHORE BOSSES..




rajusundarJanuary 21, 2020 at 11:07 AM
Dear captain

You are more apt for roles did by mohanlal in devasuram or narasimha. Truly macho. Do you know that your blogs concepts are being cherry picked by many new gen mallu directors??.
  1. http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/07/elvis-presley-i-did-it-my-way.html

    TRUMP CHERRY PICKED THE SONG ABOVE FOR HIS PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURAL VICTORY DANCE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sB15QrbgCcs


IN THE LABOR THEORY OF ECONOMICS MARX STATES THAT WORKERS’ WAGES SHOULD ONLY BE DICTATED BY THE AMOUNT OF NECESSARY LABOR THAT THE WORKER PUTS IN, RATHER THAN WHAT THE VALUE OF THE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES THE LABORER PRODUCES.

SO, IF A BRAIN NEUROSURGEON WORKS FOR 8 HOURS, HE OR SHE WILL BE COMPENSATED FOR THE AMOUNT OF LABOUR THEY PUT IN, AND NOT BASED ON THE VALUE OF DOING A SURGICAL OPERATION. THE LAW OF VALUE IS NOTHING BUT MARX'S VERSION OF SMITH'S "INVISIBLE HAND".

KARL MARX IN GENERAL HAD ZILCH IDEA OF REAL ECONOMICS.  HIS BASIC PRINCIPLES OF WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION, HEAVY GOVERNMENT CONTROL OVER RESOURCES AND HIS LABOUR THEORY OF ECONOMICS ARE ALL TERRIBLY STUPID.

IDIOT MARX THOUGHT THAT THE VALUE OF A PRODUCT WAS DETERMINED BY THE LABOUR INVESTED IN IT.  BUT THIS IS CLEARLY FALSE.   

FOR EXAMPLE, IF SOMEONE PRODUCES THINGS THAT NOBODY WANTS THEN NO MATTER HOW MUCH LABOR IS EXPENDED, IT WILL HAVE NO MARKET VALUE. AND WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING VALUE ONE CAN’T UNDERSTAND MARGINAL UTILITY AND WITHOUT THAT, THERE IS NO CHANCE OF UNDERSTANDING THE PRICE SYSTEM.

THAT MARX HAD COMPLETELY FORGOTTEN THE IMPORTANCE OF TIME IN PRODUCTION. ON THE BASIS OF THE LABOR THEORY OF VALUE, MARX BELIEVED CAPITALIST BOSSES EXPLOITED THEIR WORKERS, GETTING SEVERAL DAYS’ LABOR – AND THEREFORE VALUE – OUT OF THEM IN ADVANCE, BEFORE FINALLY PAYING THEM ONLY AT THE END OF THE WEEK.

HEY SHALL WE PAY EVERY HOUR TO COMMIE WORKERS  ?  IMAGINE MICROSOFT OR APPLE DOING THIS TO THEIR CODING PROJECT SOFTWARE WORKERS  !

IT CAN TAKE MONTHS OR EVEN YEARS BEFORE A PRODUCT IS READY TO TAKE TO MARKET – AND IT IS ONLY THEN THAT THE ENTREPRENEUR GETS PAID. 

ENTREPRENEURS ARE ACTUALLY PROVIDING WORKERS WITH AN INCOME WELL IN ADVANCE OF THE REVENUE THAT THEY HOPE TO GET FROM SELLING THE GOODS THAT ARE PRODUCED.

IT IS NOT EVEN A CERTAIN HOPE. IT IS A RISK, WHICH THE ENTREPRENEUR HAS TO TAKE ON, TOGETHER WITH THE BURDEN OF FINANCING AND ORGANIZING THE COMPLICATED, ‘ROUNDABOUT’ PRODUCTION PROCESS.   

THE WAGES PAID TO WORKERS CAN ONLY REFLECT WHAT PEOPLE TODAY EXPECT THEIR PRODUCTS TO BE WORTH IN THE FUTURE, WHEN THEY ARE PUT IN FRONT OF CONSUMERS.

PLAINLY, ENTREPRENEURS AND WORKERS MAY DISAGREE ON THAT, WITH THE ENTREPRENEUR (WHO IS CARRYING THE RISK) LIKELY TO BE MORE CAUTIOUS THAN WORKERS AND THEIR REPRESENTATIVES. THAT IS WHY THERE ARE DISPUTES ABOUT WAGES. 

BUT THE DISPUTES ARE ENTIRELY NATURAL DIFFERENCES IN VALUATION, NOT AN INDICATION THAT ANYONE IS BEING EXPLOITED.


SOCIALIST CLASS DISTINCTIONS ARE BOGUS. THEY DON'T EXIST IN THE REAL WORLD.

Marx, was a self-proclaimed philosopher.. Rothschild ensured that no ordinary man could make head or tail of his Das Kapital theory.. 

But Rothschild’s media proclaimed Marx as this planet’s no 1 thinker..  

Reason?  

Rothschild wanted to steal the wealth of 60% of this planet via communism. He did it and how!’

In Russia people could not even own their own pillows.. Whatever their forefathers had handed down generations ( like gold and jewellery ) had to be given to Rothschild,  lest they die in the icy gulag..

200 million people would die..

I ASK MY READERS—

WHO WAS SMARTER JEWESS HELENA OR JEW ROTHSCHILD?.. 

TELL ME VIA COMMENTS COLUMN.

HELENA WAS A ONE PERSON SHOW..


ROTHSCHILD WAS A FAMILY SHOW RUNNING DOWN CENTURIES.    

NOBODY ON THE PLANET KNEW THAT ROTHSCHILD RULED INDIA— NOT THE QUEEN OR BRITISH PARLIAMENT.

ROTHSCHILD CONVERTED INDIA FROM THE RICHEST ON THE PLANET TO THE POOREST IN 250 YEARS FLAT..





Jewess Commie Emma Goldman is also known as Red Emma, a diehard supporter of Katl Marx..   

 This Rothschild agent  went to USA to spread communism.  She was deported back to Russia as she triggered violent labour strikes.   

Emma praised Rothschild’s Bolshevik revolution  as "the most fundamental, far-reaching and all-embracing principles of human freedom and of economic well-being".

Emma Goldman wrote that  the economic system of capitalism was incompatible with human liberty..

"The only demand that property recognizes," she wrote in Anarchism and Other Essays, "is its own gluttonous appetite for greater wealth, because wealth means power; the power to subdue, to crush, to exploit, the power to enslave, to outrage, to degrade." 

She also argued that capitalism dehumanized workers, "turning the producer into a mere particle of a machine, with less will and decision than his master of steel and iron.

Jew Rothshild controlled both violent anarchists ( Red Emma ) and non-violent anarchists ( anarcho pacifist Gandhi )

Red Emma founded and controlled Anarcha-feminism in USA. She led the lesbian movement. She was the main tool for Jew Rothschild to break the harmony of the American family.  She supported adultery  and was a an advocate of free love in schools and a strong critic of marriage. 

In 1897,  Emma baby wrote: "I demand the independence of woman, her right to support herself; to live for herself; to love whomever she pleases, or as many as she pleases. I demand freedom for both sexes, freedom of action, freedom in love and freedom in motherhood" 


Emma  was the first and only woman, indeed the first and only American, to take up the defense of homosexual love before the general public

in numerous speeches and letters, she defended the right of gay men and lesbians to love as they pleased ( perform deviant sex ) and condemned the fear and stigma associated with homosexuality

SHE WAS A MEAN BITCH OF THE FIRST ORDER ..


HENRY FORD DID NOT HAVE THE BALLS TO UTTER THE DREADED WORD "  R  "

OTHER THAN ANDREW JACKSON,  NO US PRESIDENT HAD THE GAAND MEIN TATTI TO UTTER THE DREADED WORD " R "

ALL THE AUTHORS IN THE LINK BELOW ARE JEWS.


TO BE FRANK, THE TOP 30 MOST HARMFUL BOOKS EVER WRITTEN ARE BY JEWS

THE TOP 100 OF THE MOST EVIL HUMANS WHO WALKED ON PLANET EARTH ARE JEWS..


US President Andrew Jackson the seventh President of the United States (1829–1837) was a man with balls of steel -- the only man who took on Rothschild and won.

He was fearless and tough , he challenged those he did NOT like, to a shooting duel and killed several of them.

In 1835, Andrew Jackson paid off the entire US national debt, the only time in U.S. history that has been accomplished .

the current US debt is 23.2 TRILLION US DOLLARS.


 watch the debt clock running .

why do you think USA is scared of India today ?

when Andrew Jackson took over US presidency, he knew that 20% of his presidential staff and white house staff were under Rothschild's pay roll.

So our man implemented the theory of rotation in office for political appointments .   By the end of his first four years, Andrew Jackson had dismissed more than 20% of the Federal employees who were working at the start of his first term, -- all Rothschild stooges .

 In the first two years itself he sacked more than 2,000 of the 11,000 employees of the Federal Government.

NOW YOU CAN IMAGINE HOW MANY OF OUR MINISTERS , MPs, MEDIA, JUDICIARY, IAS BABUS ETC ARE LOBBIED UP BY THE COMMIE JEWISH DEEP STATE .

On January 30, 1835, Rothschild tried to have Andrew Jackson assassinated . When Jackson was leaving a funeral an assassin named Lawrence from England aimed a pistol at Jackson, which misfired.   Lawrence immediately pulled out a second pistol--but our man Jackson pounced on him with a cane and beat the living shit out of him.

Andrew Jackson had told his vice president, Martin Van Buren on the spot , "The Jewish bank, Mr. Van Buren, is trying to kill me...."

After a couple of weeks Andrew Jackson found out the plot and he gave a speech.

"You Rothschild bankers are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning".

Andrew Jackson was not happy with the Rothschild central bank. When Rothschild’s agent banker Biddle sought to renew the bank’s charter in 1832, President Jackson put his re-election bid on the line and vetoed Congress’ attempt to renew the charter. He vetoed it for three reasons. The bank was becoming a monopoly; it was unconstitutional, and it was a grave danger to the country by having the bank heavily dominated by Jewish foreign interests

Rothschild immediately put the screws on Andrew Jackson for refusing to allow him to re-establish the Rothschild central bank by shrinking the US money supply. He did this by refusing to make loans. By so doing, he upended the economy and money disappeared. Unemployment ran high. Companies went bankrupt because they could not pay their loans.

The nation went into a panic depression. Rothschild felt he could force Jackson to keep the central bank. So confident was he that he publicly boasted that he had caused the economic woes in America. Due to his foolish bragging, Andrew Jackson became a folk hero and the central bank died. It died until its re-establishment in 1913.

Andrew Jackson was unique for the times in being elected by the voters, without the direct support of a recognized political organization. He vetoed the renewal of the charter for the Bank of the United States on July 10, 1832.

When Jackson came to the Presidency in 1828, Rothschild’s banker agent Biddle was in full control of the Federal government’s central bank. This was not the first time that a central bank had been established.

Twice before, first under Robert Morris, and then under Alexander Hamilton, had a central bank been tried, but in both cases it had failed because of fraudulent actions on the part of the Rothschild bankers who were in control.

After the War of 1812, a central bank was tried again, and it was in this third attempt that we find R agent banker Biddle.


INDIANS WENT TO UGANDA AS INDENTURED LABOUR SLAVES.. 


PRETTY SOON ROTHSCHILD INJECTED INDIAN CRYPTO JEWS ( MOSTLY  GANDHIs KATHIWARI JEW CLAN )  INTO UGANDA AS HIS FRONTS TO LOOT UGANDAs WEALTH ..

THESE INDIANS TOOK OVER THE ECONOMY OF UGANDA AND MADE THE SONS OF THE SOIL, THE “NOT SO BRIGHT”  BLACK MAN THEIR SERVANTS.. 

“BRIGHT” IDI AMIN KICKED OUT ALL THESE BLOOD SUCKING INDIANS.. NOT OF RICH INDIAN CAME BACK TO INDIA..THEY ALL MIGRATED TO UK.




JEWISH COMMIE US JUDGES  SPONSORED MEXICO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS,  JNU COMMIE PROFESSORS SUPPORTED BY ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY / BENAMI MEDIA WANT ILLEGAL MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS FROM BANGLADESH AND ROHINGYA CRIMINAL MUSLIMS TO BE ABSORBED BY INDIA..

THIS IS WHAT A NORWEGIAN PATRIOT  ANDERS BEHRING BREIVIK  DID TO A JEWISH MARXIST ELITE INDOCTRINATION SUMMER CAMP ( FOR CHILDREN ) AT OTOYA ISLAND NORWAY.. 




FOR SPEAKING ABOUT “VALUES” , “FREEDOM” AND “ SEAMLESS BOUNDARIES “  THE CRYPTO JEW PM OF NORWAY JENS STOLTENBERG  ( A DEEP STATE MEMBER ) WHO SUPPORTED ILLEGAL MUSLIM IMMIGRATION TO NORWAY WAS PROMOTED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD TO BE THE NATO SECRETARY GENERAL.



BELOW: AS SOON AS MUSLIMS GET A TOEHOLD ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET, THEY CLAMOUR FOR SHARIA LAW..    MOST MUSLIMS DONT REALIZE THAT THEIR LEADERS ARE CRYPTO JEWS.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/07/cracked-heels-and-prayer-marks-capt.html




COMMUNISM IS THE MANIFESTATION OF A DEEP PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SPIRITUAL WEAKNESS IN HUMAN NATURE, SEETHING IN ENVY. THE DESIRE FOR COMMUNISM—I.E., THE NEED TO BE SHIELDED FROM ONE’S OWN FAILINGS —LIVES IN THE DARK SIDE OF EVERY INDIVIDUAL.


THE MARXIST DEMONS CONCEIVED BY FALSEHOOD (BY JEW ROTHSCHILD) , AND NURTURED BY IGNORANCE ( KOSHER MEDIA /  JUDGES IN DEEP STATE PAYROLL), MUST BE EXORCIZED BY TRUTH ( BLOGGERS ON INTERNET ).

The horrible Russian GULAG system had over half a million in camps in 1933; since 1936, there were over a million convicts, reaching numbers of 2,8 million by the beginning of the 1950s. The atrocities of the system were obvious, especially for foreign onlookers.

‘A concentration camp is better’ - Lenin

Even at the beginning of the Soviet state, the Bolsheviks They met with strong civil resistance, sometimes bursting into rebellions like the Tambov rebellion of 1920-1921, where over 50,000 peasants were interred and tens of thousands were killed by the Red Army.

The sunk Tambov Rebellion ,  was one of the largest and best-organized peasant rebellions challenging the Bolshevik regime during the Russian Civil War. This rebellion was sunk by Jew Rothschild’s media

It developed into a prolonger guerrilla war against the Red Army, Cheka units and the Soviet Russian authorities. It is estimated that around 3.1  lakh people  were arrested and around 32,000 shot dead during the suppression of the uprising. It took until the middle of 1922 until the province came to rest completely

Jew Mikhail Tukhachevsky ( Red Napoloen ) was asked to crush the rebellion by scorched earth tactics.

The Red Army  used chemical weapons to finish off the rebellion , this is kept as a big secret by Jew Rothschild monopolized media and peer reviewed historians
The Red Army used heavy artillery and armored trains and also engaged in the summary execution of civilians

War criminal Jew Mikhail Tukhachevsky  would be rewarded . He later served as chief of staff of the Red Army from 1925 through 1928, Achieving the rank of Marshal of the Soviet Union in 1935 at the young age of 42.

He was awarded the Order of Lenin on 21 February 1933

He would be awarded in kind by German Jew Rothschild in Germany in Jan 1936

Stalin shot this bastard for treason  ( he was fixed by Stalin for being a threat to his power base ).. 

Tukhachevsky's family members all suffered after his execution. His wife, Nina Tukhachevskaya, and his brothers Alexandr and Nikolai, were all shot. Three of his sisters were sent to the Gulag. His underage daughter was arrested when she reached adulthood and remained in the Gulag until the 1950s Khrushchev thaw.


BELOW: COMMIE LEADERS ( BEGGARS ) LIVED IN MORE OPULENCE THAN THE CZAR


THE GAME IS OVER !


WE KNOW THE INDIAN COMMIE BEGGARS ( UNFIT TO CLEAN EVEN SHIT POTS ) WHO DRESSED UP AS KINGS  






Ho atyarchar pe gussa
Bharstachar pe gussa
Social pe hai gussa
Parshasan pe hai gussa
Badhte zulam pe hai gussa
Haan thamta nahi hai yeh gussa
Na lena bachega na dena bachega
Sabka hisaab barabar karega
Aawaz se govinda..govinda..
Sara shehar khada hai
Govinda..govinda..
Govinda..govinda..
Jo sarkar kahega shehar karega

COMMUNISM/ SOCIALISM IS THE BIG LIE OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY. WHILE IT PROMISED PROSPERITY, EQUALITY, AND SECURITY, IT DELIVERED POVERTY, MISERY, AND TYRANNY. 

EQUALITY WAS ACHIEVED ONLY IN THE SENSE THAT EVERYONE WAS EQUAL IN HIS OR HER MISERY --  BY PULLING DOWN PEOPLE, NEVER TIDING UP. 

COMMIES HAD NOTHING, YET THEY WERE EAGER TO SHARE IT WITH EVERYBODY


THE REPUDIATION OF COMMUNIST CONDUCT IS NOT ENOUGH.  COMMUNIST DEFEATS WILL BE TEMPORARY IF THE ERRORS OF MARXIST DOCTRINE ARE NOT EXPOSED.  

A NEW GENERATION WILL BE SEDUCED BY THE DOCTRINES, AND COMMUNIST KILLING WILL RECOMMENCE.   IT ALL BOILS DOWN TO COMMIE JEWS STEALING ( LITERALLY MAKING MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR)  AND GRABBING WORLD POWER.


THE DELUSIONAL DOCTRINES OF ROTHSCHILDs BLOOD RELATIVE JEW KARL MARX BEAR THE SAME RELATIONSHIP TO MASS MURDER THAT THE MALARIAL PARASITE DOES TO THE DISEASE OF MALARIA.



THE REASON THAT COMMUNISM IS THE GREATEST EVIL IS SIMPLE:  COMMUNISM IS THE GREATEST ENEMY OF PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY EVER INVENTED.   EVERY COMMUNIST POLICY—FROM THE MINIMUM WAGE TO SINGLE-PAYER HEALTH CARE TO RENT CONTROL—IS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE AND THWART PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. 

THEIR LEADERS, THE CRYPTO JEWS CONTROL THESE “MINDLESS ANIMALS” WHO ARE SEDUCED BY “HEAVEN OF FREEDOM SANS NARROW DOMESTIC WALLS ” VERSES OF ROTHSCHILD’S AGENT RABINDRANATH TAGORE.



In the long run, Communism/ Socialism has always proven to be a formula for tyranny and misery.

A pyramid scheme is ultimately unsustainable because it is based on faulty principles. Likewise, collectivism is unsustainable in the long run because it is a flawed theory. 

Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with fundamental principles of human behavior.

The failure of communism/ socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives and innovation.


IN A CAPITALIST ECONOMY, INCENTIVES ARE OF THE UTMOST IMPORTANCE. MARKET PRICES, THE PROFIT-AND-LOSS SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTING, AND PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS PROVIDE AN EFFICIENT, INTERRELATED SYSTEM OF INCENTIVES TO GUIDE AND DIRECT ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR. CAPITALISM IS BASED ON THE THEORY THAT INCENTIVES MATTER!


UNDER SOCIALISM, INCENTIVES EITHER PLAY A MINIMAL ROLE OR ARE IGNORED TOTALLY. A CENTRALLY PLANNED ECONOMY WITHOUT MARKET PRICES OR PROFITS, WHERE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY THE STATE, IS A SYSTEM WITHOUT AN EFFECTIVE INCENTIVE MECHANISM TO DIRECT ECONOMIC ACTIVITY. BY FAILING TO EMPHASIZE INCENTIVES, SOCIALISM IS A THEORY INCONSISTENT WITH HUMAN NATURE AND IS THEREFORE DOOMED TO FAIL. SOCIALISM IS BASED ON THE THEORY THAT INCENTIVES DON’T MATTER!


.
Communism is an imposter created philosophy that masqueraded as science and functioned as an ideology with blinkers on. 

Communism was a  political organization with ulterior motives and vested interests that placed the state as an absolute over the individual, while advocating elimination of states and fulfillment of all human beings.

Communism is now dead and it is as appetizing as a stinking drowned cat . 

Communism failed because mad Darwinism and mad Marxism masquerade as   science created by intellectuals.

Communism gave itself the cloak of the science of Dialectical Materialism, rather than a philosophy.  Hence, it refused to see itself as a theory about the truth, but insisted that it was the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Atheist Communism  was mindless doctrinaire and dogmatic like messiah religions . Marxism  insisted on its exclusive correctness, could not detect its own errors.  Communism fucked  itself by its blind attachment to its own fucked up vision

Marxism refused to learn from its mistakes or from the insights of others.  We have Kerala commie Pinarayi Vijayan learning from his Sabarimala mistakes of the previous year.. 

Discovery was inhibited by rabid dogma.  In the commie system, intellectual and political, received guidance not from  scientists but from casuists sans commonsense . 

Commie reasoning sought to resolve moral problems by extracting or extending theoretical rules from a particular case, and reapplying those rules to new instances— something like the STUPID stare decisis of our own chootiya Illegal collegium Indian Judiciary..

Past rulings ( sans context and perimeter ) of stupid judges were used as an addendum to the Indian constitution by slimy and unsound reasoning,

Marxism, touted by Rothschild’s monopolized media as THE true science was in fact rabid  ideology of a class of closed-minded kosher rulers.

The dialectical method was too inflexible and dogma laden.

Marxism was unable to encounter ideas or events outside of  dialectical opposition.  It consumed without understanding. While Marxism appeared dynamic at the surface of the murky waters and ever on the move, at bottom it was static and totally out of step. 

It got itself into a red knicker twist because of the fixity of its morbid thinking.

The Marxist insights about dialectical movement in history, in  action, and in thought, became distortions of reality because of unswerving insistence on absolute science—we are the best !.

Communism reserved all the truth for itself, it  relegated all other philosophies, sciences, and theories to the status of ideology, that is, a set of doctrines instrumental to a party, class, or state.

Marxism failed to understand the nature of people whom they tried to control .   Marxism painted itself into a red corner.. It was a bullshit philosophy, pretending to be science, that ruled out real philosophy.

Absolutism is the refusal to recognize alternatives. Graded absolutism of Marxism, is the stupid view that a moral absolute, such as "Do not kill", can be greater or lesser than another moral absolute, such as "Do not lie"

The Communist dialectic made genuine dialogue impossible nay dangerous .  All answers other than its own had to be wrong or incomplete and hence punishable . Only Marxism  supposedly escaped ideology, as the true voice of the science of history.

Communism, absolved from ideological function and  absolute in its knowledge, served as irresistible apology for the program of totalitarian and brutal commie states with heavy-handed propaganda, and masking in fancy intellectual  terms actions motivated by greed, pride, fear, and ignorance.

Many unforgivable sins were committed in the name of Communism. Many brutal excesses, , are attributable to the figures in power, who would have covered their dastardly deeds with the terms  borrowed from whatever ideology was at hand. 

They were beyond reproach..

Today President Xi of China knows, if there is a war with India, he will be the first to hang. Chinese economy is a Ponzi scheme—nay – a bubble within a bubble

Read both parts ..

Rapid industrialization was paid for at the cost of millions of lives crushed.  Jew Mao’s  insistence on  such stupid  ideas as having workers manufacture steel in back  yards, while the crops went unharvested, led to the  starvation of 35 million people.

Communism was just “not worth it” – apologies to Aishwarya Rai

As a practice, Communism brought about a net loss of values. In sum, Marxism as theory opened itself too  easily to service as ideology for unbridled tyranny.  There were no checks and balances, as in democracy ..

Those features of Marxism that attracted such sinister political  exploitation were íts delusion of absolute knowledge, its rejection  of freedom of the intellect , and its inclination toward authoritarianism.

Communism cultivated the cult of personality.  What was the need to have such large statues of Lenin and Mao?

It linked its  absolutism of knowledge with the authoritarianism of interpreters.

Marx consulted history, Marxists consulted Mad Marx.

Marxism periodically needed insights that went beyond Marx yet stayed within Marxism. Hence, everything  in Marxism had to be stretched without being corrected.

Marxism would not have painted itself into a corner , has they rejected the absolutism of  Dialectical Materialism.—the mindless belief that  that ideas could arise, therefore, only as products and reflections of material conditions.

Communism  opted to retain the absolute while revising it, to bow to Marx as the supreme authority while adding other prophets as sidekicks .

Communism's fatal error was to  overrule the value of the individual by insensitive and impersonal  forces Persons don't count, according to Communism,  because they do not really exist. How could Jew Darwin be wrong? 

You see, authentic human beings will only be produced when all the world has gone Communist, all the states, those instruments of oppression, have withered away, and every individual has been socialized to live in harmony with all others—looking at the red sunset

The Golden Age of the social person lies in the future. And the only way to get to that future is through upheavals by the  militant masses. This bastard Marx was a killer. History must judge him so..

The not-yet social person is but a cog in the machinery that obeys iron laws which eventually will  manufacture real persons who do not suffer oppression or inflict it.

Every body except Indian commie leaders like Sitaram Yechury ad Brinda Karat know that people were virtual prisoners under Communism. They  had no access to the outside world.

I have seen every commie nation and how people live

What was done to them was  Hidden and Rothschild’s media did not report it . The internationalism of Communism was isolationist, its  solidarity was xenophobic.

For the sake of the future humanity, present-day human beings  were regarded by Communism as dispensable.  The idea of being in the moment was never there.. 

People were not ends in themselves  but merely means in history. Hence, as Communism  aims at universal liberation, it demanded complete obedience and self-sacrifice. It was sacrifice for commie ideology, not for the watan.

While it paraded the vision of a world at peace,  it called for revolution and brutal injustice everywhere. While it denounced the  oppression of people by capitalism, it prepared to oppress the  capitalists and unfairly order around the rest of the people for the sake  of a new socialization.

The  ruling nomenclatura commie elite class certainly would not allow  the proletarian masses to come to power by exercise of their  supposed rights, such as fair and open elections.

In addition to  ownership of the means of production, the new pigs of “animal farm” bourgeois owned the  legislature, the courts, the police, the press, and even the ballot  box.

Communism itself created a corrupted class of decadent rulers.  The error of the Marxists was to stick to Marx's dismissal of  liberalism as deceit.

Ideas change reality as people are guided by them in their  action. Marx was mistaken in seeing ideas as only the product of  material conditions.

Communism initially opposed human rights, as doctrine and as  institution, because it thought it knew better.

Communism freely rode rough shod on liberalism in order o liberate el futuro— inshah allah.

Communism brutally by way of whiplash  exercised its power against people, all in the name of its ideology  as a necessary path through history to the realm of human  fulfillment.   

Several of the errors of Communism –misjudgment  of evolution within capitalism, inflexible theory of historical  process, ignorance of the power of ideas over institutions, and  self-deception concerning its own ideological functions- combined to contribute to the monstrous record of Communism

Dissidents were declared mad and given chemical injections and surgical operations of brain to numb their minds permanently

How could such dehumanization, oppression, and violation  occur on such a huge scale, given the passionate rejection of  injustice that pervaded the life and writings of the founder, Karl  Marx? 

Marx was a means for Jew Rothschild to steal the wealth of the planet..Every thing was planned centuries in advance

The paradoxical of Marxism was “ people of now really do not matter, because people of el fattichar future matter”.   BRAAAAYY

The humane outcome demanded inhumane process, right ?.  BRAAAYY

Killing was for the sake of peace.   BRAAAY .

 Slave labor contributed to liberation.   BRAAAYYY.

Oppression of peoples will lead to solidarity.   BRAAAYYY

Tyranny  is the servant of freedom.   BRAAAAY

This is worse than nonsense; it is stupid. It is a blank check for inflicting the worst imaginable sufferings on human beings. The  bank against which the check is drawn

Any crime may be committed for such an ultimate good, because somehow  they are not crimes, and the good, though guaranteed, is always  yet to come. It will come sooner than later, right?   BRAAAYYY

The double doctrine of Marxism was "We crush people to uplift People !  BRAAAAYYYY.

With its absolute commitment to a  final uplifting of all people, Communism had no inhibition to  its systematic crushing of any people.

 It did not hold itself  responsible to such liberal notions as human rights.

Was it love of  humanity that led Communism to bloody its hands?

Communism  was largely practiced with a disdain for humanity. After all Commies follow Darwin’s FINCH science, right?

The cloak of  necessity and final outcome concealed the vicious enjoyment taken in inflicting suffering upon people at will.

Because Marxism saw humanity as infinitely malleable, to be  reshaped by socioeconomic conditions, and without an inherent  core, such as dignity, human beings were pushed about like so  much living matter.

The ends, fulfilled human  beings in society, required the rape of human souls along  the way, right. The doctrine of using people merely as means is a mean  doctrine, vile and self-contradictory. Nobody has ever put a finger on this.. thanks to Jew Rothschild’s peer reviewed media and historians..

The noble end of humanity  for which Communists worked was at the same time worked  against by them in kicking the asses of humanity that had to kneel before  them.

The goal was invisible, even if  thought to be inevitable. How could this planet’s no 1 thinker Marx be wrong?

Digression:--

HOW CAN SHIT BE THERE ON OXFORD STREET?
once nehru's assistant was walking on oxford street .
he saw shit lying on the asphalt .
now- how can shit lie on honorable oxford street, bhaiyya -
shit can lie on indian street ,but not oxford street , right ?
so he bend down and smelt it.
it smelt like shit.
but then how can shit like on esteemed oxford street?
so he pinched a piece of shit and felt in his fingers.
the texture was of fresh shit-
but then how can shit lie on world famous oxford street?
so he ate a piece of shit .
then he spit it out in disgust-- PTTTHHLEEEEOOOYYYYY !
now he was cock sure it was shit.
so he cried--

THANK GOD I DID NOT STEP ON THIS MANGY SHIT - BACHCH GAYA SAALA !


COMMUNISM FAILED BECAUSE IT WOULD NOT ACCEPT CORRECTION. IT ELEVATED A CRACKPOT THEORY OF HISTORICAL DETERMINISM TO AN UNCHALLENGEABLE DOGMA, 

THEN PERSECUTED ANYONE WHO DISPUTED IT. THERE WAS NO REASON WHATSOEVER TO DO THIS.  GRAND DELUSIONAL , MUDDLE-HEADED HALLUCINATIONS ABOUT REALITY, MAN, SOCIETY AND CONSCIOUSNESS.

RISK IS CENTRAL TO ECONOMIC ACTIVITY, BUT MARX PRETTY MUCH IGNORES IT. HE WROTE CONTEMPTUOUSLY ABOUT INVESTMENT BEING MERELY "PUSHING TOKENS AROUND".
 MARX DID NOT UNDERSTAND VALUE AND THE PRICE SYSTEM. 

HE DID NOT UNDERSTAND PRODUCTIVITY AND THE ECONOMIC GROWTH. HE DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE ULTRA-COMPETITIVENESS OF MARKET FORCES WHICH PROPEL INNOVATION, DRIVE DOWN PRICES, IMPROVE PRODUCTIVITY AND IMPROVE WORKERS’ WELFARE. HE DID NOT UNDERSTAND SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC MOBILITY IN THE FREE MARKET SYSTEM.


ESSENTIALLY MARX WAS A DUD “ECONOMIST”.  HE FOOLED A LOT OF PEOPLE SINCE THEY NEVER KNEW BETTER. IMAGINE MARX USED ADVANCED MATH TO SOUND LIKE A GENIUS

Communism did not lift up those it faced, though it  told them that they were being liberated. Communism made them  kneel for the sake of uplifting others: the future. On that sacred  altar, the commie Jew tyrant could sacrifice individual s and masses without  limit.

The striking fact was that those who had endured Communism  were glad to get rid of it the moment they could.

The spark of free choice triumphed

Communism was rejected by the masses as it imposed unwarranted suffering, while its promises remained unrealizable. . History shall judge Communism as having been a crime against humanity.

 Marxism failed to foresee or check the corruption that comes with the victory of the Communist party in any state.

 Attachment to a noble vision  of the future is no guarantee against giving in to the evil temptations that surround those newly arrived to power.

Absolute power is a license for absolute corruption. Just as the science of Dialectical Materialism was absolute, so were its interpreters.

The private life of JEW  Mao, as recounted by his personal physician..


The Communist ruling class was not held in check by care for  human dignity. It was not moderated by spirituality. It was  not criticized by philosophic freedom.

Granted that its goals were  of the highest, the eventual good of all, yet the Communist party  elite Jew Nomenclatura gave priority to itself, making unassailable its control over every  aspect of society.

Along the way, Communists, who were only  human, enjoyed their greater share of material goods. Greed was conjoined with the pleasure to be had in making others subject to  one's will.

The Communist state  (always a contradiction in terms) facilitated corruption in  government and corruption by government. It had no correctives other than show trials and the firing squad. Communism, despite  its virtuous aims, seemed inevitably to become government by vice.

The people who were  to be molded under Communism for the revolutionary march of  history chose against such history, they stepped out of the march,  and they asserted their identity based on their historical and  national heritage.

The tables were turned when Marxist revolutionary history was overthrown by the history of the peoples  oppressed by Marxism.

Communism erred in its suppression of spirituality. By  stamping out the "opium of the masses," the communists lost  their adherence and respect.

Communism as the opium of the  bureaucrats had nothing to offer in place of this powerful dimension to human community. The popular witticism that atheistic Communism itself is a religion is bullshit..

The centralized command economy was a coercive economy.

It thereby condemned itself to production of inferior goods, to  corruption and inequity in distribution, and to disaffection of the  working classes.

Communism, which arose in  protest against the alienation of the workers under capitalism, in  turn inflicted a hopeless alienation upon its workers.

When given the option of moving toward a free-market  economy, those who had lived under Communism jumped at the  chance.  

The economic incentive was a large component in that  quest for freedom which led millions of Germans in the Communist state of the German Democratic Republic to rush  over in 1989 to the capitalist state of the German Federal  Republic.

The next year, without a shot, Germany was reunified.

A command economy can only be efficient in the short run  The lack of incentive, initiative, and imagination means that long term progress is inhibited. Stagnation sets in.

A c1osed market has  nowhere to go once it has produced what was its goal. An open market reinvigorates itself. It discovers new goals thanks to its  very process.   
Competition leads to innovation and better products that are more easily accessible and at lower cost.

The Communists stuck themselves with a  third-rate economy.  Communism was King Midas in reverse.

Balls to socioeconomics. the social science that studies how economic activity  effects and is shaped by social processes-- how how societies progress, stagnate, or regress because of their local or regional economy, Marxism disabled itself from the start—it fell PHUTT on its face

Communism could not be saved. It had so many faults  linked together that they could only be corrected by abandoning communism. Communism was not simply a system with some  errors; it was a totally erroneous system.

It could not be salvaged other  than by closing one's eyes to the truth, silencing opposition, and  insisting that everything is INJIKKREW and was going according to the plan ..

Communism fell due to the blindness of its thinking that  precluded corrigibility, a blindness coupled with disrespect for  the intrinsic worth of human beings.

Communism fell from within—nay—imploded from within .

It could not offer what it  claimed with certainty it would offer.

The credit for  overcoming Communism, must be given, in the final irony, to the Communists themselves .

Capitalism must not get the credit for the collapse of  Communism. To give such credit might increase the arrogance,  complacency, corruption, and insensitivity that can plague  capitalist systems.

Progress in the world in terms of humane cooperation  requires that we ever be open to correcting our thinking and our  ways of interacting. Humanity reforms by learning from its  errors.


MARX HAD ZILCH GRASP OF PSYCHOLOGY AND HOW HUMANS FUNCTION.  COMMUNISM IS A TERRIBLE IDEA. THE REASON IT TOOK SO LONG TO FAIL, AND DESTROYED HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE IN THE MOST SOUL CRUSHING WAYS IMAGINABLE

IT TAKES DECISION MAKING AWAY FROM THE INDIVIDUAL AND GIVES IT TO THE ‘COLLECTIVE’, PARTICULARLY WITHOUT LIMITING THAT POWER THROUGH THE MECHANISM OF NATURAL RIGHTS. THIS MEANS THAT OTHER PEOPLE ARE NOW RULING THAT INDIVIDUAL WITH NO LIMITS ON THAT POWER. 

THIS IS CALLED SLAVERY. COMMUNISM IS SLAVERY AT ALL TIMES UNDER ALL CONDITIONS. THE REASONS FOR ITS FAILURE SHOULD NOW BE OBVIOUS.

YOU CAN’T GO AGAINST NATURE. OTHER SYSTEMS DON’T WORK WELL BECAUSE THEY ARE IMPERFECT, COMMUNISM CAN’T WORK BECAUSE IT’S UNNATURAL.

IT IS ALL ABOUT ALLOWING JEWS TO STEAL AND GRAB POWER

COMMUNISM FAILS, BECAUSE IT IS A SYSTEM BASED ON COMMUNITY BEFORE SELF, AND THAT SYSTEM CANNOT AND WILL NOT WORK. EVER…

THE REASON THE US SUCCEEDED SO GRANDLY WAS BECAUSE IT CREATED A SYSTEM TO REWARD THE EFFORTS OF CREATIVE PEOPLE. THEY CREATED A SYSTEM TO REWARD HARD WORK, AND INITIATIVE.

A GOVERNMENT CANNOT CREATE WEALTH. ALL IT CAN DO IS TAX IT. AND IF THERE ARE NO INCENTIVES TO CREATE WEALTH, THEN THERE IS NOTHING TO TAX.


A COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT IS NOTHING MORE THAN A HUGE BUREAUCRACY ( JEWISH NOMENCLATURA ) . 

AND IN BUREAUCRACY, ONE IS OFTEN PROMOTED TO THEIR LEVEL OF INCOMPETENCE, OR ONE IS PROMOTED OUT OF FAVORITISM.  IT IS VERY RARE THAT A PERSON IS ACTUALLY JUDGED OR REWARDED BASED ON MERIT. AND THUS, THE LEADERS OF A BUREAUCRACY ARE OFTEN THE LEAST QUALIFIED TO BE LEADERS.

THE COMMIE  STATE OWNS BUSINESSES ON BEHALF OF THE PROLETARIAN WORKERS, WHICH, IN EFFECT, MEANS THE GOVERNMENT OWNS A MONOPOLY.    

IN COMMUNISM, CENTRAL PLANNERS REPLACE THE FORCES OF COMPETITION AND THE LAWS OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND THAT OPERATE IN A MARKET ECONOMY, AS WELL AS THE CUSTOMS THAT GUIDE A TRADITIONAL ECONOMY.    

THERE ARE VERY FEW THINKERS ON THIS PLANET WHO CAN GLEAN THE KOSHER SLIME  OF BIG BROTHER JEW ROTHSCHILD  . THIS IS HOW BULLSHIT BOOK DAS KAPITAL BECAME THIS PLANETs NO 2 SELLING BOOK AFTER BIBLE.

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL SAYS—BAN DAS KAPITAL IN INDIA..

ABOLISH THE COMMUNIST PART OF INDIA AND JAIL THE LEADERS WHO HAVE FOOLED THE  PEOPLE .

WE DON’T NEED THESE CUNTS IN INDIA..


The ugliest episode in the post-World War II history of the Jewish labor movement was the 1968 NYC teachers strike led the Commie United Federation of Teachers and its high profile president  Russian Jew Commie Albert Shanker.   The Union accused the community board of union-busting - and anti-Semitism, because the bulk of the teachers it removed were commie Jews who were brainwashing children to have loose morals ,  adopt homosexuality, and disobey their parents

Bastard Jew Albert Shanker was president of the United Federation of Teachers from 1964 to 1985 and president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) from 1974 to 1997. He began his tenure as a union organizer in 1959 to help organize the Teacher's Guild, a New York City affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers that was founded by JEW John Dewey ( mentor of BR Ambekar) in 1917.

Bastard Jew John Dewey has been referred to as a "totalitarian socialist who envisioned total government control over all education through the agency of public schools."

Dewey’s book, Democracy and Education, was listed by Human Events magazine as fifth in a list of the ten most harmful books of the 19th and 20th centuries behind The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx, Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler, Quotations from Chairman Mao by Mao Zedong, and the Kinsey Report by Alfred Kinsey. He was a professor at Columbia.

John Dewey signed the Humanist Manifesto and rejected traditional religion and moral absolutes  .. 

What is going on today in social sciences  depts. Of JNU/ JU/ DU/ IITs / TISS  and FTI is Rothschild’s agent John Dewey’s brainchild.

By the late nineteenth century, the classical curriculum of the British grammar school, imported in the early years of colonial North America, gave way to the ideas of European social revolutionaries like JEW Jean-Jacques Rousseau  ,  JEW Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi ,  JEW Johann Friedrich Herbart, JEW  Friedrich Fröbel  etc .

These Jew sham philosophers changed our perception of the school's purpose, slowly eroding the traditional concentration on formal literacy and the acquisition of knowledge,

Following the influence of the continental Europeans came EVIL JEW  John Dewey, the man whose thought has probably had the greatest single influence on western education in the twentieth century.

Dewey launched a frontal assault on the traditional school beginning with the publication of his persuasive dual treatise The School and Society and The Child and the Curriculum in 1899 and 1902.

Dewey's major work Democracy and Education (1916) had a Promethean effect on educational theory and practice around the world. Thanks to Rothschild’s media and Judges in deep state payroll , his ideas took our educational establishment by storm. 
 Dewey's disciples like Jew Sidney Hook  began to turn his ideas into a new educational orthodoxy.

The progressive model of what came to be known as "active learning" or "pragmatism" captured nay corrupted the hearts and minds of generations of western teachers,
John Dewey; then entered John Hopkins University to emerge in 1884, one year after Marx's death, with a Ph.D. on "The Psychology of Kant." 

At the early age of twenty three, Dewey had injected himself into the European scene through the publication of his first article, "The Metaphysical Assumptions of Materialism"

With his arrival at Columbia University in 1904, Dewey began to concentrate more on creative work in philosophy, but he always maintained a close connection with the field of education.

For many years he offered a course in philosophy of education at Teacher's College, Columbia, and his pedagogical ideas continued to reach educators all over the world. Dewey is the bastard responsible for installing a statue of BR Ambedkar in Columbia University

The extent of the interest in Democracy and Education is evident from the fact that it was translated into many foreign languages including Russian, Chinese, German, Italian, Spanish, Hebrew, Hindi, Japanese, Swedish, Arabic, Persian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. 

Through the new mass journalism and machine-like political organizations founded by Rothschild..

Marxism played a central role in forming the rival revolutionary tradition. The formation of German Social Democracy, British Fabianism, Russian revolutionary violence and western syndicalism were all part of this adversary tradition.

Marx and the Marxists divided the world. They became a collective revolutionary professoriate; the universal teachers of teachers. They provided the intellectual tools for the construction of a more didactic past and a new and  future.

Das Kapital was first translated into English in 1887, just three years before John Dewey began to produce his toxic landmark essays on North American schools and traditional curriculum.

Like Marx, Dewey was never just an academician. He wished to influence the events and practices of his times.. he could do it thanks to his master Rothschild..

Dewey intended to develop a philosophy that would take in the broad field of human activity with which he was concerned. From the beginning, his philosophy was "politically programmatic." He addressed himself to social progress which he regarded as the only true objective of philosophy.

ROTHSCHILDs AGENT  JEW JOHN DEWEY WROTE THE RED BOOK OF MAO


Karl Marx played a central role in the visions of social progress pursued by Jewish intellectuals like Dewey

 Dewey certainly understood the essence of the Hegelian contradiction in the same way Marx did. The Child and the Curriculum begins with the discovery of an inherent contradiction in the educational process and its enunciation in dialectical terms.

Dewey declared :

“Profound differences in theory are never gratuitous or invented. They grow out of conflicting elements in a genuine problem - a problem which is genuine just because the elements, taken as they stand, are conflicting. Any significant problem involves conditions that for the moment, contradict one another.”

Throughout Dewey's work, the significant conflict in the educational process is between the child and the curriculum; between innocent potential and the accumulated culture of a flawed adult work; between the energy and the talent of the students and the structures of an archaic school system; between the "forces of production" that can move us forward and the "relations of production" that hold us back.

For John Dewey, the child and the curriculum were trapped in an unsuitable marriage that would require dissolution, then resolution through "reconstruction" and "growth." The traditional curriculum - laden with formal subjects, religion, and moral lessons - was designed to teach and inspire, but its fundamental irrelevance from the child's immediate, active experience, rendered its content uninspiring and unteachable.

The idea of a child, not simply bored by inadequate instruction, but systematically separated from his studies by an inherent contradiction in the learning process is likely to have been derivative of Marxist dialectical analysis. The dialectical perspective led Dewey to describe the traditional education process as "contradictory" because he felt it was unfolding in a way that was both necessary to and destructive of the process itself.

The conflict between the child and Dewey's caricature of the traditional curriculum is a dramatic saga of tension and alienation. Dewey's children are alienated from school work by a contradiction existing between their real interests and those of the school. 

Like Marx's proletariat, they are caught up in a world conditioned by the interaction of opposing forces. The fundamental opposing factors in the process were "an immature undeveloped being" and "certain social aims, meanings, values incarnate in the mature experience of the adult."

Specialized studies divided and fractured the child's world. Facts were abstracted and analyzed from different points of view or rearranged to suit principles outside the child's understanding. The ties of affection and "the connecting bonds of activity" were destroyed.


Dewey saw the schools of his day as intellectual battlefields between the forces of reaction and enlightenment.

The former fixed their attention solely upon "the importance of the subject matter of the curriculum." They ignored the contents of the child's own experience. Their studies pretended to reveal a "great wide universe" with "fullness and complexity." But, the "teaching of external and general truths" only became an opiate for the educator and an obstacle to the real growth and development of the child.

Just as Marx had chosen the end product of the capitalist system, the commodity itself, to begin his analysis of capitalism, Dewey chose the child, the end product of the school, as the starting point of his analysis of education. From here he launched a revolutionary assault on unprogressive teachers.

The child is the starting point, the center, and the end. His development, his growth, is the ideal. It alone furnishes the standard. To the growth of the child all studies are subservient; they are instruments valued as they serve the needs of growth. Personality, character, is more than subject matter. Not knowledge or information, but self realization ( the way Rothschild wanted ) , is the goal.

The children had nothing to lose but the chains of the curriculum. Self realization was a worldly transcendence that would remake the child into a perfect model of the new socialist man.

Dewey's other early essay on education, The School and Society, continues in the same vein. Most chapters were designed to stand alone as lectures in education, so they tend to repeat and elaborate on familiar themes in Dewey's work. 

In a chapter on "The School and Social Progress," readers are reminded that the school is much more than a collection of individuals. Students should not enter simply to acquire knowledge as a businessman enters the marketplace to acquire profit. The progress of an individual can only be seen in relation to the needs of the community.

DEWEY MENTORED BR AMBEDKAR..

BR AMBEDKAR DID NOT HAVE THE BRAINS TO UNDERSTAND THE AGENDA OF THIS JEWISH COMMIE..

THE SOCIAL ENGINEERING PARTS OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION IS DEWEYs BRAINCHILD

Dewey asserted that in the school "individualism and socialism are at one" and it was "especially necessary to take the broader view" over the narrow and acquisitive course.

Like Marx, Dewey informed his readers that inevitable changes were forthcoming in the "modes of industry and commerce" and, again like Marx, Dewey was convinced that his predictions were based on scientific laws generated through the methods of dialectical materialism.

Indeed, in one of his later works, Dewey was very forthright in declaring that "we are in for some kind of socialism, call it whatever name we please, and no matter what it will be called when it is realized, economic determinism is now a fact not a theory." 

In the light of his convictions, Dewey sought to conceive a new philosophy of education.

Dewey's school would be intricately connected with the unfolding of materialist history or as Dewey put it "part and parcel of the whole social evolution."

The new school would become an instrument of dealienation.  Dewey echoed the Marxist contention that the intimate connection between men and their occupations which had existed in preindustrial societies, had been lost in the capitalist mode of production.

He alerted his readers to the concentration of industry and division of labour that "had practically eliminated household and neighbourhood occupations." The new mission of the school was to become a training ground for cooperative labour, instead of a place set apart in which to learn lessons.

Dewey was convinced that the introduction of manual training and the activity method would create a vigorous occupational spirit in the educational process. The school would affiliate itself with the life of the child and the community. It would become an embryonic socialist community. The new school communities would become incubators for social revolution.

THE COMMIE BASTARDS OF JNU HAD NO LOVE FOR THE WATAN

Dewey saw the new school providing a unique and irresistible example to capitalist society because its aim was "not the economic value of the product but the development of social power and insight."

School, liberated from the religious influences -- which, like Marx, he regarded as medieval superstitions -- would demonstrate to all that it was neither God nor Providence but the earth and man's labour that were responsible for all progress 

THI S IS WHY INDIAN COMMIES SUPPORTED CHINA DURING THE INDO-CHINA WAR OF 1962.

Training in "social directions" would raise the child's consciousness ( SIC )and allow him to "locate the source of our economic evils."

Whatever history may be for the scientific historian, for the educator, it must be an indirect sociology -- a study of society which lays bare its process of be-coming and its modes of organization.

Dewey's entire chapter on "The Aims of History in Elementary Education" recommends nothing less than a Marxist history for the new curriculum. 

If history was to become "dynamic" and "moving," its "economic and industrial aspects" had to be emphasized. This alone could prevent the tendency to "swamp history in myth, fairy story and merely literary renderings" of the bourgeois culture he sought to usher out.

Yet, DOUBLE AGENT John Dewey ( who wrote Jew Mao’s Little Red Book ) frequently denied his attraction to the ideas of Karl Marx and made much of what he declared to be Marx's fundamental error: the belief that a violent class struggle was a means toward social progress.

In hindsight one has to wander whether or not Dewey's commitment to peaceful evolution, the "method of intelligence," and the concept of "growth," really put very much ideological distance between himself and Marxism

Dewey's commitment WAS “ socialism through education” ..


Dewey SECRETLY visited Stalin's Soviet Union in the summer of 1928. He went as a member of an unofficial delegation of twenty five American educators ( all Commie Jews )  under the sponsorship of the American Society for Cultural Relations with Russia. 

His philosophical influence on socialist educators in Russia can be traced back to the 1905 revolution, but since his most prominent followers did time in Czarist prisons thereafter, his ideas were not resurrected until after 1917

A GREASE AND TACKLE AJIT DOVAL CANNOT MAKE HEAD OR TAIL OF WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN ABOVE..

AFTER THE KANHAIYA HUMAR EPISODE IN JNU, IN THE SUBSEQUENT STUDENT UNION ELECTION EXTREME LEFT HAS GAINED GROUND..  

THIS SHOWS WHAT NSA AJIT DOVAL IS WORTH.. HE IS A SPENT FORCE AND MUST RETIRE.

JEW KARL MARX "SAW RELIGION, NOT JUST NEGATIVELY AS 'THE OPIUM OF THE PEOPLE,' BUT POSITIVELY AS THE 'SIGH OF THE OPPRESSED CREATURE, THE HEART OF A HEARTLESS WORLD, THE SOUL OF SOULLESS CONDITIONS.   

SPIRITUALITY GIVE HOPE AND MARX WANTS ONLY JEWISH COMMIES TO PEDDLE HOPE— TO GRAB POWER AND WEALTH

SANATANA DHARMA IS ENMESHED WITH KARMA—AS KARMA GIVES US HOPE, IN THIS LIFETIME.. KARMA DOCTRINE MAKES SANATANA DHARMA A GREAT RELIGION. THERE IS NO ETERNAL HELL IN SANATANA DHARMA. 

IF YOU SCREW UP THIS LIFE, YOU CAN MAKE GOOD IN YOUR NEXT LIFE..


KARL MARX, GAVE THE WORKING CLASSES FALSE HOPE FOR MILLENNIA., RELIGION IS SEEN AS HINDERING HUMAN DEVELOPMENT.    

DUE TO THIS, A NUMBER OF  COMMIE GOVERNMENTS IN THE 20TH CENTURY, SUCH AS THE SOVIET UNION UNDER LENIN/ STALIN AND THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA UNDER MAO ZEDONG, IMPLEMENTED RULES INTRODUCING STATE ATHEISM.   

IF YOU WERE CAUGHT PRAYING IT COULD MEAN TORTURE AND JAIL 

AMERICA HAS BEEN SOCIALLY POLLUTED BY THE INFLUX OF CRIMINAL DNA EUROPEAN JEWS IN FROM THE PERIOD OF 1920 TO 1950..   

A BIG PERCENTAGE OF THEM WERE ANAL SEX RECEIVING MALES MOSTLY LEFT HANDED ( WHOSE ANCESTOR WERE CANNIBALS IN THE DARK AGES ) ..

JEWS CREATE ALL TROUBLE YET THEY KEEP MOANING,,  200 MILLION PEOPLE WERE KILLED BY JEWISH COMMIES YET THE JEWS  KEEP CRYING ABOUT 6 MILLION JEWS DEAD..  THEY INCLUDED ROMA GYPSIES DEAD IN THE JEWISH TALLY.


 LET TRUTH BE TOLD WITHOUT BEING POLITICALLY CORRECT..  THE PROMISED HOMELAND DID NOT WANT THESE ANAL SEX RECEIVING JEWS

HITLER WAS A JEW..


IN INDIA THERE ARE LOT OF CRYPTO JEWS..


TODAY, THE WORLD’S 14.6 MILLION OR SO JEWS ARE FOUND MAINLY IN TWO PLACES: ISRAEL AND THE UNITED STATES.

SEXUAL ABUSE IN CHURCH WAS FIRST TRIGGERED BY JEWS.. ALL POPES WERE CRYPTO JEW TILL ISLAM WAS BORN.. 

THE GOAN INQUISITION WAS A JEWISH THINGY


ROTHSCHILD WAITED FOR TIPU SULTAN TO STEAL KERALA TEMPLE GOLD , A DIRTY JOB..  

WHEN TIPU MADE A HEAP OF GOLD IN SRIRANGAPATNAM, ROTHSCHILD KILLED TIPU BY SHOOTING HIM WHEN HE WAS HAVING BREAKFAST AND SWIPED THE GOLD.

SAME WAY-

JEW ARE NOW IN A NARROW STRIP OF LAND CALLED ISRAEL.. DO NOT PROVOKE IRAN AND MAKE THEM DO AN ENCORE OF WHAT HAPPENED TO TIPU SULTAN..  A WAR WITH IRAN WILL CONVERT ISRAEL INTO A GAPING HOLE..

TIMES HAVE CHANGED.. 

THERE IS SOMETHING CALLED DIVINE RETRIBUTION,  LEAVE IRAN ALONE ..

WE DON’T NEED WW3.. 

WW1 AND WW2 CREATED ISRAEL.. WW3 WILL DECIMATE ISRAEL..

IT IS ROTHSCHILDs MEDIA INVENTION THAT IRAN IS AFTER JEWS..  THIS IS DESPITE JEWS NEVER BEING LOYAL TO THE MOTHERLAND IN IRAN.




Karl Marx's "Dialectical materialism" is a dialectic that occurs between the interests of people who own "material" (i.e., capitalists) and the interests of people who don't own it (i.e., the proletariat).

Marxist philosophy is not a strictly defined sub-field of philosophy, because the diverse influence of Marxist theory has extended into fields as varied as aesthetics, ethics, ontology, epistemology, theoretical psychology and philosophy of science, as well as its obvious influence on political philosophy and the philosophy of history.

The key characteristics of Marxism in philosophy are its materialism and its commitment to political practice as the end goal of all thought. The theory is also about the hustles of the proletariat and their reprimand of the bourgeoisie.

Dialectics is not a trishul of thesis-antithesis-synthesis that serves as an all-purpose explanation ( like the mind boggling wisdom of  7000 year old  DVAITA Vedanta ) ; nor does it provide a formula that enables us to prove or predict anything; nor is it the motor force of history.


The dialectic, as such, explains nothing, proves nothing, predicts nothing, and causes nothing to happen. Rather, dialectics is a way of thinking that brings into focus the full range of changes and interactions that occur in the world.’

Mad Jew Hegel’s philosophy stood ‘right side up’ is a necessary condition for explaining Marx’s method. Lenin had claimed that you cannot properly understand Marx’s Das Kapital unless you have first fully grasped the arguments of Hegel’s Science of Logic

The dialectical idealism of Hegel was a rationalisation concocted from the mess of unreality left by Kant, so to use it as a philosophical base was nonsensical from the start. Then to switch its applicability from ideas to matter did nothing to make it any less nonsensical, it just removed it from the mind (which made it too individualistic for Marx) and placed it in dis-individualised classes.


A dialectic is a process for producing and transforming knowledge. Say you make statement A (called a thesis). Someone else comes along and makes statement B, which explains something that's wrong with A (called an antithesis).

 You then use reason to create a statement C, which transforms A and B so that they fit together (called a synthesis). A lot of scientific reasoning is dialectical: you present a theory (thesis), evidence arises that does not fit the theory (antithesis), you revise the theory to account for the new evidence (synthesis).

Jew Hegel thought that the use of dialectical reasoning itself would lead people to a kind of idealized worldview in which worldly problems could be overcome. Marx was a materialist, not an idealist; he adapted Hegel's dialectic as an interplay between productive forces. 

On one hand you have a class of people who own the means of production in a society, and you have another class who do the actual labor involved in production. In feudalism you have lords who own the land and peasants who work it; in capitalism you have bourgeoisie who own the factories and mills, and proletarians who work in them; in state socialism you have a governing elite that owns more or less everything, and everyone else who does the actual labor.

The reason this is a dialectic is that it has the same thesis/antithesis/synthesis
relationship. The thesis comes from the ruling class which says this is a good and noble system of political economy; the antithesis comes from the laboring class, which complains that they do not get fair compensation for their work, and are not allowed to share in the riches of the ruling class; the synthesis is an eventual new system of production.

 Dialectical materialism is THE Communist philosophy.

Dialectical materialisms claimed to be radically different from all other philosophies. Communists say it is based on hard scientific evidence and logic. My left fuckin’ ball. 
This is the tool of social transformation.

 “The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it.” (Karl Marx).

Two premises are central for Dialectical materialism.

Everything that exists is material. Our thoughts, abstractions and ideas are only reflections of material objects in our physical brains. There are no souls, gods, angels, demons, astral beings, or anything else that doesn’t have a physical form. No “pure information” that isn’t an objective reality. This is the Materialism.

Everything that exists, is in contradiction and conflict with something else. That comes in pairs. Magnetic poles, Reps and Dems, boys and girls, iOS and Android. They fight, and fight, and out of that fight, something new comes about. And immediately faces something else to fight against. This has no beginning and no end. 

Whatever, or whoever is not fighting, is dead, or is a fiction of our imagination. No need for God to make people and things move their asses, they do this by themselves. This is the Dialectics.

In socialist countries it was mandatory for every university student to take a course on Dialectical Materialism (also Historical Materialism, etc.) - whatever one’s field of study.

So you learn about the Law of the Negation of the Negation (also called Double Negation, or Dialectical Negation).

The cannonical example goes like this: ‘The plant negates the seed. Then the seed negates the plant. And that’s how from one seed we get many.’

What’s this supposed to mean, you might ask.

Absolutely nothing— it is  BULLSHIT .

Marx took Hegel’s Dialectic Idealism and turned it on its head, as some have said, which is to convert the Idealism into Materialism and assume that historical predictions can be made about the future of human society. Well, both Marx and Hegel are cuckoo crazy about being able to predict human history on either idealism or materialism.
  
Marxism's philosophical roots were thus commonly explained as derived from three sources: English political economy, French republicanism and radicalism, and German idealist philosophy.

Marx did not study directly with Hegel, but after Hegel died Marx studied under one of Hegel's pupils, Bruno Bauer, a leader of the circle of Young Hegelians to whom Marx attached himself. 



MARX’S LABOR THEORY OF VALUE IS BULLSHIT

 MARX FACES THE PROBLEM OF REDUCING ALL HETEROGENEOUS HUMAN LABOR TO A HOMOGENEOUS ABSTRACT SOCIALLY NECESSARY LABOR TIME UNIT, BUT DOES NOT PROPERLY EXPLAIN HOW THIS HAPPENS; 

THERE IS NO REASON WHY FREE HUMAN WAGE LABOR SHOULD HAVE A SPECIAL POWER THAT ANIMALS, OR MACHINES DO NOT HAVE.

MODERN FIAT MONEY ( EXAMPLE US DOLLAR ) REFUTES MARX’S THEORY OF MONEY AND ALSO HIS LABOR THEORY OF VALUE, SINCE MONEY MUST BE A PRODUCED COMMODITY IN MARX’S THEORY BUT HAS LONG SINCE CEASED TO BE


THE EMPIRICAL REALITY IS THAT PRICES ARE NOT SET BY MEANS OF THE ABSTRACT SOCIALLY NECESSARY LABOR TIME OF COMMODITIES OR OF MONEY AS A PRODUCED COMMODITY, AND  THE PROBLEM THAT SURPLUS LABOR VALUE WOULD NOT REALLY EXPLAIN MONEY PROFITS, SINCE MONEY PROFITS CAN EXIST IN IN AN ECONOMY WHERE MACHINES DID MOST OF THE WORK.


 IF MARXISTS WANT TO CLING SENTIMENTALLY TO "VALUE THEORY" REGARDLESS OF FACTS AND LOGIC, THIS CANNOT BE CALLED A "SCIENCE" - IT HAS MORE IN COMMON WITH A NEW AGE RELIGION.



SOMEBODY CALLED ME UP AND CRIED

CAPTAIN HOW CAN YOU TRASH WORLDs NO1  THINKER KARL MARX LIKE THIS?

WELL I HAVE NOT EVEN STARTED..THOUGH I AM AT PART 8 OF MY 12 PARTS SERIES

MARX CREATED 3 BILLION COMMIES.. 

I PLAN TO MAKE 3 BILLION RED DILDOS SO THAT ALL THESE COMMIES CAN SHOVE IT UP THEIR MARXIAN ASSES.

THIS DILDO WILL BE STAMPEDTRPF



The tendency of the rate of profit to fall (TRPF) is a hypothesis in economics and political economy, most famously expounded by Karl Marx in chapter 13 of Capital, Volume III.

The theory of the TRPF "has been regarded, by Marxist thinkers , as the backbone of revolutionary Marxism.

With this “law,” Marx formulates a very far-reaching existential proposition, which cannot be empirically proven…

Intellectual  Marxists regarded the law of TRPF as the foundation of Marx’s theory of crisis, they vehemently defended it against every critique.

Though the first capitalist who uses the technology will be able to sell at the market price, and thus gain, once the technology is widely adopted, the value of the commodity will decrease – a ‘fallacy of composition’

Marx describes this tendency for the rate of profit to fall in his notebook as “in every respect the most important law of modern political economy, and the most essential for understanding the most difficult relations. It is the most important law from the historical standpoint”

If JEWISH CUNT Marx had discovered that the tendency of the rate of profit to fall was “the most important law of modern political economy”, one might well ask why he never mentioned this “eureka fuckin’ moment” in any of his detailed correspondence with JEWISH CUNT Engels, his closest collaborator, or anyone else for that matter.

Marx regarded the TRPF as proof that capitalist production could not be an everlasting form of production since in the end the profit principle itself would suffer a breakdown.

 However, because Marx never published any finished manuscript on the TRPF himself, because the tendency is hard to prove or disprove theoretically and because it is hard to test and measure the rate of profit, Marx's TRPF theory has been a topic of global controversy for more than a century.

The “law” claims that a fall in the rate of profit results in the long-term from the capitalist mode of development of the forces of production. If the rate of profit has fallen in the past, this does not constitute a proof—since the law purports to apply to future development, and the mere fact of a fall in the rate of profit in the past says nothing about the future. 

If the rate of profit has risen in the past, then this is also not a refutation, since the law does not require a permanent fall, but rather merely a “tendential” fall, which can still occur in the future. Even if the law cannot be empirically verified, the argumentative conclusiveness of Marx’s reasoning can be discussed.

Here, two points have to be distinguished. The first point concerns the relationship between “the law as such” and the “counteracting factors.” Marx assumes that the fall in the rate of profit, derived as a law, in the long term outweighs all counteracting factors. Yet Marx does not offer a reason for this.

The second point concerns the “law as such”: does Marx actually manage conclusively to prove the “law as such”? This section will be concerned solely with this point: it can be shown that Marx does not succeed in providing such a proof. 

The “law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall” does not first fall apart in the face of the “counteracting factors”; it already falls apart because the “law as such” cannot be substantiated.

Marx could not understand the concept of  "reflexive labor" - labor applied to itself with the aim of increasing the productivity of labor ..Reflexive law means that law changes itself so that it becomes capable of actually facilitating self-regulation in other systems.

 Marx could not demonstrate that the rate of profit would fall when increases in productivity are taken into account.

NOBODY WANTS TO POINT OUT THAT THE EMPEROR AINT WEARING CLOTHES.. AFTER ALL HOW CAN THERE BE SHIT ON OXFORD FUCKIN’ STREET ?

Profitability itself can be influenced by an enormous array of different factors, going far beyond those which Marx specified.

 The TRPF was based on the idea that only labor can create new value (following the labor theory of value), and that there was a tendency over time for ratio of capital to labor (in value terms) to rise. However, if surplus can be produced by all production inputs, then there is no reason why an increase in the ratio of capital to labor inputs should cause the overall rate of surplus to decline.

Marxist critics tried to prove that capitalism was necessarily doomed, at least in the long term.-- and a lot of them used advanced math to prove it by spraying fog..

THESE CUNTS WILL SAY THE MODI GOVT WILL FALL Y ADVANCED MATH..   THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE TRYING TO DO WITH ALL THESE GDP GROWTH FIGURES..  WHEN STATISTIC DI NOT WORK ( THEY GOT CAUGHT FOR FAKE SAMPLING ) THEY JUMPED OFF THE DEEP END INTO ADVANCED CALCULUS..   MATH DOES NOT FRIGHTEN INDIA..WE INVENTED MATH.

Mark Twain said, “there are lies, damned lies, and statistics.” Like the medieval Schoolmen arguing over the sex of angels they squabble over the minutiae of statistics to prove that they, and not the other side, are correct.

TRPF was mostly "neglected" in Marxist theoretical discussions during the 1920s as they had no blessed idea.

According to Marx's theory, surplus value is equal to the new value created by workers in excess of their own labor-cost, which is appropriated by the capitalist as profit when products are sold.

Mad Marx describes  TRPF “the second great law”, among the “two immediate laws”.

The first law he describes as “surplus value expressed as profit always appears as a smaller proportion than surplus value in its immediate reality actually amounts to.” He underlines this sentence, by which to emphasise that the rate of profit is always smaller than the rate of surplus value. Consequently, “the rate of profit never expresses the real rate at which capital exploits labour, but always a much smaller relation.”8

The falling rate of profit is then referred to as the second great law.

Despite its undoubted importance, out of 52 chapters in volume three of Capital, only three are devoted to the tendency of the rate of profit to fall. Again, this is hardly the space you would expect to squeeze in “the most important law of modern political economy”. 

If Marx had regarded it as such, he would have written a whole book on the subject. Instead, one chapter deals with “The Law Itself”, followed by a chapter on “Counteracting Factors”, and finally one on “The Development of the Laws’s Internal Contradictions”.

He explains the tendency in the third volume of Capital by the following example:

“Once wages and the working day are given, a variable capital, which we can take as 100, represents a definite number of workers set in motion; it is an index of this number. Say that £100 provides the wages of 100 workers for one week. If these 100 workers perform as much surplus labour as necessary labour, they work as much time for the capitalist each day, for the production of surplus value, as they do for themselves, for the reproduction of their wages, and their total value product would then be £200, the surplus value they produce amounting to £100. The rate of surplus value s/v would be 100 per cent. Yet, as we have seen, this rate of surplus value will be expressed in very different rates of profit, according to the differing scale of the constant capital c and hence the total capital C, since the rate of profit is s/C. If the rate of surplus value is 100 per cent, we have:

If c = 50 and v = 100, then p’ = 100/150 =

66 2/3 per cent;

If c = 100 and v = 100, then p’ = 100/200 =

50 per cent;

If c = 200 and v = 100, then p’ = 100/300 =

33 1/3 per cent;

If c = 300 and v = 100, then p’ = 100/400 =

25 per cent;

If c = 400 and v = 100, then p’ = 100/500 =

20 per cent.

“The same rate of surplus value, therefore, and an unchanged level of exploitation of labour, is expressed in a falling rate of profit, as the value of the constant capital and hence the total capital grows with the constant capital’s material volume.”

In other words, a rising organic composition of capital, assuming that the rate of exploitation remains the same, must bring about a fall in the rate of profit. This is a permanent tendency under capitalism as the system expands and the productivity of labour grows. 

In other words, the relative decrease in variable capital relative to constant capital is but another expression for greater productivity of labour. Every capitalist is striving to increase the productivity of his workforce, namely the amount produced in a given period of time.

Factors involved in profitability which “frog in the commie well” Marx did not discuss includes:--
Reductions in the turnover time of industrial capital generally (and especially fixed capital investment).
Accelerated depreciation and faster throughput.
The level of price inflation for different types of goods and services.
Taxes, levies, subsidies and credit policies of governments, interest and rent costs.
Capital investment into areas of (previously) non-capitalist production, where a lower organic composition of capital prevailed.
Military wars or military spending causing capital assets to be inoperative or destroyed, or spurring war production (see permanent arms economy).
Demographic factors.
Advances in technology and technological revolutions which rapidly reduce input costs.
Particularly in the era of globalization, the national and international freight rate (shipping, trucking, railfreight, airfreight).
Substituted natural resource inputs, or marginal increased cost of non-substituted natural resource inputs.
Consolidation of mature industries into an oligarchy of survivors. Mature industries do not attract new capital because of low returns. Mature companies with large amounts of capital invested and brand recognition can also try to block new competitors in their markets. See also secular stagnation theory.
The use of credit instruments to reduce capital costs for new production. 

Mad Marx regarded the TRPF as proof that capitalist production could not be an everlasting form of production since in the end the profit principle itself would suffer a breakdown. None of the conceivable counteracting factors could stem the tendency toward falling profits from production. The capitalist system would age like any other system, and would be able only to compensate for its age, before it left the stage of history for good.  TEEE HEEEEE .. Hats off to CUNT Marx..

TRPF cannot be considered as an economic "law" . Tendencies in combination with other tendencies are taken as assumptions ???

What the fuck is all this??..

You wanna model a situation in which a developmental tendency would, after some time, win through despite a variety of counteracting forces that would ordinarily reduce or cancel out the tendency, right?

So this was a religion peddled by Messiah Marx , right?

There is a Univeral law that things have a tendency to right themselves and find equilibrium . . This is the essence of Rajas/ Sattva/ Tamas. 

So, Mad Marx will model this tendency with an mindless atheist materialistic cloak?

असतो मा सद्गमय
तमसो मा ज्योतिर्गमय
मृत्योर्मा अमृतं गमय
शान्तिः शान्तिः शान्तिः Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 5000 BC

Om Asato Maa Sad-Gamaya |
Tamaso Maa Jyotir-Gamaya |
Mrtyor-Maa Amrtam Gamaya |
Om Shaantih Shaantih Shaantih ||

Meaning:
1: Lead us from Unreal to the Real,
2: Lead us from the Darkness to the Light ( TAMAS to SATTVA ) ,
3: Lead us from the Fear of Death to the Knowledge of Immortality.
4: OM- Peace, Peace, Peace.




In Capital, Volume I, Marx analyzed how the capitalist enterprise buys materials and labour-power (inputs) to produce commodities sold for profit (outputs). At that stage he was not concerned much with price fluctuations or market volatility (except for the price of labour hired). 

In chapter 9 of Capital, Volume III, he notes that he had previously assumed that, to the purchasing capitalist, the value of a commodity bought was the same as its cost-price.  In reality, he argued, this cost-price is itself a market price based on a production price (a cost-price + a profit) of the supplying capitalist producer: the input purchasing price of one capitalist is the output selling price of another capitalist. 

So the acquisition cost-price of inputs itself corresponded to both a value and a surplus value, and the market prices of inputs might diverge from the labor-value of inputs. Hence, said Marx, if the cost-price of a newly produced output is assumed to be equal to the labor-value of the inputs used up in producing it, "it is always possible to go wrong"  in the calculation of the output production price (because input acquisition prices and input labor-values could diverge, given that the inputs could be bought above or below their value, and given that after purchase their inventory value could change, during the production process).

In drafting a simple model of profit distributions, Marx straightforwardly equated – for the sake of argument – the total cost-price of society's new gross output with the total production capital advanced to produce it, abstracting from many intervening variables such as capital depreciation and turnovers. 

Marx furthermore assumed, that at the point where a new output had been produced, its cost-price in the bookkeeping (a sum of money-capital representing materials costs, wage costs and operating costs) was a given, unchangeable datum, and he considered that price-value discrepancies of inputs bought were irrelevant to his analysis, since it was the value of this new output (and not the capital advanced) that was being related to a general price level and a general profitability level in the markets where the output was sold.

The cost-price of the new output was not based on a hypothetical "labor-value" of inputs, but based on what the producers actually paid for the inputs that were used up to create their outputs. Using various inputs, a new output was produced. This new output had a value, but precisely how much of that value would be realized as revenue, was difficult to know in advance. 

The difference between the selling price and the cost price of the new output sold, was the surplus value realized as profit by the producer of that output, and the argument was, that this profit would normally (assuming ordinary competition) tend to gravitate to an amount reflecting the average profit rate on capital. The question was about how the profit volume included in the total value product would be distributed among the producing enterprises.

If businesses could not reach a baseline profitability, they would be driven out of business sooner or later, or they would be taken over by another business and restructured, so that they did become sufficiently profitable. Inversely, if businesses overcharged for their commodities to obtain more profit, fewer people would buy them, and they would suffer decline as well. 

So output could normally be sold only within a fairly narrow range of prices, acceptable to both buyers and sellers. Marx then examined what the division of the total newly produced surplus value would be, among producing enterprises with varying capital compositions, on the hypothetical assumption of a uniform profit rate established by free competition.

Under Marxism–Leninism and Sraffianism, the "uniform rate of profits" was often taken as the literal truth. Marx did not know that that a uniform profit rate (a "general profit rate", e.g. a 10% net profit on all production capital) did not truly exist in the real world, except as a TENDENCY in the competitive process, as a norm for acceptable returns, or as a statistical average.  

If it is accepted that "perfect competition" does not exist in the real world, then a "uniform rate of profit" also cannot exist in the real world – both are just IDEALIZATIONS used to understand some implications of a model.

Marx wanted to examine the share-out of newly produced surplus value in its simplest and purest forms, abstracting from all kinds of variability of circumstances that would make his own calculation extraordinarily complex . 

He baffled people with advanced Math. 

The formation of a normal rate of profit on capital invested, common to most producers, defined the basic parameters of competition, and thereby it defined the main developmental dynamic of the capitalist production system.



ARE THERE NO THINKERS ON THIS PLANET?



THE LANGOT OF MAD FUCKIN' MARX MUST BE DIPPED IN HIS OWN COMMIE SHIT,   AND HE MUST BE SLAPPED ACROSS HIS BEARDED FACE WITH IT..



MARX HAD A THICK TRIER ACCENT AS HIS FATHER’S SIDE HAD AN UNBROKEN LINE OF RABBIS,  AND THE BEST PART WAS HE HAD A RIDICULOUS FEMININE LISP.  

MAY BE THE SHIT- SLAP TREATMENT WOULD HAVE CURED HIM

OF MARXs SEVEN LEGITIMATE CHILDREN, THREE DIED OF EXTREME NEGLECT ( THEY WERE NEVER BATHED ) .    ONLY THREE SURVIVED TO ADULTHOOD.    AND TWO OUT OF THIS THREE THAT MADE IT PAST THE ADULTHOOD THRESHOLD COMMITTED SUICIDE

MARX HIMSELF RARELY TOOK A BATH AND HAD CHRONS DISEASE . 


"THE BOURGEOISIE WILL REMEMBER MY CARBUNCLES UNTIL THEIR DYING DAY," MARX TO FRIEDRICH ENGELS, A LETTER FROM 1867.





THIS BASTARD MARX TRIED TO PROVE THAT HIS BULLSHIT DAS KAPITAL WAS DOWNLOADED FROM AKASHA LIKE THE VEDAS WITH TOE ( THEORY OF EVERYTHING )  INHERENT.

https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1098&context=econ_workingpaper

BRAAAAYYYYYYY 

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/12/108-numerical-equivalent-of-hindu-king.html


Marx says that the same work can be either productive or unproductive, depending on whether or not surplus-value (producer's profit) can be extracted from it. 

Marx never accounted for  "service economy".. the services sector—a broad category of the economy that now includes financial services, media, transportation and technology—accounted for 71 percent of GDP in the United States

Marx did not analyse ‘services’ as such , and ‘sectors’ are not the units of his economic analysis. The very concept of a ‘services sector’ is,  alien to Marx’s economics

From a Marxian approach, an activity needs to be analysed in terms of its location in the circuit of capital and its relationship with the production of surplusvalue. The ‘services sector’ includes activities which are highly heterogeneous

The sectoral categories of national accounts are not the units of analysis of Marxian analysis, and sectoral structure is not integral to Marxian economics.  Marx ignored commodityproducing services.. 

Although Marx recognizes these activities as involving productive labour and producing surplusvalue, he opts to neglect them and lump them together with unproductive wagelabour.

Marx states clearly that ‘labour as mere performance of services for the satisfaction of immediate needs has nothing whatever to do with capital, since that is not capital’s concern

QUOTE:  If a capitalist hires a woodcutter to chop wood to roast his mutton over, then not only does the woodcutter relate to the capitalist, but also the capitalist to the woodcutter, in the relation of simple exchange. The woodcutter gives him his service, a use value, which does not increase capital; rather, capital consumes itself in it; and the capitalist gives him another commodity for it in the form of money.UNQUOTE..   Karl fuckin’ Marx

He generalises such a relationship to all services ‘from whore to pope’ which are purchased  for their usevalue and are exchanged against revenue rather than capital. No capital is laid  out, no surplusvalue is generated, and all labour engaged in such services is unproductive.

Marx castigates as ‘horsepiss’ any  argument that regard any  labour that in some way indirectly contributes to surplusvalue as being productive.

QUOTE:  Smith was essentially correct with his productive and unproductive labour, correct from the  standpoint of bourgeois economy. What the other economists advance against it is either horse piss…, namely that every action after all acts upon something, thus confusion of the product in  its natural and in its economic sense; so that the pickpocket becomes a productive worker too,  since he indirectly produces books on criminal law (this reasoning at least as correct as calling a  judge a productive worker because he protects from theft). Or the modern economists have  turned themselves into such sycophants of the bourgeois that they want to demonstrate to the  latter that it is productive labour when somebody picks the lice out of his hair, or strokes his tail,  because for example the latter activity will make his fat head – blockhead – clearer the next day  in the office. UNQUOTE   -- Karl fuckin’ Marx 

The service sector makes an important contribution to GDP , providing jobs, inputs and public services for the economy. Trade in services  improves economic performance 

Service economy can refer to one or both of two recent economic developments:--

The increased importance of the service sector in industrialized economies. The current list of Fortune 500 companies contains more service companies and fewer manufacturers than in previous decades.
The relative importance of service in a product offering. The service economy in developing countries is mostly concentrated in financial services, hospitality, retail, health, human services, information technology and education. Products today have a higher service component than in previous decades. In the management literature this is referred to as the servitization of products or a product-service system. Virtually every product today has a service component to it.
The old dichotomy between product and service has been replaced by a service–product continuum. Many products are being transformed into services.

For example, IBM treats its business as a service business. Although it still manufactures computers, it sees the physical goods as a small part of the "business solutions" industry. They have found that the price elasticity of demand for "business solutions" is much less than for hardware. There has been a corresponding shift to a subscription pricing model. Rather than receiving a single payment for a piece of manufactured equipment, many manufacturers are now receiving a steady stream of revenue for ongoing contracts.

Full cost accounting and most accounting reform and monetary reform measures are usually thought to be impossible to achieve without a good model of the service economy.

Heard of a monkey named Marx?

A guy walks into a bar and orders a beer. While waiting he looks around and notices the guy several spots down has a monkey. The guy starts to watch the monkey and notices that the monkey keeps rummaging through the bar nuts, but what he does next can’t be explained. 

He watches the monkey take a specific nut, study it, then stick it up his asshole before eating it. This doesn’t happen once, twice or even three times. The monkey does every single time. The guy finally has to ask the guy what is going on.

Guy: hey mister…I notice your monkey keeps sticking the nut up his butt before he eats it. WHY?


GUY with monkey: Yeah he is a little strange but you can’t blame him. You see he likes to eat everything, nuts, bananas, paper, marbles etc. Well one day I was playing pool with a buddy when my monkey grab the Q ball and tried to eat it. Since that day. He makes sure whatever he eats will fit coming out the other end.


I HAVE REACHED 32% OF MY TIRADE AGAINST MAD MARX..

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL HAS READ THE WORKS OF MOST MAJOR GERMAN ,  FRENCH , BRITISH, EUROPEAN, JEW PHILOSOPHERS. 

NOBODY CAN DO THIS UNLESS HE CAN DO SPEED READING.. 


MY CONCLUSION?

THEY ARE A BUNCH OF FUCKIN’ IDIOTS NAY CUNTS — WHO HAVE BEEN PLACED ON A PEDESTAL BY JEW ROTHSCHILD’ MEDIA..     THEY HAVE FOOLED THE PLANET LIKE HOW TED KACZYNSKI FOOLED HIS MATH OVERSEER PROFESSOR ( BAFFLE WITH BULL ) FOR HIS PHD ..

WITHOUT THIS DEEP STATE SPONSORSHIP THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN LIKE THE AUTHOR BELOW— HAJAAAAR FUNDA— NO TAKERS !

WHATEVER READERSHIP HE HAS IS BECAUSE I HAVE REFERRED TO HIM A COUPLE OF TIMES 

THIS TAMILIAN BRAHMIN VIVEK IYER IS MORE INTELLIGENT THAN THE WHITE JEWISH FAKE PHILOSOPHERS..




  1. SOMEBODY CALLED ME UP AND CRIED--

    A CHARLATAN CALLED HIMSELF "KALKI BHAGAWAN " AND WAS CAUGHT WITH 400 CRORES OF UNACCOUNTED MONEY..

    AND THIS FELLOW HAS 14 MILLION FOLLOWERS WORLD WIDE.

    MOAN MOAN MOAN

    LISTEN

    WHY DOES IT TAKE A BLOGGER TO EXPOSE ROTHSCHILDs AGENT FREEMASON VIVEKANANDA , WHO HAS BEEN TOUTED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD AS THE GREATEST HINDU SAGE --EVEN BIGGER THAN ADI SHANKARACHARYA?

    ##########################

    VIVEKANANDA SUPPORTED THE HEAVEN- HELL THEORY, PROPPED UP ALL FAKE DASAS/ RADHA / RAM KICKING PREGNANT SITA TO THE FOREST / 16000 GOPIKA LOVERS/ 330 MILLION GODS / BHAKTI MOVEMENT/ ANIMAL SACRIFICE IN TEMPLES/ DEVADASI TEMPLE WHORES/ SATI/ AGHORIS / BIGOT MANU LIES/ KAMASUTRA SEX/ BRAHMACHARYA SEMEN/ ASHWAMEDHA HORSE SACRIFICE/ FAKE EMPEROR ASHOKA/ FAKE ROTHSCHILDs MUTTS/ ISLAMIC CONVERSION OF HINDU MONUMENTS LIKE QUTAB MINAR-TAJ MAHAL- BABRI MASJID ETC.
    VIVEKANANDA DID NOT KNOW THAT HINDU GODS ( EXCEPT VISHNU MORTAL AVATARS PARASHURAMA/ RAMA/ KRISHNA/ AYYAPPA ) ARE COSMIC ALLEGORIES .

    VIVEKANANDA WAS PART OF THE BRAHMO SAMAJ WHICH-

    REJECTED THE VEDAS
    REJECTED VISHNU AVATARS KRISHNA AND RAMA
    REJECTED TEMPLE WORSHIP OF SHIVA, VISHNU AND DEVI
    REJECTED KARMA , BE-BIRTH AND MOKSHA THEORY.

    VIVEKANANDA CONDONED HIS MASTER ROTHSCHILD –

    REPLACING VISHNUs NINTH AVATAR AYAPPA WITH FAKE PIG EATING/ PALI SPEAKING BUDDHA

    REPLACING MEMORY HOLDING WATER WIH ALCOHOL IN HOMEOPATHIC MEDICINES

    IMPALING ( MOST POTENT SYMBOL OF HINDUSIM ) EMPTY KALASHA KUMBHAM WITH A STICK UPSIDE DOWN AND STICKING IT OUTSIDE A WINDOW LIKE A SCARE CROW

    CONVERTING THE ELEVENTH GURU OF SIKHS BANDA BAHADUR WITH A HOLY BOOK GURU GRANTH SAHIB WRITTEN BY ROTHSCHILDs AGENT WHITE JEW WEARING TURBAN MAX ARTHUR MACAULIFFE .

    SOAKING OUR PURANAS WITH SEMEN


    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/02/mistakes-deliberate-or-inadvertant-in_7.html

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/09/mahamrityunjaya-mantra-most-potent.html

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/kathiawari-jain-jew-gandhi-and-kayastha.html


    WHAT ARE WE AS A ANCIENT CIVILIZATION WHICH DOWNLOADED THE VEDAS 400 CENTURIES AGO , WORTH?

    #################################

    WHO ARE ALL THESE PEOPLE WHOM WE WORSHIP TODAY LIKE SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR/ SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV/ BABA RAMDEV ETC -- WHOSE CHARAN KAMAL PM MODI KISSES ?

    WHY DID NOT ONE SINGLE HINDU OBJECT TO MODI IMPALING OUR NO 1 SYMBOL KALASHA KUMBHAM UPSIDE DOWN WITH A STICK-- AND TWEETING IT , WISHING ALL HAPPY GUDI PADWA?

    IF THIS GUJARATI FELLOW IS SO STUPID, HOW IS HE RULING INDIA?

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

STUPID ATHEIST COMMIES,  ADHERENTS OF RIDICULOUS SINGLE MESSIAH / SINGLE HOLY BOOK RELIGIONS ( WHO HAVE BEEN BORN INTO IT ) WILL EMBRACE SANATANA DHARMA,  IF THEY CAN UNDERSTAND THE POST BELOW.. 100% GUARANTEE..







HEY TOP 20 LIVING ECONOMISTS OF THIS PLANET..

LISTEN UP AND LISTEN GOOD


YOU CUNTS HAVE PUT YOUR THOUGHTS DOWN IN BLACK AND WHITE ( AND VIDEO/ AUDIO).

DO NOT FORCE CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL TO TAKE YOU DOWN,  THE WAY I AM TAKING DOWN THIS PLANETs NO 1 THINKER ECONOMIST KARL MARX..

SLOW DOWN FOR YOUR OWN GOOD..  

BE WARNED.

YOU ARE JUST PIECES OF KOSHER  SHIT..  PROPPED UP BY ROTHSCHILDs MEDIA..

DO NOT THREATENDEDENEDEN  INDIA..    YOU ARE ON WATCH.. 

Read questions to Quora 686 to 820 .






SOMEBODY ASKED ME

CAPTAIN, YOU HAD CHALLENGED THE TOP TEN COMMIE ECONOMIST INTELLECTUALS  ON THE PLANET , TO TAKE A 500 ITEM EXAM ON DAS KAPITAL.   

NOBODY DARES AS THEY KNOW , VADAKAYIL  WILL RAPE AND BLEED THEIR MINDS WITHOUT GREASE..

CAPTAIN, WHAT WOULD YOUR QUESTION NUMBER ONE  BE?  BATAOH NAAH , PLEAJJE.

I WOULD ASK, WHAT IS THE MEANING OF “KAPITAL” IN THE BOOK “DAS KAPITAL?..   ALL THESE CUNTS WILL GET IT WRONG..



THERE IS A MALAYALAM MOVIE TITLED “ARABIKATHA” BASED ON A TRUE STORY.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabikkatha

POOR MALAYALI WORKERS IN DUBAI, STAY IN A CRAMPED DORMITORY TO SAVE MONEY FOR SENDING HOME..

THE MALAYALI PEOPLE STAYING TOGETHER IS ALWAYS A MIXTURE OF MUSLIMS/ CHRISTIANS/ HINDUS AND COMMIE ATHEISTS.     THEY STAY IN HARMONY BOUND BY THE ANCIENT LANGUAGE “MALAYALAM”.

AT NIGHT BEFORE “LIGHTS OUT”BY COMMON CONSENSUS THERE IS A FIVE MINUTE PERIOD FOR “FALL OUT FOR PRAYERS”.

MUSLIMS / HINDUS/ CHRISTIANS TAKE OUT THEIR HOLY BOOKS AND PRAY IN SILENCE TOLERANT OF THE FEELINGS OF ALL IN THE CRAMPED SPACE..

MUSLIMS WOULD BE ON ALL FOURS, CHRISTIANS WOULD BE KNEELING, HINDUS WOULD BE STANDING WITH PALMS TOGETHER IN PRAYER.

THE HERO OF THE MOVIE IS ATHEIST COMMIE SRINIVASAM..  HE IS A SIMPLETON  BUT IS NAÏVE—NAY—GULLIBLE.

SRINIVASAN WOULD LIE ON HIS TOP BUNK, AND READ THE THICK BOOK “MOOLA  DHANAM”  ( DAS KAPITAL OF MARX , TRANSLATED BY EMS NAMBOODIRIPAD ) DURING THIS PRAYER PERIOD..

 YOU SEE AS AN ATHEIST COMMIE THIS WAS HIS HOLY BOOK.

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._M._S._Namboodiripad

EMS DID NOT KNOW THE MEANING OF “KAPITAL”..   NOR DOES ANY INDIAN COMMIE THINKER..

DHANAM IN MALAYALAM TRANSLATES TO MONEY (WEALTH)..  

THE GULF MALAYALIS  CALL IT  “KAAYE “..


By "capital," in Das Kapital , Karl Marx meant the physical means of production, rather than money (financial capital)

In economics and sociology, the means of production (also called capital goods)  are physical and non-financial inputs used in the production of economic value.

 The terminology of classical economics, the means of production are the "factors of production" minus financial and human capital.

Capitalism is defined as control over the means of production, where the surplus product becomes a source of unearned income for its owners.

Marx used the term "productive forces" equivalently with "factors of production".  He two timed as per his whims..

IN Das Kapital,  Marx  uses "factors of production", but , in his famous Preface to the Critique of Political Economy, he uses "productive forces"..

I can go into HCD mahaa meru detail..

But my blogs are for the LCD (  lowest common denominator)..


COMMIE LEADERS OF KERALA ARE WORSE THAN TERMITES.. 

THESE EVIL COMMIE LEADERS HAVE DESTROYED THIS ANCIENT BEAUTIFUL LAND WITH THEIR DESTRUCTIVE MENTALITY AND NEGATIVE COMMIE ATTITUDES.

THERE ARE NO JOBS IN KERALA DUE TO THESE COMMIE BASTARDS .. NOBODY WANTS TO INVEST IN KERALA..


TO GET A JOB,  A MALAYALI MUST GO OUTSIDE THE STATE..  OLD PARENTS LIVE ALONE..


ALL MUSLIMS OF THIS PLANET WHO CRY THAT TAJ MAHAL IS AN ISLAMIC STRUCTURE – LISTEN UP

EVEN WIKIPEDIA DECLARES THAT HAGIA SOPHIA WAS A CHURCH WHEN IT WAS BUILT AT ISTANBUL BY ROMAN EMPEROR CONSTANTINE THE GREAT.

HAGIA SOPHIA IS MUCH LARGER THAN TAJ MAHAL THOUGH IT LOOKS THE SAME

SO HOW COME THE SAME  TYPE OF STRUCTURE WITH HUGE DOME AND FOUR MINARETS IS BEING CLAIMED BY  CHRISTIANITY ( CHURCH )  AND ISLAM ( MOSQUE) ???? ..

THE TRUTH IS  TAJ MAHAL AND HAGIA SOPHIA WERE BOTH HINDU TEMPLES ..  BUILT  LONG BEFORE CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM WERE BORN..

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/secrets-of-roman-pantheon-inaugurated.html


I ASK MY READERS TO SPREAD THIS LIKE WILDFIRE ..


LIES WONT WORK ANYMORE..

MY REVELATIONS NOW JUMP TO 60.26 %  .. PERHAPS THIS COULD BE MY LAST REVELATION.

  1. SOMEBODY CALLED ME UP AND CRIED..

    CAPTAIN..

    YOU ARE THE ONLY PERSON ON THIS PLANET WHO CAN EXHUME TRUTHS. AND YOU HAVE SAID BEFORE “THE REAL REVELATIONS WITH COME WHEN YOU REACH THE 98% SEGMENT”.. AND YOU ARE NOW AT 60%..

    CAPTAIN, PLEASE TELL WHY YOU SAY “TAJ MAHAL IS A HINDU MONUMENT”.

    WELL,

    EVER SINCE I EXPLAINED “QUTAB MINAR IS A HINDU MONUMENT”, MUSLIMS HAVE QUIETLY ACCEPTED IT ..

    BECAUSE I EXPLAINED THE TOWER HAS TO BEEN SEEN FROM A HOVERING HELICOPTER FROM TOP, TO REALIZE WHAT IT MEANS . AND IT IS “NO CONTEST” AFTER THIS REVELATION..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/09/qutab-minar-was-dhruv-stambh-vishnu.html

    IN THE POST ABOVE I HAVE GIVEN SOME PICTURES OF THE INNARDS OF TAJ MAHAL.

    I HAVE POSTED PHOTOS OF THE TAJ MAHAL SPIRE, AND THE HUGE MOSAIC ON THE FLOOR OF THE TAJ MAHAL SHOWING THE SPIRE IN 2D..

    IT IS CLEARLY A KALASHA KUMBHAM… THE MOST POTENT SYMBOL OF SANATANA DHARMA..

    IN 1975 I HAVE SEEN THE SAME KALASHA KUMBHAM AT ISTANBUL, ON THE FLOOR OF THE SOPHIA HAGUE MOSQUE. EXACTLY LIKE IN TAJ MAHAL.

    I SAW TRIDENT ( TRISHUL ) MOTIFS ON THE INNER DOME OF SOPHIA HAGUE DOME AND IT IS STILL THERE..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/secrets-of-roman-pantheon-inaugurated.html

    NOW –

    TIME TO THINK CLEARLY.

    TAJ MAHAL HAS FOUR MINARETS.. THIS IS NOT A ISLAM THINGY THOUGH MUSLIMS MAY CLAIM SO..

    IN ISLAM MOSQUES JUST HAVE ONE MINARET FOR THE AZAN CALL.

    THE SOPHIA HAGUE CHURCH IN ISTANBUL ALSO HAS FOUR MINARETS. WHY SHOULD A CHURCH HAVE FOUR MINARETS ?

    SOPHIA HAGIA MONUMENT WAS FIRST A HINDU TEMPLE THEN A CHURCH , THEN A MOSQUE AND TODAY IT IS A MUSEUM.

    THE SOPHIA HAGIA TEMPLE WAS BUILT BY ROMAN EMPEROR CONSTANTINE THE GREAT ..

    JEWESS HELENA THE MOTHER OF HINDU EMPEROR CONSTANTINE THE GREAT CAUSED THE ROMAN EMPIRE CAPITAL TO BE SHIFTED FROM ROME TO ISTANBUL ( CONSTANTINOPLE ) IN 330 AD..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/09/istanbul-deep-seat-of-jewish-deep-state.html

    THE REASON WAS ROME DID NOT GENERATE MONEY. WHILE CONSTANTINOPLE WAS THE HUB OF SPICES EXPORTED BY CALICUT KING ( MY HOMETOWN ).

    SPICE WENT BY SHIP TO GWADAR PORT , THEN BY OVERLAND ROUTE BY CARAVAN TILL GEORGIA BATUMI AND FROM THERE BY SHIP TO CONSTANTINOPE ( ISTANBUL ).. FROM THERE THE WHITE JEWS TOOK OVER AS MIDDLEMEN.

    THIS IS WHY THE CURRENT WHITE JEWS IN ISRAEL ARE KHAZARS FROM GEORGIA.

    CONSTANTINE THE GREAT WAS POISONED BY HIS SON AND THEN BAPTIZED WITHIN A HOUR OF HIS DEATH FROM HINDUISM TO CHRISTIANITY ON 22ND MAY 337 AD...

    CONSTANTINE THE GREAT TOOK LESS THAN 5 YEARS TO BUILD SOPHIA HAGIA CHURCH.. WELL, HE WAS A HINDU, WHY SHOULD HE BUILD A CHURCH ?? .

    AND IT TOOK JUST 5 YEARS TO BUILD SUCH A HUGE STRUCTURE?? ,OH YEAH ?  IT IS IMPOSSIBLE..


    THE MARBLE STATUE OF CONSTANTINE THE GREAT EXISTED INSIDE THE SOPHIA HAGIA AND IT WAS REMOVED BY SULTAN MEHMED II ON 29TH MAY 1453...

    AFTER CONSTANTINE THE GREAT WAS MURDERED BY HIS SON, THE HINDU ( PAGAN ) MOTIFS WERE CHISELED/ GROUND OFF AND HINDU GOD IDOLS SMASHED. ..

    BUT THE CHRISTIAN SON WHO CONVERTED THE HINDU SHIVA TEMPLE INTO A SOPHIA HAGIA CHURCH NEGLECTED TO REMOVE THE HUGE TOP KALASHA KUMBHAM SPIRE .. WHICH WAS MADE OF GOLD INFUSED WITH IRRIDIUM EXACTLY LIKE IN TAJ MAHAL.
    IN 1857 ROTHSCHILD REMOVED THE TAJ MAHAL SPIRE AND MELTED IT AND CARTED IT AWAY TO GERMANY AND INSTALLED A DUPLICATE IN PLACE , WHICH IS WHAT YOU SEE TODAY..

    ON MAY 29TH 1453, TURK SULTAN MEHMED II CONQUERED CONSTANTINOPLE.. EMPEROR CONSTANINE XI WAS KILLED IN BATTLE..

    THE FIRST THING KING MEHMED II DID WAS TO REMOVE ALL CHRISTIAN ARTIFACTS AND INSTALL ISLAMIC ONES.

    MEHMED II CONSTRICTED A WOODEN MINARAT FOR THE AZAN CALL. NOW SOPHIA HAGUE WAS A CONVERSION FROM HINDU TEMPLE TO CHURCH TO MOSQUE

    MEHMED IIs BLOOD MOTHER WAS A JEWESS NAMED HUMA HATUN. BUT AT A YOUNG AGE HIS FATHER MURAD II MADE HIS SERBIAN STEPMOTHER TAKE CARE OF HIM FAR AWAY FOR SAFETY .. REASON--MEHMED IIs ELDER CROWN PRINCE BROTHER WAS STRANGULATED TO DEATH ..

    CONTINUED TO 2-
    1. CONTINUED FROM 1--

      MEHMED IIs SERBIAN STEP MOTHER WAS A HINDU (PAGAN )..

      SHE CONSULTED A HINDU ASTROLOGER WHO MADE AN ASTRONOMICAL CHART INDICATING THAT ON 28TH MAY 1453 21 YEAR OLD MEHMED II SHOULD ATTACK CONSTANTINOPLE , AS SOME PLANETS ALIGNED IN A RARE BUT POWERFUL MANNER ..

      ON THIS DAY THERE WOULD BE A BLOOD ( RED ) MOON AND THE IRIDIUM SPIRE ON SOPHIA HAGIA DOME WOULD EMIT FIRE-- WHICH IS CALLED ST ELMOs FIRE BY SEAMEN –

      ( IT HAPPENED IN MOBY DICK NOVEL AND CAPTAIN AHAB USED THIS TO BRAINWASH HIS FRIGHTENED SAILORS THAT HE IS EMPOWERED BY GOD )..

      THE EVENT WAS USED AS A GREAT PROPAGANDA VALUE AT CONSTANTINOPLE .. THE MUSLIM ARMY OF MEHMED II SAW THE RED MOON AND THEY GOT CHARGED UP.

      ON THE OTHER HAND, THE CHRISTIAN ARMY OF THE KING CONSTANTINE XI SAW THE ST ELMO FIRE CRACKING WITH GREAT SOUND AND LIGHT ( LIKE LIGHTNING AND THUNDER ) AND THEIR MORALE CRASHED..

      THEY THOUGHT THEIR GOD JESUS / MARY IS DESERTING THEM.

      THE BASTARD JEW POPE INNOCENT III IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE END OF THE ENORMOUS POWER OF CHRISTIAN ROMAN EMPIRE AT CONSTANTINOPLE BY SECRETLY ASKING THE CATHOLIC CRUSADERS TO LOOT THE WEALTH OF CONSTANTINOPLE ( FOURTH CRUSADE APRIL 1204 AD )....

      AFTER THE CITY'S SACKING, MOST OF THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE'S TERRITORIES WERE DIVIDED UP AMONG THE CATHOLIC CRUSADERS. THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DON’T KISS THE HAND OF THE POPE..

      RELATIONS BETWEEN THE CATHOLIC AND ORTHODOX CHURCHES WERE CATASTROPHICALLY WOUNDED FOR MANY CENTURIES AFTERWARDS, AND WOULD NOT BE SUBSTANTIALLY REPAIRED UNTIL MODERN TIMES.

      TO FULLY UNDERSTAND WHY THE SACK OF CONSTANTINOPLE HAPPENED, IT’S IMPORTANT TO KNOW ABOUT WHAT OCCURRED 33 YEARS BEFORE THE FOURTH CRUSADE BEGAN.

      IN THE 12TH CENTURY, CONSTANTINOPLE HAD THREE QUARTERS, WHICH WERE INHABITED BY MERCHANTS OF VENICE, PISA, AND GENOA.

      AS TIME PASSED, TENSION BEGAN TO GROW, BECAUSE THE JEWISH VENETIANS DIDN’T TOLERATE THAT THEY HAD SPICE TRADE COMPETITORS ( SPICES SHIPPED FROM CALICUT ) WHO COULD POSSIBLY OUTMATCH THEM.

      SUBSEQUENTLY, IN 1171, THE JEWISH VENETIANS RANSACKED THE GENOESE QUARTER, WHEREBY THE ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN GENOESE WERE KILLED AND THEIR PROPERTY WAS LOOTED.

      EMPEROR MANUEL I KOMNENOS IMPRISONED ALL THE VENETIANS THAT WERE LIVING IN THE JEWISH VENETIAN QUARTER, AND THEIR PROPERTY WAS CONFISCATED.

      IN 1182, THE BYZANTINES MASSACRED ABOUT 61,000 ROMAN CATHOLICS THAT INHABITED THE LATIN QUARTER IN CONSTANTINOPLE. ONLY 4.300 MANAGED TO SURVIVE.

      THESE 4.300 CATHOLICS WERE SOLD AS SLAVES TO THE TURKS IN ANATOLIA.

      THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WESTERN AND EASTERN CHURCHES ONLY WORSENED AFTER THIS MASSACRE.

      22 YEARS LATER, THE INEVITABLE OCCURRED; THE FOURTH CRUSADE.

      THE REASON WHY THE CATHOLIC CRUSADERS WERE ABLE TO SACK CONSTANTINOPLE IS DUE TO THE SUPPORT OF THE JEW VENETIANS. THE PARTICIPATION OF THE VENETIANS IN THE FOURTH CRUSADE HAD A LOT TO DO WITH MONEY AND REVENGE.

      SPICE MERCHANT JEW ENRICO DANDOLO IS KNOWN FOR HIS ROLE IN THE FOURTH CRUSADE AND THE SACK OF CONSTANTINOPLE. THIS JEWISH BASTARD IS THE REAL SHYLOCK.

      BY THE TIME OTTOMAN TURK SULTAN MEHMED II TOOK OVER CONSTANTINOPLE, ROMAN EMPEROR CONSTANTINE XI WAS MORE OF A MAYOR OF AN IMPOVERISHED CITY.. HE WAS NO MIGHTY AUGUSTUS OR JULIUS CAESAR..

      MEHMED II COULD HAVE BEEN DEFEATED IF THE BASTARD JEW POPE NICHOAS V HAD SENT A NAVAL FLEET TO SAVE CONSTANTINOPLE .. THE JEW POPE KEPT SAYING HE WILL SEND ARMS, SOLDIERS AND FOOD, BUT HE NEVER DID.

      THE MIGHTY POPE WAS ASKED ON 2ND APRIL FOR HELP AND IT DID NOT ARRIVE TILL 29TH MAY 1453 WHEN THE EMPEROR CONSTANTINE XI WAS KILLED..

      IT IS THE FIRST TIME THE ROLE OF THESE JEW POPES IN EXTERMINATING THE CHRISTIAN ROMAN EMPIRE IS BEING TOLD.. ONLY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL CAN DO THIS..

      POOR WHITE CHRISTIANS – ALWAYS RAPED BY JEWS ..

      THE LAST 70% OF OTTOMAN SULTANS WERE JEWS..

      ALL MUGHAL EMPEROR AFTER HUMAYUN WERE JEWS..

      IF I HAD NOT REVEALED THIS NOBODY COULD—TILL THE SUN GOES SUPERNOVA. MY REVELATIONS NOW JUMP TO 60.24 %..

      Capt ajit vadakayil
      ..


BELOW: IRIDIUM INFUSED TOP SPIRE ON MAIN DOME INTERACTS WITH IRIDIUM TIPPED MINARETS TO CREATE ST ELMOs FIRE


THIS IS AN INDICATION OF THE SCALAR FIELD OF BRAHMAN 


IN THE LINK BELOW--  CAPTAIN AHAB BLOWS OUT THE FIRE FROM THE TIP OF HIS HARPOON

https://etc.usf.edu/lit2go/42/moby-dick/800/chapter-119-the-candles/



THE TIP OF THE EGYPTIAN PYRAMID AT GIZA WOULD GLOW BLUE ORGONE PLASMA AT WILL, AND COULD BE SEEN THOUSANDS OF KMS AWAY

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/10/eight-sided-pyramid-of-giza-egypt.html


WHILE DEFENDER OF CONSTANTINOPLE  CAPTAIN GIOVANNI GIUSTINIANI ( A BRAVE AND RESOURCEFUL SEA PIRATE  TURNED MERCENARY ) STOOD TRANSFIXED BY THE FLAME, HE WAS TAKEN OUT BY AN SNIPER ARROW.. 

THE SIEGE WAS OVER AT THAT VERY MOMENT.

MEHMED II HAD A WHITE FLAG MEETING WITH  CHRISTIAN CAPTAIN GIOVANNI GIUSTINIANI  HIM..  OFFERED HIM THREE TIME MORE PRIZE MONEY AND ALSO PROMISED TO MAKE HIM KING OF THE AEGEAN ISLANDS..  BEING A MAN OF HONOR , HE REFUSED.. 




ONLY FIVE YEARS TO CONSTRUCT ?   

OH YEAH ?

IT WILL TAKE MORE THAN 15 YEARS TO  EVEN BUILD THE FOUNDATION OF SOPHIA HAGUE AS THERE IS A MASSIVE WATER TUNNEL SYSTEM UNDERNEATH.




JEWS / CHRISTIANS/ MUSLIMS /ATHEISTS DO NOT WANT THESE 12,000 YEAR OLD TUNNELS TO BE SCIENTIFICALLY DATED AND HENCE ( LIKE TAJ MAHAL ) IS BRICKED UP



THERE ARE HINDU ( PAGAN ) MOTIFS ON THE PILLARS OF THE UNDERGROUND TUNNELS 


PAGAN MOTIFS HAVE BEEN CONVERTED TO CHRISTIAN LORE.. THIS IS NO BULLSHIT MEDUSA..  EVEN IF IT IS MEDUSA , IT IS FAR FAR OLDER THAN CHRISTIANITY.


GIANT AQUEDUCTS FAR OLDER THAN SOPHIA HAGUE BRING WATER TO THE UNDERGROUND TUNNELS OF SOPHIA HAGUE

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/secrets-of-roman-pantheon-inaugurated.html


BRICKED UP 12,000 YEAR OLD KERALA DANAVA CIVILIZATION HISTORY OF THE SOPHIA HAGIA HINDU TEMPLE..

AFTER ALL , AS PER THE BIBLE ( COOKED UP BY JEWESS HELENA IN 325 AD ) , THE BIG BANG HAPPENED ON 23RD OCT , 9 AM IN 4004 BC

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/secrets-of-12000-year-old-baalbek.html







FALSIFICATION OF ANCIENT HINDU SPIRITUAL HISTORY WAS THE NO 1 AGENDA OF JEW KARL MARX AND HIS BOSS JEW ROTHSCHILD .. 

THERE COULD BE NO WORLD HISTORY OLDER THAN 6000 YEARS ..


FREEMASON NEHRU PLAYED BALL IN HIS “GLIMPSES OF WORLD HISTORY BOOK





  1. Mohit HandaJanuary 29, 2020 at 5:09 PM
    Namaste Captain Ajitji,

    You have not resumed blogging from sometime.

    My best guess is that you are annoyed with readers, and have decided to take time out to fulfill personal commitments.

    My worst guess is that you are completely frustated with us readers and do not want to blog and publish/reply comments at all.

    My mind keeps fluctuating between the two with much unease.

    But in anycase I would like to offer my sincerest APOLOGIES for any lack of commitment or wrongdoing or any action/inaction from my side which would have hurt you.

    I know how much pains you have taken for putting all this effort in the last 10 years
    Getting up everyday - responding to comments
    - preparing your posts which cover so many diverse topics
    - managing, recalling, reconciling, assessing, contemplating in writing your posts.
    - Holding on to all the facts, ideas, opinions and judgements about plethora of topics you have posted.
    - putting relevant comments in many of your old posts.
    - Read and respond to our comments how ridiculous they may be.
    - You your self make an effort to put various comments on TOI to awaken masses. We readers ourselves must have not posted half of comments in social media as compared to your comments on TOI.
    - In all this, you have shown concern to put comments which get lost due to 200 limit.
    - You have provided us DEEKSHA to which very few have given their commitment back. The long list of people wishing on your birthday have not responded you on your comment requests with same zeal.
    - putting up with idiotic commentors.
    - helping us provide perspective consistently by straining over every new incident or happenings in the world. Readers have conveniently taken you for ride on this. I know this because of how people respond in so called Vadakayil fan groups.
    - Put up with so much ridiculing over social media.
    - Put up with so much insult over your family by some disgraceful reporters.
    - Spending so much time day and night on a computer is not easy even with help of family.
    - Have seen you responding to comments in midnight/early morning with full ENTHUSIASM.
    - for showing us how to love our motherland
    - for showing us true meaning of GOD
    - for showing us our roots.
    - for removing our illusions and busting myths.

    All this is not an ordinary mans's cup of tea.

    For all what I have mentioned above and for all that I could not express above, I thank you from my heart and will always be indebted to you. I wish you all the love, peace and health and hope you have a propsperous family life ahead.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    ##############

    Capt. Ajit Vadakayil January 29, 2020 at 7:18 PM

    I HAVE SEEN THIS PLANET FOR 40 YEARS ...

    ONLY INDIANS PULL DOWN PATRIOTS WHO DO GOOD FOR THE WATAN..

    IT IS A CURSE .. ( WHAT IS IN IT FOR ME ?? )


    WHAT ABOUT THE MOST SELFISH CREATURE -- MODI?  HE WORE A MOSSAD SPONSORED TURBAN IN 1976 , HE HAS IGNORED MORE THAN 500 CRITICAL SUGGESTIONS..

    I AM DONE !

    capt ajit vadakayil





























  1. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/despite-protests-caa-will-not-be-withdrawn-amit-shah/articleshow/73481252.cms

    THIS CAA THINGY IS A BLESSING IN DISGUISE..

    THIS IS THE TIME TO WEED OUT TRAITORS IN FOREIGN PAYROLL.

    EVEN CAPT AMARINDER SINGH HAS TURNED OUT TO BE A TRAITOR-- A CLOSET KHALISTANI. HIS ANCESTORS WERE DARLINGS OF JEW ROTHSCHILD.. SIKHS SUPPORTED ROTHSCHILD IN 1857 ..

    AMIT SHAH-- USE HD CAMERAS TO PROFILE DESH DROHIS.. EVEN FRIENDS AND RELATIVES MUST BE PROFILED.. DO NOT LET SHAHEEN BAHG BECOME ANOTHER HONG KONG TYPE PROTEST ..

    CANCEL VIAS OF ALL FOREINERS WHO SUPPORT THESE ANTI-CAA PROTESTS.

    TRAITOR BABUS IN MINISTRIES MUST LOSE THEIR PENSIONS..WE KNOW WHO THEY ARE ..THEY HAVE BEEN CARELESS.

    WE ASK AJIT DOVAL-- FORM A SEPARATE INTELLIGENCE WING FOR DESH DROHIS IN FOREIGN PAYROLL. WHY HAVE YOU BEEN SO LENIENT WITH FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs IN INDIA?..

    WE ASK MODI/ AMIT SHAH -- GIVE STRICT INSTRUCTIONS..INFLICT SVERE PAIN ON TRAITORS..

    WE NEED TO FORM MILITARY COURTS-- TO HANG A FEW JUDAS JUDGES / MEDIA PERSONS / NAC MEMBERS ..

    WE ASK LAW MINISTER/ ATTORNEY GENERAL-- REVISE THE CONSTITUTION..

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/we-people-are-done-with-illegal.html

    I ASK MY READERS TO SPREAD THIS COMMENT BY WHATS APP.

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..
  1. https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-we-find-much-Hjras-in-Kerala-like-in-other-states

    AT SCHOOL MY FRIENDS TOLD ME ABOUT HIJRAS .. THEY TERMED THAM RAAMAN KALYAANIS..

    I NEVER SAW THEM TILL I LEFT FOR MUMBAI TO DO MY CADETSHIP FOR TWO YEARS WITH 250 CADETS..

    I SAW THEM AT ATRFFIC JUNCTION WHILE ON SHORELEAVE

    THEN I CAME BACK ON BOARD AND ASKED MY FRIENDS-- THEY TOLD ME ALL SORTS OF STORIES..THAT IF A CHILD IS BORN IN NORTH INDIA, HIJRAS WOULD COME TO CHECK THE GENITALS, AND IF THE CHILD WAS A HIJRA THEY WOULD FORCIBLY TAKE AWAY THE BABY..

    AND THE BABY IS NORMAL, THEY WOULD DEMAND MONEY FOR A WASTED TRIP AND IF NOT SATISFIED-THEY WOULD LIFT THEIR SAREE AND SHOW THE PRIVATE PARTS..

    I ASKED ONE FRIEND-- WHAT DID YOU SEE

    HE SAID-- I JUST SAW A HOLE ..

    MANY RADERS HAVE ASKED ME ABOUT KING EDWARDS WIFE WHO WAS A HERMAPHRODITE.. THEY ARE CONFUSED, HOW HIS WIFE COULD FUCK THE HUSBAND..

    HERMAPHRODITES HAVE A LARGE DONG--

    THEY HAVE TWO HOLES UNDERNEATH THE PRICK --ONE A VAGINA ( PLAY PEN --NOT NURSERY ) AND OTHER THE ASSHOLE..

    THE PRICK IS ACTUALLY AN ENLARGED CLITORIS.. THE IRREVERENCE IS WHEN THEY ORGASM, THEY EJECT SEMEN..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/11/great-romance-and-curse-of-kohinoor.html

    THE PICTURE BELOW MUST BE TAKEN AS SCIENCE NOT PORN..

    THE ORIGINAL CONFESSIONS IN CHURCH WERE TO CREATE A SEXUAL DATABASE OF HERMAPHRODITES FOR UNMARRIED HOMOSEXUAL CATHOLIC VATICAN PRIESTS ( CANON 21 ) ..

    THE HERMAPHRODITE WOMAN (UTRIUSQUE SEXUS, WITH A DONG ) HUMPS THE MAN, AND INJECTS SEMEN INTO HIS ASSHOLE.. GOD DOES NOT ALLOW THIS, REVERSAL OF ROLES FOR LUST ..

    CATHOLIC CLERGY IS NOT ALLOWED BY THE POPE TO MARRY. HOMOSEXUAL MEN FOUND FRUITFUL REFUGE REFUGE IN CATHOLIC CHURCHES AS CLERGY..


    CANON 21, "Omnis utriusque sexus", commands every HERMAPHRODITE Christian who has reached the years of discretion to confess all ITS sins at least once a year to ITS priest. This was more of a political ploy..

    UTRIUSQUE SEXUS MEANS HERMAPHRODITE.. A PERSON WITH PENIS ( WITHOUT BALLS ) AND VAGINA ..

    THESE UNFORTUNATE PEOPLE WERE THEN BLACKMAILED FOR SEX BY CATHOLIC ELITES WHO ENGAGED IN SUCH DEVIANT PLEASURES ..

    CONFESSIONS WERE 100% SEXUAL IN NATURE AND WEALTHY GAY CLIENTSS USED TO WAIT OUTSIDE THE CHURCH..

    THE SEXUAL ORIENTATION OF THIS HERMAPHRODITE WAS WHAT WAS CONFESSED AS SOMETIME IT COULD SATISFY AN ANAL SEX HUMPING GAY-- OR EVEN A PERVERTED STRAIGHT AS IT HAD A VAGINA.. .

    LATER THIS CONFESSION WAS EXTENDED TO BOTH MALE AND FEMALE GENDERS.. WHY SHOULD A WOMAN CONFESS TO A STRANGER MALE PRIEST ?

    JESUS WAS FIRST DEPICTED ON A CROSS ONLY 1148 YEARS AGO.. JESUS CHRIST WAS COOKED UP AT THE FIRST COUNCIL OF NICEA BY ROMAN EMPEROR CONSTANTIN THE GREAT IN 325 AD..

    EVEN THE ITALIAN TOURIST GUIDES IN ROME KNOW THIS..

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

BELOW: THIS BLOGSITE EMPATHIZES WITH THESE UNFORTUNATE HERMAPHRODITES --   BUT NEVER WITH A HOMOSEXUAL - AS 99% OF THEM ARE DANGEROUS PEDOPHILES..



BELOW:   HERMAPHRODITES WERE IN GREAT DEMAND BY ANAL SEX RECEIVING CATHOLIC CLERGY.. AND BY HUMPING GAYS TOO..  

AS YOU CAN SEE, BALLS ARE MISSING.. STILL THEY PRODUCE SEMEN..

I HAD ONE OF MY FRIENDS ( A EUROPEAN ) SCREWING A HERMAPHRODITE IN MOROCCO. HE THOUGHT "IT" WAS A FEMALE, WITH ONE LEG AMPUTATED..  AT THE THIGHBONE.. 

WHEN SHE UNDRESSED HE FOUND OUT THE TRUTH.. 

THIS WOMAN WAS NOT A WHORE.. DURING SEX SHE WAS MOANING WITH PLEASURE AND HER STUMP LEG WAS FLAPPING FURIOUSLY LIKE A DOGs TAIL..

HE SHOWED ME HER PHOTO.. SHE WAS RICH AND HAD SEX ONLY WITH STRAIGHT MEN NOT FOR MONEY BUT FOR BIOLOGICAL NEED .. SHE LOST HER LEG IN AN ACCIDENT..


BELOW: ANAL SEX RECEIVING KING JEW EDWARD VIII WAS ASKED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD TO ABDICATE..  HE NEEDED A KING WHO WOULD FOLLOW ORDERS.. 

JEWESS WALLIS SIMPSON HUMPED HER HUSBAND, BOTH LOVED EACH OTHER 





BELOW:  IF CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WERE TO MONETIZE HIS BLOGSITE AND SELL HIMSELF , EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT KALKI BHAGWAN, SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR , SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV, BABA RAMDEV  ETC  ( WHO KNOW NOTHING ABOUT SANATANA DHARMA) WOULD BE LEFT FAR BEHIND COLLECTIVELY

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Bhagavan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravi_Shankar_(spiritual_leader)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaggi_Vasudev

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramdev





  1. JEW ROTHSCHILD NEEDED ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF LEATHER FOR WW1 AND WW2 WHICH HE TRIGGERED TO CARVE OUT THE STATE OF ISRAEL..

    INDIA PRODUCED LEATHER FOR ALL ALLIED ARMIES WORLD WIDE..

    JEW ROTHSCHILD BUILT MOSQUES AND MADRASSAS AT EVERY TANNERY.. JEW ROTHSCHILD EMPLOYED CRYPTO JEW CHRISTIAN MISSIONARIES TO CONVERT HINDU DALITS INTO MUSLIMS..

    FIRST HE CREATED HUNDREDS OF FAKE HINDU MUTTS TO HARASS THE POOR HINDUS.

    WHEN THE WHITE INVADER CAME TO INDIA THERE WERE ONLY 4 ORIGINAL MUTTS, WHOSE PONTIFFS WERE VEDA ORAL ROUTE KNOWING KERALA NAMBOODIRIS .

    BY THE TIME HE LEFT INDIA THERE WOULD BE MORE THAN 1000 HINDU MUTTS, LED BY PONTIFFS WHO WERE MOSTLY ANAL SEX RECEIVING HOMOSEXUALS , CLAIMING TO BE BRAHMACHARIS..

    JEW ROTHSCHILD NEEDED LEATHER- - HORSE SADDLES, BRIDLES, BOOTS, HOLSTERS ETC… 70% OF INDIAs HUMPED COWS WERE DECIMATED ..

    HE BUILT HUNDREDS OF TANNERIES WHERE RIVERS MEET THE SEA , TO AVOID POLLUTION -- AT THREE PLACES WEST PAKISTAN/ BANGLADESH AND KANPUR….

    WHY KANPUR ?.. BECAUSE IT HOUSED THE WORLDs LARGEST LARGEST MILITARY CANTONMENT…

    GERMAN JEW ROTHCHILD CREATED SHABBY WEE SUNNI MOSQUES ATTACHED TO EVERY TANNERY.. ..

    HE FITTED THESE MOSQUES WITH LOUD SPEAKERS IMPORTED FROM GERMANY TO WAKE UP THE WORKERS BEFORE DAWN , RATHER THAN TO PRAY TO AZAN CALL. ..

    HE ALSO BUILT MADRASSAS WITH FREE FOOD ….. CRYPTO JEW MULLAHS CONVERTED DALITS TO MUSLIMS ENMASSE ..WHO WOULD MAN THESE TANNERIES ….

    WHY DID PAKISTAN AND BANDLADESH HAVE MUSLIM MAJORITY BEFORE INDEPENDENCE IN 1947?.... ONLY BECAUSE JEW ROTHSCHILD CREATED TANNERIES AT THE SEA END OF RIVERS INDUS/ GANGES TO AVOID POLLUTION.. .

    GANGES SUPPLIED WATER FOR HIS SHIPS .. AS THE WATER DID NOT GET SPOILT..

    GANDHI RECRUITED 13 LAKH ( 1.3 MILLION ) INDIAN SOLDIERS IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR ..– OUT OF WHICH 111000 ( 1.11 LAKH ) INDIAN SOLDIERS WERE KILLED ….

    GANDHI RECRUITED 25 LAKH ( 2.5 MILLION ) INDIAN SOLDIERS IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR... OUT OF THIS 243000 ( 2.43 LAKH) SOLDIERS WERE KILLED……

    MAJORITY OF INDIA IS WOKEN UP AT 0445 HRS IN THE MORNING BY EAR SHATTERING AZAN CALLS FROM MOSQUES WHICH AFFECT OUR REM SLEEP.

    THE FIRST AZAN MUST NOT BE EARLIER THAN CIVIL TWILIGHT START TIME ( CENTRE OF SUN MUST BE LESS THAN SIX DEGREES BELOW HORIZON ) ... IN INDIA WE HEAR MORNING FAJR AZAN 75 MINUTES BEFORE SUNRISE.. THIS IS NOT ALLOWED AS PER KORAN. ...

    THE FIRST AZAN CANNOT BE MORE THAN 48 MINUTES BEFORE SUNRISE...

    MORE THAN 81% OF THE PEOPLE OF INDIA AND WOKEN UP IN THE MORNING BY BLARING AZAN CALLS BY LOUDSPEAKER FITTED ON MOSQUES AT AN UNEARTHY HOUR OF 0430 IST.. WHY IS THIS ALLOWED?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBASeEiAxDo

    WHEN CHILDREN ARE DEPRIVES OF REM SLEEP, THEY FORGET WHAT THEY STUDIED THE PREVIOUS WEEK..

    ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY IS IN CONTEMPT OF "WE THE PEOPLE" AND THE CONSTITUTION..

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/we-people-are-done-with-illegal.html

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..


https://www.sacnilk.com/quicknews/Chhapaak_2020_Day_12_Box_Office_Collection?hl=en

I ASK MY READERS

BOYCOTT CHHAPAAK..

KALANK TO INDIAN WOMENHOOD DEEPIKA PADUKONE WAS SITTING IN THE FRONT ROW OF AIB ROAST AND GUFFAWING ( LIKE A DONKEY WHO HAS SEEN FRESH SHIT ) AT EVERY FILTHY ANAL SEX JOKE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ADoZ0CnV34

THE AUDIENCE IS PACKED WITH NOUVEAU RICHE--

CLASSLESS / CULTURELESS SCUM, BORN IN CHAWLS AND WHOSE MOTHERS WERE SLUTS..



BELOW: KANNUR MALAYALAM IS SPECIAL..  ONCE MY WIFE AND I WENT TO A LAMP SHOP . SHE WANTED TO DONATE A LAMP TO THE NEAREST TEMPLE..  SHE CHOSE THE BIGGEST LAMP.. 

THE SHOPKEEPER SAID " I HAVE BIGGER LAMPS"

MY WIFE ASKED  "EADTHOOO"

THE SHOPKEEPR REMARKS  " NINGAL KANNUR AANE ELLAY?"






BELOW:   WE WERE CADETS TOGETHER IN 1973.. ON A SHIP WHICH HAD 250 CADETS

LEFT TO RIGHT-- SRINIVASAN, VADAKAYIL, MASCERENHAS , PANDE ..

PLAYING BACK THE OLD NOSTALGIA LADEN  SONG OF "REMEMBER WHEN "..




http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/01/nostalgia-capt-ajit-vadakayil.html





BELOW: AT 0.54, WE ALL WERE NAKED.. WE ALL KNOW THE SIZE OF EACH OTHERs  PRICKS.




SOMETIMES WHEN WE BERTHED AT FERRY WHARF ( BHAUCHA DHAKKA ) , CHUTNEY MARYs FROM MUMBAI USED TO THRONG AT THE WHARF--

 --HOPING THAT THE TIDE LEVEL BRINGS THE HEADS ( SHOWER HALL ) PORTHOLE TO EYE LEVEL SO THAT THEY CAN HAVE A GANDER AT 250 PRICKS OF VIRILE BOYS BETWEEN AGES OF 16 TO 18.   

 I AM SURE THEIR TWATS WOULD HAVE DRIPPED DOWN THEIR THIGHS..

AS SOON AS THE 45 MINUTE BATH TIME WAS OVER , THEY WOULD BE AN MASS EXODUS OF THESE FEMALES FROM THE WHARF RUSHING HOME TO DO A SWARA TRRR BHASKAR ..












THIS POST IS NOW CONTINUED TO PART 9, BELOW--

https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_27.html


CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..

1 comment:

  1. COMMENTS IN THIS POST WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED

    MAKE COMMENTS IN THE POST BELOW--

    https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2020/01/communism-failed-because-jew-karl-marx_12.html

    ReplyDelete