Monday, September 30, 2013



Our vedic dieties like Lord Ganesha, Kubera, Bhudevi ( mother of Sita ) hold it when in the multi armed format.

Above: Gold of wealth and prosperity Kubera .

Why pomegranate?

Because it is given the status of a DIVINE FRUIT in Ayurveda and the Vedas.

Above : Lord Ganesha, the son of Lord Shiva  is also known as the Bijapuraphalasakta, the one fond of the many-seeded pomegranate fruit.

Divine fruit , because it follows the Fibonaccis series and the Golden mean.

Fibonacci is an Italian thief who stole Indian knowledge and patented it in his name.

Punch into Google search-

The golden mean ratio of 1.618 was known to Indians in hoary antiquity.

Punch into Google search-

Modern science has NOT yet woken up to the benefits of pomegranate , which is written in our Sanskrit texts in 5000 BC.

Ayurveda used pomegranate to prevent as well as cure.

Punch into Google search-

Pomegranate spread from India outwards.  In 7000 BC Emperor Vikramaditya ruled from Jerusalem to Urals to Vietnam.

Since this fruit requires dry soil, the main source of pomegranate in ancient times used to be Afghanistan, which was part of India.  Pomegranates are drought-tolerant. In wet  areas, they can be prone to root decay from fungal diseases. They are tolerant to cold temperatures as low as -13 deg C.

Queen Gandhari of Mahabharata 4000 BC, was born in Kandahar, which is today an Islamic bastion.

The flowers, leaves, bark, peel and the seeds of pomegranate are all edible and have potent medicinal qualities.  

The Vedas of 5000 BC , considers pomegranate is as a symbol of fertility and prosperity.  Pomegranate along with coconut is an auspicious item in Indian Hindu weddings.

Take it from Capt Ajit Vadakayil that pomegranate was the ‘original forbidden fruit’ in the garden of Eden.   A large, dry pomegranate was found in the tomb of Djehuty, the butler of Queen Hatshepsut in Egypt, and it went from India.   3000 years ago King Solomon designed his coronet based on the pomegranate's "crown"./

Pomegranate is the most powerful anti-oxidant of all fruits which  protects against damaging free radicals.

In Kerala, we still prefer to use the rind of this fruit to cure us of diarrhea, dysentery and intestinal parasites, over modern western medicine.  The peels or rind of pomegranate are astringent and bitter in taste.  Matalam peels or pomegranate peels left to dry in the sun, are a common sight in any Kerala home.

Pomegranate gives good Calcium, Magnesium , Potassium , Zinc , Vitamic C , Phosphorus and dietary fibre.

Punch into Google search-

The health benefits of phosphorous include healthy bone formation, improved digestion, regulated excretion, protein formation, hormonal balance, improved energy extraction, cellular repair, optimized chemical reactions, and proper nutrient utilization.

Let me list out the benefits of consuming pomegranate as per 6000 year old Ayurveda :---

Pomegranate juice is anti-bacterial and anti-microbial , to fight viruses and bacteria .

Boosts the immunity system and has the highest potential among fruits to inhibit the transmission of HIV.  Its high content of anti- oxidants stimulate the white blood cells to neutralize toxins in the body .

Lowers  bad cholesterol (LDL) and raises good cholesterol (HDL) levels.

Lowers  high blood pressure.

Prevents formation of plaque in the arteries.

Prevents heart attacks .  It  keeps the blood from coagulating and forming blood clots. It even acts as a blood thinner allowing for an unrestricted flow of blood through the body.

Prevents prostate cancer.

Prevents kidney problems. It is good for people who are on modern dialysis.

Prevents hormone dependent breast cancer in women by blocking certain enzymes.

Corrective effect on erectile dysfunction due to its powerful anti-oxidant properties. It is a  natural aphrodisiac and improves sperm count and semen quality. ( AAHA pomegranate kidhar hai? Leke aao !)

Strengthens  hair follicles and thus prevents hair fall, and also gives hair a lustrous appearance.

Helps in the regeneration of cells in the epidermal and dermal layers of the skin and thus  hastens the process of healing of wounds.

Pomegranate juice application on oily skin prevents the outbreak of pimples and controls the production of sebum.  It slows down the process of ageing by reducing wrinkles on the face caused by constant exposure to sun.  It regenerates the skin cells and prevent hyper pigmentation.

Pomegranate juice aids in the smooth functioning of the stomach, heart and liver. It is a good appetizer and can control thirst.

It prevents anemia caused by the deficiency of red blood cells in the body as it contains a good amount of iron. Pomegranate seed extract supplies iron to blood and thus, help to decrease the anemic symptoms including fatigue  and hear loss.

Soothes the stomach, and has  a vital role in the secretion of enzymes which aids proper digestion.
Prevents breast cancer in women.

Diabetics can have this juice as it does not elevate the blood sugar level as other fruit juices do.
Reduces dental plaque.

Pomegranate seed extract prevents Alzheimer’s disease .

Prevents PMS depression in women .

Pomegranate juice used as eyedrops prevents the development of cataracts.

Decoction made by boiling pomegranate peels are used  for gargling in case of sore throat and tonsillitis.

Roasted and powdered pomegranate skin can be mixed with  lime juice and applied  for soothing pimples, and for removing  black heads.

Good to prevent nausea and vomiting.

The flower juice, rind and tree bark aid in stopping nose and gum bleeds.

Boiling the tree root will help  kill worms and parasites.

Roast the peel  until it is dark brown and brittle. Crush into powder and mix with a little coconut oil apply over the anus to prevent anal itching .

Water boiled with pomegranate leaves strengthens the receding gums.

Mix the powder above with pepper to prevent dental decay.

Prevents morbid obesity.

Pomegranate juice increases memory power .

It is recommended that the pomegranate be consumed with along its seeds. Punicic acid is an omega-5 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid found in pomegranate seed which has cancer preventive actions.


Grace and peace !


Saturday, September 28, 2013



During my travels over 4 decades to Islamic countires I have asked hundreds of Muslim men . 

Why do you circumcise your dick ?

All of them said because it is mentioned in the Koran.

When I tell them that I too have read the Koran and there is nothing mentioned in Koran about circumcision, they try to argue and then keep quiet with a confused look.

Khitan or circumcision is only mentioned in the Hadith —  which also includes circumcision, removing pubic hair,  clipping the mustache,  paring the nails, and plucking the hair under the armpits.

How many percentage Muslims do you see around the world with shaved upperlips?

The Five Pillars of the Islamic Faith are - the profession of faith, daily prayer, fasting at Ramadan, giving money to the poor (charity), and the pilgrimage to Mecca.

Muhammad the Prophet was a very intelligent person, and he created laws for the survival of a “not so bright” desert Bedouin community. 

He made several laws which even the most learned of Muslims do NOT know the reason why?
I am a Hindu and NOT a Muslim.

From now on this post if for educated Muslims who are Indians first.  This post is NOT for people who are Muslims first and then desh drohi Pakistanis. 

I am sure NO educated or uneducated Muslim wants his respected mother, dear sister or darling daughter to be divorced by a man gone astray, just by saying TALAQ TALAQ TALAQ.  

Or a Hindu man like Dharmendra converting to Islam just because he wants to marry Hema Malini who is more attractive than his first wife , without divorcing her.

Punch into Google search-

Yes, taking four wives had a social engineering purpose in those days .

Now , punch into Google search-

Like Muslims , Hindus and Jews too do NOT eat pork. 

Ever since the Babri Masjid demolition even good desh bhakt Muslims  see a conspiracy when a Hindu talks about amending Muslims personal laws, to be congruent with the times.

Yes, India is a secular country. SECULAR means treating all religions the same. Secular does NOT mean that you kick the majority and pamper the minority in a selfish manner for votes.

Muslims do NOT understand why Hindus demolished the Babri Masjid.  I am NOT a supporter of this demolition.  But it has happened and there is NO point crying over it.  Moreover no  namaz prayers have ever been conducted in this structure, since it was built — never mind the SP propaganda.

Imagine Israel in all its arrogant power, bombs Kaaba in Mecca and then uses the same stones to build a synagogue on top of the existing foundation.  And after 400 years the Muslims of Saudi Arabia are in a condition where they can undo a past wrong,  will they not do it?  

Same way, Ayodhya for Hindus is like Mecca.

Thought the waitress and her coterie has kicked Hindus on their ehads and tried to prove that Lord Rama and Ayodhya is just fiction , the rest of the world does NOT think so.  

Before 7000 BC India ruled the whole world.

South Korean tourist come in droves to visit Ayodhya and their government also wanted to ADOPT Ayodhya, which we did NOT permit.

Punch into google search-




We cannot have different rules in India for different communities.  We recollect the incident where Simranjit Singh Mann wanted to enter parliament with his sword.   If so Coorgis can carry guns into parliament.    

If so if we can convert to an Australian aborginee community and can welcome each other by shaking their pricks instead of hands.   Or we can convert ourselves to Eskimos and do wife swapping merrily.  Or we convert to some Bantu tribe and carry bows and arrows into airplanes.

Finally is this not what Dharmendra and Hema Malini has done?

How valid is Dharmendra’s seat in Lok Sabha and Hema Malini’s seat in Rajya Sabha when their entry forms itself are a big lie.  Why have we allowed false hood and chicanery to penetrate the Indian Parliament.

How valid is Hema Malini’s daughter’s marriage ?

How many of you can feel the mental agony of Prakash Kaur?

Check out their case.

Hema Malini fell in love with her co-star Dharmendra during the filming of Sholay.  She eventually kicked his wife Prakash Kaur on her head and married him.  Prakash Kaur did NOT divorce her husband Dharmendra.   

Before Dharmendra and Hema Malinin  married, they both converted to Islam, though the conversion was for convenience only for Hindus are not allowed second marriage. Their marriage was solemnised on 21 August 1979 in Bombay in accordance with Islamic rites.

While filing his nomination papers as a BJP candidate before the returning officer, Dharmendra had written his name as Deol Dharmendra Kewal Krishn concealing his Muslim name Dilawar Khan and wrote the name of his first wife Prakash Kaur in the respective column.  

When his political rivals brought the issue to the notice of election authorities and the general public, Dharmendra lied through his teeth and denied his conversion to Islam and change of name.  

Lies in the affidavit submitted on oath to the returning officer -- is this what is expected out of an MP? BJP must sack Dharmendra and deny him a party ticket.   Sections 420 (cheating), infringement of the Hindu Marriage Act and Islamic Shariat law must be applied on both Dharmendra and Hema Malini and their properties must NOT pass on to their children..  

Hema Malini too has concealed her name vide her  marital status in her Rajya Sabha form.  Both of them have taken refuge in the political spectrum—it is NOT that both are so found of the fish market known as the Indian Parliament  .

The magazine Outlook published a photocopy of his Nikahnama (marriage document) which clearly said that Dilawar Khan Kewal Krishn (44 years) accepted Aisha Bi R. Chakravarty (29 years) as his wife on 21 August 1979 at a mehr of, Rs 111,000 in the presence of two legal witnesses…’ The nikah was solemnised by Maulana Qazi Abu Talha Misbahi Faizabadi. .  

Both the nikahnama and the affidavit before the returning officer state his address as Plot number 22, Road Number 11 J.V.P.D. Scheme, Juhu, Mumbai—400049.  The nikahnama also carries details of the maulvi and eyewitnesses present on the occasion. A mehr of Rs 1,11,000 too is shown to have been finalised between the two parties as the agreement for the nikah.

In an interview to Outlook , Dharmendra lied again and  categorically denied he had changed his religion. "This allegation is totally incorrect. I am not the kind of man who will change his religion to suit his interests." When asked about the Congress charges, he had asserted: "If there is any truth in this charge, let someone prove it with evidence. If this a lie, let the public decide."

What do you mean let the public decide.  It is the Indian judiciary who will decide if CHAAR SAU BISI  has been done.

Polygamy is illegal in India for Hindus and other religious groups under the Hindu Marriage Act. It remains legal for Muslims under the terms of The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act of 1937, as interpreted by the All India Muslim Personal Law Board.

And who are all these Muslim mullahs and stalwarts who interpret the Muslims personal laws.  Are they elected in a fair manner ?   It is because of these hardliners who re-interpret the Hadith as they please, that Islam as a religion is put in bad light.

Why do we have selective Islamic laws?

Koran wants the hand of a Muslim thief to be cut off .  

If we can afford a Muslim TALAQ  privelage why NOT a chopped off hand?  

In future if any Muslim man with 4 wives steals-- let his hands be chopped off.  Why cherry pick Sharia rules selectively for selfish advantage.   

Why are we being selective?

Narendra Modi,  the BJP Prime Ministerial candidate of the BJP started his poll campaign, calling for a Uniform Civil Code.  India has two sets of  Laws, General law and Personal Law.

General law is applicable to all the persons who approach the Courts like the Criminal laws including the Indian Penal Code and procedural laws like the Civil Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code and the Indian Evidence Act.

Personal laws are special laws applicable to the persons in their private family affairs like Marriage, Divorce, Adoption, Inheritance, Wills, Guardianship etc.

The Legislature has not interfered in the personal laws applicable to persons following their religion or the established customs and traditions.

Allah does NOT  distinguish between men and women.   The self proclaimed Islamic clerics are ignorant about what the Koran has to say on the subject of women’s lives.   The unelected Muslim Personal Law Board is not representative of all Muslims, as they have very few educated women in their organization.

Muhammed the prophet introduced reformist Islam and Koran to uplift women. It was NOT his intention to kick Muslim women on their heads.  Koran  promotes gender equality  gave women the right to divorce,  re-marry,  and work.

Muslim women like Shah Bano have NOT argued against the Koran . Rather, they only plead for their rights under Koran.  Shah Bano was an old Indian Muslim lady then in her seventies,  now deceased, whose affluent lawyer husband famously deserted her for a younger attractive woman and then sought to rely on traditional Muslim law  to refuse any further responsibility for her welfare.

Shah Bano was kicked out by her husband after 4 decades of  marriage and several children. He claimed that giving his old former wife the stipulated iddat money and the dower  (haq mahr), together just a few hundred Indian Rupees, fulfilled his legal obligations  towards her, relying on traditional Muslim law to exempt himself from any further  liability.  

Well before the Shah Bano case, however, the increasingly activist Indian Supreme Court had already established in a 1979 case that a Muslim ex-husband would only be exempt from further payments to his ex-wife if the payments were  sufficient for her “to keep body and soul together”. 

What does our Constitution say about Uniform Civil Code? In article 44, our constitution clearly specifies this: "The State shall endeavor to secure the citizen a uniform civil code through out the territory of India".

However, in response to this, there exist-

Article 14 which guarantees the Fundamental Right of equality before law.

Article 15 which prohibits discrimination against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth .

Articles 25-29 providing religious and cultural freedom... 

Article 13 of the Constitution says that all laws in force in India at the time of the commencement of the constitution, if repugnant to any of the fundamental rights, have to cease to apply in any manner whatsoever.

Article 372 at the same time requires that "all the laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this constitution shall continue in force therein until altered or repealed or amended by a competent legislature or other competent authority."

Article 15  requires non-discrimination based on "sex". It goes against the Indian constitution when Muslim Personal Law favours the man in cases of divorce and  polygamy. Equality before the law would essentially mean that Muslim women could take up to four husbands.

BR Ambedkar while making the constitution had an axe to grind with Hinduism.

Who was BR Ambedkar?

Punch into Google search-


Muslims who are NOT a majority in other countries accept uniform civil laws where they do not consider this as a personal defeat whereas in India it is.  This is the result of the vulgar secularism. In India secularism is all about vote bank politics.  Indian Muslims vote for Muslims candidates —in general.  

Is it secular to have different laws for different religion or it is secular to have a uniform law, where all are equal ?

A uniform civil code administers the same set of secular civil laws to govern all people irrespective of their religion, caste and tribe. This supersedes the right of citizens to be governed under different personal laws based on their religion or caste or tribe.

Such codes are in place in most modern nations,and in India only in Goa.

This was a sham by the Portuguese,  who tried to historically delete their immoral and sadistic Goan Inquisition .

Punch into Google search-


Hindus, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists come under Hindu law, whereas Muslims and Christians have their own laws.  Muslim law is based on the Sharia.

The Indian Mullahs try to cling on to power. Once an UCC comes into force, nobody will care for them. Even in Pakistan the 1961 Muslim Family Law Ordinance of Pakistan "makes it obligatory for a man who desires to take a second wife to obtain a written permission from a government appointed Arbitration Council" –  superceeding the Shariat Act of 1937.   

It is a shame that India has yet to learn from Pakistan , how to protect Muslim women.

You will find moth eaten faces like Shabana Azmi waiting in ambush like a spider,  to hog the limelight.  Are we to assume that  she does NOT understand all this?

Where more than 80% of citizens have already been brought under codified personal law, there is no justification whatsoever to keep the remaining 20% in abeyance just for vote banks.

Now let us apply our collective commonsense to find out which article of the constitution must take preponderence..   No intelligence or literacy is required here.  

This is like the “Order of Operations – BODMAS”

But, when you see something like...

1 + 5 x 6 - 3 + (4 - 2)

... what part should you calculate first?

Calculate them in the wrong order, and you will get a wrong answer !

This is where BODMAS kicks in !

B- Brackets first
O- Orders (ie Powers and Square Roots, etc.)
DM- Division and Multiplication (left-to-right)
AS- Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)

“Secular India” must not interfere in the religious matters of various communities.  However, a reverse point can be made as well i.e. why should a secular India give such sweeping exemptions based on religion?

Principle of secularism means that state will not discriminate against individuals on the basis of their religious beliefs or lack of it.   But by instituting religion based personal laws state is doing precisely that!

Is there NO intelligence in our law makers or judiciary? Is there NO intelligent “think tank”?

Can we made a BODMAS to kick in UCC.

Article 44 is based on the concept that there is no necessary connection between religion and personal law in a civilised society.

We must honour Article 44 of the Constitution which states "the State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India".   The Constitution was made in 1950, and 64 years had passed since it was promulgated, but Article 44 had been totally ignored by vested politicians—eager to appease Muslims for vote bank politics . We must have one common criminal law in india.  

Article 25 guarantees religious freedom whereas Article 44 seeks to divest religion from social relations and personal law.

Marriage, succession and like matters of a secular character cannot be brought within the guarantee enshrined under Articles 25, 26 and 27.

Punch into google search-


And read about 3 friends,  3 beers and the missing dollar.

To be frank our constitution makers have nothing to be proud of.   They just did NOT have the perception to imagine a fu#kin'  BODMAS.

We all know the great tamasha of the Sania Mirza marriage,  where her Muslim Pakistani cricketer husband married his first Indian Muslim wife on---  “hold your breath” -- telephone!!   

Everybody knows that Shoaib Malik left his first wife Ayesha Siddiqui  just because she became fat. 

Like the mullahs seem to be trying to convey, UCC  does not insist people from one religion to start practicing rituals of other religions.  All it says is, with changing living styles along with the time, there should be a uniform civil code irrespective of all religions as far as social ethics are concerned.

Hindus have accepted changes in their personal  laws with grace.  Child marriages were banned, Sati was banned, widow re-marriage was encouraged, divorce was introduced, inheritance laws were amended and Hindus accepted all these changes. They never complained of hurting their religious sentiments like the Muslims. 

Muslims in other countries , where they are in minority accept uniform civil laws where they do not consider this as a great defeat whereas in India it is.  This is the result of the vulgar vote bank politics. 

During independence in 1947, all hardcore Indian Muslims were given the free option of going to Pakistan.  It is NOT that they were never given a choice.  These people who decided to stay back in India and now crying hoarse about UCC as an attempt  to destroy “Muslim Identity”.  

The vast majority of Muslims led by the Jumiat al-Ulama and other orthodox Muslim groups have fought tooth and nail against any change to the Personal Law, and this includes educated Indian Muslims too. 

All this is despite Muslims being pampered and allowed to go on Haj pilgrimage with government subsidy with taxes paid by majority Hindus. The Muslim Madrassas which breed terrorists too are being subsidized by taxed paid by Hindu majority. We do know of the inflow of Saudi Wahabi funds too for desh drohi activities.

That “Secular India” must not interfere in the religious matters of various communities is pure nonsense.  Secular India must NOT give such sweeping exemptions based on religion, when a Muslim man can marry four times , while men of other religions will be thrown into jail .

A uniform civil code doesn’t mean it will limit the freedom of people to follow their religion, it just means that every person will be treated the same.  This is the meaning of secularism, NOT majority bashing or proving that majority is always wrong. .  

All the laws related to marriage, inheritance, family, land etc. should be equal for all Indians.  This is the only way to ensure that all Indians are treated same.

The biggest benefit is that India will be rid of vote bank politics.  Not having a uniform civil code is detrimental to true democracy and that has to change.   

UCC will cut the strength from under the feet of the power drunk mullahs.  Power is also an intoxicant.  Islam prohibits intoxication. UCC is NOT about Muslim bashing.  

This change for the better , especially for the Muslim women ( which is 50% of the Muslim population ) must come from within the educated sections Muslim community itself.

Even Islam allows a Muslim who is hungry for three days to taken forbidden food.

Divorce should not be a hasty decision and an impulsive or ego laden  act.  Sufficient time is given to both parties to consider reconciliation before they finally decide to part.

The Koran has been very fair in this regard.  Koran  introduces several time capsule stages for final separation, so that the married couple may reconsider their position before jumping off the deep end.

Islamic divorce is to be pronounced thrice after each menstrual period called “Tuhrs”.  Repudiation must not take place during menstruation.  This provides enough time for relatives to come from far off places , to intervene, counsel and protect the interests of the helpless wife and children.  In most of the Muslim countries divorce has been made a judicial act.  

When divorce is initiated by the wife and the husband consents to it, divorce is known as ‘Khula’. In several Muslim countries, new laws have been framed to enforce this con­cession given to women. But in India Khula has no legal sanction.

Islam does NOT permit polygamy unconditionally.  It is allowed only when it helps the new woman and it is more to help orphan girls and helpless widows.

Sameer Ali in his “Spirit of Is­lam”, says, “You may marry two, three, or four wives, but not more”. The subsequent lines declare, “but if you cannot deal equitably and justly with all, you shall marry only one, (IV: 3).

India is still one one of the only countries where Muslim women are rarely allowed to pray in mosques. . 
Marriages are not required to be registered, and sometimes made without women’s consent. 

Muslim women’s groups have argued that since personal laws are uncodified, customary practices have superseded the laws of the holy Koran.

It is high time, the issue receives the serious consideration of our Ulema, and if they fail to see reason they must be told to LUMP the UCC, with or without a pinch of salt.  

In the olden days, yes these mullahs were known to be Koran experts.   Today anybody educated woman can download the Koran on the internet and be an expert in one month flat—more so when women are NOT allowed to participate in the Islamic decision-making process affecting their lives and souls.

Muslim women must  demand  equality as enshrined in the Koran .

India is not an Islamic country and in fact,  has a secular code for criminal law.  If the Muslim community has accepted a non-sharia code in one sphere, then logically, it should be amenable to such a code in other spheres as well.   

For a country to progress  law be divorced from religion.  Only then India will emerge as a much more cohesive and integrated nation.

The mullahs will never support the Muslim woman , as they stand to lose their falthu power. Muslim society became gradually feudalised and women acquired a subjugated status only because of these selfish mullahs.

Can you imagine the mullahs have been saying this –

Bernard Shaw has said ( sic !)  “the laws of marriage and divorce given by Islam are most suitable for our times.”


Bernard Shaw never said that!!

George Bernard Shaw was a Rothschild stooge who praised the Red Communist Bolsheviks and Jew Stalin.  No wonder he got the Nobel prize and was planted as a founder of the London School of Economics.  He went all the way to Moscow to meet Stalin in 1931.
It is the DEEP STATE within India which keeps Kashmir on the tinderbox.. This DEEP STATE is sustained by JNU commies and crypto Jews ..

Farooq Abdullah's mother is JEWESS Begum Akbar Jehan whose father was Rothschild's agent JEW Michael Harry Nedou.. Begum Akbat Jehan was married to Lawrence of Arabia as per my Pakistani officers.

JEW Lawrence of Arabia was the kingpin for the wordwide DEEP STATE of Rothschild.

Read all 5 parts ---




Article 370 of the Indian constitution is an article that grants special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir.

The article is drafted in Part XXI of the Constitution: Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions.

The State's Constituent Assembly was empowered to recommend the articles of the Indian constitution to be applied to the state or to abrogate the Article 370 altogether.

After the state Constituent Assembly dissolved itself without recommending abrogation, the Article 370 was deemed to have become a permanent feature of the Indian Constitution.


They exploited Article 370, and adopted Sections 6, 8 and 9 for incorporation in the Constitution under which the State was to be governed in the future.

Article 370 gave the solitary State of Jammu & Kashmir the right to have a separate Constitution and separate flag, but nowhere does it say which category of Indians will enjoy all citizenship rights in Jammu & Kashmir and which sections will not.


Jawaharlal Nehru, the HALF BROTHER of Sheikh Abdullah (who married the wife of LAWRENCE OF ARABIA-- JEWESS BEGUM AKBAR JEHAN) subverted the basic structure of the Indian Constitution in May 1954 to deprive all Indian citizens, including refugees from West Pakistan settled in Jammu province. of their fundamental right to exercise all rights in Jammu & Kashmir…

Nehru and Sheikh Abdullah made sure that the Permanent Residents of Jammu & Kashmir shall exercise all rights all over India…

Nehru amended Article 368 without taking the Indian Parliament into confidence, THOUGH Parliament alone had the power to amend or not amend the Constitution, to amend Article 35 and add to it the atrocious Article 35A which was enforced in Jammu & Kashmir through the Constitution (Application to Jammu & Kashmir) Order, May 1954.

Article 35A enabled the Jammu & Kashmir Constituent Assembly to deny citizenship rights to the HINDU refugees from West Pakistan and all other Indians, barring Permanent Residents of the State.

Armed with absolute power, the Jammu & Kashmir Constituent Assembly adopted Section 6 which said no persons who had crossed over to the state after May 1944 will be considered eligible for citizenship rights.

Nehru enforced Article 35A in Jammu & Kashmir UNCONSTITUTIONALLY - More important he criminally CONCEALED it.

He hid the amendments from the public, by not mentioning the same in the main body of the Constitution—read this line twice.

The unconstitutional amendments to Article 368 and Article 35 were mentioned only in Appendix-I and Appendix-II, respectively, so that they could escape public attention in a CRIMINAL MANNER.




    Nehru in cahoots with his HALF BROTHER Sheikh Abdullah conspired against the HINDU refugees from West Pakistan, and then further hatched a conspiracy against all Indian citizens, in order to pander to communalists in Kashmir, by subverting Articles 16 and 19 of the Indian Constitution which deal with the rights of Indian citizens, including fundamental rights.

    Article 19, for example, says that “All citizens shall have the right (a) to freedom of speech and expression, (b) to assemble peacefully and without arms, (c) to form associations or unions, (d) to move freely throughout the territory of India, (e) to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India; (f) to acquire, hold and dispose of property; and (g) to practice any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business”.

    It follows that what is needed is not just the abrogation of Article 370 but also the revocation of Article 35A. This is the only course left to enable the refugees from West Pakistan and other Indians to exercise citizenship rights in Jammu & Kashmir and integrate it fully into India.

    In October 2015, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir has ruled that the Article 370 cannot be "abrogated, repealed or even amended."

    It explained that the clause (3) of the Article conferred power to the State's Constituent Assembly to recommend to the President on the matter of the repeal of the Article.

    Since the Constituent Assembly did not make such a recommendation before its dissolution in 1957, the Article 370 has taken on the features of a "permanent provision" despite being titled a temporary provision in the Constitution.

    BALLS !

    Article 35A came into existence by a Presidential Order passed by Dr. Rajandra Prasad ( Rothschild sponsored FAKE Kayastha ) on the advice of Nehru’s cabinet in 1954...

    President of India has sole legislative power under article 123 power to make ordinance when either house of the Parliament is not in session. 

    - This legislative powers of the President has an EXPIRY SHELL PERIOD OF MERE SIX MONTHS....

    The Constitution can be amended only by the Parliament as per procedure clearly laid out in Article 368. but Article 35A was never presented before the Parliament of India…

    This effectively means, in this case, the President bypassed the amending procedure as laid out in the Constitution of India in order to add the new Article 35A…

    This also means that Article 368 of the Constitution, in its application to Jammu and Kashmir, also got amended!..

    The President of India does not have legislative power, but here in this case he performed the function of Parliament!..

    Article 35A appears in the Constitution as an appendix…How can an Article, which has been implemented on the ground as if it’s a part of the Constitution, be missing from the text of the Constitution ?

    Article 35A was an amendment in our Constitution via the back door (Presidential order), without the involvement of India’s Parliament…

    Article 35A is an example of the abuse of Article 370.   Article 35A is a violation of the basic structure of our Constitution.    Article 35A spawned a set of laws that were discriminatory in nature. ..

    It curbs certain basic rights enshrined in the very Preamble of the Constitution. A Kashmiri woman marrying a non-permanent resident or outsider loses all succession rights, while a Kashmiri man does not.

    As a result of the implementation of Article 35A,.lakhs of Indian HINDU citizens have been deprived of “ JUSTICE, social, economic and political ” and “ EQUALITY of status and of opportunity ”...

    In the laws under Article 370 read with Article 35A even the President of India may be denied a place or land for official purpose. This is a breach of trust…



    Democratic India cannot allow any section of its population to be treated as second-rate citizens in any part of the country.

    Article 368 is the only way to amend the Constitution,.. Not the President.

    The marginal note of Article 368 states; “ Power of the Parliament to amend the Constitution and procedure, therefore ”.. Which means it is the Parliament that has the power to amend the Constitution.

    Sub-clause 2 of the Article 368 states that: --
    “ An amendment of this Constitution may be initiated only by the introduction of a Bill for the purpose in either House of Parliament, and when the Bill is passed in each House by majority of not less than two-third of the members of that House present and voting, [it shall be presented to the President who shall give his assent to the Bill and thereupon] the Constitution shall stand amended in accordance with the terms of Bill..."

    The President of India does NOT have the sole UNBRIDLED power to amend the constitution through the bypass of the entire Constitutional mechanism nor does Article 370 give power to the President to insert any Article in any Part of the Constitution....

    The parliamentary route of lawmaking was bypassed when the President incorporated Article 35A into the Constitution. Article 368 (i) of the Constitution empowers only Parliament to amend the Constitution. The President acted outside his jurisdiction.. Article 35A is void because the Nehru government did not place it before Parliament for discussion..

    Article 370 grants special status to Jammu and Kashmir, while Article 35A empowers the state legislature to define permanent citizens.

    Article 370 and Article 35A of the Indian Constitution are an "unnecessary baggage" of the past and hence these laws be repealed..

    Restricting citizens from other States from getting employment or buying property within Jammu and Kashmir is a violation of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution…

    Article 370 (along with Article 35A) is an anachronistic decree that has outlived its utility, militates against India’s sovereignty, and discriminates against both Indians and Kashmiris by mutually excluding each other from syncretic growth. It is redundant, and constitutionally discarded into the dustbin of history.



    Capt ajit vadakayil

Grace and peace !