Wednesday, April 27, 2016

SANATANA DHARMA , HINDUISM EXHUMED AND RESURRECTED, PART 22 - CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL



THIS POST IS A CONTINUATION OF PART 21, BELOW--




Sanatana Dharma classifies all knowledge into two parts:  sense-experienced and suprasensory .

Very few on the planet have gone to the suprasensory.  

Sanatana Dhama has the advantage of being kick started by seers and 12 strand maharishis , with wide sense bandwidths who transgressed beyond the 5 narrow senses

The Greek philosophy of ETHODS-LOGOS-PATHOS is totally , 100% lifted from Indian Vedanta. 


Greeks never really understood the real essence of profound subjects like Epistemology, though Indian sages taught them in their own lands.

Pythagoras ( died 495 BC ) and Plato studied in India.  Aristotle lifted from Vedanta material taken out of India


Plato ( died 348 BC ) , a homosexual shared his stolen from Kodungallur University spoils with his mentor Socrates ( died 399 BC ) , and fellow homosexual side kick Aristotle ( died 322 BC ) and got himself immortalized as the founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world.

Aristotle, Socrates and Plato were hardcore homosexuals  .  Aristotle initiated Alexander the great into homosexuality.

Both knowledge of the senses and subtle knowledge are gained by six methods of knowledge. Epistemology in Indian philosophy is divided into six pramanas.  

Pramanas examines the nature of knowledge and how one can acquire .  Pramas cover the philosophical analysis of the nature of knowledge and how it relates to such concepts as truth, belief, and justification. It investigates the origin, nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge.

Even today, the modern mind has NOT reached the bottom of the ancient Indian sage’s mind.  

The white historian must know that Greek philosophy was stolen from Indian philosophy written 4500 years earlier.

The six pramanas as correct means of accurate knowledge and to truths are:
Pratyakṣa (perception),
Anumāṇa (inference),
Upamāṇa (comparison and analogy),
Arthāpatti (postulation, derivation from circumstances),
Anupalabdi (non-perception, negative/cognitive proof) and
Śabda (word, testimony of past or present reliable experts).

Each of these are further categorized in terms of conditionality, completeness, confidence and possibility of error, by each school of Indian philosophies.


Below: I have trashed 6 maha merus-- this guy was No 1-enough of BULL !   It takes a Capt Ajit Vadakayil to dismantle him.


Pramaṇa refers to epistemology in Vedanta--  Yukti  which means active application of epistemology or what one already knows, innovation, clever expedients or connections, methodological or reasoning trick, joining together, application of contrivance, means, method, novelty or device to more efficiently achieve a purpose.

The focus of Pramana is how correct knowledge can be acquired, how one knows, how one doesn't, and to what extent knowledge pertinent about someone or something can be acquired

Pramaṇa concept is derived from the Sanskrit root, prama which means "correct notion, true knowledge, basis, foundation, accurate notion".

Yukti and Pramana are discussed together in some Indian texts, with Yukti described as active process of gaining knowledge in contrast to passive process of gaining knowledge through observation/ perception.

The texts on Pramana, particularly by Samkhya, Yoga and Advaita Vedanta schools of Hinduism, include in their meaning and scope "Theories of Errors", that is why human beings make error and reach incorrect knowledge, how can one know if one is wrong, and if so, how can one discover whether one's epistemic method was flawed, or one's conclusion (truth) was flawed, in order to revise oneself and reach correct knowledge.

In some texts such as by Vedavyasa, ten pramanas are discussed.   Vedanta gave importance to circumstantial implication (arthāpatti), which appeals to common sense (e.g., one does not see the sun move from minute to minute, but, as it is in a different place at different times of day, one must conclude that either earth or sun has moved.

Digression:

On our training ship with 250 cadets ( 16/ 17 years age ) in 1973,  we had a young Punjabi boxing instructor.  One day he was too harsh on us during our morning drill .   So one guy put chewing gum in his cabin door lock.  

When he came back at night from ashore , he tried his lock it would NOT open.   All cadets in the dorm were pretending to sleep. There were 8 dorms for 250 cadets .   

So we hear our instructor ( slightly inebriated ) utter loudly this profound Punjaabi paraatha phaado rustic wisdom –

YAH TOH KISSI NEH KUCH KIYA HAI,    YAH TOH  KUCH HO GAYA HAI— APNE AAP TOH HO NAHIN SAKTA ..

( maybe somebody did something OR maybe something happened - BUT --this cant happen by itself)  

The cadets ( 30 of them ) pretending to sleep found it so funny, that all burst out laughing.

The cat was out of the bag and next morning the whole dorm paid the price,.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/US-keeps-India-China-and-Russia-on-intellectual-property-shame-list/articleshow/52013374.cms

THE WHITE MAN HAD NIL INVENTIONS AND DISCOVERIES , TILL HE INVADED INDIA

BEFORE THAT THE ANCIENT GREEKS STOLE FROM INDIA

DURING THE DARK AGES OF VATICAN MONOPOLY-- THE WHITE MAN LIFTED FROM TRANSLATED TO ARABIC ARAB KNOWLEDGE WHICH WE IN KERALA GAVE THEM IN RETURN FOR GOLD


http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/01/mansa-musa-king-of-mali-and-sri.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/12/perfect-six-pack-capt-ajit-vadakayil.html

capt ajit vadakayil
..


Pratyakṣa  means perception. 

It is of two types in Hindu texts: external and internal.    External perception is described as that arising from the interaction of five senses and worldly objects, while internal perception is described by this school as that of inner sense, the mind.

The ancient and medieval Indian texts identify four requirements for correct perception :-

Indriyarthasannikarsa (direct experience by one's sensory organ(s) with the object, whatever is being studied),

Avyapadesya (non-verbal; correct perception is not through hearsay, according to ancient Indian scholars, where one's sensory organ relies on accepting or rejecting someone else's perception),

Avyabhicara (does not wander; correct perception does not change, nor is it the result of deception because one's sensory organ or means of observation is drifting, defective, suspect)

Vyavasayatmaka (definite; correct perception excludes judgments of doubt, either because of one's failure to observe all the details, or because one is mixing inference with observation and observing what one wants to observe, or not observing what one does not want to observe

The internal perception concepts included pratibha (intuition)-

samanyalaksanapratyaksa (a form of induction from perceived specifics to a universal),

 jnanalaksanapratyaksa (a form of perception of prior processes and previous states of a 'topic of study' by observing its current state).

In Indian yoga, intuition is the single greatest tool to finding happiness .

"Intuition is soul guidance or the inner voice " wrote the great master Yogananda Paramahamsa. Intuition helps you stay in the present, like what is advocated in the Bhagavat Gita.

It has little to do with predicting the future. . Intuition is a gift of crisis--- It tells you the right thing to do when you don't have time to figure it all out.

Intuits are able to see possibilities and alternatives that aren’t immediately apparent. Your inner knowing comes from first your instincts, second your intellect, and third from your intuition. 

Intuition is not pseudo-science . It is an essential psychological function like thinking, feeling and sensing. The divining power of intuition comes from our inner self. It arises from very rapid processing of bits of information that are stored in our subconscious. 

Intuition thinks in terms of metaphor, feelings, pictures, and the spatial whole and doesn't fit neatly into the cause-and-effect model. Your intuition will not force you to do things that are truly wrong for yourself or other people in contradiction with the laws of the universe. Intuition is listening to the inner voice or heeding the promptings from within.

Intuition is a ability to cut through the thickness of surface reality . Intuition and confidence go hand in hand. Your sub-conscious which operates a dozen times faster than your conscious mind has picked up on signals that your conscious mind has not yet processed. 

We function through partial information, and intuition gives us an overview, a whole sense of things. Intuition acts like a bridge between your logical reasoning and the sum total of your experience-based knowledge.

Intuition is a knowing, a sensing that is beyond the conscious understanding — a gut feeling-- flashes of spontaneous thought that are done apparently without relating to facts or logic. Intuition is fast, based on pattern matching. Very few people are good in pattern matching

The divining power of intuition comes from our inner self-- very rapid processing of bits of information that are stored in our subconscious. We cannot command our gut feeling to use it at will. It just surfaces spontaneously when certain circumstances are present. Intuitive insights suddenly appear as ideas or feelings.

Intuition is now an EQ competency. It’s considered something necessary to successful living, and something to be respected and valued. Intuitive decisions are NOT guesswork . Intuition has an important role to play in decision making . Intuition is not limited to opinions but can encompass the ability to know valid solutions to problems.

Intuition usually shows up in the areas where you have passion and talent. By logic that we prove, by intuition we discover. Intuition is a sudden and inexplicable knowing. It lies at the roots of spontaneity, humor, creativity, inspiration, and even genius. 

Intuition has its own unique language for communicating with you through touch, sight, taste, sound, and smell. As you pay attention to your senses, you’ll begin to understand the “vocabulary” of your intuition.

Mental static and ego can get in the way of tapping into intuition. Intuition bubbles up from within and can be overwhelmed by old mental or emotional "tapes" . Intuition gone wild becomes “jumping to conclusions”. By going too far out on a limb , you risk misinterpreting the situation and start harming others. Intuition should not be overused.

Your brain is a complex tapestry of interacting neurons, all working together to provide you with insights that guide you through life. It’s complicated. So complicated that your conscious brain cannot keep up with everything it’s trying to tell you. 

So what exactly is intuition? 

It is the messages from your unconscious mind making contact with your consciousness. . The uncanny ability to detect patterns in the world around us, and to extrapolate larger truths . Use it always, never ignore it. 

Our instincts and intuition are more reliable in a decision making, than our conscious brain. . By listening to what our heart and soul tells us to do - and then doing it - we can take ourselves anywhere we have ever dreamed of going.

Your consciousness only uses a tiny proportion of your brainpower and your intuition accesses the residual power and communicates to your consciousness the bank of wisdom and knowledge it has available. 

This is done subtly through thoughts, feelings, sensations, images, sounds or any combination of them. Just as animals have a natural survival instinct so humans are born with the natural ability to be intuitive; your human instinct.

Traits often found in those with high intuitive intelligence include-- an awareness of one's personal value system, a healthy awareness of one's own feelings, an ability for self-direction and self-management, a powerful level of self-trust, a desire for innovation, a refined knowledge of one's strengths and weaknesses, and a high degree of self-regard and freedom. 

Never ignore the inner spark , the gut feeling, the sixth sense or hunch that ignites vision and leads you to success. Intuitive insights motivate us to grow closer to the creative source, thereby igniting our own creative spark and expression, which is the essence of our true self. 

When you feel excited about something, that's a hint about what to pursue. Decisions are made in the mind—choices are made in the gut.  Choices come from your essence and attunement to your higher self.

Being in the zone is a state of mind—where you are free of thinking and negative emotions and in A FEELING MODE. The less you think, the more you achieve—for you own your destiny.

GENIUSES ARE ORDINARY PEOPLE WHO CAN MAKE CONSCIOUS THEIR UNCONSCIOUS PERCEPTIONS. 

REMEMBER , EVERYTHING YOU DO WELL WITHOUT AWARENESS ,IS DONE BY THE SUBCONSCIOUS.

When the left and right lobe of the brain works in harmony, the unleashed mysterious K force can made you achieve the extraordinary . Our intuition is like the weather vane, pointing us in the right direction. It does not take your decisions. 

Any idea or thought you yourself accept as true will be taken as a command by the subconscious mind, as it cannot distinguish between dreams and reality . You can program or harness or fool the subconscious mind by imagining, unrestrained by left lobe censorship and conventional inhibitions .

Never squelch the hunches and perceptions spewed by your subconscious. Do not think inwards, think in feelings and images— if possible using all 5 senses—like texture , smells etc. 

Any problem if approached from a unpredictable angle can give unexpected creative results. This is called lateral thinking. The subconscious responds to stimuli, not pressure.

We have heard athletes describe the phenomenon of BEING IN THE ZONE.  The frontal lobe is that part of the brain that allows us to be in the PRESENT MOMENT.

Arjun saw only the eye of the fish before his shot the arrow to win princess Draupadi —at that time the activity in the neocortex ceases and there is no thinking. The cerebellum takes over at that point. When the frontal lobe is activated you have focus, clarity, decisiveness, concentration, pro activeness and individuality.

We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then is not an action, but  a habit.  TT players, high board divers –let the body do the work and tell the minds to FO. 

When the mind has repeatedly instructed the body to perform an action, the body will begin to remember the action better than the thinking brain. Communication between cells is faster than the speed of light. Nerve cells are called neurons.

The face of a high board diver in the Olympics just before the jump for the gold medal --is the face of a human being in the zone. The brain has surrendered to the body. 

CIVILISATION HAS ADVANCED BY EXTENDING THE NUMBER OF IMPORTANT OPERATIONS WHICH WE CAN PERFORM WITHOUT THINKING ABOUT THEM. 

Do not think about clutch , brake and accelerator pedals--just drive.   Let your fingers fly on the laptop keyboard .


Vedanta says that perception that does not require the possession of concepts when you are spiritually evolved. 

Maharishis with exploded consciousness went beyond the quantum screen where the 5 human senses do NOT take a role.  

It was impossible to fool a maharishi by illusions  or magic tricks .  This is beyond the shallow intellect of white men.


In 4000 BC, when Arjun of Mahabharata shot an arrow into the red ruby eye of a unsteady floating magnetic compass revolving fish overhead, by looking at its reflection into a pool ripple at the bottom, ( to win the hand of princess Draupadi ) it was a supreme test of consciousness. 


You may be aware that your animal or bird pets cannot see themselves in the mirror.  Only a couple of animals like elephants, dolphins and bonobos can see themselves in a mirror.


My character has been moulded by a CLASSIC MASTERPIECE Hollywood movie—MY COUSIN VINNY. I doubt if such a great movie can be ever made again . It was a low budget movie of 11 million USD.

Two young New Yorker boys are charged with man slaughter in hilly billy rural Ala- fuckin' -Bama  -- for a crime they never did.    

Joe Pesci , who has never contested a case , is a lawyer related to one of the boys.  He meets them in jail and asked them " Did you kill the store clerk?".

When the boys said NO!--he tells them ( to this effect ) .

" -- if you have not done the crime, then the prosecution will try to show that you did it.  Their case is like a building which they will try to show the judge and jury as real and solid -- while actually it is just a facade .    I am smart enough to expose the illusion from the right angle and perspective "

This is the meaning of PERCEPTION , ladies and gentlemen!



SHE GIVES CONFIDENT BULL -   
CALIBRATED TO BE DEAD ON BALLS ACCURATE !!



On chemical tankers our lives depend on "dead on balls" CALIBRATION


The Vedic philosophy of perception deals extensively with exteroception. The ancient Indians seers wrote down that there is a huge world beyond the quantum screen , which our 5 squelched senses of narrow bandwidth cannot detect.

Perception in ancient India was powered by amazing flora and fauna, the types of which are NOT available anywhere else on the planet.


When my ship had to escape from this planet’s worst storm, my perception was rooted in ancient Indian Panchatantra.   There are many who will teach stuff to others but will never apply it on themselves , because they do NOT have the balls.


When you look at a person you see only his physical body.   A Maharishi can see 7 extra  layers or auras surrounding it.   He also knows after you die which astral layer your soul ( YOU ) will be parked before the next re-induction , determined by you KARMIC BAGGAGE. 
A Maharishi reading the auras at this level may pick up thoughts that are not conscious to the person being read but that are unconsciously influencing his behavior.   he can pick up messages about future events that will impact the person being read. This is because on a etheric level, events in the future already exist. The feeling of being pushed or pulled by fate is also the influence of the higher cosmic forces.

The 3 higher spiritual auras are the seat of the higher self. The higher self or super conscious is our personal link between visible and invisible universe.  It communicates and interrelates with higher cosmic consciousness.

The higher self transmits messages to the subconscious mind in the form of dreams, intuition and psychic insight. The subconscious then communicates these to your conscious mind through images, thoughts and feelings. Dreams are symbolic and need interpretation by a man of perception.
he auras contain seven chakras . The crown chakra is the point of access to the spiritual universe. The Chakras are traditionally considered the "nervous system" of the metaphysical body, since it is through them that life energies are received, processed, and transmitted, and through them that body, mind, and spirit are linked together into one holistic system. The energy-information frequencies found in the Aura are identical to those found in the Chakra channels

The chakras are connected to each other through etheric channels. Physical, emotional, mental and spiritual ailments can be correlated with energy blocks or dysfunctions within the chakras. Balancing the chakra through psychic healing allows the appropriate flow of energy to a chakra to reestablish health on each level.

Logical left brain thinking is held in high esteem by the western society.you can overturn this and pay attention to your hunches and grow your clairvoyance. The spirit world exists in a dimension of higher vibration. 

A medium forms a link or channel , a route of communication with those who have passed to the other side. He does so by raising his vibration or frequency to a point where the link can be formed. As this same time the spirits lower their vibration.  They communicate the energies through pictures , feelings, sounds and thoughts.  The medium interprets these through his broadened sense bands.

The universe cannot distinguish between a positive and negative thought.  A negative thought will bring a negative manifestation towards you. Karma is the law of cause and effect.

When you use psychic power you tap into the level of the universe, where individuality does not exist. At this level each of us is a part of a universal and cosmic consciousness where we are connected as though held together by invisible threads. This interconnectedness means that every thing we do or think affects everything and everyone else.

Everything is made out of energy. What appears to be solid is made up of vibrating particles, atoms and molecules. This includes human beings. According to psychic theory all the beings that live in the universe are made up of vibrating energies. The higher and faster the frequency, the higher the plane of the universe.

Psychic development will teach you how to raise your vibration or lower it at will.

Time and space are features in the material world , not the invisible world.  There the present past and future are all occurring right now. This means when you contact the higher realms you can tap into past lives or the future.

By learning to project your will and change your vibration through altering the state of your consciousness , you will begin to develop psychic powers.

All psychic exercises require you to alter your state of consciousness to reach ALPHA ( 7  Hz )  state. It is a light trance state achieved by meditation. Your breathing slows down, you cease to notice noise, and visual distractions.  You must be in the NOW.

Self hypnosis is a form of meditation in which the mind is stilled to reach an altered state of consciousness.

Gold colour can balance disturbed energy. Indian did not start wearing gold , quartz and diamonds  for sheer investment.

Dark spots in the aura may indicate illness. Aura’s energy-information can be used to accurately analyze a patient’s psychological and emotional states. Each part and level of the human Aura is related to different aspects of the person's psychology or physical health, and reveals an interaction of both physical and mental factors.

When you touch something you implant your psychic imprint on it like a magnetic recording on a tape. By holding the object and tuning in through your ESP you can pick up these subtle vibrations. Be careful of inherited jewellery especially if it contains gem stones and crystals, which pick up magnetic imprints very easily.

Every building has its own energy. Having ill, mentally unstable or negative people in a home can leave a residual energy in the building.   Hindus do Ganapati Homam to neutralize the negative residual energy when they move to second hand homes.  This is NOT superstition.  

Bursting firecrackers at the end of Thrissur Pooram is NOT superstition or entertainment, like New Year fireworks .

A healer is only a medium—or a bridge between two worlds. If he closes down the channel he has no innate ability. Healers generate electrical voltages >60 V during healing sessions --as measured by electrometers.

Russian inventor Semyon Davidovich Kirlian,  experimented with the qualities and meanings of Auras using photography and electrofield imaging.


Maharishis do NOT need Kirlean cameras.


EEG (electroencephalogram) technology analyses and monitors mental activity entirely by electromagnetic principles.  Science also has the  electrocardiogram (EKG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the electromyogram (EMG).

We exist in a sea of various EM waves that are continuously interacting and interfering with each other. Living beings transmit EM waves with numerous frequencies and strengths, and these interact with EM waves traveling throughout our environments that have multiple frequencies and strengths.


The practical result is a “boundary layer” of interaction between the person and the environment, in which waves are constructively and destructively interfering to various degrees, until  RESONANCE is achieved, causing an amplification of the vibrations  much the same way that constructive interference occurs with waves.


The result can be that the increase in vibration reduces the object’s structural stability – hence, the breaking of a glass when a soprano singer hits a high enough note to match the fundamental frequency or a harmonic frequency of the glass.


Psychic ability is the natural extension of intuition. Aura is a magnetic energy and is a protective shield.`. All thoughts , emotions and feelings are contained in the aura and sent out to the universe. All 7 chakras have their own frequencies of resonant vibration. Clairsentient people are sensitive to energy.

All have psychic power- but it remains repressed. The ordinary man ignores his intuition in favour of commonsense—and so in the course of time untuition stops manifesting clearly. The psychic is a supersensitive soul. He can figure out the nuances of intuition. 

For him intuition works at his beck and call in a clear way.. he does not need to go into a trance or even meditate. He will answer all your questions effortlessly. A true psychic's intuition can spot falsehood immediately.  His intuition ecompasses space and time.

A reiki practitioner, projects “white light” ( SCALAR ENERGY ) toward a person with a “disharmonious” energy field. Depending on the experience of the healer and the strength (intent) of the projection, the white light, which is comprised of the theoretical highest frequency (and strength) will entrain the weaker EM field of the patient, eventually inducing resonance to occur, which strengthens the patient’s own EM field. 

The movement of blood through the circulatory system is another way that EM fields are produced.  Each cell in our bodies is a transmitting antenna. Our DNA is the master tuning fork of our body.

Newton's ideas of absolute space and time and Einstein's ideas of relative time and space, are replaced by a truer picture by true psychics, for whom the universe exists in a vast here --where HERE represents all points of space and time at a single instant. In the quantum world of the zero point field, subatomic particles exist in a state of all potential unless observed, when it gets frozen down to a single state.

Psychic remote viewers can see information encoded in quantum fluctuation. On the subatomic level MIND IS OVER MATTER.  We create time and space on the surface of our retinas. Nothing in this universe exists as an actual thing independently of our perception of it.

WHEN I WANT TO HAVE FUN, I  READ WESTERN BOOKS ON PHILOSOPHY AND EPISTEMOLOGY -- THEIR INCREDIBLY SHALLOW MINDS MAKE ME LAUGH .

Epistemology is the branch of philosophy that studies the nature, acquisition, and validation of knowledge. The epistemology of perception matches patterns and fills gaps. All the obligatory duties of the Hindu owe their allegiance to the Vedas.  

They draw forth the thought of successive generations of Maharshi seers -- spiritual giants who were ultimate in epistemology. Vedic texts include hymns, liturgical instructions, and philosophical courses. 

The ancient Maharishi passed on Vedanta whose theories deal with puzzles about the source, nature, foundation, scope, validity and limits of human knowledge. The shallow western mind ( who come to India for life's answers ) can never come to grips with such profound wisdom.

SHELDON POLLOCK , A HALF WIT AND A SIDEKICK OF COCKEYED NR NARAYANA MURTHY THINKS VEDAS ARE MERE EXPRESSIONS –

HEY, WHY NOT BURPS AND FARTS LIKE THE HUMPLESS COW ?

 Vedas show how ancient rishis experienced the divine reality and how they responded with exuberant joy, confidence and a feeling of intimacy. This literature is not rustic or primitive but highly developed in its literary form, in its intellectual insight, and in its questioning attitude. The glory of this vast literature is its imaginative and emotional qualities.

The Maharishis were experts in Metaphysics to determine the real nature of things—to determine the meaning, structure, and principles of whatever is in so far as it is-- with reality as a whole. 

It is a call to recognize the existence and overwhelming importance of a set of higher realities that ordinary men could not deduce--the science of ultimate reality , as opposed to appearance or the contrast between appearance and reality .

The Vedic metaphysician was a sort of super scientist, unlimited in his curiosity and gifted with a capacity for putting together other people's findings with a skill and imagination that none of them individually commands. He can refute by debate, through a method for systematic evaluation of definitions

The Indian rishis were the first to engage their great minds in dialectics in philosophy—the  method of investigating the nature of truth by the criticism of initial concepts and hypotheses—all in the most peaceful natural surroundings  .

The ancient Indian Vedic dialectic is based on a dialogue between two or more rishis , master or student - people who may hold differing views, yet wish to pursue truth by seeking agreement with one another.

This is in contrast to debate, in which two or more people hold differing views and wish to persuade or prove one another wrong (and thus a jury or judge is needed to decide the matter), or rhetoric, which is a relatively long monologue oration conducted by a single stupid person.

THE PRIME TIME DEBATE --  NAY FISH MARKET SCREAMING ,  CONDUCTED BY A COCAINE SORTING ORANGUTAN IS NOT VEDIC DIALECTIC.

From the Vedas evolved the Upanishads, whose copious enquiries into the nature of man, the Universe, and God, strike the intelligent and high IQ modern scientific mind with speechless wonder.

Vedas are verses written in the most digitally perfect language in the world, Sanskrit, with a scientific alphabet and perfected vocabulary, and a grammar which is itself a great work of art.

The Vedic seers , propounded six systems of philosophy explaining man, universe, and God, before which Aristotle's and Plato's theories look like juvenile endeavors. They stole and patented , but could NOT get the essense .

ALMOST EVERY PIECE OF WESTERN PHILOSOPY ( THOUGH STOLEN ) IS BULLSHIT FROM MEDIOCRE MINDS – SO SAYS CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL

The seers discovered the Earth's rotatory and revolutionary motions, and studied the courses of constellations and stars, and founded the twin sciences of astronomy and astrology.  These seers were by no means dreamers – their great minds were fractal and they could do 4D geometry inside their heads .

Watch the Hollywood movie , about Ramanujan, and you will notice how they murdered a great mind ( at par with Tesla ) and brought it down to the level of a Stephen Hawking.



YOU WILL NOTICE THAT AFTER PLATO, PYTHAGORAS, ARISTOTLE AND SOCRATES THE GREEK MINDS WENT PHUTT . .   

KODUNGALLUR UNIVERSITY FROM WHERE THEY STOLE AND PATENTED IN OWN NAMES  , TOOK A DIM VIEW TO PLAIGIARISED KNOWLEDGE ,  MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD .  

The sages who wrote the originals  did not care to leave their names;  the truths they set down were eternal, and the identity of those who arranged the words irrelevant.

Even today the white man’s navigation books terms LONGITUDE OF THE SUN ON THE CELESTIAL SPHERE as HOUR ANGLE ARIES –  when it should be HOUR ANGLE PISCES.

The white man lifted navigation from the Kerala school of navigation—and did NOT understand precession ( Vishnu Nabhi lotus )


I ask NR Narayana Murthy ( I dont care for this man ) to read the Nasadiya Sukta and decide for himself if Vedas are FARTS or BURPS –or MERE EXPRESSIONS


Never mind what Wikipedia writes— Vedas have NO authors--leave alone females writing Vedas.   

Seers just picked it off Akashic ether as longitudinal sound waves-  Sanskrit verses perfect in meter .

These are not shepherds’ verses as ridiculed by jealous Vatican-  but an amazing encyclopedia of the most mind boggling philosophy of thought. All the obligatory duties of the Hindu owe their allegiance to the Vedas.

The white historian writes that contemporaries Buddha ( died 483 BC )  and Maharvira ( died 527 BC) shunned the Vedas.

Sorry, this duplicate DUO are NOT the original Buddha ( 1900 BC )  or the original Mahavira, the 24th Thirthankara  (4500 BC) 


The whole of the West tried even to prove that Aryan invasion happened inwards, so that they could claim credit for writing the Vedas.    Now since the DNA age has nailed their foul LIE, they now use people like SHELDON POLLOCK to say that Vedas are MERE EXPRESSIONS

Our modern culture is oriented towards reducing one’s self awareness rather than expanding it. The Vedic revelations are so cosmic that they approach more closely the findings of modern quantum physics and astronomy than the pious pronouncements of rabid preachers. 

The rishis made claims so cosmic that even modern physics is only catching up with them and realizing, after every scientific breakthrough, that the ancients were there long before them. The Vedas  are the world's oldest intellectual legacies—30 millenniums on oral route before being penned down 7000 years ago.

Vedas record the spiritual experiences of souls strongly endowed with the sense for reality. They are held to be authoritative on the ground that they express the experiences of the experts in the field of religion. 

The Vedas bring together different ways in which the religious-minded of that era experienced reality and describe the general principles of religious knowledge and growth. The experiences themselves are of a varied character, so their records are many-sided (visvatomukham) or 'suggestive of many interpretations' (anekarthatam).

Vedic hymns are used today at Hindu wedding ceremonies, and temple and school prayers  in an astonishing example of continuous tradition. The feat of memorizing and handing down a vast amount of oral literature is a hallmark of Hinduism. It would not have been handed down if even one generation asked WHAT NONSENSE IS ALL THIS?

While the Vedas look outward in reverence and awe of the phenomenal world, the Upanishads look inward,  finding the powers of nature only an expression of the more awe-inspiring powers of human consciousness. Vedas and Upanishads thus work in a Tamas Rajas ( Yin Yang ) way.

Vedanta taught the technique of self-development. The ultimate destiny of man is to discover within himself the true Self as the changeless behind the changing, the eternal behind the ephemeral, and the infinite behind the finite. Free from theology and dogma, Vedanta remains the primary source of inspiration and guidance for millions of Hindus and non-Hindus alike.

The Upanishads are the concluding portions of the Vedas and the teachings based on them is called Vedanta. The Upanishads focus on philosophical questions such as the purpose of life, origin of the universe, concepts of time, space and matter, as well as concepts of atman, Brahman, maya, immortality, rebirth, karma, and the world.

In the Indian tradition, the guru would be seated under a tree, near a river or lake, and one or more disciples would cluster around him to learnt he wisdom. They are the dialogues between guru and sisya—the teacher and student.

These teachers and students are NOT like the stupid COMMIE professors and students of JNU.
The Upanishads tell us that there is a Reality underlying life which rituals cannot reach, next to which the things we see and touch in everyday life are shadows. 

They teach that this Reality is the essence of every created thing, and the same Reality is our real Self so that each of us is one with the power that created and sustains the universe. The Upanishads are not philosophy but are darshanas, “something seen” and therefore to be realized.

The ancient Maharshis understood the staggering scale of the divine play. Many centuries later the scientific mind still boggles at the scale of creation which makes infinity intelligible.

Science, in its most advanced stage, is closer to Vedanta than ever before. The intuition of Indian mystics led them to understand the multidimensional reality and of space-time continuum which is the basis of the modern theory of relativity.

The Upanishads are summits of thought on mankind and the universe, designed to push human ideas to their very limit and beyond. They give us both spiritual vision and philosophical argument, and it is by a strictly personal effort that one can reach the truth.

In the Upanishads we get a glimpse into the workings of the minds of the great Indian thinkers who were unhampered by the tyranny of religious dogma, political authority, pressure of public opinion, seeking truth with single-minded devotion,  rare in the history of thought.

THIS TYPE OF LOFTY THINKING CANNOT BE DONE BY MOOLADHARA LEVEL HOMOSEXUALS LIKE PLATO, ARISTOTLE AND SOCRATES WHO NEED TO PUT THEIR PRICKS INTO ANOTHER MANs ASSHOLE



Anumaṇa means inference -- an exact process of logical deduction

Poonam Pandey JI’s baby is in bed upstairs.  She hears a bang and crying. She can infer that her baby fell out of bed.
A woman walks into a store soaking wet and it is raining. It can be inferred that she does not have an umbrella.
Watching a man run towards the gate at the airport, one can infer that he is running late for his flight.

You triangulate a truth from one or more observations and previous truths by applying reason.  The method of inference has three steps:   pratijna (hypothesis),  hetu (a reason), and drshtanta (examples).

The hypothesis is in two steps :  sadhya (that idea which needs to proven or disproven) and paksha (the object on which the sadhya is predicated).

The inference is conditionally true if sapaksha (positive examples as evidence) are present, and if vipaksha (negative examples as counter-evidence) are absent.

Vedic epistemology requires Vyapti - the requirement that the hetu (reason) must necessarily and separately account for the inference in "all" cases, in both sapaksha and vipaksha.

A conditionally proven hypothesis is called a nigamana (conclusion).

Anumana can also be classified into 3 types:-

Pūrvavat (inferring an unperceived effect from a perceived cause),
Śeṣavat (inferring an unperceived cause from a perceived effect) and

Sāmānyatodṛṣṭa (when inference is not based on causation but on uniformity of co-existence). 


The word Anu means “to follow” and Maanam means “to gauge, guess or infer”.

Anumāna can be of two types – inference for oneself (Svārthānumāna, where one does not need any formal procedure, and at the most the last three of their 5 steps), and inference for others (Parāthānumāna, which requires a systematic methodology of 5 steps).

By inductive inference we open doors to new knowledge .   Anumana Pramana is the act of inferring i.e. knowledge of unknown from the known facts.   It is  indirect knowledge based on reasoning.

Anumana is a logical conclusion based on reasoning and prior perception.
 It is of three types & is related to the three times.
a) Inference of the cause from the effect -relates to past ( retrospective study)
b) Inference of the effect from the cause – relates to future (  prospective study design )
c) The commonly observed events at present.   (Time prevalence study)


Anumana or Inference helps in establishing correlation between two factors or to establish cause-effect relationship between two variables.   Anumana (Inference) is used extensively   as means to acquire knowledge.    Various  causes of non-perceptibility can create  hurdles in direct perception.  In this field,  Anumana helps in acquiring knowledge.

Anumana Pramana plays a vital role in interpretation of results. Interpretation refers to the task of drawing inferences from the collected facts after an analytical or experimental study. It is search for broader meaning of research findings. Generalization of results is based on inference only.

Anumana Pramana is of two types –
a)  for one’s own self  i.e.Swarthanumana
b) to provide knowledge to others  i.e.Pararthanumana


Swarthanumana (Inference for one self) is  the cause of deduction of logical reference  in one’s own mind.   For this; one should have inquisitiveness or curiosity.     As it is said; inquisitiveness is the mother of all knowledge.    A person with curious & questioning attitude will search for truth in a scientific manner and by applying logical process of reasoning he will reach to valid conclusion.

Pararthanumana  (Demonstrative inference) –   A person after getting inferential knowledge; it should be demonstrated to others by Panchavayavi vakya ( 5 components of reasoning), it is known as Pararthanumana.

Panchavayavi Vakya contains:
a) Pratidnya (Proposition)
b) Hetu (Reason or Cause)
c) Udaharana (Example)
d) Upanaya (Justification)
e) Nigamana (Conclusion)

Pararthanumana is an important means through which the knowledge recognized by one person is distributed to others.   This can be correlated with report writing according to process of research.   The purpose of research is not well versed unless the findings are made known to others.   Research results must invariably enter the general store of knowledge.

The epistemology of logic focuses on issues concerning the normative status of our beliefs about logical truth and logical validity. 

In Ayurveda brilliant diagnosis was done by inference.


One the ship I used Anumana .

I TOLD MY SHORE BOSSES “FUCK OFF’ , WHEN THEY ORDERED ME TO DO RISKY THINGS. 

I MADE MY OWN DYNAMIC RISK ASSESSMENT ROOTED IN ANUMANA , IN DAYS WHEN NOBODY HEARD OF SUCH A TERM  .


I TOLD MY SHORE BOSSES “FUCK OFF”   WHEN THEY ORDERED ME TO FOLLOW A PEA BRAINED PLANNED MAINTENANCE.

I SENT THEM MY OWN PRIORITISED  PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE ROOTED IN ANUMANA—  AGAIN IN DAYS WHEN NOBODY HEARD SUCH A TERM .



Below: This HALF WIT-- I have trashed -- it takes a Capt Ajit Vadakayil to do it !



Inferences are not achieved with mathematical rigor.   


Inference is a conscious mental process by which we reach a conclusion based on specific evidence. 

Inferences are the stock and trade of detectives examining clues, of doctors diagnosing diseases, and of car mechanics repairing engine problems. We infer motives, purpose, and intentions.

Inference is part of, being human. We engage in inference every day. We interpret actions to be examples of behavior characteristics, intents, or expressions of particular feelings.  
  
But hey today , we do NOT infer that  evidence in a text is authoritative when it is attributed to a PEER REVIEWED Jewish scholar in the field.

The more evidence we have before us, and the more carefully we reason, the more valid our inferences.   

There is an old joke about an optimistic kid that is left in a room full to the brim with horse shit. The people who left him there return about an hour later, and to their surprise, they find the boy happily digging through the shit and ask “Hey Boy! What are you doing?,” to which the boy responds: “With all this shit I figured ( inferred ) there’s got to be a pony in here somewhere.”

Why does USA welcome Indian doctors? Because they have infer better and provide better diagnosis than white doctors . Once diagnosis is done even an IDIOT or a nurse can treat the patient.



Upamaṇa means analogy.

Greek philosophers Plato , Socrates and Aristotle who stole philosophy material from Kodungallur University and patented it in their own names, used mindless broad spectrum  analogy.  

These half wits saw analogy as a shared abstraction  .

Analogies should also make those abstractions easier to understand .  A similarity between like features of two things, on which a comparison may be based:  the analogy between the heart and a pump.

Analogy is NOT a simile or a metaphor

A metaphor is a figure of speech that uses one thing to mean another and makes a comparison between the two.  The key words here are “one thing to mean another.”

So, when someone says “He’s become a shell of a man,” we know not to take this literally, even though it’s stated directly as if this person had actually lost his internal substance.

A simile compares two different things in order to create a new meaning.

In this case, we are made explicitly aware that a comparison is being made due to the use of “like” or “as” (He’s like a shell of a man).

A simile is a figure of speech that compares two things that are alike in some way. To help you identify a simile versus a metaphor, know that the words “like” or “as” are typically used in a simile.

Well-known similes are:

as busy as a bee
as black as coal
as blind as a bat

Writers, poets, and songwriters make use of similes often to add depth and emphasize what they are trying to convey to the reader or listener

They fought like cats and dogs.
He is as strong as an ox.
That guy is as nutty as a fruitcake.
As cool as a cucumber
As tough as nails

An analogy is comparable to metaphor and simile in that it shows how two different things are similar, but it’s a bit more complex.   Rather than a figure of speech, an analogy is more of a conscious logical argument.

The presenter of an analogy will often demonstrate how two things are alike by pointing out shared characteristics, with the goal of showing that if two things are similar in some ways, they are similar in other ways as well.

A metaphor carries so much more power than a simile, because it’s direct. Using “like” or “as” to make an open comparison will often diminish the vivid visual you’re trying to paint in the reader’s mind.    Likewise, a spot-on metaphor will spark instant understanding for a reader, without the elaboration that an analogy requires.

Few metaphors-
I was lost in a sea of nameless faces.
The computer in the classroom was an old dinosaur.
The teacher planted the seeds of wisdom..
In capitalism, money is the life blood of society.
This job is the cancer of my dreams and aspirations.

Everything you touch turns to fuckin’ shit

Analogy is a cognitive process of transferring information or meaning from a particular subject (the analogue or source) to another (the target), or a linguistic expression corresponding to such a process.

In a narrower sense, analogy is an inference or an argument from one particular to another particular, as opposed to deduction, induction, and abduction, where at least one of the premises or the conclusion is general.

Analogy plays a significant role in problem solving such as, decision making, perception, memory, creativity, emotion, explanation, and communication.


Sometimes words and phrases can prove inept in conveying the exact depth of our expression. When someone presents a concept or an idea, which is contrasted with a similar concept, then the central idea becomes more apparent   

Analogy also spices up the sentence preventing it from getting monotonous. That is why analogy has been extensively used in rhetoric.

Analogy is a figure of speech that is used to make a concept or an idea clearer to the listener. An analogy creates a visual representation of the concept, making it easier to grasp the subject matter. So, when you are at a loss on how to explain something, then simply compare it with another relative concept. 

Few analogies -
The relationship between them began to thaw.
He is like a rock.
I feel like a fish out of water.
There are hajaaar fish in the sea.
What a general is to an army, a CEO is to a company.

Sword is the weapon of a warrior,  pen is the weapon of a writer.

Specific analogical language comprises exemplification, comparisons, metaphors, similes, allegories, and parables

 Analogy is important not only in ordinary language and common sense (where proverbs and idioms give many examples of its application)

The subject of comparison is formally called upameyam, the object of comparison is called upamanam, while the attributes are identified as samanya. 

In various ancient  texts of Hinduism, 32 types of Upanama and their value in epistemology are debated.   The word Upa means similarity and Maanam means to cognitively gauge.

There are main three characteristics of Upamana; i.e,
1. In Saharmaya- Upamana (when) the description of an unknown object given in terms of its similarity to a well known object by some authoritative person.   A class concept to certain facts on the basis of some observed similarity between them and other known facts are applies here. The concept is given to us and the facts to which it applied are selected by us.

2. In Vaidharmaya-Upamana the objects denoted by a word are described in terms of their contrast or dissimilarity to some well known objects of experience. This negative description enables a man to recognize certain objects as denoted by a word or as belonging to a certain class in so far as he finds that they fit in the given description.

3. In Dharmamatra-Upamana the object denoted by a name is described in terms of its particular attributes to any combination of attributes which is particular to it. This description enables us to discriminate between the things denoted by the name from all other things and consequently apply the name to just that class of things.


One thing common to all cases of upamana is the knowledge of the denotative relations, between a word and a certain class of objects. Thus upamana is a process of reasoning by which we know that a  word denotes a certain class of objects on the basis of some authoritative statement.

Upamana is the source of our knowledge of the relation between a name and things so named or between a word and its denotation (sanjnasanjnisambandha).

 Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the origins, structure, methods, and validity of knowledge. In order to theorize about the nature of knowledge, epistemologists have often used analogies


Epistemological theories can be classified as either foundational or coherentist. Foundational theories attempt to ground knowledge in a solid base such as sense experience (empiricism) or a priori reasoning (rationalism).

In contrast, coherentists argue that there are no foundations for our beliefs, whose justification derives from how well they fit together with each other. Many of the most influential foundationalists and coherentists have expounded and defended their theories using suggestive metaphors and analogies.


In sum, the uses of metaphor and analogy in epistemology and philosophy in general are much the same as their uses in science. Analogy is a powerful mode of thought that is indispensable in the formation, development, evaluation, and exposition of theories, in philosophy as well as science.


Like science, philosophy is primarily theory development, not poetry or rhetoric, even though rhetoric and even poetry can sometimes be displayed in both fields. 



Philosophy is not the queen, handmaiden, or under-laborer of the sciences, but rather a partner in a collaborative endeavor to understand and improve the world.

Below: A popular question for orals exams --ASSUMPTIONS SHALL NOT BE BASED ON SCANTY INFORMATION



Arthapatti means postulation.

THE COLLEGIUM JUDGES OF INDIA MUST BE TRAINED IN VEDIC ARTHAPATTI --  

THEY RELY TOO MUCH ON " OBJECTIVE  EVIDENCE " GIVEN IN COURT BY SOLD OUT FAKE WITNESSES  , PICKED OUT OF THIN AIR .  

FOREIGN FUNDED TROJAN HORSE NGOs HAVE ALLOWED NAXALS AND CRIMINALS TO GET AWAY .

TODAY A WHORE CAN COMPLAIN THAT YOU WINKED AT HER AND PUT YOU IN JAIL


Arthapatti is knowledge arrived at by circumstantial implication. Proof of facts offered as evidence from which other facts are to be inferred (contrasted with direct evidence ).

It is about derivation from circumstances - indirect evidence that tends to establish a conclusion by inference.  It is statement that is agreed by everyone to self evident and hence be correct.

This is useful for creating proofs in mathematics and science, and postulates are often the basic truth of a much larger theory or law.

Arthapatti is a fundamental principle, a  prerequisite,  a basic principle. from which a further idea is formed or developed example of a postulate.  A line can be drawn between two points.

By the way Euclid ( 300 BC ).of Alexandria is called the father of Geometry studied in the Kerala school of Math.   

Whatever Euclid has written , 100% is stolen from India  and patented in his name .

I ask –  is there a geometry more complicated on this planet than the Sri Yantra which is found in our ancient temples ?  

Mind you this geometry is in 2D for idiots and 3D for the cerebral.




Long ago a tuft named Vinod Dua told Ram Jethmalani on TV — all you have is circumstantial evidence.    This is NOT enough for courts.   We know you have been to Zurich, and this can mean that you have a bank account there. We the media will NOT accept your arguments.  

I am a trained journalist like you are a trained lawyer.  

Ram Jethmalani just shut him up with one sentence “ If you are my judge I will never win any case!”

In criminal cases, "eyewitness" ("I saw Poonam Pandey JI  shoot Sunny Leone JI") type evidence is often lacking and may be unreliable, so circumstantial evidence becomes essential.

Prior threats to the victim, fingerprints found at the scene of the crime, ownership of the murder weapon, and the accused being seen in the neighborhood, certainly point to the suspect as being the killer, but each bit of evidence is circumstantial.

In criminal law, the inference is made by the trier of fact in order to support the truth of an assertion (of guilt or absence of guilt).

Circumstantial evidence is used in civil courts to establish or refute liability.. Forensic analysis of skid marks can frequently allow a reconstruction of the accident.   By measuring the length of such marks and using dynamic analysis of the car and road conditions at the time of the accident, it may be found that a driver underestimated his or her speed. 

Circumstantial evidence is used in criminal courts to establish guilt or innocence through reasoning.

Most criminals try to avoid generating direct evidence.  No criminal admits  to a guilt.   Hence the prosecution usually must resort to circumstantial evidence to prove guilt and that the crime was deliberate , NOT an accident.
.
 One example of circumstantial evidence is the behavior of a person around the time of an alleged offense. If someone was charged with theft of money and was then seen in a shopping spree purchasing expensive items, the shopping spree might be circumstantial evidence of the individual's guilt.  

Say. you go  to a slum hovel and you find 30 broken gold chains and 40 empty expensive mens wallets hidden under a pot.

Other examples of circumstantial evidence are fingerprint, blood analysis or DNA analysis of the evidence found at the scene of a crime..    Owing to developments in forensic methods, old undecided cases (or cold cases) are frequently resolved.

The Indian judiciary is NOT yet mature enough to understand that live witnesses can lie or be bought. 

DURING GUJARAT RIOTS PAID WITNESS ( BROUGHT OUT OF THIN AIR ) TESTIFIED THAT THEY SAW WITH THEIR OWN EYES , A CURVED KNIFE PUT INTO A PREGNANT MUSLIM WOMANs VAGINA AND HER UTERUS WITH FETUS WAS REMOVED . 

NONE OF THEM COULD EVEN DESCRIBE THE PLACE WHERE THE CRIME WAS DONE OR WHAT THE WOMAN LOOKED LIKE OR WHAT SHE WORE.

A popular misconception is that circumstantial evidence is less valid or less important than direct evidence.

Direct evidence is popularly, but mistakenly, considered more powerful.

Many successful criminal prosecutions rely largely or entirely on circumstantial evidence, and civil charges are frequently based on circumstantial or indirect evidence.  

Circumstantial evidence can be, and often is much more powerful than direct evidence.    Indeed, the common metaphor for the strongest possible evidence in any case—the "smoking gun"—is an example of proof based on circumstantial evidence.

Similarly, fingerprint evidence, videotapes, sound recordings, photographs, hidden video cams . and many other examples of physical evidence that support the drawing of an inference, i.e., circumstantial evidence, are considered very strong possible evidence.

In practice, circumstantial evidence can have an advantage over direct evidence in that it can come from multiple sources that check and reinforce each other.     Eyewitness testimony can be inaccurate or false  at times,  strong circumstantial evidence can provide a more reliable basis for a verdict.

In cases where one conclusion implies a defendant's guilt and another his innocence, the "benefit of the doubt" principle would apply.  

Circumstantial Evidence is  indirect evidence.. The party offering circumstantial evidence argues that this series of facts, by reason and experience, is so closely associated with the fact to be proved that the fact to be proved may be inferred simply from the existence of the circumstantial evidence.

The following examples illustrate the difference between direct and circumstantial evidence:-- 

If  Dick testifies that he saw Prick raise a gun and fire it at Mary and that Mary then fell to the ground,  Dick’s testimony is direct evidence that Prick shot Mary.   

If, however, Dick testifies that he saw Prick and Mary go into another room and that he heard Prick say to Mary that he was going to shoot her, heard a shot, and saw Prick leave the room with a smoking gun, then Dick’s testimony is circumstantial evidence from which it can be inferred that Prick shot Mary. 

The judge must determine whether John's testimony is credible.

Circumstantial evidence is most often employed in criminal trials.   Books, movies, and television often perpetuate the belief that circumstantial evidence may not be used to convict a criminal of a crime.   But this view is incorrect.  

In most cases, circumstantial evidence is the only evidence linking an accused to a crime; direct evidence may simply not exist.

INDIA IS THE ONLY NATION WHERE A WHORE CAN SAY A MAN WINKED AT HER AND CALL THE NCW TO PUNISH THE MAN.

The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "circumstantial evidence is intrinsically no different from direct evidence ".   

If a witness testifies that he saw a defendant fire a bullet into the body of a person who then died, this is direct testimony of material facts in murder, and the only question is whether the witness is telling the truth ( he could not have been present at the scene and might have agreed to be a witness on a monetary payoff ) .   

If, however, the witness is able to testify only that he heard the shot and that he arrived on the scene seconds later to see the accused standing over the corpse with a smoking pistol in his hand, the evidence is circumstantial; the accused may have been shooting at the escaping killer or merely have been a bystander who picked up the weapon after the killer had dropped it.

Most criminal convictions are based on circumstantial evidence.

In a case of a theft, examples of circumstantial evidence include:--

Evidence of the defendant's fingerprints at the scene of the crime
The fact that the defendant was found with a large amount of money without being able to give any reason


In the case of a murder, examples of circumstantial evidence include:---
The fact that the accused had an intense dislike of the victim
The fact that the accused behaved in a bizarre and suspicious way after the offence
The fact that he or she lied about his or her alibi
The fact that he or she was in the area at the time that the offence was committed
The fact that the defendant's blood or DNA corresponds to blood or DNA found on the victim's body.

A court would be very slow to convict a defendant on the basis of one piece of circumstantial evidence alone, for example, the fact that his or her fingerprints were found at the scene of the crime.

For example, in a theft case, if the defendant was seen in the area at the time of the theft, his or her fingerprints were found at the scene of the crime and if he or she was later found with a large sum of money that he or she could not explain, then the court would be more likely to convict the accused.

Generally, evidence can be classified into two categories: direct and circumstantial,. Classic examples of direct evidence are eyewitness testimony,  or hidden cam  video of the defendant in the act of committing a crime, and incriminating statements made by the defendant, victim, or witness.

Unlike direct evidence, which relies on personal  observation and yields a definite conclusion, circumstantial evidence is based largely on inference and uses inductive reasoning ( arthapatti ) .

Indirect or circumstantial evidence implies that the defendant was involved in the crime, and is typically sufficient to convict a defendant if the evidence and inferences drawn from the evidence can be used to establish that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

This is the standard of evidence used in criminal trials to overcome the presumption that a person is innocent until proven guilty. Thus, evidence need not prove that the defendant is absolutely guilty or guilty beyond any question, but rather that there are no other logical explanations resulting from the case facts that anyone other than the defendant could have committed the crime.

Guilt can be easily be proven using a process of arthapatti or logical deduction.   The burden of establishing proof beyond a reasonable doubt is the responsibility of the prosecutor.   Real, direct, or physical evidence must be presented in court through testimonial evidence to establish a foundation for admissibility.

Forensic evidence generated by the wide variety of forensic specialty areas including fingerprint identification and DNA analysis, fall under the category of circumstantial evidence  .. Scientific evidence is often sufficient to resolve a criminal matter.  

An exception to physical evidence that does not fall into the category of circumstantial evidence includes illicit drugs, which simply by their presence violates a law.    Consequently, there is no need for a judge to make assumptions or inferences to reach a conclusion that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

Unlike the incorrect examples perpetuated by television shows, movies, and novels, a majority of convictions are based solely on circumstantial evidence if for no other reason than this type of evidence is more commonly encountered at crime scenes than direct evidence.

In USA they have done statistics and have come to the conclusion that eyewitness identification has proven to be mostly unreliable. There is NO system in India to give harsh punishment to false witnesses who have taken bribes and appeared out of thin air.

The confession of an accused is direct evidence. But the judge must be careful to find out if the confession is under duress.  -- that man’s child could have been kidnapped.

THE JUDICIARY IN INDIA , ARE SO POORLY TRAINED ( OR-  collegium BRIBED ) THAT THEY FALL PREY TO HEGELIAN DIALECTIC AND FALSE FLAG ATTACKS 90 % OF THE TIME.



A BIG CHUNK OF UNDERTRIALS LANGUISHING IN INDIAN JAILS HAVE BROUGHT PROMOTIONS AND MEDALS TO UNIFORMED POLICE.



‘Arthāpatti’is described as the necessary supposition of an unperceived fact which alone can explain a phenomenon that demands an explanation.   

For example it is also observed that a man goes on an indefinite fast and after 10 days he has put on weight .  It means he is eating while in the toilet where the camera is NOT on him. It is impossible to reconcile these two facts, fatness and fasting—such  postulation is ‘arthāpatti.’


On chemical tankers if there is an accident, the Captain has to take alcometer readings ( drug test if Captain feels it is warranted ) of the crew or officer involved.  These alcometers have electronic log records which cant be deleted.  They have to be calibrated every month—we have span gases for this . 
The purpose for obtaining and developing all this evidence, and trying to ensure its admissibility, is fundamental.


NEVER ALLOW A MAD MAN LIKE CHARLES DARWIN TO ENGAGE IN ARTHAPATTI  .  

HE HAD A BAG FULL OF GOODIES -- FINCHES , BEAKS AND WHAT NOT!



Anupalabdi means negative-cognitive proof.

Anupalabdhi pramana suggests that knowing a negative, such as " there is no duster at the blackboard“ is a form of valid knowledge.

If something can be observed or inferred or proven as non-existent or impossible, then one knows more than what one did without such means.

Anupalabdhi as epistemically valid –it can be either sadrupa (positive) or asadrupa (negative) relation - both correct and valuable.

Vedic sages refined Anupalabdi to four types:

non-perception of the cause,  karana-anupalabdhi
non-perception of the effect,  vyapaka-anupalabdhi
non-perception of object,  svabhava-anupalabdhi
non-perception of contradiction.  viruddha-anupalabdhi


Anupalabdi literally means non-apprehension. Non-existence of a thing is apprehended by its non-perception.

On automated ships we rely on negative affirmation for emergency shut down of machinery.  For example zero sump luboil pressure causes interlocks to operate or the engine will seize and cause a fire.


When I hold management meeting on board my ship, I look for negative feedback. I can make instant risk assessment and decisions based on this.  During emergency drills my senior most and best qualified officers are put as ROVING SQUAD for such negative feedback. 

When my company told that this system is NOT part of their blue book and safety policy , I told them to FUCK OFF .

When they threatened to screw me for insubordination I unleashed the SWORD OF CAPTAINs AUTHORITY .   

This was later regularized by IMO ( ISM code ) .   

Not many people know how much I worked for this too happen.





The use of this method of knowledge is crucial  :  

Pressure guage shows 7 kilos pressure but there is NO sound of liquid flow in the pipeline -  looks like the shore valve is shut ”.    

Absence of a thing established by the absence of another is  anupalabdi.

It may seem paradoxical that non-apprehension of a thing is a means to the apprehension of its non-existence (abhava).

But in fact both non-perception as well as perception serve as a means to get various knowledge, for the simple reason that the knower is conscious of both.

THERE IS NO WATER IN  JEW DARLING MODIs KALASHA KUMBHAM  --  


HOW DO YOU KNOW ?




IT IS UPSIDE DOWN IMPALED ON A FUCKIN'  POLE 




पूर्णमदः पूर्णमिदं पूर्णात्पुर्णमुदच्यते
पूर्णश्य पूर्णमादाय पूर्णमेवावशिष्यते
शान्तिः शान्तिः शान्तिः

Om Puurnnam-Adah Puurnnam-Idam Puurnnaat-Purnnam-Udacyate
Puurnnashya Puurnnam-Aadaaya Puurnnam-Eva-Avashissyate ||
Om Shaantih Shaantih Shaantih ||
Upanishads 5000 BC

Below: This profound symbol , full of living water , projects our faith 

OM, That is infinite, This is infinite,
From fullness comes the absolute
If absolute is removed from absolute,  
Absolute  still  pervades

Brahman is limitless, infinite number of universes come out and go into the infinite Brahman,  Brahman remains unchanged.    BrahmAn thy morphogenetic consciousness field is infinite, whole and complete
.

Sorry, Mr Narendra Modi--  these serial posts on Sanatan Dharma will last till the sun goes supernova.      Long after you are NOT even a memory,   people will wonder who this Modi fellow is

Dear Sir

Is there any reference to menstruation in the vedas or other hindu scriptures? Why do hindus consider menstruation, child birth, etc as "Ashuddhi"?

I'm not a highly spiritual or learned person. I have gone to Sabarimala only thrice. But i find the arguments put up by devaswom layer not very convincing.

As a common man and a hindu, what i understand is
1. Lord Ayyappa is a celibate and even his consort is waiting outside the temple. How can the women activist challenge these beliefs.

2. All the pilgrims visiting the shrine are following celibacy or brahmacharya for 41 days by abstaining from sex or sexual thoughts or masturbation. They focus their thoughts only on lord ayyappa and abstain from any influence of sexual thoughts like tv, films, close contact of females, even abstaining from their wife during menstruation.

3. The concept of "tatvamasi" means that all the pilgrims are Lord Ayyappan himself. Thats why all the pilgrims who have put mala are considered to be Lord Ayyappan and called Swami. So all the pilgrims are celibate and should not be distracted.

4. Now are women impure during menstruation? I dont have an answer to that because i understand that mentrual blood, child birth, are considered "Asshudhi". But on logical thought, sabarimala bans all women who may be sexually active so that the pilgrims who become Swami Ayyappan after putting mala are not distracted.

5. Women activist are saying they will take 42 days vratham and visit sabarimala. I doubt that they can do that. Men can avoid sexual thoughts, sexual acts and prevent release of semen/sperm consciously. Nightfalls during sleep cannot be compared as they are unconscious occurence.But women cannot prevent ovulation and menstruation, which is a normal reproductive cycle. It is medically recognised that during ovulation there are lots of harmones getting released by which there is sexual drive in women to conceive. This biological phenomenon cannot be controlled, moreover the male pilgrims who are normal human beings and not a real God, cannot control his normal sex drive when women come in close contact. All the vratham and brahmacharya will be lost if women are allowed by SC judgement.

6. The women activist are comparing this as bad tradition like Sati. I really dont understand why men like Rahul Easwar cannot tell them that Sati, Dowry death, female infanticide, child marriage, rape, forced polygamy, forced prostitution are atrocities against women. Going to Sabarimala is a choice, women can go to other temples, there is no life threatening force used by males.

7. The women are considering this as discrimination against them. Then reservation is an official discrimination, why do they fight for women reservation bill? Why do they want separate toilets, hostels, coaches, seats in buses, separate teams for men and women, let Sania mirza play against Nadal, let Mary Kom fight with Mike tyson.

Sir, i may be wrong by saying all this. But i dont find any Hindu organisation or Ayyappa Seva Sangam coming out with justification and protest against this attempted judicial over reach. I really feel that it is judicial overeach, has the SC judges read all the vedas, upanishads, smrithis and have understood all the diverse customs and traditions followed in hindu way of life.

Sir, my humble request to provide more clarity with your great knowledge and wisdom. Also please ask all the right minded hindus to come out and make peaceful protest in their own way to tell the world and SC judges that we are concerned by such indirect attacks on our basic beliefs and to protect Sabarimala.

Regards
Shashi AG





  1. hi sag,

    both the judges are not hindus--

    justice kurian is so hardcore , that he refused to meet PM Modi on easter day for a crucial meeting.

    justics gowda is a veerashaiva lingayath --who bury their dead and are NOT hindu

    rahul eashwar has put forwards immature arguments -- every time he jumps into cricket team men/ women.

    the fact remains that men have taken VRAT for 41 days ( no sex/ no masturbation / no passion ) and on the last day before he sees the makara vilakku 3 flashes -- he cannot be distracted by young women ( old women and girl children are allowed ).

    his vrat goes PHUTTTT in the human throng

    ALL ARE JEALOUS THAT SABARIMALA IS THIS PLANETs NO 1 PILGRIMAGE.

    JOSHUA PROJECT 2 TRIED TO DRY UP THE PAMPA RIVER, MADE TAMIL/ MALAYALI PILGRIMS THROW STONES AT EACH OTHER ( FALSE FLAG --MEN WITHOUT 41 DAY BEARD GROWTH ) .

    THE WHITE INVADER DELETED LORD AYYAPPA AS THE NINTH AVATAR OF VISHNU AND INSERTED BUDDHA ( A MORTAL ) EVERYWHERE.

    the udipi krishna temple ( FAKE mutt ) was actually a ayyappa temple. the idol is still there in the adjacent shiva temple corner room. I have seen it.

    the pujari there knew english--

    i asked him--how old is the ayyappa idol--he says more than 5000 years .

    then i asked him --how old is the krishna idol installed by the FAKE creation of rothschild madhavacharya --he says less than 700 years .

    THIS IS THE WAY HINDUS HAVE BEEN FOOLED .

    TODAY HINDUISM IS BEING DESTROYED FROM WITHIN--

    PM MODI WORSHIPING AT ROTHSCHILDS KAMAKHYA TEMPLE, PM MODI SHOWING KALASH KUMBHAM UPSIDE DOWN ON HIS TWITTER SITE , PM MODI KEEPING FAST FOR THE FAKE NAVARATRI IN APRIL ( ACTUAL IS IN OCTOBER )

    NORTH INDIANS PRAYING TO HUGE WHITE STATUES ( IT SHOULD BE SMALL BLACK IDOLS ) - NORTH INDIANS MARRYING AT NIGHT OUTSIDE THE MUHURTAM WINDOW PERIOD, FALSE PANCHANGAMS, NORTH INDIANS USING A FAKE SHUKLA YAJURVEDA etc

    today most hindu orgs and websites are operated by agents of jews and joshua project 2.

    these hindu orgs and websites NEVER EVER fights for hindus-- rather they make hindus fight against muslims and christians .

    they force hindus to worship fake creations of rothschild-- saw how devoted modi was to the statue of BASAVA at river thames london.

    BASAVA was created by CP Brown who created the FAKE vemana.

    Check out his ridiculous SHIT PISS veda --below link

    how VEMANA has ridiculed our gods .

    these lines are highlighted in yellow .

    CP Brown created a deliberate famine to make telugus migrate abroad as slaves. i am sure modi will give him BHARAT RATNA soon.

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/09/sanatana-dharma-hinduism-exhumed-and_30.html

    TODAY HINDUISM IS ATTACKED FROM WITHIN BY FORCES CONTROLLED FROM ABROAD USING TROJAN HORSE NGOs.

    NO HINDU GURU CAN DABBLE IN POLITICS AS PER SANATANA DHARMA

    WHAT ARE THESE YOGI ADITYANATH TYPE OF CHARACTERS OF THE FAKE GORAKHNATH MUTT CREATED BY ROTHSCHILD DOING ?

    THE GEETA PRESS CREATED BY ROTHSCHILD AT GORAKHNATH CHURNED OUT MILLIONS OF POISON INJECTED HINDU SCRIPTURES
    --

    -- INCLUDING PROPPING UP ALL THE FAKE ROTHSCHILD CREATED "DASA" CHARACTERS , KRISHNAs MISTRESS RADHA, RAM KICKING HIS PREGNANT WIFE SITA TO THE FOREST WHERE SHE DELIVERS FAKE LUV /KUSH TWINS.

    THE SIKH HOLY BOOK GURU GRANTH SAHIB IS PACKED WITH DASA VERSES.

    TODAY SIKHS IN UK AND CANADA WHO CLAMOUR FOR "GURKHA REGIMENT" TYPE HIGHLY PAID "SIKH REGIMENT" SAY THAT THEY ARE NOT INDIANS ( FAKE POLLS BY CRYPTO JEW KHALISTANI SIKHS WEARING 5K).

    THE ENTIRE KHALISTANI MOVEMENT WAS TRIGERRED BY CRYPTO JEWS WEARING 5K.

    LORD RAMs TWINS LUV/ KUSH NEVER EXISTED --

    YET TODAY SIKHS HAVE LUV/ KUSH LINEAGE---

    the Bedi sub-caste of the Khatris derives its lineage from Kush, Sodhi sub-caste claims descent from the Lav--

    i have told only 3% as sikhs are NOT ready to handle the truth-- probably it will NEVER be told --as i have social responsibility..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/07/unknown-history-of-sikhs-and-sikhism.html

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

Dear Capt Ajit sir,

This is ridiculous side of AK Antony.......http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/defence-minister-wife-elizabeth-antony-paintings-for-rs.-28-crore/1/201258.html w
What do you say ? He's overtaken Mamata didi in paintings scam ?




  1. http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/09/francis-newton-souza-birth-painting.html

    AK ANTONY IS PROJECTED AS A JEW BY ROTHSCHILD MEDIA

    BUT HE IS NOT

    THE BENE ISRALE JEW GENERAL JFR JACOB WAS USED IN SUCH FALSE PROPAGANDA TO MAKE MANY MALAYALIS LOYAL TO ISRAEL AND DISLOYAL TO THE WATAN. 

    YOU SHOULD HAVE SEEN THE WAY PM MODI SUCKED UP TO THIS JEW GENERAL JFR JACOB.

    THIS JEW GENERAL WAS MADE GOVERNOR OF GOA-- AND DURING HIS TENURE THE GOVERNORS BUNGALOW WAS VISITED BY ALL SORTS OF SHADY JEWS , WITHOUT MAKING AN ENTRY IN THE VISITORS REGISTER .

    HE HAD A LOYAL MAN FRIDAY FROM KOTTAYAM KERALA NAMED CHACKO KURIAN -- JEW GEN JFR JACOB WROTE THAT CAPT CHACKO KURIAN IS A JEW

    HE IS NOT !


    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

























  • Free Economics Class from Gujju2 and thin upper lip guy to India to USURP the Temple Gold and Gold from Indians. Put Gold in the bank and take more loans from IMF and World Bank and One day screw the system and take all the gold like our PM chandrasekhar if am right to foreign lands and phutt. Also some hidden agenda to change black money in the form of Gold to Bank notes to convert black to white in the pretext of Old Gold. Also I heard lot of bank money in swiss banks and other accounts in overseas are simply turned into Gold and smuggled into India and put it in banks and convert into Gold. Guruji Please Correct me if I am wrong.
    Delete
  • hi sn,

    PM CHANDRASEKHAR GAVE AWAY 67 TONNES OF INDIA GOLD TO ROTHSCHILDs IMF.

    THERE WAS NO ECONOMIC CRISIS .

    THIS FALSE CRISIS WAS USED AS AN EXCUSE FOR IMF/ WORLD BANK TO INSIST THAT THEY WANT MANMOHAN SINGH ( ROTHSCHILDs MAN ) AS FINANCE MINISTER

    MANMOHAN SINGH WAS BROUGHT IN VIA THE RAJYA SABHA BACK DOOR --LIKE OUR MR THIN UPPER LIP.

    i had predicted that arun jatley would lose--but he would still be brought in via the back door like manmohan singh -- as finance minister/ defence minister --

    -- and as soon as the BARAK MISSILE DEAL is paid up-- he would be shifted to I&B ministery where he would push to make india an UIMMORAL NATION ( anal sex )

    NAVJOT SINGH SIDHU WOULD HAVE TRASHED CAPT AMRINDER SINGH IN AMRITSAR .

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/03/pm-defense-minister-finance-minister-of.html

    EVEN TODAY I CHALLENGE MANMOHAN SINGH TO STAND FOR ELECTIONS IN HIS HOMESTATE IN PUNJAB--HE WILL LOSE HIS DEPOSIT.

    BR AMBEDKER LOST HIS DEPOSIT EVERY TIME HE STOOD FOR ELECTIONS --EVEN DALIT MAHARS DID NOT VOTE FOR HIM

    WHY WAS RAJIV DIXIT MURDERED ?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6t6hOVpFFo

    WHY IS RAGHURAM RAJAN ( WITH BENAMI MEDIA SUPPORT ) CRYING THAT OUR ECONOMY IS IN POOR STATE , WHEN INDIA IS THE ONLY NATION DOING WELL ON THE PLANET ? 

    IT HAS TO DO WITH SIPHONING OFF OUR GOLD .

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

























  • Salute the captain,
    The man in need of the hour,
    Sagar of gyann,
    Hope of light
    Through knowledge,
    Crusader of Satanists,
    Command us captain,
    To fight and die,
    By ur side.
    Salute the captain
    Salute our captain..
  • DO NOT ALLOW ENEMIES FROM WITHIN DESTROY SANATAN DHARMA.

    DURING 800 YEARS OF SLAVERY OUR ANCESTORS HELD ON TO THE FAITH

    THEY HELD STEADY DESPITE FEAR OF SWORD AND GREED OF SOPS

    POISON INJECTED INTO OUR SCRIPTURES COULD NOT SHAKE THE FAITH

    OUR FAITH SHALL SURVIVE , BE ASSURED WE WILL SURVIVE !

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..



    Long ago we had a cadet jumping overboard from the ship off Durban.  His shoes were laid out neatly at the ships railing.  It showed suicide . 

    The absence of the MDs car in his parking slot means that he has left office .

    The absence of the car is  'hetu' and conclusion of his absence in the office is ' saadhya'.  This follows a concomitant relation between the hetu and saadhya -

    Anupalabdhi is a way to apprehend an absence

    All things exist in places either in a positive (sadrupa) or in a negative (asadrupa) relation, and it is only in the former case that they come into contact with the senses, while in the latter case the perception of the negative existence can only be had by a separate mode of movement of the mind, a separate pramana – anupalabdhi.

    The lack of perceptible (yogya) adjuncts (upadhi) is known through non-perception of what is perceptible (yogya-anupalabdhi) and the lack of imperceptible adjuncts is known by showing that which is thought to be an adjunct.

    Abhava  means non-existence. Abhava-pramana has been discussed in ancient Hindu texts in the context of Padartha .   A Padartha is defined as that which is simultaneously Astitva (existent), Jneyatva (knowable) and Abhidheyatva (nameable).

     Specific examples of padartha,  include dravya (substance), guna (quality), karma (activity/motion), samanya/jati (universal/class property), samavaya (inherence) and vishesha (individuality).
    Abhava is explained as "referents of negative expression" in contrast to "referents of positive expression" in Padartha.

    Abhava was further refined in four types, by the schools of Hinduism that accepted it as a useful method of epistemology: dhvamsa (termination of what existed), atyanta-abhava (impossibility, absolute non-existence, contradiction), anyonya-abhava (mutual negation, reciprocal absence) and pragavasa (prior, antecedent non-existence).



    Shabda means reliable expert testimony .

    People are willing to listen what Maradona has to say on the subject of soccer  - he needs NO introduction or production of bonafides.  He needs NO peer review.  

    People will vouch , Maradona knoweth soccerETH..

    But beware –
    Jew Rothschild cloaked Gandhi in ETHOS before he imported him from South Africa and unleashed him on unsuspecting Indians, to sit on the drivers seat of our freedom struggle—always to utter the right words , but always to steer away from the goal.

    Jew Rothschild who ruled India gave instant cooked up ethos to Gandhi using his monopolized media.

    Today in India we know the PERCEPTION MOLDERS who come on primetime TV are stooges of powerful desh drohi forces .  

    None of them have any ETHOS.   Nobody cares for them though they blabber away. 

    We have a man termed SENIOR JOURNLIST –Kumar Ketkar whose mind is full of poison.  I do NOT remember when he spoke for the watan last --I have been watching this an for a decade . He was a sidekick of Commie late SA Dange , who went to Moscow in 1951 to see Stalin 


    The modern world knows NOTHING of the ancient art of mentorship.   A mentor must have ethos oozing out of every pore. 

    Ethos involves the speaker’s/ writer’s authority on the subject,  sterling character , credibility , reputation ,  inherent ethics,  trust he generates,  integrity , compassion,  fairness,  accountability, superior style , tone,  ethics,  behavior , personal warmth , clarity of mind , knowledge , experience , family history, code of conduct , transparency , selflessness etc . His reputation precedes him.


    In the Vedic days a mentor was called a GURU.



    Long ago when I wrote the Chemical Manual for my shipping company, some Captain and Chief Engineer colleagues asked during a lunch break   “Ajit, how do you know all this highly technical stuff you are churning out every day for the past two months ?”

    To this I replied  “  The painting is mine alone.  I have NOT discovered the colors,  I have NOT invented the canvas / paint brush  / oils .  I have NOT created the female I painted “

    I USED THE PERIODIC TABLE OF DMITRI MENDELEEV.   

    DIMITRI SAID THAT HE USED PANINIs SANSKRIT ALPHABETS .  

    PANINI USED THE SRI YANTRA PICKED OFF THE AKASHIK RECORDS BY A UNKNOWN MAHARISHI . .


    DIGRESSION:

    Since Panini wrote the adaptable Sankrit grammar 7500 years ago, there has been NO changes, it is that perfect-- the work of a genius!!  

    Sanskrit has a construct like geometry in cymatics and can be digitalised. The way words unfold from their seed forms is amazing.

    The mathematical precision throughout the language and give it its extraordinary power, and hence only Sanskrit mantras work . There is a direct link between the sound and signs,it is phonetic.

    The writing of Sanskrit language is based on the sound of the spoken form. Sanskrit has no spelling, nor there are any silent letters .

    There is logic in its sound system, and a natural continuity in its word-making as well as sentence-making. Sanskrit sentence structure is flexible--to hell with syntax. The order of words in a sentence does not matter.

    Sanskrit has three genders (masculine, feminine, and neuter), three numbers (singular, dual, and plural), and eight cases (nominative, accusative, instrumental, dative, ablative, genitive, locative, and vocative), although only in the singular of the most common declension does a noun show different forms for each case.

    Adjectives are inflected to agree with nouns. Verbs are inflected for tense, mode, voice, number, and person.  There is a vibration or resonance in the sounds of Sanskrit.  Sanskrit grammar has extensive  grammatical tenses.  

    There are ten tenses: one form for the present tense, three forms for the past tense and two forms for the future tense.

    There is also imperative mood, potential mood, benedictive mood (called asheerling, which is used for indicating a blessing), and conditional.  Each tense has three separate words for each of the three grammatical persons (first person, second person and third person), and it further distinguishes if it’s referring to one, two, or more than two people (called eakvachan, dvivachan and bahuvachan).

    There are three categories of the verbs called atmanepadi, parasmaipadi and ubhaipadi. These forms indicate whether the outcome of the action is related to the doer or the other person or both. In this way there are ninety forms of one single verb.

    Sanskrit words are formed of a root word called dhatu.  For instance: kri root word means ‘to do,’ gam root word means ‘to go.’ So, there are ninety forms of each of these verbs like, karoti, kurutah, kurvanti, and gachchati, gachchatah, gachchanti etc.  There are ready-made single words for all kinds of uses and situations.

    There are words for all the three genders and each word has twenty-one forms of its own which covers every situation. Then there is a very elaborate and precise system of composing, phrasing, making a sentence, joining two words and coining any number of words according to the need.

    Sanskrit grammar has the capacity for creating any number of new words for a new situation or concept or thing.

    The morphology of word formation is unique and of its own kind where a word is formed from a tiny seed root (called dhatu) in a precise grammatical order which has been the same since the very beginning.

    Any number of desired words could be created through its root words and the prefix and suffix system as detailed in the Ashtadhyayi of Panini.  Furthermore, 90 forms of each verb and 21 forms of each noun or pronoun could be formed that could be used in any situation.

    Its vowels are the actual ‘voice pattern’ of the sound and consonants are only the ‘form’ of the ‘voice pattern’ of the sound. So a consonant  alone cannot be pronounced as it is only a ‘form’ of the ‘voice pattern’ until it is attached to a vowel. hus, a vowel, which itself is a ‘voice pattern,’ can be pronounced alone (like,) or it can be modulated by adding a consonant to it (like,)

    S is the subject, V is the verb and O is the object; the three exhaustive elements of a simple sentence.

    Malayalam is subject–object–verb (SOV) language is one in which the subject, object, and verb of a sentence appear or usually appear in that order.

    If English were SOV, " Dick apple ate" would be an ordinary sentence, as opposed to the actual Standard English " Dick ate apple". Hindi is SOV.

    Hebrew is subject–verb–object (SVO) is a sentence structure where the subject comes first, the verb second, and the object third. English is SVO.

    BILBLICAL HEBREW WAS VSO LIKE CLASSICAL ARABIC .

    SANSKRIT IS THE MOTHER OF ALL LANGUAGES

    Simple sentences in Sanskrit do not need to follow any specified structure. They are attached either to the subject or the object in form of ‘vibhakti’. Thus, in principle, every simple sentence in Sanskrit can be condensed into three distinct words: the subject, the verb and the object. We can write these three words in any order we want (all 3! = 6 ways) and the sentence will bear the same meaning. A unique meaning.

    Sanskrit like Malayalam is usually used in SOV format though.

    Sanskrit's grammatical structure, words carry extra information with them. Because of this extra information, word order is more flexible in Sanskrit than in English.

    IN STUPID ENGLISH BANANA CAN EAT ELEPHANT, WHICH CANNOT HAPPEN IN SANSKRIT.

    Sanskrit, uses inflection to a great extent. In Sanskrit, a complex idea can exist as one word and still carry a single and precise meaning.

    Malayalam and Hindi employs postpositions, whereas English employs prepositions

    Term/Definition
    Grammar/The set of rules that describes or defines a language
    Grammatical/used to describe an expression that follows the rules of grammar.
    Subject/ In a sentence, the thing that performs an action
    Verb/ In a sentence, the word that describes the action
    Object/ In a sentence, the thing that is affected by the action
    Emphasis/ a quality that tells us to pay attention to certain words
    Inflection/ the act of changing a word to further clarify its meaning

    Shabda Panama , verbal testimony is the statement of a trustworthy perceptive person --a man of great ethos   

    Verbal testimony is of two kinds—laukikam ( academic- master ) and vaidikam (scriptural- guru ).   Verbal testimony can be in the form of spoken or written words. This is adopted in vedanta .

    A human being usually has a useful learning life of 70 years .  He cannot possibly discover or invent everything. He needs to start off from a foundation he chooses for himself.

    It is accepted and epistemically valid that a human being needs to know numerous facts, and with the limited time and energy available, he can learn only a fraction of those facts and truths directly.

    He must rely on others, his parent, family, friends, teachers, ancestors and kindred members of society to rapidly acquire and share knowledge and thereby enrich each other's lives.

    This means of gaining proper knowledge is either spoken or written, but through Sabda (words).[
    Sabda pramana is testimony by words, written or oral. It is also called ‘apta-vakyas’ (statement of a trust-worthy person’, and agama (authentic word).

    Note: THE WHITE INVADER USED HIS FAKE KANCHI MUTT TO COOK UP RIDICULOUS TAMIL LANGUAGE AGAMA SHASTRA , TO CUT DOWN SANSKRIT BASED VEDANTA.

    A verbal statement, uttered or written, is man’s most potent instrument for transmitting knowledge. We learn mostly by means of words..  In India we had our amazing jungles full of animal and plant life.

    We Indians observed and inferred too . Our ancient kings were taught by Gurus , just by telling them stories about jungle life and asking the young prince child to made a moral for the story.



    WHY IS IT THAT SINCE ADI SHANKARACHARYA,  NO HINDU HAS TOLD OR WRITTEN THAT THERE IS NO HEAVEN OR HELL IN HINDUISM ? 

    WHY DOES IT TAKE A BLOGGER NAMED CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL TO SAY THIS AFTER 4000 YEARS . 

    NOW ALL FAKE GURUS ARE BUSY DELETING AND CORRECTING ON THE INTERNET AND IN THEIR NEW EDITION BOOKS.

    We constantly get various information, direction and knowledge through words.   People read books.  

    There is a limit to getting knowledge from books unless you are good in SPEED READING where your mind rapidly and effortlessly vacuums in the gold specks and leaves out the dirt mud.

    Only a competent person possessed of knowledge can impart accurate knowledge. In my chemical posts I give my photo in uniform and my experience in years.   My words( SHABDA ) in the post can be accepted more easily. 

    Because today we have CHOOTS who write how to climb Mount Everest of the Himalayas when they have NOT even seen the mountain — all they have seen is pictures. 

    WHEN I WROTE THE FOLLOWING POSTS ON CHANGE ( I HAVE REVEALED ONLY 15 % OF THE TECHNIQUE  )  .  I HAVE DONE IT MYSELF AS A “CHANGE MANAGER” . 



    OUR PM NARENDRA MODI THINKS,    THAT RUNNING AROUND IN A SLIMY MANNER FOR MUSLIM / CHRISTIAN / DALIT VOTES ,   BEGGING FOR FOREIGN INVESTMENT,   AND ENDLESS BOASTING  ABOUT VIKAAAS ,   IS GOOD GOVERNANCE .

    I remember in the early seventies when we were young cadets , oil tankers had just come into the market.   We cadets ran the ship by hit and trail by reading the manuals and using our commonsense .

    The Captain and the officers knew shit.

    At that time I swore to myself , when I become a captain things will be different.

    Then Chemical tankers came to the market—I as the Captain ran the ship by micro managing till all learnt their jobs—never abdicated my responsibilities in the garb of pathetic delegation to crew who did NOT know their jobs.

    BIG BROTHER tried his best to make  MAD MAN Charles Darwin and man of  great ethos whose SHABDA could be trusted like the gospel. 

    And mind you Rothschild succeeded  and created the COMMIE system where men killed without fear of God.    Today in this DNA age Indian text books still teach EVOLUTION of Darwin.   

    Drohis like Romila Thapar and Irfan Habib are still calling the shots two years after this FEKU Narendra Modi has sat on the PM chair – JEW Noam Chomsky naaraaz ho jaayega !.  

    Shabda pramana needs no verification, unless of course there is doubt about its reliability. If all that we know from verbal testimony were to await confirmation, then the bulk of human knowledge would have to be regarded as baseless. 

    The process of verbal knowledge cannot be clubbed with inference because it does not involve any knowledge of invariable concomitance ( fact of existing or occurring together with something else)   as is the case in inference.   So it is a category by itself.

    Shabda pramana needs no verification, unless of course there is doubt about its reliability.  If all that we know from verbal testimony were to await confirmation, then the bulk of human knowledge would have to be regarded as baseless.   

    The process of verbal knowledge cannot be clubbed with inference because it does not involve any knowledge of invariable concomitance ( fact of existing or occurring together with something else)   as is the case in inference.   So it is a category by itself.


    Apart from being the words of a trustworthy person ,  the next condition laid own for a statement to be a means of valid knowledge is that it should not be contradicted by any other means of knowledge, such as perception, inference, commonsense etc. 
    In such a circumstance the knowledge from the academic statement, which was till then considered to be valid, would become invalid.

    Our ancients have clearly demarcated the spheres of authority of the Veda on the one hand and all the other means of knowledge on the other.  
    As regards matters which fall clearly within the scope of perception Adi Shankaracharya says in his bhashya on Bri. Upa. 3.3.1:--
    “Nor are the Srutis supposed to have authority in matters that are contradicted by other means of knowledge, as, for instance, if they said, ‘Fire is cold and wets things’.   If, however, a passage is ascertained (by the application of the six tests, namely, beginning and conclusion, repetition, originality, result, eulogy and demonstration) to have the meaning given by the Srutis, then the evidence of the other means of knowledge must be held to be fallacious”.

    It is through verbal statements, spoken as well as written, that knowledge is transmitted. The scope of verbal testimony is much wider than that of the other means of knowledge. Through perception we can know only what is here and now.   Inference, etc., also have their own limitations.   But it is through verbal testimony in the form of books, newspapers and other records that we come to know what has happened in the past and what is happening elsewhere at the present time. 

    The meanings of words are of two kinds, primary (shakti) and implied (lakshya).

    The primary meaning of a word is its literal meaning.   The word ‘cow’ means the animal known by that name.   In Vedas a cow standing on one leg is Dharma in Kali Yuga


    Adi Shankaracharya  has found this theory useful for refuting the contention of an opponent in his bhAshya on brahmasUtra 1.3.28.   

    He says there, “Words are connected with the general characteristics and not with the individuals, for the individuals are infinite, and it is impossible to comprehend the relation of a word (with all of them)”.     

    The primary meaning of a word is known as ‘vacyartha’.

    If in a particular sentence the literal meaning of a word does not give rise to the intended sense of the sentence as a whole. In such cases the literal meaning of the word is discarded and an implied meaning is adopted.
     Such an implied meaning is known as ‘lakshyartha’  and the implication is known as ‘lakshana’.

    There are three kinds of implication. These are:--

    1. jahal-lakshana—exclusive implication.
    2. ajahal-lakshana—inclusive implication.
    3. jahad-ajahal-lakshana- quasi-implication or exclusive-inclusive implication.

      These three kinds of implication will now be explained.

    1. Exclusive implication—When we say “India won the match” it does not mean the country as a whole, but the Indian team.
      
    2. Inclusive implication.  A hawker selling plantains is going along my street, pushing a cart containing plantains. I call him by shouting, “ Hey, plantain, come here”.   What I mean is that the plantain-seller should come along with his cart of plantains. So the word ‘plantain’ is retained and ‘plantain-seller’ is added by implication. 

    3. Quasi-implication.   Here the primary meanings of the words of a sentence are partly included and partly excluded. The classic example for this is the sentence,  “This is that  girl”.   Here ‘this’ refers to the person in front now and ‘that’ refers to the same person seen at some other time in some other place. The identity of ‘this’ and ‘that’ is to be understood by discarding the person’s connection with the past time and place on the one hand and the present time and place on the other. This implication is also known by the name bhagatyagalakshana since one part of each of the items is discarded.

    Greater wisdom has and will never be  compressed into three little words as done by the Chandogya Upanishad which proclaimed the true Self of man as part of the Infinite Spirit.

    TAT TWAM ASI  ( That Thou Art )
    Chandogya Upanishad 6.8.7 ( Sama Veda ) 5000 BC


    The ultimate destiny of man is to discover within himself the true Self as the changeless behind the changing, the eternal behind the ephemeral, and the infinite behind the finite.    

    CONSCIOUSNESS IS WITHIN YOU –  BRAHMAN IS EVERYWHERE

    I AM A MORTAL ON EARTH --  WHO AM I  ( NAAN YAAR ) ? --  “HEY WAVE , YOU ARE JUST A PART OF THAT MIGHTY OCEAN!”

    YOUR SOUL IS A SMALL PART OF THE MORPOGENTIC CONSCIOUSNESS FIELD-

    Below: This tattoo is a most valuable one in Sanatana Dharma

    WHEN YOU GET MOKSHA , YOUR SOUL MERGES WITH THE MOTHER FIELD—YOU ARE NOW BRAHMAN , YOU ARE NOW GOD

    THE AIM OF EVERY HINDU, IS TO ATTAIN MOKSHA ( BY REDUCING KARMIC BAGGAGE TO NIL ) 




     IN INDIAN COURTS , JUDGES USUALLY GIVE WRONG JUDGMENTS

    THE INDIAN JUDGE MUST KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT SHABDA PRAMANA TO DO JUSTICE TO HIS JOB.

    IF A JUDGE ASKS A PAID WITNESS ( PRODUCED OUT OF THIN AIR ) "HOW SURE ARE YOU OF YOUR WITNESS TESTIMONY?"

    HE WILL ALWAYS SAY “I AM 100% SURE “.

    BECAUSE OTHERWISE , THE PERSON WHO BRIBED HIM WILL BREAK HIS LEGS.

    When people fail to perceive that a significant event is transpiring, their attention is not focused on the event, and the lack of attention leads to poorer perception and memory of the event.

    The more violent the act, the lower will be the accuracy and completeness of perception and memory and hence the SHABDA

    Contrary to the popular belief that stress heightens perception and memory,  perception and memory acquisition function most accurately when the subject is exposed to a moderate amount of stress.

    When stress levels are too low, people do not pay sufficient  attention, and when stress levels are too high, the ability to concentrate and perceive are negatively impacted.

    When I hold meetings on the ship I usually pounce on someone and will ask him “What did I just say?”

    When people are concerned about own personal safety, they , they pay less  attention to the other details of the crime scene, such as characteristics of the perpetrator (e.g., facial features, hair color and style, clothing, height, weight, etc.), the crime scene, and other important details.   This phenomenon manifests itself particularly when a weapon or  bomb or chance of a  stampede is present.

    The so-called weapons effect describes crime situations in which a weapon is used and witnesses spend more time and psychic energy focusing on the weapon rather than on other aspects of the event.  The weapons effect results in incomplete or inaccurate information about the crime scene and the perpetrator.

    This effect is magnified when the use of a weapon comes as a total surprise to a witness ( FHATT GAYA USKA GAAND ).

    A person's expectations and stereotypes can also affect both perception and memory: what he perceives and encodes is, to a large extent, determined by cultural biases, personal prejudices, effects of training, prior information, and expectations induced by motivational states, among others.

    Effectively, expectations and stereotypes cause people to see and remember what they want or expect to see or to remember.

    Remember , elderly witnesses are much less reliable than younger ones.  The elderly frequently believe events they imagined were actually perceived—Judges have hung innocents because they do NOT understand the human psyche.

    Both children and the elderly are particularly "susceptible to the effects of suggestive questioning or post-event misinformation.

    I had objected when NARCO TEST was being conducted on vulnerable and helpless servants ( suggestive ) during the trial of the Talwar girl murder .


    IF I WANT I CAN CONDUCT A NARCO TEST ON ANY BOLLYWOOD ACTRESS , AND MAKE HER CONFESS THAT SHE IS JUST BACK FROM AN ORGY WHERE SHE FUCKED ALL THE BOLLYWOOD ACTORS AND DIRECTORS IN ONE ROOM

    A woman pays more attention to clothing, while a man might take notice of the make of a car.
    An eyewitness is much more likely to identify accurately someone of his or her own race than someone of a different race.

    When sequential viewing is used, witnesses should be asked how certain they are of an identification. Obtaining a statement of confidence level before other information can prevent contamination of a witness' judgment, thereby increasing the reliability of an identification.

    In the US Jury system they have determined "Expert testimony has been proven to improve juror knowledge, sensitize jurors to witnessing and identification factors, and desensitize them toward witness confidence."

    However overwhelming majority of US courts have excluded such expert testimony. In MY COUSIN VINNY check out how the heroine female makes an ass of the Judge by EXPERT TESTIMONY ON CARS

    The reason most frequently cited by courts for excluding expert testimony is that expert testimony regarding the accuracy of identifications usurps the role of the jury as the sole judge of the credibility of witnesses.

    It is high time we bring the JURY SYSTEM back in India. It was done away with after a case which catapulted Ram Jethmalani into an ICON status ( letting down his own Singhi community )

    The white wife of a Parsi Naval Commander , was fucking a rich and handsome Singhi—and the Commander murdered him . 

    The yellow ROTHSCHILD Press made the TATTU Naval Commander a knight in shining armour.


    Vedic Nyaya school's epistemology accepts Shabda

    Authoritative verbal testimony  is the statement of a trustworthy person (aptavakya)

    A sentence is  a collection of words and a word is defined as that which is potent to convey its meaning. The power in a word to convey its meaning comes, according to ancient Nyaya, from long established convention.

    Verbal Testimony is of two kinds:--

    Vaidika and secular (laukika). The Vaidika testimony is perfect and infallible because the Vedas are spoken by God;
    Laukika  testimony, being the words of human beings who are liable to error, is not infalliable.

    A sentence in order to be intelligible must conform to certain conditions. These conditions are four:

    1. Akanksa: It is mutual implication or expectancy. It is the capacity of the words to become objects of enquiry. When we hear a word describing or signifying a course of action something of that course of action becomes our object of enquiry. The words of a sentence are interrelated and stand in need of one another in order to express a complete sense.

    2.      Yogyata: the words should possess the fitness to convey the sense and should not contradict the meaning. It is the condition of consistency.

    3.      Sannidhi:. The words must be spoken in quick secession without any long intervals. If the words ‘take ’, ‘this, ‘gift’ are uttered at long intervals they would not make a logical sentence.  It is defined as contiguity.

    4.      Tatparya: The valid of a sentence depends on it purport not on its literal meaning. It is the condition of the intention of the speaker if the words are ambiguous.  In English the same word has different meanings –unlike Sanskrit.  

    Tatparya is used to indicate the original intention of the author in putting down a certain statement. Nyaya is a Sanskrit word which means a  universal rule which includes natural justice, the science of rational, coherent inquiry and pursuit of real knowledge.

    In philosophical context, Nyaya encompasses propriety, logic and method. Nyaya is related to several other concepts :--

    Hetu-vidya (science of causes),
    Anviksiki (science of inquiry, systematic philosophy),
    Pramana-sastra (epistemology, science of correct knowledge),
    Tattva-sastra (science of categories),
    Tarka-vidya (science of reasoning, innovation, synthesis),
    Vadartha (science of discussion) and
    Phakkika-sastra (science of uncovering sophism, fraud, error, finding fakes

    The Nyaya metaphysics recognizes sixteen padarthas or categories and includes all six (or seven) categories of the Vaisheshika in the second one of them, called prameya.

    These sixteen categories are pramāṇa (valid means of knowledge), prameya (objects of valid knowledge), saṁśaya (doubt), prayojana (aim), dṛṣṭānta (example), siddhānta (conclusion), avayava (members of syllogism), tarka (hypothetical reasoning), nirṇaya (settlement), vāda (discussion), jalpa (wrangling), vitaṇḍā (cavilling), hetvābhāsa (fallacy), chala (quibbling), jāti (sophisticated refutation) and nigrahasthāna (point of defeat)

    The focus of Pramana ( of which SHABA is a part ) is how correct knowledge can be acquired, how one knows, how one doesn't, and to what extent knowledge pertinent about someone or something can be acquired. Pramana, a Sanskrit/ Malayalam word, literally is "means of knowledge". 

    The focus of Pramana is how correct knowledge can be acquired, how one knows, how one doesn't, and to what extent knowledge pertinent about someone or something can be acquired .  

    Nyaya scholars, along with those from other schools of Hinduism, also developed a theory of error, to methodically establish means to identify errors and the process by which errors are made in human pursuit of knowledge. 

    These include Saṁśaya ( problems, inconsistencies, doubts) and Viparyaya ( contrariness, errors) which can be corrected or resolved by a systematic process of Tarka (  reasoning, technique).

    A cause is defined as an unconditional and invariable antecedent of an effect and an effect as an unconditional and invariable consequent of a cause. 

    The same cause produces the same effect; and the same effect is produced by the same cause. The cause is not present in any hidden form whatsoever in its effect.

    The following Nyaya conditions should be met:

    The cause must be antecedent [Purvavrtti]
    Invariability [Niyatapurvavrtti]
    Unconditionality [Ananyathasiddha]

    Nyaya recognizes five kinds of accidental antecedents [Anyathasiddha]:-- 

    Mere accidental antecedent.
    Remote cause is not a cause because it is not unconditional..
    The co-effects of a cause are not causally related.
    Eternal substances, or eternal conditions are not unconditional antecedents,.
    Unnecessary superfluous things,.

    Nyaya recognizes three kinds of cause:

    Samavayi, material cause, e.g. thread of a cloth.
    Asamavayi, colour of the thread which gives the colour of the cloth.
    Nimitta, efficient cause, e.g. the weaver of the cloth.



    THE ENTIRE WESTERN PHILOSOPY IS LIFTED FROM ANCIENT INDIAN PHILOSOPHY,  WHICH WAS MOSTLY PENNED DOWN 7000 YEARS AGO,  WHEN THE WHITE MAN WAS DOING GRUNT GRUNT FOR LANGUAGE.

    BECAUSE THE NON-SPIRITUAL WESTERN PHILOSOPHERS HAD NOTHING ORIGINAL TO OFFER ( EXCEPT COMMIE THEORIES AND SIGMUND FREUDs RIDICULOUS SEX THEORIES ) THEIR SHALLOW PHILOSOPHY IS A FUNNY CARPET IN TATTERS ,  FULL OF HOLES- HAVING NO REGULAR WARP AND WEFT.


    Nyaya distinction between qualificative and non-qualificative perceptual cognition will further illuminate Bertrand Russell’s distinction between knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description.   

    CHOOT Russell’s concept of acquaintance leads to overbearing CHOOT John Galt type solipsism.  

    In epistemology, solipsism contends that knowledge of anything outside one's own mind is unsure and unreliable . As a metaphysical position, solipsism concludes that the world and other minds do not exist. There is never a sense of gratitude .

    The Nyāya concept of non-qualificative perceptual cognition does not lead to solipsism, it is superior to shallow minded Bertrand Russell’s concept of knowledge by acquaintance.


    In Indian philosophy , the cognition of words, the memory – cognition of objects, the cognition of the relation between a word and its referent, the syntactic expectancy between the words (akaikua), semantic compatibility (yogyata), contiguity of words (asatti) and the intention of the speaker (tatparya) are treated as causal conditions for understanding the meaning of a sentence.

    Nyaya philosophers have explained both the atomistic and the holistic understanding of a molecular sentence.  Shallow minded and non-spiritual western philosophers have not  developed a logic or mechanism for holistic understanding.

    Nyaya philosophers have  described the phenomenological properties of perceptual, inferential and verbal cognitions- the difference between them in terms of the ways cognitions are related to the same object.

    The difference between them is explained in terms of the following pairs of the Nyaya philosophy:

    1. anuyoga- pratiyoga ( first term- second term)
    2. adhara- adheya (substratum- supersratum )
    3. visheshya- visheshuana (qualificand- qualifier)
    4. visheshya – prakara ( qualificand- relation qualifier)
    5. uddesha- vidheya ( subject- predicate)
    6. paksa - sadhya ( the locus of inference- probandum )
    7. hetu- sadhya (probans- probandum )

    Note: “factum probandum", means  “the fact to be proved”


    Like: “hermigas pantalunas” means “ants in pants “     

    The western philosophers have sprinkled Latin words in their works to show that their thoughts are original—NOT stolen.

    ANYBODY WHO HAS READ INDIAN PHILOSOPHY , AND THEN READS ITS LIFTED WESTERN EQUIVALENT,  WILL ROLL IN LAUGHTER .

    Perceptual cognition involves four pairs, 
    verbal cognition three pairs, but 
    inferential cognition involves all the seven pairs. 


    THE WHITE HISTORIAN HAD  HAJAAAAR PROBLEM IN ACCEPTING THAT ANCIENT HINDU SCRIPTURES LIKE VEDAS/ UPANISHADS WERE PENNED DOWN IN 5000 BC AFTER 30 MILLINIUMS ON THE ORAL ROUTE –

    WHY ?


    BECAUSE  AS PER THE RIDICULOUS BIBLE COOKED UP IN 325 AD BY EMPEROR CONSTANTINE THE GREAT AT THE FIRST COUNCIL OF NICEA, THE BIG BANG HAPPENED AT 9 AM ON 23RD OCT IN 4004 BC


    Below:    See, we Jews built the pyramids and Moses Paaji led us out by parting the Red Sea --remember the EXODUS and our Kosher Promised land .   

    The JEWS have to LIE , that they are the best , the oldest, the wisest, the most beautiful , the most intelligent  -- right? 


    Below: Caution-- God at work in 4004 BC, 23 rd Oct ,  9.01 AM Kosher time 

    THE OLD TESTAMENT NEVER MENTIONED THE EGYPTIAN PYRAMIDS EVEN ONCE . 

    HEY LYING JEWS ,  - - -THE OLD TESTAMENT MENTIONS HILLY AREAS , AND NOT FLAT EGYPT

    NO EGYPTIAN ANCIENT DOCUMENT EVER MENTIONS THAT THEIR KING WAS PHAROAH.-NOT EVEN ONE SINGLE TIME   .  THE TERM  FARAON WAS USED FOR TRIBE LEADER OF MIZRAIM SECT

    ISRAELITES ARE NOT MENTIONED IN EGYPTIAN RECORDS EVEN ONE - REPEAT ONCE.

    JEWS WERE NEVER EVER SLAVES IN EGYPT -    NOT A SINGLE WORLD IN THE OLD TESTAMENT ABOUT A GREAT AND CURIOUS STRUCTURE CALLED SPHINX.

    THE COOKED UP BIBLE IN 325 AD, MENTIONS EGYPT MORE THAN 700 TIMES -JUST TO SHOW JEWS ARE ANCIENT PEOPLE .

    NO ANCIENT WRITER BEFORE 325 BC HAS EVER MENTIONED THE WORD PHAROAH. OR WORD ISRAEL

    ARMENIAN GENOCIDE WAS DONE BY ZIONIST JEWS ( not Muslims ) WHO WANTED TO PRESERVE THE LIES AND DIABOLICAL HATE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT .

    The Book of Exodus relates that Joshua fought against Amalek under the inspiration of Moses, who was supported by Aaron and Hur, and that he mowed them down with the sword. Amalek was not destroyed, however, and at the end of this war Moses was ordered to write in a document, as a reminder, that the Lord would one day blot out the memory of Amalek from under the heaven.

    The ADL for long denied the Armenian genocide, because sooner than later the whole world will know that  Mustafa Kemal Ataturk was a Jew and NOT a Muslim.
    Armenia is  called Amalek by the Byzantines

    ARMENIANS ARE CONSIDERED AMALEKITES BY THE JEWS .

    Armenian was one of the first languages into which the Bible was translated.
    Armenia adopted Christianity in 326 AD

    IN 7000 BC INDIA RULED ARMENIA.


    My revelations now jump to 19.20 %

    Today we live in a age where almost all witnesses produced in court are bribed .    Many innocent Hindus were sent to jail on the basis of Teesta Setalvad chosen and coached  “witnesses produced out of thin air “

    The judges knews that their doctored testimony cant be trusted – yet they convicted  innocent Hindus.
    Because and judges do not have access to the original event, it is paramount to know whether a testimony is based on actual experience or not.

    A LYING AND SOLD OUT WITNESS IS NOT “OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE “.     

    SUCH BRIBED LYING WITNESSES MUST BE PUNISHED SEVERELY.

    Let me quote Wikipedia-
    QUOTE:  In November 2010, Setalvad was accused of pressuring Zaheera Sheikh, the key witness in the Best Bakery case, to make certain statements, leading to the unprecedented transferral of the case outside Gujarat. In August 2005, the Supreme Court of India committee absolved her of the charges of inducement levelled against her by Zaheera and awarded a one-year jail sentence to Zaheera for perjury.[41] In 2013 Tehelka in an undercover investigation discovered that Zaheera had been paid to alter her testimony. Teesta Setalvad's former aide Rais Khan Pathan has filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court alleging manipulation of evidence, which were in the form of statements of witnesses, by her in five sensitive post-Godhra riot cases.[43] In April 2009, the Times of India ran a story claiming that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) set up by the Supreme Court of India to investigate and expedite the Gujarat riot cases had submitted before the Court that Teesta Setalvad had cooked up cases of violence to spice up the incidents. The SIT which is headed by former CBI director, R K Raghavan has said that false witnesses were tutored to give evidence about imaginary incidents by Teesta Setalvad and other NGOs.[44] The SIT charged her of "cooking up macabre tales of killings".[45] The court was told that 22 witnesses, who had submitted identical affidavits before various courts relating to riot incidents, were questioned by SIT and it was found that the witnesses had not actually witnessed the incidents and they were tutored and the affidavits were handed over to them by Setalvad.[45] The report which was brought to the notice of the bench consisting of Justices Arijit Pasayat, P Sathasivam and Aftab Alam, noted that the much publicised case of a pregnant Muslim woman Kausar Bano being gangraped by a mob and foetus being removed with sharp weapons, was also fabricated, and false.[44][46] eesta's Sabrang Communications and Publishing (not registered under FCRA) had between 2004 and 2014 accepted $290,000 from the US-based Ford Foundation without the government approval .The Ford Foundation, one of the largest international donors, was put on the watch-list following a Gujarat government complaint that it was interfering in India's "internal affairs" and encouraging Teesta's NGOs to promote "communal disharmony".[72] Ford Foundation has been accused of such allegations in another country also.[73]:UNQUOTE

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teesta_Setalvad

    EX-CNS ADMIRAL LN RAMDASs DAUGHTER WHO MARRIED A PAKISTANI IS INDIAs COUNTRY REPRESENTATIVE FOR FORD FOUNDATION

    EXAMINING A WITNESS AFTER 20 YEARS OF THE EVENT IS CRIMINAL —THE JUDGE HIMSELF IS MAKING A MOCKERY OF JUSTICE

    RECENTLY FEW PEOPLE WERE ASKED BY THE MELORD JUDGE TO IDENTIFY SALMAN KHAN IN COURT

    THIS IS A WELL KNOWN PLOY

    AFTER THAT THE SAME PEOPLE GET PSYCHED ( AFTER 20 YEARS ) TO SAY THAT THIS WAS THE MAN WHO CRASHED INTO US.

    AT NIGHT WITH POOR STREET LIGHTING, YOU CANNOT RECOGNIZE A MAN MORE THAN 20 FEET AWAY—TRY IT !

    False verbal information can integrate with original memory.   In experiments , when participants were presented with either truthful information or misleading information, and overall it showed that even the false information verbally presented became part of the memory after the participant was asked to recall details. 

    Facial recognition is a good indicator of how easily memories can be manipulated.   In this specific experiment, if a misleading feature was presented, more than a third of the participants recalled that detail. With a specific detail, almost 70% of people claimed that it had been there, when it had not been present.

    People were highly susceptible to suggestion, and Judges do NOT warn slimy lawyers to have a  a better approach to questioning witnesses.

    Mistaken or flawed identification has assumed a newfound prominence in recent years.

    In USA more than 80% of convictions were later overturned by DNA testing, according to the New York-based Innocence Project, which works to free the wrongly convicted.   

    Innocence Project has led to the freeing of 337 wrongfully convicted people, including 20 who spent time on death row. Almost all (99%) of the convictions proven to be false were of males with blacks getting the short end of the stick.

    Police and Judges must nore the confidence levels of eyewitnesses when they select a suspect.
    In India police wrangle promotions and medals when they arrest innocent people and keep them as undertrials without being charged .  A lot of high ranking police officers are such characterless people.


    The nature of erroneous perception are termed Khyatis.   

    There are six important Khyatis in Indian philosophy.

    They are:
    1. Satkhyati, ( what is experienced is real , non-existent cannot be perceived )
    2. Akhyati, ( memory mistaken for perception,   lack of right discrimination vis-à-vis memory )
    3. Anyathakhyati, (misapprehension,  one reality is mistaken for another,
    4. Atmakhyati, (subjective existence and objective non-existence, error not in the object but in the subject)
    5. Asatkhyati, ( error consists in the apprehension of the unreal or in the perception of non-existent entities )
    6. Anirvachaniyakhyati. (  indeterminate judgement ,   apprehension of the indescribable  )

    VEDIC PHILOSOPHY IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS POST –  JUST GIVING A WHIFF .    

    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL SAYS, WESTERN PHILOSOPHY IS 100% LIFTED FROM VEDIC PHILOSOPHY (   THE NON-SPIRITUAL WHITE MAN HAS MURDERED IT )  .

    PHILOSOPHERS MUST BE GRACEFUL AND SPIRITUAL.    AGGRESSIVE, BEEF EATING, DEBAUCHED WHITE MEN CAN NEVER BE DEEP THINKERS.    

    Schizophrenics construct their own fantasy world. 

    Morbid minds hallucinate and create wars


    Stereo typing ( a Jew is intelligent ) , 

    similar to me effect ( hum bhi French tum bhi French Rinchet-majja hai ) ,  

    self serving bias ( I did this, I did that, but alas WE ran aground ),  

    self fulfilling prophecy ( dont fuck it up this time ,  negative expectations – negative results ) ,  

    horn effect ( just because he drinks, he is bad ), 

    halo effect ( just because he prays in church, he is good ), 

    recency effect (  Ronaldo did not hit a goal is the last 3 matches—he is useless ), 

    primary effect ( first impression- he is so polite ), 

    selective perception ( mindset ), 

    skewing errors ( partiality ), 

    fundamental attribution bias ( my shit does not smell- I am the best  ), 

    lucky bastard ( success is luck, failure is because he is incompetent ), 

    perception error ( ours is better ), 

    collecting irrelevant evidence ( I prayed to Basava at river Thames –now all Veerashaiva Lingayaths will vote for me )

    THIS POST IS NOW CONTINUED TO PART 23 , BELOW-








    STOP PRESS:

    INSTEAD OF LEADING THE CHARGE , GIVING DIRECT ORDERS FOR DESILTING SILTED DAM RESERVOIRS--

    WHAT IS THIS GUJARATI FELLOW MODI DOING ?

    HE IS RUNNING AFTER VOTES --WHILE INDIA BURNS

    HE HAS JUMPED INTO VARANASI GHATS E BOATS

    HE CARES FOR HIS PM KURSSI-- NOT THE WATAN

    27 DAYS ARE LEFT FOR DESILTING INDIAN DAMS-- 100% OF THEM DO NOT HAVE DESILTING FACILITIES

    FARMERS ARE COMMITTING SUICIDE DAILY

    YET THIS PATHETIC GUJJU NO 2 HAS NOT YET GIVEN AN ORDER TO DESILT 

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..



    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..