THEODORE KACZYNSKI IS A JEW..
ONE OF MY POLISH SECOND ENGINEERs WITH SAME NAME TOLD ME THAT HE IS A JEW..
99% SERIAL KILLERS ARE WHITE JEWS
VADAKAYIL WILL BE THE JUDGE IF TED IS A CUNT OR A GENIUS
AND I DARE ANY CUNT PROFESSOR WHO TEACHES "SOCIAL SCIENCES" IN ELITE COLLEGES TO EVALUATE THIS PIECE OF WORK SUBJECTIVELY..
THEY MUST KNOW THAT TEDs IQ IS 168- AND HE WROTE IT IN AN ERA WHEN COMPUTERS HAD JUST COME IN
BELOW:: FREDDY MERCURY, THE KING !
-
SOMEBODY CALLED ME UP AND CRIED--
CAPTAIN, HOW DID ROTHSCHILD BRAINWASH GANDHI?
WELL-
GANDHI WAS BRAINWASHED WHEN HE WAS AT TOLSTOY FARM BY GERMAN JEW AND HUMPING GAY HERMANN KALLENCBACK..
BOTH SHARED THE SAME ROOM AND BED, AFTER GANDHI KICKED OUT WIFE KASTURBA , QUOTING "BRAHMACHARYA"..
THE METHOD CHOSEN WAS "HIJACKING THE MOOLADHARA CHAKRA"..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2017/01/mahatma-gandhi-and-his-endless.html
MY REVELATION NOW JUMPS TO 60.13 %
YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW MUCH EVIL THERE IS ON THIS PLANET..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kaczynski
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhunt:_Unabomber
TED KACZYNSKI WAS A GENIUS..
AT HARVARD HIS PROFESSOR MURRAY WHOM HE TRUSTED, IMMORALLY LENT HIM TO MK ULTRA BRAINWASH BY FBI..
THIS FLIPPED HIS MIND AND BE BECAME A SERIAL KILLER ..MK STANDS FOR THE INITIALS OF GANDHI AND KING..
BOTH WERE BRAINWASHED IN AS MUCH AS THEY WERE ABLE TO CONVINCE MILLIONS OF BROWN/ BLACK PEOPLE-- THAT IT IS OK TO BE NON-VIOLENT WHEN THE WHITE MAN SHITS ON YOUR FACE , RAPES YOUR DAUGHTERS, AND STEALS YOUR MONEY..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/07/martin-luther-king-jr-had-125-white.html
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-diabolical-brain-washing-process-of.html
EVER HEARD OF TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE?
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2015/09/tavistock-institute-creating-herd.html
TED WAS A NICE , INTELLIGENT, LEVEL HEADED, LOVING AND COMPASSIONATE YOUNG MAN. SEE HIS PHOTO..
HIS STORY IS FUDGED TO PROTECT THE REPUTATION OF ROTHSCHILDs IVY LEAGUE UNIVERSITY HARVARD.
https://www.history.com/news/what-happened-to-the-unabomber-at-harvard
TED IS IN JAIL --HE WILL BE THERE TILL HE DIES..
THIS RAISES THE QUESTION-- WHO FLIPPED HIS SENSITIVE GENIUS MIND ?
TED WAS A REAL GENIUS--WITH AN IQ OF MORE THAN 168.
INSTEAD WE WORSHIP A MEDIOCRE GERMAN JEW NAMED ALBERT EINSTEIN, AN AGENT OF JEW ROTHSCHILD..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/11/albert-einstein-was-thief-plagiarist.html
TODAY KOSHER EVIL PHARMA KILLS MORE PEOPLE THAN ANYBODY ELSE..
EVEN PUTIN DOES NOT KNOW THAT LEO TOLSTOY WAS A GERMAN JEW, A BRAINWASHING EXERT.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/german-jew-leo-tolstoy-who-fanned-dying.htm
WE LIVE IN A WORLD FULL OF LIES. ONLY THIS BLOGSITE ATTEMPTS TO EXHUME LONG BURIED TRUTHS.capt ajit vadakayil
..
ONCE IN JAPAN ME AND MY
WIFE WANTED TO CROSS A DESERTED STREET.
WE COULD SEE ONE KM ON EITHER SIDE.. THERE WAS NO TRAFFIC.
SO WE DECIDED TO CROSS
THE ROAD, FLOUTING THE STREET LIGHT SIGNAL FOR WALKERS.
AN OLD JAP GENTLEMAN WAS
WITH US..
WHEN I AND MY WIFE CROSSES THE ROAD, THE JAP GENTLEMAN TOO CROSSED WITH US..
SUDDENLY THE OLD JAP
REALISED THAT THE GREEN SIGNAL WAS NOT ON, AS THERE ARE SOUND SIGNALS FOR THE
BLIND..
HE RAN BACK ACROSS THE
ROAD TO THE OTHER SIDE , GESTICULATING FURIOUSLY , THAT ME AND MY WIFE THAT WE
TOO SHOULD FOLLOW HIS “ GOOD CITIZEN” EXAMPLE.
THIS SAYS IT ALL,.
NOTE: THIS BLOGSITE DOES NOT CONDONE MURDER.
IF THERE WAS AN INTERNET AND TED COULD BLOG, HE WOULD NOT BE IN JAIL .
IN 64 YEARS OF MY LIFE I HAVE SEEN "HUMAN PROGRESS"..
FOR 40 YEARS I HAVE SEEN THIS PLANET
IN CALICUT, MY HOME IS IN THE LAP OF NATURE, I CAN WALK NAKED IN MY YARD.
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SELF IMPOSED SOLITUDE AND LONELINESS GIFTED BY OTHERS.
I KNOW WHAT IT IS TO LIVE IN A CONCRETE GHETTO-- AND KEEPING UP WITH THE JONESES USING FACEBOOK.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/02/jealousy-growing-ulcer-within-capt-ajit.html
WHEN TECHNOLOGY KILLS
NOBODY CARES..
WHEN AI POWERED DRONES KILL
NOBODY EVEN KNOWS
Industrial Society and
Its Future Theodore Kaczynski 1995
INTRODUCTION 1. The
Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human
race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live
in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life
unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to
widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as
well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued
development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject
human being to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural
world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological
suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced”
countries. 2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break
down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and
psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful
period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings
and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the
social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be
inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to
prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy. 3. If the system
breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the
system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it
is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later. 4. We
therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution
may or may not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively
gradual process spanning a few decades. We can’t predict any of that. But we do
outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial
system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that
form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be
to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the
present society. 5. In this article we give attention to only some of the
negative developments that have grown out of the industrial-technological
system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or ignore altogether.
This does not mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For
practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received
insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For
example, since there are well-developed environmental and wilderness movements,
we have written very little about environmental degradation or the destruction
of wild nature, even though we consider these to be highly important. THE
PSYCHOLOGY OF MODERN LEFTISM 6. Almost everyone will agree that we live in a
deeply troubled society. One of the most widespread manifestations of the
craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism
can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern
society in general. 7. But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th
century leftism could have been practically identified with socialism. Today
the movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a
leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly
socialists, collectivists, “politically correct” types, feminists, gay and
disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. But not everyone
who is associated with one of these movements is a leftist. What we are trying
to get at in discussing leftism is not so much movement or an ideology as a
psychological type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean
by “leftism” will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion of
leftist psychology. (Also, see paragraphs 227-230.) 8. Even so, our conception
of leftism will remain a good deal less clear than we would wish, but there
doesn’t seem to be any remedy for this. All we are trying to do here is
indicate in a rough and approximate way the two psychological tendencies that
we believe are the main driving force of modern leftism. We by no means claim
to be telling the WHOLE truth about leftist psychology. Also, our discussion is
meant to apply to modern leftism only. We leave open the question of the extent
to which our discussion could be applied to the leftists of the 19th and early
20th centuries. 9. The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern
leftism we call “feelings of inferiority” and “oversocialization”. Feelings of
inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while
oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern
leftism; but this segment is highly influential. FEELINGS OF INFERIORITY 10. By
“feelings of inferiority” we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strict
sense but a whole spectrum of related traits; low self-esteem, feelings of
powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self-hatred, 1 etc. We
argue that modern leftists tend to have some such feelings (possibly more or
less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the
direction of modern leftism. 11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost
anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we
conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is
pronounced among minority rights activists, whether or not they belong to the
minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the
words used to designate minorities and about anything that is said concerning
minorities. The terms “negro”, “oriental”, “handicapped” or “chick” for an
African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory
connotation. “Broad” and “chick” were merely the feminine equivalents of “guy”,
“dude” or “fellow”. The negative connotations have been attached to these terms
by the activists themselves. Some animal rights activists have gone so far as
to reject the word “pet” and insist on its replacement by “animal companion”.
Leftish anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about
primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want
to replace the word “primitive” by “nonliterate”. They seem almost paranoid
about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our
own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We
merely point out the hyper sensitivity of leftish anthropologists.) 12. Those
who are most sensitive about “politically incorrect” terminology are not the
average black ghettodweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person,
but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any “oppressed”
group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its
stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with
comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual white males
from middle- to upper-middle-class families. 13. Many leftists have an intense
identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak
(women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise
inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They
would never admit to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely
because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their
problems. (We do not mean to suggest that women, Indians, etc. ARE inferior; we
are only making a point about leftist psychology.) 14. Feminists are
desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men.
Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as
capable as men. 15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being
strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization,
they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give
for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives.
They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric
and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in
primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he
GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and
often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western
civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real
motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because
they are strong and successful. 16. Words like “self-confidence”,
“self-reliance”, “initiative”, “enterprise”, “optimism”, etc., play little role
in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is antiindividualistic,
pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve every one’s problems for them,
satisfy everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of
person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own
problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagohistic to the concept
of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser. 17. Art forms that
appeal to modern leftish intellectuals tend to focus on sordidness, defeat and
despair, or else they take an orgiastic tone, throwing off rational control as
if there were no hope of accomplishing anything through rational calculation
and all that was left was to immerse oneself in the sensations of the moment.
18. Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective
reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative. It is true that
one can ask serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and
about how, if at all, the concept of objective reality can be defined. But it
is obvious that modern leftish philosophers are not simply cool-headed
logicians systematically analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are
deeply involved emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack
these concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their
attack is an outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it
satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates science and
rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful,
superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed, inferior). The leftist’s feelings
of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some
things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This
also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness
and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic
explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to
make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to
give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it.
Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he
has not been brought up properly. 19. The leftist is not typically the kind of
person whose feelings of inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully,
a self-promoter, a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost
faith in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but he
can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong, and his
efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant behavior. [1] But the
leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings of inferiority are so ingrained
that he 2 cannot conceive of himself as individually strong and valuable. Hence
the collectivism of the leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large
organization or a mass movement with which he identifies himself. 20. Notice
the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists protest by lying down in
front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke police or racists to abuse them,
etc. These tactics may often be effective, but many leftists use them not as a
means to an end but because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a
leftist trait. 21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion
or by moral principles, and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of
the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main
motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist
behavior; so is the drive for power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not
rationally calculated to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to
be trying to help. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good
for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or
dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a diplomatic and
conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal and symbolic concessions
to white people who think that affirmative action discriminates against them.
But leftist activists do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy
their emotional needs. Helping black people is not their real goal. Instead,
race problems serve as an excuse for them to express their own hostility and
frustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm black people, because
the activists’ hostile attitude toward the white majority tends to intensify
race hatred. 22. If our society had no social problems at all, the leftists
would have to INVENT problems in order to provide themselves with an excuse for
making a fuss. 23. We emphasize that the foregoing does not pretend to be an
accurate description of everyone who might be considered a leftist. It is only
a rough indication of a general tendency of leftism. OVERSOCIALIZATION 24.
Psychologists use the term “socialization” to designate the process by which
children are trained to think and act as society demands. A person is said to
be well socialized if he believes in and obeys the moral code of his society
and fits in well as a functioning part of that society. It may seem senseless
to say that many leftists are over-socialized, since the leftist is perceived
as a rebel. Nevertheless, the position can be defended. Many leftists are not such
rebels as they seem. 25. The moral code of our society is so demanding that no
one can think, feel and act in a completely moral way. For example, we are not
supposed to hate anyone, yet almost everyone hates somebody at some time or
other, whether he admits it to himself or not. Some people are so highly
socialized that the attempt to think, feel and act morally imposes a severe
burden on them. In order to avoid feelings of guilt, they continually have to
deceive themselves about their own motives and find moral explanations for
feelings and actions that in reality have a nonmoral origin. We use the term
“oversocialized” to describe such people. [2] 26. Oversocialization can lead to
low self-esteem, a sense of powerlessness, defeatism, guilt, etc. One of the
most important means by which our society socializes children is by making them
feel ashamed of behavior or speech that is contrary to society’s expectations.
If this is overdone, or if a particular child is especially susceptible to such
feelings, he ends by feeling ashamed of HIMSELF. Moreover the thought and the
behavior of the oversocialized person are more restricted by society’s
expectations than are those of the lightly socialized person. The majority of
people engage in a significant amount of naughty behavior. They lie, they
commit petty thefts, they break traffic laws, they goof off at work, they hate
someone, they say spiteful things or they use some underhanded trick to get
ahead of the other guy. The oversocialized person cannot do these things, or if
he does do them he generates in himself a sense of shame and self-hatred. The
oversocialized person cannot even experience, without guilt, thoughts or
feelings that are contrary to the accepted morality; he cannot think “unclean”
thoughts. And socialization is not just a matter of morality; we are socialized
to conform to many norms of behavior that do not fall under the heading of
morality. Thus the oversocialized person is kept on a psychological leash and
spends his life running on rails that society has laid down for him. In many
oversocialized people this results in a sense of constraint and powerlessness
that can be a severe hardship. We suggest that oversocialization is among the
more serious cruelties that human being inflict on one another. 27. We argue
that a very important and influential segment of the modern left is
oversocialized and that their oversocialization is of great importance in
determining the direction of modern leftism. Leftists of the oversocialized
type tend to be intellectuals or members of the upper-middle class. Notice that
university intellectuals [3] constitute the most highly socialized segment of
our society and also the most leftwing segment. 28. The leftist of the
oversocialized type tries to get off his psychological leash and assert his
autonomy by rebelling. But usually he is not strong enough to rebel against the
most basic values of society. Generally speaking, the goals of today’s leftists
are NOT in conflict with the accepted morality. On the contrary, the left takes
an accepted moral principle, adopts it as its own, and then accuses mainstream
society of violating that principle. Examples: racial equality, equality of the
sexes, helping poor people, peace as opposed to war, nonviolence generally,
freedom of expression, kindness to animals. More fundamentally, the duty of the
individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the
individual. All these have been deeply rooted values of our society (or at
least of its middle and upper classes [4] for a long time. These values are
explicitly or implicitly expressed or presupposed in most of the material
presented to us by the mainstream communications media and the educational
system. Lef3 tists, especially those of the oversocialized type, usually do not
rebel against these principles but justify their hostility to society by
claiming (with some degree of truth) that society is not living up to these
principles. 29. Here is an illustration of the way in which the oversocialized
leftist shows his real attachment to the conventional attitudes of our society
while pretending to be in rebellion aginst it. Many leftists push for
affirmative action, for moving black people into high-prestige jobs, for
improved education in black schools and more money for such schools; the way of
life of the black “underclass” they regard as a social disgrace. They want to
integrate the black man into the system, make him a business executive, a
lawyer, a scientist just like upper-middle-class white people. The leftists
will reply that the last thing they want is to make the black man into a copy
of the white man; instead, they want to preserve African American culture. But
in what does this preservation of African American culture consist? It can
hardly consist in anything more than eating black-style food, listening to
black-style music, wearing black-style clothing and going to a black-style
church or mosque. In other words, it can express itself only in superficial
matters. In all ESSENTIAL respects most leftists of the oversocialized type
want to make the black man conform to white, middle-class ideals. They want to
make him study technical subjects, become an executive or a scientist, spend
his life climbing the status ladder to prove that black people are as good as
white. They want to make black fathers “responsible,” they want black gangs to
become nonviolent, etc. But these are exactly the values of the industrial-
technological system. The system couldn’t care less what kind of music a man
listens to, what kind of clothes he wears or what religion he believes in as
long as he studies in school, holds a respectable job, climbs the status
ladder, is a “responsible” parent, is nonviolent and so forth. In effect,
however much he may deny it, the oversocialized leftist wants to integrate the
black man into the system and make him adopt its values. 30. We certainly do
not claim that leftists, even of the oversocialized type, NEVER rebel against
the fundamental values of our society. Clearly they sometimes do. Some oversocialized
leftists have gone so far as to rebel against one of modern society’s most
important principles by engaging in physical violence. By their own account,
violence is for them a form of “liberation.” In other words, by committing
violence they break through the psychological restraints that have been trained
into them. Because they are oversocialized these restraints have been more
confining for them than for others; hence their need to break free of them. But
they usually justify their rebellion in terms of mainstream values. If they
engage in violence they claim to be fighting against racism or the like. 31. We
realize that many objections could be raised to the foregoing thumbnail sketch
of leftist psychology. The real situation is complex, and anything like a
complete description of it would take several volumes even if the necessary
data were available. We claim only to have indicated very roughly the two most
important tendencies in the psychology of modern leftism. 32. The problems of
the leftist are indicative of the problems of our society as a whole. Low
self-esteem, depressive tendencies and defeatism are not restricted to the
left. Though they are especially noticeable in the left, they are widespread in
our society. And today’s society tries to socialize us to a greater extent than
any previous society. We are even told by experts how to eat, how to exercise,
how to make love, how to raise our kids and so forth. THE POWER PROCESS 33.
Human beings have a need (probably based in biology) for something that we will
call the power process. This is closely related to the need for power (which is
widely recognized) but is not quite the same thing. The power process has four
elements. The three most clearcut of these we call goal, effort and attainment
of goal. (Everyone needs to have goals whose attainment requires effort, and
needs to succeed in attaining at least some of his goals.) The fourth element
is more difficult to define and may not be necessary for everyone. We call it
autonomy and will discuss it later (paragraphs 42-44). 34. Consider the
hypothetical case of a man who can have anything he wants just by wishing for
it. Such a man has power, but he will develop serious psychological problems.
At first he will have a lot of fun, but by and by he will become acutely bored
and demoralized. Eventually he may become clinically depressed. History shows
that leisured aristocracies tend to become decadent. This is not true of
fighting aristocracies that have to struggle to maintain their power. But leisured,
secure aristocracies that have no need to exert themselves usually become
bored, hedonistic and demoralized, even though they have power. This shows that
power is not enough. One must have goals toward which to exercise one’s power.
35. Everyone has goals; if nothing else, to obtain the physical necessities of
life: food, water and whatever clothing and shelter are made necessary by the
climate. But the leisured aristocrat obtains these things without effort. Hence
his boredom and demoralization. 36. Nonattainment of important goals results in
death if the goals are physical necessities, and in frustration if
non-attainment of the goals is compatible with survival. Consistent failure to
attain goals throughout life results in defeatism, low self-esteem or
depression. 37. Thus, in order to avoid serious psychological problems, a human
being needs goals whose attainment requires effort, and he must have a
reasonable rate of success in attaining his goals. SURROGATE ACTIVITIES 38. But
not every leisured aristocrat becomes bored and demoralized. For example, the
emperor Hirohito, instead of sinking into decadent hedonism, devoted himself to
marine biology, a field in which he became distinguished. When people do not
have to exert themselves to satisfy 4 their physical needs they often set up
artificial goals for themselves. In many cases they then pursue these goals
with the same energy and emotional involvement that they otherwise would have
put into the search for physical necessities. Thus the aristocrats of the Roman
Empire had their literary pretensions; many European aristocrats a few
centuries ago invested tremendous time and energy in hunting, though they
certainly didn’t need the meat; other aristocracies have competed for status
through elaborate displays of wealth; and a few aristocrats, like Hirohito,
have turned to science. 39. We use the term “surrogate activity” to designate
an activity that is directed toward an artificial goal that people set up for
themselves merely in order to have some goal to work toward, or let us say,
merely for the qake of the “fulfillment” that they get from pursuing the goal.
Here is a rule of thumb for the identification of surrogate activities. Given a
person who devotes much time and energy to the pursuit of goal X, ask yourself
this: If he had to devote most of his time and energy to satisfying his
biological needs, and if that effort required him to use his physical and
mental faculties in a varied and interesting way, would he feel seriously
deprived because he did not attain goal X? If the answer is no, then the
person’s pursuit of goal X is a surrogate activity. Hirohito’s studies in
marine biology clearly constituted a surrogate activity, since it is pretty
certain that if Hirohito had had to spend his time working at interesting
non-scientific tasks in order to obtain the necessities of life, he would not
have felt deprived because he didn’t know all about the anatomy and life-cycles
of marine animals. On the other hand the pursuit of sex and love (for example)
is not a surrogate activity, because most people, even if their existence were
otherwise satisfactory, would feel deprived if they passed their lives without
ever having a relationship with a member of the opposite sex. (But pursuit of
an excessive amount of sex, more than one really needs, can be a surrogate
activity.) 40. In modern industrial society only minimal effort is necessary to
satisfy one’s physical needs. It is enough to go through a training program to
acquire some petty technical skill, then come to work on time and exert the
very modest effort needed to hold a job. The only requirements are a moderate
amount of intelligence and, most of all, simple OBEDIENCE. If one has those,
society takes care of one from cradle to grave. (Yes, there is an underclass
that cannot take the physical necessities for granted, but we are speaking here
of mainstream society.) Thus it is not surprising that modern society is full
of surrogate activities. These include scientific work, athletic achievement,
humanitarian work, artistic and literary creation, climbing the corporate
ladder, acquisition of money and material goods far beyond the point at which
they cease to give any additional physical satisfaction, and social activism
when it addresses issues that are not important for the activist personally, as
in the case of white activists who work for the rights of nonwhite minorities.
These are not always PURE surrogate activities, since for many people they may
be motivated in part by needs other than the need to have some goal to pursue.
Scientific work may be motivated in part by a drive for prestige, artistic
creation by a need to express feelings, militant social activism by hostility.
But for most people who pursue them, these activities are in large part surrogate
activities. For example, the majority of scientists will probably agree that
the “fulfillment” they get from their work is more important than the money and
prestige they earn. 41. For many if not most people, surrogate activities are
less satisfying than the pursuit of real goals (that is, goals that people
would want to attain even if their need for the power process were already
fulfilled). One indication of this is the fact that, in many or most cases,
people who are deeply involved in surrogate activities are never satisfied,
never at rest. Thus the money-maker constantly strives for more and more
wealth. The scientist no sooner solves one problem than he moves on to the
next. The long-distance runner drives himself to run always farther and faster.
Many people who pursue surrogate activities will say that they get far more
fulfillment from these activities than they do from the “mundane” business of
satisfying their biological needs, but that is because in our society the
effort needed to satisfy the biological needs has been reduced to triviality.
More importantly, in our society people do not satisfy their biological needs
AUTONOMOUSLY but by functioning as parts of an immense social machine. In
contrast, people generally have a great deal of autonomy in pursuing their
surrogate activities. AUTONOMY 42. Autonomy as a part of the power process may
not be necessary for every individual. But most people need a greater or lesser
degree of autonomy in working toward their goals. Their efforts must be undertaken
on their own initiative and must be under their own direction and control. Yet
most people do not have to exert this initiative, direction and control as
single individuals. It is usually enough to act as a member of a SMALL group.
Thus if half a dozen people discuss a goal among themselves and make a
successful joint effort to attain that goal, their need for the power process
will be served. But if they work under rigid orders handed down from above that
leave them no room for autonomous decision and initiative, then their need for
the power process will not be served. The same is true when decisions are made
on a collective basis if the group making the collective decision is so large
that the role of each individual is insignificant. [5] 43. It is true that some
individuals seem to have little need for autonomy. Either their drive for power
is weak or they satisfy it by identifying themselves with some powerful
organization to which they belong. And then there are unthinking, animal types
who seem to be satisfied with a purely physical sense of power (the good combat
soldier, who gets his sense of power by developing fighting skills that he is
quite content to use in blind obedience to his superiors). 5 44. But for most
people it is through the power process — having a goal, making an AUTONOMOUS
effort and attaining the goal — that self-esteem, self-confidence and a sense
of power are acquired. When one does not have adequate opportunity to go
through the power process the consequences are (depending on the individual and
on the way the power process is disrupted) boredom, demoralization, low
self-esteem, inferiority feelings, defeatism, depression, anxiety, guilt,
frustration, hostility, spouse or child abuse, insatiable hedonism, abnormal
sexual behavior, sleep disorders, eating disorders. etc. [6] SOURCES OF SOCIAL
PROBLEMS 45. Any of the foregoing symptoms can occur in any society, but in
modern industrial society they are present on a massive scale. We aren’t the
first to mention that the world today seems to be going crazy. This sort of
thing is not normal for human societies. There is good reason to believe that
primitive man suffered from less stress and frustration and was better
satisfied with his way of life than modern man is. It is true that not all was
sweetness and light in primitive societies. Abuse of women was common among the
Australian aborigines, transexuality was fairly common among some of the
American Indian tribes. But it does appear that GENERALLY SPEAKING the kinds of
problems that we have listed in the preceding paragraph were far less common
among primitive peoples than they are in modern society. 46. We attribute the
social and psychological problems of modern society to the fact that that
society requires people to live under conditions radically different from those
under which the human race evolved and to behave in ways that conflict with the
patterns of behavior that the human race developed while living under the
earlier conditions. It is clear from what we have already written that we
consider lack of opportunity to properly experience the power process as the
most important of the abnormal conditions to which modern society subjects
people. But it is not the only one. Before dealing with disruption of the power
process as a source of social problems we will discuss some of the other
sources. 47. Among the abnormal conditions present in modern industrial society
are excessive density of population, isolation of man from nature, excessive
rapidity of social change and the breakdown of natural small-scale communities
such as the extended family, the village or the tribe. 48. It is well known
that crowding increases stress and aggression. The degree of crowding that
exists today and the isolation of man from nature are consequences of
technological progress. All pre-industrial societies were predominantly rural.
The Industrial Revolution vastly increased the size of cities and the
proportion of the population that lives in them, and modern agricultural
technology has made it possible for the Earth to support a far denser
population than it ever did before. (Also, technology exacerbates the effects
of crowding because it puts increased disruptive powers in people’s hands. For
example, a variety of noise-making devices: power mowers, radios, motorcycles,
etc. If the use of these devices is unrestricted, people who want peace and
quiet are frustrated by the noise. If their use is restricted, people who use
the devices are frustrated by the regulations. But if these machines had never
been invented there would have been no conflict and no frustration generated by
them.) 49. For primitive societies the natural world (which usually changes
only slowly) provided a stable framework and therefore a sense of security. In
the modern world it is human society that dominates nature rather than the
other way around, and modern society changes very rapidly owing to
technological change. Thus there is no stable framework. 50. The conservatives
are fools: They whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they
enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently
it never occurs to them that you can’t make rapid, drastic changes in the
technology and the economy of a society without causing rapid changes in all other
aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break
down traditional values. 51. The breakdown of traditional values to some extent
implies the breakdown of the bonds that hold together traditional small-scale
social groups. The disintegration of small-scale social groups is also promoted
by the fact that modern conditions often require or tempt individuals to move
to new locations, separating themselves from their communities. Beyond that, a
technological society HAS TO weaken family ties and local communities if it is
to function efficiently. In modern society an individual’s loyalty must be
first to the system and only secondarily to a smallscale community, because if
the internal loyalties of small-scale communities were stronger than loyalty to
the system, such communities would pursue their own advantage at the expense of
the system. 52. Suppose that a public official or a corporation executive
appoints his cousin, his friend or his co-religionist to a position rather than
appointing the person best qualified for the job. He has permitted personal
loyalty to supersede his loyalty to the system, and that is “nepotism” or
“discrimination,” both of which are terrible sins in modern society. Would-be
industrial societies that have done a poor job of subordinating personal or
local loyalties to loyalty to the system are usually very inefficient. (Look at
Latin America.) Thus an advanced industrial society can tolerate only those
small-scale communities that are emasculated, tamed and made into tools of the
system. [7] 53. Crowding, rapid change and the breakdown of communities have
been widely recognized as sources of social problems. But we do not believe
tbey are enough to account for the extent of the problems that are seen today. 54.
A few pre-industrial cities were very large and crowded, yet their inhabitants
do not seem to have suffered from psychological problems to the same extent as
modern man. In America today there still are uncrowded rural areas, and we find
there the same problems as in urban areas, though the problems tend to be less
acute in the rural areas. Thus crowding does not seem to be the decisive
factor. 6 55. On the growing edge of the American frontier during the 19th
century, the mobility of the population probably broke down extended families
and small-scale social groups to at least the same extent as these are broken
down today. In fact, many nuclear families lived by choice in such isolation,
having no neighbors within several miles, that they belonged to no community at
all, yet they do not seem to have developed problems as a result. 56.
Furthermore, change in American frontier society was very rapid and deep. A man
might be born and raised in a log cabin, outside the reach of law and order and
fed largely on wild meat; and by the time he arrived at old age he might be
working at a regular job and living in an ordered community with effective law
enforcement. This was a deeper change than that which typically occurs in the
life of a modern individual, yet it does not seem to have led to psychological
problems. In fact, 19th century American society had an optimistic and
self-confident tone, quite unlike that of today’s society. [8] 57. The
difference, we argue, is that modern man has the sense (largely justified) that
change is IMPOSED on him, whereas the 19th century frontiersman had the sense
(also largely justified) that he created change himself, by his own choice.
Thus a pioneer settled on a piece of land of his own choosing and made it into
a farm through his own effort. In those days an entire county might have only a
couple of hundred inhabitants and was a far more isolated and autonomous entity
than a modern county is. Hence the pioneer farmer participated as a member of a
relatively small group in the creation of a new, ordered community. One may
well question whether the creation of this community was an improvement, but at
any rate it satisfied the pioneer’s need for the power process. 58. It would be
possible to give other examples of societies in which there has been rapid
change and/or lack of close community ties without the kind of massive
behavioral aberration that is seen in today’s industrial society. We contend
that the most important cause of social and psychological problems in modern society
is the fact that people have insufficient opportunity to go through the power
process in a normal way. We don’t mean to say that modern society is the only
one in which the power process has been disrupted. Probably most if not all
civilized societies have interfered with the power process to a greater or
lesser extent. But in modern industrial society the problem has become
particularly acute. Leftism, at least in its recent (mid- to late-20th century)
form, is in part a symptom of deprivation with respect to the power process.
DISRUPTION OF THE POWER PROCESS IN MODERN SOCIETY 59. We divide human drives
into three groups: (1) those drives that can be satisfied with minimal effort;
(2) those that can be satisfied but only at the cost of serious effort; (3)
those that cannot be adequately satisfied no matter how much effort one makes.
The power process is the process of satisfying the drives of the second group.
The more drives there are in the third group, the more there is frustration,
anger, eventually defeatism, depression, etc. 60. In modern industrial society
natural human drives tend to be pushed into the first and third groups, and the
second group tends to consist increasingly of artificially created drives. 61.
In primitive societies, physical necessities generally fall into group 2: They
can be obtained, but only at the cost of serious effort. But modern society
tends to guaranty the physical necessities to everyone [9] in exchange for only
minimal effort, hence physical needs are pushed into group 1. (There may be
disagreement about whether the effort needed to hold a job is “minimal”; but
usually, in lower- to middle-level jobs, whatever effort is required is merely
that of OBEDIENCE. You sit or stand where you are told to sit or stand and do what
you are told to do in the way you are told to do it. Seldom do you have to
exert yourself seriously, and in any case you have hardly any autonomy in work,
so that the need for the power process is not well served.) 62. Social needs,
such as sex, love and status, often remain in group 2 in modern society,
depending on the situation of the individual. [10] But, except for people who
have a particularly strong drive for status, the effort required to fulfill the
social drives is insufficient to satisfy adequately the need for the power
process. 63. So certain artificial needs have been created that fall into group
2, hence serve the need for the power process. Advertising and marketing
techniques have been developed that make many people feel they need things that
their grandparents never desired or even dreamed of. It requires serious effort
to earn enough money to satisfy these artificial needs, hence they fall into
group 2. (But see paragraphs 80-82.) Modern man must satisfy his need for the
power process largely through pursuit of the artificial needs created by the
advertising and marketing industry [11], and through surrogate activities. 64.
It seems that for many people, maybe the majority, these artificial forms of
the power process are insufficient. A theme that appears repeatediy in the
writings of the social critics of the second half of the 20th century is the
sense of purposelessness that afflicts many people in modern society. (This
purposelessness is often called by other names such as “anomic” or
“middle-class vacuity.”) We suggest that the so-called “identity crisis” is
actually a search for a sense of purpose, often for commitment to a suitable
surrogate activity. It may be that existentialism is in large part a response
to the purposelessness of modern life. [12] Very widespread in modern society
is the search for “fulfillment.” But we think that for the majority of people
an activity whose main goal is fulfillment (that is, a surrogate activity) does
not bring completely satisfactory fulfillment. In other words, it does not
fully satisfy the need for the power process. (See paragraph 41.) That need can
be fully satisfied only through activities that have some external goal, such
as physical necessities, sex, love, status, revenge, etc. 65. Moreover, where
goals are pursued through earning money, climbing the status ladder or
functioning as part of the system in some other way, most people are not in a
po7 sition to pursue their goals AUTONOMOUSLY. Most workers are someone else’s
employee and, as we pointed out in paragraph 61, must spend their days doing
what they are told to do in the way they are told to do it. Even most people
who are in business for themselves have only limited autonomy. It is a chronic
complaint of small-business persons and entrepreneurs that their hands are tied
by excessive government regulation. Some of these regulations are doubtless
unnecessary, but for the most part government regulations are essential and
inevitable parts of our extremely complex society. A large portion of small
business today operates on the franchise system. It was reported in the Wall
Street Journal a few years ago that many of the franchise-granting companies
require applicants for franchises to take a personality test that is designed
to EXCLUDE those who have creativity and initiative, because such persons are
not sufficiently docile to go along obediently with the franchise system. This
excludes from small business many of the people who most need autonomy. 66.
Today people live more by virtue of what the system does FOR them or TO them
than by virtue of what they do for themselves. And what they do for themselves
is done more and more along channels laid down by the system. Opportunities
tend to be those that the system provides, the opportunities must be exploited
in accord with rules and regulations [13], and techniques prescribed by experts
must be followed if there is to be a chance of success. 67. Thus the power
process is disrupted in our society through a deficiency of real goals and a deficiency
of autonomy in the pursuit of goals. But it is also disrupted because of those
human drives that fall into group 3: the drives that one cannot adequately
satisfy no matter how much effort one makes. One of these drives is the need
for security. Our lives depend on decisions made by other people; we have no
control over these decisions and usually we do not even know the people who
make them. (“We live in a world in which relatively few people — maybe 500 or
1,000 — make the important decisions”, Philip B. Heymann of Harvard Law School,
quoted by Anthony Lewis, New York Times, April 21, 1995.) Our lives depend on
whether safety standards at a nuclear power plant are properly maintained; on
how much pesticide is allowed to get into our food or how much pollution into
our air; on how skillful (or incompetent) our doctor is; whether we lose or get
a job may depend on decisions made by government economists or corporation
executives; and so forth. Most individuals are not in a position to secure
themselves against these threats to more [than] a very limited extent. The
individual’s search for security is therefore frustrated, which leads to a
sense of powerlessness. 68. It may be objected that primitive man is physically
less secure than modern man, as is shown by his shorter life expectancy; hence
modern man suffers from less, not more than the amount of insecurity that is
normal for human beings. But psychological security does not closely correspond
with physical security. What makes us FEEL secure is not so much objective
security as a sense of confidence in our ability to take care of ourselves.
Primitive man, threatened by a fierce animal or by hunger, can fight in
self-defense or travel in search of food. He has no certainty of success in
these efforts, but he is by no means helpless against the things that threaten
him. The modern individual on the other hand is threatened by many things
against which he is helpless: nuclear accidents, carcinogens in food,
environmental pollution, war, increasing taxes, invasion of his privacy by
large organizations, nationwide social or economic phenomena that may disrupt
his way of life. 69. It is true that primitive man is powerless against some of
the things that threaten him; disease for example. But he can accept the risk
of disease stoically. It is part of the nature of things, it is no one’s fault,
unless it is the fault of some imaginary, impersonal demon. But threats to the
modern individual tend to be MAN-MADE. They are not the results of chance but
are IMPOSED on him by other persons whose decisions he, as an individual, is
unable to influence. Consequently he feels frustrated, humiliated and angry.
70. Thus primitive man for the most part has his security in his own hands
(either as an individual or as a member of a SMALL group) whereas the security
of modern man is in the hands of persons or organizations that are too remote
or too large for him to be able personally to influence them. So modern man’s
drive for security tends to fall into groups 1 and 3; in some areas (food,
shelter etc.) his security is assured at the cost of only trivial effort,
whereas in other areas he CANNOT attain security. (The foregoing greatly
simplifies the real situation, but it does indicate in a rough, general way how
the condition of modern man differs from that of primitive man.) 71. People
have many transitory drives or impulses that are necessarily frustrated in
modern life, hence fall into group 3. One may become angry, but modern society
cannot permit fighting. In many situations it does not even permit verbal
aggression. When going somewhere one may be in a hurry, or one may be in a mood
to travel slowly, but one generally has no choice but to move with the flow of
traffic and obey the traffic signals. One may want to do one’s work in a
different way, but usually one can work only according to the rules laid down
by one’s employer. In many other ways as well, modern man is strapped down by a
network of rules and regulations (explicit or implicit) that frustrate many of
his impulses and thus interfere with the power process. Most of these
regulations cannot be dispensed with, because they are necessary for the
functioning of industrial society. 72. Modern society is in certain respects
extremely permissive. In matters that are irrelevant to the functioning of the
system we can generally do what we please. We can believe in any religion (as
long as it does not encourage behavior that is dangerous to the system). We can
go to bed with anyone we like (as long as we practice “safe sex”). We can do
anything we like as long as it is UNIMPORTANT. But in all IMPORTANT matters the
system tends increasingly to regulate our behavior. 73. Behavior is regulated
not only through explicit rules and not only by the government. Control is
often exer8 cised through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure
or manipulation, and by organizations other than the government, or by the
system as a whole. Most large organizations use some form of propaganda [14] to
manipulate public attitudes or behavior. Propaganda is not limited to
“commercials” and advertisements, and sometimes it is not even consciously
intended as propaganda by the people who make it. For instance, the content of
entertainment programming is a powerful form of propaganda. An example of
indirect coercion: There is no law that says we have to go to work every day
and follow our employer’s orders. Legally there is nothing to prevent us from
going to live in the wild like primitive people or from going into business for
ourselves. But in practice there is very little wild country left, and there is
room in the economy for only a limited number of small business owners. Hence
most of us can survive only as someone else’s employee. 74. We suggest that
modern man’s obsession with longevity, and with maintaining physical vigor and
sexual attractiveness to an advanced age, is a symptom of unfulfillment
resulting from deprivation with respect to the power process. The “mid-lffe
crisis” also is such a symptom. So is the lack of interest in having children
that is fairly common in modern society but almost unheard-of in primitive
societies. 75. In primitive societies life is a succession of stages. The needs
and purposes of one stage having been fulfilled, there is no particular
reluctance about passing on to the next stage. A young man goes through the
power process by becoming a hunter, hunting not for sport or for fulfillment
but to get meat that is necessary for food. (In young women the process is more
complex, with greater emphasis on social power; we won’t discuss that here.)
This phase having been successfully passed through, the young man has no
reluctance about settling down to the responsibilities of raising a family. (In
contrast, some modern people indefinitely postpone having children because they
are too busy seeking some kind of “fulfillment.” We suggest that the
fulfillment they need is adequate experience of the power process — with real
goals instead of the artificial goals of surrogate activities.) Again, having
successfully raised his children, going through the power process by providing
them with the physical necessities, the primitive man feels that his work is
done and he is prepared to accept old age (if he survives that long) and death.
Many modern people, on the other hand, are disturbed by the prospect of
physical deterioration and death, as is shown by the amount of effort they
expend trying to maintain their physical condition, appearance and health. We
argue that this is due to unfulfillment resulting from the fact that they have
never put their physical powers to any practical use, have never gone through
the power process using their bodies in a serious way. It is not the primitive
man, who has used his body daily for practical purposes, who fears the
deterioration of age, but the modern man, who has never had a practical use for
his body beyond walking from his car to his house. It is the man whose need for
the power process has been satisfied during his life who is best prepared to
accept the end of that life. 76. In response to the arguments of this section
someone will say, “Society must find a way to give people the opportunity to go
through the power process.” This won’t work for those who need autonomy in the
power process. For such people the value of the opportunity is destroyed by the
very fact that society gives it to them. What they need is to find or make
their own opportunities. As long as the system GIVES them their opportunities
it still has them on a leash. To attain autonomy they must get off that leash.
HOW SOME PEOPLE ADJUST 77. Not everyone in industrial-technological society
suffers from psychological problems. Some people even profess to be quite
satisfied with society as it is. We now discuss some of the reasons why people
differ so greatly in their response to modern society. 78. First, there
doubtless are differences in the strength of the drive for power. Individuals
with a weak drive for power may have relatively little need to go through the
power process, or at least relatively little need for autonomy in the power
process. These are docile types who would have been happy as plantation darkies
in the Old South. (We don’t mean to sneer at the “plantation darkies” of the
Old South. To their credit, most of the slaves were NOT content with their
servitude. We do sneer at people who ARE content with servitude.) 79. Some
people may have some exceptional drive, in pursuing which they satisfy their
need for the power process. For example, those who have an unusually strong
drive for social status may spend their whole lives climbing the status ladder
without ever getting bored with that game. 80. People vary in their
susceptibility to advertising and marketing techniques. Some are so susceptible
that, even if they make a great deal of money, they cannot satisfy their
constant craving for the the shiny new toys that the marketing industry dangles
before their eyes. So they always feel hard-pressed financially even if their
income is large, and their cravings are frustrated. 81. Some people have low susceptibility
to advertising and marketing techniques. These are the people who aren’t
interested in money. Material acquisition does not serve their need for the
power process. 82. People who have medium susceptibility to advertising and
marketing techniques are able to earn enough money to satisfy their craving for
goods and services, but only at the cost of serious effort (putting in
overtime, taking a second job, earning promotions, etc.). Thus material
acquisition serves their need for the power process. But it does not
necessarily follow that their need is fully satisfied. They may have
insufficient autonomy in the power process (their work may consist of following
orders) and some of their drives may be frustrated (e.g., security,
aggression). (We are guilty of oversimplification in paragraphs 80-82 because
we have assumed that the desire 9 for material acquisition is entirely a
creation of the advertising and marketing industry. Of course it’s not that
simple. [11] 83. Some people partly satisfy their need for power by identifying
themselves with a powerful organization or mass movement. An individual lacking
goals or power joins a movement or an organization, adopts its goals as his
own, then works toward those goals. When some of the goals are attained, the
individual, even though his personal efforts have played only an insignificant
part in the attainment of the goals, feels (through his identification with the
movement or organization) as if he had gone through the power process. This
phenomenon was exploited by the fascists, nazis and communists. Our society
uses it too, though less crudely. Example: Manuel Noriega was an irritant to
the U.S. (goal: punish Noriega). The U.S. invaded Panama (effort) and punished
Noriega (attainment of goal). Thus the U.S. went through the power process and
many Americans, because of their identification with the U.S., experienced the
power process vicariously. Hence the widespread public approval of the Panama
invasion; it gave people a sense of power. [15] We see the same phenomenon in
armies, corporations, political parties, humanitarian organizations, religious
or ideological movements. In particular, leftist movements tend to attract
people who are seeking to satisfy their need for power. But for most people
identification with a large organization or a mass movement does not fully
satisfy the need for power. 84. Another way in which people satisfy their need
for the power process is through surrogate activities. As we explained in
paragraphs 38-40, a surrogate activity is an activity that is directed toward
an artificial goal that the individual pursues for the sake of the
“fulfillment” that he gets from pursuing the goal, not because he needs to
attain the goal itself. For instance, there is no practical motive for building
enormous muscles, hitting a little ball into a hole or acquiring a complete
series of postage stamps. Yet many people in our society devote themselves with
passion to bodybuilding, golf or stamp-collecting. Some people are more
“other-directed” than others, and therefore will more readily attach importance
to a surrogate activity simply because the people around them treat it as
important or because society tells them it is important. That is why some
people get very serious about essentially trivial activities such as sports, or
bridge, or chess, or arcane scholarly pursuits, whereas others who are more
clear-sighted never see these things as anything but the surrogate activities
that they are, and consequently never attach enough importance to them to
satisfy their need for the power process in that way. It only remains to point
out that in many cases a person’s way of earning a living is also a surrogate
activity. Not a PURE surrogate activity, since part of the motive for the
activity is to gain the physical necessities and (for some people) social
status and the luxuries that advertising makes them want. But many people put
into their work far more effort than is necessary to earn whatever money and
status they require, and this extra effort constitutes a surrogate activity.
This extra effort, together with the emotional investment that accompanies it,
is one of the most potent forces acting toward the continual development and
perfecting of the system, with negative consequences for individual freedom
(see paragraph 131). Especially, for the most creative scientists and
engineers, work tends to be largely a surrogate activity. This point is so
important that it deserves a separate discussion, which we shall give in a
moment (paragraphs 87-92). 85. In this section we have explained how many
people in modern society do satisfy their need for the power process to a
greater or lesser extent. But we think that for the majority of people the need
for the power process is not fully satisfied. In the first place, those who
have an insatiable drive for status, or who get firmly “hooked” on a surrogate
activity, or who identify strongly enough with a movement or organization to
satisfy their need for power in that way, are exceptional personalities. Others
are not fully satisfied with surrogate activities or by identification with an
organization (see paragraphs 41, 64). In the second place, too much control is
imposed by the system through explicit regulation or through socialization,
which results in a deficiency of autonomy, and in frustration due to the
impossibility of attaining certain goals and the necessity of restraining too
many impulses. 86. But even if most people in industrial-technological society
were well satisfied, we (FC) would still be opposed to that form of society,
because (among other reasons) we consider it demeaning to fulfill one’s need
for the power process through surrogate activities or through identification
with an organization, rather than through pursuit of real goals. THE MOTIVES OF
SCIENTISTS 87. Science and technology provide the most important examples of
surrogate activities. Some scientists claim that they are motivated by
“curiosity” or by a desire to “benefit humanity.” But it is easy to see that
neither of these can be the principal motive of most scientists. As for
“curiosity,” that notion is simply absurd. Most scientists work on highly
specialized problems that are not the object of any normal curiosity. For
example, is an astronomer, a mathematician or an entomologist curious about the
properties of isopropyltrimethylmethane? Of course not. Only a chemist is
curious about such a thing, and he is curious about it only because chemistry
is his surrogate activity. Is the chemist curious about the appropriate
classification of a new species of beetle? No. That question is of interest
only to the entomologist, and he is interested in it only because entomology is
his surrogate activity. If the chemist and the entomologist had to exert
themselves seriously to obtain the physical necessities, and if that effort
exercised their abilities in an interesting way but in some nonscientific
pursuit, then they wouldn’t give a damn about isopropyltrimethylmethane or the
classification of beetles. Suppose that lack of funds for postgraduate
education had led the chemist to become an insurance broker instead of a
chemist. In that case he would have been very interested 10 in insurance
matters but would have cared nothing about isopropyltrimethylmethane. In any
case it is not normal to put into the satisfaction of mere curiosity the amount
of time and effort that scientists put into their work. The “curiosity”
explanation for the scientists’ motive just doesn’t stand up. 88. The “benefit
of humanity” explanation doesn’t work any better. Some scientific work has no
conceivable relation to the welfare of the human race most of archaeology or
comparative linguistics for example. Some other areas of science present
obviously dangerous possibilities. Yet scientists in these areas are just as
enthusiastic about their work as those who develop vaccines or study air
pollution. Consider the case of Dr. Edward Teller, who had an obvious emotional
involvement in promoting nuclear power plants. Did this involvement stem from a
desire to benefit humanity? If so, then why didn’t Dr. Teller get emotional
about other “humanitarian” causes? If he was such a humanitarian then why did
he help to develop the H-bomb? As with many other scientific achievements, it
is very much open to question whether nuclear power plants actually do benefit
humanity. Does the cheap electricity outweigh the accumulating waste and the
risk of accidents? Dr. Teller saw only one side of the question. Clearly his
emotional involvement with nuclear power arose not from a desire to “benefit
humanity” but from a personal fulfillment he got from his work and from seeing
it put to practical use. 89. The same is true of scientists generally. With
possible rare exceptions, their motive is neither curiosity nor a desire to
benefit humanity but the need to go through the power process: to have a goal
(a scientific problem to solve), to make an effort (research) and to attain the
goal (solution of the problem.) Science is a surrogate activity because
scientists work mainly for the fulfillment they get out of the work itself. 90.
Of course, it’s not that simple. Other motives do play a role for many
scientists. Money and status for example. Some scientists may be persons of the
type who have an insatiable drive for status (see paragraph 79) and this may
provide much of the motivation for their work. No doubt the majority of
scientists, like the majority of the general population, are more or less
susceptible to advertising and marketing techniques and need money to satisfy
their craving for goods and services. Thus science is not a PURE surrogate
activity. But it is in large part a surrogate activity. 91. Also, science and
technology constitute a power mass movement, and many scientists gratify their
need for power through identification with this mass movement (see paragraph
83). 92. Thus science marches on blindly, without regard to the real welfare of
the human race or to any other standard, obedient only to the psychological
needs of the scientists and of the government of ficials and corporation executives
who provide the funds for research. THE NATURE OF FREEDOM 93. We are going to
argue that industrial-technological society cannot be reformed in such a way as
to prevent it from progressively narrowing the sphere of human freedom. But,
because “freedom” is a word that can be interpreted in many ways, we must first
make clear what kind of freedom we are concerned with. 94. By “freedom” we mean
the opportunity to go through the power process, with real goals not the
artificial goals of surrogate activities, and without interference,
manipulation or supervision from anyone, especially from any large
organization. Freedom means being in control (either as an individual or as a
member of a SMALL group) of the life-and-death issues of one’s existence: food,
clothing, shelter and defense against whatever threats there may be in one’s
environment. Freedom means having power; not the power to control other people
but the power to control the circumstances of one’s own life. One does not have
freedom if anyone else (especially a large organization) has power over one, no
matter how benevolently, tolerantly and permissively that power may be
exercised. It is important not to confuse freedom with mere permissiveness (see
paragraph 72). 95. It is said that we live in a free society because we have a
certain number of constitutionally guaranteed rights. But these are not as
important as they seem. The degree of personal freedom that exists in a society
is determined more by the economic and technological structure of the society
than by its laws or its form of government. [16] Most of the Indian nations of
New England were monarchies, and many of the cities of the Italian Renaissance
were controlled by dictators. But in reading about these societies one gets the
impression that they allowed far more personal freedom than our society does.
In part this was because they lacked efficient mechanisms for enforcing the
ruler’s will: There were no modern, wellorganized police forces, no rapid
long-distance communications, no surveillance cameras, no dossiers of
information about the lives of average citizens. Hence it was relatively easy
to evade control. 96. As for our constitutional rights, consider for example
that of freedom of the press. We certainly don’t mean to knock that right; it
is very important tool for limiting concentration of political power and for
keeping those who do have political power in line by publicly exposing any
misbehavior on their part. But freedom of the press is of very little use to
the average citizen as an individual. The mass media are mostly under the
control of large organizations that are integrated into the system. Anyone who
has a little money can have something printed, or can distribute it on the
Internet or in some such way, but what he has to say will be swamped by the
vast volume of material put out by the media, hence it will have no practical
effect. To make an impression on society with words is therefore almost
impossible for most individuals and small groups. Take us (FC) for example. If
we had never done anything violent and had submitted the present writings to a
publisher, they probably would not have been accepted. If they had been been
accepted and 11 published, they probably would not have attracted many readers,
because it’s more fun to watch the entertainment put out by the media than to
read a sober essay. Even ff these writings had had many readers, most of these
readers would soon have forgotten what they had read as their minds were
flooded by the mass of material to which the media expose them. In order to get
our message before the public with some chance of making a lasting impression,
we’ve had to kill people. 97. Constitutional rights are useful up to a point,
but they do not serve to guarantee much more than what might be called the
bourgeois conception of freedom. According to the bourgeois conception, a
“free” man is essentially an element of a social machine and has only a certain
set of prescribed and delimited freedoms; freedoms that are designed to serve
the needs of the social machine more than those of the individual. Thus the
bourgeois’s “free” man has economic freedom because that promotes growth and
progress; he has freedom of the press because public criticism restrains
misbehavior by political leaders; he has a right to a fair trial because
imprisonment at the whim of the powerful would be bad for the system. This was
clearly the attitude of Simon Bolivar. To him, people deserved liberty only if
they used it to promote progress (progress as conceived by the bourgeois).
Other bourgeois thinkers have taken a similar view of freedom as a mere means
to collective ends. Chester C. Tan, “Chinese Political Thought in the Twentieth
Century,” page 202, explains the philosophy of the Kuomintang leader Hu
Han-min: “An individual is granted rights because he is a member of society and
his community life requires such rights. By community Hu meant the whole
society of the nation.” And on page 259 Tan states that according to Carsum
Chang (Chang Chun-mai, head of the State Socialist Party in China) freedom had
to be used in the interest of the state and of the people as a whole. But what
kind of freedom does one have if one can use it only as someone else
prescribes? FC’s conception of freedom is not that of Bolivar, Hu, Chang or
other bourgeois theorists. The trouble with such theorists is that they have
made the development and application of social theories their surrogate
activity. Consequently the theories are designed to serve the needs of the
theorists more than the needs of any people who may be unlucky enough to live
in a society on which the theories are imposed. 98. One more point to be made
in this section: It should not be assumed that a person has enough freedom just
because he SAYS he has enough. Freedom is restricted in part by psychological
controls of which people are unconscious, and moreover many people’s ideas of
what constitutes freedom are governed more by social convention than by their
real needs. For example, it’s likely that many leftists of the oversocialized
type would say that most people, including themselves, are socialized too
little rather than too much, yet the oversocialized leftist pays a heavy
psychological price for his high level of socialization. SOME PRINCIPLES OF
HISTORY 99. Think of history as being the sum of two components: an erratic
component that consists of unpredictable events that follow no discernible
pattern, and a regular component that consists of long-term historical trends.
Here we are concerned with the long-term trends. 100. FIRST PRINCIPLE. If a
SMALL change is made that affects a long-term historical trend, then the effect
of that change will almost always be transitory — the trend will soon revert to
its original state. (Example: A reform movement designed to clean up political
corruption in a society rarely has more than a short-term effect; sooner or
later the reformers relax and corruption creeps back in. The level of political
corruption in a given society tends to remain constant, or to change only
slowly with the evolution of the society. Normally, a political cleanup will be
permanent only if accompanied by widespread social changes; a SMALL change in
the society won’t be enough.) If a small change in a long-term historical trend
appears to be permanent, it is only because the change acts in the direction in
which the trend is already moving, so that the trend is not altered by only
pushed a step ahead. 101. The first principle is almost a tautology. If a trend
were not stable with respect to small changes, it would wander at random rather
than following a definite direction; in other words it would not be a long-term
trend at all. 102. SECOND PRINCIPLE. If a change is made that is sufficiently
large to alter permanently a long-term historical trend, then it will alter the
society as a whole. In other words, a society is a system in which all parts
are interrelated, and you can’t permanently change any important part without
changing all other parts as well. 103. THIRD PRINCIPLE. If a change is made
that is large enough to alter permanently a long-term trend, then the
consequences for the society as a whole cannot be predicted in advance. (Unless
various other societies have passed through the same change and have all
experienced the same consequences, in which case one can predict on empirical
grounds that another society that passes through the same change will be like
to experience similar consequences.) 104. FOURTH PRINCIPLE. A new kind of
society cannot be designed on paper. That is, you cannot plan out a new form of
society in advance, then set it up and expect it to function as it was designed
to do. 105. The third and fourth principles result from the complexity of human
societies. A change in human behavior will affect the economy of a society and
its physical environment; the economy will affect the environment and vice
versa, and the changes in the economy and the environment will affect human
behavior in complex, unpredictable ways; and so forth. The network of causes
and effects is far too complex to be untangled and understood. 106. FIFTH
PRINCIPLE. People do not consciously and rationally choose the form of their
society. Societies develop through processes of social evolution that are not
under rational human control. 12 107. The fifth principle is a consequence of
the other four. 108. To illustrate: By the first principle, generally speaking
an attempt at social reform either acts in the direction in which the society
is developing anyway (so that it merely accelerates a change that would have
occurred in any case) or else it has only a transitory effect, so that the
society soon slips back into its old groove. To make a lasting change in the
direction of development of any important aspect of a society, reform is
insufficient and revolution is required. (A revolution does not necessarily
involve an armed uprising or the overthrow of a government.) By the second
principle, a revolution never changes only one aspect of a society, it changes
the whole society; and by the third principle changes occur that were never
expected or desired by the revolutionaries. By the fourth principle, when
revolutionaries or utopians set up a new kind of society, it never works out as
planned. 109. The American Revolution does not provide a counterexample. The
American “Revolution” was not a revolution in our sense of the word, but a war
of independence followed by a rather far-reaching political reform. The
Founding Fathers did not change the direction of development of American
society, nor did they aspire to do so. They only freed the development of
American society from the retarding effect of British rule. Their political
reform did not change any basic trend, but only pushed American political
culture along its natural direction of development. British society, of which
American society was an offshoot, had been moving for a long time in the
direction of representative democracy. And prior to the War of Independence the
Americans were already practicing a significant degree of representative
democracy in the colonial assemblies. The political system established by the
Constitution was modeled on the British system and on the colonial assemblies.
With major alteration, to be sure — there is no doubt that the Founding Fathers
took a very important step. But it was a step along the road that
English-speaking world was already traveling. The proof is that Britain and all
of its colonies that were populated predominantly by people of British descent
ended up with systems of representative democracy essentially similar to that
of the United States. If the Founding Fathers had lost their nerve and declined
to sign the Declaration of Independence, our way of lffe today would not have
been significantly different. Maybe we would have had somewhat closer ties to
Britain, and would have had a Parliament and Prime Minister instead of a
Congress and President. No big deal. Thus the American Revolution provides not
a counterexample to our principles but a good illustration of them. 110. Still,
one has to use common sense in applying the principles. They are expressed in
imprecise language that allows latitude for interpretation, and exceptions to
them can be found. So we present these principles not as inviolable laws but as
rules of thumb, or guides to thinking, that may provide a partial antidote to
naive ideas about the future of society. The principles should be borne
constantly in mind, and whenever one reaches a conciusion that conflicts with
them one should carefully reexamine one’s thinking and retain the conclusion
only if one has good, solid reasons for doing so. INDUSTRIAL-TECHNOLOGICAL
SOCIETY CANNOT BE REFORMED 111. The foregoing principles help to show how
hopelessly difficult it would be to reform the industrial system in such a way
as to prevent it from progressively narrowing our sphere of freedom. There has
been a consistent tendency, going back at least to the Industrial Revolution
for technology to strengthen the system at a high cost in individual freedom
and local autonomy. Hence any change designed to protect freedom from technology
would be contrary to a fundamental trend in the development of our society.
Consequently, such a change either would be a transitory one — soon swamped by
the tide of history — or, if large enough to be permanent would alter the
nature of our whole society. This by the first and second principles. Moreover,
since society would be altered in a way that could not be predicted in advance
(third principle) there would be great risk. Changes large enough to make a
lasting difference in favor of freedom would not be initiated because it would
be realized that they would gravely disrupt the system. So any attempts at
reform would be too timid to be effective. Even if changes large enough to make
a lasting difference were initiated, they would be retracted when their
disruptive effects became apparent. Thus, permanent changes in favor of freedom
could be brought about only by persons prepared to accept radical, dangerous
and unpredictable alteration of the entire system. In other words by
revolutionaries, not reformers. 112. People anxious to rescue freedom without
sacrificing the supposed benefits of technology will suggest naive schemes for
some new form of society that would reconcile freedom with technology. Apart
from the fact that people who make such suggestions seldom propose any
practical means by which the new form of society could be set up in the first
place, it follows from the fourth principle that even if the new form of
society could be once established, it either would collapse or would give results
very different from those expected. 113. So even on very general grounds it
seems highly improbable that any way of changing society could be found that
would reconcile freedom with modern technology. In the next few sections we
will give more specific reasons for concluding that freedom and technological
progress are incompatible. RESTRICTION OF FREEDOM IS UNAVOIDABLE IN INDUSTRIAL
SOCIETY 114. As explained in paragraphs 65-67, 70-73, modern man is strapped
down by a network of rules and regulations, and his fate depends on the actions
of persons remote from him whose decisions he cannot influence. This is not
accidental or a result of the arbitrariness of arrogant bureaucrats. It is
necessary and inevitable in any technologically advanced society. The system
HAS TO regulate human behavior closely in order to function. At work people 13
have to do what they are told to do, otherwise production would be thrown into
chaos. Bureaucracies HAVE TO be run according to rigid rules. To allow any
substantial personal discretion to lower-level bureaucrats would disrupt the
system and lead to charges of unfairness due to differences in the way
individual bureaucrats exercised their discretion. It is true that some
restrictions on our freedom could be eliminated, but GENERALLY SPEAKING the
regulation of our lives by large organizations is necessary for the functioning
of industrial-technological society. The result is a sense of powerlessness on
the part of the average person. It may be, however, that formal regulations
will tend increasingly to be replaced by psychological tools that make us want
to do what the system requires of us. (Propaganda [14], educational techniques,
“mental health” programs, etc.) 115. The system HAS TO force people to behave
in ways that are increasingly remote from the natural pattern of human
behavior. For example, the system needs scientists, mathematicians and
engineers. It can’t function without them. So heavy pressure is put on children
to excel in these fields. It isn’t natural for an adolescent human being to
spend the bulk of his time sitting at a desk absorbed in study. A normal
adolescent wants to spend his time in active contact with the real world. Among
primitive peoples the things that children are trained to do tend to be in
reasonable harmony with natural human impulses. Among the American Indians, for
example, boys were trained in active outdoor pursuits — just the sort of thing
that boys like. But in our society children are pushed into studying technical
subjects, which most do grudgingly. 116. Because of the constant pressure that
the system exerts to modify human behavior, there is a gradual increase in the
number of people who cannot or will not adjust to society’s requirements:
welfare leeches, youth gang members, cultists, anti-government rebels, radical
environmentalist saboteurs, dropouts and resisters of various kinds. 117. In
any technologically advanced society the individual’s fate MUST depend on
decisions that he personally cannot influence to any great extent. A
technological society cannot be broken down into small, autonomous communities,
because production depends on the cooperation of very large numbers of people
and machines. Such a society MUST be highly organized and decisions HAVE TO be
made that affect very large numbers of people. When a decision affects, say, a
million people, then each of the affected individuals has, on the average, only
a onemillionth share in making the decision. What usually happens in practice
is that decisions are made by public officials or corporation executives, or by
technical specialists, but even when the public votes on a decision the number
of voters ordinarily is too large for the vote of any one individual to be
significant. [17] Thus most individuals are unable to influence measurably the
major decisions that affect their lives. There is no conceivable way to remedy
this in a technologically advanced society. The system tries to “solve” this
problem by using propaganda to make people WANT the decisions that have been made
for them, but even if this “solution” were completely successful in making
people feel better, it would be demeaning. 118. Conservatives and some others
advocate more “local autonomy.” Local communities once did have autonomy, but
such autonomy becomes less and less possible as local communities become more
enmeshed with and dependent on large-scale systems like public utilities,
computer networks, highway systems, the mass communications media, the modern
health care system. Also operating against autonomy is the fact that technology
applied in one location often affects people at other locations far way. Thus
pesticide or chemical use near a creek may contaminate the water supply
hundreds of miles downstream, and the greenhouse effect affects the whole world.
119. The system does not and cannot exist to satisfy human needs. Instead, it
is human behavior that has to be modified to fit the needs of the system. This
has nothing to do with the political or social ideology that may pretend to
guide the technological system. It is not the fault of capitalism and it is not
the fault of socialism. It is the fault of technology, because the system is
guided not by ideology but by technical necessity. [18] Of course the system
does satisfy many human needs, but generally speaking it does this only to the
extend that it is to the advantage of the system to do it. It is the needs of
the system that are paramount, not those of the human being. For example, the
system provides people with food because the system couldn’t function if
everyone starved; it attends to people’s psychological needs whenever it can
CONVENIENTLY do so, because it couldn’t function if too many people became
depressed or rebellious. But the system, for good, solid, practical reasons,
must exert constant pressure on people to mold their behavior to the needs of
the system. To much waste accumulating? The government, the media, the
educational system, environmentalists, everyone inundates us with a mass of
propaganda about recycling. Need more technical personnel? A chorus of voices
exhorts kids to study science. No one stops to ask whether it is inhumane to
force adolescents to spend the bulk of their time studying subjects most of
them hate. When skilled workers are put out of a job by technical advances and
have to undergo “retraining,” no one asks whether it is humiliating for them to
be pushed around in this way. It is simply taken for granted that everyone must
bow to technical necessity. and for good reason: If human needs were put before
technical necessity there would be economic problems, unemployment, shortages
or worse. The concept of “mental health” in our society is defined largely by
the extent to which an individual behaves in accord with the needs of the
system and does so without showing signs of stress. 120. Efforts to make room
for a sense of purpose and for autonomy within the system are no better than a
joke. For example, one company, instead of having each of its employees
assemble only one section of a catalogue, had each assemble a whole catalogue,
and this was supposed to give them a sense of purpose and achievement. Some
companies have tried to give their employees more autonomy in their work, but
for practical reasons this usually can be done only to a very limited extent,
and in any case employees are never given autonomy as to ultimate goals 14 —
their “autonomous” efforts can never be directed toward goals that they select
personally, but only toward their employer’s goals, such as the survival and
growth of the company. Any company would soon go out of business if it
permitted its employees to act otherwise. Similarly, in any enterprise within a
socialist system, workers must direct their efforts toward the goals of the
enterprise, otherwise the enterprise will not serve its purpose as part of the
system. Once again, for purely technical reasons it is not possible for most
individuals or small groups to have much autonomy in industrial society. Even
the small-business owner commonly has only limited autonomy. Apart from the necessity
of government regulation, he is restricted by the fact that he must fit into
the economic system and conform to its requirements. For instance, when someone
develops a new technology, the small- business person often has to use that
technology whether he wants to or not, in order to remain competitive. THE
’BAD’ PARTS OF TECHNOLOGY CANNOT BE SEPARATED FROM THE ’GOOD’ PARTS 121. A
further reason why industrial society cannot be reformed in favor of freedom is
that modern technology is a unified system in which all parts are dependent on
one another. You can’t get rid of the “bad” parts of technology and retain only
the “good” parts. Take modern medicine, for example. Progress in medical
science depends on progress in chemistry, physics, biology, computer science
and other fields. Advanced medical treatments require expensive, high-tech
equipment that can be made available only by a technologically progressive,
economically rich society. Clearly you can’t have much Progress in medicine
without the whole technological system and everything that goes with it. 122.
Even if medical progress could be maintained without the rest of the
technological system, it would by itself bring certain evils. Suppose for
example that a cure for diabetes is discovered. People with a genetic tendency
to diabetes will then be able to survive and reproduce as well as anyone else.
Natural selection against genes for diabetes will cease and such genes will
spread throughout the population. (This may be occurring to some extent already,
since diabetes, while not curable, can be controlled through use of insulin.)
The same thing will happen with many other diseases susceptibility to which is
affected by genetic degradation of the population. The only solution will be
some sort of eugenics program or extensive genetic engineering of human beings,
so that man in the future will no longer be a creation of nature, or of chance,
or of God (depending on your religious or philosophical opinions), but a
manufactured product. 123. If you think that big government interferes in your
life too much NOW, just wait till the government starts regulating the genetic
constitution of your children. Such regulation will inevitably follow the
introduction of genetic engineering of human beings, because the consequences
of unregulated genetic engineering would be disastrous. [19] 124. The usual
response to such concerns is to talk about “medical ethics.” But a code of
ethics would not serve to protect freedom in the face of medical progress; it
would only make matters worse. A code of ethics applicable to genetic
engineering would be in effect a means of regulating the genetic constitution
of human beings. Somebody (probably the upper-middle class, mostly) would
decide that such and such applications of genetic engineering were “ethical”.
and others were not, so that in effect they would be imposing their own values
on the genetic constitution of the population at large. Even if a code of
ethics were chosen on a completely democratic basis, the majority would be
imposing their own values on any minorities who might have a different idea of
what constituted an “ethical” use of genetic engineering. The only code of
ethics that would truly protect freedom would be one that prohibited ANY
genetic engineering of human beings, and you can be sure that no such code will
ever be applied in a technological society. No code that reduced genetic
engineering to a minor role could stand up for long, because the temptation
presented by the immense power of biotechnology would be irresistible,
especially since to the majority of people many of its applications will seem
obviously and unequivocally good (eliminating physical and mental diseases,
giving people the abilities they need to get along in today’s world).
Inevitably, genetic engineering will be used extensively, but only in ways
consistent with the needs of the industrial-technological system. [20]
TECHNOLOGY IS A MORE POWERFUL SOCIAL FORCE THAN THE ASPIRATION FOR FREEDOOM
125. It is not possible to make a LASTING compromise between technology and
freedom, because technology is by far the more powerful social force and
continually encroaches on freedom through REPEATED compromises. Imagine the
case of two neighbors, each of whom at the outset owns the same amount of land,
but one of whom is more powerful than the other. The powerful one demands a
piece of the other’s land. The weak one refuses. The powerful one says, “OK,
let’s compromise. Give me half of what I asked.” The weak one has little choice
but to give in. Some time later the powerful neighbor demands another piece of
land, again there is a compromise, and so forth. By forcing a long series of
compromises on the weaker man, the powerful one eventually gets all of his
land. So it goes in the conflict between technology and freedom. 126. Let us
explain why technology is a more powerful social force than the aspiration for
freedom. 127. A technological advance that appears not to threaten freedom
often turns out to threaten it very seriously later on. For example, consider
motorized transport. A walking man formerly could go where he pleased, go at
his own pace without observing any traffic regulations, and was independent of
technological support-systems. When motor vehicles were introduced they
appeared to increase man’s freedom. They took no freedom away from the walking
man, no one had to have an automobile if he 15 didn’t want one, and anyone who
did choose to buy an automobile could travel much faster and farther than a
walking man. But the introduction of motorized transport soon changed society
in such a way as to restrict greatly man’s freedom of locomotion. When
automobiles became numerous, it became necessary to regulate their use
extensively. In a car, especially in densely populated areas, one cannot just go
where one likes at one’s own pace; one’s movement is governed by the flow of
traffic and by various traffic laws. One is tied down by various obligations:
license requirements, driver test, renewing registration, insurance,
maintenance required for safety, monthly payments on purchase price. Moreover,
the use of motorized transport is no longer optional. Since the introduction of
motorized transport the arrangement of our cities has changed in such a way
that the majority of people no longer live within walking distance of their
place of employment, shopping areas and recreational opportunities, so that
they HAVE TO depend on the automobile for transportation. Or else they must use
public transportation, in which case they have even less control over their own
movement than when driving a car. Even the walker’s freedom is now greatly
restricted. In the city he continually has to stop to wait for traffic lights
that are designed mainly to serve auto traffic. In the country, motor traffic
makes it dangerous and unpleasant to walk along the highway. (Note this
important point that we have just illustrated with the case of motorized
transport: When a new item of technology is introduced as an option that an
individual can accept or not as he chooses, it does not necessarily REMAIN
optional. In many cases the new technology changes society in such a way that
people eventually find themselves FORCED to use it.) 128. While technological
progress AS A WHOLE continually narrows our sphere of freedom, each new technical
advance CONSIDERED BY ITSELF appears to be desirable. Electricity, indoor
plumbing, rapid long-distance communications... how could one argue against any
of these things, or against any other of the innumerable technical advances
that have made modern society? It would have been absurd to resist the
introduction of the telephone, for example. It offered many advantages and no
disadvantages. Yet, as we explained in paragraphs 59-76, all these technical
advances taken together have created a world in which the average man’s fate is
no longer in his own hands or in the hands of his neighbors and friends, but in
those of politicians, corporation executives and remote, anonymous technicians
and bureaucrats whom he as an individual has no power to influence. [21] The
same process will continue in the future. Take genetic engineering, for
example. Few people will resist the introduction of a genetic technique that
eliminates a hereditary disease. It does no apparent harm and prevents.much
suffering. Yet a large number of genetic improvements taken together will make
the human being into an engineered product rather than a free creation of
chance (or of God, or whatever, depending on your religious beliefs). 129.
Another reason why technology is such a powerful social force is that, within
the context of a given society, technological progress marches in only one
direction; it can never be reversed. Once a technical innovation has been
introduced, people usually become dependent on it, so that they can never again
do without it, unless it is replaced by some still more advanced innovation.
Not only do people become dependent as individuals on a new item of technology,
but, even more, the system as a whole becomes dependent on it. (Imagine what
would happen to the system today if computers, for example, were eliminated.)
Thus the system can move in only one direction, toward greater
technologization. Technology repeatedly forces freedom to take a step back, but
technology can never take a step back — short of the overthrow of the whole
technological system. 130. TechnoIogy advances with great rapidity and
threatens freedom at many different points at the same time (crowding, rules
and regulations, increasing dependence of individuals on large organizations,
propaganda and other psychological techniques, genetic engineering, invasion of
privacy through surveillance devices and computers, etc.). To hold back any ONE
of the threats to freedom would require a long and difficult social struggle.
Those who want to protect freedom are overwhelmed by the sheer number of new
attacks and the rapidity with which they develop, hence they become apathetic
and no longer resist. To fight each of the threats separately would be futile.
Success can be hoped for only by fighting the technological system as a whole;
but that is revolution, not reform. 131. Technicians (we use this term in its
broad sense to describe all those who perform a specialized task that requires
training) tend to be so involved in their work (their surrogate activity) that
when a conflict arises between their technical work and freedom, they almost
always decide in favor of their technical work. This is obvious in the case of
scientists, but it also appears elsewhere: educators, humanitarian groups,
conservation organizations do not hesitate to use propaganda[14] or other
psychological techniques to help them achieve their laudable ends. Corporations
and government agencies, when they find it useful, do not hesitate to collect
information about individuals without regard to their privacy. Law enforcement
agencies are frequently inconvenienced by the constitutional rights of suspects
and often of completely innocent persons, and they do whatever they can do
legally (or sometimes illegally) to restrict or circumvent those rights. Most
of these educators, government officials and law officers believe in freedom,
privacy and constitutional rights, but when these conflict with their work,
they usually feel that their work is more important. 132. It is well known that
people generally work better and more persistently when striving for a reward
than when attempting to avoid a punishment or negative outcome. Scientists and
other technicians are motivated mainly by the rewards they get through their
work. But those who oppose technological invasions of freedom are working to
avoid a negative outcome, consequently there are few who work persistently and
well at this discouraging task. If reformers ever achieved a signal victory
that seemed to set up a solid barrier against further erosion of freedom
through technical progress, most would tend to 16 relax and turn their
attention to more agreeable pursuits. But the scientists would remain busy in
their laboratories, and technology as it progresses would find ways, in spite
of any barriers, to exert more and more control over individuals and make them
always more dependent on the system. 133. No social arrangements, whether laws,
institutions, customs or ethical codes, can provide permanent protection
against technology. History shows that all social arrangements are transitory;
they all change or break down eventually. But technological advances are
permanent within the context of a given civilization. Suppose for example that
it were possible to arrive at some social arrangements that would prevent
genetic engineering from being applied to human beings, or prevent it from
being applied in such a way as to threaten freedom and dignity. Still, the
technology would remain waiting. Sooner or later the social arrangement would
break down. Probably sooner, given the pace of change in our society. Then
genetic engineering would begin to invade our sphere of freedom. and this
invasion would be irreversible (short of a breakdown of technological
civilization itself). Any illusions about achieving anything permanent through
social arrangements should be dispelled by what is currently happening with
environmental legislation. A few years ago its seemed that there were secure
legal barriers preventing at least SOME of the worst forms of environmental
degradation. A change in the political wind, and those barriers begin to
crumble. 134. For all of the foregoing reasons, technology is a more powerful
social force than the aspiration for freedom. But this statement requires an
important qualification. It appears that during the next several decades the
industrial-technological system will be undergoing severe stresses due to
economic and environmental problems, and especially due to problems of human
behavior (alienation, rebellion, hostility, a variety of social and
psychological difficulties). We hope that the stresses through which the system
is likely to pass will cause it to break down, or at least will weaken it
sufficiently so that a revolution against it becomes possible. If such a
revolution occurs and is successful, then at that particular moment the
aspiration for freedom will have proved more powerful than technology. 135. In
paragraph 125 we used an analogy of a weak neighbor who is left destitute by a
strong neighbor who takes all his land by forcing on him a series of
compromises. But suppose now that the strong neighbor gets sick, so tha he is
unable to defend himself. The weak neighbor can force the strong one to give
him his land back, or he can kill him. If he lets the strong man survive and
only forces him to give the land back, he is a fool, because when the strong
man gets well he will again take all the land for himself. The only sensible
alternative for the weaker man is to kill the strong one while he has the
chance. In the same way, while the industrial system is sick we must destroy
it. If we compromise with it and let it recover from its sickness, it will
eventually wipe out all of our freedom. SIMPLER SOCIAL PROBLEMS HAVE PROVED
INTRACTABLE 136. If anyone still imagines that it would be possible to reform
the system in such a way as to protect freedom from technology, let him
consider how clumsily and for the most part unsuccessfully our society has
dealt with other social problems that are far more simple and straighfforward.
Among other things, the system has failed to stop environmental degradation,
political corruption, drug trafficking or domestic abuse. 137. Take our
environmental problems, for example. Here the conflict of values is
straightforward: economic expedience now versus saving some of our natural
resources for our grandchildren. [22] But on this subject we get only a lot of
blather and obfuscation from the people who have power, and nothing like a
clear, consistent line of action, and we keep on piling up environmental
problems that our grandchildren will have to live with. Attempts to resolve the
environmental issue consist of struggles and compromises between different
factions, some of which are ascendant at one moment, others at another moment.
The line of struggle changes with the shifting currents of public opinion. This
is not a rational process, nor is it one that is likely to lead to a timely and
successful solution to the problem. Major social problems, if they get “solved”
at all, are rarely or never solved through any rational, comprehensive plan.
They just work themselves out through a process in which various competing
groups pursuing their own (usually short-term) selfinterest [23] arrive (mainly
by luck) at some more or less stable modus vivendi. In fact, the principles we
formulated in paragraphs 100-106 make it seem doubtful that rational long-term
social planning can EVER be successful. 138. Thus it is clear that the human
race has at best a very limited capacity for solving even relatively straightforward
social problems. How then is it going to solve the far more difficult and
subtle problem of reconciling freedom with technology? Technology presents
clear-cut material advantages, whereas freedom is an abstraction that means
different things to different people. and its loss is easily obscured by
propaganda and fancy talk. 139. And note this important difference: It is
conceivable that our environmental problems (for example) may some day be
settled through a rational, comprehensive plan, but if this happens it will be
only because it is in the longterm interest of the system to solve these
problems. But it is NOT in the interest of the system to preserve freedom or
small-group autonomy. On the contrary, it is in the interest of the system to
bring human behavior under control to the greatest possible extent. [24] Thus,
while practical considerations may eventually force the system to take a
rational, prudent approach to environmental problems, equally practical
considerations will force the system to regulate human behavior ever more
closely (preferably by indirect means that will disguise the encroachment on
freedom). This isn’t just our opinion. Eminent social scientists (e.g. James Q.
Wilson) have stressed the importance of “socializing” people more effectively.
17 REVOLUTION IS EASIER THAN REFORM 140. We hope we have convinced the reader
that the system cannot be reformed in such a way as to reconcile freedom with
technology. The only way out is to dispense with the industrialtechnological
system altogether. This implies revolution, not necessarily an armed uprising,
but certainly a radical and fundamental change in the nature of society. 141.
People tend to assume that because a revolution involves a much greater change
than reform does, it is more difficult to bring about than reform is. Actually,
under certain circumstances revolution is much easier than reform. The reason
is that a revolutionary movement can inspire an intensity of commitment that a
reform movement cannot inspire. A reform movement merely offers to solve a
particular social problem. A revolutionary movement offers to solve all
problems at one stroke and create a whole new world; it provides the kind of
ideal for which people will take great risks and make great sacrifices. For
this reasons it would be much easier to overthrow the whole technological
system than to put effective, permanent restraints on the development or
application of any one segment of technology, such as genetic engineering, for
example. Not many people will devote themselves with single-minded passion to
imposing and maintaining restraints on genetic engineering, but under suitable
conditions large numbers of people may devote themselves passionately to a
revolution against the industrial-technological system. As we noted in
paragraph 132, reformers seeking to limit certain aspects of technology would
be working to avoid a negative outcome. But revolutionaries work to gain a
powerful reward — fulfillment of their revolutionary vision — and therefore
work harder and more persistently than reformers do. 142. Reform is always
restrained by the fear of painful consequences if changes go too far. But once
a revolutionary fever has taken hold of a society, people are willing to
undergo unlimited hardships for the sake of their revolution. This was clearly
shown in the French and Russian Revolutions. It may be that in such cases only
a minority of the population is really committed to the revolution, but this
minority is sufficiently large and active so that it becomes the dominant force
in society. We will have more to say about revolution in paragraphs 180-205.
CONTROL OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR 143. Since the beginning of civilization, organized
societies have had to put pressures on human beings of the sake of the
functioning of the social organism. The kinds of pressures vary greatly from
one society to another. Some of the pressures are physical (poor diet,
excessive labor, environmental pollution), some are psychological (noise,
crowding, forcing human behavior into the mold that society requires). In the
past, human nature has been approximately constant, or at any rate has varied
only within certain bounds. Consequently, societies have been able to push
people only up to certain limits. When the limit of human endurance has been
passed, things start going wrong: rebellion, or crime, or corruption, or
evasion of work, or depression and other mental problems, or an elevated death
rate, or a declining birth rate or something else, so that either the society
breaks down, or its functioning becomes too inefficient and it is (quickly or
gradually, through conquest, attrition or evolution) replaced by some more
efficient form of society. [25] 144. Thus human nature has in the past put
certain limits on the development of societies. People could be pushed only so
far and no farther. But today this may be changing, because modern technology
is developing ways of modifying human beings. 145. Imagine a society that
subjects people to conditions that make them terribly unhappy, then gives them
drugs to take away their unhappiness. Science fiction? It is already happening
to some extent in our own society. It is well known that the rate of clinical
depression has been greatly increasing in recent decades. We believe that this
is due to disruption of the power process, as explained in paragraphs 59-76.
But even if we are wrong, the increasing rate of depression is certainly the
result of SOME conditions that exist in today’s society. Instead of removing
the conditions that make people depressed, modern society gives them
antidepressant drugs. In effect, antidepressants are a means of modifying an
individual’s internal state in such a way as to enable him to tolerate social
conditions that he would otherwise find intolerable. (Yes, we know that depression
is often of purely genetic origin. We are referring here to those cases in
which environment plays the predominant role.) 146. Drugs that affect the mind
are only one example of the new methods of controlling human behavior that
modern society is developing. Let us look at some of the other methods. 147. To
start with, there are the techniques of surveillance. Hidden video cameras are
now used in most stores and in many other places, computers are used to collect
and process vast amounts of information about individuals. Information so
obtained greatly increases the effectiveness of physical coercion (i.e., law
enforcement). [26] Then there are the methods of propaganda, for which the mass
communication media provide effective vehicles. Efflcient techniques have been
developed for winning elections, selling products, influencing public opinion.
The entertainment industry serves as an important psychological tool of the
system, possibly even when it is dishing out large amounts of sex and violence.
Entertainment provides modern man with an essential means of escape. While
absorbed in television, videos, etc., he can forget stress, anxiety,
frustration, dissatisfaction. Many primitive peoples, when they don’t have work
to do, are quite content to sit for hours at a time doing nothing at all,
because they are at peace with themselves and their world. But most modern
people must be constantly occupied or 18 entertained, otherwise they get
“bored,” i.e., they get fidgety, uneasy, irritable. 148. Other techniques
strike deeper than the foregoing. Education is no longer a simple affair of
paddling a kid’s behind when he doesn’t know his lessons and patting him on the
head when he does know them. It is becoming a scientific technique for
controlling the child’s development. Sylvan Learning Centers, for example, have
had great success in motivating children to study, and psychological techniques
are also used with more or less success in many conventional schools.
“Parenting” techniques that are taught to parents are designed to make children
accept fundamental values of the system and behave in ways that the system
finds desirable. “Mental health” programs, “intervention” techniques,
psychotherapy and so forth are ostensibly designed to benefit individuals, but in
practice they usually serve as methods for inducing individuals to think and
behave as the system requires. (There is no contradiction here; an individual
whose attitudes or behavior bring him into conflict with the system is up
against a force that is too powerful for him to conquer or escape from, hence
he is likely to suffer from stress, frustration, defeat. His path will be much
easier if he thinks and behaves as the system requires. In that sense the
system is acting for the benefit of the individual when it brainwashes him into
conformity.) Child abuse in its gross and obvious forms is disapproved in most
if not all cultures. Tormenting a child for a trivial reason or no reason at
all is something that appalls almost everyone. But many psychologists interpret
the concept of abuse much more broadly. Is spanking, when used as part of a
rational and consistent system of discipline, a form of abuse? The question
will ultimately be decided by whether or not spanking tends to produce behavior
that makes a person fit in well with the existing system of society. In
practice, the word “abuse” tends to be interpreted to include any method of
child-rearing that produces behavior inconvenient for the system. Thus, when
they go beyond the prevention of obvious, senseless cruelty, programs for
preventing “child abuse” are directed toward the control of human behavior on
behalf of the system. 149. Presumably, research will continue to increase the
effectiveness of psychological techniques for controlling human behavior. But
we think it is unlikely that psychological techniques alone will be sufficient
to adjust human beings to the kind of society that technology is creating.
Biological methods probably will have to be used. We have already mentioned the
use of drugs in this connection. Neurology may provide other avenues for
modifying the human mind. Genetic engineering of human beings is already
beginning to occur in the form of “gene therapy,” and there is no reason to
assume that such methods will not eventually be used to modify those aspects of
the body that affect mental functioning. 150. As we mentioned in paragraph 134,
industrial society seems likely to be entering a period of severe stress, due
in part to problems of human behavior and in part to economic and environmental
problems. And a considerable proportion of the system’s economic and
environmental problems result from the way human beings behave. Alienation, low
self-esteem, depression, hostility, rebellion; children who won’t study, youth
gangs, illegal drug use, rape, child abuse, other crimes, unsafe sex, teen
pregnancy, population growth, political corruption, race hatred, ethnic
rivalry, bitter ideological conflict (e.g., pro-choice vs. pro-life), political
extremism, terrorism, sabotage, anti-government groups, hate groups. All these
threaten the very survival of the system. The system will therefore be FORCED
to use every practical means of controlling human behavior. 151. The social
disruption that we see today is certainly not the result of mere chance. It can
only be a result of the conditions of life that the system imposes on people.
(We have argued that the most important of these conditions is disruption of
the power process.) If the systems succeeds in imposing sufficient control over
human behavior to assure its own survival, a new watershed in human history
will have been passed. Whereas formerly the limits of human endurance have
imposed limits on the development of societies (as we explained in Paragraphs
143, 144), industrial-technological society will be able to pass those limits
by modifying human beings, whether by psychological methods or biological
methods or both. In the future, social systems will not be adjusted to suit the
needs of human beings. Instead, human being will be adjusted to suit the needs
of the system. [27] 152. Generally speaking, technological control over human
behavior will probably not be introduced with a totalitarian intention or even
through a conscious desire to restrict human freedom. [28] Each new step in the
assertion of control over the human mind will be taken as a rational response
to a problem that faces society, such as curing alcoholism, reducing the crime
rate or inducing young people to study science and engineering. In many cases
there will be a humanitarian justification. For example, when a psychiatrist
prescribes an antidepressant for a depressed patient, he is clearly doing that
individual a favor. It would be inhumane to withhold the drug from someone who
needs it. When Parents send their children to Sylvan Learning Centers to have
them manipulated into becoming enthusiastic about their studies, they do so
from concern for their children’s welfare. It may be that some of these parents
wish that one didn’t have to have specialized training to get a job and that
their kid didn’t have to be brainwashed into becoming a computer nerd. But what
can they do? They can’t change society, and their child may be unemployable if
he doesn’t have certain skills. So they send him to Sylvan. 153. Thus control
over human behavior will be introduced not by a calculated decision of the
authorities but through a process of social evolution (RAPID evolution,
however). The process will be impossible to resist, because each advance,
considered by itself, will appear to be beneficial, or at least the evil
involved in making the advance will appear to be beneficial, or at least the
evil involved in making the advance will seem to be less than that which would
result from not making it (see paragraph 127). Propaganda for example is used
for many good purposes, such as discouraging child abuse or race hatred. [14]
Sex education is obviously useful, yet the ef19 fect of sex education (to the
extent that it is successful) is to take the shaping of sexual attitudes away
from the family and put it into the hands of the state as represented by the
public school system. 154. Suppose a biological trait is discovered that
increases the likelihood that a child will grow up to be a criminal, and
suppose some sort of gene therapy can remove this trait. [29] Of course most
parents whose children possess the trait will have them undergo the therapy. It
would be inhumane to do otherwise, since the child would probably have a
miserable life if he grew up to be a criminal. But many or most primitive
societies have a low crime rate in comparison with that of our society, even
though they have neither high-tech methods of child-rearing nor harsh systems
of punishment. Since there is no reason to suppose that more modern men than
primitive men have innate predatory tendencies, the high crime rate of our
society must be due to the pressures that modern conditions put on people, to
which many cannot or will not adjust. Thus a treatment designed to remove
potential criminal tendencies is at least in part a way of re-engineering
people so that they suit the requirements of the system. 155. Our society tends
to regard as a “sickness” any mode of thought or behavior that is inconvenient
for the system, and this is plausible because when an individual doesn’t fit
into the system it causes pain to the individual as well as problems for the
system. Thus the manipulation of an individual to adjust him to the system is
seen as a “cure” for a “sickness” and therefore as good. 156. In paragraph 127
we pointed out that if the use of a new item of technology is INITIALLY
optional, it does not necessarily REMAIN optional, because the new technology
tends to change society in such a way that it becomes difficult or impossible
for an individual to function without using that technology. This applies also
to the technology of human behavior. In a world in which most children are put
through a program to make them enthusiastic about studying, a parent will
almost be forced to put his kid through such a program, because if he does not,
then the kid will grow up to be, comparatively speaking, an ignoramus and
therefore unemployable. Or suppose a biological treatment is discovered that,
without undesirable side-effects, will greatly reduce the psychological stress
from which so many people suffer in our society. If large numbers of people
choose to undergo the treatment, then the general level of stress in society
will be reduced, so that it will be possible for the system to increase the
stress-producing pressures. This will lead more people to undergo the
treatment; and so forth, so that eventually the pressures may become so heavy
that few people will be able to survive without undergoing the stress-reducing
treatment. In fact, something like this seems to have happened already with one
of our society’s most important psychological tools for enabling people to
reduce (or at least temporarily escape from) stress, namely, mass entertainment
(see paragraph 147). Our use of mass entertainment is “optional”: No law
requires us to watch television, listen to the radio, read magazines. Yet mass
entertainment is a means of escape and stress-reduction on which most of us
have become dependent. Everyone complains about the trashiness of television,
but almost everyone watches it. A few have kicked the TV habit, but it would be
a rare person who could get along today without using ANY form of mass
entertainment. (Yet until quite recently in human histoy most people got along
very nicely with no other entertainment than that which each local community
created for itself.) Without the entertainment industry the system probably
would not have been able to get away with putting as much stressproducing
pressure on us as it does. 157. Assuming that industrial society survives, it
is likely that technology will eventually acquire something approaching
complete control over human behavior. It has been established beyond any
rational doubt that human thought and behavior have a largely biological basis.
As experimenters have demonstrated, feelings such as hunger, pleasure, anger
and fear can be turned on and off by electrical stimulation of appropriate
parts of the brain. Memories can be destroyed by damaging parts of the brain or
they can be brought to the surface by electrical stimulation. Hallucinations
can be induced or moods changed by drugs. There may or may not be an immaterial
human soul, but if there is one it clearly is less powerful that the biological
mechanisms of human behavior. For if that were not the case then researchers
would not be able so easily to manipulate human feelings and behavior with
drugs and electrical currents. 158. It presumably would be impractical for all
people to have electrodes inserted in their heads so that they could be
controlled by the authorities. But the fact that human thoughts and feelings
are so open to biological intervention shows that the problem of controlling
human behavior is mainly a technical problem; a problem of neurons, hormones
and complex molecules; the kind of problem that is accessible to scientific
attack. Given the outstanding record of our society in solving technical
problems, it is overwhelmingly probable that great advances will be made in the
control of human behavior. 159. Will public resistance prevent the introduction
of technological control of human behavior? It certainly would if an attempt
were made to introduce such control all at once. But since technological
control will be introduced through a long sequence of small advances, there
will be no rational and effective public resistance. (See paragraphs 127, 132,
153.) 160. To those who think that all this sounds like science fiction, we
point out that yesterday’s science fiction is today’s fact. The Industrial
Revolution has radically altered man’s environment and way of life, and it is
only to be expected that as technology is increasingly applied to the human
body and mind, man himself will be altered as radically as his environment and
way of life have been. HUMAN RACE AT A CROSSROADS 161. But we have gotten ahead
of our story. It is one thing to develop in the laboratory a series of
psychological or biological techniques for manipulating human behavior and
quite another to integrate these techniques into a 20 functioning social
system. The latter problem is the more difficult of the two. For example, while
the techniques of educational psychology doubtless work quite well in the “lab
schools” where they are developed, it is not necessarily easy to apply them
effectively throughout our educational system. We all know what many of our
schools are like. The teachers are too busy taking knives and guns away from
the kids to subject them to the latest techniques for making them into computer
nerds. Thus, in spite of all its technical advances relating to human behavior,
the system to date has not been impressively successful in controlling human
beings. The people whose behavior is fairly well under the control of the
system are those of the type that might be called “bourgeois.” But there are
growing numbers of people who in one way or another are rebels against the
system: welfare leaches, youth gangs, cultists, satanists, nazis, radical
environmentalists, militiamen, etc. 162. The system is currently engaged in a
desperate struggle to overcome certain problems that threaten its survival,
among which the problems of human behavior are the most important. If the
system succeeds in acquiring sufficient control over human behavior quickly
enough, it will probably survive. Otherwise it will break down. We think the
issue will most likely be resolved within the next several decades, say 40 to
100 years. 163. Suppose the system survives the crisis of the next several
decades. By that time it will have to have solved, or at least brought under
control, the principal problems that confront it, in particular that of
“socializing” human beings; that is, making people sufficiently docile so that
heir behavior no longer threatens the system. That being accomplished, it does
not appear that there would be any further obstacle to the development of technology,
and it would presumably advance toward its logical conclusion, which is
complete control over everything on Earth, including human beings and all other
important organisms. The system may become a unitary, monolithic organization,
or it may be more or less fragmented and consist of a number of organizations
coexisting in a relationship that includes elements of both cooperation and
competition, just as today the government, the corporations and other large
organizations both cooperate and compete with one another. Human freedom mostly
will have vanished, because individuals and small groups will be impotent
visa-vis large organizations armed with supertechnology and an arsenal of
advanced psychological and biological tools for manipulating human beings,
besides instruments of surveillance and physical coercion. Only a small number
of people will have any real power, and even these probably will have only very
limited freedom, because their behavior too will be regulated; just as today
our politicians and corporation executives can retain their positions of power
only as long as their behavior remains within certain fairly narrow limits.
164. Don’t imagine that the systems will stop developing further techniques for
controlling human beings and nature once the crisis of the next few decades is
over and increasing control is no longer necessary for the system’s survival.
On the contrary, once the hard times are over the system will increase its
control over people and nature more rapidly, because it will no longer be
hampered by difficulties of the kind that it is currently experiencing.
Survival is not the principal motive for extending control. As we explained in
paragraphs 87-90, technicians and scientists carry on their work largely as a
surrogate activity; that is, they satisfy their need for power by solving
technical problems. They will continue to do this with unabated enthusiasm, and
among the most interesting and challenging problems for them to solve will be
those of understanding the human body and mind and intervening in their
development. For the “good of humanity,” of course. 165. But suppose on the
other hand that the stresses of the coming decades prove to be too much for the
system. If the system breaks down there may be a period of chaos, a “time of
troubles” such as those that history has recorded at various epochs in the
past. It is impossible to predict what would emerge from such a time of
troubles, but at any rate the human race would be given a new chance. The
greatest danger is that industrial society may begin to reconstitute itself
within the first few years after the breakdown. Certainly there will be many
people (powerhungry types espeeially) who will be anxious to get the factories
running again. 166. Therefore two tasks confront those who hate the servitude
to which the industrial system is reducing the human race. First, we must work
to heighten the social stresses within the system so as to increase the
likelihood that it will break down or be weakened sufficiently so that a revolution
against it becomes possible. Second, it is necessary to develop and propagate
an ideology that opposes technology and the industrial system. Such an ideology
can become the basis for a revolution against industrial society if and when
the system becomes sufficiently weakened. And such an ideology will help to
assure that, if and when industrial society breaks down, its remnants will be
smashed beyond repair, so that the system cannot be reconstituted. The
factories should be destroyed, technical books burned, etc. HUMAN SUFFERING
167. The industrial system will not break down purely as a result of
revolutionary action. It will not be vulnerable to revolutionary attack unless
its own internal problems of development lead it into very serious difficulties.
So if the system breaks down it will do so either spontaneously, or through a
process that is in part spontaneous but helped along by revolutionaries. If the
breakdown is sudden, many people will die, since the world’s population has
become so overblown that it cannot even feed itself any longer without advanced
technology. Even if the breakdown is gradual enough so that reduction of the
population can occur more through lowering of the birth rate than through
elevation of the death rate, the process of deindustrialization probably will
be very chaotic and involve much suffering. It is naive to think it likely that
technology can be phased out in a smoothly managed, orderly way, 21 especially
since the technophiles will fight stubbornly at every step. Is it therefore
cruel to work for the breakdown of the system? Maybe, but maybe not. In the
first place, revolutionaries will not be able to break the system down unless
it is already in enough trouble so that there would be a good chance of its
eventually breaking down by itself anyway; and the bigger the system grows, the
more disastrous the consequences of its breakdown will be; so it may be that
revolutionaries, by hastening the onset of the breakdown, will be reducing the
extent of the disaster. 168. In the second place, one has to balance struggle
and death against the loss of freedom and dignity. To many of us, freedom and
dignity are more important than a long life or avoidance of physical pain.
Besides, we all have to die some time, and it may be better to die fighting for
survival, or for a cause, than to live a long but empty and purposeless life.
169. In the third place, it is not at all certain that survival of the system
will lead to less suffering than breakdown of the system would. The system has
already caused, and is continuing to cause, immense suffering all over the
world. Ancient cultures, that for hundreds of years gave people a satisfactory
relationship with each other and with their environment, have been shattered by
contact with industrial society, and the result has been a whole catalogue of
economic, environmental, social and psychological problems. One of the effects
of the intrusion of industrial society has been that over much of the world
traditional controls on population have been thrown out of balance. Hence the
population explosion, with all that that implies. Then there is the
psychological suffering that is widespread throughout the supposedly fortunate
countries of the West (see paragraphs 44, 45). No one knows what will happen as
a result of ozone depletion, the greenhouse effect and other environmental
problems that cannot yet be foreseen. And, as nuclear proliferation has shown,
new technology cannot be kept out of the hands of dictators and irresponsible
Third World nations. Would you like to speculate about what Iraq or North Korea
will do with genetic engineering? 170. “Oh!” say the technophiles, “Science is
going to fix all that! We will conquer famine, eliminate psychological
suffering, make everybody healthy and happy!” Yeah, sure. That’s what they said
200 years ago. The Industrial Revolution was supposed to eliminate poverty,
make everybody happy, etc. The actual result has been quite different. The
technophiles are hopelessly naive (or selfdeceiving) in their understanding of
social problems. They are unaware of (or choose to ignore) the fact that when
large changes, even seemingly beneficial ones, are introduced into a society,
they lead to a long sequence of other changes, most of which are impossible to
predict (paragraph 103). The result is disruption of the society. So it is very
probable that in their attempts to end poverty and disease, engineer docile,
happy personalities and so forth, the technophiles will create social systems
that are terribly troubled, even more so than the present one. For example, the
scientists boast that they will end famine by creating new, genetically
engineered food plants. But this will allow the human population to keep
expanding indefinitely, and it is well known that crowding leads to increased
stress and aggression. This is merely one example of the PREDICTABLE problems
that will arise. We emphasize that, as past experience has shown, technical
progress will lead to other new problems that CANNOT be predicted in advance
(paragraph 103). In fact, ever since the Industrial Revolution, technology has
been creating new problems for society far more rapidly than it has been
solving old ones. Thus it will take a long and difficult period of trial and
error for the technophiles to work the bugs out of their Brave New World (if
they every do). In the meantime there will be great suffering. So it is not at
all clear that the survival of industrial society would involve less suffering
than the breakdown of that society would. Technology has gotten the human race
into a fix from which there is not likely to be any easy escape. THE FUTURE
171. But suppose now that industrial society does survive the next several
decades and that the bugs do eventually get worked out of the system, so that
it functions smoothly. What kind of system will it be? We will consider several
possibilities. 172. First let us postulate that the computer scientists succeed
in developing intelligent machines that can do all things better than human
beings can do them. In that case presumably all work will be done by vast,
highly organized systems of machines and no human effort will be necessary.
Either of two cases might occur. The machines might be permitted to make all of
their own decisions without human oversight, or else human control over the
machines might be retained. 173. If the machines are permitted to make all
their own decisions, we can’t make any conjectures as to the results, because
it is impossible to guess how such machines might behave. We only point out that
the fate of the human race would be at the mercy of the machines. It might be
argued that the human race would never be foolish enough to hand over all power
to the machines. But we are suggesting neither that the human race would
voluntarily turn power over to the machines nor that the machines would
willfully seize power. What we do suggest is that the human race might easily
permit itself to drift into a position of such dependence on the machines that
it would have no practical choice but to accept all of the machines’ decisions.
As society and the problems that face it become more and more complex and as
machines become more and more intelligent, people will let machines make more
and more of their decisions for them, simply because machine-made decisions
will bring better results than man-made ones. Eventually a stage may be reached
at which the decisions necessary to keep the system running will be so complex
that human beings will be incapable of making them intelligently. At that stage
the machines will be in effective control. People won’t be able to just turn
the machine off, because they will be so dependent on them that turning them
off would amount to suicide. 22 174. On the other hand it is possible that
human control over the machines may be retained. In that case the average man
may have control over certain private machines of his own, such as his car or
his personal computer, but control over large systems of machines will be in
the hands of a tiny elite — just as it is today, but with two differences. Due
to improved techniques the elite will have greater control over the masses; and
because human work will no longer be necessary the masses will be superfluous,
a useless burden on the system. If the elite is ruthless they may simply decide
to exterminate the mass of humanity. If they are humane they may use propaganda
or other psychological or biological techniques to reduce the birth rate until
the mass of humanity becomes extinct, leaving the world to the elite. Or, if
the elite consists of softhearted liberals, they may decide to play the role of
good shepherds to the rest of the human race. They will see to it that
everyone’s physical needs are satisfied, that all children are raised under
psychologically hygienic conditions, that everyone has a wholesome hobby to
keep him busy, and that anyone who may become dissatisfied undergoes
“treatment” to cure his “problem.” Of course, life will be so purposeless that
people will have to be biologically or psychologically engineered either to remove
their need for the power process or to make them “sublimate” their drive for
power into some harmless hobby. These engineered human beings may be happy in
such a society, but they most certainly will not be free. They will have been
reduced to the status of domestic animals. 175. But suppose now that the
computer scientists do not succeed in developing artificial intelligence, so
that human work remains necessary. Even so, machines will take care of more and
more of the simpler tasks so that there will be an increasing surplus of human
workers at the lower levels of ability. (We see this happening already. There
are many people who find it difficult or impossible to get work, because for
intellectual or psychological reasons they cannot acquire the level of training
necessary to make themselves useful in the present system.) On those who are
employed, ever-increasing demands will be placed: They will need more and more
training, more and more ability, and will have to be ever more reliable,
conforming and docile, because they will be more and more like cells of a giant
organism. Their tasks will be increasingly specialized, so that their work will
be, in a sense, out of touch with the real world, being concentrated on one
tiny slice of reality. The system will have to use any means that it can,
whether psychological or biological, to engineer people to be docile, to have
the abilities that the system requires and to “sublimate” their drive for power
into some specialized task. But the statement that the people of such a society
will have to be docile may require qualification. The society may find
competitiveness useful, provided that ways are found of directing
competitiveness into channels that serve the needs of the system. We can
imagine a future society in which there is endless competition for positions of
prestige and power. But no more than a very few people will ever reach the top,
where the only real power is (see end of paragraph 163). Very repellent is a
society in which a person can satisfy his need for power only by pushing large
numbers of other people out of the way and depriving them of THEIR opportunity
for power. 176. One can envision scenarios that incorporate aspects of more
than one of the possibilities that we have just discussed. For instance, it may
be that machines will take over most of the work that is of real, practical
importance, but that human beings will be kept busy by being given relatively
unimportant work. It has been suggested, for example, that a great development
of the service industries might provide work for human beings. Thus people
would spent their time shining each other’s shoes, driving each other around in
taxicabs, making handicrafts for one another, waiting on each other’s tables,
etc. This seems to us a thoroughly contemptible way for the human race to end
up, and we doubt that many people would find fulfilling lives in such pointless
busy-work. They would seek other, dangerous outlets (drugs, crime, “cults,”
hate groups) unless they were biologically or psychologically engineered to
adapt them to such a way of life. 177. Needless to say, the scenarios outlined
above do not exhaust all the possibilities. They only indicate the kinds of
outcomes that seem to us most likely. But we can envision no plausible scenarios
that are any more palatable than the ones we’ve just described. It is
overwhelmingly probable that if the industrial-technological system survives
the next 40 to 100 years, it will by that time have developed certain general
characteristics: Individuals (at least those of the “bourgeois” type, who are
integrated into the system and make it run, and who therefore have all the
power) will be more dependent than ever on large organizations; they will be
more “socialized” than ever and their physical and mental qualities to a
significant extent (possibly to a very great extent) will be those that are
engineered into them rather than being the results of chance (or of God’s will,
or whatever); and whatever may be left of wild nature will be reduced to
remnants preserved for scientific study and kept under the supervision and
management of scientists (hence it will no longer be truly wild). In the long
run (say a few centuries from now) it is likely that neither the human race nor
any other important organisms will exist as we know them today, because once
you start modifying organisms through genetic engineering there is no reason to
stop at any particular point, so that the modifications will probably continue
until man and other organisms have been utterly transformed. 178. Whatever else
may be the case, it is certain that technology is creating for human beings a
new physical and social environment radically different from the spectrum of
environments to which natural selection has adapted the human race physically
and psychologically. If man is not adjusted to this new environment by being
artificially re-engineered, then he will be adapted to it through a long and
painful process of natural selection. The former is far more likely than the
latter. 179. It would be better to dump the whole stinking system and take the
consequences. 23 STRATEGY 180. The technophiles are taking us all on an utterly
reckless ride into the unknown. Many people understand something of what
technological progress is doing to us yet take a passive attitude toward it
because they think it is inevitable. But we (FC) don’t think it is inevitable.
We think it can be stopped, and we will give here some indications of how to go
about stopping it. 181. As we stated in paragraph 166, the two main tasks for
the present are to promote social stress and instability in industrial society
and to develop and propagate an ideology that opposes technology and the
industrial system. When the system becomes sufficiently stressed and unstable,
a revolution against technology may be possible. The pattern would be similar
to that of the French and Russian Revolutions. French society and Russian
society, for several decades prior to their respective revolutions, showed
increasing signs of stress and weakness. Meanwhile, ideologies were being
developed that offered a new world view that was quite different from the old
one. In the Russian case, revolutionaries were actively working to undermine
the old order. Then, when the old system was put under sufficient additional
stress (by financial crisis in France, by military defeat in Russia) it was
swept away by revolution. What we propose is something along the same lines.
182. It will be objected that the French and Russian Revolutions were failures.
But most revolutions have two goals. One is to destroy an old form of society
and the other is to set up the new form of society envisioned by the
revolutionaries. The French and Russian revolutionaries failed (fortunately!)
to create the new kind of society of which they dreamed, but they were quite
successful in destroying the old society. We have no illusions about the
feasibility of creating a new, ideal form of society. Our goal is only to
destroy the existing form of society. 183. But an ideology, in order to gain enthusiastic
support, must have a positive ideal as well as a negative one; it must be FOR
something as well as AGAINST something. The positive ideal that we propose is
Nature. That is, WILD nature: those aspects of the functioning of the Earth and
its living things that are independent of human management and free of human
interference and control. And with wild nature we include human nature, by
which we mean those aspects of the functioning of the human individual that are
not subject to regulation by organized society but are products of chance, or
free will, or God (depending on your religious or philosophical opinions). 184.
Nature makes a perfect counter-ideal to technology for several reasons. Nature
(that which is outside the power of the system) is the opposite of technology
(which seeks to expand indefinitely the power of the system). Most people will
agree that nature is beautiful; certainly it has tremendous popular appeal. The
radical environmentalists ALREADY hold an ideology that exalts nature and
opposes technology. [30] It is not necessary for the sake of nature to set up
some chimerical utopia or any new kind of social order. Nature takes care of
itself: It was a spontaneous creation that existed long before any human
society, and for countless centuries many different kinds of human societies
coexisted with nature without doing it an excessive amount of damage. Only with
the Industrial Revolution did the effect of human society on nature become
really devastating. To relieve the pressure on nature it is not necessary to
create a special kind of social system, it is only necessary to get rid of
industrial society. Granted, this will not solve all problems. Industrial
society has already done tremendous damage to nature and it will take a very long
time for the scars to heal. Besides, even preindustrial societies can do
significant damage to nature. Nevertheless, getting rid of industrial society
will accomplish a great deal. It will relieve the worst of the pressure on
nature so that the scars can begin to heal. It will remove the capacity of
organized society to keep increasing its control over nature (including human
nature). Whatever kind of society may exist after the demise of the industrial
system, it is certain that most people will live close to nature, because in
the absence of advanced technology there is no other way that people CAN live.
To feed themselves they must be peasants or herdsmen or fishermen or hunters,
etc. And, generally speaking, local autonomy should tend to increase, because
lack of advanced technology and rapid communications will limit the capacity of
governments or other large organizations to control local communities. 185. As
for the negative consequences of eliminating industrial society — well, you
can’t eat your cake and have it too. To gain one thing you have to sacrifice
another. 186. Most people hate psychological conflict. For this reason they
avoid doing any serious thinking about difficult social issues, and they like
to have such issues presented to them in simple, black-and-white terms: THIS is
all good and THAT is all bad. The revolutionary ideology should therefore be
developed on two levels. 187. On the more sophisticated level the ideology
should address itself to people who are intelligent, thoughtful and rational.
The object should be to create a core of people who will be opposed to the
industrial system on a rational, thought-out basis, with full appreciation of
the problems and ambiguities involved, and of the price that has to be paid for
getting rid of the system. It is particularly important to attract people of
this type, as they are capable people and will be instrumental in influencing
others. These people should be addressed on as rational a level as possible.
Facts should never intentionally be distorted and intemperate language should
be avoided. This does not mean that no appeal can be made to the emotions, but
in making such appeal care should be taken to avoid misrepresenting the truth
or doing anything else that would destroy the intellectual respectability of
the ideology. 188. On a second level, the ideology should be propagated in a
simplified form that will enable the unthinking majority to see the conflict of
technology vs. nature in unambiguous terms. But even on this second level the
ideology should not be expressed in language that is so cheap, intemperate or
irrational that it alienates people of the thoughfful and rational type. Cheap,
intemperate propaganda sometimes achieves impressive short-term gains, 24 but
it will be more advantageous in the long run to keep the loyalty of a small
number of intelligently committed people than to arouse the passions of an
unthinking, fickle mob who will change their attitude as soon as someone comes
along with a better propaganda gimmick. However, propaganda of the
rabble-rousing type may be necessary when the system is nearing the point of
collapse and there is a final struggle between rival ideologies to determine
which will become dominant when the old worldview goes under. 189. Prior to that
final struggle, the revolutionaries should not expect to have a majority of
people on their side. History is made by active, determined minorities, not by
the majority, which seldom has a clear and consistent idea of what it really
wants. Until the time comes for the final push toward revolution [31], the task
of revolutionaries will be less to win the shallow support of the majority than
to build a small core of deeply committed people. As for the majority, it will
be enough to make them aware of the existence of the new ideology and remind
them of it frequently; though of course it will be desirable to get majority
support to the extent that this can be done without weakening the core of
seriously committed people. 190. Any kind of social conflict helps to
destabilize the system, but one should be careful about what kind of conflict
one encourages. The line of conflict should be drawn between the mass of the
people and the power-holding elite of industrial society (politicians,
scientists, upper-level business executives, government officials, etc.). It
should NOT be drawn between the revolutionaries and the mass of the people. For
example, it would be bad strategy for the revolutionaries to condemn Americans
for their habits of consumption. Instead, the average American should be
portrayed as a victim of the advertising and marketing industry, which has
suckered him into buying a lot of junk that he doesn’t need and that is very
poor compensation for his lost freedom. Either approach is consistent with the
facts. It is merely a matter of attitude whether you blame the advertising
industry for manipulating the public or blame the public for allowing itself to
be manipulated. As a matter of strategy one should generally avoid blaming the
public. 191. One should think twice before encouraging any other social
conflict than that between the power-holding elite (which wields technology)
and the general public (over which technology exerts its power). For one thing,
other conflicts tend to distract attention from the important conflicts
(between power-elite and ordinary people, between technology and nature); for
another thing, other conflicts may actually tend to encourage technologization,
because each side in such a conflict wants to use technological power to gain
advantages over its adversary. This is clearly seen in rivalries between
nations. It also appears in ethnic conflicts within nations. For example, in
America many black leaders are anxious to gain power for African Americans by
placing back individuals in the technological power-elite. They want there to
be many black government officials, scientists, corporation executives and so
forth. In this way they are helping to absorb the African American subculture
into the technological system. Generally speaking, one should encourage only
those social conflicts that can be fitted into the framework of the conflicts
of power-elite vs. ordinary people, technology vs nature. 192. But the way to
discourage ethnic conflict is NOT through militant advocacy of minority rights
(see paragraphs 21, 29). Instead, the revolutionaries should emphasize that
although minorities do suffer more or less disadvantage, this disadvantage is
of peripheral significance. Our real enemy is the industrial- technological
system, and in the struggle against the system, ethnic distinctions are of no
importance. 193. The kind of revolution we have in mind will not necessarily
involve an armed uprising against any government. It may or may not involve
physical violence, but it will not be a POLITICAL revolution. Its focus will be
on technology and economics, not politics. [32] 194. Probably the
revolutionaries should even AVOID assuming political power, whether by legal or
illegal means, until the industrial system is stressed to the danger point and
has proved itself to be a failure in the eyes of most people. Suppose for
example that some “green” party should win control of the United States
Congress in an election. In order to avoid betraying or watering down their own
ideology they would have to take vigrous measures to turn economic growth into
economic shrinkage. To the average man the results would appear disastrous:
There would be massive unemployment, shortages of commodities, etc. Even if the
grosser ill effects could be avoided through superhumanly skillful management,
still people would have to begin giving up the luxuries to which they have
become addicted. Dissatisfaction would grow, the “green” party would be voted
out o,f offfice and the revolutionaries would have suffered a severe setback.
For this reason the revolutionaries should not try to acquire political power
until the system has gotten itself into such a mess that any hardships will be
seen as resulting from the failures of the industrial system itself and not
from the policies of the revolutionaries. The revolution against technology
will probably have to be a revolution by outsiders, a revolution from below and
not from above. 195. The revolution must be international and worldwide. It
cannot be carried out on a nation-by-nation basis. Whenever it is suggested
that the United States, for example, should cut back on technological progress
or economic growth, people get hysterical and start screaming that if we fall
behind in technology the Japanese will get ahead of us. Holy robots! The world
will fly off its orbit if the Japanese ever sell more cars than we do!
(Nationalism is a great promoter of technology.) More reasonably, it is argued
that if the relatively democratic nations of the world fall behind in
technology while nasty, dictatorial nations like China, Vietnam and North Korea
continue to progress, eventually the dictators may come to dominate the world.
That is why the industrial system should be attacked in all nations
simultaneously, to the extent that this may be possible. True, there is no
assurance that the industrial system can be destroyed at approximately the same
time all over the world, and it is 25 even conceivable that the attempt to
overthrow the system could lead instead to the domination of the system by
dictators. That is a risk that has to be taken. And it is worth taking, since
the difference between a “democratic” industrial system and one controlled by
dictators is small compared with the difference between an industrial system
and a non-industrial one. [33] It might even be argued that an industrial
system controlled by dictators would be preferable, because dictator-controlled
systems usually have proved ineffficient, hence they are presumably more likely
to break down. Look at Cuba. 196. Revolutionaries might consider favoring
measures that tend to bind the world economy into a unified whole. Free trade
agreements like NAFTA and GATT are probably harmful to the environment in the
short run, but in the long run they may perhaps be advantageous because they
foster economic interdependence between nations. It will be easier to destroy
the industrial system on a worldwide basis if the world economy is so unified
that its breakdown in any one major nation will lead to its breakdown in all
industrialized nations. 197. Some people take the line that modern man has too
much power, too much control over nature; they argue for a more passive
attitude on the part of the human race. At best these people are expressing
themselves unclearly, because they fail to distinguish between power for LARGE
ORGANIZATIONS and power for INDIVIDUALS and SMALL GROUPS. It is a mistake to
argue for powerlessness and passivity, because people NEED power. Modern man as
a collective entity — that is, the industrial system — has immense power over
nature, and we (FC) regard this as evil. But modern INDIVIDUALS and SMALL
GROUPS OF INDIVIDUALS have far less power than primitive man ever did.
Generally speaking, the vast power of “modern man” over nature is exercised not
by individuals or small groups but by large organizations. To the extent that
the average modern INDIVIDUAL can wield the power of technology, he is
permitted to do so only within narrow limits and only under the supervision and
control of the system. (You need a license for everything and with the license
come rules and regulations.) The individual has only those technological powers
with which the system chooses to provide him. His PERSONAL power over nature is
slight. 198. Primitive INDIVIDUALS and SMALL GROUPS actually had considerable
power over nature; or maybe it would be better to say power WITHIN nature. When
primitive man needed food he knew how to find and prepare edible roots, how to
track game and take it with homemade weapons. He knew how to protect himself from
heat cold, rain, dangerous animals, etc. But primitive man did relatively
little damage to nature because the COLLECTIVE power of primitive society was
negligible compared to the COLLECTIVE power of industrial society. 199. Instead
of arguing for powerlessness and passivity, one should argue that the power of
the INDUSTRIAL SYSTEM should be broken, and that this will greatly INCREASE the
power and freedom of INDIVIDUALS and SMALL GROUPS. 200. Until the industrial
system has been thoroughly wrecked, the destruction of that system must be the
revolutionaries’ ONLY goal. Other goals would distract attention and energy
from the main goal. More importantly if the revolutionaries permit themselves
to have any other goal than the destruction of technology, they will be tempted
to use technology as a tool for reaching that other goal. If they give in to
that temptation, they will fall right back into the technological trap, because
modern technology is a unified, tightly organized system, so that, in order to retain
SOME technology, one finds oneself obliged to retain MOST technology, hence one
ends up sacrificing only token amounts of technology. 201. Suppose for example
that the revolutionaries took “social justice” as a goal. Human nature being
what it is, social justice would not come about spontaneously; it would have to
be enforced. In order to enforce it the revolutionaries would have to retain
central organization and control. For that they would need rapid long-distance
transportation and communication, and therefore all the technology needed to
support the transportation and communication systems. To feed and clothe poor
people they would have to use agricultural and manufacturing technology. And so
forth. So that the attempt to insure social justice would force them to retain
most parts of the technological system. Not that we have anything against
social justice, but it must not be allowed to interfere with the effort to get
rid of the technological system. 202. It would be hopeless for revolutionaries
to try to attack the system without using SOME modern technology. If nothing
else they must use the communications media to spread their message. But they
should use modern technology for only ONE purpose: to attack the technological
system. 203. Imagine an alcoholic sitting with a barrel of wine in front of
him. Suppose he starts saying to himself, “Wine isn’t bad for you if used in
moderation. Why, they say small amounts of wine are even good for you! It won’t
do me any harm if I take just one little drink....” Well you know what is going
to happen. Never forget that the human race with technology is just like an
alcoholic with a barrel of wine. 204. Revolutionaries should have as many
children as they can. There is strong scientific evidence that social attitudes
are to a significant extent inherited. No one suggests that a social attitude
is a direct outcome of a person’s genetic constitution, but it appears that
personality traits are partly inherited and that certain personality traits
tend, within the context of our society, to make a person more likely to hold
this or that social attitude. Objections to these findings have been raised,
but the objections are feeble and seem to be ideologically motivated. In any
event, no one denies that children tend on the average to hold social attitudes
similar to those of their parents. From our point of view it doesn’t matter all
that much whether the attitudes are passed on genetically or through childhood
training. In either case they ARE passed on. 205. The trouble is that many of
the people who are inclined to rebel against the industrial system are also
concerned about the population problems, hence they are 26 apt to have few or
no children. In this way they may be handing the world over to the sort of
people who support or at least accept the industrial system. To ensure the
strength of the next generation of revolutionaries the present generation
should reproduce itself abundantly. In doing so they will be worsening the
population problem only slightly. And the important problem is to get rid of
the industrial system, because once the industrial system is gone the world’s
population necessarily will decrease (see paragraph 167); whereas, if the
industrial system survives, it will continue developing new techniques of food
production that may enable the world’s population to keep increasing almost
indefinitely. 206. With regard to revolutionary strategy, the only points on
which we absolutely insist are that the single overriding goal must be the
elimination of modern technology, and that no other goal can be allowed to
compete with this one. For the rest, revolutionaries should take an empirical
approach. If experience indicates that some of the recommendations made in the
foregoing paragraphs are not going to give good results, then those
recommendations should be discarded. TWO KINDS OF TECHNOLOGY 207. An argument
likely to be raised against our proposed revolution is that it is bound to
fail, because (it is claimed) throughout history technology has always progressed,
never regressed, hence technological regression is impossible. But this claim
is false. 208. We distinguish between two kinds of technology, which we will
call smallscale technology and organizationdependent technology. Small-scale
technology is technology that can be used by small-scale communities without
outside assistance. Organization-dependent technology is technology that
depends on large-scale social organization. We are aware of no significant
cases of regression in small-scale technology. But organizationdependent
technology DOES regress when the social organization on which it depends breaks
down. Example: When the Roman Empire fell apart the Romans’ smallscale
technology survived because any clever village craftsman could build, for instance,
a water wheel, any skilled smith could make steel by Roman methods, and so
forth. But the Romans’ organization- dependent technology DID regress. Their
aqueducts fell into disrepair and were never rebuilt. Their techniques of road
construction were lost. The Roman system of urban sanitation was forgotten, so
that not until rather recent times did the sanitation of European cities equal
that of Ancient Rome. 209. The reason why technology has seemed always to
progress is that, until perhaps a century or two before the Industrial
Revolution, most technology was small-scale technology. But most of the
technology developed since the Industrial Revolution is organization-dependent
technology. Take the refrigerator for example. Without factorymade parts or the
facilities of a postindustrial machine shop it would be virtually impossible
for a handful of local craftsmen to build a refrigerator. If by some miracle
they did succeed in building one it would be useless to them without a reliable
source of electric power. So they would have to dam a stream and build a
generator. Generators require large amounts of copper wire. Imagine trying to
make that wire without modern machinery. And where would they get a gas
suitable for refrigeration? It would be much easier to build an icehouse or
preserve food by drying or picking, as was done before the invention of the
refrigerator. 210. So it is clear that if the industrial system were once
thoroughly broken down, refrigeration technology would quickly be lost. The
same is true of other organizationdependent technology. And once this
technology had been lost for a generation or so it would take centuries to
rebuild it, just as it took centuries to build it the first time around.
Surviving technical books would be few and scattered. An industrial society, if
built from scratch without outside help, can only be built in a series of
stages: You need tools to make tools to make tools to make tools... A long
process of economic development and progress in social organization is required.
And, even in the absence of an ideology opposed to technology, there is no
reason to believe that anyone would be interested in rebuilding industrial
society. The enthusiasm for “progress” is a phenomenon peculiar to the modern
form of society, and it seems not to have existed prior to the 17th century or
thereabouts. 211. In the late Middle Ages there were four main civilizations
that were about equally “advanced”: Europe, the Islamic world, India, and the
Far East (China, Japan, Korea). Three of those civilizations remained more or
less stable, and only Europe became dynamic. No one knows why Europe became
dynamic at that time; historians have their theories but these are only
speculation. At any rate, it is clear that rapid development toward a technological
form of society occurs only under special conditions. So there is no reason to
assume that a long-lasting technological regression cannot be brought about.
212. Would society EVENTUALLY develop again toward an industrial-technological
form? Maybe, but there is no use in worrying about it, since we can’t predict
or control events 500 or 1,000 years in the future. Those problems must be
dealt with by the people who will live at that time. THE DANGER OF LEFTISM 213.
Because of their need for rebellion and for membership in a movement, leftists
or persons of similar psychological type often are unattracted to a rebellious
or activist movement whose goals and membership are not initially leftist. The
resulting influx of leftish types can easily turn a non-leftist movement into a
leftist one, so that leftist goals replace or distort the original goals of the
movement. 214. To avoid this, a movement that exalts nature and opposes
technology must take a resolutely anti-leftist 27 stance and must avoid all
collaboration with leftists. Leftism is in the long run inconsistent with wild
nature, with human freedom and with the elimination of modern technology.
Leftism is collectivist; it seeks to bind together the entire world (both
nature and the human race) into a unified whole. But this implies management of
nature and of human life by organized society, and it requires advanced
technology. You can’t have a united world without rapid transportation and
communication, you can’t make all people love one another without sophisticated
psychological techniques, you can’t have a “planned society” without the
necessary technological base. Above all, leftism is driven by the need for
power, and the leftist seeks power on a collective basis, through
identification with a mass movement or an organization. Leftism is unlikely
ever to give up technology, because technology is too valuable a source of
collective power. 215. The anarchist [34] too seeks power, but he seeks it on
an individual or small-group basis; he wants individuals and small groups to be
able to control the circumstances of their own lives. He opposes technology
because it makes small groups dependent on large organizations. 216. Some
leftists may seem to oppose technology, but they will oppose it only so long as
they are outsiders and the technological system is controlled by non-leftists.
If leftism ever becomes dominant in society, so that the technological system
becomes a tool in the hands of leftists, they will enthusiastically use it and
promote its growth. In doing this they will be repeating a pattern that leftism
has shown again and again in the past. When the Bolsheviks in Russia were
outsiders, they vigorously opposed censorship and the secret police, they
advocated self-determination for ethnic minorities, and so forth; but as soon
as they came into power themselves, they imposed a tighter censorship and
created a more ruthless secret police than any that had existed under the
tsars, and they oppressed ethnic minorities at least as much as the tsars had
done. In the United States, a couple of decades ago when leftists were a
minority in our universities, leftist professors were vigorous proponents of
academic freedom, but today, in those of our universities where leftists have
become dominant, they have shown themselves ready to take away from everyone
else’s academic freedom. (This is “political correctness.”) The same will
happen with leftists and technology: They will use it to oppress everyone else
if they ever get it under their own control. 217. In earlier revolutions,
leftists of the most powerhungry type, repeatedly, have first cooperated with
nonleftist revolutionaries, as well as with leftists of a more libertarian
inclination, and later have double-crossed them to seize power for themselves.
Robespierre did this in the French Revolution, the Bolsheviks did it in the
Russian Revolution, the communists did it in Spain in 1938 and Castro and his
followers did it in Cuba. Given the past history of leftism, it would be
utterly foolish for non-leftist revolutionaries today to collaborate with
leftists. 218. Various thinkers have pointed out that leftism is a kind of
religion. Leftism is not a religion in the strict sense because leftist
doctrine does not postulate the existence of any supernatural being. But, for
the leftist, leftism plays a psychological role much like that which religion
plays for some people. The leftist NEEDS to believe in leftism; it plays a
vital role in his psychological economy. His beliefs are not easily modified by
logic or facts. He has a deep conviction that leftism is morally Right with a
capital R, and that he has not only a right but a duty to impose leftist
morality on everyone. (However, many of the people we are referring to as
“leftists” do not think of themselves as leftists and would not describe their
system of beliefs as leftism. We use the term “leftism” because we don’t know
of any better words to designate the spectrum of related creeds that includes
the feminist, gay rights, political correctness, etc., movements, and because
these movements have a strong affinity with the old left. See paragraphs
227-230.) 219. Leftism is a totalitarian force. Wherever leftism is in a
position of power it tends to invade every private corner and force every
thought into a leftist mold. In part this is because of the quasi-religious
character of leftism: everything contrary to leftist beliefs represents Sin.
More importantly, leftism is a totalitarian force because of the leftists’
drive for power. The leftist seeks to satisfy his need for power through
identification with a social movement and he tries to go through the power
process by helping to pursue and attain the goals of the movement (see
paragraph 83). But no matter how far the movement has gone in attaining its goals
the leftist is never satisfied, because his activism is a surrogate activity
(see paragraph 41). That is, the leftist’s real motive is not to attain the
ostensible goals of leftism; in reality he is motivated by the sense of power
he gets from struggling for and then reaching a social goal. [35] Consequently
the leftist is never satisfied with the goals he has already attained; his need
for the power process leads him always to pursue some new goal. The leftist
wants equal opportunities for minorities. When that is attained he insists on
statistical equality of achievement by minorities. And as long as anyone
harbors in some corner of his mind a negative attitude toward some minority,
the leftist has to re-educated him. And ethnic minorities are not enough; no
one can be allowed to have a negative attitude toward homosexuals, disabled
people, fat people, old people, ugly people, and on and on and on. It’s not
enough that the public should be informed about the hazards of smoking; a
warning has to be stamped on every package of cigarettes. Then cigarette
advertising has to be restricted if not banned. The activists will never be
satisfied until tobacco is outlawed, and after that it will be alcohol, then
junk food, etc. Activists have fought gross child abuse, which is reasonable.
But now they want to stop all spanking. When they have done that they will want
to ban something else they consider unwholesome, then another thing and then
another. They will never be satisfied until they have complete control over all
child rearing practices. And then they will move on to another cause. 220.
Suppose you asked leftists to make a list of ALL the things that were wrong
with society, and then suppose you instituted EVERY social change that they
demanded. It is safe to say that within a couple of years the majority of
leftists would find something new to complain about, 28 some new social “evil”
to correct; because, once again, the leftist is motivated less by distress at
society’s ills than by the need to satisfy his drive for power by imposing his
solutions on society. 221. Because of the restrictions placed on their thoughts
and behavior by their high level of socialization, many leftists of the
over-socialized type cannot pursue power in the ways that other people do. For
them the drive for power has only one morally acceptable outlet, and that is in
the struggle to impose their morality on everyone. 222. Leftists, especially
those of the oversocialized type, are True Believers in the sense of Eric
Hoffer’s book, The True Believer. But not all True Believers are of the same
psychological type as leftists. Presumably a true-believing nazi, for instance,
is very different psychologically from a true-believing leftist. Because of
their capacity for singleminded devotion to a cause, True Believers are a
useful, perhaps a necessary, ingredient of any revolutionary movement. This
presents a problem with which we must admit we don’t know how to deal. We
aren’t sure how to harness the energies of the True Believer to a revolution
against technology. At present all we can say is that no True Believer will
make a safe recruit to the revolution unless his commitment is exclusively to
the destruction of technology. If he is committed also to another ideal, he may
want to use technology as a tool for pursuing that other ideal (see paragraphs
200, 201). 223. Some readers may say, “This stuff about leftism is a lot of
crap. I know John and Jane who are leftish types and they don’t have all these
totalitarian tendencies.” It’s quite true that many leftists, possibly even a
numerical majority, are decent people who sincerely believe in tolerating
others’ values (up to a point) and wouldn’t want to use high-handed methods to
reach their social goals. Our remarks about leftism are not meant to apply to
every individual leftist but to describe the general character of leftism as a
movement. And the general character of a movement is not necessarily determined
by the numerical proportions of the various kinds of people involved in the
movement. 224. The people who rise to positions of power in leftist movements
tend to be leftists of the most power-hungry type, because power-hungry people
are those who strive hardest to get into positions of power. Once the
powerhungry types have captured control of the movement, there are many
leftists of a gentler breed who inwardly disapprove of many of the actions of
the leaders, but cannot bring themselves to oppose them. They NEED their faith
in the movement, and because they cannot give up this faith they go along with
the leaders. True, SOME leftists do have the guts to oppose the totalitarian
tendencies that emerge, but they generally lose, because the powerhungry types
are better organized, are more ruthless and Machiavellian and have taken care
to build themselves a strong power base. 225. These phenomena appeared clearly
in Russia and other countries that were taken over by leftists. Similarly,
before the breakdown of communism in the, USSR, leftish types in the West
would, seldom criticize that country. If prodded they would admit that the USSR
did many wrong things, but then they would try to find excuses for the
communists and begin talking about the faults of the West. They always opposed
Western military resistance to communist aggression. Leftish types all over the
world vigorously protested the U.S. military action in Vietnam, but when the
USSR invaded Afghanistan they did nothing. Not that they approved of the Soviet
actions; but because of their leftist faith, they just couldn’t bear to put
themselves in opposition to communism. Today, in those of our universities
where “political correctness” has become dominant, there are probably many
leftish types who privately disapprove of the suppression of academic freedom,
but they go along with it anyway. 226. Thus the fact that many individual
leftists are personally mild and fairly tolerant people by no means prevents
leftism as a whole form having a totalitarian tendency. 227. Our discussion of
leftism has a serious weakness. It is still far from clear what we mean by the
word “leftist.” There doesn’t seem to be much we can do about this. Today
leftism is fragmented into a whole spectrum of activist movements. Yet not all
activist movements are leftist, and some activist movements (e.g., radical
environmentalism) seem to include both personalities of the leftist type and
personalities of thoroughly un-leftist types who ought to know better than to
collaborate with leftists. Varieties of leftists fade out gradually into
varieties of non-leftists and we ourselves would often be hard-pressed to
decide whether a given individual is or is not a leftist. To the extent that it
is defined at all, our conception of leftism is defined by the discussion of it
that we have given in this article, and we can only advise the reader to use
his own judgment in deciding who is a leftist. 228. But it will be helpful to
list some criteria for diagnosing leftism. These criteria cannot be applied in
a cut and dried manner. Some individuals may meet some of the criteria without
being leftists, some leftists may not meet any of the criteria. Again, you just
have to use your judgment. 229. The leftist is oriented toward large-scale
collectivism. He emphasizes the duty of the individual to serve society and the
duty of society to take care of the individual. He has a negative attitude
toward individualism. He often takes a moralistic tone. He tends to be for gun
control, for sex education and other psychologically “enlightened” educational
methods, for social planning, for affirmative action, for multiculturalism. He
tends to identify with victims. He tends to be against competition and against
violence, but he ofte finds excuses for those leftists who do commit violence.
He is fond of using the common catch-phrases of the left, like “racism,”
“sexism,” “homophobia,” “capitalism,” “imperialism,” “neocolonialism,”
“genocide,” “social change,” “social justice,” “social responsibility.” Maybe
the best diagnostic trait of the leftist is his tendency to sympathize with the
following movements: feminism, gay rights, ethnic rights, disability rights,
animal rights, political correctness. Anyone who strongly sympathizes with ALL
of these movements is almost certainly a leftist. [36] 230. The more dangerous
leftists, that is, those who 29 are most power-hungry, are often characterized
by arrogance or by a dogmatic approach to ideology. However, the most dangerous
leftists of all may be certain oversocialized types who avoid irritating
displays of aggressiveness and refrain from advertising their leftism, but work
quietly and unobtrusively to promote collectivist values, “enlightened”
psychological techniques for socializing children, dependence of the individual
on the system, and so forth. These crypto-leftists (as we may call them)
approximate certain bourgeois types as far as practical action is concerned,
but differ from them in psychology, ideology and motivation. The ordinary
bourgeois tries to bring people under control of the system in order to protect
his way of life, or he does so simply because his attitudes are conventional.
The crypto-leftist tries to bring people under control of the system because he
is a True Believer in a collectivistic ideology. The crypto-leftist is
differentiated from the average leftist of the oversocialized type by the fact
that his rebellious impulse is weaker and he is more securely socialized. He is
differentiated from the ordinary well-socialized bourgeois by the fact that
there is some deep lack within him that makes it necessary for him to devote
himself to a cause and immerse himself in a collectivity. And maybe his
(well-sublimated) drive for power is stronger than that of the average
bourgeois. FINAL NOTE 231. Throughout this article we’ve made imprecise
statements and statements that ought to have had all sorts of qualifications
and reservations attached to them; and some of our statements may be flatly
false. Lack of sufficient information and the need for brevity made it
impossible for us to formulate our assertions more precisely or add all the
necessary qualifications. And of course in a discussion of this kind one must
rely heavily on intuitive judgment, and that can sometimes be wrong. So we
don’t claim that this article expresses more than a crude approximation to the
truth. 232. All the same, we are reasonably confident that the general outlines
of the picture we have painted here are roughly correct. Just one possible weak
point needs to be mentioned. We have portrayed leftism in its modern form as a
phenomenon peculiar to our time and as a symptom of the disruption of the power
process. But we might possibly be wrong about this. Oversocialized types who
try to satisfy their drive for power by imposing their morality on everyone
have certainly been around for a long time. But we THINK that the decisive role
played by feelings of inferiority, low self-esteem, powerlessness,
identification with victims by people who are not themselves victims, is a
peculiarity of modern leftism. Identification with victims by people not
themselves victims can be seen to some extent in 19th century leftism and early
Christianity, but as far as we can make out, symptoms of low self-esteem, etc.,
were not nearly so evident in these movements, or in any other movements, as
they are in modern leftism. But we are not in a position to assert confidently
that no such movements have existed prior to modern leftism. This is a
significant question to which historians ought to give their attention. NOTES
1. (Paragraph 19) We are asserting that ALL, or even most, bullies and ruthless
competitors suffer from feelings of inferiority. 2. (Paragraph 25) During the
Victorian period many oversocialized people suffered from serious psychological
problems as a result of repressing or trying to repress their sexual feelings.
Freud apparently based his theories on people of this type. Today the focus of
socialization has shifted from sex to aggression. 3. (Paragraph 27) Not
necessarily including specialists in engineering or the “hard” sciences. 4.
(Paragraph 28) There are many individuals of the middle and upper classes who
resist some of these values, but usually their resistance is more or less
covert. Such resistance appears in the mass media only to a very limited
extent. The main thrust of propaganda in our society is in favor of the stated
values. The main reason why these values have become, so to speak, the official
values of our society is that they are useful to the industrial system.
Violence is discouraged because it disrupts the functioning of the system.
Racism is discouraged because ethnic conflicts also disrupt the system, and
discrimination wastes the talents of minority-group members who could be useful
to the system. Poverty must be “cured” because the underclass causes problems
for the system and contact with the underclass lowers the morale of the other
classes. Women are encouraged to have careers because their talents are useful
to the system and, more importantly, because by having regular jobs women
become better integrated into the system and tied directly to it rather than to
their families. This helps to weaken family solidarity. (The leaders of the
system say they want to strengthen the family, but they really mean is that
they want the family to serve as an effective tool for socializing children in
accord with the needs of the system. We argue in paragraphs 51, 52 that the
system cannot afford to let the family or other smallscale social groups be
strong or autonomous.) 5. (Paragraph 42) It may be argued that the majority of
people don’t want to make their own decisions but want leaders to do their
thinking for them. There is an element of truth in this. People like to make
their own decisions in small matters, but making decisions on difficult,
fundamental questions requires facing up to psychological conflict, and most
people hate psychological conflict. Hence they tend to lean on others in making
difficult decisions. But it does not follow that they like to have decisions
imposed upon them without having any opportunity to influence those decisions.
The majority of people are natural followers, not leaders, but they like to
have direct personal access to their leaders, they want to be able to influence
the leaders and participate to some extent in making even the difficult
decisions. At least to that degree they need autonomy. 30 6. (Paragraph 44)
Some of the symptoms listed are similar to those shown by caged animals. To
explain how these symptoms arise from deprivation with respect to the power
process: common-sense understanding of human nature tells one that lack of goals
whose attainment requires effort leads to boredom and that boredom, long
continued, often leads eventually to depression. Failure to attain goals leads
to frustration and lowering of selfesteem. Frustration leads to anger, anger to
aggression, often in the form of spouse or child abuse. It has been shown that
long-continued frustration commonly leads to depression and that depression
tends to cause guilt, sleep disorders, eating disorders and bad feelings about
oneself. Those who are tending toward depression seek pleasure as an antidote;
hence insatiable hedonism and excessive sex, with perversions as a means of
getting new kicks. Boredom too tends to cause excessive pleasure-seeking since,
lacking other goals, people often use pleasure as a goal. The foregoing is a
simplification. Reality is more complex, and of course, deprivation with
respect to the power process is not the ONLY cause of the symptoms described.
By the way, when we mention depression we do not necessarily mean depression
that is severe enough to be treated by a psychiatrist. Often only mild forms of
depression are involved. And when we speak of goals we do not necessarily mean
long-term, thought-out goals. For many or most people through much of human
history, the goals of a hand-to-mouth existence (merely providing oneself and
one’s family with food from day to day) have been quite sufficient. 7.
(Paragraph 52) A partial exception may be made for a few passive, inwardlooking
groups, such as the Amish, which have little effect on the wider society. Apart
from these, some genuine small-scale communities do exist in America today. For
instance, youth gangs and “cults.” Everyone regards them as dangerous, and so
they are, because the members of these groups are loyal primarily to one another
rather than to the system, hence the system cannot control them. Or take the
gypsies. The gypsies commonly get away with theft and fraud because their
loyalties are such that they can always get other gypsies to give testimony
that “proves” their innocence. Obviously the system would be in serious trouble
if too many people belonged to such groups. Some of the early-20th century
Chinese thinkers who were concerned with modernizing China recognized the
necessity breaking down small-scale social groups such as the family:
“(According to Sun Yatsen) the Chinese people needed a new surge of patriotism,
which would lead to a transfer of loyalty from the family to the state....
(According to Li Huang) traditional attachments, particularly to the family had
to be abandoned if nationalism were to develop in China.” (Chester C. Tan,
“Chinese Political Thought in the Twentieth Century,” page 125, page 297.) 8.
(Paragraph 56) Yes, we know that 19th century America had its problems, and
serious ones, but for the sake of brevity we have to express ourselves in
simplified terms. 9. (Paragraph 61) We leave aside the “underclass.” We are
speaking of the mainstream. 10. (Paragraph 62) Some social scientists,
educators, “mental health” professionals and the like are doing their best to
push the social drives into group 1 by trying to see to it that everyone has a
satisfactory social life. 11. (Paragraphs 63, 82) Is the drive for endless
material acquisition really an artificial creation of the advertising and
marketing industry? Certainly there is no innate human drive for material
acquisition. There have been many cultures in which people have desired little
material wealth beyond what was necessary to satisfy their basic physical needs
(Australian aborigines, traditional Mexican peasant culture, some African
cultures). On the other hand there have also been many pre-industrial cultures
in which material acquisition has played an important role. So we can’t claim
that today’s acquisition-oriented culture is exclusively a creation of the
advertising and marketing industry. But it is clear that the advertising and
marketing industry has had an important part in creating that culture. The big
corporations that spend millions on advertising wouldn’t be spending that kind
of money without solid proof that they were getting it back in increased sales.
One member of FC met a sales manager a couple of years ago who was frank enough
to tell him, “Our job is to make people buy things they don’t want and don’t
need.” He then described how an untrained novice could present people with the
facts about a product, and make no sales at all, while a trained and
experienced professional salesman would make lots of sales to the same people.
This shows that people are manipulated into buying things they don’t really
want. 12. (Paragraph 64) The problem of purposelessness seems to have become
less serious during the last 15 years or so, because people now feel less
secure physically and economically than they did earlier, and the need for
security provides them with a goal. But purposelessness has been replaced by
frustration over the difficulty of attaining security. We emphasize the problem
of purposelessness because the liberals and leftists would wish to solve our
social problems by having society guarantee everyone’s security; but if that
could be done it would only bring back the problem of purposelessness. The real
issue is not whether society provides well or poorly for people’s security; the
trouble is that people are dependent on the system for their security rather
than having it in their own hands. This, by the way, is part of the reason why
some people get worked up about the right to bear arms; possession of a gun
puts that aspect of their security in their own hands. 13. (Paragraph 66) Conservatives’
efforts to decrease the amount of government regulation are of little benefit
to the average man. For one thing, only a fraction of the regulations can be
eliminated because most regulations are necessary. For another thing, most of
the deregulation affects business rather than the average individual, so that
its main effect is to take power from the government and give it to private
corporations. What this means for the average man is that government
interference in his life is replaced by interference from big corporations,
which may be permitted, for example, to dump more chemicals that get into his
water supply and give him cancer. The conservatives are just taking the average
man for a sucker, 31 exploiting his resentment of Big Government to promote the
power of Big Business. 14. (Paragraph 73) When someone approves of the purpose
for which propaganda is being used in a given case, he generally calls it
“education” or applies to it some similar euphemism. But propaganda is
propaganda regardless of the purpose for which it is used. 15. (Paragraph 83)
We are not expressing approval or disapproval of the Panama invasion. We only
use it to illustrate a point. 16. (Paragraph 95) When the American colonies
were under British rule there were fewer and less effective legal guarantees of
freedom than there were after the American Constitution went into effect, yet
there was more personal freedom in pre-industrial America, both before and
after the War of Independence, than there was after the Industrial Revolution
took hold in this country. We quote from “Violence in America: Historical and
Comparative Perspectives,” edited by Hugh Davis Graham and Ted Robert Gurr,
Chapter 12 by Roger Lane, pages 476-478: “The progressive heightening of
standards of propriety, and with it the increasing reliance on official law
enforcement (in l9th century America)... were common to the whole society....
[T]he change in social behavior is so long term and so widespread as to suggest
a connection with the most fundamental of contemporary social processes; that
of industrial urbanization itself.... Massachusetts in 1835 had a population of
some 660,940, 81 percent rural, overwhelmingly preindustrial and native born.
It’s citizens were used to considerable personal freedom. Whether teamsters,
farmers or artisans, they were all accustomed to setting their own schedules,
and the nature of their work made them physically independent of each other....
Individual problems, sins or even crimes, were not generally cause for wider social
concern...."But the impact of the twin movements to the city and to the
factory, both just gathering force in 1835, had a progressive effect on
personal behavior throughout the 19th century and into the 20th. The factory
demanded regularity of behavior, a life governed by obedience to the rhythms of
clock and calendar, the demands of foreman and supervisor. In the city or town,
the needs of living in closely packed neighborhoods inhibited many actions
previously unobjectionable. Both blue- and white-collar employees in larger
establishments were mutually dependent on their fellows; as one man’s work fit
into anther’s, so one man’s business was no longer his own. The results of the
new organization of life and work were apparent by 1900, when some 76 percent
of the 2,805,346 inhabitants of Massachusetts were classified as urbanites.
Much violent or irregular behavior which had been tolerable in a casual,
independent society was no longer acceptable in the more formalized,
cooperative atmosphere of the later period.... The move to the cities had, in
short, produced a more tractable, more socialized, more ’civilized’ generation
than its predecessors.” 17. (Paragraph 117) Apologists for the system are fond
of citing cases in which elections have been decided by one or two votes, but
such cases are rare. 18. (Paragraph 119) “Today, in technologically advanced
lands, men live very similar lives in spite of geographical, religious, and
political differences. The daily lives of a Christian bank clerk in Chicago, a
Buddhist bank clerk in Tokyo, and a Communist bank clerk in Moscow are far more
alike than the life of any one of them is like that of any single man who lived
a thousand years ago. These similarities are the result of a common
technology....” L. Sprague de Camp, “The Ancient Engineers,” Ballantine
edition, page 17. The lives of the three bank clerks are not IDENTICAL.
Ideology does have SOME effect. But all technological societies, in order to
survive, must evolve along APPROXIMATELY the same trajectory. 19. (Paragraph
123) Just think an irresponsible genetic engineer might create a lot of
terrorists. 20. (Paragraph 124) For a further example of undesirable
consequences of medical progress, suppose a reliable cure for cancer is
discovered. Even if the treatment is too expensive to be available to any but
the elite, it will greatly reduce their incentive to stop the escape of
carcinogens into the environment. 21. (Paragraph 128) Since many people may
find paradoxical the notion that a large number of good things can add up to a
bad thing, we illustrate with an analogy. Suppose Mr. A is playing chess with
Mr. B. Mr. C, a Grand Master, is looking over Mr. A’s shoulder. Mr. A of course
wants to win his game, so if Mr. C points out a good move for him to make, he
is doing Mr. A a favor. But suppose now that Mr. C tells Mr. A how to make ALL
of his moves. In each particular instance he does Mr. A a favor by showing him
his best move, but by making ALL of his moves for him he spoils his game, since
there is not point in Mr. A’s playing the game at all if someone else makes all
his moves. The situation of modern man is analogous to that of Mr. A. The system
makes an individual’s life easier for him in innumerable ways, but in doing so
it deprives him of control over his own fate. 22. (Paragraph 137) Here we are
considering only the conflict of values within the mainstream. For the sake of
simplicity we leave out of the picture “outsider” values like the idea that
wild nature is more important than human economic welfare. 23. (Paragraph 137)
Self-interest is not necessarily MATERIAL self-interest. It can consist in
fulfillment of some psychological need, for example, by promoting one’s own
ideology or religion. 24. (Paragraph 139) A qualification: It is in the
interest of the system to permit a certain prescribed degree of freedom in some
areas. For example, economic freedom (with suitable limitations and restraints)
has proved effective in promoting economic growth. But only planned,
circumscribed, limited freedom is in the interest of the system. The individual
must always be kept on a leash, even if the leash is sometimes long (see
paragraphs 94, 97). 25. (Paragraph 143) We don’t mean to suggest that the
efficiency or the potential for survival of a society has always been inversely
proportional to the amount of pressure or discomfort to which the society
subjects people. That certainly is not the case. There is good reason to
believe that many primitive societies subjected people to less pressure than
European society did, but European society 32 proved far more efficient than
any primitive society and always won out in conflicts with such societies
because of the advantages conferred by technology. 26. (Paragraph 147) If you
think that more effective law enforcement is unequivocally good because it
suppresses crime, then remember that crime as defined by the system is not
necessarily what YOU would call crime. Today, smoking marijuana is a “crime,”
and, in some places in the U.S., so is possession of an unregistered handgun.
Tomorrow, possession of ANY firearm, registered or not, may be made a crime,
and the same thing may happen with disapproved methods of child-rearing, such
as spanking. In some countries, expression of dissident political opinions is a
crime, and there is no certainty that this will never happen in the U.S., since
no constitution or political system lasts forever. If a society needs a large,
powerful law enforcement establishment, then there is something gravely wrong
with that society; it must be subjecting people to severe pressures if so many
refuse to follow the rules, or follow them only because forced. Many societies
in the past have gotten by with little or no formal law-enforcement. 27.
(Paragraph 151) To be sure, past societies have had means of influencing human
behavior, but these have been primitive and of low effectiveness compared with
the technological means that are now being developed. 28. (Paragraph 152)
However, some psychologists have publicly expressed opinions indicating their
contempt for human freedom. And the mathematician Claude Shannon was quoted in
Omni (August 1987) as saying, “I visualize a time when we will be to robots
what dogs are to humans, and I’m rooting for the machines.” 29. (Paragraph 154)
This is no science fiction! After writing paragraph 154 we came across an
article in Scientific American according to which scientists are actively
developing techniques for identffying possible future criminals and for
treating them by a combination of biological and psychological means. Some
scientists advocate compulsory application of the treatment, which may be
available in the near future. (See “Seeking the Criminal Element,” by W. Wayt
Gibbs, Scientific American, March 1995.) Maybe you think this is okay because
the treatment would be applied to those who might become violent criminals. But
of course it won’t stop there. Next, a treatment will be applied to those who
might become drunk drivers (they endanger human life too), then perhaps to peel
who spank their children, then to environmentalists who sabotage logging
equipment, eventually to anyone whose behavior is inconvenient for the system.
30. (Paragraph 184) A further advantage of nature as a counter-ideal to
technology is that, in many people, nature inspires the kind of reverence that
is associated with religion, so that nature could perhaps be idealized on a
religious basis. It is true that in many societies religion has served as a
support and justification for the established order, but it is also true that
religion has often provided a basis for rebellion. Thus it may be useful to
introduce a religious element into the rebellion against technology, the more
so because Western society today has no strong religious foundation. Religion,
nowadays either is used as cheap and transparent support for narrow,
short-sighted selfishness (some conservatives use it this way), or even is
cynically exploited to make easy money (by many evangelists), or has
degenerated into crude irrationalism (fundamentalist protestant sects,
“cults”), or is simply stagnant (Catholicism, main-line Protestantism). The
nearest thing to a strong, widespread, dynamic religion that the West has seen
in recent times has been the quasi-religion of leftism, but leftism today is
fragmented and has no clear, unified, inspiring goal. Thus there is a religious
vacuum in our society that could perhaps be filled by a religion focused on
nature in opposition to technology. But it would be a mistake to try to concoct
artificially a religion to fill this role. Such an invented religion would
probably be a failure. Take the “Gaia” religion for example. Do its adherents
REALLY believe in it or are they just play-acting? If they are just play-acting
their religion will be a flop in the end. It is probably best not to try to
introduce religion into the conflict of nature vs. technology unless you REALLY
believe in that religion yourself and find that it arouses a deep, strong,
genuine response in many other people. 31. (Paragraph 189) Assuming that such a
final push occurs. Conceivably the industrial system might be eliminated in a
somewhat gradual or piecemeal fashion (see paragraphs 4, 167 and Note 32). 32. (Paragraph
193) It is even conceivable (remotely) that the revolution might consist only
of a massive change of attitudes toward technology resulting in a relatively
gradual and painless disintegration of the industrial system. But if this
happens we’ll be very lucky. It’s far more probably that the transition to a
nontechnological society will be very difficult and full of conflicts and
disasters. 33. (Paragraph 195) The economic and technological structure of a
society are far more important than its political structure in determining the
way the average man lives (see paragraphs 95, 119 and Notes 16, 18). 34.
(Paragraph 215) This statement refers to our particular brand of anarchism. A
wide variety of social attitudes have been called “anarchist,” and it may be
that many who consider themselves anarchists would not accept our statement of
paragraph 215. It should be noted, by the way, that there is a nonviolent
anarchist movement whose members probably would not accept FC as anarchist and
certainly would not approve of FC’s violent methods. 35. (Paragraph 219) Many
leftists are motivated also by hostility, but the hostility probably results in
part from a frustrated need for power. 36. (Paragraph 229) It is important to
understand that we mean someone who sympathizes with these movements as they
exist today in our society. One who believes that women, homosexuals, etc.,
should have equal rights is not necessary a leftist. The feminist, gay rights,
etc., movements that exist in our society have the particular ideological tone
that characterizes leftism, and if one believes, for example, that women should
have equal rights it does not necessarily follow that one must sympathize with
the feminist movement as it exists today. c 1995 Hache et les auteurs sauf indication
contraire http://editions-hache.com/
BELOW: MENTAL PEACE TO TED , TILL HE DIES !
FOR HIS TORMENTORS, NO REM SLEEP TILL THEY DIE !!
BELOW: THIS GERMAN JEWISH BASTARD, AN AGENT OF JEW ROTHSCHILD IS NO 17 IN MY GARBAGE BUCKET LIST..
HIS UNCLE WAS MAD BASTARD SIGMUND FREUD ( MOOLADHARA CHAKRA CORRUPTION EXPERT ) WHO IS NO 3 IN VADAKAYILs GARBAGE BUCKET
-
Boss bouncer gaya.
-
DONT GET INTIMIDATED BY HIS 168 IQ LEVEL..
MERE INTELLECT CANNOT TAKE YOU FAR
EXPERIENCE AND EXPOSURE MEANS EVERYTHING.. KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEPTION IS ROOTED IN EXPERIENCE..
QUOTE: Thus pesticide or chemical use near a creek may contaminate the water supply hundreds of miles downstream, and the greenhouse effect affects the whole world. 119.UNQUOTE
TED BABYs CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL REVOLVES AROUND A CREEK. THIS IS EARTH WORM TUNNEL VISION..
WHERE DOES VADAKAYILs CONDOR VISON TAKE HIM?
I TALK OF METHANE IN GULF STREAM AFFECTING THE GLOBAL OCEAN CURRENT CONVEYOR BELT AND AFFECTING INDIAs MONSOONS.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/06/record-heat-wave-europe-2019-root-cause.html
CAN TED BABY EVER IMAGINE THIS ? THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A FROG IN A WELL AND A CONDOR
CAN TED BABY COVER THE VAST AMOUNT OF TOPICS I HAVE COVERED IN MY BLOGS? CAN HE MAKE MORE THAN 10,000 REVELATIONS?
OH YEAH ?
Capt ajit vadakayil
..
-
-
TODAY--
TWO NEW PEOPLE MK GANDHI AND SONIA GANDHI ARE FLUSHED DOWN THE SHITHOLE
GARBAGE BUCKET LIST:
1) BERTRAND RUSSEL
2 NOAM CHOMSKY
3 SIGMUND FREUD
4) GEORG WILHELM HEGEL
5) AMARTYA SEN
6) FREIDRICH WILHELM NIETZSCHE
7) IMMANUEL KANT
8 ) BARUCH SPINOZA
9) ALBERT EINSTEIN
10) ISAAC NEWTON
11) GUGLEILMO MARCONI
12) CHARLES DARWIN
13) KARL MARX
14) MAX WEBER
15) THOMAS ALVA EDISON
16) FIBONACCI
17) EDWARD BERNAYS
18) JOHN DEWEY
19) GEORGE IVANOVICH GURDJEIFF
20 PETER D OUPENSKY
21) OPRAH WINFREY
22) RICHARD BANDLER AND JOHN GRINDER
23) CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR
24) STEPHEN HAWKING
25) SIDNEY HOOK
26) ALFRED KINSEY
27) BARACK OBAMA
28) AYN RAND
29) WILHELM WUNDT
30) RENE DESCARTES.
31) EMPRESS HELENA
32) RAYMOND IV
33) SAINT MOTHER TERESA
########################
BBB ) HERE ARE PEOPLE WHO MADE A DENT IN THE UNIVERSE— THEY GET THE "VADAKAYIL PRIZE". THIS IS NOT A VESTED “NOBEL PRIZE “
1) NIKOLA TESLA
2) DIMITRI MENDELEYEEV
3) IE IRODOV
4) ARYABHATTA ( 2700 BC)
5) SRINIVASAN RAMANUJAN
6) CHANAKYA ( 372 BC )
7) ADI SHANKARACHARYA ( 2000 BC )
8) APOLLONIUS OF TYANA ( KERALA SAGE WHOSE LEGACY WAS USURPED BY COOKED UP JESUS IN 325 AD )
9) "JOHN DOE"
10) JULIAN ASSANGE
11) SWAMI CHINMAYANANDA
12) GARY STEPHEN WEBB
13) GEORGE ORWELL.
13) CESAR MILLAN
14) HENRY FORD.
15) PANINI ( 5500 BC )
16) BHARTRHARI ( 7000 BC )
17) PATANJALI ( 5000 BC )
18) MANU (8300 BC)
19) YASKA ( 5800 BC )
20) JOHN CARMAC
21) QUEEN DIDO ( 1600 BC )
22) KANADA MUNI ( 6500 BC )
23) VARAHAMIHIRA ( 2660 BC )
24) VARARUCHI ( 2830 BC )
25) VIROCHANA ( 10, 650 BC )
26) MAHABALI ( 10,600 BC )
27) KALANAMI ( 10500 BC )
28) IMHOTEP / AYYAPPA ( 3900 BC )
29) PROF HYPATIA
30) SWARBANU
31) PUTIN
32) EDWARD SNOWDEN
CCC) DOWN THE SHIT HOLE----
1) SUHEL SETH
2) PRITISH NANDI
3) DILIP CHERIAN
4) PRANNOY JAMES ROY
5) AROON PURIE
6) VINEET JAIN
7) SHEKHAR GUPTA
8) SAGARIKA GHOSE AND HUSBAND RAJDEEP SARDESAI
9) SHOBHAA DE
10) SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN AND WIFE NANDINI SUNDAR
11) KAMALHAASAN
12) AUDREY TRUSCHKE
13) NOSTRODAMUS
14) MANI SHANKAR AIYAR
15) VERGHESE KURIEN
16) MS SWAMINATHAN
17) DEVDUTT PATTANAIK
18) SANJAY R HEGDE
19) MARK ZUCKERBERG
20) JACK DORSEY
21) THOMAS L FRIEDMAN
22) ROMILA THAPAR
23) IRFAN HABIB
24) RAMCHANDRA GUHA
25) SHELDON POLLOCK
26) WENDY DONIGER
27) BARKHA DUTT
28) ADMIRAL LN RAMDAS , WIFE LALITA AND DAUGHTER KAVITA.
29) SWARA BHASKAR
30) KARAN THAPAR
31) ADAM D ANGELO
32) SAINT CRYIL ARCHBISHOP OF ALEXANDRIA
33) N RAM
34) GREAT THUNBERG
35) MK GANDHI
36) SONIA GANDHI
-
"10 worst countries for women in the world 2020
10. United States
9. Nigeria
8. Yemen
7. Democratic Republic of Congo
6. Pakistan
5. Saudi Arabia
4. Somalia
3. Syria
2. Afghanistan
1. India
India ranked as the most dangerous country for women on three issues; CULTURAL TRADITIONS, sexual violence and human trafficking. Domestic violence in India is endemic and widespread predominantly against women. Around 70% of women in India are victims of violence includes; Rape, marital rapes, sexual assault and harassment, CULTURAL AND TRADITIONAL PRACTICES, and human trafficking including forced labor, sex slavery and DOMESTIC SERVITUDE."
https://www.wonderslist.com/10-worst-countries-for-women/
http://poll2018.trust.org-
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL HAS SEEN THIS PLANET
HE SAYS , INDIA IS THE BEST PLACE FOR WOMEN!
IF THERE IS ANYBODY ON THIS PLANET MORE PERCEPTIVE AND EXPERIENCED THAN VADAKAYIL, RAISE HIS / HER HAND..
NOW--FUCK OFF AND HOLD YOUR PEACE FOREVER.
capt ajit vadakayil
..
-
-
SOMEONE CALLED ME UP AND CRIED..
CAPTAIN, WHY IS THAT WE KNOW ABOUT VISHNUs GATEKEEPER JAYA IN THE ROLE OF HIRANYAKASHIPU ( KILLED BY VISHNU AVATAR NARASIMHA ) AND RAVANA ( KILLED BY VISHNU AVATAR RAMA ) – BUT NEVER SISHUPALA ( KILLED BY VISHNU AVATAR KRISHNA )?
CHAKKAR KYA HAI.
GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHILD DELETED THE PURANA STORY OF SISHUPALA AS HE DID NOT WANT RUKMINI TO BE ASSOCIATED HER KULDEVI MALINITHAN TEMPLE IN ARUNACHAL PRADESH..
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/ilp-cab-nrc-why-china-wants-arunachal.html
KRISHNA AFTER MARRYING RUKMINI VISITED THIS TEMPLE FOR BLESSINGS OF SHAKTI ( SHIVAs WIFE )..
MALINITHAN TEMPLE ( DURGA ) IN ARUNACHAL PRADESH IS 6000 YEARS OLD, NOT 800 AS PER WIKIPEDIA PROPAGANDA ..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/09/shishupala-and-dantavakra-third-re.html
KERALA KING SISHUPALA’S MOTHER WAS THE SISTER OF KRISHNA’S FATHER VASUDEV FROM GURUVAYUR KERALA.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/06/guruvayur-temple-idol-carved-out-of.html
MAYA DANAVA ESCAPED TO PATALA ( PERU ) IN HIS VIMANA FEARING KRISHNA.. KRISHNA CAUSED THE ESCAPE TO HAPPEN TO SET UP A FOREIGN CIVILIZATION OF MAYANS 6000 YEARS AGO ..
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/6000-year-old-mayan-and-aztec.html
MAYA DANAVAs DAUGHTER MANDODARI MARRIED RAVANA.. KRISHNA CAUSED THE ESCAPE TO HAPPEN TO SET UP A CILILIZATION OF MAYANS
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/09/king-ravana-of-ramayana-hero-or-villian.html
KRISHNA CAUSED THE BANISHING OF KERALA KING MAHABALI TO PATALA ( PERU ) WHERE HIS FATHER KING VIROCHANA WAS TREATED AS GOD.
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/07/secrets-of-12000-year-old-machu-picchu.html
KRISHNAs BEAUTIFUL WIFE JAMBAVATI WAS THE DAUGHTER OF JAMBAVAN, THE KING OF THE BEAR KINGDOM ( KERALA )..
SYAMANTHAKA MANI ( KOHINIOOR DIAMOND ) WAS GIVEN TO KRISHNA AS DOWRY WHEN HE MARRIED JAMBAVANs DAUGHTER
IN KERALA WHEN OUR PURANA STORY TELLING GRANDMOTHERs UTTERED “JAMBAVAN KALAM” MEANS – LONG AGO IN THE ANCIENT TIME OF JAMBAVAN.
JAMBAVANs ANCESTOR WITNESSED VISHNU AVATAR VAMANA BANISHING KERALA KING MAHABALI TO PATALA ..
JAMBAVANs ANCESTOR WAS ONE OF THE 54 DANAVAs AT SAMUDRA MANTHAN ALONG WITH MAHABALIs ( DANAVA BLOODLINE HIRANAYA KASHIPUs / / VIROCHANAs / KALANEMIs ) ANCESTOR AND KING SWARBANUs ( HIRANYAKSHA ) ANCESTOR ..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/09/onam-our-only-link-to-planets-oldest.html
MAHABALIs SON KALANEMI BUILT THE 12,000 YEAR OLD BENT PYRAMID OF EGYPT.
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/07/secrets-of-bent-pyramid-at-dahsur-egypt_28.html
HIRANYAKSHAs ( KILLED BY VISHNU AVATAR VARAHA ) ANCESTOR SWARBANU WAS ONE OF THE 54 DANAVAs AT SAMUDRA MANTHA. HIS HEAD WAS CUT OFF BY VISHNU AVATAR KURMA , THE HEAD BECOMING RAHU AND BODY BECOMING KETU.
SWARMANUs ( SENIOR) DESCENDANT KERALA KING SWARBANU (JUNIOR ) BUIILT THE 12,000 YER OLD SUDAN PYRAMIDS AND THE 12,000 YEAR OLD BAALBEK SHIVA TEMPLE ( MUTHAPPAN ) AT LEBANON .
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/secrets-of-12000-year-old-baalbek.html
RAMAYANA AND MAHABHARATA HAD COMMON PEOPLE
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/08/common-characters-of-ramayana-and.html
ROTHSCHILD THOUGHT THAT HE DELETED DANAVA CIVILIZATION HISTORY ..
BUT HE COULD NOT SINK THE KATHAKALI LORE—THIS PLANETs FIRST DANCE AND SONG FORM—WHICH ENACTED THE GLORIES OF DANAVA KINGS OF KERALA SWARBANU ( SENIOR) / SWARBANU ( JUNIOR) / KING HIRANYAKASHIPU / PRINCESS HOLIKA, SISTER OF HIRANYAKASHIPU / KING VIROCHANA/ KING MAKABALI/ KING KALANEMI..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/sanatana-dharma-hinduism-exhumed-and.html
THE WOMAN YOU SEE WITH A CAPE IN SOME KATHAKALI STORIES ARE HOLIKA WITH HER MAGIC CAPE. WE DON’T CELEBRATE HOLI IN KERALA , AS WE CONSIDER HOLIKA AS A HEROINE.
WE DON’T CELEBRATE DIWALI IN KERALA AS WE CARE FOR OUR ANCIENT KING MAHABALI.. AMIT SHAH TRIED TO CHANGE THE NAME OF ONAM TO VAMANA JAYANTI AND HIS BALLS GOT BURNT.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/09/why-kerala-does-not-celebrate-diwali-or.html
CONTINUED TO 2-
Dear Reader,
Thanks for posting a comment on our article!.
We appreciate your engagement on our website. But we are sorry, we cannot publish your comment as the content is not compliant with our editorial policies. While we do encourage you to participate in conversations on the website, we request you to refrain from posting any obscene, defamatory, or inflammatory comments. We also request you not to indulge in any personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community through your comments. Also, please do not copy message from the article itself.
Comment Removed: You're right.
Gandhi slept naked with under-aged girls, someone would tell why? Gandhi himself admits and we should call him father of nation, sic!
Best wishes,
Team TOI
Thanks for posting a comment on our article!.
We appreciate your engagement on our website. But we are sorry, we cannot publish your comment as the content is not compliant with our editorial policies. While we do encourage you to participate in conversations on the website, we request you to refrain from posting any obscene, defamatory, or inflammatory comments. We also request you not to indulge in any personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community through your comments. Also, please do not copy message from the article itself.
Comment Removed: You're right.
Gandhi slept naked with under-aged girls, someone would tell why? Gandhi himself admits and we should call him father of nation, sic!
Best wishes,
Team TOI
GANDHI HIMSELF REVEALED HIS "EXPERIMENTS WITH TRUTH"..
HE SAID IT WAS NOT ABOUT "ERECTION", IT WAS ABOUT "SEMEN EJACULATION"..
GANDHI WOULD TRY NOT TO HAVE AN ORGASM -- TO PROVE HIS SELF CONTROL.. HE WOULD HAVE A ERECTION FOR HOURS..
GANDHIs CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN HAVE ADMITTED THAT GANDHI SLEPT WITH NAKED UNDERAGED GIRLS --AFTER HE KICKED OUT KASTURBA ( WIFE ) FROM HIS BED ROOM.
HIS SONS HAD REVOLTED .. SON DEVADAS WAS COUNTER CHARGED BY GANDHI ( FALSE ) OF BEING A PEDOPHILE HIMSELF, A WHOREMASTER AND A DRUNKARD.. WIFE KASTURBA REVOLTED..
ONE OF GANDHIs GRANDCHILDREN CAME ON TV ( I SAW THIS) AND ADMITTED WITH A SAD FACE , THAT HIS GRANDFATHER HAD THE SAME HUMAN WEAKNESSES OF OTHERS..
TODAY WE ARE BRANDED A PEDOPHILE FOR ONE "SINGLE WEAK MOMEMT".. OUR LIFE WILL BE OVER IF CAUGHT..
THIS HAPPENS TO EVERYBODY.
IF YOU TELL THE TRUTH, IT HAS HAPPENED TO YOU TOO.
I NEVER LIKED TO VISIT MY SONS IN THEIR SCHOOLS, THE WAY SMALL SCHOOL GIRLS IN THE AGE OF 13 TO 15 THREW THEMSELVES AT ME..
THIS IS A VERY VULNERABLE AGE..AND I WAS AN OLD MAN WITH SILVER HAIR.
ONE PRETTY GIRL WITH BIG ASS AND TITS, EVEN CAME IN FRONT OF ME, WITH HER ASS TOUCHING MY CROTCH ,, DROPPED HER HANKY AND WAS GRINDING HER "BHOASADA" AGAINST ME. HER HANKY REMAINED EVER ELUSIVE TO HER GRASP..
I MOVED AWAY FAST.. THIS COULD KICK ME INTO THE PEN TILL I DIE..
GANDHI IS GUILTY OF NOT ONE MOMENT
NOT ONE MINUTE
NOT ONE HOUR
NOT ONE DAY
NOT A WEEK
NOT A MONTH
NOT A YEAR
NOT A SINGLE DECADE
HE DID "OPEN PEDOPHILIA" FOR SEVERAL DECADES..
GANDHI WAS "BRAIN WASHED " VIA THE MOOLADHARA CHAKRA METHOD BY GERMAN JEW AND HUMPING GAY, A BODY BUILDER NAMED HERMANN KALLENBACH..
HERMANN BABY HIMSELF ADMITTED THAT HE AND GANDHI SHARED THE SAME ROOM AND BED AFTER HE KICKED OUT KASTURBA IN THE NAME OF BRAHMACHARI..
I GOT THIS DIRTY SECRET FROM A OLD INDIAN MAN IN CAPETOWN, WHO CLEANED GANDHIs BED ROOM ( AND HIS SHIT LADEN CHAMBER POT CONTAINING THE ENEMA EXPELLED WATERY SHIT OF GANDHI AND GANDHIs AND HIS TWO UNDERAGE GIRLS ) DAILY , TWICE A DAY..
ONLY PEOPLE WITH CORRUPT SOULS ENGAGE IN PEDOPHILIA FOR SEVERAL DECADES..
WE DARE MODI CONDUCT A NATIONWIDE REFERENDUM ###### WHOM DO YOU WANT AS FATHER OF OUR NATION, ROTHSCHILDs AGENT KATHIAWARI JEW GANDHI OR CHANAKYA OR ADI SHANKARACHARYA" #########
IN THIS INTERNET AGE , PEOPLE KNOW.. DOODH KA DOODH, PAANI KA PAANI.
NAKED GANDHI TOOK BATH WITH THESE NAKED GIRLS, WHO SOAPED HIS BODY..
ONE MAGAZINE CONDUCTED THE INTERVIEW OF ONE OF THESE GIRLS, IN HER OLD AGE, STILL SCARRED BY EXTREME TRAUMA..
QUESTION FROM WRITER --WERE YOU NAKED WHEN YOU AND GANDHI TOOK BATH TOGETHER ?
ANSWER ---( AFTER A LONG PAUSE , HER FACE FLUSHED AND FOREHEAD /CHIN CREASED ) -- I DONT REMEMBER !
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-diabolical-brain-washing-process-of.html
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2017/01/mahatma-gandhi-and-his-endless.html
capt ajit vadakayil
..
HE SAID IT WAS NOT ABOUT "ERECTION", IT WAS ABOUT "SEMEN EJACULATION"..
GANDHI WOULD TRY NOT TO HAVE AN ORGASM -- TO PROVE HIS SELF CONTROL.. HE WOULD HAVE A ERECTION FOR HOURS..
GANDHIs CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN HAVE ADMITTED THAT GANDHI SLEPT WITH NAKED UNDERAGED GIRLS --AFTER HE KICKED OUT KASTURBA ( WIFE ) FROM HIS BED ROOM.
HIS SONS HAD REVOLTED .. SON DEVADAS WAS COUNTER CHARGED BY GANDHI ( FALSE ) OF BEING A PEDOPHILE HIMSELF, A WHOREMASTER AND A DRUNKARD.. WIFE KASTURBA REVOLTED..
ONE OF GANDHIs GRANDCHILDREN CAME ON TV ( I SAW THIS) AND ADMITTED WITH A SAD FACE , THAT HIS GRANDFATHER HAD THE SAME HUMAN WEAKNESSES OF OTHERS..
TODAY WE ARE BRANDED A PEDOPHILE FOR ONE "SINGLE WEAK MOMEMT".. OUR LIFE WILL BE OVER IF CAUGHT..
THIS HAPPENS TO EVERYBODY.
IF YOU TELL THE TRUTH, IT HAS HAPPENED TO YOU TOO.
I NEVER LIKED TO VISIT MY SONS IN THEIR SCHOOLS, THE WAY SMALL SCHOOL GIRLS IN THE AGE OF 13 TO 15 THREW THEMSELVES AT ME..
THIS IS A VERY VULNERABLE AGE..AND I WAS AN OLD MAN WITH SILVER HAIR.
ONE PRETTY GIRL WITH BIG ASS AND TITS, EVEN CAME IN FRONT OF ME, WITH HER ASS TOUCHING MY CROTCH ,, DROPPED HER HANKY AND WAS GRINDING HER "BHOASADA" AGAINST ME. HER HANKY REMAINED EVER ELUSIVE TO HER GRASP..
I MOVED AWAY FAST.. THIS COULD KICK ME INTO THE PEN TILL I DIE..
GANDHI IS GUILTY OF NOT ONE MOMENT
NOT ONE MINUTE
NOT ONE HOUR
NOT ONE DAY
NOT A WEEK
NOT A MONTH
NOT A YEAR
NOT A SINGLE DECADE
HE DID "OPEN PEDOPHILIA" FOR SEVERAL DECADES..
GANDHI WAS "BRAIN WASHED " VIA THE MOOLADHARA CHAKRA METHOD BY GERMAN JEW AND HUMPING GAY, A BODY BUILDER NAMED HERMANN KALLENBACH..
HERMANN BABY HIMSELF ADMITTED THAT HE AND GANDHI SHARED THE SAME ROOM AND BED AFTER HE KICKED OUT KASTURBA IN THE NAME OF BRAHMACHARI..
I GOT THIS DIRTY SECRET FROM A OLD INDIAN MAN IN CAPETOWN, WHO CLEANED GANDHIs BED ROOM ( AND HIS SHIT LADEN CHAMBER POT CONTAINING THE ENEMA EXPELLED WATERY SHIT OF GANDHI AND GANDHIs AND HIS TWO UNDERAGE GIRLS ) DAILY , TWICE A DAY..
ONLY PEOPLE WITH CORRUPT SOULS ENGAGE IN PEDOPHILIA FOR SEVERAL DECADES..
WE DARE MODI CONDUCT A NATIONWIDE REFERENDUM ###### WHOM DO YOU WANT AS FATHER OF OUR NATION, ROTHSCHILDs AGENT KATHIAWARI JEW GANDHI OR CHANAKYA OR ADI SHANKARACHARYA" #########
IN THIS INTERNET AGE , PEOPLE KNOW.. DOODH KA DOODH, PAANI KA PAANI.
NAKED GANDHI TOOK BATH WITH THESE NAKED GIRLS, WHO SOAPED HIS BODY..
ONE MAGAZINE CONDUCTED THE INTERVIEW OF ONE OF THESE GIRLS, IN HER OLD AGE, STILL SCARRED BY EXTREME TRAUMA..
QUESTION FROM WRITER --WERE YOU NAKED WHEN YOU AND GANDHI TOOK BATH TOGETHER ?
ANSWER ---( AFTER A LONG PAUSE , HER FACE FLUSHED AND FOREHEAD /CHIN CREASED ) -- I DONT REMEMBER !
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-diabolical-brain-washing-process-of.html
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2017/01/mahatma-gandhi-and-his-endless.html
capt ajit vadakayil
..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipQ76epASZA
ReplyDeleteAFTER TEVEZ WENT AWAY FROM JUVENTUS I LOST INTEREST IN SOCCER
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/09/tevez-mancini-fight-advise-to-soccer.html
WHEN I WAS A SMALL BOY LEV YASHIN WAS MY HERO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Is6lUEl3oTk
AND ALSO PUSHKAS
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/10/puskas-soccer-legend-capt-ajit.html
I NEVER LIKED PELE
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/08/maradona-vs-pele-who-is-better-capt.html
OPEN THE LINK BELOW AND SEE TWO VIDEOS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE POST..
ReplyDeletehttps://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/industrial-society-and-its-future-by_22.html
WE ASK THE MODI GOVT.. INSTALL VIDEO CAMS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES CLASSES OF ALL INDIAN ELITE COLLEGES ..
MOST OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES PROFESSORS ARE COMMIES IN FOREIGN PAYROLL..
BHARATMATA IS RACING TO BE THIS PLANETs NO 1 SUPERPOWER IN 14 YEARS.. BEFORE THAN THE JEALOUS WHITE WANTS INDIA TO IMPLODE FROM WITHIN..
BURN THE COMMIE LIBRARY SECTION OF JNU AND BRENNAN COLLEGE KANNUR..
STOP TEACHING SOCIAL SCIENCES A TECHNICAL COLLEGE LIKE IIT..
MOST SOCIAL SCIENCE THEORIES ARE WRITTEN BY AGENTS OF THE JEWISH DEEP STATE WITH A VESTED AGENDA , TO BRAINWASH YOUNG IMPRESSIONABLE MINDS..
THE SYLLABUS OF SOCIAL SCIENCES MUST BE VETTED BY INTELLIGENT INDIANS..
STOP TEACHING AMARTYA SENs / ROMILA THAPARs LIES IN NALANDA UNIVESITY..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/06/deliberately-buried-truths-about-buddha.html
WE THE PEOPLE WATCH..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
DeleteDEANS AND VC OF EVERY ELITE COLLEGE IN INDIA TEACHING SOCIAL SCIENCES
VC NALANDA UNIVERSITY
AMARTYA SEN
NIVEDITA MENON
ROMILA THAPAR
PMO
PM MODI
SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
BABA RAMDEV
SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV
MATA AMRITANANDA MAYI
DEVDUTT PATTANAIK
CHETAN BHAGAT
AMISH TRIPATHI
WENDY DONIGER
SHELDON POLLOCK
AUDREY TRUSCHKE
TOM VADAKKAN
E SREEDHARAN
CHANDRACHUD
NARIMAN
ALL INDIAN MEDIA
NITI AYOG
AMITABH KANT
NCERT
EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL MPs OF INDIA
ALL MLAs OF INDIA
CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
DGPs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
CJI BOBDE
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
DAVID FRAWLEY
STEPHEN KNAPP
WILLIAM DALRYMPLE
KONRAED ELST
FRANCOIS GAUTIER
AJIT DOVAL
RAW
IB
NIA
ED
CBI
AMIT SHAH
HOME MINISTRY
DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
RSS
AVBP
VHP
MOHAN BHAGWAT
RAM MADHAV
THAMBI SUNDAR PICHAI
CEO OF WIKIPEDIA
QUORA CEO ANGELO D ADAMS
QUORA MODERATION TEAM
KURT OF QUORA
GAUTAM SHEWAKRAMANI
PGURUS
NALIN KOHLI
GVL NARASIMHA RAO
SAMBIT PATRA
VIVEK OBEROI
GAUTAM GAMBHIR
ASHOK PANDIT
ANUPAM KHER
KANGANA RANAUT
VIVEK AGNIHOTRI
KIRON KHER
MEENAKSHI LEKHI
SMRITI IRANI
PRASOON JOSHI
MADHUR BHANDARKAR
SWAPAN DASGUPTA
SONAL MANSINGH
MADHU KISHWAR
SUDHIR CHAUDHARY
GEN GD BAKSHI
RSN SINGH
MOHANLAL
SURESH GOPI
CHANDAN MITRA
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-
PAVAN VARMA
RAMACHANDRA GUHA
ALL MEDIA OF KERALA
MUKESH AMBANI
RATA TATA
ANAND MAHINDRA
KUMARAMANGALAMBIRLA
LAXMI MNARAYAN MITTAL
AZIM PREMJI
KAANIYA MURTHY
RAHUL BAJAJ
RAJAN RAHEJA
NAVEEN JINDAL
GOPICHAND HINDUJA
DILIP SHANGHVI
GAUTAM ADANI
THE QUINT
THE SCROLL
THE WIRE
THE PRINT
MK VENU
MADHU TREHAN
RAJDEEP SARDESAI
PAAGALIKA GHOSE
NAVIKA KUMAR
ANAND NARASIMHAN
SRINIVASAN JAIN
SONAL MEHROTRA KAPOOR
VIKRAM CHANDRA
NIDHI RAZDAN
FAYE DSOUZA
ZAKKA JACOB
RAVISH KUMAR
PRANNOY JAMES ROY
AROON PURIE
VINEET JAIN
RAGHAV BAHL
SEEMA CHISTI
DILEEP PADGOANKAR
VIR SANGHVI
KARAN THAPAR
PRITISH NANDI
SHEKHAR GUPTA
SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
SWAMY
RAJIV MALHOTRA
SOLI BABY
FALI BABY
KATJU BABY
SALVE BABY
I&B DEPT/ MINISTER
LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
ANGREZ KA AULAAD- SUHEL SETH
PRAKASH KARAT
SITARAM YECHURY
D RAJA
BRINDA KARAT
ASADDUDIN OWAISI
FATHER CEDRIC PRAKASH
ANNA VETTICKAD
ANNIE RAJA
JOHN BRITTAS
FINANCE MINISTER OF KERALA THOMAS ISAAC
JULIO REBEIRO
SONIA GANDHI
RAHUL GANDHI
PRIYANKA GANDHI
AK ANTONY
OOMMEN CHANDY
RANA AYYUB
JAVED AKHTHAR
NASIRUDDIN SHAH
KUNHALIKUTTY
MAMOOTTY
DULQUER SALMAN
SHOBHAA DE
ARUNDATI ROY
NIVEDITA MENON
ROMILA THAPAR
IRFAN HABIB
KAVITA RAMDAS
LALITHA RAMDAS
ADMIRAL RAMDAS
SUDHEENDRA KULKARNI
SHATRUGHAN SINHA
LK ADVANI
MURLI MANOHAR JOSHI
ARUN SHOURIE
PRAKASH RAJ
KAMALAHASSAN
ALPESH THAKORE
SALMAN RUSHDIE
SHUBHA MUDGAL
NALINI SINGH
DILIP CHERIAN
SUMEET CHOPRA
DINESH VARSHNEY
VC OF JNU
VC OF DU/ JU/ TISS
DEAN OF FTII
SHASHI THAROOR
MANI SHANGARAN AIYERAN
JOHN DAYAL
KANCHA ILAIH
RAJEEV CHANDRASHEKAR
MOHANDAS PAI
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Mailed to-
Deleteminister.hrd@gov.in
contact@amitshah.co.in
prakash.j@sansad.nic.in
ravis@sansad.nic.in
rajeev@rajeev.in
supremecourt@nic.in
jpnadda@gmail.com
sadhvipragyabjp@gmail.com
38ashokroad@gmail.com
contactus@rss.org
info@vhp.org
narendramodi1234@gmail.com
secy.ncert@nic.in
pstohrm@gov.in
mos-mhrd@gov.in
vcnalanda@gmail.com
swamy39@gmail.com
asen@fas.harvard.edu
koenraadelst@hotmail.com
ombirlakota@gmail.com
info.srd@tiss.edu
mot_fb@nic.in
info.nia@gov.in
info@loyolacollegekerala.edu.in
tisshyd@tiss.edu
soe@ignou.ac.in
contact@republicworld.com
romilathapar@gmail.com
nivedita@mail.jnu.ac.in
tweeted:-
Deletehttps://twitter.com/AKJANGRA17/status/1209027478175399936?s=20
############################
also ur msg on pramila jaypal send to him:-
https://twitter.com/AKJANGRA17/status/1208789415071342592?s=20
###########################
also ur comment IMA IS CONTROLLED BY FOREIGN FORCES., THEY PROTECT KOSHER EVIL PHARMA tweeted to jp nadda & health ministry:-
https://twitter.com/AKJANGRA17/status/1209381375666581505?s=20
SOMEBODY CALLED ME UP AND CRIED
ReplyDeleteCAPTAIN, YOU HAVE ARBITRARILY REDUCED THE IQ LEVEL OF THEODORE KACZYNSKI FROM 168 TO 141..
WHAT WAS YOUR METHOD..
LISTEN--
YOU CANNOT GAUGE THE IQ OF A PERSON BASED ON STUPID MENSA QUESTIONS MADE BY THE WHITE JEW..
THE FIRST CONDITION IS THE MAN WHO FIXES THE IQ OF A PERSON MUST BE MORE INTELLIGENT AND PERCEPTIVE THAN THE SUBJECT WHOSE IQ IS JUDGED..
FOR A MAN TO GET HIGH IQ, HE MUST BE ORIGINAL.. HE CANNOT STEAL FROM OTHERS ARE DECLARE " APUN BHI GENIUS!"
FOR MY READERS , I WILL MAKE IT EASY ..
THERE ARE MORE THAN 10,000 ORIGINAL REVELATIONS MADE BY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL..
SHALL I JUST PUT DOWN A FEW?
MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WROTE ABOUT CERTAIN THINGS- BUT THEY COULD NOT ENTER THE BINDU AND LOOK OUTWARDS.. SOMETHING CALLED VADAKAYIL 4D THINKING..
WHO WROTE THE FOLLOWING FIRST ?
1) STONEHENGE HAS 27 PORTALS CORRESPONDING TO 27 NAKSHATRAS... AND THIS STRUCTURE NOT MADE BY ALIENS, .. GIVE ME 3 STRONG PEOPLE AND I WILL MAKE A BETTER ONE.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/01/mystery-of-stonehenge-solved-capt-ajit.html
2) QUTAB MINAR MUST BE VIEWED FROM A HOVERING HELICOPTER FROM TOP.. IT REPRESENTS PRECESSION OF THE PLANET.. THE HINDU YUGA CYCLE OF 24,000 YEARS..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/09/qutab-minar-was-dhruv-stambh-vishnu.html
3) PYRAMIDS WERE BUILT BY WATER FLOTATION METHOD.. IT IS BASED ON SRI YANTRA AND VAASTU..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/10/eight-sided-pyramid-of-giza-egypt.html
4) SANATANA DHARMA CAN BE UNDERSTOOD ONLY BY SUPERIMPOSING THREE TEMPLATES OF ADVAITA/ DVAITA/ SANKHYA VEDANTA ..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/09/sanatana-dharma-hinduism-exhumed-and.html
5) WHY THE 12,000 YEAR OLD INTIHUATANA STONE AT THE HIGHEST POINT OF MACHU PICCHU IS ANGLED TO 13.1 DEGREES..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/07/secrets-of-12000-year-old-machu-picchu_30.html
THESE ARE JUST 5 AMONG 10,000 ORIGINAL REVELATIONS ON THIS BLOGSITE..
YOU DONT NEED A MATHEMATICAL / TECHNICAL BRAIN TO HAVE HIGH IQ..
ALL YOU NEED IS AN ABUNDANCE OF COMMONSENSE AND PERCEPTION-- WHICH COMES FROM YOUR RIGHT BRAIN LOBE ( FOR A RIGHT HANDER ) AND YOUR SOUL..
A SOCCER COACH WHO UNDERSTANDS TEAM DYNAMICS CAN BE A GENIUS.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/12/team-work-team-dynamics-capt-ajit.html
SO SO SO
BALLS TO THE IQ OF 168 GIVEN TO JEW MATHEMATICIAN TED KACZYNSKI..
COULD HE COMPETE AGAINST SHAKUNTALA DEVI OR RAMANUJAM?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakuntala_Devi
INSTEAD OF WRITING ON HER MATH TALENT-- WIKIPEDIA HAS CONVERTED HER TO HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVIST..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/11/fractal-mind-of-srinivasa-ramanujan.html
WIKIPEDIA DOES NOT SAY THAT TED IS A JEW-- JUST BECAUSE HE TURNED OUT TO BE A SERIAL KILLER..
DIABOLICAL SERIAL KILLING, WITH A SIGNATURE IS A JEWISH MONOPOLY..
IN TEDs CASE HE LEFT BEHIND "FC" ON A METAL PIECE WHICH WOULD SURVIVE THE BOMB BLAST.
capt ajit vadakayil
..
Hi Captain,
ReplyDeleteMallu Doctor fired from Qatar hospital for supporting CAA
https://www.organiser.org/Encyc/2019/12/22/2_11_08_02_g_1_H@@IGHT_350_W@@IDTH_450.jpg
Restaurant in Bahrain raided by mallu jihadis for supporting PM Modi
https://twitter.com/HKupdate/status/1208687102914904066
Kid glove treatment to Jihadis harassing a woman and child by police in contrast to peaceful shabarimala protests
https://twitter.com/reachsunilnair/status/1207531226036424704
Jihadis in kerala schools
https://twitter.com/politicsnowi/status/1208644769079070720
More Kerala bases stories here
https://twitter.com/HKupdate
https://twitter.com/PartyVillage017
Other parts of India, Courageous old man (probably has some m health issues) beaten up for saying "Bharat mata ki jai"
https://twitter.com/tathagata2/status/1208678406365143040
And Commie mallu Hindu response, https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EMaGX1sVUAEifI-.png
Future employment in ISIS for this couple, Let these traitors among Hindus die as jihadis or at their hands for betraying our nation.
Reason for debacle in Jharkhand is HRD under Prakash Javadekar. If tribals had been educated about Hindu glory, heroic resistance of tribals against Mughals (Gond) and British neither would they convert nor vote for Congis and co. If they didnt like BJP candidates, they would have voted for patriotic alternative like Babulal Marandi or others like AJSU. Now evangeslists will be let loose on tribals. It was more important for BJP to win Chattisgarh and Jharkhand compared to MP and Maharashtra. For his pathetic comments, cancer coming up for Sanjay Raut,
Request. Would be great if you could write one of the Sanatan Dharma posts now. So much negativity these days. Maybe topic being Ishwarapranidhana in yoga explaining why Yoga is a Hindu discipline and Chittavritti nirodah can be acheived by pranidhana to an unbiased true God only. God being from beyond words and gunas Parabrahma to manifestations in sookshma rupa as pranava to the trinity in Prakriti/Purusha form to the dieties like Ganapati who open the doors to higher realization. A lot is covered in your posts already. One on Ashtanga yoga would be very helpful for those who cant grasp dharanas of VBT and Swara.
Thanks,
Abhi
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/saudi-sentences-five-to-death-three-to-jail-in-khashoggi-case/articleshow/72937672.cms
ReplyDeleteTHE JEWISH CROWN PRINCE SALMAN IS INNOCENT !
Dear Captain,
DeleteIs he Jew? In qmap.pub it says "In November, 2017 something extraordinary happened in Saudi Arabia. For the first time in history, one side of the NWO triangle was removed. The House of Saud, a puppet master who was controlling many elected US politicians, had its strings cut. There was a power shift in Saudi Arabia with the rise of Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman, a reformer, who is working with Trump to purge corruption and evil from his country and the middle east. This culminated with the arrest of Al-Waleed bin Talal, a billionaire who had major stakes in US high tech companies".
ReplyDeleteRohan PandeyDecember 23, 2019 at 3:29 PM
I was reading somewhere captain that there were rumours around 2014 that deepika padukone met dawood ibrahim for her funding of her hollywood film
Was it true or just some false bogus claims
Plzz tell us captain ji!!!
POOR JEWISH DEEP STATE
ReplyDeleteHONGKONG TYPE PROTESTS DID NOT WORK IN INDIA..
THROW SOME STINKING KOSHER VINEGAR IN THEIR GENERAL DIRECTION..
ROTHSCHILDs MAIN STREAM MEDIA HAS NOW INVADED THE INTERNET..
ReplyDeleteTHEY CANNOT SURVIVE AS LONG AS YOU KEEP AN ADBLOCKER ON..
NOBODY BUYS A NEWSPRINT NEWSPAPER ANYMORE.
MAIN STREAM MEDIA LIKE TOILET PAPER PAY THEIR STAFF ( VERY LITTLE SALARY ) BY PAID NEWS..
ReplyDeleteOshiaanaDecember 23, 2019 at 5:38 PM
Eternally thanking you... Om Namah Shivay 🙏
ReplyDeleteRob WatsonDecember 23, 2019 at 5:34 PM
Priceless
http://82.221.129.208/.vv1.html
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/entertainment/hindi/kalki-koechlin-embodies-everything-graceful-and-powerful-in-new-maternity-photoshoot/videoshow/72932380.cms
ReplyDeleteGRACE , POWER, BEAUTY
ALL WE SEE IS A UGLY SLUT WITH PLASTIC IN HER LIPS
Dear Capt Ajit sir,
ReplyDeleteIn the post on Trump - what next....Pelosi's invitation to Trump for a state of the union address...is this something sinister attempt or ok for Trump to attend and address the SOTU ?
http://82.221.129.208/.vv1.html
https://photogallery.indiatimes.com/celebs/bollywood/new-party-pictures-of-malaika-arora-and-her-girl-gang-go-viral-/Malaika-Arora-Arjun-Kapoor-pictures/articleshow/70662160.cms
ReplyDeleteWE ARE SUPPOSED TO FEEL JEALOUS OF THESE SLUTS FROM UNHAPPY HOMES ?
ReplyDeletePratikDecember 23, 2019 at 6:26 PM
guruji, capt caj vanderperre (worth 1B) must be your die hard fan if he really fired that secretary !! please provide some more details of your encounters chaatne ke vaaste.
https://twitter.com/AsYouNotWish/status/1209016516332544007
ReplyDeleteSONAM BABY NEVER TALKS ABOUT HER OWN HUSBAND..
HE IS NOT WORTH IT?
Captain,
ReplyDeletewhat is matter with individuals names 'Bhagwan'? 3 to 4 decades ago there was Bhagwan Gidwani. he wrote a book glorifying the tyrant Tippu. One of those khans made a TV serial based on Gidwani's book. The khan further tried to exalt Gidwani's glorification of the tyrant but divine retribution followed.
Nowadays is is the 'Professor' Bhagwan who calls Mahabharata as a whore book, Rama a drunk etc. In between there was a Osho Acharya Bhagwan.
I can predict the next Bhagwan. It will be Bhagwan Taimoor or Taimoor Bhagwan.
If 'Bhagwan' himself shows us the way we all should follow it , right?
Jai Bhagwan!
Here is such a strange "aggression" historically manifested by the Russians!
ReplyDeleteWith the significant contribution of this country, even Switzerland achieved independence from France. More precisely, this was done thanks to Suvorov (217 years ago) and since then Switzerland has never fought (!)
Also took place:
- The liberation of Austria from the Third Reich of 1945;
- The liberation of Czechoslovakia from the Third Reich of 1945;
- The position of Catherine II in 1780 with the creation of the League of Armed Neutrality and the actual support of the North American United States in the struggle for their independence from Britain.
- twice in the last 2 centuries, independence granted by Russia to most European states after its destruction of Hitler and Napoleon;
- The position of Stalin in negotiations with the USA and England gave Germany the opportunity to maintain statehood after the defeat in 1945;
- Gorbachev’s position, which made it possible to reunite the two Germanys without problems in 1990;
- Soviet assistance to Egypt, after which he was able to survive and consolidate his independence in the war with Israel, Britain and France in 1956-57.
- The intervention of the USSR in 1967 stopped the war between Israel and Egypt (in fact, saved the Arabs from defeat in two wars in 1967-74).
- The decisive role of the Union ensured Angola's conquest of its independence in 1975.
Priyapetta Captain Maasheku oru Koopukai...
ReplyDeleteI received a Whatsapp message found worth sharing, Against Western Russophobia,
The Finnish blogger shocked Facebook when he posted this article:
"THAT WHY HALF THE RUSSIA ARE REQUIRED BY THE Coffin of Life"
Veikko Korhonen is a blogger from the city of Oulu (Finland), like most modern Finns periodically fell under the corrupting influence of pro-Western history textbooks.
Everything in them that belonged to the Russian, as a rule, was poured over with total dirt, the joint Russian-Finnish history was presented as a continuous nightmare, and the corrupting influence of the present was constantly supported by tales of aggressiveness and hostility of the closest neighbor.
Fortunately, Veiko Korhonenna had a very wise and educated grandmother, and therefore, from an early age, he knew very well about the right course of our joint history. And once, tired of constant disputes with anti-Russian-minded compatriots, he wrote on his Facebook page , a small article, and every time I met another Russophobe, I simply gave her my direct link to it.

Are you asking about the results of Russia's "aggressions"? They are as follows: half of Europe and part of Asia got their statehood from the hands of this particular state.
Let's remember who exactly:
- Finland in 1802 and 1918 .. (Until 1802, it never had its own state).
- Latvia in 1918 (before 1918 it never had its own state).
- Estonia in 1918 (until 1918 it never had its own state).
- Lithuania restored statehood in 1918 thanks also to Russia.
- Poland restored the state with the help of Russia twice, in 1918 and 1944. The division of Poland between the USSR and Germany is only a short period!
- Romania was born as a result of the Russian-Turkish wars, and became sovereign by the will of Russia in 1877–1878.
- Moldova as a state was born inside the USSR.
- Bulgaria was freed from the oppression of the Ottoman Empire and regained its independence as a result of the victory of Russian weapons in the Russian-Turkish war of 1877-1878, which had this as its purpose. As a thank you, the state of Bulgaria in two world wars participated in the anti-Russian coalitions. Now Bulgaria is a member of NATO, and US bases are located on its territory. After 1945, there was not a single Russian soldier on its territory ...
-Serbia as a sovereign state was also born as a result of this war.
- Azerbaijan as a state took shape for the first time only as part of the USSR.
- Armenia was physically preserved and revived as a state only as part of the USSR.
- Georgia was preserved physically and reborn as a state thanks to the Russian Empire
- Turkmenistan never had statehood and formed it only as part of the USSR.
- Kyrgyzstan never had statehood and formed it only as part of the USSR.
- Kazakhstan never had statehood and formed it only as part of the USSR.
- Mongolia never had statehood and formed it only with the help of the USSR.
- Belarus and Ukraine also first gained statehood as a consequence of the Great October Revolution as part of the republics of the USSR. And only in 1991 (also from Russia) received their full independence.
It is also worth considering the role of Russia-USSR in the birth and formation of such states as the PRC, Vietnam, North Korea, India, Greece (was recaptured from the Turks by Russia back in 1821), Algeria, Cuba, Israel, Angola, Mozambique, etc. .
Continued to next comment
Ajit sir, saw this post on somebody's FB time line. Quote For those who don't understand Malayalam, here is a video in which Preacher, Mullakara Mohammed Ali describes how a Hindu King Cheran Perumal helped build the first Mosque in India in 629 AD at Kodungallur in Thrissur dist of Kerala.
ReplyDeleteThe bricks and doors that were kept ready for the construction of a temple, was donated for a Mosque along with 6 and half acres of land, after Arab traders who came from Mecca sought King Cheran's help for a place to pray. That was how big hearted, the Hindu community of Kodungallur was.
Mullakara Mohammed Ali tells Muslims that this was how Hindus accomodated the 12 Arabs way back then. Can't we give them back their land where Babri Masjid stood once? Why go for the review petitions and all the nonsense, he asks.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tlmSczgssLM
Unquote
It's obvious where the preacher has got the information about Cheraman Perumal from. Kudos to you Captain, even Indian Muslims are learning their true history from your blog.
Dear Capt Ajit sir,
ReplyDeleteBJP+AJSU would have won 45 seats...united you win...divided you lose is Jharkhand lesson...BJP and Modi won't listen to heed to Hindus requests.
Jharkhand Christian conversions highest in BJP rule...same in Chattisgarh ;-)
THIS IS FROM SWAMYs TWITTER SITE
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/VaidikSanatan/status/1208724036383064065
SO SOME STUPID "LAWYER TURNED JUDGE " WILL DECIDE?
LAWYERS ARE THE BOTTOM DREGS OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL..
JUDGES ARE DISCARDS OF THE LOSER LAWYER POOL..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/08/netaji-subhash-chandra-bose-untold.html
AFTER THE GODHRA TRAIN BURNING-- A JUDGE RULED THAT HINDU WOMEN COOKED AND SET THE COMPARTMENT ON FIRE..
THIS BASTARD SUPREME COURT JUDGE UC BANNERJEE IGNORED HUNDREDS OF STONES INSIDE THE COMPARTMENT AND BROKEN WINDOW GLASS PANES ..
HE IGNORED THE FACT THAT DOZENS OF EMPTY JERRY CANS WITH BLUE KEROSENE STILL AT THE BOTTOM WERE FOUND ON EITHER SIDE OF THE RAILWAY TRACKS..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umesh_Chandra_Banerjee
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/11/babri-masjid-demolition-mughal-emperor.html
WE THE PEOPLE DO NOT TRUST OUR JUDGES ANY MORE..
WE TRUST OUR IPS POLICE WHO HAVE PASSED EXAMS AND SWORN OATHS TO PROTECT THE WATAN
capt ajit vadakayil
..
JEWISH DEEP STATE DARLING MODI DOES NOT SAY SOME THINGS..
ReplyDeleteMODI SAYS WIND IS FREE -- BUT HE WILL NEVER SAY THAT THE WIND TURBINES HE BUYS ARE FROM JEWS..
MODI SAYS SUNLIGHT IS FREE-- BUT HE WILL NEVER SAY THAT SOLAR PANELS HE BUYS ARE FROM JEWS..
MODI SAYS E-VEHICLES HAVE NO NEED FOR EXPENSIVE PETROL -- BUT HE WILL NEVER SAY THAT HE BUYS RECHARGEABLE BATTERY ELECTRODES HAVE BEEN MONOPOLIZED BY JEW..
WAAH RAJAAAH WAAAHH..
GUJJU NO 2 MODI-- CAN YOUR PLEAJJJE, KINDLY, KRIPAYYA GIVE US MORE JAANKKAAARI ABOUT GUJJU NO 1 GANDHI? ...
SURE , YOU GIVE US TRUCKLOADS EVERY DAY-- BUT CAN YOU DO IT EVERY HOUR ?
HUM DHANYYA HOH JAYEENGA..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/07/how-gandhi-converted-opium-to-indigo-in.html
WE SEND JEW DARLINGS TO WTO MEETS.. AT WTO NAIROBI JNU WOMAN NIRMALA SITARAMAN CAPITULATED, AND STARTED MOANING..
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2971690
capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
DeletePMO
PM MODI
NITI AYOG
AMITABH KANT
NCERT
CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
DGPs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
CJI BOBDE
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
NIRMALA SITARAMAN
FINANCE MINISTRY
COMMERCE MINISTER
PRAKASH JAVEDEKAR
ENVIRMENT MINISTRY CENTRE/ STATES
Best way to tell a lie is include partial truth in it.
DeleteIt is still buyer beware.
Can solar panels etc be run using car or inverter batteries.? Lead zinc acid type.?
DeleteHi Captain
ReplyDeleteCouple of Indian movies are asking women to not be a stay at home mother but go after their "dreams".
Panga in Hindi and Bigil in Tamil.
I don't see why women view slaving away at some corporation as a 'dream'.
DeleteFinancial independence is the buzz word.
DeleteUp until the mid-1950s Hindu men could hv more than one wife. I am realising that this is more natural than current system.
ReplyDeleteA man could easily impregnate 700-900 women in a given year while in the same period a woman can have a single child. We are designed totally differently.
In ancient India what was the custom?
Some one like u cud easily have 3-4 wives each bearing 3-4 children.
IN SANATANA DHARMA ONLY ONE WIFE IS ALLOWED..
DeleteKINGS KEPT MULTIPLE WIVES TO CONTINUED TO BLOODLINE -- AND THIS WAS DONE ON ADVISE OF THE SAGES.
In case of kings marriages and alliances went together ,so there were political reasons too.
DeleteINDEED--
DeleteALEXANDER THE GREAT MARRIED AN INDIAN PRINCESS TO PROVE THAT HE WAS NOT AN ASSHOLE HUMPING HOMOSEXUAL.. HE WAS FUCKING HIS OWN TEACHER , ANAL SEX RECEIVING ARISTOTLE..
ARISTOTLE KNEW HE WAS NOT WELCOME AT KODUNGALLUR UNIVERSITY WHERE HIS ASSHOLE HUMPING TEACHER PLATO STUDIED..
IN THE MAFIA THEY MADE ALLIANCES BY MARRYING INTO RIVAL GANGS..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
Captain ji, I view u as a king, even ur appearance is majestic. Imagine if you had many intelligent children.
DeleteI guess u view yourself as the wise Advisor to the King...
ANYBODY CAN DO WHAT I DO
DeleteIF YOU CAN DO SPEED READING AND IF YOU HAD TRAVELED THIS PLANET FOR 40 YEARS ..
I AM FROM THE DANAVA CIVILIZATION WHOSE SAGES DOWNLOADED THE VEDAS.-- I DIP INTO MY GENOME.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/police-entering-hospitals-unacceptable-doctors-association/articleshow/72946748.cms
ReplyDeleteIMA IS CONTROLLED BY FOREIGN FORCES.... THEY PROTECT KOSHER EVIL PHARMA...
THERE IS BIG MONEY INVOLVED....
WILL IMA ISSUE VISA TO POLICE, LIKE IN JNU/ AMU/ JAMIA...
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2014/11/sterilisation-deaths-of-13-tribalwomen.html
To combat the global outbreaks of vaccine derived polio in third world countries, the WHO is going to authorise use of a vaccine that has not yet undergone clinical trials. As the WHO says, this is a great way to find out if anything might go wrong.
ReplyDeletehttps://mobile.twitter.com/CasparKashkin/status/1207097286251040768?p=v
ReplyDeleteramakrishnaDecember 24, 2019 at 6:14 AM
Superb is inadequate
ReplyDelete
Replies
Capt. Ajit VadakayilDecember 24, 2019 at 8:24 AM
IT IS NOT JUST SUPERB-- IT IS "SUPER SUPERB"..
WHY DOES MY BLOGSITE HAVE A "GOOGLE PROFILE VIEW COUNT " OF 1020 MILLION?
BY LUCK -- BY MISTAKE OF GOOGLE ? BY MANIPULATING WITH BOTS LIKE OTHERS WHO ARE IN SECOND AND THIRD RANKS WITH A COUPLE OF MILLION ?
( 102 CRORES/ 1.02 BILLION / 10200 LAKHS )
THINKING IS THE MOST DIFFICULT THING ON THE PLANET, RIGHT?
MORE THAN 300 OF MY CRITICAL SUGGESTIONS FOR THE SURVIVAL OF BHARATMATA HAS BEEN IGNORED BY GUJJU NO 2 MODI, WHO WORKS FOR HIS JEWISH MASTERS , RATHER THAN BHARATMATA.. ALL THIS WAS COPIED TO NSA AJIT DOVAL TOO..
MIND YOU THIS FELLOW MODI WORE A MOSSAD SPONSORED SIKH TURBAN IN 1976..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
https://mobile.twitter.com/CasparKashkin/status/1207097286251040768?p=v
ReplyDeleteINDIANS WERE USED AS GUINEA PIGS FOR ORAL POLIO VACCINE..
THIS IS ONE INSTANCE WHERE TED KACZYNSKI WAS RIGHT IN HIS UNABOMBER MANIFESTO..
SUPERSTARS LIKE AMITABH BACHCHAN WERE ROPED IN FOR PROPAGANDA..
WHAT FOLLOWS HAS BEEN SENT TO MODI AND HIS SLAVE HEALTH MINISTER JP NADDA MORE THAN 15 TIMES.
#########################
PM MODI, ARE YOU PERSONALLY PART OF THE KOSHER PROGRAM AGAINST THE CHILDREN OF BHARATAMATA ?...
WHY WAS ORAL POLIO VACCINE THRUST DOWN THE THROATS OF OUR BABIES , WHEN THE WEST NEVER USED THIS ?... THE WEST USED SAFE VACCINE ( IPV ) -- INACTIVATED POLIO VACCINE..
BABIES IN THE VILLAGES AND FORESTS WHO WERE NEVER GIVEN ORAL POLIO VACCINES WERE AFFLICTED WITH VAPP ( VACCINE ASSOCIATED PARALYTIC POLIOMYELITIS )...
LIVE ATTENUATED INFLUENZA VACCINE (LAIV) IS A TYPE OF INFLUENZA VACCINE IN THE FORM OF A NASAL SPRAY THAT USED TO BE RECOMMENDED TO PREVENT INFLUENZA...
WHAT US CDC DOES NOT TELL YOU IS THAT INDIANS ARE BEING USED AS GUINEA PIGS. ..
WE THE PEOPLE WATCH... MANY WILL LAND UP IN TIHAR JAIL... WE KNOW THE TRAITORS...
FIRST WORLD COUNTRIES LIKE CANADA AND THE US HAVE BANNED OPV AS FAR BACK AS 2000 OR EARLIER BUT WE HAVE CONTINUED IT. WHY?...
LAKHS OF BABIES DIED ALL OVER INDIA - BUT THIS WAS HUSHED UP BY BRIBING ALL INVOLVED IN INDIA.. DOCTORS WERE SENT ABROAD FOR SEXUAL JAUNTS...
THESE BRIBED LUTYENS DEEP STATE MINISTER, BABUS AND DOCTORS DID MASSIVE PROPAGANDA THAT OPV IS BEST SUITED FOR INDIAN CONDITIONS ( SIC ) DUE TO ITS LOW COST, HIGH EFFICACY AND EASE OF ADMINISTERING.
WHAT THEY DID NOT SAY WAS A WESTERN BABY VACCINATED WITH IPV COULD NOT SPREAD THE DISEASE.
BUT AN INDIAN BABY GIVEN OPV ( BY MOUTH DROPS ) COULD SPREAD DISEASE TO BABIES WHO HAVE NOT BEEN GIVEN THE POLIO DROPS. A KILLER CONDITION CALLED VACCINE-ASSOCIATED PARALYTIC POLIO (VAPP), AND ALSO VACCINE-DERIVED POLIOVIRUSES (VDPVS)
'WHEN A BABY IS GIVEN OPV, ( ORAL POLIO VACCINE ) THE CONTENT IS INGESTED, THE VIRUSES REPLICATE IN THE INTESTINAL TRACT, PROVIDING IMMUNITY TO SUBSEQUENT INFECTION…
VACCINE-DERIVED POLIOVIRUS (VDPV) IS A STRAIN OF POLIOVIRUS THAT WAS INITIALLY INCLUDED IN ORAL POLIO VACCINE (OPV) AND THAT HAS CHANGED OVER TIME AND BEHAVES MORE LIKE THE NATURALLY OCCURRING VIRUS…
THIS MEANS IT CAN BE SPREAD MORE EASILY TO PEOPLE WHO ARE UNVACCINATED AGAINST POLIO AND WHO COME IN CONTACT WITH THE STO0L OR RESPIRATORY SECRETIONS, SUCH AS FROM A SNEEZE, OF AN INFECTED PERSON... THESE VIRUSES MAY CAUSE ILLNESS, INCLUDING PARALYSIS - ESPECIALLY AMONG THE UNDERNOURISHED INDIAN CHILDREN…
THESE BRIBED LUTYENS DEEP STATE MINISTER, BABUS AND DOCTORS DID MASSIVE PROPAGANDA THAT OPV IS BEST SUITED FOR INDIAN CONDITIONS ( SIC ) DUE TO ITS LOW COST, HIGH EFFICACY AND EASE OF ADMINISTERING.
############################
FOR WRITING ABOVE I WAS THREATENED WITH DEFAMATION AND JAIL BY FORCES IN THE PAYROLL OF EVIL KOSHER PHARMA.
I WAS SUED FOR DEFAMATION BY A CRYING BOLLYWOOD SUPERSTAR FOR BRINGING DOWN “SATYAMEVA JAYATE” , A TOP TRP TV PROGRAME SPONSORED BY ROTHSCHILDs AXIS BANK.
ALL IT TOOK WAS THE CRYING BOLLYWOOD SUPERSTAR TO RING UP HIS POODLE TOP COP , AND THE MACHINERY MOVED.. THIS IS THE “UMANG” EFFECT – A NIGHT WHERE MUMBAI TOP COPS AND TOP BOLLYWOOD STARS TANGO .
FOUR POLICE OFFICERS CAME ALL THE WAY FROM MUMBAI TO CAICUT AND THEN MANIPAL TO ARREST ME. CAN THIS HAPPEN IN ANY OTHER NATION ON THIS PLANET? WHY WAS SO MUCH EXPENSE INCURRED TO ARREST A TRITH EXHUMING BLOGGER.. IS CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL AJMAL ASAB?
THE BEST PART WAS I GAVE MY ADDRESS IN MANIPAL BY SMS, WHEN MY CARETAKER AT MY CALICUT BUNGALOW TOLD ME ABOUT MARATHI SPEAKING COPS ON A WILD GOOSE CHASE IN CALICUT ..
IN THE NEWSPAPERS IT WAS REPORTED “ THAT POLICE NABBED A RETIRED MERCHANT OFFICER VADAKAYIL“.. SORRY, I AM NOT A MERE MERCHANT OFFICER, I AM A SHIP CAPTAIN OF 30 YEARS COMMAND EXPERIENCE —A WORLD RECORD.
CONTINUED TO 2--
CONTINUED FROM 1--
DeleteDURING THE LAST SIX YEARS, GLOBALLY, CASES OF POLIO CAUSED BY VACCINE VIRUSES HAVE OUTNUMBERED THOSE OF POLIO CAUSED BY NATURAL (WILD) POLIOVIRUSES.. THIS IS BEING KEPT AS A GREAT SECRET AND INDIAN BABIES ARE STILL BEING USED AS GUINEA PIGS AS OF TODAY ( 24TH DEC 2019 ).
THE EFFICACY OF OPV WAS NOT SATISFACTORY IN INDIA , RESULTING IN VACCINE-FAILURE POLIO DUE TO WILD POLIOVIRUSES IN LARGE NUMBERS OF CHILDREN UPTO TEN DOSES.
EXCLUDING IPV FROM PUBLIC HEALTH INTERVENTIONS CONTRAVENED PUBLIC HEALTH ETHICS.. WHO WAS IN CAHOOTS WITH EVIL KOSHER PHARMA ..
A vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV) is a strain of the weakened poliovirus that was initially included in oral polio vaccine (OPV) and that has changed over time and behaves more like the wild or naturally occurring virus.
Apart from cVDPV, OPV also causes polio due to immune-deficiency associated VDPV (iVDPV) and ambiguous VDPV (a VDPV). These are vaccine viruses reverting to a virulent state without evidence of circulation – iVDPVs are isolated from persons with primary immunodeficiency (PID) and aVDPV are isolates from individuals or from environmental samples.
IN 2017, SYRIA RULED BY BAD MAN ASSAD WHO DEFIED JEWS HAD A PROGRAMME-INDUCED TYPE 2 EPIDEMIC OF POLIO THAT PARALYSED 74 CHILDREN.
SYRIAN CHILDREN WERE USED AS GUINEA PIGS ( LIKE INDIA ) USING OPV.. MIND YOU SYRIA HAS NOT HAD ANY NATURAL POLIO FOR MORE THAN THREE DECADES.
TYPE 2 VACCINE VIRUS WAS WITHDRAWN FROM USE IN 2016.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2015/10/autism-in-india-and-triple-vaccine-mmr.html
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/03/say-no-to-hpv-vaccination-for-indian.html
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2017/02/vaccine-induced-encephalitis-mylelin.html
WE KNOW THE TRAITOR IN DEEP STATE/ EVIL PHARMA PAYROLL IN INDIA
I HAVE NOW STOPPED BlOGGING ON MEDICAL AFFaIRS OR GIVING MEDICAL ADVISE..
Capt ajit vadakayil
..
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/industrial-society-and-its-future-by_22.html
DeleteHULLO KAYASTHA BOLLYWOOD STAR AMITABH BACHCHAN...
WHY IS BILL GATES SO GRATEFUL TO YOU?
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/07/we-never-heard-words-kayastha-and.html
capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-
TRUMP
PUTIN
AMBASSADOR TO FROM USA/ INDIA
AMITABH BACHCHAN
JAYABACHCHAN
AISHWARYA RAI
ABHISHEK BACHCHAN
SHOBHAA DE
ARUNDHATI ROY
JP NADDA
PM MODI
PMO
HARSH VARDHAN
FAGGAN SINGH KULASTE
HEALTH MINISTRY CENTRE STATES
PMO
PM MODI
NITI AYOG
AMITABH KANT
NCERT
EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL MPs OF INDIA
ALL MLAs OF INDIA
CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
DGPs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
CJI BOBDE
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
DAVID FRAWLEY
STEPHEN KNAPP
WILLIAM DALRYMPLE
KONRAED ELST
FRANCOIS GAUTIER
AJIT DOVAL
RAW
IB
NIA
ED
CBI
AMIT SHAH
HOME MINISTRY
DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
RSS
AVBP
VHP
MOHAN BHAGWAT
RAM MADHAV
THAMBI SUNDAR PICHAI
CEO OF WIKIPEDIA
QUORA CEO ANGELO D ADAMS
QUORA MODERATION TEAM
KURT OF QUORA
GAUTAM SHEWAKRAMANI
PGURUS
RAJEEV CHANDRASHEKAR
MOHANDAS PAI
CHETAN BHAGAT
E SREEDHARAN
ALL INDIAN MEDIA
PAVAN VARMA
RAMACHANDRA GUHA
MUKESH AMBANI
RATA TATA
ANAND MAHINDRA
KUMARAMANGALAMBIRLA
LAXMI MNARAYAN MITTAL
AZIM PREMJI
KAANIYA MURTHY
RAHUL BAJAJ
RAJAN RAHEJA
NAVEEN JINDAL
GOPICHAND HINDUJA
DILIP SHANGHVI
GAUTAM ADANI
THE QUINT
THE SCROLL
THE WIRE
THE PRINT
MK VENU
MADHU TREHAN
RAJDEEP SARDESAI
PAAGALIKA GHOSE
NAVIKA KUMAR
ANAND NARASIMHAN
SRINIVASAN JAIN
SONAL MEHROTRA KAPOOR
VIKRAM CHANDRA
NIDHI RAZDAN
FAYE DSOUZA
ZAKKA JACOB
RAVISH KUMAR
PRANNOY JAMES ROY
AROON PURIE
VINEET JAIN
RAGHAV BAHL
SEEMA CHISTI
DILEEP PADGOANKAR
VIR SANGHVI
KARAN THAPAR
PRITISH NANDI
SHEKHAR GUPTA
SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
SWAMY
RAJIV MALHOTRA
SOLI BABY
FALI BABY
KATJU BABY
SALVE BABY
I&B DEPT/ MINISTER
LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
ANGREZ KA AULAAD- SUHEL SETH
PRAKASH KARAT
SITARAM YECHURY
D RAJA
BRINDA KARAT
ASADDUDIN OWAISI
FATHER CEDRIC PRAKASH
ANNA VETTICKAD
ANNIE RAJA
JOHN BRITTAS
FINANCE MINISTER OF KERALA THOMAS ISAAC
JULIO REBEIRO
SONIA GANDHI
RAHUL GANDHI
PRIYANKA GANDHI
AK ANTONY
OOMMEN CHANDY
RANA AYYUB
JAVED AKHTHAR
NASIRUDDIN SHAH
KUNHALIKUTTY
MAMOOTTY
DULQUER SALMAN
ROMILA THAPAR
IRFAN HABIB
KAVITA RAMDAS
LALITHA RAMDAS
ADMIRAL RAMDAS
SUDHEENDRA KULKARNI
SHATRUGHAN SINHA
LK ADVANI
MURLI MANOHAR JOSHI
ARUN SHOURIE
PRAKASH RAJ
KAMALAHASSAN
ALPESH THAKORE
SALMAN RUSHDIE
SHUBHA MUDGAL
NALINI SINGH
DILIP CHERIAN
SUMEET CHOPRA
DINESH VARSHNEY
SHASHI THAROOR
MANI SHANGARAN AIYERAN
JOHN DAYAL
KANCHA ILAIH
NALIN KOHLI
GVL NARASIMHA RAO
SAMBIT PATRA
VIVEK OBEROI
GAUTAM GAMBHIR
ASHOK PANDIT
ANUPAM KHER
KANGANA RANAUT
VIVEK AGNIHOTRI
KIRON KHER
MEENAKSHI LEKHI
SMRITI IRANI
PRASOON JOSHI
MADHUR BHANDARKAR
SWAPAN DASGUPTA
SONAL MANSINGH
MADHU KISHWAR
SUDHIR CHAUDHARY
GEN GD BAKSHI
RSN SINGH
MOHANLAL
SURESH GOPI
CHANDAN MITRA
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Experiments with truth is the new way ahead for all pedophiles ..Keep a copy of Gandhi's book and a big garlanded picture ...
ReplyDeleteAfter all he is the father of the nation...
The establishment has no option but to promote the lie about Gandhi.
Too much effort needed to dethrone .
Imagine the joy of the British rulers - they must be laughing at the fact they made a drug addicted pedophile the father of a nation.
DeleteNot to mention even on currency notes .
DeleteSTATE GOVTs BLOCKING CENTRAL AGENDATO PROTTECT BHARATMATAs SECURITY CAN BE DISMISSED..
DeleteNO JUDGE CAN INTERFERE WHEN THE WATANs EXTERNAL SECURITY IS COPROMISED..
WE WILL NOT ALLOW MUSLIM ROHINGYA/ BANGLADESI REFUGEES IN INDIA..
ONLY ISLAM HAS THE STRANGE THING OF MUSLIMS RUNNING OUT OF MOSQUES ON FRIDAY NOON TO KILL PEOPLE OF OTHER RELIGIONS ENMASSE.. THIS MUST BE STOPPED ..
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/german-at-iit-m-told-to-leave-india-over-stir/articleshow/72946493.cms
ReplyDeleteFUCK OFF YOU GERMAN JEW BASTARD !
ReplyDeletenamiDecember 24, 2019 at 9:47 AM
Both Menon and that girl have MK ultra stamp.
PRASHANT KISHORE AND SWATI MALLIWAL ARE AIMING TO BE FUTURE PMs OF INDIA..
ReplyDeleteTWO OPPORTUNISTS OF THE FIRST ORDER !
hara -mutr-(aka..greenpiss..) ngo's gora-deported..chinta-bar local desh-drohi's adda-at iit-chennai=urban-naxals..phoren-funded-caa--flovor-of0-moment-riots-organised..from -cong-commie-rag-misnamed (anti)-"hind"..chi chi..https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/german-student-who-took-part-in-anti-caa-protests-told-to-leave-india/article30384816.ece
ReplyDeletehttps://de.linkedin.com/in/jakob-lindenthal-65b9a3147
ReplyDeletetranslated from german by google..LinkedIn
Jakob Lindenthal
Student, Technical University Dresden
Berlin Area, Germany 60 contacts
Log in to network
Institute for Applied Photophysics (IAPP) - TU Dresden
Technical University Dresden
info
Popular with Jakob Lindenthal
Bonus to being in South Africa, I got to meet Africans Rising's founding chair Kumi Naidoo of Amnesty International. I literally fanned out and the ...
Popular with Jakob Lindenthal
We were incredibly proud to work with Yunus on this topic, really fantastic day with a wonderful group of participants - https://lnkd.in/erqSx5g.
Popular with Jakob Lindenthal
Sign in to see all activities
work experience
Institute for Applied Photophysics (IAPP) - TU Dresden
SHK
Institute for Applied Photophysics (IAPP) - TU Dresden
Nov. 2017 - May 2019 1 year 7 months
Dresden, Germany
Fire and Rescue Force Tanzania
Fireman / Technician
Fire and Rescue Force Tanzania
October 2015 - October 2016 1 year 1 month
Dar es Salaam
Volunteer service with the German "Weltwärts" program, supporting the state fire service in Dar es Salaam as a technician and fireman.
education
Technical University Dresden
Bachelor of Science in Physics
2016 - 2019
Rudolf Steiner School Nuremberg
High School
2001 - 2015
Rudolf Steiner School Nuremberg
Journeyman metal worker metal worker
2010 - 2013
Volunteering
Speaker of the Saxon Green Party's economy forum (Landesarbeitsgemeinschaft Wirtschaft Sachsen)
ALLIANCE 90 / THE GREENS
Speaker of the Saxon Green Party's economy forum (Landesarbeitsgemeinschaft Wirtschaft Sachsen)
ALLIANCE 90 / THE GREENS
June 2018
Pastoral area Allerheiligen-St. Josef Nurnberg
Councilor
Pastoral area Allerheiligen-St. Josef Nurnberg
September 2014 - May 2015 9 months
social services
Website management
languages
German
mother tongue or bilingual
English
Negotiable
Swedish
proficiency
French
Fluently
swahili
Fluently
Latin
proficiency
Spanish
Basic knowledge
View Jakob's full profile
checkmark see what common contacts you have
checkmark to be introduced
checkmark Contact Jakob Lindenthal directly
Sign in to see full profile
Also viewed
Vincent Market
Student and student assistant, Technical University Dresden
Scholarship Holder at Femtec Network
Vahid Farhikhteh Asl
Vahid Farhikhteh Asl
Graduate from TU Dresden, Working at HZDR
Franziska Hübner
Helmholtz Center Dresden-Rossendorf, human resources
Anton Winderlich
Student at The University of Göttingen
Constanze Albrecht
Civil servant
Maximilian Rhode
When learning meets passion, there are no limits
Ulrich Schramm
-
Constanze Albrecht
-
Mara Wiltshire-Turkay
Mara Wiltshire-Turkay
MSc ive | communicative | curious
Acquire the knowledge that Jakob has
PowerPoint 2019 for Mac basic course
Access: Tables for advanced users
Basic skills in the profession
Show all courses
Jakob's public profile badge
Use this LinkedIn profile on other websites
Jakob Lindenthal
Student, Technical University Dresden
school image for Dresden University of Technology
Technical University Dresden
show profile
LinkedIn
View profile badges
Show similar profiles
Silvina Stinco
HIV - HTLV Virology Assistant Research at Max Von Pettenkofer Institute
Andrea Lewen
Andrea Lewen
Technician at University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty
Velko Johnen
-
Erhard Ebbinghaus
Technician, master mechanic at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt, Federal Highway Research Institute)
Manja Thorwirth
Manja Thorwirtechnical assistant at LMU Munich, Dept. Physiological Genomics
Hartwig Pohl
Center Development & Scientific Controlling - member staff unit at Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research - UFZ
Stephanie Wieneke
Research Assistant at Evotec
Soundararajah Raj Ruban
Environmental technician at Bayer HealthCare
Ronny Buckan
Technician chemical engineering at Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research
Andreas Ertl
Hardware Development Engineer, Supply Chain Manager, DGSA, SAM
© 2019
Via LinkedIn
Very lacklustre.
Deletehttps://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/industrial-society-and-its-future-by_22.html
ReplyDeleteSPREAD THE LINK ABOVE BY WHATS APP AND EVERY WHICH WAY
PEOPLE MUST KNOW HOW EVIL PHARMA USES BOLLYWOOD CELEBRITIES TO SCREW BHARATMATA
Sent via whatsup captain
DeleteIF THERE ARE VIOLENT PROTESTS IN INDIA..
ReplyDeleteANYBODY COVERING THE FACE WITH MASKS MUST BE CONSIDERED AS MISCREANTS AND JAILED..
https://www.storypick.com/lilliput-interview/
ReplyDeleteDWARF LILLIPUT USED TO BE MC OF A COMEDY PROGRAM ON TV
HE INTERVIEWED SEVERAL CELEBRITIES-- AND IT WAS FUN..
THEN CAME ABHIJEET BHATTACHARYA..
HE INSULTED THE DWARF.. HE WENT TO THE EXTENT OF WIPING OF SWEAT FROM HIS ON FOREHEAD AND RUBBING IT ON THE LAPELS OF THE DWARF, WHOSE SHOW IT WAS..
THIS KILLED ABHIJEETs CAREER IN A WAY..
HE WAS A FINE SINGER WITH A GOLDEN VOICE..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSkF_wHrfTY
THE DWARF NEVER RECOVERED FROM THIS EXTREME TRAUMA..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bjp-leader-chandra-kumar-bose-subhash-chandra-boses-relative-questions-citizenship-amendment-act-2153469?amp=1&akamai-rum=off
ReplyDeletesir ji traitors in BJP demanding inclusion of muslims in CAA .. BJP should kickout these cunts asap .
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/all-you-need-to-know-about-national-population-register-that-could-pave-way-for-pan-india-nrc/articleshow/72952448.cms
ReplyDeleteNO STATE CM CAN BLOCK NPR..
THIS IS LIKE CHIEF COOK SAYING ON THE SHIP-- I AM CHIEF.. I WILL NOT ALLOW THE SHIP TO BERTH AT NEW YORK.. I WILL ONLY ALLOW JHUMRITILAYYA.
Respected Sir,
ReplyDeleteDo soulmates need to be husband and wife.
Or can they be even father and daughter or for that matter any other close relationship.
Thank you
CAN BE ANYBODY
DeleteSir have been commenting a lot .. iij initially it was fun to see so many masks slipping
ReplyDeleteBut one thing I also realized that because Indian muslims are kept away from rest of society,a lot of the people truly are scared that due to the normal mistakes in the forms etc. (Typical of indian systems) they will not be able to prove their citizenship and will be thrown out
That is a true fear that needs to be addressed by government asap
if you google for---
ReplyDeleteINDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE BY THEODORE KACZYNSKI, A REVIEW- CRITIQUE
it now comes on page 3 .. despite me calling Ted bay a Jewish serial killer BASTARD
HOW DOES IT FIGURE IN OTHER SEARCH ENGINES ?
it shows on first page in other search engine like yahoo, bing, duckduckgo, AOL, & 2nd on ask.com
DeleteReply from Ministry Of Commerce regarding "Indians Should Declare How Much Bitcoin He Has With Him"
ReplyDeleteName Of Complainant Debdoot Sarkar
Date of Receipt 19/12/2019
Received By Ministry/Department Commerce
Grievance Description
Namaskar
Kindly acknowledge the below comment taken from Captain Ajit Vadakayils blog
WE ASK THE MODI GOVT..
MAKE IT COMPULSORY FOR EVERY INDIAN TO DECLARE HOW MUCH BITCOIN HE HAS WITH HIM..
HE ALSO HAS TO DECLARE HOW HE GOT IT..
MAKE IT A JAILABLE OFFENCE FOR MISDECLARATION ..
CYBER HACKERS ARE ASKING FOR PAYMENT IN BITCOIN..
DDOS SCAMMERS ARE IMPERSONATING ONE OF RUSSIAS MOST NOTORIOUS HACKING GROUPS IN ORDER TO EXTORT VICTIMS OUT OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS WORTH OF BITCOIN.
THE SCHEME WORKS LIKE THIS: ATTACKERS LAUNCH THE DDOS ATTACK FROM A BOTNET, IN WHICH EACH IP IN THE BOTNET SENDS A FRACTION OF THE OVERALL TRAFFIC TO THE TARGET. THE VICTIM HAS A DEADLINE, TYPICALLY SIX DAYS, TO PAY TWO BITCOIN. IF THEY DONT PAY BY THE TIME THE DEADLINE EXPIRES, THE FEE INCREASES BY ONE BITCOIN PER DAY, AND THE DDOS RESUMES.
A U.S. JUDGE SENTENCED A 21-YEAR-OLD MAN SERGIY USATYUK, OF ILLINOI TO 13 MONTHS IN PRISON FOR RUNNING SERVICES THAT MADE IT POSSIBLE FOR ATTACKERS TO LAUNCH MILLIONS OF THEIR OWN DDOS ATTACKS WITH LITTLE FEAR OF BEING APPREHENDED
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/11/what-artificial-intelligence-cannot-do_15.html
capt ajit vadakayil
..
Thanks And Regards
Debdoot Sarkar...
Current Status Case closed
Date of Action 24/12/2019
Remarks
The Government has set up a Committee to examine issues on virtual currencies. The Committee has submitted its Report,which is also available in the DEA website. However, the Report is awaiting approval of the Government.
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name Manmohan Sachdeva
Officer Designation Director
Contact Address ROOM NO. North Block New Delhi
Email Address mm.sachdeva@nic.in
Contact Number 23093810
Sir, the last Russian czarina's grandmother was Queen Victoria. Victoria had German jew rothschild blood. So rothschild murdered his own blood relatives when he eliminated the czarina's 5 children
ReplyDeleteGERMAN JEWESS QUEEN VICTORIA IS KNOWN AS THE GRANDMOTHER OF EUROPE AS HER CHILDREN MARRIED INTO ROYAL FAMILIES ACROSS THE CONTINENT
DeleteTHE YOUNG QUEEN VICTORIA WAS FLUENT IN GERMAN .. HER MOTHER PRINCESS VICTORIA OF SAXE-COBURG-SAALFELD WAS A GERMAN JEWESS . SHE SPOKE IN GERMAN TO HER GERMAN JEW HUSBAND, PRINCE ALBERT OF SAXE-COBURG AND GOTH
QUEEN VICTORIA’S GRANDFATHER WAS GERMAN JEW FRANCIS, DUKE OF SAXE-COBURG-SAALFELD
QUEEN VICTORIA IN HER OLD AGE WAS BEING FUCKED ANALLY BY HER INDIAN SERVANT WITH A HUGE DONG, WHILE SHE SIPPED LAUDANUM.. OPIUM LACED WINE..
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/2017/09/02/queen-victoria-always-liked-sex-judi-dench-stephen-frears-making/
https://youtu.be/LmZPcXI73QM
EVER HEARD OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S GERMAN JEW SON, KING EDWARD VII?
KING EDWARD VII TOOK OVER THE BRITISH THRONE AFTER THE DEATH OF QUEEN VICTORIA.
KING EDWARD VII WITH GERMAN JEW ROTHSCHILD BLOOD IN HIM, WAS THE REASON WHY WW1 TOOK PLACE—AND THE FOUNDATIONS FOR CARVING OUT THE STATE OF ISRAEL.
THE NAIVE JOHN BULL DOES NOT KNOW EVEN TODAY THAT THEIR ROYAL ENGLISH BLOOD IS GERMAN AND JEWISH.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/01/of-honey-traps-and-pots-capt-ajit.html
NOR DO THEY KNOW THAT EDWARD VII WAS THE REAL FATHER OF GERMAN JEW WINSTON CHURCHILL.
JEW WINSTON CHURCHILL’S MOTHER WAS FUCKED BY KING EDWARD VII. EVERYBODY DID WONDER WHY WINSTON CHURCHILL WAS SO COCKY WITH THE KING - DARING TO BLOW CIGAR SMOKE ON HIS FACE .
WINSTON CHURCHILL WAS BORN IN A TOILET , AS DURING A DANCE JENNY JEROME ( ROTHSCHILD BLOOD ) DEVELOPED LABOUR PAINS.
EDWARD VII’S MENTALLY DEFICIENT SON PRINCE ALBERT VICTOR, DUKE OF CLARENCE ( BORN TWO MONTHS PREMATURE ) , WAS JACK THE RIPPER ..
JACK THE RIPPER’S SIGNATURE WAS TO MUTILATE THE WOMEN’S VAGINAS, WOMBS , OVARIES AND BREASTS. ALMOST ALL SERIAL KILLERS ARE WHITE JEW S.
WINSTON CHURCHILL WAS INVITED TO BECOME THE PRIME MINISTER BY HIS NEPHEW, KING GEORGE VI—ALL WITH ROTHSCHILD’S BLESSINGS
ACTRESSES SARAH BERNHARDT WHO MADE NIKOLA TESLA AND SWAMI VIVEKANANDA MEET AT HER PARTY , WAS A MISTRESS OF EDWARD VII
WHEN QUEEN VICTORIA DIED SENILE ON 22 JANUARY 1901, EDWARD VII BECAME KING OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, EMPEROR OF INDIA AND KING OF THE BRITISH DOMINIONS.
MIND YOU, JEW ROTHSCHILD WAS THE REAL BOSS OF INDIA AND OTHER BRITISH DOMINIONS. THE KING / QUEEN OF ENGLAND WAS ONLY A FRONT.
KING EDWARD FUCKED MORE THAN 10,000 WOMEN IN HIS LIFETIME.. HE LOVED VIRGINS.. HE HAD A SPECIAL CHAIR AS HIS TUMMY WAS TOO BIG ..HE SAMPLED AT LEAST FOUR WOMEN A WEEK FROM THE AGE OF NINETEEN UNTIL HE DIED AT SIXTY-NINE. THE ACTUAL FIGURE COULD BE BETWEEN FIFTEEN AND EIGHTEEN THOUSAND, THOUGH, BECAUSE IN GOOD WEEKS HE MANAGED SIX OR SEVEN DIFFERENT BED PARTNERS.
A PRINCE FROM INDIA , AWARE OF EDWARD VII’S ENORMOUS SEXUAL APPETITE SENT HIM A GOLF BAG AS A BIRTHDAY PRESENT MADE FROM A GIANT ELEPHANT'S PENIS.
KING EDWARD VII HAD A BEAUTIFUL WIFE ALEXANDRA , THE DAUGHTER OF DENMARK'S KING JEW CHRISTIAN IX. ALEXANDRA DIDN'T MIND THE FACT THAT HER HUSBAND HAD SEX WITH THOUSANDS OF OTHER WOMEN.
WHEN KING EDWARD VII DIED IN 1910, PRINCE GEORGE AND HIS WIFE CAME TO THE THRONE AS KING GEORGE V AND QUEEN MARY. MARY DID NOT HAVE A DROP OF ENGLISH BLOOD IN HER VEINS.
KING GEORGE V’S SON WAS AN ANAL SEX RECEIVING GAY EDWARD VIII. HIS WIFE DID NOT NEED A STRAP ON DILDO.. SHE HAD A HUGE DONG, BEING A HERMAPHRODITE
KING EDWARD VIII DID NOT WANT WW2. SO HE WAS WEEDED OUT. KAAN PAKADKE ROTHSCHILD NIKAAL DIYA
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/11/great-romance-and-curse-of-kohinoor.html
CONTINUED TO 2--
CONTINUED FROM 1--
DeleteFOR WW2 ROTHSCHILD WANTED A KING WHO COULD NOT SAY THREE WORDS TOGETHER ON HIS OWN , WITHOUT MELANCHOLY AND WEEPING – SO THAT HE COULD HAVE WW2 AND CARVE OUT THE STATE OF ISRAEL..
KING GEORGE VI WOULD BE MADE TO PRACTICE EVERY PUBLIC SPEECH FOR HOURS USING SPEECH THERAPISTS. CHURCHILL WOULD PICK HIS BIG ASS IN PUBLIC MAKING HIM CRY LIKE CHILD.
ALL THOSE WHO WANT TO KNOW QUEEN ELIZABETH 1 WHO HAD BALLS AND A PRICK, READ THE POST BELOW.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/12/exhumed-truths-of-spanish-armada-and.html
AND THOSE WHO WANT TO KNOW ABOUT BLOODY MARY READ THE POST BELOW.
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/11/mary-mary-quite-contrary-bloody-mary.html
BUT FOR THE INTERNET AND BLOGGER NAMED VADAKAYIL, THE ROTHSCHILD MONOPOLIZED MEDIA WOULD NEVER ALLOW ALL THESE TRUTH TO BE KNOWN.
Capt ajit vadakayil
..
Another one from home affairs, this is about why Pranab Mukherjee has been given a Bharat Ratna
ReplyDeleteName Of Complainant Debdoot Sarkar
Date of Receipt 28/08/2019
Received By Ministry/Department Home Affairs
Grievance Description
Namaskar
Kindly acknowledge the below comment taken from Captain Ajit Vadakayils blog
WE ASK MODI--
WHY HAVE YOU GIVEN MENTAL MIDGET PRANAB MUKHERJEE BHARAT RATNA
WHAT ARE YOU UP TO .. IS THIS A COMMAND FROM YOUR JEWISH MASTERS ..
DEEP STATE AGENT EX-PRESIDENT PRANAB MUKHERJEE EXTOLLED THE VIRTUES OF CONSTITUTIONAL PATRIOTISM --- EXTREME LOYALTY TO A BOOK LIKE MAOs RED BOOK OR THE KORAN , NOT THE MOTHERLAND / WATAN..
THIS IS WHY DURING INDO-PAK WARS MANY MUSLIMS SUPPORTED PAKISTAN AGAINST THEIR OWN WATAN..
THIS IS WHY INDIAN COMMIES SUPPORTED CHINA DURING THE 1962 WAR..
WE HAVE SOLIS , FALIS AND SALVES AND RETIRED LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES , THE DESH DROHI PERCEPTION MOLDERS WHO COME ON TV, THE JUDAS BENAMI MEDIA, THE FOREIGN PAYROLL MPs IN RAJYA SABHA ETC GIVING AN EVIL SPIN TO THE WORD SEDITION......
TRUTH: WHEN SOMEONE ABUSES THE WATAN AND CALLS FOR DISMEMBERMENT OF BHARATMATA , IT IS SEDITION. .THE PUNISHMENT IS DEATH .....
TRUTH: ABUSING A RULER ON A THRONE ( SAY PM MODI ) OR ANY MORTAL IS NOT SEDITION.....
WHAT HAPPENED IN JNU IS SEDITION ( BHARAT TERE TUKDE HOGE INSHAAH ALLAH )..
WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ALLOW CONSTITUTIONAL PATRIOTISM ( MAOs RED BOOK TYPE ) WHICH CAUSED INDIAN COMMIE TO SUPPORT CHINA IN THE 1962 WAR .. WE WILL ALLOW ONLY PATRIOTISM TO THE WATAN..
AFTER WW2 JEW ROTHSCHILD ENSURED THAT ALL NATIONS LEADERS SWEAR OATHS TO THE PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION... HOWEVER IN HIS OWN LAND ISRAEL ALL LEADERS SWEAR OATHS TO PROTECT THE WATAN..
ILLEGAL DEEP STATE SPONSORED COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY CREATED THE NAXAL RED CORRIDOR..
EVERY TIME OUR UNIFORMED MEN RISK THEIR LIVES AND ARREST TERRORISTS , NAXALS AND SEPARATISTS - - OUR DEEP STATE CONTROLLED COLLEGIUM MELORDS WHO ARE AFRAID OF JEW NOAM CHOMSKY SAVES THEM . .
SOLI SORABJEE AND SANJAY HEGDE KEEPS GIVING UNSOLICITED INFORMATION GHADI GHADI THAT SEDITION LAWS CAN BE APPLIED ONLY IF THIS RESULTS IN VIOLENCE.....
SORRY -- WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ACCEPT THIS.........
IN INDIA MOST OF THE VIOLENCE IS TRIGGERED BY TROJAN HORSE FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs CONTROLLED BY THE BENAMI MEDIA...
WE CAN SEE THE NEXUS BETWEEN JEW ROTHSCHILDs MEDIA AND JUDICIARY IN USA -- DONALD TRUMP HAS FOUND THIS OUT.... SAME NEXUS EXISTS IN INDIA.....
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/second-defeat-for-deep-state-capt-ajit.html
HULLO ITALIAN MAINO JEW HALF BREED RAHUL VINCI.. NATION IS MADE OF LAND NOT PEOPLE.. OR YOU BECOME LIKE SINDHIS, PEOPE WITHOUT A WATAN ..THIS BRAINWASH WONT WORK ANY MORE.
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/rahul-gandhi-on-jammu-and-kashmir-article-370-1577782-2019-08-06
I ASK SINDHIS WORLD WIDE-- YOU ALL ARE FILTHY RICH CANT YOU TAKE BACK OUR HOMELAND SINDH FROM PAKISTAN WHAT ARE YOU WORTH ..
YOU SINDHIS WANT EASY LIFE , RIGHT ..BUT YOU ARE THE NEW JEWS OF THIS PLANET--HATED BY ALL..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/12/dama-dam-mast-qalandar-prayer-to-sindhi.html
BHUTTO RIDICULED INDIRA GANDHI.. AFTER THE INDIA PAKISTAN WAR HE ASKED INDIRA GANDHI--YOU WANT YOUR POW JAWANS OR YOUR CAPTURED LAND.
BHUTTO TAUNTED INDIRA WAS SO FOOLISH THAT SHE GAVE A FILMI DIALOGUE AND ASKED BHUTTO IF HE WANTS BACK 93,000 PAKISTANI POWs OR PAKISTANI LAND CAPTURED BY INDIA....
BHUTTO SAID I WANT MY LOST LAND, NOT THE PAKISTANI POWs
INDIA BHUTTO SAYS WOULD HAVE TO RETURN THE POWs IN DUE COURSE AS PER INTERNATIONAL LAW... AND INDIA WAS HAVING A HARD TIME FEEDING THEM IN POW CAMPS..
https://www.timesnownews.com/international/article/indira-gandhi-negotiated-land-deal-with-pakistan-after-1971-war-claims-ex-pak-president-asif-ali-zardari/466229
capt ajit vadakayil
..
Thanks And Regards
Debdoot Sarkar...
Current Status Case closed
Date of Action 24/12/2019
1/2
2/2
ReplyDeleteRemarks
In terms of extant practice, the Prime Minister makes the recommendations for Bharat Ratna Award to the President and the names for the Bharat Ratna Award are announced by the Presidents Secretariat after obtaining the approval of President.
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name S K Shahi
Officer Designation Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Email Address vb.dubey@gov.in
Contact Number 23092722
Dear Sir, Why we Indians are short than tall Europeans these days? I don't like when I see any short Indian standing aside tall European.
ReplyDeleteProtein in diet. Adaptation to famines
Deleteheight tends to have an inverse relationship with population density(current as well as ancestral) from what i observe. Hasn't always got to do with malnutrition.
DeleteDongaria Kondhs are tribals who live in the forests of odisha, chattisgarh and andhra border.
DeleteThey still dont makecontact with outsiders.
They are all 6 feet plus tall even women. I have seen them
I WISH MY READERS A MERRY CHRISTMAS
ReplyDeleteAND A HAPPY NEW YEAR..
WITH YOU ALL- PEACE , HEALTH AND PROSPERITY IN THE YEAR 2020..
DeleteYour words carry incredible weight.Thank you Mahodaya.
Wish you the same to you and family and all readers.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to You and your family captain ☺
DeleteDear captain and family,
DeleteThanks alot and wish you the same.
Also myself and my family wish all the readers Happy english new year 2020.
Radhakrishnan s kundayil
Jaihind jaibharat ��
Thank you so much...
DeleteI wish you and your family the best of everything this christmas and 2020 new year.
Dear captain,
DeleteShall i use the image of protest for sabarimala and protest for caa to spread via whatsup.
Thanks.
BMG
DeleteBE MY GUEST
Captain,
DeleteThank you Sir..
Wish you and all readers a Merry Christmas and Happy New year too!!
I m blessed with a daughter after 8 years of marriage. Self belief and confidence instilled from your blogs has helped me and wife in this period. Hope to spread the message of your blogs next year with more vigor.
Thank You very much Ajit Sir
DeleteWishing You, Your Family and all readers Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year 2020
Sarada
Greetings and thanks for the wishes, Capt. Wish you and yours a great year ahead!
DeleteHello Captain,
DeleteA Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and family! Also to all deshbhakt Indians world wide!
Regards,
Hi Capt,
DeleteWish you and all the readers the same. Happy new year.
Dearest Sir and Ma'm,
DeleteWishing you and your family a merry Christmas and a Happy,healthy,peaceful and prosperous New year 2020!! may God's grace be with you always!!
Also wishing fellow readers the same!!
Love and regards.
Happy Christmas Captain Sir!
DeleteWish you the best to you and your family!
Pranamams,
Sriganesh
Pranam Guruji.
DeleteMerry Christmas to you and your family. I wish the same for all readers too. Thank you very much Captain sir for your blessings.
Merry Christmas Captain and readers
DeleteMerry Christmas and a happy, healthy and prosperous 2020 to Captain, his family, fellow readers and your near and dear ones.
Delete- Kiran
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year To You Capt., Your family and all fellow readers.
DeleteDear Captain, readers and families, Wish you all a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
DeleteSame to u sir.. Aap nahi hote toh hamri rasta aur raste kaun dikhata.. Grateful to have u in our life.. God. Bless us all.. To the light..
DeleteDear captain and family,
DeleteWishing a Very Happy New Year...2020!
Regards
Sukanya
&
Srinivas
Suprabhat Capt Ajitji,
DeleteMerry Christmas to you and your family.
And a happy new year 2020.
We all wish you very best of health, prosperity and hope you get sufficient REM sleep.
We wish that Vadakayil family tree extends and flourishes in years to come.
Happy new year sir and merry christmas..
DeleteWhen Christ the jesus didn't exist as per you then kaahe ka Christmas
DeleteDear Capt Ajit Sir,
DeleteWish u and your family merry Christmas and happy new year.
I am filled with gratitude for your blogposts giving so much of focus and direction in our lives to fight for our watan to be #1...in the face of all kind of masks/treachery.
Hope India implements BTT with your push sooner...that's the low hanging fruit, Modi should have valid reasons to implement it...other than nobel prize !!!
Wishing you most n more and hope lot many revelations in the new year.
JAYAN DIVAKARAN--
DeleteOVER THE YEARS YOU HAVE BECOME EXTREMELY CYNICAL..
THIS IS THE BEHAVIOR OF OLD LADIES..
DONT DESTROY YOUR FAMILY LIKE AND PROFESSIONAL LIFE WITH THIS POOR ATTITUDE..
THIS BLOGSITE HAS NOTHING AGAINST FOLLOWERS OF RELIGIONS WHICH I CRITICIZE..
DeleteALMOST ALL WERE BORN INTO THIS RELIGION..
THESE ARE DESCENDANTS OF PEOPLE WHO DID NOT HAVE THE BALLS TO FACE UP TO THE ISLAMIC SWORD .. SOME CONVERTED FOR SHEER SURVIVAL ( JIZYA TAX )
THE CHRISTIANS FELL TO GREED OF SOPS .. EVEN TODAY ENTIRE FAMILIES ARE BEING CONVERTED ENMASSE BY SOP OF ENGLISH MEDIUM CHILDRENs EDUCATION/ FREE KIDNEY DIALYSIS ETC ..
HINDUS HAVE RESISTED ALL THIS..
EXCEPTION: IN KERALA HINDUS CONVERTED TO ISLAM. CHRISTIANITY DUE TO SHEER DISGUST -- EXTREME HIGHHANDEDNESS OF NAMBOODIRIS..
FROM 4000 BC TO 1933 AD, NAIRS ( MENONS/ NAMBIARS/ PILLAIs ETC ) DID NOT EVEN KNOW WHO THEIR FATHER WAS.. BUT FOR THIS BLOGSITE THIS TRUTH WOULD HAVE BEEN BURIED FOREVER..
NEVER IGNORE HISTORY.. IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/10/worst-racists-on-planet-earth-capt-ajit.html
Dear Ajit Sir and readers,
DeleteHappiness got no dates but it's Christmas and has a celebration fervour.
I wish lots of happiness to everyone.
Enjoy these holidays.
Until jewess helena cooked up birthday of jesus as dec 25th,hindu Roman senators celebrated this day as festival of saturnalia(an ancient shani festival of hindus)...and they used to have a vacation from dec 17th to dec 25th...
DeleteSo,
Wish you,your family and all the readers Happy saturnalia or Christmas and along with that a very happy new year 2020..
Master Ji and All Readers,
DeleteHappy new year and Merry Christmas to all and your family, God enlighten us all and bless all for ever.
Thanks and Namaste to all.
May coming year give you and all our readers a very healthy year..
DeleteMandar
Dear captain,
DeleteHappy Christmas and happy new year in advance to captain and all the readers. Enjoy.
Sudhir.
Thanks Captain Ji, I take it as a blessing from you on my birthday (25 December) .. wish all the readers of this blogsite a wonderful year ahead with Captain leading from the front.
DeletePranams to you and Ma'am.
Captain, Readers & respective-families, wish you all a very Merry-Christmas ! :)
DeleteCaptain Sir,
DeleteWish you, your readers, family, near and dear ones happy X-mas and New Year !!
Thanks Dear Captain.
DeleteWish you and all readers a merry Christmas and happy new year in advance :)
Everybody reading thus, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
DeleteMay this new decade make your dreams come to life
Happy New Year and a Merry Christmas to everyone !!!!!
DeleteHappy Christmas and New year sir!
DeleteThank you Captain. Wish you and all readers a very happy new year 2020. Merry Christmas to all who are celebrating.
DeleteMerry Christmas and happy new year captain
DeletePranaam Guruji _/\_
ReplyDeleteWish You, Your Family And All The Readers Merry Christmas And Happy New Year 2020
Jai Bharat
Thanks And Regards
Debdoot Sarkar
Merry Christmas captain to you and family and all reader's 🙏
ReplyDeletehttps://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/bigg-boss-13-arhaan-khan-threatens-to-throw-acid-on-sidharth-shukla-netizens-want-police-to-take-strict-action/articleshow/72950028.cms
ReplyDeleteREMOVE THIS CRIMINAL ARHAA KHAN FROM BIGG BOSS 13 AND PUT HIM IN JAIL.. OR THIS BEHAVIOR WILL SPREAD...
OUR ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY, BENAMI MEDIA , DEEP STATE CREATED NCW HAS ALWAYS SAVED HEARTLESS ACID THROWERS..
THROWING ACID ON A YOUNG WOMAN IS WORSE THAN RAPE..
HAVING CARRIED 99.99% SULFURIC ACID ON SHIPS, I KNOW WHAT IT MEANS..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/06/sulphuric-acid-carriage-dangers-on.html
WE THE PEOPLE WATCH..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteMerry Christmas and a Happy New year to you Captain and all the readers.
ReplyDeleteShraddheya Shri Gurudev
ReplyDeleteWishing you and your family a merry christmas and a very happy and a dynamic new year.
Looking ahead for the Makaravilakku 2020 .
Pranam
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/bigg-boss-13-arhaan-khan-threatens-to-throw-acid-on-sidharth-shukla-netizens-want-police-to-take-strict-action/articleshow/72950028.cms
ReplyDeleteTHE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND NCW IN FOREIGN PAYROLL HAS ALWAYS BEEN LENIENT TO ACID THROWERS..
THROWING ACID OF A WOMANs FACE IS WORSE THAN RAPE..
I KNOW THE PAIN / TISSUE DAMAGE OF SULPHURIC ACID ON THE HUMAN BODY..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/06/sulphuric-acid-carriage-dangers-on.html
WE ASK THIS FELLOW AARHAN KHAN IS JAILED , NOW !
WE THE PEOPLE WILL BRING DOWN COLORs TV, SALMAN KHANS CAREER AND BIGG BOSS SHOW..
BE WARNED..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2010/12/sulphuric-acid-on-chemical-tankers-capt.html
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/01/dubious-role-of-bilderberg-club-created.html
capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITE OF--
COLORS TV MD
BIGG BOSS 13 PRODUCER
SALMAN KHAN
PMO
PM MODI
DGPs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
CJI BOBDE
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
AJIT DOVAL
RAW
IB
NIA
ED
CBI
AMIT SHAH
HOME MINISTRY
DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
I&B MINISTER/ MINISTRY STATE - CENTRAL
NCW MAIN/ STATES
REKHA SHARMA
SWATI MALLIWAL
Your Registration Number is : PMOPG/E/2019/0725669
Deletehttps://www.oneindia.com/photos/sabarimala-temple-opens-for-devotees-2019-57792.html
ReplyDeletehttp://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/11/5900-year-old-sabarimala-this-planets.html
***Wish You, your family, your well wishers and your well wishing readers a Merry Christmas***
ReplyDeleteDear Capt Ajit Sir,
ReplyDelete--- Season's Greetings ---
Wishing you and your family, and all readers another great prosperity, healthy and wealthy year ahead.
Love,
Bert
Merry Christmas and Happy New year to you, your family and all the readers here...
ReplyDeletehttps://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/isi-behind-violence-over-caa-says-tarek-fateh/articleshow/72960033.cms
ReplyDeleteDear Captain..Wish you merry Christmas and wishing good health and happiness for you and ur family and wonderful year 2020.
ReplyDeleteAlways grateful for all that you do��������
Yes one can be true to oneself and exist in the world. Nobody will take advantage as all this is governed by laws of Karma. One has to drive with both eyes open, due diligence in all tasks .
ReplyDeleteOccasional accidents may happen but that doesn't mean give up driving.
It all depends on the strength of an individual's intention. The most powerful magic/science a human being possesses.
Pranaam Captain,
ReplyDeleteWish you, your family and all the readers a very HAPPY NEW YEAR 2020 and Merry Christmas !!
Regards
Vineet
Dear Captain, Excellent critique, doodh ka doodh pani ka pani.
ReplyDeleteUnbiased review coupled with perception, experience and exposure to various writers. The so called movie/Novel critics shall learn how to write a review.
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/industrial-society-and-its-future-by_22.html
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/industrial-society-and-its-future-by_24.html
DeleteNONE OF THE JOURNALISTS ON THIS PLANET ARE WELL READ..
EVEN IF THEY HAVE A PENCHANT TO READ GOOD BOOKS, THEY ARE TOO SLOW..
I COULD NEVER GIVE KICK MAHAMERUs OF THIS PLANET INTO TE VADAKAYIL GARBAGE BIN, OR FLUSH THEM DOWN THE SHIT HOLE, IF I COULD NOT SPEED READ..
IT IS UNFAIR TO CONDEMN ANYBODY UNLESS YOU READ ALL HIS ACCLAIMED WORKS..
MANY CONMAN HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED AS INTELLECTUALS BECAUSE THEY WRITE IN "PURPLE PROSE" TO BAFFLE THE READERS..
FOR EXAMPLE-- I DARE ANY COMMIE INTELLECTUAL ON THIS PLANET TO DEBATE KARL MARXs "DAS KAPITAL" WITH ME..
CAN ANY ECONOMICS MAHA MERU ON THE PLANET EVEN UNDERSTAND WHY MODERN ECONOMICS IS BULLSHIT..
NATIONS HAVE DEBT FAR BEYOND THEIR GDP AND CALL THEMSELVES RICH?
THEIR GDP ITSELF IS INFLATED BULLSHIT CERTIFIED BY ROTHSCHILDs RATING AGENCIES..
READ QUESTIONS TO QUORA FROM 686 TO 820 IN THE POST BELOW--
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/06/archived-questions-to-quora-from-capt.html
PEOPLE ALL OVER THE PLANET ARE WAKING UP-- THERE IS A SILENT REVOLUTION..
ROTHSCHILD AGENTS DATTA SAMANT SCREWED THE MUMBAI MILLWORKERS.. TODAY PRIME MILL REAL ESTATE /PROPERTY IS INFESTED WITH ROTHSCHILDs AGENTS..
DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutta_Samant
COMMIE SA DANGE WAS A ROTHSCHILD AGENT..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shripad_Amrit_Dange
HE WENT TO MOSCOW TO MEET STALIN AND IMPORT ARMS INTO INDIA FOR A BLOODY REVOLUTION TO BRING DOWN NEHRU..
READ THE LAST PART OF THE POST BELOW WHERE COMRADES AJOY GHOSH, S.A. DANGE, C. RAJESWARA RAO AND M. BASAVA PUNNAIAH WENT AS STOWAWAYS ON A RUSSIAN SHIP FROM CALCUTTA KIDDERPORE DOCKS TO MEET STALIN IN MOSCOW--ALL ARRANGED BY TRAITOR COMMIE JOURNALIST NIKHIL CHKRAVARTTY..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/08/chinese-revolution-biggest-genocide-on.html
NOW THEY KOSHER DEEP STATE ( WITH PAKISTANI ISI AND PRAYER BREAKFAST GROUP ) IS TRYING TO BRING HONGKONG STYLE RIOTS TO INDIA..
HONGKONG RIOTS ARE LED FROM THE SHADOWS BY JEWISH MONEY LAUNDERERS..
INDIA MUST KILL THESE RIOTS WITHIN THIS WEEK..USE PELLETS/ INDELIBLE DYE CARTRIDGES/ ARREST PEOPLE HIDING FACES.. DO IT NOW.. DONT CARE FOR ROTHSCHILDs MEDIA OR JEWISH RULERS OF EU..
HOFFA WAS SOMEBODY LIKE DATTA SAMANT-- DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES. WHEN JEWISH DEEP STATE TELLS YOU TO GET OFF THE UNION LEADERS CHAIR, THE UNION LEADER MUST DO IT..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Hoffa
capt ajit vadakayil
..
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-
DeleteCHANDRACHUD
NARIMAN
TRUMP
PUTIN
PM OF UK
AMBASSADORS TO FROM US/ RUSSIA/ UK
ENTIRE BBC GANG
ALL US MEDIA.
ALL INDIAN MEDIA
PMO
PM MODI
NITI AYOG
AMITABH KANT
NCERT
EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL MPs OF INDIA
ALL MLAs OF INDIA
CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
DGPs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
CJI BOBDE
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
DAVID FRAWLEY
STEPHEN KNAPP
WILLIAM DALRYMPLE
KONRAED ELST
FRANCOIS GAUTIER
AJIT DOVAL
RAW
IB
NIA
ED
CBI
AMIT SHAH
HOME MINISTRY
DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
RSS
AVBP
VHP
MOHAN BHAGWAT
RAM MADHAV
THAMBI SUNDAR PICHAI
CEO OF WIKIPEDIA
QUORA CEO ANGELO D ADAMS
QUORA MODERATION TEAM
KURT OF QUORA
GAUTAM SHEWAKRAMANI
PGURUS
SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV
MATA AMRITANANDA MAYI
BABA RAMDEV
CHETAN BHAGAT
AMISH TRIPATHI
DEVADUTT PATTANAIK
NALIN KOHLI
GVL NARASIMHA RAO
SAMBIT PATRA
VIVEK OBEROI
GAUTAM GAMBHIR
ASHOK PANDIT
ANUPAM KHER
KANGANA RANAUT
VIVEK AGNIHOTRI
KIRON KHER
MEENAKSHI LEKHI
SMRITI IRANI
PRASOON JOSHI
MADHUR BHANDARKAR
SWAPAN DASGUPTA
SONAL MANSINGH
MADHU KISHWAR
SUDHIR CHAUDHARY
GEN GD BAKSHI
RSN SINGH
E SREEDHARAN
MOHANLAL
SURESH GOPI
CHANDAN MITRA
PAVAN VARMA
RAMACHANDRA GUHA
ALL MEDIA OF KERALA
MUKESH AMBANI
RATA TATA
ANAND MAHINDRA
KUMARAMANGALAMBIRLA
LAXMI MNARAYAN MITTAL
AZIM PREMJI
KAANIYA MURTHY
RAHUL BAJAJ
RAJAN RAHEJA
NAVEEN JINDAL
GOPICHAND HINDUJA
DILIP SHANGHVI
GAUTAM ADANI
THE QUINT
THE SCROLL
THE WIRE
THE PRINT
MK VENU
MADHU TREHAN
RAJDEEP SARDESAI
PAAGALIKA GHOSE
NAVIKA KUMAR
ANAND NARASIMHAN
SRINIVASAN JAIN
SONAL MEHROTRA KAPOOR
VIKRAM CHANDRA
NIDHI RAZDAN
FAYE DSOUZA
ZAKKA JACOB
RAVISH KUMAR
PRANNOY JAMES ROY
AROON PURIE
VINEET JAIN
RAGHAV BAHL
SEEMA CHISTI
DILEEP PADGOANKAR
VIR SANGHVI
KARAN THAPAR
PRITISH NANDI
SHEKHAR GUPTA
SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
SWAMY
RAJIV MALHOTRA
SOLI BABY
FALI BABY
KATJU BABY
SALVE BABY
I&B DEPT/ MINISTER
LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
ANGREZ KA AULAAD- SUHEL SETH
PGURUS
PRAKASH KARAT
SITARAM YECHURY
D RAJA
ASADDUDIN OWAISI
FATHER CEDRIC PRAKASH
ANNA VETTICKAD
ANNIE RAJA
JOHN BRITTAS
FINANCE MINISTER OF KERALA THOMAS ISAAC
JULIO REBEIRO
SONIA GANDHI
RAHUL GANDHI
PRIYANKA GANDHI
AK ANTONY
OOMMEN CHANDY
PC GEORGE
JOHN ABRAHAM
FAZAL GAFOOR (MES )
ASADDUDIN OWAISI
RANA AYYUB
JAVED AKHTHAR
NASIRUDDIN SHAH
KUNHALIKUTTY
MAMOOTTY
DULQUER SALMAN
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Your Registration Number is : PMOPG/E/2019/0725666
DeleteCaptain, I noticed a strange phenomenon that on Christmas Eve the lines leading to Beer Stores are soooooo long.
ReplyDeleteWhat went wrong with Christianity that on a spiritual night, they turn to drink and snore.
Where as on a Shivaratri day, the Hindus line up in front of temples starting from the wee hours to have a Darshan; still we are branded as savages, backwards, stinky etc.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year captain, we are grateful to have your presence in our life.
ReplyDeleteDear Captain,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the wishes.Merry Christmas and happy new year to you and your family.
Best Regards
Basavaraj
Wish you and all readers a Merry Christmas and a Happy and Prosperous 2020...
ReplyDeleteWith Gratitude,
Anil.
Merry Christmas🎄 captain.
ReplyDeleteSir,
ReplyDeleteWish u and urs family &all readers Merry Christmas.
Dear Capt Ajit sir,
ReplyDeleteSwapan Dasgupta also reads your blogs...used the term 'Useful idiots' in the last para of this article, where he says politicalm are pushed to the corner and made irrelevent !!!
https://t.co/EClCqf3w9c
Pranam Captain,
ReplyDeleteWish you and your family and all the readers a very Happy New Year and Merry Christmas.
Regards
NPR , NRC at state level is conducted by manpower from the local states usually this is dumped on govt school teachers.
ReplyDeleteHostile states can prevent or delay the implementation with impunity citing various reasons or simply intimidating the staff deputed .
Wishing you a merry X mas and a happy new year.
Dear Capt Ajit Sir,
ReplyDeleteWishing you and family, and all readers another Merry Christmas and prosperous Happy New Year!
Love,
Bert
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bengal-governor-not-allowed-to-enter-university-for-convocation/articleshow/72961812.cms
ReplyDeleteTHE STUPID BENGAL GOVERNOR DOES NOT KNOW HIS OWN POWERS..
YES. YES. He just tweets and complains. He has the power to do what's necessary and yet doesn't. BJP used to blame everything on Congress but now they are in power and still coming up with excuses.
DeleteIndeed stupid.
DeleteHe once called/tweeted the Jews to be non-violent.
I read it but didn't add fearing account suspension.
A big Malayali handle after sometime caught up with this Governor and gave him left-Right-Centre, exposing the Jews.
It was fun to find this Governor having no answer.
Most Governors of India are stupid/useless.
They do nothing.
Today people trending manushruti dahan diwas
ReplyDeleteI posted your few screenshot from 2011 to let them know who was Manu
Mandar
Captain ji, u hv mentioned timely justice and cases languishing in court for decades. With CAA and NRC I don't feel that ppl who have lived and settled here for 10 plus years should be deported. It is actually India's fault for having and continuing to have poor Border Security. If we can send satellites into space we can surely patrol a border but we intentionally don't - WHAT GIVES?
ReplyDeleteSir,
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3PRzblgl_A
There is a complete panic for Mamta Bannerjee by seeing the support for the CAA in Bengal.
In this interview with a Bengal senior journalist, he tells that there is no democracy in the party and
whatever Mamta Bannerjee says , is been finalised in the party. Mamta Bannerjee is also looking for the president rule in Bengal.
He says that she is willing to cross any limits to win the election. She is clear in her mind that she has to consolidate 30-32 %
minority votes in her favour, as if she achieves it, she can come back in power.
This channel(Capital TV) is run by Dr Manish Kumar and I have observed and even heard from many sources that the news is
purely truth and inside coverage and there is no fake news propagnada unlke many others like NDTV etc.
Regards
Sorry boss, ground reality is very different. I hope u are not BJP troll. I actually live in West Bengal.
DeleteI REMIND MY READERS THE SIXTH TIME
ReplyDeleteDO NOT MAKE COMMENTS IN ANYPOST WHERE THE NUMBER OF COMMENTS EXCEED 200..
IT WONT SHOW UP EVEN IF I PUBLISH IT.. DONT WASTE MY TIME..
FREEZE THE BANK ACCOUNTS OF PEOPLE THROWING STONES AT POLICE AND DESH DROHIS WHO VANDALISE PROPERTY..
ReplyDeleteMAKE IT A JAILABLE OFFENCE TO HIDE YOUR FACE DURING PROTESTS AND RIOTS..
MAKE IT A JAILABLE OFFENCE TO BURN CAR TYRES..
INDIA IS IN THIS STATE BECAUSE OF OUR DESH DROHI JUDICIARY WHO WORK IN CAHOOTS WITH BENAMI MEDIA
THE SAME HAPPENS IN USA..
THE ENTIRE MEDIA IS CONTROLLED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD..
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/10/second-defeat-for-deep-state-capt-ajit.html
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-
DeleteCHANDRACHUD
NARIMAN
TRUMP
PUTIN
PM OF UK
AMBASSADORS TO FROM US/ RUSSIA/ UK
ENTIRE BBC GANG
ALL US MEDIA.
ALL INDIAN MEDIA
PMO
PM MODI
NITI AYOG
AMITABH KANT
NCERT
EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL MPs OF INDIA
ALL MLAs OF INDIA
CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
DGPs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
CJI BOBDE
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
DAVID FRAWLEY
STEPHEN KNAPP
WILLIAM DALRYMPLE
KONRAED ELST
FRANCOIS GAUTIER
AJIT DOVAL
RAW
IB
NIA
ED
CBI
AMIT SHAH
HOME MINISTRY
DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
RSS
AVBP
VHP
MOHAN BHAGWAT
RAM MADHAV
THAMBI SUNDAR PICHAI
CEO OF WIKIPEDIA
QUORA CEO ANGELO D ADAMS
QUORA MODERATION TEAM
KURT OF QUORA
GAUTAM SHEWAKRAMANI
PGURUS
SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV
MATA AMRITANANDA MAYI
BABA RAMDEV
CHETAN BHAGAT
AMISH TRIPATHI
DEVADUTT PATTANAIK
NALIN KOHLI
GVL NARASIMHA RAO
SAMBIT PATRA
VIVEK OBEROI
GAUTAM GAMBHIR
ASHOK PANDIT
ANUPAM KHER
KANGANA RANAUT
VIVEK AGNIHOTRI
KIRON KHER
MEENAKSHI LEKHI
SMRITI IRANI
PRASOON JOSHI
MADHUR BHANDARKAR
SWAPAN DASGUPTA
SONAL MANSINGH
MADHU KISHWAR
SUDHIR CHAUDHARY
GEN GD BAKSHI
RSN SINGH
E SREEDHARAN
MOHANLAL
SURESH GOPI
CHANDAN MITRA
PAVAN VARMA
RAMACHANDRA GUHA
ALL MEDIA OF KERALA
MUKESH AMBANI
RATA TATA
ANAND MAHINDRA
KUMARAMANGALAMBIRLA
LAXMI MNARAYAN MITTAL
AZIM PREMJI
KAANIYA MURTHY
RAHUL BAJAJ
RAJAN RAHEJA
NAVEEN JINDAL
GOPICHAND HINDUJA
DILIP SHANGHVI
GAUTAM ADANI
THE QUINT
THE SCROLL
THE WIRE
THE PRINT
MK VENU
MADHU TREHAN
RAJDEEP SARDESAI
PAAGALIKA GHOSE
NAVIKA KUMAR
ANAND NARASIMHAN
SRINIVASAN JAIN
SONAL MEHROTRA KAPOOR
VIKRAM CHANDRA
NIDHI RAZDAN
FAYE DSOUZA
ZAKKA JACOB
RAVISH KUMAR
PRANNOY JAMES ROY
AROON PURIE
VINEET JAIN
RAGHAV BAHL
SEEMA CHISTI
DILEEP PADGOANKAR
VIR SANGHVI
KARAN THAPAR
PRITISH NANDI
SHEKHAR GUPTA
SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
SWAMY
RAJIV MALHOTRA
SOLI BABY
FALI BABY
KATJU BABY
SALVE BABY
I&B DEPT/ MINISTER
LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
ANGREZ KA AULAAD- SUHEL SETH
PGURUS
PRAKASH KARAT
SITARAM YECHURY
D RAJA
ASADDUDIN OWAISI
FATHER CEDRIC PRAKASH
ANNA VETTICKAD
ANNIE RAJA
JOHN BRITTAS
FINANCE MINISTER OF KERALA THOMAS ISAAC
JULIO REBEIRO
SONIA GANDHI
RAHUL GANDHI
PRIYANKA GANDHI
AK ANTONY
OOMMEN CHANDY
PC GEORGE
JOHN ABRAHAM
FAZAL GAFOOR (MES )
ASADDUDIN OWAISI
RANA AYYUB
JAVED AKHTHAR
NASIRUDDIN SHAH
KUNHALIKUTTY
MAMOOTTY
DULQUER SALMAN
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Your Registration Number is : PMOPG/E/2019/0725657
DeletePlease expose Prakash Javedkar - he MUST be a CRYPTO JEW. He looks like a rabbi. Put a yarmulke on him...that's a JEW.
ReplyDeleteI know these R created Kayasthas are Jews brought in to handle the administration of the EIC. They look like Jews, they act like Jews...but I think their corrupted DNA has now got the best of them.
He is a Chitpavan Jew.
DeleteBut Captain ji calls him out as a Kayastha. I also thought he had said he was a Chitpavan (Brahmin)Jew.
DeleteJAVEDEKAR CLAIMS TO BE KAYASTHA
DeleteIN REALITY HE IS A CHITPAVAN JEW..
https://photogallery.indiatimes.com/celebs/international/bold-pictures-of-worlds-hottest-nurse-carina-linn/articleshow/70959673.cms?picid=72945257
ReplyDeleteCHILDLESS MIDGET JAIN MUST BE JACKING OFF TO THESE PICTURES
Is this graphic on the internet prove that Jews are followers of Satan. It is essentially acknowledging that porn is approved and sponsored by Jews. They play the role of the devil in debasing men.
Deletehttps://www.google.com/search?q=pornhub+menorah+graphic&sxsrf=ACYBGNQchj5ujObFMVytYBtmrjGzltS8cw:1577254902337&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj98bGxlNDmAhXHc94KHVDrDvcQ_AUoAXoECAsQAw&biw=1280&bih=580#imgrc=ICd6ldp0-3h6vM:
This is coming in FB
ReplyDeleteRumors of detention-centers being spread by Urban Naxals and Congress
https://www.modilies.in/2019/12/22/lie-rumors-of-detention-centers-being-spread-by-urban-naxals-and-congress/
https://www.modilies.in/
AN ILLEGAL ROHINGYA IMMIGRANT CAUGHT IN HYDERABAD/ CALICUT MUST BE PUT IN A DETENTION CENTRE WITH FAMILY -- NOT IN JAIL..
DeleteThen what? Which country will accept them?
DeleteIllegal immigrants are put in detention centers and later they are deported to their own countries
Deletehttps://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/india-to-deport-7-rohingyas-to-myanmar-thursday/articleshow/66055792.cms
Respected Sir,
ReplyDeleteThank You for explaining where the illegal Rohingya immigrant should be put if he is caught.
Captain, if Sanskrit was perfect & used Granthi script, then what was the need to create Malayalam, Tamil, etc. ? You have mentioned that Sanskrit is the oldest language followed by Malayalam and Tamil, but what is the need for the rest (all languages after Sanskrit), when Sanskrit itself was perfect and useful ?
ReplyDeleteTHIS WAS TO SEGREGATE VEDA ORAL ROUTE KNOWING SAGES..
DeleteCaptain, the Supreme-Consciousness (BrahmAn) knows everything and consists of everything. Aakasha is the universal record/knowledge-keeping system which could be accessed by the Sages & Enlightened-people like Tesla and allowed creation of many inventions/innovations. But Aakasha exists due to BrahmAn. You have revealed that the entire journey of a soul (small-fragment seperated by BrahmAn from itself) is to learn & give feedback to the BrahmAn. Whenever things go wrong in the Universe, BrahmAn intervenes by creating an Avatar. But why would a being that knows everything, creates concepts like time/karma/life/death/etc., intervene as an Avatar, etc. do all this activity if it already knows everything ? Is this just a big activity trap for BrahmAn itself to keep itself busy ? And if so, why not just create a decent-world where everything is ok and there is no mutation/degradation which will need to be corrected by intervening in form of an Avatar ?
ReplyDeleteBRAHMAN EXPECTS THE INDIVIDUAL SOUL, TO CREATE MORE OUTSIDE THE PERIMETER OF THE KNOWLEDGE BANK THE FIELD HOLDS .
DeleteBRAHMAN DOES NOT EXPECT MAN TO GO BACK TO THE STONE AGE LIKE WHAT TED KACZYNSKI WANTS..
MAN IS JUST A CHANNEL THROWN IN THE MIDST OF MAYA.... WITH QUANTUM PHYSICS ALL MARVEL THE THE EXTENT OF MAYA
EVERYTHING IS THE LILA ( PLAY )OF GOD ..
Dear Captain,
DeleteHow is the individual soul expected to know the perimeter of the knowledge bank the field holds?
Does this not contradict the definition of Akasha as the storehouse of all knowledge manifested AND unmanifested?
Gratefully,
Anish.
EVERY MOKSHA SOUL ADDS TO THE FIELD KNOWLEDGE..
DeleteEVERY EXPERIENCE IS NEW
Respected CAptain,
Deletewhat if the FIELD KNOWLEDGE has sent an AVATAR, how will taht avatar pick-up the knowledge, and add nore to that field?
what should be done to donload that knowledge?
regards
goldy
Nanni Gurunatha!!!
ReplyDeleteYendey sneham niranja Navavalsara aashamsagal....with blessings from you and with all determination I want these coming year to be more successful..iIwish that evereyone should develop courage to face the world and follow dharmic principles and start welcoming the great Avatar KALKI!!!...strength and Honor always
GURUNATHA request you to bless us ,I am starting a venture along with my wife and few good wills support...Nanni Vinith
Seasons greetings to you, your family and all the readers Captain. Wishing everyone wonderful holidays with family and friend.
ReplyDeleteWarm Regards,
Prapulla
Captain, please read this guy's claims about the Fukushima-disaster and the Germanwings-disaster.
ReplyDeletehttp://82.221.129.208/fukureport1b.pdf
http://www.jimstone.is/shutupordie.html
http://82.221.129.208/a320crash.html
Captain, Mossad has "Sayanim" (volunteer-jews) who support them directly/indirectly. The interviews of a French Anti-Zionist guy called "Dr.Jacob Cohen" are interesting because he says that Sayanim are everywhere. Last two videos are unrelated to sayanim but speak about Crypto-Jews.
ReplyDeletehttps://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Sayanim
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtBF6MxquWI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3reCXatMmZE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plJ9vkstvbA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=pRM82TxDcmU
https://youtu.be/niIrzaeursM?t=1271
Captain, in the 1986-movie Top-Gun, there is a character called Tom-"Iceman"-Kazansky who is cocky & has big-ego. Sharing this because these traits are similar to Ted-Kasczynski. Kazansky might be an anglicized/corrupted version of Kasczynski, just like Kannur became Cannanore during the British-Raj. Maybe this was a coincidence or a deliberate propaganda by the zionists in Hollywood who wanted to subtly portray their jew/crypto-jew pilot as better than the main-character christian-american pilot (Maverick).
ReplyDeletehttps://topgun.fandom.com/wiki/Tom_Kazansky
https://youtu.be/Uh7L2aCCbiA?t=188
https://youtu.be/cXq3ywxVhq4?t=202
https://youtu.be/RiRAYp9t9E0?t=490
Ajit Sir tomorrow is eclipse and heard its its strongest. So should we take any precautions.
ReplyDeleteONE CALENDAR YEAR HAS TWO SOLAR ECLIPSES..
DeleteDO NOT LOOK DIRECTLY AT THE SUN FR EXTENDED PERIODS — YOU CAN DO IT FOR A COUPLE OF SECONDS
https://youtu.be/71SxRG10sLc
Dear Captain Ajith Vadakayil sir,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your Christmas and new year greetings. Merry Christmas and Happy new year to you and all.
https://photogallery.indiatimes.com/news/world/in-pics-santa-claus-around-the-world/articleshow/72949780.cms
ReplyDeleteTHE ORIGINAL SANTA CLAUS WAS ONE EYED SHUKRACHARYA-- LIFTED AS NORSE GOD ODIN
http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/12/helena-mother-of-roman-emperor.html
Respected Sir,
ReplyDeleteIs it ok to chant mantras like Gayatri mantra, Aditya hrudayam etc shlokas during Surya grahan.is there anything that one should strictly avoid during this period.
Thank you
CAN
DeleteAS LONG AS YOU DONT SHIT ON YOUR DOOR STEP AFTER THAT
Jayapal criticizes Indian official for refusing to meet her: It's 'a sign of weakness'
ReplyDeleteBY RACHEL FRAZIN - 12/24/19 04:05 PM EST 257
85..https://thehill.com/homenews/house/475869-jayapal-responds-after-indian-official-refuses-to-meet-with-her-its-a-sign-of
..sad she considers it an advesory relationship in a zero sum game...
Respected Sir,
ReplyDeleteIf a person is physically harassed in his/her dreams what should one do to get out of it.
Thank you
DO SURYA NAMASKAR
Deletehttp://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/12/sleep-paralysis-and-sinister-presence.html
COMMENTS IN THIS POST IS NOW CLOSED
ReplyDeleteMAKE YOUR COMMENTS IN THE POST BELOW--
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/industrial-society-and-its-future-by_19.html
Dear Captain Prannam!! Wish you and your family and all readers merry Xmas and prosperous New year!!
ReplyDeletehttps://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/npr-will-serve-as-database-for-nrc-oppose-it-arundhati-roy/articleshow/72966741.cms
ReplyDeleteHEY ARUNDHATI SUZANNE ROY...
IN THE LINK BELOW CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL HAS DECLARED THAT YOU PLAGIARIZED YOUR BOOKER AWARD WINNING BOOK "GOD OF SMALL THINGS" FROM THE BOOK OF HARPER LEE " TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD"..
AFTER THAT THE JEWISH DEEP STATE WANTS YOU TO ADVISE INDIA?
https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/12/industrial-society-and-its-future-by_22.html
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL PLANS TO WRITE A FULL BLOGPOST SERIES ON YOU.... WATCH THIS SPACE..
capt ajit vadakayil
..
.
Delete.
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-
ARUNDHATI ROY
SHOBHAA DE
ROMILA THAPAR
IRFAN HABIB
TEESTA SETALVAD
KAVITHA KRISHNAN
SWARA TRRRR BHAKSKAR ( OR IS PRRRR ? )
ARUNA ROY
HARSH MANDAR
JEAN DREZE
BELA BHATIA
PRASHANT KISHORE
SWAPAN DASGUPTA
CHANDRACHUD
NARIMAN
TRUMP
PUTIN
PM OF UK
AMBASSADORS TO FROM US/ RUSSIA/ UK
ENTIRE BBC GANG
ALL US MEDIA.
ALL INDIAN MEDIA
PMO
PM MODI
NITI AYOG
AMITABH KANT
NCERT
EDUCATION MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL MPs OF INDIA
ALL MLAs OF INDIA
CMs OF ALL INDIAN STATES
DGPs OF ALL STATES
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
CJI BOBDE
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGES
ALL SUPREME COURT LAWYERS
LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY CENTRE AND STATE
ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES
DAVID FRAWLEY
STEPHEN KNAPP
WILLIAM DALRYMPLE
KONRAED ELST
FRANCOIS GAUTIER
AJIT DOVAL
RAW
IB
NIA
ED
CBI
AMIT SHAH
HOME MINISTRY
DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
RSS
AVBP
VHP
MOHAN BHAGWAT
RAM MADHAV
THAMBI SUNDAR PICHAI
CEO OF WIKIPEDIA
QUORA CEO ANGELO D ADAMS
QUORA MODERATION TEAM
KURT OF QUORA
GAUTAM SHEWAKRAMANI
PGURUS
SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV
MATA AMRITANANDA MAYI
BABA RAMDEV
CHETAN BHAGAT
AMISH TRIPATHI
DEVADUTT PATTANAIK
NALIN KOHLI
GVL NARASIMHA RAO
SAMBIT PATRA
VIVEK OBEROI
GAUTAM GAMBHIR
ASHOK PANDIT
ANUPAM KHER
KANGANA RANAUT
VIVEK AGNIHOTRI
KIRON KHER
MEENAKSHI LEKHI
SMRITI IRANI
PRASOON JOSHI
MADHUR BHANDARKAR
SWAPAN DASGUPTA
SONAL MANSINGH
MADHU KISHWAR
SUDHIR CHAUDHARY
GEN GD BAKSHI
RSN SINGH
E SREEDHARAN
MOHANLAL
SURESH GOPI
CHANDAN MITRA
PAVAN VARMA
RAMACHANDRA GUHA
ALL MEDIA OF KERALA
MUKESH AMBANI
RATA TATA
ANAND MAHINDRA
KUMARAMANGALAMBIRLA
LAXMI MNARAYAN MITTAL
AZIM PREMJI
KAANIYA MURTHY
RAHUL BAJAJ
RAJAN RAHEJA
NAVEEN JINDAL
GOPICHAND HINDUJA
DILIP SHANGHVI
GAUTAM ADANI
THE QUINT
THE SCROLL
THE WIRE
THE PRINT
MK VENU
MADHU TREHAN
RAJDEEP SARDESAI
PAAGALIKA GHOSE
NAVIKA KUMAR
ANAND NARASIMHAN
SRINIVASAN JAIN
SONAL MEHROTRA KAPOOR
VIKRAM CHANDRA
NIDHI RAZDAN
FAYE DSOUZA
ZAKKA JACOB
RAVISH KUMAR
PRANNOY JAMES ROY
AROON PURIE
VINEET JAIN
RAGHAV BAHL
SEEMA CHISTI
DILEEP PADGOANKAR
VIR SANGHVI
KARAN THAPAR
PRITISH NANDI
SHEKHAR GUPTA
SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
SWAMY
RAJIV MALHOTRA
SOLI BABY
FALI BABY
KATJU BABY
SALVE BABY
I&B DEPT/ MINISTER
LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
ANGREZ KA AULAAD- SUHEL SETH
PGURUS
PRAKASH KARAT
SITARAM YECHURY
D RAJA
ASADDUDIN OWAISI
FATHER CEDRIC PRAKASH
ANNA VETTICKAD
ANNIE RAJA
JOHN BRITTAS
FINANCE MINISTER OF KERALA THOMAS ISAAC
JULIO REBEIRO
SONIA GANDHI
RAHUL GANDHI
PRIYANKA GANDHI
AK ANTONY
OOMMEN CHANDY
PC GEORGE
JOHN ABRAHAM
FAZAL GAFOOR (MES )
ASADDUDIN OWAISI
RANA AYYUB
JAVED AKHTHAR
NASIRUDDIN SHAH
KUNHALIKUTTY
MAMOOTTY
DULQUER SALMAN
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Dear guru ji, readers and families, Wish you all a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
ReplyDeleteRESPECTED CAPTAIN,
ReplyDeleteas the
i would also likem to know how
but
the many muslims and christian are undeserving, please let them make suffer their descendents by the way of their aatmaa
as a request from those who aare doing dhyaan-saadhanaa as a HIndu,
my family members where humiliated and tortured
by the above-mentioned non-Hindus
you can even judge how i think about them by the syntax of my typo, you can even judge what i and Hindus who have suffered from their hands, please don't let them pass through the filter
REGARDS
GOLDY