Justice cannot be blind , NATURAL JUSTICE shall be inherent , CONTEXT shall be the perimeter, PART TWO – Capt Ajit Vadakayil

THIS POST IS CONTINUED FROM PART ONE BELOW--

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2016/10/justice-cannot-be-blind-natural-justice.html

Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.  Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc.  If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

This was suggested to me by police ( as genuine brotherly /well wisher advise) –why stick your neck out—fuck it captain saab,  you alone as an intellectual cant do anything for the watan..    If you indeed insist to do something you must be part of a BIG and powerful organisation.

When faced with truth SPIN DOCTORS become incredulous and indignant.  They avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues  This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.

ENGLISH IS A STUPID LANGUAGE WHICH CAN BE TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT 

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/11/sanskrit-digital-language-versus-versus.html

I SHOT THE CLERK ?

I SHOT THE CLERK !

WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF A DANG CONFESSION HERE

CONTEXT CHANGES WITH TIME

For example:  suppose someone from Kerala says  “I expect my trip to Delhi will be easy.”   A simple enough statement. But what about the context, the determining conditions?

Today a person can take a flight .

Now suppose it was during the all India  riots after Indira Gandhi’s assassination ?

Suppose it was in the year 1300 AD ?

The statement remains exactly the same but the context changes and then so does the meaning and our ability to draw meaningful conclusions.

If I said  "I beat my wife ... . " it seems to mean one thing, but if the rest of that part of the interview was about playing tennis  with her --   but that information isn't included with the quote, then the quote is misleading because it was taken out of context.

Context is the set of circumstances, time, place, background, environment within which something takes place. Context determines the conditions and the meaning in which something is understood.

What the context does is set the statement into a very specific reality and its meaning is determined according to that reality.

A context is a scheme of relations that alters the way we understand things. That set of relations can very broadly and deeply expand out or it can be narrow and pointed making the latter much more easy to grasp and draw definitive conclusions from.   

So if you take something out of its scheme of relations you shift the base upon which you can draw conclusions.

An agenda is essentially a list, a plan, or outline of things to be done. Its focus is on those things which must be driven forward, acted upon, or processed. Also an agenda is static. 

It is limited by the list for a given meeting or event whereas a context is dynamic, it is alive in the sense that it moves, grows, advances, recedes, and changes and with that the meanings of the agenda items change.

For example when the context shifts the urgency of an agenda item can be increased or decreased. For a meeting to be successful the underlying context should be announced so that everyone can be on the same trajectory and decisions can be set up for success. 

Context and agenda fit together seamlessly only if this difference is understood.

Context is any information that characterize the environment of an entity (a person, group of person, a place or an object) relevant to the interaction of the application and the users .

Context means, understanding the whole environment and current situation of the entity.  In the pure theory, modeling context consist in answer the questions associated with the entity and the action: Who was the entity, Where the action took place, What the actions were, When did it happen, and How it performed the action.

Context-awareness aims to enable better service delivery through proactively adapting use, access, structure and behavior of information, services applications and physical resources with respect to available context information .

On the other hand, Situation-awareness means the understanding of the events related with the entity and its context in a concrete situation by determining its role.  In that way, the situation could be seen as a course of events that evolves to more sophisticated relations between entities (or even situations).

The situations change with certain probability from one condition into another (or the same one) according the incoming events, so, it aims to predict what is the current situation and what will be the next one

Situational Awareness is the ability to identify, process, and comprehend the critical elements of information about what is happening to the team with regards to the mission. More simply, it's knowing what is going on around you.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/04/dynamic-risk-assessment-on-chemical.html

Situations are often defined as, "the condition" or "the current state of affairs".

Therefore, the term "situation" is more knowledge and information rich than "context".

Context is commonly defined as "the set of circumstances or facts that surround a particular event, situation, etc."

Therefore, "context" is used to describe, define and detect "situations" and generally speaking, the more context you have, the better a situation can be "perceived."

DUFFER LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES CANT GRASP ALL THIS

As nouns the difference between circumstance and context is that –

---circumstance is that which attends, or relates to, or in some way affects, a fact or event; an attendant thing or state of things –

while --

-- context is the surroundings, circumstances, environment, background or settings that determine, specify, or clarify the meaning of an event or other occurrence.

Context is a very powerful thing—our DUFFER LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES cant figure it out.

Much more than a catch phrase for politicians caught out with a gaff (“I may have said that but you’re taking it completely out of context”)--

It can mean the difference between a message and meaning, a presence and an inner truth, and even one’s definition of right and wrong.

Almost anything which happens in life has meanings which differ depending on the context in which it occurs. 

Likewise, context is vital to any case. 

JUDGES MUST TRAINED IN CONTEXT .

THIS POST CAN BE IN THE CURRICULUM FOR TRAINING JUDGES –  LEAVE OUT ORNAMENTS -- NAY-- BAD WORDS LIKE TWAT , CHOOT AND CUNT.

Ignoring context can not only hinder an investigation but can leave both the investigator and client liable for missed information.

A JUDGE WHO IGNORES CONTEXT MUST BE SACKED—OR IMPEACHED – IF IT MAKES THE DUFFER MELORDS FEEL ANY BETTER .  

TO BE FRANK , HOW MANY DUFFER JUDGES CAN READ THIS POST ( TWICE ) AND THEN EXPLAIN IT BACK TO SOMEONE ?

Context helps all understand what they otherwise wouldn't be able to comprehend. 

Below: KOSHER justice !

Capt. Ajit VadakayilOctober 8, 2016 at 9:15 AM

I THANK THE FOLLOWING READERS FOR BIRTHDAY GREETINGS- THANKS FOR YOUR KIND WORDS ( I DON’T DESERVE IT )

Kkk
Shouri Suman
Jk
Rahul Hari
Sai
Aniketh
Saurav77
Tat tvam si
Ravi
Ch
Jagadish
pavan kumar
anurag k
Rahul sharma
Sangeeta
Aakarsh Thakur
Buddha Zorba
Sehaj
hitesh islania
sujeet kadam
Prashant Uchil
Slasher
shailesh M
sri
Spaniard
Kuldeep singh
Nitesh pokhrel
Indian nationalist
Jk
Prashant naik
Srinu k
Anoop hariharan
Razor skidrow
Tushar dudam
Amol shende
Rajesh maurya
Sushanta kumar das
Pixar 6
Words are magic
Karthikeyan
Vinay kumar
Kavin
Jivanupayogi sukragalu
Hindustani deshbhakt
Aquarius
Vikhyat singh
Yadagiri gawrayya
Nelson singh
Ishan sharma
Ankush
Krish net
Shruti Kajuria
Sasha
Swagat
Aneesh gupta
Aiswarya r
Muthu swamynathan
Srikapilan g
Kapil agrawal
Lord aseem
Munna
Shriram hedge
Sanathan dharm
Dipesh agrawal
Abcindiagogo
Balamurali shivaram
Akash raj
Prachi bharadwaj
Gunjan arya
Buga sharma
Raj
Amitmishra
Himansu panchal
Sparrow
Lakshmi prasanna x
Nishant Goyal
Mythra 81
Priyanka
Shekhar sharma
Ajit kumar
Subhash rao
Ancientine
Venkat
Abhijeet rai
Krishnadev m
Arun jha
Vikas bharti
Harish bv
Devank Pimparkar
Krish pillai
Nobeatingroundthebush
Padmanabhan r
Freespirit
Raghavenda desai
Scientific spirituality
Santosh kumar
Vk
Satish kartik
Indiana therat
Evan
Manuettan chandran
Prashant kp
Lao tsu
Ashwani tyagi
umarajashekher vedula
ck vignesh
thyaga
vishwanath n
aks
sandeep
naag raaj
jay Gatsby
rn muthy
src 356
mayor rathod
the script writer
sandy
jay giri
om
m
naren p
sunita dheenan
gautam
manunath rao
seeker of knowledge
raj prasat
jinoy
Few UNKNOWNS

I SHALL DRINK TO YOUR HEALTH AND HAPPINESS TODAY 

capt ajit vadakayil
..

A non-sequitur is completely illogical nonsense..   Most DUFFER collegium judges are swayed by non-sequitur.

In a MAD non sequitur, G. W. Bush tells the US troops: --

  "It is wonderful to bravely, patriotically, serve your country and fight terrorism. I am committed to fighting terrorism. Some of you may die in this war, but that is a sacrifice that I am willing to make. Bring 'em on!"

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/11/one-and-only-one-bush-capt-ajit.html

MOST OF OUR COLLEGIUM , LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES ARE NO BETTER THAN BUSH

The supporters of George W. Bush insist that having investigations to discover the truth behind Bush's many, many mistakes, deceptions, and false statements regarding the war in Iraq would not be good for America:

"We can't discover the truth right now; we are in a war against terrorism."

That is a non sequitur.

Senior George Bush was in Dubai, where he was harshly criticized for the foreign policy of the United States and the military adventurism of his son.  Papa Bush responded, "How come everybody wants to come to the United States if the United States is so bad?"

That is a non sequitur.

There are many good reasons for wanting to come to the United States which do not imply approval of George W.'s bombing and invasion of Afghanistan and Iraqi, or his policy of unquestioning support of Israel.  One good reason for coming to the USA is to get away from American bombing in their nations . Another good reason is to get away from American-trained death squads in military dictatorships around the world.

Another non sequitur: a cult old-timer declares, "I dedicated my life to the cult. I worked hard for 20 years to promote it and recruit new members. Therefore I am noble and selfless and the cult is wonderful, and we all live lives of self-sacrifice to help others."

This non sequitur might be called "proof by delusion": "I saw lights, so it was a spiritual experience." Many FAKE gurus in India claim this.

Non sequitur means "it does not follow" — the logic is broken. If there is a chain of argument, every link in the chain must work.

A non sequitur can be something like this:

"I supported terrorists today.  I did just a little bit of  cannabis , I thought I was just having fun, but I gave money to terrorists when I did that."

WE DONT WANT LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES IN INDIA .. .  

WE DONT WANT ANTI-WATAN , ANTI-HINDU ATHEIST COMMIE JUDGES IN INDIA.

Consider one of Mormon Mitt Romney’s most famous remarks: "Corporations are people, my friend." When the audience jeered, he elaborated: "Everything corporations earn ultimately goes to people. Where do you think it goes? Whose pockets? Whose pockets? People’s pockets."

The fact that people get money from corporations does not mean that corporations are people, entitled to human rights, like freedom of speech or the right to vote. Corporations cannot be imprisoned for their crimes, can they? Or be given the death sentence for polluting children to death. Or die of old age. Or get cancer. Or bleed and suffer. 

Corporations are actually just legal fictions that allow some people to do business without being liable for the consequences of their actions. If the same people do business as a partnership, they can be put in prison for their crimes.

The modus operandi of the JNU commie professors and Naxal indoctrination party is to make people feel guilty.  They were made to feel guilty for being part of "a rich racist and fascist society where they never cared about the fate of the poor dalit/ tribal “.  

Then the dalits/ tribals had to confess that in self-criticism sessions, and then the only way to atone for such sins was to love and praise the wonderful Chinese Communist society where everyone was equal (but some people were more equal than others).

Fear, especially fear of death, is a particularly powerful emotion, one that can be manipulated to good advantage:

A preacher who wants to increase attendance at his church advertises: "Don't wait for the hearse to take you to church."

IN INDIA THE NCW AND COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY HAS LOCKED AWAY MANY INNOCENT MEN ON FALSE RAPE CHARGES

THEY IGNORE CONTEXT.

EXAMPLE:

AN UNMARRIED  COUPLE HAVE BEEN LIVING TOGETHER IN A FLAT . 

BUT AFTER TEN YEARS , THE MAN HAS FOUND OUT THAT HIS PARTNER HAS BEEN SLEEPING AROUND WITH OTHER MEN.

WHEN HE TRIES TO MOVE AWAY, THE WOMAN FILES RAPE CHARGES.

THE JUDGE IGNORES THE TRUTH THAT THIS WOMAN HAS HAD SEX WITH DOZENS OF  MEN .

EVEN WHORES FILE RAPE CHARGES  .   

THE JUDGE IGNORES THE TRUTH THAT THE WOMAN IS A WELL KNOWN WHORE WHO WAS CAUGHT STEALING MONEY FROM HER CLIENTS PURSE. 

THE ANONYMITY ATTACHED TO THE CASE PREVENTS  HER PREVIOUS “ROBBED “ CUSTOMERS FROM COMING TO GIVE EVIDENCE.

NCW HAS BEEN CREATED IN INDIA BY THE BILDERBERG CLUB SO THAT THE PLAYING FIELD  CAN BE TILTED.  ANY WOMAN CAN CRY MOLESTATION.   

PROMISING  CAREERS OF MEN CAN BE PULVERISED WITHIN SECONDS

Even consensual sex based on a promise of marriage, cannot be termed as rape in case the promise is not fulfilled.  No man wants to marry a LIVE IN  woman who is having sex with dozens of men behind his back.

When there is insufficient supporting evidence to determine whether an accusation is true or false, it is described as "unsubstantiated" or "unfounded".

Accusations that are determined to be false based on corroborating evidence can be divided into three categories:-

An allegation that is completely false in that the events that were alleged did not occur;

An allegation that describes events that did occur, but were perpetrated by an individual who is not accused, and in which the accused person is innocent.

An allegation that is partially true and partially false, in that it mixes descriptions of events that actually happened with other events that did not occur.

IN WESTERN NATIONS MORE THAN 20% OF RAPE CHARGES LEVELED BY LIVE IN WOMEN HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE FALSE.

ALMOST ALL HOMOSEXUALS ARE PEDOPHILES.     YET WHEN A PEDOPHILIA  ACCUSATION IS MADE AGAINST A HOMOSEXUAL , THE LAW ( SPONSORED BY THE NEW WORLD ORDER ) IS VERY LAX.

IN INDIA A LOT OF WORK PLACE SEXUAL BULLYING/ HARASSMENT  CHARGES , IS WHEN THE  WOMAN IS DENIED A PROMOTION OR A RAISE – BECAUSE SHE IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/11/nagging-unhappiness-at-home-death-of.html

NO SANE MAN WILL GO AFTER A WOMAN “IN SWEET PURSUIT OF LOVE” IF SHE HISSES AT HIM AND WARNS HIM THAT SHE WILL EXPOSE HIM NEXT TIME .. .

THERE IS A VERY THIN LINE BETWEEN “SWEET PURSUIT OF LOVE” AND “STALKING” .  

HORMONES OF THE WOMAN USUALLY  DECIDES . ..

People who understand the science of NAGGING knows how hormones play up in a woman ..

Some women are addicted to the foul game of BLOW HOT BLOW COLD.  

Capt. Ajit VadakayilOctober 8, 2016 at 10:33 PM

EVERY TIME MANISH TIWARI COMES ON TV HE GIVES SMART ALEC FUNDA-

HOUND BEFORE HARE

CART BEFORE HORSE

FALSE DISCHOTOMY ( WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT THE FUCK IT IS )

BLAH BLHA

NOW HIS LATEST FUNDA IS "DISCOURSE DOMINANCE "--WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT IT IS

Dominant discourse is a way of speaking or behaving on any given topic — it is the language and actions that appear most prevalently within a given society. These behaviors and patterns of speech and writing reflect the ideologies of those who have the most power in the society.

A problem with dominant discourse is that it can become so ingrained within a society that few people challenge the norm. Without these challenges, few new ideas enter the mainstream. The society thus may stagnate and fail to progress. Even when people want to challenge the dominant paradigm, they may fail to do so if they lack the power to get their message or behaviors far enough into the public eye

Dominant discourse is the ability in decision making to see something in a different way.

Dominant discourse gives us the prevailing "accepted" rules of everyday living as practiced by our decision-makers. Dominant discourse rarely includes the perspective of the Other, the non-power holding Other.

IN ANCIENT INDIA WE NEVER ALLOWED DOMINANT DISCOURSE. IT WAS WIN -WIN --THE SWEET BANQUET OF THE MIND.
GOD DISCOURSE SINKS WIN-LOSE DIFFERENCES AND SEEKS AGREEMENTS

THE RABID ANTI-MODI TRAITORS WONT UNDERSTAND ALL THIS.

capt ajit vadakayil
..

A lot of our judges suffer from APOPHENIA.   Some are so anti-Hindu that they see Hindus as superstitious savages. 

Apophenia is also known as "seeing through tinted lenses".

People's brains have an unfortunate tendency to see what they expect to see, and only notice what they want to see. Once somebody buys into a peculiar model of reality, a perceptual filter kicks in where they notice more and more "facts" that appear to reinforce their chosen beliefs, and they ignore any conflicting information that comes along, so they become more and more convinced of the correctness of their beliefs: "It's all so obvious to anyone who learns the real truth!"

Apophenia is the experience of seeing meaningful patterns or connections in random or meaningless data.

"All of us show bias when it comes to what information we take in. We typically focus on anything that agrees with the outcome we want."

"We need to acknowledge our tendency to incorrectly process challenging news and actively push ourselves to hear the bad as well as the good."

Some phenomena classified under the general umbrella of apophenia include:

Clustering illusion: Related to an inability to recognise actual random patterns. Uneven clusters caused by true randomness are mistaken for patterns.

Confirmation bias: A bias towards testing to confirm ones' hypothesis rather than disprove it.

Gambler's fallacy: Feeling that past events reflect and alter probability when, in fact, they don't.

Pareidolia: Seeing shapes, most often faces, in random patterns

A feeling of a loss of control can increase the detection of false patterns in random data such as visual noise and stock market reports.

Human perception can, at times, be unreliable and one notable flaw in our capabilities of sensory perception which indicates this is a phenomenon known as  apophenia.

Pareidolia is the name given to a psychological phenomenon which is usually brought on by images or sounds that we don’t consciously recognize.

PERCEPTION IS PATTERN MATCHING

This causes our minds to search the subconscious ‘database’ for similar patterns stored in our memory, which causes us to see things that are not really there.

Although apophenia and pareidolia are essentially the same thing, apophenia is the name given to the actual experience, whereas the term pareidolia is the name given to describe the psychological phenomenon.

Humans are pattern-seeking, storytelling animals. We look for and find patterns in our world and in our lives, then weave narratives around those patterns to bring them to life and give them meaning. Such is the stuff of which myth, religion, history, and science are made

Capt. Ajit VadakayilOctober 9, 2016 at 8:45 AM

MORE AND MORE ROTHSCHILD PAYROLL REPUBLICAN SENATORS ARE CALLING DONALD TRUMP TO WITHDRAW FROM THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE

SO WHAT HAS TRUMP DONE?

WHAT IS HIS DEADLY SIN ?

HE JUST TALKED LIKE A NORMAL MAN IN HIS YOUNGER DAYS.

YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHO WE SAILORS TALK OVER A DRINK AT SEA

WHAT MATTERS IS DEEDS NOT WORDS

IF ANY WOMAN READS MY BLOGS --FULL OF TWITS, TWATS, CUNTS AND SHIT -- SHE WILL THINK I AM A BAD MAN

ASK MY WIFE WHO I AM -- THAT IS ME --SHE WILL VOUCH THAT I AM NO MISOGYNIST.

I KNOW HOW TO EXPOSE EVIL WOMEN AND WHORES. I KNOW THESE PMS/ EGO LADEN UGLY BARREN WOMEN WHOSE HORMONES RULE THE STATES THEY RULE. I KNOW THESE WOMEN LIB HEROINES WHO CANT CHANGE A CAR TYRE , WHO SAY THEY ARE EQUAL TO MAN , YET WANT TO BE RESCUED FROM SINKING SHIPS EVEN BEFORE THE CHILDREN.

DONALD TRUMP ONLY TALKED .

AND WHAT HE SAID IS RIGHT. YANK WOMEN ARE GOLD DIGGERS . IF YOU ARE RICH AND FAMOUS THEY WILL ALLOW YOU TO GRAB PUSSY--EVEN IF YOU ARE UGLY.

WHAT WERE MAHAMERUS LIKE JOHN F KENNEDY AND BILL CLINTON DOING?

WHILE TALKING TO PRESIDENTS OF OTHER NATIONS IN THEIR OFFICE IN WHITE HOUSE , A WOMAN WAS CROUCHING BETWEEN THEIR LEGS AND GIVING THEM A BLOW JOB UNDER THE PRESIDENTIAL DESK

WE ALL HEARD OF MARILYN MONROE AND MONICA LEWINSKY .

SO TRUMP LISTEN UP

AND LISTEN GOOD

IN YOUR SECOND PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE TELL THE STUPID HILLY BILLY YANKS THE EQUATION.

TELL THE ROTHSCHILD PAY ROLL VICE PRESIDENT AND REPUBLICAN SENATORS TO CATCH AND SWING --FIRST FROM PORT TO STARBOARD AND THEN FROM FORWARD TO AFT.

TELL THEM ONLY DEEDS MATTER -NOT WORDS

FACTA NON VERBA -YOU BILDERBERG CUNTS !

Now I will talk about AD HOMINEM PERSONAL ATTACKS

YESTERDAY ON TV I SAW A DISCUSSION , BETWEEN MANISH SISODIA, TAREK FATAH, SWAMY AND NAPALAT.

WHEN MANISH SISODIA WAS GETTING SCREWED BY TAREK FATAH , HE CALLED HIM AN OUTSIDER. 

THIS MADE TAREK FATAH RETORT    “ OH , I DID NOT KNOW ONLY INDIANS ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK IN THIS DISCUSSION “ 

--AND THE HE KEPT PEERING INTO HIS MOBILE PHONE TILL THE DISCUSSION ENDED.

When you can't refute factual arguments, kill the messenger.  Have fun with character assassination.

Attack the arguer and not the argument.

Ad Hominem includes slurs, slander, libel, innuendo, baseless accusations, irrelevant criticism, groundless denunciations, and name-calling.

"You are an outsider."

"You are just trying to make us look bad."

"You are in denial."

"You are just up tight. Don't be so up tight."

"You don't know what you are talking about."

"You are carrying on like an old woman."

Name calling is a kind of ad hominem attack, but it has a special power and flavor all its own.

If you can't answer a man's argument, all is not lost; you can still call him vile names.

This technique is simple and obvious: you just call your opponents names, preferably really derogatory and slanderous names, like this:

"You are a right wing hyper nationalist, and a liar.”

Apply labels to things or people — especially derogatory labels. This is very similar to name-calling.

If someone talks about universal health care, scream "That's Brahmanism !"

If someone talks about peace and freedom and justice, complain, "That's a Liberal agenda."

Delegitimize one's opponent so as to avoid addressing the substance of his argument. This is another kind of ad hominem attack. 

The goal is to make it impossible for opponents to be heard respectfully in the debate.

"Those protesters are just a bunch of unruly hotheads ."

THIS METHOD WAS USED BY GANDHI,NEHRU AND PATEL , DURING THE INDIAN NAVY MUTINY.    THEY DID NOT WANT THEIR SHEEN TO GET TARNISHED.   

AFTER ALL ROTHSCHILD CHOSE THEM TO LEAD THE FREEDOM MOVEMENT

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/02/the-indian-navy-mutiny-of-1946-only-war.html

Attempt to delegitimize annoying and inconvenient little facts and evidence by a variety of techniques like bad logic, slurs, and innuendo. Similarly, dismiss criticism as invalid without actually answering it.

For instance:

"That report is old hat." (Dismiss by Antiquity, reject by age.)

"Everybody considers that blogpost is fiction." (Appeal to "everybody knows".)

"You are criticizing Israel's mistreatment of the Palestinian people because you are anti-Semitic and racist." (Use of ad hominem.)

"I'm offended by your accusations." (Use of the tragedy drama Queen Ploy.)

Use invalid or spurious reasons for rejecting a question that you don't wish to answer.

For example:

"That question is loaded, I wont answer !"

"That's none of your business!"

SABOOOT DIYA , KUTHE KOH- DHAAAD!!

GAAND MEIN SURICAL STRIKE !

WHO IS NEXT?

CHID,  SLIMY MANI,  BAK BAK, YECHOOOOORY ?

Capt. Ajit VadakayilOctober 7, 2016 at 9:39 PM

YESTERDAY DURING NEWSHOUR I WAS WATCHING SOME CREATURES NAY VERMIN , UNITED BY THEIR COMMON HATRED FOR PM MOD, PUTTING THE WATAN LAST AND THEIR FOUL PERSONAL AGENDA FIRST......


AND ONE GUY NAMED MAYANK GANDHI WAS IMPLORING, PLEASE KEEP NATION FIRST
I WAS REMINED OF MYSELF AT SEA

WHEN IT CAME TO DEFENDING THE HONOUR OF BHARATMATA , I KICKED MY JOB SEVERAL TIMES
WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME ?

WE WERE IN SOUTH KOREA UNLOADING CHEMICALS AT ANCHOR INTO BARGES

I NOTIED THAT THE SECOND MATE , A MANGALOREAN CHRISTIAN HAD NOT FILLED UP THE PORT PROGRESS LOG . .

I ASKED THE CHIEF MATE— AND HE TOLD ME THAT THE SECOND MATE WAS IN DEEP DEPRESSION.

SO I CALLED UP THE SECOND MATE TO MY CABIN—HE WAS ASLEEP—I INSISTED

THIS BOY WAS A VERY HUMBLE GUY , AND HIS HUMILITY WAS WAY OVER FOR AN OFFICER WHO SERVED UNDER MY COMMAND. HE WAS MOST SINCERE CONSCIENTIOUS IN HIS JOB . .

AS SOON AS HE ENTERED I CLOSED THE DOOR AND ASKED HIM ” SOMETHING IS EATING YOU UP—I WANT TO KNOW WHY”

He said –“ the Korean Supercargo ( a captain ) came on board after midnight, he came to the CCR and I gave him the owners cabin key and told him where to find his cabin. He handed over his brief case to me and ordered me to carry it to his cabin. So I asked him, if I was a white skinned British or German officer, if h would do the same thing “

“ On the way to the owner’s cabin, this Korean captain ( come as Cargo Superintendent appointed by US charterers ) kept GIGGLING LOUDLY . After that my mind has just chatters , I cant concentrate –as the insult was too deep , it has scarred my mind. I feel ashamed to be an Indian with brown skin“

I replied “ This Korean Captain is now sleeping , as he has given wake up call instruction to the CCR . Go to the owners cabin, wake him up and say Captain wants to see you on the bridge in 300 SECONDS “

My second mate held my wrist , HARD, like how my wife would do when I was about to lose my restraint –Sir let it be –I know what you will do now”

I replied to this well wisher ’ Follow my orders”

Within 300 seconds the Korean was on the navigating bridge with an angry indignant look.

He knew Captain was aware of the brief case incident –as he asked the second mate on the way up, if he told the Captain.

I ordered him” There are six barges along side my ship. I will allow only two. I order you to give orders within 600 SECONDS . If you don’t do that I will shut cargo operations and call up your bosses in USA to remove you from my ship”

THE YANK TOP BOSS WAS MY FAN.  MY SHIT WOULD NOT SMELL FOR HIM.

The Korean Captain had pull with the Jap owners and made them call my bosses to tell them that I insulted the Supercargo.

My bosses wanted an explanation.

I said “ I take decisions on my ship-PERIOD “

INDIA IS FULL OF TRAITORS WHO DON’T LOVE THE WATAN. THIS IS WHY BHARATMATA WAS IN CHAINS FOR 800 YEARS.

JUST MAKE AN EXAMPLE OF A FEW TRAITORS LIKE SLIMY MANI , AND SEE HOW ALL FALL IN LINE.

Capt ajit vadakayil
..

Capt. Ajit VadakayilOctober 7, 2016 at 7:26 PM

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/rest-of-world/Colombian-President-Juan-Manuel-Santos-wins-2016-Nobel-Peace-Prize/articleshow/54734245.cms

Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos is a crypto Jew with connections to Jew Rothschild.

His family is the richest in Colombia as they were business partners of Rothschild.

This IMMORAL man has pushed GAY MARRIAGE in Colombia.

His great uncle Eduardo Santos Montejo was installed president of Colombia by business partner ( COFFEE AND DRUGS ) Rothschild ARBITRARILY in 1938.

After escaping from the Berlin bunker Jew Hitler escaped to Argentina ( via Spain ) and then hid in Bogota with the Santos family.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/10/if-zionist-jews-created-isis-who.html

Operation Jaque was a Colombian military operation that resulted in the successful rescue of 15 KOSHER hostages - including top mercenaries of Northrop Grumman. Israeli tracking technology was used in the rescue. Jews are grateful to our Nobel Prize winner .

Northrop Aircraft bought Grumman Aerospace, famous for building the Apollo Lunar Module to create Northrop Grumman (NG)

MAJJA HAI

KISSI KOH KUCH NAHI PATHA

In between our rogue Guru Sri Sri Ravishankar claimed that he was instrumental for signing the peace treaty. 
My Colombian officers say BALLS !

capt ajit vadakayil
..

Capt. Ajit VadakayilOctober 7, 2016 at 7:46 PM

WHY COLOMBIA ?

LIKE SPAIN UNDER JEW GEN BRANCO, ROTHSCHILD ENSURED COLOMBIA WAS NEUTRAL DURING WW2,  HE USED THIS NATION TO CONTROL PANAMA CANAL , ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC OCEANS . .

ROTHSCHILD CONTROLLED TAX HAVEN ARUBA WAS THE PLACE WHERE COCAINE/ COFFEE MONEY WAS LAUNDERED. 

"A magnificent washing-machine is sold here, its trademark is Aruba. The machine is an Aruban-Colombian product, its model called Cartel. The brand is well-known for its good performance in the United States and Europe. It is recommended by former ministers, members of Parliament, owners of casinos, supermarkets, cosmetics manufacturers and importers of cars and batteries. The washing-machine fits everybody who has become inexplicably rich from one day to another." Speech by a Aruba Minister Elio Nicolaas.

EVERY DRUG/ FINANCE CRIMINAL USED ARUBA AS A SAFE HOUSE

Aruba's reputation as a 'Mafia island' became public in March 1993 when it was described by the Italian daily Corriere della Sera as "the first state to be bought by the bosses Cosa Nostra."

The Sicilian JEWISH Mafia clan of the families Cuntrera and Caruana allegedly had taken over the island. Between 1988 and 1992 they acquired 60 per cent of Aruba through investments in hotels, casino's and the election-campaign of a Prime Minister. Aruba looked set to be the first independent state under Mafia control.

The first Jews in Aruba were Sephardi Jewish immigrants from Netherlands and Portugal.

The first Jew to settle in Aruba was a Portuguese-Jewish worker for the Rotshchild owned Dutch West Indies Company named Moses Solomon Levie Maduro, who arrived in Aruba with his family in 1754.

The current Prime Minister of Aruba Mike Eman is Jewish. His Jewish brother Henny Eman was the first Prime Minister of Aruba.

CRYPTO JEW IN MUSLIM GARB Jossy Mehsen Mansur of Aruba , used cigarette business as a front . He had the licence of Philip Morris, they were the major suppliers of Marlboro . He is the front for Rothschild banking in Aruba.

WHEN MY WIFE VISITED ARUBA , THE WORLD FAMOUS RESORT-- ALL SHE SAW WAS CACTUS AND SEA. SHE KEPT ASKING ME "WHEN ARE WE REACHING ARUBA " .

I REPLIED " BABY, THIS IS ARUBA!! "

capt ajit vadakayil
..

THIS POST IS NOW CONTINUED TO PART 3 -

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/10/justice-cannot-be-blind-natural-justice_9.html

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..