MAHATMA GANDHI , RE-WRITING INDIAN HISTORY -- CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL

WHY GANDHI DID NOT GET NOBEL PRIZE FOR PEACE,   JOSEPH LELYVELD,  HERMANN KALLENBACH,  GOPAL KRISHNA GOKHALE UNMASKED , WINSTON CHURCHILL, ROTHSCHILD ,  THE WEB OF DECEIT-  CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL

WARNING: This contents of this post cannot be re-produced without referring to this blogsite as the source . This information is being revealed for the first time on this planet. 

I should have written all  this in 1977. I have kept all this inside my chest for 35 years.

It is time to reveal shocking truths.

I want all patriots to read this post at least 3 times. Then I want you to allow the information to incubate inside you for 1 month.

Meanwhile I would suggest that you do some research of your own. If your conscience tells you that this post is the "naked truth", then I would like you to pass it on to people who deserve knowing the truth.

My readers will realise, that I did NOT allow Anna Hazare to repeat history and be converted to another gullible Gandhi.

Punch into Google search ( later ) - BABA RAMDEV AND ANNA HAZARE TEAM UP- VADAKAYIL

At the National Archives, letters penned by Mohandas K. Gandhi, B.R. Ambedkar, Gopal Krishna Gokhale,  suffered from exposure to humid weather, staff negligence and mishandling, and improper preservation methods.  Make no mistake that these damning documents were destroyed deliberately.

Gandhi managed to pass the Matriculation Examination in 1887 in the third division, scoring a pathetic 247 out of 625. He became more articulate in his old age.

I am very well aware that Mahatma Gandhi is the father of the nation.

So, what has prompted me to reveal something so gruesome , after 35 years.

Well the trigger is the untruths I see on Internet and media about a book written by a Jew Joseph Lelyveld “Great Soul: Mahatma Gandhi and His Struggle With India” . 

Joseph Lelyveld, is a Zionist and a Pulitzer Prize winner.

Pulitzer is a prize awarded by Columbia University USA.  Columbia university was made with Opium drug money by Rothschild.  

Rothchild was the owner of British East India Company, who grew Opium in India and sold it in China.

The book portrays Gandhi as a debauched bisexual with a gay relationship with one of his disciples, the German-Jewish architect and body builder Hermann Kallenbach.

The headlines of UK’s Daily Mail, Britain’s second-largest newspaper, screamed, “Gandhi left his wife to live with a male lover, new book claims”-- and this made the day of the Christian white invaders.

The Wall Street Journal's review states the book depicts Gandhi as "a sexual weirdo, a political incompetent, a fanatical faddist, implacably racist, and a ceaseless self-promoter, professing his love for mankind as a concept while actually despising people as individuals."

Lelyveld quotes correspondence between Gandhi and Kallenbach, including excerpts from the latter's diary, with language that seems suggestive of a homosexual relationship, with Gandhi speaking of his Hermann Kallenbach as "Lower House," and of himself as "Upper House," and saying that cotton-wool and Vaseline were a constant reminder of their "mutual love"

In a letter written from a London hotel during a trip to lobby British authorities in 1909, for example, Gandhi’s infatuation with Kallenbach is clear: “Your portrait (the only one) stands on my mantelpiece in the bedroom. The mantelpiece is opposite the bed.” 

Politicians in India have generally and across the political spectrum denounced the book and demanded it be banned as being allegedly defamatory, with the Government of Gujarat under Narendra Modi banning the book as "perverse in nature... hurting the sentiments of those with capacity for sane and logical thinking," and demanding a "public apology" from Lelyveld, and with Federal Law Minister Veerappa Moily of the Governments of India and Industries Minister Narayan Rane of the Government of Maharashtra promising to ban it.

The State Assembly of Gujarat (with a population of more than 50 million), where Gandhi was born, voted unanimously to ban the book immediately after the state’s chief minister, Narendra Modi, said it “deserves to be despised.”.  Its publication “shall not be tolerated under any circumstances,” Chief Minister of Gujarat Modi declared, according to the Associated Press.

Whenever they were apart, they sustained a frequent and intense correspondence. Only half of their letters survive today; Gandhi systematically destroyed all of what he described as Kallenbach’s ”logical and charming love notes” to him.

Gandhi’s 13 letters to Kallenbach, however, were put up for auction decades after the death of the two men, and were eventually acquired by the National Archives of India.

Lelyveld Arthur Joseph , a rabbi  received his B.A. from Columbia University in 1933 . He was instrumental role in obtaining critical American recognition of the newly formed State of Israel. Lelyveld was a contributor to the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. He was a veteran of four decades with the New York Times,owned by Rothschilds, where he served as executive editor from 1994 to 2001.

The book has not yet been released in India.

Well, Capt Vadakayil who is more perceptive than all of them put together, does NOT believe the two men were lovers.   He says that it is a mindless cherry pickin' interpretation with ulterior motives. 

These decadent souls will accuse a woman of having sex with her dog if she as much says "I love my dog".

The decadent invading Christians have no idea that 11000 years before Thomas Babington Macaulay cried "soap is civilization",  

Sanatana Dharma had the concept that sexuality has elemental energy, which if  sublimated and contained  can give you amazing spiritual powers.  

In Kerala we have the Sabarimala pilgrimage , the largest on the planet, where 53 million pilgrims has to be vegetarian and celibate for 41 days, before he starts off.

Sotheby's had put a pre-sale estimate of between £500,000 and £700,000 on the collection of letters.  The sale was pulled after Indian authorities agreed to purchase the entire archive for around £700,000 (60million rupees). Sotheby's said in a terse statement: 'The Gandhi-Kallenbach archive... has been sold in a private transaction to the Indian government on 10th July 2012.'

German Jew Kallenback was a  skilled ice-skater, swimmer, cyclist and gymnast, and an architect. In 1904 he was told by German Jew Rothschild  to befriend  Gandhi, who was then working in South Africa.   In 1910 , on Rothchild’s orders Kallenbach, donated to Gandhi his 1100 acre (4 km²)  farm near Johannesburg.  

It was less than 2 miles from the nearest railway station and already had 1,000 fruit bearing trees. There were 2 wells and a spring,  and a few small buildings. The farm was used to run Gandhi's famous "Tolstoy Farm" that housed the families of his satyagrahis.  Kallenbach himself  named this farm after Leo Tolstoy. Kallenback's task was to brainwash Gandhi into non-violence to fight the enemy.  Leo Tolstoy died on 20th Nov 1910.

The famous Russian author Leo Tolstoy ( like Karl Marx ) was a crypto-jew. He wrote in 1891 as follows: 

“The Jew was the pioneer of civilization, many thousands of years before the birth of Christ when the ancient world was surrounded with an impregnable wall of barbarism and rudeness. 

The prevailing rule in the land of Israel was that each individual was obligated to teach those who were uneducated or those unable to read or write… the Jews have and always will adhere, support and spread the idea of liberty, civilization and religious tolerance.”

“What is the Jew?…What kind of unique creature is this whom all the rulers of all the nations of the world have disgraced and crushed and expelled and destroyed; persecuted, burned and drowned, and who, despite their anger and their fury, continues to live and to flourish. 

What is this Jew whom they have never succeeded in enticing with all the enticements in the world, whose oppressors and persecutors only suggested that he deny (and disown) his religion and cast aside the faithfulness of his ancestors?!

The Jew – is the symbol of eternity. … He is the one who for so long had guarded the prophetic message and transmitted it to all mankind. A people such as this can never disappear. The Jew is eternal. He is the embodiment of eternity.”

SIC--PUKE!

Leo Nikolayevich Tolstoy achieved his place as one of the greatest Russian writers of all time, with Rothschild's support. His average books War and Peace, and Anna Karenina, were made out to be classics by the Rothschild held media.  Rothschild made Tolstoy brainwash young and gullible  Mohandas Gandhi with the idea of nonviolent resistance ..

Bengal had become an unsafe place for the British . Calcutta was a hotbed for violent freedom fighters. Many patriots like Resh Bihari Bose, Aurobindo Ghosh, Bagha Jatin, Khudiram Bose etc made life unsafe for the white invader.  They even had to transfer the Capital of India from Calcutta to Delhi in 1911.  

Britain need "their type of non-violent freedom figher" to take over the reins of Indian freedom fighting.  The "well planned" 1st world war was drawing close. They needed to recruit at least 1.3 million Indian soldiers for WW1.

 Rothschild used Winston Churchill, whose mother Jenny Jerome was Rothschilds , to fan the flames of first world war. There were enormous profits to be made. They wanted to carve out a homeland for the Jews in Palestine. Winston was told by Rothschild to create MI-5 and MI-6--the information and security services in 1909. 

They would draw America into the war by sinking a passenger ship full of Americans. (SS Lusitania). The ultimate aim was to enforce the Barflour declaration for the state of Israel. They could NOT afford to fight a war without the help of thousands of willing and brave cannon fodder Indian Soldiers.

Winston Churchill was catapulted from a Mr. Nobody to the "most famous Englishman " and to the world stage by mind boggling deceit-- the way Rothschild always did,

Rothschild nurtured moulded their British agent carefully. Using immense money power they manipulated everything for Winston and made him a popular author by the age of 24 , and a cabinet minister at the age of 33.

Rothschild even doctored a bravery medal for Winston. 

They engineered  (by paying a fortune in bribes) a great drama in South Africa, where Winston was imprisoned and made a most daring escape from Boers custody. He immediately became a national hero , as Rothschild owned almost all the media.

   

Winston Churchill resigned his commission from the military in 1899, setting goals to make a living writing and later, politics and headed for South Africa.  In South Africa during the time, a lengthy war continued with the British and Boer Republic colonies.  A very complex war, but for relevance’s sake, a war of revolution, the Boer’s fighting for freedom from the rule of the British. 

The Boer fought a guerrilla dominant warfare, and during Churchill’s stay the British counterattacked with scorched earth tactics. The practice of destroying anything which may be of use to the enemy (roads, buildings, irrigation, etc.), may have played in the decision of Churchill later in this life to support the controversial act of carpet bombing.

Within the first month of Churchill’s presence in South Africa, he became famous for saving an ambushed train of British soldiers, even at the cost of sacrificing his own freedom, --  all stage managed.

So, in 1899,  our brave Winston Churchill headed to South Africa as a newspaper correspondent for the Morning Post owned by Rothschilds,  to cover the Boer War between British and Dutch settlers. He was made to be  present at an ambush of an armored train and captured by enemy Boer soldiers.-- all stage managed.. 

On the night of December 12th, when the prison guards conveniently turned their backs on Humpty Dumpty-- nay-- Churchill , he took the opportunity to climb over the prison wall. 

Wearing a brown flannel suit with £75 (the equivalent of $375) and 4 slabs of chocolate in his pocket ( or was it 5 ? ) , Churchill walked on leisurely through the night in hopes of finding the Delagoa Bay Railway. So began his great escape and journey to freedom. All this can only be believed only by an inebriated John Bull.

  

Gargantuan Churchill jumped onto a train and hid among soft sacks covered in coal dust.  Leaving the train before daybreak, Churchill continued on his escape.  With luck, Winston Churchill happened upon the home of Mr. John Howard, manager of the Transvaal Collieries.  Maybe he had GPS.

Upon knocking on his door, Mr. Howard’s response to Winston Churchill plea for help was “Thank God you have come here! It is the only house for twenty miles where you would not have been handed over. But we are all British here, and we will see you through.” 

HOW CHWEEEEEEET !

Mr. Howard first hid Churchill in a coal mine then transported him to safety by having gargantuan Churchill squeeze into a tiny hole at the end of a train car, with a few bales of wool, thrown in for good measure. 

Churchill’s fame would grow to legendary rock star status as he escaped from the captors, -- huge bribes were paid by Rothschilds to make this Cinderella  drama happen.

Churchill headed to Europe as a awesome celebrity to write, and lecture amongst the European countries.  He was the toast of every English town. 

He was catapulted to First Lord of the Admiralty ( Oct 1911 ), at the young age of 37, a post usually given to old grey haired men-- 

--and Churchill successfully petitioned the Cabinet for the largest naval expenditure in the history of the British. 

In 1889, because of the discovery of vast wealth in gold and diamonds in South Africa, the Rothschilds came back to loot the nation with 400,000 British soldiers pitted against 30,000 "irregulars" -- that is, farmers with rifles -- whom the Boers could put into the field. 

The Boer War was started by Rothschild's agent, Lord Alfred Milner. His plans were aided by another Rothschild agent, Cecil Rhodes, who later left his entire fortune to the furtherance of the Rothschild program, through the Rhodes Trust. The British fought a "no prisoners" scorched earth war, destroying farms and mercilessly shooting down Boers who tried to surrender. 

It was in this war that the institution of "concentration camps" was brought to the world, as the British rounded up and imprisoned in unsanitary, fever-ridden camps anyone thought to be sympathetic to the Boers, including many women and children, who died by the thousands. 

So Gandhi and Kallenbach lived together for two years as soul mates,  starting from 1907.. during this period Gandhi was prepared for the "great Indian show".

 Kallenbach was micro managing Gandhi throughout the Satyagraha (non-violent resistance) struggle, which lasted in South Africa until 1914.

The form of resistance that Gandhiji devised was unique: satyagraha.  He would patiently appeal to the good sense of the Christian whites, while also refusing to follow their laws that he regarded evil.  He was willing to suffer punishment for breaking these laws,  but refused to hate the invading white men. 

While in South Africa, Gandhi did not miss a single opportunity to please the British crown. Just after the Boer war, Gandhi expressed his loyalty by sending felicitation to Queen Victoria on her birthday.  Queen Victoria died in January, 1901 and Gandhi sent a condolence message to the Colonial Secretary in London, laid a wreath on the pedestal of the Queen’s statue in Durban and distributed picture of the Queen among the school children.  

Well there are NO secrets in the Internet age

Later on, when George-V was coroneted as the king of England, Gandhi expressed his loyalty by sending congratulatory telegram to England that read, “The Indian residents of this country (i.e. South Africa) sent congratulatory cablegrams on the occasion, thus declaring their loyalty”.

In 1909, Lord Ampthill visited South Africa and Gandhi was out to please him by whatever means he could. The British statesmen and rulers always wanted a man who condemned extremists and revolutionists in India and Gandhi took the opportunity to please Armphill by denouncing the revolutionaries of India and their policy. 

Through several letters, Gandhi tried to convince him that his doctrine of passive resistance or nonviolent Satyagraha has no intention to hurt others – ‘a satyagrahi do not inflict sufferings on others, but he invites it on himself’. 

Many believe that it was the most important cause that inspired the British to bring Gandhi to India, made him the topmost leader of Indian freedom movement and his creed of Satyagraha was projected as the only mode of freedom struggle in India.

Due to this unwavering loyalty to the British Crown, Gandhiwas chosen by Rothschild  to come to India to lead the freedom movement, or to be frank, to sabotage the simmering freedom movement. 

His doctrine of nonviolence suited them . It was not difficult for the British to understand that his harmless and nonviolent Satyagraha would pose no threat to the British Empire.

 It has been ponted out earlier that British in India, at that time, were terribly afraid of violent freedom struggle launched by the patriots of Bengal, Maharastra and Punjab. But Gandhi, through his speeches and writings, managed to expose that he was against any sort of violence in Indian freedom movement.

Now I must digress and go to a great British stooge Gopal Krishna Gokhale.

In 1905, when Gokhale was elected president of the Indian National Congress and was at the height of his political power. He was a supporter of the British on the quiet, while he pretended to be a freedom fighter.  

Freedom fighters of that era will tell you that Gokhale was just a social reformer ( like BR Ambedkar ) . He was never put into jail.  

Gokhale was loved by the British and he was was invited to London to meet with secretary of state Lord John Morley, to shape the Morley-Minto Reforms introduced in1909. Gokhale was appointed a CIE (Companion of the Order of the Indian Empire) in the 1904 New Year's Honours List, a formal recognition by the Empire of his service. 

Gokhale was told by Britain to mentor  Mahatma Gandhi , so that he can hand over the mantle to him, later in case his health went bad.

In 1906, the Congress was split into two.. The group led by Tilak and supported by Lala Lajpat Rai and Bepin Bihari Pal was known as the extremist group, while the British stooges and loyalists were called the moderates. Gradually, the extremists, with the help of mass support, gained popularity and emerged as the dominant group while the moderates lost their control over the Congress. 

So, when the British took Gokhale into confidence and disclosed their plan to bring loyalist Gandhi to India and make him the sole leader of Congress, Gokhale found to ray of hope to regain their hegemony in the Congress. He readily supported the intrigue and agreed to play a mediator between Gandhi and the British.

To recapitulate, in 1891, Gandhi had returned from England as a barrister and in the next year he had sailed to South Africa to fight a case for an Indian business firm Dada Abdulla & Co., against an immigrant Indian Muslim Tyabji Haji Khan Muhammad.

Viceroy Minto ( Gilbert Elliot Murray Kynynmound ) complained to Rothschild, on 25 January 1910 , “with the gloom several assassinations hanging over everyone, a spirit hitherto unknown to India has come into existence, a spirit of anarchy and lawlessness which seeks to subvert not only British rule but the Governments of Indian chiefs…”

He was promptly replaced on orders from an upset Rothschild.

Viceroy Charles Hardinge told Britain on 28 May 1911, (totally shaken up, after being the target of several  assassination attempts)--  “In my opinion, nothing can be worse than the condition of Bengal and Eastern Bengal. There is practically no Government in either province…It is better to shift the Capital from Calcutta to Delhi,  and call Gandhi to India from South Africa  ”

In 1912, Gokhale was told to go to South Africa and do the preliminary training of Gandhi.  Gandhi himself had written that Gokhale was his mentor and guide.  

Gokhale was also the role model and mentor of Mohammed Ali Jinnah, the future Shia Muslim founder of Pakistan, who in 1912, aspired to become in his own words the "Muslim Gokhale".  

After reaching South Africa, Gokhale, (whom Gandhi revered as his political guru) , told Gandhi that he would have to return to India within a year (according to the plan of their British masters). 

Apart from his unwavering loyalty to the British Empire, Gandhi was chosen by the British as the new leader of India’s freedom struggle due his newly invented doctrine of nonviolence. 

It was not difficult for the British to understand that his harmless and nonviolent Satyagraha would pose no threat to the British Empire.

To explain Satyagraha, Gandhi used to say, “A Satyagrahi should expect to get killed by an aggressor and not to kill him”.  

One should recall here that instruction of Bhagawat Gita is to kill an aggressor without giving a second thought—just do your duty.

Rothschild wanted Gandhi to succeed Gopal Krishna Gokhale in India , at the helm of freedom fighting.

So when Gokhale reached Cape Town by ship on 22nd Oct 1912, , instructions were given out well in advance by Rothschild to  play to the gallery, and establish huge respect for Gokhale as the Mentor and Gandhi as the "rising sun" and the prospective successor  as disposer of the destiny of the enslaved Indian.

Tata the Opium agents of Rothschild in Bombay had sent huge amount of money to Gandhi, for the pomp and show soon to unfold.  The railway station was decorated and even the British joined the grand reception fit for King George.

 Everything would be splashed in next days Rothschild owned newspapers in South Africa and India. Gokhale lead by Gandhi and the British visited each and every Indian community all over South Africa. 

The Senator WP Schriener was also in tow, as ordered by Rothschild. All were given to understand without an iota of doubt that the helm of freedom fighting would be handed over from Gokhale to Gandhi as soon as he went back to India. 

The mayors of all these towns gave a royal reception in the town halls, and everything was splurged in the Rothschild held media. 

They were even given conducted tours in Rothschild owned Kimberley diamond mines.  Premier Botha a racist of the first order was arm twisted  to swallow his pride and attitude and give a two hour meeting time with Gokhale and Gandhi. 

The Indians were encouraged to air their grievances. As stage managed , an issue of a 3 pound tax was aired.  

Gandhi was allowed  a quick win here by Governor General John Gladstone . 

The Indians who were treated like dirt, were amazed and confused. What the hell is happening? . Was Gandhi such a great leader and a negotiator, in which case the destiny of Indians would be safe in his hands. 

Kallenback was keeping a hawks eye on behalf of Rothschild, just to make sure the original blue print and script was being followed.  

Rothschild could be absolutely ruthless when his orders are disobeyed. Gokhale stayed in Kallenbacks house. Never mind what is written by historians that all slept on the floor etc.

Gokhale after he came back to Poona, India would be in constant touch with Gandhi by telegrams--which were given top urgency.

Just before Gandhi finally left for England on 18th July 1914, on SS Kilfauns Castle , all Rothschild media splashed headlines calling Gandhi , MAHATMA or the "great soul".  

Now you get the drift why Rothschild made sure Gandhi never got the Nobel Prize for peace. They had some conscience.

Before Gandhi sailed for England , Gokhale left for England to arrange for a grand reception , involving thousand of cheering British , for newspaper photographs, suitable for a "great Mahatma "--  and meetings with Churchill and MPs, to coach and familiarise him. 

Gandhi would make sure thousands of Indian soldiers joined Britain to fight along with them in the first world war.  Gokhale was stuck at Paris as the 1st World war just broke out.  Gandhi's ship was in the English channel at this time, just 24 hours from London

Hermann Kallenback accompanied Gandhi and his wife on their final voyage from South Africa to London in 1914.  He was indeed the quintessential  "Big brother's eye " or the "embedded reporter ".

When Gandhi mobilised Indians in England to enlist as soldiers with the British a law student Sorabji Adajania got hoppin' mad, and asked him how he can take such unilateral decisions and who the fu#k has authorised him?

On August 13, Gandhi issued a circular affirming his resolve to tender his unconditional service to the British Empire and sent it around to collect signatures.  

He also set up an Indian Volunteer Committee with himself in the chair and  V.V. Giri and others as members.  VV Giri ultimately resigned from the committee,  as he found all this to be nonsense. 

Gandhi finally met Gokhale in London on September 18, 1914. Thus proceeded the plan to sabotage India’s freedom movement according to the design of the British aggressors.  

Gopal Krishna Gokhale, said that it is immaterial who rules the country as long as its people have security and reasonable freedom in their private life,  as given to them by the British--just like BR Ambedkar later,

 .

 Britain desperately wanted Gandhi's help in swaying the minds and hearts of the Indian Muslims who saw the Khalifa of Turkey ( Ottoman ) Kemal as the sipitual leader of the Sunnis.  And Turkey had just sided with the Germans.  

So for the Indian Muslim soldiers the fight along with the British would be to save their souls.  Sarojini Naidu was also in London with Gokhale.  

Tilak finding that Gokhale and Sir Pherozah Mehta were British stooges meanwhile split the Indian National Congress, back home.

When Gandhi returned to India on 19th Dec 1914 on SS Arabia,  Hermann  Kallenbach was unable (sic!) to get permission to travel to India, since England and Germany were at war. 

His job of keeping an eye on Gandhi was over. 

From now on Gokhale , Pherozah Mehta and then BR Ambedkar would keep an eye on him , and report to Rothschild via Churchill .

Gandhi was now 45, and he was coming back to India after 12 years. He reached Mumbai on 9th Jan 1915. to a tumultuous welcome.  Gokhale was at the quay with a rapturous reception party.

Indians were literally overcome with awe. 

Who was this great Mahatma who was respected and feared by the British, that even the PM and King of Britain gave him an audience. 

Separate receptions were held by Jinnah and Sir Pherozah Mehta too.  The British in Bombay were told to treat Gandhi like the cat's whiskers. The newspapers were full of the just arrived "messiah".

Gokhale told Gandhi to tour extensively all over India in 3rd class train, to give a "darshan" to all Indians.  

Above meeting -- " Hi Indians, I am the MAHATMA -- you must join the British army and  fight -- killing Germans is NOT violence.   But killing our dear British rulers , and driving them away from India is VIOLENCE--  and I wont allow that!

Such was the curiosity raised by endless propaganda of the great Mahatma-- that thousands lines up along railway tracks, doing namaste. It was a media blitzkrieg.

Above picture:  Hi, Indians, I am the Mahatma-- the GREAT SOUL- I have been chosen to be your MESSIAH.


At Calcutta another Opium agent of Rothschild in Calcutta, GD Birla, jumped into the crowd and started pulling Gandhi's carriage with great gusto.  

The Governor of Bombay was told by Rothschild to bestow Gandhi the title of "Kaiser E Hind" .  

The British made sure that every railway station was jam packed with awe struck Indians..

Who is this Maha Meru who gave the British and even the King of England , an inferiority complex?  This propaganda at its best--even Joseph Goebbels would admit..

 On 20th Feb 1915, Gokhale died. 

Now Gandhi was in the drivers seat. At Lucknow Nehru was introduced to Gandhi, as per the Rothschild blueprint.  He would be groomed to take over the mantle from Gandhi.  

Subhash Chandra Bose will know exactly what I mean--you cant win an election against Nehru, as long as Gandhi was there.

Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose with high intellect and leadership aura, was more respected than Gandhi and Nehru in the Congress by the members. Both were stumbling blocks for Bose. When Bose was re-elected to the post of Congress President in 1939 it created unhealthy  tension between him and the Mahatma / Nehru combine , especially as he had won the post defeating Pattabhi Sitaramaiah (who was Gandhiji’s nominee). Gandhiji apparently took Sitaramayya’s defeat personally and is believed to have remarked: “I consider Pattabhi’s defeat as my own”.  Gandhi prompted by the British and Parsees did NOT allow Bose to function the way he wanted.

After landing at Bombay  Gandhi wrote a letter to the Governor of Bombay Presidency expressing his promise that he would always abide by his instructions.  All these letters have been exposed in this Internet age.

The First World War began in Europe on 28 June 1914, and Gandhi, immediately after reaching India, started to recruit Indian soldiers for the British army, in his eagerness to express his loyalty to the British Empire. 

It was surprising to all that, Gandhi, the apostle of nonviolence,  supported war and according to his promise to the British master, recruited Indians for both world wars to be sacrificed as lambs. He personally travelled far and wide and addressed meetings in his bid to recruit soldiers for Britain, under the hawks eye and "patronage" of Commissioner Pratt. 

Confused Indians used to ask him every day, “ Why should we help the British invader?  What good will it do to us? What had Britain done to deserve our blood? 

13.83 lakh Indian soldiers were recruited as a direct result of Gandhi’s actions for overseas action. 

The British Crown, could have never ever had forced drafting of such a huge number, and given them guns and bullets . 

Out of this 1.11 lakh or 111000 

soldiers were killed in action. 

This does NOT include the soldiers who came back without a limb or on wheelchair. 

Britain used Indians in the worst areas of war, in dangerous sectors, in the front lines as canon fodder..  

Nobody writes about all this today. 

There is no war memorial for these dead souls, who were equated with animals.

Brave Indian soldiers were used in the suicidal areas on the Western Front, in the "deadly" Battle of Gallipoli, in the Sinai, Palestine, Mesopotamia Campaigns, the Siege of Kut and in the Battle of Tanga in East Africa.

Below picture-- Bagha Jatin

The British used Gandhi to disarm and demoralise the patriotic revolutionaries of India, like Bagha Jatin , Aurobindo Ghosh , Surya Sen, jatin das, MN Roy etc.  He was asked to travel to Bengal to extinguish the fire of violent freedom struggle .

On April 24, 1915, in a meeting organized by the Madras Bar Association, Gandhi declared to a shocked audience, “It gives me the greatest pleasure this evening at this very great and important gathering to re-declare my loyalty to the British Empire and my loyalty is based upon very selfish grounds. As a passive resister I discovered that I could not have that free scope which I had under the British Empire … and I discovered that the British Empire has certain ideals with which I have fallen in love.”  Difficult to believe this, right?

Gandhi never lost an opportunity to condemn the patriotic revolutionaries of India to please the British. He publicly appealed to the volatile youths of Bengal and Punjab, to give up violence.  On April 27, 1915, he asked the students of Madras to give up political assassination, political dacoities and conquer the conquerors not by shedding blood,  but by sheer force of "spiritual predominance" (sic!) . 

He deplored patriots like Khudiram Bose and Rash Behari Bose. Gandhi condemned violence and said that it was an evil path and that all revolutionaries were anarchists.  

Lokamanya Bal Gangadhara Tilak was arrested in Mumbai because he wrote three articles in the Kesari supporting Khudiram’s bomb explosion at Muzaffarpur, and was sentenced on July 22, 1908, to six years’ transportation.  

Gandhi deplored Tilak on the charge of inciting Indians against British rule. Gandhi chastised tall leaders like Subhash Chandra Bose , because they were in favour of immediate independence.  Any idiot can see that all such utterances of Gandhi overjoyed the British invaders.  

Sir Samuel Hoare, the Viscount of Templewood , made a comment that "Gandhi was one of the best friends of the British".  

Later on after 1930, Gandhi was compelled to support the Indian call of independence just to remain at the drivers wheel and to avoid flak and growing dissent with his suspect leadership.  His real non-violent resistance started with the Dandi Salt March on 12th march 1930-- 16 years after he came to India. For on 26th Jan 1930, the INC declared Indian Independence.

Gandhi supported the British decision of partitioning of Bengal. When Khudiram Bose and Prafulla Chaki threw bombs on Englishmen at Muzaffarpur in Bihar on April 30, 1908, Gandhi immediately condemned the incident and said, “They had no reason to rejoice at the introduction of Russian methods. 

On that occasion, Bal Gangadhar Tilak wrote 3 articles in the Kesari, supporting the action of Khudiram, and was promptly sentenced by the British for 6 years incarceration in the dreaded Burmese Mandalay jail 

Gandhi condemned Tilak and in his Indian Opinion, wrote: “ He (Tilak) aimed at inciting Indians against British rule. The rulers are justified, from their point of view, in taking action against him. … We submit that Mr. Tilak’s view should be rejected”.  Tilak died on 1st Aug 1920.

Gandhi had deplored Madan Lal Dhingra before he was hanged by the British on 17th Aug 1909,  for avenging the transportation to Kaala Pani on flimsy grounds of the great patriot, Ganesh Baburao Savarkar, the elder brother of Veer Savarkar.  

Gandhi also condemned Veer Vinayak Savarkar for supporting Dhingra.  

Gandhi asked all people like Dhingra to abandon violence and adopt nonviolent Satyagraha as the means to fight British power and earn freedom.  Gandhi said, “Is killing honourable? Is the dagger of an assassin a fit precursor of an honourable death?” 

He also said that he wanted to purge India of the atmosphere of suspicion on either side and there was no reason for anarchism in India. This literally pissed of Lokmanya Tilak. 

On 28 December 1885, British government of India formed the Indian National Congress with Allan Octavian Hume as the president and few other eminent, loyal and English educated Indians like Dadabhai Naoroji, Gopal Krishna Gokhale, Phirozeshah Mehta and so on. The sole intention was simply to get prior information of what the Indians were thinking and going to do in near future so that another Sepoy Mutiny might not recur. 

At the beginning it was like an elite club dominated by the loyalists. But later on, appearance of Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai and Bepin Bihari Pal (popularly known as Lal Bal Pal), the scenario changed considerably.  Lokamanya Tilak was first to embrace independence of India from British rule as the national goal and it aroused the first spurt of nationalism among the members of the Congress.

Parsee Sir Pherozeshah Mehta, KCIE (August 4, 1845 - November 5, 1915) was a leading lawyer of Bombay.  His political ideology was, as was the case with most of the Parsees of his time was friendly to the British Crown's sovereignty--and most of them had made their fortune by being opium agents of Rothschilds. Punch into Google search THE DRUG RUNNERS OF INDIA- VADAKAYIL. 

Above: The Rothschild blue print for Gandhi-- this must be his message for Indians.

By 1946 as many as 63 Parsis had been knighted. Sir Pherozeshah Mehta - he was the first Mayor and he had three terms as Mayor. In 1910, he started Bombay Chronicle, an English-language weekly newspaper.  He became the Municipal commissioner of Bombay Municipality in 1873 . He was President four times - 1884, 1885, 1905 and 1911. of the Bombay Municipal Corporation. Central Bank of India was established in the year 1911. It was the first Indian commercial bank to be wholly owned and managed by Indians. Sir Pherozeshah Mehta , the Rothschild's Opium agent , was the first Chairman of the central Bank of India. 

Pherozeshah Mehta's aversion to violent methods in politics alienated him from Bal Gandhara Tilak and Bipin Chandra Pal .  His main endeavour was to keep the extremists from dominating the Congress, and in this he was largely successful, as he was feared as an informer.  He was made a C.I.E. in 1894 and 1904 saw him being Knighted as SIR . In 1915 the University of Bombay decided to confer upon him the honorary degree of Doctor of Law.

Both British stooges BR Ambedkar and GK Gokhale were from Ratnagiri.

Britain friendly actions and utterances of Gandhi encouraged Rothschild to transfer Gandhi to India and put him at the helm of the freedom movement, so that nonviolent Satyagraha could be the only mode of Indian freedom struggle. Hermann Kalleback vetted Gandhi in South Africa and passed him as a dependable stooge who could be taken into confidence ..

The blacks and Indians of South Africa, were denied basic rights by the racist regime of the British colonialists. Gandhi himself bore the brunt of such extreme discrimination.  So in South Africa, he applied  nonviolence as a political strategy . 

This  movement of peaceful civil disobedience was named Satyagraha. Ostensibly as a result, the government of South Africa passed the Indian Relief Act-1914, granting some peanut privileges to the Indians. The protagonists of Gandhian nonviolence always highlight this fact as a great victory of Gandhi .  

But these naive souls do not know that though apartheid had been abolished from the rest of the world quite a long ago, it continued in South Africa till May 1994. The racists white regime of Sout Africa always was quick to remind the oppressed blacks of the quick and sure benefits of adopting a Gandhian type nonviolent movement. 

Almost all Parsees of India, were British stooges, and were NOT part of the freedom struggle. One notable exception was Madame Bhikaiji Cama (1861-1936)   She was a radical firebrand freedom fighter, and was exiled from India and Britain and lived in France.  Bhikaiji was a tireless propagandist for Indian Independence. 

Her Parsi husband Rustom Cama was a British stooge.  In 1936, alone and seriously ill, wishing to die in her own country she petitioned the British government to be allowed to return home. Her request was granted, provided she sign (what she had refused to all her life) a statement promising she would take no part in politics.  

She returned to Bombay and after an illness of eight months, died lonely, forgotten and unsung in the Parsi General Hospital at the age of 74. We Indians must remember and honour this noble and kind woman. 

In 1977 my ship a VLCC Koyali docked at Cape Town. We were the largest ship to ever berth at Cape Town, with 340 metres length.  I was Second Officer. We had alternator ( Pielstick )  problems and since such huge high capacity spares were NOT available we were idling at berth for 3 weeks . Every day hundreds of people and local TV cameras would come to gape at the steel leviathan . Our ships picture would be in the papers almost every day-- a blow by blow running commentary --today at 7AM the ship was straining against her ropes to a fresh SE breeze--blah blah--.

The Indians out there were very happy to see Indians from the mainland.  They would invite us to their homes, and when we go there they all would be dressed as if they were going for a wedding reception, with men wearing 3 piece suits and women wearing make up and heavy jewellery.  I spoke to some octogenarians , who knew what Gandhiji did.

I was told by my old QM NOT to have cold soft drinks-- "for if you do that, you will fall in love with the daughter of the family--as they will put some magic powder ". 

So when we came back to the ship we used to compare notes. We used to go on Table mountain. Every night we used to have parties with dozens of pretty girls ( not Indians necessarily ) on board.

The Captain went to a "white only" restaurant --and he sat for sometime, and then a black waiter comes to him and says " Sir, I am sorry, this restaurant does NOT serve Indians ".

The Indian beaches were different from the white beaches. The "whites only"  beaches were beautiful and shallow for a long distance. 

I saw discos, bridges , trains , cabs and buses and even barbecue areas in the woods which said "whites only".

Below , the ship is so big, that we use bicycles on deck. That is me as a young boy ( on cycle ) in 1977.

So the day we sailed , after repairs, we had a party on board.  The girls wanted me to write a poem in remembrance of good times and cheer  Let me try to remember-- Yes-- I gave it in a sealed envelop, with instructions to open it only 24 hours after we sailed out.

i still remember our days in cape town

our engines on koyali were sick and down

we danced and sung the nights away

and scouted the hills during the day

the deck officers had a well earned rest

the girls they had were cape town's best

the engineers slogged night and day

for the work in hand , was no child's play

every time the cape, koyali will round

we shall remember our days of joy unbound

( with apologies to the engineers )

The white run newspapers used to bitch daily  " See we allow Indians to go ashore.  Wonder if a South African ship goes to Bombay, if they will reciprocate ".

I was in Durban later, in 1993 in command of a container ship when the apartheid system was nipped. I went to a "white only" restaurant and also a "discotheque"  at the riviera .  

I also went for the Derby horse racing, ( 2 tickets given by the white charterers ) and I and my officer were the only browns there in that crowded place among hundreds of elite.   All were whites-- (you sit in the restaurant for hours) and look out at the track.  The whites would NOT look at our table --  the young white girls would ogle like mad , give free shows, and give secret "take a chance on me" smiles ( paradox?  HMMMM !! ). 

I guess lust has NO barriers , unlike love.

But my Radio Officer and Third Mate who joined the ship at Durban told me, that when they went to the swimming pool of the hotel, it was full of whites.  As soon as the two of them got into the pool, within  5 minutes all the whites, melted away. And they felt all ba##s.

Even in 1994, the letter heads coming from my White Charterers Ahrenkeil ( ALS ) director's office at Johannesberg would have DUTCH,  BRITISH on the signature affixed, printed .  Dutch were one notch above the Brits in the peckin' order.  So I would write back with INDIAN. 

TEE HEEEEE-- 

Gopal Krishna Gokhale used his scarf given by his guru Ranade as a personality prop.  Almost the same way Mohinder Amarnath used to leave a red silk handkerchief given to him by his father, peeking out of his back pocket, when he walked out to bat. 

Gandhi made a great deal of washing and ironing the scarf to endear himself to Gokhale. And Gandhi made a great deal of not wearing chappals for a year after Gokhale died. Why do you need to give a public display of all these private affections, unless something is seriously wrong with your character and mindset? 

Now I want you  to punch into Google search THE DRUG RUNNERS OF INDIA- VADAKAYIL

Dadabhai Naoroji was the mentor of Gopal Krishna Gokhale.  Dadabha Naoroji was a Member of Parliament (MP) in the United Kingdom House of Commons between 1892 and 1895, and the first Asian to ever be a British MP.  The Indian National Congress was founded by him , along with A.O. Hume and Dinshaw Edulji Wacha . Naoroji was elected President of the Congress in 1886. Naoroji was a Rothschild stooge.  Dadabhai Naoroji was an Opium agent of Rothschild.

In 1885 he went to England to manage his company Cama & Co.  He was a part owner in this Opium shipping agency , the other owners being Kharshedji Cama , Mancherji Hormusjee Cama.  The Cama family partly owned and ran Asia's oldest newspaper The Bombay Samachar in India,  the other part owner being Rothschild.

If patriot Babarao Ganesh Savarkar had been awarded the “ Knight Commander of the British Raj empire “ award,  which was accepted by Gokhale,  he would have fainted in shame -- and then shaved off his head in penance.

My next post will be about Bagha Jatin,

a SUNK patriot --  India would have 

been free before the first world war 

if the German ship had delivered a 

shipload of arms and ammunition 

to him.  Bagha Jatin is the BENGAL 

TIGER OF INDIA.  Gandhi had 

condemned Jatin several times.

Now, some doodh ka doodh paani ka paani--

The cry JAI HIND was NOT coined by Netaji Bose.  It was made by Dr Champakaraman Pillai ,  who formed the Berlin Committee in Germany to assist freedom fighters before the 1^st World war . He  had direct dealings with Hitler. He died on May 28th, 1934 under suspicious circumstances , because he asked for a written apology from Hitler with a deadline, for derogatory reference to Indians in his book Mein Kamph.. His ashes were scattered in Karamana River in Thiruvananthapuram.  His ashes could not be brought in before, due to objections from Gandhiji and Nehru . The Indian Navy's warship, I.N.S. Delhi, flying the flag of Free India, brought the great patriot Pillai's ashes to Cochin on September 16, 1966.   He had come to Madras on German battleship, SS Emden and angrez ka ghar mein ghuske maara.  

Rash Behari Bose was in Japan taking shelter with Mitsuru Toyama, head of the dreaded Yakuza.

Bagha Jatin the great patriot was in charge in India —the Bengal Tiger of India.

Pandit Shyamaji Krishnavarma, formed  Indian Home Rule Society, India House in London . His ashes too were rejected by Gandhi and Nehru.  Finally Bollywood actor Vinod Khanna , Narendra Modi , and others etc pulled levers, and this great patriot's ashes was officially handed over to the Chief Minister of Gujarat State on August 22, 2003,  by the Ville de Genève and the Swiss government, 55 years after Indian Independence.

Well what do we know?-- the young generation knows Diggi Vijay , Ambika Soni , Anand Sharma , Kapil Sibal etc , right?

"Right is might" --  Capt Ajit Vadakayil ( Sept 2012 ) 

SOMETIMES ANIMALS ARE MORE PERCEPTIVE THAN GULLIBLE HUMANS-- SEE VIDEO BELOW.

WE INDIANS HAVE GIVEN THIS HONEST AND HONOURABLE MAN , A VERY RAW DEAL. 

THE NEHRU DYNASTY DID NOT EVEN INVESTIGATE HIS DEATH IN TASHKENT.  

I KNOW WHAT HAPPENED, AS IT WAS TOLD TO ME 2 DECADES AGO BY MY RUSSIAN CHIEF OFFICER, WHOSE FATHER WORKED IN KGB-- OVER A COUPLE OF VODKAS.

This post is continued . Part 2 can be read by punching into Google search-- DIABOLICAL BRAIN WASHING PROCESS OF MAHATMA GANDHI- VADAKAYIL

11100 ( 1.11 lakh ) Indian soldiers died in the First World War for Britain and 24300 ( 2.43 ) lakh Indian soldiers died in the Second World War for Britain. 

Indians did NOT want to fight for the cruel white English speaking Christian invader.  

See how well Rothschild groomed Gandhi in South Africa using Leo Tolstoy's mindless non-violence doctrine.

"May it please Your Honour"

by Nathuram Godse               

[On 8 November 1948, Nathuram Godse (19 May 1910-15 November 1949) rose to make his statement in court. Reading quietly from a typed manuscript, he sought to explain why he had killed Gandhi. His thesis covered ninety-pages, and he was on his feet for five hours. Godse's statement, excerpted below, should be read by citizens and scholars in its entirely, for it provides an insight into his personality and his understanding of the concept of Indian nationhood – Editor]

"Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined anti-caste movements and maintained that all Hindus are of equal status as to rights, social and religious, and should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste or profession.

I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins, Vaishyas, Kshatriyas, Chamars and B-----s participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the company of each other. I have read the speeches and writings of Dadabhai Naoroji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India and some prominent countries like England, France, America and Russia. Moreover I studied the tenets of socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied very closely what Veer (brave) Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two ideologies have contributed more to the moulding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the last thirty years or so, than any other factor has done.

All this thinking and reading led me to believe that it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (three hundred million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and well-being of all India, one fifth of the human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanatanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the National Independence of Hindustan, my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well. Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokmanya Tilak, Gandhi's influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme.

His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence, which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to these slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a dream if you imagine the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day. In fact, honour, duty and love of one's own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is unjust.

I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. (In the Ramayana) Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita. (In the Mahabharata) Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations, including the revered Bhishma, because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed the total ignorance of the springs of human action. In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India. It was absolutely essential for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history's towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Govind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhi has merely exposed his self-conceit.

He was, paradoxical, as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen forever for the freedom they brought to them. The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very good work in South Africa to uphold the rights and well being of the Indian community there.

But when he finally returned to India, he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on in his own way. Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the judge of everyone and everything; he was the master brain guiding the Civil Disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin it and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, but that could make no difference to the Mahatma's infallibility. 'A Satyagrahi can never fail' was his formula for his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is.

Thus the Mahatma became the judge and the jury in his own case. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible. Many people thought that his policies were irrational, but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility, Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, and disaster after disaster. Gandhi's pro-Muslim policy is blatantly illustrated in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India. It is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language.

In the beginning of his career in India, Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi, but as he found that the Muslims did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani. Everybody in India knows that there is no language in India called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect; it is spoken, not written. It is a tongue and a crossbreed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the Mahatma's sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that Hindustani alone should be the national language of India. His blind followers, of course, supported him and the so-called hybrid language began to be used. The charm and the purity of the Hindi language were to be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus.

From August 1946 onwards, the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with little retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi's infatuation for them.

Lord Wavell had to resign as he could not bring about a settlement and was succeeded by Lord Mountbatten. King Stork followed King Log. The Congress, which had boasted of its nationalism and secularism, secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the Indian Territory became foreign land to us from 15 August 1947. Lord Mountbatten came to be described in the Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had.

The official date for the handing over of power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what the Congress party calls 'freedom' and 'peaceful transfer of power'. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called it 'freedom won by them with sacrifice' - whose sacrifice? When top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country - which we considered a deity of worship - my mind was filled with direful anger.

One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed some conditions on the Muslims in Pakistan, there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any conditions on the Muslims.

He was fully aware from past experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi. Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he has failed in his paternal duty inasmuch he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power, his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled against Jinnah's iron will and proved to be powerless.

Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw that I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I thought that the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be practical, able to retaliate and would be powerful with the armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan. People may even call me or dub me as devoid of any sense or foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the course founded on the reason, which I consider necessary for sound nation-building.

After having fully considered the question, I took the final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in both my hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th January 1948, on the prayer-grounds in Birla House. I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots. I bear no ill will towards anyone individually, but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy, which was unfairly favourable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due to the presence of Gandhi.

I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preaching and deeds are at times at variance with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi's persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims. I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone should beg for mercy on my behalf.

My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof someday in future."

Nathuram Godse was hanged a year later, on 15 November 1949; as per his last wishes, his family and followers have preserved his ashes for immersion in the Indus River of a re-united India 

Above: Gandhi's last moment of truth!

Grace and peace!

Virtue is more to be feared than vice, because its excesses are not subject to the regulation of conscience. 

Remember in both First and Second World Wars,  Gandhi urged Indians to kill Germans for the British. He did NOT want Indians to kill the British invaders .

Rings a bell?

Gandhi’s eldest son Harilal Mohandas Gandhi died after Gandhi was assassinated and he turned up for the funeral like a vagabond  and nobody recognized him.  Seeing his father mollycoddling the Muslims he had revolted and converted to Islam.   Aware of his father’s devious ways , he became a total drunkard .

NATHU RAM GODSE'S SPEECH AT THE TRIAL

  

Nathuram Godse's speech at trial .. DO read it fully

Full text of Godse's speech at his trial.....

" On January 13, 1948, I learnt that Gandhiji had decided to go on fast unto

death. The reason given was that he wanted an assurance of Hindu-Muslim

Unity... But I and many others could easily see that the real motive...

[was] to compel the Dominion Government to pay the sum of Rs 55 crores to

Pakistan, the payment of which was emphatically refused by the

Government.... But this decision of the people's Government was reversed to

suit the tune of Gandhiji's fast. It was evident to my mind that the force

of public opinion was nothing but a trifle when compared with the leanings

of Gandhiji favourable to Pakistan.

....In 1946 or thereabout, Muslim atrocities perpetrated on Hindus under the

Government patronage of Surhawardy in Noakhali made our blood boil. Our

shame and indignation knew no bounds when we saw that Gandhiji had come

forward to shield that very Surhawardy and began to style him as 'Shaheed

Saheb' - a martyr - even in his prayer meetings...

....Gandhiji's influence in the Congress first increased and then became

supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their

intensity and were reinforced by the slogans of truth and non-violence which

he ostentatiously paraded before the country... I could never conceive that

an armed resistance to the aggressor is unjust... Ram killed Ravan in a

tumultuous fight... Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness... In

condemning Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Govind as 'misguided patriots,'

Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit... Gandhiji was, paradoxically,

a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name

of truth and nonviolence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will

remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen forever...

....By 1919, Gandhiji had become desperate in his endeavours to get the

Muslims to trust him and went from one absurd promise to another... He

backed the Khilafat movement in this country and was able to enlist the full

support of the National Congress in that policy... very soon the Moplah

Rebellion showed that the Muslims had not the slightest idea of national

unity... There followed a huge slaughter of Hindus... The British

Government, entirely unmoved by the rebellion, suppressed it in a few months

and left to Gandhiji the joy of his Hindu-Muslim Unity... British

Imperialism emerged stronger, the Muslims became more fanatical, and the

consequences were visited on the Hindus...

The accumulating provocation of 32 years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim

fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhiji

should be brought to an end immediately... he developed a subjective

mentality under which he alone was the final judge of what was right or

wrong... Either Congress had to surrender its will to him and play second

fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality... or it had to carry on

without him... He was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience

movement... The movement may succeed or fail; it may bring untold disasters

and political reverses, but that could make no difference to the Mahatma's

infallibility... These childish inanities and obstinacies, coupled with a

most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character, made

Gandhiji formidable and irresistible... In a position of such absolute

irresponsibility, Gandhiji was guilty of blunder after blunder...

....The Mahatma even supported the separation of Sindh from the Bombay

Presidency and threw the Hindus of Sindh to the communal wolves. Numerous

riots took place in Karachi, Sukkur, Shikarpur and other places in which the

Hindus were the only sufferers...

....From August 1946 onwards, the private armies of the Muslim League began

a massacre of the Hindus... Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi

with mild reactions in the Deccan... The Interim government formed in

September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members, but the more they

became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part,

the greater was Gandhi's infatuation for them...

....The Congress, which had boasted of its nationalism and socialism,

secretly accepted Pakistan and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was

vivisected and one-third of the Indian territory became foreign land to

us... This is what Gandhiji had achieved after 30 years of undisputed

dictatorship, and this is what Congress party calls 'freedom'...

....One of the conditions imposed by Gandhiji for his breaking of the fast

unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by Hindu refugees. But

when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much

as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan government...

Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so,

he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherously

to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it... The people of

this country were eager and vehement in their opposition to Pakistan. But

Gandhiji played false with the people...

....I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the

people would be nothing but hatred... if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the

same time, I felt that Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would

surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and be powerful with armed

forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation

would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan...

....I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action

had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus... There was

no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book, and

for this reason I fired those fatal shots...

....I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me... I did fire shots at

Gandhiji in open daylight. I did not make any attempt to run away; in fact I

never entertained any idea of running away. I did not try to shoot myself...

for, it was my ardent desire to give vent to my thoughts in an open Court.

My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by

the criticism levelled of against it on all sides. 

I have no doubt, honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the

 true value thereof some day in future. "

CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL

..