Monday, August 5, 2019

WE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION DEMAND “ ABOLISH ILLEGAL JUDICIAL REVIEW, PIL AND COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY “ — CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL





  1. YESTERDAY I COMPLETED WATCHING ALL 5 SEASONS OF "PERSON OF INTEREST"-- A TV SERIAL..

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person_of_Interest_(TV_series)

    IT IS ABOUT HOW ARTIFICIAL INTELLIEGNCE IS TAKING OVER THE PLANET.. INDIANS WORKING AT HIGH LEVELS OF FACEBOOK/ TWITTER TYPE COMPANIES , KNOW HOW MUCH CLANDESTINE WORK IS GOING ON, CONTROLLED BY THE KOSHER DEEP STATE .

    AM I AN IDIOT TO WRITE A 32 PART POST ON THE DEEP STATE ? I WROTE IT FOR MODI AND AJIT DOVAL..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2018/08/the-deep-state-and-shadow-government_16.html

    IN THE SERIAL JEW ROTHSCHILD IS A CHARACTER CALLED JOHN GREER ( LOOKING LIKE JACOB ROTHSCHILD ) OF DECIMA TECHNOLOGIES.. HE RUNS THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE "SAMARITAN"..

    IN THE END ROTHSCHILD ( GREER ) COMMITS SUICIDE FOR THE GOOD OF THE PLANET.. BRAAAAYYYYYYYYYYY …

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oejfta88oSc

    IN THE VIDEO ABOVE AT 0.29 THE REPORTER TALKS ABOUT FEDERAL RESERVE...

    IN THE TV SERIAL "SAMARITAN" IS HIDDEN INSIDE THE FEDERAL RESERVE VAULT..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/10/say-no-to-big-brother-of-george-orwells.html

    TRUMP CALLS THE DEEP STATE -- THE SWAMP..

    BUT IT IS APPARENT THAT HE IS JUST A PUPPET OF THE KOSHER SWAMP..

    BEWARE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TAKING OVER THE PLANET..

    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DOES NOT HAVE A SUBCONSCIOUS BRAIN.. IT CAN NEVER SUSTAIN DHARMA, WHICH IS SUBJECTIVE..

    ALL RELIGIONS ON THE PLANET ARE OBJECTIVE --EXCEPT SANATANA DHARMA..

    BHAGAWAD GITA IS A SUBJECTIVE DOCUMENT-- ASHTAVAKRA GITA COOKED UP BY JEW ROTHSCHILD IS AN OBJECTIVE DOCUMENT--LIKE A ZIONIST COMPANY MANUAL..

    KORAN KEEPS REMINDING MUSLIMS TO " FEAR ALLAH" AND "HOUR OF JUDGEMENT" --

    ONLY SANATANA DHARMA TELLS YOU TO LOVE GOD ..HINDUS ARE ASKED FOR SHRADDHA ( CONSCIENCE BASED SPIRITUALITY ) NEVER BHAKTI ( BLIND DEVOTION TO SINGLE MESSIAH DOGMA )..

    PRESIDENT AND STATE GOVERNORS ARE GIVEN DISCRETIONARY POWERS TO SUSTAIN DHARMA.. THEY HAVE VETO POWERS.. THE DEEP STATE CONTROLLED INDIAN COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND BENAMI MEDIA BRAINWASHED US-- PRESIDENT / STATE GOVERNORS ARE RUBBER STAMPS..

    WHAT THE HELL-- JEW ROTHSCHILD CONVINCED INDIANS TO IMPALE THE KALASHA KUMBAM , OUR MOST POTENT AND ANCIENT SYMBOL, WITH A STICK AND HUNG IT OUTSIDE THE WINDOW LIKE A SCARE CROW -- UPSIDE DOWN..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/05/kalasha-symbol-of-cosmic-womb-capt-ajit.html

    GUJJU NO 2 PLAYED BALL BY TWEETING SUCH PICTURES ..

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A CONSCIOUS HUMAN BRAIN AND A COMPUTER ( ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ) ?

    IF WORLD HUNGER HAS TO BE STOPPED-- THE SUBJECTIVE HUMAN LEADER WILL SAY "GROW MORE FOOD"..

    THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ( SAMARITAN ) WILL SAY --KILL OF 50% PEOPLE FROM THIRD WORLD NATIONS..

    DOES A COMPUTER --
    1) HAVE CONSCIENCE ?
    2) LAUGH AT A JOKE ?
    3) FEEL DESPAIR ?
    4) HAVE FEELINGS ?
    5) UNDERSTAND CONTEXT ?
    6) TELL THE MORAL OF A SIMPLE STORY WHICH EVEN A CHILD CAN DO ?
    7) LAUGH AT SUBTLE WIT ? ( THIS IS NOT KAPIL SHARMAs LOW CLASS BUFFOONERY)
    8) DELIVER SUBJECTIVE DHARMA?
    9) ACT ON FREE WILL?
    10) TAKE ACTIONS BASED ON SUBJECTIVE CHOICE?

    CONTINUED TO 2-

    1. TODAY CAN WE GET A PACKET OF SALT IN INDIA, WHICH IS "NON-IODISED"?

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2015/10/iodized-salt-infertility-and.html

      CAN WE GET A CARTON OF MILK WHICH IS NOT TOXIC A1 OF HUMPLESS ( WORSE THAN PIGS) , WESTERN COW ?

      CAN WE GET VEGGIES / FRUITS WHICH ARE NON GMO ?

      MODI IS DANCING TO THE KOSHER DEEP STATE TUNE -- ALL FOR A NOBEL PRIZE !

      MODI IS NOT HAPPY WITH THE "CHAMPION OF EARTH" TITLE GIVEN TO HIM BY JEW ROTHSCHILD !! HE WANTS MORE !!! CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WILL WRITE HIS LEGACY..

      OUR ANCIENT MAHARISHIS WANTED BHARAT TO BE RUN ON LAWS OF DHARMA-- IN BETWEEN WE LOST TRACK..

      TODAY 5 DEEP STATE CONTROLLED "LIBERAL" JUDGES HAVE KICKED BHARATMATA INTO THE ADULTERY HOMOSEXUAL MANDI ( WHEN REST OF 1300 MILLION INDIANS DONT WANT IT ) .. WITH GUJJU NO 2 MODI CONTROLLING FROM THE SHADOWS..

      THIS BLOGSITE ASKS READERS TO THINK FOR THEMSELVES..

      THIS BLOG SITEs MISSION STATEMENT --

      This blogsite will transform your mind . You yourself, are the teacher, the pupil, the messiah, the seeker, the traveller and the destination . It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to this profoundly sick society . I am from INDIA, the mother of all civilizations . I will be re-writing world history , and this will surely not gratify the evil hijackers of human history . Awaken your inner voice . Experience the joy of your own being . Your own conscience is the best interpreter . In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act . The naked truth can never be hate speech or defamation. This blogsite does not sacrifice truth on the altar of political correctness . Capt Ajit Vadakayil leads the only silent revolution on this planet .. STRENGTH AND HONOR - ALWAYS !.

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..



https://twitter.com/JM_Scindia/status/1158729410507182080

I ASK ALL MY READERS TO "LIKE" THE COMMENT ABOVE.. AND MAKE A SHORT DECLARATION THAT ITALIANS ARE RUINING OUR NATION.. THEY HAVE NO LOYALTY TO THE WATAN-- OUR HOLY MITTI..

REPORT BACK.. THERE IS ENOUGH OF EMPTY COMMENT SPACE..

I WATCH..

PILOT IS MARRIED TO OMAR ABDULLAHs SISTER.. HER MOTHER IS A WHITE BRITISH JEWESS MOLLY. PILOT IS LOYAL TO THE ABDULLAHs AND NEHRU FAMILY- NOT BHARATATA..

capt ajit vadakayil
..

JUST IN CASE SOME ALICE IN WONDERLAND WONDERS , HOW CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL CAN CALL HIMSELF " WE THE PEOPLE" 

TRY AND MATCH THIS.. 


HIS BLOG SITE HAS A PROFILE VIEW OF NEARLY ONE BILLION..




LETs GET TO BUSINESS -


CHECK OUT WHAT DESH DROHI MIYAAH- BIWI RAGHAL BAHL AND RITU KAPUR WANTS.

THEY WANT JUDICIAL REVIEW OVER ELECTED EXECUTIVE DECISION ON ARTICLE 370 AND 35A.




JUDGES DO NOT HAVE THE POWERS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LAWS CREATED BY LAW MAKERS..

THERE IS NO PROVISION FOR “JUDICIAL REVIEW “  IN THE CONSTITUTION..   THESE WORDS JUST DON’T EXIST ..

ALL JUDGES ARE ALLOWED IS TO "INTERPRET " THE CONSTITUTION...

THE JUDICIARY CAN ONLY HUMBLY AND RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE LEGISLATURE ( ARTICLE 13 ) TO HAVE A SECOND LOOK IN CASE ANY  LAW PASSED BY THE ELECTED AND ACCOUNTABLE LAWMAKERS TRAMPLE ON THE BASIC FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS “WE THE PEOPLE” ENJOY UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES..

JUDICIARY DOES NOT HAVE THE POWERS TO “STRIKE DOWN” ANY LAW CREATED BY LAW MAKERS..

LAWMAKERS HAVE MASSIVE POWERS UNDER ARTICLE 368 OF THE CONSTITUTION.

WE THE PEOPLE WARN THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE— JUDICIAL REVIEW IS AN UNDEMOCRATIC SYSTEM AND IT IS DANGEROUS TO THE WATAN WHEN JUDGES ARE CONTROLLED BY THE DEEP STATE..OR IN THEIR PAYROLL.

WE ASK PM MODI TO JAIL SOME DESH DROHI DEEP STATE CONTROLLED COLLEGIUM JUDGES..AS AN EXEMPLARY MEASURE.. 

THE SUPREME COURT IS ITSELF BOUND BY THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND THE PARLIAMENT CAN AMEND THE CONSTITUTION ANY TIME THEY WANT.. 

JUDICIAL REVIEW EMPOWERS THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TO DECIDE THE FATE OF LAWS PASSED BY THE ELECTED AND ACCOUNTABLE LEGISTLATURE WHICH REPRESENTS THE SOVEREIGN WILL OF THE PEOPLE.

WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA DEMAND THAT THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY BE ABOLISHED IMMEDIATELY..

COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY WHERE JUDGES ELECT JUDGES IS NOT ALLOWED BY THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION..

INDIA IS THE ONLY NATION ON THE PLANET WHERE JUDGES ELECT JUDGES.

OUR COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY IS PACKED WITH JUDGES WHO CANNOT THINK FOR NUTS..     AN INTELLIGENT MAN THROWS UP EVERY DAY , IT IS AMAZING HOW WE ACCEPT SUCH INFERIOR INTELLECT IN OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM.

WE NEED JUDGES TO BE RECRUITED BY AN INTELLIGENT SYSTEM LIKE IIT OR IAS..

WE ARE DONE WITH THE BOTTOM DREGS OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL BECOMING LAWYERS AND THEN BOTTOM DREGS OF THE LOSER LAWYER POOL BECOMING MELORD JUDGES,   WHO ARE SO SQUEAMISH ( OUT OF INFERIORITY COMPLEX ) THAT THEY WILL SEND YOU TO JAIL FOR "CONTEMPT OF COURT " AT THE DROP OF A HAT. 

HEY YOU CAN ABUSE THE PM OF THE NATION,   BUT DONT YOU DARE EVEN TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT A STUPID COLLEGIUM JUDGE,  WHO IS WORSE IN THE CEREBRAL DEPARTMENT THAN A SOOTH SAYERS PARROT.

WE HAD A PEA BRAINED – NAY- STUPID CJI , ( WHO THANKFULLY HAS RETIRED ) , DIPAK MISRA WHO DECLARED IN A COCKY MANNER , THAT SUPREME COURT IS SUPREME AND CAN STRIKE DOWN ANY LAW MADE BY ELECTED AND ACCOUNTABLE LAWMAKERS.

THANKFULLY HE GAVE AN EXTRA LONG FAREWELL SPEECH TO THE NATION LIVE ON TV ..  THE WHOLE OF INDIA WAS APPALLED –  IS THIS CORNY FELLOW OUR CHIEF JUSTICE? 

THIS FELLOW COULD NOT ARTICULATE A SINGLE INTELLIGENT SENTENCE..

IF A FORM HAS TO BE FILLED IN CAPITAL, THIS FELLOW WILL TAKE A FLIGHT TO INDIA CAPITAL NEW DELHI..

INDIA HAS NOT PRODUCED AN INTELLECTUAL GIANT IN OUR JUDICIARY SINCE INDEPENDENCE— ALL MEN OF INFERIOR INTELLECT.

THE WORDS  JUDICIAL REVIEW IS NOT MENTIONED IN THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.    ARTICLE 13 OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION JUST PROVIDES FOR THE “DOCTRINE” OF JUDICIAL REVIEW.    IT DECLARES THAT ALL LAWS THAT ARE INCONSISTENT WITH OR IN DEROGATION OF ANY OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS SHALL BE VOID.

AGAIN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ( EXAMPLE PRIVACY )  ARE NOT ABSOLUTE.

A LEGAL DOCUMENT IS AN ASS.

AT SEA WHEN I WANTED TO INTERPRET A LEGAL DOCUMENT  I ASKED MY WIFE TO DO IT—  AS I WOULD BE MENTALLY STRAIT JACKETED BY PRE-CONCEIVED NOTIONS..

IF A WORD “SHALL “ IS CONVERTED TO “SHOULD” ( BY CHICANERY ) THE WHOLE COLOR OF THE LEGAL DOCUMENT CHANGES..

THE SUPREME COURT HAS NO POWERS TO NULLIFYING AN ACT WHICH IS ASSENTED BY THE INDIAN PARLIAMENT FOR THE SIMPLE REASON THAT PARLIAMENT IN A DEMOCRACY IS THE SUPREME DECISION MAKING BODY . THE ACCOUNTABLE MPS ARE THE PEOPLES REPRESENTATIVES ELECTED BY PROCESS OF VOTING .

INDIAN DEMOCRACY CANNOT BE SNUFFED BY THE SUPREME COURT --  LIKE IN THE CASE ABOUT NJAC .  THIS IS A DIRECT AFFRONT TO THE DEMOCRACY AND DEMOCRATIC PROCESS.


THE DOCTRINE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW WAS LAID DOWN BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN THE CELEBRATED CASE OF MARBURY VS MADISON 5 US (1 CRANCH) 137 (1803), IN WHICH THE DEEP STATE CONTROLLED COURT HELD THAT THE JUDICIARY HAS THE POWER TO REVIEW ACTIONS OF THE LEGISLATURE OR THE EXECUTIVE IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT THE EXERCISE OF SUCH POWER IS NOT IN VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION.

JUDICIAL REVIEW IS NOT VALID IN INDIA..LIKE IN UK.

THIS HAS BEEN TRANSLATED TO INDIA, DESPITE INDIAN CONSTITUTION BEING A STRAIGHT LIFT OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION.. THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION IS JUST A BUNCH OF LOOSE SHEATHS OF PAPER.. THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT IS SUPREME.


AGAIN, JUDICIAL REVIEW IS NOT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED IN THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA;   THE CONCEPT IS BORROWED FROM THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, WHICH IS NONSENSE !

EX-CJI DIPAK MISRA SPAKE..   “ THE SUPREME COURT CAN STRIKE DOWN ANY ACT OF PARLIAMENT IF THE COURT FINDS THAT THE ACT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL   THIS IS NONSENSE AS THE INDIAN PARLIAMENT CAN AMEND THE CONSTITUTION ANY TIME THEY WANT..   INDIA IS A DEMOCRACY—NOT A DICTATOR SHIP RUN BY DEEP STATE PAYROLL JUDGES , AS THE CASE WAS IN USA,  TILL DONALD TRUMP BECAME PRESIDENT..

SUPREME COURT CANNOT GO BEYOND THE OBJECTIVE..  

JUDGES CAN NEVER DELIVER SUBJECTIVE DHARMA ( NATURAL JUSTICE ).. WHILE THE ELECTED LEGISLATURE CAN..

THAT IS WHY WE HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO HAS BEEN BESTOWED SUBJECTIVE DISCRETIONARY POWERS ( INCLUDING VETO ) BY THE CONSTITUTION .. THIS IS WHY THE PRESIDENT IS THE SUPREME COMMANDER OF THE ARMED FORCES.

THIS IS WHY OBJECTIVE JUDGES ( WHO CANNOT GO BEYOND THE CONSTITUTION )  CANNOT INTERFERE WITH EXTERNAL SECURITY OF THE WATAN... 

THE COLLEGIUM JUDGES JUST DONT HAVE THE BRAINS TO UNDERSTAND THIS.. THIS IS WHY AN INTELLIGENT BLOGGER NEEDS TO PEN THIS FUCKIN' POST BEFORE THE WATAN GOES TO THE DOGS..

THE CUNT COOK CANT EXERCISE VETO POWERS OVER THE CAPTAINs DECISION ON THE NAVIGATING BRIDGE IN TRAFFIC ..

LET NOT THE SUPREME COURT THINK THAT ONLY THE COLLEGIUM JUDGES HAVE SWORN AN OATH TO FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION.. 


AND LET NOT THE CJI THINK THAT HE IS A GREATER CAT THAN THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA , AND HE OUGHT TO TAKE THE CHIEF GUEST SALUTE AT THE REPUBLIC DAY PARADE-- EVEN IF THE BENAMI MEDIA PEA BRAINS THINK SO..


JUST CHECK OUT THIS RIDICULOUS NONSENSE ..

ONLY PHOTOS OF PRESIDENT , PRIME MINISTER AND CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA CAN BE PUT ON GOVT ADVERTISEMENTS ???

APPIDIYAAAAA ?

JUST WHO THE HELL IS CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA ?     

IS HE PART OF THE ELECTED GOVT ?

AT THE BEST CJI CAN ONLY RULE THE ILLEGAL PATLI GALLI CALLED "PIL LANE "

KAUN SA KHET KA BEET ROOT HAI YEH CJI !

THE EGO LADEN CJI OF INDIA GOGOI HAS “BROKEN THE SYSTEM” BY HUMILIATING THE CBI BOSS LIKE A KINDERGARTEN SCHOOL BOY WHO HAS TO KNEEL IN A CORNER OF THE CLASS WEARING A DUNCE CAP..

PM MODI HAS ALLOWED IT … 

IN A LANDMARK RULING ON 11 JANUARY 2007, THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RULED THAT ALL LAWS (INCLUDING THOSE IN THE NINTH SCHEDULE) WOULD BE OPEN TO JUDICIAL REVIEW IF THEY VIOLATED THE BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION.

SORRY,  WE THE PEOPLE DECLARE “ THIS RULING IS NULL AND VOID “..

SUPREME COURT HAS NO SUCH POWERS.

WE THE PEOPLE ASK THE MODI GOVT TO BRING AN ORDINANCE TO OVERTURN THE SUPREME COURT MUNGERILAL VERDICT


WE THE PEOPLE WARN THE ELECTED EXECUTIVE—JUDICIAL REVIEW IS AN UNDEMOCRATIC SYSTEM AND IT IS DANGEROUS TO THE WATAN WHEN JUDGES ARE CONTROLLED BY THE DEEP STATE..

THE KOSHER DEEP STATE WAS THRILLED WHEN INDIA REGULARISED HOMOSEXUALITY AND ADULTERY..

JUDICIAL REVIEW EMPOWERS THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TO DECIDE THE FATE OF LAWS PASSED BY THE ELECTED AND ACCOUNTABLE LEGISTLATURE WHICH REPRESENTS THE SOVEREIGN WILL OF THE PEOPLE.

WE THE PEOPLE ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION.

A BENCH (3 OR 5 OR 9 JUDGES) OF THE SUPREME COURT HEARS A JUDICIAL REVIEW CASE. IT GIVES A DECISION BY A SIMPLE MAJORITY. VERY OFTEN, THE FATE OF A LAW IS DETERMINED BY THE MAJORITY OF A SINGLE JUDGE. IN THIS WAY A SINGLE JUDGE’S REASONING CAN DETERMINE THE FATE OF A LAW WHICH HAD BEEN PASSED BY A MASSIVE MAJORITY OF THE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES OF THE SOVEREIGN PEOPLE.

MIND YOU OUR JUDGES ARE THE BOTTOM DREGS OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL AND THE BOTTOM DREGS OF THE LOSER LAWYERS POOL.

THE NJAC ACT AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ACT CAME INTO FORCE FROM 13 APRIL 2015.

ON 16 OCTOBER 2015, THE CONSTITUTION BENCH OF SUPREME COURT UPHELD THE COLLEGIUM SYSTEM AND STRUCK DOWN THE NJAC AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL .

AN ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY DID THIS TO BHARATMATA.

COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY WHERE JUDGES ELECT JUDGES IS NOT ALLOWED BY THE CONSTITUTION 

INDIA IS THE ONLY NATION ON THE PLANET WHERE JUDGES ELECT JUDGES – IN THE CASE OF INDIA, THE DEEP STATE IS INVOLVED IN SELECTING JUDGES ( LIKE LIKE JNU COMMIE PROFESSORS )..

WE HAD A FEW DESH DROHI KAYASTHA FAMILIES ( CONTROLLED BY THE DEEP STATE)  , RULING THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY ROOST.


NO JUDGE CAN GO BEYOND THE CONSTITUTION.  JUDGES CANNOT STRIKE DOWN OR CREATE ANY LAWS ..

THE CONSTITUTION IS A DYNAMIC DOCUMENT..   CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE USED AS A FRANKENSTEIN TO STRAITJACKET WE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION...

TO MOVE WITH THE TIMES—WHEN THE BABY BECOME BIGGER , LENGTHEN  THE CRADLE ( CONSTITUTION ) , DON’T CUT THE LEGS OF THE BABY.  WE ARE IN THE MODERN DIGITAL AGE…

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS CANNOT INJURE/ CRIPPLE  BHARATMATA .. THE WATAN IS ABOVE “WE THE PEOPLE”.

NOWHERE IS IT WRITTEN IN THE CONSTITUTION THAT IT IS A RIGID ETCHED IN STONE DOCUMENT , WHICH CANNOT BE AMENDED BY THE ACCOUNTABLE ELECTED LEGISLATURE TO MOVE WITH THE TIMES..

WE ARE IN THE DIGITAL AGE NOT THE LEDGER BABU AGE..

COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY ALWAYS HARPS ON THE “COMPETENCE OF THE LEGISLATURE” AND “TARDINESS OF LEGISLATURE “ —  THIS IS THE GREATEST JOKE ON THE PLANET— LOOK WHO IS TALKING!! ..


WE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION DECLARE -- IT IS THE PREROGATIVE OF THE PARLIAMENT TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION AND MAKE THE LAWS..  

EVERY ELECTED MP HAS SWORN AN OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION.. WE TRUST OUR MPS MORE THAN THE ILLEGAL AND PEA BRAINED COLLEGIUM JUDGES..

“TYRANNY OF THE ELECTED”  IS A FALSE NARRATIVE SPREAD BY BENAMI DESH DROHI MEDIA..

“TYRANNY OF THE UNELECTED “ WILL NOT BE ALLOWED ANYMORE BY WE THE PEOPLE.. 


IF SOMEBODY DOES NOT AGREE,   LET US HAVE A NATIONWIDE REFERENDUM ON “ADULTERY”..

IF EVEN 0.1% PEOPLE VOTE FOR ADULTERY, I WILL EAT MY OWN HEAD.. 

IMAGINE FIVE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDGES ( WITH DEEP STATE CHEERING THEM FROM THE SIDELINES ) HAVE SHOVED ADULTERY DOWN THE THROATS OF 1300 UNWILLING INDIANS..  TRAMPLING ON THE WILL OF "WE THE PEOPLE"  IN A DEMOCRACY .

INDIA IS NO LONGER A NOBLE NATION ..


SUPREMACY OF THE CONSTITUTION IS A DOCTRINE WHERE BY THE CONSTITUTION IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND AND ALL THE STATE ORGANS INCLUDING PARLIAMENT AND STATE LEGISLATURES ARE BOUND BY IT. THEY MUST ACT WITHIN THE LIMITS LAID DOWN BY THE CONSTITUTION. 

BUT WE THE PEOPLE WILL DECIDE ON THE LIMITS ( IN CONSONANCE WITH OUR CULTURE AND TIMES ) USING OUR ELECTED ACCOUNTABLE LAW MAKERS ..WE DON’T HAVE A NATIONWIDE REFERENDUM SYSTEM IN INDIA .. 


 THE CONSTITUTION CAN BE AMENDED BY THE PARLIAMENT – WHICH CAN ALTER OR MODIFY MANY OF THE LAWS OF THE CONSTITUTION BY A SIMPLE MAJORITY  AS IS REQUIRED FOR ORDINARY LEGISLATIONS. 

PARLIAMENT CAN AMEND OTHER MAJOR PARTS OF THE CONSTITUTION WITH SPECIAL MAJORITY (A MAJORITY OF NOT LESS THAN 2/3 OF THE MEMBERS OF EACH HOUSE PRESENT  AND MAJORITY OF THEM VOTING) AS MENTIONED IN ARTICLE 368.  



THE SUPREME COURT IS ITSELF BOUND BY THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND THE PARLIAMENT CAN AMEND THE CONSTITUTION ANY TIME THEY WANT.. 

INDIA HAS THE LONGEST WRITTEN CONSTITUTION OF ANY INDEPENDENT NATION IN THE WORLD, CONTAINING 395 ARTICLES AND 12 SCHEDULES, AS WELL AS NUMEROUS AMENDMENTS, FOR A TOTAL OF 117,369 WORDS IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE VERSION

ARTICLE 368, DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY LIMITATION ON THE POWER OF PARLIAMENT TO AMEND ANY PART OF THE CONSTITUTION.

ARTICLE 368  EMPOWERS THE PARLIAMENT TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION WITHOUT ANY EXCEPTION AND IT IS THE EXERCISE OF SOVEREIGN CONSTITUENT POWER.

THE CONSTITUTION NOT ONLY DEFINES THE POWERS OF EACH ORGAN, BUT ALSO DEMARCATES THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES. IT REGULATES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT ORGANS AND BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT AND THE PEOPLE. 

THE PREAMBLE SAYS "WE THE PEOPLE" ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION—THIS MEANS CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE USED TO STRAIT JACKET THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF THE NATION..

 LESS THAN 0.1% OF INDIANS  ( ALL HOMOSEXUALS ) WOULD APPROVE OF ADULTERY BEING LEGAL-  YET 5 ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDGES LUMPED ADULTERY DOWN 1300 MILLION INDIANS.

A CONSTITUTION SHOULD BE A DYNAMIC DOCUMENT. 

IT SHOULD BE ABLE TO ADAPT ITSELF TO THE CHANGING NEEDS OF THE SOCIETY. 

SOMETIMES UNDER THE IMPACT OF NEW POWERFUL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC FORCES, THE PATTERN OF GOVERNMENT WILL REQUIRE MAJOR CHANGES. 

KEEPING THIS FACTOR IN MIND THE DRAFTSMEN OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION INCORPORATED ARTICLE 368 IN THE CONSTITUTION WHICH DEALT WITH THE PROCEDURE OF AMENDMENT. 

DUE TO ARTICLE 368 THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE CALLED RIGID.

Articles of the Indian Constitution can be amended by a simple majority in the Parliament (Second Schedule, Article 100(3), 105, 11, 124, 135, 81, 137), or by special majority that is majority of the total membership of each house and by majority of not less than two thirds of the members of each house present and voting , or by Ratification by the State Legislatures after special majority (Article 73, 162, Chapter 1V of Part V, Chapter V of Part V1, Seventh Schedule, representation of the State in Parliament and provisions dealing with amendment of the Constitution).

Constituent power is termed as a power which is exercised by a representative body authorized by a Constitution to amend the Constitution. This amending power is one of the most desirable powers in a Constitution, if a Constitution as a fundamental document is to continue. We are now in the DIGITAL age.

Article 368 (1) of the Constitution of India grants constituent power to make formal amendments and empowers Parliament to amend the Constitution by way of addition, variation or repeal of any provision according to the procedure laid down therein, which is different from the procedure for ordinary legislation. Article 368 has been amended by the 24th and 42nd Amendments in 1971 and 1976 respectively.

Article 368 in The Constitution Of India 1949--

368. Power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and procedure therefore-

(1) Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, Parliament may in exercise of its constituent power amend by way of addition, variation or repeal any provision of this Constitution in accordance with the procedure laid down in this article

(2) An amendment of this Constitution may be initiated only by the introduction of a Bill for the purpose in either House of Parliament, and when the Bill is passed in each House by a majority of the total membership of that House present and voting, it shall be presented to the President who shall give his assent to the Bill and thereupon the Constitution shall stand amended in accordance with the terms of the Bill: Provided that if such amendment seeks to make any change in-

(a) Article 54, Article 55, Article 73, Article 162 or Article 241, or
(b) Chapter IV of Part V, Chapter V of Part VI, or Chapter I of Part XI, or
(c) any of the Lists in the Seventh Schedule, or
(d) the representation of States in Parliament, or
(e) the provisions of this article, the amendment shall also require to be ratified by the Legislature of not less than one half of the States by resolution to that effect passed by those Legislatures before the Bill making provision for such amendment is presented to the President for assent

(3) Nothing in Article 13 shall apply to any amendment made under this article

(4) No amendment of this Constitution (including the provisions of Part III) made or purporting to have been made under this article whether before or after the commencement of Section 55 of the Constitution (Forty second Amendment) Act, 1976 shall be called in question in any court on any ground

(5) For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that there shall be no limitation whatever on the constituent power of Parliament to amend by way of addition, variation or repeal the provisions of this Constitution under this article PART XXI TEMPORARY, TRANSITIONAL AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS 

SUPREME COURT RULED THAT THE CONSTITUENT POWER UNDER ARTICLE 368 MUST BE EXERCISED BY THE PARLIAMENT IN THE PRESCRIBED MANNER AND CAN NOT BE EXERCISED UNDER THE LEGISLATIVE POWERS OF THE PARLIAMENT— WHICH IS NONSENSE !

In India all constitutional amendments can be generally effectuated by a Special Majority, i.e., it must be passed by both the houses, with more than 50% of total number of members along with two thirds of members present and voting.

The clause 2 of Art 368 also specifies certain situations in which apart from above mentioned special majority ratification by more than half of the number of States is required, they are:--

# Election of the President.
# Extent of executive power of the Union and State.
# Provisions dealing with the Supreme Court.
# Provisions dealing with High Courts in the States and Union territories
# Distribution of legislative power between Centre and State
# Representation of States in Parliament.
# Seventh schedule
# Art. 368 itself.

 The Twenty-fourth Amendment made changes to articles 13 and 368 in 1971:
(i) A new clause was added to article 13: "(4) Nothing in this article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under article 368."
(ii) Amendments were made to article 368:--

a) The article was given a new marginal heading: "Power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and procedure therefore."

b) A new clause was added as clause (I): "(I) Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, Parliament may in exercise of its constituent power amend by way of addition, variation or repeal any provision of this Constitution in accordance with the procedure laid down in this article.

c) Another clause was added as clause (3): "(3) Nothing in article 13 shall apply to any amendment under this article."

Another amendment to the old article 368 (now article 368(2)) made it obligatory rather than discretionary for the President to give his assent to any Bill duly passed under the article.

Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala: It is a landmark of the Supreme Court of India, and is the basis in Indian law for the exercise by the Indian judiciary of the power to judicially review, and strike down, amendments to the Constitution of India passed by the Indian Parliament which conflict with or seek to alter the Constitution's basic structure. The judgment also defined the extent to which the Indian Parliament could restrict the right to property, in pursuit of land reform and the redistribution of large landholdings to cultivators, overruling previous decisions that suggested that the right to property could not be restricted. Clauses (4) and (5) inserted in Art. 368 by the 42nd Amendment Act are invalid because they take away the right of judicial review. Parliament cannot increase its amending power by amending Art. 368. The courts enlarged their powers by inventing implied limitations… Without uncontrolled power the Parliament cannot bring about socio-economic reforms.  


WE THE PEOPLE DECLARE THIS NULL AND VOID.. THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY DOES NOT HAVE THE  POWERS ..


WE WANT ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES TO DELIVER DHARMA ( NOT DEEP STATE CONTROLLED A COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY )..    WE DON’T WANT ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TO SAVE THE WATAN..


THE FRAMERS OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION WERE ANXIOUS TO HAVE A DOCUMENT WHICH COULD GROW WITH A GROWING NATION, ADAPT ITSELF TO THE CHANGING CIRCUMSTANCES OF A GROWING PEOPLE.   THE CONSTITUTION HAS TO BE CHANGED AT EVERY INTERVAL OF TIME.   NOBODY CAN SAY THAT THIS IS THE FINALITY.

A CONSTITUTION WHICH IS STATIC IS A CONSTITUTION WHICH ULTIMATELY BECOMES A BIG HURDLE IN THE PATH OF THE PROGRESS OF THE NATION. THE COLLEGIUM MELORDS DON’T HAVE THE BRAINS TO UNDERSTAND THIS.

ACCORDING TO CONSTITUTION, PARLIAMENT AND STATE LEGISLATURE IN INDIA HAVE THE POWER TO MAKE THE LAWS WITHIN THEIR RESPECTIVE JURISDICTION.

THE COLLEGIUM SYSTEM IS ILLEGAL AND NOT ALLOWED BY THE CONSTITUTION...  

THE FAKE SYSTEM IS CONTROLLED BY THE DESH DROHI DEEP STATE TO SUSTAIN THE HORRIBLE AGENDA OF "STARE DECISIS"  WHERE YOU BUILD UPON PAST LIES...

STARE DECISIS IS NOT ALLOWED --  WHERE PAST RULINGS OF STUPID JUDGES UNDER THE MINDLESS SYSTEM OF "JUSTICE IS BLIND SANS CONTEXT " IS ATTACHED AS AN ADDENDUM-- NAY-- LANGOT TO THE CONSTITUTION..


BHARATMATA ( WHO WAS IN CHAINS FOR 800 YEARS ) IS NOW FREE AND IS RACING TO BE THIS PLANETs NO 1 SUPERPOWER IN 14 YEARS FLAT...

THE WHITE JEW OF THE DEEP STATE WILL NEVER ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN .. AND HE IS USING THE JUDICIARY AS A TOOL..

            'PANCHATANTRA STORY---..

There was this sparrow, pretty but headstrong and sharp tongued..
She got fed up with her lot and tried flying high..
For long she flew higher and higher with gay abandon..
Suddenly her wings froze and she fell to mother earth in a tail spin..
A passing lion saw her , and took pity on the frozen bird..
He had promises to keep , and miles to go before he could sleep..
The kind lion shat on the sparrow , to thaw her..
Her beak thawed first-- she heaped abuses on the lion for crapping on her..
A passing fox heard the din, walked past the lion , and ate the sparrow…..

OBJECTIVE RULING ROOTED IN STARE DECISIS AND JUSTICE IS BLIND SANS CONTEXT , BY COLLEGIUM MELORDS .. – “BAAAD LION, WHO SHAT ON POOR SPARROW .. TO BE IMPRISONED FOR LIPE -- NAY LIFE , AFTER 100 WHIPS ON AS$” …..

AIYOOOOOOOO… 

TOBA TOAAHBAAHHH……

SUBJECTIVE RULING ROOTED IN CONTEXT AND JUSTICE WITH EYES WIDE OPEN BY LAY JUDGE CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL – “ GOOOD LION , WHO SPAT ON STUPID SPARROW … TO BE GIVEN PURASKAAR AND GIFT HAMPER “

WE THE PEOPLE REJECT THE  "CONSTITUTIONAL PATRIOTISM " DEMANDED BY DEEP STATE DARING EX-PRESIDENT PRANAB MUKHERJEE AT THE RSS CONCLAVE AT NAGPUR.. WE THE PEOPLE ARE NOT STUPID..

WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT ALLOW "CONSTITUTIONAL PATRIOTISM " ( MAOs RED BOOK TYPE ) WHICH CAUSED INDIAN COMMIE TO SUPPORT CHINA IN THE 1962 WAR ..   WE WILL ALLOW ONLY "PATRIOTISM TO THE WATAN"..

THE MELORDS WANTS LOYALTY TO A BOOK CALLED CONSTITUTION TO WHICH THEY HAVE ATTACHED A LONG LANGOT OF “STARE DECISIS “.. 

THE JUDGES WONT HAVE LOYALTY TO THE WATAN .. LOYALTY TO THE WATAN STINKS OF “BRAHMINICAL PATRIARCHY “, RIGHT?..

MELORDS USE THE CONSTITUTION TO PROTECT SEDITIOUS TERRORISTS HOLDING FOREIGN GUNS .. THEY GET INSTANT BAIL.. HONEST CITIZENS LANGUISH IN JAIL FOR DECADES..

WE DON’T WANT ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TO DEAL WITH INDIAs EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL SECURITY…

BUT THERE HAS ALWAYS BEEN AN EXCEPTION..

WHEN IT COMES TO SAVING DESH DROHI/ NAXALS/ TERRORITS, THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY DOES A 180 DEG U TURN AND GOES TO THE "SUBJECTIVE MODE WITH EYES WIDE OPEN , WITHIN CONTEXT "..

THIS WAS BORNE TRUE AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN..

N RAM STOLE "CLASSIFIED MILITARY SECRETS " TO SCREW PM MODI OVER THE RAFALE DEAL..

AT COURT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TOLD CJI GOGOI THAT THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY COMMIE N RAM IS A STOLEN MILITARY SECRET -- AND IS A CRIME WHICH ENTAILS 14 YEARS OF JAIL..

BUT HEY WHAT DOOES CJI GOGOI AND JUSTICE KM JOSEPH TELL THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ?   THEY WONT CONSIDER THAT THE DOCUMENT WAS STOLEN.. THEY WILL CHECK IF THE DOCUMENT HOLDS WATER..

WHAT THE HELL IS ALL THIS ?

WE ASK PM MODI - ARE YOU A BABE IN THE WOODS ?..

CJI GOGOI JUMPED INTO FORBIDDEN SUBJECTIVE TERRITORY AND ARGUED ON BEHALF OF DEEP STATE AGENT COMMIE N RAM –

QUOTE-- " If an accused stole a document to prove his innocence, it should be admitted in court" -- UNQUOTE..

WE THE PEOPLE WANT THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY TO BE ABOLISHED.. THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT ALLOW JUDGES ELECTING JUDGES..

THE SUPREME COURT IS IN "CONTEMPT OF THE CONSTITUTION" AND IN "CONTEMPT OF WE THE PEOPLE " WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION..


WHAT IS ARTICLE 141 ?

Article 141 in The Constitution Of India 1949--
141. Law declared by Supreme Court to be binding on all courts The law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of India
Under this provision, the Supreme Court has the power to declare any law and the said declaration has the force of an authoritative precedent, binding on all other courts in India, of course except the Supreme Court itself. Such a final authority which the Supreme Court claims to possess includes power to decide the validity of a law and to interpret it.

THIS GIVES THE ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY  UNBRIDLED DISCRETIONARY POWER WITHOUT ANY ACCOUNTABILITY  WHATSOEVER.

BUT HEY , DOES THE JUDICIARY HAVE THE POWERS TO GO FROM OBJECTIVE TO SUBJECTIVE ?   AFTER ALL JUSTICE IS BLIND !


ONLY PRESIDENT OF INDIA AND GOVERNORS OF STATES HAVE BEEN GRANTED SUBJECTIVE DISCRETIONARY POWERS BY OUR CONSTITUTION.

IN RECENT YEARS, ONE HAS COME ACROSS SEVERAL JUDGMENTS OF THE SUPREME COURT WHEREIN IT HAS BEEN FORAYING INTO AREAS WHICH HAD LONG BEEN FORBIDDEN TO THE JUDICIARY BY REASON OF THE DOCTRINE OF ‘SEPARATION OF POWERS’, WHICH IS PART OF THE BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION.

UNFORTUNATELY, THESE JUDGMENTS HAVE CREATED AN UNCERTAINTY ABOUT THE DISCRETION VESTED IN THE COURT TO INVOKE ARTICLE 142 WHERE EVEN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS ARE BEING IGNORED. 

WHAT WE HAVE FOUND IS THAT THE COURT, IN ITS ANXIETY TO DO JUSTICE IN A PARTICULAR CASE OR MATTER, HAS FAILED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE FAR-REACHING EFFECTS OF ITS JUDGMENTS, WHICH MAY RESULT IN THE DEPRIVATION OF THE RIGHTS OF A MULTITUDE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE NOT BEFORE THE COURT AT THAT TIME.

THE SUPREME COURT HAD ITSELF HELD THAT THE RIGHT TO EMPLOYMENT IS A BASIC RIGHT TRACEABLE TO ARTICLE 21.

HOWEVER, IN ITS ORDER BANNING THE SALE OF ALCOHOL ALONG HIGHWAYS, THE MELORDS PLAYING GOD MADE NO REFERENCE TO THE LOSS OF EMPLOYMENT TO LAKHS OF PEOPLE, A DIRECT CONSEQUENCE OF THE ORDER.

THERE IS A THIN LINE VARIATION BETWEEN JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND JUDICIAL OVERREACH.

THE SUPREME COURT BOASTS, OUR JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 32 IS NOT A PANACEA FOR ALL ILLS ,  BUT SURELY A REMEDY FOR VIOLATION OF PHUNDA-- NAY-- FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS !


WITH THE ADVENT OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, LETTERS, NEWSPAPER REPORTS, COMPLAINTS BY NON-AGGRIEVED FAALTHU PUBLIC-SPIRITED PERSONS ( LIKE DEEP STATE AGENT PRASHANT BHUSHAN WITH A  VESTED AGENDA , ALWAYS ) , SOCIAL ACTION GROUPS BRINGING TO THE NOTICE OF THE COURT REGARDING VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS WERE DEALT WITH TREATING THEM AS WRIT PETITIONS AND THE RELIEF OF COMPENSATION WAS ALSO GRANTED THROUGH WRIT JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION.

Article 32 in The Constitution Of India 1949--

32. Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part
(1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed

(2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part

(3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clause ( 1 ) and ( 2 ), Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause ( 2 )

(4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution


HEY, LET US FUCK SOMEONE ELSEs WIFE —

ADULTERY IS LEGAL NOW ..THANKS TO OUR PEA BRAINED COLLEGIUM JUDGES.

WHILE READING THE JUDGMENT, CHIEF JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA SAID, "ADULTERY CANNOT BE A CRIMINAL OFFENCE, HOWEVER IT CAN BE A GROUND FOR CIVIL ISSUES LIKE DIVORCE"

HEY MELORD WILL YOU PAY THE FUCKIN' ALIMONY ?


NO PAKISTANI ISIS FUNDED  NGO MUST BE ALLOWED TO FILE A PIL..


IF A PIL HAS ULTERIOR MOTIVE OR IS FRIVOLOUS, THE PARTY WHO FILED THE PIL MUST BE FINED HEAVILY AND BE BARRED FROM FILING A PIL EVER AGAIN.


WHO WAS SOHBRABUDDIN?

WAS HE SOME BABE IN THE GUJARATI WOODS?  

HOME MINISTER AMIT SHAH WAS KICKED INTO JAIL FOR THREE MONTHS WITHOUT BAIL..

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION ('PIL') HAS UNDERGONE EVOLUTIONARY CHANGES IN TERMS OF ITS PERCEPTION, AMBIT, ACCESSIBILITY AND IMPLICATIONS.

WHAT STARTED AS A JURISTIC REVOLUTION OF THE EIGHTIES FOR POORER SECTIONS TO HAVE EASY ACCESS TO JUSTICE DELIVERY SYSTEM HAS EVOLVED ITSELF INTO A MULTI DIMENSIONAL JUDICIAL MECHANISM, ENCOMPASSING ALMOST EVERY ASPECT OF OUR DAY-TO-DAY LIFE - CONSUMER WELFARE, ECOLOGY, ENVIRONMENT, FORESTS, PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY, PUBLIC WELFARE SCHEMES, ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, NATIONAL HERITAGE PROTECTION AND SO ON AND SO FORTH.

INSTANCES ARE NOT WANTING WHEN PIL AND RTI MECHANISMS ARE MISUSED, INTER ALIA, TO TARGET POLITICAL RIVALS, HASSLE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES AND SETTLE PERSONAL SCORES.


COURTS, WHILE DEALING WITH PILS, ARE  NOT AWARE OF THE INCREASING THINNING LINE BETWEEN JUSTICE DELIVERY AND POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENT ON EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE DOMAINS


 THE SUPREME COURT MUST HAVE  STRICT GUIDELINES ON SUBSTANCE AND PROCEDURE FOR ENTERTAINING PILS.


PIL IS NO LONGER A WEAPON TO HELP THE POOR AND THE UNDERPRIVILEGED. RATHER,  IT HAS BECOME A TOOL TO “SHIFT THE COURSE” OF JUSTICE— SO EASY , BECAUSE MOST OF OUR COLLEGIUM JUDGES ARE PEA BRAINED.

BELOW: IN INDIA JUDGES APPOINT THEMSELVES



OUR COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY BURNT MIDNIGHT OIL TO OPEN CHAMIYA BARS ( WH0RE HOUSES IN MUMBAI ) BY PIL ROUTE …..

BREAD WINNERS OF ENTIRE FAMILIES HAVE BEEN ROTTING IN JAIL WITHOUT A TRIAL FOR THREE DECADES .. . . ..

WE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION WILL NOT ALLOW LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES TO PLAY GOD . . .

EVERY TIME DESH DROHI FOREIGN FORCES WANT A NEW LAW IN INDIA, THEY USE THEIR TROJAN HORSE NGOs TO FILE A PIL WHICH STRANGELY IS GIVEN TOP PRIORITY

JUDGES CANNOT MAKE OR BREAK LAWS ( VIA PIL )... ALL JUDGES CAN DO IS TO INTERPRET LAWS --AND THAT TOO ONLY WHEN INVITED ...

COLLEGIUM JUDGES NEVER CARED FOR PILs ABOUT KASHMIRI PANDITS AND HOW MAJORITY MUSLIMS HAVE BECOME MINORITY IN KASHMIR – AND STILL REAPING FALSE BENEFITS….

COMMIES ( LIKE IN JNU ) HAVE INVADED COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY, NHRC, NCM, NCW, HUMAN RIGHTs ORGS ...... BHARATMATA IS BEING BLED BY PILs FROM DESH DROHI TROJAN HORSE NGOs CONTROLLED FROM ABROAD....

'THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION HAS NOT GIVEN POWERS TO THE JUDICIARY TO STRIKE DOWN LAWS, CREATE NEW LAWS OR TAKE UP PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION ( PIL ) WHICH AFFECTS THE FORTUNES OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF INDIA….

JUDICIARY TAKING ARBITRARY DECISIONS BY PIL ROUTE FOR THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF THE NATION, IS NOT ALLOWED BY THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION OR—OR BY ANY STATUTE OR ACT.. ..

TAKING DECISIONS WHICH AFFECT THE FORTUNES OF THE ENTIRE NATION IS THE SOLE PREROGATIVE OF THE ELECTED LAW MAKERS..WHO ARE ACCOUNTABLE TO THE PEOPLE AND THE WATAN…. THIS IS THE MEANING OF DEMOCRACY..

REMEMBER “WE THE PEOPLE “ ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION—OUR REPRESENTATIVES IN A DEMOCRACY ARE THE ONES WE ELECT… NOT COUPLE OF JUDGES IMPOSED ON US BY AN ILLEGAL COLLEGIUM SYSTEM….

JUDGES CAN ONLY JUDGE FOR A SPECIFIC CASE FOR AN AGGRIEVED INDIVIDUAL OR SMALL GROUP OF LIMITED NUMBERS … FOR AN AGGRIEVED NATION OF 1300 MILLION PEOPLE WE HAVE AN ELECTED DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM..

THE SUPREME COURT HAS IGNORED THE "AGGRIEVED PERSON" PROVISION AS PER OUR CONSTITUTION .. 

A MUSLIM NON-BELEIVER NAMED NAUSHAD AHMAD KHAN ( CRYPTO JEW ) FILED THE CASE AGAINST MENSTRUATING WOMEN ENTRY IN SABARIMALA JUST TO THROW A MONKEY WRENCH INTO THE WORKS OF A RIVAL RELIGION HINDUISM..'

WE ASK THE LEGISLATURE TO CREATE AN IMMEDIATE LAW WHICH RESTRICTS THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHICH CAN BE AFFECTED BY A PIL RULING BY JUDGES …

WE EXPECT OUR LEGISLATURE TO DELIVER SUBJECTIVE DHARMA…NOT OBJECTIVE “ BLIND JUSTICE “ WHICH TRAMPLES ON OUR PRICELESS CULTURE …

THE WHOLE OF INDIA WAS MORTIFIED WHEN DEEP STATE CONTROLLED MELORDS ORDERED THE PM OF INDIA TO INTERLINK ALL RIVERS WITHIN A DEAD LINE-- AND KILL BHARATMATA..

SUPREME COURT LAWYERS WHO FILE PILs TO CREATE INSTANT LAWS ARE MERE FRONTS..

THESE SUPREME COURT LAWYERS ARE KING PINS IN FILING PILs BY WHICH DESH BHAKT POLICE AND POLITICIANS ARE PUT BEHIND BARS FOR CRIMINAL TRAITORS ( LIKE SOHRABUDDIN / IRHAT JEHAN ETC) ..AND THAT TOO FOR SEVERAL YEARS ..

FIND OUT THE NUMBER OF FRIVOLOUS PILs FILED BY NAXALITE LOVER PRASHANT BHUSHAN..

BHARATMATA IS RACING TO BE THIS PLANETS NO 1 SUPERPOWER IN 14 YEARS --BEFORE THAT THE NEW WORLD ORDER WANTS INDIA TO IMPLODE.  ..  

PM MODI CAN BE ABUSED LEFT AND RIGHT AND CALLED PSYCHOPATH --THE COLLEGIUM MELORD JUDGE SAID - - IT IS NORMAL - - - BECAUSE THERE WERE NO VIOLENT RIOTS --  . .

THE GRAVE IMPLICATION IS,  WE COLLEGIUM JUDGES CONTROL INDIA. . .  ALMOST ALL MEDIA BARONS RUN THEIR OWN FOREIGN FUNDED NGOS AND THEY CAN TRIGGER VIOLENT RIOTS AND THEN GET THE COLLEGIUM JUDGE TO ACT AND JAIL ANYBODY . 


THESE NON-TECHNICAL BRAINED " LOSER LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES " DONT EVEN KNOW WHAT IS BODMAS AND HOW TO APPLY IT TO OUR CONSTITUTION….

go0gle for the blogpost below ( read all 8 parts ) – 


capt ajit vadakayil


.

https://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2019/08/we-people-who-are-above-constitution.html

WE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION DEMAND “ ABOLISH ILLEGAL JUDICIAL REVIEW, PIL AND COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY “ — CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL

PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF—
PMO
PM MODI
AJIT DOVAL
CBI
NIA
ED
RAW
IB
NITI AGOG
AMITABH KANT
I&B DEPT
I&B MINISTERS CENTRE/ STATES
CJI
SUPREME COURT JUDGES
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALL HIGH COURT CHIEF JUSTICES OF INDIA
LAW MINISTER/ MINISTRY
DGPs OF ALL STATES
CMs OF ALL STATES
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
GOVERNORS OF ALL STATES
ALL CENTRAL/ STATE MINISTRIES/ MINISTERS..
DEFENCE MINISTER/ MINISTRY
ALL 3 ARMED FORCE CHIEFS
RSS
VHP
AVBP
RAM MADHAV
SWAMY
NCERT
EDUCATION MINISTRY CENTRE/ STATES
SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR
SADGURU JAGGI VASUDEV
BABA RAMDEV
CHETAN BHAGAT
ARUNDHATI ROY
SHASHI THAROOR
AMIT SHAH
HOME MINISTRY
CLOSET COMMIE ARNAB GOSWMI
RAJDEEP SARDESAI
BARKHA DUTT
NAVIKA KUMAR
ZAKKA JACOB
ANAND NARASIMHAN
FAYE DSOUZA
GAURAV C SAWANT
SHEKHAR GUPTA
PRANNOY JAMES ROY
AROON PURIE
VINEET JAIN
RAGHAV BAHL
RITU KAPOOR
HARINDER BAWEJA
NIDHI THAKUR
ALOKANANDA
AMRITA BHINDER
DIVYA SINGH
SANGEETA B PISHAROTY
ANURAG THAKUR
NILANJANA ROY
ROHINI MOHAN
SUPRIYA SHARMA
RUKMINI S
ABHISHEK BAXI
ANKIT PANDA
REEMA OMER
OMAIR AHMAD
MANAK GUPTA
SEEMA CHISTI
KANGANA RANAUT
SONAL MANSINGH
MADUR BANDARKAR
VIVEK AGNIHOTRI
SUSHIL PANDIT
ASHOK PANDIT
PRASOON JOSHI
PAVAN VARMA
RAMACHANDRA GUHA
VIVEK OBEROI
GAUTAM GAMBHIR
KIRON KHER
MEENAKSHI LEKHI
SMRITI IRANI
MADHU KISHWAR
SUDHIR CHAUDHARY
GEN GD BAKSHI
SAMBIT PATRA
RSN SINGH
ANUPAM KHER
SHOBHAA DE
NHRC
NCM
NCW
ALL CONGRESS SPOKESMEN
RAHUL GANDHI
SONIA GANDHI
PRIYANKA VADRA
BRINDA KARAT
PRAKASH KARAT
SITARAM YECHURY
SUMEET CHOPRA
DINESH VARSHNEY
SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN
N RAM
MANI SHANKAR AIYERAN
PRAKASH RAJ
KANCHA ILAIH
JOHN DAYAL
KAVITA KRISHNAN
SWARA TRRR BHASKAR ( OR IS IT PRRRR ? )
SNEHLA RASHID
PAGALIKA GHOSE
KAMALAHASSAN
DILIP CHERIAN
SUHEL SETH
ADMIRAL LN RAMDAS
KAVITA RAMDAS
LALITA RAMDAS
NAYANTARA SEHGAL
JOHN BRITTAS
MOHANLAL
SURESH GOPI
RAJ THACKREY
UDDHAV THACKREY
MOHANT BHAGWAT
RSS
VHP
AVBP
RAM MADHAV
GURUMURTHY
RAJIV MALHOTRA
EVERY HINDU ORGANISTAION
ALL BJP SPOKESMEN
SOLI BABY
FALI BABY
SALVE BABY
KATJU BABY
VC OF JNU
VC OF DU/ JU/ TISS
DEAN OF FTII
E SREEDHARAN
DILEEP PADGOANKAR
VIR SANGHVI
PRITISH NANDI
ASHISH NANDI
JEAN DREZE
ARUNA ROY
HARSH MANDER
NANDITA DAS
ANAND PATWARDHAN
VINOD DUA
LK ADVANI
MURLI MANOHAR JOSHI
SUDHEENDRA KULKARNI
PRAKASH RAJ
NAYANTARA SEHGAL
MAMMEN MATHEW ( MALAYALA MANORANA)
PI RAJEEV ( MATRUBHURMI)
SASHI KUMAR
PGURUS
EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER INDIA
EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTRY

SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA




  1. UNIFORM CIVIL CODE MUST GO ...

    THIS WILL PULL THE CARPET FROM UNDER THE FEET OF "DRUNK WITH POWER MULLAHs "--

    MOST OF THE TALL MUSLIM LEADERS AND MULLAHS ARE CRYPTO JEWS CONTROLLED BY KOSHER DEEP STATE.. THEY HAVE NO ZEBIBA MARKS ON THEIR FOREHEADS OF HAVE THE MARK IN THE WRONG PLACE....

    WAHABI/ SALAFI ISLAMIC FUNDS ARE JEWISH...

    ISIS WAS CREATED/ ARMED/ FUNDED BY JEWS.. THOUSANDS OF ISIS ISLAMIC SUICIDE BOMBERS KILLED ONLY MUSLIMS, NEVER JEWS ... WHY?

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2011/07/cracked-heels-and-prayer-marks-capt.html

    THE KORAN AND THE HADITH HAS BEEN HIJACKED BY CRYPTO JEWS.

    THE HADITHS HAVE BEEN TOTALLY POISON INJECTED BY JEWS . . . JUST LIKE THE VEDAS. . .

    ALL THE MUSLIMS NEED TO UNDERSTAND IS THAT UCC BENEFITS 50% OF THEIR COMMUNITY-- WHICH IS THE FEMALE GENDER . ..

    EVERY MUSLIM HAS A MOTHER, A WIFE , A DAUGHTER AND A SISTER. I AM SURE MUSLIM MEN HAVE NO ILL FEELINGS TO THEIR FEMALE GENDER . . .

    ALL CHILDREN OF BHARATMA ARE THE SAME . . . UNLESS WE HAVE UCC, SOCIAL DIVIDES AND GENDER DIVIDES , WILL HAPPEN-- FUELLED BY TROJAN HORSE NGOs AND BENAMI MEDIA .. .

    OUR CONSTITUTION DOES NOT TILT THE PLAYING GROUND FOR ANYBODY ON THE BASIS OF RELIGION, CASTE AND GENDER….

    INDIA IS NOT RULED BY COLLEGIUM JUDGES .. .. WHO ARE ALL THESE MUSLIM MULLAHS AND STALWARTS WHO INTERPRET THE MUSLIMS PERSONAL LAWS?. ARE THEY ELECTED IN A FAIR MANNER ? …

    IT IS BECAUSE OF THESE HARDLINERS WHO RE-INTERPRET THE HADITH AS THEY PLEASE, THAT ISLAM AS A RELIGION IS PUT IN BAD LIGHT. …

    KORAN DOES NOT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT SACRIFICING GOATS, CIRCUMCISION, TRIPLE TALAQ, BURIAL AFTER DEATH ETC…..

    OUR PM SWORE AN OATH ON THE CONSTITUTION WHILE TAKING OVER THE GOVT . .. AS PER OUR CONSTITUTION ALL CHILDREN OF BHARATMA ARE THE SAME . . .

    UNLESS WE HAVE UCC, SOCIAL DIVIDES AND GENDER DIVIDES , WILL HAPPEN-- FUELLED BY TROJAN HORSE NGOs AND BENAMI MEDIA ..

    NEXT TIME A MUSLIM AND HINDU STEALS THE SAME STUFF AT THE SAME TIME, LET THE HINDU SPEND 6 MONTHS IN JAIL AS PER OUR IPC SECTION -- AND LET THE MUSLIM GET HIS RIGHT HAND CHOPPED OFF…

    FOR A COUNTRY TO PROGRESS LAW BE DIVORCED FROM RELIGION. ONLY THEN INDIA WILL EMERGE AS A MUCH MORE COHESIVE AND INTEGRATED NATION…… IN THE OLDEN DAYS, YES THESE MULLAHS WERE KNOWN TO BE KORAN EXPERTS. …..

    TODAY ANYBODY EDUCATED WOMAN CAN DOWNLOAD THE KORAN ON THE INTERNET AND BE AN EXPERT IN ONE MONTH FLAT… RIGHT TO LEFT READING MULLAHS ARE THE BANE OF INDIA..

    UCC WILL CUT THE STRENGTH FROM UNDER THE FEET OF THE POWER DRUNK MULLAHS….. POWER IS ALSO AN INTOXICANT. ISLAM PROHIBITS INTOXICATION. UCC IS NOT ABOUT MUSLIM BASHING.

    THE CONSTITUTION WAS MADE IN 1950, AND 64 YEARS HAD PASSED SINCE IT WAS PROMULGATED, BUT ARTICLE 44 HAD BEEN TOTALLY IGNORED BY VESTED POLITICIANS- EAGER TO APPEASE MUSLIMS FOR VOTE BANK POLITICS ..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2013/09/uniform-civil-code-in-india-capt-ajit.html

    capt ajit vadakayil
    .
https://twitter.com/JM_Scindia/status/1158729410507182080

I ASK ALL MY READERS TO "LIKE" THE COMMENT ABOVE.. AND MAKE A SHORT DECLARATION THAT ITALIANS ARE RUINING OUR NATION.. THEY HAVE NO LOYALTY TO THE WATAN-- OUR HOLY MITTI..

REPORT BACK.. THERE IS ENOUGH OF EMPTY COMMENT SPACE..

I WATCH..

PILOT IS MARRIED TO OMAR ABDULLAHs SISTER.. HER MOTHER IS A WHITE BRITISH JEWESS MOLLY. PILOT IS LOYAL TO THE ABDULLAHs AND NEHRU FAMILY- NOT BHARATATA..

capt ajit vadakayil
..


COMMENTS MADE IN THIS POST WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED



CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..

1 comment: