THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART 1 BELOW--
Increasingly we find Police officers answering questions of DESH DROHI Benami media when an incident has happened.
This must never be done.
Only authorized ad TRAINED people in the police dept must answer media questions
WHEN I FIRST WROTE THAT ALMOST ALL MAJOR INDIAN MEDIA IS BENAMI- OWNED BY WHITE JEWS USING INDIAN MEDIA BARON FRONTS –ALL WERE MOST SARCASTIC
TODAY THEY KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE US PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP.
THE WHOLE WORLDs ( INCLUDING INDIAN ) MAIN STREAM MEDIA IS AGAINST HIM.
HILLARY CLINTON WAS ROTHSCHILDs CANDIDATE.
ROTHSCHILD WAS GIVING PRIVATE ORDERS TO THE US PRESIDENT —WE ALL KNOW OF HILLARY CLINTONs SECRET SERVER TODAY.
In India almost all Benami Indian media barons run their own NGOs .
These desh drohi NGOs CREATE news . Any idiot can figure out how the media correspondent landed up at the exact spot ( some god forsaken place ) in seconds to report some rape or beef wars
And don’t get carried away, if the “on the sport” field TV reporter gives hajaar ORIGINAL funda when asked by the main studio TV anchor from New Delhi or Mumbai.
His script to mouth is drafted by the main studio anchor. The people “on the spot” being interviewed are stooges planted by the field reporter.
THE DEATH TOLL IN 2002 GUJARAT RIOTS , INCREASED BECAUSE BARKHA DUTT AND HER MUSLIM CAMERA MAN JAMI UPLOADED A ( PLANTED ) BURNT KORAN PAGE. CHECK 30.00 OF VIDEO BELOW
NO ACTION WAS TAKEN AGAINST HER-- THIS COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY ( ROTHSCHILDs OPIUM FOUNDED ) EDUCATED WOMAN IS BABE IN THE WOODS , RIGHT ?
Today we find police officers putting on their best uniform and peak cap –giving interviews to main stream media whores on TV. They allow words to be put into their mouths by desh drohi TV anchors trained in NLP.
Thse pathetic police officers want their children to boast in school “ My daddy was on NDTV or INDIA TODAY TV today “
Who has authorized these police officers to give press interviews and spoil a situation?
If any officer on my ship ( included Chief Officer/ Chief Engineer ) gives an interview to press without my express permission after an incident —woe begone this fellow!
I WILL SACK HIM AT THE SAME PORT—FORGET ABOUT TAKING HIM TO THE NEXT PORT
Ship Captains are not like police officers . We can come on the cover of TIME magazine.
Below: This idiot does not know that for oil to escape into the sea-- something has to enter the tank in its place . He had NO idea of the meaning of hermetically sealing a ruptured tank or the fact that oil and water have different densities and do NOT mix--lack of basic knowledge of science.
Ship Captains are trained in MEDIA RESPONSE .
We have seminars are we are given CERTIFICATES for having undergone this course in media response
Some of our seminars are fancy.
For example a three day seminar at the Egyptian resort of SHARM EL SHEIK ( where US presidents have conferences ) where more than two hundred people of the company ( or associated with the company ) with wives , fly in from all round the planet.
A typical scene would be around 100 captains watching in the hall while ONE captain is selected to respond to media calls via VHF or satellite phone after a grounding incident where oil was spilt into the harbor.
There would be media like CNN ( all simulation ) asking the Captain all sorts of questions .
In one seminar we had the ship Captain chosen for this , answering all questions like an idiot (nay Little Bo Peep ). He was then bombarded with questions from various harbor authorities, coast guard, pollution dept, companys technical bosses , commercial bosses , insurance lawyers , salvage tugs, local politicians , yellow media etc ( simulated ) and he was answering all of them like a CUNT without prioritizing .
As a senior Captain , I was called on stage to evaluate the young Captain after this simulated exercise.
I said “ In my entire career as Captain , I have never responded personally even when the situation is normal . Say , while entering a port – if I have to speak to the Port Control , my officer on watch will call the port control . Only when the desired man is on line will I as a Captain be called to communicate and that too— to the point like ETA . I will never answer questions like “what is the length of your ship” --I leave that to the OOW. In the case this Captain of the ship involved in the accident wasted 25% of his precious time by calling other parties and behaving like a messenger -nay- a PEON at sea . Captain must never behave like a peon when his ship had a disaster . CAPTAIN IS MEANT TO DO COMMAND AND CONTROL “
CHECK OUT THE COMMENT BELOW. INDIA WILL REMAIN IN THIS PATHETIC STATE AS LONG AS OUR POLITICIANS , POLICE , JUDICIARY , IAS OFFICERS AND MEDIA DO NOT HAVE A TECHNICAL BRAIN
In modern times the Ship Captain has to warn the crew of immediate sacking if they take photos in secret and send it by WHATSUP or email to media ( sometimes for rewards ). Once the company’s reputation is lost , it is difficult to survive
This content can find its way around the world almost instantly. In a recent case, video of a ship collision recorded on a Filipino crew member’s camera phone was trending on youtube and finding its way into the mainstream media before the owners even knew that a collision had occurred.
Once I had a man with a camera taking pictures of my ship. When summoned him to my cabin , this white skinned fellow tells me “This is my country. I don’t need permission from the Ship’s captain to take a picture” .
I immediately invited him to enter my bed room and take a picture of my wife in bed . Then I confiscated his camera , made him gave me his address and told him that the camera will be returned by the ship’s agent. He was then thrown out of the ship.
The Pasha Bulker Grounding off Newcastle north of Sydney in 2007 is a classic case study. The mishap kickstarted a whole new industry in the sea-side city. Getting a room in any motel was difficult. Restaurants were in overdrive. Sticky-beakers and happy-snappers were everywhere. There was this festive feeling in the air. A big coal ship gate-crashing our shores and threatening to leak oil!
Newcastle on the world map! Lap it up folks !
A lot of this had to do with salvage crews and government officials coming to town, not to mention tourists. And, of course, the media - journos, producers, crews and support staff in cars, TV trucks, satellite trailers and helicopters, all vying for the latest break or exclusive. A battalion of cameramen and photographers with an appetite for information somewhere between insatiable and insane.
This, of course, isn’t just the norm down under. Be assured it will happen pretty much anywhere that a big ship comes to grief, especially if the media can get easy access to capture visuals, and especially if the vessel is in a precarious or striking state (listing, semi submerged or losing cargo overboard).
The Captain after an accident must not admit liability. There is no such thing as an “off the record”remark.
IT IS BETTER TO READ OUT A STATEMENT RATHER THAN BE INVOLVED IN AN OPEN ENDED DIALOGUE .
AFTER THAT TELL “ THE NEXT STATEMENT AT SO AND SO TIME . DON’T CALL ME I WILL CALL YOU ”
Simplify your message to no more than three bullet points and get these across as often as you can in plain, jargon-free English.
I remember a STUPID senior Indian police officer giving a one hour statement to TV after a murder peppered with ridiculous references to a popular English novel.
With the exception of specialised maritime magazines, there are only a few journalists who focus on the maritime sector. Therefore, coverage of this complex industry is generally left to economic and financial editors. When maritime incidents occur, the media ( who don’t know port from starboard ) depends on generalist newsstaff to cover these stories.
Therefore, don’t be urprised that your incident may become an international news ( in case of pollution or loss of life ) event within minutes.
AS A SHIP CAPTAIN DO NOT ALLOW MEDIA TO AGGRESSIVELY PUT HIS/ HER MIKE UNDER YOUR NOSE WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT LIKE WHAT THEY DO FOR PAHLAJ NIHALANI .
IF HE DOES IT—HE LOSES HIS CHANCE FOREVER.
After an accident the ship captain must show concern and show great understanding for those affected—without being TRAGEDY KING .
Show you’re effective. Describe positive actions. Audiences are often not impressed by processes which may lead nowhere.
If no one is assigned to manage media in these crucial first hours, the company will lose control of the story. This could have serious ramifications during the response and — more importantly— in its aftermath.
Your company’s name and reputation are on the line! You company could just disappear . You have NO idea how Exxon took a hit .
THE ITALIAN WAITRESS DROVE A 131 YEAR OLD GRAND OLD PARTY INTO THE GROUND BY SENDING HER AKKAL KA DUSHMAN SON TO JNU TO STAND IN SOLIDARITY WITH DESH DROHI COMMIE STUDENTS/ PROFESSORS.
NEHRU/ INDIRA GANDHI/ RAJIV GANDHI WOULD NEVER HAVE DONE THIS
Managing media in the midst of a crisis is a vital response function.
A trainer should have real-life experience in crisis communications and management. A public relations or media firm that lacks this experience cannot provide the essential knowledge and perspective required for this specialized form of communications.
There must be a focus on strategies and steps to take before, during and after media interviews. Interactive use of video can be used to enhance the training experience of participants. Everyone’s familiar with the concept of‘reputation’, but measuring and quantifying it is much more difficult
For Capt Ajit Vadakayil— Chanakya is THE FATHER OF THE NATION –not Rothschild’s agent Gandhi
Chanakyas DANDANITI was more into prevention THAN cure..
Arthashastra contains both the civil law and criminal law. Kautilya ascribed a lot of importance to ‘dharma’. According to him, ‘the ultimate source of all law is dharma’. He appealed in the name of ‘dharma’ to the sense of honour and duty and to human dignity, to moral responsibility and to enlightened patriotism.
The judge in the arthashastra was called ‘dharmashta’ or upholder of dharma. He was NOT an adherent of Rothschild’s justice system where JUSTICE IS BLIND. Rather Chanakya’s judicial system was based on NATURAL JUSTICE within the perimeter of context.
Chanakya warned that anybody giving false evidence would face the DANDA ( stick )
Arthashastra-- “because the King is the guardian of right conduct of this world with four ‘varnas’ and four ‘ashramas’ he (alone) can enact and promulgate laws (to uphold them) when all traditional codes of conduct perish (through disuse or disobedience).”
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed (Repeat 5 times)
Mann mein aghna se bhare bolo kahan jaaye
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed
Yeh trishna se bhare bolo kahan jaaye
Sarkar ke dhwar pe jaake teher jaaye
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed (Repeat 2 times)
Sarkar ek vichaar jo maane ga jaane ga hoo
Govinda govinda govinda govinda
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed (Repeat 2 times)
Anyay ke saath mein kaise jiye jaaye
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed
Sarkar ke dhwar pe jaake tehar jaaye
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed
Anyay ke saath mein kaise jiye jaaye
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed
Sarkar ke dhwar pe jaake tehar jaaye
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed
Sarkar besaar ko bhoole na bhoole na
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed (Repeat 2 times)
Govinda govinda govinda govinda govinda
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed
Saam daam dand bhed, saam daam dand bhed
There are four ways of making someone to do a task, stated as “Saam, Daam, Dand & Bhed”.
This sutra by Chanakya is used worldwide. Why? It works and is highly practical.
According to Chanakya, the primary duty of the king is to protect "Dharma"
IT DENOTES FOUR WAYS IN WHICH WORK CAN BE TAKEN FROM OTHERS—BY MOTIVATION
MASLOW LIFTED FROM CHANAKYA NEETI
SAAM -knowledge ( negotiations, ask after explaining why, evince interest for help , convince , create sense of belonging , foster brotherhood , raise awareness from correct perspective )
DAAM -money ( offer , pay , reward, catalyse, mollify , incentives )
DAND - punishment ( create fear by display of power, consequences , sanctions, discipline , penalize)
BHED – discriminate ( describing right from wrong –conscience appeal , catalyse , laying own terms)
BHED IS NOT DIVIDE AND RULE-- NOR TORTURE-- NOR BY HOOK-- NOR BY CROOK-- NOR EXPLOITATION OF VULNERABILITY – NOR A FOUL STING OPERATION – NOR AMPUTATE
In Malayalam and Sanskrit BHED means “better option “
DAND is as simple as not allowing your child to eat unless he has washed his hand .
In ancient times the King was looked upon as the protector of dharma. He too was governed by his dharma as any other citizen was.
Thus if any actions of the King went against the prevailing notion of dharma, associations and/or the individual citizens were free to question him.
Chanakya wrote that ‘dharma’ alone is guiding star for every king, or rather every individual and that following ‘dharma’ one shall have a life of dignity while social order prevailing in society.
He remarked, “A King who administers justice in accordance with ‘dharma’, evidence, customs, and written law will be able to conquer whole world”.
Chanakya hastened to add that the King was not the sole interpreter of dharma. In fact there was no specific institution vested with the authority of interpreting dharma.
Every individual was deemed competent to interpret it. This was an important factor in ensuring the non-religious character of the Vedic state.
Chanakya however did not view law to be an expression of the free will of the people. Thus sovereignty – the authority to make laws, did not vest with citizens.
Laws were derived from four sources – dharma (scared law), vyavhara (evidence), charita (history and custom), and rajasasana (edicts of the King).
Chanakya prescribed that any matter of dispute shall be judged according to four bases of justice.
These in order of increasing importance are:---
– ‘Dharma’, which is based on truth
– ‘Evidence’, which is based on witnesses
– ‘Custom’, i.e. tradition accepted by the people
– ‘Royal Edicts’, i.e. law as promulgated.
Kautilya, who framed an elaborate system of policing and laid down several grades of bureaucracy, could rightly be called the father of the modem concept of police.
Dandaniti propounded by Kautilya in Arthasastra was the science of dealing with crimes and punishments. Later Danda became the essence of the Government.
Kautilya advises the King to have his spies controlled by reliable and capable ministers. The Arthasastra contains amazingly interesting accounts of the work of individual spies, whose names are given and whose subterfuges and disguises are described
The policing system of Kautilya was on two distinct lines; i.e. civilian departments entrusted with police powers and a cadre of regular police officers. He had conferred police powers on almost all the departments, which had public dealings.
Arthashastra itself is a well-constructed text, ideal as a handbook for the ruler of a well-governed kingdom. All aspects of what we might think of as policy, planning, infrastructure, strategy, security, war, treaties, alliances, law and order, trade, taxation, revenue, property, fortifications, treasury, and defense are covered in a systematic fashion.
AnvIkShikI trayI vArtAnAM yoga-kShema-sAdhano daNDaH | tasya nItir daNDa nItiH | alabdha-lAbhaarthA labdha-parirakShaNI rakShita vivardhanI vR^iddhasya tIrthe pratipAdanI cha || 1.4.03
The daNDa [is the power] by which the application and the growth of the systems of logical analysis, the veda and business are upheld. Its management is known as political science. It is the means by which new acquisitions are made, profits are gained [in business], the acquisitions are kept secure, security and growth [are achieved] and the fruits of growth are re-distributed among the deserving.
Nevertheless, with respect to the actual application of daNDa, viShNugupta advocates what might be termed the path of moderation:
“tasmAl loka yAtrA .arthI nityam udyata-daNDaH syAt || na hy evaM vidhaM vasha^upanayanam asti bhUtAnAM yathA daNDaH|” ity AchAryAH ||
“Whoever is desirous of progress of the world shall always do so with the upraised rod of chastisement. Never can there be a better instrument to bring beings [implying people and other animals] under control than the application of chastisement.”
na^iti kauTilyaH || tIkShNa.daNDo hi bhUtAnAm udvejanIyo bhavati || mR^idu daNDaH paribhUyate || yathA .arha daNDaH pUjyate || 1.4.05-10
“Not so,” says kauTilya; for whoever imposes severe chastisement becomes tyrannical to the beings [a police state]; while he who is mild in chastisement is despised/disrespected [a soft state]. But he who imposes punishment as deserved is respected [the ideal Hindu state].
Chanakya is clear that learning analytical devices is not for all and sundry, and outlines who can do so:
shushrUShA shravaNa grahaNa dhAraNa vij~nAna^Uhaapoha tattvaabhiniviShTa buddhiM vidyA vinayati na^itaram || 1.5.05
The acquisition of knowledge can only culture those whose intellect is endowed with the abilities of discipline, learning from verbal instruction, grasping concepts, memory, discrimination, inference and applying falsification, but not others [those who lack these].
shrutAd hi praj~nA^upajAyate praj~nAyA yogo yogAd AtmavattA^iti vidyAnAM sAmarthyam || 1.5.16
Verily from hearing (i.e. gathering information) emerges knowledge; that knowledge allows its application; from its application one becomes prudent. This is the power of knowledge.
vidyA vinIto rAjA hi prajAnAM vinaye rataH | ananyAM pR^ithivIM bhu~Nkte sarva-bhUta-hite rataH || 1.5.16
The king who is educated in the fields of knowledge, verily interested in administration of his people, and inclined to benefi benefit all beings will enjoy the earth unopposed.
gAndharvaM nR^ittam AlekhyaM vAdyaM cha gaNitaM kalAH |
arthashAstraM dhanurvedaM yatnAd rakShen mahIpatiH || chANakya-rAjanIti 75
Music, dance, painting, discourse, mathematics, technologies, economics and military science, a king should painstakingly protect.
Listen to Chanakya —
“In the happiness of his subjects lies the King’s happiness; In their welfare his welfare.
He shall not consider as good only that which pleases him but, Treat as beneficial to him whatever pleases his subjects”
Chanakya , 2350 years ago, cautioned the king against the undesirable consequences of unduly severe punishment. In all spheres of state-activity one finds that Chanakya avoids the extreme and adopts the middle-of- the-road policy.
Masking Arthashastra a manual for the king and his ministers/ administrators, Kautilya perceived their problems with such clarity of vision that his solutions became a veritable storehouse of learning.
Before 7000 BC, India ruled the whole planet. India only gave—never took.
The greatest gift was the rule of DHARMA.
If men were angels, no government would be necessary.
In the pre-Vedic period society governed themselves by the laws of Dharma inherent in the Vedas. During these times Vedas were on oral route. After 330 centuries on oral route Vedas were penned down 70 centuries ago.
In those days the punishment of a bad man rested on the wronged person.
This code of conduct, which governed the affairs of the people, came to be known as Dharma or law.
The following verse describes the importance of the Dharma (law):--
Those who destroy Dharma get destroyed.
Dharma protects those who protect it.
Therefore Dharma should not be destroyed.
Dharma flowed from Vedas. Those days Vedas were on oral route and no pretenders were allowed into the system. Like in modern days nobody expects a nurse or a sweeper of a surgery room to pretend they know brain surgery..
In course of progress man felt that it was more convenient to live in society rather than in small groups.
In the very early period of the Indian civilization great importance was attached to Dharma. Everyone was acting according to Dharma and there was no necessity of any authority to compel obedience to the law. The society was free from the evils arising from selfishness and exploitation by the individual.
Each member of the society scrupulously respected the rights of his fellow members and infraction of such rights rarely or never took place. The following verse indicates the existence of such an ideal society.
There was neither kingdom nor the King; neither punishment nor the guilty to be punished. People were acting according to Dharma; and thereby protecting one another.
A situation arose when some persons began to exploit and torment the weaker sections of society for their selfish ends. Tyranny of the strong over the weak reigned unabated. This situation forced the law abiding people to search for a remedy. This resulted in the discovery of the institution of King and establishment of his authority over the society, which came to be known as the State.
In the Rig-Veda the King is called Gopa janasya or protector of the people. This implies that he was charged with the maintenance of law and order. According to the Dharma sutras and the Arthashastra, it was the duty of the King to ensure the security and welfare of his subjects.
Each state was divided into provinces and the provinces into divisions andndistricts. For each province, governors were appointed. District officers werenentrusted with the judicial and administrative functions.
According to Chanakya’s Arthashastra, the administration of towns was entrusted to the Nagarka. He had not only to look after the maintenance of law and order but had also to enforce various building and sanitary regulations and to prepare census of the citizens
Apart from cities and towns, there were a large number of villages. In fact, the village was the basic unit of government. Each village consisted of a village headman and Village Council or Panchayat. The office of the village headman was mostly hereditary. In villages he represented the King’s administration.
The most remarkable feature of the early Vedic polity was the institution of popular assemblies, of which two, namely, the Sabha and Samiti deserve special mention.
In the later Vedic period, the Samiti disappeared as popular assembly while the Sabha became a narrow body corresponding to the King’s Privy Council.
They introduced two new grades of military or judicial officers, Mahadandanayaks and Dandanayaks, to make the justice system more effective.
The law was recognized as a mighty instrument necessary for the protection of the individual’s rights and liberties. Whenever the right or liberty of an individual was encroached upon by another, the injured individual could seek the protection of the law with the assistance of the King, howsoever powerful the opponent might be.
The power of the King to enforce the law or to punish the wrong doer was recognized as the force (sanction) behind the law, which could compel implicit obedience to the law.
The laws of Manu (millenniums before Laws of Chanakya vide Arthashastra ) is THE most authoritative work in ancient times -- adopted world wide.
According to Chanakya , an essential duty of government is maintaining order . He defines this broadly to include both maintenance of social order as well as order in the sense of preventing and punishing criminal activity.
Chanakya has mentioned the law of procedures; the law of evidence in civil as well as criminal cases; procedure of criminal investigation; and quantum and method of punishments for various types of offences. Prisons, lockups and welfare of prisoners are also the subject matters of the Arthashastra.
Chanakya had prescribed code of conduct for Judges and even for the mighty King.
“No,” says Kautilya; for whoever imposes severe punishment becomes repulsive to the people; while he who awards mild punishment becomes contemptible. But whoever imposes punishment as deserved becomes respectable.
For punishment (danda) when awarded with due consideration, makes the people devoted to righteousness and to works productive of wealth and enjoyment; while punishment, when ill-awarded under the influence of greed and anger or owing to ignorance, excites fury even among hermits and ascetics dwelling in forests, not to speak of householders.
But when the law of punishment is kept in abeyance, it gives rise to such disorder as is implied in the proverb of fishes (matsyanyayamudbhavayati); for in the absence of a magistrate (dandadharabhave), the strong will swallow the weak; but under his protection, the weak resist the strong. [Arthashastra I:4]
It was provided that in cases where no principle of law was found in the Shruti, Smritis or custom, the King should decide according to his conscience. At this time kings word appropriate to natural justice and within the perimeter of context was the law. Unlike modern times where old mindless judgements are preserved and used out of context to subvert the law ( and cheat a judge with no brains ) , in ancient times every case was seen with a fresh pair of eyes totally based on context. Justice was not blind in ancient India.
The criminal justice system of ancient India was so organized that every villager had easy and convenient access to a judicial forum. In Vedic society the village Samitis and Sabhas were two important instruments of Indian polity.
The Village Councils, similar to modern Panchayats, consisted of a board of five or more members to dispense justice to villagers.
Village headman had the authority to levy fines on offenders. There were several village committees, including a justice committee, appointed by people’s vote. Village Council dealt with simple civil and criminal cases.
Other criminal cases were presented before the central court or the courts in towns and district headquarters presided over by the government officers under the Royal authority to administer justice.
The first institution of state police may be traced to a judgement recorded in Kautilya’s Arthashastra. It mentions that the police during ancient India was divided in two wings, namely, the regular police and the secret police. The regular police consisted of three tiers of officials: the Pradesta (rural) or the Nagaraka (urban) at the top, the rural and urban Sthanikas in the middle and the rural and urban Gopas at the bottom.
In the course of his description of the Pradesta’s duties. Chanakya narrates how an inquest was held in case of sudden death. This involved a post-mortem examination of the body as well as thorough police investigation. In Chanakya’s system the secret police is divided into two categories namely, the peripatetic and the stationary.
The ancient Manu Smriti prescribed instructions for the King to detect offences with the help of soldiers and spies. The Katyayana Smriti mentions of informant and investigating officer. This suggests that an agency like modern police existed during that period to assist the King in administration of justice.
It was provided that a jail should be constructed in the capital providing separate accommodation for men and women and it should be guarded. It was also prescribed that the prisoners should be employed in useful work. The policy of taking a sympathetic view, as regards persons found guilty of offences and punished with imprisonment imposed on them, was also laid down in the ancient Indian law.
The Dharmamahamatras were charged with the duty of protecting prisoners from molestation and releasing the deserving ones. The Arthashastra gives a detailed account of jail administration.
Violation of criminal laws was considered an offence against the State. Any member of the public could bring the violation to the notice of the King and the King was under a duty to apprehend and punish the offender. It was provided that the King should take cognizance on his own, with or without any complaint by a private party, of criminal offences.
The information or complaint about the offence committed by any individual could be made by any citizen and not necessarily by the person injured or his relatives. The person, who on his own accord detected commission of offences and reported to the King, was known as stobhaka, i.e.informant. He was entitled to remuneration from the King for giving first information.
A person who was appointed by the King to detect commission of offences was called Suchaka, i.e. Investigation Officer.
The special responsibility of the King in the matter of controlling crimes, detection of crimes and punishing the offenders was stressed in the Manu Smriti that contained the following guidelines for the King:---
(i) Persons who commit offences or who conspire to commit offences are generally found in assembly houses, hotels, brothels, gambling houses, etc.;
(ii) The King must post soldiers and spies for patrolling such places and in order to keep away thieves and antisocial elements; and
(iii) He should appoint reformed thieves who were formerly associated with such doubtful elements and through them offenders must be detected and punished.
The dandaniti, i.e. punishment policy, is one of the elaborately dwelt upon subjects in ancient India as it was intimately connected with the administration of the State. Manu emphasized the importance and utility of punishment saying:---
“Punishment alone governs all created beings, it protects them and it watches over them while they are asleep.”
As per Manu there were four kinds or methods of punishment during ancient India, namely, admonition, censure, fine and corporal punishment. Corporal punishments included death penalty, branding on the head some mark indicating the offence committed, shaving the head of the offender and parading him in public streets.
IN THE DAYS ON MANU THERE WERE NO SHUDRAS WHOM BRAHMINS TRAMPLED UPON. ALL THSE ARE LIES OF THE WHITE INVADER TO DIVIDE AND RULE . THESE LIES WERE PROPAGATED BY ROTHSCHILDs PAYROLL AGENTS AND FAKE MUTTS
MANU WAS A NOBLE MAHARISHI—NOT A BIGOT
People like BR Ambedkar and EVR Periyar ( Rothschild’s agents ) bitched that dalits were NOT allowed to read the Vedas.
There was a good reason, when Vedas were on oral route and DHARMA was sourced from Vedas . You don’t teach brain surgery to a hospital sweeper or tell the cook to navigate the ship in fog in dense traffic .
People like Kancha Iliah SQUEAK who feel it must be done can offer his children to a sweeper turned brain surgeon—GOOD LUCK !
You find white tourists coming to India and writing when they go home: “Hindus do NOT care for the beggar on the street “
Hey mister tourist -- DID YOU CARE ? YOU TOOK A PHOTO FOR YOUR OWN SELFISH REASONS, RIGHT?
This is like BR Ambedkar moaning to the white invader —the Brahmin did NOT drink from my cup .
HULLLOOO Ambedkar paaji —did you check out if the white man would drink from the brahmin’s cup ( leave alone your cup )
Thiru EVR Periyar , Mahatma Phule saab , Kancha Ilaiah SQUEAK etc do NOT know that in ancient times Brahmins lived by begging ( except in Kerala where Namboodiris owned all the land ).
Every ancient Purana and Pnchatantra story started off with there was a POOR Brahmin living in a hut.
No Hindu ever fights in the name of god. There are NO inquisitions where the priests revel in torture and killing of Kaffirs by FATWA of Mullahs .
Hindus do NOT rush out of temples on Friday noon as a gang to lynch people of other religions .
Hullo, Mr Prannoy JAMES Roy ( NDTV ) , with an Irish mother—understand this well .
Hinduism has never advocated conversion, all are aware of this truth. The exodus has already started. I predict in another 10 years almost all Christians will cremate their bodies . People now ponder about the SOUL.
Muslims are stuck. In kerala Muslim women in burqa can be seen consulting astrologers . They are NOT shy . SANATANA means " that which holds eternal Vedic knowledge"-- encompassing everything from microcosm to macrocosm. DHARMA means " righteousness".
Dharma leads to eternal bliss, both in this world and the next. It is your sole and soul companion after death. The fundamentals of Dharma as per the Bhagwat Gita are-- respect, truth, grace, restraint, love, non-violence, restraint, lack of jealousy and greed, knowledge of self and austerity.
Sanatana Dharma respects the planet along with its flora and fauna. It is the only religion which advocates vegetarianism. Manu , the ancient law giver was a committed environmentalist. Manu wrote that polluting the environment was a punishable offence.
Manu was a noble Maharishi. His image has been tarnished by the white invader so that he could WEDGE AWAY the unskilled varna, using FAKE mutts and agents like BR Ambedkar and EVR Periyar.
Manu’s laws in Manava Dharma Shastra , are in 100000 verses in 24 books and was propagated from Palestine to Urals to Vietnam in 7000 BC by the great Indian Emperor Vikramaditya who ruled these lands.
These laws were given 5300 years before Hammurabi who lifted wholesale from these laws, leaving aside kindness to the environment and social grace.
In Manu’s laws a person could be ex-communicated from society for mindless felling of tress or killing of animals, the way the English speaking white man shot the buffalo and exterminated the Indian American , or how the Australian Aborigine race was exterminated..
In Manu’s laws destruction of nature was the destruction of the state. Yet we Indians get lectured by the West daily, nowadays , on antipollution and the need to be environment friendly.
The whole idea of Vaastu was to construct something without disturbing the flow of nature and interrupting natural flow of energy. It is about peaceful co-existence and comfort. Hindu Vedas and mantras revere, nay , worship nature , and its flora and fauna. Many animals and birds were vehicles of god. The deities of Hinduism permeate the world of nature.
Hindus are blamed by the white man for illtreating women . If so why do we pray to goddesses ? No god is complete without his wife
Chanakya’s lays down that awarding of punishment must be regulated by a consideration of the motive and nature of the offence, time and place, strength, age, conduct, learning and monetary position of the offender, and by the fact, whether the offence is repeated.
An old man over eighty, a boy below sixteen, women and persons suffering from diseases were to be given half the punishment; a child less than five committed no offence and was not to suffer any punishment. In certain cases, the court was empowered to grant compensation to the aggrieved party in addition to the punishment given to the offender.
Manu prescribed that a Brahmana offender ( proficient in Vedas by oral route ) was not to be sentenced to death or corporal punishment for any offence; in such cases other punishments were substituted. However Chanakya was against exempting Brahmanas.
Chanakya mentions that a Brahmana who aspires for the Kingdom, or is guilty of sedition or instigates disaffection or rebellion against the King shall be summarily drowned.
Chanakya a Kerala Namboodiri professor ,himself defied a king and uprooted a mighty empire. Chanakya is indeed Bharatmata’s No 1 son
The Manu Smriti had a similar provision which provides that higher the varna of the offender greater the punishment.
It was prescribed that the examination of witnesses should not be delayed.
A serious defect, namely, miscarriage of justice, would result owing to delay in examination of witnesses.
Witnesses were under legal compulsion to give evidence before the court. Failure to appear before the court entailed heavy penalty. Failure to give evidence amounted to giving false evidence. Perjury, i.e. the act of giving false evidence, was considered a serious offence and punishment was prescribed for it.
The entire wealth of a person, who cited false witnesses out of greed, would be confiscated by the King, and in addition he would be externed. The party whose witnesses deposed against him could examine further and better witnesses to prove his case as well as to prove that the witnesses examined earlier were guilty of perjury.
THE WHOLE WORLDs POLICING AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM WAS SOURCED FROM INDIA. BEFORE 7000 BC INDIA RULED THE WHOLE PLANET
Failure of duty towards society was taken very seriously. Any person who fails to render assistance according to his ability in the prevention of crime would be banished with his goods and chattel.
Any owner of a house failing to help another at the time of outbreak of fire was liable to be fined. Double punishment was prescribed for those who failed to give assistance to one calling for help though they happened to be on the spot or who ran away after being approached for help.
Right of self-defence existed during ancient India. The law provided: “A person can slay without hesitation an assassin who approaches him with murderous intent. By killing an assassin the slayer commits no offence. A person has a right to oppose and kill another not only in self-defence but also in defence of women and weak persons who are not in a position to defend themselves against murderous or violent attack.
Even killing a Brahmana in exercise of such a right is no offence.
Offences and misconduct committed by police officers, Jail Superintendent and other public servants were taken very seriously and severe punishments were prescribed. It was provided that the judges who passed unjust order, or took bribes, or betrayed the confidence reposed in them, should be banished
We see in Arthashastra that law was not viewed just as code of prohibition, nor was it limited to corrective justice of law courts. Its range was wider than morality itself and institutions were creation of law while traditions and customs rested on its sanctions.
All ideas of society were moulded by it and law was blended with religion, with morality and with public opinion and by its subtle operations subjected the society to its will. The role of law in the society was to bring a just order in society and the tremendous task was to be shouldered by the King along with his subordinates.
Arthashastra outlines a system of civil, criminal, and mercantile law (now known as business laws). For example the following were codified: a foolproof procedure for interrogation, and trial, the rights of the accused, what constitutes permissible evidence, a procedure for autopsy in case of death in suspicious circumstances, what constitutes defamation and procedure for claiming damages, valid and invalid contracts.
Capt. Ajit Vadakayil
December 10, 2017 at 6:28 AM
SOMEONE ASKED ME TO EXPOUND HOW JEWS STEAL INTELLECTUAL RIGHTS AT US COLLEGES-- ESPECIALLY JEW ROTHSCHILDs OPIUM DRUG FOUNDED IVY LEAGUE UNIVERSITIES
LIKE HOW MARK ZUCKERBERG STOLE THE FACEBOOK IDEA FROM INDIAN GENIUS DIVYA NARENDRA AT HARVARD UNIVERISTY
THERE ARE JEW PROFESSORS IN SUCH UNIVERSITIES WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE COLLEGE KOSHER BOARD TO STEAL FROM NON-JEWS AND GIVE IT TO JEW STUDENTS
HERE IS A SIMPLE CASE BELOW-- WHEN A GENIUS IIT INDIAN STUDENT MAINAK SARKAR KILLED HIS JEW PROFESSOR WILLIAM KLUG FOR STEALING HIS INTELLECTUAL RIGHTS AND PASSING IT ON TO ANOTHER JEW STUDENT.
MOST INDIANS ARE PASSIVE --THEY SUCCUMB TO THREATS FROM JEW PROFESSORS --AND THEY KEEP QUIET HAPPY-- GLAD NOT BE TO DISMISSED FROM THE COLLEGE AND SEND BACK TO INDIA IN DISGRACE AS A THIEF OR DUFFER NO GOODER .
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED TO KERALA STUDENT ECG SUDARSHAN .
HIS WORK WAS GIVEN AWAY TO JEWS WHO WRANGLED NOBEL PRIZE -- ONE OF THEM A PAKISTANI CRYPTO JEW AHMEDDIYYA MUSLIM ADBUS SALAM.
WHEN PM MODI WENT TO ISRAEL--STANDING AT THE END OF THE RECEPTION LINE WAS THE HEAD OF AHMEDDIYA SECT IN ISRAEL--PERSONALLY INTRODUCED TO MODI BY BENJAMIN NETANYAHU.
I TOLD MY WIFE , WE WERE WATCHING LIVE -- THEY HAS TO BE AN AHMEDIYYA JEW PRETENDING TO BE A MUSLIM. SHE WAS VERY HAPPY WHEN I WAS VINDICATED
IN THE CASE OF GENIUS DIVYA NARENDRA , HIS SLEEING PARTNERS THE VINKLEVOSS TWINS HAD THE WHEREWITHAL TO SUE JEW MARK ZUCKERBERG --AND THEY CATAPULTED THEMSELVES TO FAME --USING A HOLLYWOOD MOVIE.
WHAT IS A SLEEPING PARTNER ?
AT CORNELL ONCE A KOREAN UNDERGRADUATE BOY TEAMED UP WITH MY ELDER SON ( MASTERS ) FOR A PROJECT IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
THEY DECIDED ON WHAT THEY WOULD DO.
THE KOREAN BOY THEN WROTE THE ENTIRE CODE "LIKE HOW HE WOULD WRITE A LETTER TO HIS FRIEND"-- THIS WAS WHAT MY SON TOLD ME AND MY WIFE ON SKYPE.
AT FREQUENT INTERVALS HE WOULD CRAVE THE INDULGENCE OF MY SON—IMPLORING "SIR, AM I RIGHT"
MY SON WAS SO EMBARRASSED -- THE KOREAN DID THE WHOLE PROJECT IN ONE FLOWING SHOT -- LITERALLY THANKFUL WHEN MY SON SAID-- " YES , CONTINUE" TO HIS " SIR- AM I RIGHT SO FAR ? "
WHEN THE CODE WAS WRITTEN AND TESTED -- MY ELDER SON TOLD HIM "SO FAR YOU HAVE DONE EVERYTHING -- I WILL WRITE THE FINAL PROJECT REPORT "
SO MY SON WROTE THE CODE PRESENTATION OVERNIGHT AND SHOWED IT TO THE KOREAN BOY THE NEXT DAY -- HE LOOKED ON MY SON AS AN ABSOLUTE HERO -- STARS IN HIS EYES AND CRIED " WOW— I COULD HAVE NEVER DONE THIS , SIR"
MY SON WAS A SLEEPING PARTNER IN THIS PROJECT. HE WAS HONEST TO ADMIT IT .
MY SON INSISTED AND WROTE THE KOREAN BOYs NAME FIRST FOLLOWED BY HIS NAME-- THROUGH COLLEGE RULES REQUIRED THE MASTERs STUDENTS NAME FIRST AND THEN THE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTs NAME
JEW ALBERT EINSTEIN WAS A MEDIOCRE BRAIN—HE WAS ABSOLUTE DISGRACE IN MATH—EINSTEIN DID NOT HAVE A MATHEMATICAL BRAIN-- HE OUTSOURCED ALL HIS MATH..
ALL HIS AWARD WINNING IDEAS OF EINSTEIN IS STOLEN FROM FROM VEDAS AND SECONDARY ONES -- STOLEN FROM AN INTELLECTUAL PATENT POOL OF WHICH HE WAS CLEVERLY PLACED AS THE GUARDIAN CLERK BY JEW ROTHSCHILD
SRINIVASAN RAMANUJAN THE INDIAN MATH GENIUS --LOST HIS DIARY, IN WHICH HE HAD RECORDED ALL HIS PRICELESS FINDINGS . THE JEW BASTARDS STOLE IT. AFTER THAT RAMANUJAN USED TO DO HIS WORK ON A SLATE , RUB IT OFF AND RETAIN RESULTS INSIDE HIS HEAD
SRINIVASAN RAMANUJAN WAS POISONED –
HIS YOUNG WIFE STARTED CRYING BITTERLY ( SHE WAS NOT THE CRYING TYPE ) AS SOON AS THE PYRE WAS LIT AND FEL INTO A FAINT -- WHEN WELL WISHERS PRESSED HER, SHE REVEALED THE TRUTH ABOUT THE "LOST DIARY"..
CONTINUED TO 2-
CONTINUED FROM 1-
EVERY TIME RAMANUJAN MADE A BREAK THROUGH DISCOVERY IN MATH , AFTER TWO WEEKS A WHITE JEW PROFESSOR WOULD COME AND ASK HIM "SRINIVASAN , DO YOU KNOW THIS JEW MATH NERD FROM POLAND --BECAUSE HE FOUND OUT THE SAME THREE WEEKS BEFORE YOU DID "
IN THE COMPUTER INDUSTRY MAXIMUM STARTUPS ARE BY WHITE JEWS..
NONE OF THESE ARE THEIR OWN IDEAS . IDEAS AND THE WHOLE SOLVED PROJECT IS GIVEN TO THEM .. THE WHOLE IDEA IS TO PROVE TO THE WORLD “ WE JEWS HAVE THE BEST BRAINS “
WHEN THE JEW STUDENT CREATES A STARTUP, ONE JEW MONEYBAG WOULD BUY THE STARTUP FOR A FEW MILLION DOLLARS
WHAT I WRITE IN MY BLOG POSTS IS STOLEN LEFT RIGHT AND CENTRE.
ONE WEE EXAMPLE?
THE "HAMZA RIVER" SHOULD REALLY BE "VADAKAYIL RIVER"
HAMZA IS A MUSLIM FROM CALICUT --WHO DISCOVERED (SIC) THE UNDERGROUND COMPONENT OF AMAZON RIVER
DID HE HAVE THE WHEREWITHAL ? 100%--- NO NO NO.
DID CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WHO FOUND THIS SEVERAL YEARS BEFORE HIM HAVE THE WHEREWITHAL? 100% ---YES YES YES
I STOPPED MY SHIP 200 MILES OFF THE AMAZON RIVER MOUTH IN THE SALTY OCEAN-- TOOK A BUCKET MYSELF AND DREW UP UPWELLING MUDDY WATER FROM MIDST OF A CLEAR BLUE OCEAN.
MY WHOLE CREW WAS WATCHING -- AS I TASTED THE WATER I TOLD THEM "THIS IS THE EXACT WAY MAGELLAN FOUND OUT ABOUT THE MIGHTY RIO DE LA PLATA ( RIVER ) AT NIGHT. HE PERSONALLY DREW A BUCKET OF WATER AND TASTED IT - AND FOUND WATER TO BE SWEET"
LET ANY OF THESE GENIUS JEWS AGREE TO A SIMPLE IQ TEST --LIVE --ON INDIAN TV--WHERE I WILL PIT THEM AGAINST A 15 YEAR OLD CHAIWALLAH BOY FROM MUMBAI OR CALCUTTA -- I WILL SHOW THEM WATER THEIR KOSHER BRAINS ARE WORTH
IN OPEN COMPETITION A JEW IN NOWHERE --AS LONG AS THE QUESTION PAPER IS SET BY A NON-JEW AND THE ANSWER SHEET IS CORRECTED BY A NON-JEW
BUT HEY, JEWS MONOPOLIZE ALL NOBEL PRIZES--LIKE HOW THEY MONOPOLIZE HOLLYWOOD ROLES WITH THEIR WEIRD TYPE KOSHER LOOKS
ALL HOLLYWOOD ACTORS WERE AFRAID TO SUPPORT DONALD TRUMP--AS ROTHSCHILD WANTED HILLARY CLINTON TO BE PRESIDENT.
THE BRIEFCASE OF JC BOSE WAS STOLEN AT HIS HOTEL BY JEW MARCONI
THOUGH YELLAPRAGADAs WORK WAS STOLEN --HE WAS HAPPY NOT TO BE DEPORTED TO INDIA IN DISGRACE
WE ASK MODI-- SHUT DOWN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LANGUAGE DEPTS OF JNU . THIS UNIVERSITY HAS PRODUCED TOO MANY UNWASHED UNCOUTH TRAITORS .
capt ajit vadakayil
Capt. Ajit Vadakayil
January 11, 2018 at 7:01 PM
JUDGES ELECT JUDGES LIKE JNU COMMIE PROFESSORS…
NAPUNSAKS PM MODI AND LAW MINISTER RAVISHANKAR PRASAD ARE SHIVERING IN FRIGHT --THEY CANT MOVE …
BOTH THESE TIMID FELLOWS SWORE TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION…
INDIAN CONSTITUTION DOES NOT ALLOW JUDGES TO ELECT JUDGES..
INDIA IS THE ONLY NATION ON THE PLANET WHERE JUDGES ELECT JUDGES..
PEOPLE LIKE JEW NOAM CHOMSKY GIVE FIATS TO COLLEGIUM MELORDS .. .
MOST OF OUR COLLEGIUM JUDGES ARE PEA BRAINED . . THEY WERE FOOT SLOGGING UNSUCCESSFUL LAWYERS . ..
MOST OF THESE LOSER LAWYERS BECAME JUDGES TO C0CK A SNOOK AT THEIR SUCCESSFUL COLLEAGUES WHO DROVE MERCEDES CARS WHILE THEY FOOT SLOGGED WITH HAWAI CHAPPALS …
WE KNOW COLLEGIUM JUDGES HAVE FOREIGN SUPPORT WHEN THEIR LEGISTLATE , DO EXTREME JUDICIAL OVERREACH . . . . . . .
BHARATMATA IS RACING TO BE THIS PLANETS NO 1 SUPERPOWER IN 15 YEARS --BEFORE THAT THE NEW WORLD ORDER WANTS INDIA TO IMPLODE. ..
OUR COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY BURNT MIDNIGHT OIL TO OPEN CHAMIYA BARS ( WH0RE HOUSES IN MUMBAI ) AS IF TWO DOZEN GOOD LOOKING DANCING GIRLS CANT GET A DECENT JOB..
BREAD WINNERS OF ENTIRE FAMILIES HAVE BEEN ROTTING IN JAIL WITHOUT A TRIAL FOR THREE DECADES .. .
ONE OF THE REASONS FOR NAXALISM , IS BECAUSE OF THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY . . .. POOR UNDERTRIALS WHO ARE BREAD WINNERS ARE KEPT IN JAIL FOR DECADES WITHOUT A TRIAL . .. .
POOR PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE THE WHEREWITHAL TO PROVIDE BAIL MONEY OR PERSONAL SURETY . . .WITH ANOTHER MAN COMING AND SHOWING ALL THOSE DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR THE GUARANTEE . ...
WHY IS THE INDIAN GOVT INSISTING ON BAIL MONEY FROM VERY POOR PEOPLE ? . ..
Article 312 of the Constitution provides for the creation of an all-India Judicial Service common to the Union and the States. ….
JUDGE CANNOT CREATE OR REPEAL LAWS..THEY CAN ONLY INTERPRET LAWS, WHEN ASKED TO DO IT—NOT BY FOREIGN FINDED NGO PIL….
IF CONTENT IS KING- CONTEXT IS GOD !!......
BURN EVERY SINGLE PAST JUDGEMENT BY COLLEGIUM SUPREME COURT JUDGES........ THESE PAST JUDGEMENTS ARE BEING USED TO HIJACK JUSTICE BY "OUT OF CONTEXT " REFERENCE .....
EVERY SINGLE CASE MUST BE SEEN WITH FRESH EYES WITHIN THE PERIMETER OF NATURAL JUSTICE AND CONTEXT..... SOME STUPID JUDGES HAVE EVEN USED RIDICULOUS PROSE IN THEIR JUDGEMENTS , TO SHOW THAT THEY ARE POETS AND PHILOSOPHERS -- EVEN QUOTING A MAD MAN NAMED SIGMUND FREUD.....
OUR FAILED LAWYERS TURNED COLLEGIUM JUDGES DO NOT HAVE THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL TO UNDERSTAND THAT SANE/ FAIR JUDGMENTS MUST BE WITHIN THE PERIMETER OF CONTEXT --AND NATURAL JUSTICE MUST BE INHERENT.......
WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA DO NOT WANT LAWYERS TO BECOME JUDGES--RATHER THERE MUST BE A NATION WIDE EXAM ( LIKE IIT/ IAS ) TO CHOOSE JUDGES . ..
WE KNOW THE BOTTOM OF THE SCHOOL CEREBRAL BARREL BECAME LAWYERS -- UNLESS THEY WERE LAWYER SONS ( LIKE BOLLYWOOD STAR SONS ) LIKE MAHESH JETHMALANI ....
GANDHI USED TOLSTOY OUT OF CONTEXT TO MAKE INDIANS SLAVES....... MEANING IS CONTEXT BOUND..... IT WAS JEW ROTHSCHILD WHO CREATED THE LEGEND THAT LADY JUSTICE IS BLIND....... JUSTICE MUST NEVER BE BLIND.....
THE RICHEST LAWYERS IN SUPREME COURT ARE THE ONES WHO HAVE A “SETTING “ OR NEXUS WITH THE COLLEGIUM JUDGE AND THE OPPOSITE CAMP LAWYER… SAB MIL BHAANTKE KHAATE HEIN….
THESE RICH LAWYERS CANT ARGUE FOR NUTS -- IF SO HOW DO THEY WIN THEIR CASES ?... WE MUST DISMANTLE THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND REBUILD IT… .
CONTINUED TO 2-
CONTINUED FROM 1-
In USA the attorney General interprets the laws that govern executive departments, and examines alleged violations of federal laws…. In India our attorney general does NOT know his powers. ..
CONTEMPT OF COURT APPLIES WHEN THE COURT IS IN SESSION AND SOMEONE IN THE COURT RELATED TO THE CASE UNDERMINES THE JUDGE'S AUTHORITY REPEATEDLY . …
CONTEMPT OF COURT CANNOT BE APPLIED ALONG THE LENGTH AND BREATH OF INDIA ( ON LAND/ UNDER GROUND/ IN SPACE ) , AS IT IS MEANT WITHIN THE CONFINES OF A WEE BRICK AND CEMENT BUILDING COURT ROOM …
ONE STUP1D JUDGE HAD SLAPPED BOTH "SEDITION" AND "CONTEMPT OF COURT " ON ARUN JAITLEY FOR SAYING CONSTITUTION DOES NOT SUPPORT "COLLEGIUM SYSTEM" BUT ONLY NJAC …
OUR FAILED LAWYERS TURNED COLLEGIUM JUDGES DO NOT HAVE THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL TO UNDERSTAND THAT SANE/ FAIR JUDGMENTS MUST BE WITHIN THE PERIMETER OF CONTEXT --AND NATURAL JUSTICE MUST BE INHERENT....
THE MELORDS CANT EVEN UNDERSTAND THE MEANING OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE ... THIS IS WHY NAXALS LOOK INTO THE CAMERA AND SAY--WE TRUST OUR SUPREME COURT... -- FOR FAKE WITNESSES CAN BE PRODUCED OUT OF THIN AIR BY FOREIGN MONEY ( LIKE TEESTA SETALVAD )….
WE DO NOT WANT UNELECTED PEOPLE TO RUN THE WATAN……..
WE THE PEOPLE ARE WATCHING…. REMEMBER-- THE POWER OF THE CHAIR IS ONLY AS LONG AS YOU SIT ON IT-- ONE DAY THESE PEOPLE WHO WENT AGAINST THE WATAN AND THE CONSTITUTION WILL RETIRE…..
CANCEL THE EXTENSIVE BRITISH COLONIAL STYLE VACATIONS OF THESE MELORDS .....THERE ARE TOO MANY CASES PENDING...
THE TIME HAS COME FOR "WE THE PEOPLE" TO DECLARE --WHATEVER LAWS HAVE BEEN CREATED BY JUDGES ARE ALL NULL AND VOID -- WE KNOW THESE " JUDGE CREATED LAWS "….
THE DAY WILL COME WHEN THE SYSTEM WILL BREAK DOWN -- THE JUDGES WILL BE JAILED--THEY WILL LOSE THEIR PENSIONS…. THIS WILL HAPPEN WHEN UPSET POLICE TELLS THE JUDGE " MAKE YOUR OWN ARREST… WE ARE DONE WITH JUDGES PLAYING GOD !"….
PM MODI-- WE ELECTED YOU FOR 5 YEARS -- YOU HAVE ALLOWED COLLEGIUM JUDGES TO SHIT ON BHARATMATAs FACE -- WE THE PEOPLE ARE SHOCKED AND DISMAYED…
WHO RULES INDIA ?
PM MODI OR THE " SOLI / FALI IMMIGRANT GANG " ?... KYA HO RAHA HAI ?...
WE DONT WANT LAWYER TURNED JUDGES TO INTERFERE WITH BHARATMATAs SECURITY-- )… KASHMIRI MUSLIMS WHO HAVE DRIVEN AWAY HINDU PANDITS, USURPED THEIR LANDS AND DESTROYED THEIR TEMPLES -- ARE CALLING THEMSELVES "MINORITY" AND MILKING THE BENEFITS – ..
NCM / NHRC ( CONTROLLED FROM ABROAD ) PLAYS ALONG… WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND TO KNOW-- THE ITALIAN WAITRESS GAVE 10 BILLION EUROS TO ITALY ZONE--- MODI GAVE 10 BILLION USD TO AFRICA AND 10 BILLION USD TO BANGLADESH…. WHAT HAVE YOUR DONE FOR KASHMIRI PANDITS SO FAR ? …
TEENAGED KASHMIRI PANDIT SCHOOL GIRLS ARE STILL LIVING IN TENTS ?... JUDGES HAVE DESTROYED THIS WATAN DUE TO ENDLESS HAIRSPLITTING , MAKING DECISIONS OUT OF CONTEXT--WITHOUT DHARMA OR NATURAL JUSTUCE…ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!..
WE KNOW WHY COLLEGIUM JUDGES GIVE PREFERENCE TO PILs FROM DESH DROHI TROJAN HORSE NGOs… ..
READ ALL 7 PARTS OF POST BELOW ...- punch into Go0gle search -- - . . …. . . . . .FOREIGN FUNDED TROJAN HORSE NGOs , PIL, JUDICIAL OVERREACH VADAKAYIL .. ….
................................................... RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN INDIA IS NOT A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT SAYS CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL .........................
..................... TIME HAS COME TO SAVE THE WATAN THE TIME IS NOW VADAKAYIL ...................... capt ajit vadakayil ..THIS POST IS NOW CONTINUED TO PART 3 BELOW--
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL